Fix bug in vlib_buffer_free_from_ring_no_next
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ vlib_buffer_free_from_ring_no_next (vlib_main_t * vm, u32 * ring, u32 start,
if (PREDICT_TRUE (start + n_buffers <= ring_size))
{
- vlib_buffer_free (vm, ring + start, n_buffers);
+ vlib_buffer_free_no_next (vm, ring + start, n_buffers);
}
else
{
