Subset (9)

continuation · 117k rows

Split (2)

train · 109k rows

input stringlengths 536 7.99k	output stringlengths 1 1.82k
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Logan had lots of toys. He had balls, dinosaurs, race cars, and even robots! Logan had so many toys he had a room for his toys. There he could play with whatever he wanted, when he wanted, and not even have to pick them back up. Logan had all kinds of balls. He had red ones, green ones, blue ones and even a pink one he hid from his sister. His robots were so cool they could change shape, fly, or race. Some even saved the world in his imagination. Logan loved his dinosaurs. He had one with big sharp teeth, one with little tiny arms, one with purple spots, and even one that his dad said didn't eat anything but plants and vegetables. Logan's favorite toys were his race cars. That was because when his dad came home from work he always went to the toy room with Logan to play with his race cars. Logan had so much fun he even lets his sister in his toy room so she can play dad too! The toy room was Logan's favorite room in the house. He spends all the time he can in his room with all his friends and family and he has so much fun. Question: Where were Logan's toys? Answer:toy room Question: Did he have race cars? Answer:yes Question: How many colors of balls did he have? Answer:four Question: Why were his robot toys neat? Answer:could change shape, fly, or race Question: Did he have a dinosaur with pink spots? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Logan had lots of toys. He had balls, dinosaurs, race cars, and even robots! Logan had so many toys he had a room for his toys. There he could play with whatever he wanted, when he wanted, and not even have to pick them back up. Logan had all kinds of balls. He had red ones, green ones, blue ones and even a pink one he hid from his sister. His robots were so cool they could change shape, fly, or race. Some even saved the world in his imagination. Logan loved his dinosaurs. He had one with big sharp teeth, one with little tiny arms, one with purple spots, and even one that his dad said didn't eat anything but plants and vegetables. Logan's favorite toys were his race cars. That was because when his dad came home from work he always went to the toy room with Logan to play with his race cars. Logan had so much fun he even lets his sister in his toy room so she can play dad too! The toy room was Logan's favorite room in the house. He spends all the time he can in his room with all his friends and family and he has so much fun. Question: Where were Logan's toys? Answer:toy room Question: Did he have race cars? Answer:yes Question: How many colors of balls did he have? Answer:four Question: Why were his robot toys neat? Answer:could change shape, fly, or race Question: Did he have a dinosaur with pink spots? Answer:no Question: Which toys were his favorites? Answer:	race cars
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Logan had lots of toys. He had balls, dinosaurs, race cars, and even robots! Logan had so many toys he had a room for his toys. There he could play with whatever he wanted, when he wanted, and not even have to pick them back up. Logan had all kinds of balls. He had red ones, green ones, blue ones and even a pink one he hid from his sister. His robots were so cool they could change shape, fly, or race. Some even saved the world in his imagination. Logan loved his dinosaurs. He had one with big sharp teeth, one with little tiny arms, one with purple spots, and even one that his dad said didn't eat anything but plants and vegetables. Logan's favorite toys were his race cars. That was because when his dad came home from work he always went to the toy room with Logan to play with his race cars. Logan had so much fun he even lets his sister in his toy room so she can play dad too! The toy room was Logan's favorite room in the house. He spends all the time he can in his room with all his friends and family and he has so much fun. Question: Where were Logan's toys? Answer:toy room Question: Did he have race cars? Answer:yes Question: How many colors of balls did he have? Answer:four Question: Why were his robot toys neat? Answer:could change shape, fly, or race Question: Did he have a dinosaur with pink spots? Answer:no Question: Which toys were his favorites? Answer:race cars Question: Why Answer:	dad played with those with him
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Logan had lots of toys. He had balls, dinosaurs, race cars, and even robots! Logan had so many toys he had a room for his toys. There he could play with whatever he wanted, when he wanted, and not even have to pick them back up. Logan had all kinds of balls. He had red ones, green ones, blue ones and even a pink one he hid from his sister. His robots were so cool they could change shape, fly, or race. Some even saved the world in his imagination. Logan loved his dinosaurs. He had one with big sharp teeth, one with little tiny arms, one with purple spots, and even one that his dad said didn't eat anything but plants and vegetables. Logan's favorite toys were his race cars. That was because when his dad came home from work he always went to the toy room with Logan to play with his race cars. Logan had so much fun he even lets his sister in his toy room so she can play dad too! The toy room was Logan's favorite room in the house. He spends all the time he can in his room with all his friends and family and he has so much fun. Question: Where were Logan's toys? Answer:toy room Question: Did he have race cars? Answer:yes Question: How many colors of balls did he have? Answer:four Question: Why were his robot toys neat? Answer:could change shape, fly, or race Question: Did he have a dinosaur with pink spots? Answer:no Question: Which toys were his favorites? Answer:race cars Question: Why Answer:dad played with those with him Question: Did anyone else play in the room? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Logan had lots of toys. He had balls, dinosaurs, race cars, and even robots! Logan had so many toys he had a room for his toys. There he could play with whatever he wanted, when he wanted, and not even have to pick them back up. Logan had all kinds of balls. He had red ones, green ones, blue ones and even a pink one he hid from his sister. His robots were so cool they could change shape, fly, or race. Some even saved the world in his imagination. Logan loved his dinosaurs. He had one with big sharp teeth, one with little tiny arms, one with purple spots, and even one that his dad said didn't eat anything but plants and vegetables. Logan's favorite toys were his race cars. That was because when his dad came home from work he always went to the toy room with Logan to play with his race cars. Logan had so much fun he even lets his sister in his toy room so she can play dad too! The toy room was Logan's favorite room in the house. He spends all the time he can in his room with all his friends and family and he has so much fun. Question: Where were Logan's toys? Answer:toy room Question: Did he have race cars? Answer:yes Question: How many colors of balls did he have? Answer:four Question: Why were his robot toys neat? Answer:could change shape, fly, or race Question: Did he have a dinosaur with pink spots? Answer:no Question: Which toys were his favorites? Answer:race cars Question: Why Answer:dad played with those with him Question: Did anyone else play in the room? Answer:yes Question: Who? Answer:	sister
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Logan had lots of toys. He had balls, dinosaurs, race cars, and even robots! Logan had so many toys he had a room for his toys. There he could play with whatever he wanted, when he wanted, and not even have to pick them back up. Logan had all kinds of balls. He had red ones, green ones, blue ones and even a pink one he hid from his sister. His robots were so cool they could change shape, fly, or race. Some even saved the world in his imagination. Logan loved his dinosaurs. He had one with big sharp teeth, one with little tiny arms, one with purple spots, and even one that his dad said didn't eat anything but plants and vegetables. Logan's favorite toys were his race cars. That was because when his dad came home from work he always went to the toy room with Logan to play with his race cars. Logan had so much fun he even lets his sister in his toy room so she can play dad too! The toy room was Logan's favorite room in the house. He spends all the time he can in his room with all his friends and family and he has so much fun. Question: Where were Logan's toys? Answer:toy room Question: Did he have race cars? Answer:yes Question: How many colors of balls did he have? Answer:four Question: Why were his robot toys neat? Answer:could change shape, fly, or race Question: Did he have a dinosaur with pink spots? Answer:no Question: Which toys were his favorites? Answer:race cars Question: Why Answer:dad played with those with him Question: Did anyone else play in the room? Answer:yes Question: Who? Answer:sister Question: When would his father play with him? Answer:	home from work
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:	TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:	Faddle.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:	No.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:	That he would be able to return to London.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:	His bag.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:	Colonel Stubbs.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:	Whether Colonel Stubbs were there.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:Whether Colonel Stubbs were there. Question: Who did he ask? Answer:	The footman at the door.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:Whether Colonel Stubbs were there. Question: Who did he ask? Answer:The footman at the door. Question: What was the answer? Answer:	Colonel Stubbs was in the house.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:Whether Colonel Stubbs were there. Question: Who did he ask? Answer:The footman at the door. Question: What was the answer? Answer:Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What was he hoping? Answer:	That Colonel Stubbs had gone away.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:Whether Colonel Stubbs were there. Question: Who did he ask? Answer:The footman at the door. Question: What was the answer? Answer:Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What was he hoping? Answer:That Colonel Stubbs had gone away. Question: What did Faddle think was absurd? Answer:	The law which required such letters to be delivered by hand.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:Whether Colonel Stubbs were there. Question: Who did he ask? Answer:The footman at the door. Question: What was the answer? Answer:Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What was he hoping? Answer:That Colonel Stubbs had gone away. Question: What did Faddle think was absurd? Answer:The law which required such letters to be delivered by hand. Question: Did he think the mail would be just as good? Answer:	Yes.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXXVI. TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Faddle as he went down into the country made up his mind that the law which required such letters to be delivered by hand was an absurd law. The post would have done just as well, and would have saved a great deal of trouble. These gloomy thoughts were occasioned by a conviction that he could not carry himself easily or make himself happy among such "howling swells" as these Alburys. If they should invite him to the house the matter would be worse that way than the other. He had no confidence in his dress coat, which he was aware had been damaged by nocturnal orgies. It is all very well to tell a fellow to be as "big a swell" as anybody else, as Tom had told him. But Faddle acknowledged to himself the difficulty of acting up to such advice. Even the eyes of Colonel Stubbs turned upon him after receipt of the letter would oppress him. Nevertheless he must do his best, and he took a gig at the station nearest to Albury. He was careful to carry his bag with him, but still he lived in hope that he would be able to return to London the same day. When he found himself within the lodges of Stalham Park he could hardly keep himself from shivering, and, when he asked the footman at the door whether Colonel Stubbs were there, he longed to be told that Colonel Stubbs had gone away on the previous day to some--he did not care what--distant part of the globe. But Colonel Stubbs had not gone away. Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What is this chapter called? Answer:TOM TRINGLE GETS AN ANSWER. Question: Who took a job at a station by Albury? Answer:Faddle. Question: Did he hope to stay there? Answer:No. Question: What did he hope? Answer:That he would be able to return to London. Question: What did he take along? Answer:His bag. Question: Who did he ask about? Answer:Colonel Stubbs. Question: What was his question? Answer:Whether Colonel Stubbs were there. Question: Who did he ask? Answer:The footman at the door. Question: What was the answer? Answer:Colonel Stubbs was in the house. Question: What was he hoping? Answer:That Colonel Stubbs had gone away. Question: What did Faddle think was absurd? Answer:The law which required such letters to be delivered by hand. Question: Did he think the mail would be just as good? Answer:Yes. Question: What would be a worse matter? Answer:	If they should invite him to the house.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:	FERN Mullins
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:	Saturday morning
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:	September
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:	picnic
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:	unknown
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:	School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:	Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:	the Dyers
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:	he's got lots more style than town boys
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:	south shore of Lake Minniemashie
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:	unknown
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:	unknown
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:unknown Question: How was Mr. Dyer acting? Answer:	clownish
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:unknown Question: How was Mr. Dyer acting? Answer:clownish Question: what did he do? Answer:	splashed water on them
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:unknown Question: How was Mr. Dyer acting? Answer:clownish Question: what did he do? Answer:splashed water on them Question: who's hat did he wear? Answer:	Carol's
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:unknown Question: How was Mr. Dyer acting? Answer:clownish Question: what did he do? Answer:splashed water on them Question: who's hat did he wear? Answer:Carol's Question: Who was the brat? Answer:	Cy Bogart
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:unknown Question: How was Mr. Dyer acting? Answer:clownish Question: what did he do? Answer:splashed water on them Question: who's hat did he wear? Answer:Carol's Question: Who was the brat? Answer:Cy Bogart Question: what did he do? Answer:	Cy climbed a tree
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: CHAPTER XXX FERN Mullins rushed into the house on a Saturday morning early in September and shrieked at Carol, "School starts next Tuesday. I've got to have one more spree before I'm arrested. Let's get up a picnic down the lake for this afternoon. Won't you come, Mrs. Kennicott, and the doctor? Cy Bogart wants to go--he's a brat but he's lively." "I don't think the doctor can go," sedately. "He said something about having to make a country call this afternoon. But I'd love to." "That's dandy! Who can we get?" "Mrs. Dyer might be chaperon. She's been so nice. And maybe Dave, if he could get away from the store." "How about Erik Valborg? I think he's got lots more style than these town boys. You like him all right, don't you?" So the picnic of Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers was not only moral but inevitable. They drove to the birch grove on the south shore of Lake Minniemashie. Dave Dyer was his most clownish self. He yelped, jigged, wore Carol's hat, dropped an ant down Fern's back, and when they went swimming (the women modestly changing in the car with the side curtains up, the men undressing behind the bushes, constantly repeating, "Gee, hope we don't run into poison ivy"), Dave splashed water on them and dived to clutch his wife's ankle. He infected the others. Erik gave an imitation of the Greek dancers he had seen in vaudeville, and when they sat down to picnic supper spread on a lap-robe on the grass, Cy climbed a tree to throw acorns at them. Question: who came in the house in a hurry? Answer:FERN Mullins Question: when? Answer:Saturday morning Question: was it late? Answer:no Question: what month? Answer:September Question: What was the excitement over? Answer:picnic Question: why was that exciting? Answer:unknown Question: was it because Fern wanted to have a spree before her arrest? Answer:School starts next Tuesday, maybe that's why Question: who attended the picnic? Answer:Carol, Fern, Erik, Cy Bogart, and the Dyers Question: was it immoral? Answer:no Question: Who was the chaperone? Answer:the Dyers Question: What was said about Erik? Answer:he's got lots more style than town boys Question: where did the picnic take place? Answer:south shore of Lake Minniemashie Question: what kind of grove? Answer:unknown Question: was it a birch grove? Answer:unknown Question: How was Mr. Dyer acting? Answer:clownish Question: what did he do? Answer:splashed water on them Question: who's hat did he wear? Answer:Carol's Question: Who was the brat? Answer:Cy Bogart Question: what did he do? Answer:Cy climbed a tree Question: why? Answer:	to throw acorns
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:	west
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:	Yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:	62%
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:	The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:	1896
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:	January 4
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:	no!
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:	more than 3 million
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:	along the Wasatch Front
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:	Salt Lake City
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:	Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:	New Mexico
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:New Mexico Question: Does the state have a slow growing population? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:New Mexico Question: Does the state have a slow growing population? Answer:no Question: What city was said to be the fastest growing? Answer:	St. George
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:New Mexico Question: Does the state have a slow growing population? Answer:no Question: What city was said to be the fastest growing? Answer:St. George Question: In what years? Answer:	from 2000 to 2005
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:New Mexico Question: Does the state have a slow growing population? Answer:no Question: What city was said to be the fastest growing? Answer:St. George Question: In what years? Answer:from 2000 to 2005 Question: Do they have a high level of income inequality? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:New Mexico Question: Does the state have a slow growing population? Answer:no Question: What city was said to be the fastest growing? Answer:St. George Question: In what years? Answer:from 2000 to 2005 Question: Do they have a high level of income inequality? Answer:no Question: What did the Gallup survey find? Answer:	Utah overall to be the "best state to live in
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: Utah ( or ) is a state in the western United States. It became the 45th state admitted to the U.S. on January 4, 1896. Utah is the 13th-largest by area, 31st-most-populous, and 10th-least-densely populated of the 50 United States. Utah has a population of more than 3 million (Census estimate for July 1, 2016), approximately 80% of whom live along the Wasatch Front, centering on the state capital Salt Lake City. Utah is bordered by Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west. It also touches a corner of New Mexico in the southeast. Approximately 62% of Utahns are reported to be members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or LDS (Mormons), which greatly influences Utahn culture and daily life. The LDS Church's world headquarters is located in Salt Lake City. Utah is the only state with a majority population belonging to a single church. The state is a center of transportation, education, information technology and research, government services, mining, and a major tourist destination for outdoor recreation. In 2013, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that Utah had the second fastest-growing population of any state. St. George was the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the United States from 2000 to 2005. Utah also has the 14th highest median average income and the least income inequality of any U.S. state. A 2012 Gallup national survey found Utah overall to be the "best state to live in" based on 13 forward-looking measurements including various economic, lifestyle, and health-related outlook metrics. Question: Is Utah part of the United States? Answer:Yes Question: What area of the US is it located in? Answer:west Question: Are more than half of the people living there Mormons? Answer:Yes Question: What percentage are Mormon? Answer:62% Question: What is the name of the Mormon church? Answer:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Question: What year did it become part of the US? Answer:1896 Question: What month and day? Answer:January 4 Question: Was it the 15th state to become part of the US? Answer:no! Question: Was it the 45th? Answer:yes Question: How many people live there? Answer:more than 3 million Question: Where so most of them reside? Answer:along the Wasatch Front Question: What is the capital? Answer:Salt Lake City Question: What states border Utah? Answer:Colorado to the east, Wyoming to the northeast, Idaho to the north, Arizona to the south, and Nevada to the west Question: What state does it touch a corner of? Answer:New Mexico Question: Does the state have a slow growing population? Answer:no Question: What city was said to be the fastest growing? Answer:St. George Question: In what years? Answer:from 2000 to 2005 Question: Do they have a high level of income inequality? Answer:no Question: What did the Gallup survey find? Answer:Utah overall to be the "best state to live in Question: What did they base that on? Answer:	13 forward-looking measurements
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:	Napoléon Bonaparte.
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:	1802
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:	highest French order of merit for military and civil merits
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:	National Order of the Legion of Honour
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:National Order of the Legion of Honour Question: How many degrees of distinction is the order divided? Answer:	five
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:National Order of the Legion of Honour Question: How many degrees of distinction is the order divided? Answer:five Question: Name them? Answer:	(Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross).
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:National Order of the Legion of Honour Question: How many degrees of distinction is the order divided? Answer:five Question: Name them? Answer:(Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). Question: What's the order's motto? Answer:	Honour and Fatherland
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:National Order of the Legion of Honour Question: How many degrees of distinction is the order divided? Answer:five Question: Name them? Answer:(Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). Question: What's the order's motto? Answer:Honour and Fatherland Question: What was Napoleon's wish? Answer:	to establish an order of chivalry
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:National Order of the Legion of Honour Question: How many degrees of distinction is the order divided? Answer:five Question: Name them? Answer:(Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). Question: What's the order's motto? Answer:Honour and Fatherland Question: What was Napoleon's wish? Answer:to establish an order of chivalry Question: Why did he create this order? Answer:	reward to commend civilians and soldiers
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: The Legion of Honour, full name, National Order of the Legion of Honour (), is the highest French order of merit for military and civil merits, established in 1802 by Napoléon Bonaparte. The order's motto is ' ("Honour and Fatherland") and its seat is the next to the Musée d'Orsay, on the left bank of the River Seine in Paris. The order is divided into five degrees of increasing distinction: ' (Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). In the French Revolution, all of the French orders of chivalry were abolished, and replaced with Weapons of Honour. It was the wish of Napoleon Bonaparte, the First Consul, to create a reward to commend civilians and soldiers and from this wish was instituted a "", a body of men that was not an order of chivalry, for Napoleon believed France wanted a recognition of merit rather than a new system of nobility. The however did use the organization of old French orders of chivalry for example the "Ordre de Saint-Louis". The badges of the legion also bear a resemblance to the , which also used a red ribbon. Napoleon originally created this to ensure political loyalty. The organization would be used as a facade to give political favours, gifts, and concessions. The was loosely patterned after a Roman legion, with legionaries, officers, commanders, regional "cohorts" and a grand council. The highest rank was not a grand cross but a " (grand eagle), a rank that wore all the insignia common to grand crosses. The members were paid, the highest of them extremely generously: Question: Who established the legion of honour? Answer:Napoléon Bonaparte. Question: In what year? Answer:1802 Question: What is the legion of honour? Answer:highest French order of merit for military and civil merits Question: Give me its full name? Answer:National Order of the Legion of Honour Question: How many degrees of distinction is the order divided? Answer:five Question: Name them? Answer:(Knight), ' (Officer), ' (Commander), ' (Grand Officer) and " (Grand Cross). Question: What's the order's motto? Answer:Honour and Fatherland Question: What was Napoleon's wish? Answer:to establish an order of chivalry Question: Why did he create this order? Answer:reward to commend civilians and soldiers Question: Was Napoleon the first consul? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:	different genres
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:	"Form in Tonal Music"
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:	Five
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:	Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:	Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:	concertos
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:	no
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:	Peter van der Merwe
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:	as pieces of music that share a certain style
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:yes Question: What is another? Answer:	the style
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:yes Question: What is another? Answer:the style Question: Is geographical origin ever used? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:yes Question: What is another? Answer:the style Question: Is geographical origin ever used? Answer:yes Question: What is one issue with that? Answer:	a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:yes Question: What is another? Answer:the style Question: Is geographical origin ever used? Answer:yes Question: What is one issue with that? Answer:a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres Question: Who said that the term has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies? Answer:	Timothy Laurie
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:yes Question: What is another? Answer:the style Question: Is geographical origin ever used? Answer:yes Question: What is one issue with that? Answer:a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres Question: Who said that the term has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies? Answer:Timothy Laurie Question: What type of framework has it become in his opinion? Answer:	for constituting and evaluating musical research objects
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: A music genre is a conventional category that identifies some pieces of music as belonging to a shared tradition or set of conventions. It is to be distinguished from "musical form" and "musical style", although in practice these terms are sometimes used interchangeably. Recently, academics have argued that categorizing music by genre is inaccurate and outdated. Music can be divided into different genres in many different ways. The artistic nature of music means that these classifications are often subjective and controversial, and some genres may overlap. There are even varying academic definitions of the term "genre "itself. In his book "Form in Tonal Music", Douglass M. Green distinguishes between genre and form. He lists madrigal, motet, canzona, ricercar, and dance as examples of genres from the Renaissance period. To further clarify the meaning of "genre", Green writes, "Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 are identical in genre – both are violin concertos – but different in form. However, Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 are quite different in genre but happen to be similar in form." Some, like Peter van der Merwe, treat the terms "genre" and "style" as the same, saying that "genre" should be defined as pieces of music that share a certain style or "basic musical language." Others, such as Allan F. Moore, state that "genre" and "style" are two separate terms, and that secondary characteristics such as subject matter can also differentiate between genres. A music genre or subgenre may also be defined by the musical techniques, the style, the cultural context, and the content and spirit of the themes. Geographical origin is sometimes used to identify a music genre, though a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres. Timothy Laurie argues that since the early 1980s, "genre has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies to being an almost ubiquitous framework for constituting and evaluating musical research objects". Question: What is music often divided into? Answer:different genres Question: Are these objective categorizations? Answer:no Question: Is there distinct boundaries between all genres? Answer:no Question: What did Green publish? Answer:"Form in Tonal Music" Question: How many categories of Renassiance music did he list? Answer:Five Question: Is dance one of those? Answer:yes Question: Did he argue that genre and form were essentially the same? Answer:no Question: Which pieces did he argue with the same genre but had different forms? Answer:Beethoven's Op. 61 and Mendelssohn's Op. 64 Question: Which works were examples of the exact opposite of that? Answer:Mozart's Rondo for Piano, K. 511, and the "Agnus Dei" from his Mass, K. 317 Question: What genre would The Beethoven and Mendelssohn pieces be listed as? Answer:concertos Question: Do van der Merwe and Moore argue the same point? Answer:no Question: Which one of them thinks genre and style are the same? Answer:Peter van der Merwe Question: How does he define it? Answer:as pieces of music that share a certain style Question: Is musical technique one way define a genre? Answer:yes Question: What is another? Answer:the style Question: Is geographical origin ever used? Answer:yes Question: What is one issue with that? Answer:a single geographical category will often include a wide variety of subgenres Question: Who said that the term has graduated from being a subset of popular music studies? Answer:Timothy Laurie Question: What type of framework has it become in his opinion? Answer:for constituting and evaluating musical research objects Question: What do recent academics think about this type of categorization? Answer:	that it is inaccurate and outdated
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:	1939
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:	Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:	north of Tokyo
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:	25
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:25 Question: Did he ever beat his own? Answer:	yes
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:25 Question: Did he ever beat his own? Answer:yes Question: When was he the world champion? Answer:	1962-1963 and 1964-1965
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:25 Question: Did he ever beat his own? Answer:yes Question: When was he the world champion? Answer:1962-1963 and 1964-1965 Question: When did he win an Olympic gold medal? Answer:	1968
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:25 Question: Did he ever beat his own? Answer:yes Question: When was he the world champion? Answer:1962-1963 and 1964-1965 Question: When did he win an Olympic gold medal? Answer:1968 Question: What did earn in 1964? Answer:	gold
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:25 Question: Did he ever beat his own? Answer:yes Question: When was he the world champion? Answer:1962-1963 and 1964-1965 Question: When did he win an Olympic gold medal? Answer:1968 Question: What did earn in 1964? Answer:gold Question: where? Answer:	Tokyo
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question. Story: (CNN) -- Yoshinobu Miyake is perhaps the only athlete apart from Dick Fosbury who has had a technique named after him. Miyake: the strongest man ever? While Fosbury was throwing himself backward over the bar in the high jump in Mexico City 1968, Miyake was placing his ankles together, instead of apart, for the lifting snatch. The "Miyake Pull" was also coined "Frog Style" after the stance the lifter adopts before the pull: heels together with knees fanned outward to around sixty degrees with a wide grip on the bar, resembling a frog upon the lift. The technique proved physiologically efficient for a body bearing some 60 kilograms (132 pounds) of stress. Miyake's Olympic gold in 1968 is less well known than Fosbury's, but pound for pound, in his own sport, he is considered one of the strongest men who ever lived -- and Japan's finest weightlifting exponent. The medal re-affirmed Miyake's pre-eminence in the featherweight class and proved he could travel. In 1964 he had also won gold in Tokyo in front of a home crowd, improving on a silver earned in Rome in 1960. Born in Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu, north of Tokyo, in 1939, Miyake was all but unstoppable in the mid-1960s. During that time he set 25 world records, many consecutively as he bettered his own standards. He was the world champion in 1962-1963 and 1964-1965. After coming fourth at the 1972 Munich Games, Miyake retired from competitive action to coach Japan's weightlifting team, helping his brother, Yoshiyuki, become world champion in 1969 and 1971. Question: When was Miyake born? Answer:1939 Question: Where? Answer:Miyagi Prefecture in Honshu Question: Where is that? Answer:north of Tokyo Question: Does he have any world records? Answer:yes Question: How many? Answer:25 Question: Did he ever beat his own? Answer:yes Question: When was he the world champion? Answer:1962-1963 and 1964-1965 Question: When did he win an Olympic gold medal? Answer:1968 Question: What did earn in 1964? Answer:gold Question: where? Answer:Tokyo Question: What had he gotten before that? Answer:	a silver

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.