text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
She is a Motherfucker
I will block you Motherfucker, Shit, bitch, punch, kill, swear, do nudity, so shut up, frickin around give you drugs, call you names like shit, fuck, bum, poo, damn! so fucker, you will be blocked and dead you shit and fuck, and I will do the rude finger sign. You fucker get bad new messages bum, oh shit. | 0.997623 | 1 | 1 |
"
I haven't. What are we talking about? (I am the Czar of all Russias!) " | 0.000896 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thank you for the comment. It was exactly what I needed. I will move it to my userspace soon; you will be welcome to edit it. And I learned a new word too. Sincerely, " | 0.000513 | 0 | 0 |
Don't tell me what to do!
First of all, I can do whatever I want in my talk page. Second, Cartman clearly had a split personality disorder. It wasn't the toy. Third, I can say whatever I want in the edit summary so people know why I removed stuff. Finally, spare me your smile. 98.221.192.218 | 0.248678 | 1 | 1 |
6th Guards Army
That was a massive expansion of that article - really good work!! Unfortunately I've had to take out Andy Johnson's 1988 guesses about where the army might be - they were totally inaccurate. The army disbanded in the Baltic region in 1947, as Feskov et al makes quite clear. Would you mind please e-mailing me through the emailthisuser function? I'll send you Feskov so you can look up fates of Soviet units after the war. Best regards (talk) | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 |
Help!
If you become an admin, I will fuckin find ya then fuckin kill ya because you are a gross, fuckin homosexual who doesn't deserve the upgrade. | 0.998274 | 1 | 1 |
STRONG DELETE- NOT NOTABLE IN THE LEAST BIT | 0.00418 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Most Hated Family in America
Your AFD comment here mentioned reliable source coverage. I have worked on the article, expanded it, and added coverage from secondary sources. (I am still in the process of research on it, have over 50 more sources to go through) Perhaps you could revisit? Thank you for your time. '''''' | 0.001112 | 0 | 0 |
"
Recap
I decided to withhold further comment until I had some sleep and time to critique the logic behind your deletion decision. I am delaying a trip this morning so that I can provide you with a response to your statement supporting deletion.
Your supporting statement for deletion is as follows:
""The result was Delete. The deletion argument was that this is original research when the article title is used to describe an algorithm, and that the references do not support the notability of the subject. Despite the verbose nature of the opposing comment, these arguments were not clearly refuted. The use of socks to give the appearance of greater support is also extremely problematic, and I have counted those opinions as being from User:Julie Dancer. Kevin (talk) ""
As for ""The deletion argument was that this is original research when the article title is used to describe an algorithm...""
In reality the article title names a type of classification which arranges attributes in order of their significance. Within the deletion discussion itself the calim is made by at that other algorithms exist, namely Examples of relevant works are ""A Fast, Bottom-Up Decision Tree Pruning Algorithm with Near-Optimal Generalization"" and ""An Efficient Algorithm For Optimal Pruning Of Decision Trees"". which are capable of performing the function the article title names:
If this is accurate then the right way to handle a necessary correction would be to add these algorithms to the article instead of nominating the article for deletion.
In anticipation of these other algorithms being added I immediately changed the body of the text to read ""The algorithm used for this purpose..."" to ""One algorithm used for this purpose..."" Since I do not now have access to the article's history as the result of your deletion I can not give you the exact date and time. However, it was prior to the end of the deletion discussion. (Incidentally, it has been suggested by a Professor at Cornell that deleting the article was for the purpose of eliminating the article history.)
Normally as a Wikipedia user I would expect other users who have an issue with such wording to correct it themselves as this is one reason the Wikipedia was setup this way. The Wikipedia still claims to be ""...the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.""
The impression I have now is that while there were an abundance of editors in the beginning who edited articles that there is now an abundance of spoiled children who expect articles to be perfect from the beginning or for someone else to edit them. They simply do not understand that each article is considered to be a work in progress and the Wikipedia being an opportunity to learn how to write and to edit rather than being completed. Instead of doing any work themselves they find it much easier to go around deleting articles which remain incomplete or have not yet reached a state of perfection, especially a maintenance edit like adding an inline reference that would require them to do any real work themselves.
As for ""...references not supporting the notability of the subject""
You can not logically make this statement without reading the reference or references first and you certainly can not follow this with a statement like ""Despite the verbose nature of the opposing comment, these arguments were not clearly refuted."" All of the arguments supporting deletion are clearly refuted in the text of the primary reference to which I deferred. Just as you saying that a stop light was green in a court of law when you did not look at the light would be a lie so would be claiming the reference did not support notability when you did not read it. I know you did not read the primary reference because all arguments supporting deletion are clearly refuted by the both the primary reference and the references it contains.
As for ""The use of socks to give the appearance of greater support is also extremely problematic...
This shows you did not read or comprehend the response I made in the deletion discussion or only scanned it. I explained that each of the user names were created so that I could track the use of my own resources better, similar to the need on the part of the Wikipedia to require bots to have their own user name even though several may be owned by the same user. Eventually at least one of my computes will be used to accommodate bots, but currently I am able to meet all of my needs by downloading the Wikipedia and mining it off line.
Since the existence of the alternate user names was stated and known by all from the beginning of the deletion discussion there is no w | 0.000742 | 0 | 0 |
As said before, it's a picture or pictures from a screen. Something anyone can take. If you want to believe slim chances and all, that's up to you. Considering the accusing factor has been flatout lying to us about it before however, aside from the irrelevance of it all, this is all a waste of time. | 0.001669 | 0 | 0 |
, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Since GO AWAY and GET LOST don't seem to work lets try higher authority. In the name of our Savior Jesus Christ I beseech our Lord to aid me in removing this Spawn of Satan. In the Name of our Lord BEGONE! BEGONE! BEGONE! Get the message?71.174.141.4 12:40 | 0.780768 | 1 | 1 |
this sort of information belongs to pages like Human trafficking in the United Kingdom or Slavery in Britain and Ireland. however, user ankhmorpork is hellbent on adding this content not only to this page but others as well (check out his edit history), and thus reveals his agenda. there are several pages about racial groups on wikipedia and none of them contain such content. for example, millions of such crimes are comitted in the usa every year but not one of them is mentioned here . this is blatant pov-pushing. | 0.001334 | 0 | 0 |
"
The DAB includes ""In music, the subject concerning certain diatonic scales known as musical modes (e.g., Ionian)"", and the link was disambiguated to this sense. If this is not what was meant, then what was?— " | 0.000587 | 0 | 0 |
hey, nerd. I don't want to have to create another username! You're one of them aren't you? Irregardless, it's pretty easy to tell that you'e been bullied your whole life and are now lashing out at the world with your abuse of internet mod privileges. Hope you're proud of yourself. Are you honestly too thick to see that a Christian cunt coming at me for breaking blasphemy laws is obscene? Honestly, you must be one of them, judging by your behaviour = IQ = Christian. | 0.850439 | 1 | 1 |
"
Now this is just a joke. You're clearly an idiot. I posted the reference which gave due credit to the Newsweek article. I question your capacity as an Administrator here and I demand that you rescind your ""judgment"" and my indefinite block which is a clear violation of WP policies. It's not a personal attack if it's true. Mate1 " | 0.831438 | 1 | 1 |
RT @KINGTUNCHI_: A bitch will say anything for attention ! | 0.980082 | 1 | 1 |
I'm saddened by your choice. Deleting is, though, a more expected response than you answering his questions.75.4.195.159 | 0.000726 | 0 | 0 |
"
(Untitled)
orange please ''''''TALK}
No problems. .Bryant
three policy proposals for piping links in infoboxes
Sorry if this feels like a mass mailout message. It is. Even so,
I've put forward three policy proposals for piping links in infoboxes on such pages as diverse as Bert Newton and Louis A. Johnson - here. I'd be delighted if you could consider the three possibilities and then say on the page which proposal you think is best. Cheers and happy editing! |ob
I'll have a look, maybe. .Bryant
Barnstar
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar Thank you for your excellent work on my user page. You don't know how much this means to me. After my troublesome past i feel like this is a fresh start with my new user page
btw i noticed you made a bot for jimothy's page so old messages where archived. could you possibly do that for me please?
I put that on mate, but im sure Daniel would be ebtter at the scripting than me! TALK
Done. And thanks for the barnstar! .Bryant " | 0.000622 | 0 | 0 |
I wonder if his partner's name is Fox Anderson | 0.000738 | 0 | 0 |
FUCK YOU
I MOTHERFUCKING HAVE BEEN TRYING TO TALK TO YOU AND ALL YOU DO IS DELETE MY COMMENTS. FUCK YOU, DON'T TOUCH MY TALK PAGE. | 0.998067 | 1 | 1 |
"
Date
I noticed that on Monster (album) you kept reverting BCG's edits in regard to the date. Wikipedia has the option where you can view the date format of your choice. This can be done by going to Preferences and selecting the ""Date format"" link. There four options will come up. For more information see Date and numbers." | 0.000548 | 0 | 0 |
"
Fuck you
You're drunk son of a bitch " | 0.998195 | 1 | 1 |
Listen Brah
You are the rudest wiki nerd in this joint. I bet you're sitting behind that computer in a chair that has the sweet impression of your ass that never moves from it. Are you wasting time till the next World of Warcraft is coming out? Does mom care that you're on here ruining lives for the rest of us fun loving wikipedia users? Did the money your grandparents sent you in a singing card by the suped up fucktarded laptop you're rocking? Here's some advice, take up Dance Dance Revolution and leave us awesome and normal people trying to make awesome Wiki pages alone. Bastard. | 0.990353 | 1 | 1 |
Well like I said I was only sourcing what was already on the artcile. I figured ANY source is better then no source. I say leave the trivia section there. The reason I was sourcing it, was so there was SOME merit to that trivia, now it looks like someone just made it up(but they didn't). Ah whatever. I posted this on my talk page as well. - | 0.000698 | 0 | 0 |
But you are master of putting words into people's mouth, i always always source and prove things, but argying with morons like you, I HAVE NOTHING TO PROVE! Weasel? yea, that is you! | 0.913729 | 1 | 1 |
LMAOOOOOOO RT @DontCallMeKyrie *Record Scratches* RT @chinitaaah_: Damn Twitter famous bitches out hea strippin!? 😭😭 http://t.co/BLrN8dzyA3 | 0.94113 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Mitchell_Rosee: It's annoying when ppl follow to unfollow.. Like bitch "I" was trying to be considerate 😒 | 0.825022 | 1 | 1 |
Did CSS fall off the earth or something? What happened to the left bar and why is everything so ugly and unorganized? 23 July 2005 19:03 (UTC) | 0.004929 | 0 | 0 |
Please see if you can find it - If you find information that would be wonderful ) | 0.000594 | 0 | 0 |
RT @Rockprincess818: Obama is Allowing millions of illegal aliens, drug cartels, and terrorists to enter our open borders...Liberal retards… | 0.792224 | 1 | 1 |
"Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Introduction
5 The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help
Tips
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! (reasoning)
Your feedback to Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting brings up many valuable points. It would be better if you were to read the talk page Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and engage in discussions and decision-making there. (reasoning) " | 0.000595 | 0 | 0 |
Besides being a fantastic Macedonian singer, Karolina is the most honest South Slav Patriot. Her active presence in a variety of live TV music shows and programs in Macedonia, Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Bulgaria etc. speaks about her great wide patriotic spirit. With her songs she sends messages of brotherhood, love and unity to all South SLavic peoples, which makes her best liked and best welcomed star in every South Slavic region. Long live Karolina. Cheers.24.86.116.250 | 0.000607 | 0 | 0 |
"LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO @bb_brooks: If your pussy is good but my mama don’t like you? Guess who gotta go………..my mama." | 0.959025 | 1 | 1 |
"
Old ""sockpuppetry suspicion"" post that you never replied to
Hello. Last July, you posted on my talk page saying that I was being suspected of sockpuppetry. This was a surprise to me. I asked you to clarify, but you never did. I just spent a while looking through the talk pages of the ""sockpuppeteer"" (or whatever the term may be) in question, and it seems like it was decided that I was ""unrelated"" to the person in question and my case was ""closed"" (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mattisse/Archive). I'd really appreciate it if you could post on my talk page something about this investigation having been resolved, so people don't think I'm some sort of evil malicious editor. I'd be glad to answer any questions. Thanks! " | 0.000792 | 0 | 0 |
Forget "resting bitch face," the next hot new trend will be "resting drunk face." | 0.956489 | 1 | 1 |
Global apocalypse
WARNING: REVERT ANOTHER ONE OF MY EDITS, AND I WILL FART, CAUSING A GLOBAL APOCALYPE AND POTENTIAL EXTINCTION OF ALL SPECIES WITH A SENSE OF SMELL! | 0.605863 | 1 | 1 |
"
Jayjg: you thrive on conflict, drifting as you do from idiotic argument to argument and getting nothing accomplished in the process; so please, start building something around here and stop tearing everything and everyone down. We are all trying to build an encyclopedia here, not constantly argue over petty ESSAYS and arcane policies that don't carry any real weight because they are constantly broken by the majority, even by yourself. That being said, please do not continue your irrationality and POV by trying to wave this essay in my face; I quote from the top of All or nothing: ""This is an essay. It is not a policy or guideline; it merely reflects some opinions of its authors."" Jews MUST be represented along with the other faith traditions at Category:People by former religion. To not include them in that category is discriminatory to say the least; the problems with those previous categories were merely the NAMES of said categories, NOT the content of them. " | 0.017262 | 0 | 0 |
]]
Category:Musicians work group articles needing attention | 0.000639 | 0 | 0 |
She gonna pop that pussy for a real niggaa | 0.996193 | 1 | 1 |
"
Wikipedia Doesn't Know What The Hell They're Doing
If you didn't know this or not, Bridget Mendler had nothing to do with this film. If I see her name placed on this page again I'm shutting this entire website down. This would not be the first mistake made by wikipedia. Countless ""Crap"" has been spotted by me. If you didn't know this already, almost 87% of information on wikipedia.org is incorrect or untrue. I'm watching and will shut this thing down with my eyes closed you bunch of hog sucking clowns." | 0.979852 | 1 | 1 |
"The article could do with some more about the history. I don't know much because I only visited it once and heard what I heard from the locals. If anyone could add some more it would make it much better. -7 " | 0.000529 | 0 | 0 |
Done, thanks for catching that. – | 0.000588 | 0 | 0 |
Nah nicca.. you GOT GAS! 😝😂😂😂RT @SpaceJam_Teeg: @VonshayeB 😂😂😂 blowing gas 😤 | 0.014203 | 0 | 1 |
Tuberculosis - pages on DOTS/RNTCP ==
I had recently started a Wikipage on RNTCP, and only later did i realise that you had contributed a lot towards Tuberculosis previously, and that had discussed about the need for including/integrating DOTS on the wikipage Tuberculosis treatment. Now it looks odd to have a separate page for RNTCP without one for DOTS. What shall i do ?
== | 0.000581 | 0 | 0 |
- Do it and I will cut you | 0.885541 | 1 | 1 |
"
JTWC prognostic reasonings──Vicente
For reference
01 // 02 // 02 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10
11 // 12 // 13
(talk✉) " | 0.000644 | 0 | 0 |
Motherfucked
you PORKI muslim, what changes have you made at 1971 main section was useless, the defeat of PORKI MUSLIMS AND 15,000 MOSLEM WOMEN BEING RAPED BY HINDU-SIKH soldiers IN RANCHI(INDIA) JAIL seems to have made you mad. | 0.998137 | 1 | 1 |
I hate you. U are a homosapian. Breasts | 0.989327 | 1 | 1 |
"
Unsourced content removal
Some of the more dubious and unsourced content has been withdrawn from this article. If you wish to view it, please see this diff: The material is not lost, it remains in the history and is clearly visible here. Please feel free to add it back, provided you have a reliable source to back it. Thanks! (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄TAB " | 0.00055 | 0 | 0 |
Austin, Texas
I would like some supporters for the proposed Austin WikiProject, and you seem like a person that might support my endeavors. Check this page for more information. | 0.000576 | 0 | 0 |
416 we know ya bitch @kendricklamar | 0.950157 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Suga_Titts69: "@Vivalaquintaa: You a sucka hoe...sucka hoe im succsess | 0.991687 | 1 | 1 |
2009 (UTC)
FOLLOW UP: And a month later, you still haven't done me the courtesy of replying to my inquiry. I'll be moving this matter on to another (hopefully more competent), editor for resolution. In the future, if you can't be responsive, then please just leave the editing to those that actually understand and appreciate the purpose of WikiPedia - it's not your personal sandbox to play with!
23:31, 7 October | 0.000799 | 0 | 0 |
"I'm sorry I fucked yo bitch... But she really dig a nigga" @KingL | 0.997993 | 1 | 1 |
You're all fags for trying to delete this article. Go kill yourselves instead89.123.100.99 God Al-fucking-mighty | 0.996177 | 1 | 1 |
"
Now that I have your attention ...
The warning was to get your attention. You seem to be new, and you may share the bewilderment of all newcomers with Wikipedia policy. Bewilderment is understandable.
Just take it a bit easier, okay!
Please discuss your edits on the talk page (rather than edit war)!
Please include a summary of your edit with every edit!
Doing those two steps will calm the other editors, who will be happy to discuss the articles with you.
Sincerely, .Wolfowitz " | 0.002199 | 0 | 0 |
Please respect WP:WEIGHT and put it into perspective. This was not a conventional, established phenomenon. 24.255.11.149 | 0.000552 | 0 | 0 |
"
Personally I prefer ""scientific consensus"", since ""scientific opinion"" does not make it clear that there is, in fact, a scientific consensus. " | 0.000591 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for nothing | 0.008645 | 0 | 0 |
This snowfire5 character doesn't know what he's talking about. I really suggest that you re-read Wikipedia's policies, as you clearly don't know any of them. A stupid television show is not worth mentioning in the article. You are an idiot.65.247.226.99 | 0.9098 | 1 | 1 |
"Thank you for experimenting with the page Tongue on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. '''''''''' ✍ " | 0.000527 | 0 | 0 |
":::What do you mean, ""mind your language""? He/she didn't say anything untoward. You strike me as someone who's into dog-fucking.
" | 0.973988 | 1 | 1 |
fucking germanian piece of shit | 0.998685 | 1 | 1 |
Agree. The discussion about the name is also going on here. I believe it should be kept in one place. Thanks. | 0.000525 | 0 | 0 |
#nationaldoughnutday bitch GET AT ME 🍩 http://t.co/5FJForyY2e | 0.983597 | 1 | 1 |
"""Nazi filth"" is impolite 04:27, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)
" | 0.903696 | 1 | 1 |
Hey Ned
HEY NED, Why don't you actually do some fucking work on this encyclopedia! All you care about now is who is blocked/unblocked 69.143.226.129 | 0.990503 | 1 | 1 |
Don't be a broke hoe hating on a paid hoe!-#PimpChampaign | 0.858251 | 1 | 1 |
Sorry to ruin your day but....
DG is back...(as a number - no prizes for figuring out which) | 0.002822 | 0 | 0 |
There is disagreement regarding whether Norman Finkelstein, Juan Cole, and/or MEMRI lie and/or mislead. Since there are a lot of non-controversial news sources available on Hamas, we should 'go there' first. The controversial sources are appropriate when describing two or more sides taken in various controversies. On important matters both sources should be heard when another substantive but not across-the-board accepted source has an opinion directly opposed to that of 'Finkelstein/Cole/MEMRI'. | 0.000608 | 0 | 0 |
Agreed, though it needs serious cleaning.baroqqque | 0.000629 | 0 | 0 |
I was working hard as a bitch today, i deserve a reward. | 0.949207 | 1 | 1 |
"
At least we can say we tried. English Wiki has over 2 millions articles. And 75% of them are worse than Power ballad!?!?! It's depressing sometimes. I've been here as a staunch anon for almost as long as there's been a Wiki to be here for. It's an interesting experiment. After over 50000 edits I still have enough interest to keep pluggin' away at it. I have no use for user accounts or dreams of adminship (I've turned that prompting down more times then I can remember) I believe in the ""purity"" of anonymous editing. It's what Wiki was built on. Keep hacking away at Power ballad. This is Wiki... it'll always be a work in progress. 156.34.208.112 " | 0.001606 | 0 | 0 |
@Are_Ohh_Bee bitch see you then then bitch. And good luck to you. | 0.986282 | 1 | 1 |
it would be like me now saying that you have already changed it the mistake... | 0.000861 | 0 | 0 |
Lamar Odom is such a little bitch. It's pathetic. | 0.992784 | 1 | 1 |
I'm about to start a bad bitch mentoring association bc GIRL YOURE A BAD BITCH DONT LET ANYBODY TELL YA OTHER WISE | 0.99019 | 1 | 1 |
@ViVaLa_Ari smh what's wrong wit u ho | 0.015381 | 0 | 1 |
It be 30 below zero and hoes still go out like its 90 degrees plus tax | 0.170506 | 1 | 1 |
ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. | 0.000544 | 0 | 0 |
"==GA Review==
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Canoe River train crash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: (talk)
Comments
I've done a mild copyedit.
Where does the term 'Canoe River' come from?
I would have liked to know more technical details about the accident; for instance, what type of rolling stock was being used? Of course, if no such information is available...
The quote regarding the bar examination, is that just an example, or is that the whole examination?
To me, the whole trial section is POV; I get the impression that the article has taken side with the defense in the case. In part this is because the article goes quite in detail with the defense' arguments, but lacks a similar listing of the crowns'. It does not help the matter that two of the main sources can be said to be quite pro-Diefenbacker.
Placing on hold. (talk) " | 0.00061 | 0 | 0 |
12th Doctor
LOOK! I HAVE HAD ENOUGH YOU SUPREMACIST!
CAN YOU STOP YOUR TOMFOOLERY IMEDIATELY YOU BULLY!
HOW DARE YOU KEEP ON CHANGING WHAT I DO!
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY A LOT OF THINGS ABOUT YOU
WHY!
PEOPLE LIKE YOU SHOULD NOT EDIT WIKIPEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!! | 0.909785 | 1 | 1 |
"
I do not play this games J Milburn. Be specific of what ""variety of sources"" you are talking about. The photographs which I took are listed as my own regardless of what they depict. The ones that are not taken by me or are scans- such as ""fall of the Phaeton"" by Peter Paul Rubens or the ""Dante and Virgil in Hell"" - are listed as they were found on wiki.commons. I do not claim any rights to them. " | 0.000741 | 0 | 0 |
"
The tagging for CSD actually had some basis, as the assertion of notability was not properly sourced. However, it could and now has been adderssed. The Slovenia wiki article, while interesting, is itself unsourced... but this is likely due to they have entirely different considerations for inclusion than enWiki. So that link has now been moved per WP:LAYOUT. Its available to readers but cannot be used to assert or confirm notability on enWiki. And naturally, being a mass murderer is pretty much a given for notability... per guideline in enWiki it must be properly sourced. The original single ref was to user-generated content on a non-reliable source, and so did not meet criteria. A much more suitable and definitely Reliable Source has been added, so the questionable source can either be removed or ignored. Further, I have tagged the article for expansion and requested the attention of experts. '''' MICHAEL Q.'' " | 0.000585 | 0 | 0 |
You don't want people to know the TRUTH about utorrant, you FAG! | 0.89337 | 1 | 1 |
I remember when this lil bitch caught me slippin n had me get ina car an 2 mins later I'm lookin at this nigga holdin a gun in my face. | 0.988255 | 1 | 1 |
S/O @HorseNuts_Clark for keeping me sane when I'm a cunt | 0.569747 | 1 | 1 |
See this is what I be talking about. People get out of pocket real quick and never ever lived with these individuals a day in their life. I hate people like this. Its not just a man or woman it was just a fucked up relationship. stfu | 0.95114 | 1 | 0 |
We can not edit wrong information.The wikipedia s information should be the same with the albanian census.the only recent study or estimate.85 percent albanian and 0.87 greek. | 0.000598 | 0 | 0 |
If your intention is to follow any single posts I make and provoke me, you won't obtain any results from that. I will ignore your last warning because there is absolutly nothing remote to what could be constituted as warning material. Having administrative privilages doesn't give you the right to throw peoples warning like this. In my book you don't fit to administratorship and I am confident that more you distribute such empty warnings and more it will become clear as it is a matter of time. But what was I expecting, when an administrator retaliate for a critic of himself and sign an RfC in which he was not involved in anyway or ban another member because he criticised him/her and didn't left another administrator handle it, obviously there is something wrong. Stop searching bugs, I have no problem being watched over and will gladly welcome any administrators to pay attention to my conducts, but out of respect to veterans here many who are registered before even you came here, at least you should leave them tell you step down and leave another administrator handle the situation. You are taking this matter too personally, and consider that you don't have to do that everytime some criticize your use of administrative privilages. (ix) | 0.002139 | 0 | 0 |
More information for the unblock reviewer
This is a serial inserter of hoax information. Please see | 0.000666 | 0 | 0 |
Bernard hopkins article
Anthony Robbins is again making personal attacks on me after your final warning. He is doing this on the talk page of the bernard hopkins article. I would like him banned for repeated personal attacks. | 0.003341 | 0 | 0 |
Contested deletion
As the largest manufacturer of power boats in the world and even being on a forbes largest list, I believe importance is asserted and speedy should be speedily declined. The Dissident Aggressor | 0.00074 | 0 | 0 |
"
Request for help on mediation board
Hello, we had an exchange a few months back regarding the ""Mohammed"" page (which has still not be resolved, but I've resigned that Wikipedia simply does not want it to be). there is another page which I have dedicated a lot of research to but is being challenged despite all the citations and sourcing. I'm requesting guidance from you to see if I have filed the request for mediation properly here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism_in_Italy I'd like to ensure this is ""by the book"" but as it is my first time doing so, I would like some assistance. thanks. " | 0.000532 | 0 | 0 |
Go and get laid
Get yourself a nice boy/girlfriend and have a little fun. Maybe it'll make you a little less uptight, and give you an alternative to being an online equivalent of a mall security guard. | 0.865234 | 1 | 1 |
Since you asked? I'd suck it up, understand that Wikipedia is attempting to be encyclopedic and that statements here should be backed up by reliable sources, and find one. You claim you're essentially an expert on Britich comics...what's to stop me from making the same claim about physics? We can't simply take an editor's word for it that they're qualified to speak about a particular subject. This is discussed at length at WP:V. Making the effort to find a reliable source seems, to me, a more productive use of your time than dwelling on the fact that your information was removed for lacking one, especially when it's not an attack on you or a matter of questioning your credibility. | 0.174846 | 1 | 0 |
Scientific analysis and historic/official data used by foreign authors when writing about S.K.
Hello I am back. I know a couple of you missed me. Has anyone found any proof of Spiro Koleka (meaning also the Koleka clan) to be Greek? If this is the case please share. Any unscientific claims by Pettifer or authors referring to him in their books' bibliographies are excluded. So far the problem is identified with Pettifer, so we put him aside and treat him and the authors pointing at him separately. To the Greek editors here, please use your own state archives to find where the Kolekas live in Greece and when did they live there. Or find their properties there, or some house, a single grave, a single piece of paper written in Greek by anyone of them. Or find when did they last leave from Greece please, or how many were/are they. I want to know. Find some church records (in Albania or Greece), get some proof so you can save face and make me shut up. How difficult can it be to find something Greek in this important man? How come all his children never left any Greek notes somewhere or are not part of some Greek facebook group? How come Spiro's daughter writes poetry books and articles in Albanian and not single one in modern Greek language? Is this family really ashamed to be Greek or is it just (*drumroll*) not greek! How about you Zoupan and Alexikoua for once be not so sure about yourselves. How about some critical thinking applied in this article? I challenge the scientific and historic foundation of your sources. | 0.006967 | 0 | 0 |
What we still need to resolve is the NPOV discussion in the section above. 04:05, July 23, 2005 (UTC) | 0.000565 | 0 | 0 |
If you need to be disabused of the naive belief that there are no racism implications for this sort of study, here's [a group that thinks otherwise http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=624342], and citing this very article , no less. | 0.000741 | 0 | 0 |
Hah a big LOL to all the tacky faggots | 0.862312 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.