text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
You again?
You got nothing better to do than stalk my edits? I would say I pity you, but it would give the impression that I have even the slightest slither of respect for you. Which I dont. | 0.181557 | 1 | 0 |
not to mention Italian and Japanese aircraft and military hardware in general, | 0.000635 | 0 | 0 |
"
Speedy deletion of Spam W@@rz
A tag has been placed on Spam W@@rz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0.000723 | 0 | 0 |
"
Shotokan dispute end of Feb thru beginning of Apr 2006
(Original message:) Hey you haven't violated this rule, but I just wanted to make sure you know about WP:3RR, because you're one revert away from violating it if you do so in the next couple of hours. Also, an anon editor has suggested mediation on the edit dispute, see Talk:Shotokan... I'd suggest you do it.. you and the other editors are all obviously acting in good faith, and just need some neutral, honest outside input.
(Reply:)Yes, I'm aware of the ""3RR"". I talked it over with a friend here and I may be abandoning my Shotokan effort for the forseeable future. Thanks for your time and your input. Regards, " | 0.000535 | 0 | 0 |
@drew4130 @mailgal2000
Y'all hire colored folk? Only work half da day and throw da mail in da sewer if we ain't done | 0.282807 | 1 | 0 |
Until next time rednecks 😉 I'll see you again 😍🇺🇸 @ Rednecks With Paychecks http://t.co/vg3nbXETzP | 0.041361 | 0 | 1 |
There are more refugees from Syria now than from any one nation since 1990-91. Wow... | 0.000659 | 0 | 0 |
Get a life brotha==
fick me looking at sum of the shit u been doin. are you queer cunt or what?
and i quote
As I'm currently away from my home ADSL network, I'll be limited since I'm now using a bandwith limited mobile limited connection. I hope to be back when the issue is fixed.
if that dont scream a fucking wanker i don't know what does.
== | 0.997903 | 1 | 1 |
Lajja link
removed the Lajja link as it directed me to a article that had nothing to do with the book aside from its title. the article'shttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lajja#Lajja_.28movie.29 talk page even says that they have nothing to do with each other. there should be an article about the book. | 0.000668 | 0 | 0 |
I can produce a birth certificate and photos of | 0.000704 | 0 | 0 |
God for an experienced Wikipedian you are an arrogant piece of shit. How about checking out the source to see if it is reliable. Bloody Hell. | 0.958865 | 1 | 1 |
"
I've never seen ""creative director"" used in the infobox for TV shows, because ""creative director"" is not a title actually held by someone, at least in fictional series, to the best of my knowledge. It is production designer, and that's what they're credited as. It also looks quite odd in the infobox, where you have someone who is the production designer listed so high in the infobox, just below the creator and above more notable roles such as the cast and executive producers. This is a good topic of discussion for Template:Infobox television, that ""creative_director"" should be changed to ""production_designer"" in the infobox and then moved into the ""Production"" portion of the infobox, along with other similar crew roles. " | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
I agree. - talk/email | 0.000541 | 0 | 0 |
Suspected Sockpuppetry
I suspect that yo may be a sockpuppet of User:188.123.231.4
Reason: You repeat the vandalism of User:188.123.231.4 and hae the same characteristic that you do no leave an edit summary. Sockpuppets are subject to indefinite blocking under Wilipedia's policy if a case is proven. 86.184.24.140 | 0.09317 | 0 | 0 |
Once again...HELLO HARDIN COUNTY
"@TheDrunkStory: "Everyone knows a hoe named Ashley" - HSN" | 0.001799 | 0 | 1 |
"
I have reviewed the changes by user ""Bueller"" and I would just like to say I agree with his assessment. This article is becoming a hobby-horse upon which to hang any negative quote, article or opinion piece on Feith is being dredged up and tacked on. Its extremely unencyclopedic. In my opinion, the article should stick to historical facts that are _manifestly true_, such as the fact he served in the Bush administration, under which bureau, some of his acts and accomplishments there etc. All this subterfuge smacks of character assassination by editors out to paint this man in a negative fashion. You can dig up negative articles on nearly any public figure, that doesn't make them encyclopedic nor scholarly." | 0.000771 | 0 | 0 |
Uh oh...internet tuffguys detected. Now they're ganging up...this could get srs. | 0.07449 | 0 | 0 |
lol, my behaviour is unacceptable? Look at your behaviour, what's your comment for blocking me for edit-warring but not your friend Chaldean? But if course you take every chance for blocking me, you keep holding your friends back, hypocrite. | 0.81346 | 1 | 1 |
"
No, actually, we're not here for the same reason. I don't have a lot of experience with Wikipedia, and I'm not here to do lots of work on Wikipedia, and I don't read their policies (would take too much time - not really interested - I'm an armchair reader/editor of Wikipedia). What I find with Wikipedia these days, is, to find out some detail/meat on a subject, one has to go to the edits and look at stuff that has been deleted. There seems to be a huge effort by people to delete stuff on subjects they know nothing about. I just got through going around in circles with a guy (I think he was also a Wikipedia administrator) where he deleted all sorts of stuff from the bio of Anthony Senter (a convicted Lucchese/Gambino mobster doing life for multiple murders). The whole bio was taken from a well-known book called ""Murder Machine"" and it was referenced at the bottom under ""References"", but this guy wanted everything deleted if it didn't have a citation at the end of each sentence. I had to tell him that the entire article came from that one book (and it's a good book, written by a well-known NY crime reporter). What the guy/administrator should have done is first known the subject matter then edit - that way, he would have known that the whole thing was in fact already referenced at the bottom. I tried putting in a few links but I couldn't get them to work (somebody else fixed them). It's really too much work to go around and around in circles with these guys (they seem to be ""busybodies"") as they delete and delete and delete, when in fact the items are either (1) well known to anybody that knows the subject matter (like Conrad's friendship with Spilotro), or (2) they are very easily found. The way you are running things here at Wikipedia, the only entries will be made by administrators like yourself who know Wikipedia's syntax, etc. You will either not get edits from people like me, or, if you do, they will be deleted. I have no interest in spending the time to become a Wikipedia administrator or Wikipedia edit expert." | 0.003402 | 0 | 0 |
The reason I was upset was not because you thought I was a sockpuppet ( I dont think you ever accused me of one) but because you accused [[user:Ma1kel] of being one, when he clearly was one of two trolls vandalizing Youtube. I agree, it was stupid of me to go off on you, I apologize, you had every right to do what you did. | 0.04526 | 0 | 0 |
RT @NewzHuddle: Y'all niggas ain't low tho. Y'all really be comin at these bitches on here then when they curve u, u act like u was playing… | 0.97466 | 1 | 1 |
"
Amblin FUCKING WELL produced The Twilight Zone, as well as the Indiana Jones films, the first two Terminator movies (and possibly the others that came after 1999), Splash, Poltergeist and Forrest Gump. As they were all fucking well mentioned on the 1999 Documentary ""From Star Wars to Star Wars: The Story of Industrial Light & Magic"" as AMBLIN PRODUCTIONS, not films that ILM had made special effects for but AMBLIN PRODUCTIONS. Now the sockpuppet of GabrielKat says Amblin didn't produce the films, but then again the sockpuppet DID CLAIM Imagine Entertainment made movies that aren't even listed on the fucking website " | 0.973623 | 1 | 1 |
I was thinking the same thing, and then I realised I don't care because I don't give a shit about her. | 0.915163 | 1 | 1 |
Okay. If Al-Qaeda didn't attack the Twin Towers, who did then? '''''' | 0.000733 | 0 | 0 |
ANTI NORTH EAST INDIA EDITOR | 0.001717 | 0 | 0 |
2015 (UTC)
What is that in the bottom left corner? That doesn't look like a recognizable landmark. Also, why a white border, not black? 01:06, 4 August | 0.000635 | 0 | 0 |
(UTC)
And fundamental Christains are not as vehement? Go f*** yourself. 16:48, 27 March 2007 | 0.982815 | 1 | 1 |
I know the RIAA are the ones who award the certifications...their database on the website is not frequently updated unfortunately. Here are some more sources reporting on the matter, including Fuse (http://www.fuse.tv/2015/07/paramore-misery-business-triple-platinum) and Rock Sound (http://www.rocksound.tv/news/read/misery-business-goes-triple-platinum). | 0.000648 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks! I was looking at Beckey, and didn't find Lytton, so thought it may have been OR. — | 0.000687 | 0 | 0 |
Simon Mills is pretty gay. It regularly takes it in the anus. | 0.95505 | 1 | 1 |
it is my God given right to have white bitches | 0.963822 | 1 | 1 |
$10 B/W commissions are still available! Please DM if you are interested! #artistforhire #commission #robots #anthro #furry #monstergirls #cyclops #pokemon #magikarp #catgirls #possum #artistsontwitter | 0.004407 | 0 | 0 |
"
reflinks.py broken?
I am getting an error on tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/reflinks.py?page=Manuloc&citeweb;=on. Is it something with the websites, or the tool? Thanks KontribsTalkM
It was some test code I forgot to remove. Thanks for reminding me. — " | 0.000818 | 0 | 0 |
"
Orphaned fair use image (Image:ASL_November.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ASL_November.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — '''''' talk " | 0.000558 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks, my perfernce is to leave your edits as they are. | 0.000995 | 0 | 0 |
I been getting bitches my whole life I been getting money my whole life 😎😎😎 | 0.914916 | 1 | 1 |
Actually, since I'm just a little bitch, I'm gonna go ahead and block you now. I'm such a FAG! | 0.978062 | 1 | 1 |
"@Shaa_Jenkins: If ya bitch always bitching clearly she care!" Or just an annoying Bitch! | 0.99602 | 1 | 1 |
Some reorganization
I propose to merge Discrete-time signal into this article and also the material in Digital_signal#Discussion that was recently split from Discrete-time signal by . This will put description of the signal that results from sampling in context of the process that creates it. Covering Discrete-time signal comprehensively will result in a lot of unnecessary overlap with this article (Sampling (signal processing)). Removing Digital_signal#Discussion from that artcile will allow Digital signal to be about one topic - the pulse train signals used for digital logic. Digital signal is now part disambiguation and part article which is not good. ~ | 0.000563 | 0 | 0 |
Pictures of notable Puerto Ricans in info box
For the sample photos of notable Puerto Ricans in the info box, Why do you guys intend on putting the whitest-looking Puerto Ricans up there??? As if there are no mixed-looking Puerto Ricans or Afro-Puerto Ricans who are notable, famous, and worthy of recognition. | 0.002185 | 0 | 0 |
I like bitches that like bitches | 0.98043 | 1 | 1 |
That is your opinion, and possibly an assertion that the CofE is the only body that counts. The Telegraph article simply pointed out that there are people who consider 12th night to be the 6th, which is reflected in the fact that the Oxford Dictionary gives the 6th as the first date. We can't choose sides. | 0.00071 | 0 | 0 |
Just for the record, that IP is blocked for 24 hours already. - | dance in the air and follow his steps | 0.000897 | 0 | 0 |
12 was like "Blocked bitch" “@NoBeeetch: Don't start "@bdoulaoblongata: They are blocking us in #Ferguson http://t.co/ymPzHmzUxG"” | 0.866126 | 1 | 1 |
RT @RealErik_95: Don't worry about my old bitch or my next bitch | 0.995186 | 1 | 1 |
Pukata Dishoom! Bi-polar Ass-Low-class S.O.B | 0.984277 | 1 | 1 |
":Let me first of all set the record straight about the history of the relationship between myself and User:Jza84. On his talk page Jza84 states 'I hardly know the editor bar an passing in a discussion from time to time'. As Mangojuice notes on that same page, 'Jza clearly knows Enaidmawr is a long-time established editor here; Jza interacted with Enaidmawr as early as November 2007, over 6 months before Jza became an admin.' That interaction was courteous and constructive and repeated on a number of occasions. I wouldn't claim that we were regular collaborators, but collaborate we did, and if somebody had aske me, before this incident, 'do you know this editor and do you have a good working relationship with him?' I would have replied in the affirmative, without hesitation. The only real ""edit conflict"" I had with him prior to this was in February of this year, at British Day. This was resolved civilly and without rancour, although I have to admit that I found his attitude at the time patronising - ""A lesson would be it took all of five minutes to strengthen the article up with a few references."" - and felt that the zealousy with which he reacted to my edits - an effort to bring balance to a biased account, in my opinion, for what it's worth - whilst ignoring a number of dubious and unsourced statements and peacock terms for the opposing view of the subject, was unbalanced. However, I refrained from comment (see Brit Day in his talk page archive). 'Everybody is entitled to their views', I said to myself, and moved on. I'll admit that I tended to avoid him after that as I had no wish to get embroiled in anything: I've got better things to do. I could have responded to this comment on Talk:Newport which I found to be deeply insulting to all Welsh people: saying that Daicaregos was 'an advocate of ""Welsh nationality"" (which doesn't exist, verifiabily)(). That statement left me with the indelible impression that Jza84 denied the nationality of myself and all Welsh people. I thought that was a very hurtful comment and completely unnecessary and I am sure that most Welsh people would feel the same way. However, once again I did not respond even though I was part of that discussion and was sorely tempted to do so: 'Ignore it', I told myself. Shortly later I became aware of a series of edits by Jza84 removing Welsh nationality and replacing it with 'British' on a number of articles on my watchlist; amongst them was the article on Dafydd Wigley, Plaid Cymru's senior statesman. Rightly or wrongly, I was by then convinced that Jza84 had a personal agenda on this matter. I reverted some edits and ignored others not on my watchlist as I genuinely did not want to get involved in a dispute (and no, it had nothing to do with his admin status). However, when I saw his edit to Template:Welsh kingdoms, also on my watchlist, I will admit that I was incensed. I reacted with less tact than I should have done, I admit. I reverted his edit. Changing 'Welsh kingdoms' to the woefully incorrect and insulting 'Brittonic petty kingdoms of Wales' seemed to me to confirm my impression of him: it basically de-Cymricised the major kingdoms of medieval Wales, which have a central place in our history and identity, used a term which is both incorrect and open to misinterpretation by the general reader (not everyone is aware of the meaning of the rather obsolete and affected term 'petty kingdom'). He than undid my edit and came up with the wording 'Ancient kingdoms of Wales', which is again quite simply incorrect ('medieval' is not 'ancient'). Then I read his ""explanation"" on the talk page. Quite frankly I thought he was taking the mickey. It also confirmed me in my opinion that he had an agenda of denying the Welsh people their identity (quote: 'What exactly are the Welsh kingdoms? Kingdoms inhabited by the Welsh? Well, no, the Welsh are a modern nation who live in Wales. Are they subdivisions of Wales? Well, also no, these kingdoms pre-date Wales by centuries (Wales was a concept of the future!'). 'What fools historians, Welsh and others, have been to refer to such icons of Welsh history as Llywelyn the Great as Welsh (and his court poets who praised him as 'King of the Welsh' etc.)', I said to myself. At that point I should have taken a deep breath and walked away to make a coffee, count to several thousand and then respond. But I did not, and the result is this. That sets the record straight. I've already apologised for any offense I may have caused and given my opinion of Jza84's decision. I write this to let my peers who have commented and acted on the matter get the 'history' behind this incident from my point of view. I do not intend to respond here to other things which have been said or implied here and at Jza84's page about | 0.000646 | 0 | 0 |
Future Perfect, thanks for warning the IP editor. However, even though the IP was edit warring with two editors, you allowed the edit to stand. If you look at 71.234.171.11, you will see that this IP started up with vandalism to a related article, and that the second revert had a reason given, (Removed disputed information inserted for political reasons by opponents of IRVto influence voters in an important referendum vote in Burlington, VT on town meeting day 2010), which, on the face, establishes a political agenda for the edit. It's true I used a vandalism template, but because of the history of actual vandalism, and I also noted that there might be a good-faith purpose to the edit. I wonder if you might consider taking the article back to the pre-political agenda state, as it would be a bit inconvenient for me to do it at the moment -). As to the content, I have not seen a discussion of that content. I am familiar with the history reported there, and it's solid, but have no comment on balance or other issues at this point. I was asking this editor to discuss, not just rip sourced material out because there is an upcoming referendum. | 0.000562 | 0 | 0 |
"These hoes keep callin but I ain't pickin up"🎶🎶 | 0.123224 | 1 | 1 |
It may be that the pictures currently on the talk page are causing some users problems, but that can be solved by users with slower connections by disabling graphics. Of course, I am not opposed to shortening the archive time back to 10 days either. Though it seems, once again, that some articles that should be archived are getting caught up and are not auto-archived and may have to be put in manually. | 0.000581 | 0 | 0 |
'm personally attacking you. Racism. It makes sence because most of us are violent. Talking about personal attacks. | 0.7082 | 1 | 1 |
Wow, are you some kind of moron? | 0.92185 | 1 | 1 |
yo
you could at least reply to my messages instead of deleting them. | 0.008193 | 0 | 0 |
you are delousional how can Albanias T-62M & T-55AM2 which Albania purcahsed in 1995 teh latest tanks to ever be purcahsed be in storage get reall and Albanias older Type 59 be in service you are posting miss information some thing goes for Albanias BMP-1, BMP-2 & BRDM-2 | 0.006167 | 0 | 0 |
I, J Freeman am a homosexual | 0.138351 | 1 | 0 |
uck me (avoiding personal attack on others.) Fuck me fuck my browsing fuck my use of wikipedia fuck it fuck fuck fuckedy fucking bang shitty cock sucking asshole licking penis peeling wanker spunker bastard, not you of course. | 0.998233 | 1 | 1 |
Its ok for now
Dear Mattisse,
I have utilized your corrections. No further is needed right now. Thanks. I will let you know when it will be time to write on my hypotheses at wiki after my bok is published. If you can help me then pls. | 0.000639 | 0 | 0 |
Happy new year
I just wanted to say, no hard feelings, you are a really good wikipedian TomStar81 and I like your attitude and the way that you get around problem issues like spelling by sheer tenacity, good research and being nice to people here. If you ever need anyone to check your spelling in 2008, then count me in, and good luck mate! | 0.000706 | 0 | 0 |
I want all my hoes back | 0.623053 | 1 | 1 |
"
Ping!
You've got mail. Please ignore it if you're too busy! hábleme " | 0.002923 | 0 | 0 |
My tail just said he dropped 20k to pay off the last of his student loans and clams he is broke. Nigga u just dropped 20k like its nothing | 0.898778 | 1 | 1 |
niggas stay with insides over some hoe shit | 0.992917 | 1 | 1 |
"
They've changed the image on their page, it seems. That's the site I got the image from, not the information. The site does not mention where on earth the Rouge Watershed actually is, which was my problem. If you know of a Rouge Watershed, and it is in Ontario, near Toronto, and you know that Highway 407 runs nearby there, the image is almost definitely of a clearcut in the Rouge Watershed near Toronto. To be blunt, I pulled the info about it being Alberta out of my ass, simply because it seemed like the most likely Rouge Valley that Wikipedia had listed. That's it. You're probably right, and you should change it. talk " | 0.084832 | 0 | 0 |
bitches please in napa fewer than 100 people were injured and literally 2 of those were reported as critical | 0.72297 | 1 | 1 |
"@altosteel115: http://t.co/tM28mh5XG2" woof woof. Sexy thug boy scally. | 0.338475 | 1 | 1 |
but i do know one thing though, bitches they come they go, Saturday through Sunday monday, monday through sunday yooooo #superman | 0.880337 | 1 | 1 |
HELP Come on @user your people are dying because of the #terroristswithin our govt and country. #DemocratsAreTerrorists, criminalize the brand. #BuildThatWall and send ALL immigrants packing before Dems send us packing or worse! | 0.768735 | 1 | 1 |
"
Ok, I will. Just a question: since it's about 'correcting IPA transcriptions according to en.wikipedia itself' (in Help:IPA for Italian and Labiodental nasal sources are already provided), if I do what you said, I'll have to do it: a) from now on; and b) on every single page where somebody has modified an IPA transcription (such as that page whose history I linked). Right? Or wrong? If I'm right, no problem. If I'm wrong... Then why making distinctions between Pittura infamante and anything else? Why must I add a source in the article instead of indicate it in the edit summary 'there' but not anywhere else? That's what seems absurd to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.208.20
Wikipedia is a collaborative site run by volunteers, and as such it is not always consistent. If you change a page while nobody is watching, and nobody notices after the fact, it slides through. If you always follow policies when it comes to sourcing, you can't go wrong. IV " | 0.000716 | 0 | 0 |
"
I find your comments personally insulting, and would appreciate if you refactored them. In response to your question, the verification policy states that ""Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."" The webpage which you pointed to would appear to be a self-published source, which are generally considered problematic. Thus, as you can see, the need for these sources is, indeed, part of Wikipedia policy.
I am not attempting to ""push the goalposts back."" I am attempting - as is generally considered part of the 'job' of an administrator - to ensure that policy and guideline are followed. This requires sources to back up the notability of the article.
As this discussion is becoming more personal and less constructive, I have requested that members of the WikiProject Songs weigh in on this discussion to draw more opinions. (arf!) " | 0.000674 | 0 | 0 |
"==Your help desk question==
You have responses.— • talk • contributions • " | 0.000591 | 0 | 0 |
25 Hysterical Chinese Insults That You Should Know Today (NSFW) | 0.160649 | 1 | 0 |
Available? ==
I'm logged into Skype at the moment, FYI. pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx
Oops. Sorry Nope. I've had very little time online. (talk · contribs · email)
== | 0.000761 | 0 | 0 |
"
I didn't find them when I looked for names including ""Review"" on this website:http://www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=96136,00.html As the saying goes, ""it's hard to prove a negative case"".
" | 0.000578 | 0 | 0 |
RT @SF_LaMasterBoy: Im scared of her...her pussy too good!! Lol | 0.987053 | 1 | 1 |
Slim Hines lil bruda ainn bout it bitch how yu figure | 0.951002 | 1 | 1 |
RT @joshuaxallen_: #tbt Halloween 2011 a spoopy hoe and her pimp daddy http://t.co/oQVP80EGhx | 0.302997 | 1 | 1 |
So who did the lead vocals? — | 0.000837 | 0 | 0 |
"
Oh dear, I'm glad you stuck around Gerda! Believe it or not, I like to have an infobox in some articles too (Sports, geography, science, film etc..) I even considered one here, but figured the box would look pretty short and redundant. I do agree, I have never been one for skirting around the issue and a more direct approach is sometimes needed. However, I am now deciding to steer clear of such discussions at ANI and other public places as it really is a never ending loop of the similar arguments you and I have seen many, many times before. Your passion on the linked word would have been my passion as a review, alas I don't think there is much more there for me. If you can wait until FAC, I would be pleased for a reminder then ) Talk " | 0.000656 | 0 | 0 |
RT @CraziestSex: Eat her pussy and look at her like 😜😝😂 http://t.co/mIgiYMGRJt | 0.987021 | 1 | 1 |
Why taxpayers should be burdened with expensive legal process for illegal refugees?Your opinion? | 0.000876 | 0 | 1 |
Be careful who you call a moron. | 0.744248 | 1 | 1 |
Metropolitan Police deception
The Metropolitan Police are making determined attempts to suppress the fact that the two 18-year old Caribbean youths were chasing a young white girl. This was on their own site in 2004. Then they took it off, as too revealing. It is still in the archive version of the Met site. Note that Wnjr is a sock-puppet of the Met. | 0.001184 | 0 | 0 |
The article Future Shock Wrestling has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0.000537 | 0 | 0 |
"
Unaswered Comment (False Pretense)
""You did not even read the links, please go re-read them as you do not understand. I do not need to convince any one of what I am saying, they need to convince me because as of yet they have failed to give a locial reason. And the poll which should not have been started and is thanks to your suggestion, pretty much has resulted in everything on Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. This guidline has been written perfectly because everything it said has happened. It was only Uther and LonelyMarble(I still have no idea how she became to be involved in these discussions) at first who were debating with me and from the history it was quite clear that Uther had been edit warring with everyone. And over the time since then he has managed to convince people with lies. He always uses his WP:MaM as a defence calling it a policy. It is neither a policy nor guideline and is simply a project. The captilization BS he uses for a defence is also false and if people took the time to actually read the redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds, they would see that in fact it further strengthens my side instead of his. They also continually defend it by sayings marsupial lions or marsupial lion family, which already redirect to Thylacoleonidae and neither of which are the uncaps ""marsupial lion"". Please go and actually read the two links I provided because I noticed you have agreed that there was a concensous when there was none. So please read them and see what has happened here. "" " | 0.000938 | 0 | 0 |
@ the chick who is gorgeous and so fine but her pussy stinks | 0.995563 | 1 | 1 |
RT @RonONealDC: Lmaooooooo RT @basedamERICan: "Ayo take this pic for me fam"
"You think the bitches gon fuck with this pic?" http://t.co/k… | 0.98622 | 1 | 1 |
Bunch of Fucking retards
You Guys are all a bunch of stupid pathetic fucking retards! Barek Dwpaul AnomieBOT Materialscientist Jytdog Corkythehornetfan ALL OF YOU! It obvious you all hate TODAY Show that why you are not willing to play fair. | 0.99852 | 1 | 1 |
"'German state of Schleswig-Holstein where wooded arrow shafts and clubs have been excavated.' TYPO= I think you meant ""wooden"" not ""wooded""" | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 |
hi, please read this its important
FUCK YOU, BITCH!
I can do whatever i want, and there is nothing you can do to stop me. you are without doubt the most annoying piece of shit i have ever even heard of. you are a flat out embarrasment to humankind. do the world a favour and kill yourself, ok? the world will be a better place without you. or if you can't bring yourself to do it, get someone else to do it, see if i care. you are a pathetic worm. go and burn in hell. on second thought, hell is too good for you. go to the darkest, most desolate pits of the universe and stay there in agony. you are a despondently hopeless worm who can do nothing but annoy people. even your mother probably wants to kill or maim you in some way.
BURN IN HELL, SNOWOLF!!!
thank you, and have a painfull death | 0.996259 | 1 | 1 |
usain bolt is sooooo fucken sexy awww mah gawd only NIGGER Gs have big fat black nigger dicks i wanna suck him n fuck him, wite boiz are weak and pathetic and feeble in bed
'only a nigger G can satisfy me!'
i h8 my wite skin i wanna do a reverse of michael jackson cuz nigger Gs r da best | 0.998171 | 1 | 1 |
I completely agree, the kid had such a clearcut desire to help the project and it's a shame it's come to this. Hopefully, after a few days, he'll consider coming back —— • (talk) | 0.000647 | 0 | 0 |
wonder if they gon have em for the low on nigger friday.... | 0.954499 | 1 | 1 |
In Response
Dear “Lessheard vanU” and to Wikipedia including all editors and administrators & Mr. Wales: This is a very serious issue. We contributing writers have attempted to follow wikipedia written polices in contributing and adding to an existing article or creating one. Yet there are double standards beings upheld by wikipedia’s own editors and administrators. As with Blackpearl14, who clearly believes that wikipedias polices don’t apply to her, and with other editors who uphold double standards. Then when challenged to the double standards, including Blackpearl14's violation of wikipedia’s own written polices and reckless authoritarian rule and control, other wikipedia editors and administrators then support each other when one of them continues to violate wikipedia’s own written polices. “Lessheard vanU” had then wrongly and deliberately calls the contributing people who writes back and flags the issue at hand a “harassing the editor”, outright agreeing with Blackpearl14. Then in addition to IP address being blocked, all “talk & discussion” are deleted leaving only one sided bias and reckless claims against the contributing writers. Even though wrongly deleted by wikipedia editors & administrators, all of this has been recorded, including that Blackpearl14 having repeatedly writing in both correspondence and her bio page (copies have been secure) that the articles belong to her and they will continue to be own and controlled by her. These statements alone proves that she is in violation of wikipedia’s own written polices and purpose. Yet you have ignored that.
As previously written in discussion, per wikipedia’s own written polices, but immediately deleted by Blackpearl14 and then sanctioned by “Lessheard vanU”, Blackpearll4 - calls herself evidently Mrs. Johnny Depp and Pirate lord-ess and such. She celebrates on her official wikipedia bio pages that she did many pages and articles on the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean for wikipedia. Why would someone devote so much time to 24/7 check the site and on these pages, and then recklessly calls anyone who doesn’t follow her bias views vandals, attackers and such. Has her judgement become impaired? Her goal to fuse her love and fantasies with the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean is very clear. That is a conflict of interest and that is not being neutral and is against wikipedia’s own written polices. Sorry, but if one purchases products, such as Pirates of the Caribbean posters, toys and Walt Disney merchandise and also using emotional love and fantasies for wikipedia / wikinews articles, doesn’t make the articles neutral and it causes a conflict of interest. As recorded, Blackpearl14's pages regarding this issue are one sided, not neutral, are bias, in conflict of interest and are all promotional tools promoting the causes and products of the Walt Disney Company and Pirates of the Caribbean. Yes, Pirates of the Caribbean and similar wikipedia articles are not neutral, they are a series of one sided promotional pages including links to products and causes of the Walt Disney Company. Following wikipedia’s own written “neutral” policy, entire articles would have to be deleted. Yet Blackpearl14 continues to violate Wikipedia polices and purpose.
Then with IP’s being deliberately blocked and contributing writers having been wrongly accused and falsely called various things, if anyone then attempts to generate a new article related to Pirates of the Caribbean following wikipedia’s own written polices, editors and administrators gang up and generate false reason upon reason, to delete those articles and ban the IP user. They use a countless list of double standards and twisted logic to justify their reckless acts. It’s a total lock out by the editors and administrators, abusing their trust tools, acting like a private monarchy. To date, Blackpearl14's has proven she has ultimate control, has repeatedly stated that is her purpose, and had even sought to have the articles locked. Then you “Lessheard vanU” wrote that you don’t want to lock these articles, stating it goes against company policy, but yet you added that you are preparing to possibly lock the articles in some capacity and do other acts against those who have been falsely branded and wrongly labeled as “vandals” and “harassing the editors” etc...
Other editors and administrators who have proven their practice of bias and manipulative and outright double standards practices include “SVTCobra” and “Whoville” and “Chris Mann”. We have documented that they say one thing, yet practice another. We have documented that they enforce one set of wikipedia polices yet discard and ignore those same policies when it applies to themselves or their selective circle of peers. We contributing writers also wonder just how many editors and admin | 0.006197 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry, WAS it would be correct.
According to the US censors, and, I believe any censors in any country, images of the erect male penis are XXX. Kids should be able to use this site.
I have removed the images. | 0.058268 | 0 | 0 |
Notes 4 and 7
There is a note #7 on the chart, but no matching note 7 below. And below there is a note #4 that does not appear in the Chart. | 0.000615 | 0 | 0 |
RT @OfficiallyIce: "That's why you're so good at this game. Cause u sit on your unemployed nigger ass playing all day." | 0.992998 | 1 | 1 |
Comment Shabak is certainly the more prominent term in Israel (ie: in Hebrew). I can confidently say that most people today don't know what you mean if you say Shin Bet. However, in English it is true that the prominent name has remained Shin Bet, for who knows what reason. It is still a Hebrew name, and for all intents and purposes, the wrong one. Until that term is phased out and Western media begins using the correct name, Shabak, I guess Wikipedia policy calls for us to continue using the current (wrong) term. | 0.000646 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thank you! I had thought of ""brother officer"" but the age difference seemed too great. Anyway, that's solved. Thanks " | 0.000542 | 0 | 0 |
i only deleted personal attacks | 0.004003 | 0 | 0 |
@EdgarGuillenjr @jo_clark6 @blakeanderson21 your a bitch if you hit a girl | 0.98906 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.