message: Meeting Outcomes for 5/14
  Good work everyone!
diff: @@ -29,3 +29,18 @@ The GraphiQL Working Group will begin meeting to plan work for GraphiQL. The mee
  - (potentially) decide on what needs to be accomplished before beginning new UI design
  - (from Hyo) Transferring ownership to GraphQL foundation
  +## Outcomes
  +
  +- GraphiQL 1.0 rearchitecture: will ship with a plugin system, and a leaner query tool as it's base
  +- Design / Architecture discussions and concrete decisions will continue to occur in github issues for GraphiQL, and ad-hoc WG meetings as necessary
  +- Decided on new contributing guidelines:
  + - Every PR should have at least one peer review before merge (enforced via github config)
  + - This review should not come from a member of the same company
  + - Rebase and merge should be used, squash if necessary. Multiple individual commits for review changes, requested changes, or to split up a major PR make sense.
  + - Clean git history is preferred
  + - As much automation as possible will be provided to minimize the review effort
  + - Hyo reminded us that performance and large-scale concerns are important. Performance impact should always be a consideration.
  +- Contributing.md will be updated to reflect these guidelines
  +- We would like to propose to the GraphQL Foundation itself that the group be renamed and/or our scope be redefined to be for all GraphQL ide tooling. Thus the "GraphQL IDE Tooling WG" or "GraphQL Tooling WG". We would like to be responsible for `codemirror-graphql` and `graphql-language-services`.
  +- We will prepare a prioritized list of technical debt items for contributors to work on.
  + - A GH label for this perhaps?
  