Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
" The Lego Movie Hi, Trip. If you have a chance, could you keep an eye on The Lego Movie? One fannish editor keeps adding obsessively, ""The film received universal acclaim,"" a hyperbolic phrase that per discussions at one of the Harry Potter movies and elsewhere we don't use. Lord save us from certain fans.... "	0.005099	0	0
Bout to smoke a 3.5 n dis bitch .. #Pollution	0.99178	1	1
How is that? Well that is very nice!!! -) Thanks a lot for making my page so nice!	0.000784	0	0
Behemoth; prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is Laz which means Muslim Pontic Greek.	0.014991	0	0
I can't see any answar to your act? Comanche cph	0.001266	0	0
wtf? you are now just as bad as fcytravis. WHY NOT WARN HIM!? Anus	0.950654	1	1
ASSHAT FUCKING STUPID ASSHOLE PAIR OF CLOWNSHOES	0.998303	1	1
I reckon you should die	0.937788	1	1
@Real_Liam_Payne be a pussy http://t.co/ttzsxBtS74	0.954488	1	1
Thank you for allowing our link to stay, but if you have not joined or seen the information available, it's hard for you to decide there isn't much content or information available.	0.00052	0	0
@user Booker is the more hysterical woman, while Harris is just a common slut.	0.920203	1	0
My mom's younger brothers gonna come disrespect my mom & call her a bitch & my cousins gonna tell my mom to STFU! Wth..	0.980435	1	1
":::I wouldn't agree with the ""my definition"" statement, as while they do retain aspects of the main game, they don't (to my knowledge) expand upon those aspects with new elements. I don't doubt that EA calls them spinoffs, but I do doubt that EA uses the term spinoff correctly, and by Wikipedia policy, if EA calls them spinoffs, they're spinoffs if EA calls them spinoffs, EA calls them spinoffs. (talk\|Contribs) "	0.000628	0	0
RT @MikeDiggEm: @TreyzUpZay @JamesyNBA @DattBoiIraq @_2kkz @_KudaBrazyy @thatboysmurf I fuck with all yaw. Yaw all my nigs	0.996717	1	1
@tupacselenas hey bitch imy	0.992675	1	1
Gay The existence of CDVF is further proof that is a sad twat. He is also very ugly, and has a willy for a face.	0.967431	1	1
“@Amillinati_: Bro like I really enjoy like eating pussy from the back... It makes it more nasty, I like nasty haha 😈”you like eating ass 2	0.981645	1	1
That depends on the margins of victory for all parties: the NDP have indicated they might support the Conservatives in a minority situation. But nothing in politics is certain: the NDP also supported the current government but precipitated its fall. \| talk \|	0.00064	0	0
Well fellow wikipedians, a lot of good images (opinion) are getting flushed down to toilet these days. Is it really making wikipedia a better, or more legal place? Not in my eyes, but I am now starting to remove all my sculpture images (several hundred?) because I'd rather do it myself than have someone else do it.	0.006107	0	0
steve irwin МљHEY FAGGIT GO RAPE A 7 YEAR OLD, MAKE HER PUSSY BLEED	0.997135	1	1
I see. Brutal force is your only real argument for people like you in Wikipedia. Keep demonstrating us what civilization is.	0.536491	1	1
Image copyright problem with Image:Facial.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Facial.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.	0.000602	0	0
You asked for evidence and I gave you evidence. Two users disagreed with two other users. The latter drove away the former and now get to decide the content of the page alone, without opposition. It is INSANE that you will do nothing about this.	0.001893	0	0
For some things its gotta be very yoda like logic - be thak ful what hasnt been taken away - and know when to turn away while the ghouls feast - and to know when to catch the breeze to float to another ledge above the precipice - ( Suro	0.0136	0	0
Damning, on the structuring of EU policy to tacitly support, or perhaps even feed, torture and enslavement of migrants in Libya for profit,	0.168543	1	0
" Not a Marilyn, but what? ""Its name may mislead as its highest point is 3 metres (10 ft) above sea level."" Nice understatement. Obviously the hills are not Marilyns or Munros. But I suppose the hill-obsessed Brits would have a name for these hills toobut Twiggy (hill) is red? "	0.002282	0	0
@SeymourBlanco you were supposed to hang w me this week nigger	0.988871	1	1
RT @TheOnlyReed: Lmaooooooo ain't fuckin no bitch with doo Doo in her butt while I'm foreplaying, THE FUCK	0.997705	1	1
RT @mckinley719: "@wizkhalifa: Pretty bitches rep Taylor Gang" #Hollah lmfaoo	0.864759	1	1
Not yet, but Pink says I was bitchy yesterday. Well... sort of. Meanwhile, I left quite a nasty note with the Johnny Depp guy above.	0.070762	0	0
You ain't trynna fuc ? Get ya shoes hoe	0.971299	1	1
" LGBT composers? Because I was unaware of them, of course. It's a big wiki. In my opinion, Category:Armenian chess players should stay, because we categorize just about every person in Category:Countryname profession. I don't quite see the point of LGBT composers, though, especially considering the sorry state that mess is in. I've put on tags to it and note that it's mostly . The answer to questions such as this is generally, . If you perceive a problem, doing something about it is more useful than complaining. adiant_>\|< "	0.000662	0	0
" How many unsustained complaints were there? I noticed ""Prior to the shooting, he had never been the subject of a sustained complaint from the agency's internal affairs department "".. so how many unsustained complaints were there? Because generally if its not on film or doesn't have a dozen witnesses.. a complaint is going nowhere. Id be interested to know how many times people have filed abuse complaints.. sustained or not - "	0.000752	0	0
Monuments Isn't there a memorial to the Balibo five, or at least one of them?	0.000626	0	0
It will not let me edit on my actual page so I am putting this here:	0.000772	0	0
@user @user Competing for Most Hysterical Woman at the Kavanaugh hearings" Trying to create outrage and Hate	0.075326	0	1
No, he seems not relevant for an article about Almaty	0.000631	0	0
" ""No one else considers...""? In other words, the meat puppets act like meat puppets, and you cite their meat puppetry as being self-justifying? Ha ha! Notice that nobody actually ADDRESSES my actual objections! Generally, they consider 'templates' (or one-liner, non-detailed comments) to be sufficient. Why am I not impressed? It's quite simple: Dodo did very wrong things, and rather than address those wrong things, the sheep bleat, ""four legs good, two legs bad!"". I've listened to their nonsense, and I PREVIOUSLY contributed constructively, or at least I tried to do so on numerous occasions. Why can't you deal with my SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS? "	0.017307	0	0
Having read the material... that seems mostly to be something being used to undermine the witness in the media (and I guess at the trial). Generally we do not deal with such material unless it becomes very pertinent; i.e. the court rejects their evidence because of it. I don't see that as having happened (yet?) so I see no reason to include issues of mental health. It's just more POV pushing. Oggi is probably not the greatest of sources here, it is tabloid (someone likened it to Time above... not by half, I am afraid). They have editorial oversight, but tend to be more gossipy than anything else. I'd treat it about the same as the Daily Mail (perhaps a bit worse). Errant (chat!)	0.000664	0	0
Hahahaha manziel is a faggot and the browns will ruin him. Win win for me	0.967012	1	1
" I have problems with nearly everything you added. I can give some examples: The hacking community was also infuriated by his habit of making the latest hacking developments public, with his publication of technical details on phone phreaking earning him top spots on the “Most Hated Person” charts in the Worldcharts diskmag for several years. That is truely an amazing version of the story. If you read these discmags the title ""most hated person"" came from rumors that Kim Schmitz had denunciatet many members of the BBS scene. Since this version is not citeable neither should be in the article. His legal team maintained that this was not insider trading as the information did not come from anybody else and Schmitz had created the business opportunity himself. “I think the outcome would be different in a court of law today as the Internet bubble had just burst at the time, everyone had lost a lot of money and there was so much media attention that I became the scapegoat,” Schmitz maintained. Where does this statement come from? Why is that relevant? Schmitz later conceded he had been young, stupid, naïve and aggressive. “I had no idea about the legal implications of my actions,” he acknowledged. “I hope my mistakes can therefore serve as an example for young entrepreneurs. They should remember one golden rule be careful and always think twice about what you are doing.” This is a sentence for an autobiography, not an Wikipedia article. Schmitz, who has also long been a fan of Formula I and organised several big parties for the races in Monaco, now plans to develop a racetrack and is currently scouting potential sites around the world. Future plans without any details have nothing to do with Wikipedia. He can announce this on his own home page. 78.34.4.52 "	0.00748	0	0
You filthy, stinking crow! I am back! Dirty crow! You better delete (or if not, support the deletion) of all photos of human private parts, you feces-gorging filthy mongrel. Are you a hog? You want to lick anuses overflowing with feces. DIRTY HOG! -	0.997587	1	1
Lmfao this is some straight up retarded shit up in here	0.990776	1	1
Great Synagogue of Vilna - not! , I greatly appreciate your quick and informative response that clarified the post-WWII identity of the two Vilna synagogues. The GFH Photo Archive director accepts this correction with thanks, and I'll add mine for your contribution to making our material accurate and reliable. I'll look forward to consulting you in the future on matters of 20th C.Lithuanian history, and also on adding photo images (something I've yet to do) to WP pages I edit. Thanks again,	0.000615	0	0
vandalism . . . fuck you, waggers.	0.997362	1	1
Image source problem with Image:Pt plelection 1999.PNG Thanks for uploading Image:Pt plelection 1999.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.	0.000598	0	0
Small minded and ignorant Wiki contributors. It seem sto me that th eoriginal noble aims of the founders have gone adrift due to the smallminded pettyness of many contributors. They usually manifest this smallminded ignorance by deleting any correction to their original articles as seemingly their godliness means the are the supreme authority on most topics even if as is the frequent case they live in some little place in USA ad have no real knowledge of life beyond the stripmalls. Constant ingestion of burgers and fries makes them feel to be experts on all things even those of which they know nothing and have n personal experience of. Thus when I spot an inconsitency in their pieces and add some correct and especially logical words to their precious piece they get their knickers in a twist and childishly erase my effort and thus leave all other Wiki readers just as ignorant as they themselves. This is Fascism and more fitting to Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Russia that the wide world of today. I will nevertheless continue to add, subtract or otherwise modify and improve various Wiki articles I find as part of my conviction that eductaion should be progressive not regressive.	0.595566	1	1
NO PISS OFF WIKIPEDIA, WHAT YOU GONNA DO ABOUT IT	0.780972	1	1
" Explanation of my recent edits Removing bolding and external links within article per WP:MOS. Only first word of section titles should be capitalized, and NCNM should not be placed on section headings (each section is about the subject of the article). Removal of peacock terms and redundant phrasing, ""extensive, unique, geared to, in its course offerings, more universal, opens numerous, in which students are immersed, designed for students with a special affinity, wanting a more streamlined graduate experience, fully"". If actually extensive needs a RS that describes it that way, likewise with unique or a description of how its unique. Geared to unless we are talking about gears this is marketing. In its course offerings is redundant. More universal with an explanation this is unnecessary, however universality is a pretty large if vague claim. Students are immersed, describe how program is immersive provide a RS that says it is notable for that. Designed for students with a special affinity, designed for students is a given for a school and special affinity sounds like peacock for interest in. Wanting a more streamlined graduate experience is marketing peacock speak for shorter/smaller course of study. Fully (accredited) is assumed if only partially accredited that would be spelled out. Removed wikilink on word school to article Medical school NCNM is not a medical school as described in target article. Adding ref improve tag: the entire Academic programs section has only the two refs supporting accreditation, the NCNM clinic section is completely unsourced as is the Accreditations and associations section and the NCNM history section. I placed 3 citation needed tags on some statements that definitely need references. These are very specific in addition to the article in general needing improved references. Additional proposed edits: I think expertise in ""with an expertise in natural medicine"" should be removed if it can't be supported with a reference. Expertise is substantial claim for education and training only. I am not sure what ""a holistic Chinese medicine education in Western medical sciences"" means. ""Since its founding, NCNM has sought to preserve and convey the classical modalities of naturopathy and honor the principles that guide naturopathic care:"" could be rephrased, ""to preserve and convey the classical modalities and honor the guiding principles of naturopathy:"" if that preserves the meaning. ""The college is alma mater to over 2,000 alumni"" is redundant if your an alumni it's your alma mater. - - "	0.000622	0	0
I note that the article on Sanchez still omits the documented fact that he was a male prostitute. Wikipedia will never publish this fact, because it intends to protect Sanchez. By the time it's finished, Wikipedia will omit Sanchez's history as an actor in dozens of gay porn movies, too. It has already reduced the number of his films from the true total, nearly 40, to only 12, and lists only six of them. Soon that will be reduced even further.	0.026076	0	0
" Unspecified source for Image:Podhale in FOX studios.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Podhale in FOX studios.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. '''''' (how now?) "	0.000546	0	0
uhhhh YOU DON'T OWN THIS SITE. SO DON'T TOUCH MY ARTICLES.	0.401282	1	1
" Harrassment, I did not do. He posted a question or whatever and I replyed, I was never rude, I never cussed, I never said anything rude to him or about him (if you want to count ""are you 5?"" in that, OK, I admit that one). The edit warring...I was removing posts on the KDKA-TV page that did not belong. Newscasts on WPCW, whether produced by KDKA or not, do not belong on the KDKA page. I tried telling User:Kd lvr this, he didn't continued to post. He was putting information that I couldn't confirm. Such as former KDKA anchor Jennifer Antkowiak is now ""working with Leslie Sansone's In Home Walking Program"". I looked this site up and could find no mention of Ms. Antkowiak. I did a Google search, same thing. This is inaccurate and unconfirmed (if it is true) information. The assuming bad faith, I had backed off on when it was found that User:Kdkatpir2 and User:Kd lvr were not one in the same. I thought they were, I didn't agree with it, but I had to accept that. When User:Kdkatpir2 was blocked for sockpuppetry, then I knew than that it was as confirmed as it could be that User:Kd lvr was up to no good. Had User:Kdkatpir2 not been blocked, I would not have done anything and would have gone back to updating pages like I have done. I make it a point not to be rude to users here (there are other users for that), I make it a point to pass problems off to an admin so I don't get in trouble and cause I don't want to deal with it. I was reverting posts on the KDKA page cause I thought it was the best thing to do at the time and prior to being blocked, I was actually updatign the KDKA page, so that the back and forth that User:Kd lvr and I were doing (which was annoying the hell outta me) would come to an end (and also make the page easier to read as well). If I was only here to berate people day in and day out, I would have been blocked long ago. I have been blocked only once before for a 24 hour 3RR violation, which I admit I did and I took something too far. That was my fault that time, but I did nothing wrong here. I was doing what I thought was right, reverting information that was incorrect and inaccurate and attempting to stop a user (who was ultimately found to be a sockpuppet by an admin) before harm was done by his behaviour. If I seemed like I was being rude or I was breaking a rule, then I apologize. I am sorry. I didn't mean for my actions to come off in that light. If my actions seemed wrong, I apologize. I didn't mean for them to and I had no and have no ill-will toward User:Kdkatpir2 and User:Kd lvr. If I have broken a rule, then again, I apologize, that was not my intention. I, again, ask that my block be lifted as I did not mean for my actions to be taken in the way that they were and I was not trying to break any rules with my actions. I, again, apologize. - (VT) "	0.010191	0	0
Ah, such adorable mutual e-fellatio	0.890732	1	1
" Hmm, interesting.. Oh, why would I make fun of mullets; they're awesome. ;-) ε "	0.000741	0	0
Origin The Brodnici was a Slavo-Romanian, Slavic or Turanian vassal state of Galicia. Where did you read that they were Turanian?	0.000777	0	0
RT @Manstagram_: This bitch went full on retard http://t.co/nXj4QqGMx2	0.99255	1	1
Telling that you wouldn't answer my question. You are a hypocrit as anyone can see	0.900918	1	1
"HISTORY== On the whole completely uncited and unreferenced. ""Perhaps it was at this time that the prescriptive borough of Crediton arose"" - Perhaps?? How is that historical fact? =="	0.000615	0	0
" I have also reconfirmed that the GLBTQ cites are accurate, and have therefore restored them along with the rest of the section. The fact that ""Jack"" doesn't know how to (or doesn't want to) confirm a quote is not a justification for deleting it. "	0.000629	0	0
Template:Marine life tasks	0.000639	0	0
See above, my post 03:20, 25 June 2007.	0.000611	0	0
Deforimity Does she have deformity. I've never seen an uglier person in my life. Please explain!?	0.50293	1	1
These girls going to school with all kind og aquatic colored weaves in their head.Fuck going on?	0.996754	1	1
Hey are you an idiot? I made all correct changes and you removed them?	0.971703	1	1
These hoes out here be GOIN UP !!!!!!!! But we not at you bitches that's what hoes do !	0.955512	1	1
Not sure why you feel as if you have ownership over this page. If you don't like it, it gets deleted, even if it archived fact? What's your problem?	0.013746	0	0
I fucked the shit out yo bitch yesterday til she couldn't stand straight she called me earlier asking could she come and get a replay	0.997673	1	1
" ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Thompsma....apparently in between your personal attacks on me and your long-winded POV pushing here, you're not listening to anyone. You're quote mining. You're pushing a creationist POV. And you're getting very tendentious. Talk• Contributions "	0.003396	0	0
good morning wikipedia fuckhead	0.990786	1	1
That bitch just walked off all like 💁 Wtf 😂😂	0.996906	1	1
RT @Smooth_Orator: Slander don't exist when you make her cum. Every bad thing she says doesn't register, cuz you got the pussy.	0.98004	1	1
Can I Eye FUCK YOU YOU NEGRO SEE GROW 05:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)	0.998761	1	1
You didn't make two seperate headers, you modified the one I provided. Don't twisted around. Enough of this. Both listings are up, both show sources. Let's leave it at that.	0.017273	0	0
young buck wanna eat!!.. dat nigguh like I aint fuckin dis up again	0.994768	1	1
Ive never seen this part of pussy town before... lolololol the end of this song thoo....	0.87345	1	1
Hallo Hans555 the article about Lauterbach has progressed very much - you have done a nice work, - i will try to translate it for the french version in the next weeks. 12:52 19.5.2007 (CEST)	0.000572	0	0
Gwen. Factual accuracy - 'mostly' implies a majority, which is not the case. Besides, OpenFutureBoy or whatever the fuck he is called has been behaving like a dick and then getting all uppity when someone calls him on it - it's pretty pathetic to see. As for Wolfowitz, well, he's been getting up people's noses since the dawn of time. You'll note the numerical majority of my edits have been minor, but constructive. I'll continue on that path if you'd prefer. Unblock me, keep me blocked - it's not hugely important but it won't stop me from making little edits (which is what I prefer to do) and occasionally insulting dicks like OpenLegBoy (which someone needs to do). Your call.	0.624132	1	1
I don't mean to sound harsh, just stating that we can't put speculation into the article. It generally falls into the category of original research, which should be avoided. (WP:OR)	0.000577	0	0
@_SqueezeMeBaby don't tell the dumb hoes that	0.90782	1	1
Hey. Aside. This was my graduation cap. Like fuck you, bitch, Detroit What. http://t.co/fvNpE7ukn7	0.997375	1	1
" I think the possibility of a corrupt core of admins is a problem worth asking candidates on. So if anybody else posted this exact question there wouldn't be a problem with it? Particularly, I imagine, if it were a well respected admin with an impeccable record positing it? I read each of the candidates statements, and used that to judge if this question would be useful, look at the time between asking the candidates questions. Also look at the ""ignore all evidence"" question, this occurred to me as I was going along and it must be regarded as a general behavioural question when linked to the ""5 days"" question, plus this shows it was not a ""spam"" question to all candidates, I did pay attention to their statements. This is the question I posed to select candidates. What general concerns do you think are raised by the 5 days of silence from the community's admins in this ANI? Are there any other general concerns which arise from the ANI? Do these quotes; ameliorate, add to or amplify concerns? Do you agree with the substance of the Jehochman quotes? If an essay WP:IGNORE ALL THE EVIDENCE were written, what concerns would be behind it, and what could be done about them? If you can point me to another ANI where lies and deceit by two admins within an ANI were ignored by the other admins in attendance for somewhere close to 5 days, then I will ask exactly the same question of those select candidates, substituting this with that example. Would that be acceptable? Have you seen such examples of systemic corruption before? Or is this the only one? Of course to answer that you would also have to answer; can you say in all honesty that you think Ruslik did not lie in this ANI? If you choose not to answer... is it because you believe it is the moral thing to do, or because of possible intimidation or repercussions on your good self? "	0.001691	0	0
That's right, these were not all under one movement, such as Dervish in the north, but they all had the same goal. Should we make a single article covering all of these and if there are major ones they will also obtain their own article?	0.00061	0	0
Not only did they not listen to him, but a number of the people editing this article were quite rude to him. They simply have no respect for anyone.	0.000814	0	0
RT @MattHasTheMusic: @SelfPaidYayo @OGMaco if u ain't making music for me to sip Henny to u a bitch so Maco winnin if he from a island no f…	0.921278	1	1
" Your submission at AfC Joshua Irungu was accepted Joshua Irungu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! "	0.000514	0	0
REDIRECT Talk:Grafenrheinfeld nuclear power plant	0.000697	0	0
" If you don't believe me, go look at the source for yourself, after Melodic Death Metal it says ""1"", click on the 1 or go to the source section, click on it, and there you have it...no reliable source, so remove that shit please."	0.837935	1	1
Money has bin on my mind lately so I think its time to leave the hoes alone and get with the program 💰	0.016061	0	1
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.	0.000708	0	0
" Reliable sources and list guidelines Please see discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. My recommendation is that this List be stubbified to an alphabetical list, removing the content that should have been added to individual bios and should have used better sources. (Talk) "	0.000535	0	0
" Simpsons would you know how to do this? talk "	0.006249	0	0
SALVIO GIULIANO IS A GIGANTIC ASSHOLE. I WILL DIG UP YOUR GRANDMOTHER AND SHIT ON HER DENTURES.	0.99621	1	1
Back in the day...before Zlykinskyja got herself banned with her pilgrimrose sign-on...when the trial was still in progress is was reasonable to balance the arguments for Knox's guilt and innocence. + Now that she's been found guilty, it seems ridiculous to keep bringing up the arguments for her innocence that were soundly rejected by the trial court. + How many times does it need to be said that Knox's Mommy and Daddy don't think she's guilty? + How the murder occured is clearly laid out in the judges narrative, and that is what should be lifted into this article to explain this crime. + Every piece of evidence does not need a notation attached to it that Knox disagrees. Everyone gets that Knox claims she's innocent. + Zlykinskyja needs to get the the court rejected Knox's claim of innocence. + Knox has been in prison for what will soon be 3 years for this crime. Every judge at every level on every issue has rules against Knox on this case. There is no miracle that awaits Knox. She's in prison for the crime, and there she will stay. + + You're wasting your time with Zlykinskyja. She will settle for nothing less than her way. 10 years from now she will her declaring Knox's innocence. She has no interest in compromise on this. As she has clearly shown by continuing to edit the article. She has an agenda, and it doesn't involve being reasonable.	0.001727	0	0
WE SALUTE THE VETS – Tuesday Jihadi Bitch Slaying: MK-48, M203’s Fired At Taliban Cockroaches Du... http://t.co/1cK21ivEUp #tcot #pjnet	0.822573	1	1
RT @Just2Savage: This height shit aint cute at all. Yall some dumb hoes going out in public looking like Jack and the bean stalk. 😂 http://…	0.897542	1	1
This game probably isin't even all that great	0.005738	0	0
If only you could understand the purpose of policies, but you are too narrowminded	0.006042	0	0
Add a mention of the widespread uses of 'rot13' on Usenet postings and other places in the early computer era, explaining that it is a Caesar substitution with a displacement of 13, so that encryption is the same operation as decryption, and that it was widely used to transmit potentially offensive matter, spoilers, and other things meant not to be understood upon inspection.	0.000672	0	0
RT @_AD4: Why all ghetto chicks gotta smell like love-spell. Or that cucumber shit, bath & body works!	0.95213	1	1

" The Lego Movie Hi, Trip. If you have a chance, could you keep an eye on The Lego Movie? One fannish editor keeps adding obsessively, ""The film received universal acclaim,"" a hyperbolic phrase that per discussions at one of the Harry Potter movies and elsewhere we don't use. Lord save us from certain fans.... "

0.005099

0

Bout to smoke a 3.5 n dis bitch .. #Pollution

0.99178

1

How is that? Well that is very nice!!! -) Thanks a lot for making my page so nice!

0.000784

0

Behemoth; prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is Laz which means Muslim Pontic Greek.

0.014991

0

I can't see any answar to your act? Comanche cph

0.001266

0

wtf? you are now just as bad as fcytravis. WHY NOT WARN HIM!? Anus

0.950654

1

ASSHAT FUCKING STUPID ASSHOLE PAIR OF CLOWNSHOES

0.998303

1

I reckon you should die

0.937788

1

@Real_Liam_Payne be a pussy http://t.co/ttzsxBtS74

0.954488

1

Thank you for allowing our link to stay, but if you have not joined or seen the information available, it's hard for you to decide there isn't much content or information available.

0.00052

0

@user Booker is the more hysterical woman, while Harris is just a common slut.

0.920203

1

0

My mom's younger brothers gonna come disrespect my mom & call her a bitch & my cousins gonna tell my mom to STFU! Wth..

0.980435

1

":::I wouldn't agree with the ""my definition"" statement, as while they do retain aspects of the main game, they don't (to my knowledge) expand upon those aspects with new elements. I don't doubt that EA calls them spinoffs, but I do doubt that EA uses the term spinoff correctly, and by Wikipedia policy, if EA calls them spinoffs, they're spinoffs if EA calls them spinoffs, EA calls them spinoffs. (talk|Contribs) "

0.000628

0

RT @MikeDiggEm: @TreyzUpZay @JamesyNBA @DattBoiIraq @_2kkz @_KudaBrazyy @thatboysmurf I fuck with all yaw. Yaw all my nigs

0.996717

1

@tupacselenas hey bitch imy

0.992675

1

Gay The existence of CDVF is further proof that is a sad twat. He is also very ugly, and has a willy for a face.

0.967431

1

“@Amillinati_: Bro like I really enjoy like eating pussy from the back... It makes it more nasty, I like nasty haha 😈”you like eating ass 2

0.981645

1

That depends on the margins of victory for all parties: the NDP have indicated they might support the Conservatives in a minority situation. But nothing in politics is certain: the NDP also supported the current government but precipitated its fall. | talk |

0.00064

0

Well fellow wikipedians, a lot of good images (opinion) are getting flushed down to toilet these days. Is it really making wikipedia a better, or more legal place? Not in my eyes, but I am now starting to remove all my sculpture images (several hundred?) because I'd rather do it myself than have someone else do it.

0.006107

0

steve irwin МљHEY FAGGIT GO RAPE A 7 YEAR OLD, MAKE HER PUSSY BLEED

0.997135

1

I see. Brutal force is your only real argument for people like you in Wikipedia. Keep demonstrating us what civilization is.

0.536491

1

Image copyright problem with Image:Facial.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Facial.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy). The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.

0.000602

0

You asked for evidence and I gave you evidence. Two users disagreed with two other users. The latter drove away the former and now get to decide the content of the page alone, without opposition. It is INSANE that you will do nothing about this.

0.001893

0

For some things its gotta be very yoda like logic - be thak ful what hasnt been taken away - and know when to turn away while the ghouls feast - and to know when to catch the breeze to float to another ledge above the precipice - ( Suro

0.0136

0

Damning, on the structuring of EU policy to tacitly support, or perhaps even feed, torture and enslavement of migrants in Libya for profit,

0.168543

1

0

" Not a Marilyn, but what? ""Its name may mislead as its highest point is 3 metres (10 ft) above sea level."" Nice understatement. Obviously the hills are not Marilyns or Munros. But I suppose the hill-obsessed Brits would have a name for these hills toobut Twiggy (hill) is red? "

0.002282

0

@SeymourBlanco you were supposed to hang w me this week nigger

0.988871

1

RT @TheOnlyReed: Lmaooooooo ain't fuckin no bitch with doo Doo in her butt while I'm foreplaying, THE FUCK

0.997705

1

RT @mckinley719: "@wizkhalifa: Pretty bitches rep Taylor Gang" #Hollah lmfaoo

0.864759

1

Not yet, but Pink says I was bitchy yesterday. Well... sort of. Meanwhile, I left quite a nasty note with the Johnny Depp guy above.

0.070762

0

You ain't trynna fuc ? Get ya shoes hoe

0.971299

1

" LGBT composers? Because I was unaware of them, of course. It's a big wiki. In my opinion, Category:Armenian chess players should stay, because we categorize just about every person in Category:Countryname profession. I don't quite see the point of LGBT composers, though, especially considering the sorry state that mess is in. I've put on tags to it and note that it's mostly . The answer to questions such as this is generally, . If you perceive a problem, doing something about it is more useful than complaining. adiant_>|< "

0.000662

0

" How many unsustained complaints were there? I noticed ""Prior to the shooting, he had never been the subject of a sustained complaint from the agency's internal affairs department "".. so how many unsustained complaints were there? Because generally if its not on film or doesn't have a dozen witnesses.. a complaint is going nowhere. Id be interested to know how many times people have filed abuse complaints.. sustained or not - "

0.000752

0

Monuments Isn't there a memorial to the Balibo five, or at least one of them?

0.000626

0

It will not let me edit on my actual page so I am putting this here:

0.000772

0

@user @user Competing for Most Hysterical Woman at the Kavanaugh hearings" Trying to create outrage and Hate

0.075326

0

1

No, he seems not relevant for an article about Almaty

0.000631

0

" ""No one else considers...""? In other words, the meat puppets act like meat puppets, and you cite their meat puppetry as being self-justifying? Ha ha! Notice that nobody actually ADDRESSES my actual objections! Generally, they consider 'templates' (or one-liner, non-detailed comments) to be sufficient. Why am I not impressed? It's quite simple: Dodo did very wrong things, and rather than address those wrong things, the sheep bleat, ""four legs good, two legs bad!"". I've listened to their nonsense, and I PREVIOUSLY contributed constructively, or at least I tried to do so on numerous occasions. Why can't you deal with my SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS? "

0.017307

0

Having read the material... that seems mostly to be something being used to undermine the witness in the media (and I guess at the trial). Generally we do not deal with such material unless it becomes very pertinent; i.e. the court rejects their evidence because of it. I don't see that as having happened (yet?) so I see no reason to include issues of mental health. It's just more POV pushing. Oggi is probably not the greatest of sources here, it is tabloid (someone likened it to Time above... not by half, I am afraid). They have editorial oversight, but tend to be more gossipy than anything else. I'd treat it about the same as the Daily Mail (perhaps a bit worse). Errant (chat!)

0.000664

0

Hahahaha manziel is a faggot and the browns will ruin him. Win win for me

0.967012

1

" I have problems with nearly everything you added. I can give some examples: The hacking community was also infuriated by his habit of making the latest hacking developments public, with his publication of technical details on phone phreaking earning him top spots on the “Most Hated Person” charts in the Worldcharts diskmag for several years. That is truely an amazing version of the story. If you read these discmags the title ""most hated person"" came from rumors that Kim Schmitz had denunciatet many members of the BBS scene. Since this version is not citeable neither should be in the article. His legal team maintained that this was not insider trading as the information did not come from anybody else and Schmitz had created the business opportunity himself. “I think the outcome would be different in a court of law today as the Internet bubble had just burst at the time, everyone had lost a lot of money and there was so much media attention that I became the scapegoat,” Schmitz maintained. Where does this statement come from? Why is that relevant? Schmitz later conceded he had been young, stupid, naïve and aggressive. “I had no idea about the legal implications of my actions,” he acknowledged. “I hope my mistakes can therefore serve as an example for young entrepreneurs. They should remember one golden rule be careful and always think twice about what you are doing.” This is a sentence for an autobiography, not an Wikipedia article. Schmitz, who has also long been a fan of Formula I and organised several big parties for the races in Monaco, now plans to develop a racetrack and is currently scouting potential sites around the world. Future plans without any details have nothing to do with Wikipedia. He can announce this on his own home page. 78.34.4.52 "

0.00748

0

You filthy, stinking crow! I am back! Dirty crow! You better delete (or if not, support the deletion) of all photos of human private parts, you feces-gorging filthy mongrel. Are you a hog? You want to lick anuses overflowing with feces. DIRTY HOG! -

0.997587

1

Lmfao this is some straight up retarded shit up in here

0.990776

1

Great Synagogue of Vilna - not! , I greatly appreciate your quick and informative response that clarified the post-WWII identity of the two Vilna synagogues. The GFH Photo Archive director accepts this correction with thanks, and I'll add mine for your contribution to making our material accurate and reliable. I'll look forward to consulting you in the future on matters of 20th C.Lithuanian history, and also on adding photo images (something I've yet to do) to WP pages I edit. Thanks again,

0.000615

0

vandalism . . . fuck you, waggers.

0.997362

1

Image source problem with Image:Pt plelection 1999.PNG Thanks for uploading Image:Pt plelection 1999.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

0.000598

0

Small minded and ignorant Wiki contributors. It seem sto me that th eoriginal noble aims of the founders have gone adrift due to the smallminded pettyness of many contributors. They usually manifest this smallminded ignorance by deleting any correction to their original articles as seemingly their godliness means the are the supreme authority on most topics even if as is the frequent case they live in some little place in USA ad have no real knowledge of life beyond the stripmalls. Constant ingestion of burgers and fries makes them feel to be experts on all things even those of which they know nothing and have n personal experience of. Thus when I spot an inconsitency in their pieces and add some correct and especially logical words to their precious piece they get their knickers in a twist and childishly erase my effort and thus leave all other Wiki readers just as ignorant as they themselves. This is Fascism and more fitting to Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Russia that the wide world of today. I will nevertheless continue to add, subtract or otherwise modify and improve various Wiki articles I find as part of my conviction that eductaion should be progressive not regressive.

0.595566

1

NO PISS OFF WIKIPEDIA, WHAT YOU GONNA DO ABOUT IT

0.780972

1

" Explanation of my recent edits Removing bolding and external links within article per WP:MOS. Only first word of section titles should be capitalized, and NCNM should not be placed on section headings (each section is about the subject of the article). Removal of peacock terms and redundant phrasing, ""extensive, unique, geared to, in its course offerings, more universal, opens numerous, in which students are immersed, designed for students with a special affinity, wanting a more streamlined graduate experience, fully"". If actually extensive needs a RS that describes it that way, likewise with unique or a description of how its unique. Geared to unless we are talking about gears this is marketing. In its course offerings is redundant. More universal with an explanation this is unnecessary, however universality is a pretty large if vague claim. Students are immersed, describe how program is immersive provide a RS that says it is notable for that. Designed for students with a special affinity, designed for students is a given for a school and special affinity sounds like peacock for interest in. Wanting a more streamlined graduate experience is marketing peacock speak for shorter/smaller course of study. Fully (accredited) is assumed if only partially accredited that would be spelled out. Removed wikilink on word school to article Medical school NCNM is not a medical school as described in target article. Adding ref improve tag: the entire Academic programs section has only the two refs supporting accreditation, the NCNM clinic section is completely unsourced as is the Accreditations and associations section and the NCNM history section. I placed 3 citation needed tags on some statements that definitely need references. These are very specific in addition to the article in general needing improved references. Additional proposed edits: I think expertise in ""with an expertise in natural medicine"" should be removed if it can't be supported with a reference. Expertise is substantial claim for education and training only. I am not sure what ""a holistic Chinese medicine education in Western medical sciences"" means. ""Since its founding, NCNM has sought to preserve and convey the classical modalities of naturopathy and honor the principles that guide naturopathic care:"" could be rephrased, ""to preserve and convey the classical modalities and honor the guiding principles of naturopathy:"" if that preserves the meaning. ""The college is alma mater to over 2,000 alumni"" is redundant if your an alumni it's your alma mater. - - "

0.000622

0

I note that the article on Sanchez still omits the documented fact that he was a male prostitute. Wikipedia will never publish this fact, because it intends to protect Sanchez. By the time it's finished, Wikipedia will omit Sanchez's history as an actor in dozens of gay porn movies, too. It has already reduced the number of his films from the true total, nearly 40, to only 12, and lists only six of them. Soon that will be reduced even further.

0.026076

0

" Unspecified source for Image:Podhale in FOX studios.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:Podhale in FOX studios.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. '''''' (how now?) "

0.000546

0

uhhhh YOU DON'T OWN THIS SITE. SO DON'T TOUCH MY ARTICLES.

0.401282

1

" Harrassment, I did not do. He posted a question or whatever and I replyed, I was never rude, I never cussed, I never said anything rude to him or about him (if you want to count ""are you 5?"" in that, OK, I admit that one). The edit warring...I was removing posts on the KDKA-TV page that did not belong. Newscasts on WPCW, whether produced by KDKA or not, do not belong on the KDKA page. I tried telling User:Kd lvr this, he didn't continued to post. He was putting information that I couldn't confirm. Such as former KDKA anchor Jennifer Antkowiak is now ""working with Leslie Sansone's In Home Walking Program"". I looked this site up and could find no mention of Ms. Antkowiak. I did a Google search, same thing. This is inaccurate and unconfirmed (if it is true) information. The assuming bad faith, I had backed off on when it was found that User:Kdkatpir2 and User:Kd lvr were not one in the same. I thought they were, I didn't agree with it, but I had to accept that. When User:Kdkatpir2 was blocked for sockpuppetry, then I knew than that it was as confirmed as it could be that User:Kd lvr was up to no good. Had User:Kdkatpir2 not been blocked, I would not have done anything and would have gone back to updating pages like I have done. I make it a point not to be rude to users here (there are other users for that), I make it a point to pass problems off to an admin so I don't get in trouble and cause I don't want to deal with it. I was reverting posts on the KDKA page cause I thought it was the best thing to do at the time and prior to being blocked, I was actually updatign the KDKA page, so that the back and forth that User:Kd lvr and I were doing (which was annoying the hell outta me) would come to an end (and also make the page easier to read as well). If I was only here to berate people day in and day out, I would have been blocked long ago. I have been blocked only once before for a 24 hour 3RR violation, which I admit I did and I took something too far. That was my fault that time, but I did nothing wrong here. I was doing what I thought was right, reverting information that was incorrect and inaccurate and attempting to stop a user (who was ultimately found to be a sockpuppet by an admin) before harm was done by his behaviour. If I seemed like I was being rude or I was breaking a rule, then I apologize. I am sorry. I didn't mean for my actions to come off in that light. If my actions seemed wrong, I apologize. I didn't mean for them to and I had no and have no ill-will toward User:Kdkatpir2 and User:Kd lvr. If I have broken a rule, then again, I apologize, that was not my intention. I, again, ask that my block be lifted as I did not mean for my actions to be taken in the way that they were and I was not trying to break any rules with my actions. I, again, apologize. - (VT) "

0.010191

0

Ah, such adorable mutual e-fellatio

0.890732

1

" Hmm, interesting.. Oh, why would I make fun of mullets; they're awesome. ;-) ε "

0.000741

0

Origin The Brodnici was a Slavo-Romanian, Slavic or Turanian vassal state of Galicia. Where did you read that they were Turanian?

0.000777

0

RT @Manstagram_: This bitch went full on retard http://t.co/nXj4QqGMx2

0.99255

1

Telling that you wouldn't answer my question. You are a hypocrit as anyone can see

0.900918

1

"HISTORY== On the whole completely uncited and unreferenced. ""Perhaps it was at this time that the prescriptive borough of Crediton arose"" - Perhaps?? How is that historical fact? =="

0.000615

0

" I have also reconfirmed that the GLBTQ cites are accurate, and have therefore restored them along with the rest of the section. The fact that ""Jack"" doesn't know how to (or doesn't want to) confirm a quote is not a justification for deleting it. "

0.000629

0

Template:Marine life tasks

0.000639

0

See above, my post 03:20, 25 June 2007.

0.000611

0

Deforimity Does she have deformity. I've never seen an uglier person in my life. Please explain!?

0.50293

1

These girls going to school with all kind og aquatic colored weaves in their head.Fuck going on?

0.996754

1

Hey are you an idiot? I made all correct changes and you removed them?

0.971703

1

These hoes out here be GOIN UP !!!!!!!! But we not at you bitches that's what hoes do !

0.955512

1

Not sure why you feel as if you have ownership over this page. If you don't like it, it gets deleted, even if it archived fact? What's your problem?

0.013746

0

I fucked the shit out yo bitch yesterday til she couldn't stand straight she called me earlier asking could she come and get a replay

0.997673

1

" ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Thompsma....apparently in between your personal attacks on me and your long-winded POV pushing here, you're not listening to anyone. You're quote mining. You're pushing a creationist POV. And you're getting very tendentious. Talk• Contributions "

0.003396

0

good morning wikipedia fuckhead

0.990786

1

That bitch just walked off all like 💁 Wtf 😂😂

0.996906

1

RT @Smooth_Orator: Slander don't exist when you make her cum. Every bad thing she says doesn't register, cuz you got the pussy.

0.98004

1

Can I Eye FUCK YOU YOU NEGRO SEE GROW 05:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

0.998761

1

You didn't make two seperate headers, you modified the one I provided. Don't twisted around. Enough of this. Both listings are up, both show sources. Let's leave it at that.

0.017273

0

young buck wanna eat!!.. dat nigguh like I aint fuckin dis up again

0.994768

1

Ive never seen this part of pussy town before... lolololol the end of this song thoo....

0.87345

1

Hallo Hans555 the article about Lauterbach has progressed very much - you have done a nice work, - i will try to translate it for the french version in the next weeks. 12:52 19.5.2007 (CEST)

0.000572

0

Gwen. Factual accuracy - 'mostly' implies a majority, which is not the case. Besides, OpenFutureBoy or whatever the fuck he is called has been behaving like a dick and then getting all uppity when someone calls him on it - it's pretty pathetic to see. As for Wolfowitz, well, he's been getting up people's noses since the dawn of time. You'll note the numerical majority of my edits have been minor, but constructive. I'll continue on that path if you'd prefer. Unblock me, keep me blocked - it's not hugely important but it won't stop me from making little edits (which is what I prefer to do) and occasionally insulting dicks like OpenLegBoy (which someone needs to do). Your call.

0.624132

1

I don't mean to sound harsh, just stating that we can't put speculation into the article. It generally falls into the category of original research, which should be avoided. (WP:OR)

0.000577

0

@_SqueezeMeBaby don't tell the dumb hoes that

0.90782

1

Hey. Aside. This was my graduation cap. Like fuck you, bitch, Detroit What. http://t.co/fvNpE7ukn7

0.997375

1

" I think the possibility of a corrupt core of admins is a problem worth asking candidates on. So if anybody else posted this exact question there wouldn't be a problem with it? Particularly, I imagine, if it were a well respected admin with an impeccable record positing it? I read each of the candidates statements, and used that to judge if this question would be useful, look at the time between asking the candidates questions. Also look at the ""ignore all evidence"" question, this occurred to me as I was going along and it must be regarded as a general behavioural question when linked to the ""5 days"" question, plus this shows it was not a ""spam"" question to all candidates, I did pay attention to their statements. This is the question I posed to select candidates. What general concerns do you think are raised by the 5 days of silence from the community's admins in this ANI? Are there any other general concerns which arise from the ANI? Do these quotes; ameliorate, add to or amplify concerns? Do you agree with the substance of the Jehochman quotes? If an essay WP:IGNORE ALL THE EVIDENCE were written, what concerns would be behind it, and what could be done about them? If you can point me to another ANI where lies and deceit by two admins within an ANI were ignored by the other admins in attendance for somewhere close to 5 days, then I will ask exactly the same question of those select candidates, substituting this with that example. Would that be acceptable? Have you seen such examples of systemic corruption before? Or is this the only one? Of course to answer that you would also have to answer; can you say in all honesty that you think Ruslik did not lie in this ANI? If you choose not to answer... is it because you believe it is the moral thing to do, or because of possible intimidation or repercussions on your good self? "

0.001691

0

That's right, these were not all under one movement, such as Dervish in the north, but they all had the same goal. Should we make a single article covering all of these and if there are major ones they will also obtain their own article?

0.00061

0

Not only did they not listen to him, but a number of the people editing this article were quite rude to him. They simply have no respect for anyone.

0.000814

0

RT @MattHasTheMusic: @SelfPaidYayo @OGMaco if u ain't making music for me to sip Henny to u a bitch so Maco winnin if he from a island no f…

0.921278

1

" Your submission at AfC Joshua Irungu was accepted Joshua Irungu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! "

0.000514

0

REDIRECT Talk:Grafenrheinfeld nuclear power plant

0.000697

0

" If you don't believe me, go look at the source for yourself, after Melodic Death Metal it says ""1"", click on the 1 or go to the source section, click on it, and there you have it...no reliable source, so remove that shit please."

0.837935

1

Money has bin on my mind lately so I think its time to leave the hoes alone and get with the program 💰

0.016061

0

1

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

0.000708

0

" Reliable sources and list guidelines Please see discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard. My recommendation is that this List be stubbified to an alphabetical list, removing the content that should have been added to individual bios and should have used better sources. (Talk) "

0.000535

0

" Simpsons would you know how to do this? talk "

0.006249

0

SALVIO GIULIANO IS A GIGANTIC ASSHOLE. I WILL DIG UP YOUR GRANDMOTHER AND SHIT ON HER DENTURES.

0.99621

1

Back in the day...before Zlykinskyja got herself banned with her pilgrimrose sign-on...when the trial was still in progress is was reasonable to balance the arguments for Knox's guilt and innocence. + Now that she's been found guilty, it seems ridiculous to keep bringing up the arguments for her innocence that were soundly rejected by the trial court. + How many times does it need to be said that Knox's Mommy and Daddy don't think she's guilty? + How the murder occured is clearly laid out in the judges narrative, and that is what should be lifted into this article to explain this crime. + Every piece of evidence does not need a notation attached to it that Knox disagrees. Everyone gets that Knox claims she's innocent. + Zlykinskyja needs to get the the court rejected Knox's claim of innocence. + Knox has been in prison for what will soon be 3 years for this crime. Every judge at every level on every issue has rules against Knox on this case. There is no miracle that awaits Knox. She's in prison for the crime, and there she will stay. + + You're wasting your time with Zlykinskyja. She will settle for nothing less than her way. 10 years from now she will her declaring Knox's innocence. She has no interest in compromise on this. As she has clearly shown by continuing to edit the article. She has an agenda, and it doesn't involve being reasonable.

0.001727

0

WE SALUTE THE VETS – Tuesday Jihadi Bitch Slaying: MK-48, M203’s Fired At Taliban Cockroaches Du... http://t.co/1cK21ivEUp #tcot #pjnet

0.822573

1

RT @Just2Savage: This height shit aint cute at all. Yall some dumb hoes going out in public looking like Jack and the bean stalk. 😂 http://…

0.897542

1

This game probably isin't even all that great

0.005738

0

If only you could understand the purpose of policies, but you are too narrowminded

0.006042

0

Add a mention of the widespread uses of 'rot13' on Usenet postings and other places in the early computer era, explaining that it is a Caesar substitution with a displacement of 13, so that encryption is the same operation as decryption, and that it was widely used to transmit potentially offensive matter, spoilers, and other things meant not to be understood upon inspection.

0.000672

0

RT @_AD4: Why all ghetto chicks gotta smell like love-spell. Or that cucumber shit, bath & body works!

0.95213

1