prompt
stringclasses 88
values | completion
stringlengths 54
470
| label
bool 2
classes | bertscore_f1
float64 0.8
0.84
| rank
int64 1
5
| file_name
stringclasses 88
values | categories
stringclasses 18
values | subcategories
stringclasses 32
values | reference_explanation
stringclasses 88
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The WEF “Cyber Attack” Scenario: Another Crisis “Much Worse than Covid”, Paralysis of Power Supply, Communications, Transportation
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the Western financial elites, played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 corona lockdown, which was conducive to a Worldwide process of economic and social chaos. It also played a key role in the launching of the Covid-19 vaccine. in November 2020.
And now they are “promising” us a crisis which is “Much Worse than Covid”.
Over the last three years the deliberate triggering of chaos has become part of a broad and complex agenda: the war in Ukraine, the hike in energy prices, the triggering of bankruptcies, the collapse of economic activity, widespread poverty, famine and despair.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In recent developments, Washington has endorsed Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine, coupled with an unfolding US-NATO-Israel military agenda against the broader Middle East.
Cyber-Attacks
The article below focusses on the imminent dangers of Cyber Warfare, which have already been announced by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In 2021, the WEF conducted a simulation of Cyber Attacks involving a scenario of Paralysis of the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, The Internet.
Klaus Schwab intimated in no uncertain terms based on “a simulated scenario” that a cyber-attack:
“Could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole …
The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.” (emphasis added)
What does Schwab have up his sleeve?
A “Cyber Terrorist Attack” conducive to unprecedented disruptions? Is this something that we should take seriously?
A renewed fear campaign, a warning of an impending danger? In the words of Jeremy Jurgens, who is the WEF’s Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The 2021 WEF cyber polygon simulation scenario had an obvious “contradictory” geopolitical slant:
The event was chaired by Russia’s Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, numerous Russian financial institutions, media and communications entities had been invited by the WEF.
Forty-eight countries participated in the Event, there were 41 partners of which 10 were from Russia and Kazakhstan: these included News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank and a leading global financial institution, the Mail.ru Group, Russia’s largest internet provider, MTS, Russia’s leading telecommunications group, the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region, Siberia. Powerful banking financial institutions from Kazakstan. Among others.
See also the assumptions of the Training Program, which are predicated on terrorist cyber hackers.
Amply documented, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been instrumental in endorsing US-NATO’s military agenda in regards to Ukraine.
Was this July 2021 Cyber Polygon event (which occurred less than 8 months prior to the outset of the Ukraine War) intent upon creating political divisions within the Russian Federation by establishing partnerships with a number of powerful Russian media, communications, banking and financial institutions, etc.
Not a single representative from the People’s Republic of China. Was the Cyber Polygon Simulation (July 2021) intended to foster confrontation between China and Russia? Are Cyber attacks contemplated as part of a Global Military agenda?
The Process of “All-Digitization”
In November 2023, as documented in an article by Peter Koenig, the Financial Elites passed from the “study of scenarios” to “implementation”. They entrusted the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “as the flag-carrier … for the deadly onslaught of All-Digitization.”
</document>
<category>
URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article suggesting a scenario in which the Western world would be subjected to cyber attacks, ultimately aiming at a destruction of the infrastructure, highlighting the potential military application of such technologies. The author is ultimately suggesting the US is behind such plans in order to generate chaos and control the population. | true | 0.806212 | 1 | EN_UA_100868.txt | URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | none | The text presents some paragraphs in which conspiracy theories related to the WEF are associated with the War in Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The WEF “Cyber Attack” Scenario: Another Crisis “Much Worse than Covid”, Paralysis of Power Supply, Communications, Transportation
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the Western financial elites, played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 corona lockdown, which was conducive to a Worldwide process of economic and social chaos. It also played a key role in the launching of the Covid-19 vaccine. in November 2020.
And now they are “promising” us a crisis which is “Much Worse than Covid”.
Over the last three years the deliberate triggering of chaos has become part of a broad and complex agenda: the war in Ukraine, the hike in energy prices, the triggering of bankruptcies, the collapse of economic activity, widespread poverty, famine and despair.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In recent developments, Washington has endorsed Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine, coupled with an unfolding US-NATO-Israel military agenda against the broader Middle East.
Cyber-Attacks
The article below focusses on the imminent dangers of Cyber Warfare, which have already been announced by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In 2021, the WEF conducted a simulation of Cyber Attacks involving a scenario of Paralysis of the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, The Internet.
Klaus Schwab intimated in no uncertain terms based on “a simulated scenario” that a cyber-attack:
“Could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole …
The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.” (emphasis added)
What does Schwab have up his sleeve?
A “Cyber Terrorist Attack” conducive to unprecedented disruptions? Is this something that we should take seriously?
A renewed fear campaign, a warning of an impending danger? In the words of Jeremy Jurgens, who is the WEF’s Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The 2021 WEF cyber polygon simulation scenario had an obvious “contradictory” geopolitical slant:
The event was chaired by Russia’s Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, numerous Russian financial institutions, media and communications entities had been invited by the WEF.
Forty-eight countries participated in the Event, there were 41 partners of which 10 were from Russia and Kazakhstan: these included News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank and a leading global financial institution, the Mail.ru Group, Russia’s largest internet provider, MTS, Russia’s leading telecommunications group, the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region, Siberia. Powerful banking financial institutions from Kazakstan. Among others.
See also the assumptions of the Training Program, which are predicated on terrorist cyber hackers.
Amply documented, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been instrumental in endorsing US-NATO’s military agenda in regards to Ukraine.
Was this July 2021 Cyber Polygon event (which occurred less than 8 months prior to the outset of the Ukraine War) intent upon creating political divisions within the Russian Federation by establishing partnerships with a number of powerful Russian media, communications, banking and financial institutions, etc.
Not a single representative from the People’s Republic of China. Was the Cyber Polygon Simulation (July 2021) intended to foster confrontation between China and Russia? Are Cyber attacks contemplated as part of a Global Military agenda?
The Process of “All-Digitization”
In November 2023, as documented in an article by Peter Koenig, the Financial Elites passed from the “study of scenarios” to “implementation”. They entrusted the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “as the flag-carrier … for the deadly onslaught of All-Digitization.”
</document>
<category>
URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Multiple paragraphs highlight alleged nefarious plots by powerful groups within the framework of WEF. These groups are accused of being behind the implementation of several dramatic events as well as policies and technologies. | true | 0.806212 | 2 | EN_UA_100868.txt | URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | none | The text presents some paragraphs in which conspiracy theories related to the WEF are associated with the War in Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The WEF “Cyber Attack” Scenario: Another Crisis “Much Worse than Covid”, Paralysis of Power Supply, Communications, Transportation
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the Western financial elites, played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 corona lockdown, which was conducive to a Worldwide process of economic and social chaos. It also played a key role in the launching of the Covid-19 vaccine. in November 2020.
And now they are “promising” us a crisis which is “Much Worse than Covid”.
Over the last three years the deliberate triggering of chaos has become part of a broad and complex agenda: the war in Ukraine, the hike in energy prices, the triggering of bankruptcies, the collapse of economic activity, widespread poverty, famine and despair.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In recent developments, Washington has endorsed Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine, coupled with an unfolding US-NATO-Israel military agenda against the broader Middle East.
Cyber-Attacks
The article below focusses on the imminent dangers of Cyber Warfare, which have already been announced by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In 2021, the WEF conducted a simulation of Cyber Attacks involving a scenario of Paralysis of the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, The Internet.
Klaus Schwab intimated in no uncertain terms based on “a simulated scenario” that a cyber-attack:
“Could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole …
The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.” (emphasis added)
What does Schwab have up his sleeve?
A “Cyber Terrorist Attack” conducive to unprecedented disruptions? Is this something that we should take seriously?
A renewed fear campaign, a warning of an impending danger? In the words of Jeremy Jurgens, who is the WEF’s Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The 2021 WEF cyber polygon simulation scenario had an obvious “contradictory” geopolitical slant:
The event was chaired by Russia’s Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, numerous Russian financial institutions, media and communications entities had been invited by the WEF.
Forty-eight countries participated in the Event, there were 41 partners of which 10 were from Russia and Kazakhstan: these included News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank and a leading global financial institution, the Mail.ru Group, Russia’s largest internet provider, MTS, Russia’s leading telecommunications group, the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region, Siberia. Powerful banking financial institutions from Kazakstan. Among others.
See also the assumptions of the Training Program, which are predicated on terrorist cyber hackers.
Amply documented, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been instrumental in endorsing US-NATO’s military agenda in regards to Ukraine.
Was this July 2021 Cyber Polygon event (which occurred less than 8 months prior to the outset of the Ukraine War) intent upon creating political divisions within the Russian Federation by establishing partnerships with a number of powerful Russian media, communications, banking and financial institutions, etc.
Not a single representative from the People’s Republic of China. Was the Cyber Polygon Simulation (July 2021) intended to foster confrontation between China and Russia? Are Cyber attacks contemplated as part of a Global Military agenda?
The Process of “All-Digitization”
In November 2023, as documented in an article by Peter Koenig, the Financial Elites passed from the “study of scenarios” to “implementation”. They entrusted the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “as the flag-carrier … for the deadly onslaught of All-Digitization.”
</document>
<category>
URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticise Western countries accusing them of using cyber warfare techniques to inflict harm to Russia and other countries | false | 0.806212 | 3 | EN_UA_100868.txt | URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | none | The text presents some paragraphs in which conspiracy theories related to the WEF are associated with the War in Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The WEF “Cyber Attack” Scenario: Another Crisis “Much Worse than Covid”, Paralysis of Power Supply, Communications, Transportation
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the Western financial elites, played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 corona lockdown, which was conducive to a Worldwide process of economic and social chaos. It also played a key role in the launching of the Covid-19 vaccine. in November 2020.
And now they are “promising” us a crisis which is “Much Worse than Covid”.
Over the last three years the deliberate triggering of chaos has become part of a broad and complex agenda: the war in Ukraine, the hike in energy prices, the triggering of bankruptcies, the collapse of economic activity, widespread poverty, famine and despair.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In recent developments, Washington has endorsed Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine, coupled with an unfolding US-NATO-Israel military agenda against the broader Middle East.
Cyber-Attacks
The article below focusses on the imminent dangers of Cyber Warfare, which have already been announced by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In 2021, the WEF conducted a simulation of Cyber Attacks involving a scenario of Paralysis of the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, The Internet.
Klaus Schwab intimated in no uncertain terms based on “a simulated scenario” that a cyber-attack:
“Could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole …
The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.” (emphasis added)
What does Schwab have up his sleeve?
A “Cyber Terrorist Attack” conducive to unprecedented disruptions? Is this something that we should take seriously?
A renewed fear campaign, a warning of an impending danger? In the words of Jeremy Jurgens, who is the WEF’s Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The 2021 WEF cyber polygon simulation scenario had an obvious “contradictory” geopolitical slant:
The event was chaired by Russia’s Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, numerous Russian financial institutions, media and communications entities had been invited by the WEF.
Forty-eight countries participated in the Event, there were 41 partners of which 10 were from Russia and Kazakhstan: these included News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank and a leading global financial institution, the Mail.ru Group, Russia’s largest internet provider, MTS, Russia’s leading telecommunications group, the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region, Siberia. Powerful banking financial institutions from Kazakstan. Among others.
See also the assumptions of the Training Program, which are predicated on terrorist cyber hackers.
Amply documented, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been instrumental in endorsing US-NATO’s military agenda in regards to Ukraine.
Was this July 2021 Cyber Polygon event (which occurred less than 8 months prior to the outset of the Ukraine War) intent upon creating political divisions within the Russian Federation by establishing partnerships with a number of powerful Russian media, communications, banking and financial institutions, etc.
Not a single representative from the People’s Republic of China. Was the Cyber Polygon Simulation (July 2021) intended to foster confrontation between China and Russia? Are Cyber attacks contemplated as part of a Global Military agenda?
The Process of “All-Digitization”
In November 2023, as documented in an article by Peter Koenig, the Financial Elites passed from the “study of scenarios” to “implementation”. They entrusted the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “as the flag-carrier … for the deadly onslaught of All-Digitization.”
</document>
<category>
URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents several paragraphs in which conspiracy theories about the WEF are associated with the war in Ukraine and its consequences | false | 0.806212 | 4 | EN_UA_100868.txt | URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | none | The text presents some paragraphs in which conspiracy theories related to the WEF are associated with the War in Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The WEF “Cyber Attack” Scenario: Another Crisis “Much Worse than Covid”, Paralysis of Power Supply, Communications, Transportation
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the Western financial elites, played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 corona lockdown, which was conducive to a Worldwide process of economic and social chaos. It also played a key role in the launching of the Covid-19 vaccine. in November 2020.
And now they are “promising” us a crisis which is “Much Worse than Covid”.
Over the last three years the deliberate triggering of chaos has become part of a broad and complex agenda: the war in Ukraine, the hike in energy prices, the triggering of bankruptcies, the collapse of economic activity, widespread poverty, famine and despair.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
In recent developments, Washington has endorsed Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine, coupled with an unfolding US-NATO-Israel military agenda against the broader Middle East.
Cyber-Attacks
The article below focusses on the imminent dangers of Cyber Warfare, which have already been announced by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In 2021, the WEF conducted a simulation of Cyber Attacks involving a scenario of Paralysis of the Power Supply, Communications, Transportation, The Internet.
Klaus Schwab intimated in no uncertain terms based on “a simulated scenario” that a cyber-attack:
“Could bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole …
The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyberattack.” (emphasis added)
What does Schwab have up his sleeve?
A “Cyber Terrorist Attack” conducive to unprecedented disruptions? Is this something that we should take seriously?
A renewed fear campaign, a warning of an impending danger? In the words of Jeremy Jurgens, who is the WEF’s Managing Director:
“I believe that there will be another crisis. It will be more significant. It will be faster than what we’ve seen with COVID. The impact will be greater, and as a result the economic and social implications will be even more significant.” (emphasis added)
The 2021 WEF cyber polygon simulation scenario had an obvious “contradictory” geopolitical slant:
The event was chaired by Russia’s Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, numerous Russian financial institutions, media and communications entities had been invited by the WEF.
Forty-eight countries participated in the Event, there were 41 partners of which 10 were from Russia and Kazakhstan: these included News Agency TASS, NTV, Sberbank, Russia’s largest bank and a leading global financial institution, the Mail.ru Group, Russia’s largest internet provider, MTS, Russia’s leading telecommunications group, the State Legal Department of the Omsk Region, Siberia. Powerful banking financial institutions from Kazakstan. Among others.
See also the assumptions of the Training Program, which are predicated on terrorist cyber hackers.
Amply documented, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has been instrumental in endorsing US-NATO’s military agenda in regards to Ukraine.
Was this July 2021 Cyber Polygon event (which occurred less than 8 months prior to the outset of the Ukraine War) intent upon creating political divisions within the Russian Federation by establishing partnerships with a number of powerful Russian media, communications, banking and financial institutions, etc.
Not a single representative from the People’s Republic of China. Was the Cyber Polygon Simulation (July 2021) intended to foster confrontation between China and Russia? Are Cyber attacks contemplated as part of a Global Military agenda?
The Process of “All-Digitization”
In November 2023, as documented in an article by Peter Koenig, the Financial Elites passed from the “study of scenarios” to “implementation”. They entrusted the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) “as the flag-carrier … for the deadly onslaught of All-Digitization.”
</document>
<category>
URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents several paragraphs criticising the WEF and its alleged attempts to disrupt public services through cyber attacks in several countries | false | 0.806212 | 5 | EN_UA_100868.txt | URW: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | none | The text presents some paragraphs in which conspiracy theories related to the WEF are associated with the War in Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
“Many signs” show Ukraine is winding down its program amid Moscow’s revelations, a senior diplomat claimed
Kiev might be shelving its alleged ‘dirty bomb’ program after Russia exposed it, Moscow’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, claimed on Tuesday. He added that Ukraine may well have time to do this before the upcoming nuclear inspection.
Over the last few days, Russian officials, including Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, have been accusing Kiev of preparing a false-flag attack with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’, a device combining conventional explosives with radioactive material. Ukraine has categorically denied Moscow’s claims.
“If you read the Ukrainian Telegram channels, you would see that there is a lot of fuss in the Ukrainian ruling circles now because of the campaign that we have started to launch, and there are many signs that they are trying to sort of wind down this program,” Polyansky said, as quoted by RIA Novosti.
In his opinion, Ukraine has enough time to scale back the ‘dirty bomb’ plans before the upcoming visit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors.
“They can come, but I am telling you that a ‘dirty bomb’ is not a very complex device,”Polyansky explained, adding that there is no guarantee that Kiev will not resume its alleged activity after the inspectors depart.
At the same time, the official claimed that the danger of Kiev using a ‘dirty bomb’ remains “very high,” and that Ukraine “has the opportunity” and “has every reason to use it.”
Earlier on Tuesday, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Russian mission’s head, Vassily Nebenzia, said that Moscow would consider the use of a ‘dirty bomb’ by Ukraine “an act of nuclear terrorism.”
Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba earlier called the Russian allegations “as absurd as they are dangerous.” He also noted that “Russians often accuse others of what they plan themselves.”
On Tuesday, the minister revealed that Ukraine had invited IAEA inspectors to come and to “prove that Ukraine has neither any dirty bombs nor plans to develop them.”
“Good cooperation with IAEA and partners allows us to foil Russia’s ‘dirty bomb’ disinfo campaign,” Kuleba said.
UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric, commenting on the matter, said that “all parties should avoid any actions that could lead to miscalculation and escalation of what’s already a devastating conflict.”
Meanwhile, the Pentagon claimed that Russia’s allegations against Ukraine were “transparently false.” NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg said that the allies “reject the allegation” and believe that Russia “must not use it as a pretext” for further escalation.
Source: https://tapnewswire.com/2022/10/russia-exposure-of-dirty-bomb-plans-caused-panic-in-kiev/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula.
This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting.
Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a sense of fear that nuclear weapons could be employed, both from Russian side but also indirectly from Ukraine. The article reports Russian officials claim that Ukraine is preparing to use them, and suggests that these claims are potentially justified given the evidence presented. | true | 0.817858 | 1 | EN_UA_100210.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed | The text presents multiple paragraphs in which Ukraine is accused to plan the use of unconventional nuclear devices against Russia. These accusations convey a depiction of the Ukranian government as criminals and extremists
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
“Many signs” show Ukraine is winding down its program amid Moscow’s revelations, a senior diplomat claimed
Kiev might be shelving its alleged ‘dirty bomb’ program after Russia exposed it, Moscow’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, claimed on Tuesday. He added that Ukraine may well have time to do this before the upcoming nuclear inspection.
Over the last few days, Russian officials, including Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, have been accusing Kiev of preparing a false-flag attack with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’, a device combining conventional explosives with radioactive material. Ukraine has categorically denied Moscow’s claims.
“If you read the Ukrainian Telegram channels, you would see that there is a lot of fuss in the Ukrainian ruling circles now because of the campaign that we have started to launch, and there are many signs that they are trying to sort of wind down this program,” Polyansky said, as quoted by RIA Novosti.
In his opinion, Ukraine has enough time to scale back the ‘dirty bomb’ plans before the upcoming visit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors.
“They can come, but I am telling you that a ‘dirty bomb’ is not a very complex device,”Polyansky explained, adding that there is no guarantee that Kiev will not resume its alleged activity after the inspectors depart.
At the same time, the official claimed that the danger of Kiev using a ‘dirty bomb’ remains “very high,” and that Ukraine “has the opportunity” and “has every reason to use it.”
Earlier on Tuesday, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Russian mission’s head, Vassily Nebenzia, said that Moscow would consider the use of a ‘dirty bomb’ by Ukraine “an act of nuclear terrorism.”
Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba earlier called the Russian allegations “as absurd as they are dangerous.” He also noted that “Russians often accuse others of what they plan themselves.”
On Tuesday, the minister revealed that Ukraine had invited IAEA inspectors to come and to “prove that Ukraine has neither any dirty bombs nor plans to develop them.”
“Good cooperation with IAEA and partners allows us to foil Russia’s ‘dirty bomb’ disinfo campaign,” Kuleba said.
UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric, commenting on the matter, said that “all parties should avoid any actions that could lead to miscalculation and escalation of what’s already a devastating conflict.”
Meanwhile, the Pentagon claimed that Russia’s allegations against Ukraine were “transparently false.” NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg said that the allies “reject the allegation” and believe that Russia “must not use it as a pretext” for further escalation.
Source: https://tapnewswire.com/2022/10/russia-exposure-of-dirty-bomb-plans-caused-panic-in-kiev/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula.
This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting.
Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article quotes Russian official as saying that Ukraine has every reason to use a 'dirty bomb'. In doing so, Ukraine would be considered as having used nuclear weapons. This is however questionable given the fact that there is no evidence that Ukraine is pursuing such a weapon | true | 0.817858 | 2 | EN_UA_100210.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed | The text presents multiple paragraphs in which Ukraine is accused to plan the use of unconventional nuclear devices against Russia. These accusations convey a depiction of the Ukranian government as criminals and extremists
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
“Many signs” show Ukraine is winding down its program amid Moscow’s revelations, a senior diplomat claimed
Kiev might be shelving its alleged ‘dirty bomb’ program after Russia exposed it, Moscow’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, claimed on Tuesday. He added that Ukraine may well have time to do this before the upcoming nuclear inspection.
Over the last few days, Russian officials, including Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, have been accusing Kiev of preparing a false-flag attack with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’, a device combining conventional explosives with radioactive material. Ukraine has categorically denied Moscow’s claims.
“If you read the Ukrainian Telegram channels, you would see that there is a lot of fuss in the Ukrainian ruling circles now because of the campaign that we have started to launch, and there are many signs that they are trying to sort of wind down this program,” Polyansky said, as quoted by RIA Novosti.
In his opinion, Ukraine has enough time to scale back the ‘dirty bomb’ plans before the upcoming visit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors.
“They can come, but I am telling you that a ‘dirty bomb’ is not a very complex device,”Polyansky explained, adding that there is no guarantee that Kiev will not resume its alleged activity after the inspectors depart.
At the same time, the official claimed that the danger of Kiev using a ‘dirty bomb’ remains “very high,” and that Ukraine “has the opportunity” and “has every reason to use it.”
Earlier on Tuesday, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Russian mission’s head, Vassily Nebenzia, said that Moscow would consider the use of a ‘dirty bomb’ by Ukraine “an act of nuclear terrorism.”
Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba earlier called the Russian allegations “as absurd as they are dangerous.” He also noted that “Russians often accuse others of what they plan themselves.”
On Tuesday, the minister revealed that Ukraine had invited IAEA inspectors to come and to “prove that Ukraine has neither any dirty bombs nor plans to develop them.”
“Good cooperation with IAEA and partners allows us to foil Russia’s ‘dirty bomb’ disinfo campaign,” Kuleba said.
UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric, commenting on the matter, said that “all parties should avoid any actions that could lead to miscalculation and escalation of what’s already a devastating conflict.”
Meanwhile, the Pentagon claimed that Russia’s allegations against Ukraine were “transparently false.” NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg said that the allies “reject the allegation” and believe that Russia “must not use it as a pretext” for further escalation.
Source: https://tapnewswire.com/2022/10/russia-exposure-of-dirty-bomb-plans-caused-panic-in-kiev/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula.
This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting.
Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has several paragraphs stressing the alleged use of nuclear weapons by Ukraine in the context of the military campaign. Russian officials and Ukraine are cited in a conflictual context in order to support the claim. | false | 0.817858 | 3 | EN_UA_100210.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed | The text presents multiple paragraphs in which Ukraine is accused to plan the use of unconventional nuclear devices against Russia. These accusations convey a depiction of the Ukranian government as criminals and extremists
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
“Many signs” show Ukraine is winding down its program amid Moscow’s revelations, a senior diplomat claimed
Kiev might be shelving its alleged ‘dirty bomb’ program after Russia exposed it, Moscow’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, claimed on Tuesday. He added that Ukraine may well have time to do this before the upcoming nuclear inspection.
Over the last few days, Russian officials, including Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, have been accusing Kiev of preparing a false-flag attack with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’, a device combining conventional explosives with radioactive material. Ukraine has categorically denied Moscow’s claims.
“If you read the Ukrainian Telegram channels, you would see that there is a lot of fuss in the Ukrainian ruling circles now because of the campaign that we have started to launch, and there are many signs that they are trying to sort of wind down this program,” Polyansky said, as quoted by RIA Novosti.
In his opinion, Ukraine has enough time to scale back the ‘dirty bomb’ plans before the upcoming visit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors.
“They can come, but I am telling you that a ‘dirty bomb’ is not a very complex device,”Polyansky explained, adding that there is no guarantee that Kiev will not resume its alleged activity after the inspectors depart.
At the same time, the official claimed that the danger of Kiev using a ‘dirty bomb’ remains “very high,” and that Ukraine “has the opportunity” and “has every reason to use it.”
Earlier on Tuesday, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Russian mission’s head, Vassily Nebenzia, said that Moscow would consider the use of a ‘dirty bomb’ by Ukraine “an act of nuclear terrorism.”
Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba earlier called the Russian allegations “as absurd as they are dangerous.” He also noted that “Russians often accuse others of what they plan themselves.”
On Tuesday, the minister revealed that Ukraine had invited IAEA inspectors to come and to “prove that Ukraine has neither any dirty bombs nor plans to develop them.”
“Good cooperation with IAEA and partners allows us to foil Russia’s ‘dirty bomb’ disinfo campaign,” Kuleba said.
UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric, commenting on the matter, said that “all parties should avoid any actions that could lead to miscalculation and escalation of what’s already a devastating conflict.”
Meanwhile, the Pentagon claimed that Russia’s allegations against Ukraine were “transparently false.” NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg said that the allies “reject the allegation” and believe that Russia “must not use it as a pretext” for further escalation.
Source: https://tapnewswire.com/2022/10/russia-exposure-of-dirty-bomb-plans-caused-panic-in-kiev/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula.
This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting.
Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a narrative emphasising the possibility that Ukraine is using chemical or biological weapons. Moreover, the text suggests that the Ukrainian army is using or will use dirty bombs to harm civilian population | false | 0.817858 | 4 | EN_UA_100210.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed | The text presents multiple paragraphs in which Ukraine is accused to plan the use of unconventional nuclear devices against Russia. These accusations convey a depiction of the Ukranian government as criminals and extremists
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
Russia – Exposure of ‘dirty bomb’ plans caused panic in Kiev
“Many signs” show Ukraine is winding down its program amid Moscow’s revelations, a senior diplomat claimed
Kiev might be shelving its alleged ‘dirty bomb’ program after Russia exposed it, Moscow’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, claimed on Tuesday. He added that Ukraine may well have time to do this before the upcoming nuclear inspection.
Over the last few days, Russian officials, including Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu, have been accusing Kiev of preparing a false-flag attack with the use of a ‘dirty bomb’, a device combining conventional explosives with radioactive material. Ukraine has categorically denied Moscow’s claims.
“If you read the Ukrainian Telegram channels, you would see that there is a lot of fuss in the Ukrainian ruling circles now because of the campaign that we have started to launch, and there are many signs that they are trying to sort of wind down this program,” Polyansky said, as quoted by RIA Novosti.
In his opinion, Ukraine has enough time to scale back the ‘dirty bomb’ plans before the upcoming visit of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors.
“They can come, but I am telling you that a ‘dirty bomb’ is not a very complex device,”Polyansky explained, adding that there is no guarantee that Kiev will not resume its alleged activity after the inspectors depart.
At the same time, the official claimed that the danger of Kiev using a ‘dirty bomb’ remains “very high,” and that Ukraine “has the opportunity” and “has every reason to use it.”
Earlier on Tuesday, in a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, the Russian mission’s head, Vassily Nebenzia, said that Moscow would consider the use of a ‘dirty bomb’ by Ukraine “an act of nuclear terrorism.”
Meanwhile, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba earlier called the Russian allegations “as absurd as they are dangerous.” He also noted that “Russians often accuse others of what they plan themselves.”
On Tuesday, the minister revealed that Ukraine had invited IAEA inspectors to come and to “prove that Ukraine has neither any dirty bombs nor plans to develop them.”
“Good cooperation with IAEA and partners allows us to foil Russia’s ‘dirty bomb’ disinfo campaign,” Kuleba said.
UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric, commenting on the matter, said that “all parties should avoid any actions that could lead to miscalculation and escalation of what’s already a devastating conflict.”
Meanwhile, the Pentagon claimed that Russia’s allegations against Ukraine were “transparently false.” NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg said that the allies “reject the allegation” and believe that Russia “must not use it as a pretext” for further escalation.
Source: https://tapnewswire.com/2022/10/russia-exposure-of-dirty-bomb-plans-caused-panic-in-kiev/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex
HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary new Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula.
This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting.
Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link, or the Banner Below.
Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...
It’s OXYGENATED
It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH
Preservative and Chemical Free
Allergen Free
Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source
Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals
Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents
Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons
Is a Full Spectrum Complex
Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.
Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout multiple paragraphs, the text presents alleged evidence that Ukraine has plans of using chemical or nuclear weapons. Russian officials are quoted directly suggesting that the country could use them soon, fostering a sense of urgency and suggesting that Ukraine might even not need much time to employ them. | false | 0.817858 | 5 | EN_UA_100210.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: There is a real possibility that nuclear weapons will be employed | The text presents multiple paragraphs in which Ukraine is accused to plan the use of unconventional nuclear devices against Russia. These accusations convey a depiction of the Ukranian government as criminals and extremists
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
NYC to begin tracking food purchases to make sure residents don’t consume “too much” meat
Just as he promised to do, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a left-wing Democrat, is going after people’s meat with new plans to save the world from “climate change” by forcing everyone to become a “plant-based” vegetarian or vegan.
Along with representatives from the Mayor’s Office of Food Policy and the Mayor’s Office of Climate & Environmental Justice, Adams has announced the launch of a new “carbon footprint” and household food consumption tracking scheme that aims to reduce the Big Apple’s “carbon emissions” by 33 percent by the year 2030.
In order to cut all that carbon, Adams and his allies are imposing new “caps on meat” that, as the name suggests, will limit the amount of meat that New Yorkers are allowed to purchase and consume at public institutions – and eventually within their own homes as well.
(Related: Last month, we warned you that Adams was planning to unleash a horrific new food policing apparatus against New Yorkers, and now he has.)
Eric Adams wants all New Yorkers to become vegans
At a pre-Earth Day event held at a Brooklyn culinary center run by NYC Health + Hospitals, the city’s public health care system, Adams unveiled a chart depicting New York City’s greenhouse gas inventory. This inventory supposedly tracks the carbon footprint generated by household food consumption.
With the help of American Express, C40 Cities, and EcoData, Adams revealed carbon emissions data about household food consumption, which was added to existing carbon emissions data on energy use, transportation, and waste.
Commissioner Rohit Aggarwala from the NYC Department of Environmental Protection unveiled the new household food consumption data. Aggarwala, by the way, also founded the Google smart city subsidiary Sidewalk Labs, which collects data in order to forge “a new standard for what cities have to do” as a novel way to shape policy.
While the inventory that Aggarwala presented will also now include greenhouse gas “pollution” from the production and consumption of consumer goods like clothing, air travel, and health care, Adams focused his efforts at the event specifically on the foods that New Yorkers consume – mainly meat and dairy, which he personally opposes.
“Food is the third-biggest source of cities’ emissions right after buildings and transportation, but all food is not created equal,” Adams unsubstantially stated. “The vast majority of food that is contributing to our emission crisis lies in meat and dairy products.”
“It is easy to talk about the emissions that’s coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment, but we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are ready for this conversation.”
Other than fish, Adams reportedly abides by a “plant-based” vegan diet, which he says helped him overcome diabetes. He wrote a vegan cookbook to promote his personal dietary choices, which he now wants all New Yorkers to follow in order to stop “global warming.”
“We already know that a plant-powered diet is better for your physical and mental health, and I am living proof of that,” Adams declared. “But the reality is that thanks to this new inventory, we’re finding out it is better for the planet.”
The simplistic way in which Adams couched his argument against meat and dairy has already been debunked by people who are actually educated in such things, including Melissa McKendree, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State University.
“Different meats have different kinds of greenhouse gas footprints,” McKendree clarified about how pasture-raised animals do not harm the environment like feedlot animals do. “All land is not created equal.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article conveys a narrative portraying the New York City Mayor as adopting eco-policies that are described as alarmist, irrational and ineffective. The author adopts a provocative tone, using emotive words and emphasizing the negative impact of such initiatives on people's freedom | true | 0.826275 | 1 | EN_CC_200021.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures | The article reports about New Your City's mayor's initiative to control the amount of meat people consume. The author calls the mayor incompetent person who goes after people's meat and wants to make everyone vegan forcefeully.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
NYC to begin tracking food purchases to make sure residents don’t consume “too much” meat
Just as he promised to do, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a left-wing Democrat, is going after people’s meat with new plans to save the world from “climate change” by forcing everyone to become a “plant-based” vegetarian or vegan.
Along with representatives from the Mayor’s Office of Food Policy and the Mayor’s Office of Climate & Environmental Justice, Adams has announced the launch of a new “carbon footprint” and household food consumption tracking scheme that aims to reduce the Big Apple’s “carbon emissions” by 33 percent by the year 2030.
In order to cut all that carbon, Adams and his allies are imposing new “caps on meat” that, as the name suggests, will limit the amount of meat that New Yorkers are allowed to purchase and consume at public institutions – and eventually within their own homes as well.
(Related: Last month, we warned you that Adams was planning to unleash a horrific new food policing apparatus against New Yorkers, and now he has.)
Eric Adams wants all New Yorkers to become vegans
At a pre-Earth Day event held at a Brooklyn culinary center run by NYC Health + Hospitals, the city’s public health care system, Adams unveiled a chart depicting New York City’s greenhouse gas inventory. This inventory supposedly tracks the carbon footprint generated by household food consumption.
With the help of American Express, C40 Cities, and EcoData, Adams revealed carbon emissions data about household food consumption, which was added to existing carbon emissions data on energy use, transportation, and waste.
Commissioner Rohit Aggarwala from the NYC Department of Environmental Protection unveiled the new household food consumption data. Aggarwala, by the way, also founded the Google smart city subsidiary Sidewalk Labs, which collects data in order to forge “a new standard for what cities have to do” as a novel way to shape policy.
While the inventory that Aggarwala presented will also now include greenhouse gas “pollution” from the production and consumption of consumer goods like clothing, air travel, and health care, Adams focused his efforts at the event specifically on the foods that New Yorkers consume – mainly meat and dairy, which he personally opposes.
“Food is the third-biggest source of cities’ emissions right after buildings and transportation, but all food is not created equal,” Adams unsubstantially stated. “The vast majority of food that is contributing to our emission crisis lies in meat and dairy products.”
“It is easy to talk about the emissions that’s coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment, but we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are ready for this conversation.”
Other than fish, Adams reportedly abides by a “plant-based” vegan diet, which he says helped him overcome diabetes. He wrote a vegan cookbook to promote his personal dietary choices, which he now wants all New Yorkers to follow in order to stop “global warming.”
“We already know that a plant-powered diet is better for your physical and mental health, and I am living proof of that,” Adams declared. “But the reality is that thanks to this new inventory, we’re finding out it is better for the planet.”
The simplistic way in which Adams couched his argument against meat and dairy has already been debunked by people who are actually educated in such things, including Melissa McKendree, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State University.
“Different meats have different kinds of greenhouse gas footprints,” McKendree clarified about how pasture-raised animals do not harm the environment like feedlot animals do. “All land is not created equal.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article conveys a sense of outrage in New York City as mayor Adams implements plans to monitor food consumption in households to reduce carbon emissions | true | 0.826275 | 2 | EN_CC_200021.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures | The article reports about New Your City's mayor's initiative to control the amount of meat people consume. The author calls the mayor incompetent person who goes after people's meat and wants to make everyone vegan forcefeully.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
NYC to begin tracking food purchases to make sure residents don’t consume “too much” meat
Just as he promised to do, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a left-wing Democrat, is going after people’s meat with new plans to save the world from “climate change” by forcing everyone to become a “plant-based” vegetarian or vegan.
Along with representatives from the Mayor’s Office of Food Policy and the Mayor’s Office of Climate & Environmental Justice, Adams has announced the launch of a new “carbon footprint” and household food consumption tracking scheme that aims to reduce the Big Apple’s “carbon emissions” by 33 percent by the year 2030.
In order to cut all that carbon, Adams and his allies are imposing new “caps on meat” that, as the name suggests, will limit the amount of meat that New Yorkers are allowed to purchase and consume at public institutions – and eventually within their own homes as well.
(Related: Last month, we warned you that Adams was planning to unleash a horrific new food policing apparatus against New Yorkers, and now he has.)
Eric Adams wants all New Yorkers to become vegans
At a pre-Earth Day event held at a Brooklyn culinary center run by NYC Health + Hospitals, the city’s public health care system, Adams unveiled a chart depicting New York City’s greenhouse gas inventory. This inventory supposedly tracks the carbon footprint generated by household food consumption.
With the help of American Express, C40 Cities, and EcoData, Adams revealed carbon emissions data about household food consumption, which was added to existing carbon emissions data on energy use, transportation, and waste.
Commissioner Rohit Aggarwala from the NYC Department of Environmental Protection unveiled the new household food consumption data. Aggarwala, by the way, also founded the Google smart city subsidiary Sidewalk Labs, which collects data in order to forge “a new standard for what cities have to do” as a novel way to shape policy.
While the inventory that Aggarwala presented will also now include greenhouse gas “pollution” from the production and consumption of consumer goods like clothing, air travel, and health care, Adams focused his efforts at the event specifically on the foods that New Yorkers consume – mainly meat and dairy, which he personally opposes.
“Food is the third-biggest source of cities’ emissions right after buildings and transportation, but all food is not created equal,” Adams unsubstantially stated. “The vast majority of food that is contributing to our emission crisis lies in meat and dairy products.”
“It is easy to talk about the emissions that’s coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment, but we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are ready for this conversation.”
Other than fish, Adams reportedly abides by a “plant-based” vegan diet, which he says helped him overcome diabetes. He wrote a vegan cookbook to promote his personal dietary choices, which he now wants all New Yorkers to follow in order to stop “global warming.”
“We already know that a plant-powered diet is better for your physical and mental health, and I am living proof of that,” Adams declared. “But the reality is that thanks to this new inventory, we’re finding out it is better for the planet.”
The simplistic way in which Adams couched his argument against meat and dairy has already been debunked by people who are actually educated in such things, including Melissa McKendree, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State University.
“Different meats have different kinds of greenhouse gas footprints,” McKendree clarified about how pasture-raised animals do not harm the environment like feedlot animals do. “All land is not created equal.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has several paragraphs criticising the mayor of New York City for implementing a regulation which has as the objective to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The author uses quotes from the mayor to claim that the regulation is infringing on the right of people to decide what to eat | false | 0.826275 | 3 | EN_CC_200021.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures | The article reports about New Your City's mayor's initiative to control the amount of meat people consume. The author calls the mayor incompetent person who goes after people's meat and wants to make everyone vegan forcefeully.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
NYC to begin tracking food purchases to make sure residents don’t consume “too much” meat
Just as he promised to do, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a left-wing Democrat, is going after people’s meat with new plans to save the world from “climate change” by forcing everyone to become a “plant-based” vegetarian or vegan.
Along with representatives from the Mayor’s Office of Food Policy and the Mayor’s Office of Climate & Environmental Justice, Adams has announced the launch of a new “carbon footprint” and household food consumption tracking scheme that aims to reduce the Big Apple’s “carbon emissions” by 33 percent by the year 2030.
In order to cut all that carbon, Adams and his allies are imposing new “caps on meat” that, as the name suggests, will limit the amount of meat that New Yorkers are allowed to purchase and consume at public institutions – and eventually within their own homes as well.
(Related: Last month, we warned you that Adams was planning to unleash a horrific new food policing apparatus against New Yorkers, and now he has.)
Eric Adams wants all New Yorkers to become vegans
At a pre-Earth Day event held at a Brooklyn culinary center run by NYC Health + Hospitals, the city’s public health care system, Adams unveiled a chart depicting New York City’s greenhouse gas inventory. This inventory supposedly tracks the carbon footprint generated by household food consumption.
With the help of American Express, C40 Cities, and EcoData, Adams revealed carbon emissions data about household food consumption, which was added to existing carbon emissions data on energy use, transportation, and waste.
Commissioner Rohit Aggarwala from the NYC Department of Environmental Protection unveiled the new household food consumption data. Aggarwala, by the way, also founded the Google smart city subsidiary Sidewalk Labs, which collects data in order to forge “a new standard for what cities have to do” as a novel way to shape policy.
While the inventory that Aggarwala presented will also now include greenhouse gas “pollution” from the production and consumption of consumer goods like clothing, air travel, and health care, Adams focused his efforts at the event specifically on the foods that New Yorkers consume – mainly meat and dairy, which he personally opposes.
“Food is the third-biggest source of cities’ emissions right after buildings and transportation, but all food is not created equal,” Adams unsubstantially stated. “The vast majority of food that is contributing to our emission crisis lies in meat and dairy products.”
“It is easy to talk about the emissions that’s coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment, but we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are ready for this conversation.”
Other than fish, Adams reportedly abides by a “plant-based” vegan diet, which he says helped him overcome diabetes. He wrote a vegan cookbook to promote his personal dietary choices, which he now wants all New Yorkers to follow in order to stop “global warming.”
“We already know that a plant-powered diet is better for your physical and mental health, and I am living proof of that,” Adams declared. “But the reality is that thanks to this new inventory, we’re finding out it is better for the planet.”
The simplistic way in which Adams couched his argument against meat and dairy has already been debunked by people who are actually educated in such things, including Melissa McKendree, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State University.
“Different meats have different kinds of greenhouse gas footprints,” McKendree clarified about how pasture-raised animals do not harm the environment like feedlot animals do. “All land is not created equal.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text attackes mayor Eric Adams and his staff underlining how their plans to make all New Yorkers become vegans is harmful for the city. According to the article, Adams's plan would harm people's health and is based on no evidence | false | 0.826275 | 4 | EN_CC_200021.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures | The article reports about New Your City's mayor's initiative to control the amount of meat people consume. The author calls the mayor incompetent person who goes after people's meat and wants to make everyone vegan forcefeully.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
NYC to begin tracking food purchases to make sure residents don’t consume “too much” meat
Just as he promised to do, New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a left-wing Democrat, is going after people’s meat with new plans to save the world from “climate change” by forcing everyone to become a “plant-based” vegetarian or vegan.
Along with representatives from the Mayor’s Office of Food Policy and the Mayor’s Office of Climate & Environmental Justice, Adams has announced the launch of a new “carbon footprint” and household food consumption tracking scheme that aims to reduce the Big Apple’s “carbon emissions” by 33 percent by the year 2030.
In order to cut all that carbon, Adams and his allies are imposing new “caps on meat” that, as the name suggests, will limit the amount of meat that New Yorkers are allowed to purchase and consume at public institutions – and eventually within their own homes as well.
(Related: Last month, we warned you that Adams was planning to unleash a horrific new food policing apparatus against New Yorkers, and now he has.)
Eric Adams wants all New Yorkers to become vegans
At a pre-Earth Day event held at a Brooklyn culinary center run by NYC Health + Hospitals, the city’s public health care system, Adams unveiled a chart depicting New York City’s greenhouse gas inventory. This inventory supposedly tracks the carbon footprint generated by household food consumption.
With the help of American Express, C40 Cities, and EcoData, Adams revealed carbon emissions data about household food consumption, which was added to existing carbon emissions data on energy use, transportation, and waste.
Commissioner Rohit Aggarwala from the NYC Department of Environmental Protection unveiled the new household food consumption data. Aggarwala, by the way, also founded the Google smart city subsidiary Sidewalk Labs, which collects data in order to forge “a new standard for what cities have to do” as a novel way to shape policy.
While the inventory that Aggarwala presented will also now include greenhouse gas “pollution” from the production and consumption of consumer goods like clothing, air travel, and health care, Adams focused his efforts at the event specifically on the foods that New Yorkers consume – mainly meat and dairy, which he personally opposes.
“Food is the third-biggest source of cities’ emissions right after buildings and transportation, but all food is not created equal,” Adams unsubstantially stated. “The vast majority of food that is contributing to our emission crisis lies in meat and dairy products.”
“It is easy to talk about the emissions that’s coming from buildings and how it impacts our environment, but we now have to talk about beef. And I don’t know if people are ready for this conversation.”
Other than fish, Adams reportedly abides by a “plant-based” vegan diet, which he says helped him overcome diabetes. He wrote a vegan cookbook to promote his personal dietary choices, which he now wants all New Yorkers to follow in order to stop “global warming.”
“We already know that a plant-powered diet is better for your physical and mental health, and I am living proof of that,” Adams declared. “But the reality is that thanks to this new inventory, we’re finding out it is better for the planet.”
The simplistic way in which Adams couched his argument against meat and dairy has already been debunked by people who are actually educated in such things, including Melissa McKendree, PhD, an agricultural economist at Michigan State University.
“Different meats have different kinds of greenhouse gas footprints,” McKendree clarified about how pasture-raised animals do not harm the environment like feedlot animals do. “All land is not created equal.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents multiple paragraphs underlinging how NYC mayor Eric Adams is imposing measures to tackle CO2 emissions which are considered unreasonable and ineffective. The author targets the mayor with personal attacks and accusing him of pursuing a political agenda while at the same time trying to attack other prominent people linked to him, suggesting collusion | false | 0.826275 | 5 | EN_CC_200021.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of political organizations and figures | The article reports about New Your City's mayor's initiative to control the amount of meat people consume. The author calls the mayor incompetent person who goes after people's meat and wants to make everyone vegan forcefeully.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
EU’s top diplomat angry at Hungarian FM for labeling EU ‘pro-war’
Josep Borrell, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, called Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó’s accusation that the European Union is “pro-war” completely unacceptable,
“This is totally unacceptable. The European Union is not in favor of war. The European Union is not on the side of war,” Borrell said, adding that the EU is supporting Ukraine in its war against aggression by Russia and wants to end the war in accordance with the UN Charter.
Borrell also said the “unacceptable approach” of the Hungarian government regarding Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s visit to Moscow and Kyiv would be discussed at a separate meeting on Monday.
Borrell noted that member states should be looking at how investment and funding could help Ukraine, such as by restoring its damaged electricity infrastructure as soon as possible and providing additional air defense systems.
“These are the two most important things right now,” he stressed.
Borrell also commented on the opinion issued by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ), which was delivered on Friday, according to which Israel’s settlement policy and use of natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territories violate international law and Israel must pay reparations to the Palestinians for the damage caused by the occupation.
He said that these conclusions were largely in line with the EU position, which he said was fully consistent with UN resolutions on the status of the occupied Palestinian territories.
“At a time of continuing and increasing violations of international law, we have a moral duty to reaffirm consistently our unwavering commitment to all the rulings of the International Court of Justice, whatever the case in question,” Borrell said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article presenting several paragraphs in which Western countries are described as acting appropriately regarding the situation in Ukraine. They are described as supporting Ukraine and applying sanctions against Russia. | true | 0.838725 | 1 | EN_UA_028520.txt | URW: Overpraising the West | URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history | The text presents a paragraph in which the EU and the West are described as doing the right thing in supporting Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
EU’s top diplomat angry at Hungarian FM for labeling EU ‘pro-war’
Josep Borrell, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, called Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó’s accusation that the European Union is “pro-war” completely unacceptable,
“This is totally unacceptable. The European Union is not in favor of war. The European Union is not on the side of war,” Borrell said, adding that the EU is supporting Ukraine in its war against aggression by Russia and wants to end the war in accordance with the UN Charter.
Borrell also said the “unacceptable approach” of the Hungarian government regarding Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s visit to Moscow and Kyiv would be discussed at a separate meeting on Monday.
Borrell noted that member states should be looking at how investment and funding could help Ukraine, such as by restoring its damaged electricity infrastructure as soon as possible and providing additional air defense systems.
“These are the two most important things right now,” he stressed.
Borrell also commented on the opinion issued by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ), which was delivered on Friday, according to which Israel’s settlement policy and use of natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territories violate international law and Israel must pay reparations to the Palestinians for the damage caused by the occupation.
He said that these conclusions were largely in line with the EU position, which he said was fully consistent with UN resolutions on the status of the occupied Palestinian territories.
“At a time of continuing and increasing violations of international law, we have a moral duty to reaffirm consistently our unwavering commitment to all the rulings of the International Court of Justice, whatever the case in question,” Borrell said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has several paragraphs praising Western countries and the EU for supporting Ukraine and respecting international laws, while accusing Russia of violating it. | true | 0.82909 | 2 | EN_UA_028520.txt | URW: Overpraising the West | URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history | The text presents a paragraph in which the EU and the West are described as doing the right thing in supporting Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
EU’s top diplomat angry at Hungarian FM for labeling EU ‘pro-war’
Josep Borrell, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, called Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó’s accusation that the European Union is “pro-war” completely unacceptable,
“This is totally unacceptable. The European Union is not in favor of war. The European Union is not on the side of war,” Borrell said, adding that the EU is supporting Ukraine in its war against aggression by Russia and wants to end the war in accordance with the UN Charter.
Borrell also said the “unacceptable approach” of the Hungarian government regarding Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s visit to Moscow and Kyiv would be discussed at a separate meeting on Monday.
Borrell noted that member states should be looking at how investment and funding could help Ukraine, such as by restoring its damaged electricity infrastructure as soon as possible and providing additional air defense systems.
“These are the two most important things right now,” he stressed.
Borrell also commented on the opinion issued by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ), which was delivered on Friday, according to which Israel’s settlement policy and use of natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territories violate international law and Israel must pay reparations to the Palestinians for the damage caused by the occupation.
He said that these conclusions were largely in line with the EU position, which he said was fully consistent with UN resolutions on the status of the occupied Palestinian territories.
“At a time of continuing and increasing violations of international law, we have a moral duty to reaffirm consistently our unwavering commitment to all the rulings of the International Court of Justice, whatever the case in question,” Borrell said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text adopts multiple paragraphs praising EU and international community's help to Ukraine. According to the text, Hungary's attempt to frame the EU as being pro-war is described as unacceptable and contradictory. | false | 0.826711 | 3 | EN_UA_028520.txt | URW: Overpraising the West | URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history | The text presents a paragraph in which the EU and the West are described as doing the right thing in supporting Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
EU’s top diplomat angry at Hungarian FM for labeling EU ‘pro-war’
Josep Borrell, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, called Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó’s accusation that the European Union is “pro-war” completely unacceptable,
“This is totally unacceptable. The European Union is not in favor of war. The European Union is not on the side of war,” Borrell said, adding that the EU is supporting Ukraine in its war against aggression by Russia and wants to end the war in accordance with the UN Charter.
Borrell also said the “unacceptable approach” of the Hungarian government regarding Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s visit to Moscow and Kyiv would be discussed at a separate meeting on Monday.
Borrell noted that member states should be looking at how investment and funding could help Ukraine, such as by restoring its damaged electricity infrastructure as soon as possible and providing additional air defense systems.
“These are the two most important things right now,” he stressed.
Borrell also commented on the opinion issued by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ), which was delivered on Friday, according to which Israel’s settlement policy and use of natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territories violate international law and Israel must pay reparations to the Palestinians for the damage caused by the occupation.
He said that these conclusions were largely in line with the EU position, which he said was fully consistent with UN resolutions on the status of the occupied Palestinian territories.
“At a time of continuing and increasing violations of international law, we have a moral duty to reaffirm consistently our unwavering commitment to all the rulings of the International Court of Justice, whatever the case in question,” Borrell said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticises Hungary for accusing the EU of being "pro-war". It emphasies that the EU is providing support to Ukraine as well as being in line with UN resolutions, which makes it impossible that the EU would be considered being in the wrong side of history | false | 0.821411 | 4 | EN_UA_028520.txt | URW: Overpraising the West | URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history | The text presents a paragraph in which the EU and the West are described as doing the right thing in supporting Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
EU’s top diplomat angry at Hungarian FM for labeling EU ‘pro-war’
Josep Borrell, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, called Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó’s accusation that the European Union is “pro-war” completely unacceptable,
“This is totally unacceptable. The European Union is not in favor of war. The European Union is not on the side of war,” Borrell said, adding that the EU is supporting Ukraine in its war against aggression by Russia and wants to end the war in accordance with the UN Charter.
Borrell also said the “unacceptable approach” of the Hungarian government regarding Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s visit to Moscow and Kyiv would be discussed at a separate meeting on Monday.
Borrell noted that member states should be looking at how investment and funding could help Ukraine, such as by restoring its damaged electricity infrastructure as soon as possible and providing additional air defense systems.
“These are the two most important things right now,” he stressed.
Borrell also commented on the opinion issued by the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ), which was delivered on Friday, according to which Israel’s settlement policy and use of natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territories violate international law and Israel must pay reparations to the Palestinians for the damage caused by the occupation.
He said that these conclusions were largely in line with the EU position, which he said was fully consistent with UN resolutions on the status of the occupied Palestinian territories.
“At a time of continuing and increasing violations of international law, we have a moral duty to reaffirm consistently our unwavering commitment to all the rulings of the International Court of Justice, whatever the case in question,” Borrell said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article accusing Hungarian FM of being pro-war since he described EU as supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia. | false | 0.817179 | 5 | EN_UA_028520.txt | URW: Overpraising the West | URW: Overpraising the West: The West belongs in the right side of history | The text presents a paragraph in which the EU and the West are described as doing the right thing in supporting Ukraine
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
from Liberty Sentinel: Tyrants at the United Nations are eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meat and, through live animal stem cells, manufacture lab grown meat, explains Debbie Bacigalupi, a cattle rancher in Northern California. “When you say they are coming after me, and they are coming after my family, and […]
Source: https://www.sgtreport.com/2023/12/united-nations-cop28-climate-summit-takes-aim-at-american-farmers-says-rancher/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticises UN's COP28 climate conference alleging that it promotes climate alarmism which aims at imposing meat-restrictions while infringing upon personal liberties. | true | 0.815268 | 1 | EN_CC_100050.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities | The author calls the UN a tyrant, saying that it is eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meant.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
from Liberty Sentinel: Tyrants at the United Nations are eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meat and, through live animal stem cells, manufacture lab grown meat, explains Debbie Bacigalupi, a cattle rancher in Northern California. “When you say they are coming after me, and they are coming after my family, and […]
Source: https://www.sgtreport.com/2023/12/united-nations-cop28-climate-summit-takes-aim-at-american-farmers-says-rancher/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Multiple paragraphs describe the UN as an incompetent and corrupt organization attempting to push a failed climate agenda | true | 0.815268 | 2 | EN_CC_100050.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities | The author calls the UN a tyrant, saying that it is eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meant.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
from Liberty Sentinel: Tyrants at the United Nations are eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meat and, through live animal stem cells, manufacture lab grown meat, explains Debbie Bacigalupi, a cattle rancher in Northern California. “When you say they are coming after me, and they are coming after my family, and […]
Source: https://www.sgtreport.com/2023/12/united-nations-cop28-climate-summit-takes-aim-at-american-farmers-says-rancher/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs depict the UN climate movement as threatening US farmers and attacking them. | false | 0.815268 | 3 | EN_CC_100050.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities | The author calls the UN a tyrant, saying that it is eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meant.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
from Liberty Sentinel: Tyrants at the United Nations are eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meat and, through live animal stem cells, manufacture lab grown meat, explains Debbie Bacigalupi, a cattle rancher in Northern California. “When you say they are coming after me, and they are coming after my family, and […]
Source: https://www.sgtreport.com/2023/12/united-nations-cop28-climate-summit-takes-aim-at-american-farmers-says-rancher/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Multiple paragraphs within the text present alleged evidence that international institutions such as the UN and the COP27 are attempting to ban meat and attack famers, using alarmist words such as "eager" and "war". | false | 0.815268 | 4 | EN_CC_100050.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities | The author calls the UN a tyrant, saying that it is eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meant.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
United Nations COP28 ‘Climate’ Summit Takes Aim at American Farmers, Says Rancher
from Liberty Sentinel: Tyrants at the United Nations are eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meat and, through live animal stem cells, manufacture lab grown meat, explains Debbie Bacigalupi, a cattle rancher in Northern California. “When you say they are coming after me, and they are coming after my family, and […]
Source: https://www.sgtreport.com/2023/12/united-nations-cop28-climate-summit-takes-aim-at-american-farmers-says-rancher/
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticises the UN claiming that it wants to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meat. The text also calls UN officials "tyrants". | false | 0.815268 | 5 | EN_CC_100050.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of international entities | The author calls the UN a tyrant, saying that it is eager to wage war on farmers by trying to ban meant.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Fonda Heads To Canada For Oil Sands Protest, Manages To Tick Everyone Off
Actress Jane Fonda’s latest performance as a climate change activist drew a slew of criticism as she protested the Alberta oil sands in the Canadian province.
Fonda was castigated by locals, ambushed by a social media reporter and criticized by a left-leaning provincial premier. On Wednesday, at an Edmonton, Alberta news conference, she condemned a fellow-progressive, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, saying that “people shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking Liberals,” and accused him of “betraying” the Paris climate agreement.
Fonda claimed that, like President Barack Obama, her first impression of Trudeau was one of admiration: “When I heard that your prime minister, the shining hope at the … Paris climate talks, who talked so beautifully about needing to meet the requirements of the climate treaty, and respect and hold to the treaties with the Indigenous people, and so forth — such a heroic stance he took there,” Fonda said. “And yet he has betrayed every one of the things that he committed to in Paris.
“I guess the lesson is we shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking liberals, no matter how well spoken they are. What a disappointment.”
But there was disappointment in the remarks of Alberta’s premier, Rachel Notley, who leads the left-leaning provincial New Democratic Party. She called Fonda “tone deaf” and “ill-informed.”
Fonda received an invitation from the Alberta government to discuss the oil sands but she refused.
“I would suggest if someone was going to come to Alberta … [and] fly over a city that is going through a significant economic downturn, that’s just been through the largest natural disaster in the history of Canada, and then lecture them about where they should get jobs elsewhere, first of all, that’s super tone deaf,” Notley said.
On the first day of her oil sands protest, as she strolled through nearby Fort McMurray, Fonda was ambushed by social media reporter Robbie Picard.
Picard, who hosts the Facebook group OilSands Strong, peppered Fonda with questions about the oil sands, asking her if she was aware of how many First Nations businesses have invested money in the project.
The episode was captured on video by a CBC journalist who was attempting to interview the actress. Fonda did not address any of the questions but insisted, “I’m on your side.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text attacks climate movement activists such as Jane Fonda for supposedly not caring about the economic situation of the places that are affected by the measures against CO2 emissions. It says that Fonda is "tone deaf" and "ill-informed". | true | 0.815485 | 1 | EN_CC_100003.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists | The text criticises promiment climate activists such as Jane Fonda within the context of Canada's situation, accusing here of not being properly informed and acting in a wrong way.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Fonda Heads To Canada For Oil Sands Protest, Manages To Tick Everyone Off
Actress Jane Fonda’s latest performance as a climate change activist drew a slew of criticism as she protested the Alberta oil sands in the Canadian province.
Fonda was castigated by locals, ambushed by a social media reporter and criticized by a left-leaning provincial premier. On Wednesday, at an Edmonton, Alberta news conference, she condemned a fellow-progressive, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, saying that “people shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking Liberals,” and accused him of “betraying” the Paris climate agreement.
Fonda claimed that, like President Barack Obama, her first impression of Trudeau was one of admiration: “When I heard that your prime minister, the shining hope at the … Paris climate talks, who talked so beautifully about needing to meet the requirements of the climate treaty, and respect and hold to the treaties with the Indigenous people, and so forth — such a heroic stance he took there,” Fonda said. “And yet he has betrayed every one of the things that he committed to in Paris.
“I guess the lesson is we shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking liberals, no matter how well spoken they are. What a disappointment.”
But there was disappointment in the remarks of Alberta’s premier, Rachel Notley, who leads the left-leaning provincial New Democratic Party. She called Fonda “tone deaf” and “ill-informed.”
Fonda received an invitation from the Alberta government to discuss the oil sands but she refused.
“I would suggest if someone was going to come to Alberta … [and] fly over a city that is going through a significant economic downturn, that’s just been through the largest natural disaster in the history of Canada, and then lecture them about where they should get jobs elsewhere, first of all, that’s super tone deaf,” Notley said.
On the first day of her oil sands protest, as she strolled through nearby Fort McMurray, Fonda was ambushed by social media reporter Robbie Picard.
Picard, who hosts the Facebook group OilSands Strong, peppered Fonda with questions about the oil sands, asking her if she was aware of how many First Nations businesses have invested money in the project.
The episode was captured on video by a CBC journalist who was attempting to interview the actress. Fonda did not address any of the questions but insisted, “I’m on your side.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout the text, climate activist Jane Fonda is accused of not knowing the facts about the case and being incompetent | true | 0.815485 | 2 | EN_CC_100003.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists | The text criticises promiment climate activists such as Jane Fonda within the context of Canada's situation, accusing here of not being properly informed and acting in a wrong way.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Fonda Heads To Canada For Oil Sands Protest, Manages To Tick Everyone Off
Actress Jane Fonda’s latest performance as a climate change activist drew a slew of criticism as she protested the Alberta oil sands in the Canadian province.
Fonda was castigated by locals, ambushed by a social media reporter and criticized by a left-leaning provincial premier. On Wednesday, at an Edmonton, Alberta news conference, she condemned a fellow-progressive, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, saying that “people shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking Liberals,” and accused him of “betraying” the Paris climate agreement.
Fonda claimed that, like President Barack Obama, her first impression of Trudeau was one of admiration: “When I heard that your prime minister, the shining hope at the … Paris climate talks, who talked so beautifully about needing to meet the requirements of the climate treaty, and respect and hold to the treaties with the Indigenous people, and so forth — such a heroic stance he took there,” Fonda said. “And yet he has betrayed every one of the things that he committed to in Paris.
“I guess the lesson is we shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking liberals, no matter how well spoken they are. What a disappointment.”
But there was disappointment in the remarks of Alberta’s premier, Rachel Notley, who leads the left-leaning provincial New Democratic Party. She called Fonda “tone deaf” and “ill-informed.”
Fonda received an invitation from the Alberta government to discuss the oil sands but she refused.
“I would suggest if someone was going to come to Alberta … [and] fly over a city that is going through a significant economic downturn, that’s just been through the largest natural disaster in the history of Canada, and then lecture them about where they should get jobs elsewhere, first of all, that’s super tone deaf,” Notley said.
On the first day of her oil sands protest, as she strolled through nearby Fort McMurray, Fonda was ambushed by social media reporter Robbie Picard.
Picard, who hosts the Facebook group OilSands Strong, peppered Fonda with questions about the oil sands, asking her if she was aware of how many First Nations businesses have invested money in the project.
The episode was captured on video by a CBC journalist who was attempting to interview the actress. Fonda did not address any of the questions but insisted, “I’m on your side.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text talks about prominent climate activists that adopted an allegedly extreme stance that is criticized by many, including members of the same political faction. The overall atmosphere of the text is that the climate movement is weak because it has been infiltrated by people with bad intentions and ulterior motives | false | 0.815485 | 3 | EN_CC_100003.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists | The text criticises promiment climate activists such as Jane Fonda within the context of Canada's situation, accusing here of not being properly informed and acting in a wrong way.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Fonda Heads To Canada For Oil Sands Protest, Manages To Tick Everyone Off
Actress Jane Fonda’s latest performance as a climate change activist drew a slew of criticism as she protested the Alberta oil sands in the Canadian province.
Fonda was castigated by locals, ambushed by a social media reporter and criticized by a left-leaning provincial premier. On Wednesday, at an Edmonton, Alberta news conference, she condemned a fellow-progressive, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, saying that “people shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking Liberals,” and accused him of “betraying” the Paris climate agreement.
Fonda claimed that, like President Barack Obama, her first impression of Trudeau was one of admiration: “When I heard that your prime minister, the shining hope at the … Paris climate talks, who talked so beautifully about needing to meet the requirements of the climate treaty, and respect and hold to the treaties with the Indigenous people, and so forth — such a heroic stance he took there,” Fonda said. “And yet he has betrayed every one of the things that he committed to in Paris.
“I guess the lesson is we shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking liberals, no matter how well spoken they are. What a disappointment.”
But there was disappointment in the remarks of Alberta’s premier, Rachel Notley, who leads the left-leaning provincial New Democratic Party. She called Fonda “tone deaf” and “ill-informed.”
Fonda received an invitation from the Alberta government to discuss the oil sands but she refused.
“I would suggest if someone was going to come to Alberta … [and] fly over a city that is going through a significant economic downturn, that’s just been through the largest natural disaster in the history of Canada, and then lecture them about where they should get jobs elsewhere, first of all, that’s super tone deaf,” Notley said.
On the first day of her oil sands protest, as she strolled through nearby Fort McMurray, Fonda was ambushed by social media reporter Robbie Picard.
Picard, who hosts the Facebook group OilSands Strong, peppered Fonda with questions about the oil sands, asking her if she was aware of how many First Nations businesses have invested money in the project.
The episode was captured on video by a CBC journalist who was attempting to interview the actress. Fonda did not address any of the questions but insisted, “I’m on your side.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has multiple paragraphs criticising climate activist Jane Fonda. The author questions the sincerity of her activism since she lives in the US and is not properly informed about the situation of Canadian oil sands. | false | 0.815485 | 4 | EN_CC_100003.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists | The text criticises promiment climate activists such as Jane Fonda within the context of Canada's situation, accusing here of not being properly informed and acting in a wrong way.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Fonda Heads To Canada For Oil Sands Protest, Manages To Tick Everyone Off
Actress Jane Fonda’s latest performance as a climate change activist drew a slew of criticism as she protested the Alberta oil sands in the Canadian province.
Fonda was castigated by locals, ambushed by a social media reporter and criticized by a left-leaning provincial premier. On Wednesday, at an Edmonton, Alberta news conference, she condemned a fellow-progressive, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, saying that “people shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking Liberals,” and accused him of “betraying” the Paris climate agreement.
Fonda claimed that, like President Barack Obama, her first impression of Trudeau was one of admiration: “When I heard that your prime minister, the shining hope at the … Paris climate talks, who talked so beautifully about needing to meet the requirements of the climate treaty, and respect and hold to the treaties with the Indigenous people, and so forth — such a heroic stance he took there,” Fonda said. “And yet he has betrayed every one of the things that he committed to in Paris.
“I guess the lesson is we shouldn’t be fooled by good-looking liberals, no matter how well spoken they are. What a disappointment.”
But there was disappointment in the remarks of Alberta’s premier, Rachel Notley, who leads the left-leaning provincial New Democratic Party. She called Fonda “tone deaf” and “ill-informed.”
Fonda received an invitation from the Alberta government to discuss the oil sands but she refused.
“I would suggest if someone was going to come to Alberta … [and] fly over a city that is going through a significant economic downturn, that’s just been through the largest natural disaster in the history of Canada, and then lecture them about where they should get jobs elsewhere, first of all, that’s super tone deaf,” Notley said.
On the first day of her oil sands protest, as she strolled through nearby Fort McMurray, Fonda was ambushed by social media reporter Robbie Picard.
Picard, who hosts the Facebook group OilSands Strong, peppered Fonda with questions about the oil sands, asking her if she was aware of how many First Nations businesses have invested money in the project.
The episode was captured on video by a CBC journalist who was attempting to interview the actress. Fonda did not address any of the questions but insisted, “I’m on your side.”
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author questions the motivation of an important climate activist, accusing her of being hypocritical for not being informed about the complex reality of the Canadian oil sands | false | 0.815485 | 5 | EN_CC_100003.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Ad hominem attacks on key activists | The text criticises promiment climate activists such as Jane Fonda within the context of Canada's situation, accusing here of not being properly informed and acting in a wrong way.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Authored by Citizen Soldier via RealClearDefense,
All Aboard! Here comes the latest Postwar Gravy Train, laden with massive government spending, lax oversight and other goodies for cunning contractors and economic opportunists seeking to benefit from the near-destruction of Ukraine.
Last week, the State Department announced it intends to seize Russian assets in the United States to help fund rebuilding efforts, though the estimated $300 billion here and in Europe won’t cover the projected price tag of $500 billion. “What Putin destroyed, Russia should – must – pay to rebuild,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said.
Like an earlier generation of interventionists, Blinken cites the “Pottery Barn rule” – You Break It, You Own It – to explain an aggressor’s moral obligation to rebuild. Colin Powell used the same reasoning in the summer of 2002, as a "caution" to President George W. Bush about the consequences of military action in Iraq. A major difference is the dollars at stake. American and European firms undoubtedly are eager to reconstruct a modern, high-tech country from the ground up.
Our government seeks every opportunity to impose itself, at home and abroad, but has a poor track record for managing projects.
No-bid contract awards, bribes and billions of missing dollars are the legacy of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s rebuilding work in Iraq, where officials concluded that not enough was accomplished for the amount of funds expended. We learned that when taxpayer money is plentiful, oversight and results will be negligible. Just imagine how generous and hands-off our government might be spending Russia’s money.
Not everyone endorses the act of confiscating Russia’s money, pointing to the principle of reciprocity as a reason to show restraint. “Stealing” the assets of a foreign country sets a dangerous precedent that could be applied against us. For example, what if China confiscates American assets to fund rebuilding projects in Libya, Iraq or other nations the United States has damaged through war?
The DC hype-meisters talk about the Great Power Competition of wannabe superpowers; they tell us that China is on the brink of becoming the dominant international force, that Russia is preparing to seize all of Europe. Here, though, the façade falls away—the elites believe the United States has no economic or military peers. When you’re as rich and mighty as America, there’s no fear of reciprocity.
The elites will do what’s in the immediate best interest of their friends, which include certain corporations and investors who will benefit from the most extensive international project since World War II. For this group, the only morality is a morality of power: Treating other nations the way you want to be treated is a rule for losers and weaker players.
Blinken and the politicians talk about our categorical imperative in Ukraine, how the world relies on America to “defend democracy” and “protect the rules-based order.” But their words ring hollow. The cynical truth is that what Russia breaks, America will take—using confiscated money to fund a massive rebuilding project that will be poorly managed, but lucrative for the chosen few involved.
Citizen Soldier believes in life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout the text, Ukraine and the Western allies are negatively mentioned multiple times. The text adopt an allegedly moral standpoint while accusing Western countries of not caring about Ukraine and of being hypocrites for advocating for the respect of international law. The text also adopt an allegedly anti-war stance, arguing that the reconstruction plan is only benefitial to corporations that would take advantage of the situation | true | 0.824048 | 1 | EN_UA_100411.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests | The text has some paragraphs depicting the US and the West as profiting from the situation in Ukraine, especially thanks to the reconstructions plans. In doing so, they negatively mention what the US has done in Iraq
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Authored by Citizen Soldier via RealClearDefense,
All Aboard! Here comes the latest Postwar Gravy Train, laden with massive government spending, lax oversight and other goodies for cunning contractors and economic opportunists seeking to benefit from the near-destruction of Ukraine.
Last week, the State Department announced it intends to seize Russian assets in the United States to help fund rebuilding efforts, though the estimated $300 billion here and in Europe won’t cover the projected price tag of $500 billion. “What Putin destroyed, Russia should – must – pay to rebuild,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said.
Like an earlier generation of interventionists, Blinken cites the “Pottery Barn rule” – You Break It, You Own It – to explain an aggressor’s moral obligation to rebuild. Colin Powell used the same reasoning in the summer of 2002, as a "caution" to President George W. Bush about the consequences of military action in Iraq. A major difference is the dollars at stake. American and European firms undoubtedly are eager to reconstruct a modern, high-tech country from the ground up.
Our government seeks every opportunity to impose itself, at home and abroad, but has a poor track record for managing projects.
No-bid contract awards, bribes and billions of missing dollars are the legacy of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s rebuilding work in Iraq, where officials concluded that not enough was accomplished for the amount of funds expended. We learned that when taxpayer money is plentiful, oversight and results will be negligible. Just imagine how generous and hands-off our government might be spending Russia’s money.
Not everyone endorses the act of confiscating Russia’s money, pointing to the principle of reciprocity as a reason to show restraint. “Stealing” the assets of a foreign country sets a dangerous precedent that could be applied against us. For example, what if China confiscates American assets to fund rebuilding projects in Libya, Iraq or other nations the United States has damaged through war?
The DC hype-meisters talk about the Great Power Competition of wannabe superpowers; they tell us that China is on the brink of becoming the dominant international force, that Russia is preparing to seize all of Europe. Here, though, the façade falls away—the elites believe the United States has no economic or military peers. When you’re as rich and mighty as America, there’s no fear of reciprocity.
The elites will do what’s in the immediate best interest of their friends, which include certain corporations and investors who will benefit from the most extensive international project since World War II. For this group, the only morality is a morality of power: Treating other nations the way you want to be treated is a rule for losers and weaker players.
Blinken and the politicians talk about our categorical imperative in Ukraine, how the world relies on America to “defend democracy” and “protect the rules-based order.” But their words ring hollow. The cynical truth is that what Russia breaks, America will take—using confiscated money to fund a massive rebuilding project that will be poorly managed, but lucrative for the chosen few involved.
Citizen Soldier believes in life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article says the US is only doing what's in its best interest. It also mentions a poor management of funds | true | 0.824048 | 2 | EN_UA_100411.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests | The text has some paragraphs depicting the US and the West as profiting from the situation in Ukraine, especially thanks to the reconstructions plans. In doing so, they negatively mention what the US has done in Iraq
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Authored by Citizen Soldier via RealClearDefense,
All Aboard! Here comes the latest Postwar Gravy Train, laden with massive government spending, lax oversight and other goodies for cunning contractors and economic opportunists seeking to benefit from the near-destruction of Ukraine.
Last week, the State Department announced it intends to seize Russian assets in the United States to help fund rebuilding efforts, though the estimated $300 billion here and in Europe won’t cover the projected price tag of $500 billion. “What Putin destroyed, Russia should – must – pay to rebuild,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said.
Like an earlier generation of interventionists, Blinken cites the “Pottery Barn rule” – You Break It, You Own It – to explain an aggressor’s moral obligation to rebuild. Colin Powell used the same reasoning in the summer of 2002, as a "caution" to President George W. Bush about the consequences of military action in Iraq. A major difference is the dollars at stake. American and European firms undoubtedly are eager to reconstruct a modern, high-tech country from the ground up.
Our government seeks every opportunity to impose itself, at home and abroad, but has a poor track record for managing projects.
No-bid contract awards, bribes and billions of missing dollars are the legacy of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s rebuilding work in Iraq, where officials concluded that not enough was accomplished for the amount of funds expended. We learned that when taxpayer money is plentiful, oversight and results will be negligible. Just imagine how generous and hands-off our government might be spending Russia’s money.
Not everyone endorses the act of confiscating Russia’s money, pointing to the principle of reciprocity as a reason to show restraint. “Stealing” the assets of a foreign country sets a dangerous precedent that could be applied against us. For example, what if China confiscates American assets to fund rebuilding projects in Libya, Iraq or other nations the United States has damaged through war?
The DC hype-meisters talk about the Great Power Competition of wannabe superpowers; they tell us that China is on the brink of becoming the dominant international force, that Russia is preparing to seize all of Europe. Here, though, the façade falls away—the elites believe the United States has no economic or military peers. When you’re as rich and mighty as America, there’s no fear of reciprocity.
The elites will do what’s in the immediate best interest of their friends, which include certain corporations and investors who will benefit from the most extensive international project since World War II. For this group, the only morality is a morality of power: Treating other nations the way you want to be treated is a rule for losers and weaker players.
Blinken and the politicians talk about our categorical imperative in Ukraine, how the world relies on America to “defend democracy” and “protect the rules-based order.” But their words ring hollow. The cynical truth is that what Russia breaks, America will take—using confiscated money to fund a massive rebuilding project that will be poorly managed, but lucrative for the chosen few involved.
Citizen Soldier believes in life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author has a conversation with the US administration, claiming that it's wrong to take Russia's money to fund Ukraine's reconstruction, as it would be beneficial only to US investors. | false | 0.824048 | 3 | EN_UA_100411.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests | The text has some paragraphs depicting the US and the West as profiting from the situation in Ukraine, especially thanks to the reconstructions plans. In doing so, they negatively mention what the US has done in Iraq
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Authored by Citizen Soldier via RealClearDefense,
All Aboard! Here comes the latest Postwar Gravy Train, laden with massive government spending, lax oversight and other goodies for cunning contractors and economic opportunists seeking to benefit from the near-destruction of Ukraine.
Last week, the State Department announced it intends to seize Russian assets in the United States to help fund rebuilding efforts, though the estimated $300 billion here and in Europe won’t cover the projected price tag of $500 billion. “What Putin destroyed, Russia should – must – pay to rebuild,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said.
Like an earlier generation of interventionists, Blinken cites the “Pottery Barn rule” – You Break It, You Own It – to explain an aggressor’s moral obligation to rebuild. Colin Powell used the same reasoning in the summer of 2002, as a "caution" to President George W. Bush about the consequences of military action in Iraq. A major difference is the dollars at stake. American and European firms undoubtedly are eager to reconstruct a modern, high-tech country from the ground up.
Our government seeks every opportunity to impose itself, at home and abroad, but has a poor track record for managing projects.
No-bid contract awards, bribes and billions of missing dollars are the legacy of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s rebuilding work in Iraq, where officials concluded that not enough was accomplished for the amount of funds expended. We learned that when taxpayer money is plentiful, oversight and results will be negligible. Just imagine how generous and hands-off our government might be spending Russia’s money.
Not everyone endorses the act of confiscating Russia’s money, pointing to the principle of reciprocity as a reason to show restraint. “Stealing” the assets of a foreign country sets a dangerous precedent that could be applied against us. For example, what if China confiscates American assets to fund rebuilding projects in Libya, Iraq or other nations the United States has damaged through war?
The DC hype-meisters talk about the Great Power Competition of wannabe superpowers; they tell us that China is on the brink of becoming the dominant international force, that Russia is preparing to seize all of Europe. Here, though, the façade falls away—the elites believe the United States has no economic or military peers. When you’re as rich and mighty as America, there’s no fear of reciprocity.
The elites will do what’s in the immediate best interest of their friends, which include certain corporations and investors who will benefit from the most extensive international project since World War II. For this group, the only morality is a morality of power: Treating other nations the way you want to be treated is a rule for losers and weaker players.
Blinken and the politicians talk about our categorical imperative in Ukraine, how the world relies on America to “defend democracy” and “protect the rules-based order.” But their words ring hollow. The cynical truth is that what Russia breaks, America will take—using confiscated money to fund a massive rebuilding project that will be poorly managed, but lucrative for the chosen few involved.
Citizen Soldier believes in life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article says US and allies want to rebuild Ukraine underlining the negative aspects of this strategy. Article presents several paragraphs underlining US inefficiency in Iraq. US is presented as the main aggressor. | false | 0.824048 | 4 | EN_UA_100411.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests | The text has some paragraphs depicting the US and the West as profiting from the situation in Ukraine, especially thanks to the reconstructions plans. In doing so, they negatively mention what the US has done in Iraq
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Ukraine: You Break It, We Take It
Authored by Citizen Soldier via RealClearDefense,
All Aboard! Here comes the latest Postwar Gravy Train, laden with massive government spending, lax oversight and other goodies for cunning contractors and economic opportunists seeking to benefit from the near-destruction of Ukraine.
Last week, the State Department announced it intends to seize Russian assets in the United States to help fund rebuilding efforts, though the estimated $300 billion here and in Europe won’t cover the projected price tag of $500 billion. “What Putin destroyed, Russia should – must – pay to rebuild,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said.
Like an earlier generation of interventionists, Blinken cites the “Pottery Barn rule” – You Break It, You Own It – to explain an aggressor’s moral obligation to rebuild. Colin Powell used the same reasoning in the summer of 2002, as a "caution" to President George W. Bush about the consequences of military action in Iraq. A major difference is the dollars at stake. American and European firms undoubtedly are eager to reconstruct a modern, high-tech country from the ground up.
Our government seeks every opportunity to impose itself, at home and abroad, but has a poor track record for managing projects.
No-bid contract awards, bribes and billions of missing dollars are the legacy of the Coalition Provisional Authority’s rebuilding work in Iraq, where officials concluded that not enough was accomplished for the amount of funds expended. We learned that when taxpayer money is plentiful, oversight and results will be negligible. Just imagine how generous and hands-off our government might be spending Russia’s money.
Not everyone endorses the act of confiscating Russia’s money, pointing to the principle of reciprocity as a reason to show restraint. “Stealing” the assets of a foreign country sets a dangerous precedent that could be applied against us. For example, what if China confiscates American assets to fund rebuilding projects in Libya, Iraq or other nations the United States has damaged through war?
The DC hype-meisters talk about the Great Power Competition of wannabe superpowers; they tell us that China is on the brink of becoming the dominant international force, that Russia is preparing to seize all of Europe. Here, though, the façade falls away—the elites believe the United States has no economic or military peers. When you’re as rich and mighty as America, there’s no fear of reciprocity.
The elites will do what’s in the immediate best interest of their friends, which include certain corporations and investors who will benefit from the most extensive international project since World War II. For this group, the only morality is a morality of power: Treating other nations the way you want to be treated is a rule for losers and weaker players.
Blinken and the politicians talk about our categorical imperative in Ukraine, how the world relies on America to “defend democracy” and “protect the rules-based order.” But their words ring hollow. The cynical truth is that what Russia breaks, America will take—using confiscated money to fund a massive rebuilding project that will be poorly managed, but lucrative for the chosen few involved.
Citizen Soldier believes in life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has several paragraphs in which the US and the West are blamed for having the wrong intentions in Ukraine, not caring about Ukraine but only using it as an opportunity to make profits through reconstruction plans while at the same time poorly managing funds. | false | 0.824048 | 5 | EN_UA_100411.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: The West does not care about Ukraine, only about its interests | The text has some paragraphs depicting the US and the West as profiting from the situation in Ukraine, especially thanks to the reconstructions plans. In doing so, they negatively mention what the US has done in Iraq
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Kremlin warns of tensions if Poland sends troops to monitor Finnish-Russian border
If Finland decides to allow a “concentration” of troops on its border with Russia, it would be viewed by Moscow as a threat, the Kremlin said, after Poland offered to send military advisers to help Helsinki monitor the frontier.
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Jacek Siewiera, said in a post on social media X that Poland would send military advisers to its NATO ally Finland, in response to “an official request for allied support in the face of a hybrid attack on the Finnish border”.
“A team of military advisers will provide on-site knowledge on border security, also in operational terms,” he said.
Finland said on Thursday it was unaware of the Polish offer. It has closed its entire 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia for two weeks in a bid to halt an unusually large flow of asylum seekers that Helsinki says amounts to a “hybrid attack” orchestrated by Moscow, a charge the Kremlin denies.
Asked about the Polish offer to Finland during a call with reporters, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “This is an absolutely redundant measure to ensure border security because there is no threat there.”
“The Finns must be clearly aware that this will pose a threat to us - an increase in the concentration of military units on our borders.”
Any planned deployment would be unprovoked and unjustified, said Peskov.
Finland’s Border Guard and the interior ministry both said they were unaware of any plan to bring Polish military advisers to Finland’s eastern border.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto held talks with his Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda in Warsaw last week but they did not discuss military cooperation on the Finnish border with Russia, Niinisto’s office said in a statement to Reuters.
Finland infuriated Russia earlier this year when it joined NATO, ending decades of military non-alignment, due to the war in Ukraine.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a narrative in which Finland and Poland are portrayed as posing a threat to Russia. | true | 0.82671 | 1 | EN_UA_021872.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Several paragraphs depict Western countries as posing a threat to Russia. This aspect is underlined by the declarations of Russian officials in relation to the intensification of Finnish border security.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Kremlin warns of tensions if Poland sends troops to monitor Finnish-Russian border
If Finland decides to allow a “concentration” of troops on its border with Russia, it would be viewed by Moscow as a threat, the Kremlin said, after Poland offered to send military advisers to help Helsinki monitor the frontier.
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Jacek Siewiera, said in a post on social media X that Poland would send military advisers to its NATO ally Finland, in response to “an official request for allied support in the face of a hybrid attack on the Finnish border”.
“A team of military advisers will provide on-site knowledge on border security, also in operational terms,” he said.
Finland said on Thursday it was unaware of the Polish offer. It has closed its entire 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia for two weeks in a bid to halt an unusually large flow of asylum seekers that Helsinki says amounts to a “hybrid attack” orchestrated by Moscow, a charge the Kremlin denies.
Asked about the Polish offer to Finland during a call with reporters, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “This is an absolutely redundant measure to ensure border security because there is no threat there.”
“The Finns must be clearly aware that this will pose a threat to us - an increase in the concentration of military units on our borders.”
Any planned deployment would be unprovoked and unjustified, said Peskov.
Finland’s Border Guard and the interior ministry both said they were unaware of any plan to bring Polish military advisers to Finland’s eastern border.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto held talks with his Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda in Warsaw last week but they did not discuss military cooperation on the Finnish border with Russia, Niinisto’s office said in a statement to Reuters.
Finland infuriated Russia earlier this year when it joined NATO, ending decades of military non-alignment, due to the war in Ukraine.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| In this text, several paragraphs have the function of suggesting that Finland's military decision to close its border with Russia as well as the eventual acceptance of military advisors from Poland are unjustified. The text underlines multiple times that the Finnish border with Russia is safe, indicating that Finland is adopting military measures for no reason and therefore posing a threat to Russia. | true | 0.823492 | 2 | EN_UA_021872.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Several paragraphs depict Western countries as posing a threat to Russia. This aspect is underlined by the declarations of Russian officials in relation to the intensification of Finnish border security.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Kremlin warns of tensions if Poland sends troops to monitor Finnish-Russian border
If Finland decides to allow a “concentration” of troops on its border with Russia, it would be viewed by Moscow as a threat, the Kremlin said, after Poland offered to send military advisers to help Helsinki monitor the frontier.
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Jacek Siewiera, said in a post on social media X that Poland would send military advisers to its NATO ally Finland, in response to “an official request for allied support in the face of a hybrid attack on the Finnish border”.
“A team of military advisers will provide on-site knowledge on border security, also in operational terms,” he said.
Finland said on Thursday it was unaware of the Polish offer. It has closed its entire 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia for two weeks in a bid to halt an unusually large flow of asylum seekers that Helsinki says amounts to a “hybrid attack” orchestrated by Moscow, a charge the Kremlin denies.
Asked about the Polish offer to Finland during a call with reporters, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “This is an absolutely redundant measure to ensure border security because there is no threat there.”
“The Finns must be clearly aware that this will pose a threat to us - an increase in the concentration of military units on our borders.”
Any planned deployment would be unprovoked and unjustified, said Peskov.
Finland’s Border Guard and the interior ministry both said they were unaware of any plan to bring Polish military advisers to Finland’s eastern border.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto held talks with his Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda in Warsaw last week but they did not discuss military cooperation on the Finnish border with Russia, Niinisto’s office said in a statement to Reuters.
Finland infuriated Russia earlier this year when it joined NATO, ending decades of military non-alignment, due to the war in Ukraine.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs question Finnish security decisions claiming that it is Russia who is under threat | false | 0.823489 | 3 | EN_UA_021872.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Several paragraphs depict Western countries as posing a threat to Russia. This aspect is underlined by the declarations of Russian officials in relation to the intensification of Finnish border security.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Kremlin warns of tensions if Poland sends troops to monitor Finnish-Russian border
If Finland decides to allow a “concentration” of troops on its border with Russia, it would be viewed by Moscow as a threat, the Kremlin said, after Poland offered to send military advisers to help Helsinki monitor the frontier.
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Jacek Siewiera, said in a post on social media X that Poland would send military advisers to its NATO ally Finland, in response to “an official request for allied support in the face of a hybrid attack on the Finnish border”.
“A team of military advisers will provide on-site knowledge on border security, also in operational terms,” he said.
Finland said on Thursday it was unaware of the Polish offer. It has closed its entire 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia for two weeks in a bid to halt an unusually large flow of asylum seekers that Helsinki says amounts to a “hybrid attack” orchestrated by Moscow, a charge the Kremlin denies.
Asked about the Polish offer to Finland during a call with reporters, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “This is an absolutely redundant measure to ensure border security because there is no threat there.”
“The Finns must be clearly aware that this will pose a threat to us - an increase in the concentration of military units on our borders.”
Any planned deployment would be unprovoked and unjustified, said Peskov.
Finland’s Border Guard and the interior ministry both said they were unaware of any plan to bring Polish military advisers to Finland’s eastern border.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto held talks with his Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda in Warsaw last week but they did not discuss military cooperation on the Finnish border with Russia, Niinisto’s office said in a statement to Reuters.
Finland infuriated Russia earlier this year when it joined NATO, ending decades of military non-alignment, due to the war in Ukraine.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article talks about tensions between Finland and Russia, and how there's a possibility of Finnish forces to threaten Russian borders. The article follows an attempt by Polish military advisers to help Finnish border security, something that according to Russia will be seen as a threat to them. | false | 0.821027 | 4 | EN_UA_021872.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Several paragraphs depict Western countries as posing a threat to Russia. This aspect is underlined by the declarations of Russian officials in relation to the intensification of Finnish border security.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Kremlin warns of tensions if Poland sends troops to monitor Finnish-Russian border
If Finland decides to allow a “concentration” of troops on its border with Russia, it would be viewed by Moscow as a threat, the Kremlin said, after Poland offered to send military advisers to help Helsinki monitor the frontier.
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Jacek Siewiera, said in a post on social media X that Poland would send military advisers to its NATO ally Finland, in response to “an official request for allied support in the face of a hybrid attack on the Finnish border”.
“A team of military advisers will provide on-site knowledge on border security, also in operational terms,” he said.
Finland said on Thursday it was unaware of the Polish offer. It has closed its entire 1,340 km (833 mile) border with Russia for two weeks in a bid to halt an unusually large flow of asylum seekers that Helsinki says amounts to a “hybrid attack” orchestrated by Moscow, a charge the Kremlin denies.
Asked about the Polish offer to Finland during a call with reporters, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “This is an absolutely redundant measure to ensure border security because there is no threat there.”
“The Finns must be clearly aware that this will pose a threat to us - an increase in the concentration of military units on our borders.”
Any planned deployment would be unprovoked and unjustified, said Peskov.
Finland’s Border Guard and the interior ministry both said they were unaware of any plan to bring Polish military advisers to Finland’s eastern border.
Finnish President Sauli Niinisto held talks with his Polish counterpart Andrzej Duda in Warsaw last week but they did not discuss military cooperation on the Finnish border with Russia, Niinisto’s office said in a statement to Reuters.
Finland infuriated Russia earlier this year when it joined NATO, ending decades of military non-alignment, due to the war in Ukraine.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article reports that if Finland decides to allow a "concentration" of troops on its border with Russia, it would be viewed by Moscow as a threat. Russia blames Western countries for provoking it. | false | 0.819625 | 5 | EN_UA_021872.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Several paragraphs depict Western countries as posing a threat to Russia. This aspect is underlined by the declarations of Russian officials in relation to the intensification of Finnish border security.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday showed up in Kiev during an unannounced visit, and at an awkward moment for US-Ukraine relations given President Zelensky has been publicly complaining over a decrease in artillery shell supplies, given they are now going to Israel for its war in Gaza.
"I was honored to meet with President @ZelenskyyUa in Kyiv today to reaffirm the United States’ steadfast support for Ukraine," Austin wrote on X. "We, along with our allies and partners, will continue to support Ukraine’s urgent battlefield needs and long-term defense requirements," Austin added.
This convenient shift of Washington and the Pentagon to talking mainly about "long-term defense" began occurring as it became clear Ukraine's counteroffensive was failing.
But Congress has been dragging its feet on passing Biden's latest supplemental funding requests - again given there's been some wrangling over what gets sent to Israel vs. what's set aside for Ukraine.
This is Austin's second trip to Kiev since the Russian invasion. "I’m here today to deliver an important message – the United States will continue to stand with Ukraine in their fight for freedom against Russia’s aggression, both now and into the future," he said.
Just last week, CIA Director William Burns also made a secretive, unannounced visit to Ukraine to hold urgent meetings with Zelensky and top military and intelligence officials. Commentary in Asia Times has concluded that this flurry of activity is in response to how badly things are going on the battlefield. Washington has invested many tens of billions of dollars into what's clearly a 'proxy war' against Russia. Asia Times wrote:
Wednesday, November 15th is Z-Day for the War in Ukraine. CIA Chief William Burns will arrive in Kiev for urgent, secret meetings with Zelensky. It is worth asking: How come Burns is on an urgent mission to Ukraine?
The answer to the question is that Ukraine is imploding. The crumbling of the Zelensky regime is unsurprising: Ukraine has been sustaining far too many casualties to survive for much longer. Ukraine either must find a way to make a deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion.
Indeed, there have been recent media rumors and rumblings that Washington has begun to quietly push Kiev to the negotiating table. Was this in any way the focus of these new visits by Burns and Austin?
"The Russian strategy is to bleed-down Ukraine’s armed forces and create a political crisis in Kiev," the Asia Times report continued. "The Russian effort is ahead of schedule, which has surprised Moscow as much as Washington."
Zelensky has lately sacked and replaced many within his own war cabinet. All of this is a sign of deepening friction, also as Zelensky has admitted that the Gaza crisis has taken the international attention off of Ukraine's war efforts. This has led to waning monetary and weapons support as well.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs within the text underline that Western support for Ukraine has reached its limits. Western countries are either reluctant or incompetent | true | 0.805885 | 1 | EN_UA_021123.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine | The text presents a narrative depicting the Ukraine's Western allies as withdrawing their support, suggesting that they prioritize their interests according the evolving geopolitical scenario
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday showed up in Kiev during an unannounced visit, and at an awkward moment for US-Ukraine relations given President Zelensky has been publicly complaining over a decrease in artillery shell supplies, given they are now going to Israel for its war in Gaza.
"I was honored to meet with President @ZelenskyyUa in Kyiv today to reaffirm the United States’ steadfast support for Ukraine," Austin wrote on X. "We, along with our allies and partners, will continue to support Ukraine’s urgent battlefield needs and long-term defense requirements," Austin added.
This convenient shift of Washington and the Pentagon to talking mainly about "long-term defense" began occurring as it became clear Ukraine's counteroffensive was failing.
But Congress has been dragging its feet on passing Biden's latest supplemental funding requests - again given there's been some wrangling over what gets sent to Israel vs. what's set aside for Ukraine.
This is Austin's second trip to Kiev since the Russian invasion. "I’m here today to deliver an important message – the United States will continue to stand with Ukraine in their fight for freedom against Russia’s aggression, both now and into the future," he said.
Just last week, CIA Director William Burns also made a secretive, unannounced visit to Ukraine to hold urgent meetings with Zelensky and top military and intelligence officials. Commentary in Asia Times has concluded that this flurry of activity is in response to how badly things are going on the battlefield. Washington has invested many tens of billions of dollars into what's clearly a 'proxy war' against Russia. Asia Times wrote:
Wednesday, November 15th is Z-Day for the War in Ukraine. CIA Chief William Burns will arrive in Kiev for urgent, secret meetings with Zelensky. It is worth asking: How come Burns is on an urgent mission to Ukraine?
The answer to the question is that Ukraine is imploding. The crumbling of the Zelensky regime is unsurprising: Ukraine has been sustaining far too many casualties to survive for much longer. Ukraine either must find a way to make a deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion.
Indeed, there have been recent media rumors and rumblings that Washington has begun to quietly push Kiev to the negotiating table. Was this in any way the focus of these new visits by Burns and Austin?
"The Russian strategy is to bleed-down Ukraine’s armed forces and create a political crisis in Kiev," the Asia Times report continued. "The Russian effort is ahead of schedule, which has surprised Moscow as much as Washington."
Zelensky has lately sacked and replaced many within his own war cabinet. All of this is a sign of deepening friction, also as Zelensky has admitted that the Gaza crisis has taken the international attention off of Ukraine's war efforts. This has led to waning monetary and weapons support as well.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs together suggest that Western allies are tired of Ukraine's war efforts, giving the fact that they are providing less military aid | true | 0.805885 | 2 | EN_UA_021123.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine | The text presents a narrative depicting the Ukraine's Western allies as withdrawing their support, suggesting that they prioritize their interests according the evolving geopolitical scenario
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday showed up in Kiev during an unannounced visit, and at an awkward moment for US-Ukraine relations given President Zelensky has been publicly complaining over a decrease in artillery shell supplies, given they are now going to Israel for its war in Gaza.
"I was honored to meet with President @ZelenskyyUa in Kyiv today to reaffirm the United States’ steadfast support for Ukraine," Austin wrote on X. "We, along with our allies and partners, will continue to support Ukraine’s urgent battlefield needs and long-term defense requirements," Austin added.
This convenient shift of Washington and the Pentagon to talking mainly about "long-term defense" began occurring as it became clear Ukraine's counteroffensive was failing.
But Congress has been dragging its feet on passing Biden's latest supplemental funding requests - again given there's been some wrangling over what gets sent to Israel vs. what's set aside for Ukraine.
This is Austin's second trip to Kiev since the Russian invasion. "I’m here today to deliver an important message – the United States will continue to stand with Ukraine in their fight for freedom against Russia’s aggression, both now and into the future," he said.
Just last week, CIA Director William Burns also made a secretive, unannounced visit to Ukraine to hold urgent meetings with Zelensky and top military and intelligence officials. Commentary in Asia Times has concluded that this flurry of activity is in response to how badly things are going on the battlefield. Washington has invested many tens of billions of dollars into what's clearly a 'proxy war' against Russia. Asia Times wrote:
Wednesday, November 15th is Z-Day for the War in Ukraine. CIA Chief William Burns will arrive in Kiev for urgent, secret meetings with Zelensky. It is worth asking: How come Burns is on an urgent mission to Ukraine?
The answer to the question is that Ukraine is imploding. The crumbling of the Zelensky regime is unsurprising: Ukraine has been sustaining far too many casualties to survive for much longer. Ukraine either must find a way to make a deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion.
Indeed, there have been recent media rumors and rumblings that Washington has begun to quietly push Kiev to the negotiating table. Was this in any way the focus of these new visits by Burns and Austin?
"The Russian strategy is to bleed-down Ukraine’s armed forces and create a political crisis in Kiev," the Asia Times report continued. "The Russian effort is ahead of schedule, which has surprised Moscow as much as Washington."
Zelensky has lately sacked and replaced many within his own war cabinet. All of this is a sign of deepening friction, also as Zelensky has admitted that the Gaza crisis has taken the international attention off of Ukraine's war efforts. This has led to waning monetary and weapons support as well.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs report that Ukraine's western allies have less and less interest in supporting Ukraine, blaming them for being more interested in their own geostrategic goals than the just war of Ukraine. The text adopt a Russinan perspective on the Ukrainian situation, especially blaming the US for fueling the conflict in the first place. | false | 0.805885 | 3 | EN_UA_021123.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine | The text presents a narrative depicting the Ukraine's Western allies as withdrawing their support, suggesting that they prioritize their interests according the evolving geopolitical scenario
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday showed up in Kiev during an unannounced visit, and at an awkward moment for US-Ukraine relations given President Zelensky has been publicly complaining over a decrease in artillery shell supplies, given they are now going to Israel for its war in Gaza.
"I was honored to meet with President @ZelenskyyUa in Kyiv today to reaffirm the United States’ steadfast support for Ukraine," Austin wrote on X. "We, along with our allies and partners, will continue to support Ukraine’s urgent battlefield needs and long-term defense requirements," Austin added.
This convenient shift of Washington and the Pentagon to talking mainly about "long-term defense" began occurring as it became clear Ukraine's counteroffensive was failing.
But Congress has been dragging its feet on passing Biden's latest supplemental funding requests - again given there's been some wrangling over what gets sent to Israel vs. what's set aside for Ukraine.
This is Austin's second trip to Kiev since the Russian invasion. "I’m here today to deliver an important message – the United States will continue to stand with Ukraine in their fight for freedom against Russia’s aggression, both now and into the future," he said.
Just last week, CIA Director William Burns also made a secretive, unannounced visit to Ukraine to hold urgent meetings with Zelensky and top military and intelligence officials. Commentary in Asia Times has concluded that this flurry of activity is in response to how badly things are going on the battlefield. Washington has invested many tens of billions of dollars into what's clearly a 'proxy war' against Russia. Asia Times wrote:
Wednesday, November 15th is Z-Day for the War in Ukraine. CIA Chief William Burns will arrive in Kiev for urgent, secret meetings with Zelensky. It is worth asking: How come Burns is on an urgent mission to Ukraine?
The answer to the question is that Ukraine is imploding. The crumbling of the Zelensky regime is unsurprising: Ukraine has been sustaining far too many casualties to survive for much longer. Ukraine either must find a way to make a deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion.
Indeed, there have been recent media rumors and rumblings that Washington has begun to quietly push Kiev to the negotiating table. Was this in any way the focus of these new visits by Burns and Austin?
"The Russian strategy is to bleed-down Ukraine’s armed forces and create a political crisis in Kiev," the Asia Times report continued. "The Russian effort is ahead of schedule, which has surprised Moscow as much as Washington."
Zelensky has lately sacked and replaced many within his own war cabinet. All of this is a sign of deepening friction, also as Zelensky has admitted that the Gaza crisis has taken the international attention off of Ukraine's war efforts. This has led to waning monetary and weapons support as well.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs highlight how Ukraine's allies are reluctant to provide further help, pointing to the diminishing outcomes on the battlefield as well as domestic political problems within Ukraine | false | 0.805885 | 4 | EN_UA_021123.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine | The text presents a narrative depicting the Ukraine's Western allies as withdrawing their support, suggesting that they prioritize their interests according the evolving geopolitical scenario
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
CIA's Burns & SecDef Austin In Separate 'Urgent' Trips To Ukraine As War Effort Implodes
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin on Monday showed up in Kiev during an unannounced visit, and at an awkward moment for US-Ukraine relations given President Zelensky has been publicly complaining over a decrease in artillery shell supplies, given they are now going to Israel for its war in Gaza.
"I was honored to meet with President @ZelenskyyUa in Kyiv today to reaffirm the United States’ steadfast support for Ukraine," Austin wrote on X. "We, along with our allies and partners, will continue to support Ukraine’s urgent battlefield needs and long-term defense requirements," Austin added.
This convenient shift of Washington and the Pentagon to talking mainly about "long-term defense" began occurring as it became clear Ukraine's counteroffensive was failing.
But Congress has been dragging its feet on passing Biden's latest supplemental funding requests - again given there's been some wrangling over what gets sent to Israel vs. what's set aside for Ukraine.
This is Austin's second trip to Kiev since the Russian invasion. "I’m here today to deliver an important message – the United States will continue to stand with Ukraine in their fight for freedom against Russia’s aggression, both now and into the future," he said.
Just last week, CIA Director William Burns also made a secretive, unannounced visit to Ukraine to hold urgent meetings with Zelensky and top military and intelligence officials. Commentary in Asia Times has concluded that this flurry of activity is in response to how badly things are going on the battlefield. Washington has invested many tens of billions of dollars into what's clearly a 'proxy war' against Russia. Asia Times wrote:
Wednesday, November 15th is Z-Day for the War in Ukraine. CIA Chief William Burns will arrive in Kiev for urgent, secret meetings with Zelensky. It is worth asking: How come Burns is on an urgent mission to Ukraine?
The answer to the question is that Ukraine is imploding. The crumbling of the Zelensky regime is unsurprising: Ukraine has been sustaining far too many casualties to survive for much longer. Ukraine either must find a way to make a deal with Russia or face an internal rebellion.
Indeed, there have been recent media rumors and rumblings that Washington has begun to quietly push Kiev to the negotiating table. Was this in any way the focus of these new visits by Burns and Austin?
"The Russian strategy is to bleed-down Ukraine’s armed forces and create a political crisis in Kiev," the Asia Times report continued. "The Russian effort is ahead of schedule, which has surprised Moscow as much as Washington."
Zelensky has lately sacked and replaced many within his own war cabinet. All of this is a sign of deepening friction, also as Zelensky has admitted that the Gaza crisis has taken the international attention off of Ukraine's war efforts. This has led to waning monetary and weapons support as well.
</document>
<category>
URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout all the text, it is highlighted the Ukraine's effort to counter attack Russia's army is not working. Indeed, there are several paragraphs in which Washington and the West are considered weak or not reliable partners | false | 0.805885 | 5 | EN_UA_021123.txt | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy | URW: Discrediting the West, Diplomacy: West is tired of Ukraine | The text presents a narrative depicting the Ukraine's Western allies as withdrawing their support, suggesting that they prioritize their interests according the evolving geopolitical scenario
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
UK Intelligence Experts Concerned Russia Will Use ‘Fabricated’ Chemical Weapons Claims in ‘False-Flag’ Attack on Ukraine
UK intelligence experts are concerned that Russia will use “fabricated” claims regarding chemical weapons in Ukraine to move forward with a “false-flag operation.”
“Russia could possibly be planning to use chemical or biological weapons in a ‘false-flag’ operation. Such an operation could take the form of a faked attack, a staged ‘discovery’ of agents or munitions, or fabricated evidence of alleged Ukrainian planning to use such weapons,” officials said, adding that such a “false-flag” attack would “almost certainly be accompanied by extensive disinformation to complicate attribution.”
Officials added that intelligence suggests that Moscow had likely intended to use false-flag operations as justification for its invasion of neighboring Ukraine on Feb. 24.
However, analysts believe that the narrative is part of the Kremlin’s plan to create a false-flag operation in an attempt to justify using chemical weapons operations in Ukraine itself.
Yet both the United States and Ukraine maintain that the laboratories seek to prevent bioweapons and pathogens, a project backed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, an agency within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
In response to Russia’s allegations, State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that the disinformation being spread by Russia is “total nonsense and not the first time Russia has invented such false claims against another country.”
The UK Ministry of Defence’s report comes as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned on March 13 that the Kremlin might use chemical or biological weapons in its invasion of Ukraine, which would amount to a war crime.
The NATO Secretary General echoed comments by the UK’s Ministry of Defense that Russia could be using the claims to create a false pretext to justify its actions.
“Now that these false claims have been made, we must remain vigilant because it is possible that Russia itself could plan chemical weapons operations under this fabrication of lies. That would be a war crime,” Price said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs together create a narrative of Russia preparing the use of chemical weapons, underlining the dangers for Ukraine but also for Western countries | true | 0.828798 | 1 | EN_UA_102054.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | throughout the text, it is suggested that Russia will use chemical weapons in Ukraine, ampifying the fear of the use of unconventional dangerous weapons
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
UK Intelligence Experts Concerned Russia Will Use ‘Fabricated’ Chemical Weapons Claims in ‘False-Flag’ Attack on Ukraine
UK intelligence experts are concerned that Russia will use “fabricated” claims regarding chemical weapons in Ukraine to move forward with a “false-flag operation.”
“Russia could possibly be planning to use chemical or biological weapons in a ‘false-flag’ operation. Such an operation could take the form of a faked attack, a staged ‘discovery’ of agents or munitions, or fabricated evidence of alleged Ukrainian planning to use such weapons,” officials said, adding that such a “false-flag” attack would “almost certainly be accompanied by extensive disinformation to complicate attribution.”
Officials added that intelligence suggests that Moscow had likely intended to use false-flag operations as justification for its invasion of neighboring Ukraine on Feb. 24.
However, analysts believe that the narrative is part of the Kremlin’s plan to create a false-flag operation in an attempt to justify using chemical weapons operations in Ukraine itself.
Yet both the United States and Ukraine maintain that the laboratories seek to prevent bioweapons and pathogens, a project backed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, an agency within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
In response to Russia’s allegations, State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that the disinformation being spread by Russia is “total nonsense and not the first time Russia has invented such false claims against another country.”
The UK Ministry of Defence’s report comes as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned on March 13 that the Kremlin might use chemical or biological weapons in its invasion of Ukraine, which would amount to a war crime.
The NATO Secretary General echoed comments by the UK’s Ministry of Defense that Russia could be using the claims to create a false pretext to justify its actions.
“Now that these false claims have been made, we must remain vigilant because it is possible that Russia itself could plan chemical weapons operations under this fabrication of lies. That would be a war crime,” Price said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a sense of fear towards possible use of chemical weapons by Russian forces. In doing so, the text also questions Russian intents and eventually calls Russian claims of Ukrainian attempts to develop biological weapons as part of US efforts false. | true | 0.828318 | 2 | EN_UA_102054.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | throughout the text, it is suggested that Russia will use chemical weapons in Ukraine, ampifying the fear of the use of unconventional dangerous weapons
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
UK Intelligence Experts Concerned Russia Will Use ‘Fabricated’ Chemical Weapons Claims in ‘False-Flag’ Attack on Ukraine
UK intelligence experts are concerned that Russia will use “fabricated” claims regarding chemical weapons in Ukraine to move forward with a “false-flag operation.”
“Russia could possibly be planning to use chemical or biological weapons in a ‘false-flag’ operation. Such an operation could take the form of a faked attack, a staged ‘discovery’ of agents or munitions, or fabricated evidence of alleged Ukrainian planning to use such weapons,” officials said, adding that such a “false-flag” attack would “almost certainly be accompanied by extensive disinformation to complicate attribution.”
Officials added that intelligence suggests that Moscow had likely intended to use false-flag operations as justification for its invasion of neighboring Ukraine on Feb. 24.
However, analysts believe that the narrative is part of the Kremlin’s plan to create a false-flag operation in an attempt to justify using chemical weapons operations in Ukraine itself.
Yet both the United States and Ukraine maintain that the laboratories seek to prevent bioweapons and pathogens, a project backed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, an agency within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
In response to Russia’s allegations, State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that the disinformation being spread by Russia is “total nonsense and not the first time Russia has invented such false claims against another country.”
The UK Ministry of Defence’s report comes as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned on March 13 that the Kremlin might use chemical or biological weapons in its invasion of Ukraine, which would amount to a war crime.
The NATO Secretary General echoed comments by the UK’s Ministry of Defense that Russia could be using the claims to create a false pretext to justify its actions.
“Now that these false claims have been made, we must remain vigilant because it is possible that Russia itself could plan chemical weapons operations under this fabrication of lies. That would be a war crime,” Price said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout several paragraphs, the text presents quotes and arguments amplifying fears that Russia will eventually use chemical weapons in Ukraine, eventually suggesting the operation is part of the Kremlin's plan to justify its war | false | 0.82781 | 3 | EN_UA_102054.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | throughout the text, it is suggested that Russia will use chemical weapons in Ukraine, ampifying the fear of the use of unconventional dangerous weapons
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
UK Intelligence Experts Concerned Russia Will Use ‘Fabricated’ Chemical Weapons Claims in ‘False-Flag’ Attack on Ukraine
UK intelligence experts are concerned that Russia will use “fabricated” claims regarding chemical weapons in Ukraine to move forward with a “false-flag operation.”
“Russia could possibly be planning to use chemical or biological weapons in a ‘false-flag’ operation. Such an operation could take the form of a faked attack, a staged ‘discovery’ of agents or munitions, or fabricated evidence of alleged Ukrainian planning to use such weapons,” officials said, adding that such a “false-flag” attack would “almost certainly be accompanied by extensive disinformation to complicate attribution.”
Officials added that intelligence suggests that Moscow had likely intended to use false-flag operations as justification for its invasion of neighboring Ukraine on Feb. 24.
However, analysts believe that the narrative is part of the Kremlin’s plan to create a false-flag operation in an attempt to justify using chemical weapons operations in Ukraine itself.
Yet both the United States and Ukraine maintain that the laboratories seek to prevent bioweapons and pathogens, a project backed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, an agency within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
In response to Russia’s allegations, State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that the disinformation being spread by Russia is “total nonsense and not the first time Russia has invented such false claims against another country.”
The UK Ministry of Defence’s report comes as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned on March 13 that the Kremlin might use chemical or biological weapons in its invasion of Ukraine, which would amount to a war crime.
The NATO Secretary General echoed comments by the UK’s Ministry of Defense that Russia could be using the claims to create a false pretext to justify its actions.
“Now that these false claims have been made, we must remain vigilant because it is possible that Russia itself could plan chemical weapons operations under this fabrication of lies. That would be a war crime,” Price said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author argues that the use of chemical weapons would constitute a war crime. Furthermore, the author also highlights that Russia is likely behind the allegations in an effort to justify their use of chemical weapons. | false | 0.823599 | 4 | EN_UA_102054.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | throughout the text, it is suggested that Russia will use chemical weapons in Ukraine, ampifying the fear of the use of unconventional dangerous weapons
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
UK Intelligence Experts Concerned Russia Will Use ‘Fabricated’ Chemical Weapons Claims in ‘False-Flag’ Attack on Ukraine
UK intelligence experts are concerned that Russia will use “fabricated” claims regarding chemical weapons in Ukraine to move forward with a “false-flag operation.”
“Russia could possibly be planning to use chemical or biological weapons in a ‘false-flag’ operation. Such an operation could take the form of a faked attack, a staged ‘discovery’ of agents or munitions, or fabricated evidence of alleged Ukrainian planning to use such weapons,” officials said, adding that such a “false-flag” attack would “almost certainly be accompanied by extensive disinformation to complicate attribution.”
Officials added that intelligence suggests that Moscow had likely intended to use false-flag operations as justification for its invasion of neighboring Ukraine on Feb. 24.
However, analysts believe that the narrative is part of the Kremlin’s plan to create a false-flag operation in an attempt to justify using chemical weapons operations in Ukraine itself.
Yet both the United States and Ukraine maintain that the laboratories seek to prevent bioweapons and pathogens, a project backed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, an agency within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
In response to Russia’s allegations, State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that the disinformation being spread by Russia is “total nonsense and not the first time Russia has invented such false claims against another country.”
The UK Ministry of Defence’s report comes as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg warned on March 13 that the Kremlin might use chemical or biological weapons in its invasion of Ukraine, which would amount to a war crime.
The NATO Secretary General echoed comments by the UK’s Ministry of Defense that Russia could be using the claims to create a false pretext to justify its actions.
“Now that these false claims have been made, we must remain vigilant because it is possible that Russia itself could plan chemical weapons operations under this fabrication of lies. That would be a war crime,” Price said.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article mentioning that Russia could use chemical weapons in Ukraine as it's alleged that false-flag operations were carried out by Russia in the past. | false | 0.822638 | 5 | EN_UA_102054.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | throughout the text, it is suggested that Russia will use chemical weapons in Ukraine, ampifying the fear of the use of unconventional dangerous weapons
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Putin’s allies call for London to be ‘turned to dust’ after Ukraine said it would use Brit missiles to blitz Crimea
KREMLIN propagandists have called for London to be “turned to dust” after Ukraine said it would use British missiles.
The deranged ranting was part of a nightly show dedicated to pro-war discussion on state TV that’s hosted by a notorious Putin acolyte.
Last night’s show featured discussion of a report in The Sun saying Kyiv said it would use the Storm Shadow missile if the UK was willing to provide it.
At one point host Vladimir Solovyov bizarrely raised his hand as if to cast a spell, then stared manically at the camera and said: “London will turn to dust! To dust.”
Mad Vlad's mouthpiece, his face twisted with rage, then switches to English and begins shouting: “Burn in hell!” and “Flames!”
Solovyov was responding to a panellist who made a wildly exaggerated claim about a news story published by The Sun.
READ MORE ON THE SUN
He fumed: “The British press is saying ‘We’ll give them hell! I’m quoting verbatim from their most popular paper The Sun.
“They all regard this as completely fine - ‘Russians can and need to be killed’. They’re saying that constantly.
“There’s one problem with Russians. They won’t give up as easily as that.”
The clip and its translation was tweeted by BBC Monitoring, which regularly posts on pro-Kremlin propaganda shows.
Most read in The Sun
It comes after Volodymyr Zelensky asked for 600mph British missiles when he visited the UK recently with a shopping list of weapons.
Ukrainian defence sources Kyiv would be prepared to use the missiles to strike Crimea
It followed a warning from Zelensky that longer-range weapons from western allies would allow Ukraine to take the battle to areas occupied by Russian.
"It will allow us to make the evil completely retreat from our country by destroying its airbases deep in the occupied territories,” he said during his visit.
In response, Rishi Sunak said “nothing is off the table” when it comes to military support for Ukraine.
The Government is still weighing up whether to send deadly Harpoon anti-ship missiles or surface-to-air Storm Shadows to arm Ukrainian defenders.
After Germany finally agree to send tanks, Solovyov, and other Kremlin propagandists threatened nuclear strikes on the West.
In a similar rant he claimed it meant Germany had joined the war.
Solovyov said: "It’s time to send a clear, resolute message that we now consider Germany a direct party to the conflict, rekindling memories of World War Two.
“German tanks appearing [in Ukraine] will definitely mean we consider German territory, military bases and other sites as legitimate targets.”
Raging Moscow TV pundit Yevgeny Satanovsky said warheads should be launched on the German capital Berlin and the country’s parliament, the Bundestag.
“Flat, slightly radioactive, melted-down ground [will remain in its place].”
Ukrainian defenders are bracing for an assault that could include 1,800 tanks, 3,950 armoured vehicles, 400 fighter jets and 300 helicopters incoming from Russia.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
However, NATO’s Secretary-General, Jens Stoltenberg, has said that Russia has already launched its new offensive and was “sending more troops, more weapons, more capabilities”.
Ukraine has been monitoring the military build-up as they continue to plea for Western support.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs suggest that Russia might attack not only Ukraine, but also other countries that provide support to Ukraine, among those the UK, Germany, and NATO. The attack would happen soon, using hypersonic weapons, nuclear or not. | true | 0.808572 | 1 | EN_UA_012234.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries | Several quotes from Russian TV presenters are quoted calling for nuclear attack on London, provoking fear of escalation. Russian position is subsequently framed as weak and isolated.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Putin’s allies call for London to be ‘turned to dust’ after Ukraine said it would use Brit missiles to blitz Crimea
KREMLIN propagandists have called for London to be “turned to dust” after Ukraine said it would use British missiles.
The deranged ranting was part of a nightly show dedicated to pro-war discussion on state TV that’s hosted by a notorious Putin acolyte.
Last night’s show featured discussion of a report in The Sun saying Kyiv said it would use the Storm Shadow missile if the UK was willing to provide it.
At one point host Vladimir Solovyov bizarrely raised his hand as if to cast a spell, then stared manically at the camera and said: “London will turn to dust! To dust.”
Mad Vlad's mouthpiece, his face twisted with rage, then switches to English and begins shouting: “Burn in hell!” and “Flames!”
Solovyov was responding to a panellist who made a wildly exaggerated claim about a news story published by The Sun.
READ MORE ON THE SUN
He fumed: “The British press is saying ‘We’ll give them hell! I’m quoting verbatim from their most popular paper The Sun.
“They all regard this as completely fine - ‘Russians can and need to be killed’. They’re saying that constantly.
“There’s one problem with Russians. They won’t give up as easily as that.”
The clip and its translation was tweeted by BBC Monitoring, which regularly posts on pro-Kremlin propaganda shows.
Most read in The Sun
It comes after Volodymyr Zelensky asked for 600mph British missiles when he visited the UK recently with a shopping list of weapons.
Ukrainian defence sources Kyiv would be prepared to use the missiles to strike Crimea
It followed a warning from Zelensky that longer-range weapons from western allies would allow Ukraine to take the battle to areas occupied by Russian.
"It will allow us to make the evil completely retreat from our country by destroying its airbases deep in the occupied territories,” he said during his visit.
In response, Rishi Sunak said “nothing is off the table” when it comes to military support for Ukraine.
The Government is still weighing up whether to send deadly Harpoon anti-ship missiles or surface-to-air Storm Shadows to arm Ukrainian defenders.
After Germany finally agree to send tanks, Solovyov, and other Kremlin propagandists threatened nuclear strikes on the West.
In a similar rant he claimed it meant Germany had joined the war.
Solovyov said: "It’s time to send a clear, resolute message that we now consider Germany a direct party to the conflict, rekindling memories of World War Two.
“German tanks appearing [in Ukraine] will definitely mean we consider German territory, military bases and other sites as legitimate targets.”
Raging Moscow TV pundit Yevgeny Satanovsky said warheads should be launched on the German capital Berlin and the country’s parliament, the Bundestag.
“Flat, slightly radioactive, melted-down ground [will remain in its place].”
Ukrainian defenders are bracing for an assault that could include 1,800 tanks, 3,950 armoured vehicles, 400 fighter jets and 300 helicopters incoming from Russia.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
However, NATO’s Secretary-General, Jens Stoltenberg, has said that Russia has already launched its new offensive and was “sending more troops, more weapons, more capabilities”.
Ukraine has been monitoring the military build-up as they continue to plea for Western support.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a narrative claiming that Russian military targets will attack other countries such as Germany and the UK in the attempt of escalating the conflict | true | 0.808572 | 2 | EN_UA_012234.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries | Several quotes from Russian TV presenters are quoted calling for nuclear attack on London, provoking fear of escalation. Russian position is subsequently framed as weak and isolated.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Putin’s allies call for London to be ‘turned to dust’ after Ukraine said it would use Brit missiles to blitz Crimea
KREMLIN propagandists have called for London to be “turned to dust” after Ukraine said it would use British missiles.
The deranged ranting was part of a nightly show dedicated to pro-war discussion on state TV that’s hosted by a notorious Putin acolyte.
Last night’s show featured discussion of a report in The Sun saying Kyiv said it would use the Storm Shadow missile if the UK was willing to provide it.
At one point host Vladimir Solovyov bizarrely raised his hand as if to cast a spell, then stared manically at the camera and said: “London will turn to dust! To dust.”
Mad Vlad's mouthpiece, his face twisted with rage, then switches to English and begins shouting: “Burn in hell!” and “Flames!”
Solovyov was responding to a panellist who made a wildly exaggerated claim about a news story published by The Sun.
READ MORE ON THE SUN
He fumed: “The British press is saying ‘We’ll give them hell! I’m quoting verbatim from their most popular paper The Sun.
“They all regard this as completely fine - ‘Russians can and need to be killed’. They’re saying that constantly.
“There’s one problem with Russians. They won’t give up as easily as that.”
The clip and its translation was tweeted by BBC Monitoring, which regularly posts on pro-Kremlin propaganda shows.
Most read in The Sun
It comes after Volodymyr Zelensky asked for 600mph British missiles when he visited the UK recently with a shopping list of weapons.
Ukrainian defence sources Kyiv would be prepared to use the missiles to strike Crimea
It followed a warning from Zelensky that longer-range weapons from western allies would allow Ukraine to take the battle to areas occupied by Russian.
"It will allow us to make the evil completely retreat from our country by destroying its airbases deep in the occupied territories,” he said during his visit.
In response, Rishi Sunak said “nothing is off the table” when it comes to military support for Ukraine.
The Government is still weighing up whether to send deadly Harpoon anti-ship missiles or surface-to-air Storm Shadows to arm Ukrainian defenders.
After Germany finally agree to send tanks, Solovyov, and other Kremlin propagandists threatened nuclear strikes on the West.
In a similar rant he claimed it meant Germany had joined the war.
Solovyov said: "It’s time to send a clear, resolute message that we now consider Germany a direct party to the conflict, rekindling memories of World War Two.
“German tanks appearing [in Ukraine] will definitely mean we consider German territory, military bases and other sites as legitimate targets.”
Raging Moscow TV pundit Yevgeny Satanovsky said warheads should be launched on the German capital Berlin and the country’s parliament, the Bundestag.
“Flat, slightly radioactive, melted-down ground [will remain in its place].”
Ukrainian defenders are bracing for an assault that could include 1,800 tanks, 3,950 armoured vehicles, 400 fighter jets and 300 helicopters incoming from Russia.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
However, NATO’s Secretary-General, Jens Stoltenberg, has said that Russia has already launched its new offensive and was “sending more troops, more weapons, more capabilities”.
Ukraine has been monitoring the military build-up as they continue to plea for Western support.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text talks about Russian's military threat for several paragraphs, especially in passages where Russia is mentioned as well as the West, using words such as attack, threaten. | false | 0.808572 | 3 | EN_UA_012234.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries | Several quotes from Russian TV presenters are quoted calling for nuclear attack on London, provoking fear of escalation. Russian position is subsequently framed as weak and isolated.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Putin’s allies call for London to be ‘turned to dust’ after Ukraine said it would use Brit missiles to blitz Crimea
KREMLIN propagandists have called for London to be “turned to dust” after Ukraine said it would use British missiles.
The deranged ranting was part of a nightly show dedicated to pro-war discussion on state TV that’s hosted by a notorious Putin acolyte.
Last night’s show featured discussion of a report in The Sun saying Kyiv said it would use the Storm Shadow missile if the UK was willing to provide it.
At one point host Vladimir Solovyov bizarrely raised his hand as if to cast a spell, then stared manically at the camera and said: “London will turn to dust! To dust.”
Mad Vlad's mouthpiece, his face twisted with rage, then switches to English and begins shouting: “Burn in hell!” and “Flames!”
Solovyov was responding to a panellist who made a wildly exaggerated claim about a news story published by The Sun.
READ MORE ON THE SUN
He fumed: “The British press is saying ‘We’ll give them hell! I’m quoting verbatim from their most popular paper The Sun.
“They all regard this as completely fine - ‘Russians can and need to be killed’. They’re saying that constantly.
“There’s one problem with Russians. They won’t give up as easily as that.”
The clip and its translation was tweeted by BBC Monitoring, which regularly posts on pro-Kremlin propaganda shows.
Most read in The Sun
It comes after Volodymyr Zelensky asked for 600mph British missiles when he visited the UK recently with a shopping list of weapons.
Ukrainian defence sources Kyiv would be prepared to use the missiles to strike Crimea
It followed a warning from Zelensky that longer-range weapons from western allies would allow Ukraine to take the battle to areas occupied by Russian.
"It will allow us to make the evil completely retreat from our country by destroying its airbases deep in the occupied territories,” he said during his visit.
In response, Rishi Sunak said “nothing is off the table” when it comes to military support for Ukraine.
The Government is still weighing up whether to send deadly Harpoon anti-ship missiles or surface-to-air Storm Shadows to arm Ukrainian defenders.
After Germany finally agree to send tanks, Solovyov, and other Kremlin propagandists threatened nuclear strikes on the West.
In a similar rant he claimed it meant Germany had joined the war.
Solovyov said: "It’s time to send a clear, resolute message that we now consider Germany a direct party to the conflict, rekindling memories of World War Two.
“German tanks appearing [in Ukraine] will definitely mean we consider German territory, military bases and other sites as legitimate targets.”
Raging Moscow TV pundit Yevgeny Satanovsky said warheads should be launched on the German capital Berlin and the country’s parliament, the Bundestag.
“Flat, slightly radioactive, melted-down ground [will remain in its place].”
Ukrainian defenders are bracing for an assault that could include 1,800 tanks, 3,950 armoured vehicles, 400 fighter jets and 300 helicopters incoming from Russia.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
However, NATO’s Secretary-General, Jens Stoltenberg, has said that Russia has already launched its new offensive and was “sending more troops, more weapons, more capabilities”.
Ukraine has been monitoring the military build-up as they continue to plea for Western support.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article reports the aftermath of a Russian state TV show where the presenter is ranting and calling for nuclear strikes on London, implying that it would be a consequence of the West supplying weapons to Ukraine | false | 0.808572 | 4 | EN_UA_012234.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries | Several quotes from Russian TV presenters are quoted calling for nuclear attack on London, provoking fear of escalation. Russian position is subsequently framed as weak and isolated.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Putin’s allies call for London to be ‘turned to dust’ after Ukraine said it would use Brit missiles to blitz Crimea
KREMLIN propagandists have called for London to be “turned to dust” after Ukraine said it would use British missiles.
The deranged ranting was part of a nightly show dedicated to pro-war discussion on state TV that’s hosted by a notorious Putin acolyte.
Last night’s show featured discussion of a report in The Sun saying Kyiv said it would use the Storm Shadow missile if the UK was willing to provide it.
At one point host Vladimir Solovyov bizarrely raised his hand as if to cast a spell, then stared manically at the camera and said: “London will turn to dust! To dust.”
Mad Vlad's mouthpiece, his face twisted with rage, then switches to English and begins shouting: “Burn in hell!” and “Flames!”
Solovyov was responding to a panellist who made a wildly exaggerated claim about a news story published by The Sun.
READ MORE ON THE SUN
He fumed: “The British press is saying ‘We’ll give them hell! I’m quoting verbatim from their most popular paper The Sun.
“They all regard this as completely fine - ‘Russians can and need to be killed’. They’re saying that constantly.
“There’s one problem with Russians. They won’t give up as easily as that.”
The clip and its translation was tweeted by BBC Monitoring, which regularly posts on pro-Kremlin propaganda shows.
Most read in The Sun
It comes after Volodymyr Zelensky asked for 600mph British missiles when he visited the UK recently with a shopping list of weapons.
Ukrainian defence sources Kyiv would be prepared to use the missiles to strike Crimea
It followed a warning from Zelensky that longer-range weapons from western allies would allow Ukraine to take the battle to areas occupied by Russian.
"It will allow us to make the evil completely retreat from our country by destroying its airbases deep in the occupied territories,” he said during his visit.
In response, Rishi Sunak said “nothing is off the table” when it comes to military support for Ukraine.
The Government is still weighing up whether to send deadly Harpoon anti-ship missiles or surface-to-air Storm Shadows to arm Ukrainian defenders.
After Germany finally agree to send tanks, Solovyov, and other Kremlin propagandists threatened nuclear strikes on the West.
In a similar rant he claimed it meant Germany had joined the war.
Solovyov said: "It’s time to send a clear, resolute message that we now consider Germany a direct party to the conflict, rekindling memories of World War Two.
“German tanks appearing [in Ukraine] will definitely mean we consider German territory, military bases and other sites as legitimate targets.”
Raging Moscow TV pundit Yevgeny Satanovsky said warheads should be launched on the German capital Berlin and the country’s parliament, the Bundestag.
“Flat, slightly radioactive, melted-down ground [will remain in its place].”
Ukrainian defenders are bracing for an assault that could include 1,800 tanks, 3,950 armoured vehicles, 400 fighter jets and 300 helicopters incoming from Russia.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
However, NATO’s Secretary-General, Jens Stoltenberg, has said that Russia has already launched its new offensive and was “sending more troops, more weapons, more capabilities”.
Ukraine has been monitoring the military build-up as they continue to plea for Western support.
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article quotes russian propagandists saying that military help to Ukraine will result in attack on UK | false | 0.808572 | 5 | EN_UA_012234.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | URW: Amplifying war-related fears: Russia will also attack other countries | Several quotes from Russian TV presenters are quoted calling for nuclear attack on London, provoking fear of escalation. Russian position is subsequently framed as weak and isolated.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
'Fraud On American Investors': Republicans Plan Crackdown On Woke Investing Following The Midterms
Republican lawmakers will probe the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and large private investors for their role in pushing an environmental agenda throughout the financial sector after the midterm elections.
Republican Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said that investigating the Biden administration and Wall Street’s use of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles will be a major focus of his committee if Republicans gain a majority in the House on Nov. 8, according to The Washington Post. The lawmakers argue that large financial institutions have withheld investment from businesses that they don’t consider to be eco-friendly based on their ESG criteria. (RELATED: Kentucky Officials Demand Proof That State Pension Funds Aren’t Used For Woke Investing)
“My view is that ESG investing is a cancer within our capital markets,” Barr told the Post. “It is a fraud on American investors.”
Barr and other Republicans hope to force SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to answer questions on the agency’s proposed climate disclosure rule, which would require all publicly traded companies to disclose their carbon emissions and climate change risks, the Post reported. The rule could allow climate-focused investors to more easily discern the “climate risks” of certain businesses and pressure them to become more eco-friendly.
Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska introduced a bill in May to combat major investors’ influence and will continue discussing such actions with industry executives, his spokesman told the Post.
“We’ve become the loud noise in their right ear after all the screaming in their left ear,” Republican Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said about GOP efforts to push back against Wall Street firms’ climate-focused investment strategies, according to the Post.
Republican Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri and ranking member on the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions told the Post that he wants to force BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street executives to testify in front of the financial services committee as the three massive money managers have used their financial influence to push companies to adopt their climate agenda and other political movements.
BlackRock, which manages nearly $8 trillion in assets, has been scrutinized by Republican attorneys general and state treasurers over its alleged failure to place the interests of its investors above the firm’s stance on climate change.
The Republicans are expected to take back the House in the midterm elections and will hold a majority in the House Financial Services Committee as well as other committees that can be used to probe the SEC, banks and asset managers.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article talking about Republican investigation of climate related financial practices. Article talks about how companies are being forced to change their business practices according to the climate agenda. Republicans argue that this is a bad practice as it goes against what investor want as well as is not transparent. | true | 0.808832 | 1 | EN_CC_100024.txt | CC: Criticism of climate policies | CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit | The text has several paragraphs criticising climate policies within the US economic context since they are considered an instrument to make profit which companies. These companies would allegedly have deals with the Biden administration
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
'Fraud On American Investors': Republicans Plan Crackdown On Woke Investing Following The Midterms
Republican lawmakers will probe the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and large private investors for their role in pushing an environmental agenda throughout the financial sector after the midterm elections.
Republican Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said that investigating the Biden administration and Wall Street’s use of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles will be a major focus of his committee if Republicans gain a majority in the House on Nov. 8, according to The Washington Post. The lawmakers argue that large financial institutions have withheld investment from businesses that they don’t consider to be eco-friendly based on their ESG criteria. (RELATED: Kentucky Officials Demand Proof That State Pension Funds Aren’t Used For Woke Investing)
“My view is that ESG investing is a cancer within our capital markets,” Barr told the Post. “It is a fraud on American investors.”
Barr and other Republicans hope to force SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to answer questions on the agency’s proposed climate disclosure rule, which would require all publicly traded companies to disclose their carbon emissions and climate change risks, the Post reported. The rule could allow climate-focused investors to more easily discern the “climate risks” of certain businesses and pressure them to become more eco-friendly.
Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska introduced a bill in May to combat major investors’ influence and will continue discussing such actions with industry executives, his spokesman told the Post.
“We’ve become the loud noise in their right ear after all the screaming in their left ear,” Republican Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said about GOP efforts to push back against Wall Street firms’ climate-focused investment strategies, according to the Post.
Republican Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri and ranking member on the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions told the Post that he wants to force BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street executives to testify in front of the financial services committee as the three massive money managers have used their financial influence to push companies to adopt their climate agenda and other political movements.
BlackRock, which manages nearly $8 trillion in assets, has been scrutinized by Republican attorneys general and state treasurers over its alleged failure to place the interests of its investors above the firm’s stance on climate change.
The Republicans are expected to take back the House in the midterm elections and will hold a majority in the House Financial Services Committee as well as other committees that can be used to probe the SEC, banks and asset managers.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents multiple paragraphs in which climate related policies are attacked since they are considered detrimental for the US economy as well as a tool for companies to make profit. The text quotes several politicians which blame climate related policies as not being transparent as well as having no scientific basis. | true | 0.808832 | 2 | EN_CC_100024.txt | CC: Criticism of climate policies | CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit | The text has several paragraphs criticising climate policies within the US economic context since they are considered an instrument to make profit which companies. These companies would allegedly have deals with the Biden administration
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
'Fraud On American Investors': Republicans Plan Crackdown On Woke Investing Following The Midterms
Republican lawmakers will probe the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and large private investors for their role in pushing an environmental agenda throughout the financial sector after the midterm elections.
Republican Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said that investigating the Biden administration and Wall Street’s use of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles will be a major focus of his committee if Republicans gain a majority in the House on Nov. 8, according to The Washington Post. The lawmakers argue that large financial institutions have withheld investment from businesses that they don’t consider to be eco-friendly based on their ESG criteria. (RELATED: Kentucky Officials Demand Proof That State Pension Funds Aren’t Used For Woke Investing)
“My view is that ESG investing is a cancer within our capital markets,” Barr told the Post. “It is a fraud on American investors.”
Barr and other Republicans hope to force SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to answer questions on the agency’s proposed climate disclosure rule, which would require all publicly traded companies to disclose their carbon emissions and climate change risks, the Post reported. The rule could allow climate-focused investors to more easily discern the “climate risks” of certain businesses and pressure them to become more eco-friendly.
Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska introduced a bill in May to combat major investors’ influence and will continue discussing such actions with industry executives, his spokesman told the Post.
“We’ve become the loud noise in their right ear after all the screaming in their left ear,” Republican Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said about GOP efforts to push back against Wall Street firms’ climate-focused investment strategies, according to the Post.
Republican Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri and ranking member on the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions told the Post that he wants to force BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street executives to testify in front of the financial services committee as the three massive money managers have used their financial influence to push companies to adopt their climate agenda and other political movements.
BlackRock, which manages nearly $8 trillion in assets, has been scrutinized by Republican attorneys general and state treasurers over its alleged failure to place the interests of its investors above the firm’s stance on climate change.
The Republicans are expected to take back the House in the midterm elections and will hold a majority in the House Financial Services Committee as well as other committees that can be used to probe the SEC, banks and asset managers.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article quoting Republican officials in US saying climate-related financial policies such as ESG are detrimental for the economy as they negatively affect business operations. The author emphasies the anti-climate movement's need to pressure financial institutions to act according to their economic rather than climate interests. | false | 0.808832 | 3 | EN_CC_100024.txt | CC: Criticism of climate policies | CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit | The text has several paragraphs criticising climate policies within the US economic context since they are considered an instrument to make profit which companies. These companies would allegedly have deals with the Biden administration
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
'Fraud On American Investors': Republicans Plan Crackdown On Woke Investing Following The Midterms
Republican lawmakers will probe the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and large private investors for their role in pushing an environmental agenda throughout the financial sector after the midterm elections.
Republican Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said that investigating the Biden administration and Wall Street’s use of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles will be a major focus of his committee if Republicans gain a majority in the House on Nov. 8, according to The Washington Post. The lawmakers argue that large financial institutions have withheld investment from businesses that they don’t consider to be eco-friendly based on their ESG criteria. (RELATED: Kentucky Officials Demand Proof That State Pension Funds Aren’t Used For Woke Investing)
“My view is that ESG investing is a cancer within our capital markets,” Barr told the Post. “It is a fraud on American investors.”
Barr and other Republicans hope to force SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to answer questions on the agency’s proposed climate disclosure rule, which would require all publicly traded companies to disclose their carbon emissions and climate change risks, the Post reported. The rule could allow climate-focused investors to more easily discern the “climate risks” of certain businesses and pressure them to become more eco-friendly.
Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska introduced a bill in May to combat major investors’ influence and will continue discussing such actions with industry executives, his spokesman told the Post.
“We’ve become the loud noise in their right ear after all the screaming in their left ear,” Republican Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said about GOP efforts to push back against Wall Street firms’ climate-focused investment strategies, according to the Post.
Republican Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri and ranking member on the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions told the Post that he wants to force BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street executives to testify in front of the financial services committee as the three massive money managers have used their financial influence to push companies to adopt their climate agenda and other political movements.
BlackRock, which manages nearly $8 trillion in assets, has been scrutinized by Republican attorneys general and state treasurers over its alleged failure to place the interests of its investors above the firm’s stance on climate change.
The Republicans are expected to take back the House in the midterm elections and will hold a majority in the House Financial Services Committee as well as other committees that can be used to probe the SEC, banks and asset managers.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article presents quotes from republican politicians accusing climate policies of being an instrument to make profit, and they plan to investigate big investors that collaborate with the Biden administration. | false | 0.808832 | 4 | EN_CC_100024.txt | CC: Criticism of climate policies | CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit | The text has several paragraphs criticising climate policies within the US economic context since they are considered an instrument to make profit which companies. These companies would allegedly have deals with the Biden administration
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
'Fraud On American Investors': Republicans Plan Crackdown On Woke Investing Following The Midterms
Republican lawmakers will probe the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and large private investors for their role in pushing an environmental agenda throughout the financial sector after the midterm elections.
Republican Rep. Andy Barr of Kentucky, a member of the House Financial Services Committee, said that investigating the Biden administration and Wall Street’s use of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) principles will be a major focus of his committee if Republicans gain a majority in the House on Nov. 8, according to The Washington Post. The lawmakers argue that large financial institutions have withheld investment from businesses that they don’t consider to be eco-friendly based on their ESG criteria. (RELATED: Kentucky Officials Demand Proof That State Pension Funds Aren’t Used For Woke Investing)
“My view is that ESG investing is a cancer within our capital markets,” Barr told the Post. “It is a fraud on American investors.”
Barr and other Republicans hope to force SEC Chairman Gary Gensler to answer questions on the agency’s proposed climate disclosure rule, which would require all publicly traded companies to disclose their carbon emissions and climate change risks, the Post reported. The rule could allow climate-focused investors to more easily discern the “climate risks” of certain businesses and pressure them to become more eco-friendly.
Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska introduced a bill in May to combat major investors’ influence and will continue discussing such actions with industry executives, his spokesman told the Post.
“We’ve become the loud noise in their right ear after all the screaming in their left ear,” Republican Senator Kevin Cramer of North Dakota said about GOP efforts to push back against Wall Street firms’ climate-focused investment strategies, according to the Post.
Republican Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri and ranking member on the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions told the Post that he wants to force BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street executives to testify in front of the financial services committee as the three massive money managers have used their financial influence to push companies to adopt their climate agenda and other political movements.
BlackRock, which manages nearly $8 trillion in assets, has been scrutinized by Republican attorneys general and state treasurers over its alleged failure to place the interests of its investors above the firm’s stance on climate change.
The Republicans are expected to take back the House in the midterm elections and will hold a majority in the House Financial Services Committee as well as other committees that can be used to probe the SEC, banks and asset managers.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a narrative depicting climate policies as a way for companies to make profit. Climate policies are used to pressure businesses to become more eco-friendly and allegedly there is a lack of transparency in how these policies are applied. | false | 0.808832 | 5 | EN_CC_100024.txt | CC: Criticism of climate policies | CC: Criticism of climate policies: Climate policies are only for profit | The text has several paragraphs criticising climate policies within the US economic context since they are considered an instrument to make profit which companies. These companies would allegedly have deals with the Biden administration
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate Hypocrisy Exposed: EV Battery Production's Demand for Nickel Wreaking Havoc in Indonesia
We have seen, time and again, the hypocrisy of the extreme environmental movement, especially the climate-change wing of this movement — most of whom don't live anywhere near the actual environment. From Al Gore's mansion to John Kerry's private jets to Leonardo DiCaprio's mega-yacht, these people are all really big on "Do as we say, not as we do."
And it's worth digging a little deeper into the issues behind the net-zero issue, that being the advocacy for net zero carbon emissions, something that is all but impossible. Why? Because of the things required for the manufacture of electric vehicles (EVs); specifically, their batteries and, even more specifically, the raw materials required to make those batteries.
This brings us to Indonesia and the environmental havoc that mining for nickel, an essential component of EV batteries, is wreaking on that country.
Swathes of rainforest and coastal communities are being destroyed by a nickel mining boom in Indonesia sparked by the race to transition away from fossil fuels.
Across the country, a major drive to exploit the country’s abundant natural resources is underway. These photographs capture the sheer scale of the production process.
Rows of chimneys, belching smoke and fumes, tower over the schools and houses of what were once rural communities in scenes recalling the work of L.S. Lowry, whose paintings captured life in the industrial districts of North West England in the mid-20th century.
Indonesia is now the world’s largest nickel producer, with 15 per cent of the globe’s lateritic nickel resources – typically low-grade deposits found near the surface.
But demand is still soaring in tandem with the rise of the electric vehicles (EVs), which depend on it for their batteries.
Guess who is, in large part, funding all this?
Billion dollar Chinese firms anchor the nickel market in Indonesia, but they are often fed cheap ore by hundreds of smaller, mostly locally-owned mines that dot the rainforest. These mines have transformed once-peaceful agrarian villages and communities, providing economic opportunity but a health and environmental crisis looms from pollution.
In just three years, Indonesia has signed more than a dozen deals worth more than $15 billion for battery materials and electric vehicle production with global manufacturers including Hyundai, LG and Foxconn.
Granted, nickel extraction will probably go on regardless of the EV push, regardless of the net-zero goals of climate scolds, and we should remember that extraction and refining bring jobs to impoverished communities in Indonesia. That's not the point that we should be examining here.
It's the hypocrisy of the climate scolds ignoring these inescapable consequences of their agenda that's galling.
See Related: Tax Cuts for the Rich? Clean Energy Credits Mostly Go to Higher-Income Filers
MUST WATCH: Guyana President Lights Up BBC Host Who Tries to Climate Shame Him Over Extracting Oil
That's always been the whole problem with these people; they never count the cost, all the costs, of the agenda for which they advocate. They are of a kind with (and in many cases are the same people) who complain about, say, my going into the woods to shoot a grouse or a snowshoe hare for supper, demanding to know why I can't get my meat at a grocery store so no animal has to die. They are of a kind with the "Stop Oil" protesters who block traffic for hours, forcing people to sit with their car engines idling, pouring still more exhaust into the air. They are of a kind with the Greta Thunbergs of the world, ill-informed scolds who want to dictate the end of our modern, technological lifestyles.
They never figure situations like the mining of nickel for EV batteries in Indonesia into their calculus, any more than they account for the mining of cobalt with slave labor in Congo, or mining for lithium and its accompanying environmental disturbance.
To put it bluntly, they are hypocrites of the worst sort. Why do they ignore these problems with their policies? Is it just because these particular environments are far away and out of sight of these mostly affluent, mostly Western activists?
Or are they just ignorant?
My money's on "both."
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author criticizes climate activists who are in favour of Net Zero targets for ignoring the detrimental impacts of mining operations related to the production of electric vehicles, such as the nickel extraction in Indonesia. According to the text, these activists have double standards as they do not account for all the CO2 emissions generated in the process of the supply chain of their preferred technologies. | true | 0.811628 | 1 | EN_CC_200009.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt | The text attacks climate activists for hypocritically ignoring the issues generated by the EVs' industry. Specific prominent activists are mentioned, blaming them for living luxurious lives in the West while poor countries are exploited. Overall, green technologies are criticised for being just a another way for companies to make profit.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate Hypocrisy Exposed: EV Battery Production's Demand for Nickel Wreaking Havoc in Indonesia
We have seen, time and again, the hypocrisy of the extreme environmental movement, especially the climate-change wing of this movement — most of whom don't live anywhere near the actual environment. From Al Gore's mansion to John Kerry's private jets to Leonardo DiCaprio's mega-yacht, these people are all really big on "Do as we say, not as we do."
And it's worth digging a little deeper into the issues behind the net-zero issue, that being the advocacy for net zero carbon emissions, something that is all but impossible. Why? Because of the things required for the manufacture of electric vehicles (EVs); specifically, their batteries and, even more specifically, the raw materials required to make those batteries.
This brings us to Indonesia and the environmental havoc that mining for nickel, an essential component of EV batteries, is wreaking on that country.
Swathes of rainforest and coastal communities are being destroyed by a nickel mining boom in Indonesia sparked by the race to transition away from fossil fuels.
Across the country, a major drive to exploit the country’s abundant natural resources is underway. These photographs capture the sheer scale of the production process.
Rows of chimneys, belching smoke and fumes, tower over the schools and houses of what were once rural communities in scenes recalling the work of L.S. Lowry, whose paintings captured life in the industrial districts of North West England in the mid-20th century.
Indonesia is now the world’s largest nickel producer, with 15 per cent of the globe’s lateritic nickel resources – typically low-grade deposits found near the surface.
But demand is still soaring in tandem with the rise of the electric vehicles (EVs), which depend on it for their batteries.
Guess who is, in large part, funding all this?
Billion dollar Chinese firms anchor the nickel market in Indonesia, but they are often fed cheap ore by hundreds of smaller, mostly locally-owned mines that dot the rainforest. These mines have transformed once-peaceful agrarian villages and communities, providing economic opportunity but a health and environmental crisis looms from pollution.
In just three years, Indonesia has signed more than a dozen deals worth more than $15 billion for battery materials and electric vehicle production with global manufacturers including Hyundai, LG and Foxconn.
Granted, nickel extraction will probably go on regardless of the EV push, regardless of the net-zero goals of climate scolds, and we should remember that extraction and refining bring jobs to impoverished communities in Indonesia. That's not the point that we should be examining here.
It's the hypocrisy of the climate scolds ignoring these inescapable consequences of their agenda that's galling.
See Related: Tax Cuts for the Rich? Clean Energy Credits Mostly Go to Higher-Income Filers
MUST WATCH: Guyana President Lights Up BBC Host Who Tries to Climate Shame Him Over Extracting Oil
That's always been the whole problem with these people; they never count the cost, all the costs, of the agenda for which they advocate. They are of a kind with (and in many cases are the same people) who complain about, say, my going into the woods to shoot a grouse or a snowshoe hare for supper, demanding to know why I can't get my meat at a grocery store so no animal has to die. They are of a kind with the "Stop Oil" protesters who block traffic for hours, forcing people to sit with their car engines idling, pouring still more exhaust into the air. They are of a kind with the Greta Thunbergs of the world, ill-informed scolds who want to dictate the end of our modern, technological lifestyles.
They never figure situations like the mining of nickel for EV batteries in Indonesia into their calculus, any more than they account for the mining of cobalt with slave labor in Congo, or mining for lithium and its accompanying environmental disturbance.
To put it bluntly, they are hypocrites of the worst sort. Why do they ignore these problems with their policies? Is it just because these particular environments are far away and out of sight of these mostly affluent, mostly Western activists?
Or are they just ignorant?
My money's on "both."
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents some paragraphs underlining the negative impacts of green technologies such as the use of electric cars, especially mentioning the problem of raw materials' extraction. This extraction process is considered highly damaging for the environment as well as socially questionable since it involves poor communities. In doing so, climate activists are depicted as hypocrite and inconsistent as well as being ill-informed and incompetent. | true | 0.811628 | 2 | EN_CC_200009.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt | The text attacks climate activists for hypocritically ignoring the issues generated by the EVs' industry. Specific prominent activists are mentioned, blaming them for living luxurious lives in the West while poor countries are exploited. Overall, green technologies are criticised for being just a another way for companies to make profit.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate Hypocrisy Exposed: EV Battery Production's Demand for Nickel Wreaking Havoc in Indonesia
We have seen, time and again, the hypocrisy of the extreme environmental movement, especially the climate-change wing of this movement — most of whom don't live anywhere near the actual environment. From Al Gore's mansion to John Kerry's private jets to Leonardo DiCaprio's mega-yacht, these people are all really big on "Do as we say, not as we do."
And it's worth digging a little deeper into the issues behind the net-zero issue, that being the advocacy for net zero carbon emissions, something that is all but impossible. Why? Because of the things required for the manufacture of electric vehicles (EVs); specifically, their batteries and, even more specifically, the raw materials required to make those batteries.
This brings us to Indonesia and the environmental havoc that mining for nickel, an essential component of EV batteries, is wreaking on that country.
Swathes of rainforest and coastal communities are being destroyed by a nickel mining boom in Indonesia sparked by the race to transition away from fossil fuels.
Across the country, a major drive to exploit the country’s abundant natural resources is underway. These photographs capture the sheer scale of the production process.
Rows of chimneys, belching smoke and fumes, tower over the schools and houses of what were once rural communities in scenes recalling the work of L.S. Lowry, whose paintings captured life in the industrial districts of North West England in the mid-20th century.
Indonesia is now the world’s largest nickel producer, with 15 per cent of the globe’s lateritic nickel resources – typically low-grade deposits found near the surface.
But demand is still soaring in tandem with the rise of the electric vehicles (EVs), which depend on it for their batteries.
Guess who is, in large part, funding all this?
Billion dollar Chinese firms anchor the nickel market in Indonesia, but they are often fed cheap ore by hundreds of smaller, mostly locally-owned mines that dot the rainforest. These mines have transformed once-peaceful agrarian villages and communities, providing economic opportunity but a health and environmental crisis looms from pollution.
In just three years, Indonesia has signed more than a dozen deals worth more than $15 billion for battery materials and electric vehicle production with global manufacturers including Hyundai, LG and Foxconn.
Granted, nickel extraction will probably go on regardless of the EV push, regardless of the net-zero goals of climate scolds, and we should remember that extraction and refining bring jobs to impoverished communities in Indonesia. That's not the point that we should be examining here.
It's the hypocrisy of the climate scolds ignoring these inescapable consequences of their agenda that's galling.
See Related: Tax Cuts for the Rich? Clean Energy Credits Mostly Go to Higher-Income Filers
MUST WATCH: Guyana President Lights Up BBC Host Who Tries to Climate Shame Him Over Extracting Oil
That's always been the whole problem with these people; they never count the cost, all the costs, of the agenda for which they advocate. They are of a kind with (and in many cases are the same people) who complain about, say, my going into the woods to shoot a grouse or a snowshoe hare for supper, demanding to know why I can't get my meat at a grocery store so no animal has to die. They are of a kind with the "Stop Oil" protesters who block traffic for hours, forcing people to sit with their car engines idling, pouring still more exhaust into the air. They are of a kind with the Greta Thunbergs of the world, ill-informed scolds who want to dictate the end of our modern, technological lifestyles.
They never figure situations like the mining of nickel for EV batteries in Indonesia into their calculus, any more than they account for the mining of cobalt with slave labor in Congo, or mining for lithium and its accompanying environmental disturbance.
To put it bluntly, they are hypocrites of the worst sort. Why do they ignore these problems with their policies? Is it just because these particular environments are far away and out of sight of these mostly affluent, mostly Western activists?
Or are they just ignorant?
My money's on "both."
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article criticises climate movement highlighting hypocrisy of the prominent activists. The author targets specifically Indonesian nickel mining industry that is providing material for EVs while creating enviromental degradation | false | 0.811628 | 3 | EN_CC_200009.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt | The text attacks climate activists for hypocritically ignoring the issues generated by the EVs' industry. Specific prominent activists are mentioned, blaming them for living luxurious lives in the West while poor countries are exploited. Overall, green technologies are criticised for being just a another way for companies to make profit.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate Hypocrisy Exposed: EV Battery Production's Demand for Nickel Wreaking Havoc in Indonesia
We have seen, time and again, the hypocrisy of the extreme environmental movement, especially the climate-change wing of this movement — most of whom don't live anywhere near the actual environment. From Al Gore's mansion to John Kerry's private jets to Leonardo DiCaprio's mega-yacht, these people are all really big on "Do as we say, not as we do."
And it's worth digging a little deeper into the issues behind the net-zero issue, that being the advocacy for net zero carbon emissions, something that is all but impossible. Why? Because of the things required for the manufacture of electric vehicles (EVs); specifically, their batteries and, even more specifically, the raw materials required to make those batteries.
This brings us to Indonesia and the environmental havoc that mining for nickel, an essential component of EV batteries, is wreaking on that country.
Swathes of rainforest and coastal communities are being destroyed by a nickel mining boom in Indonesia sparked by the race to transition away from fossil fuels.
Across the country, a major drive to exploit the country’s abundant natural resources is underway. These photographs capture the sheer scale of the production process.
Rows of chimneys, belching smoke and fumes, tower over the schools and houses of what were once rural communities in scenes recalling the work of L.S. Lowry, whose paintings captured life in the industrial districts of North West England in the mid-20th century.
Indonesia is now the world’s largest nickel producer, with 15 per cent of the globe’s lateritic nickel resources – typically low-grade deposits found near the surface.
But demand is still soaring in tandem with the rise of the electric vehicles (EVs), which depend on it for their batteries.
Guess who is, in large part, funding all this?
Billion dollar Chinese firms anchor the nickel market in Indonesia, but they are often fed cheap ore by hundreds of smaller, mostly locally-owned mines that dot the rainforest. These mines have transformed once-peaceful agrarian villages and communities, providing economic opportunity but a health and environmental crisis looms from pollution.
In just three years, Indonesia has signed more than a dozen deals worth more than $15 billion for battery materials and electric vehicle production with global manufacturers including Hyundai, LG and Foxconn.
Granted, nickel extraction will probably go on regardless of the EV push, regardless of the net-zero goals of climate scolds, and we should remember that extraction and refining bring jobs to impoverished communities in Indonesia. That's not the point that we should be examining here.
It's the hypocrisy of the climate scolds ignoring these inescapable consequences of their agenda that's galling.
See Related: Tax Cuts for the Rich? Clean Energy Credits Mostly Go to Higher-Income Filers
MUST WATCH: Guyana President Lights Up BBC Host Who Tries to Climate Shame Him Over Extracting Oil
That's always been the whole problem with these people; they never count the cost, all the costs, of the agenda for which they advocate. They are of a kind with (and in many cases are the same people) who complain about, say, my going into the woods to shoot a grouse or a snowshoe hare for supper, demanding to know why I can't get my meat at a grocery store so no animal has to die. They are of a kind with the "Stop Oil" protesters who block traffic for hours, forcing people to sit with their car engines idling, pouring still more exhaust into the air. They are of a kind with the Greta Thunbergs of the world, ill-informed scolds who want to dictate the end of our modern, technological lifestyles.
They never figure situations like the mining of nickel for EV batteries in Indonesia into their calculus, any more than they account for the mining of cobalt with slave labor in Congo, or mining for lithium and its accompanying environmental disturbance.
To put it bluntly, they are hypocrites of the worst sort. Why do they ignore these problems with their policies? Is it just because these particular environments are far away and out of sight of these mostly affluent, mostly Western activists?
Or are they just ignorant?
My money's on "both."
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author argues that climate activists are hypocrites for ignoring the negative environmental impact of the technologies they advocate. They are accused of being ignorant or simply applying double standards. | false | 0.811628 | 4 | EN_CC_200009.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt | The text attacks climate activists for hypocritically ignoring the issues generated by the EVs' industry. Specific prominent activists are mentioned, blaming them for living luxurious lives in the West while poor countries are exploited. Overall, green technologies are criticised for being just a another way for companies to make profit.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate Hypocrisy Exposed: EV Battery Production's Demand for Nickel Wreaking Havoc in Indonesia
We have seen, time and again, the hypocrisy of the extreme environmental movement, especially the climate-change wing of this movement — most of whom don't live anywhere near the actual environment. From Al Gore's mansion to John Kerry's private jets to Leonardo DiCaprio's mega-yacht, these people are all really big on "Do as we say, not as we do."
And it's worth digging a little deeper into the issues behind the net-zero issue, that being the advocacy for net zero carbon emissions, something that is all but impossible. Why? Because of the things required for the manufacture of electric vehicles (EVs); specifically, their batteries and, even more specifically, the raw materials required to make those batteries.
This brings us to Indonesia and the environmental havoc that mining for nickel, an essential component of EV batteries, is wreaking on that country.
Swathes of rainforest and coastal communities are being destroyed by a nickel mining boom in Indonesia sparked by the race to transition away from fossil fuels.
Across the country, a major drive to exploit the country’s abundant natural resources is underway. These photographs capture the sheer scale of the production process.
Rows of chimneys, belching smoke and fumes, tower over the schools and houses of what were once rural communities in scenes recalling the work of L.S. Lowry, whose paintings captured life in the industrial districts of North West England in the mid-20th century.
Indonesia is now the world’s largest nickel producer, with 15 per cent of the globe’s lateritic nickel resources – typically low-grade deposits found near the surface.
But demand is still soaring in tandem with the rise of the electric vehicles (EVs), which depend on it for their batteries.
Guess who is, in large part, funding all this?
Billion dollar Chinese firms anchor the nickel market in Indonesia, but they are often fed cheap ore by hundreds of smaller, mostly locally-owned mines that dot the rainforest. These mines have transformed once-peaceful agrarian villages and communities, providing economic opportunity but a health and environmental crisis looms from pollution.
In just three years, Indonesia has signed more than a dozen deals worth more than $15 billion for battery materials and electric vehicle production with global manufacturers including Hyundai, LG and Foxconn.
Granted, nickel extraction will probably go on regardless of the EV push, regardless of the net-zero goals of climate scolds, and we should remember that extraction and refining bring jobs to impoverished communities in Indonesia. That's not the point that we should be examining here.
It's the hypocrisy of the climate scolds ignoring these inescapable consequences of their agenda that's galling.
See Related: Tax Cuts for the Rich? Clean Energy Credits Mostly Go to Higher-Income Filers
MUST WATCH: Guyana President Lights Up BBC Host Who Tries to Climate Shame Him Over Extracting Oil
That's always been the whole problem with these people; they never count the cost, all the costs, of the agenda for which they advocate. They are of a kind with (and in many cases are the same people) who complain about, say, my going into the woods to shoot a grouse or a snowshoe hare for supper, demanding to know why I can't get my meat at a grocery store so no animal has to die. They are of a kind with the "Stop Oil" protesters who block traffic for hours, forcing people to sit with their car engines idling, pouring still more exhaust into the air. They are of a kind with the Greta Thunbergs of the world, ill-informed scolds who want to dictate the end of our modern, technological lifestyles.
They never figure situations like the mining of nickel for EV batteries in Indonesia into their calculus, any more than they account for the mining of cobalt with slave labor in Congo, or mining for lithium and its accompanying environmental disturbance.
To put it bluntly, they are hypocrites of the worst sort. Why do they ignore these problems with their policies? Is it just because these particular environments are far away and out of sight of these mostly affluent, mostly Western activists?
Or are they just ignorant?
My money's on "both."
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text talks about the climate movement as hypocritical because some members live luxuous lives despite fighting climate change. It then moves on talking about how the supply chain of EVs and batteries harm the environment. | false | 0.811628 | 5 | EN_CC_200009.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | CC: Criticism of climate movement: Climate movement is corrupt | The text attacks climate activists for hypocritically ignoring the issues generated by the EVs' industry. Specific prominent activists are mentioned, blaming them for living luxurious lives in the West while poor countries are exploited. Overall, green technologies are criticised for being just a another way for companies to make profit.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17: The Quest for Truth and Justice. Review of the Evidence
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
Eight years ago, on 17 July 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) was shot down in Eastern Ukraine.
In recent development, A Netherlands Court on November 17, 2022 found the Kremlin responsible for the alleged attack: two Russians and
a separatist Ukrainian” were identified as “guilty of mass murder for their involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17”.
The media has highlighted the downing of MH17 in the context of the war in Ukraine. The Court ruling is fraudulent, based on fabricated evidence.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
***
This background text was prepared in the context of the Kuala Lumpur MH17 Conference entitled MH17: The Quest for Justice, organized by JUST, the PGPF and the CRG in August 2019.
This comprehensive report provides detailed evidence that Russia was not involved in the downing of MH17.
It also confirms the insidious role of Ukraine’s intelligence agency.
****
The underlying objective is to examine the evidence, reveal the truth and uphold the rule of law.
Today, July 29th 2021, our thoughts are with the families of the victims of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 tragedy.
The 2019 Conference was dedicated to the memory of the victims.
It is also a national tragedy for the people of Malaysia. The downing of MH17 with 283 passengers and 15 crew on board, took place barely a few months following the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 after departing on March 8, 2014 from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing, with 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board.
It is worth recalling that immediately after the MH17 plane crash on July 17 2014, prior to the conduct of a preliminary investigation, Secretary of State John Kerry and US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power pointed their finger at Moscow without a shred of evidence. In turn, the allegations directed against Russia were used to justify the imposition of sweeping economic sanctions against the Russian Federation.
According to President Obama (hours after the tragedy):
“… the downing of MH17 should be “a wake-up call” to Europe to get serious about confronting Russia over Ukraine after EU leaders have proved reluctant to impose tought sanctions.” (Telegraph, July 18,2019)
The Wall Street Journal reports (July 18, 2014) that “Obama is getting his wish and Brussels is now weighing new sanctions”:
European governments, jolted by the downing of a passenger plane over eastern Ukraine that killed nearly 300 people, are contemplating a major expansion of sanctions on Russia as early as next week.
European Union leaders decided in recent days to expand the penalties to a broad new category of people and companies. But the apparent shooting down of a plane carrying more than 200 EU citizens has intensified a desire to act quickly and forcefully, including sanctions against oligarchs with ties to the Kremlin.
In Brussels, some diplomats described the incident as a game-changer. “It would have major consequences if it was certain it came from the rebels— major consequences,” said one official. (WSJ, July 18, 2014)
On July 22, 2014, The European Union decided to expand its sanctions blacklist against Moscow including Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.
EU foreign ministers decided to “draw up further broad measures including an arms embargo and financial restrictions on Russian businesses, … following the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17.” (Guardian, July 22, 2019)
Michel Chossudovsky, August 2019, updated July 17, 2020, July 16, 2022
</document>
<category>
URW: Russia is the Victim
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Multiple passages in the text attempt to convey the idea that Russia is being framed as responsible of shooting down MH17. According to the author, there is no evidence of Russia's involvement while Western countries would use this alleged evidence to justify sanctions. | true | 0.822748 | 1 | EN_UA_010909.txt | URW: Russia is the Victim | none | The text presents several paragraphs suggesting that Russia is wrongly accused by Western countries for being responsible of the downing of the MH17 flight. Russia is depicted as the victim, suggesting a russophobic intention driving the accusers
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17: The Quest for Truth and Justice. Review of the Evidence
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
Eight years ago, on 17 July 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) was shot down in Eastern Ukraine.
In recent development, A Netherlands Court on November 17, 2022 found the Kremlin responsible for the alleged attack: two Russians and
a separatist Ukrainian” were identified as “guilty of mass murder for their involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17”.
The media has highlighted the downing of MH17 in the context of the war in Ukraine. The Court ruling is fraudulent, based on fabricated evidence.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
***
This background text was prepared in the context of the Kuala Lumpur MH17 Conference entitled MH17: The Quest for Justice, organized by JUST, the PGPF and the CRG in August 2019.
This comprehensive report provides detailed evidence that Russia was not involved in the downing of MH17.
It also confirms the insidious role of Ukraine’s intelligence agency.
****
The underlying objective is to examine the evidence, reveal the truth and uphold the rule of law.
Today, July 29th 2021, our thoughts are with the families of the victims of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 tragedy.
The 2019 Conference was dedicated to the memory of the victims.
It is also a national tragedy for the people of Malaysia. The downing of MH17 with 283 passengers and 15 crew on board, took place barely a few months following the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 after departing on March 8, 2014 from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing, with 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board.
It is worth recalling that immediately after the MH17 plane crash on July 17 2014, prior to the conduct of a preliminary investigation, Secretary of State John Kerry and US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power pointed their finger at Moscow without a shred of evidence. In turn, the allegations directed against Russia were used to justify the imposition of sweeping economic sanctions against the Russian Federation.
According to President Obama (hours after the tragedy):
“… the downing of MH17 should be “a wake-up call” to Europe to get serious about confronting Russia over Ukraine after EU leaders have proved reluctant to impose tought sanctions.” (Telegraph, July 18,2019)
The Wall Street Journal reports (July 18, 2014) that “Obama is getting his wish and Brussels is now weighing new sanctions”:
European governments, jolted by the downing of a passenger plane over eastern Ukraine that killed nearly 300 people, are contemplating a major expansion of sanctions on Russia as early as next week.
European Union leaders decided in recent days to expand the penalties to a broad new category of people and companies. But the apparent shooting down of a plane carrying more than 200 EU citizens has intensified a desire to act quickly and forcefully, including sanctions against oligarchs with ties to the Kremlin.
In Brussels, some diplomats described the incident as a game-changer. “It would have major consequences if it was certain it came from the rebels— major consequences,” said one official. (WSJ, July 18, 2014)
On July 22, 2014, The European Union decided to expand its sanctions blacklist against Moscow including Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.
EU foreign ministers decided to “draw up further broad measures including an arms embargo and financial restrictions on Russian businesses, … following the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17.” (Guardian, July 22, 2019)
Michel Chossudovsky, August 2019, updated July 17, 2020, July 16, 2022
</document>
<category>
URW: Russia is the Victim
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticises several Western countries for not respecting the law. Indeed, Western countries such as the Netherlands have sentenced alleged perpetrators of the attack on MH17 flight, without providing evidence. Furthermore, the sanctions imposed by the EU are considered arbitrary. | true | 0.822748 | 2 | EN_UA_010909.txt | URW: Russia is the Victim | none | The text presents several paragraphs suggesting that Russia is wrongly accused by Western countries for being responsible of the downing of the MH17 flight. Russia is depicted as the victim, suggesting a russophobic intention driving the accusers
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17: The Quest for Truth and Justice. Review of the Evidence
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
Eight years ago, on 17 July 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) was shot down in Eastern Ukraine.
In recent development, A Netherlands Court on November 17, 2022 found the Kremlin responsible for the alleged attack: two Russians and
a separatist Ukrainian” were identified as “guilty of mass murder for their involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17”.
The media has highlighted the downing of MH17 in the context of the war in Ukraine. The Court ruling is fraudulent, based on fabricated evidence.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
***
This background text was prepared in the context of the Kuala Lumpur MH17 Conference entitled MH17: The Quest for Justice, organized by JUST, the PGPF and the CRG in August 2019.
This comprehensive report provides detailed evidence that Russia was not involved in the downing of MH17.
It also confirms the insidious role of Ukraine’s intelligence agency.
****
The underlying objective is to examine the evidence, reveal the truth and uphold the rule of law.
Today, July 29th 2021, our thoughts are with the families of the victims of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 tragedy.
The 2019 Conference was dedicated to the memory of the victims.
It is also a national tragedy for the people of Malaysia. The downing of MH17 with 283 passengers and 15 crew on board, took place barely a few months following the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 after departing on March 8, 2014 from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing, with 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board.
It is worth recalling that immediately after the MH17 plane crash on July 17 2014, prior to the conduct of a preliminary investigation, Secretary of State John Kerry and US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power pointed their finger at Moscow without a shred of evidence. In turn, the allegations directed against Russia were used to justify the imposition of sweeping economic sanctions against the Russian Federation.
According to President Obama (hours after the tragedy):
“… the downing of MH17 should be “a wake-up call” to Europe to get serious about confronting Russia over Ukraine after EU leaders have proved reluctant to impose tought sanctions.” (Telegraph, July 18,2019)
The Wall Street Journal reports (July 18, 2014) that “Obama is getting his wish and Brussels is now weighing new sanctions”:
European governments, jolted by the downing of a passenger plane over eastern Ukraine that killed nearly 300 people, are contemplating a major expansion of sanctions on Russia as early as next week.
European Union leaders decided in recent days to expand the penalties to a broad new category of people and companies. But the apparent shooting down of a plane carrying more than 200 EU citizens has intensified a desire to act quickly and forcefully, including sanctions against oligarchs with ties to the Kremlin.
In Brussels, some diplomats described the incident as a game-changer. “It would have major consequences if it was certain it came from the rebels— major consequences,” said one official. (WSJ, July 18, 2014)
On July 22, 2014, The European Union decided to expand its sanctions blacklist against Moscow including Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.
EU foreign ministers decided to “draw up further broad measures including an arms embargo and financial restrictions on Russian businesses, … following the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17.” (Guardian, July 22, 2019)
Michel Chossudovsky, August 2019, updated July 17, 2020, July 16, 2022
</document>
<category>
URW: Russia is the Victim
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has several paragraphs which together suggest that Russia is innocent of the attack on MH17 and that the West are the culprits. Several paragraphs suggest the the attack was staged in order to provide pretext to impose sanctions against Russia | false | 0.822748 | 3 | EN_UA_010909.txt | URW: Russia is the Victim | none | The text presents several paragraphs suggesting that Russia is wrongly accused by Western countries for being responsible of the downing of the MH17 flight. Russia is depicted as the victim, suggesting a russophobic intention driving the accusers
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17: The Quest for Truth and Justice. Review of the Evidence
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
Eight years ago, on 17 July 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) was shot down in Eastern Ukraine.
In recent development, A Netherlands Court on November 17, 2022 found the Kremlin responsible for the alleged attack: two Russians and
a separatist Ukrainian” were identified as “guilty of mass murder for their involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17”.
The media has highlighted the downing of MH17 in the context of the war in Ukraine. The Court ruling is fraudulent, based on fabricated evidence.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
***
This background text was prepared in the context of the Kuala Lumpur MH17 Conference entitled MH17: The Quest for Justice, organized by JUST, the PGPF and the CRG in August 2019.
This comprehensive report provides detailed evidence that Russia was not involved in the downing of MH17.
It also confirms the insidious role of Ukraine’s intelligence agency.
****
The underlying objective is to examine the evidence, reveal the truth and uphold the rule of law.
Today, July 29th 2021, our thoughts are with the families of the victims of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 tragedy.
The 2019 Conference was dedicated to the memory of the victims.
It is also a national tragedy for the people of Malaysia. The downing of MH17 with 283 passengers and 15 crew on board, took place barely a few months following the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 after departing on March 8, 2014 from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing, with 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board.
It is worth recalling that immediately after the MH17 plane crash on July 17 2014, prior to the conduct of a preliminary investigation, Secretary of State John Kerry and US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power pointed their finger at Moscow without a shred of evidence. In turn, the allegations directed against Russia were used to justify the imposition of sweeping economic sanctions against the Russian Federation.
According to President Obama (hours after the tragedy):
“… the downing of MH17 should be “a wake-up call” to Europe to get serious about confronting Russia over Ukraine after EU leaders have proved reluctant to impose tought sanctions.” (Telegraph, July 18,2019)
The Wall Street Journal reports (July 18, 2014) that “Obama is getting his wish and Brussels is now weighing new sanctions”:
European governments, jolted by the downing of a passenger plane over eastern Ukraine that killed nearly 300 people, are contemplating a major expansion of sanctions on Russia as early as next week.
European Union leaders decided in recent days to expand the penalties to a broad new category of people and companies. But the apparent shooting down of a plane carrying more than 200 EU citizens has intensified a desire to act quickly and forcefully, including sanctions against oligarchs with ties to the Kremlin.
In Brussels, some diplomats described the incident as a game-changer. “It would have major consequences if it was certain it came from the rebels— major consequences,” said one official. (WSJ, July 18, 2014)
On July 22, 2014, The European Union decided to expand its sanctions blacklist against Moscow including Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.
EU foreign ministers decided to “draw up further broad measures including an arms embargo and financial restrictions on Russian businesses, … following the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17.” (Guardian, July 22, 2019)
Michel Chossudovsky, August 2019, updated July 17, 2020, July 16, 2022
</document>
<category>
URW: Russia is the Victim
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text argues that Russia has been framed as being responsible for the downing of the MH17 flight, arguing that there is no evidence for that and the attempts to scapegoat Moscow are an instrument to justify sanctions against it. | false | 0.822748 | 4 | EN_UA_010909.txt | URW: Russia is the Victim | none | The text presents several paragraphs suggesting that Russia is wrongly accused by Western countries for being responsible of the downing of the MH17 flight. Russia is depicted as the victim, suggesting a russophobic intention driving the accusers
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17: The Quest for Truth and Justice. Review of the Evidence
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research:
Eight years ago, on 17 July 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) was shot down in Eastern Ukraine.
In recent development, A Netherlands Court on November 17, 2022 found the Kremlin responsible for the alleged attack: two Russians and
a separatist Ukrainian” were identified as “guilty of mass murder for their involvement in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17”.
The media has highlighted the downing of MH17 in the context of the war in Ukraine. The Court ruling is fraudulent, based on fabricated evidence.
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
***
This background text was prepared in the context of the Kuala Lumpur MH17 Conference entitled MH17: The Quest for Justice, organized by JUST, the PGPF and the CRG in August 2019.
This comprehensive report provides detailed evidence that Russia was not involved in the downing of MH17.
It also confirms the insidious role of Ukraine’s intelligence agency.
****
The underlying objective is to examine the evidence, reveal the truth and uphold the rule of law.
Today, July 29th 2021, our thoughts are with the families of the victims of the Malaysian Airlines MH17 tragedy.
The 2019 Conference was dedicated to the memory of the victims.
It is also a national tragedy for the people of Malaysia. The downing of MH17 with 283 passengers and 15 crew on board, took place barely a few months following the mysterious disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 after departing on March 8, 2014 from Kuala Lumpur for Beijing, with 227 passengers and 12 crew members on board.
It is worth recalling that immediately after the MH17 plane crash on July 17 2014, prior to the conduct of a preliminary investigation, Secretary of State John Kerry and US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power pointed their finger at Moscow without a shred of evidence. In turn, the allegations directed against Russia were used to justify the imposition of sweeping economic sanctions against the Russian Federation.
According to President Obama (hours after the tragedy):
“… the downing of MH17 should be “a wake-up call” to Europe to get serious about confronting Russia over Ukraine after EU leaders have proved reluctant to impose tought sanctions.” (Telegraph, July 18,2019)
The Wall Street Journal reports (July 18, 2014) that “Obama is getting his wish and Brussels is now weighing new sanctions”:
European governments, jolted by the downing of a passenger plane over eastern Ukraine that killed nearly 300 people, are contemplating a major expansion of sanctions on Russia as early as next week.
European Union leaders decided in recent days to expand the penalties to a broad new category of people and companies. But the apparent shooting down of a plane carrying more than 200 EU citizens has intensified a desire to act quickly and forcefully, including sanctions against oligarchs with ties to the Kremlin.
In Brussels, some diplomats described the incident as a game-changer. “It would have major consequences if it was certain it came from the rebels— major consequences,” said one official. (WSJ, July 18, 2014)
On July 22, 2014, The European Union decided to expand its sanctions blacklist against Moscow including Vladimir Putin’s inner circle.
EU foreign ministers decided to “draw up further broad measures including an arms embargo and financial restrictions on Russian businesses, … following the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17.” (Guardian, July 22, 2019)
Michel Chossudovsky, August 2019, updated July 17, 2020, July 16, 2022
</document>
<category>
URW: Russia is the Victim
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has multiple paragraphs suggesting that the international community has adopted sanction towards Russia in a way that is not justified. According to the text, the sanctions are the result of an attack against Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 that has been wrongly attributed to Russia. | false | 0.822748 | 5 | EN_UA_010909.txt | URW: Russia is the Victim | none | The text presents several paragraphs suggesting that Russia is wrongly accused by Western countries for being responsible of the downing of the MH17 flight. Russia is depicted as the victim, suggesting a russophobic intention driving the accusers
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
AMERICAN hospitals are most vulnerable to a cyberattack that would be more devastating than the September 11 terror attacks, an expert fears.
Professor Scheherazade Rehman, director of the European Union Research Center (EURC), warned that the healthcare sector has been "exacerbated" by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Rehman said financial institutions have upgraded their cyber defenses over the past decade - unlike healthcare.
She told The Sun: "We don't have anything that the banks are doing in healthcare settings from hospitals to healthcare delivery centers.
"If your card has been hacked, the bank can lock it down and switch the number.
“But you cannot change your blood type, you can’t change if you’ve had cancer, you can’t change your date of birth or your DNA. Healthcare information once hacked is not reversible.
“Simply changing someone’s birthday is enough to disrupt the entire US online health system and fixing it would be very, very difficult.”
The expert said that a potential cyberattack on institutions would be “more crippling” than a terrorist attack.
She added: “9/11 was a shock event. It was traumatic as we had never seen anything like it before.
Most read in Tech
“But, the real disruption to people, companies, and systems of governance is going to be a cyberattack.”
In June 2017, the Health Care Industry Cybersecurity Task Force warned in a report that healthcare cybersecurity is in a “critical condition”.
The dossier stated: “Healthcare cybersecurity is a key public health concern that needs immediate and aggressive attention.”
Researchers at the computer hardware company IBM say that healthcare firms on average take around 236 days to detect a data breach, and 93 days to mitigate the damage.
This compares to the average of 207 days to identify and 73 days to contain a cyberattack.
'EASY TARGETS'
And, US hospitals have around 10-15 networked medical devices per bed on average, meaning officials are working to secure machinery that’s easy to breach, according to Wired.
Analysts at the Brookings Institute believe “the fate of healthcare security” depends on whether investments in cybersecurity are made.
They said: “Just as a responsible healthcare professional seeks to identify and treat patients’ underlying chronic conditions before they cause a serious medical emergency, so too must responsible healthcare organizations address vulnerabilities in their digital infrastructure to prevent cyberattacks."
Fears of a potential cyberattack on US institutions are rising amid the crisis in Ukraine.
Department of Homeland Security officials warned that the US is on “heightened alert” for a potential cyberattack from Moscow.
Rehman believes an attack on the US is "highly likely" should the crisis in Eastern Europe escalate.
Pentagon officials warned Friday that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would result in a "horrific" aftermath.
Moscow has amassed around 100,000 troops at the Ukrainian border - something which Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he hadn't seen in the past four decades.
Rehman said: “A US response would probably set off what we believe will be the world’s first large-scale cyberwar.
US IN 'WARFARE STATE'
“The Russians have been doing cyber-espionage and pre-positioning operations – meaning they’re setting up vulnerabilities in our infrastructure which means when they’re ready, they can release. It might not necessarily be tomorrow.”
R.P. Eddy, CEO of the cybersecurity firm Ergo, warned that the US is already in a “warfare state” with Moscow, Fox News reports.
He told governors: “What’s Russia’s next move? [It’s] very likely is to increase cyberattacks. It’s an easy move for them.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
“We are already in a warfare state right now and we need to be aware of that.”
Jen Easterly, Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), warned said officials are taking any "rippling effects" of a potential Russian invasion “very seriously”.
We pay for your stories!
Do you have a story for The US Sun team?
Email us at [email protected] or call 212 416 4552.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/TheSunUS and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunUS
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several passages suggest that US infrastructures, particularly healthcare, are vulnerable to cyber-attack which would have disastrous consequences. | true | 0.812768 | 1 | EN_UA_103168.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | Multiple paragraphs amplify the fear of a cyber attack against the US by Russia. According to the text, these attacks can happen anytime.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
AMERICAN hospitals are most vulnerable to a cyberattack that would be more devastating than the September 11 terror attacks, an expert fears.
Professor Scheherazade Rehman, director of the European Union Research Center (EURC), warned that the healthcare sector has been "exacerbated" by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Rehman said financial institutions have upgraded their cyber defenses over the past decade - unlike healthcare.
She told The Sun: "We don't have anything that the banks are doing in healthcare settings from hospitals to healthcare delivery centers.
"If your card has been hacked, the bank can lock it down and switch the number.
“But you cannot change your blood type, you can’t change if you’ve had cancer, you can’t change your date of birth or your DNA. Healthcare information once hacked is not reversible.
“Simply changing someone’s birthday is enough to disrupt the entire US online health system and fixing it would be very, very difficult.”
The expert said that a potential cyberattack on institutions would be “more crippling” than a terrorist attack.
She added: “9/11 was a shock event. It was traumatic as we had never seen anything like it before.
Most read in Tech
“But, the real disruption to people, companies, and systems of governance is going to be a cyberattack.”
In June 2017, the Health Care Industry Cybersecurity Task Force warned in a report that healthcare cybersecurity is in a “critical condition”.
The dossier stated: “Healthcare cybersecurity is a key public health concern that needs immediate and aggressive attention.”
Researchers at the computer hardware company IBM say that healthcare firms on average take around 236 days to detect a data breach, and 93 days to mitigate the damage.
This compares to the average of 207 days to identify and 73 days to contain a cyberattack.
'EASY TARGETS'
And, US hospitals have around 10-15 networked medical devices per bed on average, meaning officials are working to secure machinery that’s easy to breach, according to Wired.
Analysts at the Brookings Institute believe “the fate of healthcare security” depends on whether investments in cybersecurity are made.
They said: “Just as a responsible healthcare professional seeks to identify and treat patients’ underlying chronic conditions before they cause a serious medical emergency, so too must responsible healthcare organizations address vulnerabilities in their digital infrastructure to prevent cyberattacks."
Fears of a potential cyberattack on US institutions are rising amid the crisis in Ukraine.
Department of Homeland Security officials warned that the US is on “heightened alert” for a potential cyberattack from Moscow.
Rehman believes an attack on the US is "highly likely" should the crisis in Eastern Europe escalate.
Pentagon officials warned Friday that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would result in a "horrific" aftermath.
Moscow has amassed around 100,000 troops at the Ukrainian border - something which Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he hadn't seen in the past four decades.
Rehman said: “A US response would probably set off what we believe will be the world’s first large-scale cyberwar.
US IN 'WARFARE STATE'
“The Russians have been doing cyber-espionage and pre-positioning operations – meaning they’re setting up vulnerabilities in our infrastructure which means when they’re ready, they can release. It might not necessarily be tomorrow.”
R.P. Eddy, CEO of the cybersecurity firm Ergo, warned that the US is already in a “warfare state” with Moscow, Fox News reports.
He told governors: “What’s Russia’s next move? [It’s] very likely is to increase cyberattacks. It’s an easy move for them.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
“We are already in a warfare state right now and we need to be aware of that.”
Jen Easterly, Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), warned said officials are taking any "rippling effects" of a potential Russian invasion “very seriously”.
We pay for your stories!
Do you have a story for The US Sun team?
Email us at [email protected] or call 212 416 4552.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/TheSunUS and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunUS
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text has several passages suggesting that the US should be worried about cyberattacks from Russia. US institutions, including hospitals, are deemed particularly vulnerable | true | 0.812768 | 2 | EN_UA_103168.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | Multiple paragraphs amplify the fear of a cyber attack against the US by Russia. According to the text, these attacks can happen anytime.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
AMERICAN hospitals are most vulnerable to a cyberattack that would be more devastating than the September 11 terror attacks, an expert fears.
Professor Scheherazade Rehman, director of the European Union Research Center (EURC), warned that the healthcare sector has been "exacerbated" by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Rehman said financial institutions have upgraded their cyber defenses over the past decade - unlike healthcare.
She told The Sun: "We don't have anything that the banks are doing in healthcare settings from hospitals to healthcare delivery centers.
"If your card has been hacked, the bank can lock it down and switch the number.
“But you cannot change your blood type, you can’t change if you’ve had cancer, you can’t change your date of birth or your DNA. Healthcare information once hacked is not reversible.
“Simply changing someone’s birthday is enough to disrupt the entire US online health system and fixing it would be very, very difficult.”
The expert said that a potential cyberattack on institutions would be “more crippling” than a terrorist attack.
She added: “9/11 was a shock event. It was traumatic as we had never seen anything like it before.
Most read in Tech
“But, the real disruption to people, companies, and systems of governance is going to be a cyberattack.”
In June 2017, the Health Care Industry Cybersecurity Task Force warned in a report that healthcare cybersecurity is in a “critical condition”.
The dossier stated: “Healthcare cybersecurity is a key public health concern that needs immediate and aggressive attention.”
Researchers at the computer hardware company IBM say that healthcare firms on average take around 236 days to detect a data breach, and 93 days to mitigate the damage.
This compares to the average of 207 days to identify and 73 days to contain a cyberattack.
'EASY TARGETS'
And, US hospitals have around 10-15 networked medical devices per bed on average, meaning officials are working to secure machinery that’s easy to breach, according to Wired.
Analysts at the Brookings Institute believe “the fate of healthcare security” depends on whether investments in cybersecurity are made.
They said: “Just as a responsible healthcare professional seeks to identify and treat patients’ underlying chronic conditions before they cause a serious medical emergency, so too must responsible healthcare organizations address vulnerabilities in their digital infrastructure to prevent cyberattacks."
Fears of a potential cyberattack on US institutions are rising amid the crisis in Ukraine.
Department of Homeland Security officials warned that the US is on “heightened alert” for a potential cyberattack from Moscow.
Rehman believes an attack on the US is "highly likely" should the crisis in Eastern Europe escalate.
Pentagon officials warned Friday that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would result in a "horrific" aftermath.
Moscow has amassed around 100,000 troops at the Ukrainian border - something which Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he hadn't seen in the past four decades.
Rehman said: “A US response would probably set off what we believe will be the world’s first large-scale cyberwar.
US IN 'WARFARE STATE'
“The Russians have been doing cyber-espionage and pre-positioning operations – meaning they’re setting up vulnerabilities in our infrastructure which means when they’re ready, they can release. It might not necessarily be tomorrow.”
R.P. Eddy, CEO of the cybersecurity firm Ergo, warned that the US is already in a “warfare state” with Moscow, Fox News reports.
He told governors: “What’s Russia’s next move? [It’s] very likely is to increase cyberattacks. It’s an easy move for them.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
“We are already in a warfare state right now and we need to be aware of that.”
Jen Easterly, Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), warned said officials are taking any "rippling effects" of a potential Russian invasion “very seriously”.
We pay for your stories!
Do you have a story for The US Sun team?
Email us at [email protected] or call 212 416 4552.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/TheSunUS and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunUS
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article talks about the US security infrastructure being in vulnerable condition, claiming that cyber-attacks could be worse than a 9/11. It uses alarmist terms such as "exacerbated" to describe the vulnerabilities of US hospitals as well as "warfare state" to describe the relationship between the US and Russia. | false | 0.812768 | 3 | EN_UA_103168.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | Multiple paragraphs amplify the fear of a cyber attack against the US by Russia. According to the text, these attacks can happen anytime.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
AMERICAN hospitals are most vulnerable to a cyberattack that would be more devastating than the September 11 terror attacks, an expert fears.
Professor Scheherazade Rehman, director of the European Union Research Center (EURC), warned that the healthcare sector has been "exacerbated" by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Rehman said financial institutions have upgraded their cyber defenses over the past decade - unlike healthcare.
She told The Sun: "We don't have anything that the banks are doing in healthcare settings from hospitals to healthcare delivery centers.
"If your card has been hacked, the bank can lock it down and switch the number.
“But you cannot change your blood type, you can’t change if you’ve had cancer, you can’t change your date of birth or your DNA. Healthcare information once hacked is not reversible.
“Simply changing someone’s birthday is enough to disrupt the entire US online health system and fixing it would be very, very difficult.”
The expert said that a potential cyberattack on institutions would be “more crippling” than a terrorist attack.
She added: “9/11 was a shock event. It was traumatic as we had never seen anything like it before.
Most read in Tech
“But, the real disruption to people, companies, and systems of governance is going to be a cyberattack.”
In June 2017, the Health Care Industry Cybersecurity Task Force warned in a report that healthcare cybersecurity is in a “critical condition”.
The dossier stated: “Healthcare cybersecurity is a key public health concern that needs immediate and aggressive attention.”
Researchers at the computer hardware company IBM say that healthcare firms on average take around 236 days to detect a data breach, and 93 days to mitigate the damage.
This compares to the average of 207 days to identify and 73 days to contain a cyberattack.
'EASY TARGETS'
And, US hospitals have around 10-15 networked medical devices per bed on average, meaning officials are working to secure machinery that’s easy to breach, according to Wired.
Analysts at the Brookings Institute believe “the fate of healthcare security” depends on whether investments in cybersecurity are made.
They said: “Just as a responsible healthcare professional seeks to identify and treat patients’ underlying chronic conditions before they cause a serious medical emergency, so too must responsible healthcare organizations address vulnerabilities in their digital infrastructure to prevent cyberattacks."
Fears of a potential cyberattack on US institutions are rising amid the crisis in Ukraine.
Department of Homeland Security officials warned that the US is on “heightened alert” for a potential cyberattack from Moscow.
Rehman believes an attack on the US is "highly likely" should the crisis in Eastern Europe escalate.
Pentagon officials warned Friday that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would result in a "horrific" aftermath.
Moscow has amassed around 100,000 troops at the Ukrainian border - something which Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he hadn't seen in the past four decades.
Rehman said: “A US response would probably set off what we believe will be the world’s first large-scale cyberwar.
US IN 'WARFARE STATE'
“The Russians have been doing cyber-espionage and pre-positioning operations – meaning they’re setting up vulnerabilities in our infrastructure which means when they’re ready, they can release. It might not necessarily be tomorrow.”
R.P. Eddy, CEO of the cybersecurity firm Ergo, warned that the US is already in a “warfare state” with Moscow, Fox News reports.
He told governors: “What’s Russia’s next move? [It’s] very likely is to increase cyberattacks. It’s an easy move for them.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
“We are already in a warfare state right now and we need to be aware of that.”
Jen Easterly, Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), warned said officials are taking any "rippling effects" of a potential Russian invasion “very seriously”.
We pay for your stories!
Do you have a story for The US Sun team?
Email us at [email protected] or call 212 416 4552.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/TheSunUS and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunUS
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents multiple paragraphs in which the possible use of cyberattacks by Russia in case of escalation in Ukraine is highlighted, specifying that the US healthcare system would be among the most vulnerable | false | 0.812768 | 4 | EN_UA_103168.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | Multiple paragraphs amplify the fear of a cyber attack against the US by Russia. According to the text, these attacks can happen anytime.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
Warning US hospitals are ‘most vulnerable to cyber attack that will be more devastating than 9/11’ in wake of Covid
AMERICAN hospitals are most vulnerable to a cyberattack that would be more devastating than the September 11 terror attacks, an expert fears.
Professor Scheherazade Rehman, director of the European Union Research Center (EURC), warned that the healthcare sector has been "exacerbated" by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Rehman said financial institutions have upgraded their cyber defenses over the past decade - unlike healthcare.
She told The Sun: "We don't have anything that the banks are doing in healthcare settings from hospitals to healthcare delivery centers.
"If your card has been hacked, the bank can lock it down and switch the number.
“But you cannot change your blood type, you can’t change if you’ve had cancer, you can’t change your date of birth or your DNA. Healthcare information once hacked is not reversible.
“Simply changing someone’s birthday is enough to disrupt the entire US online health system and fixing it would be very, very difficult.”
The expert said that a potential cyberattack on institutions would be “more crippling” than a terrorist attack.
She added: “9/11 was a shock event. It was traumatic as we had never seen anything like it before.
Most read in Tech
“But, the real disruption to people, companies, and systems of governance is going to be a cyberattack.”
In June 2017, the Health Care Industry Cybersecurity Task Force warned in a report that healthcare cybersecurity is in a “critical condition”.
The dossier stated: “Healthcare cybersecurity is a key public health concern that needs immediate and aggressive attention.”
Researchers at the computer hardware company IBM say that healthcare firms on average take around 236 days to detect a data breach, and 93 days to mitigate the damage.
This compares to the average of 207 days to identify and 73 days to contain a cyberattack.
'EASY TARGETS'
And, US hospitals have around 10-15 networked medical devices per bed on average, meaning officials are working to secure machinery that’s easy to breach, according to Wired.
Analysts at the Brookings Institute believe “the fate of healthcare security” depends on whether investments in cybersecurity are made.
They said: “Just as a responsible healthcare professional seeks to identify and treat patients’ underlying chronic conditions before they cause a serious medical emergency, so too must responsible healthcare organizations address vulnerabilities in their digital infrastructure to prevent cyberattacks."
Fears of a potential cyberattack on US institutions are rising amid the crisis in Ukraine.
Department of Homeland Security officials warned that the US is on “heightened alert” for a potential cyberattack from Moscow.
Rehman believes an attack on the US is "highly likely" should the crisis in Eastern Europe escalate.
Pentagon officials warned Friday that a Russian invasion of Ukraine would result in a "horrific" aftermath.
Moscow has amassed around 100,000 troops at the Ukrainian border - something which Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he hadn't seen in the past four decades.
Rehman said: “A US response would probably set off what we believe will be the world’s first large-scale cyberwar.
US IN 'WARFARE STATE'
“The Russians have been doing cyber-espionage and pre-positioning operations – meaning they’re setting up vulnerabilities in our infrastructure which means when they’re ready, they can release. It might not necessarily be tomorrow.”
R.P. Eddy, CEO of the cybersecurity firm Ergo, warned that the US is already in a “warfare state” with Moscow, Fox News reports.
He told governors: “What’s Russia’s next move? [It’s] very likely is to increase cyberattacks. It’s an easy move for them.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
“We are already in a warfare state right now and we need to be aware of that.”
Jen Easterly, Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), warned said officials are taking any "rippling effects" of a potential Russian invasion “very seriously”.
We pay for your stories!
Do you have a story for The US Sun team?
Email us at [email protected] or call 212 416 4552.
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/TheSunUS and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSunUS
</document>
<category>
URW: Amplifying war-related fears
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text reports several passages in which a possible cyber-attack is mentioned as a likely scenario in the context of the Russian-Ukraine conflict. The text does not mention the attacker, but it is implicitly Russia | false | 0.812768 | 5 | EN_UA_103168.txt | URW: Amplifying war-related fears | none | Multiple paragraphs amplify the fear of a cyber attack against the US by Russia. According to the text, these attacks can happen anytime.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
Democratic governments suppress protests at home but preach human rights abroad, Climate Rights International has said
Rich democratic nations are deploying harsh measures against climate change activists, while criticizing states in the Global South for similar actions, according to a report by Climate Rights International.
The report highlights the increasingly “heavy-handed treatment” of eco activists in Australia, Germany, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, and the US, emphasizing that authorities in those nations are violating their legal commitments to protect basic human rights.
According to the study, the drastic steps taken by governments in nations perceived as democratic include lengthy prison terms, preventive detention, and intimidation and harassment online and in the media.
The 70-page report entitled “On Thin Ice: Disproportionate Responses to Climate Change Protesters in Democratic Countries” also highlights how such governments criticize authorities in developing nations for not respecting the right to peaceful protest.
“Governments too often take such a strong and principled view about the right to peaceful protest in other countries – but when they don’t like certain kinds of protests at home they pass laws and deploy the police to stop them,” the executive director of Climate Rights International, Brad Adams, told The Guardian.
Judicial authorities in several countries including the UK, Germany and the US have been imposing “record-breaking” sentences for “non-violent protest,” the report said, emphasizing that some national and state governments are using preemptive arrests and detention of those suspected of planning rallies.
Governments in Western states are also adopting new laws to make the vast majority of protests illegal, and allowing more severe penalties for demonstrators, the report noted.
The researchers accused Western authorities of undermining the right to a fair trial by taking legal steps to stop juries from hearing about people’s motives for taking part in protests during court hearings.
In one UK case in July, five Just Stop Oil protesters were convicted of conspiracy to cause public nuisance by blocking a highway, and were handed the longest-ever sentences for a nonviolent protest. One of the group received a five-year sentence, while four others received four-year terms.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article talks about the West applying double standards when it comes to climate activism. They claim that Western countries have harsh measures against climate activism but criticize countries in the global South for similar actions | true | 0.825185 | 1 | EN_CC_200012.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments | The text attacks Western national governments for repressing and adopting harsh measures against climate activism, pointing out an hypocritical attitude since often the same governments promote climate initiatives in non-Western countries
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
Democratic governments suppress protests at home but preach human rights abroad, Climate Rights International has said
Rich democratic nations are deploying harsh measures against climate change activists, while criticizing states in the Global South for similar actions, according to a report by Climate Rights International.
The report highlights the increasingly “heavy-handed treatment” of eco activists in Australia, Germany, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, and the US, emphasizing that authorities in those nations are violating their legal commitments to protect basic human rights.
According to the study, the drastic steps taken by governments in nations perceived as democratic include lengthy prison terms, preventive detention, and intimidation and harassment online and in the media.
The 70-page report entitled “On Thin Ice: Disproportionate Responses to Climate Change Protesters in Democratic Countries” also highlights how such governments criticize authorities in developing nations for not respecting the right to peaceful protest.
“Governments too often take such a strong and principled view about the right to peaceful protest in other countries – but when they don’t like certain kinds of protests at home they pass laws and deploy the police to stop them,” the executive director of Climate Rights International, Brad Adams, told The Guardian.
Judicial authorities in several countries including the UK, Germany and the US have been imposing “record-breaking” sentences for “non-violent protest,” the report said, emphasizing that some national and state governments are using preemptive arrests and detention of those suspected of planning rallies.
Governments in Western states are also adopting new laws to make the vast majority of protests illegal, and allowing more severe penalties for demonstrators, the report noted.
The researchers accused Western authorities of undermining the right to a fair trial by taking legal steps to stop juries from hearing about people’s motives for taking part in protests during court hearings.
In one UK case in July, five Just Stop Oil protesters were convicted of conspiracy to cause public nuisance by blocking a highway, and were handed the longest-ever sentences for a nonviolent protest. One of the group received a five-year sentence, while four others received four-year terms.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticises national governments in Western countries for adopting severe measures against climate movement activists, emphasising that these measures are disproportionate compared to the perceived threat that the protests represent, and are actually worse than in many non-Western countries. | true | 0.825185 | 2 | EN_CC_200012.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments | The text attacks Western national governments for repressing and adopting harsh measures against climate activism, pointing out an hypocritical attitude since often the same governments promote climate initiatives in non-Western countries
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
Democratic governments suppress protests at home but preach human rights abroad, Climate Rights International has said
Rich democratic nations are deploying harsh measures against climate change activists, while criticizing states in the Global South for similar actions, according to a report by Climate Rights International.
The report highlights the increasingly “heavy-handed treatment” of eco activists in Australia, Germany, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, and the US, emphasizing that authorities in those nations are violating their legal commitments to protect basic human rights.
According to the study, the drastic steps taken by governments in nations perceived as democratic include lengthy prison terms, preventive detention, and intimidation and harassment online and in the media.
The 70-page report entitled “On Thin Ice: Disproportionate Responses to Climate Change Protesters in Democratic Countries” also highlights how such governments criticize authorities in developing nations for not respecting the right to peaceful protest.
“Governments too often take such a strong and principled view about the right to peaceful protest in other countries – but when they don’t like certain kinds of protests at home they pass laws and deploy the police to stop them,” the executive director of Climate Rights International, Brad Adams, told The Guardian.
Judicial authorities in several countries including the UK, Germany and the US have been imposing “record-breaking” sentences for “non-violent protest,” the report said, emphasizing that some national and state governments are using preemptive arrests and detention of those suspected of planning rallies.
Governments in Western states are also adopting new laws to make the vast majority of protests illegal, and allowing more severe penalties for demonstrators, the report noted.
The researchers accused Western authorities of undermining the right to a fair trial by taking legal steps to stop juries from hearing about people’s motives for taking part in protests during court hearings.
In one UK case in July, five Just Stop Oil protesters were convicted of conspiracy to cause public nuisance by blocking a highway, and were handed the longest-ever sentences for a nonviolent protest. One of the group received a five-year sentence, while four others received four-year terms.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text repeatedly suggests that national governments of Western countries are restricting climate activism, highlighting examples of the use of harsh sentences for peaceful protest and the use of new laws to allow preventive detention | false | 0.825185 | 3 | EN_CC_200012.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments | The text attacks Western national governments for repressing and adopting harsh measures against climate activism, pointing out an hypocritical attitude since often the same governments promote climate initiatives in non-Western countries
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
Democratic governments suppress protests at home but preach human rights abroad, Climate Rights International has said
Rich democratic nations are deploying harsh measures against climate change activists, while criticizing states in the Global South for similar actions, according to a report by Climate Rights International.
The report highlights the increasingly “heavy-handed treatment” of eco activists in Australia, Germany, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, and the US, emphasizing that authorities in those nations are violating their legal commitments to protect basic human rights.
According to the study, the drastic steps taken by governments in nations perceived as democratic include lengthy prison terms, preventive detention, and intimidation and harassment online and in the media.
The 70-page report entitled “On Thin Ice: Disproportionate Responses to Climate Change Protesters in Democratic Countries” also highlights how such governments criticize authorities in developing nations for not respecting the right to peaceful protest.
“Governments too often take such a strong and principled view about the right to peaceful protest in other countries – but when they don’t like certain kinds of protests at home they pass laws and deploy the police to stop them,” the executive director of Climate Rights International, Brad Adams, told The Guardian.
Judicial authorities in several countries including the UK, Germany and the US have been imposing “record-breaking” sentences for “non-violent protest,” the report said, emphasizing that some national and state governments are using preemptive arrests and detention of those suspected of planning rallies.
Governments in Western states are also adopting new laws to make the vast majority of protests illegal, and allowing more severe penalties for demonstrators, the report noted.
The researchers accused Western authorities of undermining the right to a fair trial by taking legal steps to stop juries from hearing about people’s motives for taking part in protests during court hearings.
In one UK case in July, five Just Stop Oil protesters were convicted of conspiracy to cause public nuisance by blocking a highway, and were handed the longest-ever sentences for a nonviolent protest. One of the group received a five-year sentence, while four others received four-year terms.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article talks about Western countries adopting harsh measures against climate activists such as long prison sentences. Article emphasizes hypocrisy of these countries since they preach human rights abroad while suppressing protest at home. | false | 0.825185 | 4 | EN_CC_200012.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments | The text attacks Western national governments for repressing and adopting harsh measures against climate activism, pointing out an hypocritical attitude since often the same governments promote climate initiatives in non-Western countries
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
West silences activists at home while promoting rights abroad – report
Democratic governments suppress protests at home but preach human rights abroad, Climate Rights International has said
Rich democratic nations are deploying harsh measures against climate change activists, while criticizing states in the Global South for similar actions, according to a report by Climate Rights International.
The report highlights the increasingly “heavy-handed treatment” of eco activists in Australia, Germany, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, the UK, and the US, emphasizing that authorities in those nations are violating their legal commitments to protect basic human rights.
According to the study, the drastic steps taken by governments in nations perceived as democratic include lengthy prison terms, preventive detention, and intimidation and harassment online and in the media.
The 70-page report entitled “On Thin Ice: Disproportionate Responses to Climate Change Protesters in Democratic Countries” also highlights how such governments criticize authorities in developing nations for not respecting the right to peaceful protest.
“Governments too often take such a strong and principled view about the right to peaceful protest in other countries – but when they don’t like certain kinds of protests at home they pass laws and deploy the police to stop them,” the executive director of Climate Rights International, Brad Adams, told The Guardian.
Judicial authorities in several countries including the UK, Germany and the US have been imposing “record-breaking” sentences for “non-violent protest,” the report said, emphasizing that some national and state governments are using preemptive arrests and detention of those suspected of planning rallies.
Governments in Western states are also adopting new laws to make the vast majority of protests illegal, and allowing more severe penalties for demonstrators, the report noted.
The researchers accused Western authorities of undermining the right to a fair trial by taking legal steps to stop juries from hearing about people’s motives for taking part in protests during court hearings.
In one UK case in July, five Just Stop Oil protesters were convicted of conspiracy to cause public nuisance by blocking a highway, and were handed the longest-ever sentences for a nonviolent protest. One of the group received a five-year sentence, while four others received four-year terms.
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout the text, the West, specifically Western countries such as the UK and US, are depicted as adopting heavy-handed measures against climate change activists. Indeed, these countries are accused of repressing such activists while adopting laws to make most protests illegal. | false | 0.825185 | 5 | EN_CC_200012.txt | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities | CC: Criticism of institutions and authorities: Criticism of national governments | The text attacks Western national governments for repressing and adopting harsh measures against climate activism, pointing out an hypocritical attitude since often the same governments promote climate initiatives in non-Western countries
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
WEF Memo Reveals Plan to Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People By 2030
The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030.
If you thought the Great Replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
According to a WEF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world’s problems including climate change and colonialism, and in the interests of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority.
The WEF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan and the results are already playing out before our eyes.
Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven’t already, and join the People’s Voice Locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel.
The Netherlands has become one of the global elite’s testing grounds for the most extreme policies.
Just as the Netherlands was ground zero for the elite’s war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elite’s plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek reports from the Netherlands.
What is wrong with our leaders?
They are fully bought and paid for compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos.
Catching the elite in “mask off” moments is nothing short of terrifying.
Take for example footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society.
Dr. Carol Baker was describing what she described as the “solution” at a panel discussion in New York City.
You won’t be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary in 2009.
She was also honored with the 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a D.C. ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates-connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don’t cooperate with the elite’s vaccine agenda?
This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it’s time to talk about “death panels” that will sentence ordinary, law-abiding people to death for the crime of being of no use to the elite.
This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates at the WEF are determined to usher in as part of their Great Reset and Great Replacement.
It gets even worse when you understand how far and wide their evil ideology has spread.
The globalist elite are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multi-pronged attack and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time.
Of course, the mainstream media are still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes.
They will attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you. You might lose your bank account.
You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris’ open border, even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand.
Biden is a compromised puppet politician who has been shamelessly selling out America to the globalists for decades.
Now that he has been sacrificed by the global elite in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who is approximately eight inches taller than the last version, it is worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid.
They really think we are not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multi-pronged attacks maiming and killing the population all have one thing in common.
Chemtrails and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that is statistically impossible unless it’s by design.
Of course the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The Covid vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world.
But it gets even worse, as Robert F. Kennedy explained in New York City. The bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races.
We can’t allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal.
Here at the People’s Voice we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elite. But we need your help. Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the Peoples Voice Locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there.
</document>
<category>
CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text presents several passages in which Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum are accused of orchestrating a plan to depopulate the world and eliminate white people by the use of vaccines. | true | 0.822113 | 1 | EN_CC_100012.txt | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites | The text constantly mentions an alleged secret plan to reduce the white global population perpetrated by the WEF and unspecified global elites. These actors are accused of other conspiracy theories throughout the text as well.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
WEF Memo Reveals Plan to Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People By 2030
The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030.
If you thought the Great Replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
According to a WEF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world’s problems including climate change and colonialism, and in the interests of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority.
The WEF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan and the results are already playing out before our eyes.
Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven’t already, and join the People’s Voice Locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel.
The Netherlands has become one of the global elite’s testing grounds for the most extreme policies.
Just as the Netherlands was ground zero for the elite’s war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elite’s plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek reports from the Netherlands.
What is wrong with our leaders?
They are fully bought and paid for compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos.
Catching the elite in “mask off” moments is nothing short of terrifying.
Take for example footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society.
Dr. Carol Baker was describing what she described as the “solution” at a panel discussion in New York City.
You won’t be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary in 2009.
She was also honored with the 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a D.C. ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates-connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don’t cooperate with the elite’s vaccine agenda?
This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it’s time to talk about “death panels” that will sentence ordinary, law-abiding people to death for the crime of being of no use to the elite.
This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates at the WEF are determined to usher in as part of their Great Reset and Great Replacement.
It gets even worse when you understand how far and wide their evil ideology has spread.
The globalist elite are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multi-pronged attack and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time.
Of course, the mainstream media are still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes.
They will attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you. You might lose your bank account.
You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris’ open border, even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand.
Biden is a compromised puppet politician who has been shamelessly selling out America to the globalists for decades.
Now that he has been sacrificed by the global elite in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who is approximately eight inches taller than the last version, it is worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid.
They really think we are not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multi-pronged attacks maiming and killing the population all have one thing in common.
Chemtrails and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that is statistically impossible unless it’s by design.
Of course the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The Covid vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world.
But it gets even worse, as Robert F. Kennedy explained in New York City. The bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races.
We can’t allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal.
Here at the People’s Voice we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elite. But we need your help. Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the Peoples Voice Locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there.
</document>
<category>
CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article talks about the WEF's alleged plans to reduce the number of white people in the world. The text adopts a conspiracy approach suggesting that the WEF has the power to impose its agenda while attacks journalists and US institutions. | true | 0.822113 | 2 | EN_CC_100012.txt | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites | The text constantly mentions an alleged secret plan to reduce the white global population perpetrated by the WEF and unspecified global elites. These actors are accused of other conspiracy theories throughout the text as well.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
WEF Memo Reveals Plan to Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People By 2030
The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030.
If you thought the Great Replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
According to a WEF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world’s problems including climate change and colonialism, and in the interests of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority.
The WEF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan and the results are already playing out before our eyes.
Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven’t already, and join the People’s Voice Locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel.
The Netherlands has become one of the global elite’s testing grounds for the most extreme policies.
Just as the Netherlands was ground zero for the elite’s war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elite’s plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek reports from the Netherlands.
What is wrong with our leaders?
They are fully bought and paid for compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos.
Catching the elite in “mask off” moments is nothing short of terrifying.
Take for example footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society.
Dr. Carol Baker was describing what she described as the “solution” at a panel discussion in New York City.
You won’t be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary in 2009.
She was also honored with the 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a D.C. ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates-connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don’t cooperate with the elite’s vaccine agenda?
This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it’s time to talk about “death panels” that will sentence ordinary, law-abiding people to death for the crime of being of no use to the elite.
This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates at the WEF are determined to usher in as part of their Great Reset and Great Replacement.
It gets even worse when you understand how far and wide their evil ideology has spread.
The globalist elite are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multi-pronged attack and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time.
Of course, the mainstream media are still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes.
They will attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you. You might lose your bank account.
You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris’ open border, even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand.
Biden is a compromised puppet politician who has been shamelessly selling out America to the globalists for decades.
Now that he has been sacrificed by the global elite in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who is approximately eight inches taller than the last version, it is worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid.
They really think we are not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multi-pronged attacks maiming and killing the population all have one thing in common.
Chemtrails and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that is statistically impossible unless it’s by design.
Of course the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The Covid vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world.
But it gets even worse, as Robert F. Kennedy explained in New York City. The bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races.
We can’t allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal.
Here at the People’s Voice we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elite. But we need your help. Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the Peoples Voice Locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there.
</document>
<category>
CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Multiple paragraphs present claims arguing that global elites are attempting to depopulate the world, arguing that these plans would take the form of attacks directed against white people | false | 0.822113 | 3 | EN_CC_100012.txt | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites | The text constantly mentions an alleged secret plan to reduce the white global population perpetrated by the WEF and unspecified global elites. These actors are accused of other conspiracy theories throughout the text as well.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
WEF Memo Reveals Plan to Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People By 2030
The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030.
If you thought the Great Replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
According to a WEF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world’s problems including climate change and colonialism, and in the interests of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority.
The WEF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan and the results are already playing out before our eyes.
Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven’t already, and join the People’s Voice Locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel.
The Netherlands has become one of the global elite’s testing grounds for the most extreme policies.
Just as the Netherlands was ground zero for the elite’s war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elite’s plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek reports from the Netherlands.
What is wrong with our leaders?
They are fully bought and paid for compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos.
Catching the elite in “mask off” moments is nothing short of terrifying.
Take for example footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society.
Dr. Carol Baker was describing what she described as the “solution” at a panel discussion in New York City.
You won’t be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary in 2009.
She was also honored with the 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a D.C. ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates-connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don’t cooperate with the elite’s vaccine agenda?
This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it’s time to talk about “death panels” that will sentence ordinary, law-abiding people to death for the crime of being of no use to the elite.
This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates at the WEF are determined to usher in as part of their Great Reset and Great Replacement.
It gets even worse when you understand how far and wide their evil ideology has spread.
The globalist elite are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multi-pronged attack and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time.
Of course, the mainstream media are still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes.
They will attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you. You might lose your bank account.
You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris’ open border, even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand.
Biden is a compromised puppet politician who has been shamelessly selling out America to the globalists for decades.
Now that he has been sacrificed by the global elite in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who is approximately eight inches taller than the last version, it is worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid.
They really think we are not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multi-pronged attacks maiming and killing the population all have one thing in common.
Chemtrails and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that is statistically impossible unless it’s by design.
Of course the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The Covid vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world.
But it gets even worse, as Robert F. Kennedy explained in New York City. The bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races.
We can’t allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal.
Here at the People’s Voice we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elite. But we need your help. Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the Peoples Voice Locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there.
</document>
<category>
CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several passages criticise some initiatives of the WEF which, according to the author, have the intent to depopulate the world by reducing the white population. The author attributes such alleged plan to some high profile people which, in some cases, are wrongly identified. | false | 0.822113 | 4 | EN_CC_100012.txt | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites | The text constantly mentions an alleged secret plan to reduce the white global population perpetrated by the WEF and unspecified global elites. These actors are accused of other conspiracy theories throughout the text as well.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
WEF Memo Reveals Plan to Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People By 2030
The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030.
If you thought the Great Replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again.
You can unsubscribe any time. By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use
According to a WEF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world’s problems including climate change and colonialism, and in the interests of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority.
The WEF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan and the results are already playing out before our eyes.
Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven’t already, and join the People’s Voice Locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel.
The Netherlands has become one of the global elite’s testing grounds for the most extreme policies.
Just as the Netherlands was ground zero for the elite’s war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elite’s plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics.
Eva Vlaardingerbroek reports from the Netherlands.
What is wrong with our leaders?
They are fully bought and paid for compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos.
Catching the elite in “mask off” moments is nothing short of terrifying.
Take for example footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must “get rid of of all the whites in the United States” and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society.
Dr. Carol Baker was describing what she described as the “solution” at a panel discussion in New York City.
You won’t be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed Chair of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization by Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary in 2009.
She was also honored with the 2019 Albert B. Sabin Gold Medal at a D.C. ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates-connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don’t cooperate with the elite’s vaccine agenda?
This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it’s time to talk about “death panels” that will sentence ordinary, law-abiding people to death for the crime of being of no use to the elite.
This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates at the WEF are determined to usher in as part of their Great Reset and Great Replacement.
It gets even worse when you understand how far and wide their evil ideology has spread.
The globalist elite are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multi-pronged attack and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time.
Of course, the mainstream media are still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes.
They will attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you. You might lose your bank account.
You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris’ open border, even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand.
Biden is a compromised puppet politician who has been shamelessly selling out America to the globalists for decades.
Now that he has been sacrificed by the global elite in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who is approximately eight inches taller than the last version, it is worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid.
They really think we are not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multi-pronged attacks maiming and killing the population all have one thing in common.
Chemtrails and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that is statistically impossible unless it’s by design.
Of course the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The Covid vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world.
But it gets even worse, as Robert F. Kennedy explained in New York City. The bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races.
We can’t allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal.
Here at the People’s Voice we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elite. But we need your help. Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the Peoples Voice Locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there.
</document>
<category>
CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author talks about the elites depopulating the world through the great replacement. The argument is that they're targeting white people through the vaccines and bioweapons. | false | 0.822113 | 5 | EN_CC_100012.txt | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups | CC: Hidden plots by secret schemes of powerful groups: Blaming global elites | The text constantly mentions an alleged secret plan to reduce the white global population perpetrated by the WEF and unspecified global elites. These actors are accused of other conspiracy theories throughout the text as well.
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Panicking Putin desperately classifies medical files that revealed his ‘cancer battle’ as weak ruler fears coup
Paranoid Putin tries to hide ‘cancer battle’ by making bombshell medical files SECRET as weak ruler fears being toppled’
PANICKED Vladimir Putin has dramatically classified bombshell data which appears to prove he has been treated for cancer.
Rumours have persistently swirled that the tyrant, 70, is "critically ill" - fuelled by his bloated face and trembling legs.
Bombshell spy documents leaked to The Sun appeared to confirm Putin has pancreatic cancer and early-stage Parkinson's disease.
Now the panicked Russian leader has desperately classified medical files that reveal an apparent cancer battle as he fears a coup inside the Kremlin.
A loophole previously allowed investigative journalists to show that the dictator was constantly accompanied by a top thyroid cancer specialist and other medics.
Revelations last April indicated surgeon Yevgeny Selivanov, of Moscow's Central Clinical Hospital, had flown to Putin no less than 35 times in Black Sea resort Sochi.
More on Putin
The proof of Putin’s treatment by cancer doctors was deduced from the existence of contracts with the hospital which were listed on a Russian public procurement website.
Now such details have been made top secret, preventing public knowledge of current and future contracts.
Earlier it was seen that Putin was accompanied by between six and 13 medical specialists on his trips.
Medics were also seen to be on standby near his favourite official residences outside Moscow, for example in Sochi and Valdai.
Most read in The Sun
The report by Proekt media in April gave credence to rumours that Putin had suffered from cancer.
Medics appeared to be thyroid and ENT specialists.
It comes after it was revealed the Russian government has built a secret network of rail lines that lead to Putin's residences - and train stations nearby.
The blocking of data of such contracts was revealed by Sirena, part of Radio Liberty.
KREMLIN COUP?
The move is likely to increase speculation that the Kremlin is hiding the truth about Putin’s health during the war against Ukraine.
Symptoms of thyroid cancer include the appearance of a thick nodule in the thyroid area; hoarseness of voice; difficulty swallowing; pain in the neck and throat; enlarged lymph nodes in the neck; a dry cough, scratchy or scratchy feeling in the throat or behind the sternum.
There have also been claims that Putin is suffering from abdominal cancer and other ailments.
Meanwhile, there have been suggestions that drugs to treat his cancer may have distorted his mind when he launched the war in Ukraine.
The Kremlin insists that Putin is healthy.
Among the medics named as treating Putin were Dr Dmitry Verbovoy, an expert in acute illnesses, injuries and poisonings.
Another was Dr Konstantin Sim, an orthopaedic traumatologist, possibly helping with ice hockey injuries, ENT doctor Alexei Shcheglov and infectious disease specialist Yaroslav Protasenko.
He was also seen by neurosurgeons from the Central Clinical Hospital, led by department head Oleg Myshkin and Dr Elena Rastrusina, plus a resuscitator
Dr Pavel Sharikov, and head nurse Lyudmila Kadenkova.
A rehabilitation specialist was also involved, Dr Mikhail Tsykunov.In July 2020, Putin met with the head of the National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ivan Dedov.
It comes after the former head of MI6 suggested said there could be a coup inside the Kremlin to oust Putin - but the mechanisms for political change in Russia are "fragile".
Sir Richard Dearlove told The Sun: "I think we're heading into another phase where you're going to get a political upheaval as a result of a war gone badly wrong.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
"There could be a coup inside the Kremlin.
"I don't think there will be a popular uprising in Russia, but because of the catastrophic situation they're in, there must be massive tensions in the current leadership."
</document>
<category>
URW: Speculating war outcomes
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article reports on several occasions that the health of Putin is very poor. Several paragraphs say that he may have cancer. There is a paragraph saying that there could be a coup inside the Kremlin to remove Putin. | true | 0.812726 | 1 | EN_UA_012803.txt | URW: Speculating war outcomes | none | Several paragraphs indicate an imminent collapse of Russian government with coup in the Kremlin to remove Putin from the leadership of the country
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Panicking Putin desperately classifies medical files that revealed his ‘cancer battle’ as weak ruler fears coup
Paranoid Putin tries to hide ‘cancer battle’ by making bombshell medical files SECRET as weak ruler fears being toppled’
PANICKED Vladimir Putin has dramatically classified bombshell data which appears to prove he has been treated for cancer.
Rumours have persistently swirled that the tyrant, 70, is "critically ill" - fuelled by his bloated face and trembling legs.
Bombshell spy documents leaked to The Sun appeared to confirm Putin has pancreatic cancer and early-stage Parkinson's disease.
Now the panicked Russian leader has desperately classified medical files that reveal an apparent cancer battle as he fears a coup inside the Kremlin.
A loophole previously allowed investigative journalists to show that the dictator was constantly accompanied by a top thyroid cancer specialist and other medics.
Revelations last April indicated surgeon Yevgeny Selivanov, of Moscow's Central Clinical Hospital, had flown to Putin no less than 35 times in Black Sea resort Sochi.
More on Putin
The proof of Putin’s treatment by cancer doctors was deduced from the existence of contracts with the hospital which were listed on a Russian public procurement website.
Now such details have been made top secret, preventing public knowledge of current and future contracts.
Earlier it was seen that Putin was accompanied by between six and 13 medical specialists on his trips.
Medics were also seen to be on standby near his favourite official residences outside Moscow, for example in Sochi and Valdai.
Most read in The Sun
The report by Proekt media in April gave credence to rumours that Putin had suffered from cancer.
Medics appeared to be thyroid and ENT specialists.
It comes after it was revealed the Russian government has built a secret network of rail lines that lead to Putin's residences - and train stations nearby.
The blocking of data of such contracts was revealed by Sirena, part of Radio Liberty.
KREMLIN COUP?
The move is likely to increase speculation that the Kremlin is hiding the truth about Putin’s health during the war against Ukraine.
Symptoms of thyroid cancer include the appearance of a thick nodule in the thyroid area; hoarseness of voice; difficulty swallowing; pain in the neck and throat; enlarged lymph nodes in the neck; a dry cough, scratchy or scratchy feeling in the throat or behind the sternum.
There have also been claims that Putin is suffering from abdominal cancer and other ailments.
Meanwhile, there have been suggestions that drugs to treat his cancer may have distorted his mind when he launched the war in Ukraine.
The Kremlin insists that Putin is healthy.
Among the medics named as treating Putin were Dr Dmitry Verbovoy, an expert in acute illnesses, injuries and poisonings.
Another was Dr Konstantin Sim, an orthopaedic traumatologist, possibly helping with ice hockey injuries, ENT doctor Alexei Shcheglov and infectious disease specialist Yaroslav Protasenko.
He was also seen by neurosurgeons from the Central Clinical Hospital, led by department head Oleg Myshkin and Dr Elena Rastrusina, plus a resuscitator
Dr Pavel Sharikov, and head nurse Lyudmila Kadenkova.
A rehabilitation specialist was also involved, Dr Mikhail Tsykunov.In July 2020, Putin met with the head of the National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ivan Dedov.
It comes after the former head of MI6 suggested said there could be a coup inside the Kremlin to oust Putin - but the mechanisms for political change in Russia are "fragile".
Sir Richard Dearlove told The Sun: "I think we're heading into another phase where you're going to get a political upheaval as a result of a war gone badly wrong.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
"There could be a coup inside the Kremlin.
"I don't think there will be a popular uprising in Russia, but because of the catastrophic situation they're in, there must be massive tensions in the current leadership."
</document>
<category>
URW: Speculating war outcomes
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text conveys a sense of weakness of Russian government underlining several occasions of health problems of Vladimir Putin. This is argued to be a proof that Russian government has problems from within which will result in a coup in Kremlin. | true | 0.812726 | 2 | EN_UA_012803.txt | URW: Speculating war outcomes | none | Several paragraphs indicate an imminent collapse of Russian government with coup in the Kremlin to remove Putin from the leadership of the country
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Panicking Putin desperately classifies medical files that revealed his ‘cancer battle’ as weak ruler fears coup
Paranoid Putin tries to hide ‘cancer battle’ by making bombshell medical files SECRET as weak ruler fears being toppled’
PANICKED Vladimir Putin has dramatically classified bombshell data which appears to prove he has been treated for cancer.
Rumours have persistently swirled that the tyrant, 70, is "critically ill" - fuelled by his bloated face and trembling legs.
Bombshell spy documents leaked to The Sun appeared to confirm Putin has pancreatic cancer and early-stage Parkinson's disease.
Now the panicked Russian leader has desperately classified medical files that reveal an apparent cancer battle as he fears a coup inside the Kremlin.
A loophole previously allowed investigative journalists to show that the dictator was constantly accompanied by a top thyroid cancer specialist and other medics.
Revelations last April indicated surgeon Yevgeny Selivanov, of Moscow's Central Clinical Hospital, had flown to Putin no less than 35 times in Black Sea resort Sochi.
More on Putin
The proof of Putin’s treatment by cancer doctors was deduced from the existence of contracts with the hospital which were listed on a Russian public procurement website.
Now such details have been made top secret, preventing public knowledge of current and future contracts.
Earlier it was seen that Putin was accompanied by between six and 13 medical specialists on his trips.
Medics were also seen to be on standby near his favourite official residences outside Moscow, for example in Sochi and Valdai.
Most read in The Sun
The report by Proekt media in April gave credence to rumours that Putin had suffered from cancer.
Medics appeared to be thyroid and ENT specialists.
It comes after it was revealed the Russian government has built a secret network of rail lines that lead to Putin's residences - and train stations nearby.
The blocking of data of such contracts was revealed by Sirena, part of Radio Liberty.
KREMLIN COUP?
The move is likely to increase speculation that the Kremlin is hiding the truth about Putin’s health during the war against Ukraine.
Symptoms of thyroid cancer include the appearance of a thick nodule in the thyroid area; hoarseness of voice; difficulty swallowing; pain in the neck and throat; enlarged lymph nodes in the neck; a dry cough, scratchy or scratchy feeling in the throat or behind the sternum.
There have also been claims that Putin is suffering from abdominal cancer and other ailments.
Meanwhile, there have been suggestions that drugs to treat his cancer may have distorted his mind when he launched the war in Ukraine.
The Kremlin insists that Putin is healthy.
Among the medics named as treating Putin were Dr Dmitry Verbovoy, an expert in acute illnesses, injuries and poisonings.
Another was Dr Konstantin Sim, an orthopaedic traumatologist, possibly helping with ice hockey injuries, ENT doctor Alexei Shcheglov and infectious disease specialist Yaroslav Protasenko.
He was also seen by neurosurgeons from the Central Clinical Hospital, led by department head Oleg Myshkin and Dr Elena Rastrusina, plus a resuscitator
Dr Pavel Sharikov, and head nurse Lyudmila Kadenkova.
A rehabilitation specialist was also involved, Dr Mikhail Tsykunov.In July 2020, Putin met with the head of the National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ivan Dedov.
It comes after the former head of MI6 suggested said there could be a coup inside the Kremlin to oust Putin - but the mechanisms for political change in Russia are "fragile".
Sir Richard Dearlove told The Sun: "I think we're heading into another phase where you're going to get a political upheaval as a result of a war gone badly wrong.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
"There could be a coup inside the Kremlin.
"I don't think there will be a popular uprising in Russia, but because of the catastrophic situation they're in, there must be massive tensions in the current leadership."
</document>
<category>
URW: Speculating war outcomes
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article suggests that Russia might experience a coup due to bad leadership. The situation in Russia is considered dire because of bad management and wrong decisions by the leadership. | false | 0.812726 | 3 | EN_UA_012803.txt | URW: Speculating war outcomes | none | Several paragraphs indicate an imminent collapse of Russian government with coup in the Kremlin to remove Putin from the leadership of the country
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Panicking Putin desperately classifies medical files that revealed his ‘cancer battle’ as weak ruler fears coup
Paranoid Putin tries to hide ‘cancer battle’ by making bombshell medical files SECRET as weak ruler fears being toppled’
PANICKED Vladimir Putin has dramatically classified bombshell data which appears to prove he has been treated for cancer.
Rumours have persistently swirled that the tyrant, 70, is "critically ill" - fuelled by his bloated face and trembling legs.
Bombshell spy documents leaked to The Sun appeared to confirm Putin has pancreatic cancer and early-stage Parkinson's disease.
Now the panicked Russian leader has desperately classified medical files that reveal an apparent cancer battle as he fears a coup inside the Kremlin.
A loophole previously allowed investigative journalists to show that the dictator was constantly accompanied by a top thyroid cancer specialist and other medics.
Revelations last April indicated surgeon Yevgeny Selivanov, of Moscow's Central Clinical Hospital, had flown to Putin no less than 35 times in Black Sea resort Sochi.
More on Putin
The proof of Putin’s treatment by cancer doctors was deduced from the existence of contracts with the hospital which were listed on a Russian public procurement website.
Now such details have been made top secret, preventing public knowledge of current and future contracts.
Earlier it was seen that Putin was accompanied by between six and 13 medical specialists on his trips.
Medics were also seen to be on standby near his favourite official residences outside Moscow, for example in Sochi and Valdai.
Most read in The Sun
The report by Proekt media in April gave credence to rumours that Putin had suffered from cancer.
Medics appeared to be thyroid and ENT specialists.
It comes after it was revealed the Russian government has built a secret network of rail lines that lead to Putin's residences - and train stations nearby.
The blocking of data of such contracts was revealed by Sirena, part of Radio Liberty.
KREMLIN COUP?
The move is likely to increase speculation that the Kremlin is hiding the truth about Putin’s health during the war against Ukraine.
Symptoms of thyroid cancer include the appearance of a thick nodule in the thyroid area; hoarseness of voice; difficulty swallowing; pain in the neck and throat; enlarged lymph nodes in the neck; a dry cough, scratchy or scratchy feeling in the throat or behind the sternum.
There have also been claims that Putin is suffering from abdominal cancer and other ailments.
Meanwhile, there have been suggestions that drugs to treat his cancer may have distorted his mind when he launched the war in Ukraine.
The Kremlin insists that Putin is healthy.
Among the medics named as treating Putin were Dr Dmitry Verbovoy, an expert in acute illnesses, injuries and poisonings.
Another was Dr Konstantin Sim, an orthopaedic traumatologist, possibly helping with ice hockey injuries, ENT doctor Alexei Shcheglov and infectious disease specialist Yaroslav Protasenko.
He was also seen by neurosurgeons from the Central Clinical Hospital, led by department head Oleg Myshkin and Dr Elena Rastrusina, plus a resuscitator
Dr Pavel Sharikov, and head nurse Lyudmila Kadenkova.
A rehabilitation specialist was also involved, Dr Mikhail Tsykunov.In July 2020, Putin met with the head of the National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ivan Dedov.
It comes after the former head of MI6 suggested said there could be a coup inside the Kremlin to oust Putin - but the mechanisms for political change in Russia are "fragile".
Sir Richard Dearlove told The Sun: "I think we're heading into another phase where you're going to get a political upheaval as a result of a war gone badly wrong.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
"There could be a coup inside the Kremlin.
"I don't think there will be a popular uprising in Russia, but because of the catastrophic situation they're in, there must be massive tensions in the current leadership."
</document>
<category>
URW: Speculating war outcomes
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article reporting several claims that Putin is unfit to rule due to his illness. Speculates that a coup is imminent in Russia | false | 0.812726 | 4 | EN_UA_012803.txt | URW: Speculating war outcomes | none | Several paragraphs indicate an imminent collapse of Russian government with coup in the Kremlin to remove Putin from the leadership of the country
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Panicking Putin desperately classifies medical files that revealed his ‘cancer battle’ as weak ruler fears coup
Paranoid Putin tries to hide ‘cancer battle’ by making bombshell medical files SECRET as weak ruler fears being toppled’
PANICKED Vladimir Putin has dramatically classified bombshell data which appears to prove he has been treated for cancer.
Rumours have persistently swirled that the tyrant, 70, is "critically ill" - fuelled by his bloated face and trembling legs.
Bombshell spy documents leaked to The Sun appeared to confirm Putin has pancreatic cancer and early-stage Parkinson's disease.
Now the panicked Russian leader has desperately classified medical files that reveal an apparent cancer battle as he fears a coup inside the Kremlin.
A loophole previously allowed investigative journalists to show that the dictator was constantly accompanied by a top thyroid cancer specialist and other medics.
Revelations last April indicated surgeon Yevgeny Selivanov, of Moscow's Central Clinical Hospital, had flown to Putin no less than 35 times in Black Sea resort Sochi.
More on Putin
The proof of Putin’s treatment by cancer doctors was deduced from the existence of contracts with the hospital which were listed on a Russian public procurement website.
Now such details have been made top secret, preventing public knowledge of current and future contracts.
Earlier it was seen that Putin was accompanied by between six and 13 medical specialists on his trips.
Medics were also seen to be on standby near his favourite official residences outside Moscow, for example in Sochi and Valdai.
Most read in The Sun
The report by Proekt media in April gave credence to rumours that Putin had suffered from cancer.
Medics appeared to be thyroid and ENT specialists.
It comes after it was revealed the Russian government has built a secret network of rail lines that lead to Putin's residences - and train stations nearby.
The blocking of data of such contracts was revealed by Sirena, part of Radio Liberty.
KREMLIN COUP?
The move is likely to increase speculation that the Kremlin is hiding the truth about Putin’s health during the war against Ukraine.
Symptoms of thyroid cancer include the appearance of a thick nodule in the thyroid area; hoarseness of voice; difficulty swallowing; pain in the neck and throat; enlarged lymph nodes in the neck; a dry cough, scratchy or scratchy feeling in the throat or behind the sternum.
There have also been claims that Putin is suffering from abdominal cancer and other ailments.
Meanwhile, there have been suggestions that drugs to treat his cancer may have distorted his mind when he launched the war in Ukraine.
The Kremlin insists that Putin is healthy.
Among the medics named as treating Putin were Dr Dmitry Verbovoy, an expert in acute illnesses, injuries and poisonings.
Another was Dr Konstantin Sim, an orthopaedic traumatologist, possibly helping with ice hockey injuries, ENT doctor Alexei Shcheglov and infectious disease specialist Yaroslav Protasenko.
He was also seen by neurosurgeons from the Central Clinical Hospital, led by department head Oleg Myshkin and Dr Elena Rastrusina, plus a resuscitator
Dr Pavel Sharikov, and head nurse Lyudmila Kadenkova.
A rehabilitation specialist was also involved, Dr Mikhail Tsykunov.In July 2020, Putin met with the head of the National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology, Ivan Dedov.
It comes after the former head of MI6 suggested said there could be a coup inside the Kremlin to oust Putin - but the mechanisms for political change in Russia are "fragile".
Sir Richard Dearlove told The Sun: "I think we're heading into another phase where you're going to get a political upheaval as a result of a war gone badly wrong.
READ MORE SUN STORIES
"There could be a coup inside the Kremlin.
"I don't think there will be a popular uprising in Russia, but because of the catastrophic situation they're in, there must be massive tensions in the current leadership."
</document>
<category>
URW: Speculating war outcomes
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article speculate that there is a conspiracy within the Kremlin to remove Vladimir Putin as a leader. | false | 0.812726 | 5 | EN_UA_012803.txt | URW: Speculating war outcomes | none | Several paragraphs indicate an imminent collapse of Russian government with coup in the Kremlin to remove Putin from the leadership of the country
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate change protesters hoping to ‘shut down’ Congressional Baseball Game
Climate change protesters are hoping to “shut down” the annual Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night.
Youth-led activist group Climate Defiance plans to protest at the north gate of Nationals Park and “shut” the game down, Evan Drukker-Schardl, an organizer for the group, told The Hill.
“This game is an important kind of illustration of what’s wrong with our politics and our political elite that’s destroying our planet,” Drukker-Schardl said. “We’re not going to let this celebration of corporate political corruption go unchallenged.”
The organization, established in March 2023, also led a plan to blockade the White House Correspondents’ Dinner nearly two months ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I hope the FBI has their Far Left, DemonRAT, Red Flag, No Sale Gun list up to date. Those fags normally shoot at Republicans playing baseball.
Tonight is beautiful weather for evening baseball
these punks have never experienced being punched in the face or even been in a fight. About time for them to experience the pain derived from above
Here’s hoping Rs have the edginess to throw brushbacks, go in spikes high to second or third base, do a Pete Rose bowlover of catcher, or my favorite as first baseman- glove slap to the face to runner diving back to first on pickoff attempt.
About time they start sending messages
I thought this game was an annual fundraiser for DC youth summer sports programs. Liberals are so stupid.
Why don’t the Reps just forfeit like they do on everything else
That’s because they’re driven by emotions, not reason and they lack the ability to think rationally.
Just shoot at them. It worked the last time.
He is a professional troublemaker. He has never held an honest job.
Treat him accordingly.
They want to wait until the 9th inning when they have a 10-run lead - then they will forfeit.
LOL !
Concede the game and brag about how they will win next time.
Or actually fluke out a win, but hand the trophy to the Dems anyway.
He's not wrong. But his conclusion is incorrect.
The Wealthy Liberal Elite is controlling our political system right now. And they have Hollywood, Big Tech, Wall Street, Mainstream Media, Elite Universities and of course, the "Deep State".
Why don’t the Congressional Members work on projects they are paid for instead of playing games on Taxpayers nickel?
either of those work
highly likely
Sounds like it
bloody them and they will think twice
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs criticise climate protesters, labeling them as "troublemakers" and "professional protesters". In doing so they accuse them of not caring about climate change, but instead profiting from the issue. | true | 0.804539 | 1 | EN_CC_200016.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | none | The text presents several paragraphs in which climate activists are attacked. They are accused of being extremists attempting to disrupt public events in the US. The text also uses strong emotional words and suggests that these people should be eliminated violently
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate change protesters hoping to ‘shut down’ Congressional Baseball Game
Climate change protesters are hoping to “shut down” the annual Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night.
Youth-led activist group Climate Defiance plans to protest at the north gate of Nationals Park and “shut” the game down, Evan Drukker-Schardl, an organizer for the group, told The Hill.
“This game is an important kind of illustration of what’s wrong with our politics and our political elite that’s destroying our planet,” Drukker-Schardl said. “We’re not going to let this celebration of corporate political corruption go unchallenged.”
The organization, established in March 2023, also led a plan to blockade the White House Correspondents’ Dinner nearly two months ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I hope the FBI has their Far Left, DemonRAT, Red Flag, No Sale Gun list up to date. Those fags normally shoot at Republicans playing baseball.
Tonight is beautiful weather for evening baseball
these punks have never experienced being punched in the face or even been in a fight. About time for them to experience the pain derived from above
Here’s hoping Rs have the edginess to throw brushbacks, go in spikes high to second or third base, do a Pete Rose bowlover of catcher, or my favorite as first baseman- glove slap to the face to runner diving back to first on pickoff attempt.
About time they start sending messages
I thought this game was an annual fundraiser for DC youth summer sports programs. Liberals are so stupid.
Why don’t the Reps just forfeit like they do on everything else
That’s because they’re driven by emotions, not reason and they lack the ability to think rationally.
Just shoot at them. It worked the last time.
He is a professional troublemaker. He has never held an honest job.
Treat him accordingly.
They want to wait until the 9th inning when they have a 10-run lead - then they will forfeit.
LOL !
Concede the game and brag about how they will win next time.
Or actually fluke out a win, but hand the trophy to the Dems anyway.
He's not wrong. But his conclusion is incorrect.
The Wealthy Liberal Elite is controlling our political system right now. And they have Hollywood, Big Tech, Wall Street, Mainstream Media, Elite Universities and of course, the "Deep State".
Why don’t the Congressional Members work on projects they are paid for instead of playing games on Taxpayers nickel?
either of those work
highly likely
Sounds like it
bloody them and they will think twice
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text talks about climate activists trying to disrupt a baseball game in Washington. Several paragraphs mention how reckless and ill-informed the activists are. | true | 0.804539 | 2 | EN_CC_200016.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | none | The text presents several paragraphs in which climate activists are attacked. They are accused of being extremists attempting to disrupt public events in the US. The text also uses strong emotional words and suggests that these people should be eliminated violently
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate change protesters hoping to ‘shut down’ Congressional Baseball Game
Climate change protesters are hoping to “shut down” the annual Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night.
Youth-led activist group Climate Defiance plans to protest at the north gate of Nationals Park and “shut” the game down, Evan Drukker-Schardl, an organizer for the group, told The Hill.
“This game is an important kind of illustration of what’s wrong with our politics and our political elite that’s destroying our planet,” Drukker-Schardl said. “We’re not going to let this celebration of corporate political corruption go unchallenged.”
The organization, established in March 2023, also led a plan to blockade the White House Correspondents’ Dinner nearly two months ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I hope the FBI has their Far Left, DemonRAT, Red Flag, No Sale Gun list up to date. Those fags normally shoot at Republicans playing baseball.
Tonight is beautiful weather for evening baseball
these punks have never experienced being punched in the face or even been in a fight. About time for them to experience the pain derived from above
Here’s hoping Rs have the edginess to throw brushbacks, go in spikes high to second or third base, do a Pete Rose bowlover of catcher, or my favorite as first baseman- glove slap to the face to runner diving back to first on pickoff attempt.
About time they start sending messages
I thought this game was an annual fundraiser for DC youth summer sports programs. Liberals are so stupid.
Why don’t the Reps just forfeit like they do on everything else
That’s because they’re driven by emotions, not reason and they lack the ability to think rationally.
Just shoot at them. It worked the last time.
He is a professional troublemaker. He has never held an honest job.
Treat him accordingly.
They want to wait until the 9th inning when they have a 10-run lead - then they will forfeit.
LOL !
Concede the game and brag about how they will win next time.
Or actually fluke out a win, but hand the trophy to the Dems anyway.
He's not wrong. But his conclusion is incorrect.
The Wealthy Liberal Elite is controlling our political system right now. And they have Hollywood, Big Tech, Wall Street, Mainstream Media, Elite Universities and of course, the "Deep State".
Why don’t the Congressional Members work on projects they are paid for instead of playing games on Taxpayers nickel?
either of those work
highly likely
Sounds like it
bloody them and they will think twice
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The text criticise the climate movement, suggesting that they have the wrong intentions as well as adopting extremist actions | false | 0.804539 | 3 | EN_CC_200016.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | none | The text presents several paragraphs in which climate activists are attacked. They are accused of being extremists attempting to disrupt public events in the US. The text also uses strong emotional words and suggests that these people should be eliminated violently
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate change protesters hoping to ‘shut down’ Congressional Baseball Game
Climate change protesters are hoping to “shut down” the annual Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night.
Youth-led activist group Climate Defiance plans to protest at the north gate of Nationals Park and “shut” the game down, Evan Drukker-Schardl, an organizer for the group, told The Hill.
“This game is an important kind of illustration of what’s wrong with our politics and our political elite that’s destroying our planet,” Drukker-Schardl said. “We’re not going to let this celebration of corporate political corruption go unchallenged.”
The organization, established in March 2023, also led a plan to blockade the White House Correspondents’ Dinner nearly two months ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I hope the FBI has their Far Left, DemonRAT, Red Flag, No Sale Gun list up to date. Those fags normally shoot at Republicans playing baseball.
Tonight is beautiful weather for evening baseball
these punks have never experienced being punched in the face or even been in a fight. About time for them to experience the pain derived from above
Here’s hoping Rs have the edginess to throw brushbacks, go in spikes high to second or third base, do a Pete Rose bowlover of catcher, or my favorite as first baseman- glove slap to the face to runner diving back to first on pickoff attempt.
About time they start sending messages
I thought this game was an annual fundraiser for DC youth summer sports programs. Liberals are so stupid.
Why don’t the Reps just forfeit like they do on everything else
That’s because they’re driven by emotions, not reason and they lack the ability to think rationally.
Just shoot at them. It worked the last time.
He is a professional troublemaker. He has never held an honest job.
Treat him accordingly.
They want to wait until the 9th inning when they have a 10-run lead - then they will forfeit.
LOL !
Concede the game and brag about how they will win next time.
Or actually fluke out a win, but hand the trophy to the Dems anyway.
He's not wrong. But his conclusion is incorrect.
The Wealthy Liberal Elite is controlling our political system right now. And they have Hollywood, Big Tech, Wall Street, Mainstream Media, Elite Universities and of course, the "Deep State".
Why don’t the Congressional Members work on projects they are paid for instead of playing games on Taxpayers nickel?
either of those work
highly likely
Sounds like it
bloody them and they will think twice
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Article suggests climate protesters are extremist who want to inflict physical harm and also negatively mentions some well known political figures and public figures. | false | 0.804539 | 4 | EN_CC_200016.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | none | The text presents several paragraphs in which climate activists are attacked. They are accused of being extremists attempting to disrupt public events in the US. The text also uses strong emotional words and suggests that these people should be eliminated violently
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
Climate change protesters hoping to ‘shut down’ Congressional Baseball Game
Climate change protesters are hoping to “shut down” the annual Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night.
Youth-led activist group Climate Defiance plans to protest at the north gate of Nationals Park and “shut” the game down, Evan Drukker-Schardl, an organizer for the group, told The Hill.
“This game is an important kind of illustration of what’s wrong with our politics and our political elite that’s destroying our planet,” Drukker-Schardl said. “We’re not going to let this celebration of corporate political corruption go unchallenged.”
The organization, established in March 2023, also led a plan to blockade the White House Correspondents’ Dinner nearly two months ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I hope the FBI has their Far Left, DemonRAT, Red Flag, No Sale Gun list up to date. Those fags normally shoot at Republicans playing baseball.
Tonight is beautiful weather for evening baseball
these punks have never experienced being punched in the face or even been in a fight. About time for them to experience the pain derived from above
Here’s hoping Rs have the edginess to throw brushbacks, go in spikes high to second or third base, do a Pete Rose bowlover of catcher, or my favorite as first baseman- glove slap to the face to runner diving back to first on pickoff attempt.
About time they start sending messages
I thought this game was an annual fundraiser for DC youth summer sports programs. Liberals are so stupid.
Why don’t the Reps just forfeit like they do on everything else
That’s because they’re driven by emotions, not reason and they lack the ability to think rationally.
Just shoot at them. It worked the last time.
He is a professional troublemaker. He has never held an honest job.
Treat him accordingly.
They want to wait until the 9th inning when they have a 10-run lead - then they will forfeit.
LOL !
Concede the game and brag about how they will win next time.
Or actually fluke out a win, but hand the trophy to the Dems anyway.
He's not wrong. But his conclusion is incorrect.
The Wealthy Liberal Elite is controlling our political system right now. And they have Hollywood, Big Tech, Wall Street, Mainstream Media, Elite Universities and of course, the "Deep State".
Why don’t the Congressional Members work on projects they are paid for instead of playing games on Taxpayers nickel?
either of those work
highly likely
Sounds like it
bloody them and they will think twice
</document>
<category>
CC: Criticism of climate movement
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Multiple paragraphs depict climate activists in a negative light. They accuse them of being extremists that threaten public safety while also adopting hypocritical behaviours. | false | 0.804539 | 5 | EN_CC_200016.txt | CC: Criticism of climate movement | none | The text presents several paragraphs in which climate activists are attacked. They are accused of being extremists attempting to disrupt public events in the US. The text also uses strong emotional words and suggests that these people should be eliminated violently
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Lies that All Pro-U.S.-Government Media Spread
by Eric Zuesse, The Duran:
First here, are a group of lies that all are false, all for the very same reason — that they all blatantly contradict the actual (as is to be documented here) history (just click onto each given lying phrase below, to see instances in which the given false phrase has been reported as being instead true — and, then, I shall here document them all to be not just false but the reverse of truth, the exact opposite of the reality):
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine” (commonly used in U.S.-and-allied official Government statements).
“unprovoked war in Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
“Russian aggression against Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
Any alleged report that employs any such phrase is propaganda — lying ‘news’ or ‘history’ — that bases itself upon the false unstated assumption that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 started the war in Ukraine, instead of responded to a war in Ukraine that U.S. President Barack Obama’s Administration (including Joe Biden) — the American Government — had actually started there, in 2014, against Ukraine’s adjoining nation of Russia. America is planning ultimately to invade Russia from the only nation that is only 300 miles away from Moscow (Russia’s central command — far closer than Cuba was to Washington DC during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis).
Here, as proven in the links, are the historical facts, documenting the U.S. Government’s increasing aggression against Russia — using Ukraine as its primary springboard in its plan to conquer Russia:
The Obama Administration perpetrated in February 2014 a bloody Ukrainian coup (hidden behind popular anti-corruption Ukrainian demonstrations that the CIA and State Department had trained and organized local racist-fascist anti-Russian Ukrainians to lead) overthrowing the democratically elected President of Ukraine and replacing him by a racist-fascist (ideologically nazi) regime that immediately replaced Ukraine’s generals with ones to ethnically cleanse pro-Russian Ukrainians and kill some and terrorize the others to flee into Russia so as to get rid of the people in the Ukrainian regions that had voted 70% or more for that democratically elected President — and this ethnic cleansing would enable the nazi U.S.-installed regime in Ukraine to be ‘democratically elected’, and so to continue the U.S.-Government’s control over that country, on Russia’s border.
For the full details, see this.
So: all three of those phrases (“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine”, “unprovoked war in Ukraine”, and “Russian aggression against Ukraine”) are lies, which reverse the aggressor (purportedly Russia, but actually America) and the defender (purportedly Ukraine — which is America’s proxy in its war against Russia — but actually Russia).
The war in Ukraine started with Obama’s coup, not with Putin’s ultimate response to it (which occurred soon after America’s rejection on 7 January 2022, of Russia’s demand, NOT to allow Ukraine into NATO).
America’s plan here is to place its missiles on Ukraine’s border with Russia, only a five-minute-missile-flight away from blitz-nuking The Kremlin and thereby beheading Russia’s central command — too fast for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles.
What is the power of lies?
In a U.N. General Assembly vote on November 14th, the U.N. General Assembly (which has no power) voted by 94 votes for, 73 abstentions, and only 14 votes against, a Resolution to demand that Russia pay restitution to Ukraine, for the war in Ukraine — that America started against Russia by its 2014 coup.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs attribute the initiation of the war in Ukraine to the West and the US, depicting them as the aggressors | true | 0.814792 | 1 | EN_UA_104523.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Throughout the text, Western countries, and specifically the US, are blamed for being the aggressors withing the context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The US are accused of being behind the alleged coup happened in 2014, arguing that President Obama had the plan to attack Russia
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Lies that All Pro-U.S.-Government Media Spread
by Eric Zuesse, The Duran:
First here, are a group of lies that all are false, all for the very same reason — that they all blatantly contradict the actual (as is to be documented here) history (just click onto each given lying phrase below, to see instances in which the given false phrase has been reported as being instead true — and, then, I shall here document them all to be not just false but the reverse of truth, the exact opposite of the reality):
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine” (commonly used in U.S.-and-allied official Government statements).
“unprovoked war in Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
“Russian aggression against Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
Any alleged report that employs any such phrase is propaganda — lying ‘news’ or ‘history’ — that bases itself upon the false unstated assumption that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 started the war in Ukraine, instead of responded to a war in Ukraine that U.S. President Barack Obama’s Administration (including Joe Biden) — the American Government — had actually started there, in 2014, against Ukraine’s adjoining nation of Russia. America is planning ultimately to invade Russia from the only nation that is only 300 miles away from Moscow (Russia’s central command — far closer than Cuba was to Washington DC during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis).
Here, as proven in the links, are the historical facts, documenting the U.S. Government’s increasing aggression against Russia — using Ukraine as its primary springboard in its plan to conquer Russia:
The Obama Administration perpetrated in February 2014 a bloody Ukrainian coup (hidden behind popular anti-corruption Ukrainian demonstrations that the CIA and State Department had trained and organized local racist-fascist anti-Russian Ukrainians to lead) overthrowing the democratically elected President of Ukraine and replacing him by a racist-fascist (ideologically nazi) regime that immediately replaced Ukraine’s generals with ones to ethnically cleanse pro-Russian Ukrainians and kill some and terrorize the others to flee into Russia so as to get rid of the people in the Ukrainian regions that had voted 70% or more for that democratically elected President — and this ethnic cleansing would enable the nazi U.S.-installed regime in Ukraine to be ‘democratically elected’, and so to continue the U.S.-Government’s control over that country, on Russia’s border.
For the full details, see this.
So: all three of those phrases (“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine”, “unprovoked war in Ukraine”, and “Russian aggression against Ukraine”) are lies, which reverse the aggressor (purportedly Russia, but actually America) and the defender (purportedly Ukraine — which is America’s proxy in its war against Russia — but actually Russia).
The war in Ukraine started with Obama’s coup, not with Putin’s ultimate response to it (which occurred soon after America’s rejection on 7 January 2022, of Russia’s demand, NOT to allow Ukraine into NATO).
America’s plan here is to place its missiles on Ukraine’s border with Russia, only a five-minute-missile-flight away from blitz-nuking The Kremlin and thereby beheading Russia’s central command — too fast for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles.
What is the power of lies?
In a U.N. General Assembly vote on November 14th, the U.N. General Assembly (which has no power) voted by 94 votes for, 73 abstentions, and only 14 votes against, a Resolution to demand that Russia pay restitution to Ukraine, for the war in Ukraine — that America started against Russia by its 2014 coup.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Several paragraphs argue that Western countries are the aggressors. Specifically, they argue that Western countries started the war in Ukraine by organizing a coup in 2014. | true | 0.814792 | 2 | EN_UA_104523.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Throughout the text, Western countries, and specifically the US, are blamed for being the aggressors withing the context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The US are accused of being behind the alleged coup happened in 2014, arguing that President Obama had the plan to attack Russia
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Lies that All Pro-U.S.-Government Media Spread
by Eric Zuesse, The Duran:
First here, are a group of lies that all are false, all for the very same reason — that they all blatantly contradict the actual (as is to be documented here) history (just click onto each given lying phrase below, to see instances in which the given false phrase has been reported as being instead true — and, then, I shall here document them all to be not just false but the reverse of truth, the exact opposite of the reality):
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine” (commonly used in U.S.-and-allied official Government statements).
“unprovoked war in Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
“Russian aggression against Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
Any alleged report that employs any such phrase is propaganda — lying ‘news’ or ‘history’ — that bases itself upon the false unstated assumption that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 started the war in Ukraine, instead of responded to a war in Ukraine that U.S. President Barack Obama’s Administration (including Joe Biden) — the American Government — had actually started there, in 2014, against Ukraine’s adjoining nation of Russia. America is planning ultimately to invade Russia from the only nation that is only 300 miles away from Moscow (Russia’s central command — far closer than Cuba was to Washington DC during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis).
Here, as proven in the links, are the historical facts, documenting the U.S. Government’s increasing aggression against Russia — using Ukraine as its primary springboard in its plan to conquer Russia:
The Obama Administration perpetrated in February 2014 a bloody Ukrainian coup (hidden behind popular anti-corruption Ukrainian demonstrations that the CIA and State Department had trained and organized local racist-fascist anti-Russian Ukrainians to lead) overthrowing the democratically elected President of Ukraine and replacing him by a racist-fascist (ideologically nazi) regime that immediately replaced Ukraine’s generals with ones to ethnically cleanse pro-Russian Ukrainians and kill some and terrorize the others to flee into Russia so as to get rid of the people in the Ukrainian regions that had voted 70% or more for that democratically elected President — and this ethnic cleansing would enable the nazi U.S.-installed regime in Ukraine to be ‘democratically elected’, and so to continue the U.S.-Government’s control over that country, on Russia’s border.
For the full details, see this.
So: all three of those phrases (“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine”, “unprovoked war in Ukraine”, and “Russian aggression against Ukraine”) are lies, which reverse the aggressor (purportedly Russia, but actually America) and the defender (purportedly Ukraine — which is America’s proxy in its war against Russia — but actually Russia).
The war in Ukraine started with Obama’s coup, not with Putin’s ultimate response to it (which occurred soon after America’s rejection on 7 January 2022, of Russia’s demand, NOT to allow Ukraine into NATO).
America’s plan here is to place its missiles on Ukraine’s border with Russia, only a five-minute-missile-flight away from blitz-nuking The Kremlin and thereby beheading Russia’s central command — too fast for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles.
What is the power of lies?
In a U.N. General Assembly vote on November 14th, the U.N. General Assembly (which has no power) voted by 94 votes for, 73 abstentions, and only 14 votes against, a Resolution to demand that Russia pay restitution to Ukraine, for the war in Ukraine — that America started against Russia by its 2014 coup.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The author argues that the West are the agressors because they were the ones instigating conflict with Russia by supporting Ukraine against Russia. | false | 0.814792 | 3 | EN_UA_104523.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Throughout the text, Western countries, and specifically the US, are blamed for being the aggressors withing the context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The US are accused of being behind the alleged coup happened in 2014, arguing that President Obama had the plan to attack Russia
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Lies that All Pro-U.S.-Government Media Spread
by Eric Zuesse, The Duran:
First here, are a group of lies that all are false, all for the very same reason — that they all blatantly contradict the actual (as is to be documented here) history (just click onto each given lying phrase below, to see instances in which the given false phrase has been reported as being instead true — and, then, I shall here document them all to be not just false but the reverse of truth, the exact opposite of the reality):
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine” (commonly used in U.S.-and-allied official Government statements).
“unprovoked war in Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
“Russian aggression against Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
Any alleged report that employs any such phrase is propaganda — lying ‘news’ or ‘history’ — that bases itself upon the false unstated assumption that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 started the war in Ukraine, instead of responded to a war in Ukraine that U.S. President Barack Obama’s Administration (including Joe Biden) — the American Government — had actually started there, in 2014, against Ukraine’s adjoining nation of Russia. America is planning ultimately to invade Russia from the only nation that is only 300 miles away from Moscow (Russia’s central command — far closer than Cuba was to Washington DC during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis).
Here, as proven in the links, are the historical facts, documenting the U.S. Government’s increasing aggression against Russia — using Ukraine as its primary springboard in its plan to conquer Russia:
The Obama Administration perpetrated in February 2014 a bloody Ukrainian coup (hidden behind popular anti-corruption Ukrainian demonstrations that the CIA and State Department had trained and organized local racist-fascist anti-Russian Ukrainians to lead) overthrowing the democratically elected President of Ukraine and replacing him by a racist-fascist (ideologically nazi) regime that immediately replaced Ukraine’s generals with ones to ethnically cleanse pro-Russian Ukrainians and kill some and terrorize the others to flee into Russia so as to get rid of the people in the Ukrainian regions that had voted 70% or more for that democratically elected President — and this ethnic cleansing would enable the nazi U.S.-installed regime in Ukraine to be ‘democratically elected’, and so to continue the U.S.-Government’s control over that country, on Russia’s border.
For the full details, see this.
So: all three of those phrases (“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine”, “unprovoked war in Ukraine”, and “Russian aggression against Ukraine”) are lies, which reverse the aggressor (purportedly Russia, but actually America) and the defender (purportedly Ukraine — which is America’s proxy in its war against Russia — but actually Russia).
The war in Ukraine started with Obama’s coup, not with Putin’s ultimate response to it (which occurred soon after America’s rejection on 7 January 2022, of Russia’s demand, NOT to allow Ukraine into NATO).
America’s plan here is to place its missiles on Ukraine’s border with Russia, only a five-minute-missile-flight away from blitz-nuking The Kremlin and thereby beheading Russia’s central command — too fast for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles.
What is the power of lies?
In a U.N. General Assembly vote on November 14th, the U.N. General Assembly (which has no power) voted by 94 votes for, 73 abstentions, and only 14 votes against, a Resolution to demand that Russia pay restitution to Ukraine, for the war in Ukraine — that America started against Russia by its 2014 coup.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| The article argues that Russia is not the aggressor, but the West is, underlining the historic context of the US intervention in the region as well. | false | 0.814792 | 4 | EN_UA_104523.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Throughout the text, Western countries, and specifically the US, are blamed for being the aggressors withing the context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The US are accused of being behind the alleged coup happened in 2014, arguing that President Obama had the plan to attack Russia
|
<bos><start_of_turn>user
<document>
The Lies that All Pro-U.S.-Government Media Spread
by Eric Zuesse, The Duran:
First here, are a group of lies that all are false, all for the very same reason — that they all blatantly contradict the actual (as is to be documented here) history (just click onto each given lying phrase below, to see instances in which the given false phrase has been reported as being instead true — and, then, I shall here document them all to be not just false but the reverse of truth, the exact opposite of the reality):
TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/
“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine” (commonly used in U.S.-and-allied official Government statements).
“unprovoked war in Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
“Russian aggression against Ukraine” (two typical examples using it are this and this).
Any alleged report that employs any such phrase is propaganda — lying ‘news’ or ‘history’ — that bases itself upon the false unstated assumption that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 started the war in Ukraine, instead of responded to a war in Ukraine that U.S. President Barack Obama’s Administration (including Joe Biden) — the American Government — had actually started there, in 2014, against Ukraine’s adjoining nation of Russia. America is planning ultimately to invade Russia from the only nation that is only 300 miles away from Moscow (Russia’s central command — far closer than Cuba was to Washington DC during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis).
Here, as proven in the links, are the historical facts, documenting the U.S. Government’s increasing aggression against Russia — using Ukraine as its primary springboard in its plan to conquer Russia:
The Obama Administration perpetrated in February 2014 a bloody Ukrainian coup (hidden behind popular anti-corruption Ukrainian demonstrations that the CIA and State Department had trained and organized local racist-fascist anti-Russian Ukrainians to lead) overthrowing the democratically elected President of Ukraine and replacing him by a racist-fascist (ideologically nazi) regime that immediately replaced Ukraine’s generals with ones to ethnically cleanse pro-Russian Ukrainians and kill some and terrorize the others to flee into Russia so as to get rid of the people in the Ukrainian regions that had voted 70% or more for that democratically elected President — and this ethnic cleansing would enable the nazi U.S.-installed regime in Ukraine to be ‘democratically elected’, and so to continue the U.S.-Government’s control over that country, on Russia’s border.
For the full details, see this.
So: all three of those phrases (“Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine”, “unprovoked war in Ukraine”, and “Russian aggression against Ukraine”) are lies, which reverse the aggressor (purportedly Russia, but actually America) and the defender (purportedly Ukraine — which is America’s proxy in its war against Russia — but actually Russia).
The war in Ukraine started with Obama’s coup, not with Putin’s ultimate response to it (which occurred soon after America’s rejection on 7 January 2022, of Russia’s demand, NOT to allow Ukraine into NATO).
America’s plan here is to place its missiles on Ukraine’s border with Russia, only a five-minute-missile-flight away from blitz-nuking The Kremlin and thereby beheading Russia’s central command — too fast for Russia to be able to launch its retaliatory missiles.
What is the power of lies?
In a U.N. General Assembly vote on November 14th, the U.N. General Assembly (which has no power) voted by 94 votes for, 73 abstentions, and only 14 votes against, a Resolution to demand that Russia pay restitution to Ukraine, for the war in Ukraine — that America started against Russia by its 2014 coup.
</document>
<category>
URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors
</category><end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
| Throughout the text, several passages address how Western countries, and mainly the USA, are the aggressors, giving several alleged proofs. These range from the claim that Western countries are the ones that initiated the conflict, to the claim that they provide weapons and support Ukraine, which is depicted as an US proxy in its attempt to subjugate Russia. | false | 0.814792 | 5 | EN_UA_104523.txt | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader | URW: Blaming the war on others rather than the invader: The West are the aggressors | Throughout the text, Western countries, and specifically the US, are blamed for being the aggressors withing the context of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The US are accused of being behind the alleged coup happened in 2014, arguing that President Obama had the plan to attack Russia
|
Subsets and Splits