text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
RT @thecoreyholcomb: Every time you sleep with two women in a day it proves this country has a problem educating bitches about their self w… | 0.8849 | 1 | 1 |
What is Property? Property is Theft!
Yes, there is so much more we could say about What Is Property. Some of that was written at Property Is Theft. I say the first step is to bring them together.
I'm glad you brought up Category:Political slogans - you will see some of them italicised (also in the sub-category Category:American political slogans). Click on them, and you will see what I have in mind. I think that is a much better way to go for this case - the slogan does not naturally divide from the book. It's question and answer after all.
If after this you still think they should be separate, then that's fine. I will withdraw the proposal and we will carry on.
This Branden business is a waste of time. I see no pressing need to deal with it. Time will be better spent improving What Is Property. Having done some of that, there is a good chance Steve will relent, as he doesn't seem to me to be all that unreasonable. Or else he may lose interest. Or, failing that, I expect it will be easier to convince uninvolved editors or administrators to remove dodgy material from a passable article than it will be to convince them to remove dodgy material from a dodgy article.
Regards, | 0.007499 | 0 | 0 |
@iAM_tRoyal5 @treydayy_ @TeflonDon4200 @Bossman_Carl big bro thought he was on house party's pajama jam like a bitch http://t.co/djuvhsBy84 | 0.877209 | 1 | 1 |
"
More False Allegations
I HAVE NOT MADE ANY LEGAL THREATS
I HAVE A SUGGESTION. WHY DON'T YOU SIMPLY REMOVE EVERYTHING ABOUT ME FROM WIKI? I WOULD BE HAPPY WITH THAT. YOU GUYS ARE TOO LITERAL AND HUMORLESS FOR ME TO DEAL WITH. I AM USED TO MORE COMPLEX AND SUBTLE MINDS. THERE IS A COARSENESS IN THE RESOLVING POWER OF THE ""EDITORS"" WHO ARE NOT ABLE TO MAKE THE RELEVANT DISTINCTIONS. YOU GUYS CAN'T SEEM TO SEE WHAT DAVID BOHM CALLED 'SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES"". Right now I consider that several of your ""editors"" are in fact Cyber-Terrorists who are stalking me. CH is a good example. He has been stalking me on the WEB years before Wiki. I suspect some of the others are in league with him.
[Jack Sarfatti]" | 0.109487 | 1 | 1 |
Block
Your sockpuppet was used to harass another user. | 0.557809 | 1 | 1 |
"::""Posting anonymously?"" I'm guessing that CltFn is not your real name ... Anyway, I'm not hiding that my edits are by me. I just don't see what utility there is to me to get a user account, other than to avoid semi-protects as at Zionism. DLH
" | 0.015021 | 0 | 0 |
Notability
Exactly how notable is this really? We shouldn't be acting as plot summary and their involvment in this group could be mentioned in their own articles. I am going to recommend for deletion. | 0.000735 | 0 | 0 |
Juniors are still pussies | 0.859808 | 1 | 1 |
THE ACLU IS ON YOUR ASS!
This latino will never get up until everyone of you racist WiKKKipedia gringos are behind bars! | 0.995821 | 1 | 1 |
x_x RT @LaDarinAintShit: Fat bitches with normal sized legs be looking like car keys. | 0.968355 | 1 | 1 |
Oh, and you suck dick. | 0.997142 | 1 | 1 |
TCBY with these hoes 💕 || @arabellaann @jackireininga http://t.co/aUVQnOGvdY | 0.21894 | 1 | 1 |
Chillax ladies. 94.14.142.147 | 0.0009 | 0 | 0 |
I swear a nicca sleep but im up .. Tired as fuk! | 0.932511 | 1 | 1 |
"
I see. Well, no, the ""oldest attestation of a mango"" isn't found in the Vedas. A mango is mentioned in passing in an Upanishad. I'm not sure how notable this is to the mango article. As to ""above and over all fruits"", I don't know which text you are referring to. I am sure there are lots of stories involving mangoes in medieval Indian texts, but I haven't researched these. (𒁳) " | 0.000562 | 0 | 0 |
Palatal nasal - 118
Kwamikagami claims that: The palatal nasal is a type of consonant.... The symbol in the International Phonetic Alphabet that represents this sound is ⟨ ɲ⟩
I don't believe this. | 0.000737 | 0 | 0 |
"
Sthenelaos
Googling ""Sthenelaos"" I found mention of a character in the Iliad, who seems to be Sthenelos; is Sthenelaos a spurious variant, etymologically unsupported? " | 0.000911 | 0 | 0 |
For the record, U-Haul pickup trucks and cargo vans (Ford F-150 and E-150) are leased to the company for a fee. U-Haul International does not own these vechiles. | 0.004134 | 0 | 0 |
"
Edits on Gadhimai festival
Your edits in Gadhimai festival are controversial/disputed. Certainly, your inclusion of vegetarianism and Hindu scriptures etc DO NOT deal with the issue and need to be deleted here or moved to appropriate articles. On the other hand, it also seems that you are probably involved in an edit war involving socks.
My suggestion: please propose your changes in talk page. I will vet out the refs and comment on what is acceptable or not and why as a neutral third party. Propose one change at a time. However, do understand that whole sections abour vegeterianism in Hindu scriptures etc are unwarranted. Stick closely to material relevant to this article and use reliable sources.
I have come to this article on being alerted by a probable sock account on my talk page. However, I have no view on this except relevance, NPOV, proportionate, notable etc.
OKAY. I'll try to follow your rules. Thank you! (Talk?) " | 0.000623 | 0 | 0 |
RT @__HerEyezLow: U gotta be a pathetic bitch to ride by another females house looking for a nigga that ain't yours smh | 0.99626 | 1 | 1 |
Urination as a physiological function | 0.000911 | 0 | 0 |
Cam Newton is Such a little girl like grow up and quit actin like a bitch | 0.969539 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Jaykelz: @LeBronVuitton @1stName_Bravo they renamed that bitch the yacht club | 0.829702 | 1 | 1 |
@Lion_of_Gray @roodawg1971 @mrfayoh @khanye_s @sas2afoundation here's my opinion on the matter..... She's a cunt. | 0.835999 | 1 | 1 |
We only list permanent fleet assignments that lasts for a good portion of a decade or so. | 0.000536 | 0 | 0 |
Respect is earned by respect
That user IS a troll and a stalker. They are not respected and are close to being banned. Did you bother to read the inflammatory garbage that they write on wikipedia? Or are you just part of a troll posse? | 0.507597 | 1 | 1 |
Gallowglass image
Noticed you put up a request template on Talk:Gallowglass a while ago. I think i found the image, just to letting you know. Dunno if Dürer made others though. | 0.000637 | 0 | 0 |
digg trolls vandalize Volume_license_key#FCKGW
you can't get full keys added to this article, so you add them to the Volume license key article. nice.
Please note that you need to sign your posts on talk pages like this one, as you have previously been told on your talk page. Also please remember to keep headings neutral and on topic. Try to add comments that are useful and relevant; if you notice vandalism, see Wikipedia:Vandalism for details on how to revert or report vandalism. Thanks! (talk)
censorship at wikipedia
all of you who were saying that wikipedia is being censored are right. i'm apparently going to get banned soon (see my talk page) because some admin doesn't like anon users.
welcome to the night of long knives.
Talk pages are created for the purpose of discussing or suggesting changes to the article, not your personal blog or soap box.
Agreed, this section is superfluous and should be deleted
censoring allegations of censorship. nice. | 0.013255 | 0 | 0 |
"
I thank you for your warning and I respect you administrating articles. However, I do not personally see my edit as vandalism. I do admit, however, that openly saying he is a ""crazed lunatic"" was the incorrect way to go about doing things. I believe in the merits of wikipedia and that it should strive for truth and excellence. There is absolutely no place in the current article about Camping that states science disagrees with his statements. Instead, the only mentions of disagreement are ""As a result, some individuals have criticized him for 'date-setting'"" and ""they [a ministry] believe his entire method of Bible interpretation is flawed."" If you would like, I can pen a section about the invalidity of his arguments from a fact-based scientific stance. If I cannot do it, someone most certainly should. Otherwise, wikipedia is no more than a medium for which inaccurate science can propagate through the minds of the public. When looking at a page such as homeopathy's, the second sentence reads ""The collective weight of scientific evidence has found homeopathy to be no more effective than a placebo."" Do you not think statements such as those made by Camping should get the same treatment? On a final note, 24 hours from now nearly the entire article I edited will be proven nonsense. The second sentence under this text box states ""Encyclopedic content must be verifiable."" Yet, despite this, the second paragraph of his page states:
""He has used Bible-based numerology to predict dates for the end of the world.[2] His current end times prediction is that the Rapture will be on May 21, 2011 and that God will completely destroy the Earth and the universe five months later on October 21.[3][4] He had previously predicted that the Rapture would occur in September 1994.[5]""
The only verifiable thing regarding these predictions is that they are wrong, yet that statement is nowhere to be found. Tomorrow evening, or Sunday if you wish, please add the sentence ""He was wrong about both of his previous predictions"" to the opening paragraphs of his page.
" | 0.000848 | 0 | 0 |
Drunkkkk HotBoxing these kushy blunts straight bumpin #AOB this hoe on some other shit bro i got mind fucked like when black zetzu betrayed | 0.998024 | 1 | 1 |
Being single and not texting no bitches late night almost wacker than coming home after the club drunk and fuckin your girlfriend | 0.997445 | 1 | 1 |
Yo bitch ass needs to boss the fuck up. | 0.998208 | 1 | 0 |
WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter
The September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! (talk • contrib) | 0.000533 | 0 | 0 |
Stupid fucking cunt, what you dont like me so youre gonna speed through a stopped bus to what? Try & run me & my 4 year old down? Wanna act like a tough ass, come do it to my face. Dont put my kids safety at risk cause youre a stupid bitch. | 0.997532 | 1 | 1 |
RT @O_ShitItsLaura: “@yadirasarmiento: you can be skinny and still be ugly stop acting like being thin is beautiful dumb bitch .” 😂👏 | 0.993247 | 1 | 1 |
"
Rounding of Onset of and Raising of Onset of
In the older ""true Cockney"" accents, which is what this article seems to be about, not only is backed, but the onset is also rounded to , according to Wells (1982b: 308, 310). Wells calls a ""Popular London"" variant. He defines ""Popular London"" as the accent of suburban working-class speakers. So according to Wells, the ""true Cockney"" variant is . Because this realization starts to encroach on 's space, according to Wells, the onset of is raised to in Cockney. " | 0.000613 | 0 | 0 |
"
Well others might not be reliable as you said, but The Economic Times is a highly reliable source and so is NDTV and the gross figures is from all versions. (Ping Back) " | 0.000579 | 0 | 0 |
RT @O3_Millz: Yeah he a bitch 💯💯💯😤😤 | 0.98705 | 1 | 1 |
November 2006 (UTC)
Now listen here you commie
Fight Dem Back article must be closed down because they are a out side group that is not a real registered group. So realy they are not real or even a proper group. They are bias. FightDemBack (who is linked with Fight Dem Back) is bias and his or her comments are based on lies. The Australia First Party is not a neo-nazi party. A example of this is their support for democracy. Neo-nazis do not support democracy or trade unions. PYL isn't a a neo-nazi group. FiightDemBack is politicaly driven and must be band. 04:24, 18 | 0.031812 | 0 | 0 |
"
Well it needs to still be sourced to the game.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) " | 0.000552 | 0 | 0 |
It's funny that you have no other word to use but sockpuppet, dumbo. | 0.924187 | 1 | 1 |
@nsanemujer @surfboard101 fuck you both bitches. | 0.997796 | 1 | 1 |
Infoboxes should be piled in the Grand Canyon and set on fire. Other than that, I have no reply to your comment. | 0.775765 | 1 | 1 |
better!
I'd like to issue a public thank you to the Wikipedia community for their attention to this area. This article has defiantly shown an improvement and is closer to scientifically accurate after my posts. It is a big responsibility that Wikipedia has, and that responsibility should be free of cultural bias, even if it may seem to go against what we have been led to believe by American media and culture.
When I first started looking into this topic, the articles I found were woefully inaccurate and defiantly biased. I still feel that objectively, the definition should clearly state that most cross-breeds lead to a reduction in fitness. Heterosis can be induced through breeding stragity such as line-breeding but it is a wasteful effort. Random mixing of genes is similar to random mutation, most of which is deadly and not beneficial to the gene pool. 99% of mutations are deleterious.
Respect of natural selection should be the default position. There are quantifiable difference between the races which were developed over hundreds of generations and whatever diversity we have managed to achieve should be cherished, what makes us different is what makes us special. By mixing the races, in one or two generations we can undo the work of hundreds or thousands of years of evolution. | 0.000876 | 0 | 0 |
Karmas a bitch I guess you should of loved the old me. | 0.980546 | 1 | 1 |
"
The logo is outdated and should be replaced with the current version but I think the ""R"" should be removed since wikipedia is contributions and not and official site of man u 1 March 2011" | 0.000769 | 0 | 0 |
Please stop the GNU search and replace
The text GNU/Linux currently points to a redirect. Your current search-and-replace activities violate WP policy (I won't dig out the rule just yet). Please find a better use for your energy. | 0.000657 | 0 | 0 |
Silence! You obviously didn't read this!! WP: NONSENSE | 0.578934 | 1 | 1 |
"Why should I ""assume good faith"" from someone adding anti-Semitic lies to an article? Your obvious ignorance on the subject is not an excuse.
" | 0.53574 | 1 | 1 |
Whats wrong little boy? Still mad that I was being mean you in the sandbox? Then maybe the sandbox isn't for you then. I guess if little boys like you can't get along there, you shouldn't play there.
Please, by all means, continue to vandalize my talk page. I want you too. Why? Because then I can get you blocked!! Come on little boy, don't be scared!! | 0.472322 | 1 | 1 |
At WP:DRN we volunteers have a fairly broad discretion within DRN to do whatever we think will best resolve the conflict (we have that freedom because we have zero authority and you can freely ignore us), and in my considered opinion, the combination of you filing the dispute with a nonexistent article name, you filing as an IP when you have a user name, and the preliminary reaction of the other editors named, led me to believe that the dispute would be more likely to be resolved if you refiled with the right article name and with you logged in.
As for the rights of IP users vs logged in users, yes, editing semi-protected articles is one difference (neither group can edit fully protected articles) but that is not the only difference. See Wikipedia:IPs are human too#What an unregistered user can't do for a complete list.
In your case, the problem is not the IP, but rather editing under two different accounts (logged in and not logged in). When registered users sign out of their accounts and contribute under their IP address, it makes it difficult to see their true editing history. Because of this, I am asking you to please sign in before filing DRN disputes. | 0.000615 | 0 | 0 |
"==Overrated==
A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article Overrated, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add to the top of the page. sama " | 0.000655 | 0 | 0 |
Niggas fall in love with an EVIL bitch and turn they back on they friends..... Its Cool Tho. | 0.994494 | 1 | 1 |
@_wordtothewise I am hurt im.not in it wtf, fuck Danielle that bitch | 0.996621 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Jaydillz: My babies pussy is too tight today. http://t.co/if4K4v74RO | 0.974731 | 1 | 1 |
RT @divonte_photos: Momma said no pussy cats inside of my dog house. | 0.923991 | 1 | 1 |
' I wonder if you females out here ever just sit around and think bout how yall hoes or how unfaithful Yall really is . | 0.442916 | 1 | 1 |
"
Minor POV issues
Things like ""Both sides raised armies as the Union assumed control of the border states early in the war and established a naval blockade"", ""In September 1862, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation made ending slavery in the South a war goal, and dissuaded the British from intervening"", ""Confederate commander Robert E. Lee won battles in the east, but in 1863 his northward advance was turned back after the Battle of Gettysburg and, in the west, the Union gained control of the Mississippi River at the Battle of Vicksburg, thereby splitting the Confederacy"" and ""and brought changes that helped make the country a united superpower"" put too much emphasis on Lee as well as portray the north as both the agressor who is out to conquer the south and the victim who is out to defend human rights. While I am very much glad that the north did win, I would expect that Good Articles would have gotten rid of this kind of wording. Any suggestions as to how to fix this?Coldplay Expért Let's talk " | 0.000705 | 0 | 0 |
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls!
image:scrotum.jpgSuck my balls! | 0.972036 | 1 | 1 |
:Spanish dance styles
A tag has been placed on Spanish dance styles, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of Spanish dance styles and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.| | 0.000577 | 0 | 0 |
truth you dont dare to | 0.014649 | 0 | 0 |
95% of the truly talented people i've come across are retarded professionally. 95% of the awful, untalented people are on point and polite.. | 0.715175 | 1 | 1 |
RT @__Stackzz: “@VoiceOfDStreetz: “@__Stackzz: @VoiceOfDStreetz lol for what?” Lol you dissing us”😂😂😂 shut up bitch | 0.995188 | 1 | 1 |
I noticed that you deleted peacecorpswiki
Why did you delete this...this is an important online resource for Returned Volunteers. | 0.000765 | 0 | 0 |
EkoGraf - EK728
Since them deleted my earlier comment I'm the same niger from two years ago who posted that crap up about - Battle of Aguelhok - you deleted my crap I deleted yours. Just want to tell u i know your autistic and I'm here fore you man. As far as I'm concern this comment is clean as can be. | 0.826376 | 1 | 1 |
' Waaaaittt niggah holllll'up ✋ these niggahs come to town start wife'n my old sluts 󾌴󾌴󾌴󾌺󾌺 . | 0.982023 | 1 | 1 |
i hate you dai pritchard | 0.895178 | 1 | 1 |
Gonna straight hip check the next hillbilly who tries to apply the term "derecho" to a run-of-the-mill thunderstorm. #WVWX | 0.027237 | 0 | 1 |
"
Getting rid of time stamps
STOP MAKING THIS CHANGE ON PLAYERS PROFILES! IT IS FINE AS IT IS AND DOES NOT NEED CHANGING. UNDOING YOUR POINTLESS EDITS IS VERY ANNOYING TO PEOPLE! YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD ABOUT THIS BY OTHER MEMBERS AS WELL. STOP IT OR FACING ACTION FROM WIKIPEDIA!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.254.14 " | 0.025235 | 0 | 1 |
In that case I will split it into 1961-65, 1966-68, 1969-71 and 1972-5 | 0.000671 | 0 | 0 |
@Rvm3o bitch. | 0.996207 | 1 | 1 |
who changes shit which shouldn't be changed | 0.971186 | 1 | 1 |
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (talk) | 0.000518 | 0 | 0 |
And lets face it mainstream sources call him an anti-technologist and not an anarchist , | 0.002587 | 0 | 0 |
DW's original run. '''''' | 0.00092 | 0 | 0 |
@argylegray @JTrevorHowerton @HollyRFisher I don't give a flying fuck what you think about my tweets, worthless teabagger scum. | 0.996288 | 1 | 1 |
I'm coming at this as a relative outsider, but I really don't think that the award should be in the lead. The reason? Whether it's good or bad, it isn't what he's known for; it isn't what makes him notable; it's not what people would be looking up this article for. Therefore, there may be reason to have it in the article, but there's also reason to keep it out of the lead. | 0.00056 | 0 | 0 |
RT @VictoriaDahl: “@donnajherren: Well, there's "crazy bitch", and there's "you can look for that motherfucker's corpse, but you won't find… | 0.987111 | 1 | 1 |
Get tf off joseline pussy!!!! Like damn | 0.996368 | 1 | 1 |
" January 2013 (UTC)
I have not reviewed the underlying problem, so I will assume that you have a point that my referring to this individual as an ""editor"" was not the best term. Fictitious? Well, I came here to talk about the AfD, and it doesn't look like you are interested in that discussion. I was done here two edits ago, and I am still done here. Bye, 01:29, 30" | 0.000564 | 0 | 0 |
Skanderbeg
Attilios, could you please have a look at User_talk:Aldux#Venetian_Albania and see if you can give us a hand with a couple of references? Also if the article picks up your interest, please feel free to throw a couple of contributions, I would like to have a couple of Italian editors to bring more Italian sources on Papal States, Kingdom of Naples, and Republic of Venice' relationship with Skanderbeg. Thank you in advance for your time and efforts. | 0.000525 | 0 | 0 |
Lil 16 y/o in trouble for beatin a bitch showing the judge zero respect. Lol brooklyn niggas and they temper | 0.992591 | 1 | 1 |
That angle sucks. Find a better one. | 0.957666 | 1 | 0 |
The Best Remix for P.I.M.P.
. . . . .I DONT KNO WHAT U HERD ABOUT ME
BUT A BITCH CANT GET A BLUNT UP OUT OF ME
I DROP SLOBZZ WHERE IM FROM AND IMMA G
CUZZ IMMA MUTHA FUKKIN C.R.I.P.
-Brandon Santiago | 0.829958 | 1 | 1 |
Found a CBS News link.
The narrative in the article jumps around a little too much. I can see the value in putting personal life and relationships in one section (including anything post 1980), with separate sections for music, art, peace activism and other professional activities.
Artwork
The paragraph about John Cage is unsourced
The detail about Painting to Be Stepped On is unsourced | 0.000547 | 0 | 0 |
Apparently, saying something nice to someone these days means you're trying to stick them with your poker. Get over yourselves bitches. | 0.976455 | 1 | 1 |
Numbers may be either listed separately at the beginning, or stuck in the list like they were spelled out. | 0.00059 | 0 | 0 |
Two horny guys play with a sexy AV models trimmed pussy before they fuck her http://t.co/Y3sYBsVpV4 | 0.996257 | 1 | 1 |
LeBron bout to cry lil bitch | 0.981001 | 1 | 1 |
In fact it was the Daily Mail that revealed this, although Whicker denies it. There is certainly an age discrepancy here as we know that he was an army captain by 1943, which would have been impossible if he was born in 1925. 84.71.202.224 | 0.000737 | 0 | 0 |
Im a Single bitch on this Money shit 💯💸 | 0.995088 | 1 | 1 |
Thanks Joshua! Just a scratch at the surface. I also looked at the writings on your page. Pretty extensive work! Good job ) | 0.00054 | 0 | 0 |
"
Image source problem with Image:Dark Taranis.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dark Taranis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (Talk••) " | 0.000575 | 0 | 0 |
Love when the bitches take selfies with their tongue out, just gearin up for that money shot | 0.94789 | 1 | 1 |
"== Speedy Deletion Request ==
If everyone who posted racist comments online was a notable figure Wikipedia would be full of this info. There is no claim to notability for this individual. The article seems like a way to ""expose"" the individual or punish him for being racist. As far as the information on the individual's actions, the article only states that the individual was a prolific poster of racist material on a racist forum and attracted some unwanted attention in the form of quasi-legal action by a lawyer. The article is a good candidate for speedy deletion. " | 0.00111 | 0 | 0 |
@SoftestMuffin @TorahBlaze @_tee13 billy goat hillbillies you sucking & fucking. You disgraceful brazzen faced unabashed pig | 0.997621 | 1 | 1 |
My cousin just said these hoes ain't shit. Idk why they want me. I ain't shit either. Got me dying over here lol | 0.965565 | 1 | 1 |
Congratulations, your just like every other stuck up materialistic American bitch. 👏 | 0.92805 | 1 | 1 |
November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose but not because of the overated KC Chiefs, but because other uses for that word exist outside of rugby. 00:07, 28 | 0.000666 | 0 | 0 |
And you have a problem in sticking your nose where it doesn't belong.
I am not encouraging a troll... No, you're enabling a troll ultimately, not much different. See below for further evidence. | Talk | 0.054848 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.