Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
kafziel, get a life and stop working for these idiots, if you know whats good for you, cause the whole damn company will burn down if this continues! i will not be visiting your peice of shit website any more, and i will be telling all 100 people i know not to either! your goin down fuckin jerk offs!!!!!!!!!	0.997036	1	1
NOT GOING TO FUCKING ISLE OF SHEPPEY WE'RE NOT GOING THERE. END OF! 86.178.49.98	0.99236	1	1
Initiative-wise, there are two or three Avengers operating, and the original Captain America the one that the article references is, y'know, dead.	0.00069	0	0
RT @_JBsoprano: "Young N**s act hard and all the bad B***s grew up to be trash broads" -@JaeTips	0.787797	1	1
UnderstandMexico Would you please provide an explanation as to why you reverted the external link to the Baja California page of UnderstandMexico? If you can find a more suitable replacement for investment data, perhaps from Bancomext, Sedeco, Detac or Copreen I welcome you to replace it, but as to my very informed knowledge no such information exists on the Internet I request you restore the link to the Baja California investment guide on UnderstandMexico.	0.000533	0	0
Discography Shouldn't there be a section on her Discography? I didn't even know she sings, and I'm sure nobody else did, so what the fuck did she sing?	0.94268	1	1
@user @user @user Stfu you pussy. Clearly the white guy was the fucking aggressor and laid hands on him first. Typical response from your kind	0.998497	1	1
Ah - the category being merged in used the other form and I assumed as the longer version it was more complete.	0.000575	0	0
Gotta go get a haircut ASAP tomorrow ain't no bitches looking at me right now. And today they all was out. The frustration.	0.780418	1	1
Image:Tommy 9.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tommy 9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.	0.000667	0	0
After giving this article sufficient time to be looked at, isn't it time for a complete revamp, especially the first development section that reads like pulp fiction. FWIW .	0.000689	0	0
The article Great Miami Rowing Club has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.	0.000522	0	0
What is this, an Old Boys Club? Listen, you are employing some serious double standards. I get harasse4d by an Admin, you do nothing. I shout back, and you block me. Well, you can keep on blocking me, because as long as I'm provoked, I'll hit back, and I will not stop until this pestering annoyance backs off.	0.711507	1	1
I'd say the Lincoln Blackwood at 15 months is the shortest production run of a non-limited-edition vehicle. The Aztek actually sold pretty well. I'm editing. 17:01, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)	0.00059	0	0
You can take your sandbox And pull your cheeks apart and stick it up your asshole. Thanks. ;)	0.982022	1	1
Pulled up on this coco ratchet on my way home 😂😭 @@kayysavage yes bitch	0.893337	1	1
" February By my logic, the first two meanings (lack of either a full or new moon in a month) can only occur in Februray, as the lunar cycle is 29.53 days, and the shortest non-Feburary month is 30 days. Feburary, being 28 days (or 29 in a bissextile year), is the only month that is less than the full cycle, and that therefore can miss either a full or new moon in the month. As the cycle from dark moon to dark moon is less than 29.53 days, it is also impossible to occur outside February. As for the fourth meaning (two new moons in a month), obviously this cannot occur in February. — talk "	0.000623	0	0
" Actually, the basis for this argument comes from the fact that by using the word ""Pegasus"", you have established a referant. The word itself is it. I.e., using the name automatically implies the existence of a concept behind it; additionally, there is NO way for a person to declare a concept NOT to exist, for in order to declare its nonexistence, it must exist. Thus, any referent thus used must, circularly, exist. "	0.00064	0	0
wikipedia tells u fucking false stuff,im gonna leave wikipedia now and you suck bitch and there is no such thing as fucking tko u bitch,im leaving	0.99814	1	1
@TheEllenShow stfu trash	0.927689	1	1
you better sleep with an eye open, you don't know which way the trouble will come from shitbag!	0.744838	1	1
" 'Self-immolation' article I have experienced all manner of wikilawyering, hostility and disruption possible at the Falun Gong pages, which has turned me away as a potential sympathiser. I have officially retired from editing those articles, having concluded that it is pointless for me to continue there - Wikipedia seems all too tolerant of conflicted-out editors and disruptive point-pushers, by not banning indefinitely. As I was the leading editor which got the 'self-immolation' article to FA, I felt closer to that article and thus decided to revisit it recently; I reserve my continue to do so from time to time, without feeling that I have violated any self-imposed 'retirement'. However, I do not intend on contributing to the ongoing discussion there. I hope that you will abide by my wish not copy my post across. The fundamental problem I see is that the FLG practitioners appear to exist in a rarefied atmosphere of their alternate paradigm - like many Chinese, they subscribe to fatalism that everything is intended or planned by powerful forces. They cannot accept that independent acts of free will can occur, nor can they accept that any PRC source can be legitimately cited, because they are not reliable. The table which is currently subject to debate has been the target of removal by Dilip some time in the past, on the grounds that it was propaganda. By my reckoning, the table is carefully cited and attributed, and all the information therein belongs there. Just apply the same benchmark to any other piece of information there (such as name and occupation), and you will see that the practitioners' wanting to remove mentions that they may have been practitioners is wholly inconsistent bullshit, and an attempt at censorship. I believe the article was, at the time it was declared FA, materially compliant with WP:NPOV. It was in a very delicate state of balance, with neither side having the overall conclusion or last word, and with the readers being more or less able to decide for themselves what probably occurred. It has already been knocked off balance by those SPAs, who cannot tolerate any possibility, however remote, that practitioners may have been involved. What those editors want, IMHO, is completely at odds with the fundamental tenets of WP. They will work tirelessly to chip away at all those bits of text they find objectionable, so that a one-sided article exonerating Falun Gong will emerge over a period of time if vigilant editors like you are not around to challenge what they are doing - using a loose definition of the word. I just know I'm mentally exhausted from fighting them over the years. ¡digame! "	0.015542	0	0
" It's a stupid project. Wikipedia should be a hub of information for all ages. If it is filled up with porno articles with inappropriate material, both Encyclopedic and for the reading of the general population, child or otherwise, then it is restricting the audience of Wikipedia surely? I mean how can a source of information be free and accessible to all, if it is ostensibly linked with explicit material, most of which shouldn't be in the Encyclopedia. PS - I know about Wikipedia's ""no censorship issue"", but sometimes it goes too far. "	0.17834	1	1
Yep, should be merged!	0.001147	0	0
My edit was constructive. It updated info, added more and new relevant info, added sourced material, and cleaned up the article.74.194.176.82	0.000616	0	0
It's talking about thge number of pages you've edited. (talk, email)	0.000637	0	0
RT @MikeyGotSteeze: Fvck friends & fvck hoes	0.252447	1	1
RT @itscoleharmon_: Guys at parties be screaming "these hoes ain't loyal" but they drunk & cheating on they gf with a girl who look like Ra…	0.683173	1	1
What a stupid name for a stupid Wikipedia editor like you dickhead.	0.992845	1	1
get lost don't bother me again, you miserable piece of shit!	0.995794	1	1
@c_mccann23 fuck yes we are 😜 triple xp nigguh	0.990957	1	1
I quite like the picture. I wonder why the concerns about the pic were not brought up when this became a FA. Or, was the pic not here then?	0.000675	0	0
@Of_Angelis yep, which is messier/more dangerous/more environmentally-unfriendly than their retarded new spouts. @innov82bgr8	0.427983	1	1
I'm not sure about a lot of the comments on this page. They seem to be based on someone's personal opinion more than anything else. Although the station is certainly quieter than most central London tube stations, it is not as quiet as this article implies.	0.000565	0	0
My mom bitches too much	0.994276	1	1
This comes rather late, but yes, I think the NOTE: blah blah section is rather unencyclopedic.	0.000762	0	0
Hey Fuck you, you Russia-loving cunt.	0.998502	1	1
Toto's Pizza House Could you please help me. I created the page Toto's Pizza House and then moved it to User:Pestbuda\Toto's Pizza House, and on realising I used the wrong slash moved it to User:Pestbuda/Toto's Pizza House. I've tried to move it to Toto's Pizza House and have been told I cannot. Could you please help me move it to just Toto's Pizza House. There are a lot of things I need to put on it but if it can be put on WP proper I think it will be OK. I've also put links, which was a silly thing for me to do before creating the article. If you could help me I'd be very appreciative, or if you cannot suggest another administrator familiar with this problem, which must have occurred before. Thank you.	0.000951	0	0
" Keilana, where did I say anything about ""all sides""? Please read closely before commenting. "	0.000556	0	0
Thanks for your kind comments - I'm under attack by a groupd of thugs Thanks for your words of support. But I am under attack by a couple of bullies and thugs chasing down everything I contribute. They even deleted your comment, but I iremember reading it before they did. Did you go through that kind of gangsterism?	0.107036	1	0
Fucken pussy	0.995849	1	1
" I wouldn't bother arguing with this loser ""Off2riorob"", he's just a sad little unemployed welfare recepient who is terrifed of loosing his benefits once the unelectable, autistic one-eyed freak Brown is voted out in May. ( )"	0.697983	1	1
You have left me no choice. Wikipedia is a group of fellow editors. You will be banned according to your actions, not your status.	0.001567	0	0
Open proxies are banned no matter who they belong to. If the good students of the University of Evansville want to edit again, they should speak to their computing services department about fixing their open proxy problem first.	0.00067	0	0
RT @YunGMiGo: 😭😭😭😂😂RT @Shane_A1: Can you imagine Tryn yo hardest to stop a bitch frm slutin and still comin up unsuccessful	0.935257	1	1
ACMEMan ACMEMan is not gsnguy. That's a lie! See my in my talk page. now.	0.046145	0	0
" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dakota ~ "	0.001017	0	0
BECAUSE HE IS A FAGOT	0.862013	1	1
Lmao I look like some 80s retard today http://t.co/ZGFv8Z3hQc	0.682002	1	1
" VERY IMPRESSED I love your Admin and editing prowess. I understand the ""hprotected."" Simple, no agrguement there. BUT, my claim to being a Rouge Admin . . . Woah? A catergory that doesn't exist. How is that disruptive? Why are you wasting your time? I don't listen to New Wave of British Heavy Metal either (technically not a genre either) and I am sure as sh!1 not a Wood Badger! Chill out. CAN YOU DIG IT? "	0.003404	0	0
RT @HBCUfessions: My body count went from 1 to 9 in one semester... I'm not a hoe just love sex -FAMU	0.130809	1	1
Well yes, it was regret that we don't execute western billionaires to which I referred.	0.000677	0	0
Suburban Express Conventional Media Sources Here are some conventional-media sources which are potentially useful for editors working on the Suburban Express article: Daily Herald Daily Herald Release: http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-release.pdf Daily Herald Article re: Fare Wars http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-fare-wars-toeppen.pdf Daily Herald Article re: University of Iowa Service http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-uiowa-se.pdf News-Gazette News-Gazette release: http://www.toeppen.com/gazette-release.pdf News-Gazette article re: Go Suburban - leave the driving to the entrepreneur: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1990_0408_news-gazette_article.pdf Daily Illini Daily Illini release: http://www.toeppen.com/di-release.pdf Daily Illini article re: New cut-rate bus service: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_0128_new_cut-rate_bus_service.pdf Daily Illini article re: Illini Union Board budget matters - Greyhound commissions down by $15k (Translates to $150k sales decrease) http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_IUB_budget_impact.pdf Daily Illini article re: Greyhound Predatory Pricing: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1985_0216_greyhound_predatory_pricing.pdf Daily Illini article re: Suburban Express using novel method to pursue cheaters: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0117_bad_checks.pdf Daily Illini letter to editor re: Bad checks article: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0118_di_letter_to_editor_re_badcheck_article.pdf Daily Illini article re: Students who thought they could do better... http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_0823_6th_Wave_Opens.pdf Daily Illini article re: ...but who arguably failed: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_1030_Sixth_Wave_Screws_Up.pdf Perhaps an editor will post these in the Talk section of the Suburban Express article.	0.000955	0	0
Spikes in article viewing Looking at the article traffic statistics: 30 March 2011, spiked to ~5x normal viewing frequency, with elevated viewing on the 31st last 30 March version 3 January 2011, spiked to ~3x normal version from 27 December User:Ceyockey (talk to me)	0.000552	0	0
#porn,#android,#iphone,#ipad,#sex,#xxx, \| #Babe \| ebony babe pussy http://t.co/3MxBXeZqxR	0.907483	1	1
Please PERMANENTLY block all editing ability from this ip, my fellow students seem to be moronic dolts. I enjoy contributing, but if I have to give that up in order to keep wikipedia working, I will.	0.045809	0	0
Flo is a bad bitch	0.99029	1	1
U MOTHERFUCKING BITCH DIDNT TELL ME I COULD MOVE MY KING CHIPS WHEN I HAD F O UR AND YOU HAD NONE. CHEATING ASS HOE.	0.997879	1	1
Hey I thnk that you an asshole You just love to fuck your momk all day bitch. Stop Fuckinmg her now!!!!!!!!!! Got it bitch	0.998201	1	1
I have no goal other than to add to a truthful information source.	0.000551	0	0
Well they are certainly prettier than you Siddiqui ugly faces. I suggest you keep it that way. Certainly gives a much better impression then you miserable Siddiquis. As far as I can see you are the biggest intellectual dishonest here judging by all the comments on your talk.	0.750646	1	1
This article is currently not balanced. It provides only a cursory summary of the official report, and then an excessively long section on the disputed account. This gives the (incorrect) impression that the official account is inadequate or wrong. Ultimately, there is one fact that is not disputed - Captain Asseline flew the aircraft into a stall. This is a very bad thing for a pilot to do at any time, and a cardinal sin when done 30 ft above the ground. The evidence is clear – the plane was at alphamax (high angle of attack), at very low airspeed, and with engine set to idle. Asseline has nobody else to blame for putting the plane into such a dangerous configuration, he was in command. All the other distracting issues, eg. precise altitude, wearing a headset, engine lag in responding to throttle-up command, etc etc, are little more than red herrings because none of them excuse the fact that the plane stalled due to pilot error. There is a lot of evidence in the official report (I haven’t been able to find a version translated into English), it’s pretty clear what actually happened. Oh, and reference 3 is a bit dubious; full of wacky conspiracy theories with no evidence to back them up. I propose that the article needs a major overhaul, trimming a lot out of the disputed account and providing more information from the official report.	0.005817	0	0
RT @NikoWavy: FACTS RT“@iDntWearCondoms: Your pussy not that good if 10 niggas had it but none of them are still with u”	0.944517	1	1
PARDON ME. You are an ass, not a fool. I am moving forward with my plans to have you banned from Wikipedia. Your removal of that article which was WELL CITED (learn how to read), was VANDALISM and it has been reported as such.	0.969774	1	1
" Just this account, dipshit? Fuck are you dumb. 68 a bullied nerd with a mod. account LOOK OUT WORLD!"	0.996897	1	1
“@MajorSlander One last shot at this love shit then I'm dogging you hoes” #Drakelistener	0.947594	1	1
Hi! Have you completed the online training for students? Your name is not on the list of students in the course who have completed it (when you finish it, I can see that through the course page). Please go ahead and do it and I'll get a notification. If you already completed the whole training, please let me know in case there was a glitch somewhere. Also, this page is your Talk page where people can communicate with you. You might want to move the sentence above to your User page. See you in class in a couple weeks!	0.000728	0	0
Many thanks Beeblebrox for looking into this!	0.000623	0	0
A miserable bitch is on the docket today. Lois 'Misery' Lerner better get grilled. The ordered harassment was undeniable. #breakherdown #war	0.987449	1	1
and their inherent, innate right to know and to claim that past	0.000837	0	0
" In response to your feedback I know its quite confusing for the beginners. See the welcome template for more information (you will find it above). "	0.000521	0	0
hello removing comments on ur user page is illegal on wikipedia. dont do it again or u will be blocked!!! BITCH	0.98682	1	1
I never said i did you ugly bastard. Get of my case, you bitch whore. Piece of shit. I said i have the right to post the No Israel and Christian Fiction userboxes NOT the personal info you bitchfuck. You fuckin fuckface. This is why I hate the Wikipedia system. It makes it difficult for people to function. You stupid shitface.	0.998345	1	1
RT @Drrake: How to curve tf outta hoes... http://t.co/LIGzDoUnJ5	0.122349	1	1
Your opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.... and timings of what? The fact that I happened to agree with someone too soon makes me automatically guilty? What an asinine proposition, coming from someone I was not even talking to. The jackassery abounds.	0.253058	1	1
, to let me get away with my fantasy revisionism to edit faggotry as normalcy	0.436816	1	0
Responce Why is it funny because I'm right? You're a peace of crap Shawn. I know I'm right because you had nothing to come back. So go have fun being broken by your corporate masters.	0.837549	1	1
If you did a thorough Nexis search, you should have seen both the state's appellate brief and the amicus briefs against the sisters. Right there you have sources you're not using. 64.38.197.224	0.000835	0	0
RT @Tahrell: Now, bitches gonna think just because they're married, they're better than every female that's not. Smh	0.966399	1	1
"I advise you change your name, we don't allow names with ""wikipedia"" in it, see WP:USERNAME. (Honk, contribs, odometer) "	0.000841	0	0
Just look at The Banner's Talk page to see the history of his criticisme on this web ?	0.00071	0	0
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. (talk)	0.000532	0	0
" Hi Emopunkundead13, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. "	0.000772	0	0
" Who the hell are you to decide who is notable, you ABSOLUTELY UNHEARD OF , BLITHERING NOBODY? You invited me to edit a page and I did, so it is NOT ""DISRUPTION""! If you don;t want it edited, DON'T MAKE IT EDITABLE! My notability is verifiable on the Web, and off. I cited STARRRING in a American/Canadian film, in the very famous ""Amityville"" series, and am noted in many places on the Web as its star. I also cited several a major North American newspaper, the Montreal Gazette (founded by Benjamin Franklin, and the largest English language daily west of Toronto). You were also told that I have been a critic for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (but YOU wouldn't know what that is, you ignorant AMERICAN, WOULD YOU?). I ALSO HAVE NUMEROUS OTHER MAJOR CREDITS, BUT HAVE NOT LISTED THEM. Obviously, you are discriminating against prominent Canadians, because you can't be bothered doiong researching outside of the Internet, or your own, self-important &^$%ng country. MY article was DISRUPTED by an ""editor"" who admits she, herself, was cautioned by Wikipedia. Here's some news for you, BInky: Wikipedia is so ""notable"" it is NOT EVEN LISTED in the Britannica 2007. Here's some more news: School children, EVERYWHERE, are warned of the general unreliability of Wikipedia, and so they should be, because it is run by wannabe editors like you, who can't find editing work outside of the virtual world. Now, go collect your unemployment cheque (or ""check"", for ignorant rabble like yourself), and buzz the hell off. G.F.Y.!"	0.747974	1	1
Don't keep changing my page I made please. You're obviously retarted. If you know the slightest thing about Brandon Semenuk, you would know he's won Red Bull Joyride four times. Leave the page alone.	0.849669	1	0
What happened to this article? This article has been vandalised, as the sections on the 'Ploughman Notes', the Irish-American Exile banknotes, & the Irish Euro notes have been deleted. What was the reasoning behind this? I think that the deletions were an extremely dumb move. - ( )	0.006731	0	0
" I did not purposely contribute to any type of outside ""false sourcing"". I used a source found on Bing. If it is ""garbage"" than it is garbage, but an indefinite block is not something that I feel is right or warranted because of your opinions that my articles are ""terrible"" and your association with some of the editors that do not like them. I am politely requesting an unblock directly from you as the blocking administrator Kinu because I do not feel an indefinite block is either warranted or fair at all. I have made positive and good faith contributions and your opinion(s) of my overall editing and now accusation of purposeful outside false sourcing simply is not true. Why would I ask you about a particular source first on your Talk page before adding it to the article if I was trying to be disruptive in any way at all? You could have productively made your point to me without an indefinite block. I politely ask you for an unblock from you directly because this is simply not fair in any way at all. "	0.003566	0	0
FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT	0.96593	1	1
What are you talking about not making a neutral point of view and how did i harass a the usuer?	0.003159	0	0
Single like a dollar fucking bitches like im slater ..AWW MANE!	0.998242	1	1
I was wondering the same thing for my User page. Either way, I don't even understand why I was blocked in the first place. Other than that some idiot named Rhobite seems to have a hard time dealing with defeat and reality.	0.394147	1	1
intelligent and honest reader	0.00068	0	0
To whomever knows about the School Board for London I've examined official papers produced by the Board and by the government setting it up and come across both 'London School Board' and 'School Board for London' being referred to as its official name. Is there a definitive answer? . fys aym.	0.000601	0	0
", 16 June 2009 (UTC) I don't disagree in principle with anything you've written above. I would have no problem with a much stricter notability policy that favored importance over other concerns. However, what you or I might prefer takes or should take a back seat to what is. And what is does not require so stringent a standard, at least the way I read the current notability standards. In my view, David Boothroyd met these standards though barely so even before the minor scandal. After it, I think there's no question he does. While I share your concerns regarding the future of such articles, the article as it currently stands in userspace presents no viable BLP concerns as far as I can tell. On a tangent, I am actually considering reworking the notability standards in a way that addresses your concerns above as my first Wikipedia-space project. There are so many ""nobodies"" that have articles currently that I think this is a rather necessary change. As this would be a major shift, I don't plan on working on it on the actual page, but using a sandbox of some sort. Could you advise me as to both the feasibility of taking on such a project, as well as how to creat a draft like CoM's current Boothroyd article? Thanks, Unitanode 16:05"	0.000593	0	0
While it may be true that there are thousands of trolls for Richard Kastle and Lang Lang... there is a huge difference. Although Lang Lang does (visually) look like an idiot when he performs with his weird facial expressions and over exaggerated face... he still happens to be a brilliant pianist (in the pieces where he doesn't decide to go 10 times the speed as directed.) Richard Kastle however as far as I (or many other people have tried) know has never had a single CD published or recorded. The fact that on the entirety of YouTube there is about 30 seconds of actual footage of Richard Kastle playing and a still shot of him on a Jay Leno show. Many of the so called 'trolls' that abuse Richard Kastle have a right to do so, due to the fact that a couple of psychologically disturbed people who praise him for being the greatest pianist of all time are truly wrong. There is also video footage on YouTube of a guy (who I believe is Kastle) discrediting major pianists such as Horowitz and Cziffra because they 'supposedly' simplified parts of their repertoire. This is completely NOT true due to the fact that University Professionals and other Professional Pianists would easily have picked up such a disregard for the music, in seconds. This article on Richard Kastle should be deleted due to the fact that it is just another excuse for one of those psychologically disturbed people who praise him for being the greatest pianist of all time, to brag about a man who does not deserve the credit he deserves. If it IS true that Kastle did actually discredit the great pianists - this page should be taken down for praising a slander who has the audacity to verbally abuse the good name and brilliant talent of the pianists who are deceased and have no way of discrediting this so called fraud called 'Richard Kastle'. I recommend that the Richard Kastle page be deleted, so we don't get every Tom, Dick and Harry wanting their own page for self-promotion.	0.021582	0	0
Do not attack users who cooperate in contributing to wiki articles. 68.173.95.177 68.173.95.177	0.002722	0	0
"::::::If the newsletters were written by Paul, sure, I would be fine with labeling them ""Paul's"". You have a source for that? Note that I don't deny the facts, but rather dispute it follows logically that these are ""his newsletters"". It is also a question of semiotics: when I hear ""Paul's newsletters"" I picture him sitting over his typewriter cranking out the latest issue, or at least Paul actively editing and overseeing the publication. I do not picture an operation sixty miles away with ghostwriters publishing a newsletter under his name while Paul is busy delivering babies elsewhere. Claiming we know it is ""Paul's newsletter"" is misleading. "	0.000666	0	0
RT @raider_level: She was like "I don't go to raider games. They are ghetto and people get jumped" lmao I was like "well the shit sound lik…	0.824232	1	1
Grinders im from philly and no one really thinks or uses the term grinder. i never heard of it till i moved to pittsburgh for a short stint. i think the article has the use of the word grinder backwords in the first paragraph. grinders are not a philly thing.	0.001249	0	0
They thought I wouldn't make it pussy nigga we made it	0.976281	1	1

kafziel, get a life and stop working for these idiots, if you know whats good for you, cause the whole damn company will burn down if this continues! i will not be visiting your peice of shit website any more, and i will be telling all 100 people i know not to either! your goin down fuckin jerk offs!!!!!!!!!

0.997036

1

NOT GOING TO FUCKING ISLE OF SHEPPEY WE'RE NOT GOING THERE. END OF! 86.178.49.98

0.99236

1

Initiative-wise, there are two or three Avengers operating, and the original Captain America the one that the article references is, y'know, dead.

0.00069

0

RT @_JBsoprano: "Young N****s act hard and all the bad B*****s grew up to be trash broads" -@JaeTips

0.787797

1

UnderstandMexico Would you please provide an explanation as to why you reverted the external link to the Baja California page of UnderstandMexico? If you can find a more suitable replacement for investment data, perhaps from Bancomext, Sedeco, Detac or Copreen I welcome you to replace it, but as to my very informed knowledge no such information exists on the Internet I request you restore the link to the Baja California investment guide on UnderstandMexico.

0.000533

0

Discography Shouldn't there be a section on her Discography? I didn't even know she sings, and I'm sure nobody else did, so what the fuck did she sing?

0.94268

1

@user @user @user Stfu you pussy. Clearly the white guy was the fucking aggressor and laid hands on him first. Typical response from your kind

0.998497

1

Ah - the category being merged in used the other form and I assumed as the longer version it was more complete.

0.000575

0

Gotta go get a haircut ASAP tomorrow ain't no bitches looking at me right now. And today they all was out. The frustration.

0.780418

1

Image:Tommy 9.jpg listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tommy 9.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.

0.000667

0

After giving this article sufficient time to be looked at, isn't it time for a complete revamp, especially the first development section that reads like pulp fiction. FWIW .

0.000689

0

The article Great Miami Rowing Club has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

0.000522

0

What is this, an Old Boys Club? Listen, you are employing some serious double standards. I get harasse4d by an Admin, you do nothing. I shout back, and you block me. Well, you can keep on blocking me, because as long as I'm provoked, I'll hit back, and I will not stop until this pestering annoyance backs off.

0.711507

1

I'd say the Lincoln Blackwood at 15 months is the shortest production run of a non-limited-edition vehicle. The Aztek actually sold pretty well. I'm editing. 17:01, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)

0.00059

0

You can take your sandbox And pull your cheeks apart and stick it up your asshole. Thanks. ;)

0.982022

1

Pulled up on this coco ratchet on my way home 😂😭 @@kayysavage yes bitch

0.893337

1

" February By my logic, the first two meanings (lack of either a full or new moon in a month) can only occur in Februray, as the lunar cycle is 29.53 days, and the shortest non-Feburary month is 30 days. Feburary, being 28 days (or 29 in a bissextile year), is the only month that is less than the full cycle, and that therefore can miss either a full or new moon in the month. As the cycle from dark moon to dark moon is less than 29.53 days, it is also impossible to occur outside February. As for the fourth meaning (two new moons in a month), obviously this cannot occur in February. — talk "

0.000623

0

" Actually, the basis for this argument comes from the fact that by using the word ""Pegasus"", you have established a referant. The word itself is it. I.e., using the name automatically implies the existence of a concept behind it; additionally, there is NO way for a person to declare a concept NOT to exist, for in order to declare its nonexistence, it must exist. Thus, any referent thus used must, circularly, exist. "

0.00064

0

wikipedia tells u fucking false stuff,im gonna leave wikipedia now and you suck bitch and there is no such thing as fucking tko u bitch,im leaving

0.99814

1

@TheEllenShow stfu trash

0.927689

1

you better sleep with an eye open, you don't know which way the trouble will come from shitbag!

0.744838

1

" 'Self-immolation' article I have experienced all manner of wikilawyering, hostility and disruption possible at the Falun Gong pages, which has turned me away as a potential sympathiser. I have officially retired from editing those articles, having concluded that it is pointless for me to continue there - Wikipedia seems all too tolerant of conflicted-out editors and disruptive point-pushers, by not banning indefinitely. As I was the leading editor which got the 'self-immolation' article to FA, I felt closer to that article and thus decided to revisit it recently; I reserve my continue to do so from time to time, without feeling that I have violated any self-imposed 'retirement'. However, I do not intend on contributing to the ongoing discussion there. I hope that you will abide by my wish not copy my post across. The fundamental problem I see is that the FLG practitioners appear to exist in a rarefied atmosphere of their alternate paradigm - like many Chinese, they subscribe to fatalism that everything is intended or planned by powerful forces. They cannot accept that independent acts of free will can occur, nor can they accept that any PRC source can be legitimately cited, because they are not reliable. The table which is currently subject to debate has been the target of removal by Dilip some time in the past, on the grounds that it was propaganda. By my reckoning, the table is carefully cited and attributed, and all the information therein belongs there. Just apply the same benchmark to any other piece of information there (such as name and occupation), and you will see that the practitioners' wanting to remove mentions that they may have been practitioners is wholly inconsistent bullshit, and an attempt at censorship. I believe the article was, at the time it was declared FA, materially compliant with WP:NPOV. It was in a very delicate state of balance, with neither side having the overall conclusion or last word, and with the readers being more or less able to decide for themselves what probably occurred. It has already been knocked off balance by those SPAs, who cannot tolerate any possibility, however remote, that practitioners may have been involved. What those editors want, IMHO, is completely at odds with the fundamental tenets of WP. They will work tirelessly to chip away at all those bits of text they find objectionable, so that a one-sided article exonerating Falun Gong will emerge over a period of time if vigilant editors like you are not around to challenge what they are doing - using a loose definition of the word. I just know I'm mentally exhausted from fighting them over the years. ¡digame! "

0.015542

0

" It's a stupid project. Wikipedia should be a hub of information for all ages. If it is filled up with porno articles with inappropriate material, both Encyclopedic and for the reading of the general population, child or otherwise, then it is restricting the audience of Wikipedia surely? I mean how can a source of information be free and accessible to all, if it is ostensibly linked with explicit material, most of which shouldn't be in the Encyclopedia. PS - I know about Wikipedia's ""no censorship issue"", but sometimes it goes too far. "

0.17834

1

Yep, should be merged!

0.001147

0

My edit was constructive. It updated info, added more and new relevant info, added sourced material, and cleaned up the article.74.194.176.82

0.000616

0

It's talking about thge number of pages you've edited. (talk, email)

0.000637

0

RT @MikeyGotSteeze: Fvck friends & fvck hoes

0.252447

1

RT @itscoleharmon_: Guys at parties be screaming "these hoes ain't loyal" but they drunk & cheating on they gf with a girl who look like Ra…

0.683173

1

What a stupid name for a stupid Wikipedia editor like you dickhead.

0.992845

1

get lost don't bother me again, you miserable piece of shit!

0.995794

1

@c_mccann23 fuck yes we are 😜 triple xp nigguh

0.990957

1

I quite like the picture. I wonder why the concerns about the pic were not brought up when this became a FA. Or, was the pic not here then?

0.000675

0

@Of_Angelis yep, which is messier/more dangerous/more environmentally-unfriendly than their retarded new spouts. @innov82bgr8

0.427983

1

I'm not sure about a lot of the comments on this page. They seem to be based on someone's personal opinion more than anything else. Although the station is certainly quieter than most central London tube stations, it is not as quiet as this article implies.

0.000565

0

My mom bitches too much

0.994276

1

This comes rather late, but yes, I think the NOTE: blah blah section is rather unencyclopedic.

0.000762

0

Hey Fuck you, you Russia-loving cunt.

0.998502

1

Toto's Pizza House Could you please help me. I created the page Toto's Pizza House and then moved it to User:Pestbuda\Toto's Pizza House, and on realising I used the wrong slash moved it to User:Pestbuda/Toto's Pizza House. I've tried to move it to Toto's Pizza House and have been told I cannot. Could you please help me move it to just Toto's Pizza House. There are a lot of things I need to put on it but if it can be put on WP proper I think it will be OK. I've also put links, which was a silly thing for me to do before creating the article. If you could help me I'd be very appreciative, or if you cannot suggest another administrator familiar with this problem, which must have occurred before. Thank you.

0.000951

0

" Keilana, where did I say anything about ""all sides""? Please read closely before commenting. "

0.000556

0

Thanks for your kind comments - I'm under attack by a groupd of thugs Thanks for your words of support. But I am under attack by a couple of bullies and thugs chasing down everything I contribute. They even deleted your comment, but I iremember reading it before they did. Did you go through that kind of gangsterism?

0.107036

1

0

Fucken pussy

0.995849

1

" I wouldn't bother arguing with this loser ""Off2riorob"", he's just a sad little unemployed welfare recepient who is terrifed of loosing his benefits once the unelectable, autistic one-eyed freak Brown is voted out in May. ( )"

0.697983

1

You have left me no choice. Wikipedia is a group of fellow editors. You will be banned according to your actions, not your status.

0.001567

0

Open proxies are banned no matter who they belong to. If the good students of the University of Evansville want to edit again, they should speak to their computing services department about fixing their open proxy problem first.

0.00067

0

RT @YunGMiGo: 😭😭😭😂😂RT @Shane_A1: Can you imagine Tryn yo hardest to stop a bitch frm slutin and still comin up unsuccessful

0.935257

1

ACMEMan ACMEMan is not gsnguy. That's a lie! See my in my talk page. now.

0.046145

0

" Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dakota ~ "

0.001017

0

BECAUSE HE IS A FAGOT

0.862013

1

Lmao I look like some 80s retard today http://t.co/ZGFv8Z3hQc

0.682002

1

" VERY IMPRESSED I love your Admin and editing prowess. I understand the ""hprotected."" Simple, no agrguement there. BUT, my claim to being a Rouge Admin . . . Woah? A catergory that doesn't exist. How is that disruptive? Why are you wasting your time? I don't listen to New Wave of British Heavy Metal either (technically not a genre either) and I am sure as sh!1 not a Wood Badger! Chill out. CAN YOU DIG IT? "

0.003404

0

RT @HBCUfessions: My body count went from 1 to 9 in one semester... I'm not a hoe just love sex -FAMU

0.130809

1

Well yes, it was regret that we don't execute western billionaires to which I referred.

0.000677

0

Suburban Express Conventional Media Sources Here are some conventional-media sources which are potentially useful for editors working on the Suburban Express article: Daily Herald Daily Herald Release: http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-release.pdf Daily Herald Article re: Fare Wars http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-fare-wars-toeppen.pdf Daily Herald Article re: University of Iowa Service http://www.toeppen.com/daily-herald-uiowa-se.pdf News-Gazette News-Gazette release: http://www.toeppen.com/gazette-release.pdf News-Gazette article re: Go Suburban - leave the driving to the entrepreneur: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1990_0408_news-gazette_article.pdf Daily Illini Daily Illini release: http://www.toeppen.com/di-release.pdf Daily Illini article re: New cut-rate bus service: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_0128_new_cut-rate_bus_service.pdf Daily Illini article re: Illini Union Board budget matters - Greyhound commissions down by $15k (Translates to $150k sales decrease) http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1984_IUB_budget_impact.pdf Daily Illini article re: Greyhound Predatory Pricing: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1985_0216_greyhound_predatory_pricing.pdf Daily Illini article re: Suburban Express using novel method to pursue cheaters: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0117_bad_checks.pdf Daily Illini letter to editor re: Bad checks article: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/1996_0118_di_letter_to_editor_re_badcheck_article.pdf Daily Illini article re: Students who thought they could do better... http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_0823_6th_Wave_Opens.pdf Daily Illini article re: ...but who arguably failed: http://www.toeppen.com/oldarticles/2000_1030_Sixth_Wave_Screws_Up.pdf Perhaps an editor will post these in the Talk section of the Suburban Express article.

0.000955

0

Spikes in article viewing Looking at the article traffic statistics: 30 March 2011, spiked to ~5x normal viewing frequency, with elevated viewing on the 31st last 30 March version 3 January 2011, spiked to ~3x normal version from 27 December User:Ceyockey (talk to me)

0.000552

0

#porn,#android,#iphone,#ipad,#sex,#xxx, | #Babe | ebony babe pussy http://t.co/3MxBXeZqxR

0.907483

1

Please PERMANENTLY block all editing ability from this ip, my fellow students seem to be moronic dolts. I enjoy contributing, but if I have to give that up in order to keep wikipedia working, I will.

0.045809

0

Flo is a bad bitch

0.99029

1

U MOTHERFUCKING BITCH DIDNT TELL ME I COULD MOVE MY KING CHIPS WHEN I HAD F O UR AND YOU HAD NONE. CHEATING ASS HOE.

0.997879

1

Hey I thnk that you an asshole You just love to fuck your momk all day bitch. Stop Fuckinmg her now!!!!!!!!!! Got it bitch

0.998201

1

I have no goal other than to add to a truthful information source.

0.000551

0

Well they are certainly prettier than you Siddiqui ugly faces. I suggest you keep it that way. Certainly gives a much better impression then you miserable Siddiquis. As far as I can see you are the biggest intellectual dishonest here judging by all the comments on your talk.

0.750646

1

This article is currently not balanced. It provides only a cursory summary of the official report, and then an excessively long section on the disputed account. This gives the (incorrect) impression that the official account is inadequate or wrong. Ultimately, there is one fact that is not disputed - Captain Asseline flew the aircraft into a stall. This is a very bad thing for a pilot to do at any time, and a cardinal sin when done 30 ft above the ground. The evidence is clear – the plane was at alphamax (high angle of attack), at very low airspeed, and with engine set to idle. Asseline has nobody else to blame for putting the plane into such a dangerous configuration, he was in command. All the other distracting issues, eg. precise altitude, wearing a headset, engine lag in responding to throttle-up command, etc etc, are little more than red herrings because none of them excuse the fact that the plane stalled due to pilot error. There is a lot of evidence in the official report (I haven’t been able to find a version translated into English), it’s pretty clear what actually happened. Oh, and reference 3 is a bit dubious; full of wacky conspiracy theories with no evidence to back them up. I propose that the article needs a major overhaul, trimming a lot out of the disputed account and providing more information from the official report.

0.005817

0

RT @NikoWavy: FACTS RT“@iDntWearCondoms: Your pussy not that good if 10 niggas had it but none of them are still with u”

0.944517

1

PARDON ME. You are an ass, not a fool. I am moving forward with my plans to have you banned from Wikipedia. Your removal of that article which was WELL CITED (learn how to read), was VANDALISM and it has been reported as such.

0.969774

1

" Just this account, dipshit? Fuck are you dumb. 68 a bullied nerd with a mod. account LOOK OUT WORLD!"

0.996897

1

“@MajorSlander One last shot at this love shit then I'm dogging you hoes” #Drakelistener

0.947594

1

Hi! Have you completed the online training for students? Your name is not on the list of students in the course who have completed it (when you finish it, I can see that through the course page). Please go ahead and do it and I'll get a notification. If you already completed the whole training, please let me know in case there was a glitch somewhere. Also, this page is your Talk page where people can communicate with you. You might want to move the sentence above to your User page. See you in class in a couple weeks!

0.000728

0

Many thanks Beeblebrox for looking into this!

0.000623

0

A miserable bitch is on the docket today. Lois 'Misery' Lerner better get grilled. The ordered harassment was undeniable. #breakherdown #war

0.987449

1

and their inherent, innate right to know and to claim that past

0.000837

0

" In response to your feedback I know its quite confusing for the beginners. See the welcome template for more information (you will find it above). "

0.000521

0

hello removing comments on ur user page is illegal on wikipedia. dont do it again or u will be blocked!!! BITCH

0.98682

1

I never said i did you ugly bastard. Get of my case, you bitch whore. Piece of shit. I said i have the right to post the No Israel and Christian Fiction userboxes NOT the personal info you bitchfuck. You fuckin fuckface. This is why I hate the Wikipedia system. It makes it difficult for people to function. You stupid shitface.

0.998345

1

RT @Drrake: How to curve tf outta hoes... http://t.co/LIGzDoUnJ5

0.122349

1

Your opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.... and timings of what? The fact that I happened to agree with someone too soon makes me automatically guilty? What an asinine proposition, coming from someone I was not even talking to. The jackassery abounds.

0.253058

1

, to let me get away with my fantasy revisionism to edit faggotry as normalcy

0.436816

1

0

Responce Why is it funny because I'm right? You're a peace of crap Shawn. I know I'm right because you had nothing to come back. So go have fun being broken by your corporate masters.

0.837549

1

If you did a thorough Nexis search, you should have seen both the state's appellate brief and the amicus briefs against the sisters. Right there you have sources you're not using. 64.38.197.224

0.000835

0

RT @Tahrell: Now, bitches gonna think just because they're married, they're better than every female that's not. Smh

0.966399

1

"I advise you change your name, we don't allow names with ""wikipedia"" in it, see WP:USERNAME. (Honk, contribs, odometer) "

0.000841

0

Just look at The Banner's Talk page to see the history of his criticisme on this web ?

0.00071

0

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. (talk)

0.000532

0

" Hi Emopunkundead13, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: Table of Contents Department directory Need help? Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes. Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. "

0.000772

0

" Who the hell are you to decide who is notable, you ABSOLUTELY UNHEARD OF , BLITHERING NOBODY? You invited me to edit a page and I did, so it is NOT ""DISRUPTION""! If you don;t want it edited, DON'T MAKE IT EDITABLE! My notability is verifiable on the Web, and off. I cited STARRRING in a American/Canadian film, in the very famous ""Amityville"" series, and am noted in many places on the Web as its star. I also cited several a major North American newspaper, the Montreal Gazette (founded by Benjamin Franklin, and the largest English language daily west of Toronto). You were also told that I have been a critic for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (but YOU wouldn't know what that is, you ignorant AMERICAN, WOULD YOU?). I ALSO HAVE NUMEROUS OTHER MAJOR CREDITS, BUT HAVE NOT LISTED THEM. Obviously, you are discriminating against prominent Canadians, because you can't be bothered doiong researching outside of the Internet, or your own, self-important *&*^$%ng country. MY article was DISRUPTED by an ""editor"" who admits she, herself, was cautioned by Wikipedia. Here's some news for you, *BInky*: Wikipedia is so ""notable"" it is NOT EVEN LISTED in the Britannica 2007. Here's some more news: School children, EVERYWHERE, are warned of the general unreliability of Wikipedia, and so they should be, because it is run by wannabe editors like you, who can't find editing work outside of the virtual world. Now, go collect your unemployment cheque (or ""check"", for ignorant rabble like yourself), and buzz the hell off. G.F.Y.!"

0.747974

1

Don't keep changing my page I made please. You're obviously retarted. If you know the slightest thing about Brandon Semenuk, you would know he's won Red Bull Joyride four times. Leave the page alone.

0.849669

1

0

What happened to this article? This article has been vandalised, as the sections on the 'Ploughman Notes', the Irish-American Exile banknotes, & the Irish Euro notes have been deleted. What was the reasoning behind this? I think that the deletions were an extremely dumb move. - ( )

0.006731

0

" I did not purposely contribute to any type of outside ""false sourcing"". I used a source found on Bing. If it is ""garbage"" than it is garbage, but an indefinite block is not something that I feel is right or warranted because of your opinions that my articles are ""terrible"" and your association with some of the editors that do not like them. I am politely requesting an unblock directly from you as the blocking administrator Kinu because I do not feel an indefinite block is either warranted or fair at all. I have made positive and good faith contributions and your opinion(s) of my overall editing and now accusation of purposeful outside false sourcing simply is not true. Why would I ask you about a particular source first on your Talk page before adding it to the article if I was trying to be disruptive in any way at all? You could have productively made your point to me without an indefinite block. I politely ask you for an unblock from you directly because this is simply not fair in any way at all. "

0.003566

0

FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT

0.96593

1

What are you talking about not making a neutral point of view and how did i harass a the usuer?

0.003159

0

Single like a dollar fucking bitches like im slater ..AWW MANE!

0.998242

1

I was wondering the same thing for my User page. Either way, I don't even understand why I was blocked in the first place. Other than that some idiot named Rhobite seems to have a hard time dealing with defeat and reality.

0.394147

1

intelligent and honest reader

0.00068

0

To whomever knows about the School Board for London I've examined official papers produced by the Board and by the government setting it up and come across both 'London School Board' and 'School Board for London' being referred to as its official name. Is there a definitive answer? . fys aym.

0.000601

0

", 16 June 2009 (UTC) I don't disagree in principle with anything you've written above. I would have no problem with a much stricter notability policy that favored importance over other concerns. However, what you or I might prefer takes or should take a back seat to what is. And what is does not require so stringent a standard, at least the way I read the current notability standards. In my view, David Boothroyd met these standards though barely so even before the minor scandal. After it, I think there's no question he does. While I share your concerns regarding the future of such articles, the article as it currently stands in userspace presents no viable BLP concerns as far as I can tell. On a tangent, I am actually considering reworking the notability standards in a way that addresses your concerns above as my first Wikipedia-space project. There are so many ""nobodies"" that have articles currently that I think this is a rather necessary change. As this would be a major shift, I don't plan on working on it on the actual page, but using a sandbox of some sort. Could you advise me as to both the feasibility of taking on such a project, as well as how to creat a draft like CoM's current Boothroyd article? Thanks, Unitanode 16:05"

0.000593

0

While it may be true that there are thousands of trolls for Richard Kastle and Lang Lang... there is a huge difference. Although Lang Lang does (visually) look like an idiot when he performs with his weird facial expressions and over exaggerated face... he still happens to be a brilliant pianist (in the pieces where he doesn't decide to go 10 times the speed as directed.) Richard Kastle however as far as I (or many other people have tried) know has never had a single CD published or recorded. The fact that on the entirety of YouTube there is about 30 seconds of actual footage of Richard Kastle playing and a still shot of him on a Jay Leno show. Many of the so called 'trolls' that abuse Richard Kastle have a right to do so, due to the fact that a couple of psychologically disturbed people who praise him for being the greatest pianist of all time are truly wrong. There is also video footage on YouTube of a guy (who I believe is Kastle) discrediting major pianists such as Horowitz and Cziffra because they 'supposedly' simplified parts of their repertoire. This is completely NOT true due to the fact that University Professionals and other Professional Pianists would easily have picked up such a disregard for the music, in seconds. This article on Richard Kastle should be deleted due to the fact that it is just another excuse for one of those psychologically disturbed people who praise him for being the greatest pianist of all time, to brag about a man who does not deserve the credit he deserves. If it IS true that Kastle did actually discredit the great pianists - this page should be taken down for praising a slander who has the audacity to verbally abuse the good name and brilliant talent of the pianists who are deceased and have no way of discrediting this so called fraud called 'Richard Kastle'. I recommend that the Richard Kastle page be deleted, so we don't get every Tom, Dick and Harry wanting their own page for self-promotion.

0.021582

0

Do not attack users who cooperate in contributing to wiki articles. 68.173.95.177 68.173.95.177

0.002722

0

"::::::If the newsletters were written by Paul, sure, I would be fine with labeling them ""Paul's"". You have a source for that? Note that I don't deny the facts, but rather dispute it follows logically that these are ""his newsletters"". It is also a question of semiotics: when I hear ""Paul's newsletters"" I picture him sitting over his typewriter cranking out the latest issue, or at least Paul actively editing and overseeing the publication. I do not picture an operation sixty miles away with ghostwriters publishing a newsletter under his name while Paul is busy delivering babies elsewhere. Claiming we know it is ""Paul's newsletter"" is misleading. "

0.000666

0

RT @raider_level: She was like "I don't go to raider games. They are ghetto and people get jumped" lmao I was like "well the shit sound lik…

0.824232

1

Grinders im from philly and no one really thinks or uses the term grinder. i never heard of it till i moved to pittsburgh for a short stint. i think the article has the use of the word grinder backwords in the first paragraph. grinders are not a philly thing.

0.001249

0

They thought I wouldn't make it pussy nigga we made it

0.976281

1