id
stringlengths 6
9
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 594
16.3k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
FINQA1400 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: deposits 2014deposits include escrow funds and certain other deposits held in trust . the company includes cash deposits in other current assets . deferred compensation obligations 2014the company 2019s deferred compensation plans allow participants to defer certain cash compensation into notional investment accounts . the company includes such plans in other long-term liabilities . the value of the company 2019s deferred compensation obligations is based on the market value of the participants 2019 notional investment accounts . the notional investments are comprised primarily of mutual funds , which are based on observable market prices . mark-to-market derivative asset and liability 2014the company utilizes fixed-to-floating interest-rate swaps , typically designated as fair-value hedges , to achieve a targeted level of variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt . the company also employs derivative financial instruments in the form of variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps and forward starting interest rate swaps , classified as economic hedges and cash flow hedges , respectively , in order to fix the interest cost on existing or forecasted debt . the company uses a calculation of future cash inflows and estimated future outflows , which are discounted , to determine the current fair value . additional inputs to the present value calculation include the contract terms , counterparty credit risk , interest rates and market volatility . other investments 2014other investments primarily represent money market funds used for active employee benefits . the company includes other investments in other current assets . note 18 : leases the company has entered into operating leases involving certain facilities and equipment . rental expenses under operating leases were $ 29 million , $ 24 million and $ 21 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . the operating leases for facilities will expire over the next 25 years and the operating leases for equipment will expire over the next 5 years . certain operating leases have renewal options ranging from one to five years . the minimum annual future rental commitment under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms over the next 5 years and thereafter are as follows: .
||amount|
|2018|$ 15|
|2019|14|
|2020|12|
|2021|9|
|2022|8|
|thereafter|65|
the company has a series of agreements with various public entities ( the 201cpartners 201d ) to establish certain joint ventures , commonly referred to as 201cpublic-private partnerships . 201d under the public-private partnerships , the company constructed utility plant , financed by the company and the partners constructed utility plant ( connected to the company 2019s property ) , financed by the partners . the company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of industrial development bonds ( 201cidbs 201d ) , issued by the partners under a state industrial development bond and commercial development act . the company leased back the total facilities , including portions funded by both the company and the partners , under leases for a period of 40 years . the leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the company have required payments from the company to the partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the idbs from the partners to the company ( as the holder of the idbs ) . as the ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the .
Question: what were the average operating rental expenses from 2015 to 2017 in millions
Answer: | 24.66667 |
FINQA1401 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis investing & lending investing & lending includes our investing activities and the origination of loans , including our relationship lending activities , to provide financing to clients . these investments and loans are typically longer-term in nature . we make investments , some of which are consolidated , including through our merchant banking business and our special situations group , in debt securities and loans , public and private equity securities , infrastructure and real estate entities . some of these investments are made indirectly through funds that we manage . we also make unsecured and secured loans to retail clients through our digital platforms , marcus and goldman sachs private bank select ( gs select ) , respectively . the table below presents the operating results of our investing & lending segment. .
|$ in millions|year ended december 2017|year ended december 2016|year ended december 2015|
|equity securities|$ 4578|$ 2573|$ 3781|
|debt securities and loans|2003|1507|1655|
|total net revenues|6581|4080|5436|
|operating expenses|2796|2386|2402|
|pre-taxearnings|$ 3785|$ 1694|$ 3034|
operating environment . during 2017 , generally higher global equity prices and tighter credit spreads contributed to a favorable environment for our equity and debt investments . results also reflected net gains from company- specific events , including sales , and corporate performance . this environment contrasts with 2016 , where , in the first quarter of 2016 , market conditions were difficult and corporate performance , particularly in the energy sector , was impacted by a challenging macroeconomic environment . however , market conditions improved during the rest of 2016 as macroeconomic concerns moderated . if macroeconomic concerns negatively affect company-specific events or corporate performance , or if global equity markets decline or credit spreads widen , net revenues in investing & lending would likely be negatively impacted . 2017 versus 2016 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 6.58 billion for 2017 , 61% ( 61 % ) higher than 2016 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 4.58 billion , including $ 3.82 billion of net gains from private equities and $ 762 million in net gains from public equities . net revenues in equity securities were 78% ( 78 % ) higher than 2016 , primarily reflecting a significant increase in net gains from private equities , which were positively impacted by company- specific events and corporate performance . in addition , net gains from public equities were significantly higher , as global equity prices increased during the year . of the $ 4.58 billion of net revenues in equity securities , approximately 60% ( 60 % ) was driven by net gains from company-specific events , such as sales , and public equities . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 2.00 billion , 33% ( 33 % ) higher than 2016 , reflecting significantly higher net interest income ( 2017 included approximately $ 1.80 billion of net interest income ) . net revenues in debt securities and loans for 2017 also included an impairment of approximately $ 130 million on a secured operating expenses were $ 2.80 billion for 2017 , 17% ( 17 % ) higher than 2016 , due to increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues , increased expenses related to consolidated investments , and increased expenses related to marcus . pre-tax earnings were $ 3.79 billion in 2017 compared with $ 1.69 billion in 2016 . 2016 versus 2015 . net revenues in investing & lending were $ 4.08 billion for 2016 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2015 . net revenues in equity securities were $ 2.57 billion , including $ 2.17 billion of net gains from private equities and $ 402 million in net gains from public equities . net revenues in equity securities were 32% ( 32 % ) lower than 2015 , primarily reflecting a significant decrease in net gains from private equities , driven by company-specific events and corporate performance . net revenues in debt securities and loans were $ 1.51 billion , 9% ( 9 % ) lower than 2015 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues related to relationship lending activities , due to the impact of changes in credit spreads on economic hedges . losses related to these hedges were $ 596 million in 2016 , compared with gains of $ 329 million in 2015 . this decrease was partially offset by higher net gains from investments in debt instruments and higher net interest income . see note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about economic hedges related to our relationship lending activities . operating expenses were $ 2.39 billion for 2016 , essentially unchanged compared with 2015 . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.69 billion in 2016 , 44% ( 44 % ) lower than 2015 . goldman sachs 2017 form 10-k 61 .
Question: in millions for 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , what was the minimum amount of equity securities?
Answer: | 2573.0 |
FINQA1402 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements certain of aon 2019s european subsidiaries have a a650 million ( u.s . $ 942 million ) multi-currency revolving loan credit facility . this facility will mature in october 2010 , unless aon opts to extend the facility . commitment fees of 8.75 basis points are payable on the unused portion of the facility . at december 31 , 2007 , aon has borrowed a376 million and $ 250 million ( $ 795 million ) under this facility . at december 31 , 2006 , a307 million was borrowed . at december 31 , 2007 , $ 250 million of the euro facility is classified as short-term debt in the consolidated statements of financial position . aon has guaranteed the obligations of its subsidiaries with respect to this facility . aon maintains a $ 600 million , 5-year u.s . committed bank credit facility to support commercial paper and other short-term borrowings , which expires in february 2010 . this facility permits the issuance of up to $ 150 million in letters of credit . at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , aon had $ 20 million in letters of credit outstanding . based on aon 2019s current credit ratings , commitment fees of 10 basis points are payable on the unused portion of the facility . for both the u.s . and euro facilities , aon is required to maintain consolidated net worth , as defined , of at least $ 2.5 billion , a ratio of consolidated ebitda ( earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation and amortization ) to consolidated interest expense of 4 to 1 and a ratio of consolidated debt to ebitda of not greater than 3 to 1 . aon also has other foreign facilities available , which include a a337.5 million ( $ 74 million ) facility , a a25 million ( $ 36 million ) facility , and a a20 million ( $ 29 million ) facility . outstanding debt securities , including aon capital a 2019s , are not redeemable by aon prior to maturity . there are no sinking fund provisions . interest is payable semi-annually on most debt securities . repayments of long-term debt are $ 548 million , $ 382 million and $ 225 million in 2010 , 2011 and 2012 , respectively . other information related to aon 2019s debt is as follows: .
|years ended december 31|2007|2006|2005|
|interest paid ( millions )|$ 147|$ 130|$ 130|
|weighted-average interest rates 2014 short-term borrowings|5.1% ( 5.1 % )|4.4% ( 4.4 % )|3.5% ( 3.5 % )|
lease commitments aon has noncancelable operating leases for certain office space , equipment and automobiles . these leases expire at various dates and may contain renewal and expansion options . in addition to base rental costs , occupancy lease agreements generally provide for rent escalations resulting from increased assessments for real estate taxes and other charges . approximately 81% ( 81 % ) of aon 2019s lease obligations are for the use of office space . rental expense for operating leases amounted to $ 368 million , $ 350 million and $ 337 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively , after deducting rentals from subleases ( $ 40 million , $ 33 million and $ 29 million for 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively ) . aon corporation .
Question: what is the rent expense reported in the financial statement of 2007?
Answer: | 408.0 |
FINQA1403 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which increased operating profit by $ 230 million , $ 150 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes expenses of $ 16 million , $ 11 million after tax ( $ 0.03 per share ) for a debt exchange , and a reduction in income tax expense of $ 62 million ( $ 0.14 per share ) resulting from a tax benefit related to claims we filed for additional extraterritorial income exclusion ( eti ) tax benefits . on a combined basis , these items increased earnings by $ 201 million after tax ( $ 0.45 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , increased operating profit by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which decreased operating profit by $ 61 million , $ 54 million after tax ( $ 0.12 per share ) . also includes a charge of $ 154 million , $ 100 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) for the early repayment of debt , and a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . on a combined basis , these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( f ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased operating profit by $ 7 million , $ 6 million after tax ( $ 0.01 per share ) . also includes a charge of $ 146 million , $ 96 million after tax ( $ 0.21 per share ) for the early repayment of debt . ( g ) we define return on invested capital ( roic ) as net earnings plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back adjustments related to postretirement benefit plans . we believe that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively we use the capital invested in our operations . we use roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also use it as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain of our incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . we calculate roic as follows : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 .
|( in millions )|2007|2006|2005|2004|2003|
|net earnings|$ 3033|$ 2529|$ 1825|$ 1266|$ 1053|
|interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1|229|235|241|276|317|
|return|$ 3262|$ 2764|$ 2066|$ 1542|$ 1370|
|average debt2 5|$ 4416|$ 4727|$ 5077|$ 5932|$ 6612|
|average equity3 5|7661|7686|7590|7015|6170|
|average benefit plan adjustments3 4 5|3171|2006|1545|1296|1504|
|average invested capital|$ 15248|$ 14419|$ 14212|$ 14243|$ 14286|
|return on invested capital|21.4% ( 21.4 % )|19.2% ( 19.2 % )|14.5% ( 14.5 % )|10.8% ( 10.8 % )|9.6% ( 9.6 % )|
1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities of long-term debt , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments , primarily for unrecognized benefit plan actuarial losses and prior service costs in 2007 and 2006 , the adjustment for the adoption of fas 158 in 2006 , and the additional minimum pension liability in years prior to 2007 . 4 average benefit plan adjustments reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the captions 201cpostretirement benefit plans , 201d 201cadjustment for adoption of fas 158 201d and 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the total of annual benefit plan adjustments to equity were : 2007 = $ 1706 million ; 2006 = ( $ 1883 ) million ; 2005 = ( $ 105 ) million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 ) million ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; and 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the current year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .
Question: what was the percentage growth in net earnings from 2003 to 2004
Answer: | 0.20228 |
FINQA1404 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter in the aggregate , are as follows ( in millions ) : .
|2011|$ 65.1|
|2012|47.6|
|2013|35.7|
|2014|27.8|
|2015|24.3|
|thereafter|78.1|
|total|$ 278.6|
in addition , the company has operating lease commitments relating to office equipment and computer hardware with annual lease payments of approximately $ 16.3 million per year which renew on a short-term basis . rent expense incurred under all operating leases during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 116.1 million , $ 100.2 million and $ 117.0 million , respectively . included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was rent expense of $ 2.0 million , $ 1.8 million and $ 17.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . data processing and maintenance services agreements . the company has agreements with various vendors , which expire between 2011 and 2017 , for portions of its computer data processing operations and related functions . the company 2019s estimated aggregate contractual obligation remaining under these agreements was approximately $ 554.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 . however , this amount could be more or less depending on various factors such as the inflation rate , foreign exchange rates , the introduction of significant new technologies , or changes in the company 2019s data processing needs . ( 16 ) employee benefit plans stock purchase plan fis employees participate in an employee stock purchase plan ( espp ) . eligible employees may voluntarily purchase , at current market prices , shares of fis 2019 common stock through payroll deductions . pursuant to the espp , employees may contribute an amount between 3% ( 3 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of their base salary and certain commissions . shares purchased are allocated to employees based upon their contributions . the company contributes varying matching amounts as specified in the espp . the company recorded an expense of $ 14.3 million , $ 12.4 million and $ 14.3 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , relating to the participation of fis employees in the espp . included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was expense of $ 0.1 million and $ 3.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . 401 ( k ) profit sharing plan the company 2019s employees are covered by a qualified 401 ( k ) plan . eligible employees may contribute up to 40% ( 40 % ) of their pretax annual compensation , up to the amount allowed pursuant to the internal revenue code . the company generally matches 50% ( 50 % ) of each dollar of employee contribution up to 6% ( 6 % ) of the employee 2019s total eligible compensation . the company recorded expense of $ 23.1 million , $ 16.6 million and $ 18.5 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , relating to the participation of fis employees in the 401 ( k ) plan . included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of earnings was expense of $ 0.1 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) %%transmsg*** transmitting job : g26369 pcn : 083000000 ***%%pcmsg|83 |00006|yes|no|03/28/2011 17:32|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what percentage of future minimum operating lease payments for leases with remaining terms greater than one year for each of the years in the five years ending december 31 , 2015 , and thereafter are due in 2012?
Answer: | 0.17085 |
FINQA1405 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .
||2019|2018|2017|
|balance at beginning of fiscal year|$ 127.1|$ 148.9|$ 166.8|
|additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )|1.0|3.4|7.7|
|additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )|103.8|3.1|5.0|
|additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years|1.8|18.0|15.2|
|reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years|( 0.5 )|( 5.3 )|( 25.6 )|
|reductions due to settlement ( 3 )|( 4.0 )|( 29.4 )|( 14.1 )|
|( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments|-1.7 ( 1.7 )|-9.6 ( 9.6 )|2.0|
|reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations|( 3.2 )|( 2.0 )|( 8.1 )|
|balance at end of fiscal year|$ 224.3|$ 127.1|$ 148.9|
( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .
Question: in 2019 , what percent of the total balance did tax positions taken in the current year amount to?
Answer: | 0.46277 |
FINQA1406 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2015 primarily related to the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we repurchased 13.6 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 285.2 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 195.5 on our common stock . net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar and euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2015|december 31 , 2014|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1509.7|$ 1667.2|
|short-term borrowings|$ 150.1|$ 107.2|
|current portion of long-term debt|1.9|2.1|
|long-term debt|1610.3|1612.9|
|total debt|$ 1762.3|$ 1722.2|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes , debt service and contributions to pension and postretirement plans . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests. .
Question: if all the balance of cash cash equivalents and marketable securities was used to repay debt , what would be the net debt at the end of 2015?
Answer: | 252.6 |
FINQA1407 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years : beginning stores new stores ( 1 ) stores closed ending stores ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . our store-based information systems , which are designed to improve the efficiency of our operations and enhance customer service , are comprised of a proprietary pos system and electronic parts catalog , or epc , system . information maintained by our pos system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly . our pos system is fully integrated with our epc system and enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles . our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information . our epc system also contains enhanced search engines and user-friendly navigation tools that enhance our team members' ability to look up any needed parts as well as additional products the customer needs to complete an automotive repair project . if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the epc system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors . available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time . we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities . our store-level inventory management system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level . with the store-level system , store team members can check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers . our stores use radio frequency hand-held devices to help ensure the accuracy of our inventory . our standard operating procedure , or sop , system is a web-based , electronic data management system that provides our team members with instant access to any of our standard operating procedures through a comprehensive on-line search function . all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability . purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan . our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals . our global sourcing team works closely with both teams . in fiscal 2011 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 500 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases . our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume . the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand . we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .
||2011|2010|2009|2008|2007|
|beginning stores|3369|3264|3243|3153|2995|
|new stores ( 1 )|95|110|75|109|175|
|stores closed|-4 ( 4 )|-5 ( 5 )|-54 ( 54 )|-19 ( 19 )|-17 ( 17 )|
|ending stores|3460|3369|3264|3243|3153|
the following table sets forth information concerning increases in the total number of our aap stores during the past five years : beginning stores new stores ( 1 ) stores closed ending stores ( 1 ) does not include stores that opened as relocations of previously existing stores within the same general market area or substantial renovations of stores . our store-based information systems , which are designed to improve the efficiency of our operations and enhance customer service , are comprised of a proprietary pos system and electronic parts catalog , or epc , system . information maintained by our pos system is used to formulate pricing , marketing and merchandising strategies and to replenish inventory accurately and rapidly . our pos system is fully integrated with our epc system and enables our store team members to assist our customers in their parts selection and ordering based on the year , make , model and engine type of their vehicles . our centrally-based epc data management system enables us to reduce the time needed to ( i ) exchange data with our vendors and ( ii ) catalog and deliver updated , accurate parts information . our epc system also contains enhanced search engines and user-friendly navigation tools that enhance our team members' ability to look up any needed parts as well as additional products the customer needs to complete an automotive repair project . if a hard-to-find part or accessory is not available at one of our stores , the epc system can determine whether the part is carried and in-stock through our hub or pdq ae networks or can be ordered directly from one of our vendors . available parts and accessories are then ordered electronically from another store , hub , pdq ae or directly from the vendor with immediate confirmation of price , availability and estimated delivery time . we also support our store operations with additional proprietary systems and customer driven labor scheduling capabilities . our store-level inventory management system provides real-time inventory tracking at the store level . with the store-level system , store team members can check the quantity of on-hand inventory for any sku , adjust stock levels for select items for store specific events , automatically process returns and defective merchandise , designate skus for cycle counts and track merchandise transfers . our stores use radio frequency hand-held devices to help ensure the accuracy of our inventory . our standard operating procedure , or sop , system is a web-based , electronic data management system that provides our team members with instant access to any of our standard operating procedures through a comprehensive on-line search function . all of these systems are tightly integrated and provide real-time , comprehensive information to store personnel , resulting in improved customer service levels , team member productivity and in-stock availability . purchasing for virtually all of the merchandise for our stores is handled by our merchandise teams located in three primary locations : 2022 store support center in roanoke , virginia ; 2022 regional office in minneapolis , minnesota ; and 2022 global sourcing office in taipei , taiwan . our roanoke team is primarily responsible for the parts categories and our minnesota team is primarily responsible for accessories , oil and chemicals . our global sourcing team works closely with both teams . in fiscal 2011 , we purchased merchandise from approximately 500 vendors , with no single vendor accounting for more than 9% ( 9 % ) of purchases . our purchasing strategy involves negotiating agreements with most of our vendors to purchase merchandise over a specified period of time along with other terms , including pricing , payment terms and volume . the merchandising team has developed strong vendor relationships in the industry and , in a collaborative effort with our vendor partners , utilizes a category management process where we manage the mix of our product offerings to meet customer demand . we believe this process , which develops a customer-focused business plan for each merchandise category , and our global sourcing operation are critical to improving comparable store sales , gross margin and inventory productivity. .
Question: what is the net number of stores that opened during 2011?
Answer: | 91.0 |
FINQA1408 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: act of 1933 , as amended , and section 1145 of the united states code . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . during the three months ended december 31 , 2008 , we issued an aggregate of 7173456 shares of our common stock upon conversion of $ 147.1 million principal amount of our 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes . pursuant to the terms of the indenture , holders of the 3.00% ( 3.00 % ) notes receive 48.7805 shares of our common stock for every $ 1000 principal amount of notes converted . in connection with the conversions , we paid such holders an aggregate of approximately $ 3.7 million , calculated based on the accrued and unpaid interest on the notes and the discounted value of the future interest payments on the notes . all shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration set forth in section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the securities act of 1933 , as amended . no underwriters were engaged in connection with such issuances . issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2008 , we repurchased 2784221 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 79.4 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .
|period|total number of shares purchased ( 1 )|average price paid per share|total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs|approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions )|
|october 2008|1379180|$ 30.51|1379180|$ 1005.3|
|november 2008|1315800|$ 26.51|1315800|$ 970.4|
|december 2008|89241|$ 27.32|89241|$ 967.9|
|total fourth quarter|2784221|$ 28.53|2784221|$ 967.9|
( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in february 2008 . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to a trading plan under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . as reflected in the above table , in the fourth quarter of 2008 , we significantly reduced purchases of common stock under our stock repurchase program based on the downturn in the economy and the disruptions in the financial and credit markets . subsequent to december 31 , 2008 , we repurchased approximately 28000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 0.8 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to this program . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the program in the future in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .
Question: what is the total cash used for stock repurchase during the fourth quarter of 2008 , in millions?
Answer: | 79.43383 |
FINQA1409 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: part ii item 5 : market for registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities motorola's common stock is listed on the new york and chicago stock exchanges . the number of stockholders of record of motorola common stock on january 31 , 2006 was 80799 . the remainder of the response to this item incorporates by reference note 15 , ""quarterly and other financial data ( unaudited ) '' of the notes to consolidated financial statements appearing under ""item 8 : financial statements and supplementary data'' . the following table provides information with respect to acquisitions by the company of shares of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2005 . issuer purchases of equity securities ( d ) maximum number ( c ) total number ( or approximate dollar of shares purchased value ) of shares that ( a ) total number ( b ) average price as part of publicly may yet be purchased of shares paid per announced plans under the plans or period purchased ( 2 ) share ( 2 ) ( 3 ) or programs ( 1 ) programs ( 1 ) .
|period|( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 2 )|( b ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) ( 3 )|( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 )|( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 )|
|10/2/05 to 10/29/05|5506400|$ 21.16|5506400|$ 3367111278|
|10/30/05 to 11/26/05|4968768|$ 22.59|4947700|$ 3257373024|
|11/27/05 to 12/31/05|5824970|$ 23.26|5503500|$ 3128512934|
|total|16300138|$ 22.26|15957600||
( 1 ) on may 18 , 2005 , the company announced that its board of directors authorized the company to repurchase up to $ 4.0 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over a 36-month period ending on may 31 , 2008 , subject to market conditions ( the ""stock repurchase program'' ) . ( 2 ) in addition to purchases under the stock repurchase program , included in this column are transactions under the company's equity compensation plans involving the delivery to the company of 342415 shares of motorola common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to company employees and the surrender of 123 shares of motorola common stock to pay the option exercise price in connection with the exercise of employee stock options . ( 3 ) average price paid per share of stock repurchased under the stock repurchase program is execution price , excluding commissions paid to brokers. .
Question: in 2005 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs on or after 11/25/2005
Answer: | 0.34488 |
FINQA1410 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
||2002|2001|
|credit facility|$ 156.2|$ 358.2|
|uncommitted credit facilities|0.5|5.7|
|total debt|$ 156.7|$ 363.9|
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 2 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such requirement . fair value commitments under the credit facility are subject to certain the carrying value of the company 2019s borrowings approxi- fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . mates fair value due to their short-term maturities and uncommitted credit facilities variable interest rates . the company has a $ 26 million uncommitted unsecured 8 . derivative financial instruments revolving line of credit . the purpose of this credit line is to support the working capital needs , letters of credit and the company is exposed to market risk due to changes overdraft needs for the company . the uncommitted credit in currency exchange rates . as a result , the company utilizes agreement contains customary affirmative and negative cove- foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the effect of nants and events of default , none of which are considered exchange rate fluctuations on anticipated foreign currency restrictive to the operation of the business . in addition , this transactions , primarily intercompany sales and purchases uncommitted credit agreement provides for unconditional expected to occur within the next twelve to twenty-four and irrevocable guarantees by the company . in the event the months . the company does not hold financial instruments company 2019s long-term debt ratings by both standard and for trading or speculative purposes . for derivatives which poor 2019s ratings services and moody 2019s investor 2019s service , inc. , qualify as hedges of future cash flows , the effective portion fall below bb- and ba3 , then the company may be required of changes in fair value is temporarily recorded in other to repay all outstanding and contingent obligations . the comprehensive income , then recognized in earnings when company 2019s credit rating as of december 31 , 2002 met such the hedged item affects earnings . the ineffective portion of requirement . this uncommitted credit line matures on a derivative 2019s change in fair value , if any , is reported in july 31 , 2003 . outstanding borrowings under this uncommit- earnings . the net amount recognized in earnings during the ted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 were $ 0.5 million years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , due to ineffective- with a weighted average interest rate of 6.35 percent . ness and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge the company also has a $ 15 million uncommitted effectiveness , was not significant . revolving unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of the notional amounts of outstanding foreign exchange credit is to support short-term working capital needs of the forward contracts , principally japanese yen and the euro , company . the agreement for this uncommitted unsecured entered into with third parties , at december 31 , 2002 , was line of credit contains customary covenants , none of which $ 252 million . the fair value of derivative instruments recorded are considered restrictive to the operation of the business . in accrued liabilities at december 31 , 2002 , was $ 13.8 million , this uncommitted line matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were or $ 8.5 million net of taxes , which is deferred in other no borrowings under this uncommitted line of credit as of comprehensive income and is expected to be reclassified to december 31 , 2002 . earnings over the next two years , of which , $ 7.7 million , or the company has a $ 20 million uncommitted revolving $ 4.8 million , net of taxes , is expected to be reclassified to unsecured line of credit . the purpose of this line of credit is earnings over the next twelve months . to support short-term working capital needs of the company . the pricing is based upon money market rates . the agree- 9 . capital stock and earnings per share ment for this uncommitted unsecured line of credit contains as discussed in note 14 , all of the shares of company customary covenants , none of which are considered restrictive common stock were distributed at the distribution by the to the operation of the business . this uncommitted line former parent to its stockholders in the form of a dividend matures on july 31 , 2003 . there were no borrowings under of one share of company common stock , and the associated this uncommitted line of credit as of december 31 , 2002 . preferred stock purchase right , for every ten shares of the company was in compliance with all covenants common stock of the former parent . in july 2001 the board under all three of the uncommitted credit facilities as of of directors of the company adopted a rights agreement december 31 , 2002 . the company had no long-term debt intended to have anti-takeover effects . under this agreement as of december 31 , 2002 . one right attaches to each share of company common stock . outstanding debt as of december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , the rights will not become exercisable until the earlier of : consist of the following ( in millions ) : a ) the company learns that a person or group acquired , or 2002 2001 obtained the right to acquire , beneficial ownership of securi- credit facility $ 156.2 $ 358.2 ties representing more than 20 percent of the shares of uncommitted credit facilities 0.5 5.7 company common stock then outstanding , or b ) such date , if any , as may be designated by the board of directorstotal debt $ 156.7 $ 363.9 following the commencement of , or first public disclosure of the company paid $ 13.0 million and $ 4.6 million in an intention to commence , a tender offer or exchange offer interest charges during 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the percentage change of total debt from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: | -0.56939 |
FINQA1411 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notional amounts and derivative receivables marked to market ( 201cmtm 201d ) notional amounts ( a ) derivative receivables mtm as of december 31 .
|as of december 31 , ( in billions )|as of december 31 , 2005|as of december 31 , 2004|2005|2004|
|interest rate|$ 38493|$ 37022|$ 30|$ 46|
|foreign exchange|2136|1886|3|8|
|equity|458|434|6|6|
|credit derivatives|2241|1071|4|3|
|commodity|265|101|7|3|
|total|$ 43593|$ 40514|50|66|
|collateral held againstderivative receivables|na|na|-6 ( 6 )|-9 ( 9 )|
|exposure net of collateral|na|na|$ 44 ( b )|$ 57 ( c )|
( a ) the notional amounts represent the gross sum of long and short third-party notional derivative contracts , excluding written options and foreign exchange spot contracts , which significantly exceed the possible credit losses that could arise from such transactions . for most derivative transactions , the notional principal amount does not change hands ; it is used simply as a reference to calculate payments . ( b ) the firm held $ 33 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2005 , consisting of $ 27 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 6 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 27 billion is reflected within the $ 50 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 33 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . ( c ) the firm held $ 41 billion of collateral against derivative receivables as of december 31 , 2004 , consisting of $ 32 billion in net cash received under credit support annexes to legally enforceable master netting agreements , and $ 9 billion of other liquid securities collateral . the benefit of the $ 32 billion is reflected within the $ 66 billion of derivative receivables mtm . excluded from the $ 41 billion of collateral is $ 10 billion of collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions ; this collateral secures exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mtm of the client 2019s transactions move in the firm 2019s favor . also excluded are credit enhancements in the form of letters of credit and surety receivables . management 2019s discussion and analysis jpmorgan chase & co . 68 jpmorgan chase & co . / 2005 annual report 1 year 2 years 5 years 10 years mdp avgavgdredre exposure profile of derivatives measures december 31 , 2005 ( in billions ) the following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative receivables ( i.e. , the mtm or fair value of the derivative contracts after taking into account the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements ) at each of the dates indicated : the mtm of derivative receivables contracts represents the cost to replace the contracts at current market rates should the counterparty default . when jpmorgan chase has more than one transaction outstanding with a counter- party , and a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists with that counterparty , the netted mtm exposure , less collateral held , represents , in the firm 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net mtm value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . however , the total potential future credit risk embedded in the firm 2019s derivatives portfolio is not the simple sum of all peak client credit risks . this is because , at the portfolio level , credit risk is reduced by the fact that when offsetting transactions are done with separate counter- parties , only one of the two trades can generate a credit loss , even if both counterparties were to default simultaneously . the firm refers to this effect as market diversification , and the market-diversified peak ( 201cmdp 201d ) measure is a portfolio aggregation of counterparty peak measures , representing the maximum losses at the 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level that would occur if all coun- terparties defaulted under any one given market scenario and time frame . derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) exposure is a measure that expresses the riskiness of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the riskiness of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) is a measure of the expected mtm value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the credit valuation adjustment ( 201ccva 201d ) , as further described below . average exposure was $ 36 billion and $ 38 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables mtm net of other highly liquid collateral of $ 44 billion and $ 57 billion at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the graph below shows exposure profiles to derivatives over the next 10 years as calculated by the mdp , dre and avg metrics . all three measures generally show declining exposure after the first year , if no new trades were added to the portfolio. .
Question: for the derivative contracts , assuming an average contract life of 10 years , what would annual exposure be in us$ billion at december 31 , 2005 on derivative receivables?
Answer: | 3.6 |
FINQA1412 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : .
||2019|2020|2021|2022|2023|2024 2013 2028|
|qualified defined benefit pension plans|$ 2350|$ 2390|$ 2470|$ 2550|$ 2610|$ 13670|
|retiree medical and life insurance plans|170|180|180|180|170|810|
defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what is the percentage change in 401 ( k ) contributions from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | -0.00648 |
FINQA1413 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: zimmer holdings , inc . 2013 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions . treasury stock 2013 we account for repurchases of common stock under the cost method and present treasury stock as a reduction of stockholders 2019 equity . we reissue common stock held in treasury only for limited purposes . noncontrolling interest 2013 in 2011 , we made an investment in a company in which we acquired a controlling financial interest , but not 100 percent of the equity . in 2013 , we purchased additional shares of the company from the minority shareholders . further information related to the noncontrolling interests of that investment has not been provided as it is not significant to our consolidated financial statements . accounting pronouncements 2013 effective january 1 , 2013 , we adopted the fasb 2019s accounting standard updates ( asus ) requiring reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income ( oci ) and balance sheet offsetting between derivative assets and liabilities . these asus only change financial statement disclosure requirements and therefore do not impact our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . see note 12 for disclosures relating to oci . see note 13 for disclosures relating to balance sheet offsetting . there are no other recently issued accounting pronouncements that we have not yet adopted that are expected to have a material effect on our financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 3 . share-based compensation our share-based payments primarily consist of stock options , restricted stock , restricted stock units ( rsus ) , and an employee stock purchase plan . share-based compensation expense is as follows ( in millions ) : .
|for the years ended december 31,|2013|2012|2011|
|stock options|$ 24.7|$ 32.4|$ 41.7|
|rsus and other|23.8|22.6|18.8|
|total expense pre-tax|48.5|55.0|60.5|
|tax benefit related to awards|-15.6 ( 15.6 )|-16.6 ( 16.6 )|-17.8 ( 17.8 )|
|total expense net of tax|$ 32.9|$ 38.4|$ 42.7|
share-based compensation cost capitalized as part of inventory for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 4.1 million , $ 6.1 million , and $ 8.8 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , approximately $ 2.4 million and $ 3.3 million of capitalized costs remained in finished goods inventory . stock options we had two equity compensation plans in effect at december 31 , 2013 : the 2009 stock incentive plan ( 2009 plan ) and the stock plan for non-employee directors . the 2009 plan succeeded the 2006 stock incentive plan ( 2006 plan ) and the teamshare stock option plan ( teamshare plan ) . no further awards have been granted under the 2006 plan or under the teamshare plan since may 2009 , and shares remaining available for grant under those plans have been merged into the 2009 plan . vested and unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock and rsus previously granted under the 2006 plan , the teamshare plan and another prior plan , the 2001 stock incentive plan , remained outstanding as of december 31 , 2013 . we have reserved the maximum number of shares of common stock available for award under the terms of each of these plans . we have registered 57.9 million shares of common stock under these plans . the 2009 plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options , long-term performance awards in the form of performance shares or units , restricted stock , rsus and stock appreciation rights . the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors determines the grant date for annual grants under our equity compensation plans . the date for annual grants under the 2009 plan to our executive officers is expected to occur in the first quarter of each year following the earnings announcements for the previous quarter and full year . the stock plan for non-employee directors provides for awards of stock options , restricted stock and rsus to non-employee directors . it has been our practice to issue shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options from previously unissued shares , except in limited circumstances where they are issued from treasury stock . the total number of awards which may be granted in a given year and/or over the life of the plan under each of our equity compensation plans is limited . at december 31 , 2013 , an aggregate of 10.4 million shares were available for future grants and awards under these plans . stock options granted to date under our plans generally vest over four years and generally have a maximum contractual life of 10 years . as established under our equity compensation plans , vesting may accelerate upon retirement after the first anniversary date of the award if certain criteria are met . we recognize expense related to stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period , less awards expected to be forfeited using estimated forfeiture rates . due to the accelerated retirement provisions , the requisite service period of our stock options range from one to four years . stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant , except in limited circumstances where local law may dictate otherwise. .
Question: what was the percentage change in share-based compensation expense between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: | -0.14323 |
FINQA1414 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents as of september 28 , 2013 . the company 2019s share repurchase program does not obligate it to acquire any specific number of shares . under the program , shares may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions , including under plans complying with rule 10b5-1 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) . in august 2012 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase arrangement ( 201casr 201d ) with a financial institution to purchase up to $ 1.95 billion of the company 2019s common stock in 2013 . in the first quarter of 2013 , 2.6 million shares were initially delivered to the company . in april 2013 , the purchase period for the asr ended and an additional 1.5 million shares were delivered to the company . in total , 4.1 million shares were delivered under the asr at an average repurchase price of $ 478.20 per share . the shares were retired in the quarters they were delivered , and the up-front payment of $ 1.95 billion was accounted for as a reduction to shareholders 2019 equity in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet in the first quarter of 2013 . in april 2013 , the company entered into a new asr program with two financial institutions to purchase up to $ 12 billion of the company 2019s common stock . in exchange for up-front payments totaling $ 12 billion , the financial institutions committed to deliver shares during the asr 2019s purchase periods , which will end during 2014 . the total number of shares ultimately delivered , and therefore the average price paid per share , will be determined at the end of the applicable purchase period based on the volume weighted average price of the company 2019s stock during that period . during the third quarter of 2013 , 23.5 million shares were initially delivered to the company and retired . this does not represent the final number of shares to be delivered under the asr . the up-front payments of $ 12 billion were accounted for as a reduction to shareholders 2019 equity in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the company reflected the asrs as a repurchase of common stock for purposes of calculating earnings per share and as forward contracts indexed to its own common stock . the forward contracts met all of the applicable criteria for equity classification , and , therefore , were not accounted for as derivative instruments . during 2013 , the company repurchased 19.4 million shares of its common stock in the open market at an average price of $ 464.11 per share for a total of $ 9.0 billion . these shares were retired upon repurchase . note 8 2013 comprehensive income comprehensive income consists of two components , net income and other comprehensive income . other comprehensive income refers to revenue , expenses , and gains and losses that under gaap are recorded as an element of shareholders 2019 equity but are excluded from net income . the company 2019s other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation adjustments from those subsidiaries not using the u.s . dollar as their functional currency , net deferred gains and losses on certain derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges , and unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities classified as available-for-sale . the following table shows the components of aoci , net of taxes , as of september 28 , 2013 and september 29 , 2012 ( in millions ) : .
||2013|2012|
|cumulative foreign currency translation|$ -105 ( 105 )|$ 8|
|net unrecognized gains/losses on derivative instruments|-175 ( 175 )|-240 ( 240 )|
|net unrealized gains/losses on marketable securities|-191 ( 191 )|731|
|accumulated other comprehensive income/ ( loss )|$ -471 ( 471 )|$ 499|
.
Question: what was the change in cumulative foreign currency translation during 2013?
Answer: | -113.0 |
FINQA1415 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station in march 2016 and a provision recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan revenues and the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales and decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 1237 gwh , or 4% ( 4 % ) , in industrial usage primarily due to an increase in demand from existing customers and expansion projects in the chemicals industry . 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 2408.8|
|retail electric price|62.5|
|volume/weather|-6.7 ( 6.7 )|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|-17.2 ( 17.2 )|
|other|-9.0 ( 9.0 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 2438.4|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: how much higher was the net revenue in 2016 than 2015 ? ( in millions )
Answer: | 29.6 |
FINQA1416 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 increased proved liquid hydrocarbon , including synthetic crude oil , reserves to 78 percent from 75 percent of proved reserves 2022 increased e&p net sales volumes , excluding libya , by 7 percent 2022 recorded 96 percent average operational availability for all major company-operated e&p assets , compared to 94 percent in 2010 2022 completed debottlenecking work that increased crude oil production capacity at the alvheim fpso in norway to 150000 gross bbld from the previous capacity of 142000 gross bbld and the original 2008 capacity of 120000 gross bbld 2022 announced two non-operated discoveries in the iraqi kurdistan region and began drilling in poland 2022 completed aosp expansion 1 , including the start-up of the expanded scotford upgrader , realizing an increase in net synthetic crude oil sales volumes of 48 percent 2022 completed dispositions of non-core assets and interests in acreage positions for net proceeds of $ 518 million 2022 repurchased 12 million shares of our common stock at a cost of $ 300 million 2022 retired $ 2498 million principal of our long-term debt 2022 resumed limited production in libya in the fourth quarter of 2011 following the february 2011 temporary suspension of operations consolidated results of operations : 2011 compared to 2010 due to the spin-off of our downstream business on june 30 , 2011 , which is reported as discontinued operations , income from continuing operations is more representative of marathon oil as an independent energy company . consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes was 9 percent higher in 2011 than in 2010 , largely due to higher liquid hydrocarbon prices . this improvement was offset by increased income taxes primarily the result of excess foreign tax credits generated during 2011 that we do not expect to utilize in the future . the effective income tax rate for continuing operations was 61 percent in 2011 compared to 54 percent in 2010 . revenues are summarized in the following table : ( in millions ) 2011 2010 .
|( in millions )|2011|2010|
|e&p|$ 13029|$ 10782|
|osm|1588|833|
|ig|93|150|
|segment revenues|14710|11765|
|elimination of intersegment revenues|-47 ( 47 )|-75 ( 75 )|
|total revenues|$ 14663|$ 11690|
e&p segment revenues increased $ 2247 million from 2010 to 2011 , primarily due to higher average liquid hydrocarbon realizations , which were $ 99.37 per bbl in 2011 , a 31 percent increase over 2010 . revenues in 2010 included net pre-tax gains of $ 95 million on derivative instruments intended to mitigate price risk on future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas . included in our e&p segment are supply optimization activities which include the purchase of commodities from third parties for resale . supply optimization serves to aggregate volumes in order to satisfy transportation commitments and to achieve flexibility within product types and delivery points . see the cost of revenues discussion as revenues from supply optimization approximate the related costs . higher average crude oil prices in 2011 compared to 2010 increased revenues related to supply optimization . revenues from the sale of our u.s . production are higher in 2011 primarily as a result of higher liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas price realizations , but sales volumes declined. .
Question: what was the total revenues for 2011 and 2010 , in millions?
Answer: | 26353.0 |
FINQA1417 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 119 implementing further revisions to the capital accord in the u.s . ( such further revisions are commonly referred to as 201cbasel iii 201d ) . basel iii revised basel ii by , among other things , narrowing the definition of capital , and increasing capital requirements for specific exposures . basel iii also includes higher capital ratio requirements and provides that the tier 1 common capital requirement will be increased to 7% ( 7 % ) , comprised of a minimum ratio of 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) plus a 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) capital conservation buffer . implementation of the 7% ( 7 % ) tier 1 common capital requirement is required by january 1 , in addition , global systemically important banks ( 201cgsibs 201d ) will be required to maintain tier 1 common requirements above the 7% ( 7 % ) minimum in amounts ranging from an additional 1% ( 1 % ) to an additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) . in november 2012 , the financial stability board ( 201cfsb 201d ) indicated that it would require the firm , as well as three other banks , to hold the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common ; the requirement will be phased in beginning in 2016 . the basel committee also stated it intended to require certain gsibs to hold an additional 1% ( 1 % ) of tier 1 common under certain circumstances , to act as a disincentive for the gsib from taking actions that would further increase its systemic importance . currently , no gsib ( including the firm ) is required to hold this additional 1% ( 1 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , pursuant to the requirements of the dodd-frank act , u.s . federal banking agencies have proposed certain permanent basel i floors under basel ii and basel iii capital calculations . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of aoci related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules would be 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non- gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts as a key measure to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . december 31 , 2012 ( in millions , except ratios ) .
|tier 1 common under basel i rules|$ 140342|
|adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans|4077|
|all other adjustments|-453 ( 453 )|
|estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules|$ 143966|
|estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a )|$ 1647903|
|estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules ( b )|8.7% ( 8.7 % )|
estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii rules ( a ) $ 1647903 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii rules ( b ) 8.7% ( 8.7 % ) ( a ) key differences in the calculation of risk-weighted assets between basel i and basel iii include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; ( 2 ) basel iii market risk rwa reflects the new capital requirements related to trading assets and securitizations , which include incremental capital requirements for stress var , correlation trading , and re-securitization positions ; and ( 3 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . the actual impact on the firm 2019s capital ratios upon implementation could differ depending on final implementation guidance from the regulators , as well as regulatory approval of certain of the firm 2019s internal risk models . ( b ) the tier 1 common ratio is tier 1 common divided by rwa . the firm 2019s estimate of its tier 1 common ratio under basel iii reflects its current understanding of the basel iii rules based on information currently published by the basel committee and u.s . federal banking agencies and on the application of such rules to its businesses as currently conducted ; it excludes the impact of any changes the firm may make in the future to its businesses as a result of implementing the basel iii rules , possible enhancements to certain market risk models , and any further implementation guidance from the regulators . the basel iii capital requirements are subject to prolonged transition periods . the transition period for banks to meet the tier 1 common requirement under basel iii was originally scheduled to begin in 2013 , with full implementation on january 1 , 2019 . in november 2012 , the u.s . federal banking agencies announced a delay in the implementation dates for the basel iii capital requirements . the additional capital requirements for gsibs will be phased in starting january 1 , 2016 , with full implementation on january 1 , 2019 . management 2019s current objective is for the firm to reach , by the end of 2013 , an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) . additional information regarding the firm 2019s capital ratios and the federal regulatory capital standards to which it is subject is presented in supervision and regulation on pages 1 20138 of the 2012 form 10-k , and note 28 on pages 306 2013 308 of this annual report . broker-dealer regulatory capital jpmorgan chase 2019s principal u.s . broker-dealer subsidiaries are j.p . morgan securities llc ( 201cjpmorgan securities 201d ) and j.p . morgan clearing corp . ( 201cjpmorgan clearing 201d ) . jpmorgan clearing is a subsidiary of jpmorgan securities and provides clearing and settlement services . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing are each subject to rule 15c3-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 ( the 201cnet capital rule 201d ) . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing are also each registered as futures commission merchants and subject to rule 1.17 of the commodity futures trading commission ( 201ccftc 201d ) . jpmorgan securities and jpmorgan clearing have elected to compute their minimum net capital requirements in accordance with the 201calternative net capital requirements 201d of the net capital rule . at december 31 , 2012 , jpmorgan securities 2019 net capital , as defined by the net capital rule , was $ 13.5 billion , exceeding the minimum requirement by .
Question: how much more money would jp morgan need to meet management 2019s plan to reach an estimated basel iii tier i common ratio of 9.5%?
Answer: | 12584.785 |
FINQA1418 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: taxes . if group or its bermuda subsidiaries were to become subject to u.s . income tax ; there could be a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flows . united kingdom . bermuda re 2019s uk branch conducts business in the uk and is subject to taxation in the uk . bermuda re believes that it has operated and will continue to operate its bermuda operation in a manner which will not cause them to be subject to uk taxation . if bermuda re 2019s bermuda operations were to become subject to uk income tax there could be a material adverse impact on the company 2019s financial condition , results of operations and cash flow . available information the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8-k , proxy state- ments and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestre.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . i t e m 1 a . r i s k f a c t o r s in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , finan- cial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . r i s k s r e l a t i n g t o o u r b u s i n e s s our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a pre-tax loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 5.0 million , before corporate level rein- surance and taxes . effective for the third quarter 2005 , industrial risk losses have been excluded from catastrophe losses , with prior periods adjusted for comparison purposes . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .
|calendar year|calendar year||
|2006|$ 287.9|million|
|2005|$ 1485.7|million|
|2004|$ 390.0|million|
|2003|$ 35.0|million|
|2002|$ 30.0|million|
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic under- writing tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the purchase of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount . we focus on potential losses that can be generated by any single event as part of our evaluation and monitoring of our aggre- gate exposure to catastrophic events . accordingly , we employ various techniques to estimate the amount of loss we could sustain from any single catastrophic event in various geographical areas . these techniques range from non-modeled deterministic approaches 2014such as tracking aggregate limits exposed in catastrophe-prone zones and applying historic dam- age factors 2014to modeled approaches that scientifically measure catastrophe risks using sophisticated monte carlo simulation techniques that provide insights into the frequency and severity of expected losses on a probabilistic basis . if our loss reserves are inadequate to meet our actual losses , net income would be reduced or we could incur a loss . we are required to maintain reserves to cover our estimated ultimate liability of losses and loss adjustment expenses for both reported and unreported claims incurred . these reserves are only estimates of what we believe the settlement and adminis- tration of claims will cost based on facts and circumstances known to us . in setting reserves for our reinsurance liabilities , we rely on claim data supplied by our ceding companies and brokers and we employ actuarial and statistical projections . the information received from our ceding companies is not always timely or accurate , which can contribute to inaccuracies in our 81790fin_a 4/13/07 11:08 am page 23 http://www.everestre.com .
Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses in the three two years?
Answer: | 2163.6 |
FINQA1419 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .
||shares ( in thousands )|weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share )|
|non-vested total as of december 31 2016|309|$ 55.94|
|granted|186|63.10|
|vested|-204 ( 204 )|46.10|
|forfeited|-10 ( 10 )|70.50|
|non-vested total as of december 31 2017|281|$ 67.33|
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .
Question: by how much did non-vested rsu's decrease from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | -0.09061 |
FINQA1420 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents 4 . acquisitions , dispositions and plant closures acquisitions 2022 so.f.ter . s.p.a . on december 1 , 2016 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the stock of the forli , italy based so.f.ter . s.p.a . ( "softer" ) , a leading thermoplastic compounder . the acquisition of softer increases the company's global engineered materials product platforms , extends the operational model , technical and industry solutions capabilities and expands project pipelines . the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the acquired operations are included in the advanced engineered materials segment . pro forma financial information since the respective acquisition date has not been provided as the acquisition did not have a material impact on the company's financial information . the company allocated the purchase price of the acquisition to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date . the excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill ( note 2 and note 11 ) . the company calculated the fair value of the assets acquired using the income , market , or cost approach ( or a combination thereof ) . fair values were determined based on level 3 inputs ( note 2 ) including estimated future cash flows , discount rates , royalty rates , growth rates , sales projections , retention rates and terminal values , all of which require significant management judgment and are susceptible to change . the purchase price allocation is based upon preliminary information and is subject to change if additional information about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date becomes available . the final fair value of the net assets acquired may result in adjustments to the assets and liabilities , including goodwill . however , any subsequent measurement period adjustments are not expected to have a material impact on the company's results of operations . the preliminary purchase price allocation for the softer acquisition is as follows : december 1 , 2016 ( in $ millions ) .
||as ofdecember 1 2016 ( in $ millions )|
|cash and cash equivalents|11|
|trade receivables - third party and affiliates|53|
|inventories|58|
|property plant and equipment net|68|
|intangible assets ( note 11 )|79|
|goodwill ( note 11 ) ( 1 )|106|
|other assets ( 2 )|33|
|total fair value of assets acquired|408|
|trade payables - third party and affiliates|-41 ( 41 )|
|total debt ( note 14 )|-103 ( 103 )|
|deferred income taxes|-30 ( 30 )|
|other liabilities|-45 ( 45 )|
|total fair value of liabilities assumed|-219 ( 219 )|
|net assets acquired|189|
______________________________ ( 1 ) goodwill consists of expected revenue and operating synergies resulting from the acquisition . none of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes . ( 2 ) includes a $ 23 million indemnity receivable for uncertain tax positions related to the acquisition . transaction related costs of $ 3 million were expensed as incurred to selling , general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations . the amount of pro forma net earnings ( loss ) of softer included in the company's consolidated statement of operations was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) ( unaudited ) of its consolidated net earnings ( loss ) had the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of 2016 . the amount of softer net earnings ( loss ) consolidated by the company since the acquisition date was not material. .
Question: if the tax controversy from softer is resolved favorably , what would the gross assets acquired be , in millions?
Answer: | 385.0 |
FINQA1421 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements entergy new orleans securitization bonds - hurricane isaac in may 2015 the city council issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover entergy new orleans 2019s hurricane isaac storm restoration costs of $ 31.8 million , including carrying costs , the costs of funding and replenishing the storm recovery reserve in the amount of $ 63.9 million , and approximately $ 3 million of up-front financing costs associated with the securitization . in july 2015 , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding i , l.l.c. , a company wholly owned and consolidated by entergy new orleans , issued $ 98.7 million of storm cost recovery bonds . the bonds have a coupon of 2.67% ( 2.67 % ) and an expected maturity date of june 2024 . although the principal amount is not due until the date given above , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 11.4 million for 2016 , $ 10.6 million for 2017 , $ 11 million for 2018 , $ 11.2 million for 2019 , and $ 11.6 million for 2020 . with the proceeds , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding purchased from entergy new orleans the storm recovery property , which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the storm recovery property is reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated entergy new orleans balance sheet . the creditors of entergy new orleans do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy new orleans storm recovery funding , including the storm recovery property , and the creditors of entergy new orleans storm recovery funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy new orleans . entergy new orleans has no payment obligations to entergy new orleans storm recovery funding except to remit storm recovery charge collections . entergy texas securitization bonds - hurricane rita in april 2007 the puct issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover $ 353 million of entergy texas 2019s hurricane rita reconstruction costs and up to $ 6 million of transaction costs , offset by $ 32 million of related deferred income tax benefits . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , llc , a company that is now wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued $ 329.5 million of senior secured transition bonds ( securitization bonds ) as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|senior secured transition bonds series a:||
|tranche a-1 ( 5.51% ( 5.51 % ) ) due october 2013|$ 93500|
|tranche a-2 ( 5.79% ( 5.79 % ) ) due october 2018|121600|
|tranche a-3 ( 5.93% ( 5.93 % ) ) due june 2022|114400|
|total senior secured transition bonds|$ 329500|
although the principal amount of each tranche is not due until the dates given above , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 26 million for 2016 , $ 27.6 million for 2017 , $ 29.2 million for 2018 , $ 30.9 million for 2019 , and $ 32.8 million for 2020 . all of the scheduled principal payments for 2016 are for tranche a-2 , $ 23.6 million of the scheduled principal payments for 2017 are for tranche a-2 and $ 4 million of the scheduled principal payments for 2017 are for tranche a-3 . all of the scheduled principal payments for 2018-2020 are for tranche a-3 . with the proceeds , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the transition property is reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated entergy texas balance sheet . the creditors of entergy texas do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy gulf states reconstruction funding , including the transition property , and the creditors of entergy gulf states reconstruction funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy texas . entergy texas has no payment obligations to entergy gulf states reconstruction funding except to remit transition charge collections. .
Question: in 2007 what was the percent of the total senior secured transition bonds by entergy texas that was tranche a-2 due october 2018
Answer: | 0.36904 |
FINQA1422 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: property investmentp yrr our overall strategy is to continue to increase our investment in quality industrial properties in both existing and select new markets and to continue to increase our investment in on-campus or hospital affiliated medical offf fice ff properties . pursuant to this strategy , we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon our market yy outlook , including general economic conditions , supply and long-term growth potential . our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon identifying suitable acquisition and development opportunities , and our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity , including issuances of debt or equity securities as well asyy generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties . leasing/capital costsg p tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant tt space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as tt second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant , but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties , are also second generation expenditures . one of the principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure , as well as capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments and for other deferred leasing costs ( in thousands ) : .
||2016|2015|2014|
|second generation tenant improvements|$ 24622|$ 28681|$ 51699|
|second generation leasing costs|27029|24471|37898|
|building improvements|7698|8748|9224|
|total second generation capital expenditures|$ 59349|$ 61900|$ 98821|
|development of real estate investments|$ 401442|$ 370466|$ 446722|
|other deferred leasing costs|$ 38410|$ 30790|$ 31503|
second generation capital expenditures were significantly lower during 2016 and 2015 , compared to 2014 , as the result of significant dispositions of office properties , which were more capital intensive to re-lease than industrial ff properties . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of ww $ 713.1 million at december 31 , 2016 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 599.8 million and $ 470.2 million at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the capital expenditures in the table above include the capitalization of internal overhead costs . we capitalized ww $ 24.0 million , $ 21.7 million and $ 23.9 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we ww capitalized $ 25.9 million , $ 23.8 million and $ 28.8 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including both development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 33.5% ( 33.5 % ) , 29.0% ( 29.0 % ) and 31.4% ( 31.4 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found in the year-to-year comparisons of general and administrative expenses and critical accounting policies sections of this item 7. .
Question: what was the total costs associated with development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space capitalized from 2014 to 2016
Answer: | 78.5 |
FINQA1423 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: other taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) .
|( millions except pershare amounts )|2002|2001|2000|
|operating revenue|$ 5940|$ 6144|$ 4894|
|operating expenses|4520|4749|3939|
|net income contribution|770|723|489|
|earnings per share contribution|$ 2.72|$ 2.86|$ 2.07|
|electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )|101|95|83|
|gas transmission throughput ( bcf )|597|553|567|
* amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .
Question: if the 2003 growth rate is the same as 2002 , what would 2003 electricity supplied equal ( million mwhrs ) ?
Answer: | 107.37895 |
FINQA1424 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . stock options in addition , in connection with the ipo , the company issued 1268986 stock options to the class b common unit holders to preserve their fully diluted equity ownership percentage . these options were issued with a per-share exercise price equal to the ipo price of $ 17.00 and are also subject to the same vesting provisions as the class b common units to which they relate . the company also granted 19412 stock options under the 2013 ltip during the year ended december 31 , 2013 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) in connection with the ipo , the company granted 1416543 rsus under the 2013 ltip at a weighted- average grant-date fair value of $ 17.03 per unit . the rsus cliff-vest at the end of four years . valuation information the company attributes the value of equity-based compensation awards to the various periods during which the recipient must perform services in order to vest in the award using the straight-line method . post-ipo equity awards the company has elected to use the black-scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted . the black-scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility , expected term , risk-free interest rates and dividend yields . the assumptions used to value the stock options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2013 are presented below . year ended december 31 , assumptions 2013 .
|assumptions|year ended december 31 2013|
|weighted-average grant date fair value|$ 4.75|
|weighted-average volatility ( 1 )|35.00% ( 35.00 % )|
|weighted-average risk-free rate ( 2 )|1.58% ( 1.58 % )|
|dividend yield|1.00% ( 1.00 % )|
|expected term ( in years ) ( 3 )|5.4|
expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 ( 1 ) based upon an assessment of the two-year , five-year and implied volatility for the company 2019s selected peer group , adjusted for the company 2019s leverage . ( 2 ) based on a composite u.s . treasury rate . ( 3 ) the expected term is calculated using the simplified method . the simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the option 2019s contractual term and the option 2019s weighted-average vesting period . the company utilizes this method as it has limited historical stock option data that is sufficient to derive a reasonable estimate of the expected stock option term. .
Question: as of dec 13 , 2013 , if all forfeited shares became vested , what percentage of shares would be vested?
Answer: | 0.31762 |
FINQA1425 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of us airways in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 129 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 63 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 65 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , american recognized $ 29 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , american recognized $ 48 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 american recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , american incurred $ 65 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 92 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 48 million of early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 55 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on american 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : .
||2013|
|labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )|$ 1733|
|aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )|320|
|fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )|218|
|professional fees|199|
|other|170|
|total reorganization items net|$ 2640|
( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , american agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue .
Question: what percentage of total 2013 reorganization items consisted of professional fees?
Answer: | 0.07538 |
FINQA1426 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: acquire operations and facilities from municipalities and other local governments , as they increasingly seek to raise capital and reduce risk . we realize synergies from consolidating businesses into our existing operations , whether through acquisitions or public-private partnerships , which allow us to reduce capital and expense requirements associated with truck routing , personnel , fleet maintenance , inventories and back-office administration . operating model the goal of our operating model pillar is to deliver a consistent , high quality service to all of our customers through the republic way : one way . everywhere . every day . this approach of developing standardized processes with rigorous controls and tracking allows us to leverage our scale and deliver durable operational excellence . the republic way is the key to harnessing the best of what we do as operators and translating that across all facets of our business . a key enabler of the republic way is our organizational structure that fosters a high performance culture by maintaining 360 degree accountability and full profit and loss responsibility with local management , supported by a functional structure to provide subject matter expertise . this structure allows us to take advantage of our scale by coordinating functionally across all of our markets , while empowering local management to respond to unique market dynamics . we have rolled out several productivity and cost control initiatives designed to deliver the best service possible to our customers in the most efficient and environmentally sound way . fleet automation approximately 74% ( 74 % ) of our residential routes have been converted to automated single driver trucks . by converting our residential routes to automated service , we reduce labor costs , improve driver productivity , decrease emissions and create a safer work environment for our employees . additionally , communities using automated vehicles have higher participation rates in recycling programs , thereby complementing our initiative to expand our recycling capabilities . fleet conversion to compressed natural gas ( cng ) approximately 18% ( 18 % ) of our fleet operates on natural gas . we expect to continue our gradual fleet conversion to cng , our preferred alternative fuel technology , as part of our ordinary annual fleet replacement process . we believe a gradual fleet conversion is most prudent to realize the full value of our previous fleet investments . approximately 36% ( 36 % ) of our replacement vehicle purchases during 2016 were cng vehicles . we believe using cng vehicles provides us a competitive advantage in communities with strict clean emission initiatives that focus on protecting the environment . although upfront capital costs are higher , using cng reduces our overall fleet operating costs through lower fuel expenses . as of december 31 , 2016 , we operated 38 cng fueling stations . standardized maintenance based on an industry trade publication , we operate the eighth largest vocational fleet in the united states . as of december 31 , 2016 , our average fleet age in years , by line of business , was as follows : approximate number of vehicles approximate average age .
||approximate number of vehicles|approximate average age|
|residential|7300|7|
|small-container commercial|4400|7|
|large-container industrial|4100|9|
|total|15800|7.5|
.
Question: as of december 312016 what was the ratio of the approximate number of residential vehicles to the large-container industrial
Answer: | 1.78049 |
FINQA1427 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) operations , net , in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . ( see note 9. ) other transactions 2014in august 2003 , the company consummated the sale of galaxy engineering ( galaxy ) , a radio frequency engineering , network design and tower-related consulting business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) . the purchase price of approximately $ 3.5 million included $ 2.0 million in cash , which the company received at closing , and an additional $ 1.5 million payable on january 15 , 2008 , or at an earlier date based on the future revenues of galaxy . the company received $ 0.5 million of this amount in january 2005 . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 2.4 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in may 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in westwood , massachusetts ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for a purchase price of approximately $ 18.5 million , including $ 2.4 million of cash proceeds and the buyer 2019s assumption of $ 16.1 million of related mortgage notes . pursuant to this transaction , the company recorded a net loss on disposal of approximately $ 3.6 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in january 2003 , the company consummated the sale of flash technologies , its remaining components business ( previously included in the company 2019s network development services segment ) for approximately $ 35.5 million in cash and has recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . in march 2003 , the company consummated the sale of an office building in schaumburg , illinois ( previously held primarily as rental property and included in the company 2019s rental and management segment ) for net proceeds of approximately $ 10.3 million in cash and recorded a net loss on disposal of $ 0.1 million in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2003 . 4 . property and equipment property and equipment ( including assets held under capital leases ) consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .
||2005|2004|
|towers|$ 4134155|$ 2788162|
|equipment|167504|115244|
|buildings and improvements|184951|162120|
|land and improvements|215974|176937|
|construction-in-progress|36991|27866|
|total|4739575|3270329|
|less accumulated depreciation and amortization|-1279049 ( 1279049 )|-996973 ( 996973 )|
|property and equipment net|$ 3460526|$ 2273356|
5 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company 2019s net carrying amount of goodwill was approximately $ 2.1 billion as of december 312005 and $ 592.7 million as of december 31 , 2004 , all of which related to its rental and management segment . the increase in the carrying value was as a result of the goodwill of $ 1.5 billion acquired in the merger with spectrasite , inc . ( see note 2. ) .
Question: what was the percentage increase in the property and equipment net from 2004 to 2005
Answer: | 0.52221 |
FINQA1428 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 156.1 in 2015 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , euro and south african rand as of december 31 , 2015 compared to december 31 , 2014. .
|balance sheet data|december 31 , 2016|december 31 , 2015|
|cash cash equivalents and marketable securities|$ 1100.6|$ 1509.7|
|short-term borrowings|$ 85.7|$ 132.9|
|current portion of long-term debt|323.9|1.9|
|long-term debt|1280.7|1610.3|
|total debt|$ 1690.3|$ 1745.1|
liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all . funding requirements our most significant funding requirements include our operations , non-cancelable operating lease obligations , capital expenditures , acquisitions , common stock dividends , taxes and debt service . additionally , we may be required to make payments to minority shareholders in certain subsidiaries if they exercise their options to sell us their equity interests . notable funding requirements include : 2022 debt service 2013 our 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) senior notes in aggregate principal amount of $ 300.0 mature on november 15 , 2017 , and a $ 22.6 note classified within our other notes payable is due on june 30 , 2017 . we expect to use available cash to fund the retirement of the outstanding notes upon maturity . the remainder of our debt is primarily long-term , with maturities scheduled through 2024 . see the table below for the maturity schedule of our long-term debt . 2022 acquisitions 2013 we paid cash of $ 52.1 , net of cash acquired of $ 13.6 , for acquisitions completed in 2016 . we also paid $ 0.5 in up-front payments and $ 59.3 in deferred payments for prior-year acquisitions as well as ownership increases in our consolidated subsidiaries . in addition to potential cash expenditures for new acquisitions , we expect to pay approximately $ 77.0 in 2017 related to prior-year acquisitions . we may also be required to pay approximately $ 31.0 in 2017 related to put options held by minority shareholders if exercised . we will continue to evaluate strategic opportunities to grow and continue to strengthen our market position , particularly in our digital and marketing services offerings , and to expand our presence in high-growth and key strategic world markets . 2022 dividends 2013 during 2016 , we paid four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.15 per share on our common stock , which corresponded to aggregate dividend payments of $ 238.4 . on february 10 , 2017 , we announced that our board of directors ( the 201cboard 201d ) had declared a common stock cash dividend of $ 0.18 per share , payable on march 15 , 2017 to holders of record as of the close of business on march 1 , 2017 . assuming we pay a quarterly dividend of $ 0.18 per share and there is no significant change in the number of outstanding shares as of december 31 , 2016 , we would expect to pay approximately $ 280.0 over the next twelve months. .
Question: what is the average quarterly dividend payment in 2016 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: | 59.6 |
FINQA1429 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: debt maturities 2013 the following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of december 31 , 2008 , excluding market value adjustments . millions of dollars .
|2009|$ 720|
|2010|465|
|2011|555|
|2012|746|
|2013|713|
|thereafter|5728|
|total debt|$ 8927|
as of december 31 , 2008 , we have reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 400 million of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance . this reclassification reflects our ability and intent to refinance any short-term borrowings and certain current maturities of long-term debt on a long-term basis . at december 31 , 2007 , we reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 550 million of debt due within one year that we intended to refinance at that time . mortgaged properties 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.8 billion at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , serves as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad equipment . as a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds . as of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion . in accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds . credit facilities 2013 on december 31 , 2008 , we had $ 1.9 billion of credit available under our revolving credit facility ( the facility ) . the facility is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper . we did not draw on the facility during 2008 . commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated , investment- grade borrowers . the facility allows borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facility requires union pacific corporation to maintain a debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio as a condition to making a borrowing . at december 31 , 2008 , and december 31 , 2007 ( and at all times during these periods ) , we were in compliance with this covenant . the definition of debt used for purposes of calculating the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio includes , among other things , certain credit arrangements , capital leases , guarantees and unfunded and vested pension benefits under title iv of erisa . at december 31 , 2008 , the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio allowed us to carry up to $ 30.9 billion of debt ( as defined in the facility ) , and we had $ 9.9 billion of debt ( as defined in the facility ) outstanding at that date . under our current capital plans , we expect to continue to satisfy the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio ; however , many factors beyond our reasonable control ( including the risk factors in item 1a of this report ) could affect our ability to comply with this provision in the future . the facility does not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require us to post collateral . the .
Question: as of december 31 , 2008 what was the percent of the total aggregate debt maturities that was due in 2012
Answer: | 0.08357 |
FINQA1430 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: interest expense .
||2019|2018|
|interest incurred|$ 150.5|$ 150.0|
|less : capitalized interest|13.5|19.5|
|interest expense|$ 137.0|$ 130.5|
interest incurred increased $ .5 as interest expense associated with financing the lu'an joint venture was mostly offset by favorable impacts from currency , a lower average interest rate on the debt portfolio , and a lower average debt balance . capitalized interest decreased 31% ( 31 % ) , or $ 6.0 , due to a decrease in the carrying value of projects under construction , primarily driven by the lu'an project in asia . other non-operating income ( expense ) , net other non-operating income ( expense ) , net of $ 66.7 increased $ 61.6 , primarily due to lower pension settlement losses , higher non-service pension income , and higher interest income on cash and cash items . the prior year included pension settlement losses of $ 43.7 ( $ 33.2 after-tax , or $ .15 per share ) primarily in connection with the transfer of certain pension assets and payment obligations to an insurer for our u.s . salaried and hourly plans . in fiscal year 2019 , we recognized a pension settlement loss of $ 5.0 ( $ 3.8 after-tax , or $ .02 per share ) associated with the u.s . supplementary pension plan during the second quarter . net income and net income margin net income of $ 1809.4 increased 18% ( 18 % ) , or $ 276.5 , primarily due to impacts from the u.s . tax cuts and jobs act , positive pricing , and favorable volumes . net income margin of 20.3% ( 20.3 % ) increased 310 bp . adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin adjusted ebitda of $ 3468.0 increased 11% ( 11 % ) , or $ 352.5 , primarily due to positive pricing and higher volumes , partially offset by unfavorable currency . adjusted ebitda margin of 38.9% ( 38.9 % ) increased 400 bp , primarily due to higher volumes , positive pricing , and the india contract modification . the india contract modification contributed 80 bp . effective tax rate the effective tax rate equals the income tax provision divided by income from continuing operations before taxes . the effective tax rate was 21.0% ( 21.0 % ) and 26.0% ( 26.0 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the current year rate was lower primarily due to impacts related to the enactment of the u.s . tax cuts and jobs act ( the 201ctax act" ) in 2018 , which significantly changed existing u.s . tax laws , including a reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , a deemed repatriation tax on unremitted foreign earnings , as well as other changes . as a result of the tax act , our income tax provision reflects discrete net income tax costs of $ 43.8 and $ 180.6 in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the current year included a cost of $ 56.2 ( $ .26 per share ) for the reversal of a benefit recorded in 2018 related to the u.s . taxation of deemed foreign dividends . we recorded this reversal based on regulations issued in 2019 . the 2019 reversal was partially offset by a favorable adjustment of $ 12.4 ( $ .06 per share ) that was recorded as we completed our estimates of the impacts of the tax act . this adjustment is primarily related to foreign tax items , including the deemed repatriation tax for foreign tax redeterminations . in addition , the current year rate included a net gain on the exchange of two equity affiliates of $ 29.1 , which was not a taxable transaction . the higher 2018 expense resulting from the tax act was partially offset by a $ 35.7 tax benefit from the restructuring of foreign subsidiaries , a $ 9.1 benefit from a foreign audit settlement agreement , and higher excess tax benefits on share-based compensation . the adjusted effective tax rate was 19.4% ( 19.4 % ) and 18.6% ( 18.6 % ) in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the lower prior year rate was primarily due to the $ 9.1 benefit from a foreign audit settlement agreement and higher excess tax benefits on share-based compensation. .
Question: what is the variation of the effective tax rate considering the years 2018-2019?
Answer: | 0.05 |
FINQA1431 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our petroleum , chemical , ethanol and other liquids terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk material services facilities , including all transload , engineering , conveying and other in-plant services . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide us opportunities for expansion . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , we have jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2014 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .
||number|capacity ( mmbbl )|
|liquids terminals|39|78.0|
|bulk terminals|78|n/a|
|materials services locations|8|n/a|
|jones act qualified tankers|7|2.3|
competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in the u.s , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical and pipeline companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminal services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our rail transloading ( material services ) operations compete with a variety of single- or multi-site transload , warehouse and terminal operators across the u.s . our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets . table of contents .
Question: what is the average capacity per liquids terminal in mmbbl?
Answer: | 2.0 |
FINQA1432 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .
||12/31/2002|12/31/2003|12/31/2004|12/31/2005|12/31/2006|12/31/2007|
|ventas|$ 100|$ 206|$ 270|$ 331|$ 457|$ 512|
|nyse composite index|$ 100|$ 132|$ 151|$ 166|$ 200|$ 217|
|all reit index|$ 100|$ 138|$ 181|$ 196|$ 262|$ 215|
|healthcare reit index|$ 100|$ 154|$ 186|$ 189|$ 273|$ 279|
|russell 1000 index|$ 100|$ 130|$ 145|$ 154|$ 178|$ 188|
ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what was the 5 year return on the nyse composite index?
Answer: | 1.17 |
FINQA1433 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following table details the growth in the global and north american cruise markets in terms of cruise passengers and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . our ships operate worldwide and have itineraries that call on destinations in alaska , asia , australia , the bahamas , bermuda , california , canada , the caribbean , europe , the galapagos islands , hawaii , mexico , the middle east , new england , new zealand , the panama canal and south america . in an effort to penetrate untapped markets and diversify our customer base , we continue to seek opportunities to redeploy ships in our royal caribbean international , celebrity cruises and azamara club cruises brands to new markets and itineraries throughout the world . the portability of our ships and our investment in infrastructure allows us to expand into new markets and helps us reduce our dependency on any one market by allowing us to create 201chome ports 201d around the world . in addition , it allows us to readily redeploy our ships to meet demand within our existing cruise markets . the current economic environment has significantly deteriorated consumer confidence and discretionary spending . while there has been a decrease in the demand for cruises and a resulting drop in cruise prices , cruising has proven to be resilient as it offers consumers a good value when compared to other vacation alternatives . however , the projected increase in capacity within the cruise industry from new cruise ships currently on order could produce additional pricing pressures within the industry . see item 1a . risk factors . global cruise passengers ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise passengers ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in america ( 1 ) .
|year|global cruise passengers ( 1 )|weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 )|north american cruise passengers ( 2 )|weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 )|
|2005|14818000|288000|9909000|190000|
|2006|15309000|304000|10080000|201000|
|2007|16586000|327000|10330000|212000|
|2008|17184000|347000|10093000|219000|
|2009|17340000|363000|10169000|222000|
1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise passengers , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally and in north america are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise passengers carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2005 through 2008 . year 2009 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . .
Question: in 2005 what was the percent of the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally in the north america
Answer: | 0.65972 |
FINQA1434 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: debt maturities 2013 the following table presents aggregate debt maturities as of december 31 , 2011 , excluding market value adjustments : millions .
|2012|$ 309|
|2013|636|
|2014|706|
|2015|467|
|2016|517|
|thereafter|6271|
|total debt|$ 8906|
as of both december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , we have reclassified as long-term debt approximately $ 100 million of debt due within one year that we intend to refinance . this reclassification reflects our ability and intent to refinance any short-term borrowings and certain current maturities of long- term debt on a long-term basis . mortgaged properties 2013 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $ 2.9 billion and $ 3.2 billion at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , served as collateral for capital leases and other types of equipment obligations in accordance with the secured financing arrangements utilized to acquire such railroad equipment . as a result of the merger of missouri pacific railroad company ( mprr ) with and into uprr on january 1 , 1997 , and pursuant to the underlying indentures for the mprr mortgage bonds , uprr must maintain the same value of assets after the merger in order to comply with the security requirements of the mortgage bonds . as of the merger date , the value of the mprr assets that secured the mortgage bonds was approximately $ 6.0 billion . in accordance with the terms of the indentures , this collateral value must be maintained during the entire term of the mortgage bonds irrespective of the outstanding balance of such bonds . credit facilities 2013 during the second quarter of 2011 , we replaced our $ 1.9 billion revolving credit facility , which was scheduled to expire in april 2012 , with a new $ 1.8 billion facility that expires in may 2015 ( the facility ) . the facility is based on substantially similar terms as those in the previous credit facility . on december 31 , 2011 , we had $ 1.8 billion of credit available under the facility , which is designated for general corporate purposes and supports the issuance of commercial paper . we did not draw on either facility during 2011 . commitment fees and interest rates payable under the facility are similar to fees and rates available to comparably rated , investment-grade borrowers . the facility allows for borrowings at floating rates based on london interbank offered rates , plus a spread , depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facility requires the corporation to maintain a debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio as a condition to making a borrowing . at december 31 , 2011 , and december 31 , 2010 ( and at all times during the year ) , we were in compliance with this covenant . the definition of debt used for purposes of calculating the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio includes , among other things , certain credit arrangements , capital leases , guarantees and unfunded and vested pension benefits under title iv of erisa . at december 31 , 2011 , the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio allowed us to carry up to $ 37.2 billion of debt ( as defined in the facility ) , and we had $ 9.5 billion of debt ( as defined in the facility ) outstanding at that date . under our current capital plans , we expect to continue to satisfy the debt-to-net-worth coverage ratio ; however , many factors beyond our reasonable control ( including the risk factors in item 1a of this report ) could affect our ability to comply with this provision in the future . the facility does not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require us to post collateral . the facility also includes a $ 75 million cross-default provision and a change-of-control provision . during 2011 , we did not issue or repay any commercial paper and , at december 31 , 2011 , we had no commercial paper outstanding . outstanding commercial paper balances are supported by our revolving credit facility but do not reduce the amount of borrowings available under the facility . dividend restrictions 2013 our revolving credit facility includes a debt-to-net worth covenant ( discussed in the credit facilities section above ) that , under certain circumstances , restricts the payment of cash .
Question: at december 31 , 2011 , what is the additional borrowing capacity in billions pursuant to the current debt coverage restrictions?
Answer: | 27.7 |
FINQA1435 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2022 net derivative losses of $ 13 million . review by segment general we serve clients through the following segments : 2022 risk solutions acts as an advisor and insurance and reinsurance broker , helping clients manage their risks , via consultation , as well as negotiation and placement of insurance risk with insurance carriers through our global distribution network . 2022 hr solutions partners with organizations to solve their most complex benefits , talent and related financial challenges , and improve business performance by designing , implementing , communicating and administering a wide range of human capital , retirement , investment management , health care , compensation and talent management strategies . risk solutions .
|years ended december 31,|2011|2010|2009|
|revenue|$ 6817|$ 6423|$ 6305|
|operating income|1314|1194|900|
|operating margin|19.3% ( 19.3 % )|18.6% ( 18.6 % )|14.3% ( 14.3 % )|
the demand for property and casualty insurance generally rises as the overall level of economic activity increases and generally falls as such activity decreases , affecting both the commissions and fees generated by our brokerage business . the economic activity that impacts property and casualty insurance is described as exposure units , and is closely correlated with employment levels , corporate revenue and asset values . during 2011 we began to see some improvement in pricing ; however , we would still consider this to be a 2018 2018soft market , 2019 2019 which began in 2007 . in a soft market , premium rates flatten or decrease , along with commission revenues , due to increased competition for market share among insurance carriers or increased underwriting capacity . changes in premiums have a direct and potentially material impact on the insurance brokerage industry , as commission revenues are generally based on a percentage of the premiums paid by insureds . in 2011 , pricing showed signs of stabilization and improvement in both our retail and reinsurance brokerage product lines and we expect this trend to slowly continue into 2012 . additionally , beginning in late 2008 and continuing through 2011 , we faced difficult conditions as a result of unprecedented disruptions in the global economy , the repricing of credit risk and the deterioration of the financial markets . weak global economic conditions have reduced our customers 2019 demand for our brokerage products , which have had a negative impact on our operational results . risk solutions generated approximately 60% ( 60 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2011 . revenues are generated primarily through fees paid by clients , commissions and fees paid by insurance and reinsurance companies , and investment income on funds held on behalf of clients . our revenues vary from quarter to quarter throughout the year as a result of the timing of our clients 2019 policy renewals , the net effect of new and lost business , the timing of services provided to our clients , and the income we earn on investments , which is heavily influenced by short-term interest rates . we operate in a highly competitive industry and compete with many retail insurance brokerage and agency firms , as well as with individual brokers , agents , and direct writers of insurance coverage . specifically , we address the highly specialized product development and risk management needs of commercial enterprises , professional groups , insurance companies , governments , health care providers , and non-profit groups , among others ; provide affinity products for professional liability , life , disability .
Question: what is the increase observed in the operating margin during 2010 and 2011?
Answer: | 0.007 |
FINQA1436 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: exchanged installment notes totaling approximately $ 4.8 billion and approximately $ 400 million of inter- national paper promissory notes for interests in enti- ties formed to monetize the notes . international paper determined that it was not the primary benefi- ciary of these entities , and therefore should not consolidate its investments in these entities . during 2006 , these entities acquired an additional $ 4.8 bil- lion of international paper debt securities for cash , resulting in a total of approximately $ 5.2 billion of international paper debt obligations held by these entities at december 31 , 2006 . since international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset its obligations under these debt instruments with its investments in the entities , international paper has offset $ 5.0 billion of interest in the entities against $ 5.0 billion of international paper debt obligations held by the entities as of december 31 , 2007 . international paper also holds variable interests in two financing entities that were used to monetize long-term notes received from sales of forestlands in 2002 and 2001 . see note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for a further discussion of these transactions . capital resources outlook for 2008 international paper expects to be able to meet pro- jected capital expenditures , service existing debt and meet working capital and dividend requirements during 2008 through current cash balances and cash from operations , supplemented as required by its various existing credit facilities . international paper has approximately $ 2.5 billion of committed bank credit agreements , which management believes is adequate to cover expected operating cash flow variability during our industry 2019s economic cycles . the agreements generally provide for interest rates at a floating rate index plus a pre-determined margin dependent upon international paper 2019s credit rating . the agreements include a $ 1.5 billion fully commit- ted revolving bank credit agreement that expires in march 2011 and has a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) payable quarterly . these agreements also include up to $ 1.0 billion of available commercial paper-based financ- ings under a receivables securitization program that expires in october 2009 with a facility fee of 0.10% ( 0.10 % ) . at december 31 , 2007 , there were no borrowings under either the bank credit agreements or receiv- ables securitization program . the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capi- tal structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . the company was in compliance with all its debt covenants at december 31 , 2007 . principal financial covenants include maintenance of a minimum net worth , defined as the sum of common stock , paid-in capital and retained earnings , less treasury stock , plus any goodwill impairment charges , of $ 9 billion ; and a maximum total debt to capital ratio , defined as total debt divided by total debt plus net worth , of 60% ( 60 % ) . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2007 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa3 ( stable outlook ) by standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) and moody 2019s investor services ( moody 2019s ) , respectively . the company currently has short-term credit ratings by s&p and moody 2019s of a-2 and p-3 , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 , were as follows : in millions 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 thereafter maturities of long-term debt ( a ) $ 267 $ 1300 $ 1069 $ 396 $ 532 $ 3056 debt obligations with right of offset ( b ) 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 5000 .
|in millions|2008|2009|2010|2011|2012|thereafter|
|maturities of long-term debt ( a )|$ 267|$ 1300|$ 1069|$ 396|$ 532|$ 3056|
|debt obligations with right of offset ( b )|2013|2013|2013|2013|2013|5000|
|lease obligations|136|116|101|84|67|92|
|purchase obligations ( c )|1953|294|261|235|212|1480|
|total ( d )|$ 2356|$ 1710|$ 1431|$ 715|$ 811|$ 9628|
( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) represents debt obligations borrowed from non-consolidated variable interest entities for which international paper has , and intends to affect , a legal right to offset these obligations with investments held in the entities . accordingly , in its con- solidated balance sheet at december 31 , 2007 , international paper has offset approximately $ 5.0 billion of interests in the entities against this $ 5.0 billion of debt obligations held by the entities ( see note 8 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements ) . ( c ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the transformation plan forestland sales . ( d ) not included in the above table are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 280 million. .
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2007 for the year of 2008 are due to maturities of long-term debt?
Answer: | 0.11333 |
FINQA1437 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 1 2014summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) present value is accreted over the life of the related lease as an operating expense . all of the company 2019s existing asset retirement obligations are associated with commitments to return property subject to operating leases to original condition upon lease termination . the following table reconciles changes in the company 2019s asset retirement liabilities for fiscal 2006 and 2005 ( in millions ) : .
|asset retirement liability as of september 25 2004|$ 8.2|
|additional asset retirement obligations recognized|2.8|
|accretion recognized|0.7|
|asset retirement liability as of september 24 2005|$ 11.7|
|additional asset retirement obligations recognized|2.5|
|accretion recognized|0.5|
|asset retirement liability as of september 30 2006|$ 14.7|
long-lived assets including goodwill and other acquired intangible assets the company reviews property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles , excluding goodwill , for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 , accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of . long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable . recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate . if property , plant , and equipment and certain identifiable intangibles are considered to be impaired , the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds its fair market value . for the three fiscal years ended september 30 , 2006 , the company had no material impairment of its long-lived assets , except for the impairment of certain assets in connection with the restructuring actions described in note 6 of these notes to consolidated financial statements . sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized but rather be tested for impairment at least annually or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that they may be impaired . the company performs its goodwill impairment tests on or about august 30 of each year . the company did not recognize any goodwill or intangible asset impairment charges in 2006 , 2005 , or 2004 . the company established reporting units based on its current reporting structure . for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment , goodwill has been allocated to these reporting units to the extent it relates to each reporting sfas no . 142 also requires that intangible assets with definite lives be amortized over their estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with sfas no . 144 . the company is currently amortizing its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over periods ranging from 3 to 10 years . foreign currency translation the company translates the assets and liabilities of its international non-u.s . functional currency subsidiaries into u.s . dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of each period . revenue and expenses for these subsidiaries are translated using rates that approximate those in effect during the period . gains and losses from these translations are credited or charged to foreign currency translation .
Question: by how much did asset retirement liability increase from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: | 0.25641 |
FINQA1438 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: third-party sales for the engineered products and solutions segment improved 7% ( 7 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily attributable to higher third-party sales of the two acquired businesses ( $ 457 ) , primarily related to the aerospace end market , and increased demand from the industrial gas turbine end market , partially offset by lower volumes in the oil and gas end market and commercial transportation end market as well as pricing pressures in aerospace . third-party sales for this segment improved 27% ( 27 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , largely attributable to the third-party sales ( $ 1310 ) of the three acquired businesses ( see above ) , and higher volumes in this segment 2019s legacy businesses , both of which were primarily related to the aerospace end market . these positive impacts were slightly offset by unfavorable foreign currency movements , principally driven by a weaker euro . atoi for the engineered products and solutions segment increased $ 47 , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily related to net productivity improvements across all businesses as well as the volume increase from both the rti acquisition and organic revenue growth , partially offset by a lower margin product mix and pricing pressures in the aerospace end market . atoi for this segment increased $ 16 , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in 2015 compared with 2014 , principally the result of net productivity improvements across most businesses , a positive contribution from acquisitions , and overall higher volumes in this segment 2019s legacy businesses . these positive impacts were partially offset by unfavorable price and product mix , higher costs related to growth projects , and net unfavorable foreign currency movements , primarily related to a weaker euro . in 2017 , demand in the commercial aerospace end market is expected to remain strong , driven by the ramp up of new aerospace engine platforms , somewhat offset by continued customer destocking and engine ramp-up challenges . demand in the defense end market is expected to grow due to the continuing ramp-up of certain aerospace programs . additionally , net productivity improvements are anticipated while pricing pressure across all markets is likely to continue . transportation and construction solutions .
||2016|2015|2014|
|third-party sales|$ 1802|$ 1882|$ 2021|
|atoi|$ 176|$ 166|$ 180|
the transportation and construction solutions segment produces products that are used mostly in the nonresidential building and construction and commercial transportation end markets . such products include integrated aluminum structural systems , architectural extrusions , and forged aluminum commercial vehicle wheels , which are sold both directly to customers and through distributors . a small part of this segment also produces aluminum products for the industrial products end market . generally , the sales and costs and expenses of this segment are transacted in the local currency of the respective operations , which are primarily the u.s . dollar , the euro , and the brazilian real . third-party sales for the transportation and construction solutions segment decreased 4% ( 4 % ) in 2016 compared with 2015 , primarily driven by lower demand from the north american commercial transportation end market , which was partially offset by rising demand from the building and construction end market . third-party sales for this segment decreased 7% ( 7 % ) in 2015 compared with 2014 , primarily driven by unfavorable foreign currency movements , principally caused by a weaker euro and brazilian real , and lower volume related to the building and construction end market , somewhat offset by higher volume related to the commercial transportation end market . atoi for the transportation and construction solutions segment increased $ 10 , or 6% ( 6 % ) , in 2016 compared with 2015 , principally driven by net productivity improvements across all businesses and growth in the building and construction segment , partially offset by lower demand in the north american heavy duty truck and brazilian markets. .
Question: considering the years 2015-2016 , what was the variation observed in the growth of the atoi in the transportation and construction solutions engineered products and solutions segments?
Answer: | 0.02 |
FINQA1439 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: wrote-off debt issuance costs of $ 4 million , which resulted in an extraordinary loss for the early retirement of debt . net income net income decreased $ 522 million to $ 273 million in 2001 from $ 795 million in 2000 . the overall decrease in net income is due to decreased net income from competitive supply and large utility businesses offset slightly by increases in the contract generation and growth distribution businesses . the decreases are primarily due to lower market prices in the united kingdom and the decline in the brazilian real during 2001 resulting in foreign currency transaction losses of approximately $ 210 million . additionally the company recorded severance and transaction costs related to the ipalco pooling-of-interest transaction and a loss from discontinued operations of $ 194 million . our 10 largest contributors to net income in 2001 were as follows : lal pir/pak gen , shady point and thames from contract generation ; somerset from competitive supply ; edc , eletropaulo , ipalco , cilcorp and cemig from large utilities ; and sul from growth distribution . 2000 compared to 1999 revenues revenues increased $ 3.4 billion , or 83% ( 83 % ) , to $ 7.5 billion in 2000 from $ 4.1 billion in 1999 . the increase in revenues is due primarily to the acquisition of new businesses . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations during 2000 or 1999 , revenues increased 6% ( 6 % ) to $ 3.6 billion. .
||2000|1999|% ( % ) change|
|contract generation|$ 1.7 billion|$ 1.3 billion|31% ( 31 % )|
|competitive supply|$ 2.4 billion|$ 873 million|175% ( 175 % )|
|large utilities|$ 2.1 billion|$ 992 million|112% ( 112 % )|
|growth distribution|$ 1.3 billion|$ 948 million|37% ( 37 % )|
contract generation revenues increased $ 400 million , or 31% ( 31 % ) , to $ 1.7 billion in 2000 from $ 1.3 billion in 1999 . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations in 2000 or 1999 , contract generation revenues increased 4% ( 4 % ) to $ 1.3 billion in 2000 . the increase in contract generation segment revenues was due primarily to increases in south america , north america , caribbean and asia , offset by a slight decline in europe/africa . in south america , contract generation segment revenue increased $ 245 million , and this is due mainly to the acquisition of tiete . in north america , contract generation segment revenues increased $ 76 million due primarily to the start of commercial operations at warrior run in january 2000 . in the caribbean , contract generation segment revenues increased $ 92 million due primarily to the start of commercial operations at merida iii in june 2000 and increased revenues from los mina . in asia , contract generation segment revenue increased $ 41 million due primarily to increased operations at the ecogen peaking plant and lal pir and pak gen in pakistan . in europe/africa , contract generation segment revenues remained fairly constant with decreases at tisza ii in hungary being offset by the acquisition of a controlling interest at kilroot . competitive supply revenues increased $ 1.5 billion , or 175% ( 175 % ) , to $ 2.4 billion in 2000 from $ 873 million in 1999 . excluding businesses acquired or that commenced commercial operations in 2000 or 1999 , competitive supply revenues increased 25% ( 25 % ) to $ 477 million in 2000 . the most significant increases occurred within north america and europe/africa . slight increases occurred in south america and the caribbean . asia reported a slight decrease . in north america , competitive supply segment revenues increased $ 610 million due primarily to the new york plants and new energy .
Question: without foreign currency transaction losses , what would 2001 net income have been in millions?
Answer: | 483.0 |
FINQA1440 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in addition , included in the loan table are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2009 was $ 825 million net of an allowance of $ 95 million . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2009 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .
|in millions of dollars|accretable yield|carrying amount of loan receivable|allowance|
|beginning balance|$ 92|$ 1510|$ 122|
|purchases ( 1 )|14|329|2014|
|disposals/payments received|-5 ( 5 )|-967 ( 967 )|2014|
|accretion|-52 ( 52 )|52|2014|
|builds ( reductions ) to the allowance|-21 ( 21 )|1|-27 ( 27 )|
|increase to expected cash flows|10|2|2014|
|fx/other|-11 ( 11 )|-7 ( 7 )|2014|
|balance december 31 2009 ( 2 )|$ 27|$ 920|$ 95|
( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 87 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 242 million under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 101 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 561 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 359 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .
Question: what is the percent of the purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method included in the carrying amount of loan receivable net of purchased loans accounted for under the under the cost-recovery method
Answer: | 0.12832 |
FINQA1441 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 52 s&p global 2018 annual report cash consideration that would be received for instances when the service components are sold separately . if the fair value to the customer for each service is not objectively determinable , we make our best estimate of the services 2019 stand-alone selling price and record revenue as it is earned over the service period . receivables we record a receivable when a customer is billed or when revenue is recognized prior to billing a customer . for multi- year agreements , we generally invoice customers annually at the beginning of each annual period . the opening balance of accounts receivable , net of allowance for doubtful accounts , was $ 1319 million as of january 1 , 2018 . contract assets contract assets include unbilled amounts from when the company transfers service to a customer before a customer pays consideration or before payment is due . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , contract assets were $ 26 million and $ 17 million , respectively , and are included in accounts receivable in our consolidated balance sheets . unearned revenue we record unearned revenue when cash payments are received or due in advance of our performance . the increase in the unearned revenue balance for the year ended december 31 , 2018 is primarily driven by cash payments received or due in advance of satisfying our performance obligations , offset by $ 1.5 billion of revenues recognized that were included in the unearned revenue balance at the beginning of the period . remaining performance obligations remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of contracts for work that has not yet been performed . as of december 31 , 2018 , the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $ 1.4 billion . we expect to recognize revenue on approximately half and three-quarters of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 and 24 months , respectively , with the remainder recognized thereafter . we do not disclose the value of unfulfilled performance obligations for ( i ) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and ( ii ) contracts where revenue is a usage-based royalty promised in exchange for a license of intellectual property . costs to obtain a contract we recognize an asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if we expect the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year . we have determined that certain sales commission programs meet the requirements to be capitalized . total capitalized costs to obtain a contract were $ 101 million as of december 31 , 2018 , and are included in prepaid and other current assets and other non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheets . the asset will be amortized over a period consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods or services to which the asset relates , calculated based on the customer term and the average life of the products and services underlying the contracts . the expense is recorded within selling and general expenses . we expense sales commissions when incurred if the amortization period would have been one year or less . these costs are recorded within selling and general expenses . presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost during the first quarter of 2018 , we adopted new accounting guidance requiring that net periodic benefit cost for our retirement and postretirement plans other than the service cost component be included outside of operating profit ; these costs are included in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income . the components of other income , net for the year ended december 31 are as follows : assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations assets and liabilities held for sale we classify a disposal group to be sold as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met : management , having the authority to approve the action , commits to a plan to sell the disposal group ; the disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such disposal group ; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the disposal group have been initiated ; the sale of the disposal group is probable , and transfer of the disposal group is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year , except if events or circumstances beyond our control extend the period of time required to sell the disposal group beyond one year ; the disposal group is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value ; and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn . a disposal group that is classified as held for sale is initially measured at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell . any loss resulting from this measurement is recognized in the period in which the held for sale criteria are met . conversely , gains are not recognized on the sale of a disposal group until the date of sale . ( in millions ) 2018 2017 2016 other components of net periodic benefit cost $ ( 30 ) $ ( 27 ) $ ( 28 ) .
|( in millions )|2018|2017|2016|
|other components of net periodic benefit cost|$ -30 ( 30 )|$ -27 ( 27 )|$ -28 ( 28 )|
|net loss from investments|5|2014|2014|
|other income net|$ -25 ( 25 )|$ -27 ( 27 )|$ -28 ( 28 )|
.
Question: what was the decline in the other net income from 2016 to 2018
Answer: | -0.10714 |
FINQA1442 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics our aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture , integration , sustainment , support , and upgrade of advanced military aircraft , including combat and air mobility aircraft , unmanned air vehicles , and related technologies . aeronautics 2019 major programs include the f-35 lightning ii joint strike fighter , c-130 hercules , f-16 fighting falcon , f-22 raptor , and the c-5m super galaxy . aeronautics 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|net sales|$ 14123|$ 14953|$ 14362|
|operating profit|1612|1699|1630|
|operating margins|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|11.4% ( 11.4 % )|11.3% ( 11.3 % )|
|backlog at year-end|28000|30100|30500|
2013 compared to 2012 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2013 decreased $ 830 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 530 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 13 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 37 delivered in 2012 ) partially offset by aircraft configuration mix ; about $ 385 million for the c-130 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries ( 25 aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to 34 in 2012 ) partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; approximately $ 255 million for the f-22 program , which includes about $ 205 million due to decreased production volume as final aircraft deliveries were completed during the second quarter of 2012 and $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter during the second quarter of 2012 ; and about $ 270 million for various other programs ( primarily sustainment activities ) due to decreased volume . the decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 295 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; approximately $ 245 million for the c-5 program due to increased aircraft deliveries ( six aircraft delivered in 2013 compared to four in 2012 ) and other modernization activities ; and about $ 70 million for the f-35 development contract due to increased volume . aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2013 decreased $ 87 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 85 million for the f-22 program , which includes approximately $ 50 million from the favorable resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 and about $ 35 million due to decreased risk retirements and production volume ; approximately $ 70 million for the c-130 program due to lower risk retirements and fewer deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activities ; about $ 65 million for the c-5 program due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the third quarter of 2013 and lower risk retirements ; approximately $ 35 million for the f-16 program due to fewer aircraft deliveries partially offset by increased sustainment activity and aircraft configuration mix . the decreases were partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 180 million for f-35 production contracts due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit was comparable for the f-35 development contract and included adjustments of approximately $ 85 million to reflect the inception-to-date impacts of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate in both 2013 and 2012 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 75 million lower for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 aeronautics 2019 net sales for 2012 increased $ 591 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher net sales of approximately $ 745 million from f-35 production contracts principally due to increased production volume ; about $ 285 million from f-16 programs primarily due to higher aircraft deliveries ( 37 f-16 aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to 22 in 2011 ) partially offset by lower volume on sustainment activities due to the completion of modification programs for certain international customers ; and approximately $ 140 million from c-5 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries ( four c-5m aircraft delivered in 2012 compared to two in 2011 ) . partially offsetting the increases were lower net sales of approximately $ 365 million from decreased production volume and lower risk retirements on the f-22 program as final aircraft deliveries were completed in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 110 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 and to a lesser extent lower volume ; and about $ 95 million from a decrease in volume on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to higher volume . net sales for c-130 programs were comparable to 2011 as a decline in sustainment activities largely was offset by increased aircraft deliveries. .
Question: what was the average net sales from 2011 to 2013
Answer: | 14479.33333 |
FINQA1443 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: .
||2018|2017|
|equity securities|34% ( 34 % )|55% ( 55 % )|
|debt securities|49% ( 49 % )|28% ( 28 % )|
|other|17% ( 17 % )|17% ( 17 % )|
|total|100% ( 100 % )|100% ( 100 % )|
for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: in 2018 what was the debt to the equity ratio
Answer: | 1.44118 |
FINQA1444 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: rental and management operations new site revenue growth . during the year ended december 31 , 2014 , we grew our portfolio of communications real estate through the acquisition and construction of approximately 8450 sites . in a majority of our international markets , the acquisition or construction of new sites results in increased pass-through revenues ( such as ground rent or power and fuel costs ) and expenses . we continue to evaluate opportunities to acquire communications real estate portfolios , both domestically and internationally , to determine whether they meet our risk-adjusted hurdle rates and whether we believe we can effectively integrate them into our existing portfolio. .
|new sites ( acquired or constructed )|2014|2013|2012|
|domestic|900|5260|960|
|international ( 1 )|7550|7810|7850|
( 1 ) the majority of sites acquired or constructed in 2014 were in brazil , india and mexico ; in 2013 were in brazil , colombia , costa rica , india , mexico and south africa ; and in 2012 were in brazil , germany , india and uganda . rental and management operations expenses . direct operating expenses incurred by our domestic and international rental and management segments include direct site level expenses and consist primarily of ground rent and power and fuel costs , some of which may be passed through to our tenants , as well as property taxes , repairs and maintenance . these segment direct operating expenses exclude all segment and corporate selling , general , administrative and development expenses , which are aggregated into one line item entitled selling , general , administrative and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations . in general , our domestic and international rental and management segments 2019 selling , general , administrative and development expenses do not significantly increase as a result of adding incremental tenants to our legacy sites and typically increase only modestly year-over-year . as a result , leasing additional space to new tenants on our legacy sites provides significant incremental cash flow . we may , however , incur additional segment selling , general , administrative and development expenses as we increase our presence in geographic areas where we have recently launched operations or are focused on expanding our portfolio . our profit margin growth is therefore positively impacted by the addition of new tenants to our legacy sites and can be temporarily diluted by our development activities . network development services segment revenue growth . as we continue to focus on growing our rental and management operations , we anticipate that our network development services revenue will continue to represent a small percentage of our total revenues . non-gaap financial measures included in our analysis of our results of operations are discussions regarding earnings before interest , taxes , depreciation , amortization and accretion , as adjusted ( 201cadjusted ebitda 201d ) , funds from operations , as defined by the national association of real estate investment trusts ( 201cnareit ffo 201d ) and adjusted funds from operations ( 201caffo 201d ) . we define adjusted ebitda as net income before income ( loss ) on discontinued operations , net ; income ( loss ) on equity method investments ; income tax benefit ( provision ) ; other income ( expense ) ; gain ( loss ) on retirement of long-term obligations ; interest expense ; interest income ; other operating income ( expense ) ; depreciation , amortization and accretion ; and stock-based compensation expense . nareit ffo is defined as net income before gains or losses from the sale or disposal of real estate , real estate related impairment charges , real estate related depreciation , amortization and accretion and dividends declared on preferred stock , and including adjustments for ( i ) unconsolidated affiliates and ( ii ) noncontrolling interest. .
Question: in 2014 , how many of the new sites were forweign?
Answer: | 0.89349 |
FINQA1445 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to consolidated financial statements the table below presents information regarding group inc . 2019s regulatory capital ratios and tier 1 leverage ratio under basel i , as implemented by the federal reserve board . the information as of december 2013 reflects the revised market risk regulatory capital requirements . these changes resulted in increased regulatory capital requirements for market risk . the information as of december 2012 is prior to the implementation of these revised market risk regulatory capital requirements. .
|$ in millions|as of december 2013|as of december 2012|
|tier 1 capital|$ 72471|$ 66977|
|tier 2 capital|$ 13632|$ 13429|
|total capital|$ 86103|$ 80406|
|risk-weighted assets|$ 433226|$ 399928|
|tier 1 capital ratio|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|16.7% ( 16.7 % )|
|total capital ratio|19.9% ( 19.9 % )|20.1% ( 20.1 % )|
|tier 1 leverage ratio|8.1% ( 8.1 % )|7.3% ( 7.3 % )|
revised capital framework the u.s . federal bank regulatory agencies ( agencies ) have approved revised risk-based capital and leverage ratio regulations establishing a new comprehensive capital framework for u.s . banking organizations ( revised capital framework ) . these regulations are largely based on the basel committee 2019s december 2010 final capital framework for strengthening international capital standards ( basel iii ) and also implement certain provisions of the dodd-frank act . under the revised capital framework , group inc . is an 201cadvanced approach 201d banking organization . below are the aspects of the rules that are most relevant to the firm , as an advanced approach banking organization . definition of capital and capital ratios . the revised capital framework introduced changes to the definition of regulatory capital , which , subject to transitional provisions , became effective across the firm 2019s regulatory capital and leverage ratios on january 1 , 2014 . these changes include the introduction of a new capital measure called common equity tier 1 ( cet1 ) , and the related regulatory capital ratio of cet1 to rwas ( cet1 ratio ) . in addition , the definition of tier 1 capital has been narrowed to include only cet1 and instruments such as perpetual non- cumulative preferred stock , which meet certain criteria . certain aspects of the revised requirements phase in over time . these include increases in the minimum capital ratio requirements and the introduction of new capital buffers and certain deductions from regulatory capital ( such as investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions ) . in addition , junior subordinated debt issued to trusts is being phased out of regulatory capital . the minimum cet1 ratio is 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) as of january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) on january 1 , 2015 . the minimum tier 1 capital ratio increased from 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) to 5.5% ( 5.5 % ) on january 1 , 2014 and will increase to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) beginning january 1 , 2015 . the minimum total capital ratio remains unchanged at 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) . these minimum ratios will be supplemented by a new capital conservation buffer that phases in , beginning january 1 , 2016 , in increments of 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per year until it reaches 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) on january 1 , 2019 . the revised capital framework also introduces a new counter-cyclical capital buffer , to be imposed in the event that national supervisors deem it necessary in order to counteract excessive credit growth . risk-weighted assets . in february 2014 , the federal reserve board informed us that we have completed a satisfactory 201cparallel run , 201d as required of advanced approach banking organizations under the revised capital framework , and therefore changes to rwas will take effect beginning with the second quarter of 2014 . accordingly , the calculation of rwas in future quarters will be based on the following methodologies : 2030 during the first quarter of 2014 2014 the basel i risk-based capital framework adjusted for certain items related to existing capital deductions and the phase-in of new capital deductions ( basel i adjusted ) ; 2030 during the remaining quarters of 2014 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced approach or the basel i adjusted calculation ; and 2030 beginning in the first quarter of 2015 2014 the higher of rwas computed under the basel iii advanced or standardized approach . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 191 .
Question: what was the percentage change in tier 2 capital between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: | 0.01512 |
FINQA1446 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2008|12/31/2009|12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|12/31/2013|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 107.75|$ 140.39|$ 145.84|$ 151.44|$ 221.91|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 126.45|$ 145.49|$ 148.55|$ 172.30|$ 228.09|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 118.59|$ 150.30|$ 150.31|$ 161.56|$ 228.42|
.
Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the dow jones transportation average for the five years ended 12/31/2013?
Answer: | -0.0651 |
FINQA1447 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: result of the effects of the costa concordia incident and the continued instability in the european eco- nomic landscape . however , we continue to believe in the long term growth potential of this market . we estimate that europe was served by 102 ships with approximately 108000 berths at the beginning of 2008 and by 117 ships with approximately 156000 berths at the end of 2012 . there are approximately 9 ships with an estimated 25000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2013 and 2017 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) .
|year|global cruise guests ( 1 )|weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 )|north american cruise guests ( 2 )|weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 )|european cruise guests|weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 )|
|2008|17184000|347000|10093000|219000|4500000|120000|
|2009|17340000|363000|10198000|222000|5000000|131000|
|2010|18800000|391000|10781000|232000|5540000|143000|
|2011|20227000|412000|11625000|245000|5894000|149000|
|2012|20823000|425000|12044000|254000|6040000|152000|
( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2008 through 2011 . year 2012 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : clia europe , formerly european cruise council , for years 2008 through 2011 . year 2012 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our princi- pal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . com- panies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : 2022 protect the health , safety and security of our guests and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , 2022 strengthen and support our human capital in order to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , 2022 further strengthen our consumer engagement in order to enhance our revenues , 2022 increase the awareness and market penetration of our brands globally , 2022 focus on cost efficiency , manage our operating expenditures and ensure adequate cash and liquid- ity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , 2022 strategically invest in our fleet through the revit ad alization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while prudently expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , 2022 capitalize on the portability and flexibility of our ships by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , 2022 further enhance our technological capabilities to service customer preferences and expectations in an innovative manner , while supporting our strategic focus on profitability , and part i 0494.indd 13 3/27/13 12:52 pm .
Question: what was the percentage increase of global cruise guests from 2008-2012?
Answer: | 21.17668 |
FINQA1448 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow are considered non-gaap financial measures . we are required to provide these financial metrics by the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , and we have included them below because we consider the indentures for these notes to be material agreements , the covenants related to tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow to be material terms of the indentures , and information about compliance with such covenants to be material to an investor 2019s understanding of our financial results and the impact of those results on our liquidity . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .
|tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008|$ 188449|
|consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008|726954|
|less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008|-741565 ( 741565 )|
|plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008|753798|
|adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008|739187|
|non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008|$ -14611 ( 14611 )|
.
Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to non-tower cash flow?
Answer: | -0.01977 |
FINQA1449 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s discussion and analysis 2030 total aus net inflows/ ( outflows ) for 2014 includes $ 19 billion of fixed income asset inflows in connection with our acquisition of deutsche asset & wealth management 2019s stable value business and $ 6 billion of liquidity products inflows in connection with our acquisition of rbs asset management 2019s money market funds . the table below presents our average monthly assets under supervision by asset class . average for the year ended december $ in billions 2016 2015 2014 .
|$ in billions|average for theyear ended december 2016|average for theyear ended december 2015|average for theyear ended december 2014|
|alternative investments|$ 149|$ 145|$ 145|
|equity|256|247|225|
|fixed income|578|530|499|
|total long-term assets under supervision|983|922|869|
|liquidity products|326|272|248|
|total assets under supervision|$ 1309|$ 1194|$ 1117|
operating environment . following a challenging first quarter of 2016 , market conditions continued to improve with higher asset prices resulting in full year appreciation in our client assets in both equity and fixed income assets . also , our assets under supervision increased during 2016 from net inflows , primarily in fixed income assets , and liquidity products . the mix of our average assets under supervision shifted slightly compared with 2015 from long- term assets under supervision to liquidity products . management fees have been impacted by many factors , including inflows to advisory services and outflows from actively-managed mutual funds . in the future , if asset prices decline , or investors continue the trend of favoring assets that typically generate lower fees or investors withdraw their assets , net revenues in investment management would likely be negatively impacted . during 2015 , investment management operated in an environment generally characterized by strong client net inflows , which more than offset the declines in equity and fixed income asset prices , which resulted in depreciation in the value of client assets , particularly in the third quarter of 2015 . the mix of average assets under supervision shifted slightly from long-term assets under supervision to liquidity products compared with 2014 . 2016 versus 2015 . net revenues in investment management were $ 5.79 billion for 2016 , 7% ( 7 % ) lower than 2015 . this decrease primarily reflected significantly lower incentive fees compared with a strong 2015 . in addition , management and other fees were slightly lower , reflecting shifts in the mix of client assets and strategies , partially offset by the impact of higher average assets under supervision . during the year , total assets under supervision increased $ 127 billion to $ 1.38 trillion . long-term assets under supervision increased $ 75 billion , including net inflows of $ 42 billion , primarily in fixed income assets , and net market appreciation of $ 33 billion , primarily in equity and fixed income assets . in addition , liquidity products increased $ 52 billion . operating expenses were $ 4.65 billion for 2016 , 4% ( 4 % ) lower than 2015 , due to decreased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting lower net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.13 billion in 2016 , 17% ( 17 % ) lower than 2015 . 2015 versus 2014 . net revenues in investment management were $ 6.21 billion for 2015 , 3% ( 3 % ) higher than 2014 , due to slightly higher management and other fees , primarily reflecting higher average assets under supervision , and higher transaction revenues . during 2015 , total assets under supervision increased $ 74 billion to $ 1.25 trillion . long-term assets under supervision increased $ 51 billion , including net inflows of $ 71 billion ( which includes $ 18 billion of asset inflows in connection with our acquisition of pacific global advisors 2019 solutions business ) , and net market depreciation of $ 20 billion , both primarily in fixed income and equity assets . in addition , liquidity products increased $ 23 billion . operating expenses were $ 4.84 billion for 2015 , 4% ( 4 % ) higher than 2014 , due to increased compensation and benefits expenses , reflecting higher net revenues . pre-tax earnings were $ 1.37 billion in 2015 , 2% ( 2 % ) lower than 2014 . geographic data see note 25 to the consolidated financial statements for a summary of our total net revenues , pre-tax earnings and net earnings by geographic region . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 65 .
Question: in billions , for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , what are total alternative investments?
Answer: | 439.0 |
FINQA1450 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) as of december 31 , 2006 , the company held a total of ten interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variable rate interest obligations under its amt opco and spectrasite credit facilities and four forward starting interest rate swap agreements to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the securitization which the company designated as cash flow hedges . the eight american tower swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $ 450.0 million and fixed rates ranging between 4.63% ( 4.63 % ) and 4.88% ( 4.88 % ) and the two spectrasite swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $ 100.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . the four forward starting interest rate swap agreements had an aggregate notional amount of $ 900.0 million , fixed rates ranging between 4.73% ( 4.73 % ) and 5.10% ( 5.10 % ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also held three interest rate swap instruments and one interest rate cap instrument that were acquired in the spectrasite , inc . merger in august 2005 and were not designated as cash flow hedges . the three interest rate swaps , which had a fair value of $ 6.7 million at the date of acquisition , have an aggregate notional amount of $ 300.0 million , a fixed rate of 3.88% ( 3.88 % ) . the interest rate cap had a notional amount of $ 175.0 million , a fixed rate of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) , and expired in february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2006 , other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains on short term available-for-sale securities of $ 10.4 million and unrealized gains related to the interest rate swap agreements in the table above of $ 5.7 million , net of tax . during the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded a net unrealized gain of approximately $ 6.5 million ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 3.5 million ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified $ 0.7 million ( net of an income tax benefit of $ 0.2 million ) into results of operations during the year ended december 31 , 2006 . 9 . commitments and contingencies lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease . ( see note 1. ) future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 .
|2008|$ 217969|
|2009|215763|
|2010|208548|
|2011|199024|
|2012|190272|
|thereafter|2451496|
|total|$ 3483072|
aggregate rent expense ( including the effect of straight-line rent expense ) under operating leases for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 approximated $ 246.4 million , $ 237.0 million and $ 168.7 million , respectively. .
Question: as of december 312007 what was the percentage of future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases in 2010
Answer: | 0.05987 |
FINQA1451 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .
|period|total number ofshares purchased|average pricepaid per share|total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs|maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs|
|october 2018|1360987|$ 66.34|1360987|$ 859039458|
|november 2018|450000|$ 61.36|450000|$ 831427985|
|december 2018|912360|$ 53.93|810000|$ 787613605|
|total for october to december 2018|2723347||2620987||
during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .
Question: of total repurchases in october to december 2018 , what percentage of shares purchased were part of publicly announced plans or programs?
Answer: | 0.96241 |
FINQA1452 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk terminal facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2016 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .
||number|capacity ( mmbbl )|
|liquids terminals|51|85.2|
|bulk terminals|37|2014|
|jones act tankers|12|4.0|
competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets. .
Question: what is the average capacity in mmbbl of liquids terminals?
Answer: | 1.67059 |
FINQA1453 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: page 20 of 100 segment sales were $ 100.7 million lower in 2009 than in 2008 , primarily as a result of the impact of lower aluminum prices partially offset by an increase in sales volumes . the higher sales volumes in 2009 were the result of incremental volumes from the four plants purchased from ab inbev , partially offset by certain plant closures and lower sales volumes in the existing business . segment earnings in 2010 were $ 122.3 million higher than in 2009 primarily due to a net $ 85 million impact related to the higher sales volumes and $ 45 million of product mix and improved manufacturing performance associated with higher production . also adding to the 2010 improvement was the effect of a $ 7 million out-of-period inventory charge in 2009 . the details of the out-of-period adjustment are included in note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included within item 8 of this report . segment earnings in 2009 were higher than in 2008 due to $ 12 million of earnings contribution from the four acquired plants and approximately $ 21 million of savings associated with plant closures . partially offsetting these favorable impacts were lower carbonated soft drink and beer can sales volumes ( excluding the newly acquired plants ) and approximately $ 25 million related to higher cost inventories in the first half of 2009 . metal beverage packaging , europe .
|( $ in millions )|2010|2009|2008|
|net sales|$ 1697.6|$ 1739.5|$ 1868.7|
|segment earnings|$ 212.9|$ 214.8|$ 230.9|
|business consolidation costs ( a )|-3.2 ( 3.2 )|2212|2212|
|total segment earnings|$ 209.7|$ 214.8|$ 230.9|
( a ) further details of these items are included in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements within item 8 of this report . the metal beverage packaging , europe , segment includes metal beverage packaging products manufactured in europe . ball packaging europe has manufacturing plants located in germany , the united kingdom , france , the netherlands , poland and serbia , and is the second largest metal beverage container business in europe . segment sales in 2010 decreased $ 41.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily due to unfavorable foreign exchange effects of $ 93 million and price and mix changes , partially offset by higher sales volumes . segment sales in 2009 as compared to 2008 were $ 129.2 million lower due to $ 110 million of unfavorable foreign exchange effects , partially offset by better commercial terms . sales volumes in 2009 were essentially flat compared to those in the prior year . segment earnings in 2010 decreased $ 1.9 million compared to 2009 , primarily the result of a $ 28 million increase related to higher sales volumes , offset by $ 18 million of negative effects from foreign currency translation and $ 12 million of higher inventory and other costs . while 2009 sales volumes were consistent with the prior year , the adverse effects of foreign currency translation , both within europe and on the conversion of the euro to the u.s . dollar , reduced segment earnings by $ 8 million . also contributing to lower segment earnings were higher cost inventory carried into 2009 and a change in sales mix , partially offset by better commercial terms in some of our contracts . on january 18 , 2011 , ball acquired aerocan s.a.s . ( aerocan ) , a leading european supplier of aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , for 20ac222.4 million ( approximately $ 300 million ) in cash and assumed debt . aerocan manufactures extruded aluminum aerosol cans and bottles , and the aluminum slugs used to make them , for customers in the personal care , pharmaceutical , beverage and food industries . it operates three aerosol can manufacturing plants 2013 one each in the czech republic , france and the united kingdom 2013 and is a 51 percent owner of a joint venture aluminum slug plant in france . the four plants employ approximately 560 people . the acquisition of aerocan will allow ball to enter a growing part of the metal packaging industry and to broaden the company 2019s market development efforts into a new customer base. .
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales metal beverage packaging , europe between 2009 to 2010?
Answer: | -0.02409 |
FINQA1454 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .
||2010|2011|2012|2013|2014|2015|
|jkhy|100.00|127.44|148.62|205.60|263.21|290.88|
|peer group|100.00|136.78|148.10|174.79|239.10|301.34|
|s&p 500|100.00|130.69|137.81|166.20|207.10|222.47|
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .
Question: in 2010 , what was the cumulative total return of the s&p 500?
Answer: | 30.69 |
FINQA1455 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 15 . commitments and contingencies lease commitments we lease certain of our facilities and some of our equipment under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements that expire at various dates through 2028 . we also have one land lease that expires in 2091 . rent expense includes base contractual rent and variable costs such as building expenses , utilities , taxes , insurance and equipment rental . rent expense and sublease income for these leases for fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were as follows ( in thousands ) : .
||2014|2013|2012|
|rent expense|$ 111149|$ 118976|$ 105809|
|less : sublease income|1412|3057|2330|
|net rent expense|$ 109737|$ 115919|$ 103479|
we occupy three office buildings in san jose , california where our corporate headquarters are located . we reference these office buildings as the almaden tower and the east and west towers . in august 2014 , we exercised our option to purchase the east and west towers for a total purchase price of $ 143.2 million . upon purchase , our investment in the lease receivable of $ 126.8 million was credited against the total purchase price and we were no longer required to maintain a standby letter of credit as stipulated in the east and west towers lease agreement . we capitalized the east and west towers as property and equipment on our consolidated balance sheets at $ 144.1 million , the lesser of cost or fair value , which represented the total purchase price plus other direct costs associated with the purchase . see note 6 for discussion of our east and west towers purchase . the lease agreement for the almaden tower is effective through march 2017 . we are the investors in the lease receivable related to the almaden tower lease in the amount of $ 80.4 million , which is recorded as investment in lease receivable on our consolidated balance sheets . as of november 28 , 2014 , the carrying value of the lease receivable related to the almaden tower approximated fair value . under the agreement for the almaden tower , we have the option to purchase the building at any time during the lease term for $ 103.6 million . if we purchase the building , the investment in the lease receivable may be credited against the purchase price . the residual value guarantee under the almaden tower obligation is $ 89.4 million . the almaden tower lease is subject to standard covenants including certain financial ratios that are reported to the lessor quarterly . as of november 28 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all of the covenants . in the case of a default , the lessor may demand we purchase the building for an amount equal to the lease balance , or require that we remarket or relinquish the building . if we choose to remarket or are required to do so upon relinquishing the building , we are bound to arrange the sale of the building to an unrelated party and will be required to pay the lessor any shortfall between the net remarketing proceeds and the lease balance , up to the residual value guarantee amount less our investment in lease receivable . the almaden tower lease qualifies for operating lease accounting treatment and , as such , the building and the related obligation are not included in our consolidated balance sheets . see note 16 for discussion of our capital lease obligation . unconditional purchase obligations our purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services entered into in the ordinary course of business. .
Question: what portion of the rent expense is covered through sublease income in 2014?
Answer: | 0.0127 |
FINQA1456 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: item 2 . properties at december 31 , 2017 , we owned or leased building space ( including offices , manufacturing plants , warehouses , service centers , laboratories and other facilities ) at approximately 375 locations primarily in the u.s . additionally , we manage or occupy approximately 15 government-owned facilities under lease and other arrangements . at december 31 , 2017 , we had significant operations in the following locations : 2022 aeronautics - palmdale , california ; marietta , georgia ; greenville , south carolina ; and fort worth , texas . 2022 missiles and fire control - camdenarkansas ; ocala and orlando , florida ; lexington , kentucky ; and grand prairie , texas . 2022 rotary andmission systems - colorado springs , colorado ; shelton and stratford , connecticut ; orlando and jupiter , florida ; moorestown/mt . laurel , new jersey ; owego and syracuse , new york ; manassas , virginia ; and mielec , poland . 2022 space - sunnyvale , california ; denver , colorado ; valley forge , pennsylvania ; and reading , england . 2022 corporate activities - bethesda , maryland . the following is a summary of our square feet of floor space by business segment at december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : owned leased government- owned total .
||owned|leased|government-owned|total|
|aeronautics|5.0|2.1|14.4|21.5|
|missiles and fire control|6.3|2.8|1.8|10.9|
|rotary and mission systems|11.2|6.6|0.4|18.2|
|space|8.6|1.9|6.7|17.2|
|corporate activities|2.7|0.9|2014|3.6|
|total|33.8|14.3|23.3|71.4|
we believe our facilities are in good condition and adequate for their current use.wemay improve , replace or reduce facilities as considered appropriate to meet the needs of our operations . item 3 . legal proceedings we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment and are subject to contingencies related to certain businesses we previously owned . these types of matters could result in fines , penalties , compensatory or treble damages or non-monetary sanctions or relief . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of each of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole , notwithstanding that the unfavorable resolution of any matter may have a material effect on our net earnings in any particular interim reporting period . we cannot predict the outcome of legal or other proceedings with certainty . these matters include the proceedings summarized in 201cnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies 201d included in our notes to consolidated financial statements . we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign requirements for protection of the environment , including those for discharge ofhazardousmaterials and remediationof contaminated sites.due inpart to thecomplexity andpervasivenessof these requirements , we are a party to or have property subject to various lawsuits , proceedings and remediation obligations . the extent of our financial exposure cannot in all cases be reasonably estimated at this time . for information regarding these matters , including current estimates of the amounts that we believe are required for remediation or clean-up to the extent estimable , see 201ccriticalaccounting policies - environmental matters 201d in management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and 201cnote 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments andcontingencies 201d included in ournotes to consolidated financial statements . as a u.s . government contractor , we are subject to various audits and investigations by the u.s . government to determine whetherouroperations arebeingconducted in accordancewith applicable regulatory requirements.u.s.government investigations of us , whether relating to government contracts or conducted for other reasons , could result in administrative , civil , or criminal liabilities , including repayments , fines or penalties being imposed upon us , suspension , proposed debarment , debarment from eligibility for future u.s . government contracting , or suspension of export privileges . suspension or debarment could have a material adverse effect on us because of our dependence on contracts with the u.s . government . u.s . government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us . we also provide products and services to customers outside of the u.s. , which are subject to u.s . and foreign laws and regulations and foreign procurement policies and practices . our compliance with local regulations or applicable u.s . government regulations also may be audited or investigated . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .
Question: at december 31 , 2017 what was the percent of the total owned square feet applicable to aeronautics 5.0
Answer: | 0.14793 |
FINQA1457 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2014 net revenue|$ 2246.1|
|retail electric price|180.0|
|volume/weather|39.5|
|waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision|-32.0 ( 32.0 )|
|miso deferral|-32.0 ( 32.0 )|
|other|7.2|
|2015 net revenue|$ 2408.8|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .
Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2015 for entergy louisiana?
Answer: | 0.07244 |
FINQA1458 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( "nsai" ) prepared a certification of the prior year's reserves for the alba field in e.g . the nsai summary reports are filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . members of the nsai team have multiple years of industry experience , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the senior technical advisor has over 35 years of practical experience in petroleum geosciences , with over 15 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . the second team member has over 10 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering , with 5 years experience in the estimation and evaluation of reserves . both are registered professional engineers in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( "ryder scott" ) also performed audits of the prior years' reserves of several of our fields in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . their summary reports are filed as exhibits to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he is a member of spe , where he served on the oil and gas reserves committee , and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2014 , 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , an increase of 101 mmboe from december 31 , 2013 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2014 : ( mmboe ) .
|beginning of year|627|
|revisions of previous estimates|1|
|improved recovery|1|
|purchases of reserves in place|4|
|extensions discoveries and other additions|227|
|dispositions|-29 ( 29 )|
|transfers to proved developed|-103 ( 103 )|
|end of year|728|
significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2014 included 121 mmboe in the eagle ford and 61 mmboe in the bakken shale plays due to development drilling . transfers from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves included 67 mmboe in the eagle ford , 26 mmboe in the bakken and 1 mmboe in the oklahoma resource basins due to development drilling and completions . costs incurred in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 3149 million , $ 2536 million and $ 1995 million . a total of 102 mmboe was booked as extensions , discoveries or other additions due to the application of reliable technology . technologies included statistical analysis of production performance , decline curve analysis , pressure and rate transient analysis , reservoir simulation and volumetric analysis . the statistical nature of production performance coupled with highly certain reservoir continuity or quality within the reliable technology areas and sufficient proved undeveloped locations establish the reasonable certainty criteria required for booking proved reserves . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as large development projects which take more than five years to complete , or the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 728 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at december 31 , 2014 , 19 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in e.g . that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance with this project intended to maintain maximum production levels . performance of this field since the board sanctioned the project has far exceeded expectations . estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . during 2012 , the compression project received the approval of the e.g . government , allowing design and planning work to progress towards implementation , with completion expected by mid-2016 . the other component of alba proved undeveloped reserves is an infill well approved in 2013 and to be drilled in the second quarter of 2015 . proved undeveloped reserves for the north gialo development , located in the libyan sahara desert , were booked for the first time in 2010 . this development , which is anticipated to take more than five years to develop , is executed by the operator and encompasses a multi-year drilling program including the design , fabrication and installation of extensive liquid handling and gas recycling facilities . anecdotal evidence from similar development projects in the region lead to an expected project execution time frame of more than five years from the time the reserves were initially booked . interruptions associated with the civil unrest in 2011 and third-party labor strikes and civil unrest in 2013-2014 have also extended the project duration . as of december 31 , 2014 , future development costs estimated to be required for the development of proved undeveloped crude oil and condensate , ngls , natural gas and synthetic crude oil reserves related to continuing operations for the years 2015 through 2019 are projected to be $ 2915 million , $ 2598 million , $ 2493 million , $ 2669 million and $ 2745 million. .
Question: what was the decrease in undeveloped reserves due to dispositions and \\ntransfers to proved developed reserves , in mmboe?
Answer: | -132.0 |
FINQA1459 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 132 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , compared to 2010 . the increase primarily was attributable to approximately $ 115 million of higher operating profit on c-130 programs due to increased volume and the retirement of risks ; increased volume and risk retirements on f-16 programs of about $ 50 million and c-5 programs of approximately $ 20 million ; and about $ 70 million due to risk retirements on other aeronautics sustainment activities in 2011 . these increases partially were offset by a decline in operating profit of approximately $ 75 million on the f-22 program and f-35 development contract primarily due to lower volume and about $ 55 million on other programs , including f-35 lrip , primarily due to lower profit rate adjustments in 2011 compared to 2010 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 90 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 contracts and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . backlog increased in 2011 compared to 2010 mainly due to higher orders on f-35 contracts , which partially were offset by higher sales volume on the c-130 programs . trends we expect aeronautics will experience a mid single digit percentage range decline in net sales for 2013 as compared to 2012 . a decrease in net sales from a decline in f-16 and c-130j aircraft deliveries is expected to be partially offset by an increase in net sales volume on f-35 lrip contracts . operating profit is projected to decrease at a high single digit percentage range from 2012 levels due to the expected decline in net sales as well as changes in aircraft mix , resulting in a slight decline in operating margins between the years . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides management services , integrated information technology solutions , and advanced technology systems and expertise across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continuing downturn in the federal information technology budgets and the impact of the continuing resolution that was effective on october 1 , 2012 , the start of the u.s . government 2019s fiscal year . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net sales|$ 8846|$ 9381|$ 9921|
|operating profit|808|874|814|
|operating margins|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|9.3% ( 9.3 % )|8.2% ( 8.2 % )|
|backlog at year-end|8700|9300|9700|
2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford ; warfighter information network-tactical ( win-t ) ; command , control , battle management and communications ( c2bmc ) ; and transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) ) . partially offsetting the decreases were higher net sales of approximately $ 140 million from qtc , which was acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2011 ; and about $ 65 million from increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and persistent threat detection system ( ptds ) operational support . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2012 decreased $ 66 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower operating profit of approximately $ 50 million due to the favorable impact of the odin contract completion in 2011 ; about $ 25 million due to an increase in reserves for performance issues related to an international airborne surveillance system in 2012 ; and approximately $ 20 million due to lower volume on certain programs ( primarily c2bmc and win-t ) . partially offsetting the decreases was an increase in operating profit due to higher risk retirements of approximately $ 15 million from the twic program ; and about $ 10 million due to increased activity on numerous other programs , primarily federal cyber security programs and ptds operational support . operating profit for the jtrs program was comparable as a decrease in volume was offset by a decrease in reserves . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 20 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what is the growth rate in net sales for is&gs in 2012?
Answer: | -535.0 |
FINQA1460 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 9 . stock-based employee compensation we have four stock-based compensation plans , which provide for awards to our officers , directors and key employees . the plans consist of a 1990 employee stock option plan , a 1995 incentive stock option plan , a 2000 stock award plan , and a 2008 equity plan . the 1990 stock option plan and the 1995 incentive stock option plan terminated by their terms in march 2000 and february 2005 , respectively . the 2000 stock award plan , as amended , and the 2008 equity plan provide for the issuance of ( i ) incentive and non-qualified stock options , ( ii ) stock appreciation rights , ( iii ) restricted stock , ( iv ) restricted stock units and ( v ) up to 13000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2000 stock award plan and up to 5000000 performance shares of our common stock for the 2008 equity plan . during any calendar year , no one individual shall be granted awards of more than 500000 shares . options and restricted stock units outstanding as of december 31 , 2009 vest in equal installments over four to five years from the date of grant . generally , options and restricted stock units are forfeited if the recipient ceases to be a director or employee before the shares vest . options are granted at a price not less than the fair value of the shares on the date of grant and expire not later than ten years after the date of grant . we also provide an employee stock purchase plan to facilitate the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock in the aggregate . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the purchase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the purchase period and the last business day of each month of the purchase period . shares of common stock of 65005 , 36836 and 20759 were issued under the espp at a weighted-average price of $ 12.78 , $ 20.97 and $ 37.25 during 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . under the chief executive officer 2019s employment agreement we contributed 10086 shares of our common stock quarterly , to a maximum of 806880 shares , to a trust on his behalf . in january 2009 , the employment agreement and related trust agreement were amended . consequently , 768018 shares were distributed from the trust and future quarterly share distributions are issued directly to the chief executive officer . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2009 was $ 16.8 million . of this amount , $ 16.2 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 0.6 million was included within payroll and related expenses . total compensation expense recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 5.7 million . of this amount , $ 6.4 million , which included a benefit of approximately $ 8.2 million due to a change in the employee forfeiture rate assumption was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and income of $ 0.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses which also included a benefit of approximately $ 1.0 million due to the change in the forfeiture rate . total compensation expenses recognized for employee stock-based compensation for the year ended december 31 , 2007 was $ 19.0 million . of this amount , $ 16.3 million was included within marketing , selling and administrative expenses and $ 2.7 million was included within payroll and related expenses . the fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the estimated fair value of stock options , less estimated forfeitures , is amortized over the vesting period using the graded-vesting method . the assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model are as follows : expected volatility was based on a combination of historical and implied volatilities . the risk-free interest rate is based on united states treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected option life assumed at the date of grant . the expected term was calculated based on historical experience and represents the time period options actually remain outstanding . we estimate forfeitures based on historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates and revise those estimates as appropriate to reflect actual experience . in 2008 , we increased our estimated forfeiture rate from 4% ( 4 % ) for options and 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) for restricted stock units to 20% ( 20 % ) to reflect changes in employee retention rates. .
||2009|2008|2007|
|dividend yield|0.0% ( 0.0 % )|1.9% ( 1.9 % )|1.3% ( 1.3 % )|
|expected stock price volatility|55.0% ( 55.0 % )|31.4% ( 31.4 % )|28.0% ( 28.0 % )|
|risk-free interest rate|1.8% ( 1.8 % )|2.8% ( 2.8 % )|4.8% ( 4.8 % )|
|expected option life|5 years|5 years|5 years|
.
Question: what was the percent of the increase in the expected stock price volatility from 2008 to 2009
Answer: | 0.75159 |
FINQA1461 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: own debt valuation adjustments ( dva ) own debt valuation adjustments are recognized on citi 2019s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected using citi 2019s credit spreads observed in the bond market . effective january 1 , 2016 , changes in fair value of fair value option liabilities related to changes in citigroup 2019s own credit spreads ( dva ) are reflected as a component of aoci . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . among other variables , the fair value of liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected ( other than non-recourse and similar liabilities ) is impacted by the narrowing or widening of the company 2019s credit spreads . the estimated changes in the fair value of these liabilities due to such changes in the company 2019s own credit spread ( or instrument-specific credit risk ) were a gain of $ 1415 million and a loss of $ 680 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the company 2019s current credit spreads observable in the bond market into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above . the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell , securities borrowed , securities sold under agreements to repurchase , securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings the company elected the fair value option for certain portfolios of fixed income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed income securities sold under agreements to repurchase , securities borrowed , securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings held primarily by broker-dealer entities in the united states , united kingdom and japan . in each case , the election was made because the related interest rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis , primarily with offsetting derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded in principal transactions . the related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and interest expense in the consolidated statement of income . certain loans and other credit products citigroup has also elected the fair value option for certain other originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s lending and trading businesses . none of these credit products are highly leveraged financing commitments . significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments , such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party . citigroup has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company . the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: .
|in millions of dollars|december 31 2018 trading assets|december 31 2018 loans|december 31 2018 trading assets|loans|
|carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet|$ 10108|$ 3224|$ 8851|$ 4374|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value|435|741|623|682|
|balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|2014|1|2014|1|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|2014|2014|2014|1|
in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 1137 million and $ 508 million of unfunded commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. .
Question: what was the difference in millions of carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet for loans between 2018 and the year prior?
Answer: | -1150.0 |
FINQA1462 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 10-k altria ar release tuesday , february 27 , 2018 10:00pm andra design llc performance stock units : in january 2017 , altria group , inc . granted an aggregate of 187886 performance stock units to eligible employees . the payout of the performance stock units requires the achievement of certain performance measures , which were predetermined at the time of grant , over a three-year performance cycle . these performance measures consist of altria group , inc . 2019s adjusted diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) compounded annual growth rate and altria group , inc . 2019s total shareholder return relative to a predetermined peer group . the performance stock units are also subject to forfeiture if certain employment conditions are not met . at december 31 , 2017 , altria group , inc . had 170755 performance stock units remaining , with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $ 70.39 per performance stock unit . the fair value of the performance stock units at the date of grant , net of estimated forfeitures , is amortized to expense over the performance period . altria group , inc . recorded pre-tax compensation expense related to performance stock units for the year ended december 31 , 2017 of $ 6 million . the unamortized compensation expense related to altria group , inc . 2019s performance stock units was $ 7 million at december 31 , 2017 . altria group , inc . did not grant any performance stock units during 2016 and 2015 . note 12 . earnings per share basic and diluted eps were calculated using the following: .
|( in millions )|for the years ended december 31 , 2017|for the years ended december 31 , 2016|for the years ended december 31 , 2015|
|net earnings attributable to altria group inc .|$ 10222|$ 14239|$ 5241|
|less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards|-14 ( 14 )|-24 ( 24 )|-10 ( 10 )|
|earnings for basic and diluted eps|$ 10208|$ 14215|$ 5231|
|weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps|1921|1952|1961|
net earnings attributable to altria group , inc . $ 10222 $ 14239 $ 5241 less : distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based awards ( 14 ) ( 24 ) ( 10 ) earnings for basic and diluted eps $ 10208 $ 14215 $ 5231 weighted-average shares for basic and diluted eps 1921 1952 1961 .
Question: what is the percent change in earnings for basic and diluted eps from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | 0.39254 |
FINQA1463 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in the fourth quarter of 2002 , aes lost voting control of one of the holding companies in the cemig ownership structure . this holding company indirectly owns the shares related to the cemig investment and indirectly holds the project financing debt related to cemig . as a result of the loss of voting control , aes stopped consolidating this holding company at december 31 , 2002 . other . during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) . the sale resulted in a gain of $ 23 million which was recorded in continuing operations . mpl and aesmo were previously reported in the contract generation segment . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company sold its investment in empresa de infovias s.a . ( 2018 2018infovias 2019 2019 ) , a telecommunications company in brazil , for proceeds of $ 31 million to cemig , an affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . the state of orissa appointed an administrator to take operational control of cesco . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . aes 2019s investment in cesco is negative . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell 100% ( 100 % ) of our ownership interest in songas . the sale of songas closed in april 2003 ( see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction ) . the following tables present summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) of the entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method. .
|as of and for the years ended december 31,|2003|2002 ( 1 )|2001 ( 1 )|
|revenues|$ 2758|$ 2832|$ 6147|
|operating income|1039|695|1717|
|net income|407|229|650|
|current assets|1347|1097|3700|
|noncurrent assets|7479|6751|14942|
|current liabilities|1434|1418|3510|
|noncurrent liabilities|3795|3349|8297|
|stockholder's equity|3597|3081|6835|
( 1 ) includes information pertaining to eletropaulo and light prior to february 2002 . in 2002 and 2001 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) and 19% ( 19 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: in 2003 what are net current assets for entities accounted for using the equity method , in millions?
Answer: | -87.0 |
FINQA1464 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .
|land improvements|20|
|buildings|39-40|
|furniture fixtures and equipment|3-10|
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .
Question: what is the total impairment charge recorded in the lat three years , in millions?
Answer: | 10.2 |
FINQA1465 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: average revenue per car 2010 2009 2008 % ( % ) change 2010 v 2009 % ( % ) change 2009 v 2008 .
|average revenue per car|2010|2009|2008|% ( % ) change 2010 v 2009|% ( % ) change 2009 v 2008|
|agricultural|$ 3286|$ 3080|$ 3352|7% ( 7 % )|( 8 ) % ( % )|
|automotive|2082|1838|2017|13|-9 ( 9 )|
|chemicals|2874|2761|2818|4|-2 ( 2 )|
|energy|1697|1543|1622|10|-5 ( 5 )|
|industrial products|2461|2388|2620|3|-9 ( 9 )|
|intermodal|974|896|955|9|-6 ( 6 )|
|average|$ 1823|$ 1718|$ 1848|6% ( 6 % )|( 7 ) % ( % )|
agricultural products 2013 higher volume , fuel surcharges , and price improvements increased agricultural freight revenue in 2010 versus 2009 . increased shipments from the midwest to export ports in the pacific northwest combined with heightened demand in mexico drove higher corn and feed grain shipments in 2010 . increased corn and feed grain shipments into ethanol plants in california and idaho and continued growth in ethanol shipments also contributed to this increase . in 2009 , some ethanol plants temporarily ceased operations due to lower ethanol margins , which contributed to the favorable year-over-year comparison . in addition , strong export demand for u.s . wheat via the gulf ports increased shipments of wheat and food grains compared to 2009 . declines in domestic wheat and food shipments partially offset the growth in export shipments . new business in feed and animal protein shipments also increased agricultural shipments in 2010 compared to 2009 . lower volume and fuel surcharges decreased agricultural freight revenue in 2009 versus 2008 . price improvements partially offset these declines . lower demand in both export and domestic markets led to fewer shipments of corn and feed grains , down 11% ( 11 % ) in 2009 compared to 2008 . weaker worldwide demand also reduced export shipments of wheat and food grains in 2009 versus 2008 . automotive 2013 37% ( 37 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) increases in shipments of finished vehicles and automotive parts in 2010 , respectively , combined with core pricing gains and fuel surcharges , improved automotive freight revenue from relatively weak 2009 levels . economic conditions in 2009 led to poor auto sales and reduced vehicle production , which in turn reduced shipments of finished vehicles and parts during the declines in shipments of finished vehicles and auto parts and lower fuel surcharges reduced freight revenue in 2009 compared to 2008 . vehicle shipments were down 35% ( 35 % ) and parts were down 24% ( 24 % ) . core pricing gains partially offset these declines . these volume declines resulted from economic conditions that reduced sales and vehicle production . in addition , two major domestic automotive manufacturers declared bankruptcy in the second quarter of 2009 , affecting production levels . although the federal car allowance rebate system ( the 201ccash for clunkers 201d program ) helped stimulate vehicle sales and shipments in the third quarter of 2009 , production cuts and soft demand throughout the year more than offset the program 2019s benefits . 2010 agricultural revenue 2010 automotive revenue .
Question: in 2010 what was the average revenue per car for agriculture products compared to automotive
Answer: | 1.57829 |
FINQA1466 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company is a registered life insurance company that maintains separate account assets , representing segregated funds held for purposes of funding individual and group pension contracts , and equal and offsetting separate account liabilities . at decem - ber 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the level 3 separate account assets were approximately $ 4 and $ 12 , respectively . the changes in level 3 assets primarily relate to purchases , sales and gains/ ( losses ) . the net investment income and net gains and losses attributable to separate account assets accrue directly to the contract owner and are not reported as non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . level 3 assets , which includes equity method investments or consolidated investments of real estate funds , private equity funds and funds of private equity funds are valued based upon valuations received from internal as well as third party fund managers . fair valuations at the underlying funds are based on a combination of methods which may include third-party independent appraisals and discounted cash flow techniques . direct investments in private equity companies held by funds of private equity funds are valued based on an assessment of each under - lying investment , incorporating evaluation of additional significant third party financing , changes in valuations of comparable peer companies and the business environment of the companies , among other factors . see note 2 for further detail on the fair value policies by the underlying funds . changes in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended december 31 , 2008 .
||investments|other assets|
|december 31 2007|$ 1240|$ 2014|
|realized and unrealized gains / ( losses ) net|-409 ( 409 )|-16 ( 16 )|
|purchases sales other settlements and issuances net|11|2|
|net transfers in and/or out of level 3|-29 ( 29 )|78|
|december 31 2008|$ 813|$ 64|
|total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets stillheld at the reporting date|$ -366 ( 366 )|$ -17 ( 17 )|
total net ( losses ) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or ( losses ) relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 366 ) $ ( 17 ) realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded for level 3 assets are reported in non-operating income ( expense ) on the consolidated statements of income . non-controlling interest expense is recorded for consoli- dated investments to reflect the portion of gains and losses not attributable to the company . the company transfers assets in and/or out of level 3 as significant inputs , including performance attributes , used for the fair value measurement become observable . 6 . variable interest entities in the normal course of business , the company is the manager of various types of sponsored investment vehicles , including collateralized debt obligations and sponsored investment funds , that may be considered vies . the company receives management fees or other incen- tive related fees for its services and may from time to time own equity or debt securities or enter into derivatives with the vehicles , each of which are considered variable inter- ests . the company engages in these variable interests principally to address client needs through the launch of such investment vehicles . the vies are primarily financed via capital contributed by equity and debt holders . the company 2019s involvement in financing the operations of the vies is limited to its equity interests , unfunded capital commitments for certain sponsored investment funds and its capital support agreements for two enhanced cash funds . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity 2019s expected losses , receives a major - ity of the entity 2019s expected residual returns or both as a result of holding variable interests . in order to determine whether the company is the primary beneficiary of a vie , management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios . assumptions made in such analyses include , but are not limited to , market prices of securities , market interest rates , poten- tial credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities , gain realization , liquidity or marketability of certain securities , discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes . vies in which blackrock is the primary beneficiary at december 31 , 2008 , the company was the primary beneficiary of three vies , which resulted in consolidation of three sponsored investment funds ( including two cash management funds and one private equity fund of funds ) . creditors of the vies do not have recourse to the credit of the company . during 2008 , the company determined it became the primary beneficiary of two enhanced cash management funds as a result of concluding that under various cash 177528_txt_59_96:layout 1 3/26/09 10:32 pm page 73 .
Question: what percent did the realized and unrealized losses effect the assets as of 2008?
Answer: | 0.3347 |
FINQA1467 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: changes in the fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in citi 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loan interest depending on the balance sheet classifications of the credit products . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 27 million and a gain of $ 10 million , respectively . certain investments in unallocated precious metals citigroup invests in unallocated precious metals accounts ( gold , silver , platinum and palladium ) as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities or to economically hedge certain exposures from issuing structured liabilities . under asc 815 , the investment is bifurcated into a debt host contract and a commodity forward derivative instrument . citigroup elects the fair value option for the debt host contract , and reports the debt host contract within trading account assets on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the total carrying amount of debt host contracts across unallocated precious metals accounts was approximately $ 0.4 billion and $ 0.9 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . the amounts are expected to fluctuate based on trading activity in future periods . as part of its commodity and foreign currency trading activities , citi trades unallocated precious metals investments and executes forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts with trading counterparties . when citi sells an unallocated precious metals investment , citi 2019s receivable from its depository bank is repaid and citi derecognizes its investment in the unallocated precious metal . the forward purchase or sale contract with the trading counterparty indexed to unallocated precious metals is accounted for as a derivative , at fair value through earnings . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately $ 13.7 billion and $ 10.3 billion in notional amounts of such forward purchase and forward sale derivative contracts outstanding , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method and other investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in citi 2019s investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of these investments . all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . citigroup also elected the fair value option for certain non-marketable equity securities whose risk is managed with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings . these securities are classified as trading account assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair value of these securities and the related derivative instruments are recorded in principal transactions . effective january 1 , 2018 under asu 2016-01 and asu 2018-03 , a fair value option election is no longer required to measure these non-marketable equity securities through earnings . see note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . certain mortgage loans held-for-sale citigroup has elected the fair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans hfs . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans hfs carried at fair value: .
|in millions of dollars|december 312018|december 31 2017|
|carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet|$ 556|$ 426|
|aggregate fair value in excess of ( less than ) unpaid principal balance|21|14|
|balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|2014|2014|
|aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due|2014|2014|
the changes in the fair values of these mortgage loans are reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . there was no net change in fair value during the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 due to instrument-specific credit risk . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue in the consolidated statement of income. .
Question: what was the change in millions in the carrying amount reported on the consolidate balance sheet from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: | 130.0 |
FINQA1468 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: of global business , there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain . some of these uncertainties arise as a consequence of cost reimbursement arrangements among related entities . although the company believes its estimates are reasonable , no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different than that which is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals . such differences could have a material impact on the company 2019s income tax provision and operating results in the period in which such determination is made . on november 4 , 2007 ( the first day of its 2008 fiscal year ) , the company adopted new accounting principles on accounting for uncertain tax positions . these principles require companies to determine whether it is 201cmore likely than not 201d that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any benefit can be recorded in the financial statements . an uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% ( 50 % ) likelihood of being sustained . there were no changes to the company 2019s liabilities for uncertain tax positions as a result of the adoption of these provisions . as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 , the company had a liability of $ 18.4 million and $ 18.2 million , respectively , for gross unrealized tax benefits , all of which , if settled in the company 2019s favor , would lower the company 2019s effective tax rate in the period recorded . in addition , as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 , the company had a liability of approximately $ 9.8 million and $ 8.0 million , respectively , for interest and penalties . the total liability as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 of $ 28.3 million and $ 26.2 million , respectively , for uncertain tax positions is classified as non-current , and is included in other non-current liabilities , because the company believes that the ultimate payment or settlement of these liabilities will not occur within the next twelve months . prior to the adoption of these provisions , these amounts were included in current income tax payable . the company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes in the condensed consolidated statements of income , and as a result , no change in classification was made upon adopting these provisions . the condensed consolidated statements of income for fiscal years 2010 , 2009 and 2008 include $ 1.8 million , $ 1.7 million and $ 1.3 million , respectively , of interest and penalties related to these uncertain tax positions . due to the complexity associated with its tax uncertainties , the company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the period in which it expects to settle the liabilities associated with these uncertain tax positions . the following table summarizes the changes in the total amounts of uncertain tax positions for fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2010. .
|balance november 3 2007|$ 9889|
|additions for tax positions of 2008|3861|
|balance november 1 2008|13750|
|additions for tax positions of 2009|4411|
|balance october 31 2009|18161|
|additions for tax positions of 2010|286|
|balance october 30 2010|$ 18447|
fiscal years 2004 and 2005 irs examination during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 , the irs completed its field examination of the company 2019s fiscal years 2004 and 2005 . on january 2 , 2008 , the irs issued its report for fiscal 2004 and 2005 , which included proposed adjustments related to these two fiscal years . the company has recorded taxes and penalties related to certain of these proposed adjustments . there are four items with an additional potential total tax liability of $ 46 million . the company has concluded , based on discussions with its tax advisors , that these four items are not likely to result in any additional tax liability . therefore , the company has not recorded any additional tax liability for these items and is appealing these proposed adjustments through the normal processes for the resolution of differences between the irs and taxpayers . the company 2019s initial meetings with the appellate division of the irs were held during fiscal analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: how is the net cash flow from operations affected by the change in liability of interest and penalties in 2010?
Answer: | 1.8 |
FINQA1469 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 2010 . on november 1 , 2010 , we redeemed all $ 400 million of our outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011 . the redemption resulted in a $ 5 million early extinguishment charge . receivables securitization facility 2013 at december 31 , 2010 , we have recorded $ 100 million as secured debt under our receivables securitization facility . ( see further discussion of our receivables securitization facility in note 10. ) 15 . variable interest entities we have entered into various lease transactions in which the structure of the leases contain variable interest entities ( vies ) . these vies were created solely for the purpose of doing lease transactions ( principally involving railroad equipment and facilities ) and have no other activities , assets or liabilities outside of the lease transactions . within these lease arrangements , we have the right to purchase some or all of the assets at fixed prices . depending on market conditions , fixed-price purchase options available in the leases could potentially provide benefits to us ; however , these benefits are not expected to be significant . we maintain and operate the assets based on contractual obligations within the lease arrangements , which set specific guidelines consistent within the railroad industry . as such , we have no control over activities that could materially impact the fair value of the leased assets . we do not hold the power to direct the activities of the vies and , therefore , do not control the ongoing activities that have a significant impact on the economic performance of the vies . additionally , we do not have the obligation to absorb losses of the vies or the right to receive benefits of the vies that could potentially be significant to the we are not considered to be the primary beneficiary and do not consolidate these vies because our actions and decisions do not have the most significant effect on the vie 2019s performance and our fixed-price purchase price options are not considered to be potentially significant to the vie 2019s . the future minimum lease payments associated with the vie leases totaled $ 4.2 billion as of december 31 , 2010 . 16 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . the consolidated statement of financial position as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 included $ 2520 million , net of $ 901 million of accumulated depreciation , and $ 2754 million , net of $ 927 million of accumulated depreciation , respectively , for properties held under capital leases . a charge to income resulting from the depreciation for assets held under capital leases is included within depreciation expense in our consolidated statements of income . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2010 , were as follows : millions operating leases capital leases .
|millions|operatingleases|capitalleases|
|2011|$ 613|$ 311|
|2012|526|251|
|2013|461|253|
|2014|382|261|
|2015|340|262|
|later years|2599|1355|
|total minimum lease payments|$ 4921|$ 2693|
|amount representing interest|n/a|-784 ( 784 )|
|present value of minimum lease payments|n/a|$ 1909|
the majority of capital lease payments relate to locomotives . rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 624 million in 2010 , $ 686 million in 2009 , and $ 747 million in 2008 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: in 2010 what was the percent of the early extinguishment charge to the amount of the outstanding 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) notes due january 15 , 2011
Answer: | 0.0125 |
FINQA1470 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: table of contents celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .
|period|totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 )|averageprice paidper share|total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program|approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 )|
|october 1 - 31 2017|10676|$ 104.10|2014|$ 1531000000|
|november 1 - 30 2017|924|$ 104.02|2014|$ 1531000000|
|december 1 - 31 2017|38605|$ 106.36|2014|$ 1531000000|
|total|50205||2014||
___________________________ ( 1 ) represents shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information. .
Question: what was the percent of the number of shares purchased in october 1 - 31 2017 as part of the 2017 total
Answer: | 0.21265 |
FINQA1471 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: hii expects to incur higher costs to complete ships currently under construction in avondale due to anticipated reductions in productivity . as a result , in the second quarter of 2010 , the company increased the estimates to complete lpd-23 and lpd-25 by approximately $ 210 million . the company recognized a $ 113 million pre-tax charge to operating income for these contracts in the second quarter of 2010 . hii is exploring alternative uses of the avondale facility , including alternative opportunities for the workforce . in connection with and as a result of the decision to wind down shipbuilding operations at the avondale , louisiana facility , the company began incurring and paying related employee severance and incentive compensation liabilities and expenditures , asset retirement obligation liabilities that became reasonably estimable , and amounts owed for not meeting certain requirements under its cooperative endeavor agreement with the state of louisiana . the company anticipates that it will incur substantial other restructuring and facilities shutdown related costs , including , but not limited to , severance expense , relocation expense , and asset write-downs related to the avondale facilities . these costs are expected to be allowable expenses under government accounting standards and thus should be recoverable in future years 2019 overhead costs . these future costs could approximate $ 271 million , based on management 2019s current estimate . such costs should be recoverable under existing flexibly priced contracts or future negotiated contracts in accordance with federal acquisition regulation ( 201cfar 201d ) provisions relating to the treatment of restructuring and shutdown related costs . the company is currently in discussions with the u.s . navy regarding its cost submission to support the recoverability of these costs under the far and applicable contracts , and this submission is subject to review and acceptance by the u.s . navy . the defense contract audit agency ( 201cdcaa 201d ) , a dod agency , prepared an initial audit report on the company 2019s cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $ 310 million , which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the dcaa to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $ 25 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , of the costs submitted by the company . accordingly , the dcaa did not accept the proposal as submitted . the company has submitted a revised proposal to address the concerns of the dcaa and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $ 271 million . should the company 2019s revised proposal be challenged by the u.s . navy , the company would likely pursue prescribed dispute resolution alternatives to resolve the challenge . that process , however , would create uncertainty as to the timing and eventual allowability of the costs related to the wind down of the avondale facility . ultimately , the company anticipates these discussions with the u.s . navy will result in an agreement that is substantially in accordance with management 2019s cost recovery expectations . accordingly , hii has treated these costs as allowable costs in determining the earnings performance on its contracts in process . the actual restructuring expenses related to the wind down may be greater than the company 2019s current estimate , and any inability to recover such costs could result in a material effect on the company 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the company also evaluated the effect that the wind down of the avondale facilities might have on the benefit plans in which hii employees participate . hii determined that the potential impact of a curtailment in these plans was not material to its consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . the table below summarizes the company 2019s liability for restructuring and shutdown related costs associated with winding down the avondale facility . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , these costs are comprised primarily of employee severance and retention and incentive bonuses . these amounts were capitalized in inventoried costs , and will be recognized as expenses in cost of product sales beginning in 2014 . ( $ in millions ) employee compensation other accruals total .
|( $ in millions )|employee compensation|other accruals|total|
|balance at january 1 2010|$ 0|$ 0|$ 0|
|accrual established|27|39|66|
|payments|0|0|0|
|adjustments|0|0|0|
|balance at december 31 2010|$ 27|$ 39|$ 66|
|accrual established|0|0|0|
|payments|-24 ( 24 )|-36 ( 36 )|-60 ( 60 )|
|adjustments|47|-3 ( 3 )|44|
|balance at december 31 2011|$ 50|$ 0|$ 50|
.
Question: what was the net adjustments as recorded in 2011 in millions
Answer: | 23.0 |
FINQA1472 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance share awards the vesting of psas is contingent upon meeting various individual , divisional or company-wide performance conditions , including revenue generation or growth in revenue , pretax income or earnings per share over a one- to five-year period . the performance conditions are not considered in the determination of the grant date fair value for these awards . the fair value of psas is based upon the market price of the aon common stock at the date of grant . compensation expense is recognized over the performance period , and in certain cases an additional vesting period , based on management 2019s estimate of the number of units expected to vest . compensation expense is adjusted to reflect the actual number of shares issued at the end of the programs . the actual issuance of shares may range from 0-200% ( 0-200 % ) of the target number of psas granted , based on the plan . dividend equivalents are not paid on psas . information regarding psas granted during the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 follows ( shares in thousands , dollars in millions , except fair value ) : .
||2011|2010|2009|
|target psus granted|1715|1390|3754|
|fair value ( 1 )|$ 50|$ 39|$ 38|
|number of shares that would be issued based on current performance levels|1772|1397|2300|
|unamortized expense based on current performance levels|$ 60|$ 18|$ 4|
( 1 ) represents per share weighted average fair value of award at date of grant . during 2011 , the company issued approximately 1.2 million shares in connection with the 2008 leadership performance plan ( 2018 2018lpp 2019 2019 ) cycle and 0.3 million shares related to a 2006 performance plan . during 2010 , the company issued approximately 1.6 million shares in connection with the completion of the 2007 lpp cycle and 84000 shares related to other performance plans . stock options options to purchase common stock are granted to certain employees at fair value on the date of grant . commencing in 2010 , the company ceased granting new stock options with the exception of historical contractual commitments . generally , employees are required to complete two continuous years of service before the options begin to vest in increments until the completion of a 4-year period of continuous employment , although a number of options were granted that require five continuous years of service before the options are fully vested . options issued under the lpp program vest ratable over 3 years with a six year term . the maximum contractual term on stock options is generally ten years from the date of grant . aon uses a lattice-binomial option-pricing model to value stock options . lattice-based option valuation models use a range of assumptions over the expected term of the options . expected volatilities are based on the average of the historical volatility of aon 2019s stock price and the implied volatility of traded options and aon 2019s stock . the valuation model stratifies employees between those receiving lpp options , special stock plan ( 2018 2018ssp 2019 2019 ) options , and all other option grants . the company believes that this stratification better represents prospective stock option exercise patterns . the expected dividend yield assumption is based on the company 2019s historical and expected future dividend rate . the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is a derived output of the lattice-binomial model. .
Question: what is the lowest value of unamortized expense during this period?
Answer: | 4.0 |
FINQA1473 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index ( excluding health care real estate investment trusts ) , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .
||2005|2006|2007|2008|2009|2010|
|vornado realty trust|100|151|113|81|100|124|
|s&p 500 index|100|116|122|77|97|112|
|the nareit all equity index|100|135|114|71|91|116|
.
Question: what was the average price of the the nareit all equity index from 2005 to 2009
Answer: | 258.0 |
FINQA1474 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) as a result of customer credits to be realized by electric customers of entergy louisiana , consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . results of operations for 2015 also include the sale in december 2015 of the 583 mw rhode island state energy center for a realized gain of $ 154 million ( $ 100 million net-of-tax ) on the sale and the $ 77 million ( $ 47 million net-of-tax ) write-off and regulatory charges to recognize that a portion of the assets associated with the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project is no longer probable of recovery . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|2015 net revenue|$ 5829|
|retail electric price|289|
|louisiana business combination customer credits|107|
|volume/weather|14|
|louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation|-17 ( 17 )|
|other|-43 ( 43 )|
|2016 net revenue|$ 6179|
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 an increase in base rates at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc . the new rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase included an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider for entergy new orleans , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station ; 2022 an increase in formula rate plan revenues for entergy louisiana , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station ; and 2022 an increase in revenues at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate proceedings . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . these costs are being entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue during 2016 is related to the change in retail electric price?
Answer: | 0.82571 |
FINQA1475 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company increased net deferred tax assets by $ 1.5 million and $ 7.2 million , respectively with a corresponding reduction of goodwill associated with the utilization of net operating and capital losses acquired in connection with the spectrasite , inc . merger . these deferred tax assets were assigned a full valuation allowance as part of the final spectrasite purchase price allocation in june 2006 , as evidence available at the time did not support that losses were more likely than not to be realized . the valuation allowance decreased from $ 308.2 million as of december 31 , 2006 to $ 88.2 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the decrease was primarily due to a $ 149.6 million reclassification to the fin 48 opening balance ( related to federal and state net operating losses acquired in connection with the spectrasite , inc . merger ) and $ 45.2 million of allowance reductions during the year ended december 31 , 2007 related to state net operating losses , capital loss expirations of $ 6.5 million and other items . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2007 and 2006 in the table above do not include $ 74.9 million and $ 31.0 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses due to the adoption of sfas no . 123r . total stockholders 2019 equity will be increased by $ 74.9 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . basis step-up from corporate restructuring represents the tax effects of increasing the basis for tax purposes of certain of the company 2019s assets in conjunction with its spin-off from american radio systems corporation , its former parent company . at december 31 , 2007 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 2.1 billion , respectively . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .
|years ended december 31,|federal|state|
|2008 to 2012||$ 294358|
|2013 to 2017||561608|
|2018 to 2022|$ 466747|803201|
|2023 to 2027|1134060|451874|
|total|$ 1600807|$ 2111041|
as described in note 1 , the company adopted the provisions of fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . as of january 1 , 2007 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $ 183.9 million of which $ 34.3 million would affect the effective tax rate , if recognized . as of december 31 , 2007 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $ 59.2 million , $ 23.0 million of which would affect the effective tax rate , if recognized . the company expects the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months if certain tax matters ultimately settle with the applicable taxing jurisdiction during this timeframe . however , based on the status of these items and the amount of uncertainty associated with the outcome and timing of audit settlements , the .
Question: what portion of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized as of december 31 , 2007?
Answer: | 0.38851 |
FINQA1476 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: gain on land sales are derived from sales of undeveloped land owned by us . we pursue opportunities to dispose of land in markets with a high concentration of undeveloped land and in those markets where the land no longer meets our strategic development plans . the increase was partially attributable to a land sale to a current corporate tenant for potential future expansion . we recorded $ 424000 and $ 560000 of impairment charges associated with contracts to sell land parcels for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2004 , only one parcel on which we recorded impairment charges is still owned by us . we anticipate selling this parcel in the first quarter of 2005 . discontinued operations we have classified operations of 86 buildings as discontinued operations as of december 31 , 2004 . these 86 buildings consist of 69 industrial , 12 office and five retail properties . as a result , we classified net income from operations , net of minority interest , of $ 1.6 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 10.7 million as net income from discontinued operations for the years ended december 31 , 2004 , 2003 and 2002 , respectively . in addition , 41 of the properties classified in discontinued operations were sold during 2004 , 42 properties were sold during 2003 , two properties were sold during 2002 and one operating property is classified as held-for-sale at december 31 , 2004 . the gains on disposal of these properties , net of impairment adjustment and minority interest , of $ 23.9 million and $ 11.8 million for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively , are also reported in discontinued operations . for the year ended december 31 , 2002 , a $ 4.5 million loss on disposal of properties , net of impairment adjustments and minority interest , is reported in discontinued operations due to impairment charges of $ 7.7 million recorded on three properties in 2002 that were later sold in 2003 and 2004 . comparison of year ended december 31 , 2003 to year ended december 31 , 2002 rental income from continuing operations rental income from continuing operations increased from $ 652.8 million in 2002 to $ 689.3 million in 2003 . the following table reconciles rental income by reportable segment to our total reported rental income from continuing operations for the years ended december 31 , 2003 and 2002 ( in thousands ) : .
||2003|2002|
|office|$ 419962|$ 393810|
|industrial|259762|250391|
|retail|5863|4733|
|other|3756|3893|
|total|$ 689343|$ 652827|
although our three reportable segments comprising rental operations ( office , industrial and retail ) are all within the real estate industry , they are not necessarily affected by the same economic and industry conditions . for example , our retail segment experienced high occupancies and strong overall performance during 2003 , while our office and industrial segments reflected the weaker economic environment for those property types . the primary causes of the increase in rental income from continuing operations , with specific references to a particular segment when applicable , are summarized below : 25cf during 2003 , in-service occupancy improved from 87.1% ( 87.1 % ) at the end of 2002 to 89.3% ( 89.3 % ) at the end of 2003 . the second half of 2003 was highlighted by a significant increase in the industrial portfolio occupancy of 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) along with a slight increase in office portfolio occupancy of 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . 25cf lease termination fees totaled $ 27.4 million in 2002 compared to $ 16.2 million in 2003 . most of this decrease was attributable to the office segment , which recognized $ 21.1 million of termination fees in 2002 as compared to $ 11.8 million in 2003 . lease termination fees relate to specific tenants that pay a fee to terminate their lease obligations before the end of the contractual lease term . the high volume of termination fees in 2002 was reflective of the contraction of the business of large office users during that year and their desire to downsize their use of office space . the decrease in termination fees for 2003 was indicative of an improving economy and a more stable financial position of our tenants . 25cf during the year ended 2003 , we acquired $ 232 million of properties totaling 2.1 million square feet . the acquisitions were primarily class a office buildings in existing markets with overall occupancy near 90% ( 90 % ) . revenues associated with these acquisitions totaled $ 11.9 million in 2003 . in addition , revenues from 2002 acquisitions totaled $ 15.8 million in 2003 compared to $ 4.8 million in 2002 . this significant increase is primarily due to a large office acquisition that closed at the end of december 2002 . 25cf developments placed in-service in 2003 provided revenues of $ 6.6 million , while revenues associated with developments placed in-service in 2002 totaled $ 13.7 million in 2003 compared to $ 4.7 million in 25cf proceeds from dispositions of held for rental properties totaled $ 126.1 million in 2003 , compared to $ 40.9 million in 2002 . these properties generated revenue of $ 12.5 million in 2003 versus $ 19.6 million in 2002 . equity in earnings of unconsolidated companies equity in earnings represents our ownership share of net income from investments in unconsolidated companies . these joint ventures generally own and operate rental properties and hold land for development . these earnings decreased from $ 27.2 million in 2002 to $ 23.7 million in 2003 . this decrease is a result of the following significant activity: .
Question: what was the total of impairment charges associated with contracts to sell land parcels for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively .
Answer: | 984000.0 |
FINQA1477 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|net sales|$ 8367|$ 8846|$ 9381|
|operating profit|759|808|874|
|operating margins|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|9.1% ( 9.1 % )|9.3% ( 9.3 % )|
|backlog at year-end|8300|8700|9300|
2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .
Question: what were average net sales for is&gs from 2011 to 2013 , in millions?
Answer: | 8864.66667 |
FINQA1478 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued as of december 31 , 2009 , the company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk : interest rate derivates number of instruments notional .
|interest rate derivates|number of instruments|notional|
|interest rate caps|2|$ 83.1 million|
|interest rate swaps|2|$ 23.6 million|
the fair value of these derivative financial instruments classified as asset derivatives was $ 0.4 million and $ 0 for december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . the fair value of these derivative financial instruments classified as liability derivatives was $ ( 0.5 ) million and $ ( 0.8 ) million for december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . credit-risk-related contingent features the company has agreements with one of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the company defaults on any of its indebtedness , including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender , then the company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations . the company has an agreement with a derivative counterparty that incorporates the loan covenant provisions of the company 2019s indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty . failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in the company being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement . 18 . preferred stock , common stock and convertible unit transactions : during december 2009 , the company completed a primary public stock offering of 28750000 shares of the company 2019s common stock . the net proceeds from this sale of common stock , totaling approximately $ 345.1 million ( after related transaction costs of $ 0.75 million ) were used to partially repay the outstanding balance under the company 2019s u.s . revolving credit facility . during april 2009 , the company completed a primary public stock offering of 105225000 shares of the company 2019s common stock . the net proceeds from this sale of common stock , totaling approximately $ 717.3 million ( after related transaction costs of $ 0.7 million ) were used to partially repay the outstanding balance under the company 2019s u.s . revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes . during september 2008 , the company completed a primary public stock offering of 11500000 shares of the company 2019s common stock . the net proceeds from this sale of common stock , totaling approximately $ 409.4 million ( after related transaction costs of $ 0.6 million ) were used to partially repay the outstanding balance under the company 2019s u.s . revolving credit facility . during october 2007 , the company issued 18400000 depositary shares ( the 201cclass g depositary shares 201d ) , after the exercise of an over-allotment option , each representing a one-hundredth fractional interest in a share of the company 2019s 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) class g cumulative redeemable preferred stock , par value $ 1.00 per share ( the 201cclass g preferred stock 201d ) . dividends on the class g depositary shares are cumulative and payable quarterly in arrears at the rate of 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) per annum based on the $ 25.00 per share initial offering price , or $ 1.9375 per annum . the class g depositary shares are redeemable , in whole or part , for cash on or after october 10 , 2012 , at the option of the company , at a redemption price of $ 25.00 per depositary share , plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon . the class g depositary shares are not convertible or exchangeable for any other property or securities of the company . the class g preferred stock ( represented by the class g depositary shares outstanding ) ranks pari passu with the company 2019s class f preferred stock as to voting rights , priority for receiving dividends and liquidation preference as set forth below . during june 2003 , the company issued 7000000 depositary shares ( the 201cclass f depositary shares 201d ) , each such class f depositary share representing a one-tenth fractional interest of a share of the company 2019s 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) class f cumulative redeemable preferred stock , par value $ 1.00 per share ( the 201cclass f preferred stock 201d ) . dividends on the class f depositary shares are cumulative and payable quarterly in arrears at the rate of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) per annum based on the .
Question: in 2009 what was the ratio of the interest rate caps to swaps
Answer: | 3.52119 |
FINQA1479 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented . discontinued operations 2014revenues and pretax income associated with our discontinued irish and gabonese operations are shown in the following table : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|( in millions )|2009|2008|2007|
|revenues applicable to discontinued operations|$ 188|$ 439|$ 456|
|pretax income from discontinued operations|$ 80|$ 221|$ 281|
angola disposition 2013 in july 2009 , we entered into an agreement to sell an undivided 20 percent outside- operated interest in the production sharing contract and joint operating agreement in block 32 offshore angola for $ 1.3 billion , excluding any purchase price adjustments at closing , with an effective date of january 1 , 2009 . the sale closed and we received net proceeds of $ 1.3 billion in february 2010 . the pretax gain on the sale will be approximately $ 800 million . we retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in block 32 . gabon disposition 2013 in december 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated fields offshore gabon , receiving net proceeds of $ 269 million , after closing adjustments . a $ 232 million pretax gain on this disposition was reported in discontinued operations for 2009 . permian basin disposition 2013 in june 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated and a portion of our outside- operated permian basin producing assets in new mexico and west texas for net proceeds after closing adjustments of $ 293 million . a $ 196 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded . ireland dispositions 2013 in april 2009 , we closed the sale of our operated properties in ireland for net proceeds of $ 84 million , after adjusting for cash held by the sold subsidiary . a $ 158 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded . as a result of this sale , we terminated our pension plan in ireland , incurring a charge of $ 18 million . in june 2009 , we entered into an agreement to sell the subsidiary holding our 19 percent outside-operated interest in the corrib natural gas development offshore ireland . total proceeds were estimated to range between $ 235 million and $ 400 million , subject to the timing of first commercial gas at corrib and closing adjustments . at closing on july 30 , 2009 , the initial $ 100 million payment plus closing adjustments was received . the fair value of the proceeds was estimated to be $ 311 million . fair value of anticipated sale proceeds includes ( i ) $ 100 million received at closing , ( ii ) $ 135 million minimum amount due at the earlier of first gas or december 31 , 2012 , and ( iii ) a range of zero to $ 165 million of contingent proceeds subject to the timing of first commercial gas . a $ 154 million impairment of the held for sale asset was recognized in discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2009 ( see note 16 ) since the fair value of the disposal group was less than the net book value . final proceeds will range between $ 135 million ( minimum amount ) to $ 300 million and are due on the earlier of first commercial gas or december 31 , 2012 . the fair value of the expected final proceeds was recorded as an asset at closing . as a result of new public information in the fourth quarter of 2009 , a writeoff was recorded on the contingent portion of the proceeds ( see note 10 ) . existing guarantees of our subsidiaries 2019 performance issued to irish government entities will remain in place after the sales until the purchasers issue similar guarantees to replace them . the guarantees , related to asset retirement obligations and natural gas production levels , have been indemnified by the purchasers . the fair value of these guarantees is not significant . norwegian disposition 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated e&p properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 . pilot travel centers disposition 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc . sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million . immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment . this was an investment of our rm&t segment. .
Question: what was total pretax income from discontinued operations for the three year period?
Answer: | 582.0 |
FINQA1480 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: 9 . junior subordinated debt securities payable in accordance with the provisions of the junior subordinated debt securities which were issued on march 29 , 2004 , holdings elected to redeem the $ 329897 thousand of 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) junior subordinated debt securities outstanding on may 24 , 2013 . as a result of the early redemption , the company incurred pre-tax expense of $ 7282 thousand related to the immediate amortization of the remaining capitalized issuance costs on the trust preferred securities . interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated: .
|( dollars in thousands )|years ended december 31 , 2014|years ended december 31 , 2013|years ended december 31 , 2012|
|interest expense incurred|$ -|$ 8181|$ 20454|
holdings considered the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities , taken together , constituted a full and unconditional guarantee by holdings of capital trust ii 2019s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities . 10 . reinsurance and trust agreements certain subsidiaries of group have established trust agreements , which effectively use the company 2019s investments as collateral , as security for assumed losses payable to certain non-affiliated ceding companies . at december 31 , 2014 , the total amount on deposit in trust accounts was $ 322285 thousand . on april 24 , 2014 , the company entered into two collateralized reinsurance agreements with kilimanjaro re limited ( 201ckilimanjaro 201d ) , a bermuda based special purpose reinsurer , to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . these agreements are multi-year reinsurance contracts which cover specified named storm and earthquake events . the first agreement provides up to $ 250000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeastern united states . the second agreement provides up to $ 200000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from named storms in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic and northeast regions of the united states and puerto rico as well as reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in specified states of the southeast , mid-atlantic , northeast and west regions of the united states , puerto rico and british columbia . on november 18 , 2014 , the company entered into a collateralized reinsurance agreement with kilimanjaro re to provide the company with catastrophe reinsurance coverage . this agreement is a multi-year reinsurance contract which covers specified earthquake events . the agreement provides up to $ 500000 thousand of reinsurance coverage from earthquakes in the united states , puerto rico and canada . kilimanjaro has financed the various property catastrophe reinsurance coverage by issuing catastrophe bonds to unrelated , external investors . on april 24 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 450000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-1 notes 201d ) . on november 18 , 2014 , kilimanjaro issued $ 500000 thousand of variable rate notes ( 201cseries 2014-2 notes 201d ) . the proceeds from the issuance of the series 2014-1 notes and the series 2014-2 notes are held in reinsurance trust throughout the duration of the applicable reinsurance agreements and invested solely in us government money market funds with a rating of at least 201caaam 201d by standard & poor 2019s. .
Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: | -0.60003 |
FINQA1481 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: leveraged performance units during the year ended may 31 , 2015 , certain executives were granted performance units that we refer to as 201cleveraged performance units , 201d or 201clpus . 201d lpus contain a market condition based on our relative stock price growth over a three-year performance period . the lpus contain a minimum threshold performance which , if not met , would result in no payout . the lpus also contain a maximum award opportunity set as a fixed dollar and fixed number of shares . after the three-year performance period , which concluded in october 2017 , one-third of the earned units converted to unrestricted common stock . the remaining two-thirds converted to restricted stock that will vest in equal installments on each of the first two anniversaries of the conversion date . we recognize share-based compensation expense based on the grant date fair value of the lpus , as determined by use of a monte carlo model , on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the lpu award . the following table summarizes the changes in unvested restricted stock and performance awards for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 : shares weighted-average grant-date fair value ( in thousands ) .
||shares ( in thousands )|weighted-averagegrant-datefair value|
|unvested at may 31 2014|1754|$ 22.72|
|granted|954|36.21|
|vested|-648 ( 648 )|23.17|
|forfeited|-212 ( 212 )|27.03|
|unvested at may 31 2015|1848|28.97|
|granted|461|57.04|
|vested|-633 ( 633 )|27.55|
|forfeited|-70 ( 70 )|34.69|
|unvested at may 31 2016|1606|37.25|
|granted|348|74.26|
|vested|-639 ( 639 )|31.38|
|forfeited|-52 ( 52 )|45.27|
|unvested at december 31 2016|1263|49.55|
|granted|899|79.79|
|vested|-858 ( 858 )|39.26|
|forfeited|-78 ( 78 )|59.56|
|unvested at december 31 2017|1226|$ 78.29|
the total fair value of restricted stock and performance awards vested was $ 33.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , $ 20.0 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and $ 17.4 million and $ 15.0 million , respectively , for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 . for restricted stock and performance awards , we recognized compensation expense of $ 35.2 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , $ 17.2 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and $ 28.8 million and $ 19.8 million , respectively , for the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there was $ 46.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock and performance awards that we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years . our restricted stock and performance award plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . stock options stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and have a term of ten years . stock options granted before the year ended may 31 , 2015 vest in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date . stock options granted during the year ended may 31 , 2015 and thereafter vest in equal installments on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date . our stock option plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions . global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report 2013 91 .
Question: what was the change in millions in the total fair value of restricted stock and performance awards vested from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: | 13.7 |
FINQA1482 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements entergy new orleans securitization bonds - hurricane isaac in may 2015 the city council issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover entergy new orleans 2019s hurricane isaac storm restoration costs of $ 31.8 million , including carrying costs , the costs of funding and replenishing the storm recovery reserve in the amount of $ 63.9 million , and approximately $ 3 million of up-front financing costs associated with the securitization . in july 2015 , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding i , l.l.c. , a company wholly owned and consolidated by entergy new orleans , issued $ 98.7 million of storm cost recovery bonds . the bonds have a coupon of 2.67% ( 2.67 % ) and an expected maturity date of june 2024 . although the principal amount is not due until the date given above , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 11.4 million for 2016 , $ 10.6 million for 2017 , $ 11 million for 2018 , $ 11.2 million for 2019 , and $ 11.6 million for 2020 . with the proceeds , entergy new orleans storm recovery funding purchased from entergy new orleans the storm recovery property , which is the right to recover from customers through a storm recovery charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the storm recovery property is reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated entergy new orleans balance sheet . the creditors of entergy new orleans do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy new orleans storm recovery funding , including the storm recovery property , and the creditors of entergy new orleans storm recovery funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy new orleans . entergy new orleans has no payment obligations to entergy new orleans storm recovery funding except to remit storm recovery charge collections . entergy texas securitization bonds - hurricane rita in april 2007 the puct issued a financing order authorizing the issuance of securitization bonds to recover $ 353 million of entergy texas 2019s hurricane rita reconstruction costs and up to $ 6 million of transaction costs , offset by $ 32 million of related deferred income tax benefits . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , llc , a company that is now wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued $ 329.5 million of senior secured transition bonds ( securitization bonds ) as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|senior secured transition bonds series a:||
|tranche a-1 ( 5.51% ( 5.51 % ) ) due october 2013|$ 93500|
|tranche a-2 ( 5.79% ( 5.79 % ) ) due october 2018|121600|
|tranche a-3 ( 5.93% ( 5.93 % ) ) due june 2022|114400|
|total senior secured transition bonds|$ 329500|
although the principal amount of each tranche is not due until the dates given above , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding expects to make principal payments on the bonds over the next five years in the amounts of $ 26 million for 2016 , $ 27.6 million for 2017 , $ 29.2 million for 2018 , $ 30.9 million for 2019 , and $ 32.8 million for 2020 . all of the scheduled principal payments for 2016 are for tranche a-2 , $ 23.6 million of the scheduled principal payments for 2017 are for tranche a-2 and $ 4 million of the scheduled principal payments for 2017 are for tranche a-3 . all of the scheduled principal payments for 2018-2020 are for tranche a-3 . with the proceeds , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . the transition property is reflected as a regulatory asset on the consolidated entergy texas balance sheet . the creditors of entergy texas do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy gulf states reconstruction funding , including the transition property , and the creditors of entergy gulf states reconstruction funding do not have recourse to the assets or revenues of entergy texas . entergy texas has no payment obligations to entergy gulf states reconstruction funding except to remit transition charge collections. .
Question: what is the principal payment in 2020 as a percentage of the total senior secured transition bonds?
Answer: | 0.09954 |
FINQA1483 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report consolidated results of operations this following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2009 . factors that related primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment . for a discussion of the critical ac- counting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 135 2013139 of this annual report . revenue year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 .
|year ended december 31 ( in millions )|2009|2008|2007|
|investment banking fees|$ 7087|$ 5526|$ 6635|
|principal transactions|9796|-10699 ( 10699 )|9015|
|lending- and deposit-related fees|7045|5088|3938|
|asset management administrationand commissions|12540|13943|14356|
|securities gains|1110|1560|164|
|mortgage fees and related income|3678|3467|2118|
|credit card income|7110|7419|6911|
|other income|916|2169|1829|
|noninterest revenue|49282|28473|44966|
|net interest income|51152|38779|26406|
|total net revenue|$ 100434|$ 67252|$ 71372|
2009 compared with 2008 total net revenue was $ 100.4 billion , up by $ 33.2 billion , or 49% ( 49 % ) , from the prior year . the increase was driven by higher principal transactions revenue , primarily related to improved performance across most fixed income and equity products , and the absence of net markdowns on legacy leveraged lending and mortgage positions in ib , as well as higher levels of trading gains and investment securities income in corporate/private equity . results also benefited from the impact of the washington mutual transaction , which contributed to increases in net interest income , lending- and deposit-related fees , and mortgage fees and related income . lastly , higher investment banking fees also contributed to revenue growth . these increases in revenue were offset partially by reduced fees and commissions from the effect of lower market levels on assets under management and custody , and the absence of proceeds from the sale of visa shares in its initial public offering in the first quarter of 2008 . investment banking fees increased from the prior year , due to higher equity and debt underwriting fees . for a further discussion of invest- ment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see ib segment results on pages 63 201365 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue , which consists of revenue from trading and private equity investing activities , was significantly higher com- pared with the prior year . trading revenue increased , driven by improved performance across most fixed income and equity products ; modest net gains on legacy leveraged lending and mortgage-related positions , compared with net markdowns of $ 10.6 billion in the prior year ; and gains on trading positions in corporate/private equity , compared with losses in the prior year of $ 1.1 billion on markdowns of federal national mortgage association ( 201cfannie mae 201d ) and fed- eral home loan mortgage corporation ( 201cfreddie mac 201d ) preferred securities . these increases in revenue were offset partially by an aggregate loss of $ 2.3 billion from the tightening of the firm 2019s credit spread on certain structured liabilities and derivatives , compared with gains of $ 2.0 billion in the prior year from widening spreads on these liabilities and derivatives . the firm 2019s private equity investments pro- duced a slight net loss in 2009 , a significant improvement from a larger net loss in 2008 . for a further discussion of principal transac- tions revenue , see ib and corporate/private equity segment results on pages 63 201365 and 82 201383 , respectively , and note 3 on pages 156 2013 173 of this annual report . lending- and deposit-related fees rose from the prior year , predomi- nantly reflecting the impact of the washington mutual transaction and organic growth in both lending- and deposit-related fees in rfs , cb , ib and tss . for a further discussion of lending- and deposit- related fees , which are mostly recorded in rfs , tss and cb , see the rfs segment results on pages 66 201371 , the tss segment results on pages 77 201378 , and the cb segment results on pages 75 201376 of this annual report . the decline in asset management , administration and commissions revenue compared with the prior year was largely due to lower asset management fees in am from the effect of lower market levels . also contributing to the decrease were lower administration fees in tss , driven by the effect of market depreciation on certain custody assets and lower securities lending balances ; and lower brokerage commis- sions revenue in ib , predominantly related to lower transaction vol- ume . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for tss on pages 77 201378 , and am on pages 79 201381 of this annual report . securities gains were lower in 2009 and included credit losses related to other-than-temporary impairment and lower gains on the sale of mastercard shares of $ 241 million in 2009 , compared with $ 668 million in 2008 . these decreases were offset partially by higher gains from repositioning the corporate investment securities portfolio in connection with managing the firm 2019s structural interest rate risk . for a further discussion of securities gains , which are mostly recorded in corporate/private equity , see the corpo- rate/private equity segment discussion on pages 82 201383 of this annual report . mortgage fees and related income increased slightly from the prior year , as higher net mortgage servicing revenue was largely offset by lower production revenue . the increase in net mortgage servicing revenue was driven by growth in average third-party loans serviced as a result of the washington mutual transaction . mortgage production revenue declined from the prior year , reflecting an increase in esti- mated losses from the repurchase of previously-sold loans , offset partially by wider margins on new originations . for a discussion of mortgage fees and related income , which is recorded primarily in rfs 2019s consumer lending business , see the consumer lending discus- sion on pages 68 201371 of this annual report . credit card income , which includes the impact of the washington mutual transaction , decreased slightly compared with the prior year .
Question: what percent of total net revenue was noninterest revenue in 2009?
Answer: | 0.49069 |
FINQA1484 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: .
||2008|2007|2006|
|balance at january 1|$ 2014|$ 16|$ 2|
|increase ( decrease ) in fair value|-9 ( 9 )|-6 ( 6 )|75|
|reclassifications to earnings|2|-10 ( 10 )|-61 ( 61 )|
|balance at december 31|$ -7 ( 7 )|$ 2014|$ 16|
net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund , available-for-sale investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values . using quoted market prices and market interest rates , the company determined that the fair value of long- term debt at december 31 , 2008 was $ 2.8 billion , compared to a carrying value of $ 4.1 billion . since considerable judgment is required in interpreting market information , the fair value of the long-term debt is not necessarily indicative of the amount which could be realized in a current market exchange . equity price market risk at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s available-for-sale equity securities portfolio had an approximate fair market value of $ 128 million , which represented a cost basis of $ 125 million and a net unrealized loss of $ 3 million . these equity securities are held for purposes other than trading . %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c49054 pcn : 105000000 ***%%pcmsg|102 |00022|yes|no|02/23/2009 19:17|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : n| .
Question: what was the change in the reclassification to earnings from 2007 to 2008
Answer: | 12.0 |
FINQA1485 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: for intangible assets subject to amortization , the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows : 2009 - $ 41.1 million , 2010 - $ 27.3 million , 2011 - $ 20.9 million , 2012 - $ 17.0 million , and 2013 - $ 12.0 million . fees and expenses related to the merger totaled $ 102.6 million , principally consisting of investment banking fees , legal fees and stock compensation ( $ 39.4 million as further discussed in note 10 ) , and are reflected in the 2007 results of operations . capitalized debt issuance costs as of the merger date of $ 87.4 million for merger-related financing were reflected in other long- term assets in the consolidated balance sheet . the following represents the unaudited pro forma results of the company 2019s consolidated operations as if the merger had occurred on february 3 , 2007 and february 4 , 2006 , respectively , after giving effect to certain adjustments , including the depreciation and amortization of the assets acquired based on their estimated fair values and changes in interest expense resulting from changes in consolidated debt ( in thousands ) : ( in thousands ) year ended february 1 , year ended february 2 .
|( in thousands )|year endedfebruary 12008|year endedfebruary 22007|
|revenue|$ 9495246|$ 9169822|
|net loss|-57939 ( 57939 )|( 156188 )|
the pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of what the company 2019s results of operations would have been if the acquisition had in fact occurred at the beginning of the periods presented , and is not intended to be a projection of the company 2019s future results of operations . subsequent to the announcement of the merger agreement , the company and its directors , along with other parties , were named in seven putative class actions filed in tennessee state courts alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of the proposed merger , all as described more fully under 201clegal proceedings 201d in note 8 below . 3 . strategic initiatives during 2006 , the company began implementing certain strategic initiatives related to its historical inventory management and real estate strategies , as more fully described below . inventory management in november 2006 , the company undertook an initiative to discontinue its historical inventory packaway model for virtually all merchandise by the end of fiscal 2007 . under the packaway model , certain unsold inventory items ( primarily seasonal merchandise ) were stored on-site and returned to the sales floor until the items were eventually sold , damaged or discarded . through end-of-season and other markdowns , this initiative resulted in the elimination of seasonal , home products and basic clothing packaway merchandise to allow for increased levels of newer , current-season merchandise . in connection with this strategic change , in the third quarter of 2006 the company recorded a reserve for lower of cost or market inventory .
Question: what was the total estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years from 2009 to 2013 in millions
Answer: | 118.3 |
FINQA1486 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
|( millions )|2011|2010|
|other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010|33|24|
|total|$ 33|$ 24|
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what would the remaining cost to repurchase shares under the october 2009 agreement be assuming the december 31 , 2009 weighted average share price ?
Answer: | 5666000.0 |
FINQA1487 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: percent of the unpaid principal balance of its residential mortgage loans ; one percent of 30 percent of its total assets ; or one-twentieth of its outstanding fhlb advances . in addition , the company must maintain qualified collateral equal to 110 to 115 percent of its advances , depending on the collateral type . these advances are secured with specific mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities . at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company pledged $ 16.8 billion and $ 12.9 billion , respectively , of the one- to four-family and home equity loans as collateral . other 2014etbh raises capital through the formation of trusts , which sell trust preferred stock in the capital markets . the capital securities must be redeemed in whole at the due date , which is generally 30 years after issuance . each trust issued floating rate cumulative preferred securities , at par with a liquidation amount of $ 1000 per capital security . the trusts use the proceeds from the sale of issuances to purchase floating rate junior subordinated debentures issued by etbh , which guarantees the trust obligations and contributes proceeds from the sale of its subordinated debentures to e*trade bank in the form of a capital contribution . during 2007 , etbh formed three trusts , etbh capital trust xxviii , etbh capital trust xxix and etbh capital trust xxx . these trusts issued a total of 60000 shares of floating rate cumulative preferred securities for a total of $ 60.0 million . net proceeds from these issuances were invested in floating rate junior subordinated debentures that mature in 2037 and have variable rates of 1.90% ( 1.90 % ) , 1.95% ( 1.95 % ) , or 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) above the three- month libor , payable quarterly . during 2006 , etbh formed five trusts , etbh capital trust xxiii through etbh capital trust xxvii . these trusts issued a total of 95000 shares of floating rate cumulative preferred securities for a total of $ 95 million . net proceeds from these issuances were invested in floating rate junior subordinated debentures that mature in 2036 or 2037 and have variable rates of 1.95% ( 1.95 % ) or 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) above the three-month libor , payable quarterly . in april 2007 , etbh called etbh capital trust iv which had sold $ 10.0 million of trust preferred stock in the capital markets in 2002 and generated a loss of $ 0.3 million . in june 2007 , etbh called telebank capital trust i which had sold $ 9.0 million of trust preferred stock in the capital markets in 1997 , and generated a loss of $ 0.9 million . in december 2006 , etbh called etbh capital trust iii which had sold $ 15.0 million of trust preferred stock in the capital markets in 2001 , and generated a loss of $ 0.5 million . the face values of outstanding trusts at december 31 , 2007 are shown below ( dollars in thousands ) : trusts maturity date annual interest rate .
|trusts|face value|maturity date|annual interest rate|
|etbh capital trust ii|$ 5000|2031|10.25% ( 10.25 % )|
|etbh capital trust i|$ 20000|2031|3.75% ( 3.75 % ) above 6-month libor|
|etbh capital trust v vi viii|$ 51000|2032|3.25%-3.65% ( 3.25%-3.65 % ) above 3-month libor|
|etbh capital trust vii ix 2014xii|$ 65000|2033|3.00%-3.30% ( 3.00%-3.30 % ) above 3-month libor|
|etbh capital trust xiii 2014xviii xx|$ 77000|2034|2.45%-2.90% ( 2.45%-2.90 % ) above 3-month libor|
|etbh capital trust xix xxi xxii|$ 60000|2035|2.20%-2.40% ( 2.20%-2.40 % ) above 3-month libor|
|etbh capital trust xxiii 2014xxiv|$ 45000|2036|2.10% ( 2.10 % ) above 3-month libor|
|etbh capital trust xxv 2014xxx|$ 110000|2037|1.90%-2.00% ( 1.90%-2.00 % ) above 3-month libor|
the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions . these loans are collateralized by equipment . borrowings under these term loans bear interest at 1% ( 1 % ) above libor , 0.68% ( 0.68 % ) above libor or 9.30% ( 9.30 % ) . the company had approximately $ 40 million of principal outstanding under these loans at december 31 , 2007 . other borrowings also includes $ 12.0 million of overnight and other short-term borrowings in connection with the federal reserve bank 2019s term investment option and treasury , tax and loan programs . the company pledged $ 12.0 million of securities to secure these borrowings from the federal reserve bank. .
Question: at december 31 , 2007 what was face values of outstanding trusts with maturity in 2037 to 2033
Answer: | 1.69231 |
FINQA1488 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: domestic utility companies and system energy notes to respective financial statements protested the disallowance of these deductions to the office of irs appeals . entergy expects to receive a notice of deficiency in 2005 for this item , and plans to vigorously contest this matter . entergy believes that the contingency provision established in its financial statements sufficiently covers the risk associated with this item . mark to market of certain power contracts in 2001 , entergy louisiana changed its method of accounting for tax purposes related to its wholesale electric power contracts . the most significant of these is the contract to purchase power from the vidalia hydroelectric project . the new tax accounting method has provided a cumulative cash flow benefit of approximately $ 790 million as of december 31 , 2004 . the related irs interest exposure is $ 93 million at december 31 , 2004 . this benefit is expected to reverse in the years 2005 through 2031 . the election did not reduce book income tax expense . the timing of the reversal of this benefit depends on several variables , including the price of power . due to the temporary nature of the tax benefit , the potential interest charge represents entergy's net earnings exposure . entergy louisiana's 2001 tax return is currently under examination by the irs , though no adjustments have yet been proposed with respect to the mark to market election . entergy believes that the contingency provision established in its financial statements will sufficiently cover the risk associated with this issue . cashpoint bankruptcy ( entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , and entergy new orleans ) in 2003 the domestic utility companies entered an agreement with cashpoint network services ( cashpoint ) under which cashpoint was to manage a network of payment agents through which entergy's utility customers could pay their bills . the payment agent system allows customers to pay their bills at various commercial or governmental locations , rather than sending payments by mail . approximately one-third of entergy's utility customers use payment agents . on april 19 , 2004 , cashpoint failed to pay funds due to the domestic utility companies that had been collected through payment agents . the domestic utility companies then obtained a temporary restraining order from the civil district court for the parish of orleans , state of louisiana , enjoining cashpoint from distributing funds belonging to entergy , except by paying those funds to entergy . on april 22 , 2004 , a petition for involuntary chapter 7 bankruptcy was filed against cashpoint by other creditors in the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of new york . in response to these events , the domestic utility companies expanded an existing contract with another company to manage all of their payment agents . the domestic utility companies filed proofs of claim in the cashpoint bankruptcy proceeding in september 2004 . although entergy cannot precisely determine at this time the amount that cashpoint owes to the domestic utility companies that may not be repaid , it has accrued an estimate of loss based on current information . if no cash is repaid to the domestic utility companies , an event entergy does not believe is likely , the current estimates of maximum exposure to loss are approximately as follows : amount ( in millions ) .
||amount ( in millions )|
|entergy arkansas|$ 1.8|
|entergy gulf states|$ 7.7|
|entergy louisiana|$ 8.8|
|entergy mississippi|$ 4.3|
|entergy new orleans|$ 2.4|
environmental issues ( entergy gulf states ) entergy gulf states has been designated as a prp for the cleanup of certain hazardous waste disposal sites . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy gulf states does not expect the remaining clean-up costs to exceed its recorded liability of $ 1.5 million for the remaining sites at which the epa has designated entergy gulf states as a prp. .
Question: what is the maximum exposure to loss for entergy if no cash is repaid to domestic utility companies , in millions?
Answer: | 25.0 |
FINQA1489 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: related expenses incurred by our logistics subsidiaries for external transportation and increased crew transportation and lodging due to volumes and a slower network . in addition , higher consulting fees and higher contract expenses ( including equipment maintenance ) increased costs compared to 2013 . locomotive and freight car material expenses increased in 2014 compared to 2013 due to additional volumes , including the impact of activating stored equipment to address operational issues caused by demand and a slower network . expenses for purchased services increased 10% ( 10 % ) in 2013 compared to 2012 due to logistics management fees , an increase in locomotive overhauls and repairs on jointly owned property . depreciation 2013 the majority of depreciation relates to road property , including rail , ties , ballast , and other track material . depreciation was up 7% ( 7 % ) compared to 2013 . a higher depreciable asset base , reflecting higher ongoing capital spending drove the increase . depreciation was up 1% ( 1 % ) in 2013 compared to 2012 . recent depreciation studies allowed us to use longer estimated service lives for certain equipment , which partially offset the impact of a higher depreciable asset base resulting from larger capital spending in recent years . equipment and other rents 2013 equipment and other rents expense primarily includes rental expense that the railroad pays for freight cars owned by other railroads or private companies ; freight car , intermodal , and locomotive leases ; and office and other rent expenses . higher intermodal volumes and longer cycle times increased short-term freight car rental expense in 2014 compared to 2013 . lower equipment leases essentially offset the higher freight car rental expense , as we exercised purchase options on some of our leased equipment . additional container costs resulting from the logistics management arrangement , and increased automotive shipments , partially offset by lower cycle times drove a $ 51 million increase in our short-term freight car rental expense in 2013 versus 2012 . conversely , lower locomotive and freight car lease expenses partially offset the higher freight car rental expense . other 2013 other expenses include state and local taxes , freight , equipment and property damage , utilities , insurance , personal injury , environmental , employee travel , telephone and cellular , computer software , bad debt , and other general expenses . higher property taxes , personal injury expense and utilities costs partially offset by lower environmental expense and costs associated with damaged freight drove the increase in other costs in 2014 compared to 2013 . higher property taxes and costs associated with damaged freight and property increased other costs in 2013 compared to 2012 . continued improvement in our safety performance and lower estimated liability for personal injury , which reduced our personal injury expense year-over-year , partially offset increases in other costs . non-operating items millions 2014 2013 2012 % ( % ) change 2014 v 2013 % ( % ) change 2013 v 2012 .
|millions|2014|2013|2012|% ( % ) change 2014 v 2013|% ( % ) change2013 v 2012|
|other income|$ 151|$ 128|$ 108|18% ( 18 % )|19% ( 19 % )|
|interest expense|-561 ( 561 )|-526 ( 526 )|-535 ( 535 )|7|-2 ( 2 )|
|income taxes|-3163 ( 3163 )|-2660 ( 2660 )|-2375 ( 2375 )|19% ( 19 % )|12% ( 12 % )|
other income 2013 other income increased in 2014 versus 2013 due to higher gains from real estate sales and a sale of a permanent easement . these gains were partially offset by higher environmental costs on non-operating property in 2014 and lower lease income due to the $ 17 million settlement of a land lease contract in 2013 . other income increased in 2013 versus 2012 due to higher gains from real estate sales and increased lease income , including the favorable impact from the $ 17 million settlement of a land lease contract . these increases were partially offset by interest received from a tax refund in 2012. .
Question: assuming an average interest rate of 7% ( 7 % ) , what is the implied composite debt level for 2014 , in millions?
Answer: | 8014.28571 |
FINQA1490 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .
||amount ( in thousands )|
|2009|$ 32452|
|2010|35138|
|2011|50421|
|2012|39067|
|2013|26301|
|years thereafter|137858|
|total|321237|
|less : amount representing interest|73512|
|present value of net minimum lease payments|$ 247725|
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what is the growth rate in the net regulatory asset in 2008 compare 2007?
Answer: | -0.47541 |
FINQA1491 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .
||12/31/2010|12/31/2011|12/31/2012|12/31/2013|12/31/2014|12/31/2015|
|united parcel service inc .|$ 100.00|$ 103.88|$ 107.87|$ 158.07|$ 171.77|$ 160.61|
|standard & poor 2019s 500 index|$ 100.00|$ 102.11|$ 118.43|$ 156.77|$ 178.22|$ 180.67|
|dow jones transportation average|$ 100.00|$ 100.01|$ 107.49|$ 151.97|$ 190.08|$ 158.23|
.
Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index the for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
Answer: | -0.2006 |
FINQA1492 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: $ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 . the retail segment represented 13% ( 13 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of the company 2019s total net sales in 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the retail segment 2019s operating income was $ 4.7 billion , $ 3.2 billion , and $ 2.3 billion during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively . these year-over-year increases in retail operating income were primarily attributable to higher overall net sales that resulted in significantly higher average revenue per store during the respective years . gross margin gross margin for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : .
||2012|2011|2010|
|net sales|$ 156508|$ 108249|$ 65225|
|cost of sales|87846|64431|39541|
|gross margin|$ 68662|$ 43818|$ 25684|
|gross margin percentage|43.9% ( 43.9 % )|40.5% ( 40.5 % )|39.4% ( 39.4 % )|
the gross margin percentage in 2012 was 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) , compared to 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) in 2011 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs , a higher mix of iphone sales , and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . the increase in gross margin was partially offset by the impact of a stronger u.s . dollar . the gross margin percentage during the first half of 2012 was 45.9% ( 45.9 % ) compared to 41.4% ( 41.4 % ) during the second half of 2012 . the primary drivers of higher gross margin in the first half of 2012 compared to the second half are a higher mix of iphone sales and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . additionally , gross margin in the second half of 2012 was also affected by the introduction of new products with flat pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers , price reductions on certain existing products , higher transition costs associated with product launches , and continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs . the gross margin percentage in 2011 was 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) , compared to 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) in 2010 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs . the company expects to experience decreases in its gross margin percentage in future periods , as compared to levels achieved during 2012 , and the company anticipates gross margin of about 36% ( 36 % ) during the first quarter of 2013 . expected future declines in gross margin are largely due to a higher mix of new and innovative products with flat or reduced pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers and anticipated component cost and other cost increases . future strengthening of the u.s . dollar could further negatively impact gross margin . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage in future periods , including the first quarter of 2013 , are forward-looking and could differ from actual results because of several factors including , but not limited to those set forth above in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors 201d and those described in this paragraph . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global product pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , product transitions and potential increases in the cost of components , as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take product pricing actions , which would adversely affect gross margins . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . due to the company 2019s significant international operations , financial results can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates. .
Question: what was the percentage change in net sales from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: | 0.65962 |
FINQA1493 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the company will continue to rely upon debt and capital markets for the majority of any necessary long-term funding not provided by operating cash flows . funding decisions will be guided by our capital structure planning objectives . the primary goals of the company 2019s capital structure planning are to maximize financial flexibility and preserve liquidity while reducing interest expense . the majority of international paper 2019s debt is accessed through global public capital markets where we have a wide base of investors . maintaining an investment grade credit rating is an important element of international paper 2019s financing strategy . at december 31 , 2015 , the company held long-term credit ratings of bbb ( stable outlook ) and baa2 ( stable outlook ) by s&p and moody 2019s , respectively . contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2015 , were as follows: .
|in millions|2015|2016|2017|2018|2019|thereafter|
|maturities of long-term debt ( a )|$ 426|$ 43|$ 811|$ 427|$ 183|$ 7436|
|lease obligations|118|95|72|55|41|128|
|purchase obligations ( b )|3001|541|447|371|358|1579|
|total ( c )|$ 3545|$ 679|$ 1330|$ 853|$ 582|$ 9143|
( a ) total debt includes scheduled principal payments only . ( b ) includes $ 2.1 billion relating to fiber supply agreements entered into at the time of the 2006 transformation plan forestland sales and in conjunction with the 2008 acquisition of weyerhaeuser company 2019s containerboard , packaging and recycling business . ( c ) not included in the above table due to the uncertainty as to the amount and timing of the payment are unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $ 101 million . we consider the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2015 , to be indefinitely reinvested and , accordingly , no u.s . income taxes have been provided thereon . as of december 31 , 2015 , the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $ 600 million . we do not anticipate the need to repatriate funds to the united states to satisfy domestic liquidity needs arising in the ordinary course of business , including liquidity needs associated with our domestic debt service requirements . pension obligations and funding at december 31 , 2015 , the projected benefit obligation for the company 2019s u.s . defined benefit plans determined under u.s . gaap was approximately $ 3.5 billion higher than the fair value of plan assets . approximately $ 3.2 billion of this amount relates to plans that are subject to minimum funding requirements . under current irs funding rules , the calculation of minimum funding requirements differs from the calculation of the present value of plan benefits ( the projected benefit obligation ) for accounting purposes . in december 2008 , the worker , retiree and employer recovery act of 2008 ( wera ) was passed by the u.s . congress which provided for pension funding relief and technical corrections . funding contributions depend on the funding method selected by the company , and the timing of its implementation , as well as on actual demographic data and the targeted funding level . the company continually reassesses the amount and timing of any discretionary contributions and elected to make contributions totaling $ 750 million and $ 353 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . at this time , we do not expect to have any required contributions to our plans in 2016 , although the company may elect to make future voluntary contributions . the timing and amount of future contributions , which could be material , will depend on a number of factors , including the actual earnings and changes in values of plan assets and changes in interest rates . international paper has announced a voluntary , limited-time opportunity for former employees who are participants in the retirement plan of international paper company ( the pension plan ) to request early payment of their entire pension plan benefit in the form of a single lump sum payment . eligible participants who wish to receive the lump sum payment must make an election between february 29 and april 29 , 2016 , and payment is scheduled to be made on or before june 30 , 2016 . all payments will be made from the pension plan trust assets . the target population has a total liability of $ 3.0 billion . the amount of the total payments will depend on the participation rate of eligible participants , but is expected to be approximately $ 1.5 billion . based on the expected level of payments , settlement accounting rules will apply in the period in which the payments are made . this will result in a plan remeasurement and the recognition in earnings of a pro-rata portion of unamortized net actuarial loss . ilim holding s.a . shareholder 2019s agreement in october 2007 , in connection with the formation of the ilim holding s.a . joint venture , international paper entered into a shareholder 2019s agreement that includes provisions relating to the reconciliation of disputes among the partners . this agreement was amended on may 7 , 2014 . pursuant to the amended agreement , beginning on january 1 , 2017 , either the company or its partners may commence certain procedures specified under the deadlock provisions . if these or any other deadlock provisions are commenced , the company may in certain situations , choose to purchase its partners 2019 50% ( 50 % ) interest in ilim . any such transaction would be subject to review and approval by russian and other relevant antitrust authorities . any such purchase by international paper would result in the consolidation of ilim 2019s financial position and results of operations in all subsequent periods. .
Question: what percentage of contractual obligations for future payments under existing debt and lease commitments and purchase obligations at december 31 , 2015 are due to maturities of long-term debt in 2016?
Answer: | 0.06333 |
FINQA1494 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: in accordance with sfas no . 142 , goodwill and other intangible assets , the goodwill is not amortized , but will be subject to a periodic assessment for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test . none of this goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . the company performs its annual test for impairment of goodwill in may of each year . the company is required to perform a periodic assessment between annual tests in certain circumstances . the company has performed its annual test of goodwill as of may 1 , 2006 and has determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2006 . the company allocated $ 15.8 million of the purchase price to in-process research and development projects . in-process research and development ( ipr&d ) represents the valuation of acquired , to-be- completed research projects . at the acquisition date , cyvera 2019s ongoing research and development initiatives were primarily involved with the development of its veracode technology and the beadxpress reader . these two projects were approximately 50% ( 50 % ) and 25% ( 25 % ) complete at the date of acquisition , respectively . as of december 31 , 2006 , these two projects were approximately 90% ( 90 % ) and 80% ( 80 % ) complete , respectively . the value assigned to purchased ipr&d was determined by estimating the costs to develop the acquired technology into commercially viable products , estimating the resulting net cash flows from the projects , and discounting the net cash flows to their present value . the revenue projections used to value the ipr&d were , in some cases , reduced based on the probability of developing a new technology , and considered the relevant market sizes and growth factors , expected trends in technology , and the nature and expected timing of new product introductions by the company and its competitors . the resulting net cash flows from such projects are based on the company 2019s estimates of cost of sales , operating expenses , and income taxes from such projects . the rates utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value were based on estimated cost of capital calculations . due to the nature of the forecast and the risks associated with the projected growth and profitability of the developmental projects , discount rates of 30% ( 30 % ) were considered appropriate for the ipr&d . the company believes that these discount rates were commensurate with the projects 2019stage of development and the uncertainties in the economic estimates described above . if these projects are not successfully developed , the sales and profitability of the combined company may be adversely affected in future periods . the company believes that the foregoing assumptions used in the ipr&d analysis were reasonable at the time of the acquisition . no assurance can be given , however , that the underlying assumptions used to estimate expected project sales , development costs or profitability , or the events associated with such projects , will transpire as estimated . at the date of acquisition , the development of these projects had not yet reached technological feasibility , and the research and development in progress had no alternative future uses . accordingly , these costs were charged to expense in the second quarter of 2005 . the following unaudited pro forma information shows the results of the company 2019s operations for the years ended january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 as though the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented ( in thousands , except per share data ) : year ended january 1 , year ended january 2 .
||year ended january 1 2006|year ended january 2 2005|
|revenue|$ 73501|$ 50583|
|net loss|-6234 ( 6234 )|-9965 ( 9965 )|
|net loss per share basic and diluted|-0.15 ( 0.15 )|-0.27 ( 0.27 )|
illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the percentage change in net loss between 2005 and 2006?
Answer: | 0.37441 |
FINQA1495 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) net proved undeveloped reserves . the following table presents the changes in eog's total proved undeveloped reserves during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 ( in mboe ) : .
||2018|2017|2016|
|balance at january 1|1162635|1053027|1045640|
|extensions and discoveries|490725|237378|138101|
|revisions|-8244 ( 8244 )|33127|64413|
|acquisition of reserves|311|2014|2014|
|sale of reserves|2014|-8253 ( 8253 )|-45917 ( 45917 )|
|conversion to proved developed reserves|-265718 ( 265718 )|-152644 ( 152644 )|-149210 ( 149210 )|
|balance at december 31|1379709|1162635|1053027|
for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2018 , total puds increased by 217 mmboe to 1380 mmboe . eog added approximately 31 mmboe of puds through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion . based on the technology employed by eog to identify and record puds ( see discussion of technology employed on pages f-36 and f-37 of this annual report on form 10-k ) , eog added 460 mmboe . the pud additions were primarily in the permian basin , anadarko basin , the eagle ford and , to a lesser extent , the rocky mountain area , and 80% ( 80 % ) of the additions were crude oil and condensate and ngls . during 2018 , eog drilled and transferred 266 mmboe of puds to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $ 2745 million . all puds , including drilled but uncompleted wells ( ducs ) , are scheduled for completion within five years of the original reserve booking . for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2017 , total puds increased by 110 mmboe to 1163 mmboe . eog added approximately 38 mmboe of puds through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion . based on the technology employed by eog to identify and record puds , eog added 199 mmboe . the pud additions were primarily in the permian basin and , to a lesser extent , the eagle ford and the rocky mountain area , and 74% ( 74 % ) of the additions were crude oil and condensate and ngls . during 2017 , eog drilled and transferred 153 mmboe of puds to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $ 1440 million . revisions of puds totaled positive 33 mmboe , primarily due to updated type curves resulting from improved performance of offsetting wells in the permian basin , the impact of increases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the december 31 , 2017 , reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate , and lower costs . during 2017 , eog sold or exchanged 8 mmboe of puds primarily in the permian basin . for the twelve-month period ended december 31 , 2016 , total puds increased by 7 mmboe to 1053 mmboe . eog added approximately 21 mmboe of puds through drilling activities where the wells were drilled but significant expenditures remained for completion . based on the technology employed by eog to identify and record puds , eog added 117 mmboe . the pud additions were primarily in the permian basin and , to a lesser extent , the rocky mountain area , and 82% ( 82 % ) of the additions were crude oil and condensate and ngls . during 2016 , eog drilled and transferred 149 mmboe of puds to proved developed reserves at a total capital cost of $ 1230 million . revisions of puds totaled positive 64 mmboe , primarily due to improved well performance , primarily in the delaware basin , and lower production costs , partially offset by the impact of decreases in the average crude oil and natural gas prices used in the december 31 , 2016 , reserves estimation as compared to the prices used in the prior year estimate . during 2016 , eog sold 46 mmboe of puds primarily in the haynesville play. .
Question: what was the increase observed in the initial balance between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: | 0.10409 |
FINQA1496 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2012 performance share program ( the 201c2012 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of specific and/or market- based performance goals outlined in the 2012 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 116% ( 116 % ) of target or approximately 1.3 million shares for the 2012 program . one third of the shares under the 2012 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two anniversaries of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2011 performance share program ( the 201c2011 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2011 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 130% ( 130 % ) of target or approximately 0.5 million shares for the 2011 program . one third of the shares under the 2011 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two annual anniversary dates of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 , the executive compensation committee certified the actual performance achievement of participants in the 2010 performance share program ( the 201c2010 program 201d ) . based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2010 program , participants had the ability to receive up to 150% ( 150 % ) of the target number of shares originally granted . actual performance resulted in participants achieving 135% ( 135 % ) of target or approximately 0.3 million shares for the 2010 program . one third of the shares under the 2011 program vested in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the remaining two thirds vest evenly on the following two annual anniversary dates of the grant , contingent upon the recipient's continued service to adobe . the following table sets forth the summary of performance share activity under our 2010 , 2011 and 2012 programs , based upon share awards actually achieved , for the fiscal years ended november 29 , 2013 , november 30 , 2012 and december 2 , 2011 ( in thousands ) : .
||2013|2012|2011|
|beginning outstanding balance|388|405|557|
|achieved|1279|492|337|
|released|-665 ( 665 )|-464 ( 464 )|-436 ( 436 )|
|forfeited|-141 ( 141 )|-45 ( 45 )|-53 ( 53 )|
|ending outstanding balance|861|388|405|
the total fair value of performance awards vested during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 25.4 million , $ 14.4 million and $ 14.8 million , respectively. .
Question: based upon the achievement of goals outlined in the 2011 program , what was the difference in percentage points between the maximum % ( % ) of the target number vs . actual performance % ( % ) for the 2011 program?
Answer: | 20.0 |
FINQA1497 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) o . significant revenue arrangements ( continued ) $ 7 million of development and commercialization milestone payments . additionally , kissei agreed to reimburse the company for certain development costs , including a portion of costs for phase 2 trials of vx-702 . research funding ended under this program in june 2000 , and the company has received the full amount of research funding specified under the agreement . kissei has exclusive rights to develop and commercialize vx-702 in japan and certain far east countries and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . the company retains exclusive marketing rights outside the far east and co-exclusive rights in china , taiwan and south korea . in addition , the company will have the right to supply bulk drug material to kissei for sale in its territory and will receive royalties or drug supply payments on future product sales , if any . in 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , approximately $ 6.4 million , $ 7.3 million and $ 3.5 million , respectively , was recognized as revenue under this agreement . the $ 7.3 million of revenue recognized in 2005 includes a $ 2.5 million milestone paid upon kissei 2019s completion of regulatory filings in preparation for phase 1 clinical development of vx-702 in japan . p . employee benefits the company has a 401 ( k ) retirement plan ( the 201cvertex 401 ( k ) plan 201d ) in which substantially all of its permanent employees are eligible to participate . participants may contribute up to 60% ( 60 % ) of their annual compensation to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan , subject to statutory limitations . the company may declare discretionary matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan that are payable in the form of vertex common stock . the match is paid in the form of fully vested interests in a vertex common stock fund . employees have the ability to transfer funds from the company stock fund as they choose . the company declared matching contributions to the vertex 401 ( k ) plan as follows ( in thousands ) : q . related party transactions as of december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , the company had a loan outstanding to a former officer of the company in the amount of $ 36000 , $ 36000 , $ 97000 , respectively , which was initially advanced in april 2002 . the loan balance is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets . in 2001 , the company entered into a four year consulting agreement with a director of the company for the provision of part-time consulting services over a period of four years , at the rate of $ 80000 per year commencing in january 2002 . the consulting agreement terminated in january 2006 . r . contingencies the company has certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities . the company accrues a reserve for contingent liabilities when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. .
||2006|2005|2004|
|discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31,|$ 3341|$ 2894|$ 2492|
|shares issued during the year ended december 31,|91|215|239|
|shares issuable as of the year ended december 31,|28|19|57|
discretionary matching contributions during the year ended december 31 , $ 3341 $ 2894 $ 2492 shares issued during the year ended december 31 , 91 215 239 shares issuable as of the year ended december 31 , 28 19 57 .
Question: what was the percent change in revenue recognized under the agreement between 2004and 2005?
Answer: | 1.08571 |
FINQA1498 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 31868 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26020 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2012 2011 2010 .
|millions|2012|2011|2010|
|agricultural|$ 3280|$ 3324|$ 3018|
|automotive|1807|1510|1271|
|chemicals|3238|2815|2425|
|coal|3912|4084|3489|
|industrial products|3494|3166|2639|
|intermodal|3955|3609|3227|
|total freight revenues|$ 19686|$ 18508|$ 16069|
|other revenues|1240|1049|896|
|total operatingrevenues|$ 20926|$ 19557|$ 16965|
although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , $ 1.8 billion in 2011 , and $ 1.6 billion in 2010 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .
Question: revenues from mexico are how much of total operating revenues in 2012?
Answer: | 0.0908 |
FINQA1499 | Please answer the given financial question based on the context.
Context: the following tables present a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) for 2017 and 2016 , respectively: .
||level 3|
|balance as of january 1 2017|$ 140|
|actual return on assets|2|
|purchases issuances and settlements net|136|
|balance as of december 31 2017|$ 278|
purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 4 ) balance as of december 31 , 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes and , within asset classes , strategies are employed to provide adequate returns , diversification and liquidity . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond-like and long-dated nature of the postretirement liabilities . in 2017 , the company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50% ( 50 % ) , up from 40% ( 40 % ) , in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility of the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates . in 2012 , the company also implemented a de-risking strategy for the medical bargaining trust within the plan to minimize volatility . in 2017 , the company conducted a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the consumer price index by more than 2% ( 2 % ) for the last 20 years . given continuously rising medical costs , the company decided to increase the equity exposure of the portfolio to 30% ( 30 % ) , up from 20% ( 20 % ) , while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% ( 80 % ) to 70% ( 70 % ) . the company also conducted an asset-liability study for the post-retirement non-bargaining medical plan . its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative , reducing the equity allocation from 70% ( 70 % ) to 60% ( 60 % ) and increasing the fixed- income allocation from 30% ( 30 % ) to 40% ( 40 % ) . the post-retirement medical non-bargaining plan 2019s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan 2019s liabilities . these changes will take place in 2018 . the company engages third party investment managers for all invested assets . managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class ( e.g . fixed income , equity , alternatives ) or strategy for which they have been appointed . investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided . futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan 2019s targeted investment policy. .
Question: what was the actual return on assets as a percentage of beginning 2017 balance?
Answer: | 0.01429 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.