message: Take out the assigning of Misbehavior when un-requested block arrive
  Assiging misbehavior here is causing issues with some tests such
  as sendheaders.py that use mininode.  We'll have to think about
  how best to proceed which doesn't break our tests.  So taking
  this out for the time being.
diff: @@ -6335,31 +6335,6 @@ bool ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, std::string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv, in
  LogPrint("blk", "received block %s peer=%d\n", inv.hash.ToString(), pfrom->id);
  UnlimitedLogBlock(block, inv.hash.ToString(), receiptTime);
  - // If block was never requested then ban the peer. We should never received
  - // unrequested blocks unless we are doing testing in regtest or is an from an expedited node.
  - {
  - LOCK(cs_main);
  - if (mapBlocksInFlight.find(inv.hash) == mapBlocksInFlight.end() && !pfrom->fWhitelisted && !IsExpeditedNode(pfrom))
  - {
  - // We also have to check mapThinBlocksInflight. It is possible that an expedited block could beat
  - // our request for a full block (if for instance a thinblock request fails we re-request a full block).
  - // In that rare event mapBlocksInFlight will be empty because we do not track by peer but only by hash.
  - // TODO: mapBlocksInFlight is needing of a rewrite (so as to track by node as well as hash) and also
  - // both mapBlocksInflight and mapThinBlocksInFlight should be put into and managed by the request
  - // manager.
  - LOCK(pfrom->cs_mapthinblocksinflight);
  - {
  - if (pfrom->mapThinBlocksInFlight.find(inv.hash) == pfrom->mapThinBlocksInFlight.end())
  - {
  - Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 1);
  - return error("Block %s was never requested, misbehaving peer %s",
  - inv.hash.ToString(),
  - pfrom->GetLogName());
  - }
  - }
  - }
  - }
  -
  if (IsChainNearlySyncd()) // BU send the received block out expedited channels quickly
  {
  CValidationState state;
  