message: Authority civic text
diff: </TEXT>
  <TEXT>
  <Tag>TXT_KEY_CIVIC_AUTHORITY_PEDIA</Tag>
  - <English>[TAB]Authoritarianism is a long-established form of legal system. Under authoritarianism, all power to make and enforce law goes to a dictatorial overlord who enforces their decrees by raw power, using the army and secret police to suppress dissent and punish lawbreakers. There are many disadvantages to such a system. It is seldom internally consistent, inspires a great deal of fear, and can break down entirely when the supreme ruler is incompetent. From the point of view of the ruler, it has the enormous advantage of permitting him to do as he pleases, punishing his enemies and upholding his friends without regard to any other source of law. The stronger the forces available to enforce his will, the more freedom he enjoys and the more easily he can keep dissent and factionalism from creating problems for his rule.</English>
  + <English>[TAB]In the earliest societies, rulers justified the exercise of their power with nothing put their personal authority. The most important tasks for early rulers were warfare and religious leadership, authority was often derived from military leadership, successful conquest or connection to the gods. Over time, these concepts would be further refined and expanded upon. For example, in the Greek and Roman world, rhetorical skill was regarded as a substantial source of authority. The great advantage of a system based on the skills and background of a single person is that there is less risk of disloyalty and factionalism to the functioning of government. However, one person can only exert their power so far. Once a civilisation grows to a certain size, power needs to be transferred to other people to maintain control, and a more sophisticated system becomes necessary to legitimise their rule.</English>
  </TEXT>
  <TEXT>
  <Tag>TXT_KEY_CIVIC_CASTE_SYSTEM_PEDIA</Tag>
  