text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|
"
Criticism section
There are many reasons to criticize hooks' ideas, spelled out in work written by actual intellectuals who have engaged her work directly rather than writing scurrilous slander for feeble birdcage liner like Frontpage Magazine. It turns out here that the only information in this section was inserted by a suspected sockpuppeteer and consists completely of assertions from Frontpage. I would like to delete it but I don't want to be accused of removing criticism of her I think anyone who has actually read hooks or her scholarly critics might find there are a lot more useful things to put in this section than Glazov's fantasies from Horowitz's rag. This article presents a far more balanced report of her 2002 commencement address to southwestern, where she did not say the things Glazov claims. And Reverend Alan Taylor notes that the speech was criticized because hooks ""dared to disturb"":
Of course, I could just insert these things in the article. But do we really need this much detail about a commencement speech in 2002? I'd rather just delete this section altogether until someone researches some legitimate criticism from reliable sources. What do others think? "
| 0 |
"
Mallaig Extension Railway
Does the Mallaig Extension Railway really qualify as a ""Historical Railway"", given that:
it's still open from end to end, and
it's actually of quite recent origin, relatively speaking?
I think it does. Having worked along the C∨ and up the WHL to Fort William; Banavie Peir came to mind; and the Invergarry and For Augustus Railway. For completeness I felt it is relevant. Linking into the NBR and then onto the LNER - detail still to be added. Loch Eil Outward Bound is a station that is not included. The West Highland Railway is another issue that need thought - for the same reason. "
| 0 |
Hello Carol. I am distressed by your remarks, which I consider to be uncivil. I provided sources for my claims that Rothbard is a revisionist, which is material to his understanding of history. Please try to be more civil in the future.
| 0 |
User with a similar username?
Its probably no big deal, but there's a
| 0 |
And on another note, what right does he have to send me blocking threats? I state my point - his reasosn are blatant false pretenses. And that is a valid case, ladies and gentlemen.
| 0 |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fan loyalty with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Imtiredofyourshit
| 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Fanboyz pulse
The article Fanboyz pulse has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
| 0 |
"
And what is your opinion regarding the reference that i have inserted for the admissions. Is it an appropriate one ? (talk) "
| 0 |
i saw it it it totally not like the pc version it has a story and for each level you have to kill a certain number of monsters
| 0 |
RE:Small request
Thank You for your advise. I will do my best to format the articles to a respectable standard. I hope that I have not caused too much of an inconvenience. And thanks for pointing out the minor detail about the main subject going into ALL CAPS to me.
| 0 |
The world does not recognize Israel's position on Jerusalem, by a majority of 193 to 1. The majority of states recognize The State of Palestine by a majority of 130 to 63. If you want a debate about WP:Undue, you'd lose on that score alone, since, as I noted, the current opening line gives undue weight to a fringe position. Still, we're here not to quarrel, but to find a sensible arrangement for an inadequate lead. I'm happy to withdraw my qualifiers if the current majority prefers the text as Evansh2008 and Tiamut tailored it, by the way. Since the SoP is a state occupied by Israel, arguments of the kind you are adducing do not apply. We do not underwrite power arrangements here, we simply state what the best sources agree is the case, which here, is that Jerusalem is not wholly in Israel, is occupied, and the occupied Palestinian part is more or less left to its own resources in managing the mess in its quarter. Since the article deals with all of the city, there's no way of equivocating over this, and trying to maintain NPOV while relegating the Palestinian fact to a footnote.
| 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! (Talk)
| 0 |
Apologies on the confusion -
| 0 |
, or a complete tourist-ad-sponsored translation of the en.wikipedia into Catalan
| 0 |
Also I'm deleting your comment, another rude comment will be deleted.
| 0 |
Contact me!
It has been a long time, but I miss you. Those private moments on the Bainbridge were special to me. You were my first. I only thought about women before you. How did we ever not get caught? But dont you remember that time we nearly were? Please email me, I know a few private clubs which I just know you would love!Email, please [email protected]. Love Bud MacDonald
| 0 |
"
Article name
The correct name is ""Encyclopedia of Life"" (EOL) not ""The Encyclopedia of Life"". "
| 0 |
Name Change
Hey Nichalp! I noticed you are active on the name change page, and I was wondering about tweaking my name. I registered my name as evilclown93, no cap. I prefer it to be Evilclown. The only place that show up is my edit count page, which kind of annoys me. Do you think I should change, or forget it? I'm just asking for advice. Thanks! The Evil Clown my contributions
| 0 |
Well, Tangobot and SQLBot have both been keeping track of the RFA stats for quite a while; those are updated at least every hour, I think. what format do you need the stats in? Did your bot do something substantially different than those do, that stops you from using their data?
| 0 |
"
This article is really unworthy of Wikipedia. I am surprised that the originator hasn't done more to ""wikify"" the entries. "
| 0 |
Just read Ukrainian through the end. You may be surprized. MaidanUA is, BTW, a site that helped a lot in the Orange Revolution and I am still reading it occasionally. But this thread with what AndriyK posted now is just disgusting.
| 0 |
"
Hello LERDMAN, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Happy editing!
Getting started Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents
Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article
Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Where to ask a question
Help pages
New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia
Community Portal
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility "
| 0 |
With any kind of electric-based cable, there's always some kind of voltage that comes across them, if only the signals themselves, so obviously many cables don't carry a supply of power, but most still refer to the end with the center that plugs into the middle of the other end as the male end. So it appears to me that what mattered more until HDMI and USB and perhaps FireWire came out, that's what mattered more for the designationthe middle part of one end plugging into the hole on the other end. So still, why not for HDMI and USB (since again, plenty of cables don't carry a supply of power but still went by that designation)?
| 0 |
Your userpage
You might want to consider removing some of the info on it; there are some nasty people out there.
| 0 |
JEW
Article misses a cornucopia of slurs for jew & slur used by jew. Here are some not reflected in the article with use and possible definition given after:
Hook Nose, Nickel Nose
Big Nose, Heebie, Red/Dead Sea pedestrian
Christ/Jesus Killer (Mel Gibson)
DIB (Dumb Israeli Bastard)
Shylock, Sheister/Shyster (Shakespeare- Merchant of Venice/Othello etc.)
Jew-bag
Jew/Khazar (as used by nonjew against nonjew & nonjew against jew- the term 'Jew' is itself a slur)
Shagitz/Shiksa (as used by jew against nonjew)
Yenta (slur against know-it-all jew women)
| 0 |
, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Not all Gedolim opposed the disengagement. Did you ask for the opinions of chassidishe poskim? Satmar, Dushinsky, Bobov, etc? And those who did oppose it did so primarily out of humanitarian concerns, because it is horrible for 10.000 Jews to be thrown out of their houses. It was not because they agreed with the Zionist ideology. | (talk) 09:20
| 0 |
" the Afd reverted on page Gadugi and Karmosin sanctioned for violating wiki/Wales policy of We Are Nice People Who Do Not Act This Way. On his user page his lists himself as a ""rebel"" which isn't something that fits in with Wiki's peaceful honeybee meme. While I respect all peoples right to their views and opinions, after an Afd completes, nominating pages out of retaliation in an attempt to oppress the majority is improper. I would like this user punished for 1) violating policies and 2) wasting yet more of my valuable time answering stupid and frivolous Afd requests and 3) interfering with me writing more articles. UPDATE: Karmosin is also making RACIST STATEMENTS on the Afd page for Cherokee Moons Ceremonies which attack my race and culture calling my work ""Cherokee-Cruft"". This conduct is WHOLLY unacceptable.
"
| 0 |
Wikipedia
Why do you bother wasting your time with this site? 194.189.32.65
| 0 |
"
Actually, Wikipedia:Removing warnings was a proposal that failed to gain acceptance, and has been marked ""This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference"" since 2006. The current guideline on this question is at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages, an it says that you may remove warnings once you have seen and read them, though archiving is preferred.
"
| 0 |
"
Saying ""I'm sick of the abuse"" indicates impatience and is inflammatory. Simply stating ""No personal attacks please."" gets the point across without ruffling feathers. "
| 0 |
will object to the name ...
| 0 |
,because it isnt a sport
| 0 |
"
Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the ""sandbox"" rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:Shaun9876my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Talk Email "
| 0 |
"
Hayley Westenra Vegetarian
, Upon your edit summary: 'actually she isn't any more see the article Hayley Westenra in charge of her career which is sourced in the article.'
And as I said on your Send me the link because I have 3, but if you have a valid current link please show me†♥
You have not provided links or any other information. The links I have that states otherwise:
http://www.richardogdenmanagement.com/pages/richard_biog.htm
http://www.hayley-westenra-international.com/dhtml-pages/html-2004/reviews/20040528_ClassicalBritAwardsRM.htm
http://www.listener.co.nz/issue/3404/features/4453/wish_upon_a_star.html;jsessionid=061201BB4F1D8677DFF9651A7A216EC8
http://www.goveg.com/feat/sexiestveg2007/
I will revert your edit unless you can provided other wise reason to have reverted mine†♥ "
| 0 |
Three images
:Image:Rasheed01.jpg, Image:SpikeAndFaye.jpg and Image:SpikeSpiegel.jpg, all of which you uploaded, have been orphaned. Unless they are placed in appropriate articles, they will be deleted due to the fact they are being kept on Wikipedia on a claim of fair use.
| 0 |
"
Henry Allingham
Welcome to Wikipedia!
As you can see from the history of the Henry Allingham article, there is some debate about whether the date of birth should be linked. May I suggest that you look at Talk:Henry Allingham to follow and contribution to the discussion?
It is useful if on the edit summary you say what you have reverted and why, rather than simply mark as ""rv"".
Thanks very much and I hope you enjoy your stay here.
Best wishes, "
| 0 |
oh that's funny, real ha ha funny
| 0 |
And is that something that should be in the article?
| 0 |
It would appear that you may be confusing Azerbaijani with Azeri. Unlike Azerbaijani-Americans, Iranian-Americans have some substantial sociological research done into their backgrounds(larger numbers + academic departments, funding etc). In fact, there is no shortage in that department, and figures for ethnicity and religion are available, even if sometimes contradictory. The Scythian
| 0 |
(Shhhhh) Let's not talk about those boring old things... - Talk
| 0 |
"
Questionable tactics
The section ""Questionable tactics"" should be renamed to ""War crimes"" or ""Possible war crimes"" if that's more NPOV, because in context a discussion of tactics during battlefield operation would be expected under a section titled ""Questionable tactics""."
| 0 |
So?
How about those Angels?
| 0 |
"
A tag has been placed on Romeo Niram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. "
| 0 |
Do you mean that they toured during the 9 years prior to 2001? That's more than likely, but also rather obvious and not worth mentioning specifically as almost every working band tours while they are active and releasing new material.
| 0 |
"
Orphaned fair use image (Image:BTT UK 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:BTT UK 1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (talk) (Contr.) "
| 0 |
As I said, citing other wikis doesn't match up to our guidelines. It's much better to cite directly the sources that the wiki is citing instead. Having the template box that points to wikisource is fine, but that is different from actually sourcing the content of the article. One is for promoting a sister project, and the other is for making sure our article content is verifiable and reliable. Because anyone can edit wikisource, it doesn't meet out standards of reliability and therefore it cannot be used as a source. Hope this makes sense.- [talk]
| 0 |
"
Not impressed by the generic explanation when you removed my link twice.
Walter,
I see that you are a fellow Christian and a fellow Christian musician, although being 12 years younger than I, it's not likely that you lived through the early days of the ""Jesus Movement"" as I did.
As a longtime Web Site content developer, K-12 Textbook editor, English Professor, Bible teacher, Music teacher, professional writer, and a one-time ""Jesus Musician,"" I've recently started a project (SchoolOfTheRock.com) to help disciple the 18-15-year olds I minister to regularly on issues of contemporary Christian living, especially in areas related to worship and Bible teaching. Despite an ad here or there on the site to help pay a fraction of the site's expenses, you'd be hard-pressed to call it a commercial endeavor. (I pay the site's manifold expenses as a ""write-off"" from my professional consulting business.)
Because I grew up with people who hate Contemporary Christian music (and still run into them from time to time), I thought it would be nice to include articles that show some of the ways in which Biblical living, and Biblical worship through contemporary musical forms tie together.
To find links I could include from my pages, I went looking for any internet articles that provided insightful, balanced, detailed, and fact-based accounts of the history of Contemporary Christian music. I didn't find any that fulfilled all of those qualificatiosn. Your Wikipedia summary IS useful, and is a good introduction, VERY appropriate for Wikipedia, but I wanted something that presented more details and presented them in a stronger narrative that showed the history of Christian music from the musician's perspective.
So I wrote an fact-based, detailed, well-organized article that included, not only the history of the industry, but also personal experiences as well as the experiences of friends who were either touring artists or industry professionals.
You might be put off by a couple of paragraphs in first person, but if you've ever read Paul Baker's books, you'll find all the proof you need that it's an accurate history, even to the minor details.
Or maybe you're put off by some of the ""negative"" statements about dark times in the history of Christian music. But the sources you cite and books you recommend have sections that are FAR more negative. Also, I carefully chose details that would get the point across with inspiring the reader to outrage on certain topics, as a fully-detailed account would have done.
I've also ""vetted"" the article for content, balance, and tone by running it past former touring artists and Christian broadcasting professionals who lived through the same era. I have gotten nothing but enthusiastic response.
If you can find another Internet-published article (or ten) on the same subject that is as well written, organized, balanced, and fact-based as my article, please let me know. I'd be VERY glad to link to them from my web site. I'd also like to know why you don't link to those articles from the Wiki article? If they exist, that is.
Finally, I confess that I am at a loss as to why you consider my article either to be a ""commercial advertisement"" or a ""personal blog"" (both accusations came through the message to me, though it was largely ""boilerplate,"" so I'm not sure which part was really yours). I recognize that is is NOT a Wikipedia article, but it is a fact-based, detailed, and hopefully balanced article nonetheless, far more so than quite a few other article links I see on similar Wikipedia pages. It is not advertising any specific product, or even any commercial web site. BTW CCM magazine is commercial - they cost money to subscribe to and have LOADS of advertising. Why do you have THEIR link, if you are seeking to avoid even the appearance of supportiing a commercial enterprise.
Also, the article dos NOT contain unverifiable personal ramblings or rants, as a blog would. (I publish blogs in other web sites so I know the difference.)
Perhaps you object to the fact that I posted the link myself. Would it be a better article if I asked an industry contact to post the link? Or maybe you should read the article yourself and let me know specifically what you feel is unsuitable about it?
If you've lost the link, it's at: http://www.schooloftherock.com/html/a_brief_history_of_contemporar.html
Frankly, I'm hoping that as a fellow musician you find the article edifying, exhorting, and comforting. And if you ARE aware of anything ""wrong"" with it on any level, please let me know, because I strive for proessionalism.
Sorry for the VERY long comment, and God bless,
Paul Race
[[Special:Contributions/198.134.2.62|198
| 0 |
Thanks for the warm welcome
I appreciate the welcome, and I look forward to contributing to the wiki-community. I took the disclaimer off my talk page as suggested. Thanks.
| 0 |
"
Two FSes!
Your Featured sound candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured sound status, File:USMC stars stripes forever.ogg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another sound, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. ''''''
Your Featured sound candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured sound status, File:Taps on bugle.ogg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another sound, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates. '''''' "
| 0 |
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Elizabeth Smart kidnapping, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
| 0 |
":: Well said. And to the ""debunker"" above: what is Zeitgeist? Sorry, I've researched this subject for over 20 years. Just because something is not commonly known today does not mean it did not happen. It was common knowledge throughout the 18th & 19th Century that the Rothschild family owned most of everything - so much so in fact that it was known as the Age of the Rothschilds among historians. Try doing some independent research all of your own and you'll soon see that the ""conspiracy theories"" about the BoE being privately owned are in fact rooted in historical fact - history which was not so long ago common knowledge. I could give you a list of reading matter to educate yourself but why bother? Your mind is already closed to anything which does not come from an establisment mouthpiece.
For your edification: the ""nationalisation"" of
"
| 0 |
"Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and stick around.
Before you start doing a lot of editing, you might want to take the Tutorial. It gives a lot of basic info you'll want to get you oriented on Wikipedia. You may also want to check out Adopt-a-User if you would like to get adopted by a more experienced user who can help show you around. Also, if you want somewhere to get used to editing, try the Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you've already figured out editing, but you have a more specific question, try the Help desk or trying added """" to your user talk page.
You can sign your name on talk pages by using three tildes ("" ~~~ "") for your username and four ("" ~~~~ "") for your username and a timestamp.
If you have any other questions about the project, then check out Wikipedia:Help. You can also drop me a question on my talk page. I'd be more than happy to help you any way that I can.
Happy editing, (talk)(contrib.) "
| 0 |
"Didi you know what the word count of english wikipedia is? ""Talk""?
"
| 0 |
Sorry, I did not mean to tag ones you have qualms with, go ahead and untag them. Most similar tags stay on if a project is related, but I do not want to step on any toes. Also, I would not have caught that about Anna Nicole Smith, thanks,
| 0 |
LOL. And we'll have a Kwami teaching us Cantonese (Yue) next? May God help you all!!! 86.136.57.254
| 0 |
Source 2: -> go to Waffen-SS & Polizei -> go to SS-STURMBANNFÜHRER -> go to D-F -> scroll down to ENDRESS, Hans.
| 0 |
"
RfC
I find it kind of amusing that you simultaneously note an under-representation of women on ArbCom while calling Risker a ""he"". ) "
| 0 |
Blocked
I have blocked this IP address as a because it has been used by a single editor using multiple accounts in a manner that appears to be deceptive. Most particularly, however, is this edit, which implied that this editor is an administrator (which is not the case). I have consulted with another checkuser prior to applying this block, and his findings concur with mine.
| 0 |
Here's the deal: you stop pretending I'm attacking you and stay off my talk page or I will give you a demonstration of a real verbal attack so you can see the difference. Deal?
| 0 |
Roux I think you should get away from this page. Your acting like some vandal or something. Alot of people contribute to this page and you seem to want to delete EVERYONES work. The reality is there is very little documentation on Trance music in texbooks. This poses a problem. In this scenario the Wiki relies on the followers of the genre to input their expertise FROM FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE. If this weren't the case the page would be almost absolutely empty with nothing in it. I know you like to say there are rules for this and that, but in this case because there is no documented research, it is all we can work with. Be happy with what is provided. Lastly the removing of Discogs as a reference is the most bizarre thing I've ever heard. Trance music is about the music...and it was experienced through records NOT BOOKS. This in of itself is the most important reference of them all.
| 0 |
"
Featured picture
Stax, obviously you know more about this than I do. I feel that this image that I just cropped from a larger PD source has great potential as a featured picture. Unfortunately, I know nothing about the FP process, and I don't know which imperfections in the picture would need to be corrected. I was hoping you might be able to offer me a little direction or guidance. I have Photoshop CS4 at work and CS at home, so I have the tools. I'm just not sure how to go forward from here. Since you've been involved with a lot of FPCs, I figured you might be able to offer me some guidance. Thanks. (Talk • Phils) "
| 0 |
I note that the user who raised this no longer has an active account. However, I have removed the citation request as it was placed in an inappropriate place in the article. That wax type cylinders were shaved so that they could accept new recordings is not in doubt. Practically all phonographs sold prior to 1903 were equipped with such a shaving device.
As whether worn out cylinders were accepted back for shaving and re-recording: it is probably unlikely that a firm citation will come to light (which is often the case with such historical articles). It is something that I had heard of from elswhere, but consider the following.
1. A cylinder would cost around 35 cents at the turn of the 20th century. (To provide context in real terms, 35 cents would have bought you two dinners at reasonable diner.)
2. The early cylinders had a very short life of between a dozen to two dozen playings.
3. For all his faults, Edison was a very astute businessman.
If Edison figured out that he could sell more cylinders by taking back the worn out ones and making an allowance toward the purchase of a new one, there can be little doubt that that is exactly what he would have done.
| 0 |
"
Your bizarre fascination with me is disturbing. Please stop posting about me. Thank you. So long as this nonsense is here, my response will be as well.- Sinneed "
| 0 |
"
WHEELER, I'm writing to thank you for your apology. I wish to emphasize that you did a great deal of good work on the article, creating the bulk of the present content and providing a great deal of references. If any of my comments in response to your use of ""moderns"" was offensive to you, I also apologize.
However, after your apology you once again accuse me of ""ignoring history"" (which is inconsequential, what is important is if wikipedia ignores history). I have not ignored history, nor your edits. I have simply added (historical) content to the article. Simply because our sources seem to differ does not mean that either is more or less suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia, it simply means that we are using different sources.
Further, you have made a request for ""classical sources"" connecting effeminacy with gender, gender roles, or sexuality. I am not ignoring this request, but you must understand that it takes time to do research, compose that research, and add it to wikipedia. You, however, have also ""ignored"", o have yet to respond, to my question: if effeminacy applies only to one gender or sex, doesn't it inherently has something to with gender or sex?
One way of deflating this conflict, which would be supported by myself and was suggested by Snowspinner, is for you to create content on Malakos. Do you have an objection to this?
Lastly, if you find my sources questionable the best way, and the only way in article space, to question them is to find further references which directly contradict or question said references (for instance, a quote by Plato saying, ""Effeminacy has nothing to do with gender, sex, or sexuality,"" would effectively disable any secondary source to the contrary, or you could find another ""modern"" ""classicist"" who describes the errors of my sources).
22:17, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)"
| 0 |
Aren't the functionalists holocaust deniers, because they deny that Hitler was responsible for the holocaust!? So maybe the redirection of from holocaust revisionism to this article was quite intentional? ;-)
| 0 |
Hi Martin: you have a valid point - I only put in information of which I am aware. But I am intrigued by the possibility that because of the state based arrangements of the ABC this could - just possibly - be an avenue whereby some lost episodes might be traced, and this is no doubt something dear to our hearts. Assuming you are South Australia, can you recall the school holiday arrangements in SA? Best wishes
| 0 |
i have going to do what ever i want
| 0 |
I respond here most of the time
Not on your page. Please mention if you want me to respond on your page, and then I will. ~AFA.
| 0 |
TNA
So is it official if he has signed with Total Nonstop Action Wrestling?
user:Dustind
| 0 |
"
3d printing is great, Mamou Mani has too be too. Now, i found that CookieMaster having on his Facebook page one single ""Like"" of Mamou Mani' himself, makes me wonder first, is this the same person ? second, are these persons close enough ? and finally shall we mention every FabLab in the world, every 3D teacher in the world or is there something special with this one ? Is the VM award important enough, and if so how come is there not one single article from secondary sources appearing anywhere. "
| 0 |
Lukeon94 is a buly and is trying to imppose his point of view. Apart from that there is no such policy that states a consensus cannot keep verifable information from being added and no I will not let you violate Wikipedia policies. All requirements have already been met and I've already said Wikipedia is not a media outlet'. We do not follow the style of media outlets here. By saying that a verified material cannot be added just because some users say no. This is not a Wikipedia policy. I'm not going to add her name because for now but will in future. But first I will try contacting some admins about this matter.
| 0 |
"icon|w|or|d}} removes the cumbersome ""IPA"" from pronounced {{IPAc-en|w|or|d"
| 0 |
I am asking you again if you understand the rules, please take your dispute to the talk page
| 0 |
As long as every claim is fully sourced, go for it!
| 0 |
Ello 'Sme
Nothing to take back mate, I told you we were BOTH right! Thanks for that info I'll make sure the old fella don't miss that! I'll try to catch it myself if I'm not working - cor bloody 'ot here at the mo, 84!! Cheers mate, hope you're well. All the best,
| 0 |
Either you hate science, or you support con artists. I'm sorry to hear that you failed the simplest science course in high school. Enjoy your career at McDonalds, Landroo.
| 0 |
But some of the other sources didn't have citations so why does the Indian one need one?
| 0 |
That's not an answer to my questions. The existence of criticisms is a fact. Fairness and balance is achieved by adhering to the rules on Wikipedia, not to your own rules.
| 0 |
Who said like that she has completed school and college education before starting acting, where is the source for your claim. ? Contributions/59.92.190.29
| 0 |
Mmmm thanks for the informative explanation.Jase
| 0 |
The post-Philips version has a narrower border.
| 0 |
"
Unfortunately the site search for Wikipedia is rubbish. I always try to check before I create a new article that it hasn't been done before, but googling the site first (and also double-checking in the categories) seems to be the best way to do it. The good news is you could easily merge your list into the pre-existing ones and raise their quality. By keeping the lists focused on one topic, it would also be possible to illustrate every single insignia (so long as there is a photo on Wikipedia or Commons somewhere). Like I said, the list you produced was fundamentally of ""featurable"" quality (possibly with a little bit of work, but not much) and there are plenty of lists on Wikipedia that are of very low quality yet are inherently featurable if they got a little bit of TLC. You seem to have the skills to do that... so if you want to do some ""rescue"" missions, there's definitely a job there for you with a rather nice reward at the end. Try not to be too dismayed! "
| 0 |
"
It wasn't too horrible but we are very sensitive here on Wikipedia. e (talk) (Clarify T1) "
| 0 |
"
It seems that your comments on have been ""misunderstood"" by editors from English speaking countries as well, especially when you in reply to jethro spoke about ""your Jewish genome"". When your Jewish genome has 30-60% European admixture..., I missed previously in your comment when you described genetics and genetic science results as based on (through remarkable extreme example of WP:OR and WP:NPOV violation) ""quasi racial stereotypes of the Jew"" To quote you ""by geneticists, who ignore that their results, based on a quasi-racial stereotyping of the Jew are not compatible with halakhic law which defines 'Jews' by different descent criteria. That is why I am completely indifferent to whatever geneticists say about history, unless they are practiced historians"" So you can not edit population genetic articles by believe that this science is based on ""quasi racial stereotypes of the Jew"" with WP:OR inventions of ""Jewish genes"" and ""Jewish types"" and by entitling yourself to be ""indifferent to whatever geneticists say about history"" because your personal attitude, believes and feelings. Your comments regarding ""Jewish genes"" ""Jewish types"" and ""Jewish geneome"" show lack of basic understanding of population genetics. The common Middle Eastern origin of Jews is not based on any ""Jewish genes, Jewish types or Jewish genome"" but on shared Middle Eastern haplogroups, haplotipes and mutation which Jews share with the rest of population from the area of their origin. I do not wish to continue this discussion further.
"
| 0 |
"
RE: To WikHead.
I got your response and I would like to clarify something. I did NOT blank out a whole page nor have I made ANY edit which could be considered as ""disruptive"" by ANY means! I simply made slight corrections to reflect facts which were not mentioned previously on the page in question. If any of you want to take this a step further, that's fine. I'll just post about it on my blog so everyone can be made aware of your unfair actions towards me. I haven't taken any action as of yet but I WILL if necessary! I don't think what you people are doing is fair and your power hungry censorship is unfounded!"
| 0 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Oxyfordianism) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
| 0 |
Absolutely. What was the profile? talk
| 0 |
January 2015
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alban_Bunjaku https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mattythewhite
| 0 |
Done. This entry is lond, I'll see about chopping it up later. maveric149
| 0 |
Hindu Unity
I am not familiar with this organisation or website, do give all the links (bbc included)on the discussion page so that people can come to theri own conclusion.
| 0 |
"
my title therory
tonight vince will make a new wwe title and have a battle royal for it stting up cena/edge at vengance and RVD will rechristen the ""old"" wwe title the ECW title tommorrow night"
| 0 |
"
Thanks you for the comment. I have missed that other link, and will now go and remove that one too. Wikipedia is not a mere list of links, and external links should ideally be tied into relevant mentions within the text (see WP:NOT). If you feel that the language school link is justified, then why not add a short section mentioning Chester's growing role as a center where Nnon-Engloish speaking students can learn English? The link might be justifiable then, but realise that favouring one language school over another would not be a good idea. (talk) "
| 0 |
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at Tredegar Iron Works. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (talk)
| 0 |
"
Exactly, I don't own Wikipedia or have the authority to randomly delete articles. We have discussions, then we build consensus. That's why I'm discussing you here other possibilities, such as merging these battles to related articles. Please do not take offense, as I sense a change in your tone. To answer your question:
We require multiple sources so that we can write a reasonably balanced article that complies with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, rather than representing only one author's point of view. This is also why multiple publications by the same person or organization are considered to be a single source for the purpose of complying with the ""multiple"" requirement. (WP:WHYN)
Lack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Similarly, a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source. (WP:GNG, footnote 3)
I appreciate your work. Truly I do. That's why I didn't AfD them right ahead; I wanted to have a thorough consultation with you, being a longtime editor after all. Have a good day. I wish you reconsider. "
| 0 |
This review seems to be even more fringe than the standard positive reviews for the following reasons: 1. This review claims that the goal of the movie is to promote interracial relationships - and the perspective of the author is that interracial relationships are a bad thing. 2. This blogger does not seem notable (as a film critic, etc) to me, nor is he quoting any primary sources. I don't think it would be an appropriate review to cite in this article.
| 0 |
, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Well, officially you are still F.Y.R.O.M, you haven't won the name yet 13:13
| 0 |
. You also did accused me of doing things that I don't remember nor did
| 0 |
"Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. khoi "
| 0 |
"
Igor, as far as i can tell, you still may not edit the article (or this space, but if i had anything to say about it, i would not proscribe that). i am reverting your edit to the article until it can be verified by recipients that this is the actual email promulgated by the Editorial Board of CQG. Steve Carlip was on that board and was the person to originally supply that other statement that is less flattering. is the ""first"" version a fabrication? did the Editorial Board officially change their mind about it? "
| 0 |
Zhaksybek Kulekeyev
Please provide your source(s) for the content you recently added to Zhaksybek Kulekeyev. Thanks,
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.