Subset (9)

continuation · 117k rows

Split (2)

train · 109k rows

input stringlengths 536 7.99k	output stringlengths 1 1.82k
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:	into Attra
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:	John Francis
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:	A fortnight
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:	Attra
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:	a Congo trader
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:	years ago
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:yes Question: Did Trent carry him too? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:yes Question: Did Trent carry him too? Answer:yes Question: Was he ever watchful? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:yes Question: Did Trent carry him too? Answer:yes Question: Was he ever watchful? Answer:yes Question: How long he didn't sleep well? Answer:	For fourteen days
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:yes Question: Did Trent carry him too? Answer:yes Question: Was he ever watchful? Answer:yes Question: How long he didn't sleep well? Answer:For fourteen days Question: Could he change his clothes in the journey? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:yes Question: Did Trent carry him too? Answer:yes Question: Was he ever watchful? Answer:yes Question: How long he didn't sleep well? Answer:For fourteen days Question: Could he change his clothes in the journey? Answer:no Question: Was he riding horse on the way to Attra? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXVII A fortnight afterwards Trent rode into Attra, pale, gaunt, and hollow-eyed. The whole history of those days would never be known by another man! Upon Trent they had left their mark for ever. Every hour of his time in this country he reckoned of great value--yet he had devoted fourteen days to saving the life of John Francis. Such days too--and such nights! They had carried him sometimes in a dead stupor, sometimes a raving madman, along a wild bush-track across rivers and swamps into the town of Garba, where years ago a Congo trader, who had made a fortune, had built a little white-washed hospital! He was safe now, but surely never a man before had walked so near the "Valley of the Shadow of Death." A single moment's vigilance relaxed, a blanket displaced, a dose of brandy forgotten, and Trent might have walked this life a multi-millionaire, a peer, a little god amongst his fellows, freed for ever from all anxiety. But Francis was tended as never a man was tended before. Trent himself had done his share of the carrying, ever keeping his eyes fixed upon the death-lit face of their burden, every ready to fight off the progress of the fever and ague, as the twitching lips or shivering limbs gave warning of a change. For fourteen days he had not slept; until they had reached Garba his clothes had never been changed since they had started upon their perilous journey. As he rode into Attra he reeled a little in his saddle, and he walked into the office of the Agent more like a ghost than a man. Question: Where Trent went? Answer:into Attra Question: Was he in good shape? Answer:no Question: Would other people know about all these? Answer:no Question: Who did he try to save? Answer:John Francis Question: For how long? Answer:A fortnight Question: Did he think highly of his time there? Answer:yes Question: Which town Francis was carried into? Answer:Attra Question: Who made fortune in Garba? Answer:a Congo trader Question: How long ago? Answer:years ago Question: Did he build something useful there? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis very close to dying? Answer:yes Question: Is he safe now? Answer:yes Question: Could Trent have a better life that this? Answer:yes Question: Was Francis too important for him to forgo that? Answer:yes Question: Did Trent carry him too? Answer:yes Question: Was he ever watchful? Answer:yes Question: How long he didn't sleep well? Answer:For fourteen days Question: Could he change his clothes in the journey? Answer:no Question: Was he riding horse on the way to Attra? Answer:yes Question: Who did he meet there? Answer:	the Agent
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:	Jeremy Lin,
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:	New York Knicks
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:	Lin's No. 17 jerseys.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:	China
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:	Seven
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:	Alan Goldsher,
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:	72 hours.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:	$1.99.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:	filed to trademark "Linsanity.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:	give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:	23
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:	America
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:Yes Question: Which is? Answer:	Taiwanese
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:Yes Question: Which is? Answer:Taiwanese Question: Who said that LIn made the ball team relevant again? Answer:	Larry Dimitriou
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:Yes Question: Which is? Answer:Taiwanese Question: Who said that LIn made the ball team relevant again? Answer:Larry Dimitriou Question: What's his profession? Answer:	\manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:Yes Question: Which is? Answer:Taiwanese Question: Who said that LIn made the ball team relevant again? Answer:Larry Dimitriou Question: What's his profession? Answer:\manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store Question: Where is that located? Answer:	Manhattan.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:Yes Question: Which is? Answer:Taiwanese Question: Who said that LIn made the ball team relevant again? Answer:Larry Dimitriou Question: What's his profession? Answer:\manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store Question: Where is that located? Answer:Manhattan. Question: Are Lin's jersey's sold fast? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Beijing (CNN) -- Entrepreneurs of all stripes are cashing in on the Lin-sanity phenomenon as swiftly as the NBA sensation can pull off his furious fast breaks. It has been only three weeks since Jeremy Lin, the 23-year-old American-born point guard of Taiwanese descent, came out of obscurity to lead the listless New York Knicks to a winning streak. But while their winning run has come to an end, Lin has gone on to become a media and marketing darling. Lin-related products have become hot items. In New York, merchandise retailers are doing brisk business selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys. "He's made the Knicks relevant again," says Larry Dimitriou, manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store in Manhattan. Jeremy 'Lin-demand' in China "We constantly get Lin jerseys every day," he says. "I put one in the window to show people we have them. A short time later, they're gone." Just as nimble and quick are the publishers of "Linsanity: The Improbable Rise of Jeremy Lin" by Alan Goldsher, an electronic book that was turned around in just 72 hours. Available wherever e-books are sold, Goldsher's insta-book costs just $1.99. According to Digital Book World, fast-thinking authors have already churned out least seven e-books, all about the humble and wholesome Harvard graduate. The other Lin-inspired titles include, "Jeremy Lin: Advice from Sun Tzu on Basketball and the Art of War," and "The Zen of Jeremy Lin." Not to be outdone, Lin himself has filed to trademark "Linsanity." The application, filed through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, would give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products, including clothing, mugs and even action figures. Question: Who lead a basketball team on a winning streak? Answer:Jeremy Lin, Question: What team? Answer:New York Knicks Question: What are popular consumer products right now? Answer:Lin's No. 17 jerseys. Question: What other country is he popular in? Answer:China Question: Are there books about him? Answer:Yes Question: How many? Answer:Seven Question: Who is an author of one? Answer:Alan Goldsher, Question: How long did it take him to write the book? Answer:72 hours. Question: How much does the book cost? Answer:$1.99. Question: What did Lin do so he wouldn't be outdone? Answer:filed to trademark "Linsanity. Question: What does that do? Answer:give him exclusive rights to put the signature term on more than 50 consumer products Question: How old is lin? Answer:23 Question: Where was he born? Answer:America Question: Does he have any other ethnicity background? Answer:Yes Question: Which is? Answer:Taiwanese Question: Who said that LIn made the ball team relevant again? Answer:Larry Dimitriou Question: What's his profession? Answer:\manager of Modell's Sporting Goods store Question: Where is that located? Answer:Manhattan. Question: Are Lin's jersey's sold fast? Answer:Yes Question: What type of business people are cashing in on Lin's popularity? Answer:	selling Lin's No. 17 jerseys.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:	Beatrice Munyenyezi
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:	Rwanda
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:	Hutu
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:	U.S.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:	42
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:	lying her way into the United States
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:	she allegedly participated in a genocide
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:	up to 800,000
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:	New Hampshire
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:	federal
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:	Tutsi
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:	3 months
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:	Arsene Shalom Ntahobali,
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:	three
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:three Question: Where did she live in Rwanda? Answer:	in the hotel
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:three Question: Where did she live in Rwanda? Answer:in the hotel Question: Which one? Answer:	Ihuriro Hotel
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:three Question: Where did she live in Rwanda? Answer:in the hotel Question: Which one? Answer:Ihuriro Hotel Question: Who owned that? Answer:	her husband's family
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:three Question: Where did she live in Rwanda? Answer:in the hotel Question: Which one? Answer:Ihuriro Hotel Question: Who owned that? Answer:her husband's family Question: Who is her attorney? Answer:	Mark Howard
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:three Question: Where did she live in Rwanda? Answer:in the hotel Question: Which one? Answer:Ihuriro Hotel Question: Who owned that? Answer:her husband's family Question: Who is her attorney? Answer:Mark Howard Question: Will she be pleading guilty to genocide? Answer:	noenocide
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- A 42-year-old immigrant from Rwanda, who is accused of lying her way into the United States after allegedly participating in the 1994 genocide that left up to 800,000 people dead, is going on trial in a New Hampshire federal court. Jury selection is set to begin Wednesday in the case of Beatrice Munyenyezi, who allegedly committed fraud in 1995 by denying her alleged involvement in mass rape, murder and kidnappings in Rwanda a year earlier. Prosecutors allege Munyenyezi, who is now a U.S. citizen, intentionally lied on a refugee questionnaire and naturalization documents about her role in the infamous slaughter, in which ethnic Hutu militants butchered their Tutsi counterparts over a three-month period. They say Munyenyezi, a Hutu, was a member of an extremist group associated with a paramilitary organization that set up roadblocks and targeted fleeing Tutsis and their sympathizers. One of the roadblocks was set up outside the Ihuriro Hotel -- an establishment owned by her husband's family, according to the indictment. The mother of three is allegedly married to former militia leader Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to life in prison last year. She allegedly lived in the hotel and helped pick out those who arrived at a nearby checkpoint to be executed and raped, the indictment said. She also is accused of stealing her victims' belongings. Her attorney, Mark Howard, said his client "categorically denies that she committed any acts of genocide, or committed any crimes, as the prosecution alleges here." Question: Who is on trial? Answer:Beatrice Munyenyezi Question: What country is she from? Answer:Rwanda Question: Which ethnic group there? Answer:Hutu Question: Is she a Rwandan citizen? Answer:no Question: What citizenship does she have? Answer:U.S. Question: How old is she? Answer:42 Question: What is she accused of doing? Answer:lying her way into the United States Question: Why did she need to do that? Answer:she allegedly participated in a genocide Question: How many people were killed? Answer:up to 800,000 Question: Where is her trial? Answer:New Hampshire Question: Is it a state or federal court? Answer:federal Question: Who did the Hutus kill? Answer:Tutsi Question: For how long were they killed? Answer:3 months Question: Who was her husband? Answer:Arsene Shalom Ntahobali, Question: And how many kids does she have? Answer:three Question: Where did she live in Rwanda? Answer:in the hotel Question: Which one? Answer:Ihuriro Hotel Question: Who owned that? Answer:her husband's family Question: Who is her attorney? Answer:Mark Howard Question: Will she be pleading guilty to genocide? Answer:noenocide Question: Will she be pleading guilty to immigration crimes? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:	Jerry Muskrat.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:	tried to spoil his dam
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:	Paddy.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:	cousin
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:	the Laughing Brook
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:	the Smiling Pool.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:	Yes.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:	No.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:	the Laughing Brook
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:	No.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:	the Big River
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:	a twinkle
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:	No.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:	Stop it.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:Stop it. Question: Did the muskrat know what to do? Answer:	No.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:Stop it. Question: Did the muskrat know what to do? Answer:No. Question: Had the beaver been living there long? Answer:	No.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:Stop it. Question: Did the muskrat know what to do? Answer:No. Question: Had the beaver been living there long? Answer:No. Question: What did the smaller animal invite the larger one to do? Answer:	come down and live in the Smiling Pool
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:Stop it. Question: Did the muskrat know what to do? Answer:No. Question: Had the beaver been living there long? Answer:No. Question: What did the smaller animal invite the larger one to do? Answer:come down and live in the Smiling Pool Question: Did the larger animal agree? Answer:	No
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:Stop it. Question: Did the muskrat know what to do? Answer:No. Question: Had the beaver been living there long? Answer:No. Question: What did the smaller animal invite the larger one to do? Answer:come down and live in the Smiling Pool Question: Did the larger animal agree? Answer:No Question: Why not? Answer:	there isn't any of the kind of food he eats
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXIII: Paddy The Beaver Does A Kind Deed Paddy the Beaver listened to all that his small cousin, Jerry Muskrat, had to tell him about the trouble which Paddy's dam had caused in the Laughing Brook and the Smiling Pool. "You see, we who live in the Smiling Pool love it dearly, and we don't want to have to leave it, but if the water cannot run down the Laughing Brook, there can be no Smiling Pool, and so we will have to move off to the Big River," concluded Jerry Muskrat. "That is why I tried to spoil your dam." There was a twinkle in the eyes of Paddy the Beaver as he replied: "Well, now that you have found out that you can't do that, because I am bigger than you and can stop you, what are you going to do about it?" "I don't know," said Jerry Muskrat sadly. "I don't see what we can do about it. Of course you are big and strong and can do just as you please, but it doesn't seem right that we who have lived here so long should have to move and go away from all that we love so just because you, a stranger, happen to want to live here. I tell you what!" Jerry's eyes sparkled as a brand new thought came to him. "Couldn't you come down and live in the Smiling Pool with us? I'm sure there is room enough!" Paddy the Beaver shook his head. "No," said he, and Jerry's heart sank. "No, I can't do that because down there there isn't any of the kind of food I eat. Besides, I wouldn't feel at all safe in the Smiling Pool. You see, I always live in the woods. No, I couldn't possibly come down to live in the Smiling Pool. But I'm truly sorry that I have made you so much worry, Cousin Jerry, and I'm going to prove it to you. Now you sit right here until I come back." Question: Who had caused the beaver some trouble? Answer:Jerry Muskrat. Question: What had he done? Answer:tried to spoil his dam Question: What was the beaver's name? Answer:Paddy. Question: What was his relationship to the other animal? Answer:cousin Question: Where was the problem caused? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Where else? Answer:the Smiling Pool. Question: Were the residents of the pond fond of it? Answer:Yes. Question: Did they want to depart? Answer:No. Question: Where did the water for the pond have to traverse? Answer:the Laughing Brook Question: Could the pond survive without it? Answer:No. Question: Where were the residents moving to? Answer:the Big River Question: What was in the beaver's expression when he answered? Answer:a twinkle Question: Was he smaller than the muskrat? Answer:No. Question: What did he say he could do to the plan? Answer:Stop it. Question: Did the muskrat know what to do? Answer:No. Question: Had the beaver been living there long? Answer:No. Question: What did the smaller animal invite the larger one to do? Answer:come down and live in the Smiling Pool Question: Did the larger animal agree? Answer:No Question: Why not? Answer:there isn't any of the kind of food he eats Question: Where did he prefer to reside? Answer:	in the woods
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:	English Civil War
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:	traveled to America
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:	nonconformists like the Puritans
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:	fleeing religious persecution
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:	Anglican King of England.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:	No
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:	Roger Williams
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:	Rhode Island
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:	William Penn
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:	Pennsylvania
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:	The Dutch colony of New Netherland
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:	Supreme Court.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:Supreme Court. Question: are any cases cited? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:Supreme Court. Question: are any cases cited? Answer:Yes Question: how many? Answer:	Reynolds v. United States
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:Supreme Court. Question: are any cases cited? Answer:Yes Question: how many? Answer:Reynolds v. United States Question: is there another? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:Supreme Court. Question: are any cases cited? Answer:Yes Question: how many? Answer:Reynolds v. United States Question: is there another? Answer:Yes Question: what? Answer:	Everson v. Board of Education
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:Supreme Court. Question: are any cases cited? Answer:Yes Question: how many? Answer:Reynolds v. United States Question: is there another? Answer:Yes Question: what? Answer:Everson v. Board of Education Question: from what year? Answer:	1947
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Jefferson's metaphor of a wall of separation has been cited repeatedly by the U.S. Supreme Court. In Reynolds v. United States (1879) the Court wrote that Jefferson's comments "may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] Amendment." In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), Justice Hugo Black wrote: "In the words of Thomas Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect a wall of separation between church and state." Many early immigrant groups traveled to America to worship freely, particularly after the English Civil War and religious conflict in France and Germany. They included nonconformists like the Puritans, who were Protestant Christians fleeing religious persecution from the Anglican King of England. Despite a common background, the groups' views on religious toleration were mixed. While some such as Roger Williams of Rhode Island and William Penn of Pennsylvania ensured the protection of religious minorities within their colonies, others like the Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony had established churches. The Dutch colony of New Netherland established the Dutch Reformed Church and outlawed all other worship, though enforcement was sparse. Religious conformity was desired partly for financial reasons: the established Church was responsible for poverty relief, putting dissenting churches at a significant disadvantage. Question: after what did a a lot of migrants travel? Answer:English Civil War Question: where did they go? Answer:traveled to America Question: who were they? Answer:nonconformists like the Puritans Question: why did they leave home? Answer:fleeing religious persecution Question: who persecuted them? Answer:Anglican King of England. Question: did they all share the same viewpoint on theology? Answer:No Question: did some protect different ideas? Answer:yes Question: who was one? Answer:Roger Williams Question: from where? Answer:Rhode Island Question: and another? Answer:William Penn Question: from? Answer:Pennsylvania Question: who banned other worshiping? Answer:The Dutch colony of New Netherland Question: what court is discussed? Answer:Supreme Court. Question: are any cases cited? Answer:Yes Question: how many? Answer:Reynolds v. United States Question: is there another? Answer:Yes Question: what? Answer:Everson v. Board of Education Question: from what year? Answer:1947 Question: is a judge mentioned? Answer:	Yes

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.