If you look closely at Teresa Halbach’s and Steven Avery’s call logs, a lot of details can be found in that information.
…well that seems to be true when referring to his calls made that day and the messages left for Teresa between 1.52 on 31st Oct and 6.42 on 1st Nov.
Please let me know if there are any flaws in my document or deductions. I have redacted the names not already known and part of the numbers. Hopefully I caught them all to keep within the rules!
This is the document I used to reach these assumptions.
I’ll just summarise what I concluded and you can tell me I am wrong/right.
Avery’s 4.35 call was not long enough (13 secs) to have left a message because TH voicemail greeting was approx 18 secs long.
She manually rejected the call from withheld number and he disconnected before listening to her entire vm greeting.
Opinion:I do find it a bit suspect that SA cell calls and TH cell calls go quiet for the same time frame between 1435 -1635 SA and 1441-1635 for TH.
The call durations and the *67 thing make me feel uneasy when added to that.
The messages left on her voicemail on the afternoon of 31st were not deleted and so it seems less likely someone was “covering up” something relevant to that day.
Steven has always upheld she was there between 2-2.30, but he called her at 2.24 and 2.35??
Info showing some weirdness in the call records Teresa’s friends gave police and info which shows Avery call was most likely rejected to vm or he hung up before she or voicemail answered.
POLICE REPORT last call 2.27 to Autotrader. Call time matches Cingular records. This is the last answered incoming call.
POLICE REPORT 4th last call Schmitz. Matches Cingular records in evidence.
POLICE REPORT 5th last call unidentified person and 12.44. Other trial show this is S. Spe******** at 12.45 as shown on cingular records.
POLICE REPORT 6th last at 12.39 calling to her vm. Confirmed by Cingular records.
a call at 1.52 that went to her voicemail. This person left a message which TH did not delete. The call rang out for 27 secs before going to vm.
We know the calls she placed to her voicemail are showing up. So why was this 2.13 vm call deliberately left out? This is the call where she would have retrieved the last 1.52 (undeleted) message.
The incoming calls at 1.52 & 2.41, so we can assume that most likely calls that go to voicemail (even after ringing) dont show. The voicemail left at 1.52 has an associated number in the voicemail report. The 2.41 call does not. But both these mesaages are not deleted.