Fix a number of comments in rpl-lite/rpl-timers.c
@@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ void
rpl_timers_schedule_dao(void)
{
if(curr_instance.used && curr_instance.mop != RPL_MOP_NO_DOWNWARD_ROUTES) {
- /* No need for aggregation delay as per RFC 6550 section 9.5, as this only
- * serves storing mode. Use simply delay instead, with the only PURPOSE
+ /* No need for DAO aggregation delay as per RFC 6550 section 9.5, as this
+ * only serves storing mode. Use simple delay instead, with the only purpose
* to reduce congestion. */
clock_time_t expiration_time = RPL_DAO_DELAY / 2 + (random_rand() % (RPL_DAO_DELAY));
/* Increment next seqno */
@@ -306,8 +306,10 @@ handle_dao_timer(void *ptr)
rpl_icmp6_dao_output(curr_instance.default_lifetime);
#if !RPL_WITH_DAO_ACK
- /* There is DAO-ACK, schedule a refresh. Must be done after rpl_icmp6_dao_output,
- because we increment curr_instance.dag.dao_curr_seqno for the next DAO (refresh) */
+ /* There is no DAO-ACK, schedule a refresh. Must be done after rpl_icmp6_dao_output,
+ because we increment curr_instance.dag.dao_curr_seqno for the next DAO (refresh).
+ Where there is DAO-ACK, the refresh is scheduled after reception of the ACK.
+ Happens when handle_dao_timer is called again next. */
schedule_dao_refresh();
#endif /* !RPL_WITH_DAO_ACK */
}
