id
stringlengths 6
9
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
FINQA1700 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy entergy wholesale commodities during 2010 entergy integrated its non-utility nuclear and its non-nuclear wholesale assets businesses into a new organization called entergy wholesale commodities . entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants , five of which are located in the northeast united states , with the sixth located in michigan , and is primarily focused on selling electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers . entergy wholesale commodities 2019 revenues are primarily derived from sales of energy and generation capacity from these plants . entergy wholesale commodities also provides operations and management services , including decommissioning services , to nuclear power plants owned by other utilities in the united states . entergy wholesale commodities also includes the ownership of , or participation in joint ventures that own , non-nuclear power plants and the sale to wholesale customers of the electric power produced by these plants . property nuclear generating stations entergy wholesale commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants : power plant market service acquired location capacity- reactor type license expiration .
|power plant|market|inserviceyear|acquired|location|capacity-reactor type|licenseexpirationdate|
|pilgrim|is0-ne|1972|july 1999|plymouth ma|688 mw - boiling water|2012|
|fitzpatrick|nyiso|1975|nov . 2000|oswego ny|838 mw - boiling water|2034|
|indian point 3|nyiso|1976|nov . 2000|buchanan ny|1041 mw - pressurized water|2015|
|indian point 2|nyiso|1974|sept . 2001|buchanan ny|1028 mw - pressurized water|2013|
|vermont yankee|is0-ne|1972|july 2002|vernon vt|605 mw - boiling water|2032|
|palisades|miso|1971|apr . 2007|south haven mi|811 mw - pressurized water|2031|
entergy wholesale commodities also includes the ownership of two non-operating nuclear facilities , big rock point in michigan and indian point 1 in new york that were acquired when entergy purchased the palisades and indian point 2 nuclear plants , respectively . these facilities are in various stages of the decommissioning process . the nrc operating license for vermont yankee was to expire in march 2012 . in march 2011 the nrc renewed vermont yankee 2019s operating license for an additional 20 years , as a result of which the license now expires in 2032 . for additional discussion regarding the continued operation of the vermont yankee plant , see 201cimpairment of long-lived assets 201d in note 1 to the financial statements . the operating licenses for pilgrim , indian point 2 , and indian point 3 expire between 2012 and 2015 . under federal law , nuclear power plants may continue to operate beyond their license expiration dates while their renewal applications are pending nrc approval . various parties have expressed opposition to renewal of the licenses . with respect to the pilgrim license renewal , the atomic safety and licensing board ( aslb ) of the nrc , after issuing an order denying a new hearing request , terminated its proceeding on pilgrim 2019s license renewal application . with the aslb process concluded the proceeding , including appeals of certain aslb decisions , is now before the nrc . in april 2007 , entergy submitted an application to the nrc to renew the operating licenses for indian point 2 and 3 for an additional 20 years . the aslb has admitted 21 contentions raised by the state of new york or other parties , which were combined into 16 discrete issues . two of the issues have been resolved , leaving 14 issues that are currently subject to aslb hearings . in july 2011 , the aslb granted the state of new york 2019s motion for summary disposition of an admitted contention challenging the adequacy of a section of indian point 2019s environmental analysis as incorporated in the fseis ( discussed below ) . that section provided cost estimates for severe accident mitigation alternatives ( samas ) , which are hardware and procedural changes that could be .
Question: what is the length of the lease for fitzpatrick , ( in years ) ?
Answer: | 34.0 |
FINQA1701 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) company is currently unable to estimate the impact of the amount of such changes , if any , to previously recorded uncertain tax positions . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the year ending december 31 , 2007 is as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|balance at january 1 2007|$ 183953|
|additions based on tax positions related to the current year|2598|
|additions for tax positions of prior years|5412|
|reductions for tax positions of prior years|-120016 ( 120016 )|
|cash advance in connection with proposed settlement|-6682 ( 6682 )|
|settlements with taxing authorities|-5372 ( 5372 )|
|reductions as a result of the lapse of statute of limitations|-669 ( 669 )|
|balance as of december 31 2007|$ 59224|
during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company recorded penalties and tax-related interest income of $ 2.5 million and interest income from tax refunds of $ 1.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total unrecognized tax benefits included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 29.6 million and $ 34.3 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2007 and january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets was $ 30.7 million and $ 33.2 million , respectively . in the fourth quarter of 2007 , the company entered into a tax amnesty program with the mexican tax authority . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company had met all of the administrative requirements of the program , which enabled the company to recognize certain tax benefits . this was confirmed by the mexican tax authority on february 5 , 2008 . these benefits include a reduction of uncertain tax benefits of $ 5.4 million along with penalties and interest of $ 12.5 million related to 2002 , all of which reduced income tax expense . in connection with the above program , the company paid $ 6.7 million to the mexican tax authority as a settlement offer for other uncertain tax positions related to 2003 and 2004 . this offer is currently under review by the mexican tax authority ; the company cannot yet determine the specific timing or the amount of any potential settlement . during 2007 , the statute of limitations on certain unrecognized tax benefits lapsed , which resulted in a $ 0.7 million decrease in the liability for uncertain tax benefits , all of which reduced the income tax provision . the company files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns , including u.s . federal and state tax returns and foreign tax returns in mexico and brazil . as a result of the company 2019s ability to carry forward federal and state net operating losses , the applicable tax years remain open to examination until three years after the applicable loss carryforwards have been used or expired . however , the company has completed u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years up to and including 2002 . the company is currently undergoing u.s . federal income tax examinations for tax years 2004 and 2005 . additionally , it is subject to examinations in various u.s . state jurisdictions for certain tax years , and is under examination in brazil for the 2001 through 2006 tax years and mexico for the 2002 tax year . sfas no . 109 , 201caccounting for income taxes , 201d requires that companies record a valuation allowance when it is 201cmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . 201d at december 31 , 2007 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 88.2 million , including approximately .
Question: what is the net change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during 2007?
Answer: | -124729.0 |
FINQA1702 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : .
||2019|2020|2021|2022|2023|2024 2013 2028|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 2350|$ 2390|$ 2470|$ 2550|$ 2610|$ 13670|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|170|180|180|180|170|810|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what was the percentage of the change in the employee matching contributions from 2017 to 2018
Answer: | 0.07341 |
FINQA1703 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in addition , the company has reclassified the following amounts from 201cdistributions from other invested assets 201d included in cash flows from investing activities to 201cdistribution of limited partnership income 201d included in cash flows from operations for interim reporting periods of 2013 : $ 33686 thousand for the three months ended march 31 , 2013 ; $ 9409 thousand and $ 43095 thousand for the three months and six months ended june 30 , 2013 , respectively ; and $ 5638 thousand and $ 48733 thousand for the three months and nine months ended september 30 , 2013 , respectively . b . investments . fixed maturity and equity security investments available for sale , at market value , reflect unrealized appreciation and depreciation , as a result of temporary changes in market value during the period , in shareholders 2019 equity , net of income taxes in 201caccumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) 201d in the consolidated balance sheets . fixed maturity and equity securities carried at fair value reflect fair value re- measurements as net realized capital gains and losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . the company records changes in fair value for its fixed maturities available for sale , at market value through shareholders 2019 equity , net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) since cash flows from these investments will be primarily used to settle its reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense liabilities . the company anticipates holding these investments for an extended period as the cash flow from interest and maturities will fund the projected payout of these liabilities . fixed maturities carried at fair value represent a portfolio of convertible bond securities , which have characteristics similar to equity securities and at times , designated foreign denominated fixed maturity securities , which will be used to settle loss and loss adjustment reserves in the same currency . the company carries all of its equity securities at fair value except for mutual fund investments whose underlying investments are comprised of fixed maturity securities . for equity securities , available for sale , at fair value , the company reflects changes in value as net realized capital gains and losses since these securities may be sold in the near term depending on financial market conditions . interest income on all fixed maturities and dividend income on all equity securities are included as part of net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) . unrealized losses on fixed maturities , which are deemed other-than-temporary and related to the credit quality of a security , are charged to net income ( loss ) as net realized capital losses . short-term investments are stated at cost , which approximates market value . realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined on the basis of identified cost . for non- publicly traded securities , market prices are determined through the use of pricing models that evaluate securities relative to the u.s . treasury yield curve , taking into account the issue type , credit quality , and cash flow characteristics of each security . for publicly traded securities , market value is based on quoted market prices or valuation models that use observable market inputs . when a sector of the financial markets is inactive or illiquid , the company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value . retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities . each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield . the recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition . outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities . conditional prepayment rates , computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities , are used to effect the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types . other invested assets include limited partnerships , rabbi trusts and an affiliated entity . limited partnerships and the affiliated entity are accounted for under the equity method of accounting , which can be recorded on a monthly or quarterly lag . c . uncollectible receivable balances . the company provides reserves for uncollectible reinsurance recoverable and premium receivable balances based on management 2019s assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances . such reserves are presented in the table below for the periods indicated. .
|( dollars in thousands )|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|
|reinsurance receivables and premium receivables|$ 29905|$ 32011|
.
Question: for the years ended december 312013 and 2012 what was the percentage change in the reinsurance receivables and premium receivables
Answer: | -0.06579 |
FINQA1704 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .
|period|totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )|averageprice paidper share|total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program|approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )|
|october 1 - 31 2014|192580|$ 58.02|164800|$ 490000000|
|november 1 - 30 2014|468128|$ 59.25|468128|$ 463000000|
|december 1 - 31 2014|199796|$ 60.78|190259|$ 451000000|
|total|860504||823187||
___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .
Question: what is the total value paid for purchased shares during december 2014?
Answer: | 12.1436 |
FINQA1705 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 4.0 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 14.9 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the years ended september 29 , 2012 , september 24 , 2011 , and september 25 , 2010 ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 121251|$ 81570|$ 51011|
|accounts receivable net|$ 10930|$ 5369|$ 5510|
|inventories|$ 791|$ 776|$ 1051|
|working capital|$ 19111|$ 17018|$ 20956|
|annual operating cash flow|$ 50856|$ 37529|$ 18595|
as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had $ 121.3 billion in cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities , an increase of $ 39.7 billion or 49% ( 49 % ) from september 24 , 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 50.9 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 8.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 1.1 billion and payments of dividends and dividend equivalent rights of $ 2.5 billion . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly-rated securities and its investment policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the policy requires investments generally to be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 29 , 2012 and september 24 , 2011 , $ 82.6 billion and $ 54.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments , common stock repurchases , dividends on its common stock , and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 10.3 billion during 2012 , consisting of $ 865 million for retail store facilities and $ 9.5 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing process .
Question: what was the increase in annual operating cash flow between 2010 and 2012?
Answer: | 32261.0 |
FINQA1706 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: local consumer lending local consumer lending ( lcl ) , which constituted approximately 70% ( 70 % ) of citi holdings by assets as of december 31 , 2010 , includes a portion of citigroup 2019s north american mortgage business , retail partner cards , western european cards and retail banking , citifinancial north america and other local consumer finance businesses globally . the student loan corporation is reported as discontinued operations within the corporate/other segment for the second half of 2010 only . at december 31 , 2010 , lcl had $ 252 billion of assets ( $ 226 billion in north america ) . approximately $ 129 billion of assets in lcl as of december 31 , 2010 consisted of u.s . mortgages in the company 2019s citimortgage and citifinancial operations . the north american assets consist of residential mortgage loans ( first and second mortgages ) , retail partner card loans , personal loans , commercial real estate ( cre ) , and other consumer loans and assets . in millions of dollars 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 vs . 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008 .
|in millions of dollars|2010|2009|2008|% ( % ) change 2010 vs . 2009|% ( % ) change 2009 vs . 2008|
|net interest revenue|$ 13831|$ 12995|$ 17136|6% ( 6 % )|( 24 ) % ( % )|
|non-interest revenue|1995|4770|6362|-58 ( 58 )|-25 ( 25 )|
|total revenues net of interest expense|$ 15826|$ 17765|$ 23498|( 11 ) % ( % )|( 24 ) % ( % )|
|total operating expenses|$ 8064|$ 9799|$ 14238|( 18 ) % ( % )|( 31 ) % ( % )|
|net credit losses|$ 17040|$ 19185|$ 13111|( 11 ) % ( % )|46% ( 46 % )|
|credit reserve build ( release )|-1771 ( 1771 )|5799|8573|nm|-32 ( 32 )|
|provision for benefits and claims|775|1054|1192|-26 ( 26 )|-12 ( 12 )|
|provision for unfunded lending commitments|2014|2014|2014|2014|2014|
|provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims|$ 16044|$ 26038|$ 22876|( 38 ) % ( % )|14% ( 14 % )|
|( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes|$ -8282 ( 8282 )|$ -18072 ( 18072 )|$ -13616 ( 13616 )|54% ( 54 % )|( 33 ) % ( % )|
|benefits for income taxes|-3289 ( 3289 )|-7656 ( 7656 )|-5259 ( 5259 )|57|-46 ( 46 )|
|( loss ) from continuing operations|$ -4993 ( 4993 )|$ -10416 ( 10416 )|$ -8357 ( 8357 )|52% ( 52 % )|( 25 ) % ( % )|
|net income attributable to noncontrolling interests|8|33|12|-76 ( 76 )|nm|
|net ( loss )|$ -5001 ( 5001 )|$ -10449 ( 10449 )|$ -8369 ( 8369 )|52% ( 52 % )|( 25 ) % ( % )|
|average assets ( in billions of dollars )|$ 324|$ 351|$ 420|( 8 ) % ( % )|-16 ( 16 )|
|net credit losses as a percentage of average loans|6.20% ( 6.20 % )|6.38% ( 6.38 % )|3.80% ( 3.80 % )|||
nm not meaningful 2010 vs . 2009 revenues , net of interest expense decreased 11% ( 11 % ) from the prior year . net interest revenue increased 6% ( 6 % ) due to the adoption of sfas 166/167 , partially offset by the impact of lower balances due to portfolio run-off and asset sales . non-interest revenue declined 58% ( 58 % ) , primarily due to the absence of the $ 1.1 billion gain on the sale of redecard in the first quarter of 2009 and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve charge . operating expenses decreased 18% ( 18 % ) , primarily due to the impact of divestitures , lower volumes , re-engineering actions and the absence of costs associated with the u.s . government loss-sharing agreement , which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009 . provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 38% ( 38 % ) , reflecting a net $ 1.8 billion credit reserve release in 2010 compared to a $ 5.8 billion build in 2009 . lower net credit losses across most businesses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of sfas 166/167 . on a comparable basis , net credit losses were lower year-over-year , driven by improvement in u.s . mortgages , international portfolios and retail partner cards . assets declined 21% ( 21 % ) from the prior year , primarily driven by portfolio run-off , higher loan loss reserve balances , and the impact of asset sales and divestitures , partially offset by an increase of $ 41 billion resulting from the adoption of sfas 166/167 . key divestitures in 2010 included the student loan corporation , primerica , auto loans , the canadian mastercard business and u.s . retail sales finance portfolios . 2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense decreased 24% ( 24 % ) from the prior year . net interest revenue was 24% ( 24 % ) lower than the prior year , primarily due to lower balances , de-risking of the portfolio , and spread compression . non-interest revenue decreased $ 1.6 billion , mostly driven by the impact of higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts , partially offset by the $ 1.1 billion gain on the sale of redecard in the first quarter of 2009 . operating expenses declined 31% ( 31 % ) from the prior year , due to lower volumes and reductions from expense re-engineering actions , and the impact of goodwill write-offs of $ 3.0 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008 , partially offset by higher costs associated with delinquent loans . provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased 14% ( 14 % ) from the prior year , reflecting an increase in net credit losses of $ 6.1 billion , partially offset by lower reserve builds of $ 2.8 billion . higher net credit losses were primarily driven by higher losses of $ 3.6 billion in residential real estate lending , $ 1.0 billion in retail partner cards , and $ 0.7 billion in international . assets decreased $ 57 billion from the prior year , primarily driven by lower originations , wind-down of specific businesses , asset sales , divestitures , write- offs and higher loan loss reserve balances . key divestitures in 2009 included the fi credit card business , italy consumer finance , diners europe , portugal cards , norway consumer and diners club north america. .
Question: what percentage of total revenues net of interest expense where net interest revenues in 2009?
Answer: | 0.73149 |
FINQA1707 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 3 ) refer to note 2 201csummary of significant accounting principles and practices 201d for further information . 13 . employee benefitsp y defined contribution savings plans aon maintains defined contribution savings plans for the benefit of its employees . the expense recognized for these plans is included in compensation and benefits in the consolidated statements of income . the expense for the significant plans in the u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canada is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|years ended december 31|2018|2017|2016|
|u.s .|$ 98|$ 105|$ 121|
|u.k .|45|43|43|
|netherlands and canada|25|25|27|
|total|$ 168|$ 173|$ 191|
pension and other postretirement benefits the company sponsors defined benefit pension and postretirement health and welfare plans that provide retirement , medical , and life insurance benefits . the postretirement health care plans are contributory , with retiree contributions adjusted annually , and the aa life insurance and pension plans are generally noncontributory . the significant u.s. , u.k. , netherlands and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants. .
Question: what was the change in the total benefits from 2017 to 2018 in millions
Answer: | -5.0 |
FINQA1708 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company recorded equity earnings , net of taxes , related to ilim of $ 290 million in 2018 , compared with earnings of $ 183 million in 2017 , and $ 199 million in 2016 . operating results recorded in 2018 included an after-tax non-cash foreign exchange loss of $ 82 million , compared with an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 15 million in 2017 and an after-tax foreign exchange gain of $ 25 million in 2016 , primarily on the remeasurement of ilim's u.s . dollar denominated net debt . ilim delivered outstanding performance in 2018 , driven largely by higher price realization and strong demand . sales volumes for the joint venture increased year over year for shipments to china of softwood pulp and linerboard , but were offset by decreased sales of hardwood pulp to china . sales volumes in the russian market increased for softwood pulp and hardwood pulp , but decreased for linerboard . average sales price realizations were significantly higher in 2018 for sales of softwood pulp , hardwood pulp and linerboard to china and other export markets . average sales price realizations in russian markets increased year over year for all products . input costs were higher in 2018 , primarily for wood , fuel and chemicals . distribution costs were negatively impacted by tariffs and inflation . the company received cash dividends from the joint venture of $ 128 million in 2018 , $ 133 million in 2017 and $ 58 million in entering the first quarter of 2019 , sales volumes are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2018 , due to the seasonal slowdown in china and fewer trading days . based on pricing to date in the current quarter , average sales prices are expected to decrease for hardwood pulp , softwood pulp and linerboard to china . input costs are projected to be relatively flat , while distribution costs are expected to increase . equity earnings - gpip international paper recorded equity earnings of $ 46 million on its 20.5% ( 20.5 % ) ownership position in gpip in 2018 . the company received cash dividends from the investment of $ 25 million in 2018 . liquidity and capital resources overview a major factor in international paper 2019s liquidity and capital resource planning is its generation of operating cash flow , which is highly sensitive to changes in the pricing and demand for our major products . while changes in key cash operating costs , such as energy , raw material , mill outage and transportation costs , do have an effect on operating cash generation , we believe that our focus on pricing and cost controls has improved our cash flow generation over an operating cycle . cash uses during 2018 were primarily focused on working capital requirements , capital spending , debt reductions and returning cash to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases under the company's share repurchase program . cash provided by operating activities cash provided by operations , including discontinued operations , totaled $ 3.2 billion in 2018 , compared with $ 1.8 billion for 2017 , and $ 2.5 billion for 2016 . cash used by working capital components ( accounts receivable , contract assets and inventory less accounts payable and accrued liabilities , interest payable and other ) totaled $ 439 million in 2018 , compared with cash used by working capital components of $ 402 million in 2017 , and cash provided by working capital components of $ 71 million in 2016 . investment activities including discontinued operations , investment activities in 2018 increased from 2017 , as 2018 included higher capital spending . in 2016 , investment activity included the purchase of weyerhaeuser's pulp business for $ 2.2 billion in cash , the purchase of the holmen business for $ 57 million in cash , net of cash acquired , and proceeds from the sale of the asia packaging business of $ 108 million , net of cash divested . the company maintains an average capital spending target around depreciation and amortization levels , or modestly above , due to strategic plans over the course of an economic cycle . capital spending was $ 1.6 billion in 2018 , or 118% ( 118 % ) of depreciation and amortization , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2017 , or 98% ( 98 % ) of depreciation and amortization , and $ 1.3 billion , or 110% ( 110 % ) of depreciation and amortization in 2016 . across our segments , capital spending as a percentage of depreciation and amortization ranged from 69.8% ( 69.8 % ) to 132.1% ( 132.1 % ) in 2018 . the following table shows capital spending for operations by business segment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , excluding amounts related to discontinued operations of $ 111 million in 2017 and $ 107 million in 2016. .
|in millions|2018|2017|2016|
|industrial packaging|$ 1061|$ 836|$ 832|
|global cellulose fibers|183|188|174|
|printing papers|303|235|215|
|subtotal|1547|1259|1221|
|corporate and other|25|21|20|
|capital spending|$ 1572|$ 1280|$ 1241|
capital expenditures in 2019 are currently expected to be about $ 1.4 billion , or 104% ( 104 % ) of depreciation and amortization , including approximately $ 400 million of strategic investments. .
Question: what was the percentage increase of capital expenditures for operations in the industrial packaging business segment in from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.26914 |
FINQA1709 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2012 performance share program ( the 201c2012 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of specific and/or market- based performance goals outlined in the 2012 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 116% ( 116 % ) of target or approximately 1.3 million shares for the 2012 program . one third of the shares under the 2012 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two anniversaries of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2011 performance share program ( the 201c2011 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2011 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 130% ( 130 % ) of target or approximately 0.5 million shares for the 2011 program . one third of the shares under the 2011 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two annual anniversary dates of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2010 performance share program ( the 201c2010 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2010 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 135% ( 135 % ) of target or approximately 0.3 million shares for the 2010 program . one third of the shares under the 2011 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two annual anniversary dates of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . the following table sets forth the summary of performance share activity under our 2010 , 2011 and 2012 programs , based upon share awards actually achieved , for the fiscal years ended november 29 , 2013 , november 30 , 2012 and december 2 , 2011 ( in thousands ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|beginning outstanding balance|388|405|557|
|achieved|1279|492|337|
|released|-665 ( 665 )|-464 ( 464 )|-436 ( 436 )|
|forfeited|-141 ( 141 )|-45 ( 45 )|-53 ( 53 )|
|ending outstanding balance|861|388|405|
the total fair value of performance awards vested during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 25.4 million , $ 14.4 million and $ 14.8 million , respectively. .
Question: what is the net increase in the balance of outstanding shares during 2013?
Answer: | 473.0 |
FINQA1710 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: .
|operating information|years ended december 31 , 2007|years ended december 31 , 2006|years ended december 31 , 2005|
|natural gas gathered ( bbtu/d )|1171|1168|1077|
|natural gas processed ( bbtu/d )|621|988|1117|
|natural gas transported ( mmcf/d )|3579|3634|1333|
|natural gas sales ( bbtu/d )|281|302|334|
|natural gas liquids gathered ( mbbl/d )|228|206|191 ( a )|
|natural gas liquids sales ( mbbl/d )|231|207|207|
|natural gas liquids fractionated ( mbbl/d )|356|313|292 ( a )|
|natural gas liquids transported ( mbbl/d )|299|200|187 ( a )|
|capital expenditures ( thousands of dollars )|$ 709858|$ 201746|$ 56255|
|conway-to-mount belvieu opis average spread ethane/propane mixture ( $ /gallon )|$ 0.06|$ 0.05|$ 0.05|
|realized composite ngl sales prices ( $ /gallon ) ( b )|$ 1.06|$ 0.93|$ 0.89|
|realized condensate sales price ( $ /bbl ) ( b )|$ 67.35|$ 57.84|$ 52.69|
|realized natural gas sales price ( $ /mmbtu ) ( b )|$ 6.21|$ 6.31|$ 7.30|
|realized gross processing spread ( $ /mmbtu ) ( b )|$ 5.21|$ 5.05|$ 2.77|
operating results - we began consolidating our investment in oneok partners as of january 1 , 2006 , in accordance with eitf 04-5 . we elected to use the prospective method , which results in our consolidated financial results and operating information including data for the legacy oneok partners operations beginning january 1 , 2006 . for additional information , see 201csignificant accounting policies 201d in note a of the notes to consolidated financial statements in this annual report on form 10-k . net margin increased by $ 52.3 million in 2007 , compared with 2006 , primarily due to the following : 2022 increased performance of oneok partners 2019 natural gas liquids businesses , which benefited primarily from new supply connections that increased volumes gathered , transported , fractionated and sold , 2022 higher ngl product price spreads and higher isomerization price spreads in oneok partners 2019 natural gas liquids gathering and fractionation business , 2022 the incremental net margin related to the acquisition of assets from kinder morgan in october 2007 in oneok partners 2019 natural gas liquids pipelines business , and 2022 increased storage margins in oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipelines business , that was partially offset by 2022 decreased natural gas processing and transportation margins in oneok partners 2019 natural gas businesses resulting primarily from lower throughput , higher fuel costs and lower natural gas volumes processed as a result of various contract terminations . operating costs increased by $ 11.6 million during 2007 , compared with 2006 , primarily due to higher employee-related costs and the incremental operating expenses associated with the assets acquired from kinder morgan , partially offset by lower litigation costs . depreciation and amortization decreased by $ 8.3 million during 2007 , compared with 2006 , primarily due to a goodwill and asset impairment charge of $ 12.0 million recorded in the second quarter of 2006 related to black mesa pipeline . gain on sale of assets decreased by $ 113.5 million during 2007 , compared with 2006 , primarily due to the $ 113.9 million gain on the sale of a 20 percent partnership interest in northern border pipeline recorded in the second quarter of 2006 . equity earnings from investments for 2007 and 2006 primarily include earnings from oneok partners 2019 interest in northern border pipeline . the decrease of $ 6.0 million during 2007 , compared with 2006 , is primarily due to the decrease in oneok partners 2019 share of northern border pipeline 2019s earnings from 70 percent in the first quarter of 2006 to 50 percent beginning in the second quarter of 2006 . see page 75 for discussion of the disposition of the 20 percent partnership interest in northern border pipeline . allowance for equity funds used during construction increased for 2007 , compared with 2006 , due to oneok partners 2019 capital projects , which are discussed beginning on page 31. .
Question: what were the increased one time benefits from non-cash charges from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: | 20300000.0 |
FINQA1711 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 236 the following table presents the u.s . and non-u.s . components of income before income tax expense/ ( benefit ) and extraordinary gain for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|year ended december 31 ( in millions )|2009|2008|2007|
|u.s .|$ 6263|$ -2094 ( 2094 )|$ 13720|
|non-u.s. ( a )|9804|4867|9085|
|income before income taxexpense/ ( benefit ) andextraordinary gain|$ 16067|$ 2773|$ 22805|
non-u.s. ( a ) 9804 4867 9085 income before income tax expense/ ( benefit ) and extraordinary gain $ 16067 $ 2773 $ 22805 ( a ) for purposes of this table , non-u.s . income is defined as income generated from operations located outside the u.s . note 28 2013 restrictions on cash and inter- company funds transfers the business of jpmorgan chase bank , national association ( 201cjpmorgan chase bank , n.a . 201d ) is subject to examination and regulation by the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) . the bank is a member of the u.s . federal reserve sys- tem , and its deposits are insured by the fdic . the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfed- eral reserve 201d ) requires depository institutions to maintain cash reserves with a federal reserve bank . the average amount of reserve balances deposited by the firm 2019s bank subsidiaries with various federal reserve banks was approximately $ 821 million and $ 1.6 billion in 2009 and 2008 , respectively . restrictions imposed by u.s . federal law prohibit jpmorgan chase and certain of its affiliates from borrowing from banking subsidiar- ies unless the loans are secured in specified amounts . such secured loans to the firm or to other affiliates are generally limited to 10% ( 10 % ) of the banking subsidiary 2019s total capital , as determined by the risk- based capital guidelines ; the aggregate amount of all such loans is limited to 20% ( 20 % ) of the banking subsidiary 2019s total capital . the principal sources of jpmorgan chase 2019s income ( on a parent company 2013only basis ) are dividends and interest from jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and the other banking and nonbanking subsidi- aries of jpmorgan chase . in addition to dividend restrictions set forth in statutes and regulations , the federal reserve , the occ and the fdic have authority under the financial institutions supervisory act to prohibit or to limit the payment of dividends by the banking organizations they supervise , including jpmorgan chase and its subsidiaries that are banks or bank holding companies , if , in the banking regulator 2019s opinion , payment of a dividend would consti- tute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condi- tion of the banking organization . at january 1 , 2010 and 2009 , jpmorgan chase 2019s banking subsidi- aries could pay , in the aggregate , $ 3.6 billion and $ 17.0 billion , respectively , in dividends to their respective bank holding compa- nies without the prior approval of their relevant banking regulators . the capacity to pay dividends in 2010 will be supplemented by the banking subsidiaries 2019 earnings during the year . in compliance with rules and regulations established by u.s . and non-u.s . regulators , as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , cash in the amount of $ 24.0 billion and $ 34.8 billion , respectively , and securities with a fair value of $ 10.2 billion and $ 23.4 billion , re- spectively , were segregated in special bank accounts for the benefit of securities and futures brokerage customers . note 29 2013 capital the federal reserve establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company . the occ establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a . there are two categories of risk-based capital : tier 1 capital and tier 2 capital . tier 1 capital includes common stockholders 2019 equity , qualifying preferred stock and minority interest less goodwill and other adjustments . tier 2 capital consists of preferred stock not qualifying as tier 1 , subordinated long-term debt and other instru- ments qualifying as tier 2 , and the aggregate allowance for credit losses up to a certain percentage of risk-weighted assets . total regulatory capital is subject to deductions for investments in certain subsidiaries . under the risk-based capital guidelines of the federal reserve , jpmorgan chase is required to maintain minimum ratios of tier 1 and total ( tier 1 plus tier 2 ) capital to risk-weighted assets , as well as minimum leverage ratios ( which are defined as tier 1 capital to average adjusted on 2013balance sheet assets ) . failure to meet these minimum requirements could cause the federal reserve to take action . banking subsidiaries also are subject to these capital requirements by their respective primary regulators . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , jpmorgan chase and all of its banking sub- sidiaries were well-capitalized and met all capital requirements to which each was subject. .
Question: for the year ended december 312009 what was the percentage of the income before income tax expense/ ( benefit ) and extraordinary gain from the us
Answer: | 0.38981 |
FINQA1712 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest expense 2013 interest expense increased in 2014 versus 2013 due to an increased weighted- average debt level of $ 10.8 billion in 2014 from $ 9.6 billion in 2013 , which more than offset the impact of the lower effective interest rate of 5.3% ( 5.3 % ) in 2014 versus 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2013 . interest expense decreased in 2013 versus 2012 due to a lower effective interest rate of 5.7% ( 5.7 % ) in 2013 versus 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) in 2012 . the increase in the weighted-average debt level to $ 9.6 billion in 2013 from $ 9.1 billion in 2012 partially offset the impact of the lower effective interest rate . income taxes 2013 higher pre-tax income increased income taxes in 2014 compared to 2013 . our effective tax rate for 2014 was 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) compared to 37.7% ( 37.7 % ) in 2013 . higher pre-tax income increased income taxes in 2013 compared to 2012 . our effective tax rate for 2013 was 37.7% ( 37.7 % ) compared to 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) in 2012 . other operating/performance and financial statistics we report a number of key performance measures weekly to the association of american railroads ( aar ) . we provide this data on our website at www.up.com/investor/aar-stb_reports/index.htm . operating/performance statistics railroad performance measures are included in the table below : 2014 2013 2012 % ( % ) change 2014 v 2013 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 .
||2014|2013|2012|% ( % ) change 2014 v 2013|% ( % ) change2013 v 2012|
|average train speed ( miles per hour )|24.0|26.0|26.5|( 8 ) % ( % )|( 2 ) % ( % )|
|average terminal dwell time ( hours )|30.3|27.1|26.2|12 % ( % )|3 % ( % )|
|gross ton-miles ( billions )|1014.9|949.1|959.3|7 % ( % )|( 1 ) % ( % )|
|revenue ton-miles ( billions )|549.6|514.3|521.1|7 % ( % )|( 1 ) % ( % )|
|operating ratio|63.5|66.1|67.8|( 2.6 ) pts|( 1.7 ) pts|
|employees ( average )|47201|46445|45928|2 % ( % )|1 % ( % )|
average train speed 2013 average train speed is calculated by dividing train miles by hours operated on our main lines between terminals . average train speed , as reported to the association of american railroads , decreased 8% ( 8 % ) in 2014 versus 2013 . the decline was driven by a 7% ( 7 % ) volume increase , a major infrastructure project in fort worth , texas and inclement weather , including flooding in the midwest in the second quarter and severe weather conditions in the first quarter that impacted all major u.s . and canadian railroads . average train speed decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2013 versus 2012 . the decline was driven by severe weather conditions and shifts of traffic to sections of our network with higher utilization . average terminal dwell time 2013 average terminal dwell time is the average time that a rail car spends at our terminals . lower average terminal dwell time improves asset utilization and service . average terminal dwell time increased 12% ( 12 % ) in 2014 compared to 2013 , caused by higher volumes and inclement weather . average terminal dwell time increased 3% ( 3 % ) in 2013 compared to 2012 , primarily due to growth of manifest traffic which requires more time in terminals for switching cars and building trains . gross and revenue ton-miles 2013 gross ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of loaded and empty freight cars by the number of miles hauled . revenue ton-miles are calculated by multiplying the weight of freight by the number of tariff miles . gross ton-miles , revenue ton-miles and carloadings all increased 7% ( 7 % ) in 2014 compared to 2013 . gross ton-miles and revenue ton-miles declined 1% ( 1 % ) in 2013 compared to 2012 and carloads remained relatively flat driven by declines in coal and agricultural products offset by growth in chemical , autos and industrial products . changes in commodity mix drove the year-over-year variances between gross ton- miles , revenue ton-miles and carloads. .
Question: if average train speed ( miles per hour ) increased at the same rate as carloadings , what would the speed have been for 2014?
Answer: | 26.07 |
FINQA1713 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment . the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units and the fair value as a percentage of book value for the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .
|reporting unit|december 31 2012 goodwill|december 31 2012 % ( % ) of fair value to book value|
|retail brokerage|$ 1791.8|190% ( 190 % )|
|market making|142.4|115% ( 115 % )|
|total goodwill|$ 1934.2||
we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization . other intangible assets have a weighted average remaining useful life of 13 years . we did not recognize impairment on our other intangible assets in the periods presented . effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary . estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using estimated future cash flows and company comparisons . if actual cash flows are less than estimated future cash flows used in the annual assessment , then goodwill would have to be tested for impairment . the estimated fair value of the market making reporting unit as a percentage of book value was approximately 115% ( 115 % ) ; therefore , if actual cash flows are less than our estimated cash flows , goodwill impairment could occur in the market making reporting unit in the future . these cash flows will be monitored closely to determine if a further evaluation of potential impairment is necessary so that impairment could be recognized in a timely manner . in addition , following the review of order handling practices and pricing for order flow between e*trade securities llc and gi execution services , llc , our regulators may initiate investigations into our historical practices which could subject us to monetary penalties and cease-and-desist orders , which could also prompt claims by customers of e*trade securities llc . any of these actions could materially and adversely affect our market making and trade execution businesses , which could impact future cash flows and could result in goodwill impairment . intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives . if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized . estimates of effective tax rates , deferred taxes and valuation allowance description in preparing the consolidated financial statements , we calculate income tax expense ( benefit ) based on our interpretation of the tax laws in the various jurisdictions where we conduct business . this requires us to estimate current tax obligations and the realizability of uncertain tax positions and to assess temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities . these differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities , the net amount of which we show as other assets or other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . we must also assess the likelihood that each of the deferred tax assets will be realized . to the extent we believe that realization is not more likely than not , we establish a valuation allowance . when we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a reporting period , we generally record a corresponding tax expense in the consolidated statement of income ( loss ) . conversely , to the extent circumstances indicate that a valuation allowance is no longer necessary , that portion of the valuation allowance is reversed , which generally reduces overall income tax expense . at december 31 , 2012 we had net deferred tax assets of $ 1416.2 million , net of a valuation allowance ( on state , foreign country and charitable contribution deferred tax assets ) of $ 97.8 million. .
Question: what percentage of total goodwill is comprised of market making at december 31 2012?
Answer: | 0.07362 |
FINQA1714 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2018 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments .
||benefit payments|expected subsidy receipts|net benefit payments|
|2009|$ 2641|$ 77|$ 2564|
|2010|3139|91|3048|
|2011|3561|115|3446|
|2012|3994|140|3854|
|2013|4357|169|4188|
|2014 2013 2018|25807|1269|24538|
the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense in accordance with sfas no . 112 , 201cemployers 2019 accounting for postemployment benefits 201d by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 2643 , $ ( 3418 ) and $ 8400 , respectively , during the years 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the company has an accrued liability related to the severance plan and other severance obligations in the amount of $ 63863 and $ 56172 at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . a facility fee of 8 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 2030 , is paid annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 37 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 for the credit facility which are being amortized straight- line over three years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility or prior facilities totaled $ 2353 , $ 2477 and $ 2717 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2008 or december 31 , 2007 . the majority of credit facility lenders are customers or affiliates of customers of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 .
Question: what is the variation observed in the net benefit payments during 2012 and 2011?
Answer: | 408.0 |
FINQA1715 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the aggregate fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.5 billion ( $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.0 billion in 2013 ) , which represents the market value of our common stock on the date that the rsus vested . the grant-date fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.1 billion ( $ 949 million in 2014 and $ 899 million in 2013 ) . the number of rsus vested includes shares of common stock that we withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements . rsus that are expected to vest are net of estimated future forfeitures . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 1.8 billion in unrecognized compensation costs related to rsus granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 1.2 years . stock option awards as of december 26 , 2015 , options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest were as follows : number of options ( in millions ) weighted average exercise weighted average remaining contractual ( in years ) aggregate intrinsic ( in millions ) .
||number ofoptions ( in millions )|weightedaverageexerciseprice|weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm ( in years )|aggregateintrinsicvalue ( in millions )|
|vested|43.8|$ 21.07|1.8|$ 609|
|expected to vest|9.6|$ 24.07|4.1|$ 104|
|total|53.4|$ 21.61|2.2|$ 713|
aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and $ 34.98 , the closing price of our common stock on december 24 , 2015 , as reported on the nasdaq global select market , for all in-the-money options outstanding . options outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated future option forfeitures . options with a fair value of $ 42 million completed vesting in 2015 ( $ 68 million in 2014 and $ 186 million in 2013 ) . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 13 million in unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of approximately eight months. .
Question: what percentage of stock option awards are vested as of december 26 , 2015?
Answer: | 0.82022 |
FINQA1716 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: long-term liabilities . the value of the company 2019s deferred compensation obligations is based on the market value of the participants 2019 notional investment accounts . the notional investments are comprised primarily of mutual funds , which are based on observable market prices . mark-to-market derivative asset and liability 2014the company utilizes fixed-to-floating interest-rate swaps , typically designated as fair-value hedges , to achieve a targeted level of variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt . the company also employs derivative financial instruments in the form of variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps , classified as economic hedges , in order to fix the interest cost on some of its variable-rate debt . the company uses a calculation of future cash inflows and estimated future outflows , which are discounted , to determine the current fair value . additional inputs to the present value calculation include the contract terms , counterparty credit risk , interest rates and market volatility . other investments 2014other investments primarily represent money market funds used for active employee benefits . the company includes other investments in other current assets . note 18 : leases the company has entered into operating leases involving certain facilities and equipment . rental expenses under operating leases were $ 21 for 2015 , $ 22 for 2014 and $ 23 for 2013 . the operating leases for facilities will expire over the next 25 years and the operating leases for equipment will expire over the next five years . certain operating leases have renewal options ranging from one to five years . the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non- cancelable lease terms over the next five years and thereafter are as follows: .
|year|amount|
|2016|$ 13|
|2017|12|
|2018|11|
|2019|10|
|2020|8|
|thereafter|74|
the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the company will revert back to the company at the end of the lease , the company has recorded these as capital leases . the lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the idbs are presented by the company on a net basis . the gross cost of the facilities funded by the company recognized as a capital lease asset was $ 156 and $ 157 as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , which is presented in property , plant and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the future payments under the lease obligations are equal to and offset by the payments receivable under the idbs. .
Question: what was the amortization expense for the operating leases for facility and equipment from 2015 to 2014 in dollars
Answer: | 1.0 |
FINQA1717 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2010 net revenue|$ 272.9|
|retail electric price|-16.9 ( 16.9 )|
|net gas revenue|-9.1 ( 9.1 )|
|gas cost recovery asset|-3.0 ( 3.0 )|
|volume/weather|5.4|
|other|-2.3 ( 2.3 )|
|2011 net revenue|$ 247.0|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .
Question: in 2010 what was the ratio of the net gas revenue to the gas cost recovery asset ( 3.0 )
Answer: | 3.03333 |
FINQA1718 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) management performs detailed reviews of its receivables on a monthly and/or quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of the allowances based on historical and current trends and other factors affecting credit losses and to determine if any impairment has occurred . a receivable is impaired when it is probable that all amounts related to the receivable will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the agreement . in circumstances where the company is aware of a specific customer 2019s inability to meet its financial obligations , a specific reserve is recorded against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably expected to be collected . additions to the allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained through adjustments to the provision for credit losses , which are charged to current period earnings ; amounts determined to be uncollectable are charged directly against the allowances , while amounts recovered on previously charged-off accounts increase the allowances . net charge-offs include the principal amount of losses charged off as well as charged-off interest and fees . recovered interest and fees previously charged-off are recorded through the allowances for doubtful accounts and increase the allowances . finance receivables are assessed for charge- off when an account becomes 120 days past due and are charged-off typically within 60 days of asset repossession . contract receivables related to equipment leases are generally charged-off when an account becomes 150 days past due , while contract receivables related to franchise finance and van leases are generally charged off up to 180 days past the asset return . for finance and contract receivables , customer bankruptcies are generally charged-off upon notification that the associated debt is not being reaffirmed or , in any event , no later than 180 days past due . snap-on does not believe that its trade accounts , finance or contract receivables represent significant concentrations of credit risk because of the diversified portfolio of individual customers and geographical areas . see note 3 for further information on receivables and allowances for doubtful accounts . other accrued liabilities : supplemental balance sheet information for 201cother accrued liabilities 201d as of 2012 and 2011 year end is as follows : ( amounts in millions ) 2012 2011 .
|( amounts in millions )|2012|2011|
|income taxes|$ 19.6|$ 11.7|
|accrued restructuring|7.2|8.4|
|accrued warranty|18.9|18.6|
|deferred subscription revenue|24.8|24.9|
|accrued property payroll and other tax|32.9|30.4|
|accrued selling and promotion expense|26.6|29.1|
|other|117.9|132.8|
|total other accrued liabilities|$ 247.9|$ 255.9|
inventories : snap-on values its inventory at the lower of cost or market and adjusts for the value of inventory that is estimated to be excess , obsolete or otherwise unmarketable . snap-on records allowances for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and estimated future demand and market conditions . allowances for raw materials are largely based on an analysis of raw material age and actual physical inspection of raw material for fitness for use . as part of evaluating the adequacy of allowances for work-in-progress and finished goods , management reviews individual product stock-keeping units ( skus ) by product category and product life cycle . cost adjustments for each product category/product life-cycle state are generally established and maintained based on a combination of historical experience , forecasted sales and promotions , technological obsolescence , inventory age and other actual known conditions and circumstances . should actual product marketability and raw material fitness for use be affected by conditions that are different from management estimates , further adjustments to inventory allowances may be required . snap-on adopted the 201clast-in , first-out 201d ( 201clifo 201d ) inventory valuation method in 1973 for its u.s . locations . snap-on 2019s u.s . inventories accounted for on a lifo basis consist of purchased product and inventory manufactured at the company 2019s heritage u.s . manufacturing facilities ( primarily hand tools and tool storage ) . as snap-on began acquiring businesses in the 1990 2019s , the company retained the 201cfirst-in , first-out 201d ( 201cfifo 201d ) inventory valuation methodology used by the predecessor businesses prior to their acquisition by snap-on ; the company does not adopt the lifo inventory valuation methodology for new acquisitions . see note 4 for further information on inventories . 72 snap-on incorporated .
Question: what was the percent of income taxes as part of the the total other accrued liabilities in 2012
Answer: | 0.07906 |
FINQA1719 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of 30 september 2016 and 2015 , there were no assets or liabilities classified as discontinued operations relating to the homecare business . 5 . business restructuring and cost reduction actions the charges we record for business restructuring and cost reduction actions have been excluded from segment operating income . cost reduction actions in fiscal year 2016 , we recognized an expense of $ 33.9 ( $ 24.0 after-tax , or $ .11 per share ) for severance and other benefits related to cost reduction actions which resulted in the elimination of approximately 700 positions . the expenses related primarily to the industrial gases 2013 americas and the industrial gases 2013 emea segments . the following table summarizes the carrying amount of the accrual for cost reduction actions at 30 september severance and other benefits .
||severance and other benefits|
|2016 charge|$ 33.9|
|amount reflected in pension liability|-.9 ( .9 )|
|cash expenditures|-20.4 ( 20.4 )|
|currency translation adjustment|.3|
|30 september 2016|$ 12.9|
business realignment and reorganization on 18 september 2014 , we announced plans to reorganize the company , including realignment of our businesses in new reporting segments and other organizational changes , effective as of 1 october 2014 . as a result of this reorganization , we incurred severance and other charges . in fiscal year 2015 , we recognized an expense of $ 207.7 ( $ 153.2 after-tax , or $ .71 per share ) . severance and other benefits totaled $ 151.9 and related to the elimination of approximately 2000 positions . asset and associated contract actions totaled $ 55.8 and related primarily to a plant shutdown in the corporate and other segment and the exit of product lines within the industrial gases 2013 global and materials technologies segments . the 2015 charges related to the segments as follows : $ 31.7 in industrial gases 2013 americas , $ 52.2 in industrial gases 2013 emea , $ 10.3 in industrial gases 2013 asia , $ 37.0 in industrial gases 2013 global , $ 27.6 in materials technologies , and $ 48.9 in corporate and other . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , an expense of $ 12.7 ( $ 8.2 after-tax , or $ .04 per share ) was incurred relating to the elimination of approximately 50 positions . the 2014 charge related to the segments as follows : $ 2.9 in industrial gases 2013 americas , $ 3.1 in industrial gases 2013 emea , $ 1.5 in industrial gases 2013 asia , $ 1.5 in industrial gases 2013 global , $ 1.6 in materials technologies , and $ 2.1 in corporate and other. .
Question: considering the 2015's charge , what is the impact of the industrial gases 2013 americas segment concerning the total expenses?
Answer: | 0.15262 |
FINQA1720 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued recorded as a decrease in 201cincome tax ( provision ) benefit , net 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . 10 . discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased material operations . the results of blockbuster are presented for all periods as discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements . during the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the revenue from our discontinued operations was $ 503 million and $ 1.085 billion , respectively . 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , before income taxes 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 54 million and $ 62 million , respectively . in addition , 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d for the same periods was a loss of $ 47 million and $ 37 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , the net assets from our discontinued operations consisted of the following : december 31 , 2013 ( in thousands ) .
||as of december 31 2013 ( in thousands )|
|current assets from discontinued operations|$ 68239|
|noncurrent assets from discontinued operations|9965|
|current liabilities from discontinued operations|-49471 ( 49471 )|
|long-term liabilities from discontinued operations|-19804 ( 19804 )|
|net assets from discontinued operations|$ 8929|
blockbuster - domestic since the blockbuster acquisition , we continually evaluated the impact of certain factors , including , among other things , competitive pressures , the ability of significantly fewer company-owned domestic retail stores to continue to support corporate administrative costs , and other issues impacting the store-level financial performance of our company-owned domestic retail stores . these factors , among others , previously led us to close a significant number of company-owned domestic retail stores during 2012 and 2013 . on november 6 , 2013 , we announced that blockbuster would close all of its remaining company-owned domestic retail stores and discontinue the blockbuster by-mail dvd service . as of december 31 , 2013 , blockbuster had ceased material operations . blockbuster 2013 mexico during the third quarter 2013 , we determined that our blockbuster operations in mexico ( 201cblockbuster mexico 201d ) were 201cheld for sale . 201d as a result , we recorded pre-tax impairment charges of $ 19 million related to exiting the business , which was recorded in 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2013 . on january 14 , 2014 , we completed the sale of blockbuster mexico . blockbuster uk administration on january 16 , 2013 , blockbuster entertainment limited and blockbuster gb limited , our blockbuster operating subsidiaries in the united kingdom , entered into administration proceedings in the united kingdom ( the 201cadministration 201d ) . as a result of the administration , we wrote down the assets of all our blockbuster uk subsidiaries to their estimated net realizable value on our consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2012 . in total , we recorded charges of approximately $ 46 million on a pre-tax basis related to the administration , which was recorded in 201cincome ( loss ) from discontinued operations , net of tax 201d on our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ( loss ) for the year ended december 31 , 2012. .
Question: what is the tax expense related to discontinued operations in 2012?
Answer: | 25.0 |
FINQA1721 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .
|( in thousands )|year ended december 31 , 2016|year ended december 31 , 2015|year ended december 31 , $ change|year ended december 31 , % ( % ) change|
|north america|$ 408424|$ 460961|$ -52537 ( 52537 )|( 11.4 ) % ( % )|
|emea|11420|3122|8298|265.8|
|asia-pacific|68338|36358|31980|88.0|
|latin america|-33891 ( 33891 )|-30593 ( 30593 )|-3298 ( 3298 )|10.8|
|connected fitness|-36820 ( 36820 )|-61301 ( 61301 )|24481|39.9|
|total operating income|$ 417471|$ 408547|$ 8924|2.2% ( 2.2 % )|
the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment decreased $ 52.5 million to $ 408.4 million in 2016 from $ 461.0 million in 2015 primarily due to decreases in gross margin discussed above in the consolidated results of operations and $ 17.0 million in expenses related to the liquidation of the sports authority , comprised of $ 15.2 million in bad debt expense and $ 1.8 million of in-store fixture impairment . in addition , this decrease reflects the movement of $ 11.1 million in expenses resulting from a strategic shift in headcount supporting our global business from our connected fitness operating segment to north america . this decrease is partially offset by the increases in revenue discussed above in the consolidated results of operations . 2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 8.3 million to $ 11.4 million in 2016 from $ 3.1 million in 2015 primarily due to sales growth discussed above and reductions in incentive compensation . this increase was offset by investments in sports marketing and infrastructure for future growth . 2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 31.9 million to $ 68.3 million in 2016 from $ 36.4 million in 2015 primarily due to sales growth discussed above and reductions in incentive compensation . this increase was offset by investments in our direct-to-consumer business and entry into new territories . 2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 3.3 million to $ 33.9 million in 2016 from $ 30.6 million in 2015 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period . this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above and reductions in incentive compensation . 2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment decreased $ 24.5 million to $ 36.8 million in 2016 from $ 61.3 million in 2015 primarily driven by sales growth discussed above . seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales . the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business . we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .
Question: what portion of total operating income is generated by north america segment in 2015?
Answer: | 1.12829 |
FINQA1722 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part iii item 10 . directors , and executive officers and corporate governance . pursuant to section 406 of the sarbanes-oxley act of 2002 , we have adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers that applies to our principal executive officer and principal financial officer , principal accounting officer and controller , and other persons performing similar functions . our code of ethics for senior financial officers is publicly available on our website at www.hologic.com . we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under item 5.05 of current report on form 8-k regarding an amendment to , or waiver from , a provision of this code by posting such information on our website , at the address specified above . the additional information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 11 . executive compensation . the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the securities and exchange commission within 120 days after the close of our fiscal year . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters . we maintain a number of equity compensation plans for employees , officers , directors and others whose efforts contribute to our success . the table below sets forth certain information as of the end of our fiscal year ended september 27 , 2008 regarding the shares of our common stock available for grant or granted under stock option plans and equity incentives that ( i ) were approved by our stockholders , and ( ii ) were not approved by our stockholders . the number of securities and the exercise price of the outstanding securities have been adjusted to reflect our two-for-one stock splits effected on november 30 , 2005 and april 2 , 2008 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15370814 $ 16.10 19977099 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 582881 $ 3.79 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )|weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )|number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|15370814|$ 16.10|19977099|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 1 )|582881|$ 3.79|2014|
|total|15953695|$ 15.65|19977099|
( 1 ) includes the following plans : 1997 employee equity incentive plan and 2000 acquisition equity incentive plan . a description of each of these plans is as follows : 1997 employee equity incentive plan . the purposes of the 1997 employee equity incentive plan ( the 201c1997 plan 201d ) , adopted by the board of directors in may 1997 , are to attract and retain key employees , consultants and advisors , to provide an incentive for them to assist us in achieving long-range performance goals , and to enable such person to participate in our long-term growth . in general , under the 1997 plan , all employees .
Question: what is the total fair value of options , warrants and rights that are issued and approved by by security holders , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: | 247.47011 |
FINQA1723 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 60 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , for 2014 compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to the activities mentioned above for sales , lower risk retirements and reserves recorded on an international program , partially offset by severance recoveries related to the restructuring announced in november 2013 of approximately $ 20 million for 2014 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013 . 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential and the outsourcing desktop initiative for nasa ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their life cycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 . backlog backlog increased in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to several multi-year international awards and various u.s . multi-year extensions . this increase was partially offset by declining activities on various direct warfighter support and command and control programs impacted by defense budget reductions . backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to lower orders on several programs ( such as eram and ngi ) , higher sales on certain programs ( the national science foundation antarctic support and the disa gsm-o ) and declining activities on several smaller programs primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2015 in the low to mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2014 , primarily driven by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets , an increasingly competitive environment , including the disaggregation of existing contracts , and new contract award delays , partially offset by increased sales resulting from acquisitions that occurred during the year . operating profit is expected to decline in the low double digit percentage range in 2015 primarily driven by volume and an increase in intangible amortization from 2014 acquisition activity , resulting in 2015 margins that are lower than 2014 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; logistics and other technical services ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support and integration services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system , hellfire , jassm , javelin , apache , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2013|2012|
|net sales|$ 7680|$ 7757|$ 7457|
|operating profit|1358|1431|1256|
|operating margins|17.7% ( 17.7 % )|18.4% ( 18.4 % )|16.8% ( 16.8 % )|
|backlog at year-end|$ 13600|$ 15000|$ 14700|
2014 compared to 2013 mfc 2019s net sales for 2014 decreased $ 77 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2013 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 385 million for technical services programs due to decreased volume reflecting market pressures ; and about $ 115 million for tactical missile programs due to fewer deliveries ( primarily high mobility artillery .
Question: what is the growth rate in operating profit for mfc in 2013?
Answer: | 0.13933 |
FINQA1724 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2016 note 16 2014share-based compensation 2007 equity incentive compensation plan the company 2019s 2007 equity incentive compensation plan , or the eip , authorizes the compensation committee of the board of directors to grant non-qualified stock options ( 201coptions 201d ) , restricted stock awards ( 201crsas 201d ) , restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) and performance-based shares to its employees and non-employee directors , for up to 236 million shares of class a common stock . shares available for award may be either authorized and unissued or previously issued shares subsequently acquired by the company . the eip will continue to be in effect until all of the common stock available under the eip is delivered and all restrictions on those shares have lapsed , unless the eip is terminated earlier by the company 2019s board of directors . in january 2016 , the company 2019s board of directors approved an amendment of the eip effective february 3 , 2016 , such that awards may be granted under the plan until january 31 , 2022 . share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost related to the eip of $ 211 million , $ 184 million and $ 172 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the related tax benefits were $ 62 million , $ 54 million and $ 51 million for fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and all per share amounts and number of shares outstanding presented below reflect the four-for-one stock split that was effected in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 . see note 14 2014stockholders 2019 equity . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and primarily vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: .
||2016|2015|2014|
|expected term ( in years ) ( 1 )|4.35|4.55|4.80|
|risk-free rate of return ( 2 )|1.5% ( 1.5 % )|1.5% ( 1.5 % )|1.3% ( 1.3 % )|
|expected volatility ( 3 )|21.7% ( 21.7 % )|22.0% ( 22.0 % )|25.2% ( 25.2 % )|
|expected dividend yield ( 4 )|0.7% ( 0.7 % )|0.8% ( 0.8 % )|0.8% ( 0.8 % )|
|fair value per option granted|$ 15.01|$ 12.04|$ 11.03|
( 1 ) this assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2016 was approximately 77% ( 77 % ) and 23% ( 23 % ) , respectively , 67% ( 67 % ) and 33% ( 33 % ) in fiscal 2015 , respectively , and 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) in fiscal 2014 , respectively. .
Question: what was the ratio of the share based compensation to the related tax benefits in 2016
Answer: | 3.40323 |
FINQA1725 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the facility is considered 201cdebt 201d for purposes of a support agreement between american water and awcc , which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by american water of awcc 2019s payment obligations under the credit facility . also , the company acquired an additional revolving line of credit as part of its keystone acquisition . the total commitment under this credit facility was $ 16 million of which $ 2 million was outstanding as of december 31 , 2015 . the following table summarizes information regarding the company 2019s aggregate credit facility commitments , letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities , as well as outstanding amounts of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilities as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 : credit facility commitment available credit facility capacity letter of credit sublimit available letter of credit capacity outstanding commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing ( in millions ) december 31 , 2015 . . . . . $ 1266 $ 1182 $ 150 $ 68 $ 626 $ 2 december 31 , 2014 . . . . . $ 1250 $ 1212 $ 150 $ 112 $ 450 $ 2014 the weighted-average interest rate on awcc short-term borrowings for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately 0.49% ( 0.49 % ) and 0.31% ( 0.31 % ) , respectively . interest accrues on the keystone revolving line of credit daily at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) above the greater of the one month or one day libor . capital structure the following table indicates the percentage of our capitalization represented by the components of our capital structure as of december 31: .
||2015|2014|2013|
|total common stockholders' equity|43.5% ( 43.5 % )|45.2% ( 45.2 % )|44.6% ( 44.6 % )|
|long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value|50.6% ( 50.6 % )|50.1% ( 50.1 % )|49.3% ( 49.3 % )|
|short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt|5.9% ( 5.9 % )|4.7% ( 4.7 % )|6.1% ( 6.1 % )|
|total|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|
the changes in the capital structure between periods were mainly attributable to changes in outstanding commercial paper balances . debt covenants our debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants . to the extent that we are not in compliance with these covenants such an event may create an event of default under the debt agreement and we or our subsidiaries may be restricted in our ability to pay dividends , issue new debt or access our revolving credit facility . for two of our smaller operating companies , we have informed our counterparties that we will provide only unaudited financial information at the subsidiary level , which resulted in technical non-compliance with certain of their reporting requirements under debt agreements with respect to $ 8 million of outstanding debt . we do not believe this event will materially impact us . our long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that , among other things , limit the company from issuing debt secured by the company 2019s assets , subject to certain exceptions . our failure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations . certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require us to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization ( as defined in the relevant documents ) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00 . on december 31 , 2015 , our ratio was 0.56 to 1.00 and therefore we were in compliance with the covenant. .
Question: what was the ratio of the commercial ( net of discount ) credit line borrowing from 2015 to 2014
Answer: | 1.39111 |
FINQA1726 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: morgan stanley notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) lending commitments . primary lending commitments are those that are originated by the company whereas secondary lending commitments are purchased from third parties in the market . the commitments include lending commitments that are made to investment grade and non-investment grade companies in connection with corporate lending and other business activities . commitments for secured lending transactions . secured lending commitments are extended by the company to companies and are secured by real estate or other physical assets of the borrower . loans made under these arrangements typically are at variable rates and generally provide for over-collateralization based upon the creditworthiness of the borrower . forward starting reverse repurchase agreements . the company has entered into forward starting securities purchased under agreements to resell ( agreements that have a trade date at or prior to december 31 , 2013 and settle subsequent to period-end ) that are primarily secured by collateral from u.s . government agency securities and other sovereign government obligations . commercial and residential mortgage-related commitments . the company enters into forward purchase contracts involving residential mortgage loans , residential mortgage lending commitments to individuals and residential home equity lines of credit . in addition , the company enters into commitments to originate commercial and residential mortgage loans . underwriting commitments . the company provides underwriting commitments in connection with its capital raising sources to a diverse group of corporate and other institutional clients . other lending commitments . other commitments generally include commercial lending commitments to small businesses and commitments related to securities-based lending activities in connection with the company 2019s wealth management business segment . the company sponsors several non-consolidated investment funds for third-party investors where the company typically acts as general partner of , and investment advisor to , these funds and typically commits to invest a minority of the capital of such funds , with subscribing third-party investors contributing the majority . the company 2019s employees , including its senior officers , as well as the company 2019s directors , may participate on the same terms and conditions as other investors in certain of these funds that the company forms primarily for client investment , except that the company may waive or lower applicable fees and charges for its employees . the company has contractual capital commitments , guarantees , lending facilities and counterparty arrangements with respect to these investment funds . premises and equipment . the company has non-cancelable operating leases covering premises and equipment ( excluding commodities operating leases , shown separately ) . at december 31 , 2013 , future minimum rental commitments under such leases ( net of subleases , principally on office rentals ) were as follows ( dollars in millions ) : year ended operating premises leases .
|year ended|operating premises leases|
|2014|$ 672|
|2015|656|
|2016|621|
|2017|554|
|2018|481|
|thereafter|2712|
.
Question: what was the increase in lease liability between 2014 and 2015?
Answer: | 16.0 |
FINQA1727 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as of may 26 , 2019 , we expect to pay approximately $ 2.0 million of unrecognized tax benefit liabilities and accrued interest within the next 12 months . we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future cash flows beyond 12 months due to uncertainties in the timing of tax audit outcomes . the remaining amount of our unrecognized tax liability was classified in other liabilities . we report accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefit liabilities in income tax expense . for fiscal 2019 , we recognized $ 0.5 million of tax-related net interest and penalties , and had $ 26.0 million of accrued interest and penalties as of may 26 , 2019 . for fiscal 2018 , we recognized a net benefit of $ 3.1 million of tax-related net interest and penalties , and had $ 27.3 million of accrued interest and penalties as of may 27 , 2018 . note 15 . leases , other commitments , and contingencies our leases are generally for warehouse space and equipment . rent expense under all operating leases from continuing operations was $ 184.9 million in fiscal 2019 , $ 189.4 million in fiscal 2018 , and $ 188.1 million in fiscal 2017 . some operating leases require payment of property taxes , insurance , and maintenance costs in addition to the rent payments . contingent and escalation rent in excess of minimum rent payments and sublease income netted in rent expense were insignificant . noncancelable future lease commitments are : in millions operating leases capital leases .
|in millions|operating leases|capital leases|
|fiscal 2020|$ 120.0|$ 0.2|
|fiscal 2021|101.7|0.1|
|fiscal 2022|85.0|-|
|fiscal 2023|63.8|-|
|fiscal 2024|49.1|-|
|after fiscal 2024|63.0|-|
|total noncancelable future lease commitments|$ 482.6|$ 0.3|
|less : interest||-|
|present value of obligations under capitalleases||$ 0.3|
depreciation on capital leases is recorded as depreciation expense in our results of operations . as of may 26 , 2019 , we have issued guarantees and comfort letters of $ 681.6 million for the debt and other obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , and guarantees and comfort letters of $ 133.9 million for the debt and other obligations of non-consolidated affiliates , mainly cpw . in addition , off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under non-cancelable operating leases , which totaled $ 482.6 million as of may 26 , 2019 . note 16 . business segment and geographic information we operate in the packaged foods industry . our operating segments are as follows : north america retail ; convenience stores & foodservice ; europe & australia ; asia & latin america ; and pet . our north america retail operating segment reflects business with a wide variety of grocery stores , mass merchandisers , membership stores , natural food chains , drug , dollar and discount chains , and e-commerce grocery providers . our product categories in this business segment are ready-to-eat cereals , refrigerated yogurt , soup , meal kits , refrigerated and frozen dough products , dessert and baking mixes , frozen pizza and pizza snacks , grain , fruit and savory snacks , and a wide variety of organic products including refrigerated yogurt , nutrition bars , meal kits , salty snacks , ready-to-eat cereal , and grain snacks. .
Question: what is the total rent expense for all operating leases from continuing operations from 2017 to 2019?
Answer: | 562.4 |
FINQA1728 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2014 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1955024 $ 36.06 4078093 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .
|plan category|number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )|weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 )|number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|1955024|$ 36.06|4078093|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 )|2014|2014|2014|
|total|1955024|$ 36.06|4078093|
( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 644321 were subject to stock options , 539742 were subject to outstanding restricted performance stock rights , and 63022 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 33571 stock rights , 11046 restricted stock rights and 663322 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 644321 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . this proof is printed at 96% ( 96 % ) of original size this line represents final trim and will not print .
Question: what portion of equity compensation plan is to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: | 0.32405 |
FINQA1729 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue .
||2006|2005|2004|
|marketing and sales|27% ( 27 % )|28% ( 28 % )|28% ( 28 % )|
|research and development|31% ( 31 % )|29% ( 29 % )|31% ( 31 % )|
|general and administrative|10% ( 10 % )|10% ( 10 % )|7% ( 7 % )|
operating expense summary 2006 compared to 2005 overall operating expenses increased $ 122.5 million in 2006 , as compared to 2005 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 58.4 million in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no . 123r ; and 2022 an increase of $ 49.2 million in salary , benefits and other employee-related costs , primarily due to an increased number of employees and increases in bonus and commission costs , in part due to our acquisition of verisity ltd. , or verisity , in the second quarter of 2005 . 2005 compared to 2004 operating expenses increased $ 97.4 million in 2005 , as compared to 2004 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 63.3 million in employee salary and benefit costs , primarily due to our acquisition of verisity and increased bonus and commission costs ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.9 million in stock-based compensation expense due to grants of restricted stock and the assumption of options in our acquisitions ; 2022 an increase of $ 8.6 million in losses associated with the sale of installment contract receivables ; and 2022 an increase of $ 7.1 million in costs related to the retirement of our executive chairman and former president and chief executive officer in 2005 ; partially offset by 2022 our restructuring activities , as discussed below . marketing and sales 2006 compared to 2005 marketing and sales expenses increased $ 39.4 million in 2006 , as compared to 2005 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 14.8 million in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no . 123r ; 2022 an increase of $ 18.2 million in employee salary , commissions , benefits and other employee-related costs due to increased hiring of sales and technical personnel , and higher commissions earned resulting from an increase in 2006 sales performance ; and 2022 an increase of $ 7.8 million in marketing programs and customer-focused conferences due to our new marketing initiatives and increased travel to visit our customers . 2005 compared to 2004 marketing and sales expenses increased $ 33.1 million in 2005 , as compared to 2004 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 29.4 million in employee salary , commission and benefit costs due to increased hiring of sales and technical personnel and higher employee bonuses and commissions ; and 2022 an increase of $ 1.6 million in stock-based compensation expense due to grants of restricted stock and the assumption of options in our acquisitions ; partially offset by 2022 a decrease of $ 1.9 million in marketing program costs. .
Question: what was the change in research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenue from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: | 0.02 |
FINQA1730 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .
||2015|2014|
|vehicles|$ 74|$ 86|
|aircraft|2289|2289|
|buildings|207|197|
|accumulated amortization|-849 ( 849 )|-781 ( 781 )|
|property plant and equipment subject to capital leases|$ 1721|$ 1791|
these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2016 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.03% ( 0.03 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.05% ( 0.05 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 100 million issued by the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities . the bonds , which were due in december 2015 , had a variable interest rate , and the average interest rates for 2015 and 2014 were 0.02% ( 0.02 % ) and 0.04% ( 0.04 % ) , respectively . as of december 2015 , these $ 100 million bonds were repaid in full . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2015 was 0.00% ( 0.00 % ) . pound sterling notes the pound sterling notes consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 notes with a principal amount of a366 million accrue interest at a 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2031 . these notes are not callable . 2022 notes with a principal amount of a3455 million accrue interest at a 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) fixed rate , and are due in february 2050 . these notes are callable at our option at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption at a benchmark u.k . government bond yield plus 15 basis points and accrued interest. .
Question: what is the difference in total property , plant and equipment subject to capital lease between 2014 and 2015?
Answer: | -70.0 |
FINQA1731 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations comcast corporation and subsidiaries28 comcast corporation and subsidiaries the exchangeable notes varies based upon the fair market value of the security to which it is indexed . the exchangeable notes are collateralized by our investments in cablevision , microsoft and vodafone , respectively . the comcast exchangeable notes are collateralized by our class a special common stock held in treasury . we have settled and intend in the future to settle all of the comcast exchangeable notes using cash . during 2004 and 2003 , we settled an aggregate of $ 847 million face amount and $ 638 million face amount , respectively , of our obligations relating to our notes exchangeable into comcast stock by delivering cash to the counterparty upon maturity of the instruments , and the equity collar agreements related to the underlying shares expired or were settled . during 2004 and 2003 , we settled $ 2.359 billion face amount and $ 1.213 billion face amount , respectively , of our obligations relating to our exchangeable notes by delivering the underlying shares of common stock to the counterparty upon maturity of the investments . as of december 31 , 2004 , our debt includes an aggregate of $ 1.699 billion of exchangeable notes , including $ 1.645 billion within current portion of long-term debt . as of december 31 , 2004 , the securities we hold collateralizing the exchangeable notes were sufficient to substantially satisfy the debt obligations associated with the outstanding exchangeable notes . stock repurchases . during 2004 , under our board-authorized , $ 2 billion share repurchase program , we repurchased 46.9 million shares of our class a special common stock for $ 1.328 billion . we expect such repurchases to continue from time to time in the open market or in private transactions , subject to market conditions . refer to notes 8 and 10 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our financing activities . investing activities net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations was $ 4.512 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2004 , and consists primarily of capital expenditures of $ 3.660 billion , additions to intangible and other noncurrent assets of $ 628 million and the acquisition of techtv for approximately $ 300 million . capital expenditures . our most significant recurring investing activity has been and is expected to continue to be capital expendi- tures . the following table illustrates the capital expenditures we incurred in our cable segment during 2004 and expect to incur in 2005 ( dollars in millions ) : .
||2004|2005|
|deployment of cable modems digital converters and new service offerings|$ 2106|$ 2300|
|upgrading of cable systems|902|200|
|recurring capital projects|614|500|
|total cable segment capital expenditures|$ 3622|$ 3000|
the amount of our capital expenditures for 2005 and for subsequent years will depend on numerous factors , some of which are beyond our control , including competition , changes in technology and the timing and rate of deployment of new services . additions to intangibles . additions to intangibles during 2004 primarily relate to our investment in a $ 250 million long-term strategic license agreement with gemstar , multiple dwelling unit contracts of approximately $ 133 million and other licenses and software intangibles of approximately $ 168 million . investments . proceeds from sales , settlements and restructurings of investments totaled $ 228 million during 2004 , related to the sales of our non-strategic investments , including our 20% ( 20 % ) interest in dhc ventures , llc ( discovery health channel ) for approximately $ 149 million . we consider investments that we determine to be non-strategic , highly-valued , or both to be a source of liquidity . we consider our investment in $ 1.5 billion in time warner common-equivalent preferred stock to be an anticipated source of liquidity . we do not have any significant contractual funding commitments with respect to any of our investments . refer to notes 6 and 7 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our investments and our intangible assets , respectively . off-balance sheet arrangements we do not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition , results of operations , liquidity , capital expenditures or capital resources. .
Question: what percentage of total cable segment capital expenditures in 2004 where due to upgrading of cable systems?
Answer: | 0.24903 |
FINQA1732 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .
||2008|2009|2010|2011|2012|2013|
|state street corporation|$ 100|$ 111|$ 118|$ 105|$ 125|$ 198|
|s&p 500 index|100|126|146|149|172|228|
|s&p financial index|100|117|132|109|141|191|
|kbw bank index|100|98|121|93|122|168|
.
Question: what percent increase would shareholders receive between 2008 and 2013?
Answer: | 0.98 |
FINQA1733 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
||december 312011|december 312012|december 312013|december 312014|december 312015|december 312016|
|disca|$ 100.00|$ 154.94|$ 220.70|$ 168.17|$ 130.24|$ 133.81|
|discb|$ 100.00|$ 150.40|$ 217.35|$ 175.04|$ 127.80|$ 137.83|
|disck|$ 100.00|$ 155.17|$ 222.44|$ 178.89|$ 133.79|$ 142.07|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 113.41|$ 146.98|$ 163.72|$ 162.53|$ 178.02|
|peer group|$ 100.00|$ 134.98|$ 220.77|$ 253.19|$ 243.93|$ 271.11|
equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference . item 6 . selected financial data . the table set forth below presents our selected financial information for each of the past five years ( in millions , except per share amounts ) . the selected statement of operations information for each of the three years ended december 31 , 2016 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the information in item 7 , 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , 201d the audited consolidated financial statements included in item 8 , 201cfinancial statements and supplementary data , 201d and other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . the selected statement of operations information for each of the two years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 and the selected balance sheet information as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 have been derived from financial statements not included in this annual report on form 10-k . 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 selected statement of operations information : revenues $ 6497 $ 6394 $ 6265 $ 5535 $ 4487 operating income 2058 1985 2061 1975 1859 income from continuing operations , net of taxes 1218 1048 1137 1077 956 loss from discontinued operations , net of taxes 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 11 ) net income 1218 1048 1137 1077 945 net income available to discovery communications , inc . 1194 1034 1139 1075 943 basic earnings per share available to discovery communications , inc . series a , b and c common stockholders : continuing operations $ 1.97 $ 1.59 $ 1.67 $ 1.50 $ 1.27 discontinued operations 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 0.01 ) net income 1.97 1.59 1.67 1.50 1.25 diluted earnings per share available to discovery communications , inc . series a , b and c common stockholders : continuing operations $ 1.96 $ 1.58 $ 1.66 $ 1.49 $ 1.26 discontinued operations 2014 2014 2014 2014 ( 0.01 ) net income 1.96 1.58 1.66 1.49 1.24 weighted average shares outstanding : basic 401 432 454 484 498 diluted 610 656 687 722 759 selected balance sheet information : cash and cash equivalents $ 300 $ 390 $ 367 $ 408 $ 1201 total assets 15758 15864 15970 14934 12892 long-term debt : current portion 82 119 1107 17 31 long-term portion 7841 7616 6002 6437 5174 total liabilities 10348 10172 9619 8701 6599 redeemable noncontrolling interests 243 241 747 36 2014 equity attributable to discovery communications , inc . 5167 5451 5602 6196 6291 total equity $ 5167 $ 5451 $ 5604 $ 6197 $ 6293 2022 income per share amounts may not sum since each is calculated independently . 2022 on september 30 , 2016 , the company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment of $ 62 million related to its investment in lionsgate . on december 2 , 2016 , the company acquired a 39% ( 39 % ) minority interest in group nine media , a newly formed media holding company , in exchange for contributions of $ 100 million and the company's digital network businesses seeker and sourcefed , resulting in a gain of $ 50 million upon deconsolidation of the businesses . ( see note 4 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. ) .
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2016?
Answer: | 0.3381 |
FINQA1734 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .
||12/11|12/12|12/13|12/14|12/15|12/16|
|royal caribbean cruises ltd .|100.00|139.36|198.03|350.40|437.09|362.38|
|s&p 500|100.00|116.00|153.58|174.60|177.01|198.18|
|dow jones us travel & leisure|100.00|113.33|164.87|191.85|203.17|218.56|
the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .
Question: what is the mathematical range for royal caribean , s&p 500 and dow jones in december , 2014?
Answer: | 173.39 |
FINQA1735 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance based restricted stock awards is generally recognized using the accelerated amortization method with each vesting tranche valued as a separate award , with a separate vesting date , consistent with the estimated value of the award at each period end . additionally , compensation expense is adjusted for actual forfeitures for all awards in the period that the award was forfeited . compensation expense for stock options is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period . maa presents stock compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations in "general and administrative expenses" . effective january 1 , 2017 , the company adopted asu 2016-09 , improvements to employee share- based payment accounting , which allows employers to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur . the company elected this option using the modified retrospective transition method , with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings , and there was no material effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations taken as a whole resulting from the reversal of previously estimated forfeitures . total compensation expense under the stock plan was approximately $ 10.8 million , $ 12.2 million and $ 6.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . of these amounts , total compensation expense capitalized was approximately $ 0.2 million , $ 0.7 million and $ 0.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , the total unrecognized compensation expense was approximately $ 14.1 million . this cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted average period of 1.2 years . total cash paid for the settlement of plan shares totaled $ 4.8 million , $ 2.0 million and $ 1.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . information concerning grants under the stock plan is listed below . restricted stock in general , restricted stock is earned based on either a service condition , performance condition , or market condition , or a combination thereof , and generally vests ratably over a period from 1 year to 5 years . service based awards are earned when the employee remains employed over the requisite service period and are valued on the grant date based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant . market based awards are earned when maa reaches a specified stock price or specified return on the stock price ( price appreciation plus dividends ) and are valued on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation . performance based awards are earned when maa reaches certain operational goals such as funds from operations , or ffo , targets and are valued based upon the market price of maa common stock on the date of grant as well as the probability of reaching the stated targets . maa remeasures the fair value of the performance based awards each balance sheet date with adjustments made on a cumulative basis until the award is settled and the final compensation is known . the weighted average grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , was $ 84.53 , $ 73.20 and $ 68.35 , respectively . the following is a summary of the key assumptions used in the valuation calculations for market based awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015: .
||2017|2016|2015|
|risk free rate|0.65% ( 0.65 % ) - 1.57% ( 1.57 % )|0.49% ( 0.49 % ) - 1.27% ( 1.27 % )|0.10% ( 0.10 % ) - 1.05% ( 1.05 % )|
|dividend yield|3.573% ( 3.573 % )|3.634% ( 3.634 % )|3.932% ( 3.932 % )|
|volatility|20.43% ( 20.43 % ) - 21.85% ( 21.85 % )|18.41% ( 18.41 % ) - 19.45% ( 19.45 % )|15.41% ( 15.41 % ) - 16.04% ( 16.04 % )|
|requisite service period|3 years|3 years|3 years|
the risk free rate was based on a zero coupon risk-free rate . the minimum risk free rate was based on a period of 0.25 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the maximum risk free rate was based on a period of 3 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . the dividend yield was based on the closing stock price of maa stock on the date of grant . volatility for maa was obtained by using a blend of both historical and implied volatility calculations . historical volatility was based on the standard deviation of daily total continuous returns , and implied volatility was based on the trailing month average of daily implied volatilities interpolating between the volatilities implied by stock call option contracts that were closest to the terms shown and closest to the money . the minimum volatility was based on a period of 3 years , 2 years and 1 year for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the maximum volatility was based on a period of 1 year , 1 year and 2 years for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the requisite service period is based on the criteria for the separate programs according to the vesting schedule. .
Question: what is the average volatility for 2017?
Answer: | 0.2114 |
FINQA1736 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: goodwill is assigned to one or more reporting segments on the date of acquisition . we evaluate goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of each of our reporting segments to its carrying value , including the associated goodwill . to determine the fair values , we use the market approach based on comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of businesses and the income approach based on estimated discounted future cash flows . our cash flow assumptions consider historical and forecasted revenue , operating costs and other relevant factors . we amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment whenever an impairment indicator exists . we continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets , including our intangible assets may not be recoverable . when such events or changes in circumstances occur , we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows . if the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets , we recognize an impairment loss based on any excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets . we did not recognize any intangible asset impairment charges in fiscal 2012 , 2011 or 2010 . our intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 1 to 13 years . amortization is based on the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset will be consumed . the weighted average useful lives of our intangible assets was as follows : weighted average useful life ( years ) .
||weighted averageuseful life ( years )|
|purchased technology|5|
|customer contracts and relationships|10|
|trademarks|7|
|acquired rights to use technology|9|
|localization|1|
|other intangibles|3|
software development costs capitalization of software development costs for software to be sold , leased , or otherwise marketed begins upon the establishment of technological feasibility , which is generally the completion of a working prototype that has been certified as having no critical bugs and is a release candidate . amortization begins once the software is ready for its intended use , generally based on the pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed . to date , software development costs incurred between completion of a working prototype and general availability of the related product have not been material . internal use software we capitalize costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage . such capitalized costs include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees , who are directly associated with the development of the applications . capitalization of such costs begins when the preliminary project stage is complete and ceases at the point in which the project is substantially complete and is ready for its intended purpose . income taxes we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes . under this method , income tax expense is recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year . in addition , deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities , and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards . we record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount for which realization is more likely than not . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the yearly amortization rate related to customer contracts and relationships?
Answer: | 10.0 |
FINQA1737 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2014|as of december 2013|
|net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements|$ 35764|$ 22176|
|collateral posted|30824|18178|
|additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade|1072|911|
|additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade|2815|2989|
additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: in millions for 2014 and 2013 , what was total amount of net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements?\\n
Answer: | 57940.0 |
FINQA1738 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 33 corporate credit allocation in 2003 , tss was assigned a corporate credit allocation of pre- tax earnings and the associated capital related to certain credit exposures managed within ib 2019s credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with tss . prior periods have been revised to reflect this allocation . for 2003 , the impact to tss of this change increased pre-tax operating results by $ 36 million and average allocated capital by $ 712 million , and it decreased sva by $ 65 million . pre-tax operating results were $ 46 million lower than in 2002 , reflecting lower loan volumes and higher related expenses , slightly offset by a decrease in credit costs . business outlook tss revenue in 2004 is expected to benefit from improved global equity markets and from two recent acquisitions : the november 2003 acquisition of the bank one corporate trust portfolio , and the january 2004 acquisition of citigroup 2019s electronic funds services business . tss also expects higher costs as it integrates these acquisitions and continues strategic investments to sup- port business expansion . by client segment tss dimensions of 2003 revenue diversification by business revenue by geographic region investor services 36% ( 36 % ) other 1% ( 1 % ) institutional trust services 23% ( 23 % ) treasury services 40% ( 40 % ) large corporations 21% ( 21 % ) middle market 18% ( 18 % ) banks 11% ( 11 % ) nonbank financial institutions 44% ( 44 % ) public sector/governments 6% ( 6 % ) europe , middle east & africa 27% ( 27 % ) asia/pacific 9% ( 9 % ) the americas 64% ( 64 % ) ( a ) includes the elimination of revenue related to shared activities with chase middle market in the amount of $ 347 million . year ended december 31 , operating revenue .
|year ended december 31 , ( in millions )|year ended december 31 , 2003|year ended december 31 , 2002|change|
|treasury services|$ 1927|$ 1818|6% ( 6 % )|
|investor services|1449|1513|-4 ( 4 )|
|institutional trust services ( a )|928|864|7|
|other ( a ) ( b )|-312 ( 312 )|-303 ( 303 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|total treasury & securities services|$ 3992|$ 3892|3% ( 3 % )|
( a ) includes a portion of the $ 41 million gain on sale of a nonstrategic business in 2003 : $ 1 million in institutional trust services and $ 40 million in other . ( b ) includes the elimination of revenues related to shared activities with chase middle market , and a $ 50 million gain on sale of a non-u.s . securities clearing firm in 2002. .
Question: in 2003 what was the ratio of the total other income to the gain on sale of a non-u.s securities
Answer: | -6.24 |
FINQA1739 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 130.29|$ 135.35|$ 140.54|$ 205.95|$ 223.79|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 115.06|$ 117.48|$ 136.26|$ 180.38|$ 205.05|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 126.74|$ 126.75|$ 136.24|$ 192.61|$ 240.91|
.
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2014?
Answer: | 1.2379 |
FINQA1740 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ventas , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) applicable indenture . the issuers may also redeem the 2015 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , on or after june 1 , 2010 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . in addition , at any time prior to june 1 , 2008 , the issuers may redeem up to 35% ( 35 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of either or both of the 2010 senior notes and 2015 senior notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 106.750% ( 106.750 % ) and 107.125% ( 107.125 % ) , respectively , of the principal amount thereof , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2014 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , ( i ) prior to october 15 , 2009 at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture and ( ii ) on or after october 15 , 2009 at varying redemption prices set forth in the applicable indenture , plus , in each case , accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date . the issuers may redeem the 2009 senior notes and the 2012 senior notes , in whole at any time or in part from time to time , at a redemption price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount thereof , plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date and a make-whole premium as described in the applicable indenture . if we experience certain kinds of changes of control , the issuers must make an offer to repurchase the senior notes , in whole or in part , at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of the principal amount of the senior notes , plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of purchase ; provided , however , that in the event moody 2019s and s&p have confirmed their ratings at ba3 or higher and bb- or higher on the senior notes and certain other conditions are met , this repurchase obligation will not apply . mortgages at december 31 , 2007 , we had outstanding 121 mortgage loans totaling $ 1.57 billion that are collateralized by the underlying assets of the properties . outstanding principal balances on these loans ranged from $ 0.4 million to $ 59.4 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the loans generally bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) to 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) per annum , except for 15 loans with outstanding principal balances ranging from $ 0.4 million to $ 32.0 million , which bear interest at the lender 2019s variable rates ranging from 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) to 7.3% ( 7.3 % ) per annum as of december 31 , 2007 . at december 31 , 2007 , the weighted average annual rate on fixed rate debt was 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) and the weighted average annual rate on the variable rate debt was 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) . the loans had a weighted average maturity of 7.0 years as of december 31 , 2007 . sunrise 2019s portion of total debt was $ 157.1 million as of december 31 , scheduled maturities of borrowing arrangements and other provisions as of december 31 , 2007 , our indebtedness had the following maturities ( in thousands ) : .
|2008|$ 193101|
|2009|605762|
|2010|282138|
|2011|303191|
|2012|527221|
|thereafter|1436263|
|total maturities|3347676|
|unamortized fair value adjustment|19669|
|unamortized commission fees and discounts|-6846 ( 6846 )|
|senior notes payable and other debt|$ 3360499|
.
Question: what percentage of total maturities expire after 2012?
Answer: | 0.42903 |
FINQA1741 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : .
|goodwill|$ 271577|
|customer-related intangible assets|147500|
|contract-based intangible assets|31000|
|acquired technology|10700|
|fixed assets|1680|
|other assets|4230|
|total assets acquired|466687|
|deferred income taxes|-38949 ( 38949 )|
|net assets acquired|$ 427738|
the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
Question: what will be the yearly amortization expense related to acquired technology , ( in thousands ) ?
Answer: | 1528.57143 |
FINQA1742 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 29 part ii item 5 2013 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities ( a ) ( 1 ) our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange and is traded under the symbol 201cpnc . 201d at the close of business on february 15 , 2019 , there were 53986 common shareholders of record . holders of pnc common stock are entitled to receive dividends when declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for this purpose . our board of directors may not pay or set apart dividends on the common stock until dividends for all past dividend periods on any series of outstanding preferred stock and certain outstanding capital securities issued by the parent company have been paid or declared and set apart for payment . the board of directors presently intends to continue the policy of paying quarterly cash dividends . the amount of any future dividends will depend on economic and market conditions , our financial condition and operating results , and other factors , including contractual restrictions and applicable government regulations and policies ( such as those relating to the ability of bank and non-bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and regulatory capital limitations ) . the amount of our dividend is also currently subject to the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve and our primary bank regulators as part of the comprehensive capital analysis and review ( ccar ) process as described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . the federal reserve has the power to prohibit us from paying dividends without its approval . for further information concerning dividend restrictions and other factors that could limit our ability to pay dividends , as well as restrictions on loans , dividends or advances from bank subsidiaries to the parent company , see the supervision and regulation section in item 1 , item 1a risk factors , the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 , and note 10 borrowed funds , note 15 equity and note 18 regulatory matters in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report , which we include here by reference . we include here by reference the information regarding our compensation plans under which pnc equity securities are authorized for issuance as of december 31 , 2018 in the table ( with introductory paragraph and notes ) in item 12 of this report . our stock transfer agent and registrar is : computershare trust company , n.a . 250 royall street canton , ma 02021 800-982-7652 www.computershare.com/pnc registered shareholders may contact computershare regarding dividends and other shareholder services . we include here by reference the information that appears under the common stock performance graph caption at the end of this item 5 . ( a ) ( 2 ) none . ( b ) not applicable . ( c ) details of our repurchases of pnc common stock during the fourth quarter of 2018 are included in the following table : in thousands , except per share data 2018 period total shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b ) .
|2018 period|total shares purchased ( a )|average price paid per share|total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b )|maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b )|
|october 1 2013 31|1204|$ 128.43|1189|25663|
|november 1 2013 30|1491|$ 133.79|1491|24172|
|december 1 2013 31|3458|$ 119.43|3458|20714|
|total|6153|$ 124.67|||
( a ) includes pnc common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans generally related to forfeitures of unvested restricted stock awards and shares used to cover employee payroll tax withholding requirements . note 11 employee benefit plans and note 12 stock based compensation plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report include additional information regarding our employee benefit and equity compensation plans that use pnc common stock . ( b ) on march 11 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program authorization in the amount of 100 million shares of pnc common stock , effective april 1 , 2015 . repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the timing and exact amount of common stock repurchases will depend on a number of factors including , among others , market and general economic conditions , regulatory capital considerations , alternative uses of capital , the potential impact on our credit ratings , and contractual and regulatory limitations , including the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve as part of the ccar process . in june 2018 , we announced share repurchase programs of up to $ 2.0 billion for the four quarter period beginning with the third quarter of 2018 , including repurchases of up to $ 300 million related to stock issuances under employee benefit plans , in accordance with pnc's 2018 capital plan . in november 2018 , we announced an increase to these previously announced programs in the amount of up to $ 900 million in additional common share repurchases . the aggregate repurchase price of shares repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2018 was $ .8 billion . see the liquidity and capital management portion of the risk management section in item 7 of this report for more information on the authorized share repurchase programs for the period july 1 , 2018 through june 30 , 2019 . http://www.computershare.com/pnc .
Question: what total percentage of total shares were purchased in november and december?
Answer: | 80.43231 |
FINQA1743 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 . stock-based compensation ( continued ) same period was $ 1988000 lower , than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no . 25 . basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were both $ 0.02 lower than if the company had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no . 25 . prior to the adoption of sfas no . 123 ( r ) , the company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from share-based payment arrangements as operating cash flows in the statements of cash flows . sfas no . 123 ( r ) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those share awards ( excess tax benefits ) to be classified as financing cash flows . the excess tax benefit of $ 2885000 classified as a financing cash inflow for the year ended december 31 , 2006 would have been classified as an operating cash inflow if the company had not adopted sfas no . 123 ( r ) . as a result of adopting sfas no 123 ( r ) , unearned compensation previously recorded in stockholders 2019 equity was reclassified against additional paid in capital on january 1 , 2006 . all stock-based compensation expense not recognized as of december 31 , 2005 and compensation expense related to post 2005 grants of stock options and amortization of restricted stock will be recorded directly to additional paid in capital . compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock recognized in the statements of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was as follows : year ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) 2006 2005 2004 .
|( in thousands )|year ended december 31 , 2006|year ended december 31 , 2005|year ended december 31 , 2004|
|stock options|$ -3273 ( 3273 )|$ 2014|$ 2014|
|restricted stock|-2789 ( 2789 )|-1677 ( 1677 )|-663 ( 663 )|
|impact on income before income taxes|-6062 ( 6062 )|-1677 ( 1677 )|-663 ( 663 )|
|income tax benefit|2382|661|260|
|impact on net income|$ -3680 ( 3680 )|$ -1016 ( 1016 )|$ -403 ( 403 )|
.
Question: what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2004 and 2005?
Answer: | 613.0 |
FINQA1744 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations. .
|in millions|2016|2015|2014|
|weighted-average number of basic shares|95.8|95.9|96.1|
|shares issuable under incentive stock plans|1.1|1.0|1.1|
|weighted-average number of diluted shares|96.9|96.9|97.2|
at december 31 , 2016 , 0.6 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 21 2013 commitments and contingencies the company is involved in various litigations , claims and administrative proceedings , including those related to environmental and product warranty matters . amounts recorded for identified contingent liabilities are estimates , which are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect additional information when it becomes available . subject to the uncertainties inherent in estimating future costs for contingent liabilities , except as expressly set forth in this note , management believes that any liability which may result from these legal matters would not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition , results of operations , liquidity or cash flows of the company . environmental matters the company is dedicated to an environmental program to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process and to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , the company is currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . changes to the company's remediation programs may result in increased expenses and increased environmental reserves . the company is sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and has received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency and similar state authorities . it has also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( "prp" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , the company 2019s involvement is minimal . in estimating its liability , the company has assumed it will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . the company incurred $ 23.3 million , $ 4.4 million , and $ 2.9 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by the company . in the fourth-quarter of 2016 , with the collaboration and approval of state regulators , the company launched a proactive , alternative approach to remediate two sites in the united states . this approach will allow the company to more aggressively address environmental conditions at these sites and reduce the impact of potential changes in regulatory requirements . as a result , the company recorded a $ 15 million charge for environmental remediation in the fourth quarter . environmental remediation costs are recorded in costs of goods sold within the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the company has recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 30.6 million and $ 15.2 million . the total reserve at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 included $ 9.6 million and $ 2.8 million related to remediation of sites previously disposed by the company . environmental reserves are classified as accrued expenses and other current liabilities or other noncurrent liabilities based on their expected term . the company's total current environmental reserve at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 was $ 6.1 million and $ 3.7 million and the remainder is classified as noncurrent . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain . warranty liability standard product warranty accruals are recorded at the time of sale and are estimated based upon product warranty terms and historical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its liabilities and will make adjustments as necessary based on known or anticipated warranty claims , or as new information becomes available. .
Question: considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of stock options that were excluded from the computation due to its anti-dilutive effect?
Answer: | 0.00619 |
FINQA1745 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 8 , 2006 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 12.59 . holders there were approximately 114 holders of record of our common stock as of march 8 , 2006 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of -pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
||high|low|
|november 5 2004 to december 31 2004|$ 24.41|$ 12.75|
|january 1 2005 to march 31 2005|$ 15.95|$ 9.64|
|april 1 2005 to june 30 2005|$ 13.87|$ 9.83|
|july 1 2005 to september 30 2005|$ 14.09|$ 9.99|
|october 1 2005 to december 31 2005|$ 13.14|$ 10.64|
.
Question: what was the highest share price in the period october 1 2005 to december 31 2005?
Answer: | 13.14 |
FINQA1746 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2015 and 2014 was $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion . the aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency hedges at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 4.1 billion and $ 804 million . derivative instruments did not have a material impact on net earnings and comprehensive income during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . substantially all of our derivatives are designated for hedge accounting . see note 16 for more information on the fair value measurements related to our derivative instruments . recent accounting pronouncements 2013 in may 2014 , the fasb issued a new standard that will change the way we recognize revenue and significantly expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements . on july 9 , 2015 , the fasb approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of the standard to 2018 for public companies , with an option that would permit companies to adopt the standard in 2017 . early adoption prior to 2017 is not permitted . the new standard may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis whereby the new standard would be applied to new contracts and existing contracts with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date , with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recorded to beginning retained earnings at the effective date for existing contracts with remaining performance obligations . in addition , the fasb is contemplating making additional changes to certain elements of the new standard . we are currently evaluating the methods of adoption allowed by the new standard and the effect the standard is expected to have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures . as the new standard will supersede substantially all existing revenue guidance affecting us under gaap , it could impact revenue and cost recognition on thousands of contracts across all our business segments , in addition to our business processes and our information technology systems . as a result , our evaluation of the effect of the new standard will extend over future periods . in september 2015 , the fasb issued a new standard that simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the standard on january 1 , 2016 and will prospectively apply the standard to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued a new standard that simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . the standard is effective january 1 , 2017 , with early adoption permitted . the standard may be applied either prospectively from the date of adoption or retrospectively to all prior periods presented . we are currently evaluating when we will adopt the standard and the method of adoption . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2015|2014|2013|
|weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations|310.3|316.8|320.9|
|weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards|4.4|5.6|5.6|
|weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations|314.7|322.4|326.5|
we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . the computation of diluted earnings per common share excluded 2.4 million stock options for the year ended december 31 , 2013 because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive , primarily due to their exercise prices exceeding the average market prices of our common stock during the respective periods . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .
Question: what was the change in the percent of the weighted average common shares outstanding for diluted computations from 2014 to 2015
Answer: | -0.02388 |
FINQA1747 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) this property is owned by board of trade investment company ( botic ) . kcbt maintains a 51% ( 51 % ) controlling interest in botic . we also lease other office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 14 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 91 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities class a common stock our class a common stock is currently listed on nasdaq under the ticker symbol 201ccme . 201d as of february 13 , 2013 , there were approximately 3106 holders of record of our class a common stock . in may 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors declared a five-for-one split of its class a common stock effected by way of a stock dividend to its class a and class b shareholders . the stock split was effective july 20 , 2012 for all shareholders of record on july 10 , 2012 . as a result of the stock split , all amounts related to shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our class a common stock on a quarterly basis , as reported on nasdaq. .
|2012 first quarter|high $ 59.73|low $ 45.20|2011 first quarter|high $ 63.40|low $ 56.06|
|second quarter|58.24|50.70|second quarter|62.15|52.45|
|third quarter|59.35|49.83|third quarter|59.80|47.43|
|fourth quarter|57.89|50.12|fourth quarter|59.73|45.20|
class b common stock our class b common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded in an organized over- the-counter market . each class of our class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division of our cme exchange . cme 2019s rules provide exchange members with trading rights and the ability to use or lease these trading rights . each share of our class b common stock can be transferred only in connection with the transfer of the associated trading rights. .
Question: what is the maximum change in share price during the first quarter of 2012?
Answer: | 14.53 |
FINQA1748 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: strategy our mission is to achieve sustainable revenue and earnings growth through providing superior solutions to our customers . our strategy to achieve this has been and will continue to be built on the following pillars : 2022 expand client relationships 2014 the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-product purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can drive meaningful value and cost savings to our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and speed for our clients' customers . 2022 buy , build or partner to add solutions to cross-sell 2014 we continue to invest in growth through internal product development , as well as through product-focused or market-centric acquisitions that complement and extend our existing capabilities and provide us with additional solutions to cross-sell . we also partner from time to time with other entities to provide comprehensive offerings to our customers . by investing in solution innovation and integration , we continue to expand our value proposition to clients . 2022 support our clients through market transformation 2014 the changing market dynamics are transforming the way our clients operate , which is driving incremental demand for our leveraged solutions , consulting expertise , and services around intellectual property . our depth of services capabilities enables us to become involved earlier in the planning and design process to assist our clients as they manage through these changes . 2022 continually improve to drive margin expansion 2014 we strive to optimize our performance through investments in infrastructure enhancements and other measures that are designed to drive organic revenue growth and margin expansion . 2022 build global diversification 2014 we continue to deploy resources in emerging global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes the revenues by our reporting segments ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|fsg|$ 2246.4|$ 2076.8|$ 1890.8|
|psg|2380.6|2372.1|2354.2|
|isg|1180.5|1177.6|917.0|
|corporate & other|0.1|-0.9 ( 0.9 )|-16.4 ( 16.4 )|
|total consolidated revenues|$ 5807.6|$ 5625.6|$ 5145.6|
financial solutions group the focus of fsg is to provide the most comprehensive software and services for the core processing , customer channel , treasury services , cash management , wealth management and capital market operations of our financial institution customers in north america . we service the core and related ancillary processing needs of north american banks , credit unions , automotive financial companies , commercial lenders , and independent community and savings institutions . fis offers a broad selection of in-house and outsourced solutions to banking customers that span the range of asset sizes . fsg customers are typically committed under multi-year contracts that provide a stable , recurring revenue base and opportunities for cross-selling additional financial and payments offerings . we employ several business models to provide our solutions to our customers . we typically deliver the highest value to our customers when we combine our software applications and deliver them in one of several types of outsourcing arrangements , such as an application service provider , facilities management processing or an application management arrangement . we are also able to deliver individual applications through a software licensing arrangement . based upon our expertise gained through the foregoing arrangements , some clients also retain us to manage their it operations without using any of our proprietary software . our solutions in this segment include: .
Question: what percent of total consolidate revenue was the psg segment in 2012?
Answer: | 0.40991 |
FINQA1749 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements entergy new orleans securitization bonds - hurricane isaac in may 2015 the city council issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover entergy new orleans 2019s hurricane isaac storm restoration costs of $ 31.8 million , including carrying costs , the costs of funding and replenishing the storm recovery reserve in the amount of $ 63.9 million , and approximately $ 3 million of up-front financing costs associated with the securitization . in july 2015 , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding i , l.l.c. , a company wholly owned and consolidated by entergy new orleans , issued $ 98.7 million of storm cost recovery bonds . the bonds have a coupon of 2.67% ( 2.67 % ) and an expected maturity date of june 2024 . although the principal amount is not due until the date given above , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 11.4 million for 2016 , $ 10.6 million for 2017 , $ 11 million for 2018 , $ 11.2 million for 2019 , and $ 11.6 million for 2020 . with the proceeds , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding purchased from entergy new orleans the storm recovery property , which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the storm recovery property is reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated entergy new orleans balance sheet . the creditors of entergy new orleans do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy new orleans storm recovery funding , including the storm recovery property , and the creditors of entergy new orleans storm recovery funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy new orleans . entergy new orleans has no payment obligations to entergy new orleans storm recovery funding except to remit storm recovery charge collections . entergy texas securitization bonds - hurricane rita in april 2007 the puct issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover $ 353 million of entergy texas 2019s hurricane rita reconstruction costs and up to $ 6 million of transaction costs , offset by $ 32 million of related deferred income tax benefits . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , llc , a company that is now wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued $ 329.5 million of senior secured transition bonds ( securitization bonds ) as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|senior secured transition bonds series a:||
|tranche a-1 ( 5.51% ( 5.51 % ) ) due october 2013|$ 93500|
|tranche a-2 ( 5.79% ( 5.79 % ) ) due october 2018|121600|
|tranche a-3 ( 5.93% ( 5.93 % ) ) due june 2022|114400|
|total senior secured transition bonds|$ 329500|
although the principal amount of each tranche is not due until the dates given above , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 26 million for 2016 , $ 27.6 million for 2017 , $ 29.2 million for 2018 , $ 30.9 million for 2019 , and $ 32.8 million for 2020 . all of the scheduled principal payments for 2016 are for tranche a-2 , $ 23.6 million of the scheduled principal payments for 2017 are for tranche a-2 and $ 4 million of the scheduled principal payments for 2017 are for tranche a-3 . all of the scheduled principal payments for 2018-2020 are for tranche a-3 . with the proceeds , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the transition property is reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated entergy texas balance sheet . the creditors of entergy texas do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy gulf states reconstruction funding , including the transition property , and the creditors of entergy gulf states reconstruction funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy texas . entergy texas has no payment obligations to entergy gulf states reconstruction funding except to remit transition charge collections. .
Question: what is the principal payment in 2017 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?
Answer: | 0.08376 |
FINQA1750 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mondavi produces , markets and sells premium , super-premium and fine california wines under the woodbridge by robert mondavi , robert mondavi private selection and robert mondavi winery brand names . woodbridge and robert mondavi private selection are the leading premium and super-premium wine brands by volume , respectively , in the united states . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the pre- mium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of robert mondavi 2019s sales are generated in the united states . the company intends to leverage the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the company and robert mondavi have complementary busi- nesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the fine wine sector within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . in par- ticular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom , united states and other wine markets . total consid- eration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company expects to incur direct acquisition costs of $ 11.2 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the pur- chase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of robert mondavi , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi business are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition . the company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets and liabilities , and refining its restructuring plan which is under development and will be finalized during the company 2019s year ending february 28 , 2006 ( see note19 ) . accordingly , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement . estimated fair values at december 22 , 2004 , are as follows : {in thousands} .
|current assets|$ 494788|
|property plant and equipment|452902|
|other assets|178823|
|trademarks|186000|
|goodwill|590459|
|total assets acquired|1902972|
|current liabilities|309051|
|long-term liabilities|552060|
|total liabilities acquired|861111|
|net assets acquired|$ 1041861|
the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in connection with the robert mondavi acquisition and robert mondavi 2019s previously disclosed intention to sell certain of its winery properties and related assets , and other vineyard prop- erties , the company has classified certain assets as held for sale as of february 28 , 2005 . the company expects to sell these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 , for net pro- ceeds of approximately $ 150 million to $ 175 million . no gain or loss is expected to be recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisition of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in winer- ies and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s market- ing and sales operations in the united kingdom . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting purposes is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consider- ation . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 mil- lion ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million .
Question: what portion of the net asset acquired is related to goodwill?
Answer: | 0.56673 |
FINQA1751 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we include here by reference additional information relating to pnc common stock under the common stock prices/ dividends declared section in the statistical information ( unaudited ) section of item 8 of this report . we include here by reference the information regarding our compensation plans under which pnc equity securities are authorized for issuance as of december 31 , 2015 in the table ( with introductory paragraph and notes ) that appears under the caption 201capproval of 2016 incentive award plan 2013 item 3 201d in our proxy statement to be filed for the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders and is incorporated by reference herein and in item 12 of this report . our stock transfer agent and registrar is : computershare trust company , n.a . 250 royall street canton , ma 02021 800-982-7652 registered shareholders may contact the above phone number regarding dividends and other shareholder services . we include here by reference the information that appears under the common stock performance graph caption at the end of this item 5 . ( a ) ( 2 ) none . ( b ) not applicable . ( c ) details of our repurchases of pnc common stock during the fourth quarter of 2015 are included in the following table : in thousands , except per share data 2015 period total shares purchased ( a ) average paid per total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs ( b ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs ( b ) .
|2015 period|total sharespurchased ( a )|averagepricepaid pershare|total sharespurchased aspartofpubliclyannouncedprograms ( b )|maximumnumberofshares thatmay yet bepurchasedunder theprograms ( b )|
|october 1 2013 31|2528|$ 89.24|2506|85413|
|november 1 2013 30|1923|$ 94.06|1923|83490|
|december 1 2013 31|1379|$ 95.20|1379|82111|
|total|5830|$ 92.24|||
( a ) includes pnc common stock purchased in connection with our various employee benefit plans generally related to forfeitures of unvested restricted stock awards and shares used to cover employee payroll tax withholding requirements . note 12 employee benefit plans and note 13 stock based compensation plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report include additional information regarding our employee benefit and equity compensation plans that use pnc common stock . ( b ) on march 11 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors had approved the establishment of a new stock repurchase program authorization in the amount of 100 million shares of pnc common stock , effective april 1 , 2015 . repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions and the timing and exact amount of common stock repurchases will depend on a number of factors including , among others , market and general economic conditions , economic capital and regulatory capital considerations , alternative uses of capital , the potential impact on our credit ratings , and contractual and regulatory limitations , including the results of the supervisory assessment of capital adequacy and capital planning processes undertaken by the federal reserve as part of the ccar process . our 2015 capital plan , submitted as part of the ccar process and accepted by the federal reserve , included share repurchase programs of up to $ 2.875 billion for the five quarter period beginning with the second quarter of 2015 . this amount does not include share repurchases in connection with various employee benefit plans referenced in note ( a ) . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , in accordance with pnc 2019s 2015 capital plan and under the share repurchase authorization in effect during that period , we repurchased 5.8 million shares of common stock on the open market , with an average price of $ 92.26 per share and an aggregate repurchase price of $ .5 billion . 30 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: total shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs in the fourth quarter of 2015 totaled what?
Answer: | 5808.0 |
FINQA1752 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the principal components of eog's rollforward of valuation allowances for deferred tax assets were as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2016|2015|2014|
|beginning balance|$ 506127|$ 463018|$ 223599|
|increase ( 1 )|37221|146602|392729|
|decrease ( 2 )|-12667 ( 12667 )|-4315 ( 4315 )|-1424 ( 1424 )|
|other ( 3 )|-147460 ( 147460 )|-99178 ( 99178 )|-151886 ( 151886 )|
|ending balance|$ 383221|$ 506127|$ 463018|
( 1 ) increase in valuation allowance related to the generation of tax net operating losses and other deferred tax assets . ( 2 ) decrease in valuation allowance associated with adjustments to certain deferred tax assets and their related allowance . ( 3 ) represents dispositions/revisions/foreign exchange rate variances and the effect of statutory income tax rate changes . the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2016 , was $ 36 million , of which $ 2 million may potentially have an earnings impact . eog records interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits to its income tax provision . currently , $ 2 million of interest has been recognized in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income . eog does not anticipate that the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change during the next twelve months . eog and its subsidiaries file income tax returns and are subject to tax audits in the united states and various state , local and foreign jurisdictions . eog's earliest open tax years in its principal jurisdictions are as follows : united states federal ( 2011 ) , canada ( 2012 ) , united kingdom ( 2015 ) , trinidad ( 2010 ) and china ( 2008 ) . eog's foreign subsidiaries' undistributed earnings of approximately $ 2 billion at december 31 , 2016 , are no longer considered to be permanently reinvested outside the united states and , accordingly , eog has cumulatively recorded $ 280 million of united states federal , foreign and state deferred income taxes . eog changed its permanent reinvestment assertion in 2014 . in 2016 , eog's alternative minimum tax ( amt ) credits were reduced by $ 21 million mostly as a result of carry-back claims and certain elections . remaining amt credits of $ 758 million , resulting from amt paid in prior years , will be carried forward indefinitely until they are used to offset regular income taxes in future periods . the ability of eog to utilize these amt credit carryforwards to reduce federal income taxes may become subject to various limitations under the internal revenue code . such limitations may arise if certain ownership changes ( as defined for income tax purposes ) were to occur . as of december 31 , 2016 , eog had state income tax net operating losses ( nols ) being carried forward of approximately $ 1.6 billion , which , if unused , expire between 2017 and 2035 . during 2016 , eog's united kingdom subsidiary incurred a tax nol of approximately $ 38 million which , along with prior years' nols of $ 740 million , will be carried forward indefinitely . as described above , these nols have been evaluated for the likelihood of future utilization , and valuation allowances have been established for the portion of these deferred tax assets that do not meet the "more likely than not" threshold . 7 . employee benefit plans stock-based compensation during 2016 , eog maintained various stock-based compensation plans as discussed below . eog recognizes compensation expense on grants of stock options , sars , restricted stock and restricted stock units , performance units and performance stock , and grants made under the eog resources , inc . employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) . stock-based compensation expense is calculated based upon the grant date estimated fair value of the awards , net of forfeitures , based upon eog's historical employee turnover rate . compensation expense is amortized over the shorter of the vesting period or the period from date of grant until the date the employee becomes eligible to retire without company approval. .
Question: what is the lowest beginning balance observed during 2014-2016?
Answer: | 223599.0 |
FINQA1753 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents notes to consolidated financial statements of american airlines , inc . american files its tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates . american 2019s 2004 through 2013 tax years are still subject to examination by the internal revenue service . various state and foreign jurisdiction tax years remain open to examination and american is under examination , in administrative appeals , or engaged in tax litigation in certain jurisdictions . american believes that the effect of additional assessments will be immaterial to its consolidated financial statements . american has an unrecognized tax benefit of approximately $ 5 million , which did not change during the twelve months ended december 31 , 2014 . changes in the unrecognized tax benefit have no impact on the effective tax rate due to the existence of the valuation allowance . accrued interest on tax positions is recorded as a component of interest expense but was not significant at december 31 , 2014 . the reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefit are ( in millions ) : .
||2014|2013|
|unrecognized tax benefit at january 1|$ 5|$ 5|
|no activity|2014|2014|
|unrecognized tax benefit at december 31|$ 5|$ 5|
american estimates that the unrecognized tax benefit will be realized within the next twelve months . 8 . risk management and financial instruments american 2019s economic prospects are heavily dependent upon two variables it cannot control : the health of the economy and the price of fuel . due to the discretionary nature of business and leisure travel spending , airline industry revenues are heavily influenced by the condition of the u.s . economy and economies in other regions of the world . unfavorable conditions in these broader economies have resulted , and may result in the future , in decreased passenger demand for air travel and changes in booking practices , both of which in turn have had , and may have in the future , a strong negative effect on american 2019s revenues . in addition , during challenging economic times , actions by our competitors to increase their revenues can have an adverse impact on american 2019s revenues . american 2019s operating results are materially impacted by changes in the availability , price volatility and cost of aircraft fuel , which represents one of the largest single cost items in american 2019s business . because of the amount of fuel needed to operate american 2019s business , even a relatively small increase in the price of fuel can have a material adverse aggregate effect on american 2019s operating results and liquidity . jet fuel market prices have fluctuated substantially over the past several years and prices continued to be volatile in 2014 . these factors could impact american 2019s results of operations , financial performance and liquidity . ( a ) fuel price risk management during the second quarter of 2014 , american sold its portfolio of fuel hedging contracts that were scheduled to settle on or after june 30 , 2014 . american has not entered into any transactions to hedge its fuel consumption since december 9 , 2013 and , accordingly , as of december 31 , 2014 , american did not have any fuel hedging contracts outstanding . as such , and assuming american does not enter into any future transactions to hedge its fuel consumption , american will continue to be fully exposed to fluctuations in fuel prices . american 2019s current policy is not to enter into transactions to hedge its fuel consumption , although american reviews that policy from time to time based on market conditions and other factors. .
Question: what was the unrecognized tax benefit at december 31 , 2013?
Answer: | 5.0 |
FINQA1754 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: anticipated or possible short-term cash needs , prevailing interest rates , our investment policy and alternative investment choices . a majority of our cash and cash equivalents balance is invested in money market mutual funds that invest only in u.s . treasury securities or u.s . government agency securities . our exposure to risk is minimal given the nature of the investments . our practice is to have our pension plan 100% ( 100 % ) funded at each year end on a projected benefit obligation basis , while also satisfying any minimum required contribution and obtaining the maximum tax deduction . based on our actuarial projections , we estimate that a $ 14.1 million contribution in 2011 will allow us to meet our funding goal . however , the amount of the actual contribution is contingent on the actual rate of return on our plan assets during 2011 and the december 31 , 2011 discount rate . net current deferred tax assets of $ 18.3 million and $ 23.8 million are included in other current assets at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . total net current deferred tax assets include unrealized losses , stock- based compensation and accrued expenses . net long-term deferred tax liabilities were $ 7.8 billion and $ 7.6 billion at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . net deferred tax liabilities are principally the result of purchase accounting for intangible assets in our various mergers including cbot holdings and nymex holdings . we have a long-term deferred tax asset of $ 145.7 million included within our domestic long-term deferred tax liability . this deferred tax asset is for an unrealized capital loss incurred in brazil related to our investment in bm&fbovespa . as of december 31 , 2010 , we do not believe that we currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to fully realize the value of the unrealized capital loss . as a result , a partial valuation allowance of $ 64.4 million has been provided for the amount of the unrealized capital loss that exceeds potential capital gains that could be used to offset the capital loss in future periods . we also have a long-term deferred tax asset related to brazilian taxes of $ 125.3 million for an unrealized capital loss incurred in brazil related to our investment in bm&fbovespa . a full valuation allowance of $ 125.3 million has been provided because we do not believe that we currently meet the more-likely-than-not threshold that would allow us to realize the value of the unrealized capital loss in brazil in the future . valuation allowances of $ 49.4 million have also been provided for additional unrealized capital losses on various other investments . net long-term deferred tax assets also include a $ 19.3 million deferred tax asset for foreign net operating losses related to swapstream . our assessment at december 31 , 2010 was that we did not currently meet the more-likely- than-not threshold that would allow us to realize the value of acquired and accumulated foreign net operating losses in the future . as a result , the $ 19.3 million deferred tax assets arising from these net operating losses have been fully reserved . each clearing firm is required to deposit and maintain specified performance bond collateral . performance bond requirements are determined by parameters established by the risk management department of the clearing house and may fluctuate over time . we accept a variety of collateral to satisfy performance bond requirements . cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions are included in our consolidated balance sheets . clearing firm deposits , other than those retained in the form of cash , are not included in our consolidated balance sheets . the balances in cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions may fluctuate significantly over time . cash performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions consisted of the following at december 31: .
|( in millions )|2010|2009|
|cash performance bonds|$ 3717.0|$ 5834.6|
|cash guaranty fund contributions|231.8|102.6|
|cross-margin arrangements|79.7|10.6|
|performance collateral for delivery|10.0|34.1|
|total|$ 4038.5|$ 5981.9|
.
Question: what is the decrease of the cash perfomance bonds in the years of 2009 and 2010 in millions?
Answer: | -2117.6 |
FINQA1755 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s principal properties at october 28 , 2012 is set forth below : location type principal use square footage ownership santa clara , ca . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 1512000 150000 leased austin , tx . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing 1719000 145000 leased rehovot , israel . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 417000 leased alzenau , germany . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development and engineering 281000 leased kalispell , mt . . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 252000 owned cheseaux , switzerland . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 165000 leased treviso , italy . . . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 150000 leased singapore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 392000 leased gloucester , ma . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing ; research , development , engineering ; customer support 319000 135000 leased tainan , taiwan . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse manufacturing and customer support 320000 owned xi 2019an , china . . . . . . . . . . . . . office , plant & warehouse research , development and engineering 567000 owned hsinchu , taiwan . . . . . . . . . . office & warehouse customer support 93000 leased .
|location|type|principal use|squarefootage|ownership|
|santa clara ca|office plant & warehouse|headquarters ; marketing ; manufacturing ; distribution ; research developmentengineering ; customer support|1512000150000|ownedleased|
|austin tx|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing|1719000145000|ownedleased|
|rehovot israel|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support|4170005000|ownedleased|
|alzenau germany|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing ; researchdevelopment andengineering|281000|leased|
|kalispell mt|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support|252000|owned|
|cheseaux switzerland|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support|165000|leased|
|treviso italy|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support|150000|leased|
|singapore|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing andcustomer support|3920005000|ownedleased|
|gloucester ma|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing ; researchdevelopment engineering;customer support|319000135000|ownedleased|
|tainan taiwan|office plant & warehouse|manufacturing andcustomer support|320000|owned|
|xi 2019an china|office plant & warehouse|research development andengineering|567000|owned|
|hsinchu taiwan|office & warehouse|customer support|930006000|ownedleased|
|shanghai china|office & warehouse|customer support|105000|leased|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . products in the silicon systems group are manufactured in austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display segment are manufactured in santa clara , california ; alzenau , germany ; and tainan , taiwan . products in the energy and environmental solutions segment are primarily manufactured in alzenau , germany ; cheseaux , switzerland ; and treviso , italy . in addition to the above properties , applied leases office space for marketing , sales , engineering and customer support offices in 79 locations throughout the world : 17 in europe , 23 in japan , 16 in north america ( principally the united states ) , 7 in china , 7 in korea , 6 in southeast asia , and 3 in taiwan . applied also owns 112 acres of buildable land in texas that could accommodate approximately 1708000 square feet of additional building space , 12.5 acres in california that could accommodate approximately 400000 square feet of additional building space , 10.8 acres in massachusetts that could accommodate approximately 65000 square feet of additional building space and 10 acres in israel that could accommodate approximately 111000 square feet of additional building space . applied also leases 4 acres in italy that could accommodate approximately 180000 square feet of additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what is the total square footage of office & warehouse customer support 93000 leased in taiwan?
Answer: | 930326000.0 |
FINQA1756 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2014 , the company closed on thirteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $ 9 . assets acquired , principally plant , totaled $ 17 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 8 , including $ 5 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 2 . during 2013 , the company closed on fifteen acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate net purchase price of $ 24 . assets acquired , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 67 . liabilities assumed totaled $ 43 , including $ 26 of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $ 13 . included in these totals was the company 2019s november 14 , 2013 acquisition of all of the capital stock of dale service corporation ( 201cdale 201d ) , a regulated wastewater utility company , for a total cash purchase price of $ 5 ( net of cash acquired of $ 7 ) , plus assumed liabilities . the dale acquisition was accounted for as a business combination ; accordingly , operating results from november 14 , 2013 were included in the company 2019s results of operations . the purchase price was allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition . the company 2019s regulatory practice was followed whereby property , plant and equipment ( rate base ) was considered fair value for business combination purposes . similarly , regulatory assets and liabilities acquired were recorded at book value and are subject to regulatory approval where applicable . the acquired debt was valued in a manner consistent with the company 2019s level 3 debt . see note 17 2014fair value of financial instruments . non-cash assets acquired in the dale acquisition , primarily utility plant , totaled $ 41 ; liabilities assumed totaled $ 36 , including debt assumed of $ 13 and contributions of $ 19 . divestitures in november 2014 , the company completed the sale of terratec , previously included in the market-based businesses . after post-close adjustments , net proceeds from the sale totaled $ 1 , and the company recorded a pretax loss on sale of $ 1 . the following table summarizes the operating results of discontinued operations presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years ended december 31: .
||2014|2013|
|operating revenues|$ 13|$ 23|
|total operating expenses net|19|26|
|loss from discontinued operations before income taxes|-6 ( 6 )|-3 ( 3 )|
|provision ( benefit ) for income taxes|1|-1 ( 1 )|
|loss from discontinued operations net of tax|$ -7 ( 7 )|$ -2 ( 2 )|
the provision for income taxes of discontinued operations includes the recognition of tax expense related to the difference between the tax basis and book basis of assets upon the sales of terratec that resulted in taxable gains , since an election was made under section 338 ( h ) ( 10 ) of the internal revenue code to treat the sales as asset sales . there were no assets or liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014. .
Question: by how much did operating revenue decrease from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: | -0.43478 |
FINQA1757 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt .
|in billions|2018|
|january 1|$ 33.3|
|issuances|4.5|
|calls and maturities|-6.8 ( 6.8 )|
|other|-.1 ( .1 )|
|december 31|$ 30.9|
.
Question: assuming all matured securities were pledged as collateral , how much should we assume came from the calls?
Answer: | 1.9 |
FINQA1758 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries item 9 . changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure there were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the last two years . item 9a . controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report , an evaluation was carried out by goldman sachs 2019 management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( e ) under the exchange act ) . based upon that evaluation , our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report . in addition , no change in our internal control over financial reporting ( as defined in rule 13a-15 ( f ) under the exchange act ) occurred during the fourth quarter of our year ended december 31 , 2018 that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting . management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting and the report of independent registered public accounting firm are set forth in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 9b . other information not applicable . part iii item 10 . directors , executive officers and corporate governance information relating to our executive officers is included on page 20 of this form 10-k . information relating to our directors , including our audit committee and audit committee financial experts and the procedures by which shareholders can recommend director nominees , and our executive officers will be in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders , which will be filed within 120 days of the end of 2018 ( 2019 proxy statement ) and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . information relating to our code of business conduct and ethics , which applies to our senior financial officers , is included in 201cbusiness 2014 available information 201d in part i , item 1 of this form 10-k . item 11 . executive compensation information relating to our executive officer and director compensation and the compensation committee of the board will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters information relating to security ownership of certain beneficial owners of our common stock and information relating to the security ownership of our management will be in the 2019 proxy statement and is incorporated in this form 10-k by reference . the table below presents information as of december 31 , 2018 regarding securities to be issued pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units ( rsus ) and securities remaining available for issuance under our equity compensation plans that were in effect during 2018 . plan category securities to be issued exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a ) weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 17176475 n/a 68211649 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2013 2013 2013 .
|plan category|securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights ( a )|weighted average exercise price of outstanding options ( b )|securities available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders|17176475|n/a|68211649|
|equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders|2013|2013|2013|
|total|17176475||68211649|
in the table above : 2030 securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights includes 17176475 shares that may be issued pursuant to outstanding rsus . these awards are subject to vesting and other conditions to the extent set forth in the respective award agreements , and the underlying shares will be delivered net of any required tax withholding . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no outstanding options . 2030 shares underlying rsus are deliverable without the payment of any consideration , and therefore these awards have not been taken into account in calculating the weighted average exercise price . 196 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what portion of the securities approved by security holders remains available for future issuance?
Answer: | 0.79884 |
FINQA1759 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .
|( square feet in thousands )|united states|other countries|total|
|owned|3964|1652|5616|
|leased|845|1153|1998|
|total|4809|2805|7614|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what percentage of the company's property is located in other countries and it is owned by the company?
Answer: | 0.21697 |
FINQA1760 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk ( amounts in millions ) in the normal course of business , we are exposed to market risks related to interest rates , foreign currency rates and certain balance sheet items . from time to time , we use derivative instruments , pursuant to established guidelines and policies , to manage some portion of these risks . derivative instruments utilized in our hedging activities are viewed as risk management tools and are not used for trading or speculative purposes . interest rates our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the fair market value and cash flows of our debt obligations . the majority of our debt ( approximately 89% ( 89 % ) and 93% ( 93 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively ) bears interest at fixed rates . we do have debt with variable interest rates , but a 10% ( 10 % ) increase or decrease in interest rates would not be material to our interest expense or cash flows . the fair market value of our debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates , and the impact of a 10% ( 10 % ) change in interest rates is summarized below . increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value as of december 31 , 10% ( 10 % ) increase in interest rates 10% ( 10 % ) decrease in interest rates .
|as of december 31,|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) increasein interest rates|increase/ ( decrease ) in fair market value 10% ( 10 % ) decreasein interest rates|
|2013|$ -26.9 ( 26.9 )|$ 27.9|
|2012|-27.5 ( 27.5 )|28.4|
we have used interest rate swaps for risk management purposes to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates . we do not have any interest rate swaps outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we had $ 1642.1 of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities as of december 31 , 2013 that we generally invest in conservative , short-term bank deposits or securities . the interest income generated from these investments is subject to both domestic and foreign interest rate movements . during 2013 and 2012 , we had interest income of $ 24.7 and $ 29.5 , respectively . based on our 2013 results , a 100-basis-point increase or decrease in interest rates would affect our interest income by approximately $ 16.4 , assuming that all cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities are impacted in the same manner and balances remain constant from year-end 2013 levels . foreign currency rates we are subject to translation and transaction risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates . since we report revenues and expenses in u.s . dollars , changes in exchange rates may either positively or negatively affect our consolidated revenues and expenses ( as expressed in u.s . dollars ) from foreign operations . the primary foreign currencies that impacted our results during 2013 were the australian dollar , brazilian real , euro , japanese yen and the south african rand . based on 2013 exchange rates and operating results , if the u.s . dollar were to strengthen or weaken by 10% ( 10 % ) , we currently estimate operating income would decrease or increase between 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , assuming that all currencies are impacted in the same manner and our international revenue and expenses remain constant at 2013 levels . the functional currency of our foreign operations is generally their respective local currency . assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date , and revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period presented . the resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of tax , in the stockholders 2019 equity section of our consolidated balance sheets . our foreign subsidiaries generally collect revenues and pay expenses in their functional currency , mitigating transaction risk . however , certain subsidiaries may enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency . assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are susceptible to movements in foreign currency until final settlement . currency transaction gains or losses primarily arising from transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are included in office and general expenses . we have not entered into a material amount of foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of potential adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. .
Question: what is the growth rate of the interest income from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | -0.16271 |
FINQA1761 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: as described above , the borrowings are extended on a non-recourse basis . as such , there is no credit or market risk exposure to us on the assets , and as a result the terms of the amlf permit exclusion of the assets from regulatory leverage and risk-based capital calculations . the interest rate on the borrowings is set by the federal reserve bank , and we earn net interest revenue by earning a spread on the difference between the yield we earn on the assets and the rate we pay on the borrowings . for 2008 , we earned net interest revenue associated with this facility of approximately $ 68 million . separately , we currently maintain a commercial paper program under which we can issue up to $ 3 billion with original maturities of up to 270 days from the date of issue . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , $ 2.59 billion and $ 2.36 billion , respectively , of commercial paper were outstanding . in addition , state street bank currently has board authority to issue bank notes up to an aggregate of $ 5 billion , including up to $ 2.48 billion of senior notes under the fdic 2019s temporary liquidity guarantee program , instituted by the fdic in october 2008 for qualified senior debt issued through june 30 , 2009 , and up to $ 1 billion of subordinated bank notes ( see note 10 ) . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , no notes payable were outstanding , and at december 31 , 2008 , all $ 5 billion was available for issuance . state street bank currently maintains a line of credit of cad $ 800 million , or approximately $ 657 million , to support its canadian securities processing operations . the line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice . at december 31 , 2008 , no balance was due on this line of credit . note 9 . restructuring charges in december 2008 , we implemented a plan to reduce our expenses from operations and support our long- term growth . in connection with this plan , we recorded aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million in our consolidated statement of income . the primary component of the plan was an involuntary reduction of approximately 7% ( 7 % ) of our global workforce , which reduction we expect to be substantially completed by the end of the first quarter of 2009 . other components of the plan included costs related to lease and software license terminations , restructuring of agreements with technology providers and other costs . of the aggregate restructuring charges of $ 306 million , $ 243 million related to severance , a portion of which will be paid in a lump sum or over a defined period , and a portion of which will provide related benefits and outplacement services for approximately 2100 employees identified for involuntary termination in connection with the plan ; $ 49 million related to future lease obligations and write-offs of capitalized assets , including $ 23 million for impairment of other intangible assets ; $ 10 million of costs associated with information technology and $ 4 million of other restructuring costs . the severance component included $ 47 million related to accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation . in december 2008 , approximately 620 employees were involuntarily terminated and left state street . the following table presents the activity in the related balance sheet reserve for 2008 . ( in millions ) severance lease and write-offs information technology other total .
|( in millions )|severance|lease and asset write-offs|information technology|other|total|
|initial accrual|$ 250|$ 42|$ 10|$ 4|$ 306|
|payments and adjustments|-20 ( 20 )|-25 ( 25 )|-10 ( 10 )|-1 ( 1 )|-56 ( 56 )|
|balance at december 31 2008|$ 230|$ 17|2014|$ 3|$ 250|
.
Question: what portion of the balance of initial accrual is related to severances?
Answer: | 0.81699 |
FINQA1762 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: meet customer needs and put us in a position to handle demand changes . we will also continue utilizing industrial engineering techniques to improve productivity . 2022 fuel prices 2013 uncertainty about the economy makes fuel price projections difficult , and we could see volatile fuel prices during the year , as they are sensitive to global and u.s . domestic demand , refining capacity , geopolitical issues and events , weather conditions and other factors . to reduce the impact of fuel price on earnings , we will continue to seek recovery from our customers through our fuel surcharge programs and to expand our fuel conservation efforts . 2022 capital plan 2013 in 2010 , we plan to make total capital investments of approximately $ 2.5 billion , including expenditures for ptc , which may be revised if business conditions or new laws or regulations affect our ability to generate sufficient returns on these investments . see further discussion in this item 7 under liquidity and capital resources 2013 capital plan . 2022 positive train control ( ptc ) 2013 in response to a legislative mandate to implement ptc by the end of 2015 , we expect to spend approximately $ 200 million during 2010 on the development of ptc . we currently estimate that ptc will cost us approximately $ 1.4 billion to implement by the end of 2015 , in accordance with rules issued by the fra . this includes costs for installing the new system along our tracks , upgrading locomotives to work with the new system , and adding digital data communication equipment so all the parts of the system can communicate with each other . 2022 financial expectations 2013 we remain cautious about economic conditions but expect volume to increase from 2009 levels . in addition , we anticipate continued pricing opportunities and further productivity improvements . results of operations operating revenues millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 % ( % ) change 2008 v 2007 .
|millions of dollars|2009|2008|2007|% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008|% ( % ) change 2008 v 2007|
|freight revenues|$ 13373|$ 17118|$ 15486|( 22 ) % ( % )|11% ( 11 % )|
|other revenues|770|852|797|-10 ( 10 )|7|
|total|$ 14143|$ 17970|$ 16283|( 21 ) % ( % )|10% ( 10 % )|
freight revenues are revenues generated by transporting freight or other materials from our six commodity groups . freight revenues vary with volume ( carloads ) and average revenue per car ( arc ) . changes in price , traffic mix and fuel surcharges drive arc . we provide some of our customers with contractual incentives for meeting or exceeding specified cumulative volumes or shipping to and from specific locations , which we record as a reduction to freight revenues based on the actual or projected future shipments . we recognize freight revenues on a percentage-of-completion basis as freight moves from origin to destination . we allocate freight revenues between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each reporting period and recognize expenses as we incur them . other revenues include revenues earned by our subsidiaries , revenues from our commuter rail operations , and accessorial revenues , which we earn when customers retain equipment owned or controlled by us or when we perform additional services such as switching or storage . we recognize other revenues as we perform services or meet contractual obligations . freight revenues and volume levels for all six commodity groups decreased during 2009 , reflecting continued economic weakness . we experienced the largest volume declines in automotive and industrial .
Question: how much of the 2010 capital expenditures are devoted to expenditures for ptc?
Answer: | 0.08 |
FINQA1763 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: proved reserves can be added as expansions are permitted , funding is approved and certain stipulations of the joint venture agreement are satisfied . the following table sets forth changes in estimated quantities of net proved bitumen reserves for the year 2008 . estimated quantities of proved bitumen reserves ( millions of barrels ) 2008 .
|( millions of barrels )|2008|
|beginning of year|421|
|revisions ( a )|-30 ( 30 )|
|extensions discoveries and additions|6|
|production|-9 ( 9 )|
|end of year|388|
( a ) revisions were driven primarily by price and the impact of the new royalty regime discussed below . the above estimated quantity of net proved bitumen reserves is a forward-looking statement and is based on a number of assumptions , including ( among others ) commodity prices , volumes in-place , presently known physical data , recoverability of bitumen , industry economic conditions , levels of cash flow from operations , and other operating considerations . to the extent these assumptions prove inaccurate , actual recoveries could be different than current estimates . for a discussion of the proved bitumen reserves estimation process , see item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 critical accounting estimates 2013 estimated net recoverable reserve quantities 2013 proved bitumen reserves . operations at the aosp are not within the scope of statement of financial accounting standards ( 201csfas 201d ) no . 25 , 201csuspension of certain accounting requirements for oil and gas producing companies ( an amendment of financial accounting standards board ( 201cfasb 201d ) statement no . 19 ) , 201d sfas no . 69 , 201cdisclosures about oil and gas producing activities ( an amendment of fasb statements 19 , 25 , 33 and 39 ) , 201d and securities and exchange commission ( 201csec 201d ) rule 4-10 of regulation s-x ; therefore , bitumen production and reserves are not included in our supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities . the sec has recently issued a release amending these disclosure requirements effective for annual reports on form 10-k for fiscal years ending on or after december 31 , 2009 , see item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 accounting standards not yet adopted for additional information . prior to our acquisition of western , the first fully-integrated expansion of the existing aosp facilities was approved in 2006 . expansion 1 , which includes construction of mining and extraction facilities at the jackpine mine , expansion of treatment facilities at the existing muskeg river mine , expansion of the scotford upgrader and development of related infrastructure , is anticipated to begin operations in late 2010 or 2011 . when expansion 1 is complete , we will have more than 50000 bpd of net production and upgrading capacity in the canadian oil sands . the timing and scope of future expansions and debottlenecking opportunities on existing operations remain under review . during 2008 , the alberta government accepted the project 2019s application to have a portion of the expansion 1 capital costs form part of the muskeg river mine 2019s allowable cost recovery pool . due to commodity price declines in the year , royalties for 2008 were one percent of the gross mine revenue . commencing january 1 , 2009 , the alberta royalty regime has been amended such that royalty rates will be based on the canadian dollar ( 201ccad 201d ) equivalent monthly average west texas intermediate ( 201cwti 201d ) price . royalty rates will rise from a minimum of one percent to a maximum of nine percent under the gross revenue method and from a minimum of 25 percent to a maximum of 40 percent under the net revenue method . under both methods , the minimum royalty is based on a wti price of $ 55.00 cad per barrel and below while the maximum royalty is reached at a wti price of $ 120.00 cad per barrel and above , with a linear increase in royalty between the aforementioned prices . the above discussion of the oil sands mining segment includes forward-looking statements concerning the anticipated completion of aosp expansion 1 . factors which could affect the expansion project include transportation logistics , availability of materials and labor , unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions , delays in obtaining or conditions imposed by necessary government and third-party approvals and other risks customarily associated with construction projects . refining , marketing and transportation refining we own and operate seven refineries in the gulf coast , midwest and upper great plains regions of the united states with an aggregate refining capacity of 1.016 million barrels per day ( 201cmmbpd 201d ) of crude oil . during 2008 .
Question: by how much did proved bitumen reserves decrease during 2008?
Answer: | -0.07838 |
FINQA1764 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 19 . subsequent events 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes and warrants offering 2014in january 2003 , the company issued 808000 units , each consisting of ( 1 ) $ 1000 principal amount at maturity of the 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) senior subordinated discount notes due 2008 of a wholly owned subsidiary of the company ( ati notes ) and ( 2 ) a warrant to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock of the company , for gross proceeds of $ 420.0 million . the gross offering proceeds were allocated between the ati notes ( $ 367.4 million ) and the fair value of the warrants ( $ 52.6 million ) . net proceeds from the offering aggregated approximately $ 397.0 million and were or will be used for the purposes described below under amended and restated loan agreement . the ati notes accrue no cash interest . instead , the accreted value of each ati note will increase between the date of original issuance and maturity ( august 1 , 2008 ) at a rate of 12.25% ( 12.25 % ) per annum . the 808000 warrants that were issued together with the ati notes each represent the right to purchase 14.0953 shares of class a common stock at $ 0.01 per share . the warrants are exercisable at any time on or after january 29 , 2006 and will expire on august 1 , 2008 . as of the issuance date , the warrants represented approximately 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) of the company 2019s outstanding common stock ( assuming exercise of all warrants ) . the indenture governing the ati notes contains covenants that , among other things , limit the ability of the issuer subsidiary and its guarantors to incur or guarantee additional indebtedness , create liens , pay dividends or make other equity distributions , enter into agreements restricting the restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability to pay dividends , purchase or redeem capital stock , make investments and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies . the ati notes rank junior in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness , including all indebtedness outstanding under the credit facilities , and are structurally senior in right of payment to all existing and future indebtedness of the company . amended and restated loan agreement 2014on february 21 , 2003 , the company completed an amendment to its credit facilities . the amendment provides for the following : 2022 prepayment of a portion of outstanding term loans . the company agreed to prepay an aggregate of $ 200.0 million of the term loans outstanding under the credit facilities from a portion of the net proceeds of the ati notes offering completed in january 2003 . this prepayment consisted of a $ 125.0 million prepayment of the term loan a and a $ 75.0 million prepayment of the term loan b , each to be applied to reduce future scheduled principal payments . giving effect to the prepayment of $ 200.0 million of term loans under the credit facility and the issuance of the ati notes as discussed above as well as the paydown of debt from net proceeds of the sale of mtn ( $ 24.5 million in february 2003 ) , the company 2019s aggregate principal payments of long- term debt , including capital leases , for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2003|$ 268496|
|2004|131262|
|2005|195082|
|2006|538479|
|2007|1065437|
|thereafter|1408783|
|total|$ 3607539|
.
Question: what is the total expected payments for principal of long- term debt , including capital leases in the next 24 months?
Answer: | 399758.0 |
FINQA1765 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements as of december 31 , 2010 , total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2007 plan was $ 57.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately two years . employee stock purchase plan 2014the company maintains an employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) for all eligible employees . under the espp , shares of the company 2019s common stock may be purchased during bi-annual offering periods at 85% ( 85 % ) of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each offering period . employees may purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% ( 15 % ) of their gross compensation during an offering period and may not purchase more than $ 25000 worth of stock in a calendar year ( based on market values at the beginning of each offering period ) . the offering periods run from june 1 through november 30 and from december 1 through may 31 of each year . during the 2010 , 2009 and 2008 offering periods employees purchased 75354 , 77509 and 55764 shares , respectively , at weighted average prices per share of $ 34.16 , $ 23.91 and $ 30.08 , respectively . the fair value of the espp offerings is estimated on the offering period commencement date using a black-scholes pricing model with the expense recognized over the expected life , which is the six month offering period over which employees accumulate payroll deductions to purchase the company 2019s common stock . the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 9.43 , $ 6.65 and $ 7.89 , respectively . at december 31 , 2010 , 8.7 million shares remain reserved for future issuance under the plan . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model for the years ended december 31 , are as follows: .
||2010|2009|2008|
|range of risk-free interest rate|0.22% ( 0.22 % ) - 0.23% ( 0.23 % )|0.29% ( 0.29 % ) - 0.44% ( 0.44 % )|1.99% ( 1.99 % ) - 3.28% ( 3.28 % )|
|weighted average risk-free interest rate|0.22% ( 0.22 % )|0.38% ( 0.38 % )|2.58% ( 2.58 % )|
|expected life of shares|6 months|6 months|6 months|
|range of expected volatility of underlying stock price|35.26% ( 35.26 % ) - 35.27% ( 35.27 % )|35.31% ( 35.31 % ) - 36.63% ( 36.63 % )|27.85% ( 27.85 % ) - 28.51% ( 28.51 % )|
|weighted average expected volatility of underlying stock price|35.26% ( 35.26 % )|35.83% ( 35.83 % )|28.51% ( 28.51 % )|
|expected annual dividends|n/a|n/a|n/a|
13 . stockholders 2019 equity warrants 2014in august 2005 , the company completed its merger with spectrasite , inc . and assumed outstanding warrants to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock . as of the merger completion date , each warrant was exercisable for two shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock at an exercise price of $ 32 per warrant . upon completion of the merger , each warrant to purchase shares of spectrasite , inc . common stock automatically converted into a warrant to purchase shares of the company 2019s common stock , such that upon exercise of each warrant , the holder has a right to receive 3.575 shares of the company 2019s common stock in lieu of each share of spectrasite , inc . common stock that would have been receivable under each assumed warrant prior to the merger . upon completion of the company 2019s merger with spectrasite , inc. , these warrants were exercisable for approximately 6.8 million shares of common stock . of these warrants , warrants to purchase approximately none and 1.7 million shares of common stock remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . these warrants expired on february 10 , 2010 . stock repurchase program 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2010 , the company repurchased an aggregate of approximately 9.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate of $ 420.8 million , including commissions and fees , of which $ 418.6 million was paid in cash prior to december 31 , 2010 and $ 2.2 million was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2010 , pursuant to its publicly announced stock repurchase program , as described below. .
Question: what was the percentage change in the weighted average fair value for the espp shares purchased from 2009 to 2010
Answer: | 0.41805 |
FINQA1766 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2017|2016|
|balance beginning of year|$ 94417|$ 10258|
|goodwill acquired as part of acquisition|2014|84159|
|working capital settlement|-1225 ( 1225 )|2014|
|impairment loss|2014|2014|
|balance end of year|$ 93192|$ 94417|
goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment . goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate . the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value . an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified . the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit . in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach . under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon . with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable . we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .
Question: what percent of the 2017 end goodwill balance is the goodwill from the acquisition?
Answer: | 0.89135 |
FINQA1767 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis interest expense was $ 17 million less in 2004 than in 2003 reflecting the year over year reduction in debt of $ 316 million . other charges declined $ 30 million in 2004 due to a combination of lower environmental remediation , legal and workers compensation expenses and the absence of certain 2003 charges . other earnings were $ 28 million higher in 2004 due primarily to higher earnings from our equity affiliates . the effective tax rate for 2004 was 30.29% ( 30.29 % ) compared to 34.76% ( 34.76 % ) for the full year 2003 . the reduction in the rate for 2004 reflects the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act not being subject to tax , the continued improvement in the geographical mix of non- u.s . earnings and the favorable resolution during 2004 of matters related to two open u.s . federal income tax years . net income in 2004 totaled $ 683 million , an increase of $ 189 million over 2003 , and earnings per share 2013 diluted increased $ 1.06 to $ 3.95 per share . results of business segments net sales operating income ( millions ) 2004 2003 2004 2003 ( 1 ) coatings $ 5275 $ 4835 $ 777 $ 719 .
|( millions )|net sales 2004|net sales 2003|net sales 2004|2003 ( 1 )|
|coatings|$ 5275|$ 4835|$ 777|$ 719|
|glass|2204|2150|169|71|
|chemicals|2034|1771|291|228|
chemicals 2034 1771 291 228 ( 1 ) operating income by segment for 2003 has been revised to reflect a change in the allocation method for certain pension and other postretirement benefit costs in 2004 ( see note 22 , 201cbusiness segment information 201d , under item 8 of this form 10-k ) . coatings sales increased $ 440 million or 9% ( 9 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes across all our coatings businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . sales declined 1% ( 1 % ) due to lower selling prices , principally in our automotive business . operating income increased $ 58 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher sales volume ( $ 135 million ) and the favorable effects of currency translation described above and improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 20 million . factors decreasing operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 82 million and lower selling prices . glass sales increased $ 54 million or 3% ( 3 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 6% ( 6 % ) from improved volumes primarily from our performance glazings ( flat glass ) , fiber glass , and automotive original equipment businesses net of lower volumes in our automotive replacement glass business . sales also increased 2% ( 2 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european fiber glass operations . sales declined 5% ( 5 % ) due to lower selling prices across all our glass businesses . operating income in 2004 increased $ 98 million . factors increasing operating income were improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 110 million , higher sales volume ( $ 53 million ) described above , higher equity earnings and the gains on the sale/leaseback of precious metals of $ 19 million . the principal factor decreasing operating income was lower selling prices . fiber glass volumes were up 15% ( 15 % ) for the year , although pricing declined . with the shift of electronic printed wiring board production to asia and the volume and pricing gains there , equity earnings from our joint venture serving that region grew in 2004 . these factors combined with focused cost reductions and manufacturing efficiencies to improve the operating performance of this business , as we continue to position it for future growth in profitability . chemicals sales increased $ 263 million or 15% ( 15 % ) in 2004 . sales increased 10% ( 10 % ) from improved volumes in our commodity and specialty businesses and 4% ( 4 % ) due to higher selling prices for our commodity products . sales also increased 1% ( 1 % ) due to the positive effects of foreign currency translation , primarily from our european operations . operating income increased $ 63 million in 2004 . factors increasing operating income were the higher selling prices for our commodity products and the higher sales volume ( $ 73 million ) described above , improved manufacturing efficiencies of $ 25 million and lower environmental expenses . factors decreasing 2004 operating income were inflationary cost increases of $ 40 million and higher energy costs of $ 79 million . other significant factors the company 2019s pension and other postretirement benefit costs for 2004 were $ 45 million lower than in 2003 . this decrease reflects the market driven growth in pension plan assets that occurred in 2003 , the impact of the $ 140 million in cash contributed to the pension plans by the company in 2004 and the benefit of the subsidy offered pursuant to the medicare act , as discussed in note 12 , 201cpension and other postretirement benefits , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k . commitments and contingent liabilities , including environmental matters ppg is involved in a number of lawsuits and claims , both actual and potential , including some that it has asserted against others , in which substantial monetary damages are sought . see item 3 , 201clegal proceedings 201d of this form 10-k and note 13 , 201ccommitments and contingent liabilities , 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for a description of certain of these lawsuits , including a description of the proposed ppg settlement arrangement for asbestos claims announced on may 14 , 2002 . as discussed in item 3 and note 13 , although the result of any future litigation of such lawsuits and claims is inherently unpredictable , management believes that , in the aggregate , the outcome of all lawsuits and claims involving ppg , including asbestos-related claims in the event the ppg settlement arrangement described in note 13 does not become effective , will not have a material effect on ppg 2019s consolidated financial position or liquidity ; however , any such outcome may be material to the results of operations of any particular period in which costs , if any , are recognized . the company has been named as a defendant , along with various other co-defendants , in a number of antitrust lawsuits filed in federal and state courts . these suits allege that ppg acted with competitors to fix prices and allocate markets in the flat glass and automotive refinish industries . 22 2005 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what would 2004 sales have been in the glass segment without the positive effects of foreign currency translation , in millions?
Answer: | 2107.0 |
FINQA1768 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 13 , $ 19 and $ 20 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 19.0 million , $ 4.2 million and $ 15.6 million , respectively . in 2012 , the company granted 931340 shares of restricted class a common stock and 4048 shares of restricted stock units . restricted common stock and restricted stock units generally have a vesting period of 2 to 4 years . the fair value related to these grants was $ 54.5 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . in 2012 , the company also granted 138410 performance shares . the fair value related to these grants was $ 7.7 million , which is recognized as compensation expense on an accelerated and straight-lined basis over the vesting period . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated performance or market conditions . the following table summarizes restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares activity for 2012 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value outstanding at december 31 , 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1432610 $ 57 .
||number of shares|weightedaveragegrant datefair value|
|outstanding at december 31 2011|1432610|$ 57|
|granted|1073798|54|
|vested|-366388 ( 366388 )|55|
|cancelled|-226493 ( 226493 )|63|
|outstanding at december 31 2012|1913527|54|
outstanding at december 31 , 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1913527 54 the total fair value of restricted stock , restricted stock units , and performance shares that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , was $ 20.9 million , $ 11.6 million and $ 10.3 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq global select market . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , a total of 27768 , 32085 and 21855 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million , $ 0.2 million and $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 40260 , 40585 and 37350 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.2 million , $ 2.1 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . 19 . fair value measurements in general , the company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine the fair value of marketable securities and equity investments . level 1 assets generally include u.s . treasury securities , equity securities listed in active markets , and investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices . if quoted prices are not available to determine fair value , the company uses other inputs that are directly observable . assets included in level 2 generally consist of asset- backed securities , municipal bonds , u.s . government agency securities and interest rate swap contracts . asset-backed securities , municipal bonds and u.s . government agency securities were measured at fair value based on matrix pricing using prices of similar securities with similar inputs such as maturity dates , interest rates and credit ratings . the company determined the fair value of its interest rate swap contracts using standard valuation models with market-based observable inputs including forward and spot exchange rates and interest rate curves. .
Question: what is the total value of cancelled shares , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: | 14.26906 |
FINQA1769 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: foodservice sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales margins were higher reflecting the realization of sales price increases for the pass-through of earlier cost increases . raw material costs for board and resins were lower . operating costs and distribution costs were both higher . the u.s . shorewood business was sold december 31 , 2011 and the non-u.s . business was sold in january looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , coated paperboard sales volumes are expected to increase slightly from the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to be slightly lower , but margins should benefit from a more favorable product mix . input costs are expected to be higher for energy and wood . no planned main- tenance outages are scheduled in the first quarter . in january 2013 the company announced the perma- nent shutdown of a coated paperboard machine at the augusta mill with an annual capacity of 140000 tons . foodservice sales volumes are expected to increase . average sales margins are expected to decrease due to the realization of sales price decreases effective with our january contract open- ers . input costs for board and resin are expected to be lower and operating costs are also expected to decrease . european consumer packaging net sales in 2012 were $ 380 million compared with $ 375 million in 2011 and $ 345 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 99 million compared with $ 93 million in 2011 and $ 76 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 . average sales price realizations were higher in russian markets , but were lower in european markets . input costs decreased , primarily for wood , and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower in 2012 than in 2011 . looking forward to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to decrease in both europe and russia . average sales price realizations are expected to be higher in russia , but be more than offset by decreases in europe . input costs are expected to increase for wood and chemicals . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . asian consumer packaging net sales were $ 830 million in 2012 compared with $ 855 million in 2011 and $ 705 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 4 million compared with $ 35 million in 2011 and $ 34 million in 2010 . sales volumes increased in 2012 compared with 2011 partially due to the start-up of a new coated paperboard machine . average sales price realizations were significantly lower , but were partially offset by lower input costs for purchased pulp . start-up costs for a new coated paperboard machine adversely impacted operating profits in 2012 . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly . average sales price realizations for folding carton board and bristols board are expected to be lower reflecting increased competitive pressures and seasonally weaker market demand . input costs should be higher for pulp and chemicals . however , costs related to the ramp-up of the new coated paperboard machine should be lower . distribution xpedx , our distribution business , is one of north america 2019s leading business-to-business distributors to manufacturers , facility managers and printers , providing customized solutions that are designed to improve efficiency , reduce costs and deliver results . customer demand is generally sensitive to changes in economic conditions and consumer behavior , along with segment specific activity including corpo- rate advertising and promotional spending , government spending and domestic manufacturing activity . distribution 2019s margins are relatively stable across an economic cycle . providing customers with the best choice for value in both products and supply chain services is a key competitive factor . addition- ally , efficient customer service , cost-effective logis- tics and focused working capital management are key factors in this segment 2019s profitability . distribution .
|in millions|2012|2011|2010|
|sales|$ 6040|$ 6630|$ 6735|
|operating profit|22|34|78|
distr ibut ion 2019s 2012 annual sales decreased 9% ( 9 % ) from 2011 , and decreased 10% ( 10 % ) from 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 22 million ( $ 71 million exclud- ing reorganization costs ) compared with $ 34 million ( $ 86 million excluding reorganization costs ) in 2011 and $ 78 million in 2010 . annual sales of printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment totaled $ 3.5 billion in 2012 compared with $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , reflecting declining demand and the exiting of unprofitable businesses . trade margins as a percent of sales for printing papers were relatively even with both 2011 and 2010 . revenue from packaging prod- ucts was flat at $ 1.6 billion in both 2012 and 2011 and up slightly compared to $ 1.5 billion in 2010 . pack- aging margins increased in 2012 from both 2011 and 2010 , reflecting the successful execution of strategic sourcing initiatives . facility supplies annual revenue was $ 0.9 billion in 2012 , down compared to $ 1.0 bil- lion in 2011 and 2010 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 49 million of reorganization costs for severance , professional services and asset write-downs compared with $ 52 .
Question: what percent of distribution sales where attributable to printing papers and graphic arts supplies and equipment in 2012?
Answer: | 0.57947 |
FINQA1770 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: equity compensation plan information the plan documents for the plans described in the footnotes below are included as exhibits to this form 10-k , and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety . the following table provides information as of dec . 31 , 2006 regarding the number of shares of ppg common stock that may be issued under ppg 2019s equity compensation plans . plan category securities exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 ) 9413216 $ 58.35 10265556 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) , ( 3 ) 2089300 $ 70.00 2014 .
|plan category|numberof securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )|weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b )|number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )|
|equity compensation plans approved by security holders ( 1 )|9413216|$ 58.35|10265556|
|equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) ( 3 )|2089300|$ 70.00|2014|
|total|11502516|$ 60.57|10265556|
( 1 ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders include the ppg industries , inc . stock plan , the ppg omnibus plan , the ppg industries , inc . executive officers 2019 long term incentive plan , and the ppg industries inc . long term incentive plan . ( 2 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders include the ppg industries , inc . challenge 2000 stock plan . this plan is a broad- based stock option plan under which the company granted to substantially all active employees of the company and its majority owned subsidiaries on july 1 , 1998 , the option to purchase 100 shares of the company 2019s common stock at its then fair market value of $ 70.00 per share . options became exercisable on july 1 , 2003 , and expire on june 30 , 2008 . there were 2089300 shares issuable upon exercise of options outstanding under this plan as of dec . 31 , 2006 . ( 3 ) excluded from the information presented here are common stock equivalents held under the ppg industries , inc . deferred compensation plan , the ppg industries , inc . deferred compensation plan for directors and the ppg industries , inc . directors 2019 common stock plan , none of which are equity compensation plans . as supplemental information , there were 491168 common stock equivalents held under such plans as of dec . 31 , 2006 . item 6 . selected financial data the information required by item 6 regarding the selected financial data for the five years ended dec . 31 , 2006 is included in exhibit 99.2 filed with this form 10-k and is incorporated herein by reference . this information is also reported in the eleven-year digest on page 72 of the annual report under the captions net sales , income ( loss ) before accounting changes , cumulative effect of accounting changes , net income ( loss ) , earnings ( loss ) per common share before accounting changes , cumulative effect of accounting changes on earnings ( loss ) per common share , earnings ( loss ) per common share , earnings ( loss ) per common share 2013 assuming dilution , dividends per share , total assets and long-term debt for the years 2002 through 2006 . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations performance in 2006 compared with 2005 performance overview our sales increased 8% ( 8 % ) to $ 11.0 billion in 2006 compared to $ 10.2 billion in 2005 . sales increased 4% ( 4 % ) due to the impact of acquisitions , 2% ( 2 % ) due to increased volumes , and 2% ( 2 % ) due to increased selling prices . cost of sales as a percentage of sales increased slightly to 63.7% ( 63.7 % ) compared to 63.5% ( 63.5 % ) in 2005 . selling , general and administrative expense increased slightly as a percentage of sales to 17.9% ( 17.9 % ) compared to 17.4% ( 17.4 % ) in 2005 . these costs increased primarily due to higher expenses related to store expansions in our architectural coatings operating segment and increased advertising to promote growth in our optical products operating segment . other charges decreased $ 81 million in 2006 . other charges in 2006 included pretax charges of $ 185 million for estimated environmental remediation costs at sites in new jersey and $ 42 million for legal settlements offset in part by pretax earnings of $ 44 million for insurance recoveries related to the marvin legal settlement and to hurricane rita . other charges in 2005 included pretax charges of $ 132 million related to the marvin legal settlement net of related insurance recoveries of $ 18 million , $ 61 million for the federal glass class action antitrust legal settlement , $ 34 million of direct costs related to the impact of hurricanes rita and katrina , $ 27 million for an asset impairment charge in our fine chemicals operating segment and $ 19 million for debt refinancing costs . other earnings increased $ 30 million in 2006 due to higher equity earnings , primarily from our asian fiber glass joint ventures , and higher royalty income . net income and earnings per share 2013 assuming dilution for 2006 were $ 711 million and $ 4.27 , respectively , compared to $ 596 million and $ 3.49 , respectively , for 2005 . net income in 2006 included aftertax charges of $ 106 million , or 64 cents a share , for estimated environmental remediation costs at sites in new jersey and louisiana in the third quarter ; $ 26 million , or 15 cents a share , for legal settlements ; $ 23 million , or 14 cents a share for business restructuring ; $ 17 million , or 10 cents a share , to reflect the net increase in the current value of the company 2019s obligation relating to asbestos claims under the ppg settlement arrangement ; and aftertax earnings of $ 24 million , or 14 cents a share for insurance recoveries . net income in 2005 included aftertax charges of $ 117 million , or 68 cents a share for legal settlements net of insurance ; $ 21 million , or 12 cents a share for direct costs related to the impact of hurricanes katrina and rita ; $ 17 million , or 10 cents a share , related to an asset impairment charge related to our fine chemicals operating segment ; $ 12 million , or 7 cents a share , for debt refinancing cost ; and $ 13 million , or 8 cents a share , to reflect the net increase in the current 2006 ppg annual report and form 10-k 19 4282_txt to be issued options , number of .
Question: if all of the unexercised shares under the challenge 2000 stock plan were exercised , what would the increase in shareholders equity be?
Answer: | 146251000.0 |
FINQA1771 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: special purpose entity ( 201cspe 201d ) . the spe obtained a term loan and revolving loan commitment from a third party lender , secured by liens on the assets of the spe , to finance the purchase of the accounts receivable , which included a $ 275 million term loan and a $ 25 million revolving loan commitment . the revolving loan commitment may be increased by an additional $ 35 million as amounts are repaid under the term loan . quintilesims has guaranteed the performance of the obligations of existing and future subsidiaries that sell and service the accounts receivable under the receivables financing facility . the assets of the spe are not available to satisfy any of our obligations or any obligations of our subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2016 , the full $ 25 million of revolving loan commitment was available under the receivables financing facility . we used the proceeds from the term loan under the receivables financing facility to repay in full the amount outstanding on the then outstanding revolving credit facility under its then outstanding senior secured credit agreement ( $ 150 million ) , to repay $ 25 million of the then outstanding term loan b-3 , to pay related fees and expenses and the remainder was used for general working capital purposes . restrictive covenants our debt agreements provide for certain covenants and events of default customary for similar instruments , including a covenant not to exceed a specified ratio of consolidated senior secured net indebtedness to consolidated ebitda , as defined in the senior secured credit facility and a covenant to maintain a specified minimum interest coverage ratio . if an event of default occurs under any of the company 2019s or the company 2019s subsidiaries 2019 financing arrangements , the creditors under such financing arrangements will be entitled to take various actions , including the acceleration of amounts due under such arrangements , and in the case of the lenders under the revolving credit facility and new term loans , other actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor . our long-term debt arrangements contain usual and customary restrictive covenants that , among other things , place limitations on our ability to declare dividends . for additional information regarding these restrictive covenants , see part ii , item 5 201cmarket for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities 2014dividend policy 201d and note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report on form 10-k . at december 31 , 2016 , the company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the company 2019s financing arrangements . years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 cash flow from operating activities .
|( in millions )|year ended december 31 , 2016|year ended december 31 , 2015|year ended december 31 , 2014|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 860|$ 476|$ 433|
2016 compared to 2015 cash provided by operating activities increased $ 384 million in 2016 as compared to 2015 . the increase in cash provided by operating activities reflects the increase in net income as adjusted for non-cash items necessary to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities . also contributing to the increase were lower payments for income taxes ( $ 15 million ) , and lower cash used in days sales outstanding ( 201cdso 201d ) and accounts payable and accrued expenses . the lower cash used in dso reflects a two-day increase in dso in 2016 compared to a seven-day increase in dso in 2015 . dso can shift significantly at each reporting period depending on the timing of cash receipts under contractual payment terms relative to the recognition of revenue over a project lifecycle. .
Question: what is the percent increase in net cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: | 0.80672 |
FINQA1772 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: supplemental pro forma financial information ( unaudited ) the following table presents summarized unaudited pro forma financial information as if sikorsky had been included in our financial results for the entire year in 2015 ( in millions ) : .
|net sales|$ 45366|
|net earnings|3534|
|basic earnings per common share|11.39|
|diluted earnings per common share|11.23|
the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data above has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the historical results of sikorskywith pro forma adjustments , net of tax , that assume the acquisition occurred on january 1 , 2015 . significant pro forma adjustments include the recognition of additional amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets and additional interest expense related to the short-term debt used to finance the acquisition . these adjustments assume the application of fair value adjustments to intangibles and the debt issuance occurred on january 1 , 2015 and are approximated as follows : amortization expense of $ 125million and interest expense of $ 40million . in addition , significant nonrecurring adjustments include the elimination of a $ 72million pension curtailment loss , net of tax , recognized in 2015 and the elimination of a $ 58 million income tax charge related to historic earnings of foreign subsidiaries recognized by sikorsky in 2015 . the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information also reflects an increase in interest expense , net of tax , of approximately $ 110 million in 2015 . the increase in interest expense is the result of assuming the november 2015 notes were issued on january 1 , 2015 . proceeds of the november 2015 notes were used to repay all outstanding borrowings under the 364- day facility used to finance a portion of the purchase price of sikorsky , as contemplated at the date of acquisition . the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information does not reflect the realization of any expected ongoing cost or revenue synergies relating to the integration of the two companies . further , the pro forma data should not be considered indicative of the results that would have occurred if the acquisition , related financing and associated notes issuance and repayment of the 364-day facility had been consummated on january 1 , 2015 , nor are they indicative of future results . consolidation of awemanagement limited on august 24 , 2016 , we increased our ownership interest in the awe joint venture , which operates the united kingdom 2019s nuclear deterrent program , from 33% ( 33 % ) to 51% ( 51 % ) . at which time , we began consolidating awe . consequently , our operating results include 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . prior to increasing our ownership interest , we accounted for our investment inawe using the equity method of accounting . under the equity method , we recognized only 33% ( 33 % ) ofawe 2019s earnings or losses and no sales.accordingly , prior toaugust 24 , 2016 , the date we obtained control , we recorded 33%ofawe 2019s net earnings in our operating results and subsequent to august 24 , 2016 , we recognized 100% ( 100 % ) of awe 2019s sales and 51% ( 51 % ) of its operating profit . we accounted for this transaction as a 201cstep acquisition 201d ( as defined by u.s . gaap ) , which requires us to consolidate and record the assets and liabilities ofawe at fair value.accordingly , we recorded intangible assets of $ 243million related to customer relationships , $ 32 million of net liabilities , and noncontrolling interests of $ 107 million . the intangible assets are being amortized over a period of eight years in accordance with the underlying pattern of economic benefit reflected by the future net cash flows . in 2016we recognized a non-cash net gain of $ 104million associatedwith obtaining a controlling interest inawewhich consisted of a $ 127 million pretax gain recognized in the operating results of our space business segment and $ 23 million of tax-related items at our corporate office . the gain represents the fair value of our 51% ( 51 % ) interest inawe , less the carrying value of our previously held investment inawe and deferred taxes . the gainwas recorded in other income , net on our consolidated statements of earnings . the fair value ofawe ( including the intangible assets ) , our controlling interest , and the noncontrolling interests were determined using the income approach . divestiture of the information systems & global solutions business onaugust 16 , 2016wedivested our former is&gsbusinesswhichmergedwithleidos , in areversemorristrust transactionrr ( the 201ctransaction 201d ) . the transaction was completed in a multi-step process pursuant to which we initially contributed the is&gs business to abacus innovations corporation ( abacus ) , a wholly owned subsidiary of lockheed martin created to facilitate the transaction , and the common stock ofabacus was distributed to participating lockheedmartin stockholders through an exchange offer . under the terms of the exchange offer , lockheedmartin stockholders had the option to exchange shares of lockheedmartin common stock for shares of abacus common stock . at the conclusion of the exchange offer , all shares of abacus common stock were exchanged for 9369694 shares of lockheed martin common stock held by lockheed martin stockholders that elected to participate in the exchange.the shares of lockheedmartin common stock thatwere exchanged and acceptedwere retired , reducing the number of shares of our common stock outstanding by approximately 3% ( 3 % ) . following the exchange offer , abacus merged with .
Question: what was the profit margin
Answer: | 0.0779 |
FINQA1773 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: our operating cash flows are significantly impacted by the seasonality of our businesses . we typically generate most of our operating cash flow in the third and fourth quarters of each year . in june 2015 , we issued $ 900 million of senior notes in a registered public offering . the senior notes consist of two tranches : $ 400 million of five-year notes due 2020 with a coupon of 3% ( 3 % ) and $ 500 million of ten-year notes due 2025 with a coupon of 4% ( 4 % ) . we used the proceeds from the senior notes offering to pay down our revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes . on december 31 , 2017 , the outstanding amount of the senior notes , net of underwriting commissions and price discounts , was $ 892.6 million . cash flows below is a summary of cash flows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 . ( in millions ) 2017 2016 2015 .
|( in millions )|2017|2016|2015|
|net cash provided by operating activities|$ 600.3|$ 650.5|$ 429.2|
|net cash used in investing activities|-287.7 ( 287.7 )|-385.1 ( 385.1 )|-766.6 ( 766.6 )|
|net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities|-250.1 ( 250.1 )|-250.4 ( 250.4 )|398.8|
|effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash|9.0|-2.0 ( 2.0 )|-14.8 ( 14.8 )|
|net increase in cash and cash equivalents|$ 71.5|$ 13.0|$ 46.6|
net cash provided by operating activities was $ 600.3 million in 2017 compared to $ 650.5 million in 2016 and $ 429.2 million in 2015 . the $ 50.2 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities from 2017 to 2016 was primarily due to higher build in working capital , primarily driven by higher inventory purchases in 2017 , partially offset by a higher net income . the $ 221.3 million increase in cash provided by operating activities from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due to a reduction in working capital in 2016 compared to 2015 and higher net income . net cash used in investing activities was $ 287.7 million in 2017 compared to $ 385.1 million in 2016 and $ 766.6 million in 2015 . the decrease of $ 97.4 million from 2016 to 2017 was primarily due lower cost of acquisitions of $ 115.1 million , partially offset by $ 15.7 million of higher capital expenditures . the decrease of $ 381.5 million from 2015 to 2016 was primarily due the decrease in cost of acquisitions of $ 413.1 million , partially offset by $ 20.8 million of higher capital spending . net cash used in financing activities was $ 250.1 million in 2017 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 250.4 million in 2016 and net cash provided by in financing activities of $ 398.8 million in 2015 . the change of $ 649.2 million in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to $ 372.8 million of higher share repurchases and lower net borrowings of $ 240.8 million . pension plans subsidiaries of fortune brands sponsor their respective defined benefit pension plans that are funded by a portfolio of investments maintained within our benefit plan trust . in 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , we contributed $ 28.4 million , zero and $ 2.3 million , respectively , to qualified pension plans . in 2018 , we expect to make pension contributions of approximately $ 12.8 million . as of december 31 , 2017 , the fair value of our total pension plan assets was $ 656.6 million , representing funding of 79% ( 79 % ) of the accumulated benefit obligation liability . for the foreseeable future , we believe that we have sufficient liquidity to meet the minimum funding that may be required by the pension protection act of 2006 . foreign exchange we have operations in various foreign countries , principally canada , china , mexico , the united kingdom , france , australia and japan . therefore , changes in the value of the related currencies affect our financial statements when translated into u.s . dollars. .
Question: \\nin june 2015 what was the percent of the five-year notes due 2020 with a coupon of 3% ( 3 % ) of senior notes in a registered public offering
Answer: | 0.44444 |
FINQA1774 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: mondavi produces , markets and sells premium , super-premium and fine california wines under the woodbridge by robert mondavi , robert mondavi private selection and robert mondavi winery brand names . woodbridge and robert mondavi private selection are the leading premium and super-premium wine brands by volume , respectively , in the united states . the acquisition of robert mondavi supports the company 2019s strategy of strengthening the breadth of its portfolio across price segments to capitalize on the overall growth in the pre- mium , super-premium and fine wine categories . the company believes that the acquired robert mondavi brand names have strong brand recognition globally . the vast majority of robert mondavi 2019s sales are generated in the united states . the company intends to leverage the robert mondavi brands in the united states through its selling , marketing and distribution infrastructure . the company also intends to further expand distribution for the robert mondavi brands in europe through its constellation europe infrastructure . the company and robert mondavi have complementary busi- nesses that share a common growth orientation and operating philosophy . the robert mondavi acquisition provides the company with a greater presence in the fine wine sector within the united states and the ability to capitalize on the broader geographic distribution in strategic international markets . the robert mondavi acquisition supports the company 2019s strategy of growth and breadth across categories and geographies , and strengthens its competitive position in its core markets . in par- ticular , the company believes there are growth opportunities for premium , super-premium and fine wines in the united kingdom , united states and other wine markets . total consid- eration paid in cash to the robert mondavi shareholders was $ 1030.7 million . additionally , the company expects to incur direct acquisition costs of $ 11.2 million . the purchase price was financed with borrowings under the company 2019s 2004 credit agreement ( as defined in note 9 ) . in accordance with the pur- chase method of accounting , the acquired net assets are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition . the purchase price was based primarily on the estimated future operating results of robert mondavi , including the factors described above , as well as an estimated benefit from operating cost synergies . the results of operations of the robert mondavi business are reported in the constellation wines segment and have been included in the consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date . the following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the robert mondavi acquisition at the date of acquisition . the company is in the process of obtaining third-party valuations of certain assets and liabilities , and refining its restructuring plan which is under development and will be finalized during the company 2019s year ending february 28 , 2006 ( see note19 ) . accordingly , the allocation of the purchase price is subject to refinement . estimated fair values at december 22 , 2004 , are as follows : {in thousands} .
|current assets|$ 494788|
|property plant and equipment|452902|
|other assets|178823|
|trademarks|186000|
|goodwill|590459|
|total assets acquired|1902972|
|current liabilities|309051|
|long-term liabilities|552060|
|total liabilities acquired|861111|
|net assets acquired|$ 1041861|
the trademarks are not subject to amortization . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in connection with the robert mondavi acquisition and robert mondavi 2019s previously disclosed intention to sell certain of its winery properties and related assets , and other vineyard prop- erties , the company has classified certain assets as held for sale as of february 28 , 2005 . the company expects to sell these assets during the year ended february 28 , 2006 , for net pro- ceeds of approximately $ 150 million to $ 175 million . no gain or loss is expected to be recognized upon the sale of these assets . hardy acquisition 2013 on march 27 , 2003 , the company acquired control of brl hardy limited , now known as hardy wine company limited ( 201chardy 201d ) , and on april 9 , 2003 , the company completed its acquisition of all of hardy 2019s outstanding capital stock . as a result of the acquisition of hardy , the company also acquired the remaining 50% ( 50 % ) ownership of pacific wine partners llc ( 201cpwp 201d ) , the joint venture the company established with hardy in july 2001 . the acquisition of hardy along with the remaining interest in pwp is referred to together as the 201chardy acquisition . 201d through this acquisition , the company acquired one of australia 2019s largest wine producers with interests in winer- ies and vineyards in most of australia 2019s major wine regions as well as new zealand and the united states and hardy 2019s market- ing and sales operations in the united kingdom . total consideration paid in cash and class a common stock to the hardy shareholders was $ 1137.4 million . additionally , the company recorded direct acquisition costs of $ 17.2 million . the acquisition date for accounting purposes is march 27 , 2003 . the company has recorded a $ 1.6 million reduction in the purchase price to reflect imputed interest between the accounting acquisition date and the final payment of consider- ation . this charge is included as interest expense in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended february 29 , 2004 . the cash portion of the purchase price paid to the hardy shareholders and optionholders ( $ 1060.2 mil- lion ) was financed with $ 660.2 million of borrowings under the company 2019s then existing credit agreement and $ 400.0 million .
Question: what percent of the hardy acquisition was paid in cash?
Answer: | 0.37729 |
FINQA1775 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 7 . derivative financial instruments under the terms of the credit facility , the company is required to enter into interest rate protection agreements on at least 50% ( 50 % ) of its variable rate debt . under these agreements , the company is exposed to credit risk to the extent that a counterparty fails to meet the terms of a contract . such exposure is limited to the current value of the contract at the time the counterparty fails to perform . the company believes its contracts as of december 31 , 2004 are with credit worthy institutions . as of december 31 , 2004 , the company had two interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $ 350.0 million ( each at an interest rate of 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) ) that expire in 2006 . as of december 31 , 2003 , the company had three interest rate caps outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $ 500.0 million ( each at a rate of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ) that expired in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , there was no fair value associated with any of these interest rate caps . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 0.3 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 0.2 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 5.9 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 3.2 million ) into results of operations . during the year ended december 31 , 2002 , the company recorded an unrealized loss of approximately $ 9.1 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 4.9 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 19.5 million ( net of a tax benefit of approximately $ 10.5 million ) into results of operations . hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a gain of approximately $ 1.0 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , which is recorded in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations . the company records the changes in fair value of its derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges in other expense . the company did not reclassify any derivative losses into its statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2004 and does not anticipate reclassifying any derivative losses into its statement of operations within the next twelve months , as there are no amounts included in other comprehensive loss as of december 31 , 2004 . 8 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are straight-lined over the term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2004 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2005|$ 106116|
|2006|106319|
|2007|106095|
|2008|106191|
|2009|106214|
|thereafter|1570111|
|total|$ 2101046|
aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 approximated $ 118741000 , $ 113956000 , and $ 109644000 , respectively. .
Question: what was the average rental expense between 2002 and 2004
Answer: | 114113666.66667 |
FINQA1776 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .
|balance december 31 2004|$ 595338|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|83656|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-15244 ( 15244 )|
|balance december 31 2005|$ 663750|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|89564|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-12807 ( 12807 )|
|balance december 31 2006|$ 740507|
|additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense|96454|
|deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property|-80258 ( 80258 )|
|balance december 31 2007|$ 756703|
.
Question: what is the variation of the additions during 2005 and 2006 , in thousands of dollars?
Answer: | 5908.0 |
FINQA1777 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance share awards the vesting of psas is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period . the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards . the fair value of psas is based upon the market price of the aon common stock at the date of grant . compensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest . compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares issued at the end of the programs . the actual issuance of shares may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the target number of psas granted , based on the plan . dividend equivalents are not paid on psas . information regarding psas granted during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 follows ( shares in thousands , dollars in millions , except fair value ) : .
||2011|2010|2009|
|target psus granted|1715|1390|3754|
|fair value ( 1 )|$ 50|$ 39|$ 38|
|number of shares that would be issued based on current performance levels|1772|1397|2300|
|unamortized expense based on current performance levels|$ 60|$ 18|$ 4|
( 1 ) represents per share weighted average fair value of award at date of grant . during 2011 , the company issued approximately 1.2 million shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 0.3 million shares related to a 2006 performance plan . during 2010 , the company issued approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 lpp cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans . stock options options to purchase common stock are granted to certain employees at fair value on the date of grant . commencing in 2010 , the company ceased granting new stock options with the exception of historical contractual commitments . generally , employees are required to complete two continuous years of service before the options begin to vest in increments until the completion of a 4-year period of continuous employment , although a number of options were granted that require five continuous years of service before the options are fully vested . options issued under the lpp program vest ratable over 3 years with a six year term . the maximum contractual term on stock options is generally ten years from the date of grant . aon uses a lattice-binomial option-pricing model to value stock options . lattice-based option valuation models use a range of assumptions over the expected term of the options . expected volatilities are based on the average of the historical volatility of aon 2019s stock price and the implied volatility of traded options and aon 2019s stock . the valuation model stratifies employees between those receiving lpp options , special stock plan ( 2018 2018ssp 2019 2019 ) options , and all other option grants . the company believes that this stratification better represents prospective stock option exercise patterns . the expected dividend yield assumption is based on the company 2019s historical and expected future dividend rate . the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is a derived output of the lattice-binomial model. .
Question: what was the ratio of the shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle to the 2006 performance plan issued in 2011
Answer: | 4.0 |
FINQA1778 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 115 impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative transactions , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative transactions . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the peak , dre and avg metrics . the three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2017 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of all collateral , at the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as assigned by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables .
|rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )|rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral|rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral|exposure net of all collateral|% ( % ) of exposure netof all collateral|
|aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3|$ 11529|29% ( 29 % )|$ 11449|28% ( 28 % )|
|a+/a1 to a-/a3|6919|17|8505|20|
|bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3|13925|34|13127|32|
|bb+/ba1 to b-/b3|7397|18|7308|18|
|ccc+/caa1 and below|645|2|984|2|
|total|$ 40415|100% ( 100 % )|$ 41373|100% ( 100 % )|
as previously noted , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk . the percentage of the firm 2019s over-the-counter derivatives transactions subject to collateral agreements 2014 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily 2014 was approximately 90% ( 90 % ) as of december 31 , 2017 , largely unchanged compared with december 31 , 2016 . credit derivatives the firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes : first , in its capacity as a market-maker , and second , as an end-user to manage the firm 2019s own credit risk associated with various exposures . for a detailed description of credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 5 . credit portfolio management activities included in the firm 2019s end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities ( loans and unfunded commitments ) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the firm 2019s wholesale businesses ( collectively , 201ccredit portfolio management 201d activities ) . information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below . for further information on derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities , see credit derivatives in note 5 . the firm also uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures , including credit risk arising from certain securities held in the firm 2019s market-making businesses . these credit derivatives are not included in credit portfolio management activities ; for further information on these credit derivatives as well as credit derivatives used in the firm 2019s capacity as a market-maker in credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 5 . 10 years5 years2 years1 year .
Question: in 2017 what was the percent of the total exposure net of all collateral that was a+/a1 to a-/a3
Answer: | 0.1712 |
FINQA1779 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .
|( square feet in thousands )|united states|other countries|total|
|owned|4530|2417|6947|
|leased|1037|1341|2378|
|total|5567|3758|9325|
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .
Question: what portion of total company used area is company owned?
Answer: | 0.74499 |
FINQA1780 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements sumitomo mitsui financial group , inc . ( smfg ) provides the firm with credit loss protection on certain approved loan commitments ( primarily investment-grade commercial lending commitments ) . the notional amount of such loan commitments was $ 32.41 billion and $ 31.94 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively . the credit loss protection on loan commitments provided by smfg is generally limited to 95% ( 95 % ) of the first loss the firm realizes on such commitments , up to a maximum of approximately $ 950 million . in addition , subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions , upon the firm 2019s request , smfg will provide protection for 70% ( 70 % ) of additional losses on such commitments , up to a maximum of $ 1.13 billion , of which $ 300 million of protection had been provided as of both december 2012 and december 2011 . the firm also uses other financial instruments to mitigate credit risks related to certain commitments not covered by smfg . these instruments primarily include credit default swaps that reference the same or similar underlying instrument or entity or credit default swaps that reference a market index . warehouse financing . the firm provides financing to clients who warehouse financial assets . these arrangements are secured by the warehoused assets , primarily consisting of commercial mortgage loans . contingent and forward starting resale and securities borrowing agreements/forward starting repurchase and secured lending agreements the firm enters into resale and securities borrowing agreements and repurchase and secured lending agreements that settle at a future date . the firm also enters into commitments to provide contingent financing to its clients and counterparties through resale agreements . the firm 2019s funding of these commitments depends on the satisfaction of all contractual conditions to the resale agreement and these commitments can expire unused . investment commitments the firm 2019s investment commitments consist of commitments to invest in private equity , real estate and other assets directly and through funds that the firm raises and manages . these commitments include $ 872 million and $ 1.62 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to real estate private investments and $ 6.47 billion and $ 7.50 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , related to corporate and other private investments . of these amounts , $ 6.21 billion and $ 8.38 billion as of december 2012 and december 2011 , respectively , relate to commitments to invest in funds managed by the firm , which will be funded at market value on the date of investment . leases the firm has contractual obligations under long-term noncancelable lease agreements , principally for office space , expiring on various dates through 2069 . certain agreements are subject to periodic escalation provisions for increases in real estate taxes and other charges . the table below presents future minimum rental payments , net of minimum sublease rentals . in millions december 2012 .
|in millions|as of december 2012|
|2013|$ 439|
|2014|407|
|2015|345|
|2016|317|
|2017|306|
|2018 - thereafter|1375|
|total|$ 3189|
rent charged to operating expense for the years ended december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 was $ 374 million , $ 475 million and $ 508 million , respectively . operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements . rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in 201coccupancy . 201d the firm records a liability , based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals , for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits . costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value on termination . goldman sachs 2012 annual report 175 .
Question: what percentage of future minimum rental payments is due after 2017?
Answer: | 0.43117 |
FINQA1781 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 130 the following histogram illustrates the daily market risk 2013related gains and losses for ib and consumer/cio positions for 2009 . the chart shows that the firm posted market risk 2013related gains on 227 out of 261 days in this period , with 69 days exceeding $ 160 million . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence level var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . losses were sustained on 34 days during 2009 and exceeded the var measure on one day due to high market volatility in the first quarter of 2009 . under the 95% ( 95 % ) confidence interval , the firm would expect to incur daily losses greater than that pre- dicted by var estimates about twelve times a year . the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . as credit curves do not typically move in a parallel fashion , the sensitivity multiplied by the change in spreads at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual revenue recognized . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity 1 basis point increase in ( in millions ) jpmorgan chase credit spread .
|( in millions )|1 basis point increase in jpmorgan chase credit spread|
|december 31 2009|$ 39|
|december 31 2008|$ 37|
loss advisories and drawdowns loss advisories and drawdowns are tools used to highlight to senior management trading losses above certain levels and initiate discus- sion of remedies . economic value stress testing while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm conducts economic- value stress tests using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly , equity prices decline and significant changes in interest rates across the major currencies . other scenar- ios focus on the risks predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for adverse movements in complex portfolios . scenarios were updated more frequently in 2009 and , in some cases , redefined to reflect the signifi- cant market volatility which began in late 2008 . along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . stress testing enhances the understanding of the firm 2019s risk profile and loss potential , and stress losses are monitored against limits . stress testing is also utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement , as well as an input to economic capital allocation . stress-test results , trends and explanations based on current market risk positions are reported to the firm 2019s senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks and to understand event risk 2013sensitive positions. .
Question: what is the increase observed in the credit spread between 2008 and 2009 , in millions of dollars?
Answer: | 2.0 |
FINQA1782 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2016 vs . 2015 sales of $ 498.8 increased $ 212.1 , or 74% ( 74 % ) . the increase in sales was driven by the jazan project which more than offset the decrease in small equipment and other air separation unit sales . in 2016 , we recognized approximately $ 300 of sales related to the jazan project . operating loss of $ 21.3 decreased 59% ( 59 % ) , or $ 30.3 , primarily from income on the jazan project and benefits from cost reduction actions , partially offset by lower other sale of equipment project activity and a gain associated with the cancellation of a sale of equipment contract that was recorded in fiscal year 2015 . corporate and other the corporate and other segment includes two ongoing global businesses ( our lng equipment business and our liquid helium and liquid hydrogen transport and storage container businesses ) , and corporate support functions that benefit all the segments . corporate and other also includes income and expense that is not directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses and stranded costs . stranded costs result from functional support previously provided to the two divisions comprising the former materials technologies segment . the majority of these costs are reimbursed to air products pursuant to short-term transition services agreements under which air products provides transition services to versum for emd and to evonik for pmd . the reimbursement for costs in support of the transition services has been reflected on the consolidated income statements within "other income ( expense ) , net." .
||2017|2016|2015|
|sales|$ 82.6|$ 236.0|$ 315.4|
|operating loss|-170.6 ( 170.6 )|-87.6 ( 87.6 )|-86.5 ( 86.5 )|
|adjusted ebitda|-158.4 ( 158.4 )|-68.1 ( 68.1 )|-66.2 ( 66.2 )|
2017 vs . 2016 sales of $ 82.6 decreased $ 153.4 , primarily due to lower lng project activity . we expect continued weakness in new lng project orders due to continued oversupply of lng in the market . operating loss of $ 170.6 increased $ 83.0 due to lower lng activity , partially offset by productivity improvements and income from transition service agreements with versum and evonik . 2016 vs . 2015 sales of $ 236.0 decreased $ 79.4 , or 25% ( 25 % ) , primarily due to lower lng sale of equipment activity . operating loss of $ 87.6 increased 1% ( 1 % ) , or $ 1.1 , due to lower lng activity , mostly offset by benefits from our recent cost reduction actions and lower foreign exchange losses . reconciliation of non-gaap financial measures ( millions of dollars unless otherwise indicated , except for per share data ) the company has presented certain financial measures on a non-gaap ( 201cadjusted 201d ) basis and has provided a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with gaap . these financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with gaap . the company believes these non-gaap measures provide investors , potential investors , securities analysts , and others with useful supplemental information to evaluate the performance of the business because such measures , when viewed together with our financial results computed in accordance with gaap , provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our historical financial performance and projected future results . in many cases , our non-gaap measures are determined by adjusting the most directly comparable gaap financial measure to exclude certain disclosed items ( 201cnon-gaap adjustments 201d ) that we believe are not representative of the underlying business performance . for example , air products has executed its strategic plan to restructure the company to focus on its core industrial gases business . this resulted in significant cost reduction and asset actions that we believe are important for investors to understand separately from the performance of the underlying business . the reader should be aware that we may incur similar expenses in the future . the tax impact of our non- gaap adjustments reflects the expected current and deferred income tax expense impact of the transactions and is impacted primarily by the statutory tax rate of the various relevant jurisdictions and the taxability of the adjustments in those jurisdictions . investors should also consider the limitations associated with these non-gaap measures , including the potential lack of comparability of these measures from one company to another. .
Question: considering the years 2015-2017 , what is the average operating loss?
Answer: | -114.9 |
FINQA1783 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the united states . we have 32094 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern united states gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two- thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .
|millions of dollars|2009|2008|2007|
|agricultural|$ 2666|$ 3174|$ 2605|
|automotive|854|1344|1458|
|chemicals|2102|2494|2287|
|energy|3118|3810|3134|
|industrial products|2147|3273|3077|
|intermodal|2486|3023|2925|
|total freight revenues|$ 13373|$ 17118|$ 15486|
|other revenues|770|852|797|
|total operating revenues|$ 14143|$ 17970|$ 16283|
although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the united states , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the united states . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . subsequent events evaluation 2013 we evaluated the effects of all subsequent events through february 5 , 2010 , the date of this report , which is concurrent with the date we file this report with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . 2 . significant accounting policies change in accounting principle 2013 we have historically accounted for rail grinding costs as a capital asset . beginning in the first quarter of 2010 , we will change our accounting policy for rail grinding costs .
Question: for the three year period what were cumulative operating revenues?
Answer: | 48396000000.0 |
FINQA1784 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 35% ( 35 % ) due primarily to certain undistributed foreign earnings for which no u.s . taxes are provided because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . as of september 24 , 2011 , the company had deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences , tax losses , and tax credits of $ 3.2 billion , and deferred tax liabilities of $ 9.2 billion . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences , will be sufficient to fully recover the deferred tax assets . the company will continue to evaluate the realizability of deferred tax assets quarterly by assessing the need for and amount of a valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( the 201cirs 201d ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for the years 2004 through 2006 and proposed certain adjustments . the company has contested certain of these adjustments through the irs appeals office . the irs is currently examining the years 2007 through 2009 . all irs audit issues for years prior to 2004 have been resolved . in addition , the company is subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . if any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits are resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income taxes in the period such resolution occurs . liquidity and capital resources the following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of and for the three years ended september 24 , 2011 ( in millions ) : .
||2011|2010|2009|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 81570|$ 51011|$ 33992|
|accounts receivable net|$ 5369|$ 5510|$ 3361|
|inventories|$ 776|$ 1051|$ 455|
|working capital|$ 17018|$ 20956|$ 20049|
|annual operating cash flow|$ 37529|$ 18595|$ 10159|
cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities increased $ 30.6 billion or 60% ( 60 % ) during 2011 . the principal components of this net increase was the cash generated by operating activities of $ 37.5 billion , which was partially offset by payments for acquisition of property , plant and equipment of $ 4.3 billion , payments for acquisition of intangible assets of $ 3.2 billion and payments made in connection with business acquisitions , net of cash acquired , of $ 244 million . the company believes its existing balances of cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities will be sufficient to satisfy its working capital needs , capital asset purchases , outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with its existing operations over the next 12 months . the company 2019s marketable securities investment portfolio is invested primarily in highly rated securities and its policy generally limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer . the company 2019s investment policy requires investments to generally be investment grade with the objective of minimizing the potential risk of principal loss . as of september 24 , 2011 and september 25 , 2010 , $ 54.3 billion and $ 30.8 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . capital assets the company 2019s capital expenditures were $ 4.6 billion during 2011 , consisting of approximately $ 614 million for retail store facilities and $ 4.0 billion for other capital expenditures , including product tooling and manufacturing .
Question: inventories were what percent of working capital for 2009?
Answer: | 0.02269 |
FINQA1785 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents a summary of level 3 financial assets. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2018|as of december 2017|
|cash instruments|$ 17227|$ 15395|
|derivatives|4948|3802|
|other financial assets|6|4|
|total|$ 22181|$ 19201|
level 3 financial assets as of december 2018 increased compared with december 2017 , primarily reflecting an increase in level 3 cash instruments . see notes 6 through 8 for further information about level 3 financial assets ( including information about unrealized gains and losses related to level 3 financial assets and financial liabilities , and transfers in and out of level 3 ) . note 6 . cash instruments cash instruments include u.s . government and agency obligations , non-u.s . government and agency obligations , mortgage-backed loans and securities , corporate debt instruments , equity securities , investments in funds at nav , and other non-derivative financial instruments owned and financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased . see below for the types of cash instruments included in each level of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to determine their fair values . see note 5 for an overview of the firm 2019s fair value measurement policies . level 1 cash instruments level 1 cash instruments include certain money market instruments , u.s . government obligations , most non-u.s . government obligations , certain government agency obligations , certain corporate debt instruments and actively traded listed equities . these instruments are valued using quoted prices for identical unrestricted instruments in active markets . the firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument . the firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity . level 2 cash instruments level 2 cash instruments include most money market instruments , most government agency obligations , certain non-u.s . government obligations , most mortgage-backed loans and securities , most corporate debt instruments , most state and municipal obligations , most other debt obligations , restricted or less liquid listed equities , commodities and certain lending commitments . valuations of level 2 cash instruments can be verified to quoted prices , recent trading activity for identical or similar instruments , broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency . consideration is given to the nature of the quotations ( e.g. , indicative or firm ) and the relationship of recent market activity to the prices provided from alternative pricing sources . valuation adjustments are typically made to level 2 cash instruments ( i ) if the cash instrument is subject to transfer restrictions and/or ( ii ) for other premiums and liquidity discounts that a market participant would require to arrive at fair value . valuation adjustments are generally based on market evidence . level 3 cash instruments level 3 cash instruments have one or more significant valuation inputs that are not observable . absent evidence to the contrary , level 3 cash instruments are initially valued at transaction price , which is considered to be the best initial estimate of fair value . subsequently , the firm uses other methodologies to determine fair value , which vary based on the type of instrument . valuation inputs and assumptions are changed when corroborated by substantive observable evidence , including values realized on sales . valuation techniques and significant inputs of level 3 cash instruments valuation techniques of level 3 cash instruments vary by instrument , but are generally based on discounted cash flow techniques . the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs used to determine the fair values of each type of level 3 cash instrument are described below : loans and securities backed by commercial real estate . loans and securities backed by commercial real estate are directly or indirectly collateralized by a single commercial real estate property or a portfolio of properties , and may include tranches of varying levels of subordination . significant inputs are generally determined based on relative value analyses and include : 2030 market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets and/or current levels and changes in market indices such as the cmbx ( an index that tracks the performance of commercial mortgage bonds ) ; 118 goldman sachs 2018 form 10-k .
Question: what is the percentage change in cash instruments from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 0.119 |
FINQA1786 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the npr is generally consistent with the basel committee 2019s lcr . however , it includes certain more stringent requirements , including an accelerated implementation time line and modifications to the definition of high-quality liquid assets and expected outflow assumptions . we continue to analyze the proposed rules and analyze their impact as well as develop strategies for compliance . the principles of the lcr are consistent with our liquidity management framework ; however , the specific calibrations of various elements within the final lcr rule , such as the eligibility of assets as hqla , operational deposit requirements and net outflow requirements could have a material effect on our liquidity , funding and business activities , including the management and composition of our investment securities portfolio and our ability to extend committed contingent credit facilities to our clients . in january 2014 , the basel committee released a revised proposal with respect to the net stable funding ratio , or nsfr , which will establish a one-year liquidity standard representing the proportion of long-term assets funded by long-term stable funding , scheduled for global implementation in 2018 . the revised nsfr has made some favorable changes regarding the treatment of operationally linked deposits and a reduction in the funding required for certain securities . however , we continue to review the specifics of the basel committee's release and will be evaluating the u.s . implementation of this standard to analyze the impact and develop strategies for compliance . u.s . banking regulators have not yet issued a proposal to implement the nsfr . contractual cash obligations and other commitments the following table presents our long-term contractual cash obligations , in total and by period due as of december 31 , 2013 . these obligations were recorded in our consolidated statement of condition as of that date , except for operating leases and the interest portions of long-term debt and capital leases . contractual cash obligations .
|as of december 31 2013 ( in millions )|payments due by period total|payments due by period less than 1year|payments due by period 1-3years|payments due by period 4-5years|payments due by period over 5years|
|long-term debt ( 1 )|$ 10630|$ 1015|$ 2979|$ 2260|$ 4376|
|operating leases|923|208|286|209|220|
|capital lease obligations|1051|99|185|169|598|
|total contractual cash obligations|$ 12604|$ 1322|$ 3450|$ 2638|$ 5194|
( 1 ) long-term debt excludes capital lease obligations ( presented as a separate line item ) and the effect of interest-rate swaps . interest payments were calculated at the stated rate with the exception of floating-rate debt , for which payments were calculated using the indexed rate in effect as of december 31 , 2013 . the table above does not include obligations which will be settled in cash , primarily in less than one year , such as client deposits , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings . additional information about deposits , federal funds purchased , securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings is provided in notes 8 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . the table does not include obligations related to derivative instruments because the derivative-related amounts recorded in our consolidated statement of condition as of december 31 , 2013 did not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under the contracts upon settlement . additional information about our derivative instruments is provided in note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . we have obligations under pension and other post-retirement benefit plans , more fully described in note 19 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k , which are not included in the above table . additional information about contractual cash obligations related to long-term debt and operating and capital leases is provided in notes 10 and 20 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 of this form 10-k . our consolidated statement of cash flows , also included under item 8 of this form 10-k , provides additional liquidity information . the following table presents our commitments , other than the contractual cash obligations presented above , in total and by duration as of december 31 , 2013 . these commitments were not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition as of that date. .
Question: what portion of the total contractual lease obligations are classified as capital leases?
Answer: | 0.53242 |
FINQA1787 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 175 securities borrowed and securities lent are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received . securities borrowed consist primarily of government and equity securities . jpmorgan chase moni- tors the market value of the securities borrowed and lent on a daily basis and calls for additional collateral when appropriate . fees received or paid in connection with securities borrowed and lent are recorded in interest income or interest expense . the following table details the components of collateralized financings. .
|december 31 ( in millions )|2008|2007|
|securities purchased under resale agreements ( a )|$ 200265|$ 169305|
|securities borrowed ( b )|124000|84184|
|securities sold under repurchase agreements ( c )|$ 174456|$ 126098|
|securities loaned|6077|10922|
( a ) includes resale agreements of $ 20.8 billion and $ 19.1 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . ( b ) includes securities borrowed of $ 3.4 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 . ( c ) includes repurchase agreements of $ 3.0 billion and $ 5.8 billion accounted for at fair value at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . jpmorgan chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to col- lateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings . pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the secured party are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consolidated balance sheets . at december 31 , 2008 , the firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged , delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $ 511.9 billion . this collateral was generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements . of these securities , approximately $ 456.6 billion were repledged , delivered or otherwise used , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales . note 14 2013 loans the accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is origi- nated or purchased and as to whether the loan is used in an invest- ing or trading strategy . for purchased loans held-for-investment , the accounting also differs depending on whether a loan is credit- impaired at the date of acquisition . purchased loans with evidence of credit deterioration since the origination date and for which it is probable , at acquisition , that all contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit-impaired . the measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of the following : 2022 at the principal amount outstanding , net of the allowance for loan losses , unearned income and any net deferred loan fees or costs , for loans held for investment ( other than purchased credit- impaired loans ) ; 2022 at the lower of cost or fair value , with valuation changes record- ed in noninterest revenue , for loans that are classified as held- for-sale ; or 2022 at fair value , with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue , for loans classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis ; 2022 purchased credit-impaired loans held for investment are account- ed for under sop 03-3 and initially measured at fair value , which includes estimated future credit losses . accordingly , an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date . see note 5 on pages 156 2013158 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s elections of fair value accounting under sfas 159 . see note 6 on pages 158 2013160 of this annual report for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets . for loans held for investment , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , interest income is recognized using the interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan . loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio . transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer . credit-related losses are charged off to the allowance for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates , or exchange rates , are recognized in noninterest revenue . loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value . these loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the firm 2019s allowance methodology . for a fur- ther discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the firm 2019s allowance for loan losses , see note 15 on pages 178 2013180 of this annual report . nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest is dis- continued . loans ( other than certain consumer and purchased credit- impaired loans discussed below ) are placed on nonaccrual status immediately if , in the opinion of management , full payment of princi- pal or interest is in doubt , or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due and collateral , if any , is insufficient to cover principal and interest . loans are charged off to the allowance for loan losses when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized . interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income . in addition , the amortiza- tion of net deferred loan fees is suspended . interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent it is received in cash . however , where there is doubt regarding the ultimate col- lectibility of loan principal , all cash thereafter received is applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans ( i.e. , the cost recovery method ) . loans are restored to accrual status only when future pay- ments of interest and principal are reasonably assured . consumer loans , other than purchased credit-impaired loans , are generally charged to the allowance for loan losses upon reaching specified stages of delinquency , in accordance with the federal financial institutions examination council policy . for example , credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiv- ing notification of the filing of bankruptcy , whichever is earlier . residential mortgage products are generally charged off to net real- izable value at no later than 180 days past due . other consumer .
Question: how much of the securities borrowed in 2008 were fair value resale agreements?
Answer: | 0.16774 |
FINQA1788 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: volatility of capital markets or macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our business . changes in financial and capital markets , including market disruptions , limited liquidity , uncertainty regarding brexit , and interest rate volatility , including as a result of the use or discontinued use of certain benchmark rates such as libor , may increase the cost of financing as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt . in addition , our borrowing costs can be affected by short and long-term ratings assigned by rating organizations . a decrease in these ratings could limit our access to capital markets and increase our borrowing costs , which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and operating results . some of our customers and counterparties are highly leveraged . consolidations in some of the industries in which our customers operate have created larger customers , some of which are highly leveraged and facing increased competition and continued credit market volatility . these factors have caused some customers to be less profitable , increasing our exposure to credit risk . a significant adverse change in the financial and/or credit position of a customer or counterparty could require us to assume greater credit risk relating to that customer or counterparty and could limit our ability to collect receivables . this could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and liquidity . item 1b . unresolved staff comments . item 2 . properties . our corporate co-headquarters are located in pittsburgh , pennsylvania and chicago , illinois . our co-headquarters are leased and house certain executive offices , our u.s . business units , and our administrative , finance , legal , and human resource functions . we maintain additional owned and leased offices throughout the regions in which we operate . we manufacture our products in our network of manufacturing and processing facilities located throughout the world . as of december 29 , 2018 , we operated 84 manufacturing and processing facilities . we own 81 and lease three of these facilities . our manufacturing and processing facilities count by segment as of december 29 , 2018 was: .
||owned|leased|
|united states|40|1|
|canada|2|2014|
|emea|12|2014|
|rest of world|27|2|
we maintain all of our manufacturing and processing facilities in good condition and believe they are suitable and are adequate for our present needs . we also enter into co-manufacturing arrangements with third parties if we determine it is advantageous to outsource the production of any of our products . in the fourth quarter of 2018 , we announced our plans to divest certain assets and operations , predominantly in canada and india , including one owned manufacturing facility in canada and one owned and one leased facility in india . see note 5 , acquisitions and divestitures , in item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , for additional information on these transactions . item 3 . legal proceedings . see note 18 , commitments and contingencies , in item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii item 5 . market for registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . our common stock is listed on nasdaq under the ticker symbol 201ckhc 201d . at june 5 , 2019 , there were approximately 49000 holders of record of our common stock . see equity and dividends in item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , for a discussion of cash dividends declared on our common stock. .
Question: what is the portion of total number of facilities located in the rest of the world?
Answer: | 0.34524 |
FINQA1789 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 .
|( millions )|dec . 31 2007|
|due in one year or less|$ 231|
|due after one year through three years|545|
|due after three years through five years|221|
|due after five years|62|
|total marketable securities|$ 1059|
predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .
Question: what was the rate of the adjustment of the auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007.\\n
Answer: | 0.52941 |
FINQA1790 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following table discloses purchases of shares of our common stock made by us or on our behalf during the fourth quarter of 2015 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares not purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( a ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( b ) .
|period|total numberof sharespurchased|averageprice paidper share|total number ofshares notpurchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs ( a )|total number ofshares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms|approximate dollarvalue of shares thatmay yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms ( b )|
|october 2015|1658771|$ 62.12|842059|816712|$ 2.0 billion|
|november 2015|2412467|$ 71.08|212878|2199589|$ 1.8 billion|
|december 2015|7008414|$ 70.31|980|7007434|$ 1.3 billion|
|total|11079652|$ 69.25|1055917|10023735|$ 1.3 billion|
( a ) the shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the fourth quarter of 2015 relating to ( i ) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions to meet our obligations under stock-based compensation plans , and ( ii ) our purchases of shares from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of stock options , the vesting of restricted stock , and other stock compensation transactions in accordance with the terms of our stock-based compensation plans . ( b ) on july 13 , 2015 , we announced that our board of directors approved our purchase of $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock ( with no expiration date ) , which was in addition to the remaining amount available under our $ 3 billion program previously authorized . during the third quarter of 2015 , we completed our purchases under the $ 3 billion program . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had $ 1.3 billion remaining available for purchase under the $ 2.5 billion program. .
Question: as of december 31 , 2015 , what was the percent of the $ 2.5 billion program remaining available for purchase
Answer: | 0.52 |
FINQA1791 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .
||december 312008|december 312009|december 312010|december 312011|december 312012|december 312013|
|disca|$ 100.00|$ 216.60|$ 294.49|$ 289.34|$ 448.31|$ 638.56|
|discb|$ 100.00|$ 207.32|$ 287.71|$ 277.03|$ 416.52|$ 602.08|
|disck|$ 100.00|$ 198.06|$ 274.01|$ 281.55|$ 436.89|$ 626.29|
|s&p 500|$ 100.00|$ 123.45|$ 139.23|$ 139.23|$ 157.90|$ 204.63|
|peer group|$ 100.00|$ 151.63|$ 181.00|$ 208.91|$ 286.74|$ 454.87|
equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 21 , 2013?
Answer: | 5.0208 |
FINQA1792 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for marketing . there are several methods that can be used to determine the estimated fair value of the ipr&d acquired in a business combination . we utilized the 201cincome method , 201d which applies a probability weighting to the estimated future net cash fl ows that are derived from projected sales revenues and estimated costs . these projec- tions are based on factors such as relevant market size , patent protection , historical pricing of similar products , and expected industry trends . the estimated future net cash fl ows are then discounted to the present value using an appropriate discount rate . this analysis is performed for each project independently . in accordance with fin 4 , applicability of fasb statement no . 2 to business combinations accounted for by the purchase method , these acquired ipr&d intangible assets totaling $ 4.71 billion and $ 340.5 million in 2008 and 2007 , respectively , were expensed immediately subsequent to the acquisition because the products had no alternative future use . the ongoing activities with respect to each of these products in development are not material to our research and development expenses . in addition to the acquisitions of businesses , we also acquired several products in development . the acquired ipr&d related to these products of $ 122.0 million and $ 405.1 million in 2008 and 2007 , respectively , was also writ- ten off by a charge to income immediately upon acquisition because the products had no alternative future use . imclone acquisition on november 24 , 2008 , we acquired all of the outstanding shares of imclone systems inc . ( imclone ) , a biopharma- ceutical company focused on advancing oncology care , for a total purchase price of approximately $ 6.5 billion , which was fi nanced through borrowings . this strategic combination will offer both targeted therapies and oncolytic agents along with a pipeline spanning all phases of clinical development . the combination also expands our bio- technology capabilities . the acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting , resulting in goodwill of $ 419.5 million . no portion of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . allocation of purchase price we are currently determining the fair values of a signifi cant portion of these net assets . the purchase price has been preliminarily allocated based on an estimate of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition . the fi nal determination of these fair values will be completed as soon as possible but no later than one year from the acquisition date . although the fi nal determination may result in asset and liability fair values that are different than the preliminary estimates of these amounts included herein , it is not expected that those differences will be material to our fi nancial results . estimated fair value at november 24 , 2008 .
|cash and short-term investments|$ 982.9|
|inventories|136.2|
|developed product technology ( erbitux ) 1|1057.9|
|goodwill|419.5|
|property and equipment|339.8|
|debt assumed|-600.0 ( 600.0 )|
|deferred taxes|-315.0 ( 315.0 )|
|deferred income|-127.7 ( 127.7 )|
|other assets and liabilities 2014 net|-72.1 ( 72.1 )|
|acquired in-process research and development|4685.4|
|total purchase price|$ 6506.9|
1this intangible asset will be amortized on a straight-line basis through 2023 in the u.s . and 2018 in the rest of the world . all of the estimated fair value of the acquired ipr&d is attributable to oncology-related products in develop- ment , including $ 1.33 billion to line extensions for erbitux . a signifi cant portion ( 81 percent ) of the remaining value of acquired ipr&d is attributable to two compounds in phase iii clinical testing and one compound in phase ii clini- cal testing , all targeted to treat various forms of cancers . the discount rate we used in valuing the acquired ipr&d projects was 13.5 percent , and the charge for acquired ipr&d of $ 4.69 billion recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 , was not deductible for tax purposes . pro forma financial information the following unaudited pro forma fi nancial information presents the combined results of our operations with .
Question: what portion of the imclone's total purchase price is dedicated to goodwill?
Answer: | 0.06447 |
FINQA1793 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: positions and collateral of the defaulting firm at each respective clearing organization , and taking into account any cross-margining loss sharing payments , any of the participating clearing organizations has a remaining liquidating surplus , and any other participating clearing organization has a remaining liquidating deficit , any additional surplus from the liquidation would be shared with the other clearing house to the extent that it has a remaining liquidating deficit . any remaining surplus funds would be passed to the bankruptcy trustee . mf global bankruptcy trust . the company provided a $ 550.0 million financial guarantee to the bankruptcy trustee of mf global to accelerate the distribution of funds to mf global customers . in the event that the trustee distributed more property in the second or third interim distributions than was permitted by the bankruptcy code and cftc regulations , the company will make a cash payment to the trustee for the amount of the erroneous distribution or distributions up to $ 550.0 million in the aggregate . a payment will only be made after the trustee makes reasonable efforts to collect the property erroneously distributed to the customer ( s ) . if a payment is made by the company , the company may have the right to seek reimbursement of the erroneously distributed property from the applicable customer ( s ) . the guarantee does not cover distributions made by the trustee to customers on the basis of their claims filed in the bankruptcy . because the trustee has now made payments to nearly all customers on the basis of their claims , the company believes that the likelihood of payment to the trustee is very remote . as a result , the guarantee liability is estimated to be immaterial at december 31 , 2012 . family farmer and rancher protection fund . in april 2012 , the company established the family farmer and rancher protection fund ( the fund ) . the fund is designed to provide payments , up to certain maximum levels , to family farmers , ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use cme group agricultural products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their cme clearing member becoming insolvent . under the terms of the fund , farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $ 25000 per participant . farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $ 100000 per cooperative . the fund has an aggregate maximum payment amount of $ 100.0 million . if payments to participants were to exceed this amount , payments would be pro-rated . clearing members and customers must register in advance with the company and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility . peregrine financial group , inc . ( pfg ) filed for bankruptcy protection on july 10 , 2012 . pfg was not one of cme 2019s clearing members and its customers had not registered for the fund . accordingly , they were not technically eligible for payments from the fund . however , because the fund was newly implemented and because pfg 2019s customers included many agricultural industry participants for whom the program was designed , the company decided to waive certain terms and conditions of the fund , solely in connection with the pfg bankruptcy , so that otherwise eligible family farmers , ranchers and agricultural cooperatives could apply for and receive benefits from cme . based on the number of such pfg customers who applied and the estimated size of their claims , the company has recorded a liability in the amount of $ 2.1 million at december 31 , 2012 . 16 . redeemable non-controlling interest the following summarizes the changes in redeemable non-controlling interest for the years presented . non- controlling interests that do not contain redemption features are presented in the statements of equity. .
|( in millions )|2012|2011|2010|
|balance at january 1|$ 70.3|$ 68.1|$ 2014|
|contribution by dow jones|2014|2014|675.0|
|distribution to dow jones|2014|2014|-607.5 ( 607.5 )|
|allocation of stock-based compensation|2014|0.1|2014|
|total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non-controlling interest|10.5|2.1|0.6|
|balance at december 31|$ 80.8|$ 70.3|$ 68.1|
contribution by dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 675.0 distribution to dow jones . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 ( 607.5 ) allocation of stock- compensation . . . . 2014 0.1 2014 total comprehensive income attributable to redeemable non- controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . 10.5 2.1 0.6 balance at december 31 . . . . . . . . . $ 80.8 $ 70.3 $ 68.1 .
Question: what was the percentage change in the redeemable non-controlling in 2012
Answer: | 0.14936 |
FINQA1794 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: we operated the following factory stores as of march 29 , 2014: .
|location|factory stores|
|the americas|150|
|europe|50|
|asia ( a )|35|
|total|235|
( a ) includes australia , china , hong kong , japan , malaysia , south korea , and taiwan . our factory stores in the americas offer selections of our menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , home furnishings , and fragrances . ranging in size from approximately 2700 to 20000 square feet , with an average of approximately 10400 square feet , these stores are principally located in major outlet centers in 40 states in the u.s. , canada , and puerto rico . our factory stores in europe offer selections of our menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , home furnishings , and fragrances . ranging in size from approximately 1400 to 19700 square feet , with an average of approximately 7000 square feet , these stores are located in 12 countries , principally in major outlet centers . our factory stores in asia offer selections of our menswear , womenswear , childrenswear , accessories , and fragrances . ranging in size from approximately 1100 to 11800 square feet , with an average of approximately 6200 square feet , these stores are primarily located throughout china and japan , in hong kong , and in or near other major cities in asia and australia . our factory stores are principally located in major outlet centers . factory stores obtain products from our suppliers , our product licensing partners , and our other retail stores and e-commerce operations , and also serve as a secondary distribution channel for our excess and out-of-season products . concession-based shop-within-shops the terms of trade for shop-within-shops are largely conducted on a concession basis , whereby inventory continues to be owned by us ( not the department store ) until ultimate sale to the end consumer . the salespeople involved in the sales transactions are generally our employees and not those of the department store . as of march 29 , 2014 , we had 503 concession-based shop-within-shops at 243 retail locations dedicated to our products , which were located in asia , australia , new zealand , and europe . the size of our concession-based shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 140 to 7400 square feet . we may share in the cost of building-out certain of these shop-within-shops with our department store partners . e-commerce websites in addition to our stores , our retail segment sells products online through our e-commerce channel , which includes : 2022 our north american e-commerce sites located at www.ralphlauren.com and www.clubmonaco.com , as well as our club monaco site in canada located at www.clubmonaco.ca ; 2022 our ralph lauren e-commerce sites in europe , including www.ralphlauren.co.uk ( servicing the united kingdom ) , www.ralphlauren.fr ( servicing belgium , france , italy , luxembourg , the netherlands , portugal , and spain ) , and www.ralphlauren.de ( servicing germany and austria ) ; and 2022 our ralph lauren e-commerce sites in asia , including www.ralphlauren.co.jp servicing japan and www.ralphlauren.co.kr servicing south korea . our ralph lauren e-commerce sites in the u.s. , europe , and asia offer our customers access to a broad array of ralph lauren , rrl , polo , and denim & supply apparel , accessories , fragrance , and home products , and reinforce the luxury image of our brands . while investing in e-commerce operations remains a primary focus , it is an extension of our investment in the integrated omni-channel strategy used to operate our overall retail business , in which our e-commerce operations are interdependent with our physical stores . our club monaco e-commerce sites in the u.s . and canada offer our domestic and canadian customers access to our club monaco global assortment of womenswear , menswear , and accessories product lines , as well as select online exclusives. .
Question: what percentage of factory stores as of march 29 , 2014 are in asia?
Answer: | 0.14894 |
FINQA1795 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award .
|named exeutive officer|target|percentage base salary|2008 annual incentive award|
|j . wayne leonard|120% ( 120 % )|168% ( 168 % )|$ 2169720|
|leo p . denault|70% ( 70 % )|98% ( 98 % )|$ 617400|
|richard j . smith|70% ( 70 % )|98% ( 98 % )|$ 632100|
|e . renae conley|60% ( 60 % )|102% ( 102 % )|$ 415000|
|hugh t . mcdonald|50% ( 50 % )|50% ( 50 % )|$ 160500|
|joseph f . domino|50% ( 50 % )|72% ( 72 % )|$ 230000|
|roderick k . west|40% ( 40 % )|80% ( 80 % )|$ 252000|
|haley fisackerly|40% ( 40 % )|46% ( 46 % )|$ 125700|
|theodore h . bunting jr .|60% ( 60 % )|117% ( 117 % )|$ 400023|
|carolyn shanks|50% ( 50 % )|72% ( 72 % )|$ 229134|
|jay a . lewis|40% ( 40 % )|60% ( 60 % )|$ 128505|
while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. .
Question: what is the difference of annual incentive award between the highest and the lowest award?
Answer: | 2044020.0 |
FINQA1796 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: amortization expense , which is included in selling , general and administrative expenses , was $ 13.0 million , $ 13.9 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the following is the estimated amortization expense for the company 2019s intangible assets as of december 31 , 2016 : ( in thousands ) .
|2017|$ 10509|
|2018|9346|
|2019|9240|
|2020|7201|
|2021|5318|
|2022 and thereafter|16756|
|amortization expense of intangible assets|$ 58370|
at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , the company determined that its goodwill and indefinite- lived intangible assets were not impaired . 5 . credit facility and other long term debt credit facility the company is party to a credit agreement that provides revolving commitments for up to $ 1.25 billion of borrowings , as well as term loan commitments , in each case maturing in january 2021 . as of december 31 , 2016 there was no outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility and $ 186.3 million of term loan borrowings remained outstanding . at the company 2019s request and the lender 2019s consent , revolving and or term loan borrowings may be increased by up to $ 300.0 million in aggregate , subject to certain conditions as set forth in the credit agreement , as amended . incremental borrowings are uncommitted and the availability thereof , will depend on market conditions at the time the company seeks to incur such borrowings . the borrowings under the revolving credit facility have maturities of less than one year . up to $ 50.0 million of the facility may be used for the issuance of letters of credit . there were $ 2.6 million of letters of credit outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 . the credit agreement contains negative covenants that , subject to significant exceptions , limit the ability of the company and its subsidiaries to , among other things , incur additional indebtedness , make restricted payments , pledge their assets as security , make investments , loans , advances , guarantees and acquisitions , undergo fundamental changes and enter into transactions with affiliates . the company is also required to maintain a ratio of consolidated ebitda , as defined in the credit agreement , to consolidated interest expense of not less than 3.50 to 1.00 and is not permitted to allow the ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to consolidated ebitda to be greater than 3.25 to 1.00 ( 201cconsolidated leverage ratio 201d ) . as of december 31 , 2016 , the company was in compliance with these ratios . in addition , the credit agreement contains events of default that are customary for a facility of this nature , and includes a cross default provision whereby an event of default under other material indebtedness , as defined in the credit agreement , will be considered an event of default under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at a rate per annum equal to , at the company 2019s option , either ( a ) an alternate base rate , or ( b ) a rate based on the rates applicable for deposits in the interbank market for u.s . dollars or the applicable currency in which the loans are made ( 201cadjusted libor 201d ) , plus in each case an applicable margin . the applicable margin for loans will .
Question: what was the difference in millions of amortization expense between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: | -0.9 |
FINQA1797 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: charge-off is based on pnc 2019s actual loss experience for each type of pool . since a pool may consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20-year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . the risk associated with our home equity lines of credit end of period draw dates is considered in establishing our alll . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2013 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 41 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest only product principal and interest product .
|in millions|interest onlyproduct|principal andinterest product|
|2014|$ 1768|$ 450|
|2015|1829|625|
|2016|1521|485|
|2017|2738|659|
|2018|1206|894|
|2019 and thereafter|3848|4562|
|total ( a ) ( b )|$ 12910|$ 7675|
( a ) includes all home equity lines of credit that mature in 2014 or later , including those with borrowers where we have terminated borrowing privileges . ( b ) includes approximately $ 185 million , $ 193 million , $ 54 million , $ 63 million , $ 47 million and $ 561 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments , including those where we have terminated borrowing privileges , with draw periods scheduled to end in 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 , 2018 and 2019 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2013 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.65% ( 3.65 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.49% ( 5.49 % ) were 90 days or more past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between 3 and 24 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 24 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for home equity lines of credit , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family or loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . table 42 provides the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans and table 43 provides the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 79 .
Question: at december 31 , 2013 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g . , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately what percent were 30-89 days past due and 90 days or more past due?
Answer: | 9.14 |
FINQA1798 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest expense .
||2014|2013|2012|
|interest incurred|$ 158.1|$ 167.6|$ 153.9|
|less : capitalized interest|33.0|25.8|30.2|
|interest expense|$ 125.1|$ 141.8|$ 123.7|
2014 vs . 2013 interest incurred decreased $ 9.5 . the decrease was primarily due to a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio which reduced interest by $ 13 , partially offset by a higher average debt balance which increased interest by $ 6 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a higher carrying value in construction in progress . 2013 vs . 2012 interest incurred increased $ 13.7 . the increase was driven primarily by a higher average debt balance for $ 41 , partially offset by a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio of $ 24 . the change in capitalized interest was driven by a decrease in project spending and a lower average interest rate . effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes . refer to note 22 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for details on factors affecting the effective tax rate . 2014 vs . 2013 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 27.0% ( 27.0 % ) and 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) in 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the effective tax rate was higher in the current year primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 305.2 , which was not deductible for tax purposes , and the chilean tax reform enacted in september 2014 which increased income tax expense by $ 20.6 . these impacts were partially offset by an income tax benefit of $ 51.6 associated with losses from transactions and a tax election in a non-u.s . subsidiary . the prior year rate included income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs . refer to note 4 , business restructuring and cost reduction actions ; note 9 , goodwill ; note 22 , income taxes ; and note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements for details on these transactions . on a non-gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) and 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 2013 vs . 2012 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 22.8% ( 22.8 % ) and 21.9% ( 21.9 % ) in 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the effective rate in 2013 includes income tax benefits of $ 73.7 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans and $ 3.7 for the advisory costs . the effective rate in 2012 includes income tax benefits of $ 105.0 related to the business restructuring and cost reduction plans , $ 58.3 related to the second quarter spanish tax ruling , and $ 3.7 related to the customer bankruptcy charge , offset by income tax expense of $ 43.8 related to the first quarter spanish tax settlement and $ 31.3 related to the gain on the previously held equity interest in da nanomaterials . refer to note 4 , business restructuring and cost reduction actions ; note 5 , business combinations ; note 22 , income taxes ; and note 23 , supplemental information , to the consolidated financial statements for details on these transactions . on a non-gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) in both 2013 and 2012 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . in 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . in addition , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in 2013 , we recorded an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in 2014 , a gain of $ 3.9 was recognized for the sale of the remaining homecare business and settlement of contingencies on the sale to the linde group . refer to note 3 , discontinued operations , to the consolidated financial statements for additional details on this business. .
Question: what is the increase observed in the interest expense during 2012 and 2013?
Answer: | 0.14632 |
FINQA1799 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: institutions . international paper continually monitors its positions with and the credit quality of these financial institutions and does not expect non- performance by the counterparties . note 14 capital stock the authorized capital stock at both december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , consisted of 990850000 shares of common stock , $ 1 par value ; 400000 shares of cumulative $ 4 preferred stock , without par value ( stated value $ 100 per share ) ; and 8750000 shares of serial preferred stock , $ 1 par value . the serial preferred stock is issuable in one or more series by the board of directors without further shareholder action . in july 2006 , in connection with the planned use of projected proceeds from the company 2019s trans- formation plan , international paper 2019s board of direc- tors authorized a share repurchase program to acquire up to $ 3.0 billion of the company 2019s stock . in a modified 201cdutch auction 201d tender offer completed in september 2006 , international paper purchased 38465260 shares of its common stock at a price of $ 36.00 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 1.4 billion . in addition , in december 2006 , the company purchased an addi- tional 1220558 shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 33.84 per share , plus costs to acquire the shares , for a total cost of approximately $ 41 million . following the completion of these share repurchases , international paper had approximately 454 million shares of common stock issued and outstanding . note 15 retirement plans u.s . defined benefit plans international paper maintains pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all domestic employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 . these employees generally are eligible to participate in the plans upon completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21 . employees hired after june 30 , 2004 , who are not eligible for these pension plans receive an additional company contribution to their savings plan ( see 201cother plans 201d on page 83 ) . the plans provide defined benefits based on years of credited service and either final average earnings ( salaried employees ) , hourly job rates or specified benefit rates ( hourly and union employees ) . for its qualified defined benefit pension plan , interna- tional paper makes contributions that are sufficient to fully fund its actuarially determined costs , gen- erally equal to the minimum amounts required by the employee retirement income security act ( erisa ) . in addition , international paper made volun- tary contributions of $ 1.0 billion to the qualified defined benefit plan in 2006 , and does not expect to make any contributions in 2007 . the company also has two unfunded nonqualified defined benefit pension plans : a pension restoration plan available to employees hired prior to july 1 , 2004 that provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation in excess of limits set by the internal revenue service , and a supplemental retirement plan for senior managers ( serp ) , which is an alternative retirement plan for senior vice presi- dents and above who are designated by the chief executive officer as participants . these nonqualified plans are only funded to the extent of benefits paid , which are expected to be $ 41 million in 2007 . net periodic pension expense service cost is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the plans 2019 benefit formula to services rendered by employees during the year . interest cost represents the increase in the projected benefit obli- gation , which is a discounted amount , due to the passage of time . the expected return on plan assets reflects the computed amount of current year earn- ings from the investment of plan assets using an estimated long-term rate of return . net periodic pension expense for qualified and nonqualified u.s . defined benefit plans comprised the following : in millions 2006 2005 2004 .
|in millions|2006|2005|2004|
|service cost|$ 141|$ 129|$ 115|
|interest cost|506|474|467|
|expected return on plan assets|-540 ( 540 )|-556 ( 556 )|-592 ( 592 )|
|actuarial loss|243|167|94|
|amortization of prior service cost|27|29|27|
|net periodic pension expense ( a )|$ 377|$ 243|$ 111|
( a ) excludes $ 9.1 million , $ 6.5 million and $ 3.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 8.7 million , $ 3.6 million and $ 1.4 million in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , of termination benefits , in connection with cost reduction programs and facility rationalizations that were recorded in restructuring and other charges in the con- solidated statement of operations . also excludes $ 77.2 million and $ 14.3 million in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , in curtailment losses , and $ 18.6 million and $ 7.6 million of termination bene- fits in 2006 and 2005 , respectively , related to certain divest- itures recorded in net losses on sales and impairments of businesses held for sale in the consolidated statement of oper- ations. .
Question: what is the percentage change in net periodic pension expense between 2004 and 2005?
Answer: | 1.18919 |
Subsets and Splits