message: Remove comment asserting producer schedule should be ordered
  Fix - as far as I can tell no ordering is enforced by schedule
diff: @@ -29,19 +29,6 @@ namespace eosio { namespace chain {
  * irreversible and that it the new producer schedule takes effect this block.
  */
  uint32_t schedule_version = 0;
  -
  - /**
  - * The changes in the round of producers after this block
  - *
  - * Must be stored with keys *and* values sorted, thus this is a valid RoundChanges:
  - * [["A", "X"],
  - * ["B", "Y"]]
  - * ... whereas this is not:
  - * [["A", "Y"],
  - * ["B", "X"]]
  - * Even though the above examples are semantically equivalent (replace A and B with X and Y), only the first is
  - * legal.
  - */
  optional<producer_schedule_type> new_producers;
  };
  