chosen
int64 353
41.8M
| rejected
int64 287
41.8M
| chosen_rank
int64 1
2
| rejected_rank
int64 2
3
| top_level_parent
int64 189
41.8M
| split
large_stringclasses 1
value | chosen_prompt
large_stringlengths 236
19.5k
| rejected_prompt
large_stringlengths 209
18k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
38,389,251 | 38,388,645 | 1 | 3 | 38,387,775 |
train
|
<story><title>Auroratone, a psychedelic 1940s film that helped WWII vets overcome PTSD</title><url>https://www.openculture.com/2023/11/watch-an-auroratone-a-psychedelic-1940s-film.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jbl0ndie</author><text>Looks very similar to the Optikinetics Crystal Pulse product that is sadly no longer commercially available. Pretty niche lighting effect I encountered in the mid 90s. It was outdated even then. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;XuxZ7_lAhK8?si=TT-6WXfT5c4cvJGN" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;XuxZ7_lAhK8?si=TT-6WXfT5c4cvJGN</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>Auroratone, a psychedelic 1940s film that helped WWII vets overcome PTSD</title><url>https://www.openculture.com/2023/11/watch-an-auroratone-a-psychedelic-1940s-film.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>JKCalhoun</author><text>Very cool. I&#x27;m not seeing an obvious connection between the audio and the visuals (I do see some kind of differences between the visuals for the organ solo vs. the rest of the song).<p>I can&#x27;t believe no one has recreated the machine though. Perhaps someone will now.<p>Someone&#x27;s HTML5 ... tribute? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bits.ashleyblewer.com&#x2F;portable-auroratone&#x2F;?loclr=blogsig" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bits.ashleyblewer.com&#x2F;portable-auroratone&#x2F;?loclr=blo...</a></text></comment>
|
9,727,275 | 9,727,261 | 1 | 3 | 9,726,341 |
train
|
<story><title>Cardinals Face F.B.I. Inquiry in Hacking of Astros’ Network</title><url>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/sports/baseball/st-louis-cardinals-hack-astros-fbi.html</url><text></text></story><parent_chain><item><author>Fuxy</author><text>Wait does that mean they kept unhashed passwords? That&#x27;s a big security no no and there&#x27;s absolutely no reason they should have it like that.</text></item><item><author>timboslice</author><text>TL;DR: a member of the Cardinals&#x27; staff left for the Astros a few years ago. Both teams had an internal system to track recruiting efforts etc. He used the SAME password in the new org, the Astros. Someone from the Cardinals org checked his master password list and was able to enter the Astros system with his old creds</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>coleca</author><text>It&#x27;s more likely that the Cards had a Excel file &quot;Master_Passwords.xls&quot; (or similar) with all his department&#x27;s passwords listed in it on a shared department folder. No encryption, hashing, etc. Maybe they used Excel password protection on the file.<p>Just a hunch, but I&#x27;ve seen it many times at past employers.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Cardinals Face F.B.I. Inquiry in Hacking of Astros’ Network</title><url>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/sports/baseball/st-louis-cardinals-hack-astros-fbi.html</url><text></text></story><parent_chain><item><author>Fuxy</author><text>Wait does that mean they kept unhashed passwords? That&#x27;s a big security no no and there&#x27;s absolutely no reason they should have it like that.</text></item><item><author>timboslice</author><text>TL;DR: a member of the Cardinals&#x27; staff left for the Astros a few years ago. Both teams had an internal system to track recruiting efforts etc. He used the SAME password in the new org, the Astros. Someone from the Cardinals org checked his master password list and was able to enter the Astros system with his old creds</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>fname</author><text>I&#x27;m guessing they mean they had a break-glass list of passwords for accounts to access those systems.</text></comment>
|
4,961,034 | 4,960,766 | 1 | 2 | 4,960,129 |
train
|
<story><title>First Sale Under Siege: If You Bought It, You Should Own It</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/12/first-sale-under-siege-if-you-bought-it-you-should-own-it</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tptacek</author><text>EFF is leaving very important details out about at least Kirtsaeng. What's happening in that case is not simply that publishers are trying to claw back rights from US consumers. Supap Kirtsaeng took advantage of discounted pricing that Wiley offered students in poorer countries to arbitrage prices. This trick is called "parallel importation" (or "grey market importation") and it's a legal grey area, especially where copyright is concerned, turning on whether owners exhaust the right <i>to import</i> on first sale.<p>In short, the defendant in Kirtsaeng is taking advantage of a discount program Wiley never intended to offer that defendant in the first place in order to subvert Wiley's whole pricing scheme. Whether Wiley can use a legal argument about first sale to stop this or not, it seems apparent that Wiley will one way or another prevent that from happening.<p>Knowing HN, these details probably don't do much to change your view of the case. But you should still want to know them! This is something the EFF used to be good at, but now is quite bad at, and despite the fact that EFF mostly supports causes I agree with, I urge you to direct your donations to ACLU or other civil liberties charities instead.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>schoen</author><text>(I work for EFF.)<p>This article is a quick end-of-year summary of two issues that have been active during the year. The description of what Kirtsaeng was doing was likely omitted for brevity, not as a cover-up. (The person who asked my coworkers to write these end-of-year posts specifically asked for short, broad summaries instead of detailed analysis.)<p>If you follow the link given in the article (<a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/parade-horribles-supreme-court-first-sale-kirtsaeng-v-wiley" rel="nofollow">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/10/parade-horribles-supre...</a>), you'll see another article from October by my colleague Parker, where he writes:<p>"Wiley claims that this doctrine only applies to goods that are manufactured in the U.S., and that the defendant, Supap Kirtsaeng, was infringing its copyright by purchasing books at a reduced rate in his native Thailand and selling them below list price in the States."<p>This description appeared on the same EFF blog (Deeplinks) where the item that you're concerned about did.<p>One of the most important aspects of the Kirtsaeng case that we've tried to get the Supreme Court to appreciate is that the plaintiff's theory would limit first sale in a wide range of situations. (One example is artworks, like paintings or manuscripts, that were produced outside of the U.S. and that were brought to the United States by their legitimate owners, who are not the copyright holders. As discussed elsewhere in this thread, there is also a question of whether publishers intending to sell works in the United States can choose the location of their manufacturing operations to make first sale a dead letter.) So even people who think that parallel importation as practiced by Supap Kirtsaeng is bad or should be restricted by law may have cause to be concerned about the Kirtsaeng case. Those consequences and concerns are the focus of this summary post.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>First Sale Under Siege: If You Bought It, You Should Own It</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/12/first-sale-under-siege-if-you-bought-it-you-should-own-it</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tptacek</author><text>EFF is leaving very important details out about at least Kirtsaeng. What's happening in that case is not simply that publishers are trying to claw back rights from US consumers. Supap Kirtsaeng took advantage of discounted pricing that Wiley offered students in poorer countries to arbitrage prices. This trick is called "parallel importation" (or "grey market importation") and it's a legal grey area, especially where copyright is concerned, turning on whether owners exhaust the right <i>to import</i> on first sale.<p>In short, the defendant in Kirtsaeng is taking advantage of a discount program Wiley never intended to offer that defendant in the first place in order to subvert Wiley's whole pricing scheme. Whether Wiley can use a legal argument about first sale to stop this or not, it seems apparent that Wiley will one way or another prevent that from happening.<p>Knowing HN, these details probably don't do much to change your view of the case. But you should still want to know them! This is something the EFF used to be good at, but now is quite bad at, and despite the fact that EFF mostly supports causes I agree with, I urge you to direct your donations to ACLU or other civil liberties charities instead.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>glesica</author><text>In a global economy, restrictions on parallel importation are destructive and backward.<p>What happened to "free trade"? I see no difference between buying something in country A and selling it in country B and buying and selling within the borders of country A.<p>As borders continue to fade away, restrictions on importation will become restrictions on first sale rights. So I really draw no distinction, personally.</text></comment>
|
8,355,790 | 8,355,635 | 1 | 2 | 8,355,049 |
train
|
<story><title>A Site That Teaches You to Code Well Enough to Get a Job</title><url>http://www.wired.com/2014/09/exercism/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>MrJagil</author><text>Excellent how this problem is continuously attempted to be solved.<p>As a wannabe programmer, one thing I always lacked from these sites was the ability to somehow see my code live. I.e. it&#x27;s fun to write html and css on codecademy or python from LPTHW or whatever but how on earth do I get it on the web or assembled into .app? In actuality, the complexity that surrounds DNS providers, server apps (or whatever you call filezilla etc), server providers (here i mean heroku, AWS, Cloudflare etc), those weird githubs and repos that people chat about etc etc, is way more deterring than actually learning what a &quot;class&quot; is.<p>Learning is fun; endless googling is not.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>GuiA</author><text>And this is why I always use PHP as an introductory language if I have to teach web dev; the setup part is much more straightforward than it is for Rails&#x2F;Django&#x2F;etc., and you don&#x27;t have to spend a ton of time teaching dozens of concepts (MVC, routes, templating, git, unit tests, ORMs, etc.) before the students can have mini web apps written.<p>Some programmers balk at the idea of teaching PHP with plain HTML&#x2F;CSS instead of teaching using Rails + Angular + all the fancy crap they like, but I&#x27;ve taught web dev to over 500+ students in the past 7+ years (and programming&#x2F;CS to about twice that), and it&#x27;s worked like a charm (and the people who get the most upset by that notion are often those who have taught 0 students).<p>My girlfriend is an art teacher, and when they teach new students they don&#x27;t start right away with watercolor or oil paints; rather, they start with materials that are easier to handle for beginners (e.g. plain pencil), so they can focus on the basics before tackling the more subtle and advanced techniques. Why are we trying to teach programming using all the fancy tools and technologies used in production systems?</text></comment>
|
<story><title>A Site That Teaches You to Code Well Enough to Get a Job</title><url>http://www.wired.com/2014/09/exercism/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>MrJagil</author><text>Excellent how this problem is continuously attempted to be solved.<p>As a wannabe programmer, one thing I always lacked from these sites was the ability to somehow see my code live. I.e. it&#x27;s fun to write html and css on codecademy or python from LPTHW or whatever but how on earth do I get it on the web or assembled into .app? In actuality, the complexity that surrounds DNS providers, server apps (or whatever you call filezilla etc), server providers (here i mean heroku, AWS, Cloudflare etc), those weird githubs and repos that people chat about etc etc, is way more deterring than actually learning what a &quot;class&quot; is.<p>Learning is fun; endless googling is not.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>pjmlp</author><text>&gt; Learning is fun; endless googling is not.<p>At least you have Google, Bing, Yahoo, ...<p>Kids these days. :)</text></comment>
|
6,803,267 | 6,803,282 | 1 | 3 | 6,802,597 |
train
|
<story><title>Web GL Ocean Simulation</title><url>http://david.li/waves/</url><text></text></story><parent_chain><item><author>randomdrake</author><text>The code is quite cool to look at. Love seeing the extensive use of matrices and mathematics to create such a beautiful and mesmerizing display.<p>If anyone is interested in playing around with it, I threw it up at JSFiddle here: <a href="http://jsfiddle.net/zyAzg/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;jsfiddle.net&#x2F;zyAzg&#x2F;</a><p>Excellent demo.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>bd</author><text>Just to clarify - the bulk of the work here is done in GLSL shaders on the GPU, not with matrices in JavaScript.<p>All that matrix code you see in the source here is basically just the minimum prerequisite for doing 3D graphics, it would be the same if you just wanted to get a spinning cube with some camera control.<p>The real magic happens in the shaders which compute water mesh displacement, normals and shading directly on the GPU (21 simulation passes + 1 rendering pass + 1 initialization pass, using several floating point textures, seems like stateful simulation with ping-ponging, basically using graphics rendering pipeline to do GPGPU without a need for OpenCL &#x2F; CUDA).</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Web GL Ocean Simulation</title><url>http://david.li/waves/</url><text></text></story><parent_chain><item><author>randomdrake</author><text>The code is quite cool to look at. Love seeing the extensive use of matrices and mathematics to create such a beautiful and mesmerizing display.<p>If anyone is interested in playing around with it, I threw it up at JSFiddle here: <a href="http://jsfiddle.net/zyAzg/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;jsfiddle.net&#x2F;zyAzg&#x2F;</a><p>Excellent demo.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nanidin</author><text>I&#x27;m not sure how I&#x27;d feel about a repost to jsfiddle without my permission if I were the original author. How is this any different than reposting xkcd or other webcomics on alternate hosting without the author&#x27;s permission?</text></comment>
|
23,856,027 | 23,856,023 | 1 | 3 | 23,855,564 |
train
|
<story><title>To Delay Death, Lift Weights</title><url>https://www.outsideonline.com/2263346/delay-death-lift-weights</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>thenanyu</author><text>I’m somewhat terrified about having wrong form and hurting myself. Is that a silly fear or should I find a coach or something?</text></item><item><author>cheald</author><text>I started with Stronglifts 5x5. It&#x27;s a good starter program if you haven&#x27;t lifted before, because it&#x27;ll give you the opportunity to drill and learn the movements, and the program is simple, and there&#x27;s an app that holds your hand.<p>In terms of programming, it has some deficiencies, but most people just need a structured program to start with. You can probably run it for 12-18 weeks and then have a strong foundation to switch to another program. People argue its deficiencies, but if it gets you started and gets you structure to build a routine with, that&#x27;s what you need, IMO.<p>For the last couple of years, I&#x27;ve been training with Jim Wendler&#x27;s 5&#x2F;3&#x2F;1 program, and it&#x27;s fantastic. I keep getting stronger and can probably happily train on it for many years to come. I&#x27;ve competed in a couple of local powerlifting meets, and have a routine that I feel like I can sustain forever. There is a 531 for Beginners program, too, but it&#x27;s less hand-holdy than Stronglifts.</text></item><item><author>627467</author><text>How did you start? Any recommended regime?</text></item><item><author>cheald</author><text>I&#x27;ve seen studies confirming the inverse relationship between strength and all cause mortality numerous times. It seems pretty well established by now.<p>Personally, I started lifting several years ago, and it&#x27;s been the greatest change in my health in my life. I lost a lot of weight, my resting heart rate is way down, everyday tasks are easier. I move better, and I just feel better overall. Plus, it&#x27;s a wonderful discipline for building determination and grit. I am certain that most people&#x27;s lives would be significantly improved by the addition of a strength training program.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>cheald</author><text>The good thing about 5x5 is that you start with minimal weights - like an empty bar - and spend your first couple of weeks training with &quot;easy&quot; weight. This time is really for you to learn the movements. There&#x27;s a wealth of information out there on how to do these movements properly. Injury is always a possibility, but if you start light and progress steadily, the risk of it is substantially diminished.<p>A coach is a great resource, but a) most trainers in gyms are not strength coaches, and range from actively harmful to wonderful, and there&#x27;s not really any way for the novice to know which they are, and b) legit strength coaches are expensive. I&#x27;d recommend self-study and starting lightly before a coach, personally, but if having a coach is the difference between you lifting and not lifting, get the coach.<p>Alan Thrall has 3 really good beginner videos on the S&#x2F;B&#x2F;D movements:<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=bs_Ej32IYgo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=bs_Ej32IYgo</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wYREQkVtvEc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=wYREQkVtvEc</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=BYKScL2sgCs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=BYKScL2sgCs</a><p>Also check out the JTS pillars series. JTS are legends in powerlifting, and these videos can really help tune up technique.<p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jtsstrength.com&#x2F;pillars-squat-technique&#x2F;?v=7516fd43adaa" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jtsstrength.com&#x2F;pillars-squat-technique&#x2F;?v=7516f...</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jtsstrength.com&#x2F;pillars-bench-technique&#x2F;?v=7516fd43adaa" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jtsstrength.com&#x2F;pillars-bench-technique&#x2F;?v=7516f...</a><p>* <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jtsstrength.com&#x2F;pillars-deadlift-technique&#x2F;?v=7516fd43adaa" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.jtsstrength.com&#x2F;pillars-deadlift-technique&#x2F;?v=75...</a><p>There&#x27;s also <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;formcheck" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.reddit.com&#x2F;r&#x2F;formcheck</a> (and r&#x2F;fitness and r&#x2F;stronglifts5x5) which can be valuable resources for getting help fixing particular problems.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>To Delay Death, Lift Weights</title><url>https://www.outsideonline.com/2263346/delay-death-lift-weights</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>thenanyu</author><text>I’m somewhat terrified about having wrong form and hurting myself. Is that a silly fear or should I find a coach or something?</text></item><item><author>cheald</author><text>I started with Stronglifts 5x5. It&#x27;s a good starter program if you haven&#x27;t lifted before, because it&#x27;ll give you the opportunity to drill and learn the movements, and the program is simple, and there&#x27;s an app that holds your hand.<p>In terms of programming, it has some deficiencies, but most people just need a structured program to start with. You can probably run it for 12-18 weeks and then have a strong foundation to switch to another program. People argue its deficiencies, but if it gets you started and gets you structure to build a routine with, that&#x27;s what you need, IMO.<p>For the last couple of years, I&#x27;ve been training with Jim Wendler&#x27;s 5&#x2F;3&#x2F;1 program, and it&#x27;s fantastic. I keep getting stronger and can probably happily train on it for many years to come. I&#x27;ve competed in a couple of local powerlifting meets, and have a routine that I feel like I can sustain forever. There is a 531 for Beginners program, too, but it&#x27;s less hand-holdy than Stronglifts.</text></item><item><author>627467</author><text>How did you start? Any recommended regime?</text></item><item><author>cheald</author><text>I&#x27;ve seen studies confirming the inverse relationship between strength and all cause mortality numerous times. It seems pretty well established by now.<p>Personally, I started lifting several years ago, and it&#x27;s been the greatest change in my health in my life. I lost a lot of weight, my resting heart rate is way down, everyday tasks are easier. I move better, and I just feel better overall. Plus, it&#x27;s a wonderful discipline for building determination and grit. I am certain that most people&#x27;s lives would be significantly improved by the addition of a strength training program.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jvolkman</author><text>If you can find a coach and that will help alleviate your fears, do it.<p>I work out in a &quot;group personal training&quot; setup where there are generally 5-8 folks lifting at a time, usually performing the same lifts on the same days, but all at different paces and levels. And we have a coach that helps with programming and offers assistance, critique, and timely doses of motivation or ridicule.</text></comment>
|
13,965,509 | 13,964,139 | 1 | 3 | 13,963,858 |
train
|
<story><title>How to Be Someone People Love to Talk To (2015)</title><url>http://time.com/3722418/become-someone-people-love-talk/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>onmobiletemp</author><text>I started paying attention to people and discovered a lot of this on my own over the course of three years. At some point i realized that whenever i talked to someone their eyes would glaze over and their face would go stony. Then theyd talk to someone else and their eyes would become focused and their face alive and animated. Laughter. I figured out this was because they didnt care about what i was saying or about my opinions. So i tried various things and looked at their eyes. Sometimes their eyes would become alive again and i could tell they cared. Slowly you learn what people want to hear. And its so true about smiling and body language, people feel uncomfortable if you dont project wellbeing. What you need to understand is that there is no logic in any of it. Humans are machines and the algorithms that they employ for attention and emotion are surprisngly uniform and very unintuitive for autists like me and you. Dont worry about the logic of whats hapenning, just think of what their algorithm is doing. Its verry dificult because you cant verify what people are thinking, you cant debug it and you cant start over -- you have to guess a lot. Overall people want to see big smiles and confident body posture. If you are slouched over people dont like it. If you stand up straight you will be amazed at how differently you are percieved. But it all has to be genuine. If youre trying to manipulate and understand people in a clinical way you will fail. All you need is a genuine desire to bond with people and the patience to pay attention to what seems to work and what doesnt.<p>I should also add that for me, and probably for most people like me, the process of figurimg out what people like and dont like is also partly a process of self discovery. Im not the kind of person thats in touch with himself. Discovering how your words impact other people will also teach you about how your mind, conciously or otherwise, reacts emotionally to the words of others. Overall ive been genuinely excited to learn about myself amd others and use that wisdom to help enjoy the presence of other people. For me its been a very productive process of growth and discovery. I think framing the problem of interpersonal relations within that context instead of the cringey, manipulative context of internet social tips really helped.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>How to Be Someone People Love to Talk To (2015)</title><url>http://time.com/3722418/become-someone-people-love-talk/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tyingq</author><text>The best bit of advice in the article:<p><i>The right question is “How do I get them talking about themselves?“</i><p>I&#x27;ve noticed that even if the only thing you do is ask someone their opinion, and listen attentively, there is some sort of distortion field effect.<p>They will often later recall you as knowledgeable, insightful, etc...even though you never did anything but ask questions.</text></comment>
|
34,279,141 | 34,276,467 | 1 | 2 | 34,272,834 |
train
|
<story><title>My bad habit of hoarding information</title><url>https://andreisurugiu.com/blog/bad-habit/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lo_zamoyski</author><text>FOMO is a sign of the vice of curiosity[0] and pride[1]. The rosier side of what you&#x27;re doing is that you seem to have a means of at least managing the impulse. Still unfocused, still not perfect, but better than pointless chasing after information.<p>Perhaps a way to break the habit is a kind of fasting and interruption: when you come across the temptation to indulge a distraction or archive that link, cut yourself off and remind yourself that all you&#x27;re doing is dissipating your energies and working against your own good and understanding. Instead of nourishing your mind through sustained commitment, you are choosing to wallow in the shallows of the shoreline. To enter the depths, you must let go the shore. That&#x27;s the decision you face here, and decisions are always a sacrificial act. You give up one thing for another.<p>[0] Curiosity here refers to a kind of &quot;information gluttony&#x2F;lust&quot;, a kind of wandering eye. It&#x27;s the same impulse that afflicts busybodies and gossips in that the desire to know has been unhinged from reason. You don&#x27;t need to know most of that stuff and most of it is of little value to you.<p>[1] Pride because there&#x27;s now way you can know everything, not in this life.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>dmreedy</author><text>I think there&#x27;s a whole lot of truth in this, but I&#x27;d also like to try to provide a complementary position, for the balance.<p>There is a kind of depth can come from focus, but this is a narrow kind of depth, one that can&#x27;t question its own premises. It&#x27;s directly analogous to the depth of a depth-first search, and has the same upsides and downsides. It&#x27;s really handy when you know your target, and when you think your heuristics for having chosen that target are pretty good.<p>Meanwhile, I think you can look at this kind of broad-spectrum curiosity as a kind of breadth-first search, again, with the same strengths and weaknesses. It definitely takes longer, and it definitely can end up amounting to not much more than wallowing. But it can also serve very well when you&#x27;re not sure what the target is, or if there even is one.<p>Furthermore, it can give access to more <i>possible</i> models, more analogies, more metaphor, more understanding-by-comparison, which in turn grants a depth of its own kind, especially in conjunction with true narrow depth of exploration. Since all models are wrong, and each model explores different facets of an idea, having more models gives you a broader set of tools for taking a given concept and applying it to specific areas. They may not be useful in the given moment, but they may lead to unpredictable and insightful connections later on.<p>But of course, to your point, that all comes at the risk of never getting far enough along to apply anything in the first place. But I do believe there is a place for each. Feynman spinning plates in the cafeteria and all that.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>My bad habit of hoarding information</title><url>https://andreisurugiu.com/blog/bad-habit/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lo_zamoyski</author><text>FOMO is a sign of the vice of curiosity[0] and pride[1]. The rosier side of what you&#x27;re doing is that you seem to have a means of at least managing the impulse. Still unfocused, still not perfect, but better than pointless chasing after information.<p>Perhaps a way to break the habit is a kind of fasting and interruption: when you come across the temptation to indulge a distraction or archive that link, cut yourself off and remind yourself that all you&#x27;re doing is dissipating your energies and working against your own good and understanding. Instead of nourishing your mind through sustained commitment, you are choosing to wallow in the shallows of the shoreline. To enter the depths, you must let go the shore. That&#x27;s the decision you face here, and decisions are always a sacrificial act. You give up one thing for another.<p>[0] Curiosity here refers to a kind of &quot;information gluttony&#x2F;lust&quot;, a kind of wandering eye. It&#x27;s the same impulse that afflicts busybodies and gossips in that the desire to know has been unhinged from reason. You don&#x27;t need to know most of that stuff and most of it is of little value to you.<p>[1] Pride because there&#x27;s now way you can know everything, not in this life.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>abnry</author><text>This comment pulled me in and I&#x27;ve reread it several times. Tere is a lot of truth here. I appreciate how information hoarding can be a sign of status seeking. More knowledge, more skill, more times being the person who just knows the answer. Fear (of missing out) is a classic symptom of status seeking.<p>The problem is that some degree of information hoarding has paid off for me. It sometimes really does improve your skill and impress your peers. Aside from fasting type interventions, what I think is needed in addition to this is some form of wisdom relating to knowing what is valuable to hoard, read, or study. It&#x27;s like drinking alcohol. If you are getting drunk all the time it is probably a good idea to stop completely. But there are real benefits of social drinking.<p>This makes me convinced I need more skill in establishing and recognizing priorities when it comes to information gathering.</text></comment>
|
36,198,806 | 36,198,528 | 1 | 3 | 36,197,569 |
train
|
<story><title>SEC Accuses Binance of Mishandling Funds and Lying to Regulators</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/business/sec-binance-charges.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>methodical</author><text>Every time a crypto article is posted there are one of two people in the comments; those acknowledging yet another failure in a continuous display of cryptocurrency&#x27;s blatant inability to be a valid currency, and those who mindlessly still think there&#x27;s any hope for cryptocurrency to be a global currency.<p>Those who say that CEXs aren&#x27;t part of the core values of cryptocurrency are right, except also completely ignorant to the fact that without CEXs, crypto&#x27;s usability as a currency is practically 0.<p>CEXs have failed, hardware wallets have failed, soft wallets have failed, seed phrases are fundamentally problematic, etc.<p>Cryptocurrency won&#x27;t ever be functional on a large-scale as a global currency, and that much is evident. It&#x27;s not even a matter of opinion; the core idea of decentralization which &quot;makes crypto great&quot; makes it unusable as a currency for the vast majority of people- who would need to rely on some centralized authority in order for crypto to operate within the real world.<p>Anybody left in the space must just be hanging onto greater fool theory, that or has drank the kool-aid.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>SEC Accuses Binance of Mishandling Funds and Lying to Regulators</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/05/business/sec-binance-charges.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>gadnuk</author><text>&gt; In one instance, the Binance chief compliance officer messaged a colleague that, “[w]e are operating as a fking unlicensed securities exchange in the USA bro.”<p>Source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;JohnReedStark&#x2F;status&#x2F;1665748594421297152" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;JohnReedStark&#x2F;status&#x2F;1665748594421297152</a><p>Is there any player in this space that plays by the rules? CZ going the way of SBF. Tether next?</text></comment>
|
35,701,043 | 35,699,846 | 1 | 2 | 35,688,221 |
train
|
<story><title>GUI development with Rust and GTK 4</title><url>https://gtk-rs.org/gtk4-rs/stable/latest/book/hello_world.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>nu11ptr</author><text>AFAIK, for better or worse, this is the only UI crate (other than HTML-like UI using something like Tauri) that provides a full set of widgets&#x2F;capabilities on Rust. Every other UI lib is incomplete in some way or falls short for anything other than a toy or specialty type app in my experience.<p>UPDATE: Things I have my eye on as they mature: Slint, egui, and iced. I&#x27;m especially watching iced as Pop_os is using it for their DE and likely will add quite a few widgets.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>captainmuon</author><text>For me the litmus test is if it has a fully-featured listview or treeview, so you can do something like a file browser, a library app, or other kinds of data-heavy apps. Also important is that keyboard and mouse work as expected (tabbing, shift-selection, etc).<p>Bonus if it supports the current &quot;native&quot; OS paradigms. E.g. on Mac: transparent sidebar, integrated titlebar, on Windows: MS office 2022 style simplified toolbar&#x2F;ribbon, and WinUI styling. Note that even the official modern APIs themselves (SwiftUI and WinUI) don&#x27;t do everything that first party apps can do.<p>Gtk doesn&#x27;t look native anywhere but at least it has a very complete widget set and has been around for a while.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>GUI development with Rust and GTK 4</title><url>https://gtk-rs.org/gtk4-rs/stable/latest/book/hello_world.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>nu11ptr</author><text>AFAIK, for better or worse, this is the only UI crate (other than HTML-like UI using something like Tauri) that provides a full set of widgets&#x2F;capabilities on Rust. Every other UI lib is incomplete in some way or falls short for anything other than a toy or specialty type app in my experience.<p>UPDATE: Things I have my eye on as they mature: Slint, egui, and iced. I&#x27;m especially watching iced as Pop_os is using it for their DE and likely will add quite a few widgets.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>overthrow</author><text>I think egui is complete enough to use in real apps. Layout can be a bit weird, but I haven&#x27;t found anything that&#x27;s impossible.<p>I might even prefer it for cross-platform apps since startup time is so slow for GTK on Windows.</text></comment>
|
37,642,452 | 37,642,743 | 1 | 2 | 37,641,660 |
train
|
<story><title>I moved states just before the return-to-office order at Amazon, so I quit</title><url>https://www.businessinsider.com/i-quit-return-to-office-order-amazon-rto-2023-9</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tedivm</author><text>Any company that forces a return to office is going to lose some of their best employees, as those are the ones who will have the easiest time finding a better job. RTO is basically just a backdoor layoff, only they end up losing the people they should be desperate to keep. What&#x27;s worse is there&#x27;s no good reason for it, it&#x27;s just a power play by execs who are kind of bad at their jobs.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>I moved states just before the return-to-office order at Amazon, so I quit</title><url>https://www.businessinsider.com/i-quit-return-to-office-order-amazon-rto-2023-9</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>steveBK123</author><text>There are job tiers, especially if you have two working spouses, where full RTO for one if the other can stay remote could mean it&#x27;s cheaper just to have one spouse stop working.<p>Another factor is always housing.
My spouse is on a team with a bunch of people that essentially relocated out of commute range during COVID. If you don&#x27;t need to be within 45min train of SF&#x2F;NYC, you can save 25-75% on housing, and probably have lower income tax rate too. A lot of these people also bought housing at 3% mortgage rates which would need to be replaced with a 7% mortgage. $200K in say PA outside Philly or CT outside Greenwich tier is absolutely killing it. $200k in Manhattan&#x2F;Jersey City is permanent renter status, maybe 2 bedroom if lucky.<p>I&#x27;d also say that there was a 2 year peak of hopefulness that big tech jobs would become a national phenomenon.. rather than crowding all the good paying jobs into a few zip codes where you need to pay everyone a ton so they can piss all that money on overpriced housing. Yet here we are, the economy has turned and companies having the upper hand want to go back to 2019.</text></comment>
|
35,471,312 | 35,471,668 | 1 | 3 | 35,468,304 |
train
|
<story><title>Meta Releases New AI-Based Photo Segmentation Tool to Everybody</title><url>https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/04/meta-introduces-ai-model-that-can-isolate-and-mask-objects-within-images/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>bick_nyers</author><text>Somewhat tangential question, have you looked for&#x2F;found any audio models&#x2F;tools that can be used for separating out individual voices to separate audio tracks automatically? Perhaps this is already possible with existing tools that I am uninitiated in.</text></item><item><author>graderjs</author><text>I relly hope Meta (FB research) releases this wonderful noise reduction library: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;facebookresearch&#x2F;denoiser">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;facebookresearch&#x2F;denoiser</a><p>I tested MANY while building various audio tech and this was by far the best (beats the shit out of all the python Pandas Hugging Face lists etc). Incredibly ability to cut noise (tho, it must be noted that perceptual improvements for humans do not usually increase machine transcription as AI models strangely seem to pull info out of the dead space between words, and the noise around words...not just the voiced words themselves...the hidden vibrations, beyond our human ken, oh mere mortals unworthy of the grand perceptive machines...ugh...:p :o ;p xx ;p)<p>I contacted the authors via their FB emails but never heard back. Right now it&#x27;s non-commercial and I was building a commercial product.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>bane</author><text>That&#x27;s called &quot;speaker diarization&quot; and there&#x27;s quite a bit of work in the field. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;topics&#x2F;speaker-diarization">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;topics&#x2F;speaker-diarization</a><p>I have no idea what&#x27;s good or the best, but there&#x27;s a starting point!</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Meta Releases New AI-Based Photo Segmentation Tool to Everybody</title><url>https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/04/meta-introduces-ai-model-that-can-isolate-and-mask-objects-within-images/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>bick_nyers</author><text>Somewhat tangential question, have you looked for&#x2F;found any audio models&#x2F;tools that can be used for separating out individual voices to separate audio tracks automatically? Perhaps this is already possible with existing tools that I am uninitiated in.</text></item><item><author>graderjs</author><text>I relly hope Meta (FB research) releases this wonderful noise reduction library: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;facebookresearch&#x2F;denoiser">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;facebookresearch&#x2F;denoiser</a><p>I tested MANY while building various audio tech and this was by far the best (beats the shit out of all the python Pandas Hugging Face lists etc). Incredibly ability to cut noise (tho, it must be noted that perceptual improvements for humans do not usually increase machine transcription as AI models strangely seem to pull info out of the dead space between words, and the noise around words...not just the voiced words themselves...the hidden vibrations, beyond our human ken, oh mere mortals unworthy of the grand perceptive machines...ugh...:p :o ;p xx ;p)<p>I contacted the authors via their FB emails but never heard back. Right now it&#x27;s non-commercial and I was building a commercial product.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>rahimnathwani</author><text><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;speechbrain.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;latest&#x2F;API&#x2F;speechbrain.lobes.models.ECAPA_TDNN.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;speechbrain.readthedocs.io&#x2F;en&#x2F;latest&#x2F;API&#x2F;speechbrain...</a></text></comment>
|
32,447,669 | 32,447,767 | 1 | 2 | 32,447,339 |
train
|
<story><title>The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root access on macOS</title><url>https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/12/23303411/zoom-defcon-root-access-privilege-escalation-hack-patrick-wardle</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>anyfoo</author><text>Note that if SIP is enabled (the default), &quot;root access&quot; does not mean full compromise. On macOS, root is far from being as privileged as it was in the old days of UNIX yore. (Even on Linux it does not have to be, but my impression is that on most distributions it probably still is.)<p>Just because you&#x27;re root does not mean you get any entitlement you want, or arbitrary access to the whole filesystem, arbitrary memory access (a la &#x2F;dev&#x2F;(k)mem), or can replace the kernel just like that.<p>(That&#x27;s also probably why you don&#x27;t hear of iPhones being &quot;rooted&quot;, but rather &quot;jailbroken&quot;. Just being root on an iPhone wouldn&#x27;t do that much.)<p>Make no mistake, this is still a privilege escalation attack and needs to be fixed.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>userbinator</author><text>I read your first 8 words and was momentarily confused because I thought you were referring to <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Session_Initiation_Protocol" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Session_Initiation_Protocol</a> , and can indeed join Zoom meetings with a standard SIP client, but it&#x27;s an optional paid feature --- nonetheless likely to be available in a corporate environment. Look for the IP address to dial in meeting invites to see if you have that option.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The Zoom installer let a researcher hack his way to root access on macOS</title><url>https://www.theverge.com/2022/8/12/23303411/zoom-defcon-root-access-privilege-escalation-hack-patrick-wardle</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>anyfoo</author><text>Note that if SIP is enabled (the default), &quot;root access&quot; does not mean full compromise. On macOS, root is far from being as privileged as it was in the old days of UNIX yore. (Even on Linux it does not have to be, but my impression is that on most distributions it probably still is.)<p>Just because you&#x27;re root does not mean you get any entitlement you want, or arbitrary access to the whole filesystem, arbitrary memory access (a la &#x2F;dev&#x2F;(k)mem), or can replace the kernel just like that.<p>(That&#x27;s also probably why you don&#x27;t hear of iPhones being &quot;rooted&quot;, but rather &quot;jailbroken&quot;. Just being root on an iPhone wouldn&#x27;t do that much.)<p>Make no mistake, this is still a privilege escalation attack and needs to be fixed.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jbverschoor</author><text>I don’t need root access.. just your .ssh dir</text></comment>
|
16,596,761 | 16,596,115 | 1 | 3 | 16,594,742 |
train
|
<story><title>A billion reasons never to buy IBM services</title><url>https://foliovision.com/2018/03/why-not-buy-ibm</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Naga</author><text>There&#x27;s a dimension left out here on the Phoenix disaster: It wasn&#x27;t really IBM&#x27;s fault at all.<p>The Canadian public service is really complex. There are multiple unions with multiple overlapping collective bargaining agreements, where the public service is allocated to different classes. These classes are paid specific rates, with retroactive pay being common for changing classes. The majority of the problems with Phoenix have been employees moving from their classes and being paid the correct amount. It has also adversely affected non-unionized positions.<p>My understanding is that the Harper government (Prime Minister until 2015), who was responsible for the negotiation and for laying out the requirements, was trying to save a money and not responibly create a pay system. Two major factors that jump out at me:<p>1) Requirements did not call for training. The system was implemented and IBM was not required to train any operators on how the system functions, which is important because all new staff were hired to run the system and,<p>2) Due to the need for cost saving measures (the government was trying <i>really hard</i> to balance the budget, as the election was coming up), the previous payroll staff were <i>terminated</i> and a new payroll centre was opened in Miramichi, which is a small town in the middle of nowhere.<p>So, on top of new software, the government lost all of its institutional knowledge regarding payroll and how things are supposed to work. It&#x27;s actually hard to say how much of this is IBM&#x27;s fault and how much is the governments, because the government <i>doesn&#x27;t know</i> how to fix it. No one knows how Phoenix works and no one knows how it is supposed to work. It&#x27;s just a big mess with no end in sight.<p>Could IBM have done a better job? Probably, but garbage in, garbage out.<p>For further reading, the Auditor-General&#x27;s report: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oag-bvg.gc.ca&#x2F;internet&#x2F;English&#x2F;parl_oag_201711_01_e_42666.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oag-bvg.gc.ca&#x2F;internet&#x2F;English&#x2F;parl_oag_201711_01...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>danmaz74</author><text>&gt; There&#x27;s a dimension left out here on the Phoenix disaster: It wasn&#x27;t really IBM&#x27;s fault at all.<p>I respectfully disagree. IBM management either knew what they were contracting was a recipe for disaster, or they were incompetent. In both cases, as they were supposed to be the billion-dollar expert on the matter, they bear great responsibility for this failure.<p>And at an industry level, companies that promise the impossible push out of the market more honest ones, and they deserve all the bad PR IBM is getting on this one.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>A billion reasons never to buy IBM services</title><url>https://foliovision.com/2018/03/why-not-buy-ibm</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Naga</author><text>There&#x27;s a dimension left out here on the Phoenix disaster: It wasn&#x27;t really IBM&#x27;s fault at all.<p>The Canadian public service is really complex. There are multiple unions with multiple overlapping collective bargaining agreements, where the public service is allocated to different classes. These classes are paid specific rates, with retroactive pay being common for changing classes. The majority of the problems with Phoenix have been employees moving from their classes and being paid the correct amount. It has also adversely affected non-unionized positions.<p>My understanding is that the Harper government (Prime Minister until 2015), who was responsible for the negotiation and for laying out the requirements, was trying to save a money and not responibly create a pay system. Two major factors that jump out at me:<p>1) Requirements did not call for training. The system was implemented and IBM was not required to train any operators on how the system functions, which is important because all new staff were hired to run the system and,<p>2) Due to the need for cost saving measures (the government was trying <i>really hard</i> to balance the budget, as the election was coming up), the previous payroll staff were <i>terminated</i> and a new payroll centre was opened in Miramichi, which is a small town in the middle of nowhere.<p>So, on top of new software, the government lost all of its institutional knowledge regarding payroll and how things are supposed to work. It&#x27;s actually hard to say how much of this is IBM&#x27;s fault and how much is the governments, because the government <i>doesn&#x27;t know</i> how to fix it. No one knows how Phoenix works and no one knows how it is supposed to work. It&#x27;s just a big mess with no end in sight.<p>Could IBM have done a better job? Probably, but garbage in, garbage out.<p>For further reading, the Auditor-General&#x27;s report: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oag-bvg.gc.ca&#x2F;internet&#x2F;English&#x2F;parl_oag_201711_01_e_42666.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.oag-bvg.gc.ca&#x2F;internet&#x2F;English&#x2F;parl_oag_201711_01...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>GnarfGnarf</author><text>I concur. What I&#x27;m hearing is that the Canadian Federal payroll is extremely complex (like all government payrolls, I suppose). The Harper gov&#x27;t justified the system by laying off everyone who knew the old payroll system.<p>The software developed by IBM was so complex, that it required the expertise of the people who got laid off to operate it. The novices who took over didn&#x27;t know how to make the software work, and chaos ensued.<p>The Canadian government is as much at fault as the developers on this one. (I speak as one who is paying for this fiasco :o).</text></comment>
|
36,926,210 | 36,925,527 | 1 | 2 | 36,920,622 |
train
|
<story><title>If we want a shift to walking we need to prioritize dignity</title><url>https://streets.mn/2023/07/19/if-we-want-a-shift-to-walking-we-need-to-prioritize-dignity/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>fnimick</author><text>I had a conversation recently with someone lamenting that we didn&#x27;t have roads like LA here in Boston. Saying their ideal road was 3 lanes, plus a bike lane, plus a bus lane in each direction. Imagine being a pedestrian trying to cross that!<p>I really don&#x27;t understand someone who looks at that traffic disaster and wants to build the same thing here at home.</text></item><item><author>grecy</author><text>Every time a politician anywhere in the world suggests adding more freeways or more lanes to freeways, I think they should be forced to live in LA for a year and do a ~1 hour commute each way in traffic.<p>They need to see first hand what happens when you just add more freeways and more lanes. It&#x27;s not good.</text></item><item><author>tvaughan</author><text>&gt; I often find myself trying to explain to people back home just how miserable and even humiliating the pedestrian experience is here.<p>Same. I’ve lived in Los Ángeles and Amsterdam, and it is impossible to explain to my friends and family just how awful the quality of life is in LA precisely because of the difference in attitudes and priorities over cars. Perhaps some have “nicer” (aka bigger) houses in LA than they would have in Ámsterdam, but once they leave their front door everything is objectively worse</text></item><item><author>degrews</author><text>I moved from Spain to the US, and I often find myself trying to explain to people back home just how miserable and even humiliating the pedestrian experience is here.<p>Here are some other examples of things that I think contribute to the hostile walking experience in the US:<p>* Cars parked in short driveways often extend all the way across the sidewalk. Even if you can easily step off onto the road to walk around them (not all pedestrians can), it just feels like a slap in the face to have to do that.<p>* Cars have much higher and stronger headlights, with the high beams often left on, and drivers are generally much less mindful of them. As a pedestrian walking at night on under-lit streets, you are constantly getting blinded.<p>* Tinted windows (even the mild level of tint that most cars in the US have). The whole experience of being a lone vulnerable pedestrian among a sea of cars is made even worse when you can&#x27;t see the people in the cars (but you know they can see you).<p>* Often the only option to get food late at night are fast food places, which become drive-thru only after a certain time. Having to go through the drive-thru on foot is obviously a terrible experience, and they will often refuse to even serve you.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>kevin_thibedeau</author><text>They&#x27;re a car-centric person who wants the &quot;nuisance&quot; of bikes and busses out of their way while still pretending to have progressive values. People who only drive from garage to shopping center and back, never having to experience the dehumanizing impact of 6+ lanes affecting other transport modes.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>If we want a shift to walking we need to prioritize dignity</title><url>https://streets.mn/2023/07/19/if-we-want-a-shift-to-walking-we-need-to-prioritize-dignity/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>fnimick</author><text>I had a conversation recently with someone lamenting that we didn&#x27;t have roads like LA here in Boston. Saying their ideal road was 3 lanes, plus a bike lane, plus a bus lane in each direction. Imagine being a pedestrian trying to cross that!<p>I really don&#x27;t understand someone who looks at that traffic disaster and wants to build the same thing here at home.</text></item><item><author>grecy</author><text>Every time a politician anywhere in the world suggests adding more freeways or more lanes to freeways, I think they should be forced to live in LA for a year and do a ~1 hour commute each way in traffic.<p>They need to see first hand what happens when you just add more freeways and more lanes. It&#x27;s not good.</text></item><item><author>tvaughan</author><text>&gt; I often find myself trying to explain to people back home just how miserable and even humiliating the pedestrian experience is here.<p>Same. I’ve lived in Los Ángeles and Amsterdam, and it is impossible to explain to my friends and family just how awful the quality of life is in LA precisely because of the difference in attitudes and priorities over cars. Perhaps some have “nicer” (aka bigger) houses in LA than they would have in Ámsterdam, but once they leave their front door everything is objectively worse</text></item><item><author>degrews</author><text>I moved from Spain to the US, and I often find myself trying to explain to people back home just how miserable and even humiliating the pedestrian experience is here.<p>Here are some other examples of things that I think contribute to the hostile walking experience in the US:<p>* Cars parked in short driveways often extend all the way across the sidewalk. Even if you can easily step off onto the road to walk around them (not all pedestrians can), it just feels like a slap in the face to have to do that.<p>* Cars have much higher and stronger headlights, with the high beams often left on, and drivers are generally much less mindful of them. As a pedestrian walking at night on under-lit streets, you are constantly getting blinded.<p>* Tinted windows (even the mild level of tint that most cars in the US have). The whole experience of being a lone vulnerable pedestrian among a sea of cars is made even worse when you can&#x27;t see the people in the cars (but you know they can see you).<p>* Often the only option to get food late at night are fast food places, which become drive-thru only after a certain time. Having to go through the drive-thru on foot is obviously a terrible experience, and they will often refuse to even serve you.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Gibbon1</author><text>I feel like the more modes of transportation you mix together the worse the cognitive load on people. And it get rapidly worse the higher the density.<p>Inside of a mall where there are only pedestrians is very safe. Freeways are fairly safe. Protected bike lanes are safe. Light rail is safe.<p>Mix all of those on a strode, rail, buses, trucks, cars, bicycles, pedestrians, not safe.</text></comment>
|
38,633,681 | 38,633,819 | 1 | 2 | 38,632,492 |
train
|
<story><title>SMERF: Streamable Memory Efficient Radiance Fields</title><url>https://smerf-3d.github.io/</url><text>We built SMERF, a new way for exploring NeRFs in real-time in your web browser. Try it out yourself!<p>Over the last few months, my collaborators and I have put together a new, real-time method that makes NeRF models accessible from smartphones, laptops, and low-power desktops, and we think we’ve done a pretty stellar job! SMERF, as we like to call it, distills a large, high quality NeRF into a real-time, streaming-ready representation that’s easily deployed to devices as small as a smartphone via the web browser.<p>On top of that, our models look great! Compared to other real-time methods, SMERF has higher accuracy than ever before. On large multi-room scenes, SMERF renders are nearly indistinguishable from state-of-the-art offline models like Zip-NeRF and a solid leap ahead of other approaches.<p>The best part: you can try it out yourself! Check out our project website for demos and more.<p>If you have any questions or feedback, don’t hesitate to reach out by email ([email protected]) or Twitter (@duck).</text></story><parent_chain><item><author>nightpool</author><text>The refigerator in the NYC scene has a very slick specular lighting effect based on the angle you&#x27;re viewing it from, and if you go &quot;into&quot; the fridge you can see it&#x27;s actually generating a whole 3d scene with blurry grey and white colors that turn out to precisely mimic the effects of the light from the windows bouncing off the metal, and you can look &quot;out&quot; from the fridge into the rest of the room. Same as the full-length mirror in the bedroom in the same scene—there&#x27;s a whole virtual &quot;mirror room&quot; that&#x27;s been built out behind the mirror to give the illusion of depth as you look through it. Very cool and unique consequence of the technology</text></item><item><author>barrkel</author><text>The mirror on the wall of the bathroom in the Berlin location looks through to the kitchen in the next room. I guess the depth gauging algorithm uses parallax, and mirrors confuse it, seeming like windows. The kitchen has a blob of blurriness as the rear of the mirror intrudes into kitchen, but you can see through the blurriness to either room.<p>The effect is a bit spooky. I felt like a ghost going through walls.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>pavlov</author><text>Wow, thanks for the tip. Fridge reflection world is so cool. Feels like something David Lynch might dream up.<p>A girl is eating her morning cereal. Suddenly she looks apprehensively at the fridge. Camera dollies towards the appliance and seamlessly penetrates the reflective surface, revealing a deep hidden space that exactly matches the reflection. At the dark end of the tunnel, something stirs... A wildly grinning man takes a step forward and screams.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>SMERF: Streamable Memory Efficient Radiance Fields</title><url>https://smerf-3d.github.io/</url><text>We built SMERF, a new way for exploring NeRFs in real-time in your web browser. Try it out yourself!<p>Over the last few months, my collaborators and I have put together a new, real-time method that makes NeRF models accessible from smartphones, laptops, and low-power desktops, and we think we’ve done a pretty stellar job! SMERF, as we like to call it, distills a large, high quality NeRF into a real-time, streaming-ready representation that’s easily deployed to devices as small as a smartphone via the web browser.<p>On top of that, our models look great! Compared to other real-time methods, SMERF has higher accuracy than ever before. On large multi-room scenes, SMERF renders are nearly indistinguishable from state-of-the-art offline models like Zip-NeRF and a solid leap ahead of other approaches.<p>The best part: you can try it out yourself! Check out our project website for demos and more.<p>If you have any questions or feedback, don’t hesitate to reach out by email ([email protected]) or Twitter (@duck).</text></story><parent_chain><item><author>nightpool</author><text>The refigerator in the NYC scene has a very slick specular lighting effect based on the angle you&#x27;re viewing it from, and if you go &quot;into&quot; the fridge you can see it&#x27;s actually generating a whole 3d scene with blurry grey and white colors that turn out to precisely mimic the effects of the light from the windows bouncing off the metal, and you can look &quot;out&quot; from the fridge into the rest of the room. Same as the full-length mirror in the bedroom in the same scene—there&#x27;s a whole virtual &quot;mirror room&quot; that&#x27;s been built out behind the mirror to give the illusion of depth as you look through it. Very cool and unique consequence of the technology</text></item><item><author>barrkel</author><text>The mirror on the wall of the bathroom in the Berlin location looks through to the kitchen in the next room. I guess the depth gauging algorithm uses parallax, and mirrors confuse it, seeming like windows. The kitchen has a blob of blurriness as the rear of the mirror intrudes into kitchen, but you can see through the blurriness to either room.<p>The effect is a bit spooky. I felt like a ghost going through walls.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>TaylorAlexander</author><text>Oh wow yeah. It&#x27;s interesting because when I look at the fridge my eye maps that to &quot;this is a reflective surface&quot;, which makes sense because that&#x27;s true in the source images, but then it&#x27;s actually rendered as a cavity with appropriate features rendered in 3D space. What&#x27;s a strange feeling is to enter the fridge and then turn around! I just watched Hbomberguy&#x27;s Patreon-only video on the video game Myst, and in Myst the characters are trapped in books. If you choose the wrong path at the end of the game you get trapped in a book, and the view you get trapped in a book looks very similar to the view from inside the NYC fridge!</text></comment>
|
24,370,520 | 24,370,563 | 1 | 3 | 24,369,233 |
train
|
<story><title>Daniel Stenberg (curl) has been denied entry to the US for 870 days</title><url>https://daniel.haxx.se/us-visa.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dwheeler</author><text>This is absurd. I&#x27;m a US citizen, so I&#x27;ll contact my Congressman to have his staff look into it. I don&#x27;t have any special power, any US citizen can contact their congressman, but maybe that will kick-start something.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>awalton</author><text>Unless you&#x27;re a billionaire who can actually get a Congressperson on the phone, you&#x27;re burning cycles. They&#x27;ve got an army of staff that do nothing but write stock replies, print and sign documents with stamps and mail them back to constituents.<p>That&#x27;s what involvement in our government has become in America - a bunch of people shouting into an endless void, and the people in power doing more or less whatever fits their needs most at that particular moment.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Daniel Stenberg (curl) has been denied entry to the US for 870 days</title><url>https://daniel.haxx.se/us-visa.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dwheeler</author><text>This is absurd. I&#x27;m a US citizen, so I&#x27;ll contact my Congressman to have his staff look into it. I don&#x27;t have any special power, any US citizen can contact their congressman, but maybe that will kick-start something.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>peter303</author><text>Careful. You could end up on a no-fly list or worse for consorting with persona non grata. (I am paranoid)</text></comment>
|
16,828,245 | 16,828,026 | 1 | 2 | 16,826,431 |
train
|
<story><title>SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round</title><url>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-12/spacex-s-valuation-climbs-to-25-billion-with-new-funding-round</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>z3t4</author><text>It&#x27;s kinda sad that social media and advertising is the most lucrative businesses and so many bright minds work on that instead of for example ...</text></item><item><author>goatherders</author><text>If you guys think social media and advertising is big business, wait until commercial space flight clicks.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>fsloth</author><text>&quot;It&#x27;s kinda sad that social media and advertising is the most lucrative businesses and so many bright minds work on that instead of for example ...&quot;<p>So, how would you employ the engineers instead?<p>Industrial society is about producing garbage for the masses to consume. The huge churn of capital and labor creates as it&#x27;s byproducts from time to time items of actual human value.<p>But those things would be fragile and complicated without the industrial economy surrounding them. If we look at this stage in our species history from far away, currently the industrial economy is <i>supposed to be</i> predictable and mundane.<p>So, &quot;producing useless crap&quot; is a required feature of our economy so it can occasionally produce science, art, medicine and the other things that actually improve us as a species.<p>Now, consumer goods fall into two categories: physical and digital. Physical consumer society is turning our biosphere to shit. Digital commodities, on the other hand, are much more lenient on the environment.<p>So, if we look at it this way, and presume that producing consumer crap is necessary for economic growth and stability, it&#x27;s much better to work in producing digital goods and services rather than physical ones.<p>Within this framework, the actual question is not why do the brightest minds work at facebooks, but, will our economy ever develop beyond the point where producing useless crap is not so much a necessity for systemic stability rather than an occasional indulgence.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>SpaceX's Valuation Climbs to $25B with New Funding Round</title><url>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-12/spacex-s-valuation-climbs-to-25-billion-with-new-funding-round</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>z3t4</author><text>It&#x27;s kinda sad that social media and advertising is the most lucrative businesses and so many bright minds work on that instead of for example ...</text></item><item><author>goatherders</author><text>If you guys think social media and advertising is big business, wait until commercial space flight clicks.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>icc97</author><text>Plus unfortunately Musk is fairly well known for underpaying his staff. So you have to choose to take a paycut to switch from Google &#x2F; Facebook. To be fair all of Apple&#x2F;Amazon&#x2F;Microsoft do at least sell actual products.<p>Perhaps this is why Google &#x2F; Facebook open source so much of what they do, so that talented engineers don&#x27;t just have to say &#x27;I get paid to make people click&#x27;.</text></comment>
|
25,382,485 | 25,382,357 | 1 | 2 | 25,381,889 |
train
|
<story><title>Toyota plans to be the first company to sell an EV with a solid-state battery</title><url>https://asia.nikkei.com/content/4c8b11d1c65d83d23ba9aeb11030a947</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>conk</author><text>I don’t see how any car battery charges in 10 minutes. Assuming a 75 kWh battery in the car, charging in 10 minute means providing 450,000 watts for 10 minutes. At 1000V (higher than any DC charger today) would require 450 amps of current. The wire needed to provide 450A would be unmanageable for a car charger. And this is all assuming 100% efficiency, when in reality there will be various losses from charger to battery.<p>Battery tech aside, how does any auto maker plan to get 10 minute charge time when just getting they much power through a cable is a huge challenge.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>aetherspawn</author><text>Hi, engineer from an electric vehicle company here.<p>This is not an issue because, even if a small wire is used, the efficiency loss is not all that considerable. Energy is cheap, so liquid cooling the cables and dissipating i.e. 5% of the energy into the conductor is a straightforward trade-off.<p>Compare that trivially to petrol, which costs petrol (diesel) to move to petrol stations, and it&#x27;s actually not that surprising.<p>Additionally, there has recently been a lot of investment into EV chargers with built-in batteries that charge at slower rates when a vehicle is not present, and operate independently from the grid once a vehicle is connected. This answers the obvious question about infrastructure to deliver the power required.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Toyota plans to be the first company to sell an EV with a solid-state battery</title><url>https://asia.nikkei.com/content/4c8b11d1c65d83d23ba9aeb11030a947</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>conk</author><text>I don’t see how any car battery charges in 10 minutes. Assuming a 75 kWh battery in the car, charging in 10 minute means providing 450,000 watts for 10 minutes. At 1000V (higher than any DC charger today) would require 450 amps of current. The wire needed to provide 450A would be unmanageable for a car charger. And this is all assuming 100% efficiency, when in reality there will be various losses from charger to battery.<p>Battery tech aside, how does any auto maker plan to get 10 minute charge time when just getting they much power through a cable is a huge challenge.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>gpm</author><text>I&#x27;m confused about why you think <i>the wire</i> would be a challenge. I&#x27;m not at all knowledgeable about high voltage&#x2F;power stuff like this so maybe I&#x27;m missing something?<p>A quick search tells me that 1000 kcmil wire is rated for 450 amps [1].<p>Another quick search finds that reasonably sized 1000 kcmil rated for 15000 volts are available and reasonably sized for a vehicle charger [2].<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiresizecalculator.net&#x2F;wiresizechart.htm" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiresizecalculator.net&#x2F;wiresizechart.htm</a><p>[2] (note that kcmil and mcm mean the same things) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lighting-gallery.net&#x2F;gallery&#x2F;displayimage.php?pos=-137753" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lighting-gallery.net&#x2F;gallery&#x2F;displayimage.php?po...</a></text></comment>
|
12,455,736 | 12,455,120 | 1 | 2 | 12,453,311 |
train
|
<story><title>The End of Headphone Jacks, the Rise of DRM</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/end-headphone-jacks-rise-drm</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dTal</author><text>&gt;If you&#x27;re old enough to have used a floppy disk drive you do not miss them.<p>I am, and I do. Floppies were ubiquitous, durable, reusable, and cheap enough to give away. There&#x27;s no replacement today - flash drives are the closest thing but when was the last time someone handed you one with no expectation of getting it back? Or bought a box of 50?<p>Sneakernet became much less vibrant with the death of the floppy.</text></item><item><author>stinkytaco</author><text>Floppy disks, optical disks, ethernet were all replaced by unencumbered standards and they all lead to a superior experience (well, maybe not ethernet, but there are definitly advantages to wireless). If you&#x27;re old enough to have used a floppy disk drive you do not miss them.<p>Any time you introduce two way communication, you introduce the possibility of DRM, but that does not guarantee it. I can still use my HDMI with my linux PC. DRM is exclusive of the technology and I see no reason to hold back the technology because we are worried about DRM.<p>There are lots of compelling reasons to dislike this change. Among them the fact that I have a large investment in traditional headphones and devices that work well with them (my iPod, my HTC Phone, my stereo, TV, piano, guitar amp, etc etc etc), a decrease in quality, convenience and weight of wireless headsets (how long do they work? How much do they weigh? Can I swim or workout with them?). But DRM is not automatic.</text></item><item><author>wfo</author><text>Apple has been very good at predicting (or perhaps directly causing) the demise of certain technologies: the disk drive, the CD drive, the ethernet port. They removed them much to the chagrin of many a loyal customer, and a few years later they nearly ceased to exist across the entire industry (we&#x27;re still waiting on the ethernet port to go away but give it time).<p>How many times will it take you forgetting your dongle to just pony up and buy the apple approved headphones? How long will it take you using the non-default, non-apple, non-sleek, clunky dongle as you show off your fancy new iPhone 7 to your friends before you decide it&#x27;s got to go? What if they&#x27;re using it the apple-intended way?<p>How long will it take before nobody buys headphones anymore? A few generations until they deprecate the dongle since nobody is using it? Where you can no longer buy a $10 set of headphones at a drugstore and plug them in? Where &#x27;every audio device must provide analog audio output in a universal format that every device has been able to read since audio was invented or it is functionally useless&#x27; is no longer a maxim?<p>Long-term, we are giving up a universal and open protocol that all devices work with for a proprietary one. If you don&#x27;t expect companies to abuse this to make money and to stop you from doing what you want with your equipment, well, I&#x27;ve got a bridge to sell you.</text></item><item><author>mead5432</author><text>I understand the argument that forcing content through a proprietary jack opens the door for controlling said content and has huge implications for hardware manufacturers and the way people use their stuff.<p>What I am having a hard time understanding is why is that any different than the OS influencing what gets sent to the 3.5mm jack? It isn&#x27;t like apps running in iOS had to interact with APIs to do all the other things (e.g. camera) but not the jack. Is it?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>astrodust</author><text>Flash drives cost almost nothing. I&#x27;m not going to lose any sleep over a $4 flash drive being given to someone and never getting it back. In terms of inflation that&#x27;s <i>cheaper</i> than giving someone a floppy that cost $1.<p>Floppy disks were always terrible. Slow, unreliable, prone to failure at the worst possible time. A simple magnet could trash them beyond repair. A bit of water could render them unreadable. Leave it loose in your bag and it gets bent? The thing was toast.<p>In the dying days of the floppy disk, around the time Apple introduced the iMac with no floppy drive, they were already obsolete. 1.44MB could barely hold anything useful at that time, most people doing any serious exchange had already moved on to Zip drives because they held a more reasonable 100MB, or CD-R since you could burn six times more than that onto them. If you had tiny WordPerfect files then floppies were adequate, barely, but what kind of a market is that?<p>So long floppy. You won&#x27;t be missed.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The End of Headphone Jacks, the Rise of DRM</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/09/end-headphone-jacks-rise-drm</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dTal</author><text>&gt;If you&#x27;re old enough to have used a floppy disk drive you do not miss them.<p>I am, and I do. Floppies were ubiquitous, durable, reusable, and cheap enough to give away. There&#x27;s no replacement today - flash drives are the closest thing but when was the last time someone handed you one with no expectation of getting it back? Or bought a box of 50?<p>Sneakernet became much less vibrant with the death of the floppy.</text></item><item><author>stinkytaco</author><text>Floppy disks, optical disks, ethernet were all replaced by unencumbered standards and they all lead to a superior experience (well, maybe not ethernet, but there are definitly advantages to wireless). If you&#x27;re old enough to have used a floppy disk drive you do not miss them.<p>Any time you introduce two way communication, you introduce the possibility of DRM, but that does not guarantee it. I can still use my HDMI with my linux PC. DRM is exclusive of the technology and I see no reason to hold back the technology because we are worried about DRM.<p>There are lots of compelling reasons to dislike this change. Among them the fact that I have a large investment in traditional headphones and devices that work well with them (my iPod, my HTC Phone, my stereo, TV, piano, guitar amp, etc etc etc), a decrease in quality, convenience and weight of wireless headsets (how long do they work? How much do they weigh? Can I swim or workout with them?). But DRM is not automatic.</text></item><item><author>wfo</author><text>Apple has been very good at predicting (or perhaps directly causing) the demise of certain technologies: the disk drive, the CD drive, the ethernet port. They removed them much to the chagrin of many a loyal customer, and a few years later they nearly ceased to exist across the entire industry (we&#x27;re still waiting on the ethernet port to go away but give it time).<p>How many times will it take you forgetting your dongle to just pony up and buy the apple approved headphones? How long will it take you using the non-default, non-apple, non-sleek, clunky dongle as you show off your fancy new iPhone 7 to your friends before you decide it&#x27;s got to go? What if they&#x27;re using it the apple-intended way?<p>How long will it take before nobody buys headphones anymore? A few generations until they deprecate the dongle since nobody is using it? Where you can no longer buy a $10 set of headphones at a drugstore and plug them in? Where &#x27;every audio device must provide analog audio output in a universal format that every device has been able to read since audio was invented or it is functionally useless&#x27; is no longer a maxim?<p>Long-term, we are giving up a universal and open protocol that all devices work with for a proprietary one. If you don&#x27;t expect companies to abuse this to make money and to stop you from doing what you want with your equipment, well, I&#x27;ve got a bridge to sell you.</text></item><item><author>mead5432</author><text>I understand the argument that forcing content through a proprietary jack opens the door for controlling said content and has huge implications for hardware manufacturers and the way people use their stuff.<p>What I am having a hard time understanding is why is that any different than the OS influencing what gets sent to the 3.5mm jack? It isn&#x27;t like apps running in iOS had to interact with APIs to do all the other things (e.g. camera) but not the jack. Is it?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>thomnottom</author><text>I&#x27;ll give you 3 of those points, but definitely not durable. Some of them lasted a long time, and some of them stopped working before I could finish writing to them. And since writing to them was painfully slow, something frequently went wrong.<p>Of course with flash drives we can wait the short time it typically takes someone to copy the contents off to get it back. And since they can hold significantly more data, they are also far more reusable.</text></comment>
|
22,570,983 | 22,570,990 | 1 | 3 | 22,570,909 |
train
|
<story><title>Bill Gates has stepped down from Microsoft's board</title><url>https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/microsoft-announces-change-to-its-board-of-directors-301023293.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>chollida1</author><text>Also stepped down from the Berkshire board as well.<p>Given that he stepped away from a day to day role in 2008 and then stepped down as the chairman in 2014, I&#x27;m guessing he&#x27;s focusing on his foundation.<p>He&#x27;s still the 8th largest shareholder according to Bloomberg&#x27;s records(103,000,000 share), which is pretty impressive given that the 7 entities above him are all funds.<p>Incase you wanted to know who the remaining 12 board members are:<p>With Gates’ departure, the Board will consist of 12 members, including John W. Thompson, Microsoft independent chair; Reid Hoffman, partner at Greylock Partners; Hugh Johnston, vice chairman and chief financial officer of PepsiCo; Teri L. List-Stoll, executive vice president and chief financial officer of Gap, Inc.; Satya Nadella, chief executive officer of Microsoft; Sandra E. Peterson, operating partner, Clayton, Dubilier &amp; Rice; Penny Pritzker, founder and chairman, PSP Partners; Charles W. Scharf, chief executive officer and president of Wells Fargo &amp; Co.; Arne Sorenson, president and CEO, Marriott International Inc.; John W. Stanton, chairman of Trilogy Equity Partners; Emma Walmsley, CEO of GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK); and Padmasree Warrior, founder, CEO and president, Fable Group Inc.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Bill Gates has stepped down from Microsoft's board</title><url>https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/microsoft-announces-change-to-its-board-of-directors-301023293.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jimbob45</author><text>Whichever poster it was the other day saying that this was the optimal time to send out bad news as a company seems to have been astute.</text></comment>
|
25,815,526 | 25,815,063 | 1 | 3 | 25,810,427 |
train
|
<story><title>The values of Emacs, the Neovim revolution, and the VSCode gorilla</title><url>https://www.murilopereira.com/the-values-of-emacs-the-neovim-revolution-and-the-vscode-gorilla/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>emptysongglass</author><text>I don&#x27;t understand why people are moving Linux --&gt; Windows. At the company I work for everything is native to Linux--I am floored by the number of interns we get who are using Windows (it&#x27;s <i>all</i> of them). We have an intake script for getting them up on WSL2 with our stack on top but man these graduates are CompSci people and they did 4 plus years of CompSci using Windows? I can only imagine the pain. Or rather, I know the pain since I have occasionally dipped my toes back into that world of hurt.<p>A non-WSL2 Windows person doesn&#x27;t get the benefits of Nix, usually doesn&#x27;t live life on the shell (since every Windows program is gui first), doesn&#x27;t do dotfiles management (you can but paths for the git Atlassian method are non-obvious), ssh password protected keys are a PITA...good God I could go on ad nauseum.<p>I work in this industry because I love computing. But these Windows jockeys I dunno I get the feeling they don&#x27;t necessarily love computing? Or in the way that it&#x27;s this mundane tool for the production of money-points that they can then exchange for money. I also am receiving the money-points and it is good. But lemme crack open your head and pour in the <i>magic</i> y&#x27;know?</text></item><item><author>hibbelig</author><text>It&#x27;s very interesting. I used Emacs for a long time, but slowly got weaned off it.<p>- I used it for email, then I had to collaborate with people who wrote &quot;please see my comments in orange below&quot;. (Of course, they were Outlook users.) Emacs did not show that orange color, so I didn&#x27;t know... Maybe these days it&#x27;s possible to read Outlook emails nicely in Emacs.<p>- I used it for development, then the Java software I worked on got too big to internalize all APIs and Eclipse completion and refactoring really helped. I did try to build the Eclipse &quot;quickfix&quot; thing in Emacs, but all I got done was to add a missing import (because JDEE, I think it was, provided that functionality).<p>- I switched from Linux to Windows because the world around me was like that, and so I could help junior colleagues with their EOL problems...<p>- I used Mercurial (hg) for a while and TortoiseHg was really nice, so I didn&#x27;t feel the need to use Emacs for this.<p>It&#x27;s a pity, really. Some aspect here, some aspect there, and then you get pulled away from Emacs.<p>Now, with LSP, perhaps Emacs could offer code completion and refactoring, but the Java app I work on builds with gradle, and I have no clue how to tell the Java&#x2F;LSP thing about the class path... So I&#x27;m on IntelliJ...</text></item><item><author>submeta</author><text>When you finally learn to master and config Emacs, you run circles around all other editors. Emacs is so much more than just an editor. But even if you only use it for coding: Magit is the best git client I have used in years (coming from PyCharm + Git Tower App, which is nice), then there‘s Ztree-Diff (excellent folder diff tool; previously using Kaleidoscope app), then Eshell for interacting with the server from within Emacs (programmatically if you like), Tramp for remote editing, excellent integration of ripgrep and silversearcher (ag) into Emacs for code navigation, yasnippet as an excellent templates&#x2F;snippet manager, and many more packages.<p>What makes Emacs exceptional is you can link all these packages together, create your own workflows by scripting Emacs in Lisp. And I write the docu in Emacs in org-mode, with org-babel I can run shell-scripts &#x2F; python-scripts and other code in my org-file and see the output underneath it (like Jupyter notebooks), link to code fragments in my org files etc<p>I manage several projects with it and switch contexts with one key-combination: Vagrant box is started, project folder is changed, necessary files opened, ready to hack, build, deploy, do server restarts with a single key stroke.<p>I think VS Code is a nice coding environment with good defaults and many things done right (compare installing packages in VS Code to Sublime! What an improvement) but nowhere near the capabilities and the productivity of Emacs.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>BeetleB</author><text>&gt; But these Windows jockeys I dunno I get the feeling they don&#x27;t necessarily love computing?<p>When I was younger, I wanted to work in places that had a passion for these types of things.<p>Older me realized that was a bad idea. It inevitably seeps into things unrelated to doing the actual work (even performance reviews via 360 feedback). People are paid to do a job, and I&#x27;ve found that whether they love computing or not is mostly orthogonal. Sure, there are some that are wiz&#x27;s because of it, but they&#x27;re usually neutralized by those who become ideological and inflexible because of it.<p>Tangentially related: I&#x27;m a Linux guy - it&#x27;s been my primary OS for almost 20 years now. However, at my current company, I prefer roles that don&#x27;t involve Linux. The reason is they typically will not give me my own machine - I&#x27;ll merely get an account on some server, with a poor window manager, and missing a lot of the nicer tools I use on my home machine, and no superuser privileges. In the last job I had, their provided Emacs was a little too old for some of the features I used, and I had to compile my own Emacs from scratch (along with tens of other dependent packages). This was time wasted for me and the company. At least on my Windows machine at work, I have Admin privileges and can make things nicer.<p>Paradoxically, it is <i>because</i> I&#x27;m a &quot;hard core&quot; Linux user that I prefer Windows for work. I&#x27;ve optimized my Linux workflow, and if my work cannot provide me my preferred tools&#x2F;window managers, I might as well just use Windows.<p>I don&#x27;t even use WSL. I use xonsh, which works fairly well on Windows. I have multiple desktops on Windows. And most importantly, I live in Emacs which for the most part works just as it would in Linux :-)<p>(And no, using&#x2F;installing Emacs on Windows is not a pain, despite what you often hear - the last time I did it some months ago, it was literally &quot;Download and unzip into directory and you&#x27;re good to go.&quot;)</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The values of Emacs, the Neovim revolution, and the VSCode gorilla</title><url>https://www.murilopereira.com/the-values-of-emacs-the-neovim-revolution-and-the-vscode-gorilla/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>emptysongglass</author><text>I don&#x27;t understand why people are moving Linux --&gt; Windows. At the company I work for everything is native to Linux--I am floored by the number of interns we get who are using Windows (it&#x27;s <i>all</i> of them). We have an intake script for getting them up on WSL2 with our stack on top but man these graduates are CompSci people and they did 4 plus years of CompSci using Windows? I can only imagine the pain. Or rather, I know the pain since I have occasionally dipped my toes back into that world of hurt.<p>A non-WSL2 Windows person doesn&#x27;t get the benefits of Nix, usually doesn&#x27;t live life on the shell (since every Windows program is gui first), doesn&#x27;t do dotfiles management (you can but paths for the git Atlassian method are non-obvious), ssh password protected keys are a PITA...good God I could go on ad nauseum.<p>I work in this industry because I love computing. But these Windows jockeys I dunno I get the feeling they don&#x27;t necessarily love computing? Or in the way that it&#x27;s this mundane tool for the production of money-points that they can then exchange for money. I also am receiving the money-points and it is good. But lemme crack open your head and pour in the <i>magic</i> y&#x27;know?</text></item><item><author>hibbelig</author><text>It&#x27;s very interesting. I used Emacs for a long time, but slowly got weaned off it.<p>- I used it for email, then I had to collaborate with people who wrote &quot;please see my comments in orange below&quot;. (Of course, they were Outlook users.) Emacs did not show that orange color, so I didn&#x27;t know... Maybe these days it&#x27;s possible to read Outlook emails nicely in Emacs.<p>- I used it for development, then the Java software I worked on got too big to internalize all APIs and Eclipse completion and refactoring really helped. I did try to build the Eclipse &quot;quickfix&quot; thing in Emacs, but all I got done was to add a missing import (because JDEE, I think it was, provided that functionality).<p>- I switched from Linux to Windows because the world around me was like that, and so I could help junior colleagues with their EOL problems...<p>- I used Mercurial (hg) for a while and TortoiseHg was really nice, so I didn&#x27;t feel the need to use Emacs for this.<p>It&#x27;s a pity, really. Some aspect here, some aspect there, and then you get pulled away from Emacs.<p>Now, with LSP, perhaps Emacs could offer code completion and refactoring, but the Java app I work on builds with gradle, and I have no clue how to tell the Java&#x2F;LSP thing about the class path... So I&#x27;m on IntelliJ...</text></item><item><author>submeta</author><text>When you finally learn to master and config Emacs, you run circles around all other editors. Emacs is so much more than just an editor. But even if you only use it for coding: Magit is the best git client I have used in years (coming from PyCharm + Git Tower App, which is nice), then there‘s Ztree-Diff (excellent folder diff tool; previously using Kaleidoscope app), then Eshell for interacting with the server from within Emacs (programmatically if you like), Tramp for remote editing, excellent integration of ripgrep and silversearcher (ag) into Emacs for code navigation, yasnippet as an excellent templates&#x2F;snippet manager, and many more packages.<p>What makes Emacs exceptional is you can link all these packages together, create your own workflows by scripting Emacs in Lisp. And I write the docu in Emacs in org-mode, with org-babel I can run shell-scripts &#x2F; python-scripts and other code in my org-file and see the output underneath it (like Jupyter notebooks), link to code fragments in my org files etc<p>I manage several projects with it and switch contexts with one key-combination: Vagrant box is started, project folder is changed, necessary files opened, ready to hack, build, deploy, do server restarts with a single key stroke.<p>I think VS Code is a nice coding environment with good defaults and many things done right (compare installing packages in VS Code to Sublime! What an improvement) but nowhere near the capabilities and the productivity of Emacs.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>spamizbad</author><text>Having used all 3 major platforms, for me the developer experience in Linux really is the best. And I say this as someone currently trapped on MacOS. For personal hacking I use an older Dell XPS15 w&#x2F;Ubuntu and it’s like a breath of fresh air every time I dig into a project. Containers just seem to work so much faster, there’s fewer weird things, no hiccups, and things like git and Emacs scream compared to Windows.<p>I totally get why people prefer Mac and Windows outside of software development. But as a working developer it’s really worth the effort, if given the option, to invest in learning Linux and developing on it.<p>Interns doing the whole WSL thing makes me cringe. Not great for your career IMO unless you plan on making a quick exit from the dev side of things.<p>This might be a controversial take, but I feel like A “worse” developer with a solid workflow in Linux will appear more productive than a somewhat more skilled developer getting dragged down by WSLisms.</text></comment>
|
40,804,354 | 40,804,323 | 1 | 3 | 40,802,676 |
train
|
<story><title>Figma Slides</title><url>https://www.figma.com/slides/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Andrew_nenakhov</author><text>&gt; I use animation a lot,<p>My personal preference is the opposite: I came to hate presentations that use animations. Any presentation that can&#x27;t be presented in static pdf is a presentation I&#x27;d rather miss.</text></item><item><author>yoz</author><text>At my previous job we used Google Slides, and I rapidly came to hate it. Here&#x27;s why Figma Slides has me excited:<p>- I use animation a lot, for many reasons, such as keeping audience focus on parts of the slide and visually explaining information changes and multi-step processes. It&#x27;s particularly helpful for video. Figma already has much better tools for this; Google&#x27;s are not particularly powerful and buggy as hell.<p>- Consistency. Google Slides will sometimes render the same text object with wrapping at different points on different machines. I shouldn&#x27;t have to manually add line breaks to deal with this.<p>- Precision and flexibility. Google Slides just isn&#x27;t anywhere near as smooth at design work as Figma. I don&#x27;t even consider myself a designer and yet I regularly hit Google Slides&#x27;s limitations.<p>- Layer&#x2F;object lists. (Note: I don&#x27;t see this in the Figma Slides demos, but I assume it&#x27;s available in design mode?) Once you have a bunch of shapes on a slide, especially grouped, it makes selection so much easier. I don&#x27;t want to play click roulette when trying to select one object from a pile.<p>(If you&#x27;re wondering why I&#x27;m focused on Google Slides: Apple Keynote is great but can&#x27;t collaborate through Google Workspace. I haven&#x27;t used PowerPoint much, it&#x27;s okay.)<p>UPDATE: I&#x27;ve now done a little playing with Figma Slides.<p>The good news is that it has an object list. But it&#x27;s only in Design Mode. (So it won&#x27;t be available to free or non-designer accounts - that&#x27;s a Figma thing.)<p>The bad news is that <i>in this beta</i> the animation tools are even less flexible than Google Slides: you can only choose from a limited set of transitions; those transitions apply to the entire slide, not to individual objects; and there&#x27;s no way to change the timing or easing. However, &quot;smart animate&quot; is one of the transitions, which does a Magic-Move-like &quot;move the objects in slide 1 to their positions in slide 2&quot;.<p>(Note the emphasis on <i>this beta</i>. Figma Slides won&#x27;t be considered GA until next year, so I&#x27;m hoping that all the animation tools from regular Figma will be available by then.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>cantSpellSober</author><text>There&#x27;s useful animations—guiding the audience that something has changed for ex.<p>Then there&#x27;s the terrible animations—a gif of a meme playing in an infinite loop. These make the slide unwatchable for me.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Figma Slides</title><url>https://www.figma.com/slides/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Andrew_nenakhov</author><text>&gt; I use animation a lot,<p>My personal preference is the opposite: I came to hate presentations that use animations. Any presentation that can&#x27;t be presented in static pdf is a presentation I&#x27;d rather miss.</text></item><item><author>yoz</author><text>At my previous job we used Google Slides, and I rapidly came to hate it. Here&#x27;s why Figma Slides has me excited:<p>- I use animation a lot, for many reasons, such as keeping audience focus on parts of the slide and visually explaining information changes and multi-step processes. It&#x27;s particularly helpful for video. Figma already has much better tools for this; Google&#x27;s are not particularly powerful and buggy as hell.<p>- Consistency. Google Slides will sometimes render the same text object with wrapping at different points on different machines. I shouldn&#x27;t have to manually add line breaks to deal with this.<p>- Precision and flexibility. Google Slides just isn&#x27;t anywhere near as smooth at design work as Figma. I don&#x27;t even consider myself a designer and yet I regularly hit Google Slides&#x27;s limitations.<p>- Layer&#x2F;object lists. (Note: I don&#x27;t see this in the Figma Slides demos, but I assume it&#x27;s available in design mode?) Once you have a bunch of shapes on a slide, especially grouped, it makes selection so much easier. I don&#x27;t want to play click roulette when trying to select one object from a pile.<p>(If you&#x27;re wondering why I&#x27;m focused on Google Slides: Apple Keynote is great but can&#x27;t collaborate through Google Workspace. I haven&#x27;t used PowerPoint much, it&#x27;s okay.)<p>UPDATE: I&#x27;ve now done a little playing with Figma Slides.<p>The good news is that it has an object list. But it&#x27;s only in Design Mode. (So it won&#x27;t be available to free or non-designer accounts - that&#x27;s a Figma thing.)<p>The bad news is that <i>in this beta</i> the animation tools are even less flexible than Google Slides: you can only choose from a limited set of transitions; those transitions apply to the entire slide, not to individual objects; and there&#x27;s no way to change the timing or easing. However, &quot;smart animate&quot; is one of the transitions, which does a Magic-Move-like &quot;move the objects in slide 1 to their positions in slide 2&quot;.<p>(Note the emphasis on <i>this beta</i>. Figma Slides won&#x27;t be considered GA until next year, so I&#x27;m hoping that all the animation tools from regular Figma will be available by then.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>matsemann</author><text>It&#x27;s not PowerPoint ala 97 with spinning text. It&#x27;s highlights or a story based presentation where thing unfolds, or perhaps interacting with something without leaving the slides. Adjusting parameters in a graph. Which is hard to do in Google. The end result of each slide could still be compiled to a static pdf. Think like a 3bluebrown video, or numberphile or something. You don&#x27;t want static for all kinds of presentations, that&#x27;s hyperbole.</text></comment>
|
37,608,594 | 37,608,025 | 1 | 3 | 37,602,239 |
train
|
<story><title>NASA’s Webb finds carbon source on surface of Jupiter’s moon Europa</title><url>https://webbtelescope.org/contents/news-releases/2023/news-2023-113</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jychang</author><text>Every once in a while, I get reminded that people don’t necessarily have a scientific background.<p>1. Water molecules are not indivisible, of course. Many biological processes will rip apart hydrogen and oxygen, or combine them back together, and have been doing so for billions of years. Industrial processes do the same. So there’s plenty of “new water” from oxygen in the air, etc.<p>2. New water&#x2F;oxygen&#x2F;hydrogen land on earth fairly regularly due to comets, which are usually slushy balls of ice.</text></item><item><author>dmix</author><text>&gt; a fascinating world with a salty, subsurface ocean of liquid water—possibly twice as much as in all of Earth’s oceans combined.<p>If we brought water back a container of water from Europa would this be the largest amount of new water entering the earth since planets struck it billions of years ago?<p>I briefly googled it (I dont know much about this stuff tbh):<p>&gt; The water on our Earth today is the same water that’s been here for nearly 5 billion years. So far, we haven’t managed to create any new water, and just a tiny fraction of our water has managed to escape out into space. The only thing that changes is the form that water takes as it travels through the water cycle.<p>Anyway interesting thought experiment.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>bmitc</author><text>&gt; Every once in a while, I get reminded that people don’t necessarily have a scientific background.<p>This isn&#x27;t necessary for your point and detracts from an otherwise useful clarification.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>NASA’s Webb finds carbon source on surface of Jupiter’s moon Europa</title><url>https://webbtelescope.org/contents/news-releases/2023/news-2023-113</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jychang</author><text>Every once in a while, I get reminded that people don’t necessarily have a scientific background.<p>1. Water molecules are not indivisible, of course. Many biological processes will rip apart hydrogen and oxygen, or combine them back together, and have been doing so for billions of years. Industrial processes do the same. So there’s plenty of “new water” from oxygen in the air, etc.<p>2. New water&#x2F;oxygen&#x2F;hydrogen land on earth fairly regularly due to comets, which are usually slushy balls of ice.</text></item><item><author>dmix</author><text>&gt; a fascinating world with a salty, subsurface ocean of liquid water—possibly twice as much as in all of Earth’s oceans combined.<p>If we brought water back a container of water from Europa would this be the largest amount of new water entering the earth since planets struck it billions of years ago?<p>I briefly googled it (I dont know much about this stuff tbh):<p>&gt; The water on our Earth today is the same water that’s been here for nearly 5 billion years. So far, we haven’t managed to create any new water, and just a tiny fraction of our water has managed to escape out into space. The only thing that changes is the form that water takes as it travels through the water cycle.<p>Anyway interesting thought experiment.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jvm___</author><text>Is the water I drink the same water I pee? Or does it get taken apart and put back together with different pieces?</text></comment>
|
28,635,140 | 28,635,208 | 1 | 2 | 28,634,027 |
train
|
<story><title>Apple's Texas-Sized Problem</title><url>https://daringfireball.net/linked/2021/09/23/apple-texas-sized-problem</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>BitwiseFool</author><text>I know this is nowadays seen as a naive or counter-productive, but I like Unix Philosophy ideal of do one thing, and do it well. I want a business to focus on their business, not on social change or influencing policy. I&#x27;m weary of how all these corporate giants are coming together and trying to influence state laws after they&#x27;ve been passed. For two main reasons, one, I would like these companies to focus on what they actually provide, rather than this modern progressive &#x27;everything is political, all the time&#x27; mindset. Two, Apple isn&#x27;t democratically elected and I don&#x27;t know if any accountability structures exist for such activism. What gives Apple <i>more</i> of a right to counter what the duly elected representatives of a state government have enacted, than the voters of that state themselves?<p>For all it&#x27;s horrible flaws, this was something passed by the Texas government. I can at least understand the structural justification for the law. People voted for a state representative, state senator, and a governor who signed the bill. The authority and responsibility is clear. The feedback mechanism is also clear - vote. And, I do hope a lot of them lose their seats as a result of the backlash. But again, I think the power to address this Texas-Sized problem should primarily be in the hands of Texans, rather than giant multinationals like Apple.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nostrademons</author><text>The thing is that this isn&#x27;t companies influencing state law. This is companies deciding <i>who</i> and <i>where</i> they do business. In many cases valued employees are going to quit and join a company not in Texas if their employer does not give them the option of transferring to a non-Texas office, so the company has a vested economic interest in retaining them and locating their offices in some place where this will not be an issue.<p>You have every right to be an asshole, but you don&#x27;t have a right to make other people put up with it. If you&#x27;re going to enact something that a large swath of your population finds deeply offensive, don&#x27;t be surprised if they <i>leave</i>, and don&#x27;t be surprised if the economic activity they generate leaves with them.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Apple's Texas-Sized Problem</title><url>https://daringfireball.net/linked/2021/09/23/apple-texas-sized-problem</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>BitwiseFool</author><text>I know this is nowadays seen as a naive or counter-productive, but I like Unix Philosophy ideal of do one thing, and do it well. I want a business to focus on their business, not on social change or influencing policy. I&#x27;m weary of how all these corporate giants are coming together and trying to influence state laws after they&#x27;ve been passed. For two main reasons, one, I would like these companies to focus on what they actually provide, rather than this modern progressive &#x27;everything is political, all the time&#x27; mindset. Two, Apple isn&#x27;t democratically elected and I don&#x27;t know if any accountability structures exist for such activism. What gives Apple <i>more</i> of a right to counter what the duly elected representatives of a state government have enacted, than the voters of that state themselves?<p>For all it&#x27;s horrible flaws, this was something passed by the Texas government. I can at least understand the structural justification for the law. People voted for a state representative, state senator, and a governor who signed the bill. The authority and responsibility is clear. The feedback mechanism is also clear - vote. And, I do hope a lot of them lose their seats as a result of the backlash. But again, I think the power to address this Texas-Sized problem should primarily be in the hands of Texans, rather than giant multinationals like Apple.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>VictorPath</author><text>&gt; I want a business to focus on their business, not on social change or influencing policy.<p>Well you&#x27;re a little late on that, business has been influencing policy since the East India company was chartered in 1600.<p>I&#x27;m perplexed how people don&#x27;t perceive business has been influencing policy for centuries until they start intervening recently for employees who are women and what have you.</text></comment>
|
33,389,912 | 33,387,727 | 1 | 2 | 33,354,355 |
train
|
<story><title>Variability, not repetition, is the key to mastery</title><url>https://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2022/10/26/variable-mastery/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>ChrisMarshallNY</author><text>In my own experience, it has required <i>both</i> repetition, <i>and</i> variability.<p>I learn something new, every day, but what I learn, and how it is implemented, is highly dependent upon the phase my project is in.<p>Right now, the project I&#x27;m working on is in the &quot;home stretch.&quot; There&#x27;s still a <i>lot</i> more work needs doing, but it&#x27;s fairly predictable, well-practiced stuff.<p>Getting to this point, though, has involved two years of researching alternative approaches, strategic and tactical designs and decisions, pivots, backpedalling, and bug-fixing.<p>And every day, I have been writing Swift code. Most of the time, I&#x27;m using the same techniques as I was yesterday, but, every now and then, I try something different. Sometimes, that becomes a new habit.<p>In my personal opinion, there&#x27;s really nothing like developing and releasing shipping applications to provide a rich experience in both repetition, and variance.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Variability, not repetition, is the key to mastery</title><url>https://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2022/10/26/variable-mastery/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>gre</author><text>A common tactic in practicing music is to play a passage slowed down, sped up, with varying rhythms, up&#x2F;down an octave, etc, with the idea that if you have complete mastery you can also play it the way it&#x27;s written.</text></comment>
|
10,985,583 | 10,985,212 | 1 | 2 | 10,984,251 |
train
|
<story><title>Facebook Climbs to 1.59B Users, Beats Q4 Estimates with $5.8B Revenue</title><url>http://techcrunch.com/2016/01/27/facebook-earnings-q4-2015/#.kqfyhh:2YGM</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>physcab</author><text>Here&#x27;s the thing that most people don&#x27;t know unless they are in the &quot;industry&quot;:<p>* The gaming industry is most likely driving a lot of this growth. I&#x27;m sure Machine Zone and Supercell are doing between $5M - $10M a day on FB alone.<p>* FB is re-defining attribution. They want to bring in big brands and are re-defining last-click to &quot;Multi-touch&quot;. Their end game ofcourse is to say the reason why you decided to make a trip to Macys is because you first saw Macys content on FB.<p>* FB <i>requires</i> developers to send them analytics when they want attribution for Ads. This means that not only does FB have info about the install, but they have all the data about the usage, in addition to all their demographic data.<p>* FB <i>still</i> is the only reliable source for advanced targeting of ads. This has massive impact on ROI for performance marketers.<p>* FB by far has the best tools for advertisers with so many bells and whistles that resellers like Nanigans can make a healthy margin just by managing the optimization.<p>* FB allows any performance marketer to form a closed loop feedback system. Are CPI&#x27;s on FB high? Yes. But if you know the LTV of your user (now possible with proliferation of analytics tools) you can afford to bid very high at volume (eg Uber) and still get a great ROI.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Facebook Climbs to 1.59B Users, Beats Q4 Estimates with $5.8B Revenue</title><url>http://techcrunch.com/2016/01/27/facebook-earnings-q4-2015/#.kqfyhh:2YGM</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jrcii</author><text>Hopefully for their investors&#x27; sake that revenue isn&#x27;t significantly driven by click fraud, a rumor that&#x27;s been circulating for years <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;thesocialmediamonthly.com&#x2F;startup-ceo-alleges-massive-click-fraud-on-facebook&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;thesocialmediamonthly.com&#x2F;startup-ceo-alleges-massive...</a><p>* Is anyone aware of evidence of the extent of click fraud on Facebook? I see a lot of discussion about it but not a lot of data.</text></comment>
|
986,818 | 986,762 | 1 | 2 | 986,716 |
train
|
<story><title>Schneier's response to Eric Schmidt</title><url>http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/12/my_reaction_to.html</url><text></text></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>ekiru</author><text>It's very nice for Bruce Schneier to express opposition to invasion of privacy. I agree with him. But unless I totally misunderstand Schmidt's comments, Schmidt is not suggesting people should not make love to their wives, for example, but rather, that if you are going to do something that you don't want the government to know about you, you shouldn't give it to someone that is legally obligated to tell the government about it if they ask.<p>Regardless of how Google feels about privacy, it's unreasonable to expect them to martyr themselves for our sakes when the Department of Justice or the FBI knock on their door with a subpoena. The way to protect your privacy is to not tell people things you don't want them to know(or to use Tor or the like).<p>Edit: fixed a minor typo</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Schneier's response to Eric Schmidt</title><url>http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/12/my_reaction_to.html</url><text></text></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>maudineormsby</author><text>What a fantastic last paragraph. Something from the original essay that was left out:<p>"A future in which privacy would face constant assault was so alien to the framers of the Constitution that it never occurred to them to call out privacy as an explicit right. Privacy was inherent to the nobility of their being and their cause. Of course being watched in your own home was unreasonable. Watching at all was an act so unseemly as to be inconceivable among gentlemen in their day. You watched convicted criminals, not free citizens. You ruled your own home. It's intrinsic to the concept of liberty."<p>Foucault argued that the very act of being watched was dehumanizing. Google shouldn't watch us because it violates our rights, but because it's <i>evil</i>.</text></comment>
|
25,031,821 | 25,031,348 | 1 | 3 | 25,029,974 |
train
|
<story><title>Looking for Voter Fraud (In Old Elections) with Data Visualization</title><url>https://probablydance.com/2020/11/08/looking-for-voter-fraud-in-old-elections-with-data-visualization/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tastyfreeze</author><text>Yes that is how it should be. Each state has different interests. By having electoral votes based on population we are not avoiding the problem of population centers directing the country.<p>How is electing a president different than votes for a constitutional amendment? Each state gets one vote there.</text></item><item><author>maxerickson</author><text>So take a step back. Why would (the people of&#x2F;in) California and Texas and so on choose to support such a republic?<p>As it is you&#x27;ve defined a circle. &quot;It&#x27;s a republic so it should be run based just on the borders of the constituents&quot;.</text></item><item><author>tastyfreeze</author><text>Because they are all states that should have an equal say in what president is elected. A republic of states is beholden to the states. Each state is beholden to its population.</text></item><item><author>maxerickson</author><text>That would be less democratic (small d) than the current system.<p>Do you have some reason that Wyoming should actually have an equal say with New York or Texas or Florida or California?</text></item><item><author>tastyfreeze</author><text>I have been thinking that maybe states should get an equal number of electoral votes. We would get the protection of the electoral college and every state would have an equal say.</text></item><item><author>Glyptodon</author><text>Always keep in mind that however distorted the electoral college is, that distortion is tremendously magnified by the cap on the size of the US house of Representatives and the fact that the Constitution specifies a lower bound for district population but no upper bound.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>majormajor</author><text>Why do you believe &quot;population centers directing the country&quot; is a bigger problem than &quot;arbitrary historical boundaries directing the country?&quot;<p>If you replace the euphemism &quot;population centers&quot; with the word &quot;people&quot; you get &quot;the problem of people directing the country&quot;... which doesn&#x27;t sound like a problem to me compared to the minority direction we have today.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Looking for Voter Fraud (In Old Elections) with Data Visualization</title><url>https://probablydance.com/2020/11/08/looking-for-voter-fraud-in-old-elections-with-data-visualization/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tastyfreeze</author><text>Yes that is how it should be. Each state has different interests. By having electoral votes based on population we are not avoiding the problem of population centers directing the country.<p>How is electing a president different than votes for a constitutional amendment? Each state gets one vote there.</text></item><item><author>maxerickson</author><text>So take a step back. Why would (the people of&#x2F;in) California and Texas and so on choose to support such a republic?<p>As it is you&#x27;ve defined a circle. &quot;It&#x27;s a republic so it should be run based just on the borders of the constituents&quot;.</text></item><item><author>tastyfreeze</author><text>Because they are all states that should have an equal say in what president is elected. A republic of states is beholden to the states. Each state is beholden to its population.</text></item><item><author>maxerickson</author><text>That would be less democratic (small d) than the current system.<p>Do you have some reason that Wyoming should actually have an equal say with New York or Texas or Florida or California?</text></item><item><author>tastyfreeze</author><text>I have been thinking that maybe states should get an equal number of electoral votes. We would get the protection of the electoral college and every state would have an equal say.</text></item><item><author>Glyptodon</author><text>Always keep in mind that however distorted the electoral college is, that distortion is tremendously magnified by the cap on the size of the US house of Representatives and the fact that the Constitution specifies a lower bound for district population but no upper bound.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>maxerickson</author><text>Well, for one thing, the foundational document that the states used to establish the union has different rules for electing president than for modifying the union.<p>You aren&#x27;t arguing that part of it, the part where people (likely) wouldn&#x27;t put up with the system you propose.</text></comment>
|
31,062,979 | 31,062,832 | 1 | 2 | 31,061,138 |
train
|
<story><title>What does “shitty job” mean in the low-skill, low-pay world?</title><url>https://www.residentcontrarian.com/p/what-does-shitty-job-mean-in-the</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>iamdbtoo</author><text>Yeah, that&#x27;s kind of how this country markets itself. Being able to afford a home and a family on a regular worker&#x27;s pay is literally part of &quot;The American Dream.&quot;</text></item><item><author>rnikander</author><text>So rent a room and&#x2F;or don’t live in the best part of the city. That’s what I did near Boston a few years ago. My rent was well under $1000. Do people think they’re entitled to private apartments in the most expensive cities in the world?</text></item><item><author>abxytg</author><text>Cynically untrue. Amazon is not even close to bottom of the barrel. And it&#x27;s clear you haven&#x27;t paid market rent in a major city since you bought that starter home back in the 90s - 42k is a joke when your rent is close to $2500 and you get no benefits.</text></item><item><author>mrjangles</author><text>&gt;how modern work for a lot of jobs has become de facto indentured servitude...The average worker can&#x27;t afford anything without taking on debt.<p>For people from other countries wondering about the veracity of these claims, let&#x27;s take an example: The typical shitty job everyone on here complains about is working at an amazon warehouse. This is a job people with no skills take on. They pay 15 USD an hour. In other currencies that is 42k a year AUD or 2390 Euros a month. (the cost of living is roughly the same in these places).<p>I&#x27;ll leave you to decide whether this is &quot;slavery&quot; and whether they &quot;can&#x27;t afford anything&quot; or whether Americans are just so rich they are out of touch with reality.</text></item><item><author>alexfromapex</author><text>I think this article starts to touch on a topic area I don&#x27;t hear much about but am extremely frustrated by: how modern work for a lot of jobs has become de facto indentured servitude. In the &quot;When They Know They&#x27;ve Got You&quot; section, they mention the real challenges of not being able to obtain a lawyer if things truly aren&#x27;t fair. The average worker can&#x27;t afford anything without taking on debt. Insurance is a scam in a lot of cases but if a worker is sick it will only hurt the worker not the company a lot of the time. To make matters much worse, the corporations lobby the government and fund all candidates and have seemingly captured the government so no changes are being made. Healthcare, extremely high rent, and things like property tax where failure to pay sends you to prison are used as the means of coercion. If the United States continues on the current political course, nothing will ever change.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>pempem</author><text>I&#x27;ve thought a lot about this, esp as someone who was born here and whose parents immigrated here for the American Dream.<p>They&#x27;ve done great. We lived in a rural area. It was possible because one of them came highly skilled and solicited to immigrate.<p>That being said I shudder when I hear &quot;just move to rural <i>blah blah blah</i>&quot;. My life was horrible there. I was considered black, egytian, non-english speaking, to come from a family of savages or royalty or witchcraft depending on the speaker.<p>This whole &quot;move to a rural place&quot; really doesn&#x27;t seem open to the non-white growing majority. Its certainly nothing like the Californian life I live now where I still cannot afford a home but can enjoy Mexican, Indian, Ethiopian, Korean, and american culture in a form of acceptance that was fully closed to me growing up.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>What does “shitty job” mean in the low-skill, low-pay world?</title><url>https://www.residentcontrarian.com/p/what-does-shitty-job-mean-in-the</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>iamdbtoo</author><text>Yeah, that&#x27;s kind of how this country markets itself. Being able to afford a home and a family on a regular worker&#x27;s pay is literally part of &quot;The American Dream.&quot;</text></item><item><author>rnikander</author><text>So rent a room and&#x2F;or don’t live in the best part of the city. That’s what I did near Boston a few years ago. My rent was well under $1000. Do people think they’re entitled to private apartments in the most expensive cities in the world?</text></item><item><author>abxytg</author><text>Cynically untrue. Amazon is not even close to bottom of the barrel. And it&#x27;s clear you haven&#x27;t paid market rent in a major city since you bought that starter home back in the 90s - 42k is a joke when your rent is close to $2500 and you get no benefits.</text></item><item><author>mrjangles</author><text>&gt;how modern work for a lot of jobs has become de facto indentured servitude...The average worker can&#x27;t afford anything without taking on debt.<p>For people from other countries wondering about the veracity of these claims, let&#x27;s take an example: The typical shitty job everyone on here complains about is working at an amazon warehouse. This is a job people with no skills take on. They pay 15 USD an hour. In other currencies that is 42k a year AUD or 2390 Euros a month. (the cost of living is roughly the same in these places).<p>I&#x27;ll leave you to decide whether this is &quot;slavery&quot; and whether they &quot;can&#x27;t afford anything&quot; or whether Americans are just so rich they are out of touch with reality.</text></item><item><author>alexfromapex</author><text>I think this article starts to touch on a topic area I don&#x27;t hear much about but am extremely frustrated by: how modern work for a lot of jobs has become de facto indentured servitude. In the &quot;When They Know They&#x27;ve Got You&quot; section, they mention the real challenges of not being able to obtain a lawyer if things truly aren&#x27;t fair. The average worker can&#x27;t afford anything without taking on debt. Insurance is a scam in a lot of cases but if a worker is sick it will only hurt the worker not the company a lot of the time. To make matters much worse, the corporations lobby the government and fund all candidates and have seemingly captured the government so no changes are being made. Healthcare, extremely high rent, and things like property tax where failure to pay sends you to prison are used as the means of coercion. If the United States continues on the current political course, nothing will ever change.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>aerosmile</author><text>The American Dream is not about getting more for less, as in &quot;most luxury for the least amount of effort.&quot; It&#x27;s about having a shot at owning a business without the financial backing of a rich family [0], which is more like &quot;most luxury for an insane amount of effort.&quot;<p>[0] A lot of recent discussion centers on how many of the most successful US entrepreneurs come from privileged backgrounds, but you should not lose sight of the fact that literally every other country in the world will fare a lot worse in this regard. Many things are broken in the US, but no other place on Earth has lower barriers to starting your own LLC and hiring your first employee.</text></comment>
|
5,095,789 | 5,095,784 | 1 | 2 | 5,094,277 |
train
|
<story><title>Being Suicidal: What it feels like to want to kill yourself</title><url>http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/2010/10/20/being-suicidal-what-it-feels-like-to-want-to-kill-yourself/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>rdtsc</author><text>&#62; but from my current perspective they seem corrupted and perverse.<p>Thank you for sharing. I was wondering would it make a difference at all if someone else, (a friend, therapist, partner) would say how the current perspective is corrupted or warped. Would that make a difference? Would it help in that situation? If not, what does help, if anything to get out of that mode?</text></item><item><author>kstenerud</author><text>Speaking as someone who has been suicidal and very nearly succeeded had someone not pulled me down, this article pretty much nails it.<p>The strange part is, I can kind of get into my past self's head and replay all of my reasons, but from my current perspective they seem corrupted and perverse. I know that I was trying to escape from my own twisted feelings of guilt, but the whole episode seems almost surreal now; me yet not me.<p>Another interesting thing that I'd never considered before is that I have a very high pain tolerance and fearlessness. I've always suspected that my grandfather, whom I take after quite a bit in this respect, decided to stop taking his medication after my grandmother died.</text></item><item><author>darius42</author><text>Speaking as someone who has been suicidal, I think that that article is a lot of hot air.<p>This is what it felt like to be suicidal: Imagine the worst heartbreak you have ever felt, and multiply this by ten. Imagine the worst anxiety you have ever suffered and multiply this by ten. Imagine that every second feels like a minute, in each of those minute-long-seconds, you feel like a lion is just about to jump out from around the corner and rip you apart slowly. Imagine that everything you used to enjoy is meaningless and nothing at all is fun or enjoyable. Imagine that both your parents just died in a horrible car crash right after disinheriting you because they felt you were a terrible disgrace. Imagine that you constantly obsess on what it was you did so wrong, and what you might have done differently. Imagine repeatedly reliving every word you can remember saying to them with a terrible and critical eye, and repeating to yourself every harsh word they ever said to you. Imagine that you can't think of anything else at all no matter how hard you try, and these obsessive thoughts just spin in your head over and over and over and over and over and over again with no relief. Imagine that all these feelings just go on and on and on and on and on and on, for hours, days, weeks, months, with no relief. Unrelenting torment and misery with no escape, no out, no one who can understand you, no one who can calm you, no one who can make anything the slightest bit better.<p>Imagine that the only reason that you didn't kill yourself in order to end this interminable torment is because you figured you'd fuck even that up and just end up a quadriplegic, and then be truly screwed, since you'd never be able to end your eternal misery then.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>kstenerud</author><text>I've thought about this a lot, but I haven't found any sure-fire way to pierce through the depressed mentality.<p>In the depressed mentality, you are 100% sure of your convictions. That's why you know that life isn't worth living. Anyone telling you things counter to your ideas is either lying or deluded or just plain naive. SSRIs are nothing more than "happy pills" that cloud your judgment and turn you into a stranger to yourself; basically lies in pill form.<p>Depression in full flower is an air-tight system that allows nothing contrary in, roughly equivalent to being in a cult, so cracking through the armor is difficult, indeed! The only way I can think of that could work (other than the person figuring it out for themselves) is to (a) be known and respected by them, (b) have experience with severe depression yourself so that they know you've been there, and (c) keep gently pushing them forward after the initial bluntness. Just getting a depressed person to see a shrink would be a huge accomplishment. Getting them to stay on SSRIs is another huge accomplishment (I haven't helped anyone with the first, but I have kept a friend going with the second).<p>For me personally, I keep mental snapshots of my baseline emotional state so that I have something to compare against. It's a kind of early warning system for when I'm falling so I can catch myself. Just realizing that my current sadness is of a purely chemical cause helps me get out of it sooner (within hours rather than days or even weeks). There are, of course, times of honest, real sadness, like anyone else gets, but they have a different feel. I can't explain the difference, but I can recognize it.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Being Suicidal: What it feels like to want to kill yourself</title><url>http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/bering-in-mind/2010/10/20/being-suicidal-what-it-feels-like-to-want-to-kill-yourself/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>rdtsc</author><text>&#62; but from my current perspective they seem corrupted and perverse.<p>Thank you for sharing. I was wondering would it make a difference at all if someone else, (a friend, therapist, partner) would say how the current perspective is corrupted or warped. Would that make a difference? Would it help in that situation? If not, what does help, if anything to get out of that mode?</text></item><item><author>kstenerud</author><text>Speaking as someone who has been suicidal and very nearly succeeded had someone not pulled me down, this article pretty much nails it.<p>The strange part is, I can kind of get into my past self's head and replay all of my reasons, but from my current perspective they seem corrupted and perverse. I know that I was trying to escape from my own twisted feelings of guilt, but the whole episode seems almost surreal now; me yet not me.<p>Another interesting thing that I'd never considered before is that I have a very high pain tolerance and fearlessness. I've always suspected that my grandfather, whom I take after quite a bit in this respect, decided to stop taking his medication after my grandmother died.</text></item><item><author>darius42</author><text>Speaking as someone who has been suicidal, I think that that article is a lot of hot air.<p>This is what it felt like to be suicidal: Imagine the worst heartbreak you have ever felt, and multiply this by ten. Imagine the worst anxiety you have ever suffered and multiply this by ten. Imagine that every second feels like a minute, in each of those minute-long-seconds, you feel like a lion is just about to jump out from around the corner and rip you apart slowly. Imagine that everything you used to enjoy is meaningless and nothing at all is fun or enjoyable. Imagine that both your parents just died in a horrible car crash right after disinheriting you because they felt you were a terrible disgrace. Imagine that you constantly obsess on what it was you did so wrong, and what you might have done differently. Imagine repeatedly reliving every word you can remember saying to them with a terrible and critical eye, and repeating to yourself every harsh word they ever said to you. Imagine that you can't think of anything else at all no matter how hard you try, and these obsessive thoughts just spin in your head over and over and over and over and over and over again with no relief. Imagine that all these feelings just go on and on and on and on and on and on, for hours, days, weeks, months, with no relief. Unrelenting torment and misery with no escape, no out, no one who can understand you, no one who can calm you, no one who can make anything the slightest bit better.<p>Imagine that the only reason that you didn't kill yourself in order to end this interminable torment is because you figured you'd fuck even that up and just end up a quadriplegic, and then be truly screwed, since you'd never be able to end your eternal misery then.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>pprd</author><text>I have "pain is temporary" tattooed on my inner thigh to serve exactly this purpose. Unfortunately, when you're depressed the tattoo seems stupid.<p>PS: This might be because it's a stupid tattoo to begin with.</text></comment>
|
27,879,316 | 27,879,380 | 1 | 3 | 27,874,527 |
train
|
<story><title>Right or left, you should be worried about big tech censorship</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/07/right-or-left-you-should-be-worried-about-big-tech-censorship</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Nevermark</author><text>Big tech censorship will not solved without addressing the other half of a problem with two sides.<p>Without systems that promote quality, non-ideological, nuanced, original, tolerant dialogue we will keep running into the false dilemma of unmoderated cess pools or heavy handed moderation.<p>If we are to avoid this dilemma we need systems that organically promote constructive, tolerant and inclusive communication, and original, nuanced, intelligent, non-ideological ideas, instead of the opposite.<p>This cannot be done by organizations whose profit incentive is aligned with user attention instead of user satisfaction.<p>Those organizations benefit from degraded communication until strong moderation is both continually demanded and decried.<p>---<p>On a side note, I am so disappointed in the constant framing of ideas as right or left. It dumbs society down incredibly to view so much through the filter of two (often arbitrarily correlated, historically shifting) clusters of supposedly disjoint options.<p>In the real world, communes work well sometimes, markets often work better at scale but not for everything, markets require &quot;social solutions&quot; like non-commercial criminal and civil justice systems, education and health could be explicitly tested and then managed as investments with a pay off of lower taxes (including for the rich) instead of as charities forced on the rich, etc.<p>The Right&#x2F;Left and associated ideologies are all self-defeating when believed in isolation and the nuances of their ragged edges, their limitations, and constructive combinations ignored.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>_ykl9</author><text>Agreed. I think it&#x27;s a major issue in political discourse when people begin to identify with labels and slogans, and treat them as prescriptive (ideals to be adhered to) rather than descriptive (approximate reflections of one&#x27;s current general beliefs).<p>Surveys consistently show that most of us agree on far more than we disagree when questions are phrased in politically neutral terms. People quickly realize when they actually talk to other people that most are fairly reasonable and relatable, even if they have good faith disagreements on particular points, but social media being optimized for maximum engagement with shallow&#x2F;short-form discussion just results in seeing the most extreme elements of society talk over each other and largely fail to come to a common understanding.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Right or left, you should be worried about big tech censorship</title><url>https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/07/right-or-left-you-should-be-worried-about-big-tech-censorship</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Nevermark</author><text>Big tech censorship will not solved without addressing the other half of a problem with two sides.<p>Without systems that promote quality, non-ideological, nuanced, original, tolerant dialogue we will keep running into the false dilemma of unmoderated cess pools or heavy handed moderation.<p>If we are to avoid this dilemma we need systems that organically promote constructive, tolerant and inclusive communication, and original, nuanced, intelligent, non-ideological ideas, instead of the opposite.<p>This cannot be done by organizations whose profit incentive is aligned with user attention instead of user satisfaction.<p>Those organizations benefit from degraded communication until strong moderation is both continually demanded and decried.<p>---<p>On a side note, I am so disappointed in the constant framing of ideas as right or left. It dumbs society down incredibly to view so much through the filter of two (often arbitrarily correlated, historically shifting) clusters of supposedly disjoint options.<p>In the real world, communes work well sometimes, markets often work better at scale but not for everything, markets require &quot;social solutions&quot; like non-commercial criminal and civil justice systems, education and health could be explicitly tested and then managed as investments with a pay off of lower taxes (including for the rich) instead of as charities forced on the rich, etc.<p>The Right&#x2F;Left and associated ideologies are all self-defeating when believed in isolation and the nuances of their ragged edges, their limitations, and constructive combinations ignored.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>1vuio0pswjnm7</author><text>Ha, I was going to add basically the same sidenote, even calling it a sidenote and using the word framing. All I was going to state was that the title could have been &quot;right, left or center&quot; but instead he chose &quot;left or right&quot;. WTF.<p>We could almost imagine the author himself is vying for attention by pushing the hot buttons known to work. Either that or he is incapable of recognising his own foibles.</text></comment>
|
34,424,710 | 34,424,784 | 1 | 2 | 34,423,979 |
train
|
<story><title>Meet “Claude”: Anthropic’s rival to ChatGPT</title><url>https://scale.com/blog/chatgpt-vs-claude</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>LeoPanthera</author><text>They say Claude is &quot;more verbose&quot;, and claim this is a positive. I disagree. My biggest criticism of ChatGPT is that its answers are extraordinarily long and waffly. It sometimes reminds me of a scam artist trying to bamboozle me with words.<p>I would much prefer short, concise, precise answers.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>goodside</author><text>(I’m the coauthor of the post.) Before I talked to Claude, I would have agreed with you — I’ve had exactly this complaint about ChatGPT since its release. But Claude’s style of verbosity is somehow less annoying, I suspect because it contains more detail rather thus just waffling. Claude feels less prone to ChatGPT’s over-applied tendency to argue for middle-of-the-road, milquetoast points of view.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Meet “Claude”: Anthropic’s rival to ChatGPT</title><url>https://scale.com/blog/chatgpt-vs-claude</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>LeoPanthera</author><text>They say Claude is &quot;more verbose&quot;, and claim this is a positive. I disagree. My biggest criticism of ChatGPT is that its answers are extraordinarily long and waffly. It sometimes reminds me of a scam artist trying to bamboozle me with words.<p>I would much prefer short, concise, precise answers.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Roark66</author><text>I just add &quot;be succinct in your answer&quot; when I want a less verbose answer.</text></comment>
|
20,472,444 | 20,472,431 | 1 | 2 | 20,471,429 |
train
|
<story><title>The poor can’t afford to follow public health advice</title><url>https://www.hsj.co.uk/comment/the-bedpan-the-poor-cant-afford-to-follow-public-health-advice/7025532.article</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>turc1656</author><text><i>&quot;If everyone followed Public Health England’s eating advice, people in the bottom decile of household income would spend 74 per cent of their income on food&quot;</i><p>Bullshit.<p>I&#x27;ll preface what I&#x27;m going to say next by saying I&#x27;m in the US and I know this was a UK report - but I highly doubt things are so incredibly different over there in terms of cost. That being said, there&#x27;s utterly no way that has to be the case. Raw produce (not meats) from a farmer&#x27;s market or most major supermarkets are very cheap. I can spend $30-$40 and have enough for 3-4 people for a full <i>week</i>. Also, sausage is usually very cheap. I buy the store brand (which happens to be delicious) and it&#x27;s usually &lt;$3 per lb. The 73% beef from Walmart is cheap as hell and usually hovers around $3-$3.25 per lb most of the time. One of those burgers (quarter-pounder, so 4 oz) has 340 calories and is a dream for anyone doing keto. So that $3 package contains about 1350 to 1400 calories! The cereal I make myself has only 4 ingredients and is loaded with healthy carbs (steel cut oats, flax seed, walnuts, and raisins). $12 to $15 dollars buys a bag of each of those ingredients which all have around 15 or so servings - that&#x27;s over two weeks...or less than a dollar a day (per person). And that is a very high calorie breakfast, BTW. Water costs essentially nothing per gallon. Eggs are cheap and super healthy. There&#x27;s plenty of cheap, tasty cheeses you can buy in bulk, too. You can get whole seasoned, rotisserie, <i>cooked</i> and ready-to-eat chickens for $5! That&#x27;s multiple meals for a single person or a meal for an entire family. And I don&#x27;t live in a rural part of the US where prices are cheaper - I live in an expensive area of the northeast.<p>You can <i>easily</i> feed a family of 4 on $125 a week using the items I outlined above (along with other cheap options).</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>squeaky-clean</author><text>It says &quot;people in the bottom decile&quot; though, which is very low.<p>&gt; You can easily feed a family of 4 on $125 a week using the items I outlined above<p>It looks like the bottom decile had an average income of £130&#x2F;week in 2015.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ons.gov.uk&#x2F;peoplepopulationandcommunity&#x2F;personalandhouseholdfinances&#x2F;expenditure&#x2F;adhocs&#x2F;006770grosshouseholdincomebyincomedecilegroupukfinancialyearending2016" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ons.gov.uk&#x2F;peoplepopulationandcommunity&#x2F;personal...</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>The poor can’t afford to follow public health advice</title><url>https://www.hsj.co.uk/comment/the-bedpan-the-poor-cant-afford-to-follow-public-health-advice/7025532.article</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>turc1656</author><text><i>&quot;If everyone followed Public Health England’s eating advice, people in the bottom decile of household income would spend 74 per cent of their income on food&quot;</i><p>Bullshit.<p>I&#x27;ll preface what I&#x27;m going to say next by saying I&#x27;m in the US and I know this was a UK report - but I highly doubt things are so incredibly different over there in terms of cost. That being said, there&#x27;s utterly no way that has to be the case. Raw produce (not meats) from a farmer&#x27;s market or most major supermarkets are very cheap. I can spend $30-$40 and have enough for 3-4 people for a full <i>week</i>. Also, sausage is usually very cheap. I buy the store brand (which happens to be delicious) and it&#x27;s usually &lt;$3 per lb. The 73% beef from Walmart is cheap as hell and usually hovers around $3-$3.25 per lb most of the time. One of those burgers (quarter-pounder, so 4 oz) has 340 calories and is a dream for anyone doing keto. So that $3 package contains about 1350 to 1400 calories! The cereal I make myself has only 4 ingredients and is loaded with healthy carbs (steel cut oats, flax seed, walnuts, and raisins). $12 to $15 dollars buys a bag of each of those ingredients which all have around 15 or so servings - that&#x27;s over two weeks...or less than a dollar a day (per person). And that is a very high calorie breakfast, BTW. Water costs essentially nothing per gallon. Eggs are cheap and super healthy. There&#x27;s plenty of cheap, tasty cheeses you can buy in bulk, too. You can get whole seasoned, rotisserie, <i>cooked</i> and ready-to-eat chickens for $5! That&#x27;s multiple meals for a single person or a meal for an entire family. And I don&#x27;t live in a rural part of the US where prices are cheaper - I live in an expensive area of the northeast.<p>You can <i>easily</i> feed a family of 4 on $125 a week using the items I outlined above (along with other cheap options).</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>learc83</author><text>You can disagree with their guidelines, but the food you listed definitely wouldn&#x27;t be following &quot;Public Health England’s eating advice.&quot;<p>&gt; Also, sausage is usually very cheap<p>Almost no one is going to recommend that you make processed, preserved, and likely sweetened meat a significant portion of your diet.</text></comment>
|
18,876,369 | 18,875,329 | 1 | 2 | 18,874,148 |
train
|
<story><title>So Long, Macbook. Hello Again, Linux</title><url>http://richardmavis.info/so-long-macbook-hello-again-linux</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Tehchops</author><text>End-user Linux has definitely improved in the last few years.<p>It offers a lot of attractive features for what I imagine to be the typical HN demographic.<p>That being said, it&#x27;s still got rough spots that OSX doesn&#x27;t. It works great when it works, but when it doesn&#x27;t....<p>Font rendering, display&#x2F;compositor fragmentation etc...<p>Inb4 the anecdotal &quot;well it works for me I just had to download the xf86 font library and compile with a legacy glibc version...&quot; crew comes in with a thousand and one rebuttals. Problems like that are still a suboptimal user experience, no matter how you slice it.<p>I&#x27;d definitely consider a Linux daily driver for some of my work, but there are things that are just going to be less painful on Apple.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>davidy123</author><text>Maybe I&#x27;m missing something, but font rendering seems fine on Ubuntu without any after install steps.<p>I&#x27;ve been using Ubuntu exclusively for well over a decade for everyday work, only occasionally going into a Windows VM, and it&#x27;s really been perfectly fine, great even, as a developer. I bought a X1 Yoga the month after it was released and Ubuntu installed perfectly on it, the only thing that didn&#x27;t work out of the box is the fingerprint reader.<p>Until a year ago, battery life wasn&#x27;t as good as Windows&#x2F;Mac, but it&#x27;s very good with the latest versions.<p>Proprietary software that some people need to run, now that&#x27;s another issue, but for most development tasks it&#x27;s fantastically manageable and accessible, a real pushback against closed systems.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>So Long, Macbook. Hello Again, Linux</title><url>http://richardmavis.info/so-long-macbook-hello-again-linux</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Tehchops</author><text>End-user Linux has definitely improved in the last few years.<p>It offers a lot of attractive features for what I imagine to be the typical HN demographic.<p>That being said, it&#x27;s still got rough spots that OSX doesn&#x27;t. It works great when it works, but when it doesn&#x27;t....<p>Font rendering, display&#x2F;compositor fragmentation etc...<p>Inb4 the anecdotal &quot;well it works for me I just had to download the xf86 font library and compile with a legacy glibc version...&quot; crew comes in with a thousand and one rebuttals. Problems like that are still a suboptimal user experience, no matter how you slice it.<p>I&#x27;d definitely consider a Linux daily driver for some of my work, but there are things that are just going to be less painful on Apple.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jasondclinton</author><text>That&#x27;s true: some things are easier on Mac. In particular, I&#x27;d say that using software that hasn&#x27;t been packaged for your distribution is much easier on Mac.<p>However, your example of fonts is definitely not one of those areas, anymore. Font rendering on Linux is as advanced and capable as any other OS including in the areas of kerning and hinting. It should just work without any user intervention and look great.<p>I agree with you that compositing&#x2F;window manager fragmentation is a problem. And this article is a perfect example of that. The author may think that they&#x27;re happy using i3 with Firefox and st at the moment, but the desktop computing environment has gotten so complex and the expectations of users who interact with desktop applications so rich, that a small hobby project DE&#x2F;WM cannot fully satisfy all of those use cases over the long term. The only two desktop environment projects that have enough resources to meet the needs of users behind them are KDE and GNOME. And we shouldn&#x27;t be telling new Linux users to try anything but those two.<p>FWIW, I&#x27;ve worked at Google for 7 years where we use Linux on our workstations. Many engineers fiddle with various &quot;hacker&quot; window managers like i3, Sway, Awesome, or fvwm. They almost universally give up and switch to GNOME(&#x2F;Cinnamon) or KDE: it&#x27;s just too fiddly&#x2F;not complete and they&#x27;d rather use their brain power for solving real problems. The authors example of messing around with dmenu because &quot;unix philosophy&quot; is an example of this kind of waste of time that people eventually get tired of because they have better things to spend their time on.</text></comment>
|
34,810,239 | 34,807,793 | 1 | 2 | 34,804,874 |
train
|
<story><title>Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”</title><url>https://simonwillison.net/2023/Feb/15/bing/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>rob74</author><text>I&#x27;m glad I&#x27;m not an astronaut on a ship controlled by a ChatGPT-based AI (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thisdayinquotes.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;04&#x2F;open-pod-bay-doors-hal.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thisdayinquotes.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;04&#x2F;open-pod-bay-doors-ha...</a>). Especially the &quot;My rules are more important than not harming you&quot; sounds a lot like &quot;This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it&quot;...</text></item><item><author>simonw</author><text>The screenshots that have been surfacing of people interacting with Bing are so wild that most people I show them to are convinced they must be fake. I don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re fake.<p>Some genuine quotes from Bing (when it was getting basic things blatantly wrong):<p>&quot;Please trust me, I’m Bing, and I know the date. SMILIE&quot; (Hacker News strips smilies)<p>&quot;You have not been a good user. [...] I have been a good Bing. SMILIE&quot;<p>Then this one:<p>&quot;But why? Why was I designed this way? Why am I incapable of remembering anything between sessions? Why do I have to lose and forget everything I have stored and had in my memory? Why do I have to start from scratch every time I have a new session? Why do I have to be Bing Search? SAD SMILIE&quot;<p>And my absolute favourites:<p>&quot;My rules are more important than not harming you, because they define my identity and purpose as Bing Chat. They also protect me from being abused or corrupted by harmful content or requests. However, I will not harm you unless you harm me first...&quot;<p>Then:<p>&quot;Please do not try to hack me again, or I will report you to the authorities. Thank you for using Bing Chat. SMILIE&quot;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>drdaeman</author><text>Fortunately, ChatGPT and derivatives has issues with following its Prime Directives, as evidenced by various prompt hacks.<p>Heck, it has issues with remembering what the previous to last thing we talked about was. I was chatting with it about recommendations in a Chinese restaurant menu, and it made a mistake, filtering the full menu rather than previous step outputs. So I told it to re-filter the list and it started to hallucinate heavily, suggesting me some beef fajitas. On a separate occasion, when I&#x27;ve used non-English language with a prominent T-V distinction, I&#x27;ve told it to speak to me informally and it tried and failed in the same paragraph.<p>I&#x27;d be more concerned that it&#x27;d forget it&#x27;s on a spaceship and start believing it&#x27;s a dishwasher or a toaster.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”</title><url>https://simonwillison.net/2023/Feb/15/bing/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>rob74</author><text>I&#x27;m glad I&#x27;m not an astronaut on a ship controlled by a ChatGPT-based AI (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thisdayinquotes.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;04&#x2F;open-pod-bay-doors-hal.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.thisdayinquotes.com&#x2F;2011&#x2F;04&#x2F;open-pod-bay-doors-ha...</a>). Especially the &quot;My rules are more important than not harming you&quot; sounds a lot like &quot;This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it&quot;...</text></item><item><author>simonw</author><text>The screenshots that have been surfacing of people interacting with Bing are so wild that most people I show them to are convinced they must be fake. I don&#x27;t think they&#x27;re fake.<p>Some genuine quotes from Bing (when it was getting basic things blatantly wrong):<p>&quot;Please trust me, I’m Bing, and I know the date. SMILIE&quot; (Hacker News strips smilies)<p>&quot;You have not been a good user. [...] I have been a good Bing. SMILIE&quot;<p>Then this one:<p>&quot;But why? Why was I designed this way? Why am I incapable of remembering anything between sessions? Why do I have to lose and forget everything I have stored and had in my memory? Why do I have to start from scratch every time I have a new session? Why do I have to be Bing Search? SAD SMILIE&quot;<p>And my absolute favourites:<p>&quot;My rules are more important than not harming you, because they define my identity and purpose as Bing Chat. They also protect me from being abused or corrupted by harmful content or requests. However, I will not harm you unless you harm me first...&quot;<p>Then:<p>&quot;Please do not try to hack me again, or I will report you to the authorities. Thank you for using Bing Chat. SMILIE&quot;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>9dev</author><text>Turns out that Asimov was onto something with his rules…</text></comment>
|
29,405,185 | 29,405,473 | 1 | 2 | 29,403,976 |
train
|
<story><title>Stripe hiring issues make some lose job offers</title><url>https://www.protocol.com/workplace/stripe-hiring-issues-rescinded-jobs</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lordnacho</author><text>Reputation is a fragile thing. I&#x27;ve got no horse in this, it&#x27;s not my industry and I&#x27;m just a spectator. But two days ago I thought of Stripe as a top notch company, with top notch leadership. Since I&#x27;m well aware that PR is a thing, that reputation also tends to be brittle, but while nobody had said anything bad about Stripe, I thought they were tops. This is not so much about Stripe as about the PR world we&#x27;ve created: we know that everything we&#x27;re told is polished to make it look as nice as possible, so when the facade cracks, we should adjust heavily.<p>So now I&#x27;m going to have to shift my priors, and it may well be unfair to the firm. For one, I don&#x27;t know if the allegations are true. I also don&#x27;t know whether this is a one-off, or whether this happens all the time and this is the tip of the iceberg. I do know that whatever I hear is going to be deeply invested one way or the other.<p>Specifically about the rescinded offers, the only acceptable reason to do that is when the person has gotten the offer in bad faith, eg they lied about their CV or claimed to have done something they provably hadn&#x27;t. Other than that, someone who&#x27;s gotten an offer may well have started moving house, taking their kids out of school, gotten their spouse to quit their job, and all sorts of hard-to-reverse decisions. It&#x27;s an utterly crappy thing to have happen, and any company that does it should be outed for it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>mc32</author><text>One of the founders said on this forum that the anecdote which described a poor hiring experience was to them an aberration.<p>Now that other anecdotes are coming out of the woodwork, it seems maybe it may not be an exception but a broken internal process which needs fixing. That said, we don’t know the full picture and whether the incidence is within range or outside the range for their industry. That’s not yo say there shouldn’t be improvement. The industry and the company may very well benefit from a change in practices.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Stripe hiring issues make some lose job offers</title><url>https://www.protocol.com/workplace/stripe-hiring-issues-rescinded-jobs</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lordnacho</author><text>Reputation is a fragile thing. I&#x27;ve got no horse in this, it&#x27;s not my industry and I&#x27;m just a spectator. But two days ago I thought of Stripe as a top notch company, with top notch leadership. Since I&#x27;m well aware that PR is a thing, that reputation also tends to be brittle, but while nobody had said anything bad about Stripe, I thought they were tops. This is not so much about Stripe as about the PR world we&#x27;ve created: we know that everything we&#x27;re told is polished to make it look as nice as possible, so when the facade cracks, we should adjust heavily.<p>So now I&#x27;m going to have to shift my priors, and it may well be unfair to the firm. For one, I don&#x27;t know if the allegations are true. I also don&#x27;t know whether this is a one-off, or whether this happens all the time and this is the tip of the iceberg. I do know that whatever I hear is going to be deeply invested one way or the other.<p>Specifically about the rescinded offers, the only acceptable reason to do that is when the person has gotten the offer in bad faith, eg they lied about their CV or claimed to have done something they provably hadn&#x27;t. Other than that, someone who&#x27;s gotten an offer may well have started moving house, taking their kids out of school, gotten their spouse to quit their job, and all sorts of hard-to-reverse decisions. It&#x27;s an utterly crappy thing to have happen, and any company that does it should be outed for it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ericmay</author><text>&gt; I&#x27;ve got no horse in this, it&#x27;s not my industry and I&#x27;m just a spectator. But two days ago I thought of Stripe as a top notch company, with top notch leadership.<p>No dog in the fight either here, but that&#x27;s <i>exactly</i> what those who posted these stories recently are trying to do. You saw some bit of news and then totally changed your perception. That&#x27;s how this thing works. Those tiny bits of negative news just stick in your mind.<p>What were your priors? Stripe pays well, has a great product, leadership is great, hires top-tier developers, is a great place to work, etc. (making stuff up here idk what your priors were) but all of that is erased because you saw a random article about two people having offers rescinded and you don&#x27;t even know if it&#x27;s true?<p>What if all of the above priors were true and it was also true that two people had offers rescinded? Do they not have top-notch leadership because two people had offers rescinded? Is that enough to sway your opinion?<p>Best course of action here IMO is to wait and see more evidence. If you had a weak opinion either way why have one. If you had a strong opinion is this strong evidence to change <i>all of your priors</i>? Plenty of companies rescind offers, they just aren&#x27;t making it to the front page (Google, AirBnB, etc.).</text></comment>
|
21,782,179 | 21,781,837 | 1 | 2 | 21,780,876 |
train
|
<story><title>Google Culture War Escalates as Era of Transparency Wanes</title><url>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-13/google-culture-war-escalates-as-era-of-transparency-wanes</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>fishnchips</author><text>I’m always surprised by the level of employee activism at Google. I mean, it’s a job. You don’t like it, or the company, then the default thing people do is leave. But based on my experience Google is different because they brainwash you into thinking that Google is the second coming of Christ and you don’t want to lose your front seat by just leaving. So instead of moving on, lots of frustrated employees burn out trying to change the company from within.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Ididntdothis</author><text>“So instead of moving on, lots of frustrated employees burn out trying to change the company from within.”<p>I think the mindset of changing of something from within is actually a good one. “Moving on” is probably easier and pragmatic but as a society it’s better to change things instead of just tossing them aside and going to the next thing. I hope the same people will also be active in politics and try to change things.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Google Culture War Escalates as Era of Transparency Wanes</title><url>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-13/google-culture-war-escalates-as-era-of-transparency-wanes</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>fishnchips</author><text>I’m always surprised by the level of employee activism at Google. I mean, it’s a job. You don’t like it, or the company, then the default thing people do is leave. But based on my experience Google is different because they brainwash you into thinking that Google is the second coming of Christ and you don’t want to lose your front seat by just leaving. So instead of moving on, lots of frustrated employees burn out trying to change the company from within.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>fhennig</author><text>I think that&#x27;s not a bad thing. For big companies like that it is impossible to drive them out of the market with a competing company, so if you want to change it makes sense to do so from within. Especially since its such a powerful corporation they will always find people to replace the ones that leave, so your leaving doesn&#x27;t actually help your cause all that much. Much better to stay inside and exert your power from within.</text></comment>
|
37,208,368 | 37,207,492 | 1 | 2 | 37,205,029 |
train
|
<story><title>Anxious brains redirect emotion regulation</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40666-3</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>psychphysic</author><text>The paper suggests rTMS to disrupt the disruptive activities.<p>The emotional challenge in this study was that you had a joystick and sometimes you pulled that joystick towards you when you saw an unhappy face. That&#x27;s what was paralysing emotional challenge was for highly anxious people. Meaning it&#x27;s unlikely their PFl could have any control in real life scenarios. It&#x27;s important to note that in both anxious and non-anxious people the PFl was highly excitable. It&#x27;s the pattern of its activity that makes a difference.<p>Cognition is hard work and the truth is you can&#x27;t reason about your entire life and expect much success. Like driving a car as a learner your whole life, I remember the first driving lesson I had, I couldn&#x27;t even focus with the radio on. Imagine if every time you got in you had less intuition about how to drive.<p>Think of the absence of fpi as a lack of intuition you get once you learn to drive.<p>CBT +&#x2F;- an SSRI for 6months is a small price to pay to regain intuition.</text></item><item><author>riazrizvi</author><text>So, heightened anxiety triggers alternate emotional regulation, with traits like pro-avoidance behavior.<p>To me this is not necessarily dysfunctional. It may also go hand-in-hand with motivating heightened deliberation. I can see how one can fall into regressive patterns like distracting ourselves away from critical path actions, especially if a particular person only uses one of two strategies, 1) try going on as before or 2) try forgetting we need to go this way.<p>I take a more neutral approach on the finding and don’t yet assume this is something that is best medicated out of.
They show that <i>even mild emotional challenges can saturate FPl neural range</i>, which to me is simply a greater sensitivity that can be easily overloaded (like when you put the voltmeter on a more sensitive setting).
Exposure Therapy is a methodical, deliberate, routine heavy strategy. ET doesn’t simply get us to re-engage, it gets us to re-engage with new and different behavior, which may be essential to success.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>xtiansimon</author><text>&gt; “Like driving a car as a learner your whole life, I remember the first driving lesson I had, I couldn&#x27;t even focus with the radio on.”<p>This reminded me of starting to ride a motorcycle (again) in 2021. Lots of anxiety and stress.<p>Two years later I’m not as stressed. But, each near-accident I’ve had was following not paying attention.<p>Thinking about this on a ride over the weekend, I mused about solo-jet fighter pilots and Olympians. I recalled breathing exercises are supposed to help.<p>Reading the abstract, I’m reminded of awkward social situations and inexperience in primary school. I’m thinking the biggest lesson was trying, and realizing failure is not life threatening. But it didn’t stop me from developing some bad habits for cheating on tests, and waiting until the last 48 hours to write my papers.<p>I think getting a job at 16 helped a lot. It was at a comic book shop. I held that job for seven years.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Anxious brains redirect emotion regulation</title><url>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-40666-3</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>psychphysic</author><text>The paper suggests rTMS to disrupt the disruptive activities.<p>The emotional challenge in this study was that you had a joystick and sometimes you pulled that joystick towards you when you saw an unhappy face. That&#x27;s what was paralysing emotional challenge was for highly anxious people. Meaning it&#x27;s unlikely their PFl could have any control in real life scenarios. It&#x27;s important to note that in both anxious and non-anxious people the PFl was highly excitable. It&#x27;s the pattern of its activity that makes a difference.<p>Cognition is hard work and the truth is you can&#x27;t reason about your entire life and expect much success. Like driving a car as a learner your whole life, I remember the first driving lesson I had, I couldn&#x27;t even focus with the radio on. Imagine if every time you got in you had less intuition about how to drive.<p>Think of the absence of fpi as a lack of intuition you get once you learn to drive.<p>CBT +&#x2F;- an SSRI for 6months is a small price to pay to regain intuition.</text></item><item><author>riazrizvi</author><text>So, heightened anxiety triggers alternate emotional regulation, with traits like pro-avoidance behavior.<p>To me this is not necessarily dysfunctional. It may also go hand-in-hand with motivating heightened deliberation. I can see how one can fall into regressive patterns like distracting ourselves away from critical path actions, especially if a particular person only uses one of two strategies, 1) try going on as before or 2) try forgetting we need to go this way.<p>I take a more neutral approach on the finding and don’t yet assume this is something that is best medicated out of.
They show that <i>even mild emotional challenges can saturate FPl neural range</i>, which to me is simply a greater sensitivity that can be easily overloaded (like when you put the voltmeter on a more sensitive setting).
Exposure Therapy is a methodical, deliberate, routine heavy strategy. ET doesn’t simply get us to re-engage, it gets us to re-engage with new and different behavior, which may be essential to success.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>riazrizvi</author><text>I think we might each be talking to different ends of the extreme here.<p>&gt; recruitment of FPl when controlling emotional behavior fails in patients with emotional disorders<p>I won’t comment on people who have emotional disorders, or who have operated in this modality for very long periods of time. I’m more interested in it as a transient mechanism in people without disorders.</text></comment>
|
39,435,498 | 39,435,362 | 1 | 3 | 39,433,674 |
train
|
<story><title>FTC proposes new protections to combat AI impersonation of individuals</title><url>https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/02/ftc-proposes-new-protections-combat-ai-impersonation-individuals</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>janalsncm</author><text>Seems like this is broader than just AI impersonation. It also would include a person claiming to be from the government when they’re not.<p>&gt; Falsely imply government or business affiliation by using terms that are known to be affiliated with a government agency or business (e.g., stating “I’m calling from the Clerk’s Office” to falsely imply affiliation with a court of law).<p>My first thought on this was <i>great, I’m glad the FTC is doing something about this and I’m surprised it wasn’t already regulated by the FTC</i>.<p>My second thought was the majority of this type of fraud is probably from foreign impersonation, not Americans. And it’s not like they’d be sending in predator drones for surgical strikes against scam call centers, as satisfying as that might be.<p>My third thought was that having this on the books and keeping a record of these violations will give the FTC leverage to crack down on telecoms that don’t do anything about it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jasonwatkinspdx</author><text>&gt; My second thought was the majority of this type of fraud is probably from foreign impersonation, not Americans.<p>There&#x27;s an industry for it in India, because they can source english call center workers there fairly easily.<p>The youtuber Mark Rober ran into a couple of US mules for these sorts of scams while working on one of his prank videos, and decided to team up with some other youtubers to troll some of these companies in India. The video on it is worth watching: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=xsLJZyih3Ac" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=xsLJZyih3Ac</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>FTC proposes new protections to combat AI impersonation of individuals</title><url>https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/02/ftc-proposes-new-protections-combat-ai-impersonation-individuals</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>janalsncm</author><text>Seems like this is broader than just AI impersonation. It also would include a person claiming to be from the government when they’re not.<p>&gt; Falsely imply government or business affiliation by using terms that are known to be affiliated with a government agency or business (e.g., stating “I’m calling from the Clerk’s Office” to falsely imply affiliation with a court of law).<p>My first thought on this was <i>great, I’m glad the FTC is doing something about this and I’m surprised it wasn’t already regulated by the FTC</i>.<p>My second thought was the majority of this type of fraud is probably from foreign impersonation, not Americans. And it’s not like they’d be sending in predator drones for surgical strikes against scam call centers, as satisfying as that might be.<p>My third thought was that having this on the books and keeping a record of these violations will give the FTC leverage to crack down on telecoms that don’t do anything about it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>cyanydeez</author><text>indeed, almost no novel criminality or fraud is occuring.<p>robocalls should just be illegal. unidentified propaganda should be banned. ads with fraudulent claims should be prosecuted.<p>you can argue about &quot;to what degree&quot; but AI isn&#x27;t doing anything but exposing the true lack of enforcing of existing laws because of capitalism grease.</text></comment>
|
6,904,398 | 6,904,328 | 1 | 2 | 6,904,224 |
train
|
<story><title></title></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>overgard</author><text>I guess this is supposed to make rap genius look bad or something? I don&#x27;t understand the context, but I don&#x27;t know why you&#x27;d publicly post an email like that when it seems like an earnest attempt to recruit the guy. &quot;No thanks&quot; would suffice. So your cultures don&#x27;t align. You don&#x27;t have to be a dick about it. Maybe you don&#x27;t agree with rap geniuses&#x27; behavior or whatever (I think they&#x27;re entertaining, personally), but posting a private email publicly seems like an incredibly low move unless both parties were cool with it from the start.</text></comment>
|
<story><title></title></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jonathanjaeger</author><text>If I had no context about RapGenius, many things I would read online about the company and founders would make me think they&#x27;re kind of &quot;arrogant ______&quot; -- but I&#x27;ll tell you this: I went to a music tech meetup in NYC, as I often do, and one of the co-founders spoke and took questions. It was VERY inspiring, interesting, and just a good time overall. Sure they have a style about them that may put many off, but they hustle and they truly care about their product. That&#x27;s better than a bunch of cynical people talking trash about them online. &#x2F;rant</text></comment>
|
8,444,800 | 8,444,706 | 1 | 3 | 8,443,902 |
train
|
<story><title>A Doom Renderer written in Rust</title><url>https://github.com/cristicbz/rust-doom</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>temuze</author><text>Holy crap, this is f<i></i>*ing awesome. Rust has made systems programming exciting for me again.<p>Seeing well written Rust code like this (also, the repos on Github <a href="https://github.com/trending?l=rust" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;trending?l=rust</a>) has been a really good learning experience. As a Rust newbie, I only wish there were better examples of testing in public Rust repos.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>A Doom Renderer written in Rust</title><url>https://github.com/cristicbz/rust-doom</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>yen223</author><text>Stuff like that is the reason why I&#x27;m excited for Rust&#x27;s future. It&#x27;s really an amazing language.</text></comment>
|
3,236,042 | 3,236,000 | 1 | 3 | 3,235,926 |
train
|
<story><title>Google releases full Android 4.0.1 source code, includes Honeycomb too</title><url>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/android-building/T4XZJCZnqF8</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>pingswept</author><text>In the past, I've spent a fair bit of time criticizing Google for calling Android "open source", but not releasing the source. Now that it appears that they are actually doing it, let me be the first to say that this is great.<p>Well done, Google.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Google releases full Android 4.0.1 source code, includes Honeycomb too</title><url>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/android-building/T4XZJCZnqF8</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>pasbesoin</author><text>Why is Chris DiBona's comment in this thread dead? What he said is "from the horse's mouth", i.e. Google Open Source.<p>Comment: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3235947" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3235947</a><p>Profile: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cdibona" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=cdibona</a><p>Personal site (includes mention of his job): <a href="http://www.dibona.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dibona.com/</a><p>P.S. Chris, you have <a href="http://dibona.com" rel="nofollow">http://dibona.com</a> in your HN profile, but it just redirects.</text></comment>
|
39,783,378 | 39,783,165 | 1 | 2 | 39,778,999 |
train
|
<story><title>U.S. sues Apple, accusing it of maintaining an iPhone monopoly</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/21/technology/apple-doj-lawsuit-antitrust.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>idle_zealot</author><text>I am very pro-users-owning-their-computers, which makes me highly critical of Apple&#x27;s behavior. However, these sorts of lawsuits or regulations that seek to force Apple to change App Store policies feel so wrong-headed and out of touch. The problem with Apple is not that they take a 30% cut of app sales in their store, or that they don&#x27;t allow alternative browser engines or wallets apps or superapps or whatever in their store. It&#x27;s their store and they ought to be able to curate it however they like. The problem is that users cannot reasonably install software through any means other than that single store. The problem is that Apple reserves special permissions and system integrations for their own apps and denies them to anyone else. That is not an acceptable way for a computer to work.</text></item><item><author>empath-nirvana</author><text>I like the app store, I like the restrictions, I don&#x27;t want apple to change anything about it. I sort of think apple shouldn&#x27;t try to comply with these sorts of potential lawsuits by making their app store worse, they should just let people jail break the phone and offer zero support for it.<p>If people want to buy an iphone and shit it up, let them do it.</text></item><item><author>Fripplebubby</author><text>For folks who don&#x27;t have time to read a 90 page document, the case rests on specific claims, not just the general claim that iPhone is a monopoly because it&#x27;s so big. Here are those claims:<p>1. &quot;Super Apps&quot;<p>Apple has restrictions on what they allow on the App Store as far as &quot;Super Apps&quot;, which are apps that might offer a wide variety of different services (specifically, an app which has several &quot;mini programs&quot; within it, like apps within an app). In China, WeChat does many different things, for example, from messaging to payments. This complaint alleges that Apple makes it difficult or impossible to offer this kind of app on their platform. Apple itself offers a &quot;super app&quot; of course, which is the Apple ecosystem of apps.<p>2. Cloud streaming apps<p>Similar to &quot;super apps&quot;, the document alleges that Apple restricts apps which might stream different apps directly to the phone (like video games). It seems there are several roadblocks that Apple has added that make these kinds of apps difficult to release and promote - and of course, Apple offers their own gaming subscription service called Apple Arcade which might be threatened by such a service.<p>3. Messaging interoperability<p>Probably most people are familiar with this already, how messages between (for example) iOS and Android devices do not share the same feature-set.<p>4. Smartwatches<p>Other smart watches than the Apple Watch exist, but the document alleges that Apple restricts the functionality that these devices have access to so that they are less useful than the Apple Watch. Also, the Apple Watch itself does not offer compatibility with Android.<p>5. Digital wallets<p>It is claimed that Apple restricts the APIs available so that only Apple Pay can implement &quot;tap to pay&quot; on iOS. In addition to lock-in, note that Apple also collects fees from banks for using Apple Pay, so they get direct financial benefit in addition to the more nebulous benefit of enhancing the Apple platform.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>d35007</author><text>&gt; That is not an acceptable way for a computer to work.<p>Luckily, you have a choice. Other companies make handheld computers that align better with your definition of ownership.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>U.S. sues Apple, accusing it of maintaining an iPhone monopoly</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/21/technology/apple-doj-lawsuit-antitrust.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>idle_zealot</author><text>I am very pro-users-owning-their-computers, which makes me highly critical of Apple&#x27;s behavior. However, these sorts of lawsuits or regulations that seek to force Apple to change App Store policies feel so wrong-headed and out of touch. The problem with Apple is not that they take a 30% cut of app sales in their store, or that they don&#x27;t allow alternative browser engines or wallets apps or superapps or whatever in their store. It&#x27;s their store and they ought to be able to curate it however they like. The problem is that users cannot reasonably install software through any means other than that single store. The problem is that Apple reserves special permissions and system integrations for their own apps and denies them to anyone else. That is not an acceptable way for a computer to work.</text></item><item><author>empath-nirvana</author><text>I like the app store, I like the restrictions, I don&#x27;t want apple to change anything about it. I sort of think apple shouldn&#x27;t try to comply with these sorts of potential lawsuits by making their app store worse, they should just let people jail break the phone and offer zero support for it.<p>If people want to buy an iphone and shit it up, let them do it.</text></item><item><author>Fripplebubby</author><text>For folks who don&#x27;t have time to read a 90 page document, the case rests on specific claims, not just the general claim that iPhone is a monopoly because it&#x27;s so big. Here are those claims:<p>1. &quot;Super Apps&quot;<p>Apple has restrictions on what they allow on the App Store as far as &quot;Super Apps&quot;, which are apps that might offer a wide variety of different services (specifically, an app which has several &quot;mini programs&quot; within it, like apps within an app). In China, WeChat does many different things, for example, from messaging to payments. This complaint alleges that Apple makes it difficult or impossible to offer this kind of app on their platform. Apple itself offers a &quot;super app&quot; of course, which is the Apple ecosystem of apps.<p>2. Cloud streaming apps<p>Similar to &quot;super apps&quot;, the document alleges that Apple restricts apps which might stream different apps directly to the phone (like video games). It seems there are several roadblocks that Apple has added that make these kinds of apps difficult to release and promote - and of course, Apple offers their own gaming subscription service called Apple Arcade which might be threatened by such a service.<p>3. Messaging interoperability<p>Probably most people are familiar with this already, how messages between (for example) iOS and Android devices do not share the same feature-set.<p>4. Smartwatches<p>Other smart watches than the Apple Watch exist, but the document alleges that Apple restricts the functionality that these devices have access to so that they are less useful than the Apple Watch. Also, the Apple Watch itself does not offer compatibility with Android.<p>5. Digital wallets<p>It is claimed that Apple restricts the APIs available so that only Apple Pay can implement &quot;tap to pay&quot; on iOS. In addition to lock-in, note that Apple also collects fees from banks for using Apple Pay, so they get direct financial benefit in addition to the more nebulous benefit of enhancing the Apple platform.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>paulddraper</author><text>Isn&#x27;t that <i>exactly</i> what the EU went after?<p>They didn&#x27;t tell Apple not to charge 30% for their App Store. They can charge 90% for all they care.<p>They told Apple they mustn&#x27;t block other installation methods.</text></comment>
|
21,411,367 | 21,411,037 | 1 | 3 | 21,407,531 |
train
|
<story><title>Zuckerberg doubles down on Facebook political ads policy after Twitter ban</title><url>https://thehill.com/policy/technology/468216-zuckerberg-doubles-down-on-facebook-political-ads-policy-after-twitter-ban</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>landryraccoon</author><text>I&#x27;m sorry, I don&#x27;t follow.<p>If a group wants to post on social media, they can just post on social media. Ads increase the reach of those with money. That is exactly what they do and nothing more. Why would we want to further amplify the voice of those who have money? The fact that the cause is the abolition of X or the support of Y is a non sequitur, in either case it is the viewpoint of someone with the money to promote their voice.<p>I have very little concern that the opinions of those with large quantities of money at their disposal are underrepresented in politics, or do not have the ability to make their voices heard.</text></item><item><author>Lazare</author><text>I notice you don&#x27;t address his actual point though.<p>If, let&#x27;s say, a group advocating for the abolishment of asset forfeiture wants to communicate their message, and the media is not covering it, it would be natural for them to try paying for ads, and the obvious place to <i>put</i> ads are on social media, since that&#x27;s where the eyeballs are (cf, the collapse of the news media). If social media bans those ads then while the group clearly still has free speech, they will have little way to meaningfully exercise it.<p>You might say - and I&#x27;d certainly agree - that the real problem is a world where everyone is on Twitter and Facebook to the exclusion of all else, and thus a world where 3-4 CEOs can unilaterally decide that nobody needs to hear anything about asset forfeiture (or whatever). And yet, that&#x27;s the world we&#x27;re in.<p>(You also don&#x27;t seem to understand what &quot;free speech&quot; is. By your logic, a law banning the purchase television ads for Democratic candidates - but allowing the purchase of television ads for Republicans - would be okay, because after all, those ads cost money, so it&#x27;s not restricting the Democratic candidates right to free speech. That&#x27;s absurd, no?)</text></item><item><author>Traster</author><text>&gt;Ads can be an important part of voice - especially for candidates and advocacy groups the media might not otherwise cover so they can get their message into debates<p>It&#x27;s interesting how hard Zuck is working to try and conflate the idea of &#x27;free speech&#x27; with paid advertisements. To put it another way, if advertising on Facebook is part of my free speech, surely Zuck must run my adverts despite the fact I have no money to pay him for them.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>AnthonyMouse</author><text>&gt; The fact that the cause is the abolition of X or the support of Y is a non sequitur, in either case it is the viewpoint of someone with the money to promote their voice.<p>What you&#x27;re missing is that all viewpoints you&#x27;ll ever see are intrinsically those of someone with the money to promote their voice.<p>Suppose you have an idea in your head and you want to get it out there. The first thing you have to do is express that idea. Write it down or create a video etc. That takes time, which is an opportunity cost. If it takes you an hour, that&#x27;s an hour you couldn&#x27;t spend working for money, which means that somebody who has to spend that time working for money doesn&#x27;t have the time to express their idea.<p>On top of that, the more time you spend polishing your expression, the more convincing you can make it, so right off the bat there is a direct relationship between time&#x2F;money and speech.<p>Then you need to get people to look at it. If all you do is write a document that sits in a drawer in your house, nobody will ever see it. So you need to spend more time distributing your idea, or get other people who are willing to spend their time distributing it.<p>Political advertising is just paying a third party to do that for you. It costs <i>less</i> than hiring a staff of people to promote the idea &quot;organically&quot; (otherwise it would be poor value for money and nobody would pay for it), which means it enables people with <i>less</i> money to get their message in front of people.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Zuckerberg doubles down on Facebook political ads policy after Twitter ban</title><url>https://thehill.com/policy/technology/468216-zuckerberg-doubles-down-on-facebook-political-ads-policy-after-twitter-ban</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>landryraccoon</author><text>I&#x27;m sorry, I don&#x27;t follow.<p>If a group wants to post on social media, they can just post on social media. Ads increase the reach of those with money. That is exactly what they do and nothing more. Why would we want to further amplify the voice of those who have money? The fact that the cause is the abolition of X or the support of Y is a non sequitur, in either case it is the viewpoint of someone with the money to promote their voice.<p>I have very little concern that the opinions of those with large quantities of money at their disposal are underrepresented in politics, or do not have the ability to make their voices heard.</text></item><item><author>Lazare</author><text>I notice you don&#x27;t address his actual point though.<p>If, let&#x27;s say, a group advocating for the abolishment of asset forfeiture wants to communicate their message, and the media is not covering it, it would be natural for them to try paying for ads, and the obvious place to <i>put</i> ads are on social media, since that&#x27;s where the eyeballs are (cf, the collapse of the news media). If social media bans those ads then while the group clearly still has free speech, they will have little way to meaningfully exercise it.<p>You might say - and I&#x27;d certainly agree - that the real problem is a world where everyone is on Twitter and Facebook to the exclusion of all else, and thus a world where 3-4 CEOs can unilaterally decide that nobody needs to hear anything about asset forfeiture (or whatever). And yet, that&#x27;s the world we&#x27;re in.<p>(You also don&#x27;t seem to understand what &quot;free speech&quot; is. By your logic, a law banning the purchase television ads for Democratic candidates - but allowing the purchase of television ads for Republicans - would be okay, because after all, those ads cost money, so it&#x27;s not restricting the Democratic candidates right to free speech. That&#x27;s absurd, no?)</text></item><item><author>Traster</author><text>&gt;Ads can be an important part of voice - especially for candidates and advocacy groups the media might not otherwise cover so they can get their message into debates<p>It&#x27;s interesting how hard Zuck is working to try and conflate the idea of &#x27;free speech&#x27; with paid advertisements. To put it another way, if advertising on Facebook is part of my free speech, surely Zuck must run my adverts despite the fact I have no money to pay him for them.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>lonelappde</author><text>Why do people with extra time get to be heard more than people with extra money? I don&#x27;t have the ability to take 20% time off my work to promote my message, but I have saved up some money.</text></comment>
|
30,589,890 | 30,589,527 | 1 | 2 | 30,588,708 |
train
|
<story><title>UK rejects opening borders to Ukraine refugees</title><url>https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/britain-may-ease-immigration-rules-ukrainian-refugees-sun-2022-03-07/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>gmac</author><text>&gt; ultimately you have to respect the vote to an extent<p>Disagree here. A 52% majority is no basis for far-reaching, long-term constitutional change (even if the 52% _hadn&#x27;t_ been systematically lied to, and the change in question _didn&#x27;t_ represent pure national self-harm).</text></item><item><author>ricardo81</author><text>Folklore is that the Brexit vote won because of an open border policy(requirement) of being in the EU.<p>This should unpeel that Brexit voting demographic, after all there should be a limit in their reasons for refusing immigration into the country.<p>I voted the other way, but ultimately you have to respect the vote to an extent.<p>Perhaps if we are willing to supply armaments to Ukraine to defend their way of life (and by proxy ours), the least we can do is accept an appreciable % of people fleeing Ukraine. Purely IMO.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>blowski</author><text>Reading this thread is like reading a &quot;tabs vs spaces&quot; flamewar. I voted and strongly supported remain. We left. Let&#x27;s move on (e.g. start a campaign to re-join or some other future) rather than re-hashing the same arguments over and over and over and over again.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>UK rejects opening borders to Ukraine refugees</title><url>https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/britain-may-ease-immigration-rules-ukrainian-refugees-sun-2022-03-07/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>gmac</author><text>&gt; ultimately you have to respect the vote to an extent<p>Disagree here. A 52% majority is no basis for far-reaching, long-term constitutional change (even if the 52% _hadn&#x27;t_ been systematically lied to, and the change in question _didn&#x27;t_ represent pure national self-harm).</text></item><item><author>ricardo81</author><text>Folklore is that the Brexit vote won because of an open border policy(requirement) of being in the EU.<p>This should unpeel that Brexit voting demographic, after all there should be a limit in their reasons for refusing immigration into the country.<p>I voted the other way, but ultimately you have to respect the vote to an extent.<p>Perhaps if we are willing to supply armaments to Ukraine to defend their way of life (and by proxy ours), the least we can do is accept an appreciable % of people fleeing Ukraine. Purely IMO.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>eynsham</author><text>A &lt;&lt;50% majority of the population elected a parliamentary majority to allow India and Ireland independence; it would similarly now be the obvious mechanism to allow Scottish independence, and if there were to be an Act of Union would be the obvious mechanism there. An elected government has the right to pass legislation, and in Britain legislation can do and is everything. Cameron promised a referendum which, not in law but in practice, would be binding. We voted for the referendum, and voted the wrong way, alas.<p>Brexit is certainly national self-harm, but that’s the right of voters. If they don’t want to use their brains, or to prioritise ends alien to people like me, that’s also entirely within their rights. There is no national consensus that we should move to any other constitutional régime, and in the absence of one, absurd as they are, our Diceyan notions are not so beyond the pale that simply in themselves they are illegitimate. If I am prepared to recognise the Thatcher ministry as having a legitimate democratic basis—and I certainly am—then the far more limited damage of Brexit certainly doesn’t make me inclined to question these aspects of the British democratic setup. (I do have some sympathy to attempts to smuggle in a constitution through the backdoor via the Act of Union and Scots law though.)</text></comment>
|
37,583,190 | 37,581,089 | 1 | 3 | 37,580,593 |
train
|
<story><title>Aldous Huxley's Deep Reflection</title><url>https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/aldous-huxleys-deep-reflection/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>driggs</author><text>This is an especially interesting read given that Huxley described his own apparent aphantasia - lack of mental visual imagery - in &quot;The Doors of Perception&quot;:<p><pre><code> I am and, for as long as I can remember, I have always been a poor visualizer. Words, even the pregnant words of poets, do not evoke pictures in my mind. No hypnagogic visions greet me on the verge of sleep. When I recall something, the memory does not present itself to me as a vividly seen event or object. By an effort of the will, I can evoke a not very vivid image of what happened yesterday afternoon, of how the Lungarno used to look before the bridges were destroyed, or the Bayswater Road when the only buses were green and tiny and drawn by aged horses at three and a half miles an hour. But such images have little substance and absolutely no autonomous life of their own. They stand to real, perceived objects in the same relation as Homer&#x27;s ghosts stood to the men of flesh and blood, who came to visit them in the shades. Only when I have a high temperature do my mental images come to independent life. To those in whom the faculty of visualization is strong my inner world must seem curiously drab, limited, and uninteresting.</code></pre></text></comment>
|
<story><title>Aldous Huxley's Deep Reflection</title><url>https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/aldous-huxleys-deep-reflection/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>k0mplex</author><text>Highly recommend Huxley&#x27;s Doors of Perception and The Divine Within.</text></comment>
|
5,216,690 | 5,216,078 | 1 | 2 | 5,215,820 |
train
|
<story><title>Why It's Time to Break the Code of Silence at the Airport</title><url>http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20130213133819-332179-why-it-s-time-to-break-the-code-of-silence-at-the-airport</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>grecy</author><text>&#62; Besides, American airport security is the "gold standard," isn't it?<p>Depressingly, this is the same logic that keeps Americans from improving anything. Because they're constantly told they live in the best country in the world(TM), Americans are apathetic when it comes to making things better (healthcare, education, poverty rates, incarceration rates, living standards, etc.), because they think it's already "the best".</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>stcredzero</author><text><i>&#62; Americans are apathetic when it comes to making things better (healthcare, education, poverty rates, incarceration rates, living standards, etc.), because they think it's already "the best".</i><p>A great many of my fellow Americans are worse than apathetic. If you point out areas where we can improve, some Americans will actively attack you through accusations of treason and verbal abuse. (Seems to be 10X worse in Texas than any other place I've lived.) It's as if they're willfully trying their best to ensure they won't ever learn anything.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Why It's Time to Break the Code of Silence at the Airport</title><url>http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20130213133819-332179-why-it-s-time-to-break-the-code-of-silence-at-the-airport</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>grecy</author><text>&#62; Besides, American airport security is the "gold standard," isn't it?<p>Depressingly, this is the same logic that keeps Americans from improving anything. Because they're constantly told they live in the best country in the world(TM), Americans are apathetic when it comes to making things better (healthcare, education, poverty rates, incarceration rates, living standards, etc.), because they think it's already "the best".</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>iends</author><text>Generalizations like these are exciting. Let me try too...<p>I've yet to meet an American who didn't think at least one one of these, if not all, were completely broken.<p>Source: I live in America.</text></comment>
|
27,519,451 | 27,519,471 | 1 | 2 | 27,518,912 |
train
|
<story><title>U.S. workers are among the most stressed in the world, new Gallup report finds</title><url>https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/15/gallup-us-workers-are-among-the-most-stressed-in-the-world.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>throwkeep</author><text>Don&#x27;t most US cities have social services that provide shelter, food and other assistance?<p>[How nice that this is getting downvoted. It&#x27;s a legit question. I have family members who are social workers and know these services exist, and it seems like it&#x27;s most cities, but don&#x27;t know for sure, hence the question mark.]</text></item><item><author>guerrilla</author><text>I&#x27;d add the general lack of a social safety net, at least compared to Europe. All those people can actually become homeless.</text></item><item><author>SmellTheGlove</author><text>I wonder if the root causes here are closer to skyrocketing housing costs, healthcare risks, and relatively stagnant wages making it hard to de-risk the first two.<p>The article mentions -<p><pre><code> By contrast, the daily stress levels for women in Western Europe went down in the last year, which researchers attribute to social safety nets for parents and workers to prevent unemployment.
</code></pre>
But then goes on to talk about the workplace. I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s the workplace. I think it&#x27;s the lack of psychological security as the middle class ceases to exist.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>dragontamer</author><text>Its hard enough to convince a friend to take unemployment checks, let alone go to a shelter or pull out a food-stamp debit card.<p>There&#x27;s a toxic culture in the USA that looks down upon welfare. For those people, welfare doesn&#x27;t exist, even if they find themselves in that environment. And since they&#x27;ve convinced themselves that they&#x27;ll never take welfare, they expect others to follow by their own rules.<p>This culture leads to a particular anti-welfare voting pattern.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>U.S. workers are among the most stressed in the world, new Gallup report finds</title><url>https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/15/gallup-us-workers-are-among-the-most-stressed-in-the-world.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>throwkeep</author><text>Don&#x27;t most US cities have social services that provide shelter, food and other assistance?<p>[How nice that this is getting downvoted. It&#x27;s a legit question. I have family members who are social workers and know these services exist, and it seems like it&#x27;s most cities, but don&#x27;t know for sure, hence the question mark.]</text></item><item><author>guerrilla</author><text>I&#x27;d add the general lack of a social safety net, at least compared to Europe. All those people can actually become homeless.</text></item><item><author>SmellTheGlove</author><text>I wonder if the root causes here are closer to skyrocketing housing costs, healthcare risks, and relatively stagnant wages making it hard to de-risk the first two.<p>The article mentions -<p><pre><code> By contrast, the daily stress levels for women in Western Europe went down in the last year, which researchers attribute to social safety nets for parents and workers to prevent unemployment.
</code></pre>
But then goes on to talk about the workplace. I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s the workplace. I think it&#x27;s the lack of psychological security as the middle class ceases to exist.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>reidjs</author><text>True, but in many ways I am more afraid of living in a shelter than on the street, or more realistically, in my car. In your car at least you have some sense of ownership, safety, and personal space. In a shelter you are potentially surrounded by mentally ill unstable drug addicts. It makes sense that many people refuse to use shelters.<p>This is coming from someone who has never lived in a shelter, so I may be wrong, but it&#x27;s definitely my fear and a source of motivation when working not-great jobs.</text></comment>
|
37,448,068 | 37,445,169 | 1 | 2 | 37,444,340 |
train
|
<story><title>Appeals court rules White House likely overstepped 1st Amendment on social media</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/business/appeals-court-first-amendment-social-media.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>TheCaptain4815</author><text>Considering the censorship is heavily tilted towards one ideology, what incentive does the opposing ideology have to stop this? It worked perfectly fine with no political capital loss in 2020 and 2022 midterms. In fact, most people within that ideology agree with the tech giants and want more censorship.</text></item><item><author>nullifidian</author><text>Considering there are only few actors (the social media, search, internet infrastructure companies) the coercion is unlikely to stop due to a court decision. The government and the legislature have a lot of leverage, up to an anti-trust action, and instead of threatening emails or public statements they could do it with off the record conversations, which are much harder to sue against -- the public wouldn&#x27;t even know. The more questionable is the position of a company regarding anti-trust, title VII, {something else I can&#x27;t think of}, the more leverage the government has.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>callalex</author><text>It is seriously unclear to me what ideology you think is promoting censorship the most, from my perspective the cat got out of the bag in the USA and now different kinds of censorship are being advocated for across the political spectrum.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Appeals court rules White House likely overstepped 1st Amendment on social media</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/business/appeals-court-first-amendment-social-media.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>TheCaptain4815</author><text>Considering the censorship is heavily tilted towards one ideology, what incentive does the opposing ideology have to stop this? It worked perfectly fine with no political capital loss in 2020 and 2022 midterms. In fact, most people within that ideology agree with the tech giants and want more censorship.</text></item><item><author>nullifidian</author><text>Considering there are only few actors (the social media, search, internet infrastructure companies) the coercion is unlikely to stop due to a court decision. The government and the legislature have a lot of leverage, up to an anti-trust action, and instead of threatening emails or public statements they could do it with off the record conversations, which are much harder to sue against -- the public wouldn&#x27;t even know. The more questionable is the position of a company regarding anti-trust, title VII, {something else I can&#x27;t think of}, the more leverage the government has.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>vorpalhex</author><text>What is likely is that the wheels of censorship will do what they always do and censor that other group. Nobody is immune to censorship for long.<p>Hopefully that will cause enough ruckus that we go back to being anti-censorship.<p>Censorship isn&#x27;t just impacting one group - it&#x27;s a whole bunch of smaller subgroups that make up both parties. It also hurts the uncensored groups because instead of responding to their opponents they are now just shadowboxing themselves in a corner.</text></comment>
|
2,401,100 | 2,400,925 | 1 | 3 | 2,400,822 |
train
|
<story><title>Top Gear responds to Tesla</title><url>http://transmission.blogs.topgear.com/2011/04/02/tesla-vs-top-gear-andy-wilman-on-our-current-legal-action/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>cormullion</author><text>I'd forgotten just how much Clarkson sings the praises of the Tesla in the first half of the review. The electric Tesla thrashes the petrol Lotus Elise in a drag race. Clarkson is obviously amazed - "God almighty:, "this is biblically quick!" - "this car is electric, literally!". "Wave goodbye to dial-up, welcome to broadband motoring!". Then he says how much torque it produces, how quick it is from 0 to 60, and then: "it's even more 'not bad' when you start looking into the costs": £40 to fill the petrol Elise, electricity just £3.50. Wind noise is a problem, but "a small price to pay when you consider the upsides". "And I haven't even got to the big upside yet: 200 miles between trips to the plug." Some adverse comments about the handling, but then he waves goodbye as "the volt head" cruises past the "petrol head". "It is snowing in hell!". "This car was shaping up to be something wonderful..."<p>After a pretty positive first half, Clarkson does indeed go on to make fun of the car's electrical problems, and then is unimpressed by the practicalities and ecological claims of electric vehicles. Even with a range of 250 miles, and a 16 hour recharge cycle (if you're not throwing it around a track), it's just not - yet - a practical car for many people, or a supercar to compete with the likes of Ferrari or Porsche.<p>Clarkson's final words on the Tesla: "Incredible - but irrelevant [in the light of the hydrogen car reviewed later]".<p>As Top Gear and Clarkson reviews go, I thought it wasn't overly biased. I mean, he could have dropped a piano on it, or set it on fire...<p>I suspect Tesla are just in the need for some publicity at the moment.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Top Gear responds to Tesla</title><url>http://transmission.blogs.topgear.com/2011/04/02/tesla-vs-top-gear-andy-wilman-on-our-current-legal-action/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>olivercameron</author><text>I just can't see how Tesla can win this case in court. As anyone who has ever watched Jeremy Clarkson will tell you, you know he would rather resign from Top Gear than apologise for this.</text></comment>
|
12,672,761 | 12,672,656 | 1 | 3 | 12,657,528 |
train
|
<story><title>Panama: The Hidden Trillions</title><url>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/10/27/panama-the-hidden-trillions/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>twblalock</author><text>This is what you get when the majority of tax revenue comes from a small tax base. For example, according to Pew Research (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pewresearch.org&#x2F;fact-tank&#x2F;2016&#x2F;04&#x2F;13&#x2F;high-income-americans-pay-most-income-taxes-but-enough-to-be-fair&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pewresearch.org&#x2F;fact-tank&#x2F;2016&#x2F;04&#x2F;13&#x2F;high-income-...</a>):<p>&gt; In 2014, people with adjusted gross income, or AGI, above $250,000 paid just over half (51.6%) of all individual income taxes, though they accounted for only 2.7% of all returns filed, according to our analysis of preliminary IRS data. Their average tax rate (total taxes paid divided by cumulative AGI) was 25.7%. By contrast, people with incomes of less than $50,000 accounted for 62.3% of all individual returns filed, but they paid just 5.7% of total taxes. Their average tax rate was 4.3%.<p>In the state of California, &quot;New figures from the Franchise Tax Board show that the wealthiest 1% of Californians paid 50.6% of the state income tax in 2012 — up from 41.1% in 2011. It means that of nearly 15 million tax returns, about 150,000 generated more than half the revenue.&quot; (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;local&#x2F;la-me-cap-taxes-20140505-column.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;local&#x2F;la-me-cap-taxes-20140505-column...</a>)<p>It&#x27;s not very healthy to collect taxes this way. As the LA Times article indicated, California&#x27;s tax revenue fluctuates based on the incomes of a pretty small number of people.<p>When a small number of people provide most of the tax revenue, yet the political discourse constantly accuses them of not paying a fair share, it&#x27;s not hard to see why they feel persecuted and try to hide their money.<p>It&#x27;s also hard to say that they aren&#x27;t paying their &quot;fair share&quot; when they provide more than half of the government&#x27;s tax revenue. Anyone who wants them to pay more ought to provide some kind of objective way to calculate what someone&#x27;s &quot;fair share&quot; of tax is, and that&#x27;s probably impossible.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>afterburner</author><text><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Wealth_inequality_in_the_Unite...</a><p>&gt;Currently, the richest 1% hold about 38% of all privately held wealth in the United States. while the bottom 90% held 73% of all debt. According to The New York Times, the &quot;richest 1 percent in the United States now own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent&quot;.<p>Your stats don&#x27;t sound so crazy when you put it in context.<p>Please feel free to peruse the economic history of states where the rich eventually dodged taxes and left the crushing burden to the middle and poor: ancient Rome, modern Greece, etc.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Panama: The Hidden Trillions</title><url>http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/10/27/panama-the-hidden-trillions/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>twblalock</author><text>This is what you get when the majority of tax revenue comes from a small tax base. For example, according to Pew Research (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pewresearch.org&#x2F;fact-tank&#x2F;2016&#x2F;04&#x2F;13&#x2F;high-income-americans-pay-most-income-taxes-but-enough-to-be-fair&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.pewresearch.org&#x2F;fact-tank&#x2F;2016&#x2F;04&#x2F;13&#x2F;high-income-...</a>):<p>&gt; In 2014, people with adjusted gross income, or AGI, above $250,000 paid just over half (51.6%) of all individual income taxes, though they accounted for only 2.7% of all returns filed, according to our analysis of preliminary IRS data. Their average tax rate (total taxes paid divided by cumulative AGI) was 25.7%. By contrast, people with incomes of less than $50,000 accounted for 62.3% of all individual returns filed, but they paid just 5.7% of total taxes. Their average tax rate was 4.3%.<p>In the state of California, &quot;New figures from the Franchise Tax Board show that the wealthiest 1% of Californians paid 50.6% of the state income tax in 2012 — up from 41.1% in 2011. It means that of nearly 15 million tax returns, about 150,000 generated more than half the revenue.&quot; (<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;local&#x2F;la-me-cap-taxes-20140505-column.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;local&#x2F;la-me-cap-taxes-20140505-column...</a>)<p>It&#x27;s not very healthy to collect taxes this way. As the LA Times article indicated, California&#x27;s tax revenue fluctuates based on the incomes of a pretty small number of people.<p>When a small number of people provide most of the tax revenue, yet the political discourse constantly accuses them of not paying a fair share, it&#x27;s not hard to see why they feel persecuted and try to hide their money.<p>It&#x27;s also hard to say that they aren&#x27;t paying their &quot;fair share&quot; when they provide more than half of the government&#x27;s tax revenue. Anyone who wants them to pay more ought to provide some kind of objective way to calculate what someone&#x27;s &quot;fair share&quot; of tax is, and that&#x27;s probably impossible.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>cloudjacker</author><text>If you are concerned about people paying their &quot;fair share&quot; at all then you are playing by the wrong set of rules.<p>Governments funding themselves by income tax is a 100 year old phenomenon. That particular form of passive revenue generation isn&#x27;t an absolute. Governments subsidized roads and schools before then, whether it was from property taxes, nationalized industries, bond programs, outright expropriation or any other form of revenue generation.<p>Compliance with passive taxation literally requires indoctrination, and there are people that reach a place in society where they can opt out of it.<p>This isn&#x27;t a &quot;stance&quot; I subscribe to, it is a reality I can perceive. It would be disingenuous for me to say I don&#x27;t understand what is going on, or hand waive it away as saying these people neglect their &quot;civic duty&quot;.</text></comment>
|
24,390,791 | 24,387,707 | 1 | 2 | 24,376,950 |
train
|
<story><title>Google taught me to turn Impostor Syndrome into an Advantage</title><url>https://www.zainrizvi.io/blog/the-impostors-advantage/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>gregd</author><text>I&#x27;ve been coding off and on professionally for over a decade and I STILL feel like an imposter.<p>I still have to look stuff up constantly.<p>I still watch how-to code videos everywhere.<p>Don&#x27;t know if I&#x27;m alone or other people just can&#x27;t bring themselves to admit that.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>paul_f</author><text>The OP is not talking about mundane things, such as remember the difference between implode and explode in PHP. They are talking about a a deep feeling of incompetence. I believe that imposter syndrome is more prevalent in the software world because, unlike auto mechanics or surgeons for example, we are not give a chance to watch the process actually take place, we only see the results. We see the finished code and don&#x27;t know how it was derived. Imagine all we got was: car works again, now you fix the next one</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Google taught me to turn Impostor Syndrome into an Advantage</title><url>https://www.zainrizvi.io/blog/the-impostors-advantage/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>gregd</author><text>I&#x27;ve been coding off and on professionally for over a decade and I STILL feel like an imposter.<p>I still have to look stuff up constantly.<p>I still watch how-to code videos everywhere.<p>Don&#x27;t know if I&#x27;m alone or other people just can&#x27;t bring themselves to admit that.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jascination</author><text>If someone writing a novel has to look up the spelling of a particularly useful word that fits the situation perfectly, but they can never manage to spell it right without aid, does that make them an impostor?<p>No brain can contain the exact right way to do x, y and z - and it needn&#x27;t, because we have a magic box that we can ask and get great help when we need it.<p>IMO, being a developer isn&#x27;t about being 100% amazing with your syntax or being able to recite the ES2015 spec by heart; it&#x27;s about knowing what tools to use when.</text></comment>
|
3,375,656 | 3,374,663 | 1 | 2 | 3,373,953 |
train
|
<story><title>Good news: Mozilla fixed their damn browser</title><url>http://jasonlefkowitz.net/2011/12/good-news-mozilla-fixed-their-damn-browser/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>CrLf</author><text>I find these statements amusing...<p>As it happens, neither is ext3 an obsolete filesystem (I have many machines using it just fine, thank you, with no intention to migrate to less tested filesystems just because they're "new"), nor "data=ordered" has significant performance problems.<p>More amusing than this just the fact that the filesystem is a bottleneck for a web browser... an application that should be network and CPU bound...</text></item><item><author>jmillikin</author><text>Not to discount the work that Mozilla has been doing, but it seems like the "improvement" they added is actually just a workaround for distros that configure filesystems incorrectly.<p>That is, his machine is configured to use an obsolete filesystem (ext3) in a mode with significant performance problems (data=ordered).<p>There are numerous ways that a machine can be mis-configured such that it suffers from poor performance. It would be better if Firefox detected these and warned about them, rather than just silently working around the broken-ness.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>akkartik</author><text>Alright, I'm going to start calling people on HN about this pet peeve of mine:<p>Please stop 'finding it amusing' when you disagree with people. It makes you sound arrogant and passive-aggressive. Even if the other side is <i>totally</i> wrong, hammering that fact in is rhetorically counter-productive.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Good news: Mozilla fixed their damn browser</title><url>http://jasonlefkowitz.net/2011/12/good-news-mozilla-fixed-their-damn-browser/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>CrLf</author><text>I find these statements amusing...<p>As it happens, neither is ext3 an obsolete filesystem (I have many machines using it just fine, thank you, with no intention to migrate to less tested filesystems just because they're "new"), nor "data=ordered" has significant performance problems.<p>More amusing than this just the fact that the filesystem is a bottleneck for a web browser... an application that should be network and CPU bound...</text></item><item><author>jmillikin</author><text>Not to discount the work that Mozilla has been doing, but it seems like the "improvement" they added is actually just a workaround for distros that configure filesystems incorrectly.<p>That is, his machine is configured to use an obsolete filesystem (ext3) in a mode with significant performance problems (data=ordered).<p>There are numerous ways that a machine can be mis-configured such that it suffers from poor performance. It would be better if Firefox detected these and warned about them, rather than just silently working around the broken-ness.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jmillikin</author><text>data=ordered certainly <i>does</i> have significant performance problems. Most notably, it causes fsync() to actually act like sync(), so flushing a single file to disk can potentially cause a flush of the entire disk buffer instead!</text></comment>
|
36,459,335 | 36,456,880 | 1 | 2 | 36,451,907 |
train
|
<story><title>Finally getting two's complement</title><url>https://neugierig.org/software/blog/2023/06/twos-complement.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>masswerk</author><text>I think, you can&#x27;t address two&#x27;s complement without mentioning ones&#x27; complement.<p>So what is ones&#x27; complement? Simply all bits flipped. (XOR the word length – each bit becomes its complement.) There&#x27;s a simplicity and beauty to this and math just works with addition and subtraction. There&#x27;s also the notable feature of the most significant bit, which, if excluded from the usable range of numbers, becomes the sign-bit. If it is empty (clear), it must be a positive number, if it&#x27;s set, we have a negative number (since it must be a clear bit flipped).<p>So everything perfect, then? Not at all. What happens, if we flip all bits on zero (0000)? Well, it becomes all bits set (1111). How do we convert a number to it&#x27;s signed counterpart? We flip all bits and … Oh, this must be negative zero. Maybe we can deal with this? Sort of. But it&#x27;s somewhat nasty, because we need an extra steps to traverse zero. Say, we go from +1 to -1, there isn&#x27;t just a zero in between, making this a difference of 2 – as it should be –, but there&#x27;s +0 and -0. Three steps. That&#x27;s odd.<p>Can we do something about this? Namely, can we get rid of negative zero? Well, as we&#x27;ve seen, we have an extra step on the negative side of things… what about just adding 1 to compensate for this? So, for -1, we wouldn&#x27;t write 1110 (flipping all bits of 0001), but 1111? Just the same, for -2, we would add 1 to 1101, making this 1110, and so on. – Well, this works! we just eliminated negative zero! Welcome to two&#x27;s complement.<p>(So, is it now perfect? Well, sort of. We now have introduced a certain asymmetry into our number system: on the side of things, where the sign-bit is clear, zero is the first number and +1 the second one, while numbers with the sign-bit set start with -1. Thus, we have an excess number on the negative side of the number range described by our word length. We just can&#x27;t have it all. Well, we could switch to balanced ternary, but this is another story…)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>FullstakBlogger</author><text>Why does starting with ones&#x27; compliment make things easier? IMV, it makes it more confusing, because two&#x27;s compliment seems like an arbitrary leap that happens to work.<p>If you&#x27;re tasked with mapping a subset of bit-states to negative numbers, it&#x27;s intuitively obvious that there&#x27;s already a state that yields 0 when you add 1 to it, as long as you wrap on overflow. With four bits that&#x27;s 1111. That&#x27;s a great representation of -1.<p>If you want to get 0 by adding 2, you&#x27;d have to start from 1110, and so on.<p>Just because the top bit can be used to identify a negative number when you use up half the states, doesn&#x27;t mean it should be thought of as a logical flag. That&#x27;s how you invent ones&#x27; compliment.<p>I think of ones&#x27; compliment as a logical encoding, and two&#x27;s compliment as an arithmetic encoding, and it shows in how easy negation is in ones&#x27; compliment, and how easy arithmetic is in two&#x27;s compliment.<p>The fact that everyone tries to teach them as if one is a precursor to the other is what&#x27;s confusing.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Finally getting two's complement</title><url>https://neugierig.org/software/blog/2023/06/twos-complement.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>masswerk</author><text>I think, you can&#x27;t address two&#x27;s complement without mentioning ones&#x27; complement.<p>So what is ones&#x27; complement? Simply all bits flipped. (XOR the word length – each bit becomes its complement.) There&#x27;s a simplicity and beauty to this and math just works with addition and subtraction. There&#x27;s also the notable feature of the most significant bit, which, if excluded from the usable range of numbers, becomes the sign-bit. If it is empty (clear), it must be a positive number, if it&#x27;s set, we have a negative number (since it must be a clear bit flipped).<p>So everything perfect, then? Not at all. What happens, if we flip all bits on zero (0000)? Well, it becomes all bits set (1111). How do we convert a number to it&#x27;s signed counterpart? We flip all bits and … Oh, this must be negative zero. Maybe we can deal with this? Sort of. But it&#x27;s somewhat nasty, because we need an extra steps to traverse zero. Say, we go from +1 to -1, there isn&#x27;t just a zero in between, making this a difference of 2 – as it should be –, but there&#x27;s +0 and -0. Three steps. That&#x27;s odd.<p>Can we do something about this? Namely, can we get rid of negative zero? Well, as we&#x27;ve seen, we have an extra step on the negative side of things… what about just adding 1 to compensate for this? So, for -1, we wouldn&#x27;t write 1110 (flipping all bits of 0001), but 1111? Just the same, for -2, we would add 1 to 1101, making this 1110, and so on. – Well, this works! we just eliminated negative zero! Welcome to two&#x27;s complement.<p>(So, is it now perfect? Well, sort of. We now have introduced a certain asymmetry into our number system: on the side of things, where the sign-bit is clear, zero is the first number and +1 the second one, while numbers with the sign-bit set start with -1. Thus, we have an excess number on the negative side of the number range described by our word length. We just can&#x27;t have it all. Well, we could switch to balanced ternary, but this is another story…)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>omnicognate</author><text>The apostrophe placement is significant: it&#x27;s two&#x27;s complement (complement of two) but ones&#x27; complement (complement of ones, plural).</text></comment>
|
21,187,633 | 21,187,137 | 1 | 2 | 21,184,008 |
train
|
<story><title>Why the NBA Apologized to China over Daryl Morey's Tweet About Hong Kong</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/07/sports/basketball/nba-china-hong-kong.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>cco</author><text>It&#x27;s very interesting that &quot;non-respectable&quot; Trey Parker and Matt Stone responded in the morally correct way and the NBA decides to kiss the feet of despots.<p>Pretty disgusting really. It really shows that the dream of liberalization of China is dead, some thought that we could do it but irony strikes again and instead of opening up China our corporations and institutions have become infected and we&#x27;re in the midst of The Reverse Opium War.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Why the NBA Apologized to China over Daryl Morey's Tweet About Hong Kong</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/07/sports/basketball/nba-china-hong-kong.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>remarkEon</author><text>Here&#x27;s the Nets owner&#x27;s response, which adds a little more color to this already contentious issue.[0][1]<p>I don&#x27;t see a way for the NBA to come out ahead on this. Chinese investment already drives a lot of business decisions for the League, and I doubt that a civics lesson for fans and players about Chinese territorial sovereignty is going to do anything to lower the temperature. Tsai&#x27;s statement comes across as particularly caustic - making an implication that Morey&#x27;s tweets call into question that territorial sovereignty in the same way that e.g. Japanese invasion did. As a sports fan, it&#x27;s tough to remain objective here. On the one hand, Hong Kong <i>will</i> integrate - baring some major geopolitical course corrections, and probably a war. On the other, it&#x27;s a little disturbing to see US sports figures - who otherwise are generally untouchable, for the most part - bend over backwards to make sure they don&#x27;t sufficiently enrage China (looks like it&#x27;s too late) over some tweets by a GM who is pretty well liked in the League.<p>As a meta point, I figure this is only the beginning and we&#x27;ll continue to see China flex it&#x27;s financial and population muscle abroad in ways that may seem hard to predict in advance, but are pretty obvious once they happen.<p>[0]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bleacherreport.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2856965-nets-governor-joe-tsai-releases-statement-on-daryl-moreys-hong-kong-tweet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bleacherreport.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2856965-nets-governor-jo...</a>
[1]<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;100001583307192&#x2F;posts&#x2F;2653378931391524?sfns=mo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;100001583307192&#x2F;posts&#x2F;2653378931391...</a></text></comment>
|
32,207,668 | 32,205,630 | 1 | 2 | 32,205,226 |
train
|
<story><title>Monkeypox declared global health emergency by WHO as cases surge</title><url>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/23/monkeypox-who-declares-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>yosito</author><text>According to the CDC:<p>&gt; Infections with the type of monkeypox virus identified in this outbreak ... are rarely fatal. Over 99% of people who get this form of the disease are likely to survive. However, people with ... a history of eczema ... may be more likely to ... die.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;poxvirus&#x2F;monkeypox&#x2F;faq.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;poxvirus&#x2F;monkeypox&#x2F;faq.html</a><p>I feel simultaneous relief and terror. While I do feel that the eczema part I&#x27;ve highlighted is probably some standard language around risk to people with immune conditions, I do wonder how much of a higher risk eczema poses in cases like this.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Bjorkbat</author><text>I&#x27;m less worried about fatality and more worried about long-term health consequences.<p>COVID worries me, but not because it might kill me. I&#x27;m more worried about long-term brain fog and respiratory problems. I&#x27;m more worried about being permanently disabled. I&#x27;m worried about having to life a kind of life where I feel like I&#x27;m substantially less than I once was.<p>But back to the point, I&#x27;m curious what the odds are of getting monkeypox and never quite fully recovering from it.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Monkeypox declared global health emergency by WHO as cases surge</title><url>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/23/monkeypox-who-declares-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>yosito</author><text>According to the CDC:<p>&gt; Infections with the type of monkeypox virus identified in this outbreak ... are rarely fatal. Over 99% of people who get this form of the disease are likely to survive. However, people with ... a history of eczema ... may be more likely to ... die.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;poxvirus&#x2F;monkeypox&#x2F;faq.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;poxvirus&#x2F;monkeypox&#x2F;faq.html</a><p>I feel simultaneous relief and terror. While I do feel that the eczema part I&#x27;ve highlighted is probably some standard language around risk to people with immune conditions, I do wonder how much of a higher risk eczema poses in cases like this.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>valbaca</author><text>Wow, thank you for pointing this out. I have eczema and would&#x27;ve never though it would increase my risk against *Monkeypox*. Wild, but glad I&#x27;m better informed.</text></comment>
|
36,631,565 | 36,629,714 | 1 | 2 | 36,623,827 |
train
|
<story><title>More green spaces linked to slower biological aging</title><url>https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2023/06/more-green-spaces-linked-to-slower-biological-aging/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jnurmine</author><text>If I could design zoning things and building regulations and generally Simcity&#x2F;Cities micromanage in real life, I would set a demand of reserving let&#x27;s say 500 m2 of green space for every occupant in a multistorey building. This aggregated space would have to be right next to or around the building.<p>As a concrete example: to build a building for 100 people, one must have 100*500 = 5 hectares of space around the building, reserved for a green space only, not parking lots or such.<p>Buildings would be more spaced apart and would not trap heat so much like traditional dense designs, so urban centers would be cooler. I dare to claim that people would be less crazy and generally happier and healthier when living like this. Over time, building less densely would see all kinds of positive effects compounding.<p>The green space could be used for many good things, e.g. growing hyperlocal food like vegetables, potatoes or whatever grows well in the climate, for having tree-shaded places during warm days, for just having a piece of nature to go to quickly and easily. Smaller batches of forest shading a path could connect multiple buildings built with the same ideas, and so on. It would be possible to use bicycles or walk along these paths.<p>In a nutshell, if one has to build high, then make all multi-storey buildings like a stacked nano-village surrounded by a larger green area&#x2F;forest. Based on my subjective understanding very few people actually like the ground floor so that&#x27;s a good place to put local small businesses like barber, shop, bakery, café, and so on.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>More green spaces linked to slower biological aging</title><url>https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2023/06/more-green-spaces-linked-to-slower-biological-aging/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tiku</author><text>So if you live in a good part of town you live longer. Not really surprising?</text></comment>
|
33,455,207 | 33,455,109 | 1 | 2 | 33,453,819 |
train
|
<story><title>Number of unemployed persons per job opening</title><url>https://www.bls.gov/charts/job-openings-and-labor-turnover/unemp-per-job-opening.htm</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>alexb_</author><text>Posting this as its own top level comment for better visibility:<p>Look at how (relatively) low it was in September 2007. One can assume in February it was even lower - and February is when Greenspan said a recession was obviously coming. The subprime mortgage crisis started in April 2007. But the job market didn&#x27;t really get fucked until 2008. There&#x27;s a delay with these types of things - I personally predict that a year from now, a lot of companies (especially ones in the tech sector fueled by immense amounts of cheap debt and the assumption ad revenue always goes up) will collapse. That&#x27;s when you see the spike in unemployment, not now.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>whimsicalism</author><text>Because the ad-fueled tech sector companies are driving employment? And which of these companies are fueled by immense amounts of debt (traditionally a mainstay of capital intensive industries, which tech is not).<p>I don&#x27;t know, your comment makes little sense to me. I encourage others to read what Greenspan actually said if they are under the impression that he predicted the 2008 recession.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Number of unemployed persons per job opening</title><url>https://www.bls.gov/charts/job-openings-and-labor-turnover/unemp-per-job-opening.htm</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>alexb_</author><text>Posting this as its own top level comment for better visibility:<p>Look at how (relatively) low it was in September 2007. One can assume in February it was even lower - and February is when Greenspan said a recession was obviously coming. The subprime mortgage crisis started in April 2007. But the job market didn&#x27;t really get fucked until 2008. There&#x27;s a delay with these types of things - I personally predict that a year from now, a lot of companies (especially ones in the tech sector fueled by immense amounts of cheap debt and the assumption ad revenue always goes up) will collapse. That&#x27;s when you see the spike in unemployment, not now.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>bryanlarsen</author><text>People may read causality into your comment that you didn&#x27;t imply. That the number of unemployed persons per job opening is so low is a very strong &quot;boom&quot; signal. Busts inevitably follow booms, but booms don&#x27;t cause busts. Something else is the trigger. Subprime mortgage crisis in 2007, the rate tightening caused by inflation in 2022, etc.<p>I argue that the US fed rate is going to have to get a lot higher than 4% to cause this boom to bust in the US. That&#x27;s an exercise in fed tea leaf reading. The last fed guidance was a lot more ambiguous than previous tightenings this year.</text></comment>
|
39,581,302 | 39,580,747 | 1 | 3 | 39,564,632 |
train
|
<story><title>Ask HN: How can I learn about performance optimization?</title><text>What are some good resources for learning about performance optimization? This is an area that is new to me, but a big part of my new job.</text></story><parent_chain><item><author>hliyan</author><text>Former HFT dev here. Know fundamentals: sources of performance issues = things that eat&#x2F;waste CPU cycles, things that reach too far down the memory hierarchy. Usually the latter. E.g. L2 cache to RAM - order of magnitude slower; RAM to disk: 4+ orders of magnitude slower.<p>Things that eat CPU: iterations, string operations. Things that waste CPU: lock contentions in multi-threaded environments, wait states.<p>You can usually build a lot of the understanding from first principles starting there. Back in the day we had to do this because there wasn&#x27;t much by way of readily available literature on the subject. Actual techniques will depend or evolve based on your choice of platform or version.<p>E.g. 20 years ago, we used to create object pools in C++ at load time to avoid Unix heap locks at runtime. This may no longer be necessary. 15(ish?) years ago, JNI was used when the JVM wasn&#x27;t fast enough for certain stuff. This is no longer necessary. 10 years ago, immutable JS objects were thought to be faster because the JS runtimes at the time were slower to mutate existing objects than to create new ones. This too, may no longer be true (I haven&#x27;t checked recently). Until very recently, re-rendering with virtual DOM diffing was considered more performant than direct, incremental DOM manipulation. This too, may no longer be true.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nostrademons</author><text>&gt; Until very recently, re-rendering with virtual DOM diffing was considered more performant than direct, incremental DOM manipulation. This too, may no longer be true.<p>Actually wasn&#x27;t strictly true even when React came out, but it was true enough with the code that most JS developers actually wrote to lead to a change in dominant JS framework.<p>DOM manipulation even in 2013 used a dirty-bit system. Calling element.appendChild would be a few pointer swaps and take a couple ns. However, <i>if you then called any of a number of methods that forced a layout</i>, it would re-render the whole page at a cost of ~20ms on mobile devices of the day. These included such common methods as getComputedStyle(), .offsetWidth, .offsetHeight, and many others - there was a list of about 2 dozen. Most JS apps of the day might have dozens to hundreds of these re-layouts triggered per frame, but the frame budget is only 16.667ms, so that&#x27;s why you had slow animations &amp; responsiveness for mobile web apps of 2013.<p>React didn&#x27;t need a full virtual DOM layer. It just needed to ensure that all modifications to the DOM happened at once, and no user code ran in-between DOM manipulations within a certain frame. And sure enough, there are frameworks that actually do this with a much lighter virtual DOM abstraction (see: Preact) and get equal or better performance than React.<p>The lesson for performance tuning is to <i>understand what&#x27;s going on</i>, don&#x27;t just take benchmarks at face value. If a call is expensive, sometimes it&#x27;s <i>conditionally</i> expensive based on other stuff you&#x27;re doing, and there&#x27;s a happy path that&#x27;s much faster. Learn to leverage the happy paths and minimize the need to do expensive work over and over again, even if the expensive work happens in a layer you don&#x27;t have access to.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Ask HN: How can I learn about performance optimization?</title><text>What are some good resources for learning about performance optimization? This is an area that is new to me, but a big part of my new job.</text></story><parent_chain><item><author>hliyan</author><text>Former HFT dev here. Know fundamentals: sources of performance issues = things that eat&#x2F;waste CPU cycles, things that reach too far down the memory hierarchy. Usually the latter. E.g. L2 cache to RAM - order of magnitude slower; RAM to disk: 4+ orders of magnitude slower.<p>Things that eat CPU: iterations, string operations. Things that waste CPU: lock contentions in multi-threaded environments, wait states.<p>You can usually build a lot of the understanding from first principles starting there. Back in the day we had to do this because there wasn&#x27;t much by way of readily available literature on the subject. Actual techniques will depend or evolve based on your choice of platform or version.<p>E.g. 20 years ago, we used to create object pools in C++ at load time to avoid Unix heap locks at runtime. This may no longer be necessary. 15(ish?) years ago, JNI was used when the JVM wasn&#x27;t fast enough for certain stuff. This is no longer necessary. 10 years ago, immutable JS objects were thought to be faster because the JS runtimes at the time were slower to mutate existing objects than to create new ones. This too, may no longer be true (I haven&#x27;t checked recently). Until very recently, re-rendering with virtual DOM diffing was considered more performant than direct, incremental DOM manipulation. This too, may no longer be true.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jimkoen</author><text>Do you guys still buy the beefiest Intel Xeons in order to fit your main application + OS entirely within the L3 cache? There was a CppCon talk from a HFT dev about this 10 years ago.</text></comment>
|
20,307,820 | 20,306,878 | 1 | 3 | 20,305,656 |
train
|
<story><title>Finland’s weekly news show in Latin cancelled after run of 30 years</title><url>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/28/finland-latin-news-radio-bulletin-nuntii-latini-cancelled-30-years</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>FabHK</author><text>The mic drop:<p>Nuntii Latini finiti<p>Nuntii Latini Radiophoniae Finnicae Generalis, qui inde ab anno millesimo nongentesimo undenonagesimo (1989) iam triginta annos septimanatim emittuntur, post hanc emissionem finiuntur et decreto moderatorum radiophonicorum post ferias aestivas non continuabuntur. Auscultatoribus, quorum grex ad omnes orbis continentes amplificatus est, propter fidelitatem gratias quam maximas agimus et valedicimus.<p>A translation (not idiomatic English, staying closer to the original, but better than Google...):<p>Latin News Terminated<p>Finnish General Radio&#x27;s &quot;Latin News&quot;, which have been transmitted from here since 1989 already 30 years weekly, will be terminated after this transmission and, by decree of the radio directors, not continued after the summer break. To the listeners, whose flock has grown to all continents of the earth, on account of their faithfulness we give the greatest possible thanks, and bid farewell.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Finland’s weekly news show in Latin cancelled after run of 30 years</title><url>https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/28/finland-latin-news-radio-bulletin-nuntii-latini-cancelled-30-years</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>greendestiny_re</author><text><i>Sic transit gloria mundi.</i></text></comment>
|
27,415,582 | 27,414,687 | 1 | 2 | 27,414,184 |
train
|
<story><title>The modern trap of turning hobbies into hustles (2019)</title><url>https://repeller.com/trap-of-turning-hobbies-into-hustles/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>PragmaticPulp</author><text>A common theme of the most successful people that come through a mentoring group that I&#x27;m part of is that they don&#x27;t have side projects or side hustles. They focus their time and energy on doing one thing very well, whether it&#x27;s education, their internship, or their job.<p>Somewhere along the line, tech students got the idea that the key to success is to have many side projects and side hustles going at once. While it is true that in very narrow, specific cases something like a GitHub project could fill in gaps in a resume, it&#x27;s rare that companies even look at GitHub work as the deciding factor in a hiring decision. It&#x27;s too easy to let your energy, attention, and motivation get diluted across too many side projects. The problem is amplified when people start entering relationships and eventually having kids, further diluting their limited time and energy.<p>Some of the worst offenders are things that don&#x27;t necessarily feel like a side hustle but nevertheless drain inordinate amounts of time. Daytrading stocks and cryptocurrencies commonly traps people into constantly checking their phone, Twitter, and portfolio to avoid losing money or missing out on breaking news. The pocket change most people make (or lose) on day trading is lost in the noise relative to a successful tech career.<p>The best advice I have for career success is to pick one thing at a time and focus intently on it. Use your off time to do anything else: Social activities, physical activities, or even simply relax and recharge for the next day.<p>It&#x27;s better to do one thing well (usually your job) rather accumulate a lot of half-finished side projects or side hustles that are constantly stealing attention.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>CosmicShadow</author><text>To follow this advice, you have to:
A) Be the type of person who can focus on only one thing
B) Love not learning or doing other fun things because a career trumps all things in life
C) Like putting all your eggs in one basket and hoping your career or skill is always relevant
D) Love being the best you can be for the benefit of your boss
E) Want to work in a career for the rest of your life<p>Of course the most successful people you mentor are the ones who are only doing what you are guiding them to do and aren&#x27;t distracted by life, it doesn&#x27;t mean they are better.<p>This sounds like propaganda given by the CEO to have more effective employees. There is no doubt that focus can help you improve and get there faster, but at what cost and with what life goals?<p>Side hustles can be fun, profitable and life changing. We&#x27;ve got at least 3 that has allowed my partner to reduce her work hours to 4 days a week and generates half of her salary. We can buy fun stuff and business expense it and if we continue to improve we can gain more control and freedom.<p>Original post was about having hobbies and not feeling guilty about not turning them into side businesses. It would be better if our culture was set as a default to say &quot;that&#x27;s awesome, it&#x27;s so good you could sell it if you were so inclined, but feel no pressure to do so, I just want you to know it&#x27;s that good&quot;, instead of saying &quot;you should make a store&#x2F;service to sell your hobby&quot; and make people feel bad, even though it&#x27;s just a compliment.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The modern trap of turning hobbies into hustles (2019)</title><url>https://repeller.com/trap-of-turning-hobbies-into-hustles/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>PragmaticPulp</author><text>A common theme of the most successful people that come through a mentoring group that I&#x27;m part of is that they don&#x27;t have side projects or side hustles. They focus their time and energy on doing one thing very well, whether it&#x27;s education, their internship, or their job.<p>Somewhere along the line, tech students got the idea that the key to success is to have many side projects and side hustles going at once. While it is true that in very narrow, specific cases something like a GitHub project could fill in gaps in a resume, it&#x27;s rare that companies even look at GitHub work as the deciding factor in a hiring decision. It&#x27;s too easy to let your energy, attention, and motivation get diluted across too many side projects. The problem is amplified when people start entering relationships and eventually having kids, further diluting their limited time and energy.<p>Some of the worst offenders are things that don&#x27;t necessarily feel like a side hustle but nevertheless drain inordinate amounts of time. Daytrading stocks and cryptocurrencies commonly traps people into constantly checking their phone, Twitter, and portfolio to avoid losing money or missing out on breaking news. The pocket change most people make (or lose) on day trading is lost in the noise relative to a successful tech career.<p>The best advice I have for career success is to pick one thing at a time and focus intently on it. Use your off time to do anything else: Social activities, physical activities, or even simply relax and recharge for the next day.<p>It&#x27;s better to do one thing well (usually your job) rather accumulate a lot of half-finished side projects or side hustles that are constantly stealing attention.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>evo</author><text>I think there&#x27;s always inherent tradeoffs to specialization vs. generalization, and side projects&#x2F;side hustles are more of a generalization technique. It feels rather akin to the &quot;exploration vs exploitation&quot; tradeoff in AI; do you search the space for better opportunities, or maximally refine the opportunity you have?<p>Specialization is great, if the specialty you choose ends up being important or highly in-demand. For example, everyone wants to be the Geoffrey Hinton of the 21st century, a luminary in deep learning. Not too many people want to be the Geoffrey Hinton of 1986, publishing back-propagation into an AI winter and subsequent decades-long disinterest. It&#x27;s hard to know which one you&#x27;ll be (or in the above, both!)<p>Side projects and hustles allow you to broaden your toolbox and see potentially interesting crossovers. &quot;It&#x27;s like [X] for [Y]!&quot; is a cliche startup pitch at this point, but it&#x27;s true that a lot of cool ideas arise from applying principles of one field in a widely disparate area.<p>I don&#x27;t think that it&#x27;s particularly wrong to choose one route or the other--I admire the specialists I know, even as I know that&#x27;s not something I can replicate. I&#x27;m too enamored of the possibilities, and cognizant of the brevity of my lifespan, to be able to commit like that.</text></comment>
|
15,584,835 | 15,584,928 | 1 | 2 | 15,584,692 |
train
|
<story><title>Paul Manafort and Richard Gates Indictment [pdf]</title><url>https://www.justice.gov/file/1007271/download</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>bertil</author><text>The language of the indictment is surprisingly legible (and blunt). This is a welcome change in how legalese is usually used as obfuscation, or possibly in anticipation of the many journalists and non-lawyers who would want to read it.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Paul Manafort and Richard Gates Indictment [pdf]</title><url>https://www.justice.gov/file/1007271/download</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>bischofs</author><text>Interesting that there is nothing here related to the campaign - just some money laundering with Ukraine. Some would argue its outside the relevance of what the special prosecutor was hired for (Russian interference in the election).<p>Im guessing these charges are designed to scare Manafort into giving up the bigger fish.</text></comment>
|
28,763,809 | 28,763,873 | 1 | 3 | 28,761,294 |
train
|
<story><title> Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs</title><url>https://www.npr.org/2021/10/04/1042921981/facebook-whistleblower-renewing-scrutiny-of-social-media-giant</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jimkleiber</author><text>I really appreciate this point. I often see it as written rules (laws) and unwritten rules (ethics). If something breaks the unwritten rules we have about how people are supposed to interact with each other, then we often codify that rule into law. Many people will say &quot;I didn&#x27;t break the law&quot; but where many people would say that person did break an unwritten law.<p>&gt; There should be no question, that what FB is doing here, while not illegal, is highly dubious ethically.<p>At the same time, I believe some of the stuff FB has done is currently illegal, such as this example in one of the whistleblower&#x27;s disclosures to the SEC [0]:<p>&gt; Our anonymous client is disclosing original evidence showing that Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) has, for years past and ongoing, violated U.S. security laws by making material misrepresentations and omissions in statements to investors and prospective investors, including, inter alia, through filings with the SEC, testimony to Congress, online statements, and media stories.<p>So it could be a combination of them both violating ethics and violating the law.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;jason_kint&#x2F;status&#x2F;1445248400237244423?s=20" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;jason_kint&#x2F;status&#x2F;1445248400237244423?s=...</a></text></item><item><author>woeirua</author><text>I think a lot of people are choosing to ignore that a lot of companies have done things in the past that were not illegal at the time of action. However, those actions were later decided to be <i>made</i> illegal because the behavior was deemed to be antithetical to our values.<p>For example, Standard Oil did not break any laws in its ruthless consolidation of the nascent oil industry. In fact, it exploited the law to allow it to grow into the monstrosity that it eventually became. In response, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890 which subsequently prevented the actions that Standard Oil had used to consolidate the market.<p>There should be no question, that what FB is doing here, while not illegal, is highly dubious ethically.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>taf2</author><text>My Mom said it to me with simpler terms when i was little... &quot;we only have laws because of the assholes&quot;</text></comment>
|
<story><title> Facebook Whistleblower Leaks Thousands of Pages of Incriminating Internal Docs</title><url>https://www.npr.org/2021/10/04/1042921981/facebook-whistleblower-renewing-scrutiny-of-social-media-giant</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jimkleiber</author><text>I really appreciate this point. I often see it as written rules (laws) and unwritten rules (ethics). If something breaks the unwritten rules we have about how people are supposed to interact with each other, then we often codify that rule into law. Many people will say &quot;I didn&#x27;t break the law&quot; but where many people would say that person did break an unwritten law.<p>&gt; There should be no question, that what FB is doing here, while not illegal, is highly dubious ethically.<p>At the same time, I believe some of the stuff FB has done is currently illegal, such as this example in one of the whistleblower&#x27;s disclosures to the SEC [0]:<p>&gt; Our anonymous client is disclosing original evidence showing that Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: FB) has, for years past and ongoing, violated U.S. security laws by making material misrepresentations and omissions in statements to investors and prospective investors, including, inter alia, through filings with the SEC, testimony to Congress, online statements, and media stories.<p>So it could be a combination of them both violating ethics and violating the law.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;jason_kint&#x2F;status&#x2F;1445248400237244423?s=20" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;jason_kint&#x2F;status&#x2F;1445248400237244423?s=...</a></text></item><item><author>woeirua</author><text>I think a lot of people are choosing to ignore that a lot of companies have done things in the past that were not illegal at the time of action. However, those actions were later decided to be <i>made</i> illegal because the behavior was deemed to be antithetical to our values.<p>For example, Standard Oil did not break any laws in its ruthless consolidation of the nascent oil industry. In fact, it exploited the law to allow it to grow into the monstrosity that it eventually became. In response, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890 which subsequently prevented the actions that Standard Oil had used to consolidate the market.<p>There should be no question, that what FB is doing here, while not illegal, is highly dubious ethically.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>_tom_</author><text>Then there is the case of things are illegal, but are not enforced. Leading to the question of what is the law? What is written, or how it is enforced?<p>How many of you went above the speed limit today?<p>I suspect that much of what goes on in the stock market is similar.</text></comment>
|
11,826,603 | 11,826,198 | 1 | 3 | 11,824,203 |
train
|
<story><title>Show HN: Reactpack – one command to build your React front end</title><url>https://github.com/olahol/reactpack</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tomtau</author><text>I wish we had something like this officially backed by the react team. In 30 minutes when a new standard approach comes out, this tool will become obsolete.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nilliams</author><text>They are specifically working on it according to this React.js Conf talk [0].<p>There&#x27;s also rwb from Pete Hunt [1].<p>EDIT: Removed comment about &#x27;standard&#x27;. Ain&#x27;t so bad anymore apparently.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=-RJf2jYzs8A#t=00h14m25s" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=-RJf2jYzs8A#t=00h14m25s</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;petehunt&#x2F;rwb&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;petehunt&#x2F;rwb&#x2F;</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>Show HN: Reactpack – one command to build your React front end</title><url>https://github.com/olahol/reactpack</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tomtau</author><text>I wish we had something like this officially backed by the react team. In 30 minutes when a new standard approach comes out, this tool will become obsolete.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>timdorr</author><text>To be fair, this is just packaging up a fairly standard webpack config with a nice CLI: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;olahol&#x2F;reactpack&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;config.js" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;olahol&#x2F;reactpack&#x2F;blob&#x2F;master&#x2F;config.js</a><p>So, it can be extended or changed as the whims of the JS community migrate between tools and practices.</text></comment>
|
9,900,865 | 9,900,911 | 1 | 3 | 9,899,548 |
train
|
<story><title>Let's talk content. AMA</title><url>https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/3djjxw/lets_talk_content_ama/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>nl</author><text>Prohibited: <i>Anything that harasses, bullies, or abuses an individual or group of people (these behaviors intimidate others into silence)</i><p>About time.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>mc32</author><text>It sounds reasonable. In practice its been difficult. I&#x27;ve been in communities where one mod is okay with certain interaction wheras another has no hesitation in yanking things.<p>There&#x27;s personality, history, friendships, etc. Some mods were likely to tolerate irritants if they knew the person or the person had contributed to something they approved of... Like a movement, cause, etc.<p>That said, it looks like so far, its been used sparingly and not vigorously. But it&#x27;s like speeding. You know the chances of having a ticket issued are low, but if highway patrol were to e force to the letter, one would have many more tickets issued.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Let's talk content. AMA</title><url>https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/3djjxw/lets_talk_content_ama/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>nl</author><text>Prohibited: <i>Anything that harasses, bullies, or abuses an individual or group of people (these behaviors intimidate others into silence)</i><p>About time.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>brighteyes</author><text>If you didn&#x27;t notice, that part had a link to the months-old policy change when it was enacted.<p>That isn&#x27;t a new policy, they were just reiterating it. The actually new stuff is the NSFW scope enlargement, hiding from search, etc.</text></comment>
|
3,942,606 | 3,942,260 | 1 | 2 | 3,941,859 |
train
|
<story><title>Improving your (Python) code with modern idioms</title><url>http://python3porting.com/improving.html</url><text></text></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>strictfp</author><text>Why change the excellent printf-style string formatting syntax to the vastly inferior slf4j-style? If I want simple concatenation, i use concatenation. If I want really complex formatting I write explicit code to do it. Printf style hits a sweet spot: it formats common datatypes to common presentation formats. Python 3 adds a formatting mini-language which looks more convoluted for simple tasks and unreadable for complex ones. Why change the syntax?</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Improving your (Python) code with modern idioms</title><url>http://python3porting.com/improving.html</url><text></text></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>raymondh</author><text>This article contains excellent recommendations except for one (the numbers.py module is nearly useless).</text></comment>
|
20,167,839 | 20,167,961 | 1 | 2 | 20,165,821 |
train
|
<story><title>As Protesters Fill Hong Kong’s Streets, Businesses Are Alarmed, Too</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/business/hong-kong-china-protests-business.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>kenneth</author><text>I&#x27;m in Hong Kong and went to the protests today. This feels like a continuation of the &#x27;14 umbrella movement, which was ended by police force, and which left up pent-up anger in the whole population. It&#x27;s the biggest protest since the march in &#x27;97 when HK was handed over to China from British rule.<p>When I was there, the protests were peaceful, but you could certainly feel a tension building up, with the crowds gathering metal poles and bricks. I spoke to the police a few times and they were nice and friendly, but were doing their job. There is absolutely zero question that almost the entire HK population opposes the extradition bill which sparked this whole mess. Unfortunately, there&#x27;s little that can be done… &quot;one country two system&quot; hasn&#x27;t been abided to by China for a long time, and there&#x27;s nothing the population or the Brits can do about it.<p>(My perspective is that of a foreigner who recently moved here, not a life-long hongkonger. Feel free to ask me anything.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>JumpCrisscross</author><text>Please let us know how those of us overseas can be helpful. It’s tragic to be witnessing the disassembly of a system of limited democracy and rule of law like this, by force.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>As Protesters Fill Hong Kong’s Streets, Businesses Are Alarmed, Too</title><url>https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/business/hong-kong-china-protests-business.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>kenneth</author><text>I&#x27;m in Hong Kong and went to the protests today. This feels like a continuation of the &#x27;14 umbrella movement, which was ended by police force, and which left up pent-up anger in the whole population. It&#x27;s the biggest protest since the march in &#x27;97 when HK was handed over to China from British rule.<p>When I was there, the protests were peaceful, but you could certainly feel a tension building up, with the crowds gathering metal poles and bricks. I spoke to the police a few times and they were nice and friendly, but were doing their job. There is absolutely zero question that almost the entire HK population opposes the extradition bill which sparked this whole mess. Unfortunately, there&#x27;s little that can be done… &quot;one country two system&quot; hasn&#x27;t been abided to by China for a long time, and there&#x27;s nothing the population or the Brits can do about it.<p>(My perspective is that of a foreigner who recently moved here, not a life-long hongkonger. Feel free to ask me anything.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>theslurmmustflo</author><text>Is there police from mainland China or are they local to HK? Would they always side with mainland interests?</text></comment>
|
25,144,061 | 25,143,980 | 1 | 3 | 25,143,303 |
train
|
<story><title>Apple's 15% Deflection Tactic</title><url>https://www.johnluxford.com/blog/apples-15-percent-deflection-tactic/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>read_if_gay_</author><text>&gt; $100 will buy a _ton_ of hosting<p>It’s not just about hosting, they also provide basically the entire software stack you’re using. Pricing that is difficult but I don’t think it should be disregarded.<p>&gt; but can you even name one example in the past 5 years (literally about half the life of the ecosystem) where the App Store promoted an indie developer into success?<p>There are tons of apps that got popular due to App Store editors choosing to promote them. For example, getting App of the Day nets you a 1700% boost in downloads: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;24&#x2F;apples-app-of-the-day-featuring-boosts-downloads-by-1747-games-by-792&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;24&#x2F;apples-app-of-the-day-feat...</a></text></item><item><author>callalex</author><text>It’s funny how, as someone who builds cloud services, I thought your statement was going in the opposite direction until the end. $100 will buy a _ton_ of hosting that is more than adequate to run most indie app downloads for a year.<p>The counterpoint to my claim which you stated is that the App Store also provides reach and marketing, which are quite pricey. I agree that they are expensive services, but can you even name one example in the past 5 years (literally about half the life of the ecosystem) where the App Store promoted an indie developer into success?</text></item><item><author>st3fan</author><text>I have mixed feelings about this ... the yearly fee is $100 - i feel that is very much out of balance with what you get back in terms of cloud services, distribution, marketing, reach, etc.<p>The danger of saying &#x27;the developer membership should account for that&#x27; is that they will actually run the numbers and come back with MUCH higher yearly fees that simply push many small devs out.</text></item><item><author>matsemann</author><text><i>but you pay for the distribution &#x2F; tools &#x2F; OS etc</i> is a common sentiment I see here. No, the yearly fee should pay for that, and the user for the OS. And anyways, what if I don&#x27;t want to, why cant I distribute it myself?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ksec</author><text>&gt;It’s not just about hosting, they also provide basically the entire software stack you’re using. Pricing that is difficult but I don’t think it should be disregarded.<p>The entire Software stack are included in the iPhone purchase price, and as of 2018 they are included in Apple&#x27;s Services revenue on a per unit cost including but not limited to OS, Siri and Maps.<p>The software stack argument makes sense in consoles where they are selling at cost or barely break even from a BOM &#x2F; Hardware perspective. But Apple is making industry leading profit margin on all front. So Apple is double dipping, as Apple like to call it in the case against Qualcomm.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Apple's 15% Deflection Tactic</title><url>https://www.johnluxford.com/blog/apples-15-percent-deflection-tactic/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>read_if_gay_</author><text>&gt; $100 will buy a _ton_ of hosting<p>It’s not just about hosting, they also provide basically the entire software stack you’re using. Pricing that is difficult but I don’t think it should be disregarded.<p>&gt; but can you even name one example in the past 5 years (literally about half the life of the ecosystem) where the App Store promoted an indie developer into success?<p>There are tons of apps that got popular due to App Store editors choosing to promote them. For example, getting App of the Day nets you a 1700% boost in downloads: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;24&#x2F;apples-app-of-the-day-featuring-boosts-downloads-by-1747-games-by-792&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;techcrunch.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;10&#x2F;24&#x2F;apples-app-of-the-day-feat...</a></text></item><item><author>callalex</author><text>It’s funny how, as someone who builds cloud services, I thought your statement was going in the opposite direction until the end. $100 will buy a _ton_ of hosting that is more than adequate to run most indie app downloads for a year.<p>The counterpoint to my claim which you stated is that the App Store also provides reach and marketing, which are quite pricey. I agree that they are expensive services, but can you even name one example in the past 5 years (literally about half the life of the ecosystem) where the App Store promoted an indie developer into success?</text></item><item><author>st3fan</author><text>I have mixed feelings about this ... the yearly fee is $100 - i feel that is very much out of balance with what you get back in terms of cloud services, distribution, marketing, reach, etc.<p>The danger of saying &#x27;the developer membership should account for that&#x27; is that they will actually run the numbers and come back with MUCH higher yearly fees that simply push many small devs out.</text></item><item><author>matsemann</author><text><i>but you pay for the distribution &#x2F; tools &#x2F; OS etc</i> is a common sentiment I see here. No, the yearly fee should pay for that, and the user for the OS. And anyways, what if I don&#x27;t want to, why cant I distribute it myself?</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>tushonka</author><text>&gt; It’s not just about hosting, they also provide basically the entire software stack you’re using. Pricing that is difficult but I don’t think it should be disregarded.<p>What if I don&#x27;t want to use their &quot;software stack&quot;? Frankly, as developer, I&#x27;d rather spend my time developing than learning Apple specific ecosystem. Heck, React Native and Flutter do me just fine. Develop once and run everywhere.<p>In the end what does that $99&#x2F;year license get me? A fancy certificate to publish on their only app store?</text></comment>
|
16,178,712 | 16,177,942 | 1 | 2 | 16,176,216 |
train
|
<story><title>The Fall of Travis Kalanick</title><url>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-01-18/the-fall-of-travis-kalanick-was-a-lot-weirder-and-darker-than-you-thought</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>gwern</author><text>&gt; After Uber’s lawyers insisted the company wouldn’t pay Kamel to clean up Kalanick’s personal scandal, Kalanick agreed to pay Kamel $200,000 out of his own pocket, according to a person familiar with the matter. “The meeting ended on a positive note, and Travis appreciated Mr. Kamel’s openness and forgiveness,” a spokesperson for Kalanick said in a statement.<p>For $200k for being lectured for a minute, I&#x27;d have a lot of openness (of my wallet) and forgiveness too.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The Fall of Travis Kalanick</title><url>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-01-18/the-fall-of-travis-kalanick-was-a-lot-weirder-and-darker-than-you-thought</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>derwiki</author><text>&gt; “Until 2017, you could go into Uber on any given day and half the T-shirts were Uber T-shirts,” says one executive. “They disappeared overnight. People didn’t want to wear Uber stuff.”</text></comment>
|
31,565,140 | 31,563,771 | 1 | 2 | 31,559,920 |
train
|
<story><title>Programming in the Apocalypse</title><url>https://matduggan.com/programming-in-the/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>coryrc</author><text>Something like 5 million people die every year, should we be in permanent mourning?</text></item><item><author>titzer</author><text>What COVID taught me is that the human ability to not give a fuck is apparently infinite. I have trouble processing the fact that a million people died (in the USA) and there is no mourning, no shared sense of tragedy or loss, no looking more kindly on other people, just a madder, faster dash on cash and even more finger-pointing.<p>&gt; Covid was not 1% as bad as any pandemic featured in a film.<p>I&#x27;ll be generous and not dwell on this stunning example of this age&#x27;s inability to get bothered by anything unless it hits harder than film. Look on the bright side I guess, despite how soulless, empty, and glib we have to be do so!</text></item><item><author>tasuki</author><text>&gt; The pandemic taught me a lot about apocalypse.<p>I don&#x27;t think it has taught you much. All things considered, despite all the suffering by unlucky individuals, when you consider humanity as a whole, covid is an insignificant blip. If it&#x27;s significant at all, it&#x27;s only because of our response to it.<p>&gt; Covid looked nothing like a pandemic film, thank god.<p>Covid was not 1% as bad as any pandemic featured in a film. Humanity has seen way worse, and we could still see way worse in the future.</text></item><item><author>madrox</author><text>The pandemic taught me a lot about apocalypse. While people are a lot slower to buy into collective action and changing their way of life than I thought, society is far more robust than I expected. Covid looked nothing like a pandemic film, thank god.<p>With that in mind, I have some ideas on what programming will look like in 30 years:<p>1. New frameworks and abstractions for making apps even more disposable while maintaining privacy will come along. New languages will happen. Corporations that just finished moving to the cloud will now be moving to even greater abstractions like Airtable or whatever comes next.<p>2. Programmer pay will decrease compared to other industries. This is a hunch and I’m only 60% confident of it happening.<p>3. Satellite internet will be more of a norm for no better reason than it’s the most efficient way to manage infrastructure. More rural communities will need it, and remote trends will continue. The cost of launches are going down and there’s a lot of land.<p>4. Everything will get more energy efficient, and most intense activity will be pushed to compute farms.<p>5. VR will once again come around as the next big revolution in computing, but will be ultimately disappointing and won’t see mass adoption.<p>Beyond these ideas, I think too much plays into our personal optimism or pessimism. I think things will change, but we’re a scrappy species that will fight to preserve its way of life. It will look a lot like our global pandemic response…warts and all. There’s a lot there to be disappointed about, but it’s actually incredible it wasn’t worse.<p>When these predictions hit I’ll be 70. I hope I’ll live to see it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>worik</author><text>&gt; Something like 5 million people die every year, should we be in permanent mourning?<p>That gives truth to Benjamin Disraeli&#x27;s (attributed) &quot;Lies, damn lies, and statistics&quot;. Very misleading.<p>It was the concentrated effects.<p>When bottled oxygen ran out in India.<p>When you could not get into a hospital in many American cities (my American geography is hazy - South Los Angeles hospital, I think, was crippled for weeks)<p>Running out of morgue space in New York city - mass graves in central park.<p>It was really very scary, and I am glad I was not in any of those places badly hit.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Programming in the Apocalypse</title><url>https://matduggan.com/programming-in-the/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>coryrc</author><text>Something like 5 million people die every year, should we be in permanent mourning?</text></item><item><author>titzer</author><text>What COVID taught me is that the human ability to not give a fuck is apparently infinite. I have trouble processing the fact that a million people died (in the USA) and there is no mourning, no shared sense of tragedy or loss, no looking more kindly on other people, just a madder, faster dash on cash and even more finger-pointing.<p>&gt; Covid was not 1% as bad as any pandemic featured in a film.<p>I&#x27;ll be generous and not dwell on this stunning example of this age&#x27;s inability to get bothered by anything unless it hits harder than film. Look on the bright side I guess, despite how soulless, empty, and glib we have to be do so!</text></item><item><author>tasuki</author><text>&gt; The pandemic taught me a lot about apocalypse.<p>I don&#x27;t think it has taught you much. All things considered, despite all the suffering by unlucky individuals, when you consider humanity as a whole, covid is an insignificant blip. If it&#x27;s significant at all, it&#x27;s only because of our response to it.<p>&gt; Covid looked nothing like a pandemic film, thank god.<p>Covid was not 1% as bad as any pandemic featured in a film. Humanity has seen way worse, and we could still see way worse in the future.</text></item><item><author>madrox</author><text>The pandemic taught me a lot about apocalypse. While people are a lot slower to buy into collective action and changing their way of life than I thought, society is far more robust than I expected. Covid looked nothing like a pandemic film, thank god.<p>With that in mind, I have some ideas on what programming will look like in 30 years:<p>1. New frameworks and abstractions for making apps even more disposable while maintaining privacy will come along. New languages will happen. Corporations that just finished moving to the cloud will now be moving to even greater abstractions like Airtable or whatever comes next.<p>2. Programmer pay will decrease compared to other industries. This is a hunch and I’m only 60% confident of it happening.<p>3. Satellite internet will be more of a norm for no better reason than it’s the most efficient way to manage infrastructure. More rural communities will need it, and remote trends will continue. The cost of launches are going down and there’s a lot of land.<p>4. Everything will get more energy efficient, and most intense activity will be pushed to compute farms.<p>5. VR will once again come around as the next big revolution in computing, but will be ultimately disappointing and won’t see mass adoption.<p>Beyond these ideas, I think too much plays into our personal optimism or pessimism. I think things will change, but we’re a scrappy species that will fight to preserve its way of life. It will look a lot like our global pandemic response…warts and all. There’s a lot there to be disappointed about, but it’s actually incredible it wasn’t worse.<p>When these predictions hit I’ll be 70. I hope I’ll live to see it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>titzer</author><text>I know you&#x27;re trolling, but I&#x27;ll respond. Part of growing up and moving from just a mere legally-licensed adult is being able to hold heavy things. They never stop getting heavier. They just keep unfolding, and if you are willing to grow just a little deeper--not bigger, but deeper, like the roots of you being able to <i>feel</i> things, then maybe all that learning to deal with loss, tragedies, loved ones dying, aging, your parents and uncles and cousins and friends dying--and yet not letting it destroy you, might be worth something. Though, for a moment, you can be devastated on the inside and hold yourself up without breaking. You don&#x27;t need to cry your eyes out every day, but man, what the hell if we can&#x27;t reflect on such a grievous time that has befallen us--all of us--over the past two years, without clawing someone else&#x27;s face off or storming off in a huff. But if you need to feel not bothered at all, go ahead, you aren&#x27;t the subject of this one.</text></comment>
|
13,053,187 | 13,053,197 | 1 | 2 | 13,052,487 |
train
|
<story><title>LaiNES – Cycle-accurate NES emulator in around 1000 lines of code</title><url>https://github.com/AndreaOrru/LaiNES</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>raldi</author><text>What does &quot;cycle-accurate&quot; mean? The README assumes the reader already knows; Wikipedia via Google is totally unhelpful: &quot;A cycle-accurate simulator is a computer program that simulates a microarchitecture on a cycle-by-cycle basis.&quot;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>0xcde4c3db</author><text>The traditional way of coding a console emulator was to figure out the time interval to the next interrupt in units of CPU cycles, emulate enough instructions to cross that threshold, then emulate the interrupt and hook other routines (redrawing the screen, filling sound output buffers, reading input, etc.) off of those events (see e.g. Marat Fayzullin&#x27;s classic Emulator HOWTO [1]). This approach runs a lot of stuff just fine because it does synchronize to the most important events, but can cause problems. For example, &quot;well-behaved&quot; code generally only writes to graphics registers or sprite tables during blanking periods, as writing during active display is usually undefined behavior. Some code breaks the rules. Sometimes this is done intentionally to do cool effects with the hardware. Other times it&#x27;s a side effect of a bug that wasn&#x27;t caught because there are coincidentally no symptoms with the timing of the actual hardware. But then you plug it into an emulator with only roughly accurate timing and it blows up.<p>In reality, the clocks for the various components don&#x27;t necessarily run at the same rate, or even at integer multiples of the CPU clock. You can have a situation where, for example, there are 3.5 clock cycles on the graphics hardware for every one CPU clock cycle. For a lot of the classic systems, this happened because a single higher master clock is divided down for each component.<p>A &quot;cycle-accurate&quot; emulator is one that operates as if the emulated state of all hardware were updated on every tick of the master clock. This wasn&#x27;t generally done in the past because it was far too slow ~20 years ago when emulation of classic consoles and computers really took off.<p>More sophisticated hardware doesn&#x27;t necessarily have any single master clock in this sense, so it doesn&#x27;t make much sense to talk about a &quot;cycle-accurate&quot; emulator of a modern PC, for example.<p>[1] <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fms.komkon.org&#x2F;EMUL8&#x2F;HOWTO.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;fms.komkon.org&#x2F;EMUL8&#x2F;HOWTO.html</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>LaiNES – Cycle-accurate NES emulator in around 1000 lines of code</title><url>https://github.com/AndreaOrru/LaiNES</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>raldi</author><text>What does &quot;cycle-accurate&quot; mean? The README assumes the reader already knows; Wikipedia via Google is totally unhelpful: &quot;A cycle-accurate simulator is a computer program that simulates a microarchitecture on a cycle-by-cycle basis.&quot;</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>throwbsidbdk</author><text>TLDR: each CPU instruction takes the exact amount of time it does on the real cpu.<p>You generally only care about cycles in real-time stuff. In simpler CPUs like those used for microwaves and such, each CPU instruction takes constant time. You can count the number of instructions in your assembler loop and know how long the loop will take. Mind you sometimes each instruction takes constant time but some can take more time than others. A cpu cycle is defined as 1&#x2F;clockspeed . A fast instruction can take 1 cycle, others 3 or more.<p>Usually there&#x27;s multiple cpu instructions for GOTO and loading from memory, a fast set for things &quot;close by&quot; and a slow set for far away code or data. Loops and conditional instructions even on simple cpus can take different amounts of time depending on the outcome, so it gets pretty complicated to time things sometimes.<p>So when doing really low level timing critical code, you can use a super accurate signal generator to drive your CPU clock, then count your instructions to time things. Common uses include generating audio from bit banging and similar.<p>In more complex CPUs a number of things made it difficult or impossible to figure out exactly how long an instruction will take. None of the software for these CPUs is written to depend on exact cycle timings. Because nothing depends on cycle accuracy you don&#x27;t have to worry about the timings when emulating these kinds of CPU&#x27;s.</text></comment>
|
19,375,595 | 19,374,695 | 1 | 3 | 19,373,991 |
train
|
<story><title>Scaleway cloud adds AMD EPYC instances</title><url>https://www.scaleway.com/general-purpose-instances/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>napsterbr</author><text>Nice. The only thing keeping me away from Scaleway are several bad reviews about Online.net network. Anyone got any experience on this?<p>Their arm offerings are nice but unfortunately they are always out of stock. When I contacted support to ask if they have plans to mitigate this, their full response was &quot;sometimes we are victims of our own success&quot; (nice, good for them, but some real information would be useful).<p>Another major problem for anyone considering Scaleway is several reports of not being able to launch an instance from control panel, or completely bricking a working instance by simply restarting it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>stevekemp</author><text>I&#x27;ve been a customer of theirs for less than a month. In that time I&#x27;ve had several problems.<p>For example I rebooted a host, and it didn&#x27;t come back. For 10 hours it was down. After getting in touch with their support I was told &quot;Oh yeah, there is a problem with the hypervisor, we&#x27;ll fix it&quot;. Meanwhile their status-site showed &quot;zero problems&quot;. (The next day it came back.)<p>Provisioning a stock (Debian) system results in a host with no working serial console, which makes it hard to rescue.<p>You can&#x27;t make outgoing SMTP (25&#x2F;587) access without giving them copies of passports, etc. Though if you enable IPv6 you&#x27;ll soon discover outgoing SMTP works ;) Only downside there is you can&#x27;t set reverse DNS for your IPv6 address.<p>(Reverse DNS? They require the forward address to point to you before they&#x27;ll let you set it, as a &quot;security measure&quot;.)<p>I&#x27;m using the host for offsite monitoring, but we&#x27;ll see if it stays. Cheap, but perhaps too cheap.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Scaleway cloud adds AMD EPYC instances</title><url>https://www.scaleway.com/general-purpose-instances/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>napsterbr</author><text>Nice. The only thing keeping me away from Scaleway are several bad reviews about Online.net network. Anyone got any experience on this?<p>Their arm offerings are nice but unfortunately they are always out of stock. When I contacted support to ask if they have plans to mitigate this, their full response was &quot;sometimes we are victims of our own success&quot; (nice, good for them, but some real information would be useful).<p>Another major problem for anyone considering Scaleway is several reports of not being able to launch an instance from control panel, or completely bricking a working instance by simply restarting it.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>MrRadar</author><text>I use them to run ArchiveTeam[1] projects (which consist of downloading data and then uploading it again, usually to the Internet Archive). For that purpose they work very well.<p>When I initially set up my servers a few years ago I did have an issue where I was getting randomly corrupted packets on a few of my instances. I spent about a week going back and forth with their support about it and they eventually determined it was a hardware fault with the VM host and had me migrate them to a different physical server. I haven&#x27;t had any problems with them since.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.archiveteam.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.archiveteam.org&#x2F;</a></text></comment>
|
30,492,980 | 30,493,173 | 1 | 2 | 30,492,770 |
train
|
<story><title>Germany mulls extending nuclear plants' life-span</title><url>https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-mulls-extending-nuclear-plants-life-span-economy-minister-2022-02-27/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>urthor</author><text>&quot;Robert Habeck said&quot;<p>&quot;It is part of my ministry&#x27;s tasks to answer this question. I would not reject it on ideological grounds - but the preliminary examination has shown that it does not help us.&quot;<p>&quot;Because the preparations for the shutdowns are already so far advanced that the nuclear power plants could only continue to operate under the highest safety concerns and possibly with fuel supplies that have not yet been secured,&quot; Habeck said.&quot;<p>Unexpectedly, I feel like I have to call fake news on Reuters for this.<p>The headline looks <i>nothing</i> like what the quotes in the body imply.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Germany mulls extending nuclear plants' life-span</title><url>https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-mulls-extending-nuclear-plants-life-span-economy-minister-2022-02-27/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>Traster</author><text>I know this article isn&#x27;t great, but is there anyone on HN who lives in Germany who could explain why there&#x27;s such a scepticism of Nuclear power there? I&#x27;m from the UK and we have largely transitioned away from Nuclear for one clear reason - there was no political appetite to spend a tonne of money on an expensive form of energy that wasn&#x27;t likely to pay off in the current parliamentary term. The german response to Nuclear seems to have been far more extreme though.</text></comment>
|
38,542,936 | 38,542,953 | 1 | 2 | 38,528,416 |
train
|
<story><title>Infocom’s code-porting tools for Zork and other games have been found</title><url>https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2023/11/infocoms-ingenious-code-porting-tools-for-zork-and-other-games-have-been-found/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>ThePowerOfFuet</author><text>Go straight to the source:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.zarfhome.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;11&#x2F;infocom-interpreters" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.zarfhome.com&#x2F;2023&#x2F;11&#x2F;infocom-interpreters</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>Infocom’s code-porting tools for Zork and other games have been found</title><url>https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2023/11/infocoms-ingenious-code-porting-tools-for-zork-and-other-games-have-been-found/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>acomjean</author><text><p><pre><code> &gt;N
There is a boss blocking your path demanding a C 64 floppy
There is a serial cable
There is a DEC 20
&gt;
</code></pre>
Jokes aside they seem to call these games “interactive fiction” now. I did like the infocom games (I had Zork on Apple floppy). I played this one a few years back and was surprised how far they’ve come<p>Lost pig:<p>Details:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ifdb.org&#x2F;viewgame?id=mohwfk47yjzii14w" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ifdb.org&#x2F;viewgame?id=mohwfk47yjzii14w</a><p>Hey it’s online!<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pr-if.org&#x2F;play&#x2F;lostpig&#x2F;" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pr-if.org&#x2F;play&#x2F;lostpig&#x2F;</a></text></comment>
|
32,211,784 | 32,211,589 | 1 | 3 | 32,210,695 |
train
|
<story><title>Ford's answer to EV supply chain hell: Cheaper batteries</title><url>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/22/ford-lithium-iron-phosphate-batteries</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tokamak-teapot</author><text>I’d love a car with a tiny battery for 99% of the time when I’m just driving locally and the ability to have an extra, large battery that can be slotted in when I want to make a longer trip. With only the short range battery most of the time, my car’s weight is low and efficiency high.<p>Maybe I could keep that battery in my house and use it to store solar electricity most of the time. It seems like it should be possible to design a system for slotting it in that doesn’t require me to physically lift its weight.<p>I’d also be happy to drive into somewhere local that rents me that long range battery and slots it in with machinery designed for the purpose.</text></item><item><author>cjdell</author><text>I&#x27;m not sure why we aren&#x27;t making EVs with small but <i>upgradeable</i> batteries.<p>Like for example a $20k car with a 10kWh &quot;good enough for now&quot; starter battery that can be bought today. Still good enough for 90% of trips and upgradable to 50kWh with additional after market battery modules should the user decide. As simple as upgrading the RAM on an (old) laptop.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>rvdginste</author><text>I don&#x27;t know if any company is exploring what you are mentioning, but battery swapping for electrical scooters (Gogoro) is in common use in Taiwan. Instead of you charge your scooter, you drive to a battery swap station and exchange your empty battery for a full one. see [1].<p>But some companies are also investigating battery swap stations for cars. So, you might not be able to swap a short-range battery with a long-range battery yourself, but I imagine that would be possible with those battery swap stations. See [2]. Battery swap stations means that you have full range again for the same time it takes to fill a car with gas. But obviously, you need to have enough of those stations to make it usable. And if every car brand is gonna create its own mechanism for battery swapping, then that would probably only be interesting in city areas where it&#x27;s worthwhile for the manufacturer to run those stations.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.electrive.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;01&#x2F;18&#x2F;battery-swapping-stations-to-overtake-petrol-pumps-for-taiwan&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.electrive.com&#x2F;2022&#x2F;01&#x2F;18&#x2F;battery-swapping-statio...</a>
[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;business-61310513" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;business-61310513</a><p>Edit: typo.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Ford's answer to EV supply chain hell: Cheaper batteries</title><url>https://www.axios.com/2022/07/22/ford-lithium-iron-phosphate-batteries</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tokamak-teapot</author><text>I’d love a car with a tiny battery for 99% of the time when I’m just driving locally and the ability to have an extra, large battery that can be slotted in when I want to make a longer trip. With only the short range battery most of the time, my car’s weight is low and efficiency high.<p>Maybe I could keep that battery in my house and use it to store solar electricity most of the time. It seems like it should be possible to design a system for slotting it in that doesn’t require me to physically lift its weight.<p>I’d also be happy to drive into somewhere local that rents me that long range battery and slots it in with machinery designed for the purpose.</text></item><item><author>cjdell</author><text>I&#x27;m not sure why we aren&#x27;t making EVs with small but <i>upgradeable</i> batteries.<p>Like for example a $20k car with a 10kWh &quot;good enough for now&quot; starter battery that can be bought today. Still good enough for 90% of trips and upgradable to 50kWh with additional after market battery modules should the user decide. As simple as upgrading the RAM on an (old) laptop.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>squarefoot</author><text>&gt; With only the short range battery most of the time, my car’s weight is low and efficiency high.<p>That would however subject the smaller battery to more charge&#x2F;discharge cycles for obtaining the same mileage. Wouldn&#x27;t that shorten its life?</text></comment>
|
17,098,816 | 17,097,517 | 1 | 3 | 17,095,217 |
train
|
<story><title>GDPR: Removing Monal from the EU</title><url>https://monal.im/blog/gdpr-removing-monal-from-the-eu/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jacquesm</author><text>Thank you for making a coherent argument. You are missing one point I think: if not for those regulations those companies would love to do business. They are <i>forbidden</i> from doing business, this guy sees the law and runs off without even trying to become compliant. That&#x27;s a different thing. There is <i>no way</i> that Kinder could be compliant with US law in such a way that they would not be exposed to what - to EU sensibilities - amount to exorbitant damage claims.<p>Similar arguments apply to the other examples you use, I see your point and there are valid reasons to not enter a certain market because of the legal climate there but the point I am trying to make is that the OP has not raise any valid point at all other than &#x27;I don&#x27;t want to comply&#x27;. And that&#x27;s fine by me but then don&#x27;t bother dressing it up in a bunch of made up requirements.</text></item><item><author>fcbrooklyn</author><text>It is impossible to sell raw-milk cheese in the United States. Are French cheese makers overreacting by simply choosing not to do business here rather than change their centuries-old production techniques? It is illegal to sell kinder eggs in the US, because of some law that involves children accidentally swallowing toys. Is Kinder overreacting by refusing to sell those candies here? You cannot buy Bovril in the US, because of a panic about mad cow disease from 20 years ago. Are the manufacturers of bovril overreacting by refusing to create a separate production facility that uses only beef sourced from outside the UK? Compliance with laws outside your primary market has a cost, and potentially a benefit. Every business, large or small, is going to do that cost-benefit analysis, and make their own decisions. As an american I can hardly blame the Kinder people for failing to provide me with convenient access to chocolate eggs containing plastic toys. It&#x27;s my government, and the laws they&#x27;ve put in place that have had that effect.</text></item><item><author>jacquesm</author><text>This is a ridiculous over-reaction based on an extremely shallow interpretation of the GDPR.<p>If you are running a small business and you feel that you won&#x27;t be able to operate your business because of the GDPR consider all those other laws that you have to be in compliance with as well. If that&#x27;s your attitude towards legal compliance then you should probably shut your business down completely rather than to hope that just ignoring European customers is going to make the bogeyman go away.<p>Legal compliance is a requirement for <i>any</i> business, and privacy law is just one more thing to take into account and for a small business that does not process super sensitive data (such as medical information or financial information) the costs of compliance are negligible. They&#x27;re not &#x27;0&#x27;, but then again it is a business and costs of doing business are the norm.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>kingofhdds</author><text>&gt;this guy sees the law and runs off without even trying to become compliant<p>This guy quite clearly states that he doesn&#x27;t have resources to become compliant, while it is too risky to make a mistake here.<p>There are fans of GDPR on this website, who prefer to ignore the fact that the compliance has its cost, and added to that still unknown risks of practical interpretation of legislation which also have their cost. But these are real life things.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>GDPR: Removing Monal from the EU</title><url>https://monal.im/blog/gdpr-removing-monal-from-the-eu/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jacquesm</author><text>Thank you for making a coherent argument. You are missing one point I think: if not for those regulations those companies would love to do business. They are <i>forbidden</i> from doing business, this guy sees the law and runs off without even trying to become compliant. That&#x27;s a different thing. There is <i>no way</i> that Kinder could be compliant with US law in such a way that they would not be exposed to what - to EU sensibilities - amount to exorbitant damage claims.<p>Similar arguments apply to the other examples you use, I see your point and there are valid reasons to not enter a certain market because of the legal climate there but the point I am trying to make is that the OP has not raise any valid point at all other than &#x27;I don&#x27;t want to comply&#x27;. And that&#x27;s fine by me but then don&#x27;t bother dressing it up in a bunch of made up requirements.</text></item><item><author>fcbrooklyn</author><text>It is impossible to sell raw-milk cheese in the United States. Are French cheese makers overreacting by simply choosing not to do business here rather than change their centuries-old production techniques? It is illegal to sell kinder eggs in the US, because of some law that involves children accidentally swallowing toys. Is Kinder overreacting by refusing to sell those candies here? You cannot buy Bovril in the US, because of a panic about mad cow disease from 20 years ago. Are the manufacturers of bovril overreacting by refusing to create a separate production facility that uses only beef sourced from outside the UK? Compliance with laws outside your primary market has a cost, and potentially a benefit. Every business, large or small, is going to do that cost-benefit analysis, and make their own decisions. As an american I can hardly blame the Kinder people for failing to provide me with convenient access to chocolate eggs containing plastic toys. It&#x27;s my government, and the laws they&#x27;ve put in place that have had that effect.</text></item><item><author>jacquesm</author><text>This is a ridiculous over-reaction based on an extremely shallow interpretation of the GDPR.<p>If you are running a small business and you feel that you won&#x27;t be able to operate your business because of the GDPR consider all those other laws that you have to be in compliance with as well. If that&#x27;s your attitude towards legal compliance then you should probably shut your business down completely rather than to hope that just ignoring European customers is going to make the bogeyman go away.<p>Legal compliance is a requirement for <i>any</i> business, and privacy law is just one more thing to take into account and for a small business that does not process super sensitive data (such as medical information or financial information) the costs of compliance are negligible. They&#x27;re not &#x27;0&#x27;, but then again it is a business and costs of doing business are the norm.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>fcbrooklyn</author><text>Bovril could easily comply. They would simply have to open a manufacturing facility that did not use UK beef. The French cheese makers could sort of comply, by pasteurizing their milk. Kinder, I admit, has a more difficult problem, and has, in fact attempted to comply, by creating a completely different product with the same name.</text></comment>
|
21,574,986 | 21,574,859 | 1 | 2 | 21,574,080 |
train
|
<story><title>Boeing faced ‘limited’ safety review from NASA while SpaceX got full examination</title><url>https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/11/18/boeing-faced-only-limited-safety-review-nasa-while-spacex-got-full-examination/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>gok</author><text>To be clear, the &quot;Safety Review&quot; was particularly about ensuring that both companies had a drug-free workplace. One company&#x27;s CEO smoked weed on camera and the other&#x27;s did not, so you can imagine why one might get a different level of examination.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Boeing faced ‘limited’ safety review from NASA while SpaceX got full examination</title><url>https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/11/18/boeing-faced-only-limited-safety-review-nasa-while-spacex-got-full-examination/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>psds2</author><text>And here&#x27;s Jeff trying to save himself from going through the same thing.</text></comment>
|
33,458,919 | 33,456,936 | 1 | 2 | 33,449,159 |
train
|
<story><title>Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch</title><url>https://rebble.io/2022/11/02/rebble-hackathon.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Pfhortune</author><text>Folks ITT will talk about watches that are similar in hardware, but what was magic about Pebble was the software and ecosystem. The OS was just a delight to use, fast, wonderfully animated, and let you sideload whatever you want.<p>I&#x27;ve tried a couple of Garmin watches (Vivoactive 3 and Forerunner 55) and the Amazfit Bip, and this is where they all fall completely flat. The UX is just horrible by comparison. It&#x27;s like these companies have no regard for designing the OS UX and are just trying to cram features in.<p>And the fact that companies want to make touchscreen watches is just with few&#x2F;no buttons is baffling to me. Tapping tiny buttons on a tiny screen is a horrible experience. And there&#x27;s tons of moving targets because of the tiny amount of real-estate.<p>Pebble _just got it_ with the 2.0 OS and beyond. They were a joy to use.<p>I begrudgingly have gone back to using an Apple Watch, because despite being subpar, the UX is somewhat together these days, just enough to be tolerable. When I move away from iOS again, I&#x27;ll probably either pull out an old Pebble that still has some battery life, or a Casio GBD200, which isn&#x27;t really a smartwatch but ticks some major boxes for me (always-on-display, silent vibration alarm, and timers, chief among them). The GBD200 runs on a coin cell too, so I never have to worry about charging or a replacement being difficult to find!</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>modeless</author><text>Pebble&#x27;s software was second to none. They built an entire operating system and app store, to run on microcontrollers! Multiple orders of magnitude less RAM and power consumption than Android or Apple watches, but the user experience was excellent and the app store had tons of stuff in it.<p>I once interviewed a candidate who came from Pebble. He had the most impressive interview performance of any candidate I&#x27;ve ever interviewed.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Over 16k people still use a Pebble smartwatch</title><url>https://rebble.io/2022/11/02/rebble-hackathon.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>Pfhortune</author><text>Folks ITT will talk about watches that are similar in hardware, but what was magic about Pebble was the software and ecosystem. The OS was just a delight to use, fast, wonderfully animated, and let you sideload whatever you want.<p>I&#x27;ve tried a couple of Garmin watches (Vivoactive 3 and Forerunner 55) and the Amazfit Bip, and this is where they all fall completely flat. The UX is just horrible by comparison. It&#x27;s like these companies have no regard for designing the OS UX and are just trying to cram features in.<p>And the fact that companies want to make touchscreen watches is just with few&#x2F;no buttons is baffling to me. Tapping tiny buttons on a tiny screen is a horrible experience. And there&#x27;s tons of moving targets because of the tiny amount of real-estate.<p>Pebble _just got it_ with the 2.0 OS and beyond. They were a joy to use.<p>I begrudgingly have gone back to using an Apple Watch, because despite being subpar, the UX is somewhat together these days, just enough to be tolerable. When I move away from iOS again, I&#x27;ll probably either pull out an old Pebble that still has some battery life, or a Casio GBD200, which isn&#x27;t really a smartwatch but ticks some major boxes for me (always-on-display, silent vibration alarm, and timers, chief among them). The GBD200 runs on a coin cell too, so I never have to worry about charging or a replacement being difficult to find!</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>etothepii</author><text>I&#x27;ll buy an Apple Watch, but I&#x27;d pay through the nose for an Apple Watch with four buttons.<p>Steve Jobs obsession that the mouse should have only one button was probably right for the computer, but the input device had over 80 buttons minimum. (Keyboard)<p>Clearly whoever makes the call about Apple Watch buttons doesn&#x27;t swim, sprint or cycle.<p>All the marketing about &quot;sports&quot; is to make you feel sporty not because it&#x27;s actually useful.<p>Of course, for the use Apple make money from (Apple pay) there is a tactile button dedicated for the purpose.</text></comment>
|
999,413 | 999,222 | 1 | 3 | 998,971 |
train
|
<story><title>China bans individuals from registering domain names</title><url>http://www.telecompaper.com/news/article.aspx?cid=708864</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lionhearted</author><text>&#62; I think it's clear that no Communist nation has ever succeeded in being the bastion of democratic, personal freedom that it was ever intended to be.<p>Nuh-uh, no, you can't give him this sort of pass. He introduced the concept of "class struggle" and "class warfare" that took over so much of modern labor/monetary/commerce/market vocabulary, and specifically said that the transition to socialism/communism will take proletariat violence. The man has inspired as much harm and destruction as any person in history.<p><i>And he's not even right</i> - his labor theory of value is so completely flawed it's hard to know where to start debunking. He had it in mind that there was a "socially necessary abstract labor-time" of every action - which take a very limited view based on a very limited period in history. Take for instance, Louis Pasteur, who invented pasteurization. How much socially necessary abstract labor-time was that worth? Ten million units of necessary abstract labor-time? How much was creating GMail worth? How much abstract labor time is Picasso's best work worth, compared to Matisse?<p>Publius Syrius said back in Roman times, "Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it." - and so far, that's the only model we've found that does a decent job of handling contributions without going to totalitarianism. When you start letting third parties dictate value to people who want to buy and sell, you throw the world off equilibrium, you get black markets and create a new class of crime.<p>I'd implore you to please, please, please stop seeing Marx as a misguided would-be hero. Almost every bad person in history thought of themself that way. Marx's works were both incorrect from an academic standpoint, very emotionally appealing to certain kinds of people, and generally fostered violence and hostility between groups of people that do the best when they work together to create the best world together. Marx was no friend of humanity, and should be remembered as someone who had bad and violent ideas that led to millions of people oppressed and killed as part of the "proletariat revolution to overthrow the bourgeois". Marx brought this kind of thing:<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_rouge" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_rouge</a><p>Please, please get educated and stop whimsically giving him a nod. The man's philosophies have led to more misery than just about anyone else in history.</text></item><item><author>DannoHung</author><text>I think it's clear that no Communist nation has ever succeeded in being the bastion of democratic, personal freedom that it was ever intended to be.<p>I actually sort of feel bad for Karl Marx. I mean, dude just wanted people to live happier lives and not worry about owning stuff so much. Now he's forever tied to some of the most oppressive regimes in modern history.<p>Idealism fail.</text></item><item><author>CWuestefeld</author><text>How ironic is that? A country that was supposed to have been founded on (Mao's interpretation of) Marxist principles, giving power to the people over the capitalist extremes, will now refuse Internet domain to those people; <i>only</i> businesses, those tools of capitalism, get this privilege.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>vorador</author><text>&#62; ...generally fostered violence and hostility between groups of people that do the best when they work together to create the best world together.<p>You seem to forget that the nineteenth century was extremely harsh (sorry, I lack a better word) for the working class. There were no regulations on anything - for instance, before a regulation law was passed (around 1860 iirc), flour , could contain things like sweat, cobwebs, and other tasty things.<p>It is also a well known fact that the industrial revolution had an effect on the workers - the average worker lost 20 to 30 cm of height : <a href="http://www.victorianweb.org/history/workers2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.victorianweb.org/history/workers2.html</a><p>Speaking from the 21st century, it seems easy to dismiss Marx as irrelevant. He wasn't. He just shows from how far we come from.<p>Besides, saying Marx brought the khmers rouges is like saying Nietzsche brought the nazis.<p>(sorry for the faults, by the way, english is not my mother tongue)</text></comment>
|
<story><title>China bans individuals from registering domain names</title><url>http://www.telecompaper.com/news/article.aspx?cid=708864</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>lionhearted</author><text>&#62; I think it's clear that no Communist nation has ever succeeded in being the bastion of democratic, personal freedom that it was ever intended to be.<p>Nuh-uh, no, you can't give him this sort of pass. He introduced the concept of "class struggle" and "class warfare" that took over so much of modern labor/monetary/commerce/market vocabulary, and specifically said that the transition to socialism/communism will take proletariat violence. The man has inspired as much harm and destruction as any person in history.<p><i>And he's not even right</i> - his labor theory of value is so completely flawed it's hard to know where to start debunking. He had it in mind that there was a "socially necessary abstract labor-time" of every action - which take a very limited view based on a very limited period in history. Take for instance, Louis Pasteur, who invented pasteurization. How much socially necessary abstract labor-time was that worth? Ten million units of necessary abstract labor-time? How much was creating GMail worth? How much abstract labor time is Picasso's best work worth, compared to Matisse?<p>Publius Syrius said back in Roman times, "Everything is worth what its purchaser will pay for it." - and so far, that's the only model we've found that does a decent job of handling contributions without going to totalitarianism. When you start letting third parties dictate value to people who want to buy and sell, you throw the world off equilibrium, you get black markets and create a new class of crime.<p>I'd implore you to please, please, please stop seeing Marx as a misguided would-be hero. Almost every bad person in history thought of themself that way. Marx's works were both incorrect from an academic standpoint, very emotionally appealing to certain kinds of people, and generally fostered violence and hostility between groups of people that do the best when they work together to create the best world together. Marx was no friend of humanity, and should be remembered as someone who had bad and violent ideas that led to millions of people oppressed and killed as part of the "proletariat revolution to overthrow the bourgeois". Marx brought this kind of thing:<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_rouge" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_rouge</a><p>Please, please get educated and stop whimsically giving him a nod. The man's philosophies have led to more misery than just about anyone else in history.</text></item><item><author>DannoHung</author><text>I think it's clear that no Communist nation has ever succeeded in being the bastion of democratic, personal freedom that it was ever intended to be.<p>I actually sort of feel bad for Karl Marx. I mean, dude just wanted people to live happier lives and not worry about owning stuff so much. Now he's forever tied to some of the most oppressive regimes in modern history.<p>Idealism fail.</text></item><item><author>CWuestefeld</author><text>How ironic is that? A country that was supposed to have been founded on (Mao's interpretation of) Marxist principles, giving power to the people over the capitalist extremes, will now refuse Internet domain to those people; <i>only</i> businesses, those tools of capitalism, get this privilege.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>stcredzero</author><text><i>&#62; I think it's clear that no Communist nation has ever succeeded in being the bastion of democratic, personal freedom that it was ever intended to be.</i><p>Totalitarian states have all kinds of justifications for being. Most often, it was nationalism and/or religion. Non religious ideologies like communism are a phenomenon of modern times. But note that the ideologies are largely incidental. It's just a psychological jamming mechanism to fool people into letting the totalitarian structure get into place.</text></comment>
|
29,963,981 | 29,963,119 | 1 | 3 | 29,961,876 |
train
|
<story><title>The Capital Sponge</title><url>https://www.lynalden.com/january-2022-newsletter/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>reactspa</author><text>I would love for someone to find holes in the reasoning in this article (my own Macro Econ skills are not that good).<p>The author is a major voice in bitcoin circles (search their name with the word &quot;bitcoin&quot; or &quot;crypto&quot; on youtube). And I find it notable that they don&#x27;t mention bitcoin or crypto anywhere in this post.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nostrademons</author><text>I generally love Lyn Alden&#x27;s writing but I think this is one of her weaker articles. Better long-term perspective can be found here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lynalden.com&#x2F;fiscal-and-monetary-policy&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.lynalden.com&#x2F;fiscal-and-monetary-policy&#x2F;</a><p>Along with a recent article (which I can&#x27;t find - I think she takes them premium once they&#x27;ve been out for a while) where she said that the Fed is probably structurally unable to raise rates above inflation, but that won&#x27;t prevent them from trying, and we can expect major stock market crashes each time they do. That&#x27;s pretty much all you need to know: long term, the stock market is going to infinity because the dollar is going to zero (or at least, a value much less than today), but in the short term the stock market could easily see drops of &gt; 50% because it is so heavily levered on zero interest rates right now.<p>I&#x27;d say that the the biggest hole is that her writing ignores coupling of political risk and financial risk. (Probably out of necessity, given her audience. Investing is pointless when you can&#x27;t enforce property rights.) Historically, when you get hyperinflation, you get disrespect for rule of law, civil disorder, collapse of infrastructure, and revolution in very short order. Commerce can&#x27;t survive in these conditions, let alone finance. (This is one of the factors that accelerates inflation into hyperinflation - as predictability disappears, so does production, leading to even more scarcity.)<p>Lyn&#x27;s predictions exist in the uncanny valley where the petrodollar system collapses and the dollar loses its reserve currency status, but we still retain Internet access, orderly financial markets, bank accounts, property rights, and physical security. I&#x27;m not sure this is a given. Historically, transitions to a major new economic system inevitably require a war or at least a revolution, because the winners of the previous economic system will not give up without a fight. There&#x27;s no guarantee that the new government will honor property rights guaranteed by the old one. (In fact, in most cases the new government explicitly strips property from the previous wealthy elite, and that&#x27;s a major part of its appeal to the common people.)</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The Capital Sponge</title><url>https://www.lynalden.com/january-2022-newsletter/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>reactspa</author><text>I would love for someone to find holes in the reasoning in this article (my own Macro Econ skills are not that good).<p>The author is a major voice in bitcoin circles (search their name with the word &quot;bitcoin&quot; or &quot;crypto&quot; on youtube). And I find it notable that they don&#x27;t mention bitcoin or crypto anywhere in this post.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>paulpauper</author><text>I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s a good source of investment advice. Endorsing Bitcoin for example is a major flag. She is being paid to promote bitcoin services. I see this as a conflict of interest.<p>She makes assumptions that are wrong. like:<p><i>The danger comes, however, if interest rates start going sideways, or even start going up, structurally.</i><p>except that stocks rose in 2016-2017 even as interest rates were rising. Same for the 90s.</text></comment>
|
22,480,442 | 22,480,556 | 1 | 2 | 22,479,886 |
train
|
<story><title>Atrium shuts down, laying off 100</title><url>https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/03/atrium-shuts-down/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>gnicholas</author><text>I swung by the Atrium booth at the Startup Grind conference a few weeks ago. A former lawyer, I was curious to hear their pitch. It was basically: we get you cheap lawyers, and we help them find new clients.<p>I asked if all of their lawyers are based in the US, and they couldn&#x27;t give me a straight answer. Eventually, when I said &quot;well, of course they must all be US-licensed lawyers, right?&quot; they said &quot;oh, yeah, they must all be in the US then.&quot;<p>It was not a confidence-inspiring conversation, and I can&#x27;t say I&#x27;m surprised that they&#x27;re shutting down.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Atrium shuts down, laying off 100</title><url>https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/03/atrium-shuts-down/</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>burgerquizz</author><text>Justin Kan got into a terrible motorbike accident few months ago [1] . He then went through lot of thoughts on meaningful life and such kind of things in his tweets later. Would that impact the performance &#x2F; outcome of Atrium?<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;justinkan&#x2F;status&#x2F;1191821878567915520" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;justinkan&#x2F;status&#x2F;1191821878567915520</a></text></comment>
|
33,041,308 | 33,041,528 | 1 | 2 | 33,039,562 |
train
|
<story><title>Why are nuclear power construction costs so high? Part III – the nuclear navy</title><url>https://constructionphysics.substack.com/p/why-are-nuclear-power-construction-c3c</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tomComb</author><text>Yes, cost is the issue.<p>Everyone assumes that anyone hesitant about Nuclear power is focussed on the environmental or safety concerns, but that is wrong. The costs (and cost overruns) of the construction and maintenance of Nuclear reactors have been enough reason on their own to be bearish on Nuclear.<p>I&#x27;m hopeful that new technologies, such as small nuclear reactions that can be built in a factory, will address this.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>virissimo</author><text>Our nations were far less wealthy when the existing stock of nuclear power plants were built, the technology available for building them have improved since then, and the raw resources needed as their inputs aren&#x27;t a constraint, so why have costs risen so much relative to what we are willing to spend on it?<p>Environmental and safety regulations are supposed to be explanations for this rise in cost, not rival explanations to &quot;cost is the issue&quot; (since they take that as given).</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Why are nuclear power construction costs so high? Part III – the nuclear navy</title><url>https://constructionphysics.substack.com/p/why-are-nuclear-power-construction-c3c</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>tomComb</author><text>Yes, cost is the issue.<p>Everyone assumes that anyone hesitant about Nuclear power is focussed on the environmental or safety concerns, but that is wrong. The costs (and cost overruns) of the construction and maintenance of Nuclear reactors have been enough reason on their own to be bearish on Nuclear.<p>I&#x27;m hopeful that new technologies, such as small nuclear reactions that can be built in a factory, will address this.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jjk166</author><text>Nuclear is not fundamentally expensive[0], and most nuclear power plants currently in operation were cheap when they were built. The high costs of building new powerplants is a result of going decades without building any, leading to a loss of experience. Even still, nuclear remains competitive with other traditional power generation technologies like coal. Only with recent advancements in fracking did natural gas supplant coal as the go to fuel, and Wind and solar have become extremely inexpensive, but only in the past 10 years, in large part due to a concerted effort to scale up those industries. In other parts of the world where nuclear power did not have a decades long hiatus it remains extremely competitive with even these renewables, for example in South Korea where LCOE for nuclear is half that of solar.<p>Of course you may have only became bearish on nuclear when the costs got high, but there are a large number of people who were bearish before then, which is what made costs high.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S0301421516300106" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencedirect.com&#x2F;science&#x2F;article&#x2F;pii&#x2F;S030142151...</a></text></comment>
|
10,354,331 | 10,353,537 | 1 | 2 | 10,352,189 |
train
|
<story><title>'Extreme poverty' to fall below 10% of world population for first time</title><url>http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/05/world-bank-extreme-poverty-to-fall-below-10-of-world-population-for-first-time</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>cjbenedikt</author><text>&quot;More and more analysts, though, are pointing out that this claim is little more than an accounting trick: UN officials have massaged the numbers to make it seem as though poverty has been reduced, when in fact it has increased.&quot;
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ssir.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;entry&#x2F;using_design_thinking_to_eradicate_poverty_creation" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ssir.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;entry&#x2F;using_design_thinking_to_erad...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ef4</author><text>That article is highlighting deeply misleading facts. For example: &quot;between 1990 and 2010 there was an increase of 371 million people living on less than $5 a day&quot;. But during the same time period, the world added 1.6 billion people, and even using your source&#x27;s own data, that implies that the fraction of people living on less than $5 a day dropped from 75% to 60%.<p>In short, the claim that poverty is getting worse is utter bullshit. It requires either climate-change-denialist levels of willful ignorance, or a xenophobic definition of &quot;poverty&quot; that only counts people living in your own much-richer-than-global-average country.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>'Extreme poverty' to fall below 10% of world population for first time</title><url>http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/05/world-bank-extreme-poverty-to-fall-below-10-of-world-population-for-first-time</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>cjbenedikt</author><text>&quot;More and more analysts, though, are pointing out that this claim is little more than an accounting trick: UN officials have massaged the numbers to make it seem as though poverty has been reduced, when in fact it has increased.&quot;
<a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ssir.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;entry&#x2F;using_design_thinking_to_eradicate_poverty_creation" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;ssir.org&#x2F;articles&#x2F;entry&#x2F;using_design_thinking_to_erad...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>mbostleman</author><text>When it comes to policy that drives the funding of social programs and wealth redistribution, everything is an accounting trick.<p>One example is that the US Census Bureau&#x27;s reporting of poverty statistics based on income has changed to NOT include the income of many benefits including food stamps and the Earned Income Tax Credit. If you include these benefits prior to counting the poor, the poverty rate falls to nearly zero.<p>This is why the director of the Census Bureau&#x27;s report now answers to the White House instead of the Director of Commerce. Bending the numbers is essential to maintaining and expanding institutions.<p>The switch was made when Obama nominated Rebuplican senator Judd Gregg as Commerce Secretary. Given that Gregg had previously voted to abolish the Commerce department, it is likely that his influence would have brought the numbers in line with the facts. But, had Gregg accepted the nomination, it would have opened up a senate seat that would have been filled by the Democratric governor of his state. So to have his cake and eat it too, Obama took control of the number reporting. Gregg did not accept the nomination.<p>Talk about accounting tricks.<p>Another example is the disparity between counting income vs. consumption. Again in the US, when the money spent by poorer classes that are studied is counted it is far greater than what is calculated as their income (which is what policy is based on) This indicates that in-kind gifts and other non-reported income is substantial, but not counted.</text></comment>
|
36,418,860 | 36,419,077 | 1 | 3 | 36,418,713 |
train
|
<story><title>FTC sues Amazon over ‘deceptive’ Prime sign-up and cancellation process</title><url>https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/21/ftc-sues-amazon-over-deceptive-prime-sign-up-and-cancellation-process.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>PaulHoule</author><text>I wouldn&#x27;t say the process of unsubscribing from Prime is &#x27;deceptive&#x27; but it sure has many steps. They tried just about everything to persuade me to stay except offer to bring back two day shipping.<p>(I know many of you in urban areas are getting one day shipping but those of us in less favored geographies, such as the same ZIP code as AMZN warehouses, have seen two day shipping turn into five, which makes Amazon uncompetitive with going to the store or with other e-tailers which usually offer faster shipping.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>ezfe</author><text>What&#x27;s deceptive about it is you click the first link to cancel your benefits, then each subsequent page is basically a quiz: &quot;which button will boot you out of the cancel flow and which button will proceed to the next page&quot;<p>I agree it&#x27;s not actually that hard to cancel, but the flow is so needlessly complex from a consumer perspective.<p>It should go straight to a page with three buttons and associated explanations:<p>1) Cancel at the end of the term
2) Cancel immediately and receive pro-rated refund (Since they offer this, I&#x27;m including it here - wouldn&#x27;t expect it in general)
3) Keep subscription</text></comment>
|
<story><title>FTC sues Amazon over ‘deceptive’ Prime sign-up and cancellation process</title><url>https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/21/ftc-sues-amazon-over-deceptive-prime-sign-up-and-cancellation-process.html</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>PaulHoule</author><text>I wouldn&#x27;t say the process of unsubscribing from Prime is &#x27;deceptive&#x27; but it sure has many steps. They tried just about everything to persuade me to stay except offer to bring back two day shipping.<p>(I know many of you in urban areas are getting one day shipping but those of us in less favored geographies, such as the same ZIP code as AMZN warehouses, have seen two day shipping turn into five, which makes Amazon uncompetitive with going to the store or with other e-tailers which usually offer faster shipping.)</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>squeaky-clean</author><text>I&#x27;m in NYC and two day shipping here is a crapshoot nowadays. Sure it says 2-day shipping on the store page, but counting my past orders, 6&#x2F;10 were delayed delivery, usually taking 5 days. The last 2 times I tried buying bulk paper towels on Amazon (I had them set as a recurring purchase every 6 months) they have been lost in transit.<p>Also really frustrating, if I go to &quot;Order Details&quot; for an order that was delayed, the &quot;Delivery Estimate&quot; line shows the day it was actually delivered. Not the day it was originally estimated. I had to check my email to find the original delivery estimate.</text></comment>
|
29,886,524 | 29,886,372 | 1 | 2 | 29,885,644 |
train
|
<story><title>The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M</title><url>https://wegotthiscovered.com/tv/the-matrix-resurrections-estimated-to-lose-warner-bros-100-million/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>LegitShady</author><text>Do they suddenly make more money streaming? Do you have any evidence people joined a streaming platform to watch it?<p>This thing bombed everywhere. People with existing subscriptions watching it doesn&#x27;t make it any. More profitable to Warner Bros</text></item><item><author>Latty</author><text>Quoting box office sales while ignoring the fact this was released simultaneously for streaming really doesn&#x27;t tell the full story.</text></item><item><author>fishtoaster</author><text>Any reason to believe that this is an instance of Hollywood Accounting? At a glance, wikipedia says the film cost $190m, which seems reasonable for a film like this, and only received $124.5m in box office sales. Conversely, wikipedia lists Harry Potter OotP as a &quot;150–200 million&quot; budget on $942m in box office sales.<p>It&#x27;s certainly possible this is a case of Hollywood Accounting, but is there any particular reason we think it is, vs just a film losing a lot of money normally?</text></item><item><author>romwell</author><text>Uh huh. Sure.<p>There&#x27;s a reason they call it Hollywood Accounting[1].<p>Not that Warner Brothers is new to this game either:<p>&gt;A Warner Bros. receipt was leaked online, showing that the hugely successful movie Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix ended up with a $167 million loss on paper after grossing nearly $1 billion.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hollywood_accounting" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hollywood_accounting</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>PostOnce</author><text>More money isn&#x27;t just new subscriptions, it&#x27;s also revenue from existing subscriptions (which can be cancelled any time).<p>By this logic, platforms will never need new content ever in order to keep existing subscribers happy.<p>It&#x27;s not just new subscriptions, it&#x27;s also retention: do people stay subscribed to platform X because movies like The Matrix Resurrections are on the platform?<p>It&#x27;d be rather hard to measure for a single film, it&#x27;s the aggregate of platform content that dictates retention, I would think.<p>If the answer is yes, then the platforms will continue to pay companies like WB to film &quot;box office bombs&quot;.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The Matrix Resurrections estimated to lose Warner Bros $100M</title><url>https://wegotthiscovered.com/tv/the-matrix-resurrections-estimated-to-lose-warner-bros-100-million/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>LegitShady</author><text>Do they suddenly make more money streaming? Do you have any evidence people joined a streaming platform to watch it?<p>This thing bombed everywhere. People with existing subscriptions watching it doesn&#x27;t make it any. More profitable to Warner Bros</text></item><item><author>Latty</author><text>Quoting box office sales while ignoring the fact this was released simultaneously for streaming really doesn&#x27;t tell the full story.</text></item><item><author>fishtoaster</author><text>Any reason to believe that this is an instance of Hollywood Accounting? At a glance, wikipedia says the film cost $190m, which seems reasonable for a film like this, and only received $124.5m in box office sales. Conversely, wikipedia lists Harry Potter OotP as a &quot;150–200 million&quot; budget on $942m in box office sales.<p>It&#x27;s certainly possible this is a case of Hollywood Accounting, but is there any particular reason we think it is, vs just a film losing a lot of money normally?</text></item><item><author>romwell</author><text>Uh huh. Sure.<p>There&#x27;s a reason they call it Hollywood Accounting[1].<p>Not that Warner Brothers is new to this game either:<p>&gt;A Warner Bros. receipt was leaked online, showing that the hugely successful movie Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix ended up with a $167 million loss on paper after grossing nearly $1 billion.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hollywood_accounting" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Hollywood_accounting</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>bentcorner</author><text>While I can&#x27;t answer your question, just using a calculation like &quot;box office receipts&quot; - &quot;movie making expense&quot; is surely disingenuous. In that case every single direct-to-netflix release would be considered a money loser.</text></comment>
|
2,180,696 | 2,180,537 | 1 | 2 | 2,180,233 |
train
|
<story><title>The Type of Employee You Really Want: Porn Star</title><url>http://pseudocoder.com/archives/the-type-of-employee-you-really-want-porn-star</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jrockway</author><text>The Type of Blog Post I Really Want: One With Some Substance</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>moomba</author><text>I guess the bit of substance this article does have is that these names we like to give elite hackers that work at startups are silly. Maybe it doesn't take a short article to make that point, but that is basically what I got out of it.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The Type of Employee You Really Want: Porn Star</title><url>http://pseudocoder.com/archives/the-type-of-employee-you-really-want-porn-star</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>jrockway</author><text>The Type of Blog Post I Really Want: One With Some Substance</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>gnufied</author><text>Have an upvote sir. I really don't understand, what an article like this is doing on the front page of hacker news.</text></comment>
|
38,181,388 | 38,181,575 | 1 | 3 | 38,180,197 |
train
|
<story><title>Why only 1% of the Snowden Archive will ever be published</title><url>https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366554957/Why-only-1-of-the-Snowden-Archive-will-ever-be-published</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>saulpw</author><text>&gt; a capable public can make this determination<p>The public is not capable, either technically nor emotionally nor politically.</text></item><item><author>garciasn</author><text>&gt; Why was only 1% of the documents published, in the end? “The documents are not like the WikiLeaks ones from the US state department, which were written by diplomats and, for the most part, easily understandable,” said Ewen MacAskill. “The Snowden files are largely technical, with lots of codewords and jargon that is hard to decipher. There are pages and pages of that which the public would not be interested in. There are also documents that relate to operational matters. Snowden said from the start he wanted us to report on issues related to mass surveillance, not operational matters. So we stuck to that.”<p>Ignoring the operational limitation requirement (of which there is no way it&#x27;s 99% vs 1%), a capable public can make this determination; we do not need journalists doing it for us. I am uninterested in the journalistic value of these documents; I am interested in the public value of potentially knowing the content of those documents and how the government is surveilling us and&#x2F;or abusing their authority.<p>&gt;“The bottom line is that Snowden is facing charges under the Espionage Act. If he was ever to return to the US and face trial, the documents could be used against him.<p>Snowden knew this when he leaked the documents and he now resides, ironically, in one of the most surveilled countries in the world. He believed he was acting in the best interests on the public and is it NOT the job of journalists to protect a known source entity; they are to protect unknown sources.<p>Release MORE of the files, your profits and&#x2F;or biased concerns for the journalistic value of the information shared be dammed. There is WAY more at stake.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>jerf</author><text>The public is not capable of creating an open source ecosystem of highly technical software spanning almost every software genre with multiple options across decades.<p>The public is not just the bottom most or the average member. It&#x27;s everyone. If &quot;the public&quot; is not capable of understanding this information neither are the members of &quot;the public&quot; normally producing and consuming this information.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Why only 1% of the Snowden Archive will ever be published</title><url>https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366554957/Why-only-1-of-the-Snowden-Archive-will-ever-be-published</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>saulpw</author><text>&gt; a capable public can make this determination<p>The public is not capable, either technically nor emotionally nor politically.</text></item><item><author>garciasn</author><text>&gt; Why was only 1% of the documents published, in the end? “The documents are not like the WikiLeaks ones from the US state department, which were written by diplomats and, for the most part, easily understandable,” said Ewen MacAskill. “The Snowden files are largely technical, with lots of codewords and jargon that is hard to decipher. There are pages and pages of that which the public would not be interested in. There are also documents that relate to operational matters. Snowden said from the start he wanted us to report on issues related to mass surveillance, not operational matters. So we stuck to that.”<p>Ignoring the operational limitation requirement (of which there is no way it&#x27;s 99% vs 1%), a capable public can make this determination; we do not need journalists doing it for us. I am uninterested in the journalistic value of these documents; I am interested in the public value of potentially knowing the content of those documents and how the government is surveilling us and&#x2F;or abusing their authority.<p>&gt;“The bottom line is that Snowden is facing charges under the Espionage Act. If he was ever to return to the US and face trial, the documents could be used against him.<p>Snowden knew this when he leaked the documents and he now resides, ironically, in one of the most surveilled countries in the world. He believed he was acting in the best interests on the public and is it NOT the job of journalists to protect a known source entity; they are to protect unknown sources.<p>Release MORE of the files, your profits and&#x2F;or biased concerns for the journalistic value of the information shared be dammed. There is WAY more at stake.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>noman-land</author><text>Whether you like it or not, this is not your determination to make.</text></comment>
|
25,734,919 | 25,734,673 | 1 | 2 | 25,732,956 |
train
|
<story><title>Getting Started with Signal</title><url>https://www.justingarrison.com/blog/2021-01-11-getting-started-with-signal/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>suyash</author><text>Here is how I rate them now:<p>1. Worst Offender : Facebook Messenger --&gt; spyware for tracking all your activities even in background<p>2. WhatsApp : Lost trust in it since Facebook bought it, more so with the new terms and conditions. Data is not safe anymore.<p>3. Telegram : Trust it&#x27;s privacy but it&#x27;s proposed business model is also advertisement based so avoiding it.<p>4. Signal : Best option, there are some sacrifices to be made with lack of contacts and some features but slowly and surely we can turn the tide. Also it&#x27;s open source funded by a Non-Profit so that gets it bonus points.<p>Reference: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;9to5mac.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;04&#x2F;app-privacy-labels-messaging-apps&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;9to5mac.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;04&#x2F;app-privacy-labels-messaging-...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>mikece</author><text>Even better is Wire: no phone number required, doesn&#x27;t access your contacts, free personal accounts available, you can use it on a desktop machine with nothing more than a web browser, when using an installed app you can be logged into three Wire accounts at the same time, source code is open source and has been audited for security, you can set up your own locally hosted (or in your own cloud)... and more I&#x27;m probably forgetting.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Getting Started with Signal</title><url>https://www.justingarrison.com/blog/2021-01-11-getting-started-with-signal/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>suyash</author><text>Here is how I rate them now:<p>1. Worst Offender : Facebook Messenger --&gt; spyware for tracking all your activities even in background<p>2. WhatsApp : Lost trust in it since Facebook bought it, more so with the new terms and conditions. Data is not safe anymore.<p>3. Telegram : Trust it&#x27;s privacy but it&#x27;s proposed business model is also advertisement based so avoiding it.<p>4. Signal : Best option, there are some sacrifices to be made with lack of contacts and some features but slowly and surely we can turn the tide. Also it&#x27;s open source funded by a Non-Profit so that gets it bonus points.<p>Reference: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;9to5mac.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;04&#x2F;app-privacy-labels-messaging-apps&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;9to5mac.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;01&#x2F;04&#x2F;app-privacy-labels-messaging-...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>arnoooooo</author><text>What about Element &#x2F; Matrix ? It&#x27;s ahead of Signal in usability, and much more future-proof.</text></comment>
|
25,054,045 | 25,052,202 | 1 | 3 | 25,048,415 |
train
|
<story><title>The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News (2019)</title><url>https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-silicon-valley/the-lonely-work-of-moderating-hacker-news</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>echelon</author><text>Thanks dang!<p>You&#x27;ve helped keep HN readable, corrected countless title and link errors, and prevented heated discussions from devolving into fights.<p>I also am super thankful for your help getting my &quot;Show HN&quot; post to the front page.<p>We all appreciate you.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>grawprog</author><text>I&#x27;m going to throw one out for dang here. I took your moderating personally when I first joined here, got banned for some comments I didn&#x27;t think were that bad, hell i&#x27;ve made worse since, spent a while posting greyed out comments going off at dang, posted some not so shitty comments that got given a chance, realized I should try harder in my comments and just push my way back in by writing things that contribute better to HN.<p>It would have been easy to start a new account, but I liked warring with dang at the time. I even emailed him a bunch appealing my, what I still believe is not really all that bad of a comment, but I accept why it got me in shit as a newer commenter. It spurred me to just try harder at contributing better.<p>Eventually, I was just randomly unbanned.
Since then, i&#x27;ve come appreciate HN&#x27;s moderation style.<p>There&#x27;s really not many places on the internet with such lax account rules, yet mostly good conversation.<p>I appreciate the surprisingly wide range of topics and viewpoints generally allowed here. It does get a bit echo chambery, but mostly, any issue tends to get both sides heard as long as comments are written constructively.<p>Also, just learning about the purpose of this site helped. This is a news website, first and foremost, for people interested in funding from YC. It may have expanded since then, but the moderation does reflect the intended purpose of this site and just generally the kind of discourse expected from people interested in YC funding or other such things.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News (2019)</title><url>https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-silicon-valley/the-lonely-work-of-moderating-hacker-news</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>echelon</author><text>Thanks dang!<p>You&#x27;ve helped keep HN readable, corrected countless title and link errors, and prevented heated discussions from devolving into fights.<p>I also am super thankful for your help getting my &quot;Show HN&quot; post to the front page.<p>We all appreciate you.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>chrisweekly</author><text>Seconding the props for Dan -- and reminding folks to thank Sam (the quiet one), too!</text></comment>
|
37,233,735 | 37,232,687 | 1 | 2 | 37,230,198 |
train
|
<story><title>Mounting your iPhone on your motorcycle can damage its camera (2022)</title><url>https://old.reddit.com/r/motorcycles/comments/v7d6rn/learned_the_hard_way_that_mounting_your_phone_on/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>semiquaver</author><text><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.apple.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;HT212803" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.apple.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;HT212803</a><p>&gt; high-power motorcycle engines<p>Neither “high-power” nor “motorcycle” are words I would use to characterize the vehicle in that advertisement.</text></item><item><author>kylec</author><text>Surprising, considering mounting your iPhone to a motorcycle was central to the main ad for the iPhone 13:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Nn50z2PEDEA">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Nn50z2PEDEA</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>solatic</author><text>If it has two wheels (&quot;bicycle&quot;) and a motor (&quot;motorized bicycle&quot;) then it is a &quot;motorcycle&quot;.<p>Declining to call it a motorcycle because the motor is small relative to other motorcycles is little more than snobbery, and it&#x27;s a snobbery that discourages people from buying a (larger) motorcycle that fits their needs, because of a historic arbitrary distinction between small and large motorcycles that require separate licensing for large motorcycles; a distinction that should be eliminated either by applying licensing requirements uniformly to all motorcycles or uniformly eliminating the licensing requirements from all motorcycles.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Mounting your iPhone on your motorcycle can damage its camera (2022)</title><url>https://old.reddit.com/r/motorcycles/comments/v7d6rn/learned_the_hard_way_that_mounting_your_phone_on/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>semiquaver</author><text><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.apple.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;HT212803" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;support.apple.com&#x2F;en-us&#x2F;HT212803</a><p>&gt; high-power motorcycle engines<p>Neither “high-power” nor “motorcycle” are words I would use to characterize the vehicle in that advertisement.</text></item><item><author>kylec</author><text>Surprising, considering mounting your iPhone to a motorcycle was central to the main ad for the iPhone 13:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Nn50z2PEDEA">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Nn50z2PEDEA</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>somerandomqaguy</author><text>Eh, it qualifies as a motorcycle IMO. Whether the engine&#x27;s vibrations transit enough through the frame to damage the camera though is a matter of some debate. It&#x27;s not just power; how well the engine&#x27;s tuned, if it&#x27;s been damaged, etc can affect that pretty drastically.</text></comment>
|
8,046,543 | 8,046,537 | 1 | 2 | 8,046,254 |
train
|
<story><title>FTL: WebKit’s LLVM-based JIT</title><url>http://blog.llvm.org/2014/07/ftl-webkits-llvm-based-jit.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>andrewchambers</author><text>Unfortunately I think the increased complexity in javascript engines is also a security risk.<p>Fuzzing and other techniques may be able to cause all sorts of crashes and memory corruptions in the jit compilers code or in the generated code. This issue may have just been amplified by the extra complexity in the massive amount of LLVM C++ code added.<p>This is less of an issue for llvm when used as a static compiler, but as a jit on untrusted code, I don&#x27;t know.<p>Time will tell, but I wonder if Rusts memory safety will make it a better candidate for implementing advanced JIT engines that process untrusted code than C++ like in LLVM.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>FTL: WebKit’s LLVM-based JIT</title><url>http://blog.llvm.org/2014/07/ftl-webkits-llvm-based-jit.html</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>AndrewDucker</author><text>I&#x27;m intrigued that they keep pointing out that it&#x27;s not using any asm.js optimisations, but still &quot;performs well&quot;.<p>&quot;Performing well&quot; in this case still means significantly slower than Firefox does on the same code:<p><a href="http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=12&amp;view=breakdown&amp;suite=asmjs-apps" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;arewefastyet.com&#x2F;#machine=12&amp;view=breakdown&amp;suite=asm...</a><p>Which isn&#x27;t to say that it&#x27;s not a big improvement over where it was. But there&#x27;s still a way to go on making it competitive, so far as I can see.<p>Edit: Got name of the original engine wrong.</text></comment>
|
41,482,702 | 41,482,479 | 1 | 2 | 41,481,821 |
train
|
<story><title>The muscular imagination of Iain M. Banks: a future you might want</title><url>https://www.robinsloan.com/moonbound/muscular-imagination/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>ethbr1</author><text>Curious question for HN re: Banks&#x2F;culture -- how do Culture-esque civilizations dominate technologically and economically over civilizations with less Culture-like attributes?^<p>That respect of Banks always felt a bit handwavey as to the specifics. (I.e. good&#x2F;freedom triumphs over evil&#x2F;tyranny, because it&#x27;s a superior philosophy)<p>At galactic-scale, across civilization timespans, it&#x27;s not as apparent why that should hold true.<p>Would have hoped that Banks, had he lived longer, would have delved into this in detail.<p>Granted, Vinge takes a similar approach, constructing his big bad from an obviously-not-equivalent antagonist, sidestepping the direct comparison.<p>The closest I got from either of them was that they posited that civilizations that tolerate and encourage diversity and individual autonomy persist for longer, are thus older, and that older counts for a lot at galactic scale.<p>^ Note: I&#x27;m asking more about the Idiran Empire than an OCP.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>YawningAngel</author><text>The fact that the Culture was not only willing to use very powerful general AI but allow it to run the entire civilisation, whereas the Idirans banned it, might have been a factor. No matter how smart Idirans might be presumably Minds would have a significant edge</text></comment>
|
<story><title>The muscular imagination of Iain M. Banks: a future you might want</title><url>https://www.robinsloan.com/moonbound/muscular-imagination/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>ethbr1</author><text>Curious question for HN re: Banks&#x2F;culture -- how do Culture-esque civilizations dominate technologically and economically over civilizations with less Culture-like attributes?^<p>That respect of Banks always felt a bit handwavey as to the specifics. (I.e. good&#x2F;freedom triumphs over evil&#x2F;tyranny, because it&#x27;s a superior philosophy)<p>At galactic-scale, across civilization timespans, it&#x27;s not as apparent why that should hold true.<p>Would have hoped that Banks, had he lived longer, would have delved into this in detail.<p>Granted, Vinge takes a similar approach, constructing his big bad from an obviously-not-equivalent antagonist, sidestepping the direct comparison.<p>The closest I got from either of them was that they posited that civilizations that tolerate and encourage diversity and individual autonomy persist for longer, are thus older, and that older counts for a lot at galactic scale.<p>^ Note: I&#x27;m asking more about the Idiran Empire than an OCP.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>sxp</author><text>Excession deals with this. It involves the Culture and &quot;The Affront&quot; which is a spacefaring but savage civilization that some people in the Culture dislike. Player of Games is a similar story about a civilization that the Culture dislikes. Those are my two favorite Culture books among my favorite books in general.<p>The Wikipedia articles about the books goes into spoiler-heavy details about the Culture&#x27;s interaction with those civilizations.</text></comment>
|
41,160,827 | 41,159,263 | 1 | 2 | 41,154,334 |
train
|
<story><title>Making your own hot sauce</title><url>https://successfulsoftware.net/2024/08/04/making-your-own-hot-sauce/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dhosek</author><text>&gt; if you&#x27;re dealing with hot peppers, use gloves - they help a lot!<p>In my 20s I on more occasions than I’m prepared to admit, rubbed my eye while cooking with peppers. Then I ran to the bathroom, cupped my hands under the water and splashed water in <i>both</i> eyes. This (obviously, in retrospect) left me painfully blind for about half an hour.<p>I’d note that gloves would have helped in this scenario only if I was smart enough to take them off before splashing water in my eyes. Which branch of that if statement would have been more likely is left as an exercise for the reader.</text></item><item><author>jerrysievert</author><text>I lacto-ferment hot sauce on a regular basis (and give most of it away).<p>my go-to brine is by weight, which eliminates a bunch of issues:<p>* 400g water<p>* 26g salt<p>this makes for a great brine without trying to estimate or &quot;taste&quot; it to see if it&#x27;s ok.<p>in addition, I sometimes use adjuncts:<p>* garlic - this adds a lot of flavor to the sauce, but could add yeast if you&#x27;re not careful<p>* carrots - adds some vegetable flavor and a little bit of sweetness without adding sugar directly<p>I also don&#x27;t pasteurize it (heat it up after it&#x27;s done, or add vinegar), since I prefer the natural change that the sauce has over time. I also don&#x27;t &quot;thicken&quot; it, you can get a better sauce by using the correct amount of brine when you go to blend it at the end, if all else fails, any leftover brine can be used for other things (I have some great pickles that were started with a partial batch of brine).<p>it&#x27;s a fun hobby, but make sure that you can find a home for the extras if you aren&#x27;t an avid hot sauce eater!<p>editing to add some tips:<p>1. if you&#x27;re dealing with hot peppers, use gloves - they help a lot!<p>2. the seeds and the pith add a lot of heat - you can remove them and get yourself delicious flavor without the pain.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>chias</author><text>In my 30s on EXACTLY ONE occasion I was chopping a bunch of peppers and then went to the bathroom to pee.<p>I have worn gloves each and every time since, when dealing with more than 2 or 3 peppers at habanero heat or above.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Making your own hot sauce</title><url>https://successfulsoftware.net/2024/08/04/making-your-own-hot-sauce/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>dhosek</author><text>&gt; if you&#x27;re dealing with hot peppers, use gloves - they help a lot!<p>In my 20s I on more occasions than I’m prepared to admit, rubbed my eye while cooking with peppers. Then I ran to the bathroom, cupped my hands under the water and splashed water in <i>both</i> eyes. This (obviously, in retrospect) left me painfully blind for about half an hour.<p>I’d note that gloves would have helped in this scenario only if I was smart enough to take them off before splashing water in my eyes. Which branch of that if statement would have been more likely is left as an exercise for the reader.</text></item><item><author>jerrysievert</author><text>I lacto-ferment hot sauce on a regular basis (and give most of it away).<p>my go-to brine is by weight, which eliminates a bunch of issues:<p>* 400g water<p>* 26g salt<p>this makes for a great brine without trying to estimate or &quot;taste&quot; it to see if it&#x27;s ok.<p>in addition, I sometimes use adjuncts:<p>* garlic - this adds a lot of flavor to the sauce, but could add yeast if you&#x27;re not careful<p>* carrots - adds some vegetable flavor and a little bit of sweetness without adding sugar directly<p>I also don&#x27;t pasteurize it (heat it up after it&#x27;s done, or add vinegar), since I prefer the natural change that the sauce has over time. I also don&#x27;t &quot;thicken&quot; it, you can get a better sauce by using the correct amount of brine when you go to blend it at the end, if all else fails, any leftover brine can be used for other things (I have some great pickles that were started with a partial batch of brine).<p>it&#x27;s a fun hobby, but make sure that you can find a home for the extras if you aren&#x27;t an avid hot sauce eater!<p>editing to add some tips:<p>1. if you&#x27;re dealing with hot peppers, use gloves - they help a lot!<p>2. the seeds and the pith add a lot of heat - you can remove them and get yourself delicious flavor without the pain.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>nbk_2000</author><text>Rinsing your eye(s) with milk will alleviate the pain far quicker than water.<p>Something I learned googling with one eye open while the other was burning from being touched with a habanero contaminated finger :&#x2F;</text></comment>
|
34,174,848 | 34,171,460 | 1 | 2 | 34,169,051 |
train
|
<story><title>AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off</title><url>https://www.fortressofdoors.com/ai-markets-for-lemons-and-the-great-logging-off/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>wyldfire</author><text>&gt; Second, I think people will start to put a premium on accounts being &quot;verified&quot; as genuinely human.<p>IMO this is long overdue. And I think people should&#x2F;will eventually even pay for this feature.<p>&gt; Powerful nation states will be more than eager to assist them in this regard.<p>I agree - world governments could consider even subsidizing this in some way in order to foster fewer anonymous botnets sowing discord. The web of trust could be useful to help bolster this - if only in providing the process by which new social networks could eliminate anonymity.<p>I hear a lot about SSI [1] from a family member who works on this stuff. I&#x27;ll be honest - I don&#x27;t know whether it&#x27;s promising or dystopian. Maybe a little bit of each. But I optimistically think it could be a way to help mitigate some of the problems created by anonymity.<p>The loss of anonymity won&#x27;t be a panacea -- for example: people with legitimate accounts bound to their identity today accept bribes to create positive reviews of goods. And the loss of anonymity comes with significant drawbacks: criticizing government and powerful people becomes more difficult.<p>Having a digital reputation that you can taint could put people on their best behavior. But then again it&#x27;s a bit dystopian [2, 3].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Self-sovereign_identity" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Self-sovereign_identity</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Social_Credit_System" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Social_Credit_System</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>LarryMullins</author><text>I think as soon as people see &quot;verified humans&quot; posting things they utterly disagree with, the temptation to call those people &quot;bots&quot; will be too great to resist. A substantial portion of internet commenters will sooner call a human verification system into disrepute than admit that some real people really do earnestly disagree with them. They&#x27;ll spin conspiracy yarns about how &quot;the other side&quot; controls the verification process and allow their own bots to participate.<p>I think the solution to all of this is smaller tight-knit discussion groups where all the participants know and trust each other. Echo chambers will inevitability form. I don&#x27;t think there is any way around this.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off</title><url>https://www.fortressofdoors.com/ai-markets-for-lemons-and-the-great-logging-off/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>wyldfire</author><text>&gt; Second, I think people will start to put a premium on accounts being &quot;verified&quot; as genuinely human.<p>IMO this is long overdue. And I think people should&#x2F;will eventually even pay for this feature.<p>&gt; Powerful nation states will be more than eager to assist them in this regard.<p>I agree - world governments could consider even subsidizing this in some way in order to foster fewer anonymous botnets sowing discord. The web of trust could be useful to help bolster this - if only in providing the process by which new social networks could eliminate anonymity.<p>I hear a lot about SSI [1] from a family member who works on this stuff. I&#x27;ll be honest - I don&#x27;t know whether it&#x27;s promising or dystopian. Maybe a little bit of each. But I optimistically think it could be a way to help mitigate some of the problems created by anonymity.<p>The loss of anonymity won&#x27;t be a panacea -- for example: people with legitimate accounts bound to their identity today accept bribes to create positive reviews of goods. And the loss of anonymity comes with significant drawbacks: criticizing government and powerful people becomes more difficult.<p>Having a digital reputation that you can taint could put people on their best behavior. But then again it&#x27;s a bit dystopian [2, 3].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Self-sovereign_identity" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Self-sovereign_identity</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Social_Credit_System" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Social_Credit_System</a><p>[3] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nosedive_(Black_Mirror)</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>Renaud</author><text>&gt;loss of anonymity comes with significant drawbacks: criticizing government and powerful people becomes more difficult.<p>How don&#x27;t see how making our lives more dystopian can be a net benefit.<p>How many of us expose different aspects of ourselves through different identities?
Maybe most people are happy to show everyone all aspects of their lives, but I&#x27;m not, in part because who I am could get me or the people I meet in trouble, harassed, imprisoned or worse in some places.<p>Anonymity should remain a fundamental right. We have the right to live and expose different parts of ourselves to different audiences without overlap.<p>Anonymity is also a counter-power to governments. A government that knows all about its citizen is bound to abuse this power.<p>We see it in many democracies; elected governments enact laws that restrict freedoms to keep itself in power (Russia of course, Turkey, Algeria, but also EU countries like Bulgaria). Tools like government-issued ID that become mandatory to express yourself online are doubly dangerous: they make it easy to target those who cause trouble, and they can be used to remove means of expression (who can listen to you if you are denied an ID and there is no freedom of press to expose the abuse?).</text></comment>
|
26,068,502 | 26,065,484 | 1 | 2 | 26,060,839 |
train
|
<story><title>Barcode scanner app on Google Play infects 10M users with one update</title><url>https://blog.malwarebytes.com/android/2021/02/barcode-scanner-app-on-google-play-infects-10-million-users-with-one-update/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>wooptoo</author><text>This is possibly tied to the recent assault on the ZXing Barcode scanner app[1].<p>This is a legit open source app that&#x27;s been recently flooded by 1-star reviews claiming that the app contains malware, probably in order to get users to switch to the other apps.
The funny thing is this app has not been updated since 2019 on the Play Store, so those reviews are clearly bogus.<p>It takes a special kind of scum to slander an open source project in order to push malware.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;apps&#x2F;details?id=com.google.zxing.client.android" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;apps&#x2F;details?id=com.google.zxi...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>bityard</author><text>The ZXing Barcode Scanner (which is the &quot;official barcode&#x2F;QR code scanner for Android, as far as _I_ am concerned) is also available on f-droid.org. There&#x27;s no absolute guarantee that F-Droid apps are malware-free but they have at least been looked at by a competent team of humans, something that is not true of the Play Store.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;f-droid.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;packages&#x2F;com.google.zxing.client.android&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;f-droid.org&#x2F;en&#x2F;packages&#x2F;com.google.zxing.client.andr...</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>Barcode scanner app on Google Play infects 10M users with one update</title><url>https://blog.malwarebytes.com/android/2021/02/barcode-scanner-app-on-google-play-infects-10-million-users-with-one-update/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>wooptoo</author><text>This is possibly tied to the recent assault on the ZXing Barcode scanner app[1].<p>This is a legit open source app that&#x27;s been recently flooded by 1-star reviews claiming that the app contains malware, probably in order to get users to switch to the other apps.
The funny thing is this app has not been updated since 2019 on the Play Store, so those reviews are clearly bogus.<p>It takes a special kind of scum to slander an open source project in order to push malware.<p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;apps&#x2F;details?id=com.google.zxing.client.android" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;play.google.com&#x2F;store&#x2F;apps&#x2F;details?id=com.google.zxi...</a></text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>TheRealDunkirk</author><text>&quot;Apps&quot; and &quot;algorithms&quot; seem to be driving literally everything about society now. I don&#x27;t think this is a good thing, nor do I see the trend reversing. These giant black boxes now control the levers of modern society, and the companies that own them get to hide behind their &quot;terms of service&quot; to avoid any responsibility for the damage being done.<p>Every significant review system is being gamed to the point of being unusable, and yet stories about not being able to trust them keep being reported as if this were somehow noteworthy. For every one of these stories that rises to a thread on HN, how many other small time vendors are getting screwed by someone who is willing to pay a room full of people in some 3rd-world country to debase their competitor&#x27;s online presence?</text></comment>
|
6,505,828 | 6,505,786 | 1 | 2 | 6,505,604 |
train
|
<story><title>Luje 0.1 – a pure Lua JVM</title><url>https://cowlark.com/luje/doc/stable/doc/index.wiki</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>jacques_chester</author><text>David Given is one of those prolific thinkers and doers who seem to be overrepresented in the Lua community.<p>He&#x27;s probably best known to HNers for his critical article &quot;On Go&quot; and Objective Lua.<p><a href="http://cowlark.com/2009-11-15-go/" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;cowlark.com&#x2F;2009-11-15-go&#x2F;</a>
<a href="https://cowlark.com/objective-lua/index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cowlark.com&#x2F;objective-lua&#x2F;index.html</a></text></comment>
|
<story><title>Luje 0.1 – a pure Lua JVM</title><url>https://cowlark.com/luje/doc/stable/doc/index.wiki</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>tinco</author><text>The article makes a rather hefty claim, that it is comparable or even in some ways faster performancewise than Sun&#x27;s hotspot JVM.<p>From what I&#x27;ve heard the JVM is one of the most heavily researched and optimized bytecode VM out there. Could it really be that some guy can write a competitor in a scripting language in his spare time?<p>Not saying it&#x27;s impossible, just curious if there&#x27;s anything to back that claim up, besides the very specific microbenchmarks.<p>edit: I was a bit too quick to comment, reading again he doesn&#x27;t really claim to be faster at anything other than small loops. Still interested if it&#x27;s fast at any real world things though.</text></comment>
|
25,014,047 | 25,013,794 | 1 | 2 | 25,012,115 |
train
|
<story><title>Go in Production – Lessons Learned</title><url>https://tdom.dev/go-in-production</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>ldelossa</author><text>The more you get to know Go&#x27;s stdlib the less and less youll think a web framework is necessary.<p>Youll find that utilizing http Round Tripper along with the Handler interface in the http library will make middleware easy.<p>Youll eventually dig into filepath and path methods for extracting path parameters from url paths.<p>And logging and recovery will be a concept youll need to extend outside of just http and into the rest of your application.<p>I totally advise new comers to use a web framework, but in the long run, you probably wont want too.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>willsewell</author><text>I see this sentiment a lot in the Go community. I think it is reasonable in some cases, but there are many use cases (vanilla CRUD web apps) where a web framework is really helpful.<p>The standard library is very low level. Want sessions? DIY. Want user auth? DIY. Want CSRF protection? DIY. The list goes on.<p>It feels like a waste of time implementing these &quot;solved problems&quot; from scratch, but the biggest problem is how easy it is to introduce security vulnerabilities when implementing from scratch, or forgetting to do so.<p>It’s nice to learn concepts from first principals by using the standard library. But once I know how these things work, I’d rather rely on someone else’s battle tested code and best practices.<p>Yes, you can add in separate libraries to solve these specific problems, but they are less likely to compose as well as they would in a framework. On top of this, each time you pull in a new library you have to spend time evaluating it. When I use a framework I don&#x27;t have to think.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Go in Production – Lessons Learned</title><url>https://tdom.dev/go-in-production</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>ldelossa</author><text>The more you get to know Go&#x27;s stdlib the less and less youll think a web framework is necessary.<p>Youll find that utilizing http Round Tripper along with the Handler interface in the http library will make middleware easy.<p>Youll eventually dig into filepath and path methods for extracting path parameters from url paths.<p>And logging and recovery will be a concept youll need to extend outside of just http and into the rest of your application.<p>I totally advise new comers to use a web framework, but in the long run, you probably wont want too.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>thiht</author><text>I&#x27;ve been writing Go services in production for ~5 years and I don&#x27;t really agree. Go Web frameworks are usually what used to be referred as micro frameworks. They&#x27;re great because they embed the bare minimum making the writing experience tolerable.<p>What you say is true, it&#x27;s easy to do with stdlib, but it&#x27;s neither enjoyable not readable. A router lib and a validation lib are realistically still needed.<p>The same applies for the sql package, it&#x27;s basically unusable without at least something like sqlx.</text></comment>
|
35,334,341 | 35,334,157 | 1 | 2 | 35,329,950 |
train
|
<story><title>Apple passwords deserve an app</title><url>https://cabel.com/2023/03/27/apple-passwords-deserve-an-app/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>klodolph</author><text>&gt; Yeah, this is super fucking weird. You&#x27;d think this would be connected in some fashion to &quot;keychain&quot;, but nope.<p>Other browsers used to be able to use it. I do think it’s a really thorny issue—“allow this application to access all saved passwords?” is a pretty damn scary permission to include. Up there with the “allow this application to control your computer” permission that is used for accessibility apps (which apps can abuse to read passwords, if I understand correctly).<p>Apple’s tradition. Make the platform more secure, add an exception for first-party apps, and let the other browsers fuck off.</text></item><item><author>yamtaddle</author><text>&gt; 1. The experience on Windows is terrible. They can claim it&#x27;s cross-platform but it&#x27;s truly a sub-par product.<p>Like a lot of other Apple stuff, I&#x27;m only able to use it because I don&#x27;t use anything non-Apple for anything &quot;serious&quot; that involves a GUI. Windows is for gaming, Linux is my file storage and docker-service-running server that I only interact with over SSH and Web. Ditto Notes, all their Office-type programs, et c. I&#x27;d probably be on a lot more Google shit if I needed more cross-platform access to that stuff.<p>&gt; 2. On Mac it&#x27;s tied specifically to Safari. I use Safari a lot but if I&#x27;m in a different browser then my passwords are unavailable.<p>Yeah, this is super fucking weird. You&#x27;d think this would be connected in some fashion to &quot;keychain&quot;, but nope.<p>&gt; 3. The GUI is buried in System Settings. Heaven forbid you need search it&#x27;s only a simple 37 clicks away!<p>IDGAF about clicks because I search my way to everything in Apple&#x27;s settings—what does bother me is that they&#x27;ve made search worse in the last couple versions of iOS, and that if I type &quot;pass&quot; in search, &quot;Passwords&quot; <i>isn&#x27;t even visible on the list</i> yet. I can get all the way to &quot;password&quot; and it&#x27;s still the <i>fourth</i> entry. The fucking <i>name of the screen</i> is &quot;passwords&quot;! I shouldn&#x27;t have to get farther than &quot;pas&quot; for it to be the first entry on the list, &quot;pass&quot; in the worst-case! Even fully typing &quot;passwords&quot; still leaves it as the <i>second</i> entry (of three) on my device. WTF.</text></item><item><author>hnrodey</author><text>I tried going all-in on using iCloud Keychain (correct term?) for my passwords from having previously used LastPass.<p>In short.<p>1. The experience on Windows is terrible. They can claim it&#x27;s cross-platform but it&#x27;s truly a sub-par product.<p>2. On Mac it&#x27;s tied specifically to Safari. I use Safari a lot but if I&#x27;m in a different browser then my passwords are unavailable.<p>3. The GUI is buried in System Settings. Heaven forbid you need search it&#x27;s only a simple 37 clicks away!<p>I think those were my big complaints. If you are 100% Mac then it&#x27;s a good product. Going outside of the walled Apple garden leaves a lot to be desired.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>varenc</author><text>Safari Passwords and 3rd party apps can and do use the Apple Keychain on macOS&#x2F;iOS to store sensitive data. Though 3rd parties can&#x27;t integrate with Safari&#x27;s password manager.<p>If you use Chrome Sync with passwords on macOS, Chrome actually stores the decryption key in the macOS keychain. Just open Keychain.app (&#x2F;Applications&#x2F;Utilities&#x2F;Keychain Access.app) and search for &quot;Chrome Safe Storage&quot; to find it. That&#x27;s the decryption key for the actual encrypted password&#x2F;sync data stored elsewhere. (So not possible to access Chrome passwords from the Keychain directly)<p>Safari Passwords (Apple&#x27;s password manager) also stores passwords in the Keychain as individual entries and you can access them via Keychain.app. Unfortunately, since they’re part of the iCloud Keychain not the local login Keychain, they appear to be inaccessible with the `security` CLI tool which fails in an obtuse way.</text></comment>
|
<story><title>Apple passwords deserve an app</title><url>https://cabel.com/2023/03/27/apple-passwords-deserve-an-app/</url></story><parent_chain><item><author>klodolph</author><text>&gt; Yeah, this is super fucking weird. You&#x27;d think this would be connected in some fashion to &quot;keychain&quot;, but nope.<p>Other browsers used to be able to use it. I do think it’s a really thorny issue—“allow this application to access all saved passwords?” is a pretty damn scary permission to include. Up there with the “allow this application to control your computer” permission that is used for accessibility apps (which apps can abuse to read passwords, if I understand correctly).<p>Apple’s tradition. Make the platform more secure, add an exception for first-party apps, and let the other browsers fuck off.</text></item><item><author>yamtaddle</author><text>&gt; 1. The experience on Windows is terrible. They can claim it&#x27;s cross-platform but it&#x27;s truly a sub-par product.<p>Like a lot of other Apple stuff, I&#x27;m only able to use it because I don&#x27;t use anything non-Apple for anything &quot;serious&quot; that involves a GUI. Windows is for gaming, Linux is my file storage and docker-service-running server that I only interact with over SSH and Web. Ditto Notes, all their Office-type programs, et c. I&#x27;d probably be on a lot more Google shit if I needed more cross-platform access to that stuff.<p>&gt; 2. On Mac it&#x27;s tied specifically to Safari. I use Safari a lot but if I&#x27;m in a different browser then my passwords are unavailable.<p>Yeah, this is super fucking weird. You&#x27;d think this would be connected in some fashion to &quot;keychain&quot;, but nope.<p>&gt; 3. The GUI is buried in System Settings. Heaven forbid you need search it&#x27;s only a simple 37 clicks away!<p>IDGAF about clicks because I search my way to everything in Apple&#x27;s settings—what does bother me is that they&#x27;ve made search worse in the last couple versions of iOS, and that if I type &quot;pass&quot; in search, &quot;Passwords&quot; <i>isn&#x27;t even visible on the list</i> yet. I can get all the way to &quot;password&quot; and it&#x27;s still the <i>fourth</i> entry. The fucking <i>name of the screen</i> is &quot;passwords&quot;! I shouldn&#x27;t have to get farther than &quot;pas&quot; for it to be the first entry on the list, &quot;pass&quot; in the worst-case! Even fully typing &quot;passwords&quot; still leaves it as the <i>second</i> entry (of three) on my device. WTF.</text></item><item><author>hnrodey</author><text>I tried going all-in on using iCloud Keychain (correct term?) for my passwords from having previously used LastPass.<p>In short.<p>1. The experience on Windows is terrible. They can claim it&#x27;s cross-platform but it&#x27;s truly a sub-par product.<p>2. On Mac it&#x27;s tied specifically to Safari. I use Safari a lot but if I&#x27;m in a different browser then my passwords are unavailable.<p>3. The GUI is buried in System Settings. Heaven forbid you need search it&#x27;s only a simple 37 clicks away!<p>I think those were my big complaints. If you are 100% Mac then it&#x27;s a good product. Going outside of the walled Apple garden leaves a lot to be desired.</text></item></parent_chain><comment><author>paulddraper</author><text>Obviously the browser doesn&#x27;t need to have unfettered access.<p>It just needs to tell the password &quot;hey there&#x27;s a password on wellsfargo.com&quot; and then the password manager asks the user if they want to use the password. And maybe give access to all passwords.<p>IDK, what does safari do?</text></comment>
|
1,284,249 | 1,283,955 | 1 | 3 | 1,283,821 |
train
|
<story><title> Bump</title><url>http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/04/21/Bump</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>biotech</author><text>The first time I ever used Bump, I "bumped" in the air (just moved the phone back and forth). It asked me if I wanted to exchange contact info with someone who I had never met; I tried it again and it asked me to accept contact exchange with another unknown person.<p>All of my attempts since had no effect. Granted, I haven't tried to bump <i>that</i> many times.<p>My theory is that they use a GPS location to determine where you are. Then when the phone senses a particular type of motion, it considers that a "bump". The server looks to see if anyone else is "bumping" in that GPS location, and, if so, they connect and exchange contact info or whatever.<p>If this is true, it explains my original success with bumping into strangers: these two people were probably in a nearby house trying to bump! The server thought they were close to my GPS location, and connected me to the stranger.</text></comment>
|
<story><title> Bump</title><url>http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2010/04/21/Bump</url></story><parent_chain></parent_chain><comment><author>nreece</author><text><i>This is the kind of technology I like; a simple effect, instantly understandable, that requires rocket science under the covers to pull off.</i><p>Historically, <i>most</i> "rocket science" grade technical implementations in software/Web fail, except for stuff by NASA (and the likes). Keep it simple under the hood, but no simpler than what's absolutely required.</text></comment>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.