Added required packages valid version check.
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this [failed invocation](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/pull/61444/checks?check_run_id=15525632648) of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. > This seems like a no-op, after you inline all definitions

Hi @mihaimaruseac and thanks for your time,
As you can see in the issue https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/61434, this avoid errors in the resolution of dependencies if the version of the package is something different from `major.minor.patch` versioning. 
I encountered this issue using `poetry` while installing the `tensorflow-rocm` package that use the `major.minor.patch.rocm-version` semantic versioning e.g. `2.12.0.560`. 
My changes simply ensure the version of the `REQUIRED_PACKAGES` to the `major.minor.parch` versioning to solve the issue. This solves dependency resolution problems even when using versions like `major.minor.patch.build`.

I hope this makes it clearer. But how does this setup.py translate to the rocm variant? > But how does this setup.py translate to the rocm variant?

This doesn't directly affect the tensorflow forks but AFAIK forks like `tensorflow-rocm` sync some changes with the main `tensorflow` branches so these changes will affect them when they will sync.
Also, this can be helpful for future forks.

However, what do you mean by "translate" specifically?
If you mean how this can benefit the rocm variant the answer is that in `tensorflow-rocm` variant the version is something like `2.12.0.560`, so in the actual state, both `FAKE_REQUIRED_PACKAGES` and `collaborator_build REQUIRED_PACKAGES` versions are still `2.12.0.560`. As you can check packages like `tensorflow-intel` (that is a `FAKE_REQUIRED_PACKAGE`) don't have a `2.12.0.560` version but only the `2.12.0` version. 
So the proposed changes simply ensure that the version of these packages is a `major.minor.patch` version that matches an existent packages version of the `REQUIRED_PACKAGES`.

I hope I have answered your doubts correctly, however, If you feel that this is not an issue directly related to `tensorflow` I imagine that forks can independently manage that issue.
 I don't understand how TF's `setup.py` is used by the other variants. Perhaps the change should actually occur on the `tensorflow-rocm` repo instead. > I don't understand how TF's `setup.py` is used by the other variants. Perhaps the change should actually occur on the `tensorflow-rocm` repo instead.

The `setup.py` is used in other tensorflow variant to create their own package version (e.g. [tensorflow-rocm](https://pypi.org/project/tensorflow-rocm/)). If the `setup.py` contains a non existent version of some packages this obviously run into an issues while installing the package with some package manager that check that like `poetry`.

However, I may have misunderstood this behavior.

Please let me know if I'm in error.
 The ROCM `setup.py` has

```py
# Append the ROCM version to the version string
if project_name.endswith('_rocm'):
  _VERSION = _VERSION + "." + str(_rocm_version(_get_rocm_install_path()).replace('.', ''))
```

I think that is the part that needs to change, not in TF. From TF's point of view, this PR is a no-op. > The ROCM `setup.py` has
> 
> ```python
> # Append the ROCM version to the version string
> if project_name.endswith('_rocm'):
>   _VERSION = _VERSION + "." + str(_rocm_version(_get_rocm_install_path()).replace('.', ''))
> ```
> 
> I think that is the part that needs to change, not in TF. From TF's point of view, this PR is a no-op.

Ok @mihaimaruseac, thanks for your time. I opened a PR on `tensorflow-rocm` to fix that. 
I think that this issue can now be closed. > tensorflow-rocm

Hi @ZappaBoy Shall we go ahead and close this PR since you created [PR#2174](https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/tensorflow-upstream/pull/2174) on tensorflow-rocm repo to fix that. Please confirm. Thank you! > Shall we go ahead and close this PR since you created [PR#2174](https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/tensorflow-upstream/pull/2174) on tensorflow-rocm repo to fix that. Please confirm. Thank you!

Sure, as I said before I think that this issue can be closed. Thanks for your support and have a nice day.
These minimal changes will ensure that both `FAKE_REQUIRED_PACKAGES` and `collaborator_build REQUIRED_PACKAGES` versions are valid regardless of the actual package version considering at most the patch version.

This will fix the dependency check while installing the tensorflow-like  packages like `tensorflow-rocm` using some package managers like `poetry` solving the issue I opened: https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/61434.

If this PR will be accepted I think that the same changes can be done also in previous versions.


However I don't know if your policies allow the PR directly in master, if some changes are needed feel free to notice that to me. I'll be glad to help.