Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
"To edit, please create an account and log in Due to persistent vandalism (), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled. If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Alternatively, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken. "	0.000584	0	0
Richard Wright I'm a little surprised Richard Wright is on the list of ant-communists. He was a Communist Party member and later became a critic of the Party. However, I do not think this was an ideological shift but more of a break over the autoritarian controls of the Party. Unless someone has a good source, I think its a stretch to call Wright an anti-communist when the article focuses on the ideological ideal rather than the Communist Party.	0.000908	0	0
" Uninitiated variables can also be avoided by a simple assignment statement, like X=3. Would you call that a ""default"" ? "	0.000608	0	0
" In response to your feedback This might be helpful: Wikipedia:Getting_started ✉ "	0.000608	0	0
Snowded demonstrating his autism once again.	0.74346	1	0
Your a twat! What happened to the george walker page motherfudger!!!!!	0.97455	1	1
I did some ce edits, accordingly.	0.000605	0	0
" May Allah (swt) either give you punishment or hidiyaat for spreading falsehood and keeping other Muslim editors from making the article neutral - Insh'Allah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.108.24.87 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.146.172.146 Your comment on your edit proves you are ignorant of Islam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.146.172.146 "	0.466708	1	1
Can I also mention that if you are going to tag WP:POV, don't tag the entire article because that is completely misleading - put it where it belongs to.	0.000825	0	0
@_Maniac_Mind_ I don't got any beef with you but tell yo boy Alex to stop acting like bitch and bring his duck ass up here.	0.991784	1	1
Agreed. The term ‘blastocyst’ appears to be based on a false distinction that has been drawn between ‘the embryo proper’ and the embryo at an earlier stage of development, sometimes the term ‘pre-embryo’ is used in this context. However the precise stage at which an embryo can be classified as a ‘blastocyst’ or a 'pre-embryo' seems to involve a somewhat subjective judgement. The article currently says: A blastocyst is a stage of development of an embryo when it is around five days old and made up of about 100 cells. Because of their highly subjective nature, terms such as bastocyst and pre-embryo are problematic and may be criticised for trying to dehumanize the human embryo.	0.000718	0	0
headlining as another name	0.000867	0	0
RT @PhillyDaBoss323: LOL favorite line tho ---> RT @_bendoneit You say no to ratchet pussy, juicy j cant.	0.863817	1	1
If my anger materialized, it would be a fucking atom bomb to blow this bitch up.	0.996191	1	1
RT @lilduval: Why black women say "I'm gon get me a white man" like white guys not dogging bitches too. Y'all so dumb	0.97486	1	1
@The_Red_Sea @shetheTRUTHtho say that shit to my face "Bruh" you a bitch for gettin in a man u dont know business. Handle yo own shit	0.997442	1	0
Please run as many check users as possible. I heartily endorse it. I have never been a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet. I have never encouraged a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. I have no knowledge of anyone who has been or is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. If I could demand a check I would.	0.002795	0	0
" Images Please be aware that images should only be used when they increase the readers understanding of the subject. They also need to be free to be used here. Given the recent attempts to beautify this page with copyright images, if you wish to add any more images to this article, please propose it here so others can check that they are not a copyright violation and to check that consensus exists that they are suitable. Any added without clear consensus and/or whose copyright status is anything but clear are likely to be removed onsite. king (edits) "	0.00055	0	0
“@ICEom @SupurMario27 coolin my nig ( @1TIMMYTEE voice)” uhhee ( @ICEom laugh)	0.259339	1	1
images just cos wikipedia is not censored doesn't mean you should put disturbing images up, if people really want to see an image of it you can put a link on the page. it is pretty grotesque.	0.001149	0	0
RT @asialacap: “@ViriDoesItt: @asialacap her face so damn flawless.. I know her pussy taste like peaches and all my life goals” lmfaooooooo	0.985328	1	1
Image:Nervous system diagram.png Hello, Medium69	0.00073	0	0
Is there any particular reason for you to remove these discussions? Do you feel something's amiss? Maybe there's been some miscommunication. I just think it would be unfortunate if you got blocked for keeping up the deletions. Isotalo	0.00107	0	0
2006 (UTC) Hope this is the right place to write. You say there's a consensus, but I only see the three of you constantly reverting a bunch of other people without giving any reason. That's why I reverted back to them. Also, the version you want has stuff missing so that Goodkind looks like less of a dick. That's biased! 20:59, 15 October	0.79585	1	1
@morgantayler_ I apologize Morgan, but a bitch was blind for a whole 35 seconds!!!!	0.962667	1	1
" Re So the same goes for the person I insulted? Let me help you to be just for one day unbiased: It is true that there are ""fringe"" elements that do not believe in evolution. However, someone who did not believe in evolution would have a very difficult time getting into graduate school in biology in any respectable accredited school anyplace in the world. Aside from a few religious fundamentalists who somehow feel that evolution challenges their beliefs... The antievolutionists are in the same camp as people who believe in extraterrestrials abducting people or cows, or in the Loch Ness Monster, or ghosts, or vampires, or avoiding black cats, or any number of other unfounded beliefs that people adopt. ...and nonbelievers in evolution Should an article on NASA have a big section on UFOs and UFO abduction of farm animals? Why would you think otherwise? Among those with advanced training, I would expect this number to be far higher. I am not going to carry on with this list. If this is the way to go about and insult/attack people in this ambiguous, indirect manner, I'd be glad to change to that way. It would be fun to attack people personally by implying things between the lines, like your buddy did (which you didn't warn). I am a very uncivil and aggressive person, so it would be fun to find alternative ways to personally attack those who do not directly insult me or my culture. Actually, I don't give a crap what you people at Wikipedia think. You're all a bunch of evolutionistic mythologists who are trying to force your lame hypotheses down the throats of those who still have the brain capacity to believe the more sensible alternative theories. Thank you. ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ "	0.164558	1	0
Spiff tryna hoe	0.185492	1	1
"== Jesse Jackson == This article is a disgrace to Wikipedia. Jesse Jackson has built his name around controversy. That is how Jesse Jackson has become the person he is. The fact that you can barely find any of his controversial mishaps in his write-up shows an obvious bias in the manner in which Wikipedia has decided to present this article. Jesse Jackson is a controversial figure, he intends to be controversial. Jesse Jackson is currently one of the most controversial public figures, yet reading this Wikipedia article you would not know why. There is a problem with that. I see no logical reason why Wikipedia does not want this information to be known. This article is exemplifies where this site has gone wrong in terms of the original intent of the Wikipedia project. You talk about Wikipedia as if there is one person who wrote this entire article (""Wikipedia does not want this information to be known""). Look around. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. If you don't like something in the article, you are free to try to make some changes. But one word of caution. Your tone suggests that you may have an agenda against Jackson (and that's fine), and Wikipedia must be balanced and appropriately weighted according to reality, maintaining a neutral point of view. Ideally, edits are made such that it is difficult to know the editor's personal opinions. If you feel you can improve the article based on reliable sources with these guidelines and policies in mind, then by all means, go for it. "	0.018396	0	0
List of countries by military expenditures I need your help getting the E.U. removed from List of countries by military expenditures since it is not a country. I see what and are trying to do, first they put the E.U. under supernational military organizations as a compromise in order to add some legitimacy for the E.U. being on that page and then after a few weeks they just flat out list it with actual countries and gettting their little E.U. buddies to gang up on all other users so you can keep the E.U. in. The E.U. is not a country and adding it to every single list that has to do with countries is a biased NPOV. Wikipedia is not a place for people from the E.U. to air their inferiority complexes by carefully editing article to make the E.U. seem like a country. Europeans also have a huge inferiority complex against Americans, as they slowely discover that: Americans brush their teeth more than once a year. American women shave, do not look like men, and have vertical teeth. The EU will never be recognized as a united sovereign state, and therefore it will never be able to compete with the US for superpower status. User:Daniel_Chiswick 17 April, 2007.	0.007659	0	0
RT @lamessican: I love when bitches throw shade. Just confirms i'm doing something right 😂	0.763288	1	1
Life RT @AC_Hussle: I'm not giving these hoes free meals so they can go lay up with the dude they can't get over. Nope.	0.284391	1	1
“@medaOriginBitch: That one friend who you greet with an insult.” @MorbidMermaid @EvanBecker513 niggers	0.93061	1	0
" You have evidence from ME! I presented you with tone of evidence, but you reject it because it goes against your fictional ideas of what New England is or should be. Even eastern(southeast anyway) CT is not into this New England thing, which actually shocked me! I have told you time and again, western CT does not think of ourselves in this NE thing. Go to a town meeting and see if Boston or NE comes up. CT and it's place in the NYC metro area is what comes up. You are doing nothing but telling lies and spreading propaganda. It has to be because you dismiss my actual facts and you make too many excuses that hold no water. In my CT, there are no signs that point to New England or Boston. Our signs point to New York state and city. Also, how you people are not on this guy's ass like you are on mine? ""I bet its cause we white folk from New England hate NYC Niggers, like this spick who posted above me. Go fuck yourself.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.162.110.60 (talk • contribs)."" I can only assume because he is one of you and he at least still believe in New England with Boston as it's capital. Get your head out of your ass. Watch you block me for those comments. If I get blocked, that guy (you? should be blocked. "	0.971929	1	1
" I'll find for you the decision on the official court site if that's hearting you so bad. If same movie will be posted on the site of Polish Historic Museum this will be the reliable source, but when it is on YouTube it's not ? It's kinda funny... By the way, according to WP:RS, ""Warsaw Voice"" news aren't reliable source because the page is made by the random people who have some beliefes so they are not NPOV. The title of the article is a hoax - ""Fighting Fascism"", in Poland we don't have fascists we have neo-nazis, that is a first thing. Second, ""Third Position neo-Nazi organization"" - Third position can't be a neo-nazi because it is against left and right wing, capitalism and socislism so ""The Warsaw Voice"" doesn't know what they are writing about. ""contains a sentence stating that ""Jews will be removed from Poland, and their possessions will be confiscated,"" taken directly from Adolph Hitler's Mein Kampf."" - No references given from the official site or documents made by NOP as a reliable source (from publishers of ideology). I wonder why ""The Warsaw Voice"" lie every sentence and don't give any references for their imaginary text. Wikipedia:Reliable sources Self-published sources Main article: Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources (online and paper) ""The Warsaw Voice"" is a private, self-made news site without give any references to their informations. As long as The Warsaw Voice will not give any RELIABLE REFERENCES that NOP statement say that ""we have to remove Jews from Poland"" it can't be on Wikipedia. "	0.010836	0	0
First thing she wit ya, next minute she against ya, like that hoe from the clippers	0.160979	1	1
Where it says Do not add [...] people without Wikipedia articles to this list on the date pages it means it. You'll need to create an article about whoever before adding their dates of birth or death.	0.000791	0	0
Fock off A turk disguised in a Italian name?! Do you want to fool us?! 114.179.18.37	0.956939	1	1
''' Gogo giving blowjobs on demand	0.985484	1	1
Consider the following People who edit wikipedia are fucking retarded. 174.134.156.86	0.997321	1	1
Shamash is Sun I agree to merge Sammash in to Shamash, since Shamash is more likely to be correct. Tracking the root of the word, clearly it is of Assyrian origin, in addition, it is a common vocabulary morph to substitute “Sh” to “S” and thus, nowadays, it is spelled as Shams in Modern Arabic.	0.000987	0	0
TE's talk page access I know it's a bit of old hat at the moment, but he was brought up on a talk page recently and I checked the history to verify a(n apparently incorrect) claim I wanted to make. (It's possible he's IP-socking again, by the way.) Why does he still have talk page access after this? Does the fact that you were the main target of the rant mean that your reverting your own previously restoring his talk page access would have been taken by some as an abuse of admin privileges? Because I really don't think anyone would fault you for it, and I have half a mind to ask another admin to do it anyway. (聖やや)	0.001024	0	0
RT @femaIes: I swear 😂 we in this forever now bitch http://t.co/293YMZDmun	0.95606	1	1
Yayyyy I'm gonna be jacking off to these bitches all day today http://t.co/LEmILFu1	0.992577	1	1
Recommend article for deletion What it says. The article is mostly un-sourced, hasn't changed much in the last four years (beyond being a corporate advertisement), and the citation tags are from April, 2010. This is plenty of time for cleanup...and apparently even the most fervent Shack members can't even be bothered to maintain the Wiki. It's not a reliable article on Wikipedia and since the lack of maintenance in keeping the citation standards has obviously not been done, I recommend this article be deleted. Vote? Discuss? All that typical democratic crap?	0.18661	1	0
" ""Stalling tactics""? Are you kidding me? Apparently I'm the only one taking this seriously. There's no ""time limit"" so talking about ""stalling tactics"" is ridiculous. Holy fuck, read what you type before you click ""save page"", ok? &L; "	0.964243	1	1
I know a lot of using ass hoes that just want bread an wheels from nigga go grind bitch❗	0.99254	1	1
That's right. You two are being overzealous and it not very much NOT appreciated. Too bad it took an outside editor's refusal to get you to admit that, User:Ankit. -Anon98 98.92.187.224	0.302821	1	0
" ::: Nishidami continually repeats nearly exactly the same verbal tics,as you do your self ,Tom,involving ""facts"" on which you both have repeatedly been corrected.The best way to stop this would by ceasing to publiish the same erroneous statements and the same tired verbal gymnastics. By the way the Stanley section is terrible but quite up to Nishidani's consistently muddled editorial standards.Example:E.A.Honigmann is cited as the source for the MSND being performed at the Stanley-Vere Wedding.It was Sir Sydney Lee(a pseudonym of Solomon Levey) who first promulgated this extremely arguable hypothesis about 1895.It was to Lefranc's great credit that he provided in both Engllsh and French(1921-1950) numerous pictorial demonstrations of the theory from contemporary prints.These were received with universal commendation, as no such ""lunatic"" assessment oof anti-Stratfordianisn then widely existed among the better educated classes,contrary to the historically false claims which you and Nishidani have published in this discussion. "	0.000816	0	0
" I know (I created the NOYT redirect )) and, as I said, I am convinced that the white coa was indeed used first after the HDZ came to power. However, even with the YouTube clip it is very possible that the red coa was also in use at the time, that the two were used interchangeably, or that the red one was used increasingly as the government decided to use the red one officially (as it was instituted a few months later). In short, I do not agree that the YouTube clip is source enough to decide the issue for the period as a whole. (TALK) "	0.000544	0	0
Dude. Place the following in the large text box: Please stop raping little boys in the anus. Don't you know that's illegal?	0.81233	1	0
all of us on Twitter do that already #shutupcrybaby lol RT @Shallow__Al I need. one of you to step up and volunteer to listen to me bitch.	0.972881	1	1
Lots of Mormons in the edit crowd, I think, that simply don't want their beloved racist homophobe seen in anything but a positive light.	0.201535	1	1
@Badassjae fuck no my school boring and ghetto	0.998277	1	1
Unspecified source for Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk	0.000543	0	0
I'm good! I have my own career, website, and IMDB page in Hollywood, CA! Thank you for your interest. You'll do anything for a free t-shirt... Wow! Cool career you have and a lot of free time...;)	0.000895	0	0
RT @AutyAut_: I hate when people say you can't befriend a hoe. How bitch how!? 1. I'm only held accountable for my pussy. 2. It's all about…	0.977001	1	1
I was smoking a blunt outside and these nasty country bitches jumped into the lake , naked 😂😂😂 that lake is nasty as fuck 😷	0.998046	1	1
U SUCK COCK U IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!	0.998267	1	1
Then ya'll idolize Kanye when he wifed up a hoe. Lol	0.064225	0	1
You know, I tried to edit C. violaceus, and put in Convert template, but it just made it worse! I used to do on my earlier articles, but since some sites don't carry the name of the author, or the last time it was visited, I avoid those. Maybe its not ethical, but it saves me some hassle. I realy want to help the Wikipedia project, but sometimes my edits could be viewed as vandalism. See, sometimes I think that the stuff that I am doing is helpful, but some people might consider it to be unhelpful. If any of my edits will give a sign of vandalism (or already are), I would like to apologize for it. Yeah, almost forgot, English is my second language, so gramatical errors could, and will happen. However, I can try to minimize them. Read my user page to see the signs for my gramatical errors.	0.002688	0	0
I've added the info. Hope this is okay.	0.000577	0	0
" YOUR INTELLECTUAL LEVEL NEEDS TO GROW. Hey Einstein, when did I say anything anti-africanist here?? please point it out for me. I'm even against the CIA sources that some people wanted to place on the article here, the one about 73% mulatto,16% white and 11% black. Do you think that I'm going to be crazy enough to believe DR is only 11% Black?? I'll be too ashamed of saying such a thing. I agree on you on that one. 51% mulatto, 46% black, 2% white is the real demographic approximates of DR. Where is the "" denial, anti-black, blaha blah and all the non-sense accusations that you are making by me saying that?? I stated an increase from 11% that somebody else place here from CIA to 46%, that's an increase of 35. So I am the anti-black, racist,denier??? I knew that you where going to throw the "" Moor myth"" about Spaniards, you are showing the radical afrocentric nut. What's next? you also believe in Van Sertima's book, that the Olmec heads of the Yucatan peninsula are Africans? or that snow is really black?? DNA studies in Spaniards show that less than 2% have Moor blood. It has been weed out,since the fall of Cordova in 1236, by the "" limpieza de sangre"" campaign of the christians. Spaniards are White as are the anglo-saxons,and the Irish. I'm not going into deep details about "" Moors and Spain"" with a radical Afrocentric nut, but going back to the article, we are not going to allow that the DR article is going to get hijack by radical afrocentric nut, nor eurocentric too. As you can see, I'm not eurocentric, 16% white to 2% white, do the math. You think that you where going to deal with an ignoramus, but when it comes to history, you are kindergarten compared to me. You say "" society"" says that such words are offensive? wow, impresive answer. you are a clown. You still don't own Wikipedia and the English language, and you don't speak for "" society"", "" society"" has diverse views of the world. The article will be changed. platanogenius"	0.493575	1	1
I'm ready now to try to improve the article, but it does not seem to have been restored. Thanks	0.000557	0	0
Morris Schwartz - flash synchronizer for work with flashbulbs	0.000731	0	0
Hey Ned HEY NED, Why don't you actually do some fucking work on this encyclopedia! All you care about now is who is blocked/unblocked 63.164.30.247	0.990142	1	1
Thank you for the welcome and for the information, I wasn't aware of that. There's a lot of information here and I haven't got to read all of it yet. I have to be careful, if I let myself, I will lose track of time investigating here ) I hope I can make some time to contribute more actively. This will be an excellent way to practice my English, maybe I could make some translating in the future. I appreciate your suggestion, I wouldn't know how to start to describe myself... I never have considered myself very interesting, but I will make an effort )	0.000511	0	0
@LadyVodkax yer dirty pussy	0.997744	1	1
''''Support attack. Stabbings - NO. it is a dreadful word, has no purpose. 206.174.72.112	0.002825	0	0
Request for assistance - hare coursing You very kindly found a link for me at game law in Portugal. Unfortunately, the link to the Government website has gone dead. I don't suppose you know if this might have moved? Many thanks.	0.000622	0	0
When u hitting it from the back u gotta call her "bitch" they love that but don't u dare call em "slut"	0.963799	1	1
" kodu and mama in chart I'm deleting the refs since the age spread is too large and I don't know if either is popular enough. Plus they are both commercial. To the people who are adding them do you have any WP:RS about their usage over such a large spread of ages (7-20?). Talk "	0.000634	0	0
Well, technically, if they're unrelated to the article, they shouldn't be here at all. —''''	0.000635	0	0
I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. You mother fucker you bastard u biased ronchos...the bastard gujjar suppporter.. I am a badgujjar and i am a rajput..why are u vandalising our histroy by removing my content..u suckdickeer.. Y u add contents about other castes.. Badgujjars are raghav and are rajputs... u bastard.,.. Proof taht badgujjars are rajputs.. chk.. http://ebadgujar.com/history.html	0.996809	1	1
Man I just watched that 50 shades of gay trailer and that shit looked like the wackest movie of all time. Y'all be hyping up trash on here	0.983295	1	1
RT @LiFEOf_AYUNgIN: That pussy is never yours it's just your turn remember that . 💯	0.964555	1	1
" Personally, glad Lynn Margulis is fucking dead. What a waste of real intelligence. As for being a notorious evolutionary biologist, sure, why not. But is this article a list of evolutionary biologists? It shouldn't be. But if it is, there is no more famous evolutionary biologist today than Dawkins. You say evolution, anyone would say Dawkins (right after Darwin). Talk• Contributions "	0.879046	1	1
RT @JamesYouCunt: I'm on my straight Grizzly so why would I buy you a gay ass teddy bear, bitch? You're already bi-polar! http://t.co/4ZsXC…	0.994355	1	1
Possible Source of information but must be verified http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Fred_Bankhead	0.000706	0	0
got like 4 hoes in my low pro	0.265681	1	1
Compwhizii explained all of that perfectly; removing valid content from articles is vandalism.	0.001267	0	0
Wikipedia is great!!! I'm 13 and love editing for misspellings and such.	0.001106	0	0
The Butt directory confirms the 1873 and 1966 dates, however it states the new Kilmaurs station opened in 1984. I'll update the page with the relevant info.	0.000598	0	0
" The first sentence says that media sources generally describe LaRouche as an extremist, and George and Wilcox explain why that is so. It also explains that he came from an extremist environment, where people fell out with each other very badly, and then started criticising each other. George and Wilcox thought it worth mentioning as a significant aspect of the story in their discussion of LaRouche, so I don't see why we should not mention it. 466 "	0.000601	0	0
Merge nasal douche to this here I suggest we merge Nasal douche to here because it is the same thing! 96.244.254.20	0.032124	0	0
]] Actually I noticed yours is WORSE. Look at that mess you crapped onto my talk page. You call that a paragraph? Buzz off, doof. [[User:Machchunk\|Machchunk	0.815446	1	1
lot of attention from many admins. I ask you to drop the matter	0.001425	0	0
RT @TrapicalGod: These hoes really ain't loyal 😂🙏 http://t.co/6u2kbYkQ2n	0.329489	1	1
Virtual Steve can burn in hell.	0.937721	1	1
" Barry Burns is a noted multi instrumentalist- he undebiably meets the criteria for the definition, and he is noted because Mogwai's albums are considered important, frequently making best-of critics lists. You don't have to sell as many albums as Radiohead to be noted- unless you plan on changing the definition to ""commercially viable"". - User:Pedimedia1"	0.00065	0	0
Lol You really are a pathetic litle cunt. Please, please make good on your threat to fuck off. I beg you.	0.996185	1	1
Agar is not digested by bacteria at all, ever. That is why it is used in bacterial culture, because the agar will remain intact while the bacteria digest the nutrients within it.	0.000763	0	0
Q:Do you believe that a significant number of editors find your conduct at the reference desks frequently inappropriate? A:Yes I admit that. It is obviously true. Q:Do you think this indicates that you ought to change that behavior? A:Yes, I will try very hard not to upset anyone in future.	0.000708	0	0
Wtf ur a asshole no advertising pls Bot	0.988821	1	1
I'm probably getting inked later this month, and I intend to take pictures. I can add one if others think it's a good idea.	0.000526	0	0
Dis bitch by my side and I'll never be broken. http://t.co/Nd2YtJkxgv	0.994542	1	1
" Dues to SUL conflict! ✉ "	0.001541	0	0
But they look ugly ( 99.235.43.93	0.608765	1	1
The only notable thing really from Juninho is that the docters and nurses at Prince of Wales Hospital seemed to get to know him well. haha	0.000775	0	0
I know now: 'seven minutes!	0.001228	0	0
OK, fine, take the music and film bootlegger's side. I bet you never even read the edit you reverted it back to, and meanwhile Cosprings probably thought he did a good thing for the article. What a joke. You two deserve each other. 72.66.80.133	0.041445	0	0

"To edit, please create an account and log in Due to persistent vandalism (), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled. If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Alternatively, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken. "

0.000584

0

Richard Wright I'm a little surprised Richard Wright is on the list of ant-communists. He was a Communist Party member and later became a critic of the Party. However, I do not think this was an ideological shift but more of a break over the autoritarian controls of the Party. Unless someone has a good source, I think its a stretch to call Wright an anti-communist when the article focuses on the ideological ideal rather than the Communist Party.

0.000908

0

" Uninitiated variables can also be avoided by a simple assignment statement, like X=3. Would you call that a ""default"" ? "

0.000608

0

" In response to your feedback This might be helpful: Wikipedia:Getting_started ✉ "

0.000608

0

Snowded demonstrating his autism once again.

0.74346

1

0

Your a twat! What happened to the george walker page motherfudger!!!!!

0.97455

1

I did some ce edits, accordingly.

0.000605

0

" May Allah (swt) either give you punishment or hidiyaat for spreading falsehood and keeping other Muslim editors from making the article neutral - Insh'Allah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.108.24.87 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.146.172.146 Your comment on your edit proves you are ignorant of Islam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.146.172.146 "

0.466708

1

Can I also mention that if you are going to tag WP:POV, don't tag the entire article because that is completely misleading - put it where it belongs to.

0.000825

0

@_Maniac_Mind_ I don't got any beef with you but tell yo boy Alex to stop acting like bitch and bring his duck ass up here.

0.991784

1

Agreed. The term ‘blastocyst’ appears to be based on a false distinction that has been drawn between ‘the embryo proper’ and the embryo at an earlier stage of development, sometimes the term ‘pre-embryo’ is used in this context. However the precise stage at which an embryo can be classified as a ‘blastocyst’ or a 'pre-embryo' seems to involve a somewhat subjective judgement. The article currently says: A blastocyst is a stage of development of an embryo when it is around five days old and made up of about 100 cells. Because of their highly subjective nature, terms such as bastocyst and pre-embryo are problematic and may be criticised for trying to dehumanize the human embryo.

0.000718

0

headlining as another name

0.000867

0

RT @PhillyDaBoss323: LOL favorite line tho ---> RT @_bendoneit You say no to ratchet pussy, juicy j cant.

0.863817

1

If my anger materialized, it would be a fucking atom bomb to blow this bitch up.

0.996191

1

RT @lilduval: Why black women say "I'm gon get me a white man" like white guys not dogging bitches too. Y'all so dumb

0.97486

1

@The_Red_Sea @shetheTRUTHtho say that shit to my face "Bruh" you a bitch for gettin in a man u dont know business. Handle yo own shit

0.997442

1

0

Please run as many check users as possible. I heartily endorse it. I have never been a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet. I have never encouraged a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. I have no knowledge of anyone who has been or is a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. If I could demand a check I would.

0.002795

0

" Images Please be aware that images should only be used when they increase the readers understanding of the subject. They also need to be free to be used here. Given the recent attempts to beautify this page with copyright images, if you wish to add any more images to this article, please propose it here so others can check that they are not a copyright violation and to check that consensus exists that they are suitable. Any added without clear consensus and/or whose copyright status is anything but clear are likely to be removed onsite. king (edits) "

0.00055

0

“@ICEom @SupurMario27 coolin my nig ( @1TIMMYTEE voice)” uhhee ( @ICEom laugh)

0.259339

1

images just cos wikipedia is not censored doesn't mean you should put disturbing images up, if people really want to see an image of it you can put a link on the page. it is pretty grotesque.

0.001149

0

RT @asialacap: “@ViriDoesItt: @asialacap her face so damn flawless.. I know her pussy taste like peaches and all my life goals” lmfaooooooo

0.985328

1

Image:Nervous system diagram.png Hello, Medium69

0.00073

0

Is there any particular reason for you to remove these discussions? Do you feel something's amiss? Maybe there's been some miscommunication. I just think it would be unfortunate if you got blocked for keeping up the deletions. Isotalo

0.00107

0

2006 (UTC) Hope this is the right place to write. You say there's a consensus, but I only see the three of you constantly reverting a bunch of other people without giving any reason. That's why I reverted back to them. Also, the version you want has stuff missing so that Goodkind looks like less of a dick. That's biased! 20:59, 15 October

0.79585

1

@morgantayler_ I apologize Morgan, but a bitch was blind for a whole 35 seconds!!!!

0.962667

1

" Re So the same goes for the person I insulted? Let me help you to be just for one day unbiased: It is true that there are ""fringe"" elements that do not believe in evolution. However, someone who did not believe in evolution would have a very difficult time getting into graduate school in biology in any respectable accredited school anyplace in the world. Aside from a few religious fundamentalists who somehow feel that evolution challenges their beliefs... The antievolutionists are in the same camp as people who believe in extraterrestrials abducting people or cows, or in the Loch Ness Monster, or ghosts, or vampires, or avoiding black cats, or any number of other unfounded beliefs that people adopt. ...and nonbelievers in evolution Should an article on NASA have a big section on UFOs and UFO abduction of farm animals? Why would you think otherwise? Among those with advanced training, I would expect this number to be far higher. I am not going to carry on with this list. If this is the way to go about and insult/attack people in this ambiguous, indirect manner, I'd be glad to change to that way. It would be fun to attack people personally by implying things between the lines, like your buddy did (which you didn't warn). I am a very uncivil and aggressive person, so it would be fun to find alternative ways to personally attack those who do not directly insult me or my culture. Actually, I don't give a crap what you people at Wikipedia think. You're all a bunch of evolutionistic mythologists who are trying to force your lame hypotheses down the throats of those who still have the brain capacity to believe the more sensible alternative theories. Thank you. ► ( Talk ♥ Contribs ) ♪♫ "

0.164558

1

0

Spiff tryna hoe

0.185492

1

"== Jesse Jackson == This article is a disgrace to Wikipedia. Jesse Jackson has built his name around controversy. That is how Jesse Jackson has become the person he is. The fact that you can barely find any of his controversial mishaps in his write-up shows an obvious bias in the manner in which Wikipedia has decided to present this article. Jesse Jackson is a controversial figure, he intends to be controversial. Jesse Jackson is currently one of the most controversial public figures, yet reading this Wikipedia article you would not know why. There is a problem with that. I see no logical reason why Wikipedia does not want this information to be known. This article is exemplifies where this site has gone wrong in terms of the original intent of the Wikipedia project. You talk about Wikipedia as if there is one person who wrote this entire article (""Wikipedia does not want this information to be known""). Look around. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone. If you don't like something in the article, you are free to try to make some changes. But one word of caution. Your tone suggests that you may have an agenda against Jackson (and that's fine), and Wikipedia must be balanced and appropriately weighted according to reality, maintaining a neutral point of view. Ideally, edits are made such that it is difficult to know the editor's personal opinions. If you feel you can improve the article based on reliable sources with these guidelines and policies in mind, then by all means, go for it. "

0.018396

0

List of countries by military expenditures I need your help getting the E.U. removed from List of countries by military expenditures since it is not a country. I see what and are trying to do, first they put the E.U. under supernational military organizations as a compromise in order to add some legitimacy for the E.U. being on that page and then after a few weeks they just flat out list it with actual countries and gettting their little E.U. buddies to gang up on all other users so you can keep the E.U. in. The E.U. is not a country and adding it to every single list that has to do with countries is a biased NPOV. Wikipedia is not a place for people from the E.U. to air their inferiority complexes by carefully editing article to make the E.U. seem like a country. Europeans also have a huge inferiority complex against Americans, as they slowely discover that: Americans brush their teeth more than once a year. American women shave, do not look like men, and have vertical teeth. The EU will never be recognized as a united sovereign state, and therefore it will never be able to compete with the US for superpower status. User:Daniel_Chiswick 17 April, 2007.

0.007659

0

RT @lamessican: I love when bitches throw shade. Just confirms i'm doing something right 😂

0.763288

1

Life RT @AC_Hussle: I'm not giving these hoes free meals so they can go lay up with the dude they can't get over. Nope.

0.284391

1

“@medaOriginBitch: That one friend who you greet with an insult.” @MorbidMermaid @EvanBecker513 niggers

0.93061

1

0

" You have evidence from ME! I presented you with tone of evidence, but you reject it because it goes against your fictional ideas of what New England is or should be. Even eastern(southeast anyway) CT is not into this New England thing, which actually shocked me! I have told you time and again, western CT does not think of ourselves in this NE thing. Go to a town meeting and see if Boston or NE comes up. CT and it's place in the NYC metro area is what comes up. You are doing nothing but telling lies and spreading propaganda. It has to be because you dismiss my actual facts and you make too many excuses that hold no water. In my CT, there are no signs that point to New England or Boston. Our signs point to New York state and city. Also, how you people are not on this guy's ass like you are on mine? ""I bet its cause we white folk from New England hate NYC Niggers, like this spick who posted above me. Go fuck yourself.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.162.110.60 (talk • contribs)."" I can only assume because he is one of you and he at least still believe in New England with Boston as it's capital. Get your head out of your ass. Watch you block me for those comments. If I get blocked, that guy (you? should be blocked. "

0.971929

1

" I'll find for you the decision on the official court site if that's hearting you so bad. If same movie will be posted on the site of Polish Historic Museum this will be the reliable source, but when it is on YouTube it's not ? It's kinda funny... By the way, according to WP:RS, ""Warsaw Voice"" news aren't reliable source because the page is made by the random people who have some beliefes so they are not NPOV. The title of the article is a hoax - ""Fighting Fascism"", in Poland we don't have fascists we have neo-nazis, that is a first thing. Second, ""Third Position neo-Nazi organization"" - Third position can't be a neo-nazi because it is against left and right wing, capitalism and socislism so ""The Warsaw Voice"" doesn't know what they are writing about. ""contains a sentence stating that ""Jews will be removed from Poland, and their possessions will be confiscated,"" taken directly from Adolph Hitler's Mein Kampf."" - No references given from the official site or documents made by NOP as a reliable source (from publishers of ideology). I wonder why ""The Warsaw Voice"" lie every sentence and don't give any references for their imaginary text. Wikipedia:Reliable sources Self-published sources Main article: Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources (online and paper) ""The Warsaw Voice"" is a private, self-made news site without give any references to their informations. As long as The Warsaw Voice will not give any RELIABLE REFERENCES that NOP statement say that ""we have to remove Jews from Poland"" it can't be on Wikipedia. "

0.010836

0

First thing she wit ya, next minute she against ya, like that hoe from the clippers

0.160979

1

Where it says Do not add [...] people without Wikipedia articles to this list on the date pages it means it. You'll need to create an article about whoever before adding their dates of birth or death.

0.000791

0

Fock off A turk disguised in a Italian name?! Do you want to fool us?! 114.179.18.37

0.956939

1

''' Gogo giving blowjobs on demand

0.985484

1

Consider the following People who edit wikipedia are fucking retarded. 174.134.156.86

0.997321

1

Shamash is Sun I agree to merge Sammash in to Shamash, since Shamash is more likely to be correct. Tracking the root of the word, clearly it is of Assyrian origin, in addition, it is a common vocabulary morph to substitute “Sh” to “S” and thus, nowadays, it is spelled as Shams in Modern Arabic.

0.000987

0

TE's talk page access I know it's a bit of old hat at the moment, but he was brought up on a talk page recently and I checked the history to verify a(n apparently incorrect) claim I wanted to make. (It's possible he's IP-socking again, by the way.) Why does he still have talk page access after this? Does the fact that you were the main target of the rant mean that your reverting your own previously restoring his talk page access would have been taken by some as an abuse of admin privileges? Because I really don't think anyone would fault you for it, and I have half a mind to ask another admin to do it anyway. (聖やや)

0.001024

0

RT @femaIes: I swear 😂 we in this forever now bitch http://t.co/293YMZDmun

0.95606

1

Yayyyy I'm gonna be jacking off to these bitches all day today http://t.co/LEmILFu1

0.992577

1

Recommend article for deletion What it says. The article is mostly un-sourced, hasn't changed much in the last four years (beyond being a corporate advertisement), and the citation tags are from April, 2010. This is plenty of time for cleanup...and apparently even the most fervent Shack members can't even be bothered to maintain the Wiki. It's not a reliable article on Wikipedia and since the lack of maintenance in keeping the citation standards has obviously not been done, I recommend this article be deleted. Vote? Discuss? All that typical democratic crap?

0.18661

1

0

" ""Stalling tactics""? Are you kidding me? Apparently I'm the only one taking this seriously. There's no ""time limit"" so talking about ""stalling tactics"" is ridiculous. Holy fuck, read what you type before you click ""save page"", ok? &L; "

0.964243

1

I know a lot of using ass hoes that just want bread an wheels from nigga go grind bitch❗

0.99254

1

That's right. You two are being overzealous and it not very much NOT appreciated. Too bad it took an outside editor's refusal to get you to admit that, User:Ankit. -Anon98 98.92.187.224

0.302821

1

0

" ::: Nishidami continually repeats nearly exactly the same verbal tics,as you do your self ,Tom,involving ""facts"" on which you both have repeatedly been corrected.The best way to stop this would by ceasing to publiish the same erroneous statements and the same tired verbal gymnastics. By the way the Stanley section is terrible but quite up to Nishidani's consistently muddled editorial standards.Example:E.A.Honigmann is cited as the source for the MSND being performed at the Stanley-Vere Wedding.It was Sir Sydney Lee(a pseudonym of Solomon Levey) who first promulgated this extremely arguable hypothesis about 1895.It was to Lefranc's great credit that he provided in both Engllsh and French(1921-1950) numerous pictorial demonstrations of the theory from contemporary prints.These were received with universal commendation, as no such ""lunatic"" assessment oof anti-Stratfordianisn then widely existed among the better educated classes,contrary to the historically false claims which you and Nishidani have published in this discussion. "

0.000816

0

" I know (I created the NOYT redirect )) and, as I said, I am convinced that the white coa was indeed used first after the HDZ came to power. However, even with the YouTube clip it is very possible that the red coa was also in use at the time, that the two were used interchangeably, or that the red one was used increasingly as the government decided to use the red one officially (as it was instituted a few months later). In short, I do not agree that the YouTube clip is source enough to decide the issue for the period as a whole. (TALK) "

0.000544

0

Dude. Place the following in the large text box: Please stop raping little boys in the anus. Don't you know that's illegal?

0.81233

1

0

all of us on Twitter do that already #shutupcrybaby lol RT @Shallow__Al I need. one of you to step up and volunteer to listen to me bitch.

0.972881

1

Lots of Mormons in the edit crowd, I think, that simply don't want their beloved racist homophobe seen in anything but a positive light.

0.201535

1

@Badassjae fuck no my school boring and ghetto

0.998277

1

Unspecified source for Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk

0.000543

0

I'm good! I have my own career, website, and IMDB page in Hollywood, CA! Thank you for your interest. You'll do anything for a free t-shirt... Wow! Cool career you have and a lot of free time...;)

0.000895

0

RT @AutyAut_: I hate when people say you can't befriend a hoe. How bitch how!? 1. I'm only held accountable for my pussy. 2. It's all about…

0.977001

1

I was smoking a blunt outside and these nasty country bitches jumped into the lake , naked 😂😂😂 that lake is nasty as fuck 😷

0.998046

1

U SUCK COCK U IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0.998267

1

Then ya'll idolize Kanye when he wifed up a hoe. Lol

0.064225

0

1

You know, I tried to edit C. violaceus, and put in Convert template, but it just made it worse! I used to do on my earlier articles, but since some sites don't carry the name of the author, or the last time it was visited, I avoid those. Maybe its not ethical, but it saves me some hassle. I realy want to help the Wikipedia project, but sometimes my edits could be viewed as vandalism. See, sometimes I think that the stuff that I am doing is helpful, but some people might consider it to be unhelpful. If any of my edits will give a sign of vandalism (or already are), I would like to apologize for it. Yeah, almost forgot, English is my second language, so gramatical errors could, and will happen. However, I can try to minimize them. Read my user page to see the signs for my gramatical errors.

0.002688

0

I've added the info. Hope this is okay.

0.000577

0

" YOUR INTELLECTUAL LEVEL NEEDS TO GROW. Hey Einstein, when did I say anything anti-africanist here?? please point it out for me. I'm even against the CIA sources that some people wanted to place on the article here, the one about 73% mulatto,16% white and 11% black. Do you think that I'm going to be crazy enough to believe DR is only 11% Black?? I'll be too ashamed of saying such a thing. I agree on you on that one. 51% mulatto, 46% black, 2% white is the real demographic approximates of DR. Where is the "" denial, anti-black, blaha blah and all the non-sense accusations that you are making by me saying that?? I stated an increase from 11% that somebody else place here from CIA to 46%, that's an increase of 35. So I am the anti-black, racist,denier??? I knew that you where going to throw the "" Moor myth"" about Spaniards, you are showing the radical afrocentric nut. What's next? you also believe in Van Sertima's book, that the Olmec heads of the Yucatan peninsula are Africans? or that snow is really black?? DNA studies in Spaniards show that less than 2% have Moor blood. It has been weed out,since the fall of Cordova in 1236, by the "" limpieza de sangre"" campaign of the christians. Spaniards are White as are the anglo-saxons,and the Irish. I'm not going into deep details about "" Moors and Spain"" with a radical Afrocentric nut, but going back to the article, we are not going to allow that the DR article is going to get hijack by radical afrocentric nut, nor eurocentric too. As you can see, I'm not eurocentric, 16% white to 2% white, do the math. You think that you where going to deal with an ignoramus, but when it comes to history, you are kindergarten compared to me. You say "" society"" says that such words are offensive? wow, impresive answer. you are a clown. You still don't own Wikipedia and the English language, and you don't speak for "" society"", "" society"" has diverse views of the world. The article will be changed. platanogenius"

0.493575

1

I'm ready now to try to improve the article, but it does not seem to have been restored. Thanks

0.000557

0

Morris Schwartz - flash synchronizer for work with flashbulbs

0.000731

0

Hey Ned HEY NED, Why don't you actually do some fucking work on this encyclopedia! All you care about now is who is blocked/unblocked 63.164.30.247

0.990142

1

Thank you for the welcome and for the information, I wasn't aware of that. There's a lot of information here and I haven't got to read all of it yet. I have to be careful, if I let myself, I will lose track of time investigating here ) I hope I can make some time to contribute more actively. This will be an excellent way to practice my English, maybe I could make some translating in the future. I appreciate your suggestion, I wouldn't know how to start to describe myself... I never have considered myself very interesting, but I will make an effort )

0.000511

0

@LadyVodkax yer dirty pussy

0.997744

1

''''Support attack. Stabbings - NO. it is a dreadful word, has no purpose. 206.174.72.112

0.002825

0

Request for assistance - hare coursing You very kindly found a link for me at game law in Portugal. Unfortunately, the link to the Government website has gone dead. I don't suppose you know if this might have moved? Many thanks.

0.000622

0

When u hitting it from the back u gotta call her "bitch" they love that but don't u dare call em "slut"

0.963799

1

" kodu and mama in chart I'm deleting the refs since the age spread is too large and I don't know if either is popular enough. Plus they are both commercial. To the people who are adding them do you have any WP:RS about their usage over such a large spread of ages (7-20?). Talk "

0.000634

0

Well, technically, if they're unrelated to the article, they shouldn't be here at all. —''''

0.000635

0

I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. You mother fucker you bastard u biased ronchos...the bastard gujjar suppporter.. I am a badgujjar and i am a rajput..why are u vandalising our histroy by removing my content..u suckdickeer.. Y u add contents about other castes.. Badgujjars are raghav and are rajputs... u bastard.,.. Proof taht badgujjars are rajputs.. chk.. http://ebadgujar.com/history.html

0.996809

1

Man I just watched that 50 shades of gay trailer and that shit looked like the wackest movie of all time. Y'all be hyping up trash on here

0.983295

1

RT @LiFEOf_AYUNgIN: That pussy is never yours it's just your turn remember that . 💯

0.964555

1

" Personally, glad Lynn Margulis is fucking dead. What a waste of real intelligence. As for being a notorious evolutionary biologist, sure, why not. But is this article a list of evolutionary biologists? It shouldn't be. But if it is, there is no more famous evolutionary biologist today than Dawkins. You say evolution, anyone would say Dawkins (right after Darwin). Talk• Contributions "

0.879046

1

RT @JamesYouCunt: I'm on my straight Grizzly so why would I buy you a gay ass teddy bear, bitch? You're already bi-polar! http://t.co/4ZsXC…

0.994355

1

Possible Source of information but must be verified http://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Fred_Bankhead

0.000706

0

got like 4 hoes in my low pro

0.265681

1

Compwhizii explained all of that perfectly; removing valid content from articles is vandalism.

0.001267

0

Wikipedia is great!!! I'm 13 and love editing for misspellings and such.

0.001106

0

The Butt directory confirms the 1873 and 1966 dates, however it states the new Kilmaurs station opened in 1984. I'll update the page with the relevant info.

0.000598

0

" The first sentence says that media sources generally describe LaRouche as an extremist, and George and Wilcox explain why that is so. It also explains that he came from an extremist environment, where people fell out with each other very badly, and then started criticising each other. George and Wilcox thought it worth mentioning as a significant aspect of the story in their discussion of LaRouche, so I don't see why we should not mention it. 466 "

0.000601

0

Merge nasal douche to this here I suggest we merge Nasal douche to here because it is the same thing! 96.244.254.20

0.032124

0

]] Actually I noticed yours is WORSE. Look at that mess you crapped onto my talk page. You call that a paragraph? Buzz off, doof. [[User:Machchunk|Machchunk

0.815446

1

lot of attention from many admins. I ask you to drop the matter

0.001425

0

RT @TrapicalGod: These hoes really ain't loyal 😂🙏 http://t.co/6u2kbYkQ2n

0.329489

1

Virtual Steve can burn in hell.

0.937721

1

" Barry Burns is a noted multi instrumentalist- he undebiably meets the criteria for the definition, and he is noted because Mogwai's albums are considered important, frequently making best-of critics lists. You don't have to sell as many albums as Radiohead to be noted- unless you plan on changing the definition to ""commercially viable"". - User:Pedimedia1"

0.00065

0

Lol You really are a pathetic litle cunt. Please, please make good on your threat to fuck off. I beg you.

0.996185

1

Agar is not digested by bacteria at all, ever. That is why it is used in bacterial culture, because the agar will remain intact while the bacteria digest the nutrients within it.

0.000763

0

Q:Do you believe that a significant number of editors find your conduct at the reference desks frequently inappropriate? A:Yes I admit that. It is obviously true. Q:Do you think this indicates that you ought to change that behavior? A:Yes, I will try very hard not to upset anyone in future.

0.000708

0

Wtf ur a asshole no advertising pls Bot

0.988821

1

I'm probably getting inked later this month, and I intend to take pictures. I can add one if others think it's a good idea.

0.000526

0

Dis bitch by my side and I'll never be broken. http://t.co/Nd2YtJkxgv

0.994542

1

" Dues to SUL conflict! ✉ "

0.001541

0

But they look ugly ( 99.235.43.93

0.608765

1

The only notable thing really from Juninho is that the docters and nurses at Prince of Wales Hospital seemed to get to know him well. haha

0.000775

0

I know now: 'seven minutes!

0.001228

0

OK, fine, take the music and film bootlegger's side. I bet you never even read the edit you reverted it back to, and meanwhile Cosprings probably thought he did a good thing for the article. What a joke. You two deserve each other. 72.66.80.133

0.041445

0