text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|
style
Hello,
Your article on the Hydrospace was proposed for deletion today. I got rid of that, but you might want to consider writing in a more formal tone. Also some kinds of information are banned on Wikipedia including
contact info
current retail prices
personal judgments or opinions
Although you did nothing wrong, many people here will reflexively erase/revert your entire contributions rather than edit your work. Taking a look at the wikipedia:Manual of Style might save some frustration later.
Have fun!
| 0 |
You have a good knowledge regarding Middle East.
| 0 |
Explanation of undo
Just to elaborate a little more on my undo in this edit.
It is true that at some level you can always replace a function by a relation giving the same information. For a unary function symbol f, you can substitute a relation symbol R, and interpret it via R(x,y) if and only if f(x)=y.
However, there are significant differences between languages that contain function symbols and ones that have only relation symbols. Function symbols have existential import, in the sense that if you have a structure for a language with a function symbol f, and a closed term t in the language, then the structure must contain an interpretation for f(t). Relation symbols don't give you that; a structure for a language containing our relation symbol R above is not guaranteed to have an object y such that the structure satisfies R(t,y).
This is important for lots of tools used to analyze structures. For example, the Ehrenfeucht–Fraïssé game is usually defined for languages that have only relation and constant symbols. If you allow non-nullary function symbols, the analysis gets more complicated.
| 0 |
"
Re: Delete stuff
Done. While I'm at it, could I ask you to remove the fake new messages bar at the top of your pages? WP:SMI does state that this should only really be done for testing purposes (April Fools' Day excepted, IMO). Thanks. (//c) "
| 0 |
No, I don't want to, at least for the moment.. cheers
| 0 |
"
Another modification - SBJ☸talk "
| 0 |
. So i accidentally reverted your edit.
| 0 |
Pop songs
Why don't Destiny's Child's singles have pop in the genre? Survivor is a very poppy album and does not have pop in the genre.
| 0 |
"
capital of Palestine
Jerusalem has been declared the capital of the State of Palestine, which declared its independence in 1988 (see Palestinian Declaration of Independence). Me thinks this merits mention. Something along the lines of ""Jerusalem has also been designated the capital of the State of Palestine in its 1988 declaration of independence. Palestine exercises no sovereignty over the city."" '''''' - "
| 0 |
"
==Scenes of a Sexual Nature==
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Scenes of a Sexual Nature, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.theworkslimited.com/index2.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Scenes of a Sexual Nature. Then you should do one of the following:
Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Scenes of a Sexual Nature where we can find that note; or
Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! talk to me "
| 0 |
– What links here, 15 more redirects – get busy!
| 0 |
|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{R&B; and Soul Music
| 0 |
"
Unblocking admin should see, the earlier blocks were due to user:VandalPatrol, user:Hkelkar, and an admin user:magicalsaumy, also a close aide of user:utcursh who got caught in sockpuppetry case. Although block log may look like many blocks, the person requesting it has now got permabanned. No-Blast "
| 0 |
It's starting to appear that you're arguing with someone else? All the information is included in both versions, except, unfortunately, for the actual name for the Parthian empire in Iranian (i.e., not transliterated), so it can't be a matter of accuracy.
| 0 |
I give up offering your WIKI any help there Huon. You seem more interested in justifying your bias than the truth of the information you claim to represent. You erase ALL my contributions and act like you're arn't destructive. I think you've ruined this topic - and won't bother referencing this page. TransAlchemy has a better source on the topic elsewhere. 74.111.4.108
| 0 |
Lookslike the links are not working as intended, you need to type in the term yourself.
| 0 |
"
Misrepresentation of Women in Football
Hi Johan. I have some serious concerns about the (probably unintentional) misogynistic POV in Football Project articles and am hoping to enlist your cooperation. I've attempted, over the past year, to begin correcting the biased POV by:
including women in football articles that previously made it seem as if only men play football or only men play well
creating new content/articles about women's football (e.g.: history, national teams and international competition)
wikifying articles related to women and football
I appreciate your passion for football and the enormous effort you've put into maintaining articles, the portal and the project. But, it is disconcerting to find my work undone without so much as an attempt to collaborate or find ways to improve the representation of women in Wikipedia football articles. Reverting to the biased content on women's role in soccer (Football (soccer) culture article) as ""soccer mom or fan"" is a violation of NPOV. And removing the Norwegian Premier League for women link from the Women's football around the world article is counter-productive, in the most generous interpretation. Perhaps it was not your intention to do anything POV. I would appreciate if you'd collaborate. Would you consider helping by finding a group of editors interested in improving the representation of women in football articles? Thanks. Deebki "
| 0 |
"
Q factor definition in the context of individual reactive components
In the context of individual reactive passive components (e.g. inductors & capacitors), I'm familiar with the following definition:
The aforementioned definition is presented, in some form, in section Individual reactive components of the article, however, the section Definition of the quality factor has no mentioning of it. Instead, the following definition is presented:
a definition which is practically the same as the other energy-based definition in the section, and furthermore, includes a reference to
James W. Nilsson's Electric Circuits 1989 edition. I've went through a recent (much newer) edition of the book, and found no energy-based definition of any kind for Q - whether for resonator circuits or individual components.
I therefore tagged the reference as ""Failed verification"", and additionally, I wonder what is the point of this definition, which is practically the same as the previous one in the article. It seems to me that one of them is superfluous.
"
| 0 |
See Talk:Compact fluorescent lamp for the rest of this discussion
| 0 |
Template:Film
Why was this cascading protected? I suspect there's some obvious reason I'm missing, but I can't think of it. - moo!
| 0 |
"
{| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0""
|style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""|
Hello, ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on , or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! talk
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;""
|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored
How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! The community
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • [[Wikipedia:No lega
| 0 |
Huh? I barely came to this site today. Let me log in, so my edits CAN be tracked97.118.188.17
| 0 |
"
Edit request on 27 March 2013
It would be nice to see this page retitled Sega Mega Drive, after all that is the consoles worldwide name, Genesis is simply the North American name. As it currently is this page title is for the minority and needs to be changed
59.167.95.245
Read the FAQ at the top of the page.
Fully protected? That's weird. I thought it was supposed to be a 24-hour protection. Wasn't that over a week ago?
This is a long-running content dispute, and admins are only allowed to make edits to protected pages if those edits have consensus. If you disagree with the protection, you should ask about it, as he is the one that protected the page. If talking with him doesn't resolve things, you can make a request for unprotection at WP:RFPP. Best — ''''''' ♪ talk ♪
I agree, the page should be renamed to suit a worldwide English speaking audience not North America only 82.41.107.134
Your opinion has been noted. Please read the FAQ. Thank you. AU93''' "
| 0 |
"Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Merle Allin. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Rats of Unusual Size, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Talk) "
| 0 |
"
It is not a personal attack - no names are mentioned and it is a bald statement of fact - if you have some time, follow up the history of the pages and see how this particular editor frequently appears on pages while I am busy, and on a number of occasions blatantly ignoring ""inuse"" tags. Perhaps you should be leaving threats on her/his page instead of mine. I do not dog the footsteps of this particular editor, nor do I have any inclination to do so. If you have the authority to do something about it, then I suggest you look into the issue in detail and try to act objectively.
Thanks for that
Thanks for that Tyrenius. Left some information. Regards "
| 0 |
, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
But they don't appear to cover the whole process. I've added a ref (same author) that tells the whole story, fortunately I have access to the full text. 11:45
| 0 |
"== Contested deletion ==
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (the speedy rationale is incorrect as assertions of notability are clearly established in the article: he's a filmmaker) "
| 0 |
"
Hi Radhatanaya - I just wanted to follow up on this. There were also a couple of related categories that were deleted a month ago, and I wondered if you were involved in those. The decision was to put all the scientists and technologists into ""Textile scientists"", because there's just not enough to differentiate at this point. If you have a different opinion or knowledge, you should definitely contribute to the ""CFD"" (categories for discussion) linked above. You might also want to read up on categories to understand how they work and what they're useful for. Cheers, Laura "
| 0 |
I knew I was forgetting something when I was exiting that. - (Talk | contribs)
| 0 |
I agree. There's a brief paragraph in the main rice article mentioning that it's a spring time event. A lot of main articles on colleges mention that kind of stuff briefly, and seems appropriate. This topic has no particular connection to this residential college at all (beyond the Rice connection).
| 0 |
"
I wonder why you say ""in good faith"", are you implying that I'm not acting in good faith? The ""simplified one"" is ridiculous. According to the ""simplified"" one Spanish is only spoken near Madrid and in Andalusia, when actually it's by far the most common language throughout Spain. Obviously, regional languages exist there too, but they exist in Italy, Germany and France (actually Spain is far more homogeneous than those countries, linguistically speaking) as well, and that map simply misleads the reader. It makes you think that Spain has four equally spoken languages, whereas France, for example, only has one. That's not the case, both countries have their national language (Spanish and French, respectively) and their regional languages (Catalan, Occitan, Breton, Basque, etc.). I hope you understand my point. "
| 0 |
PS: I like your rewrite of the lead. And so does Jossi! So your prejudgment of his reaction was WRONG. Do you think he would have responded as approvingly if he saw the remark that you aimed at him (the one I deleted)? Please LEARN from this experience!
Please feel free to delete this topic from your talk page after you have read, and preferably absorbed it. It needn't, and probably shouldn't, remain public.
| 0 |
"
Bhtbby fhy
Why do you help that 13 year old she's too young to understand wikipedia she should be kicked off —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.139.43 "
| 0 |
"
an odd deletion
I am curious. Why did you delete this:
""::You don't know jack, read his autobiography cretin, he lived in the UK, his second wife was a model from a famous UK family, his first wife was from a major mafia family and was also a model. Her cousin was Gia the model that died of aids from being a junkie. So you know nothing about Sollog, you're just like the towlah here saying lies. ""
If true it offers factual info on Sollog? Some say Sollog is also JPESsene. You may find this interesting 04:47, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)"
| 0 |
"
Piece of trivia
I removed this line that was at the bottom of the article:
Takeover was mashed up along with Rihanna's ""Hard"" and Rage Against The Machines' ""Bulls On Parade"" in the song ""Take The Hard Bulls Over"" by metal remixer bliix.
if theres somewhere this belongs, feel free to reincorporate it."
| 0 |
"Pete, it is justified scholastically because mainstream scholars have never accused Anthroposophy of being founded on rascist principles. Mainstream encyclopedias never accuse Steiner or Anthroposophy of rascism. Here's what Wikipedia has to say about it:
""In other words, views held only by a tiny minority of people should not be represented as though they are significant minority views, and perhaps should not be represented at all.
In particular, to elaborate on the last comment above, if you are able to prove something that nobody currently believes, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a proof. Once a proof has been presented and discussed elsewhere, however, it may be referenced.""
This is why I believe that the section on racism should not be a section. A mere couple of sentences is, in my opinion, too much, but I would be willing to compromise with that. Because the presence of race as a section on Steiner's page gives the article undue weight.
"
| 0 |
UKDoctor hereby publicly apologizes to David Ruben !!! Thank You for being ethical.
| 0 |
Here is one source that may be helpful:
{[cite book | title=Rome and the Eastern Churches | author=Nichols, Aidan; Nichols, Op | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Hje62q52XNsC | pages=211–212}}
It discusses Justinian's designations of roles in the imperial church among Rome and Constinople in the 6th century.
| 0 |
Ceiling fan is just a background. You seem to hate ceiling fans, don't you? 166.171.57.224
| 0 |
A bit premature. Eaton's world record is barely an hour old with a rush of editing happening by multiple parties. Give it a little time to get sorted out. And seriously there is a ratification process on top of that, which takes significantly more time before the record is deemed official.
| 0 |
"
Korean users are obviously making this into some sort of a bizarre ""Korean pride"" sort of thing. Moving the article to a different (more common) name does not ""downgrade"" the article. And even if you could argue it would, it doesn't really matter to Wikipedia Guidelines (do read them, btw). Please try and widen your horizons and not just look at this from a strictly Korean nationalistic perspective. "
| 0 |
Very odd. What are your thoughts?
| 0 |
Deletionist Calton
Well, the reason this article is put for deletion is that Calton who have been stalking me for a while now and is a fanatic deletionist found out that I wrote it and the method is the same as before, put up and mark for deletion without comments or contribution, let some deletionfriends later vote and then its gone... I really hope that some wise people will set a stop at this nonsens behaveore, I have had ehough of this and hope that the original spririt of Wikipedia will survive.
| 0 |
Is lanceting a good idea?
i've heard that you should open the sting, and drain some blood out by squezzing. is this a good idea?
| 0 |
That disqualifies you from taking part in the discussion.
| 0 |
"
You noticed something?
I wanted to make a page about WhatPort 80, the successor to Encyclopedia Dramatica. I wanted to write it because on my comment (click the link), I commented that ED has this notice up about it being closed soon. Tell me if you have time to give me a go-ahead on the project, OK? And maybe we can help on creating it. Thanks. | Contact the Council "
| 0 |
"
I did not attack you, I took offence to your edit summary ""What's wrong with you?"" and the suggestion the I am not fit to edit wikipedia. But whatever, I am in a good mood, so I have no desire to complain any more about that. More importantly, I don't feel the burden is mine to provide anything to support the removal of someones name, the burden is yours to provide a reliable cite. To be honest, there is either a cite supporting your opinion or there isnt - if there is a cite, point it out to me and I will happily revert my last edit, if there isnt, then the information should not be on the article. "
| 0 |
"
Scarborough Nicknames
While I don't really want to expand on this section, there are in fact some web references to Scompton:
You know you're from Scarborugh when...
Busta Rules
There is also a wikipedia page called Canadian slang which references Scompton as well as a couple of other nicknames not mentioned in the Scarborough article. I used Clusty search engine to find these references. Up to you whether you want to put this reference back. I don't care one way or the other.
Regards,
You're absolutely correct. Serves me right for editing before my first cup of coffee in the morning. I found nothing relevant for Scompton, but when I redid the search later, I did get results thru a search for Scompton AND Scarborough. I ought not to have deleted the entry based on a Google search turning up nothing.Personally, I generally don't see any value in having a section for nicknames for the municipality. But there is obviously precedent for having it (e.g. Toronto). The problem I have with these sections is that they end up including obvious entries (like ""Hogtown"" for Toronto), but then also up end up including nicknames that may be used in some circles but don't have particularly wide usage. The particular problem here in the Scarborough article is that so many of the nicknames have such a negative connotation perhaps that's just a reflection of public perception, but I do believe that it does, to a degree, give the reader the wrong impression of the place. Frankly, I am just waiting for someone to add ""Scandahar"" to the list. I'm not from Scarborough, so I will leave the list in the hands of folks who have a better sense of whether its inclusion is justified. Given your edits to the article, you are probably better placed to make that call than I. Cheers, "
| 0 |
Userpage
Hi Ivan, were you trying to build a userpage and made an article by mistake? Do you need some help?
| 0 |
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. The links you added to the page Mobile phone have been removed. Please do not add commercial links—or links to your own private websites—to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (talk)
| 0 |
September 11 attacks
I believe that the paragraph concerning bone fragments, while interesting, does not belong in this article. At least not in such detail. An organization this old and vast deserves a better researched article.
| 0 |
Yes well it may not appeal to you on a personal level, however it contributes towards the scope and depth of knowledge available in Wikipedia. Please leave it alone and find more useful things to do.
| 0 |
The discussion of the (apparent) end of the site and factors leading to it should be reworded to reflect a neutral POV.
| 0 |
While Singapore may not have freedom of speech, you cannot compare it to Nazi Germany. You said Nazi Germany took better care of its people than Singapore... Did you know Germany gassed or shot about eleven million civilians they considered inferior?
| 0 |
"
I was misrepresenting nothing. (Of course trying to pull a Sikh riot-Godhra switcharoo didnt work for Hornplease). Hornplease was using partisan ""secular"" sources to discredit Judge Nanavati, from sites that sahouldn't be quoted. Lostintherush made valuable contributions to the article which is why I asked him. Bakatalk "
| 0 |
"Non-ISO language userboxes are . alias Alarob
"
| 0 |
If you wanna discuss this like adults then feel free to email me at [email protected]
| 0 |
you are very possibly right. So just nominate it again for AfD. Anyone can remove a speedy except the author of the article. This is not an admin decision necessarily, '''''' ( talk )
paid advocates
| 0 |
"
Do you know where I can get that lolcat that says ""lol i already has rolback, see?"" 110 Go Longhorns! "
| 0 |
"***http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/08/jeremy-lin-isnt-the-only-ivy-league-athlete_n_1262219.html ""people have also noticed he has an unlikely background who scored 25 points in his last two games he's a Harvard grad."" 198.151.130.68
"
| 0 |
DWhiskaZ will be back even better. you think you got me i will make my point loud and clear just see the truth will be out in place. 99.237.253.217
| 0 |
"
Only way to resolve this issue, report to admin notice board. Talk page"
| 0 |
Nice move, really. I'm the uncooperative here? You equalize this edit of mine with Gabr-el's ? And I get 48 hours and he 24? And you call it filibustering? Are you kidding me? I wrote ONE sentence to make a point. And you call it filibustering? Nice move indeed. Seems isn't the only corrupt admin in this corrupt place.
| 0 |
The Write-off
Not sure how this should be denoted, but the Write-off was actually originally the Samoan drop from 1991 to early 1992. Then he started using that clothesline for his finisher, which they gave the Write-off name to (much like the Impaler name being used for multiple moves). Then later in WCW, he started using the Samoan drop for his finisher again, which they gave the Stock Market Crash name.
Here's a link to a match where you can see the Samoan drop was the original Write-off. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jV29HpbZ44 69.23.156.97
| 0 |
"
It also states that in exceptional cases like the Beatles (I would classify Pink Floyd as exceptional), members at the time of dissolution could be listed with consensus from the community. That would exclude Roger Waters in my opinion, as the last time Pink Floyd was active was during and following the release of The Division Bell. I don't count the G8 concert as active. Personally, I think it would be in order according to the musical artist template to list everyone under ""Past Members"". "
| 0 |
Re: Sonic X
That one's already in the article, but I appreciate the effort anyway.
| 0 |
"
Fair use rationale for Image:Eye of the Gods.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Eye of the Gods.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "
| 0 |
It doesn't have anything to do with a microbrewery. It's a pretty massive plant serving a region with about 2M people. So you CAN do it industrially. Their quality isn't very consistent, though. Some batches are noticeably worse than others, while some are better than usually.
| 0 |
Karen Armstrong sentence verified
See talk page of Identity of first male Muslim. I have found 5 or 6 other pro-Ali references in addition which I will post soon when I get the time.
| 0 |
"
Are you kidding me? I have been blocked for defending myself against a culprit who has been proven as such in far more ways than is humanly possible to count? Even though the idea of Wikipedia certainly is a genuine one, the way it is conducted is ridiculous. Saying my opinion is NOT an attack, and saying what is TRUE is not an attack but certainly just a way to explain things, as I had done very carefully and thoroughly in my text both now and earlier. I will say it again, no matter how you interpret it. Mario Roering is a culprit with only one single aim in life. He wants to destroy the good name and legacy of the Genseiryū Karate-do International Federation and its president, Kunihiko Tosa. I am the president of this federation in Denmark and Europe, thus I am the center of Mario Roering's attacks and defamation. These are facts, and the list of violations not only here on Wikipedia but nearly everywhere else on the Internet is too long to list anywhere. I have tons of evidence in mails, papers, letters, pdf-files, copies of homepages etc. to back it all up. Personally I got fed up a few years ago because of these endless and ridiculous ways, with which the Wikipedia admins/sysops are handling this situation. So at that time I chose to simply leave Wikipedia as it was, and leave the articles the way they were, full of defamation, lies and propaganda, all put in there by Mario Roering. I gave it a few years, then this year I tried again. It is obvious that neither Mario Roering nor the admins/sysops here at Wikipedia has changed at all. It is the exact same situation as a few years ago. Other webservices, homepages, free webhosting etc. which Mario Roering has exploited for supporting his crusade, in the same way he is exploiting Wikipedia, has all deleted and blocked Mario Roering from using their services after a short presentation of the facts and evidence etc. Only Wikipedia is still indulging Mario Roering in his ways and methods with no regard to his true intentions and what he is doing to our organization and/or myself. The way I have been treated here on Wikipedia I would categorize as pure and utter slander, defamation and harassment, in which the admins/sysops take an active part, though this might not be on purpose?!?!? What Mario Roering is and is doing, there can and is no doubt whatsoever. Blocking me, only shows, that fairness, honesty and rules only apply to a very few list of people here. Taking this matter to any official long time instance/institute of Wikipedia, only ads to the fact, that nothing will ever be done about it, as nobody cares. You are protecting a culprit, who has done nothing else than attacking, ridicule, defame, slander etc. the name of the Genseiryū Karate-do International Federation, our president, Kunihiko Tosa and myself as the president of Europe/Denmark. I have a born right as a human being to say my opinion, present the evidence as they are, and I have a right to free speech. If none of these basic human rights are treasured here at Wikipedia, it only shows, that people like Mario Roering and his methods of breaking the law, copyright violations, defamation, slander and generally lying and deceiving to reach his goals are what is treasured here at Wikipedia. For 5 years, I have spoken out, bringing to attention this man's lesser morals and lesser ethics, but every time some ignorant admin/sysop run the errands of Mario Roering, as you have done this time, punishing me for defending myself. If Mario Roering would stop his attacks, slander, defamation etc. and if this would be enforced by the sysops/admins here at Wikipedia, this situation would be solved faster than anyone of you can say Christmas. Nobody is trying to stop it, thus, whenever Mario Roering attacks me, I attack back, not every time, but often. Blocking only me, shows only, that fairness does not apply to me, but if justice was to be served, we should both be blocked forever from Wikipedia. As long as nothing is done about Mario Roering, I will continue to do as I have done, and I can assure you, that Mario Roering has, is and always will continue his culprit ways as he has done for the past 5 years. Thus the Wikipedia sysops/admins who are doing nothing to stop it, certainly only put more wood on the fire. There is absolutely no attack intended in these accusations, as they are facts and every time I have mentioned them, I have provided the proof, evidence, links etc. necessary to back up what I have said. Every time Mario Roering opens his ""mouth"", you all listen and act by blocking me, threatening me or ordering me to take any dispute further using the official channels. When Mario Roering is blocked he only write a short request for having his block removed, and it is granted. Me, I can never do that. Where is the fairness in all of this? I have not taken part in any edit war, on the contrary, I have asked help and I have explain
| 0 |
, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Dead links happen. I still have the PDF of the actual print article that appeared in the print edition of MCAD-Vision. Would you like me to send it to you? If so, email me so I can email an attachment. 16:11
| 0 |
"
LordAmeth once again, many thanks for nominating me. I have a question, though I noticed that the process was ""scheduled to end"" at 16:52 today, and we're past that now...what happens next? "
| 0 |
Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding
Just saying. Or maybe not.
Watch it.
| 0 |
UNESCO, Britannica, Encarta, Brisn Jospeph (University of Ohio) and every other source on the planet calls Arvanitic a DIALECT OF ALBANIAN. It's status is disputed, like that of Cantonese. Some people say that it is a language in its own right, some say that it is a dialect. Therefore Wikipedia should not take sides by saying that it is a language and directly contradicting EVERY AVAILABLE SOURCE. MATIA still has not provided any sources, all he says is that we should check what he has written elsewhere. Wikipedia should be neutral, it should not be a hotbed for propaganda. Clearly in all other disputed cases, the form X (linguistics) is used. Why should the POV with on verifiability be used?
| 0 |
Ulitimate Edition
This is a cleanup effort but I could see how it might look otherwise.
This article was created under Ulitimate Edition and Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 Ultimate Edition, both are copy and pasted from Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3#Ultimate Edition. It appears that the editor plans to split the article but simply copied and pasted to each of these articles, then stopped. Ulitimate Edition is a highly unlikely redirect so the first step is to clean up this. A note has been left on the editor's talk page about their intentions for Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3 Ultimate Edition.
| 0 |
"
A and C. The layout and image choice in A appears to be better balanced than B, however as someone pointed out above, the image has not scaled well to the size displayed in the collapse boxes above so that needs to be improved. Correct balancing is important, and the oversized top aerial shot at the top of B unbalances the rest of that image. On the second choice, C is broadly a better picture. While it shows more of the structure itself, the image composition on D is way off - the skyline is inappropriately placed in the bottom third and because of its angle it gives the spires undue attention and creates a vast area of empty sky. The 'daytime' photo of the structure Tariq provided above is worse, in my view, as the perspective is much too severe to be illustrative. – ‹talk›‹edits› "
| 0 |
Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.| = Tree
| 0 |
In the picture
I see you smiting pov pushers...
| 0 |
"
Don't try make an enemy of me, the discussion on my talk page is purely facetious it's not meant to cause offence, I'll delete it if it is of so much concern to you. talk "
| 0 |
Episode 2 Ratings
How is episode 2 ranked 2nd for the night but 1st for the week... obviously what ever beat it on the night also beat it for the week??210.50.6.166
| 0 |
"
I deleted the following ...
""If white plays 8. 0-0 or 8. f3, black can win a pawn. For example, 8. 0-0 Nxe4, 9. Nxe4 d5, or 8. f3 Qb6. After, 8. Bb3 black can try to put pressure on the defenders of d5.""
... because it´s completely crap. After 8. 0-0, 8...Nxe4 is the best move, but as it was correctly seen by others, that´s not winning a pawn in any line, it´s just an equalizer. Regarding 8.f3 the article is a little bit less wrong. 8.f3 is bad for white after 8...Qb6, but still not losing a pawn by force.
And the sentence regarding ""pressure on the defenders of d5"" does not make any sense at all. Of course d5 is an important square in all dragon systems. But you don´t ""put pressure"" on the Nc3 or the Bb3. Sometimes (rarely in the line that we see here) you kick it away with b7-b5-b4, if white permits that. Sometimes you sacrifice the exchange with Rxc3. But you never put pressure on it ... you don´t put pressure on minor and major pieces in general, unless they are in a bind, or otherwise immobilized."
| 0 |
. His objective, as you can clearly see in his edits, (this is WPPilots photo) is unproductive, and as you mentioned it is not going to create a unbiased reply from other users, as his comments are designed to bias people to his perspective
| 0 |
of a information. The very usage of the word in any instance is self-verifying
| 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
(talk) 01:14, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
| 0 |
"As a member of an assembly that you would probably call ""Exclusive"" (we prefer simply to be called a Christian assembly), I came to this page to see what others thought about us. I found no information about our group (you may know us by our use of ""Gospel Hall"" for our buildings) and, quite frankly, consider the article on Plymouth Brethren a much more helpful article to those seeking information about fundamentalist Christian groups. To anyone who wants information, I'd suggest going there instead. I'd love to edit the article, but I have no time and am relatively inexperienced at editing. But here's a few suggestions: The entire article seems to focus on one radical ""Christian"" group. Why? There are many other branches that are not even mentioned. I'd suggest trimming the whole article and adding a section for ""Beliefs"", maybe some more information in the section ""Listing of other Exclusive Brethren Groups"", that sort of thing. If people want information on the Raven-Taylor-Hales Brethren, they can go to a seperate article. *sigh* I honestly have to say, I think it would be best if someone erased the whole article and started over.
"
| 0 |
Scope of term?
Is the term hyperbolic growth used for:
all growth towards a mathematical singularity (i.e., any function that goes to infinity in finite time), or
only growth that looks like a hyperbola?
I ask because, for instance, has a singularity (at 0), but the graph is not a hyperbola: thus, strictly speaking, it is not hyperbolic, but perhaps the term is used loosely by analogy.
Any references or experts? Thanks!
Nils von Barth ()
| 0 |
"
I came here to say the same thing: Its better to post on the article talk page (than the user's talk page).'''''' talk "
| 0 |
You called?
What's up Shiitthead? I have 250 open wifi connections ready and available to play. 13 months to go. Games on.
| 0 |
"
That's what I was thinking. Just not sure if that is appropiate because according to the article Ferguson Highway is the original name of Highway 11. guy "
| 0 |
"== Citing sources ==
I was just reviewing your changes to Nanking Massacre denial, and noticed that you did not cite any sources, though it appears you tried to provide inline citations. If you would like to add information to Wikipedia, particularly on a contentious article, I recommend being scrupulous about properly citing all information. For guidance on how to do this, you can refer to Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. I hope this is helpful. —Zujine|talk "
| 0 |
to my dear friend
Can you tell me which university you went, because if you were a musician by education like you said; You'd know that Mario Bauza was the creator of the Afro-Cuban jazz and that salsa is 100% Cuban music, and I think you do not know where is located the White House dear friend, We studied in college, and we've given you college books and you said to us that you do not have time for that, then why you ask me, for books of salsa, if you have not looked the Afro-Cuban jazz books that I already gave you.
What you need is someone to sue you for lies and global misinformation.
| 0 |
"
I was too stoned to realise what I was doing, sorry. ► "
| 0 |
"
Dave, referring to McKitrick's ""fringe views"" is particularly unjustifiable here, as McK has published several peer-reviewed papers on UHI, which is why JGR selected him as a reviewer for the BEST UHI submittal which has apparently been sent back for further revisions. His review comments make interesting reading.
I'm not sure what blog you are complaining about surely not Revkin's dot Earth column? Anyway, I agree it's premature to add McK's review comments here better to wait for a 3rd party article. Best, "
| 0 |
you seem to be confused....
I never said that you could not post comments on the india talk page!!! I think that its good so that indian wikipedians can correct the many fasle claims being made (for example, the Indus being pakistan, this is laughable). What I did say, as I keep on repeating, and you keep on misunderstanding, that I didnot appreciate you butting into an argument without being asked.Instead, you should have created another topic ( by pressing the plus symbol next to edit). Second of all, it is quite intresting to observe that the person who has tried to edit my english, has spelled interfering incorrectly, when I wrote it correctly in my reply!!!
Finally, I would appreciate if you kept out of others buisness unless you are asked-( for moral support, more knowledge etc.)
| 0 |
How hard is it to get into this league? Is it entry-level?
| 0 |
"
Me too. To quote from the article:
Goldman had wanted the wives to be depicted as model-like women who dressed provocatively. But after casting Newman this was not to be, as Goldman stated he felt that Newman's physical appearance did not match the type of woman he imagined, and as a result this caused a change in appearance in costuming for all of the other wives.
with a reference to this source
The picture helps the reader understand this point, by showing why ""Newman's physical appearance did not match the type of woman [Goldman] had imagined"". "
| 0 |
on the other hand, perhaps a DelRev on the first one would be more appropriate ) I too regret the inconsistency and wish we could agree on guidelines for these. ''''''
| 0 |
I won't have time to finish the rest fo the inline cites for acouple of days...just to let you know...but to get it into DYK, the article generally must be less than a week old....so not sure Saturday is soon enough.
| 0 |
"As I'm continually being slimed by anti-constitution Republicans is one real estate office after another, these last 3 years; I'm, also, sick of the mean-spirited ""half-logic"" psuedo-academic debunkers here on Wikipedia pretending that they're objective skeptics. I'll tone-down when the knuckle draggers discover integrity.
"
| 0 |
"
This is one of those instances in which reductio ad absurdem is a helpful and persuasive rhetorical argument. I get it. I understand your point-of-view, and I'm sympathetic. I'm not even disagreeing. I only explain that disambiguation for the ships of the CP fleet is informed by a consensus:
(a) I understand that this consensus is not one which you unquestioningly accept.
(b) You clarify the ambit of this ""consensus"" by pointing to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships).
You announce that your background has to do with articles about military ships, and this informs my measured and somewhat cautious response. In the period in which I was more engaged in developing the articles about this relatively small fleet. I was not inattentive to the consequences of lexicographical order see Taxonomy#Military taxonomy.
RMS Empress of China disambiguation
RMS Empress of China (1921) disambiguation
Bottom line: I have not reverted nor disputed your recent move; but I'm disinclined to move too quickly in moving each article about a ship in this fleet again see here and here; see also
RMS Empress of Britain > Empress of Britain disambiguation
RMS Empress of Britain (1930) > Talk:RMS Empress of Britain (1931)#Redundant useful links
I don't quite understand the point-of-view which appears to argue that the distinction between military and non-military vessels should reasonably extend to this minor issue of disambiguation. Application of the phrase ""consensus reality"" in our Wikipedia context is one of those lessons learned the hard way. I'm still investigating the nuance of unintended consequences.
For example, was moved by to RMS Empress of Australia, and the disambiguation date was simply deemed unnecessary at this point. This edit is entirely justified, of course; but the modification fails to take into account an article which has yet to be created about RMS Empress of Australia (1953). As you know, this trivial misjudgment doesn't matter, if indeed the term ""misjudgment"" can be applied at all which perhaps makes it an excellent illustration of a grey area. "
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.