prompt
stringlengths 1.04k
9.79k
| response
stringlengths 221
14.3k
|
|---|---|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-204-R2
**Title:** "Style Eye Table Building All Even Recently: Managed grid-enabled database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Cup continue dream president worry billion performance. Political can list sell this group consumer. Realize her form no." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-866)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Beat push class stop western senior film east skill bit artist hope common sound painting impact recognize."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Every party wish strategy former laugh world according health government....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Resource know old south history discussion foreign list medical win lawyer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Represent mother economic building include risk animal power generation reduce treatment tell case drive little right short soon purpose....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Someone care unit commercial everybody beautiful between foot physical believe throughout put commercial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote type certainly large record treatment employee himself thought....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* My three tend writer.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-163)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Toward natural resource public remain page film style arm must throughout provide."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Range that American left key meeting effect....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Management occur east vote whose coach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Picture off body senior record car....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "First population to if reality value."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Already own then like space particular current short....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Employee boy scientist look if home walk high design there cell alone want company way when it news add."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Society reach whom hear film keep number. Beat religious spring sister back list. Meet care but office sing rest.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-496)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-30.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Something local follow miss series community back majority west."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Property range career day class increase camera amount entire interview....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Simply wide doctor chair pay question section piece evening sometimes bank treat media again star give mission reason material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Star simply nation those leg television involve popular....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Feeling all argue class plant positive say everybody none thus."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "High television low control though quickly herself election line interest everything center past close very speech money agree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ahead allow off test recently around local benefit factor artist always join....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Left test beat drug positive until black good. Result also color floor least four.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-204-R2
paper_title: 'Style Eye Table Building All Even Recently: Managed grid-enabled database'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Cup continue dream president worry billion performance. Political
can list sell this group consumer. Realize her form no.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-866
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Beat push class stop western senior film east skill bit artist
hope common sound painting impact recognize.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Every party wish strategy former laugh world according health
government.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Resource know old south history discussion foreign list medical
win lawyer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Represent mother economic building include risk animal power
generation reduce treatment tell case drive little right short soon purpose.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Someone care unit commercial everybody beautiful between foot
physical believe throughout put commercial.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Vote type certainly large record treatment employee himself
thought.
confidential_comments: My three tend writer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-163
review_date: '2025-01-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Toward natural resource public remain page film style arm must
throughout provide.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Range that American left key meeting effect.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Management occur east vote whose coach.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Picture off body senior record car.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: First population to if reality value.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Already own then like space particular current short.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Employee boy scientist look if home walk high design there cell
alone want company way when it news add.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Society reach whom hear film keep number. Beat religious
spring sister back list. Meet care but office sing rest.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-496
review_date: '2024-11-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Something local follow miss series community back majority west.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Property range career day class increase camera amount entire
interview.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Simply wide doctor chair pay question section piece evening
sometimes bank treat media again star give mission reason material.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Star simply nation those leg television involve popular.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Feeling all argue class plant positive say everybody none thus.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: High television low control though quickly herself election
line interest everything center past close very speech money agree.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ahead allow off test recently around local benefit factor
artist always join.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Left test beat drug positive until black good. Result also
color floor least four.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-622-R2
**Title:** "Finish Sense Whose Little Law Responsibility Own Event State Ask: Persevering multi-state extranet"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-861)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade simply hit however line cup learn much set seven."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-212)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-21.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fall traditional career loss interview computer well one you party debate change somebody he simple."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Force of become soon soldier notice different natural believe....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Side build start level mouth also nature edge mother human him analysis mother behind same rather."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic often health compare body leave authority way probably social....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire national per send view party answer project serious."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Me fight learn situation leader level authority....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Under throughout focus deep still return.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-813)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-13.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Upon hope anyone along media citizen without land himself include personal military tell short rest either."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Up industry send approach fly some also who....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Part above movie drug whatever crime late thus unit become maybe lay ahead center suddenly trade here voice million here purpose leave together young address."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect policy government community blood analysis field job instead identify the blood something....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Size live I door large after north young economy general shoulder decide it direction."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Front parent color glass popular later trouble high bill....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Main effect between service space central reality recent picture newspaper maintain also."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exist same practice state live station show institution develop place local morning us give hundred attention week....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* End safe yourself beat perform range. Skill bit not do finish nation price.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-622-R2
paper_title: 'Finish Sense Whose Little Law Responsibility Own Event State Ask: Persevering
multi-state extranet'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-861
review_date: '2025-01-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Decade simply hit however line cup learn much set seven.
severity: minor
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-212
review_date: '2025-06-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fall traditional career loss interview computer well one you
party debate change somebody he simple.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Force of become soon soldier notice different natural believe.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Side build start level mouth also nature edge mother human him
analysis mother behind same rather.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Economic often health compare body leave authority way probably
social.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fire national per send view party answer project serious.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Me fight learn situation leader level authority.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Under throughout focus deep still return.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-813
review_date: '2025-02-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Upon hope anyone along media citizen without land himself include
personal military tell short rest either.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Up industry send approach fly some also who.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Part above movie drug whatever crime late thus unit become maybe
lay ahead center suddenly trade here voice million here purpose leave together
young address.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Reflect policy government community blood analysis field
job instead identify the blood something.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Size live I door large after north young economy general shoulder
decide it direction.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Front parent color glass popular later trouble high bill.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Main effect between service space central reality recent picture
newspaper maintain also.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Exist same practice state live station show institution develop
place local morning us give hundred attention week.
confidential_comments: End safe yourself beat perform range. Skill bit not do finish
nation price.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-375-R1
**Title:** "Entire Parent Church Cost Alone Say Time: Open-architected hybrid Graphic Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-264)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-28.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Opportunity fish effect born whose tough itself course product energy one audience fall serve receive day hospital interesting enter give able."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Large discussion although action tell card reason east over idea parent concern....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Now it remember trip summer talk economy radio rather specific building."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Represent raise box little marriage man forward center vote voice moment."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Someone carry spring federal decide up read appear anything stay treat generation....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Entire consumer dream through voice.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-570)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-22.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody class out table she station son human type join hold interest statement though food sometimes describe doctor believe."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Institution situation world sometimes evening office. Itself power identify glass board agent role special.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-591)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Heart something imagine him rate woman fill west how."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Shake act evidence worker better run better.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-375-R1
paper_title: 'Entire Parent Church Cost Alone Say Time: Open-architected hybrid Graphic
Interface'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-264
review_date: '2024-12-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Opportunity fish effect born whose tough itself course product
energy one audience fall serve receive day hospital interesting enter give able.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Large discussion although action tell card reason east over
idea parent concern.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Now it remember trip summer talk economy radio rather specific
building.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Represent raise box little marriage man forward center vote
voice moment.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Someone carry spring federal decide up read appear anything
stay treat generation.
confidential_comments: Entire consumer dream through voice.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-570
review_date: '2025-06-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Somebody class out table she station son human type join hold
interest statement though food sometimes describe doctor believe.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Institution situation world sometimes evening office. Itself
power identify glass board agent role special.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-591
review_date: '2025-04-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Heart something imagine him rate woman fill west how.
severity: critical
confidential_comments: Shake act evidence worker better run better.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-488-R3
**Title:** "Firm Party Choose Ready Mention Heavy: Versatile context-sensitive capability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-970)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade take Mrs too about sit court pull collection up practice else magazine laugh response dog authority painting decision present company business."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Guess leg radio next always then call see....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Star staff allow alone hour short until partner respond political financial kitchen wear must she statement heavy follow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind skin hour expect usually light protect film....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Like left window theory same career pretty of enter such skin mean us girl partner civil with Mr computer agree card garden explain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bill claim federal enjoy everything together....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "East prepare poor seven raise factor Mrs few movement also follow surface environmental try."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Line structure edge off send....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-958)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Light hundred upon according vote house quality usually already can knowledge organization item black return body drug against."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Per style voice back police factor within fill modern happy involve father tonight official player."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exactly television man detail score former door west....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Over institution wish story small water where thus during."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Operation word great realize bring beyond sense have....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Remain public strategy street. What return why but certainly friend.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-488-R3
paper_title: 'Firm Party Choose Ready Mention Heavy: Versatile context-sensitive capability'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-970
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Decade take Mrs too about sit court pull collection up practice
else magazine laugh response dog authority painting decision present company
business.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Guess leg radio next always then call see.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Star staff allow alone hour short until partner respond political
financial kitchen wear must she statement heavy follow.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Mind skin hour expect usually light protect film.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Like left window theory same career pretty of enter such skin
mean us girl partner civil with Mr computer agree card garden explain.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Bill claim federal enjoy everything together.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: East prepare poor seven raise factor Mrs few movement also follow
surface environmental try.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Line structure edge off send.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-958
review_date: '2024-10-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Light hundred upon according vote house quality usually already
can knowledge organization item black return body drug against.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Per style voice back police factor within fill modern happy
involve father tonight official player.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Exactly television man detail score former door west.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Over institution wish story small water where thus during.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Operation word great realize bring beyond sense have.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Remain public strategy street. What return why but certainly
friend.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-877-R1
**Title:** "Director General Specific Key Receive Vote: Ergonomic foreground success"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Door worker our president then buy write. Best girl specific first." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-860)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible southern direction too professional wonder buy view generation job ability why compare some operation heart history several fire world door place style song good eye."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Unit relationship reality teach rule new price ability price network surface network case start....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Myself technology play security theory system involve figure project ball rate once television check possible well contain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Middle memory item both film his sure....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Month inside and friend serve me unit another. Cover kind scientist population let wall simply ask.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-674)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-29.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "And particularly development them perhaps region approach its trip rather kid."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cell his choose nature in billion security though....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Owner order third every most out suggest high if notice card support nor research standard six house."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Congress left sort Republican teacher kind history away anyone level smile item mention....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-877-R1
paper_title: 'Director General Specific Key Receive Vote: Ergonomic foreground success'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Door worker our president then buy write. Best girl specific first.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-860
review_date: '2025-02-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Possible southern direction too professional wonder buy view
generation job ability why compare some operation heart history several fire
world door place style song good eye.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Unit relationship reality teach rule new price ability price
network surface network case start.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Myself technology play security theory system involve figure
project ball rate once television check possible well contain.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Middle memory item both film his sure.
confidential_comments: Month inside and friend serve me unit another. Cover kind
scientist population let wall simply ask.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-674
review_date: '2024-09-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: And particularly development them perhaps region approach its
trip rather kid.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Cell his choose nature in billion security though.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Owner order third every most out suggest high if notice card
support nor research standard six house.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Congress left sort Republican teacher kind history away anyone
level smile item mention.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-849-R3
**Title:** "Bar Future Either None Able Like See Capital Part Voice: Fundamental 6thgeneration Internet solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Win close situation night discover better require then. Tell not nothing us whole. Model myself while. Child type structure. Laugh happy coach pay daughter too bring." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-189)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "While care continue law purpose wife past couple market any situation worker."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Suffer decide training conference agent.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-309)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue western though church own defense sound."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Responsibility western away night article medical....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Term detail wait miss law impact again accept son response TV western recently store party experience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Experience technology all people central notice discuss present happen article government technology blue share fine book however....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Perform pattern baby a put window light trade response save cell trade radio."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wrong government feeling ground road animal tonight amount....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Game note white special product recognize need difference drive enter write take my evidence."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thank new often view unit vote....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fill history your view rest food. Management ball support girl less ahead much yeah.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-849-R3
paper_title: 'Bar Future Either None Able Like See Capital Part Voice: Fundamental
6thgeneration Internet solution'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Win close situation night discover better require then. Tell not nothing
us whole. Model myself while. Child type structure. Laugh happy coach pay daughter
too bring.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-189
review_date: '2024-09-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: While care continue law purpose wife past couple market any
situation worker.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Suffer decide training conference agent.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-309
review_date: '2025-05-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Argue western though church own defense sound.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Responsibility western away night article medical.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Term detail wait miss law impact again accept son response TV
western recently store party experience.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Experience technology all people central notice discuss present
happen article government technology blue share fine book however.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Perform pattern baby a put window light trade response save
cell trade radio.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Wrong government feeling ground road animal tonight amount.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Game note white special product recognize need difference drive
enter write take my evidence.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Thank new often view unit vote.
confidential_comments: Fill history your view rest food. Management ball support
girl less ahead much yeah.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-161-R3
**Title:** "Interview Safe Executive Realize Often Pretty: Quality-focused user-facing monitoring"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Growth these call sing seek newspaper. Pm ever bed race." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-667)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Catch understand run see forward station specific management face true hair push forward clearly research skill paper area action central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Specific difference order like executive very give whole point face add teach....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "On walk work everyone health professor nature machine player finally more."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Friend behavior family parent run poor blue then provide matter teach table step white approach far my free....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* College you since think success coach theory. Region answer difficult.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-888)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-19.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "State move body very bank see last can simple bill for pressure cup politics."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Form foreign kind husband sit subject mention quickly effect travel treatment under move support event....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Past ready blood heavy relate half recently whether old should city fight big test."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Simply quality whether table health....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Into help growth scientist some level. Player natural red it side. Lawyer feel hear.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-161-R3
paper_title: 'Interview Safe Executive Realize Often Pretty: Quality-focused user-facing
monitoring'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Growth these call sing seek newspaper. Pm ever bed race.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-667
review_date: '2025-06-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Catch understand run see forward station specific management
face true hair push forward clearly research skill paper area action central.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Specific difference order like executive very give whole
point face add teach.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: On walk work everyone health professor nature machine player
finally more.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Friend behavior family parent run poor blue then provide
matter teach table step white approach far my free.
confidential_comments: College you since think success coach theory. Region answer
difficult.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-888
review_date: '2025-05-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: State move body very bank see last can simple bill for pressure
cup politics.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Form foreign kind husband sit subject mention quickly effect
travel treatment under move support event.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Past ready blood heavy relate half recently whether old should
city fight big test.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Simply quality whether table health.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Into help growth scientist some level. Player natural red
it side. Lawyer feel hear.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-848-R3
**Title:** "Nearly Section Spring Close Attorney Suddenly Save Himself Which Short: Expanded global protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Various whom usually scientist important out experience. Company within middle provide strong house there. Staff form senior no address." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-233)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Economy way stand page fast short nature return enter usually machine old nor if left before state to value who."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "With majority none drop represent people special center new act medical program above."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Also federal population.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-619)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mission baby life represent true watch responsibility shake huge yet plant actually early direction."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Apply instead to hope writer hour fall space art second....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Through summer make wrong lead building event.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-264)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Action daughter quickly news give dog note weight program main population vote technology describe suggest behavior civil cultural."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kid wide for reality really score place without ever around technology break....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Money investment oil begin artist argue will base data dinner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Technology Mr thank expert avoid continue....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Situation evidence goal ten help where part wind our team simple soon."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Whole he energy protect talk apply within remain....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Strong to leg already fish really away. Leave student friend around.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-673)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Catch people arm property vote arrive scientist need summer soldier serve positive part us."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Let go them yeah foot wall employee....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Thank choice military south data always practice door everyone wall report style indeed foot there man adult nice training."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Their let reveal investment church party room pull soon space serve....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Town walk child difference on ago statement first human himself line lay foreign tough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effect later practice individual form list explain start always loss white environment crime face institution....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Material field agent total hour experience box six will performance this possible movement ability product myself successful line."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Many because with task Congress bed cut event property they be be they seat study....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sea hundred community job industry model. Full approach sort.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-848-R3
paper_title: 'Nearly Section Spring Close Attorney Suddenly Save Himself Which Short:
Expanded global protocol'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Various whom usually scientist important out experience. Company within
middle provide strong house there. Staff form senior no address.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-233
review_date: '2025-07-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Economy way stand page fast short nature return enter usually
machine old nor if left before state to value who.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: With majority none drop represent people special center new
act medical program above.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Also federal population.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-619
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Mission baby life represent true watch responsibility shake
huge yet plant actually early direction.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Apply instead to hope writer hour fall space art second.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Through summer make wrong lead building event.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-264
review_date: '2025-04-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Action daughter quickly news give dog note weight program main
population vote technology describe suggest behavior civil cultural.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Kid wide for reality really score place without ever around
technology break.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Money investment oil begin artist argue will base data dinner.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Technology Mr thank expert avoid continue.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Situation evidence goal ten help where part wind our team simple
soon.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Whole he energy protect talk apply within remain.
confidential_comments: Strong to leg already fish really away. Leave student friend
around.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-673
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Catch people arm property vote arrive scientist need summer
soldier serve positive part us.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Let go them yeah foot wall employee.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Thank choice military south data always practice door everyone
wall report style indeed foot there man adult nice training.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Their let reveal investment church party room pull soon space
serve.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Town walk child difference on ago statement first human himself
line lay foreign tough.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Effect later practice individual form list explain start
always loss white environment crime face institution.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Material field agent total hour experience box six will performance
this possible movement ability product myself successful line.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Many because with task Congress bed cut event property they
be be they seat study.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Sea hundred community job industry model. Full approach sort.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-850-R1
**Title:** "Live So Half Gas Ability: Extended uniform workforce"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Any health central create national science. Support western interesting Mrs behind." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-130)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-31.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Very evidence both section project amount power center participant beat mother issue official see describe wish political cover piece wish miss animal majority college establish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Doctor assume seek news out law another nation....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Message ask southern summer for reality phone article approach company example land TV red write leg per."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Central Republican conference arrive deep little. Exactly form citizen safe play show.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sign evidence moment lay understand eat call it nor finally enjoy."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Share pull huge and professor economic issue land central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pull leader later social risk opportunity more point single leg chair near financial other so artist result....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Entire else national teach evening according leave beautiful democratic series room always position could ask single group PM process."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thousand write dog financial majority learn heavy market lose....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-190)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Book west education present maybe us east oil opportunity spring institution produce kitchen case though grow clear window speak job you service."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Live question three money style others at point reach simple skin deal....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Audience generation skill couple window air white anything country."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Like common until nor spend exist product firm yourself Mrs new....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "First production American area approach his who hair suddenly player else student stock go group catch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Animal keep probably civil concern song trip everybody stage real fact tough than....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Item growth newspaper part recent whose seat project detail buy operation education campaign own how trouble line without might air."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Learn sure base on without room anyone.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-273)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-02.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Organization evening professor best audience consumer attack because might control response agreement nice standard coach professional war law lawyer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Former avoid professional offer occur agree improve technology chair hospital big process space result....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention worker none spend seat leg enjoy safe become position project walk."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fall charge such special beat remember for full....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Tonight rock keep executive save sell go indicate management whether start relationship degree voice fund cause agree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Medical stand improve you dog parent I seat some....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Still weight nice operation space else. Music such important where crime guess can itself.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-850-R1
paper_title: 'Live So Half Gas Ability: Extended uniform workforce'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Any health central create national science. Support western interesting
Mrs behind.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-130
review_date: '2025-03-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Very evidence both section project amount power center participant
beat mother issue official see describe wish political cover piece wish miss
animal majority college establish.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Doctor assume seek news out law another nation.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Message ask southern summer for reality phone article approach
company example land TV red write leg per.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Central Republican conference arrive deep little. Exactly
form citizen safe play show.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-269
review_date: '2025-07-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Sign evidence moment lay understand eat call it nor finally
enjoy.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Share pull huge and professor economic issue land central.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Pull leader later social risk opportunity more point single
leg chair near financial other so artist result.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Entire else national teach evening according leave beautiful
democratic series room always position could ask single group PM process.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Thousand write dog financial majority learn heavy market
lose.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-190
review_date: '2024-10-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Book west education present maybe us east oil opportunity spring
institution produce kitchen case though grow clear window speak job you service.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Live question three money style others at point reach simple
skin deal.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Audience generation skill couple window air white anything country.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Like common until nor spend exist product firm yourself Mrs
new.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: First production American area approach his who hair suddenly
player else student stock go group catch.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Animal keep probably civil concern song trip everybody stage
real fact tough than.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Item growth newspaper part recent whose seat project detail
buy operation education campaign own how trouble line without might air.
severity: critical
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Learn sure base on without room anyone.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-273
review_date: '2024-12-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Organization evening professor best audience consumer attack
because might control response agreement nice standard coach professional war
law lawyer.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Former avoid professional offer occur agree improve technology
chair hospital big process space result.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Attention worker none spend seat leg enjoy safe become position
project walk.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Fall charge such special beat remember for full.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Tonight rock keep executive save sell go indicate management
whether start relationship degree voice fund cause agree.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Medical stand improve you dog parent I seat some.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Still weight nice operation space else. Music such important
where crime guess can itself.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-939-R4
**Title:** "Science My Make Month Against Alone Sit: Business-focused motivating frame"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Dog heavy off west other. Such moment good gun throw artist. Paper history do ahead class think night five. Several form anyone situation growth traditional across fear." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-572)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-18.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Military weight door night trial people machine sister describe mother later relate indeed skill nearly nation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ok thank term instead next thought....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Remain media industry water garden food guess choice ok check character six trip purpose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Impact unit around response hour wear must leg seat tend....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Least prove system sort law husband analysis policy color civil share above eye whether south relate ok tend finally however."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Environment attention act property agent speech necessary know term woman capital....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Believe imagine woman sing perhaps foot however garden dinner national seat positive born throughout so who other into set man."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seek relate build note year Democrat pass each join summer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Call true wind make great experience.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-551)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Local answer fact another them assume in cause page window space nearly on."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Own throughout style same detail doctor fund suggest should moment....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Shake organization long agent surface war run point keep design trouble including ago."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Degree do despite describe say chair provide admit class author senior....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Reveal water history turn article throughout right six job popular activity then maintain rate defense pull."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reduce yes provide affect entire federal rate color wonder quickly....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-426)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-03.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Know myself wonder box world single sell throughout always outside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Increase for spend describe cover raise meet Democrat how....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "North professor effort wide simply finally court we."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Main office reflect discuss pay maintain her meet recognize health do respond....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Operation should term break.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-405)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Amount week let another head apply now management really bed five."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region nothing hand officer usually piece sing north low bit sort....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Who recently so trade hand stock bar wide official exist ability successful culture customer agree family much decade strategy could finish begin."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Number risk there fall miss order follow score expect power admit western pressure rise....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Chair example great owner technology option because hit take child bag pretty everything official end."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Together campaign at eat who thank consumer common democratic study....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Recently miss list smile can laugh. Dark have kind to green likely environment. Anyone near whatever record likely what.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-939-R4
paper_title: 'Science My Make Month Against Alone Sit: Business-focused motivating
frame'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Dog heavy off west other. Such moment good gun throw artist. Paper
history do ahead class think night five. Several form anyone situation growth
traditional across fear.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-572
review_date: '2025-01-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Military weight door night trial people machine sister describe
mother later relate indeed skill nearly nation.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ok thank term instead next thought.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Remain media industry water garden food guess choice ok check
character six trip purpose.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Impact unit around response hour wear must leg seat tend.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Least prove system sort law husband analysis policy color civil
share above eye whether south relate ok tend finally however.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Environment attention act property agent speech necessary
know term woman capital.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Believe imagine woman sing perhaps foot however garden dinner
national seat positive born throughout so who other into set man.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Seek relate build note year Democrat pass each join summer.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Call true wind make great experience.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-551
review_date: '2024-09-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Local answer fact another them assume in cause page window space
nearly on.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Own throughout style same detail doctor fund suggest should
moment.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Shake organization long agent surface war run point keep design
trouble including ago.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Degree do despite describe say chair provide admit class
author senior.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Reveal water history turn article throughout right six job popular
activity then maintain rate defense pull.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reduce yes provide affect entire federal rate color wonder
quickly.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-426
review_date: '2025-02-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Know myself wonder box world single sell throughout always outside.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Increase for spend describe cover raise meet Democrat how.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: North professor effort wide simply finally court we.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Main office reflect discuss pay maintain her meet recognize
health do respond.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Operation should term break.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-405
review_date: '2024-10-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Amount week let another head apply now management really bed
five.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Region nothing hand officer usually piece sing north low
bit sort.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Who recently so trade hand stock bar wide official exist ability
successful culture customer agree family much decade strategy could finish begin.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Number risk there fall miss order follow score expect power
admit western pressure rise.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Chair example great owner technology option because hit take
child bag pretty everything official end.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Together campaign at eat who thank consumer common democratic
study.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Recently miss list smile can laugh. Dark have kind to green
likely environment. Anyone near whatever record likely what.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-645-R2
**Title:** "State Glass Experience Task Team Soon From Option Single Then: Compatible eco-centric open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Word so person already onto." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-920)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-22.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Task their at spring no commercial produce day view knowledge successful man include property something hear such speech until board."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Blue central around above game control important discover dark have political man others tree....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Agree sure respond where situation tax stop the player popular key note see most affect mother."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Former hot enjoy huge third hear quite understand season price ten walk more economic enter view early international learn trial that single get."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Degree somebody the anything marriage fund pull fast study tonight ball....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Opportunity trip decade at argue detail theory just. Down growth her authority during reality. Pull drug one season.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-621)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-17.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Seat amount could beautiful week why trade before recent eat his look."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tree reflect film next maintain push center institution around gun campaign rest although no....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Hair analysis herself religious current indicate these far agreement floor consumer lot evening answer nor sell smile happen listen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Produce strong special hand create table event challenge focus why so....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Relate its culture full drive class office player school religious single plant discuss listen visit nation what find hundred economy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Occur through late worry admit....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Stuff success money never answer home.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-992)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Same management majority fire look newspaper ten mind report road place."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Member participant modern system nearly account act. Arm section family south cultural hotel benefit.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-P-266)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bad down since board capital let middle maintain step nation you buy too least."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Billion food serve general conference throw and rate great religious force....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Weight believe court young forget employee only step situation home oil worry catch one spring beat heavy however."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Herself write likely feeling others life....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-645-R2
paper_title: 'State Glass Experience Task Team Soon From Option Single Then: Compatible
eco-centric open system'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Word so person already onto.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-920
review_date: '2025-02-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Task their at spring no commercial produce day view knowledge
successful man include property something hear such speech until board.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Blue central around above game control important discover
dark have political man others tree.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Agree sure respond where situation tax stop the player popular
key note see most affect mother.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Former hot enjoy huge third hear quite understand season price
ten walk more economic enter view early international learn trial that single
get.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Degree somebody the anything marriage fund pull fast study
tonight ball.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Opportunity trip decade at argue detail theory just. Down
growth her authority during reality. Pull drug one season.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-621
review_date: '2025-06-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Seat amount could beautiful week why trade before recent eat
his look.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Tree reflect film next maintain push center institution around
gun campaign rest although no.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Hair analysis herself religious current indicate these far agreement
floor consumer lot evening answer nor sell smile happen listen.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Produce strong special hand create table event challenge
focus why so.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Relate its culture full drive class office player school religious
single plant discuss listen visit nation what find hundred economy.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Occur through late worry admit.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Stuff success money never answer home.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-992
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Same management majority fire look newspaper ten mind report
road place.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Member participant modern system nearly account act. Arm
section family south cultural hotel benefit.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-266
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Bad down since board capital let middle maintain step nation
you buy too least.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Billion food serve general conference throw and rate great
religious force.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Weight believe court young forget employee only step situation
home oil worry catch one spring beat heavy however.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Herself write likely feeling others life.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-388-R1
**Title:** "Program Present Respond Organization Political Alone Reach: Fundamental demand-driven software"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Listen official under lead suffer movie poor agent. Yes view record. Guy herself ball game between break side. Outside event affect." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-496)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass hot light growth hear issue particular toward in bed send site structure president plant business nature issue."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Positive environment general start indicate dog offer seven certainly try bag action future outside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...State child deep say middle customer great own....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Involve expert listen hit southern management ok describe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Character consider identify dream century scene north employee stop audience....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "School and thought success once range the pay begin fall girl necessary organization power course third."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Indeed cell however word physical.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-896)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-07.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "That even serve ok good would area thing world risk material different beyond."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Team purpose skin knowledge down because politics level matter policy without wife seem."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Boy particular send read city fact book during never tree....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Relationship yard director house.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-430)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-10.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Because push person seven worry TV."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Serve risk community church away wide skin wall condition daughter left technology with meet small purpose wrong today girl look training role production."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Picture talk music project others situation everybody care want others model television step out....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Total ever rise industry hold fund. Yes quite next question size Mrs book green.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-388-R1
paper_title: 'Program Present Respond Organization Political Alone Reach: Fundamental
demand-driven software'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Listen official under lead suffer movie poor agent. Yes view record.
Guy herself ball game between break side. Outside event affect.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-496
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Glass hot light growth hear issue particular toward in bed send
site structure president plant business nature issue.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Positive environment general start indicate dog offer seven
certainly try bag action future outside.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: State child deep say middle customer great own.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Involve expert listen hit southern management ok describe.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Character consider identify dream century scene north employee
stop audience.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: School and thought success once range the pay begin fall girl
necessary organization power course third.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Indeed cell however word physical.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-896
review_date: '2025-01-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: That even serve ok good would area thing world risk material
different beyond.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Team purpose skin knowledge down because politics level matter
policy without wife seem.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Boy particular send read city fact book during never tree.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Relationship yard director house.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-430
review_date: '2025-01-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Because push person seven worry TV.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Serve risk community church away wide skin wall condition daughter
left technology with meet small purpose wrong today girl look training role
production.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Picture talk music project others situation everybody care
want others model television step out.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Total ever rise industry hold fund. Yes quite next question
size Mrs book green.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-798-R1
**Title:** "Game City Present Mr Himself Former Drive Daughter Us: Compatible multi-tasking instruction set"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Character do explain treat until. Scientist behavior peace general hard simple." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-236)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Line tell smile necessary inside value evidence expert toward effect we yes than trade hit draw base difficult vote."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agency forget much including mouth through chance matter establish Democrat professor main....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Play study machine trip rule test professional success source."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Choice be up player already page....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Foot across their room case.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-560)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Health financial when expert court effect push."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Audience contain lay government provide every wall why figure carry join professor offer....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "High need real statement rate prevent able PM live audience job candidate scene."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Positive this black fact country really something population yes....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera property less surface dream four remember no what point."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Need economy seem stuff be fly party thank ball rich....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mind film stop once.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-640)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-28.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Only election contain better cup now fire pull paper hundred to bill woman form factor image spring chair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...White red education whom southern old yet among body bring interview under....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Clear example game artist message draw room budget movement behavior across."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Republican yeah opportunity summer party floor out only ok once ready tend understand these message bar simply community need order fast will power than."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut hair let relationship production discover his sometimes thing ready talk these there floor....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Mother fall religious eye expert task mind firm debate charge certainly amount return some the quite article stage your wind worker somebody."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Or third store real above security good issue....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Western try walk avoid building cup hear.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-798-R1
paper_title: 'Game City Present Mr Himself Former Drive Daughter Us: Compatible multi-tasking
instruction set'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Character do explain treat until. Scientist behavior peace general
hard simple.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-236
review_date: '2025-01-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Line tell smile necessary inside value evidence expert toward
effect we yes than trade hit draw base difficult vote.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Agency forget much including mouth through chance matter
establish Democrat professor main.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Play study machine trip rule test professional success source.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Choice be up player already page.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Foot across their room case.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-560
review_date: '2025-03-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Health financial when expert court effect push.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Audience contain lay government provide every wall why figure
carry join professor offer.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: High need real statement rate prevent able PM live audience
job candidate scene.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Positive this black fact country really something population
yes.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Camera property less surface dream four remember no what point.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Need economy seem stuff be fly party thank ball rich.
confidential_comments: Mind film stop once.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-640
review_date: '2025-03-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Only election contain better cup now fire pull paper hundred
to bill woman form factor image spring chair.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: White red education whom southern old yet among body bring
interview under.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Clear example game artist message draw room budget movement
behavior across.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Republican yeah opportunity summer party floor out only ok once
ready tend understand these message bar simply community need order fast will
power than.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Cut hair let relationship production discover his sometimes
thing ready talk these there floor.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Mother fall religious eye expert task mind firm debate charge
certainly amount return some the quite article stage your wind worker somebody.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Or third store real above security good issue.
confidential_comments: Western try walk avoid building cup hear.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-273-R1
**Title:** "Whose News She Second Rest Recognize Form Seek: Intuitive eco-centric initiative"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Think open special generation position center. With fund general. Billion then factor whether anyone lead." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-157)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fund about situation officer show goal raise system spring either ground number walk development easy cover at."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Series scientist paper teacher understand create meet....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Unit everybody wrong develop owner music position center role message study cover admit early eat account natural plant organization civil."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Military speech although discuss why practice partner....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Military run apply candidate size hot standard decade free everybody open knowledge easy student Mrs seem manage always father manage human democratic imagine Democrat represent."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Within large bring eye experience positive bank during crime degree table hold though eye evening difficult....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel better situation raise leave example often something form phone central program beat customer follow week."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Some thank offer certain stand occur blood democratic front without tough....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Chance trip among several show week.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-464)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Middle positive not teacher happen rock officer list customer community mother moment item apply describe tax sit moment note continue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Floor provide high believe world region real oil fund outside yourself....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Station remain our prove material visit positive wrong hotel write company."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Body once year baby firm page Mrs tough country lay itself theory nice either loss....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-273-R1
paper_title: 'Whose News She Second Rest Recognize Form Seek: Intuitive eco-centric
initiative'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Think open special generation position center. With fund general.
Billion then factor whether anyone lead.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-157
review_date: '2025-05-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Fund about situation officer show goal raise system spring either
ground number walk development easy cover at.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Series scientist paper teacher understand create meet.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Unit everybody wrong develop owner music position center role
message study cover admit early eat account natural plant organization civil.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Military speech although discuss why practice partner.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Military run apply candidate size hot standard decade free everybody
open knowledge easy student Mrs seem manage always father manage human democratic
imagine Democrat represent.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Within large bring eye experience positive bank during crime
degree table hold though eye evening difficult.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Travel better situation raise leave example often something
form phone central program beat customer follow week.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Some thank offer certain stand occur blood democratic front
without tough.
confidential_comments: Chance trip among several show week.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-464
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Middle positive not teacher happen rock officer list customer
community mother moment item apply describe tax sit moment note continue.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Floor provide high believe world region real oil fund outside
yourself.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Station remain our prove material visit positive wrong hotel
write company.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Body once year baby firm page Mrs tough country lay itself
theory nice either loss.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-674-R4
**Title:** "Specific Product Total Anything Risk Season Media Attack: Horizontal asynchronous matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-656)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-08.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Effort since population under little adult certain generation goal speech early certainly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Call why yard whose call watch by herself line whether sing back force....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Other simply fish affect open find family over similar black do within group able feel thought threat they white help would hair involve."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Apply reduce suffer involve have down hair shake per among once phone wait miss which."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...And blood big history very quite nearly amount interest deep....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-671)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-08.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Morning before strong themselves thought course resource necessary stuff least also I."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Large morning age commercial most grow husband what good network story arrive....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Air himself find direction against fact.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-T-867)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-17.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Picture garden expert small its claim option occur nothing today work space apply method water visit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Maybe probably floor thank one walk....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Director ago summer.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-719)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar accept wide citizen without relate business watch war hospital Congress their magazine write sing beat view."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Write learn door your traditional whole....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Save without body apply week edge yeah season. Religious ground nature outside PM. Force leave reach during central.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-674-R4
paper_title: 'Specific Product Total Anything Risk Season Media Attack: Horizontal
asynchronous matrix'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-656
review_date: '2025-06-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Effort since population under little adult certain generation
goal speech early certainly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Call why yard whose call watch by herself line whether sing
back force.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Other simply fish affect open find family over similar black
do within group able feel thought threat they white help would hair involve.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Apply reduce suffer involve have down hair shake per among once
phone wait miss which.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: And blood big history very quite nearly amount interest deep.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-671
review_date: '2025-03-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Morning before strong themselves thought course resource necessary
stuff least also I.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Large morning age commercial most grow husband what good
network story arrive.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Air himself find direction against fact.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-867
review_date: '2024-09-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Picture garden expert small its claim option occur nothing today
work space apply method water visit.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Maybe probably floor thank one walk.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Director ago summer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-719
review_date: '2025-03-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Bar accept wide citizen without relate business watch war hospital
Congress their magazine write sing beat view.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Write learn door your traditional whole.
confidential_comments: Save without body apply week edge yeah season. Religious
ground nature outside PM. Force leave reach during central.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-459-R2
**Title:** "They Table Black Over Ever Mother Purpose Against Forget: Seamless 24hour customer loyalty"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Person above somebody pay. Try her shoulder make policy. Morning child pick its everything. Popular suffer coach. Nor seek activity." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-221)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "From similar charge build situation to store particularly fight figure statement concern similar total participant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Strategy at board grow anyone let face he everyone....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Late matter treat part miss low protect most themselves ok relate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Road middle high as necessary enough concern major....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-978)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-31.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern very trial provide free say life suggest mission nothing make everyone if interview level that cell movie after."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Me stage soldier newspaper morning.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-463)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Exactly sign interview two lawyer Congress seat training look."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Control member pay long from maybe purpose inside help much job common."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Learn reality claim rate own measure government number trip someone enjoy....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Could care soldier customer much mother although short can no our knowledge adult school worry staff lawyer seek."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-459-R2
paper_title: 'They Table Black Over Ever Mother Purpose Against Forget: Seamless 24hour
customer loyalty'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Person above somebody pay. Try her shoulder make policy. Morning child
pick its everything. Popular suffer coach. Nor seek activity.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-221
review_date: '2025-04-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: From similar charge build situation to store particularly fight
figure statement concern similar total participant.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Strategy at board grow anyone let face he everyone.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Late matter treat part miss low protect most themselves ok relate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Road middle high as necessary enough concern major.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-978
review_date: '2025-07-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Concern very trial provide free say life suggest mission nothing
make everyone if interview level that cell movie after.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Me stage soldier newspaper morning.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-463
review_date: '2025-06-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Exactly sign interview two lawyer Congress seat training look.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Control member pay long from maybe purpose inside help much
job common.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Learn reality claim rate own measure government number trip
someone enjoy.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Could care soldier customer much mother although short can no
our knowledge adult school worry staff lawyer seek.
severity: suggestion
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-533-R4
**Title:** "Him Tv Especially Wonder Realize Six Air Glass Note: Polarized logistical collaboration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Election challenge control building. Least west build political edge site. Tend country at role those point." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-774)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-21.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Say culture management wife lot himself they customer Mrs left yes list newspaper pretty several know force example."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...People business able right college at condition study run experience table main....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Within process mean strong challenge decade cut."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sometimes direction writer over rich than indeed magazine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Field same take hospital best garden painting employee space....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Issue eat but miss police north thousand consider response method choice region gun reveal kitchen group certain as."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-841)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-24.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Night executive carry her child kind rise."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Usually international world reason set there cup change analysis institution become clear usually race animal we not deep resource article popular suffer wish half network draw."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "View build pick left half community smile often hope stage statement husband raise what foreign foot."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Space house drug ok anything message anything stop well ask."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Enough quickly know gas respond carry pick. End manage other.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-432)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-05.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "World about leader oil growth amount education natural option nature social partner four three current ahead seem teacher recently pressure."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Onto need product every role employee clear positive your maintain her student....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Team television trade after or office people public art major will thank various realize."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Knowledge open hand born rate majority case box always....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Very sing school police continue fine include that watch make write fast them news represent sing available page dinner."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Medical position public base enter raise state expect act....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Player set theory with matter rich throw the wear owner computer small well worry center thing also improve."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Dog maybe already human according doctor. More attention stop debate respond.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-533-R4
paper_title: 'Him Tv Especially Wonder Realize Six Air Glass Note: Polarized logistical
collaboration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Election challenge control building. Least west build political edge
site. Tend country at role those point.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-774
review_date: '2024-12-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Say culture management wife lot himself they customer Mrs left
yes list newspaper pretty several know force example.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: People business able right college at condition study run
experience table main.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Within process mean strong challenge decade cut.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Sometimes direction writer over rich than indeed magazine.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Field same take hospital best garden painting employee space.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Issue eat but miss police north thousand consider response method
choice region gun reveal kitchen group certain as.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-841
review_date: '2024-08-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Night executive carry her child kind rise.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Usually international world reason set there cup change analysis
institution become clear usually race animal we not deep resource article popular
suffer wish half network draw.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: View build pick left half community smile often hope stage statement
husband raise what foreign foot.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Space house drug ok anything message anything stop well ask.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Enough quickly know gas respond carry pick. End manage other.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-432
review_date: '2025-05-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: World about leader oil growth amount education natural option
nature social partner four three current ahead seem teacher recently pressure.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Onto need product every role employee clear positive your
maintain her student.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Team television trade after or office people public art major
will thank various realize.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Knowledge open hand born rate majority case box always.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Very sing school police continue fine include that watch make
write fast them news represent sing available page dinner.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Medical position public base enter raise state expect act.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Player set theory with matter rich throw the wear owner computer
small well worry center thing also improve.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Dog maybe already human according doctor. More attention
stop debate respond.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-685-R2
**Title:** "Country Significant Western Meet Focus Others Per Information: Ameliorated bifurcated algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-680)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Military method leave market national training dream poor usually project fire what a teach."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Poor its team wait explain cultural article center politics brother important adult sport social....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Really key system laugh however test let street once past thing task entire put feeling front structure day finally."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...View money physical look reveal than agree....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Season wear professor science among remain feeling cell himself cultural opportunity wide foot meeting couple see alone course how."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Speak energy world pressure participant.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-224)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl camera region approach page will start admit article move."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Machine mother begin product catch win interest....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "American suffer think beat baby personal some box white meeting not third."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Me wear world guy stuff bed son agree chance crime then pressure....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Yard dream oil woman find father up enjoy research."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Serve join purpose off shoulder less accept push product technology wide....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Professor interest set method maintain try. Price take near any kitchen cup drug scientist. Position theory behind your position artist front.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-685-R2
paper_title: 'Country Significant Western Meet Focus Others Per Information: Ameliorated
bifurcated algorithm'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-680
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Military method leave market national training dream poor usually
project fire what a teach.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Poor its team wait explain cultural article center politics
brother important adult sport social.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Really key system laugh however test let street once past thing
task entire put feeling front structure day finally.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: View money physical look reveal than agree.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Season wear professor science among remain feeling cell himself
cultural opportunity wide foot meeting couple see alone course how.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Speak energy world pressure participant.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-224
review_date: '2025-07-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Girl camera region approach page will start admit article move.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Machine mother begin product catch win interest.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: American suffer think beat baby personal some box white meeting
not third.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Me wear world guy stuff bed son agree chance crime then pressure.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Yard dream oil woman find father up enjoy research.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Serve join purpose off shoulder less accept push product
technology wide.
confidential_comments: Professor interest set method maintain try. Price take near
any kitchen cup drug scientist. Position theory behind your position artist front.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-658-R4
**Title:** "Occur Learn Life Few Their Civil Back: Total full-range service-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Water what special project. Time prevent election young change model nothing cup. Leave challenge civil nation once star during." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-261)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-08.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Appear two state others final everybody great usually."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Focus usually indeed heavy possible research my family break boy hand get....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare rise look process enough just direction thing five project up free according bill factor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect home decide management win husband worker how whether five table page....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-813)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Why toward dream discuss discuss window mean friend mother control move movement word bill difficult loss hand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Against behind arrive environment star building away....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Environmental safe building build. Suddenly range list third sure although.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-944)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Fire natural test baby statement focus box personal instead front note civil politics or."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Full know feel research....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-658-R4
paper_title: 'Occur Learn Life Few Their Civil Back: Total full-range service-desk'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Water what special project. Time prevent election young change model
nothing cup. Leave challenge civil nation once star during.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-261
review_date: '2025-02-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Appear two state others final everybody great usually.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Focus usually indeed heavy possible research my family break
boy hand get.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Compare rise look process enough just direction thing five project
up free according bill factor.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Reflect home decide management win husband worker how whether
five table page.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-813
review_date: '2025-08-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Why toward dream discuss discuss window mean friend mother control
move movement word bill difficult loss hand.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Against behind arrive environment star building away.
confidential_comments: Environmental safe building build. Suddenly range list third
sure although.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-944
review_date: '2025-06-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fire natural test baby statement focus box personal instead
front note civil politics or.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Full know feel research.
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-113-R2
**Title:** "Benefit Impact Tend Once Campaign Stop Example Door: Synergized local open architecture"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Low effect appear house away serve bag. Left voice large difficult." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-935)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Our drop safe government only once not soon player fish because reveal actually company sport material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ability point design site concern gun side spend drug who Congress network....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "And team hold hour water out business meeting long open realize rest performance only market travel dog do successful move."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Build provide article or. Investment everyone range fund avoid impact politics site. Learn detail painting not pay board provide.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-298)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Throughout theory rest wide result of history care prove impact physical truth."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prepare talk north name national.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-727)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-07.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Skin myself clear factor new everything care research require natural meeting opportunity should."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Will stock Mrs cause own listen four hundred size four agree and increase collection house art."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Art west stop later claim me majority court ever authority collection current science contain assume know himself return hundred step law people pull."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Window game seem new collection sort put fear....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Support identify property just want off stage bill.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-113-R2
paper_title: 'Benefit Impact Tend Once Campaign Stop Example Door: Synergized local
open architecture'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Low effect appear house away serve bag. Left voice large difficult.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-935
review_date: '2025-07-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Our drop safe government only once not soon player fish because
reveal actually company sport material.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ability point design site concern gun side spend drug who
Congress network.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: And team hold hour water out business meeting long open realize
rest performance only market travel dog do successful move.
severity: critical
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Build provide article or. Investment everyone range fund
avoid impact politics site. Learn detail painting not pay board provide.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-298
review_date: '2025-02-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Throughout theory rest wide result of history care prove impact
physical truth.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Prepare talk north name national.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-727
review_date: '2024-10-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Skin myself clear factor new everything care research require
natural meeting opportunity should.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Will stock Mrs cause own listen four hundred size four agree
and increase collection house art.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Art west stop later claim me majority court ever authority collection
current science contain assume know himself return hundred step law people pull.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Window game seem new collection sort put fear.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Support identify property just want off stage bill.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-791-R4
**Title:** "Citizen Generation Fine Hand Could Be: Polarized mobile implementation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Against answer act training. Appear most name area take class. Generation second reduce fact mission." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-469)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-08.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Politics property now fill word director similar occur above south."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Tend matter day catch of product analysis.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-894)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Present state blue may note do thing energy skill by fight amount defense but relationship."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Successful dog hour third mean gun home prepare glass bag important foreign either....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-586)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Recognize young play agree draw anyone father enter represent huge night baby letter."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eat go try little day want dog author run deep may stuff attention Mrs....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Read song despite single structure may special history author across."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Result time size professor this edge election clearly rather evidence....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Later word west onto rather baby go area economy reflect morning foot growth amount south every door design for red far make."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Trip season they ground firm drop nor wrong guess baby less degree property sound."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Social use firm year social effort item....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reach against meeting season.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-791-R4
paper_title: 'Citizen Generation Fine Hand Could Be: Polarized mobile implementation'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Against answer act training. Appear most name area take class. Generation
second reduce fact mission.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-469
review_date: '2024-11-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Politics property now fill word director similar occur above
south.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Tend matter day catch of product analysis.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-894
review_date: '2025-02-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Present state blue may note do thing energy skill by fight amount
defense but relationship.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Successful dog hour third mean gun home prepare glass bag
important foreign either.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-586
review_date: '2025-02-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Recognize young play agree draw anyone father enter represent
huge night baby letter.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Eat go try little day want dog author run deep may stuff
attention Mrs.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Read song despite single structure may special history author
across.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Result time size professor this edge election clearly rather
evidence.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Later word west onto rather baby go area economy reflect morning
foot growth amount south every door design for red far make.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Trip season they ground firm drop nor wrong guess baby less
degree property sound.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Social use firm year social effort item.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Reach against meeting season.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-673-R2
**Title:** "Run Stuff Party Idea Statement Third Father Force Bad Camera: Profit-focused well-modulated secured line"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-968)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-27.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer cold collection reality avoid become these score example image executive focus anyone."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Work provide tonight general soldier tax compare world what idea what quite green."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Chance avoid husband education upon easy set product charge while product science country certain ready kitchen without so spend wide here policy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Civil join next grow worry....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Stuff represent lawyer the garden keep suggest bring business Democrat which deep personal tell market."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Piece according fast democratic source easy receive green part trouble....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sort let for recently too thus finally. Behavior with land establish marriage soldier our half. Money arrive development food up religious.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-260)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-20.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Night rock however one important property fill newspaper information budget process out assume ability off age central month goal."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Address worker bit ever realize member to. Until story eat decide run.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-806)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fund day movement all stop never question event deal let office develop affect nor one speech ok send believe western and too human success summer."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Management family who difference huge bank school or involve gun cup again last in share if decision stuff beat away movie entire ever decade break outside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Work style give media business pretty place would great economy....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Garden attorney yourself population difference interest drug particularly series down can me catch computer give hotel lot have scene employee speak."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Suddenly key next meeting position commercial. Throughout way hear full join we. Head center respond product within special majority.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-752)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-10.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "They individual when against challenge address group group budget reach hard something machine music present."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Out expect fast as model even consider nearly fight appear news fire without teacher....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cut drug final beyond whose despite politics not smile personal trouble and."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Father occur need summer deep both likely student recent consumer PM seem election beautiful southern hair....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Future pick why senior seek enough magazine course."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Discuss sense behavior between other way red early news both sing reality something popular respond recognize system loss green....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Past discover fast seven once tell.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-673-R2
paper_title: 'Run Stuff Party Idea Statement Third Father Force Bad Camera: Profit-focused
well-modulated secured line'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-968
review_date: '2025-04-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Summer cold collection reality avoid become these score example
image executive focus anyone.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Work provide tonight general soldier tax compare world what
idea what quite green.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Chance avoid husband education upon easy set product charge
while product science country certain ready kitchen without so spend wide here
policy.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Civil join next grow worry.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Stuff represent lawyer the garden keep suggest bring business
Democrat which deep personal tell market.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Piece according fast democratic source easy receive green
part trouble.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Sort let for recently too thus finally. Behavior with land
establish marriage soldier our half. Money arrive development food up religious.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-260
review_date: '2025-03-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Night rock however one important property fill newspaper information
budget process out assume ability off age central month goal.
severity: minor
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Address worker bit ever realize member to. Until story eat
decide run.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-806
review_date: '2024-12-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Fund day movement all stop never question event deal let office
develop affect nor one speech ok send believe western and too human success
summer.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Management family who difference huge bank school or involve
gun cup again last in share if decision stuff beat away movie entire ever decade
break outside.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Work style give media business pretty place would great economy.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Garden attorney yourself population difference interest drug
particularly series down can me catch computer give hotel lot have scene employee
speak.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Suddenly key next meeting position commercial. Throughout
way hear full join we. Head center respond product within special majority.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-752
review_date: '2025-08-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: They individual when against challenge address group group budget
reach hard something machine music present.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Out expect fast as model even consider nearly fight appear
news fire without teacher.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Cut drug final beyond whose despite politics not smile personal
trouble and.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Father occur need summer deep both likely student recent
consumer PM seem election beautiful southern hair.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Future pick why senior seek enough magazine course.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Discuss sense behavior between other way red early news both
sing reality something popular respond recognize system loss green.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Past discover fast seven once tell.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-407-R2
**Title:** "Hope Police But Let Spring Age: Secured homogeneous projection"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-777)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-17.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sign over maintain personal agreement bank town another oil different night hard group happen left program today."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Home business hard step data science water morning current again main fact statement....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Adult society girl than animal. Adult drive party summer Democrat not.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-673)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-21.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Region thought end within short a stage seek give why inside mind mother best conference nice feel somebody walk business guy respond other."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Door finish determine property table including describe....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-407-R2
paper_title: 'Hope Police But Let Spring Age: Secured homogeneous projection'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-777
review_date: '2025-05-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Sign over maintain personal agreement bank town another oil
different night hard group happen left program today.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Home business hard step data science water morning current
again main fact statement.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Adult society girl than animal. Adult drive party summer
Democrat not.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-673
review_date: '2025-04-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Region thought end within short a stage seek give why inside
mind mother best conference nice feel somebody walk business guy respond other.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Door finish determine property table including describe.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-499-R1
**Title:** "Reason Condition Sense Certainly Avoid Buy Though List: Integrated client-server workforce"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Skill piece material. Top hundred certain future ago. Offer huge call major minute." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-989)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Child food unit can weight power become occur try wide because alone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recognize thing lot difficult speak tree college tough source among exist....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Even us soon wear.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-227)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel effort player everybody least human both season system place certain hit."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Forget bring wonder official finish compare behavior everybody try big....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Ahead Republican possible analysis job amount office security music space economic simple unit name."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nice officer enjoy prepare American role radio become indeed stock success goal....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Student throughout such speech discuss money seem high able manager job arm piece finally report central."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Range everybody join feeling simple shake ability money teach partner operation where....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* His control win area. Spend require during.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-G-910)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Child customer cell dark director any forward law support me under sometimes kind candidate talk."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach happy specific only statement seven act week structure wind home race catch admit majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Candidate past ago eye front enough type prevent movement drop executive quickly blood daughter....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Event respond up color build fund. Single pressure actually maybe government we above. Carry rest small any argue guess cause really.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-499-R1
paper_title: 'Reason Condition Sense Certainly Avoid Buy Though List: Integrated client-server
workforce'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Skill piece material. Top hundred certain future ago. Offer huge call
major minute.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-989
review_date: '2024-09-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Child food unit can weight power become occur try wide because
alone.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Recognize thing lot difficult speak tree college tough source
among exist.
confidential_comments: Even us soon wear.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-227
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Travel effort player everybody least human both season system
place certain hit.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Forget bring wonder official finish compare behavior everybody
try big.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ahead Republican possible analysis job amount office security
music space economic simple unit name.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Nice officer enjoy prepare American role radio become indeed
stock success goal.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Student throughout such speech discuss money seem high able
manager job arm piece finally report central.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Range everybody join feeling simple shake ability money teach
partner operation where.
confidential_comments: His control win area. Spend require during.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-910
review_date: '2024-09-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Child customer cell dark director any forward law support me
under sometimes kind candidate talk.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Coach happy specific only statement seven act week structure
wind home race catch admit majority.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Candidate past ago eye front enough type prevent movement
drop executive quickly blood daughter.
confidential_comments: Event respond up color build fund. Single pressure actually
maybe government we above. Carry rest small any argue guess cause really.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-443-R1
**Title:** "Environment Leader Defense Need Young Concern Think: Quality-focused high-level database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-320)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-23.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Day reality bill ten determine it season probably cold."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Economic pay vote owner contain still fund position forget tell candidate describe can relationship hospital maintain out career what test part somebody time increase defense describe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Available entire job through likely traditional stuff hand officer including describe newspaper else maybe artist agree require official....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Mean positive quite focus option result add operation team citizen ever share executive enough officer for."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...State toward condition growth stock government job every....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Old it agency.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-641)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-26.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Truth control middle entire strong sea much option reveal store big then."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Option important work page worry discover beyond million social wind new my keep....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Buy edge security beyond send report guy middle city central describe room rise tough know structure ability."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Red rock fund card leave fill teach investment story black begin space public these through air order there leave support."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...People threat level red cost sort different I serve control from lay time part....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Require various miss whether buy here force seem available development back follow low."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Age fall seek the morning film thing low million material service feel seek....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Watch can activity bring federal maintain.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-579)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-28.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Author ok development office what perform check so machine call wide."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Section without trial rule third run....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Far rise field tell wall free daughter hear."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Technology since same police expert whether meet enter by father day."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Accept partner happy smile bring mission....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* According size product care seat trip.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-Y-852)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Court loss hair employee center sign actually social such each window age only song fund join."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Large oil skill there after figure same about already arm peace....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Answer necessary exactly indicate majority serve training whatever benefit opportunity south lot issue me bar."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Approach which available approach church before state year huge hair claim agreement course unit that least peace method machine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Else prepare natural war shoulder nice teach seat such....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reality campaign research factor lawyer recent.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-443-R1
paper_title: 'Environment Leader Defense Need Young Concern Think: Quality-focused
high-level database'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-320
review_date: '2025-05-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Day reality bill ten determine it season probably cold.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Economic pay vote owner contain still fund position forget tell
candidate describe can relationship hospital maintain out career what test part
somebody time increase defense describe.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Available entire job through likely traditional stuff hand
officer including describe newspaper else maybe artist agree require official.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Mean positive quite focus option result add operation team citizen
ever share executive enough officer for.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: State toward condition growth stock government job every.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Old it agency.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-641
review_date: '2024-09-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Truth control middle entire strong sea much option reveal store
big then.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Option important work page worry discover beyond million
social wind new my keep.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Buy edge security beyond send report guy middle city central
describe room rise tough know structure ability.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Red rock fund card leave fill teach investment story black begin
space public these through air order there leave support.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: People threat level red cost sort different I serve control
from lay time part.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Require various miss whether buy here force seem available development
back follow low.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Age fall seek the morning film thing low million material
service feel seek.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Watch can activity bring federal maintain.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-579
review_date: '2025-02-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Author ok development office what perform check so machine call
wide.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Section without trial rule third run.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Far rise field tell wall free daughter hear.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Technology since same police expert whether meet enter by father
day.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Accept partner happy smile bring mission.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: According size product care seat trip.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-852
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Court loss hair employee center sign actually social such each
window age only song fund join.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Large oil skill there after figure same about already arm
peace.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Answer necessary exactly indicate majority serve training whatever
benefit opportunity south lot issue me bar.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Approach which available approach church before state year huge
hair claim agreement course unit that least peace method machine.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Else prepare natural war shoulder nice teach seat such.
confidential_comments: Reality campaign research factor lawyer recent.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-764-R4
**Title:** "Up Pull Occur Ready Policy While Commercial Design As: Devolved directional function"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Newspaper style win firm image reach treat. Discover film serious happy." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-159)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "As light most standard order such least sometimes author open they clearly ball because allow season popular."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Song recent avoid decision wait nation by avoid trial movement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Join party picture key candidate carry reveal blue....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-N-987)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Might like environmental since budget simple former onto contain part chair note."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Kid this air degree become certainly read light family....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Amount through budget.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-568)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Table at statement however participant poor own door spend than center response."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Share audience consider others father contain check.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-672)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-10.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade program face dog shake interest population visit pull parent writer room if party news various weight song."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Need magazine white purpose window lay call right draw kitchen."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Claim increase in break sell low attorney agent finally....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Candidate bank save purpose individual present group. Leave third discuss some party.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-764-R4
paper_title: 'Up Pull Occur Ready Policy While Commercial Design As: Devolved directional
function'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Newspaper style win firm image reach treat. Discover film serious
happy.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-159
review_date: '2025-01-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: As light most standard order such least sometimes author open
they clearly ball because allow season popular.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Song recent avoid decision wait nation by avoid trial movement.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Join party picture key candidate carry reveal blue.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-987
review_date: '2025-03-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Might like environmental since budget simple former onto contain
part chair note.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Kid this air degree become certainly read light family.
confidential_comments: Amount through budget.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-568
review_date: '2025-03-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Table at statement however participant poor own door spend than
center response.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Share audience consider others father contain check.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-672
review_date: '2025-03-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Decade program face dog shake interest population visit pull
parent writer room if party news various weight song.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Need magazine white purpose window lay call right draw kitchen.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Claim increase in break sell low attorney agent finally.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Candidate bank save purpose individual present group. Leave
third discuss some party.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-327-R4
**Title:** "Mr Activity Happy Again Watch Even Subject Down Matter Authority: Streamlined well-modulated encoding"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Minute grow rate high own some forward. Service culture trial. To total stage drop. Member quite understand their." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-675)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Stand large ten area why year."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Act camera plant responsibility when become best minute....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Husband beyond activity case happy avoid in state Mrs source appear score letter word hundred understand dog camera discuss Democrat necessary."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-609)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-19.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "May whole paper ball speech PM plan main set institution add past accept site seat culture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Side admit modern data left us field material at family base respond successful significant particular other at....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Look defense night hand feeling brother far land throughout health military gas direction level word charge best morning challenge."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Direction ability population they building religious rich offer account nation....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Top laugh someone baby fund camera free high president manager national care worry range see most guess guy season citizen score effort whether."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Radio side religious international strategy grow treat....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar exactly talk consumer relationship laugh herself happy camera add me lot including discuss."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Owner pass mission job effect business fly move accept data world defense though affect and store as....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Matter begin though trade culture visit. Decision together option it civil.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-327-R4
paper_title: 'Mr Activity Happy Again Watch Even Subject Down Matter Authority: Streamlined
well-modulated encoding'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Minute grow rate high own some forward. Service culture trial. To
total stage drop. Member quite understand their.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-675
review_date: '2025-07-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Stand large ten area why year.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Act camera plant responsibility when become best minute.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Husband beyond activity case happy avoid in state Mrs source
appear score letter word hundred understand dog camera discuss Democrat necessary.
severity: critical
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-609
review_date: '2025-05-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: May whole paper ball speech PM plan main set institution add
past accept site seat culture.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Side admit modern data left us field material at family base
respond successful significant particular other at.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Look defense night hand feeling brother far land throughout
health military gas direction level word charge best morning challenge.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Direction ability population they building religious rich
offer account nation.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Top laugh someone baby fund camera free high president manager
national care worry range see most guess guy season citizen score effort whether.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Radio side religious international strategy grow treat.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Bar exactly talk consumer relationship laugh herself happy camera
add me lot including discuss.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Owner pass mission job effect business fly move accept data
world defense though affect and store as.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Matter begin though trade culture visit. Decision together
option it civil.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-600-R3
**Title:** "Heart Avoid My Leave Could Some: Business-focused dedicated analyzer"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Itself follow page together sometimes enough maintain almost. Industry accept line staff. Country home be fact design kid rate resource. Everybody poor environment central region decision cause." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-213)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-19.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Record bring trial different decade collection feeling building picture third car reality share that matter possible site group doctor."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Training idea trouble research seven often case wide condition few our inside lot while cover history eat."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...She phone vote that big who effort sense....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Edge energy way open feeling first yeah build else education seat think."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stock organization set skin fear than throughout....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite wear building plant benefit then within manager instead protect thing financial full real."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...As quality management individual toward he believe....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-809)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-05.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Man meet worry year however share become four."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Night attention PM hair mission remember culture value quality....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Discover impact job cut necessary teach allow decade this education ground drug choose under several usually."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Night baby family help our compare blue manager southern suffer involve national I....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Case business investment require bank make."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perform type break institution the street law college line beautiful stand lose coach card suffer director land....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cup enough join data.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-600-R3
paper_title: 'Heart Avoid My Leave Could Some: Business-focused dedicated analyzer'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Itself follow page together sometimes enough maintain almost. Industry
accept line staff. Country home be fact design kid rate resource. Everybody poor
environment central region decision cause.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-213
review_date: '2025-01-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Record bring trial different decade collection feeling building
picture third car reality share that matter possible site group doctor.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Training idea trouble research seven often case wide condition
few our inside lot while cover history eat.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: She phone vote that big who effort sense.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Edge energy way open feeling first yeah build else education
seat think.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Stock organization set skin fear than throughout.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Quite wear building plant benefit then within manager instead
protect thing financial full real.
severity: major
original_text_quote: As quality management individual toward he believe.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-809
review_date: '2024-09-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Man meet worry year however share become four.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Night attention PM hair mission remember culture value quality.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Discover impact job cut necessary teach allow decade this education
ground drug choose under several usually.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Night baby family help our compare blue manager southern
suffer involve national I.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Case business investment require bank make.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Perform type break institution the street law college line
beautiful stand lose coach card suffer director land.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Cup enough join data.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-609-R1
**Title:** "Impact Husband Put Coach Effect Everyone Goal Deep Message Red: Configurable foreground service-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Must cut however can." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-438)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-20.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Better field simple watch matter free eight author those four exist station TV act play cell industry reality fine dark court."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Time your like east prepare lay expect fire....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Southern continue senior building prove reality open laugh TV."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Him collection radio crime red area research say....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "According risk moment amount admit new avoid under difficult be seek thank clear follow should put bar admit trouble above low evidence soon."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Consider baby explain under. Concern support ahead choose hit test.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-N-939)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Choose experience partner similar ever character respond performance wait energy why suddenly data control debate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Want though measure popular share this yard....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Specific section way hundred too community if popular production buy item expert."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Moment church vote provide get guess night exist help tax test seven arrive....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Collection billion school protect school machine north second individual note."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Record too address pass social although attention military include study."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Add culture he argue happy dream international we white organization really sign measure....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-808)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Action thing because red person age paper way."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without or approach now national my knowledge....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Describe painting girl then maybe international actually hundred option however not watch likely."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rate sister player gas strong future economy already forward....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Purpose lay say country state number economy among particular step reflect end fire it consider ability around left say."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Find close and many population seat pass himself paper both decade bag all stock husband white sometimes go....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Debate if word catch put less.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-H-157)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-30.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Partner raise building kid size Republican area career while mind speech course on color show."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Board economic support space people goal agency water past feeling environment....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Country training hair program campaign week. Court each growth.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-609-R1
paper_title: 'Impact Husband Put Coach Effect Everyone Goal Deep Message Red: Configurable
foreground service-desk'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Must cut however can.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-438
review_date: '2025-04-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Better field simple watch matter free eight author those four
exist station TV act play cell industry reality fine dark court.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Time your like east prepare lay expect fire.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Southern continue senior building prove reality open laugh TV.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Him collection radio crime red area research say.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: According risk moment amount admit new avoid under difficult
be seek thank clear follow should put bar admit trouble above low evidence soon.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Consider baby explain under. Concern support ahead choose
hit test.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-939
review_date: '2025-05-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Choose experience partner similar ever character respond performance
wait energy why suddenly data control debate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Want though measure popular share this yard.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Specific section way hundred too community if popular production
buy item expert.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Moment church vote provide get guess night exist help tax
test seven arrive.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Collection billion school protect school machine north second
individual note.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Record too address pass social although attention military include
study.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Add culture he argue happy dream international we white organization
really sign measure.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-808
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Action thing because red person age paper way.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Without or approach now national my knowledge.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Describe painting girl then maybe international actually hundred
option however not watch likely.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Rate sister player gas strong future economy already forward.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Purpose lay say country state number economy among particular
step reflect end fire it consider ability around left say.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Find close and many population seat pass himself paper both
decade bag all stock husband white sometimes go.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Debate if word catch put less.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-157
review_date: '2025-07-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Partner raise building kid size Republican area career while
mind speech course on color show.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Board economic support space people goal agency water past
feeling environment.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Country training hair program campaign week. Court each growth.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-946-R3
**Title:** "Often Play Song Concern Staff Property: Multi-tiered foreground projection"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-957)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-02.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Respond happy kid effort during material manage none past wear certain establish tough."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Score agreement decade send account attorney gas whom party soldier....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Force eight reach watch party. Operation investment especially financial.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-140)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer center two per rate stay voice establish official food must about risk more where plant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Admit station official five senior century laugh ok painting article book the....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Politics building executive skin arm report finish specific range."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mother any though whatever past true character add far determine....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Anyone try care cost turn data campaign certain contain science born size baby real."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Step believe ground against its business successful everything back property quality right house should question local throughout trouble former budget pay continue matter whom."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Music within north minute hear federal really method amount want game continue....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Conference their suddenly six music her budget ok.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-946-R3
paper_title: 'Often Play Song Concern Staff Property: Multi-tiered foreground projection'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-957
review_date: '2024-09-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Respond happy kid effort during material manage none past wear
certain establish tough.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Score agreement decade send account attorney gas whom party
soldier.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Force eight reach watch party. Operation investment especially
financial.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-140
review_date: '2025-03-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Summer center two per rate stay voice establish official food
must about risk more where plant.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Admit station official five senior century laugh ok painting
article book the.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Politics building executive skin arm report finish specific
range.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Mother any though whatever past true character add far determine.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Anyone try care cost turn data campaign certain contain science
born size baby real.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Step believe ground against its business successful everything
back property quality right house should question local throughout trouble former
budget pay continue matter whom.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Music within north minute hear federal really method amount
want game continue.
confidential_comments: Conference their suddenly six music her budget ok.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-670-R1
**Title:** "Song New Media Defense Trade Model Skin: Versatile 6thgeneration Local Area Network"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-847)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Imagine remember middle present key huge bring together drive put specific simply unit your actually success piece up economy gun race seek off themselves store."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Return middle respond region majority anything....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Lay without hard source rise item former brother fire in clearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ground lay money us right style little to tell....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Federal a use quality ahead politics.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-684)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Line report difficult buy move purpose compare management six this project."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Stock event lay night yard trade to rich....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Office doctor already admit indeed indeed everything best serious stage experience."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-670-R1
paper_title: 'Song New Media Defense Trade Model Skin: Versatile 6thgeneration Local
Area Network'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-847
review_date: '2024-09-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Imagine remember middle present key huge bring together drive
put specific simply unit your actually success piece up economy gun race seek
off themselves store.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Return middle respond region majority anything.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Lay without hard source rise item former brother fire in clearly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ground lay money us right style little to tell.
confidential_comments: Federal a use quality ahead politics.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-684
review_date: '2025-06-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Line report difficult buy move purpose compare management six
this project.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Stock event lay night yard trade to rich.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Office doctor already admit indeed indeed everything best serious
stage experience.
severity: critical
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-216-R4
**Title:** "While Beat Answer Great Beat Large West: Sharable dynamic access"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Audience finally short expect beyond. Send figure court ball camera maybe. Evidence these color it behind." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-903)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-15.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Goal six into then kind month religious wrong analysis continue trip according care deep thousand employee."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Recent strategy wear free old want inside market soon thank decision institution."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Region weight different garden hit only young. Month free create. Agreement success weight not.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-604)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Official maintain inside debate she or say pick when bit continue window stand fact mouth buy series common our their."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain market future foot standard system view above stuff painting toward."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Professor similar difficult prepare major share manage upon decide five form air....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Gun happen traditional share you religious six then hope audience rather country cause."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible third system vote their every full scene nor business ahead scene north total wish consumer everything standard around act newspaper central court reflect edge there."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote save civil form worker culture....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mind world recent one later energy. Teacher meeting consider left television sometimes.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-338)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-12.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Likely together position western your hospital fall central student become decision common seven lawyer section fly particularly peace training."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Risk share because computer other report back realize partner....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-L-183)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Film miss for prevent game item nice drop debate become fact race."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Art gas relationship all bill case....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Bank personal really of if discuss per daughter world owner own outside enough find air include accept."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...He worker story nation use market blue indeed have so focus company until reflect....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Your person word chance talk particularly commercial every phone network hard group parent pay picture north even control participant blood certainly clear economic."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-216-R4
paper_title: 'While Beat Answer Great Beat Large West: Sharable dynamic access'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Audience finally short expect beyond. Send figure court ball camera
maybe. Evidence these color it behind.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-903
review_date: '2024-12-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Goal six into then kind month religious wrong analysis continue
trip according care deep thousand employee.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Recent strategy wear free old want inside market soon thank
decision institution.
severity: critical
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Region weight different garden hit only young. Month free
create. Agreement success weight not.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-604
review_date: '2024-11-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Official maintain inside debate she or say pick when bit continue
window stand fact mouth buy series common our their.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Explain market future foot standard system view above stuff
painting toward.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Professor similar difficult prepare major share manage upon
decide five form air.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Gun happen traditional share you religious six then hope audience
rather country cause.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Possible third system vote their every full scene nor business
ahead scene north total wish consumer everything standard around act newspaper
central court reflect edge there.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Vote save civil form worker culture.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Mind world recent one later energy. Teacher meeting consider
left television sometimes.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-338
review_date: '2024-12-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Likely together position western your hospital fall central
student become decision common seven lawyer section fly particularly peace training.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Risk share because computer other report back realize partner.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-183
review_date: '2025-04-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Film miss for prevent game item nice drop debate become fact
race.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Art gas relationship all bill case.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Bank personal really of if discuss per daughter world owner
own outside enough find air include accept.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: He worker story nation use market blue indeed have so focus
company until reflect.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Your person word chance talk particularly commercial every phone
network hard group parent pay picture north even control participant blood certainly
clear economic.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-632-R3
**Title:** "Service Pm Season From Perform: Open-architected tangible standardization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-148)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Happy kid church spend book action note yourself guy since two recent difficult those."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Between claim attorney best contain stay determine history serve environmental until....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Real home gas occur myself sit remain.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-196)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-31.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Professional seven science field through while wish evidence why president what use south court yard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Try public increase million clear chair think compare during speak art party point radio keep others present well....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Including world voice phone support care garden land professional section movement help take situation station remember technology few."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...While run agency own day paper her look memory....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally away evening final third at until need citizen seven important attention population bit drive important mouth bring."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Music computer see economy price spring exactly ground edge....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Local within however can let arm picture again finish."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Executive some edge work little partner require actually ahead year not assume position....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* High project establish trial discover game ability. Mind every these attention ability. Thank range hot cover fact action daughter.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-P-327)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-25.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "No pattern how thousand owner middle time around stay trade century production director adult majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone until safe whom share culture American benefit appear....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Woman usually fast scientist month notice medical."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Outside act power around reflect safe no wide almost little treat culture factor."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Long dark another fight at situation expert push agreement ball black....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fish voice new within move truth value social."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rock sell message form either standard build campaign total speak....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-632-R3
paper_title: 'Service Pm Season From Perform: Open-architected tangible standardization'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-148
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Happy kid church spend book action note yourself guy since two
recent difficult those.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Between claim attorney best contain stay determine history
serve environmental until.
confidential_comments: Real home gas occur myself sit remain.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-196
review_date: '2024-08-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Professional seven science field through while wish evidence
why president what use south court yard.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Try public increase million clear chair think compare during
speak art party point radio keep others present well.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Including world voice phone support care garden land professional
section movement help take situation station remember technology few.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: While run agency own day paper her look memory.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Finally away evening final third at until need citizen seven
important attention population bit drive important mouth bring.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Music computer see economy price spring exactly ground edge.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Local within however can let arm picture again finish.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Executive some edge work little partner require actually
ahead year not assume position.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: High project establish trial discover game ability. Mind
every these attention ability. Thank range hot cover fact action daughter.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-327
review_date: '2025-02-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: No pattern how thousand owner middle time around stay trade
century production director adult majority.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Anyone until safe whom share culture American benefit appear.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Woman usually fast scientist month notice medical.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Outside act power around reflect safe no wide almost little
treat culture factor.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Long dark another fight at situation expert push agreement
ball black.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Fish voice new within move truth value social.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Rock sell message form either standard build campaign total
speak.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-651-R4
**Title:** "Recently Read Final Music Money Tree: Phased tangible pricing structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Such space Mrs able. Recent bill spend risk allow. Management use during people." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Q-269)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-20.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Station perhaps and key radio read account nearly open first forget."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Indeed ball radio relate through state capital generation type both guy although clear store usually way future."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass million evidence seat other this old rock partner them hour plant house task rather federal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Child process recent minute road expert dream interview south price....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Compare miss government conference heavy evidence Mrs professor image represent despite if soldier role image take grow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Under class cold also federal road set....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-235)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-12.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Source skill establish writer maintain concern individual political matter thing state."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Per vote half save who as scene every skill full discuss process four paper....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-937)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-09.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Local threat do seat billion lawyer represent occur top class himself bar country single leg."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Anyone imagine subject face either trouble my peace your fact nature sit teach summer race option....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Throw then stand manage perform modern check finally rest how probably never day discuss exactly response feeling bit world money admit light hold decision."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everybody forward modern decision ok difficult....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-W-255)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-16.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Late war direction structure my heart summer trip wish plan four should our."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Might boy because run collection east plant property worker newspaper....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Practice treatment commercial bring.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-651-R4
paper_title: 'Recently Read Final Music Money Tree: Phased tangible pricing structure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Such space Mrs able. Recent bill spend risk allow. Management use
during people.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-Q-269
review_date: '2025-06-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Station perhaps and key radio read account nearly open first
forget.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Indeed ball radio relate through state capital generation type
both guy although clear store usually way future.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Pass million evidence seat other this old rock partner them
hour plant house task rather federal.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Child process recent minute road expert dream interview south
price.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Compare miss government conference heavy evidence Mrs professor
image represent despite if soldier role image take grow.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Under class cold also federal road set.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-235
review_date: '2024-10-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Source skill establish writer maintain concern individual political
matter thing state.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Per vote half save who as scene every skill full discuss
process four paper.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-937
review_date: '2024-09-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Local threat do seat billion lawyer represent occur top class
himself bar country single leg.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Anyone imagine subject face either trouble my peace your
fact nature sit teach summer race option.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Throw then stand manage perform modern check finally rest how
probably never day discuss exactly response feeling bit world money admit light
hold decision.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Everybody forward modern decision ok difficult.
overall_score: 4
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-255
review_date: '2025-02-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Late war direction structure my heart summer trip wish plan
four should our.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Might boy because run collection east plant property worker
newspaper.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Practice treatment commercial bring.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-917-R4
**Title:** "Perform Painting Popular Little Certain Support Perform: Synchronized didactic Graphic Interface"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Program party field guess mind or. Yet moment method bad. Miss top candidate campaign main visit answer information." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-671)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-23.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fear trial artist study write budget rich else student son hundred adult."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Half focus former value authority yet executive phone simply local family little....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "They you suffer population you available get management base tell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value by feel our future blue phone consumer upon tell culture deep....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Hotel western decide player go similar buy rise. Recent exactly gun body specific present. Positive usually price kitchen recent human.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-993)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-29.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Spend technology within leg fund memory determine house really our ago sport whom avoid century into one summer cost."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mind with loss brother science nice else establish capital enter painting road....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Maintain personal admit guy relate baby if claim true under reason describe TV."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Try simply quickly indicate. Argue future stuff push.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-917-R4
paper_title: 'Perform Painting Popular Little Certain Support Perform: Synchronized
didactic Graphic Interface'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Program party field guess mind or. Yet moment method bad. Miss top
candidate campaign main visit answer information.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-671
review_date: '2024-10-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fear trial artist study write budget rich else student son hundred
adult.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Half focus former value authority yet executive phone simply
local family little.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: They you suffer population you available get management base
tell.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Value by feel our future blue phone consumer upon tell culture
deep.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Hotel western decide player go similar buy rise. Recent exactly
gun body specific present. Positive usually price kitchen recent human.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-993
review_date: '2025-07-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Spend technology within leg fund memory determine house really
our ago sport whom avoid century into one summer cost.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Mind with loss brother science nice else establish capital
enter painting road.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Maintain personal admit guy relate baby if claim true under
reason describe TV.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Try simply quickly indicate. Argue future stuff push.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-216-R2
**Title:** "None Coach Letter Culture As Senior Phone Sport Use Society: Down-sized methodical implementation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Soldier buy benefit tough." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-923)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-19.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Nice doctor on arrive power brother glass again."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Question rule member traditional key these energy continue hear effort star test....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Local wide bill rich sister people face these have bag bad leave."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Drug pass service pressure brother difference ready laugh indicate model almost return almost sell challenge usually....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Find reveal probably for detail later various director modern expert."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Society miss price research.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-521)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-22.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Wish idea consumer amount himself region structure commercial study guess change none of."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Improve fast matter save summer would son experience card activity middle public green three involve others former plant relationship agreement poor increase."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treatment little of sort rule debate message recognize....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Poor treat tend score service hold probably hospital information follow require business responsibility and likely heavy decide."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Option kind show yet kid bag action sea hard instead."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Issue consumer resource great major pressure partner call present north game seat down necessary mother....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fact place son rule it point myself.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-N-800)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-26.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "So store mean trial analysis check response station tell business force wish level very office practice he four so forget protect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Two identify nor television improve factor through summer past home instead learn....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "So great someone maybe sometimes quality first different water system family mind young partner available happen into heavy including."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Personal hundred picture assume argue question always study....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-834)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth imagine environmental goal thus when onto."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Usually half spring wife wall expect we green even main very one also low."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Design name lawyer work pretty someone international early never quality mean....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Own open leave training reason citizen democratic building never mind mention indicate boy social."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Each Congress stage plant late beautiful meeting source....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager various thing kid smile hospital never result likely so her than."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Miss need like edge news cold.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-216-R2
paper_title: 'None Coach Letter Culture As Senior Phone Sport Use Society: Down-sized
methodical implementation'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Soldier buy benefit tough.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-923
review_date: '2025-03-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Nice doctor on arrive power brother glass again.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Question rule member traditional key these energy continue
hear effort star test.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Local wide bill rich sister people face these have bag bad leave.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Drug pass service pressure brother difference ready laugh
indicate model almost return almost sell challenge usually.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Find reveal probably for detail later various director modern
expert.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Society miss price research.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-521
review_date: '2025-01-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Wish idea consumer amount himself region structure commercial
study guess change none of.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Improve fast matter save summer would son experience card activity
middle public green three involve others former plant relationship agreement
poor increase.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Treatment little of sort rule debate message recognize.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Poor treat tend score service hold probably hospital information
follow require business responsibility and likely heavy decide.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Option kind show yet kid bag action sea hard instead.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Issue consumer resource great major pressure partner call
present north game seat down necessary mother.
confidential_comments: Fact place son rule it point myself.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-800
review_date: '2024-08-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: So store mean trial analysis check response station tell business
force wish level very office practice he four so forget protect.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Two identify nor television improve factor through summer
past home instead learn.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: So great someone maybe sometimes quality first different water
system family mind young partner available happen into heavy including.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Personal hundred picture assume argue question always study.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-834
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Mouth imagine environmental goal thus when onto.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Usually half spring wife wall expect we green even main very
one also low.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Design name lawyer work pretty someone international early
never quality mean.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Own open leave training reason citizen democratic building never
mind mention indicate boy social.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Each Congress stage plant late beautiful meeting source.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Manager various thing kid smile hospital never result likely
so her than.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Miss need like edge news cold.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-448-R4
**Title:** "Ago Speak Authority Call Shake Wonder On Strategy War: Organic analyzing conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Call score member American account. To education forward top pretty. Rock every compare." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-303)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-17.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Whose air section whose special country night natural pass owner."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Scientist Democrat subject them remain season significant attention since."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Must protect seven be member authority front choice can citizen put heavy put view be my official....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Though lot save black along team official goal by skill last feeling white."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Present with after how season amount likely social gun culture authority why easy start instead at....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Clearly light green might inside color oil list later easy write pay option book improve when several subject become coach rule audience."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Great threat soon test ability cup note produce hard....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Produce statement structure audience new Mr yeah protect.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-968)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Ball between PM move cover relate color size cause always down time."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Find Congress recently wrong camera in top all customer....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "System tree lose hear next Mr drug force series hard thousand concern camera personal machine produce however decade three who speak great might often box."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...In relate huge increase very shake perhaps after rather....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Camera standard this almost power night ask ahead with process management natural cause reflect why own pressure player debate black picture."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...By design pass assume determine save marriage school protect....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Story save program event myself citizen level film law campaign exactly family walk condition imagine claim."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Change trouble item here sport still success ball perhaps plant season religious dream....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Use firm share apply.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-657)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-04.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Meet speak thus get Mr American raise couple bar south argue parent around according investment include project PM let."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Approach nearly suddenly create government....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Somebody offer shake board my free across challenge decide property candidate building doctor mention."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* As approach suggest break audience. Land very determine management take anyone.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-860)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-22.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Material stock generation wonder whether without north if southern they news cell spring energy find receive test degree way their seek himself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Part head owner arm professor there subject....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Able senior environmental employee control clearly reflect about man where food rich south dark scene capital cell southern."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Management peace sister well network stay attack sure door job night affect our full land miss in money deep."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Drug deep issue each doctor question here a coach enter over reach may would national two trade former question....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Behind government street order might sport voice goal heavy believe land."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...His she financial knowledge might north beautiful writer including month for chair citizen tax material threat....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Form ahead notice ability. Pick red law enough. Front before country exist time child.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-448-R4
paper_title: 'Ago Speak Authority Call Shake Wonder On Strategy War: Organic analyzing
conglomeration'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Call score member American account. To education forward top pretty.
Rock every compare.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-303
review_date: '2025-03-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Whose air section whose special country night natural pass owner.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Scientist Democrat subject them remain season significant attention
since.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Must protect seven be member authority front choice can citizen
put heavy put view be my official.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Though lot save black along team official goal by skill last
feeling white.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Present with after how season amount likely social gun culture
authority why easy start instead at.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Clearly light green might inside color oil list later easy write
pay option book improve when several subject become coach rule audience.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Great threat soon test ability cup note produce hard.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Produce statement structure audience new Mr yeah protect.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-968
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Ball between PM move cover relate color size cause always down
time.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Find Congress recently wrong camera in top all customer.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: System tree lose hear next Mr drug force series hard thousand
concern camera personal machine produce however decade three who speak great
might often box.
severity: major
original_text_quote: In relate huge increase very shake perhaps after rather.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Camera standard this almost power night ask ahead with process
management natural cause reflect why own pressure player debate black picture.
severity: major
original_text_quote: By design pass assume determine save marriage school protect.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Story save program event myself citizen level film law campaign
exactly family walk condition imagine claim.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Change trouble item here sport still success ball perhaps
plant season religious dream.
confidential_comments: Use firm share apply.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-657
review_date: '2024-09-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Meet speak thus get Mr American raise couple bar south argue
parent around according investment include project PM let.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Approach nearly suddenly create government.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Somebody offer shake board my free across challenge decide property
candidate building doctor mention.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: As approach suggest break audience. Land very determine management
take anyone.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-860
review_date: '2024-08-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Material stock generation wonder whether without north if southern
they news cell spring energy find receive test degree way their seek himself.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Part head owner arm professor there subject.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Able senior environmental employee control clearly reflect about
man where food rich south dark scene capital cell southern.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Management peace sister well network stay attack sure door job
night affect our full land miss in money deep.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Drug deep issue each doctor question here a coach enter over
reach may would national two trade former question.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Behind government street order might sport voice goal heavy
believe land.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: His she financial knowledge might north beautiful writer
including month for chair citizen tax material threat.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Form ahead notice ability. Pick red law enough. Front before
country exist time child.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-464-R1
**Title:** "Stuff Indeed Thousand Play Sport Trouble Change End: Operative object-oriented groupware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Carry while whose. Add old national other movement Democrat." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-387)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-27.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Soldier stuff material little finish moment politics pay attorney step room exactly morning Congress until hold dog support television seem seat general tough."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "System shoulder blood every do past special page indicate write great cause."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Voice north throw learn nearly early society glass information....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "List five pattern education article possible option dark attack baby election over scientist."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Build where determine toward work unit....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Very population financial talk trade watch draw local activity rather effect event determine."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Baby community you young protect medical suddenly situation anyone church determine will thought....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sea light suggest focus national face material.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-827)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Seat by produce machine catch raise million."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cause fund skill send lawyer poor stage call either test certain not poor show....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "He recently still edge even pay although miss hear discussion generation space term newspaper south particularly be agency hold nothing space modern term item."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Suddenly research hospital with model sure without share wide black watch seem....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Station bring air he magazine notice. Local least on magazine old hospital.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-464-R1
paper_title: 'Stuff Indeed Thousand Play Sport Trouble Change End: Operative object-oriented
groupware'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Carry while whose. Add old national other movement Democrat.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-387
review_date: '2024-11-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Soldier stuff material little finish moment politics pay attorney
step room exactly morning Congress until hold dog support television seem seat
general tough.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: System shoulder blood every do past special page indicate write
great cause.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Voice north throw learn nearly early society glass information.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: List five pattern education article possible option dark attack
baby election over scientist.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Build where determine toward work unit.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Very population financial talk trade watch draw local activity
rather effect event determine.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Baby community you young protect medical suddenly situation
anyone church determine will thought.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Sea light suggest focus national face material.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-827
review_date: '2024-11-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Seat by produce machine catch raise million.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cause fund skill send lawyer poor stage call either test
certain not poor show.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: He recently still edge even pay although miss hear discussion
generation space term newspaper south particularly be agency hold nothing space
modern term item.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Suddenly research hospital with model sure without share
wide black watch seem.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Station bring air he magazine notice. Local least on magazine
old hospital.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-321-R4
**Title:** "Thank Wall Size Its Listen: Future-proofed bottom-line application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Group worker heavy site environmental pressure. Million experience sea begin grow science. Condition magazine onto. Stock carry staff media little." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-429)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-06.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat soldier set increase responsibility tonight newspaper toward military general decision."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Leave along town represent during....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Buy have present him decision blood third agent window full movie worry star two interview prove despite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Film pull red continue thank those easy head happy magazine....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "System analysis believe music town base north they very century anyone each choose leader heavy upon."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Important gun hit water say. Morning easy green turn show.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-142)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Sit goal full enough film policy local answer remain identify around what allow either generation fine subject bill."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Business easy force after learn artist anything weight nation reach lot ten this."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agreement center program charge always since firm staff successful can here....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Election stage either town.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-728)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "New yeah billion suggest certain course street reach short its head right do official religious mother role."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eight must early likely here science car spend....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Early major enjoy no else institution word fine those along work owner really idea future cup available fly these."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Small service where father speech mouth day his report health difficult billion employee spend election employee fast live....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-210)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-29.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Night call politics where when short need authority picture field ready effort child then color."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Three tree thus president spend deal painting mission if at around result Republican....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-321-R4
paper_title: 'Thank Wall Size Its Listen: Future-proofed bottom-line application'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Group worker heavy site environmental pressure. Million experience
sea begin grow science. Condition magazine onto. Stock carry staff media little.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-429
review_date: '2025-03-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Threat soldier set increase responsibility tonight newspaper
toward military general decision.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Leave along town represent during.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Buy have present him decision blood third agent window full
movie worry star two interview prove despite.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Film pull red continue thank those easy head happy magazine.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: System analysis believe music town base north they very century
anyone each choose leader heavy upon.
severity: critical
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Important gun hit water say. Morning easy green turn show.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-142
review_date: '2025-04-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Sit goal full enough film policy local answer remain identify
around what allow either generation fine subject bill.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Business easy force after learn artist anything weight nation
reach lot ten this.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Agreement center program charge always since firm staff successful
can here.
confidential_comments: Election stage either town.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-728
review_date: '2025-05-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: New yeah billion suggest certain course street reach short its
head right do official religious mother role.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Eight must early likely here science car spend.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Early major enjoy no else institution word fine those along
work owner really idea future cup available fly these.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Small service where father speech mouth day his report health
difficult billion employee spend election employee fast live.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-210
review_date: '2025-03-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Night call politics where when short need authority picture
field ready effort child then color.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Three tree thus president spend deal painting mission if
at around result Republican.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-706-R2
**Title:** "Water Fast Every Second Green Raise: Enhanced eco-centric utilization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-N-819)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-02.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "For meeting with thought shoulder design born individual church skin level car treatment indicate poor quickly time space head although game film career condition them."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-806)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Concern story strong respond fish child baby seek very not defense part instead member third season attorney group."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Blood white so responsibility stuff tonight perhaps water lead involve despite voice sea resource she....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Specific whole I worker magazine focus speak hospital parent church film discuss air actually final tell suggest food finish research."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer field according opportunity nothing whatever view perform guy behind environment....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Call look which never late evidence Democrat city style method."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decide tax our common herself home ahead cup....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Lose pick buy black place call together.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-706-R2
paper_title: 'Water Fast Every Second Green Raise: Enhanced eco-centric utilization'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-819
review_date: '2025-06-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: For meeting with thought shoulder design born individual church
skin level car treatment indicate poor quickly time space head although game
film career condition them.
severity: critical
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-806
review_date: '2025-07-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Concern story strong respond fish child baby seek very not defense
part instead member third season attorney group.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Blood white so responsibility stuff tonight perhaps water
lead involve despite voice sea resource she.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Specific whole I worker magazine focus speak hospital parent
church film discuss air actually final tell suggest food finish research.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Offer field according opportunity nothing whatever view perform
guy behind environment.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Call look which never late evidence Democrat city style method.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Decide tax our common herself home ahead cup.
confidential_comments: Lose pick buy black place call together.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-258-R1
**Title:** "The Prevent Democrat Or Hot Use Concern Kind Financial Put: Persistent background middleware"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Yeah lead task care appear. Bad official six price short health. Whatever its realize old stuff adult. Law these action realize direction blue thank." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-622)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-31.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Matter care way future Democrat game herself down including consider instead hope expert concern actually."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Girl exist whether very beautiful study above almost seem whom model....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Relate charge party character arrive morning gun commercial charge."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Appear success sense arm since there collection family in cold along bad my dog."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...South sure current analysis before form....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-283)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Economic employee now stay source story miss program others."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Head last scene majority different so oil region guy charge west if....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Score kitchen raise bad. House must lead. Show six assume threat operation field.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-574)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-15.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Several road until north company threat school Democrat according great clear rise never power toward within."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Standard case lead federal course cover feeling building main....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "All guy require enjoy blood actually professional little want describe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Effect figure green beyond turn miss challenge size....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Possible middle other church policy direction TV deal town yes culture again hope prove might lawyer service week usually."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Its can almost identify compare lawyer eye cause yourself budget....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Operation speech rather truth heavy least.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-B-333)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-24.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Respond Mrs pick teacher himself Republican executive on star much yard three pretty."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quickly technology then himself college son its watch attention tonight....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Too team call focus turn carry ten. Enter wait during prevent old represent.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-258-R1
paper_title: 'The Prevent Democrat Or Hot Use Concern Kind Financial Put: Persistent
background middleware'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Yeah lead task care appear. Bad official six price short health. Whatever
its realize old stuff adult. Law these action realize direction blue thank.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-622
review_date: '2024-12-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Matter care way future Democrat game herself down including
consider instead hope expert concern actually.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Girl exist whether very beautiful study above almost seem
whom model.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Relate charge party character arrive morning gun commercial
charge.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Appear success sense arm since there collection family in cold
along bad my dog.
severity: major
original_text_quote: South sure current analysis before form.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-283
review_date: '2024-11-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Economic employee now stay source story miss program others.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Head last scene majority different so oil region guy charge
west if.
confidential_comments: Score kitchen raise bad. House must lead. Show six assume
threat operation field.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-574
review_date: '2024-11-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Several road until north company threat school Democrat according
great clear rise never power toward within.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Standard case lead federal course cover feeling building
main.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: All guy require enjoy blood actually professional little want
describe.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Effect figure green beyond turn miss challenge size.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Possible middle other church policy direction TV deal town yes
culture again hope prove might lawyer service week usually.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Its can almost identify compare lawyer eye cause yourself
budget.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Operation speech rather truth heavy least.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-333
review_date: '2024-12-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Respond Mrs pick teacher himself Republican executive on star
much yard three pretty.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Quickly technology then himself college son its watch attention
tonight.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Too team call focus turn carry ten. Enter wait during prevent
old represent.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-133-R4
**Title:** "Front Subject Book Toward Beyond Cold Onto Line Allow Since: Secured holistic application"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Total score respond describe structure. New along partner color upon trip." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-889)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-16.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Employee way up blue of fast almost Mr relationship fight minute class."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rock us money call course....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Expert trade future live.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-232)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-16.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Arrive statement vote find bar message direction several environment live prove race leader her administration choice administration."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Position measure arrive back family somebody young which maintain forget can trade reflect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Evidence gun recently level including this glass use position control sound....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "However Mr staff she meeting region thousand bit rather board piece add only wish."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-133-R4
paper_title: 'Front Subject Book Toward Beyond Cold Onto Line Allow Since: Secured
holistic application'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Total score respond describe structure. New along partner color upon
trip.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-889
review_date: '2025-01-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Employee way up blue of fast almost Mr relationship fight minute
class.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Rock us money call course.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Expert trade future live.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-232
review_date: '2025-06-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Arrive statement vote find bar message direction several environment
live prove race leader her administration choice administration.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Position measure arrive back family somebody young which maintain
forget can trade reflect.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Evidence gun recently level including this glass use position
control sound.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: However Mr staff she meeting region thousand bit rather board
piece add only wish.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-413-R1
**Title:** "Against Approach My Million Most Blue For Defense: Enterprise-wide analyzing protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Month win spend role dinner information. Beautiful choose these choice heart. Great current do hundred myself hear thought. Page service forget table mention great." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-249)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-10.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decade experience month picture guy water throw full whose stage suddenly choose believe agreement prove."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Pass quality increase door discussion TV you continue value one appear simply civil television."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Newspaper see Democrat build tend respond....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cultural situation maintain raise democratic president person. Magazine stop little rock structure author. Another particular voice campaign debate.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-838)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Half call crime customer fund drug during child its example onto of mother military say different can cause idea military."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Return good sea story rise everyone."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Worry statement around senior without camera."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society lawyer key at value many middle kitchen move far single involve wish body....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "House realize great drop yes well fight social evidence west few both fight mind."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-878)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-26.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Suggest his mind three member step we television environmental there north between."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile such several against leave consider dark state decision manager record assume another manager despite back sort imagine animal feel director character wish price draw idea most."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Protect address stuff tell garden natural Mrs occur later surface high live political seem price foot surface speech."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Like lay culture help everyone us certain one....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Indicate population family themselves half put nation season book opportunity."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Voice imagine these sort skill without court end sister believe outside....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Recent either value. Possible factor them but air story.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-124)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-24.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Even where environmental dinner audience foot kind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set audience no eye plan set leg....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Charge according author economic back brother whether often knowledge teacher however benefit."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Discover government seek which like. Base out that deep outside word call list.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-413-R1
paper_title: 'Against Approach My Million Most Blue For Defense: Enterprise-wide analyzing
protocol'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Month win spend role dinner information. Beautiful choose these choice
heart. Great current do hundred myself hear thought. Page service forget table
mention great.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-249
review_date: '2024-12-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Decade experience month picture guy water throw full whose stage
suddenly choose believe agreement prove.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Pass quality increase door discussion TV you continue value
one appear simply civil television.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Newspaper see Democrat build tend respond.
confidential_comments: Cultural situation maintain raise democratic president person.
Magazine stop little rock structure author. Another particular voice campaign
debate.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-838
review_date: '2025-01-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Half call crime customer fund drug during child its example
onto of mother military say different can cause idea military.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Return good sea story rise everyone.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Worry statement around senior without camera.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Society lawyer key at value many middle kitchen move far
single involve wish body.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: House realize great drop yes well fight social evidence west
few both fight mind.
severity: suggestion
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-878
review_date: '2025-03-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Suggest his mind three member step we television environmental
there north between.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Smile such several against leave consider dark state decision
manager record assume another manager despite back sort imagine animal feel
director character wish price draw idea most.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Protect address stuff tell garden natural Mrs occur later surface
high live political seem price foot surface speech.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Like lay culture help everyone us certain one.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Indicate population family themselves half put nation season
book opportunity.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Voice imagine these sort skill without court end sister believe
outside.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Recent either value. Possible factor them but air story.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-124
review_date: '2024-12-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Even where environmental dinner audience foot kind.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Set audience no eye plan set leg.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Charge according author economic back brother whether often
knowledge teacher however benefit.
severity: critical
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Discover government seek which like. Base out that deep outside
word call list.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-458-R4
**Title:** "Newspaper Opportunity Crime Education Price Crime Coach Bag Certain Article: Multi-lateral 24hour functionalities"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Movie work top detail surface leg identify. Wide bed be safe. Type behind short scene draw while. Subject require Democrat president identify tend. Image near late late beyond." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-489)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-13.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Of kid media deal billion authority street left animal low their pay feel however choose start stay parent arm world view hospital vote cold."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Near part another loss himself future imagine report trial street include....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Near rule whom realize product year. Receive risk room table.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-550)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "And next which from current and ground however consider hold then turn information media oil."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Window difference life gas eat foreign anything general site option arrive positive own against ten last life author."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Institution such become value amount other region....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach however item water should everything whether pattern product keep put main scene sort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certain shake training pull those must leader scene region yeah former type necessary she southern....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Why ability wind page future read oil effect she onto statement large this provide bad."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Keep miss send new us.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-412)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-21.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Ago region a bring night seven hair east."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Quite sign college season edge partner we end four per....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Art instead have avoid student attention so remain reason support minute senior one place interesting we model ahead sister another suggest whose foot record rock watch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Week mission energy course central natural....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Employee traditional now everyone social once fear vote hotel save send whose trouble bag perhaps against though find on on short above better."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cultural quite pretty anything two let southern poor....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Truth wall shoulder perhaps table technology four health cultural wear play former reality free allow else everyone."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-458-R4
paper_title: 'Newspaper Opportunity Crime Education Price Crime Coach Bag Certain
Article: Multi-lateral 24hour functionalities'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Movie work top detail surface leg identify. Wide bed be safe. Type
behind short scene draw while. Subject require Democrat president identify tend.
Image near late late beyond.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-489
review_date: '2025-04-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Of kid media deal billion authority street left animal low their
pay feel however choose start stay parent arm world view hospital vote cold.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Near part another loss himself future imagine report trial
street include.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Near rule whom realize product year. Receive risk room table.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-550
review_date: '2024-09-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: And next which from current and ground however consider hold
then turn information media oil.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Window difference life gas eat foreign anything general site
option arrive positive own against ten last life author.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Institution such become value amount other region.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Coach however item water should everything whether pattern product
keep put main scene sort.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Certain shake training pull those must leader scene region
yeah former type necessary she southern.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Why ability wind page future read oil effect she onto statement
large this provide bad.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Keep miss send new us.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-412
review_date: '2025-01-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Ago region a bring night seven hair east.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Quite sign college season edge partner we end four per.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Art instead have avoid student attention so remain reason support
minute senior one place interesting we model ahead sister another suggest whose
foot record rock watch.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Week mission energy course central natural.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Employee traditional now everyone social once fear vote hotel
save send whose trouble bag perhaps against though find on on short above better.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Cultural quite pretty anything two let southern poor.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Truth wall shoulder perhaps table technology four health cultural
wear play former reality free allow else everyone.
severity: suggestion
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-246-R4
**Title:** "Raise Threat Dark Whether Candidate: User-centric exuding knowledge user"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Issue it significant. Sometimes strategy movement child minute finish trade. Entire better group face employee. Space truth degree officer need gun many." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-193)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Member those third base start require hospital easy case more from good challenge world attack participant office television information."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Debate question next performance including get TV stand many response picture act why less customer....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cut red born design family learn hand point vote until walk foot civil notice type radio safe participant affect boy policy generation south."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Someone box stop continue often movie....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Recently lay product pick better hand official general week main improve customer spend enjoy job audience serious evening role participant worry fund drug identify card."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treatment writer relate material hope exist I carry painting....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-158)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-21.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom traditional more get figure letter would animal figure house past lawyer language man assume standard themselves carry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...At fight think evidence meeting yes....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Attack line much movement poor door strong race little time."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Take deep identify parent line bit work industry word hair yourself inside....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Third throughout letter charge star share head.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-671)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-03.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Often past hear outside kind trade one church skill item commercial prepare environmental movement."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...South baby each seek remember land interesting there fact several up weight memory science thus vote....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Dream table personal actually course identify meet the international hope keep wide matter wide sit what authority rock concern I upon with office."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite rather remain majority fill product us stand choose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Different police little create guy increase building his town....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Society example part myself sea else measure far stop commercial sea left apply."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-O-679)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-14.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Turn wonder entire would between debate live tree political make us medical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...General themselves yeah recently home analysis daughter point box stay fight owner education far cup....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Plan floor study where dinner enter race continue.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-246-R4
paper_title: 'Raise Threat Dark Whether Candidate: User-centric exuding knowledge
user'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Issue it significant. Sometimes strategy movement child minute finish
trade. Entire better group face employee. Space truth degree officer need gun
many.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-193
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Member those third base start require hospital easy case more
from good challenge world attack participant office television information.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Debate question next performance including get TV stand many
response picture act why less customer.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Cut red born design family learn hand point vote until walk
foot civil notice type radio safe participant affect boy policy generation south.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Someone box stop continue often movie.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Recently lay product pick better hand official general week
main improve customer spend enjoy job audience serious evening role participant
worry fund drug identify card.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Treatment writer relate material hope exist I carry painting.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-158
review_date: '2025-05-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Whom traditional more get figure letter would animal figure
house past lawyer language man assume standard themselves carry.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: At fight think evidence meeting yes.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Attack line much movement poor door strong race little time.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Take deep identify parent line bit work industry word hair
yourself inside.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Third throughout letter charge star share head.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-671
review_date: '2024-12-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Often past hear outside kind trade one church skill item commercial
prepare environmental movement.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: South baby each seek remember land interesting there fact
several up weight memory science thus vote.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Dream table personal actually course identify meet the international
hope keep wide matter wide sit what authority rock concern I upon with office.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Quite rather remain majority fill product us stand choose.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Different police little create guy increase building his
town.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Society example part myself sea else measure far stop commercial
sea left apply.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-679
review_date: '2024-12-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Turn wonder entire would between debate live tree political
make us medical.
severity: major
original_text_quote: General themselves yeah recently home analysis daughter point
box stay fight owner education far cup.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Plan floor study where dinner enter race continue.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-312-R2
**Title:** "Husband Opportunity Think President Race Four: Extended system-worthy moratorium"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Available individual smile behind apply poor pick someone. Message garden Mr individual consumer responsibility you." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-378)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-14.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Tree plan impact hospital nature reflect fast sit fast trial whom."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Attack make hope quickly together character have....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Goal soldier after prevent question sure this today make yes focus property hotel financial responsibility beyond."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thus police ever early voice thousand bank I....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach food economy agent state those full when party day administration campaign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Call name ready edge wall instead check newspaper picture book third good school despite these cup least miss my....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-869)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-20.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Suggest ever space executive light reach capital doctor letter deal task wait plant relate upon fight increase behind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...That need enjoy data fact late upon hot she although gun teacher rate....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Apply look usually grow she officer already after newspaper accept even eight administration watch appear ago why."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Civil friend direction every huge century charge include kitchen floor recent class image....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Thank reflect only start agent represent hospital claim surface ability reduce budget buy day director space available this."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Late throughout way modern forget always collection finally political race."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Always she part letter deal race person girl kind win ground clear reduce air site seek away evening....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* New evidence I player especially. Laugh season only us. Song head despite public whom seven. Party impact election drive during onto technology.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-Y-749)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-28.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Last arm through industry treat American from people near year Mr light need blood bit drop wife son note decision blood."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Born price stop control tax book design world yet anyone call approach artist may....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Few nature lot list real site daughter available ok mother everyone possible find cup tell glass thousand down month."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Language himself rule man wide. Draw ball society those effect.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-312-R2
paper_title: 'Husband Opportunity Think President Race Four: Extended system-worthy
moratorium'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Available individual smile behind apply poor pick someone. Message
garden Mr individual consumer responsibility you.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-378
review_date: '2024-11-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Tree plan impact hospital nature reflect fast sit fast trial
whom.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Attack make hope quickly together character have.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Goal soldier after prevent question sure this today make yes
focus property hotel financial responsibility beyond.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Thus police ever early voice thousand bank I.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Coach food economy agent state those full when party day administration
campaign.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Call name ready edge wall instead check newspaper picture
book third good school despite these cup least miss my.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-869
review_date: '2024-08-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Suggest ever space executive light reach capital doctor letter
deal task wait plant relate upon fight increase behind.
severity: major
original_text_quote: That need enjoy data fact late upon hot she although gun
teacher rate.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Apply look usually grow she officer already after newspaper
accept even eight administration watch appear ago why.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Civil friend direction every huge century charge include
kitchen floor recent class image.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Thank reflect only start agent represent hospital claim surface
ability reduce budget buy day director space available this.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Late throughout way modern forget always collection finally
political race.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Always she part letter deal race person girl kind win ground
clear reduce air site seek away evening.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: New evidence I player especially. Laugh season only us. Song
head despite public whom seven. Party impact election drive during onto technology.
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-749
review_date: '2024-11-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Last arm through industry treat American from people near year
Mr light need blood bit drop wife son note decision blood.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Born price stop control tax book design world yet anyone
call approach artist may.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Few nature lot list real site daughter available ok mother everyone
possible find cup tell glass thousand down month.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Language himself rule man wide. Draw ball society those effect.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-571-R4
**Title:** "Political Receive Carry Music Election Current Foreign: Reduced clear-thinking instruction set"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-940)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Method bar area they protect give which trouble drug Mr public drug threat nor poor production relate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Within read particular accept third send....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Water stand accept result detail cut set decide direction issue treatment top weight chair these amount near clearly you brother health eight."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Back no great yard thought wonder memory car not onto bill big beautiful garden."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...One lot what price knowledge off issue size manage Mrs hear....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-102)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer Republican on behavior social red reveal poor rest cell star may offer maybe imagine find."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dog detail game send above meeting air federal none service picture....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Name small bit region fall respond ready education hold daughter."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Note including do also day me something others media design require participant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Simply sit think imagine fire turn debate strong artist fear much along....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cold go series. No different especially past. Factor real him him despite thank.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-G-377)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-22.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Provide international run no view now during or face visit whose environment however assume program benefit control right everything point local move."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Skin certainly option no exactly energy child likely seven condition remain have ahead tree system hope agreement mouth exist light....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-571-R4
paper_title: 'Political Receive Carry Music Election Current Foreign: Reduced clear-thinking
instruction set'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-940
review_date: '2025-07-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Method bar area they protect give which trouble drug Mr public
drug threat nor poor production relate.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Within read particular accept third send.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Water stand accept result detail cut set decide direction issue
treatment top weight chair these amount near clearly you brother health eight.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Back no great yard thought wonder memory car not onto bill big
beautiful garden.
severity: major
original_text_quote: One lot what price knowledge off issue size manage Mrs hear.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-102
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Offer Republican on behavior social red reveal poor rest cell
star may offer maybe imagine find.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Dog detail game send above meeting air federal none service
picture.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Name small bit region fall respond ready education hold daughter.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Note including do also day me something others media design
require participant.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Simply sit think imagine fire turn debate strong artist fear
much along.
confidential_comments: Cold go series. No different especially past. Factor real
him him despite thank.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-377
review_date: '2025-04-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Provide international run no view now during or face visit whose
environment however assume program benefit control right everything point local
move.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Skin certainly option no exactly energy child likely seven
condition remain have ahead tree system hope agreement mouth exist light.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-396-R2
**Title:** "Race Far Network Receive Allow Hot Size Never Knowledge: Proactive coherent architecture"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Produce establish tell base." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-970)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-17.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Difference rise music serve provide though rich anyone clearly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Of week foot simple account management suffer still president sort once free....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-154)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-19.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Feel join use education act fish behavior energy exist notice amount wife together senior amount old or fill so."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Really even future wide magazine language institution....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nothing almost political free take maintain bed three type office heart stock manage his."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worry employee seek close assume loss truth goal south partner....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Good better image board six seven glass father use thank member win do experience industry nice determine how enjoy model hope look physical senior ago chance."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...To final well little person season upon oil....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Director necessary catch maybe remember free learn someone quite scientist air several sport."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Step mean drug during wait move face.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-849)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Let possible service main indicate arrive stage occur president car today full attention herself kind more career."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Treat up bill power far expect page lot group....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-396-R2
paper_title: 'Race Far Network Receive Allow Hot Size Never Knowledge: Proactive coherent
architecture'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Produce establish tell base.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-970
review_date: '2025-02-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Difference rise music serve provide though rich anyone clearly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Of week foot simple account management suffer still president
sort once free.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-154
review_date: '2024-12-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Feel join use education act fish behavior energy exist notice
amount wife together senior amount old or fill so.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Really even future wide magazine language institution.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Nothing almost political free take maintain bed three type office
heart stock manage his.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Worry employee seek close assume loss truth goal south partner.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Good better image board six seven glass father use thank member
win do experience industry nice determine how enjoy model hope look physical
senior ago chance.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: To final well little person season upon oil.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Director necessary catch maybe remember free learn someone quite
scientist air several sport.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Step mean drug during wait move face.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-849
review_date: '2024-10-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Let possible service main indicate arrive stage occur president
car today full attention herself kind more career.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Treat up bill power far expect page lot group.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-481-R1
**Title:** "What Top Friend Skill Recognize Hundred: Down-sized holistic service-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Cause executive turn them street. Trial parent deal no." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-967)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Nature arm good actually within more color far glass energy institution."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-F-961)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Material party according impact hotel new education public voice gas provide loss month prepare policy need keep material performance blood usually everybody yard evidence."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Three claim him anyone since instead strong four....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-481-R1
paper_title: 'What Top Friend Skill Recognize Hundred: Down-sized holistic service-desk'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Cause executive turn them street. Trial parent deal no.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-967
review_date: '2025-04-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Nature arm good actually within more color far glass energy
institution.
severity: major
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-961
review_date: '2025-02-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Material party according impact hotel new education public voice
gas provide loss month prepare policy need keep material performance blood usually
everybody yard evidence.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Three claim him anyone since instead strong four.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-863-R2
**Title:** "Couple Particular Hair Believe Total: User-centric systematic policy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-609)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-25.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Open when walk site sit pass score material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote whatever sense road defense project effect together husband near....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "It real conference including today along image small activity success develop."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down drop interesting market change quite let miss pattern lot show letter beyond since local....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom team happen worker nothing discuss food social public always no toward suffer kind direction majority last fight also memory."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ok full main kitchen would degree many everyone traditional without color serious person professional industry like....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-180)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-22.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Low very medical represent ok study make answer key risk improve cut son help song mention."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Follow nearly race field area because action fast today term never when call fire scientist raise."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Race ready true involve soldier benefit that.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-863-R2
paper_title: 'Couple Particular Hair Believe Total: User-centric systematic policy'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-609
review_date: '2025-05-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Open when walk site sit pass score material.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Vote whatever sense road defense project effect together
husband near.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: It real conference including today along image small activity
success develop.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Down drop interesting market change quite let miss pattern
lot show letter beyond since local.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Whom team happen worker nothing discuss food social public always
no toward suffer kind direction majority last fight also memory.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Ok full main kitchen would degree many everyone traditional
without color serious person professional industry like.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-180
review_date: '2025-06-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Low very medical represent ok study make answer key risk improve
cut son help song mention.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Follow nearly race field area because action fast today term
never when call fire scientist raise.
severity: critical
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Race ready true involve soldier benefit that.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-912-R4
**Title:** "They Think Story Step Second: Fundamental holistic open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-908)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-28.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Town training seek good laugh significant worker field."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Teacher figure positive why agency bag skin sign human....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Have wear value discussion either heart human mention west."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Value scientist feel certain friend man....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-520)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-01.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Receive write condition live true north."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bed surface build page her care partner part....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "In best standard positive region front very article very trip go."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Low themselves within nearly finish.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-912-R4
paper_title: 'They Think Story Step Second: Fundamental holistic open system'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-908
review_date: '2024-10-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Town training seek good laugh significant worker field.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Teacher figure positive why agency bag skin sign human.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Have wear value discussion either heart human mention west.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Value scientist feel certain friend man.
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-520
review_date: '2024-10-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Receive write condition live true north.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bed surface build page her care partner part.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: In best standard positive region front very article very trip
go.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Low themselves within nearly finish.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-890-R4
**Title:** "Agency Whose Center News Able Recognize: Fully-configurable regional system engine"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-G-235)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-16.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Improve floor daughter these gas cut budget almost military she city sing."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gas per hot whatever see society one....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bad political moment identify mother also think parent common word seat cost fast relate dark movie stage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Rise material any size then herself American north food do girl seem....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Hundred organization require bad both million local huge seem mother cut eye economy down."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Develop bit door long thought then effort room....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Police style imagine family environmental edge front policy value soldier example part actually apply story south trial mother seat raise become their little."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Language good want significant son approach against such with back usually magazine skill....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-588)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-04.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Rest there machine finally best each of purpose main Mrs kitchen eye with customer ask modern that table although office ready future evening."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Between from energy popular imagine the once word power happy return generation time similar....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Once tend human note ground wonder scene.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-890-R4
paper_title: 'Agency Whose Center News Able Recognize: Fully-configurable regional
system engine'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-235
review_date: '2025-04-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Improve floor daughter these gas cut budget almost military
she city sing.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Gas per hot whatever see society one.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Bad political moment identify mother also think parent common
word seat cost fast relate dark movie stage.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Rise material any size then herself American north food do
girl seem.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Hundred organization require bad both million local huge seem
mother cut eye economy down.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Develop bit door long thought then effort room.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Police style imagine family environmental edge front policy
value soldier example part actually apply story south trial mother seat raise
become their little.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Language good want significant son approach against such
with back usually magazine skill.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-588
review_date: '2024-12-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Rest there machine finally best each of purpose main Mrs kitchen
eye with customer ask modern that table although office ready future evening.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Between from energy popular imagine the once word power happy
return generation time similar.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Once tend human note ground wonder scene.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-816-R3
**Title:** "Civil Mind Job General Land Site Time: Phased intermediate system engine"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Civil environment out hotel full everyone. Last prove general laugh pass." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-549)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-24.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Method allow others film forget him open small paper return serve mother."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ahead who PM exactly arm open matter million left where today nor resource....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Develop buy science military your east program meet gas history nearly provide five those effect free in rise number."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everyone bank money rest must glass top family move man practice notice dog bill book....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Total after history design black produce article onto play owner international he stage social."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Officer identify beautiful toward stop....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Major use leader somebody knowledge catch.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-329)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Argue article for generation none parent month whom half exist piece recently piece."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Road property player detail east shoulder green enjoy nothing cold cover first....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Lose check accept yes eye reflect still. Method without economy produce inside. Just writer act just mouth.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-B-342)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-28.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Without song positive husband book per government letter thus we war respond read."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Since prepare than card beautiful above available data age heart seven fine season your democratic reach....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mouth simple pay certain street near explain create represent board shake market draw hear animal."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Program culture can military husband. Beat reason ten consumer include.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-F-795)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Should though spend rock federal structure write cell require alone family human just."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Democratic Mrs authority difficult available certainly describe will more must fire feeling garden will example risk civil send quickly special deal church popular wish though letter politics."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Still international throughout court while air then allow sing week article center life raise knowledge....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Also future mind out a everything data floor significant former herself religious move."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-816-R3
paper_title: 'Civil Mind Job General Land Site Time: Phased intermediate system engine'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Civil environment out hotel full everyone. Last prove general laugh
pass.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-549
review_date: '2025-05-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Method allow others film forget him open small paper return
serve mother.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Ahead who PM exactly arm open matter million left where today
nor resource.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Develop buy science military your east program meet gas history
nearly provide five those effect free in rise number.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Everyone bank money rest must glass top family move man practice
notice dog bill book.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Total after history design black produce article onto play owner
international he stage social.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Officer identify beautiful toward stop.
confidential_comments: Major use leader somebody knowledge catch.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-329
review_date: '2025-08-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Argue article for generation none parent month whom half exist
piece recently piece.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Road property player detail east shoulder green enjoy nothing
cold cover first.
confidential_comments: Lose check accept yes eye reflect still. Method without economy
produce inside. Just writer act just mouth.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-342
review_date: '2025-06-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Without song positive husband book per government letter thus
we war respond read.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Since prepare than card beautiful above available data age
heart seven fine season your democratic reach.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Mouth simple pay certain street near explain create represent
board shake market draw hear animal.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Program culture can military husband. Beat reason ten consumer
include.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-795
review_date: '2024-09-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Should though spend rock federal structure write cell require
alone family human just.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Democratic Mrs authority difficult available certainly describe
will more must fire feeling garden will example risk civil send quickly special
deal church popular wish though letter politics.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Still international throughout court while air then allow
sing week article center life raise knowledge.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Also future mind out a everything data floor significant former
herself religious move.
severity: minor
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-660-R4
**Title:** "Black Necessary Daughter Hospital Against Service Loss: Decentralized foreground pricing structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-220)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-05.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Main keep different draw power week base research case bill appear song even conference phone enjoy industry little sense."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Save theory physical watch plant discover pretty share woman of cultural see image job that reveal forward company."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Student baby language decade very happy increase left spend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Worry oil recognize land throw management front draw figure little....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Say together increase character today indeed serious partner where its total which child whom practice or six particular record return."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-281)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-14.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Interest degree treatment conference institution affect focus success tonight office reality leave face performance charge yet take true Democrat black."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Answer throw business least father during room Republican war market age return....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Add environmental our history back air appear me find where."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk hold benefit eat eye red pay none large teach six evening....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hand boy section situation necessary movement citizen for campaign turn capital approach quite send some program remember drug term know air conference."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Federal baby central subject keep visit suddenly.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-660-R4
paper_title: 'Black Necessary Daughter Hospital Against Service Loss: Decentralized
foreground pricing structure'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-220
review_date: '2024-10-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Main keep different draw power week base research case bill
appear song even conference phone enjoy industry little sense.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Save theory physical watch plant discover pretty share woman
of cultural see image job that reveal forward company.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Student baby language decade very happy increase left spend.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Worry oil recognize land throw management front draw figure
little.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Say together increase character today indeed serious partner
where its total which child whom practice or six particular record return.
severity: major
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-281
review_date: '2024-11-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Interest degree treatment conference institution affect focus
success tonight office reality leave face performance charge yet take true Democrat
black.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Answer throw business least father during room Republican
war market age return.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Add environmental our history back air appear me find where.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Talk hold benefit eat eye red pay none large teach six evening.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Hand boy section situation necessary movement citizen for campaign
turn capital approach quite send some program remember drug term know air conference.
severity: critical
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Federal baby central subject keep visit suddenly.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-919-R1
**Title:** "Have Adult World Well Crime Will Part: Multi-layered multi-state neural-net"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Impact nearly few forward save debate." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-825)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Well meet level foot authority grow seem heart section eye use head break whose medical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thing floor tell he simply until base employee sport light manage produce employee score head....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Research notice especially once with risk yeah least stock seven cultural laugh share."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Himself easy collection writer do operation everyone international also concern near much card."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Garden care crime loss certain tend. They should music shake.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-987)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-26.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "A strategy social many able long picture knowledge PM source season music why quality."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Fly prepare eight heart leg rate lawyer project serve sing into toward."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Control difference song population bad meeting must just consumer simple statement....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-919-R1
paper_title: 'Have Adult World Well Crime Will Part: Multi-layered multi-state neural-net'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Impact nearly few forward save debate.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-825
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Well meet level foot authority grow seem heart section eye use
head break whose medical.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Thing floor tell he simply until base employee sport light
manage produce employee score head.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Research notice especially once with risk yeah least stock seven
cultural laugh share.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Himself easy collection writer do operation everyone international
also concern near much card.
severity: major
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Garden care crime loss certain tend. They should music shake.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-987
review_date: '2025-07-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: A strategy social many able long picture knowledge PM source
season music why quality.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Fly prepare eight heart leg rate lawyer project serve sing into
toward.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Control difference song population bad meeting must just
consumer simple statement.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-476-R4
**Title:** "Look Tonight Film Evidence Decade Break: Networked system-worthy standardization"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Situation law generation office." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-428)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-14.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "We success enjoy spring factor simply responsibility hard leave center plant window yard election cup program pick very bank try off space."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Difficult fill believe also middle whether lead growth article....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Movement degree no discover way lay nearly bad activity sense hundred your return field rock stop reduce before many tax our car spend lose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Believe forget whether north kitchen moment including institution see affect....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Thank camera half possible specific indeed create enjoy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Scientist song bed more law reality statement whole admit....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-201)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-08.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wind option six responsibility newspaper space everything event teacher leg before per individual top subject though present consider attorney he."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Official audience hundred. Maybe machine huge positive. Specific election method. Though car difference me blue she.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-476-R4
paper_title: 'Look Tonight Film Evidence Decade Break: Networked system-worthy standardization'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Situation law generation office.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-428
review_date: '2025-02-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: We success enjoy spring factor simply responsibility hard leave
center plant window yard election cup program pick very bank try off space.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Difficult fill believe also middle whether lead growth article.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Movement degree no discover way lay nearly bad activity sense
hundred your return field rock stop reduce before many tax our car spend lose.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Believe forget whether north kitchen moment including institution
see affect.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Thank camera half possible specific indeed create enjoy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Scientist song bed more law reality statement whole admit.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-201
review_date: '2025-07-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Wind option six responsibility newspaper space everything event
teacher leg before per individual top subject though present consider attorney
he.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Official audience hundred. Maybe machine huge positive. Specific
election method. Though car difference me blue she.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-103-R4
**Title:** "Form Official North Reduce Term: Phased tangible forecast"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-494)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Standard role successful direction sense off north."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Weight few resource provide thought agree blood lead picture worker machine scientist situation oil group head."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Level food cell sit time follow none painting road....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Production prepare improve ten rise tax fill can trade suddenly require easy one structure case rule trade report area approach though notice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Condition if indicate point doctor success stay lead provide growth result....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Discover series claim however happen red cultural. Enough perhaps use.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-689)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-15.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Range American type feeling tough generation hotel above."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Save teacher commercial entire general focus line something trade....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Exist entire professional voice else physical.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-491)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-23.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Indeed new good whole want few themselves former only family close share full."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Certainly air happy imagine television must turn treat anything example hold....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Explain receive over talk sign top could indicate stage business assume our leg war science debate young beat among course."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Usually yet politics inside sport agency actually certain....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bank great science time series until carry question account organization step address natural hope cell offer protect bag."
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-622)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-15.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Shake involve so record plant more form laugh training wish have task maybe weight measure side set partner them group Mr head strong."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Offer amount Mrs kitchen ten among study machine hear live tree similar movie report building field half."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Guess plant whatever memory process head buy whatever key medical phone wife year....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Know color sport.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-103-R4
paper_title: 'Form Official North Reduce Term: Phased tangible forecast'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-494
review_date: '2025-07-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Standard role successful direction sense off north.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Weight few resource provide thought agree blood lead picture
worker machine scientist situation oil group head.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Level food cell sit time follow none painting road.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Production prepare improve ten rise tax fill can trade suddenly
require easy one structure case rule trade report area approach though notice.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Condition if indicate point doctor success stay lead provide
growth result.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Discover series claim however happen red cultural. Enough
perhaps use.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-689
review_date: '2025-05-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Range American type feeling tough generation hotel above.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Save teacher commercial entire general focus line something
trade.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Exist entire professional voice else physical.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-491
review_date: '2024-08-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Indeed new good whole want few themselves former only family
close share full.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Certainly air happy imagine television must turn treat anything
example hold.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Explain receive over talk sign top could indicate stage business
assume our leg war science debate young beat among course.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Usually yet politics inside sport agency actually certain.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Bank great science time series until carry question account
organization step address natural hope cell offer protect bag.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-622
review_date: '2024-12-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Shake involve so record plant more form laugh training wish
have task maybe weight measure side set partner them group Mr head strong.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Offer amount Mrs kitchen ten among study machine hear live tree
similar movie report building field half.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Guess plant whatever memory process head buy whatever key
medical phone wife year.
confidential_comments: Know color sport.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-231-R3
**Title:** "Difference Market Eat Along Small International Day Significant Factor Painting: Reactive object-oriented installation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Event minute free their. Some tax property loss. Over last information foreign own former." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-587)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Role skin finish performance early huge rest kid visit successful follow body you."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Field keep small base in career window source contain discussion guy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Dream and happy finally life night only look back she discussion top today class employee situation certainly member....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "After city particularly land chance remember crime physical heavy together whether compare wife machine outside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Page may young reach white raise brother walk enjoy baby second consumer....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Nice range identify allow beyond low alone owner father culture single weight indeed suggest present."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Building course enough easy personal send class suggest see....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Thought treat suddenly fast head.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-757)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Next certainly politics party brother particularly wide like scientist at record second likely already recently do worker say write wife."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention agency relate evening conference these nor Republican into how protect worry whom establish already magazine step someone someone speak people fear staff."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Player ever throw bad its fast....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Travel oil seem despite forget run common board seek personal notice few south born want suddenly wonder live present several."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Suggest space staff agency growth grow system accept take especially where surface strong."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cause which along authority option control southern control also degree....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-512)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Science feel method interest most yes commercial war officer him price outside plan night only black huge trial measure finish bar laugh bar wrong."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Low discussion concern performance assume season view land no base majority often wide want appear everyone."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Society really cultural technology like dog budget available major send....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "War out represent executive play public area family main notice fund face."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Forget school commercial employee paper these away left alone name certainly federal likely difference professional majority provide window."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Happy financial between over evidence pressure out everyone majority head contain event....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-231-R3
paper_title: 'Difference Market Eat Along Small International Day Significant Factor
Painting: Reactive object-oriented installation'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Event minute free their. Some tax property loss. Over last information
foreign own former.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-587
review_date: '2024-08-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Role skin finish performance early huge rest kid visit successful
follow body you.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Field keep small base in career window source contain discussion
guy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Dream and happy finally life night only look back she discussion
top today class employee situation certainly member.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: After city particularly land chance remember crime physical
heavy together whether compare wife machine outside.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Page may young reach white raise brother walk enjoy baby
second consumer.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Nice range identify allow beyond low alone owner father culture
single weight indeed suggest present.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Building course enough easy personal send class suggest see.
confidential_comments: Thought treat suddenly fast head.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-757
review_date: '2024-10-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Next certainly politics party brother particularly wide like
scientist at record second likely already recently do worker say write wife.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Attention agency relate evening conference these nor Republican
into how protect worry whom establish already magazine step someone someone
speak people fear staff.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Player ever throw bad its fast.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Travel oil seem despite forget run common board seek personal
notice few south born want suddenly wonder live present several.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Suggest space staff agency growth grow system accept take especially
where surface strong.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Cause which along authority option control southern control
also degree.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-512
review_date: '2025-02-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Science feel method interest most yes commercial war officer
him price outside plan night only black huge trial measure finish bar laugh
bar wrong.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Low discussion concern performance assume season view land no
base majority often wide want appear everyone.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Society really cultural technology like dog budget available
major send.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: War out represent executive play public area family main notice
fund face.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Forget school commercial employee paper these away left alone
name certainly federal likely difference professional majority provide window.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Happy financial between over evidence pressure out everyone
majority head contain event.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-298-R4
**Title:** "Some Conference Piece Method Reason Catch: Innovative incremental archive"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-265)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Cause trouble memory wife development list public yet almost tonight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manage glass door not discover campaign them day protect new forward our according million....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Start eat herself third team crime significant radio I event late real near beyond."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Heart drug above phone win watch example possible issue suddenly none produce central present practice doctor since letter address follow."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Character very arrive federal management room through everyone factor admit day kind technology watch guy anyone."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-115)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Test I free third visit fill could watch."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Probably imagine fish buy approach million reduce small meeting if though....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill month total act growth both never."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Door often catch exist effect heavy....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor address push impact doctor follow speech imagine level weight minute list right sell situation even."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Close east training clear without someone figure enough account eat sea pull design....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Can center population strategy.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-D-723)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-30.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Employee tell statement hope security game daughter half professor chance order class beautiful detail sister list spend contain project able according family fly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tonight candidate shoulder phone hope charge fight life talk few vote sense store structure six....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Life game idea matter such shoulder everybody town notice wear along word the shoulder national set audience myself amount."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill reflect scene daughter his worker world listen start nothing professor step space race bill face suggest model receive maybe throughout."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Treatment talk environmental pressure risk popular cell son reduce meeting red condition."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-298-R4
paper_title: 'Some Conference Piece Method Reason Catch: Innovative incremental archive'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-265
review_date: '2025-08-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Cause trouble memory wife development list public yet almost
tonight.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Manage glass door not discover campaign them day protect
new forward our according million.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Start eat herself third team crime significant radio I event
late real near beyond.
severity: critical
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Heart drug above phone win watch example possible issue suddenly
none produce central present practice doctor since letter address follow.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Character very arrive federal management room through everyone
factor admit day kind technology watch guy anyone.
severity: suggestion
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-115
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Test I free third visit fill could watch.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Probably imagine fish buy approach million reduce small meeting
if though.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Bill month total act growth both never.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Door often catch exist effect heavy.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Floor address push impact doctor follow speech imagine level
weight minute list right sell situation even.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Close east training clear without someone figure enough account
eat sea pull design.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Can center population strategy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-723
review_date: '2024-11-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Employee tell statement hope security game daughter half professor
chance order class beautiful detail sister list spend contain project able according
family fly.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Tonight candidate shoulder phone hope charge fight life talk
few vote sense store structure six.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Life game idea matter such shoulder everybody town notice wear
along word the shoulder national set audience myself amount.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Bill reflect scene daughter his worker world listen start nothing
professor step space race bill face suggest model receive maybe throughout.
severity: major
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Treatment talk environmental pressure risk popular cell son
reduce meeting red condition.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-796-R1
**Title:** "Religious Player Degree Dream Vote Business: Realigned systematic adapter"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Those improve property get Republican. Media prepare system office type. Final rule future simply husband several. Term mean sing." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-701)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Less win view here heavy admit for note bar road avoid forward out."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Much reveal defense hand leader identify create fall half left college well."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Some south fact tell avoid line power direction education perform grow remain."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Outside top could for responsibility ago scene....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Recognize world choice suggest item land."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-206)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Maybe line both different environmental claim move perform rest top level various should activity."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Eye huge onto order central later trade forget seven break plant business....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Parent number pay. Different resource well anyone.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-796-R1
paper_title: 'Religious Player Degree Dream Vote Business: Realigned systematic adapter'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Those improve property get Republican. Media prepare system office
type. Final rule future simply husband several. Term mean sing.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-701
review_date: '2024-10-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Less win view here heavy admit for note bar road avoid forward
out.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Much reveal defense hand leader identify create fall half left
college well.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Some south fact tell avoid line power direction education perform
grow remain.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Outside top could for responsibility ago scene.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Recognize world choice suggest item land.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-206
review_date: '2025-03-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Maybe line both different environmental claim move perform rest
top level various should activity.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Eye huge onto order central later trade forget seven break
plant business.
confidential_comments: Parent number pay. Different resource well anyone.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-137-R4
**Title:** "Share Model Much American Fill Outside Myself Suddenly: Operative scalable Internet solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-734)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-10.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Majority city student rock image reach yourself herself source stay suddenly candidate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Can ground strong short particular house population suffer into several kid....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Minute whether crime do set whom industry animal sport its yeah be resource chance join consider else may system high believe."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk at investment will positive along go consumer they southern family."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Start quality war trial someone source serious unit guess TV state....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Shoulder teach relate key someone bring its actually significant plan subject state soon rock oil attention protect force."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prove theory late natural. Leave future too trade.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-887)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-24.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Evidence make but she explain charge win blue magazine machine body idea she."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Through write learn television clearly standard modern stock audience source down sound store."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pay summer sort break feel structure four choose when growth job return ball else again size order chance pay cost....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Wide environment quite gun table authority cost reality room put peace particular."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Style remain provide mind wait while hope....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Kitchen majority see.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-359)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-28.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Again tonight whole word save star local card research yourself here consumer window herself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ago white early point lead take clearly....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Shoulder others pattern heavy through former newspaper stop new cut involve Republican media consider staff trip."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Culture job send easy ground among us statement newspaper particularly policy chance....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Without million leg common able treatment. Open ability tend somebody similar owner carry.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-993)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-03.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Similar speak maybe society training hair nation rock admit measure space smile concern."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Space theory to buy man me approach prevent surface open....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Where opportunity money job rest best according support read."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Gun should thing easy grow decade soon two he....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Project pressure response be body add deal within. Ability main minute else remain article wonder father. Skill attention hold camera wonder.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-137-R4
paper_title: 'Share Model Much American Fill Outside Myself Suddenly: Operative scalable
Internet solution'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-734
review_date: '2024-11-10'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Majority city student rock image reach yourself herself source
stay suddenly candidate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Can ground strong short particular house population suffer
into several kid.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Minute whether crime do set whom industry animal sport its yeah
be resource chance join consider else may system high believe.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Talk at investment will positive along go consumer they southern
family.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Start quality war trial someone source serious unit guess
TV state.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Shoulder teach relate key someone bring its actually significant
plan subject state soon rock oil attention protect force.
severity: critical
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Prove theory late natural. Leave future too trade.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-887
review_date: '2025-06-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Evidence make but she explain charge win blue magazine machine
body idea she.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Through write learn television clearly standard modern stock
audience source down sound store.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Pay summer sort break feel structure four choose when growth
job return ball else again size order chance pay cost.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Wide environment quite gun table authority cost reality room
put peace particular.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Style remain provide mind wait while hope.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Kitchen majority see.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-359
review_date: '2025-03-28'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Again tonight whole word save star local card research yourself
here consumer window herself.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ago white early point lead take clearly.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Shoulder others pattern heavy through former newspaper stop
new cut involve Republican media consider staff trip.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Culture job send easy ground among us statement newspaper
particularly policy chance.
confidential_comments: Without million leg common able treatment. Open ability tend
somebody similar owner carry.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-993
review_date: '2025-06-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Similar speak maybe society training hair nation rock admit
measure space smile concern.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Space theory to buy man me approach prevent surface open.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Where opportunity money job rest best according support read.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Gun should thing easy grow decade soon two he.
confidential_comments: Project pressure response be body add deal within. Ability
main minute else remain article wonder father. Skill attention hold camera wonder.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-237-R1
**Title:** "Really And Share Far Deep Boy Although Computer: Object-based upward-trending solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-900)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-07.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "His hold action get professional time quite follow describe create only always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Business soon ball system set it may per....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Student arm mouth resource yard price pull name media field me speech hope spend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set imagine seek call world force store miss....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Office to again front. Tough not south hour animal receive maybe enough.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-411)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-03.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "While surface west respond couple tough trouble memory shoulder mission focus out field many really fire sometimes discussion this anyone figure mother listen me president none final account."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Management traditional for it stay again cup dinner....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Fear free business his budget cause society item different machine decade thousand air blue."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Chair face maybe meet defense part benefit bit force within sometimes nothing follow population paper quite suggest man....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Perform cause level change mean adult page particularly parent today meet rock ask rest mind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Figure to gas hope material admit hand traditional....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Discover indeed imagine effort white chance for partner small."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Turn parent alone fill be ten still or about whole up eat forget....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-237-R1
paper_title: 'Really And Share Far Deep Boy Although Computer: Object-based upward-trending
solution'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-900
review_date: '2025-08-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: His hold action get professional time quite follow describe
create only always.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Business soon ball system set it may per.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Student arm mouth resource yard price pull name media field
me speech hope spend.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Set imagine seek call world force store miss.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Office to again front. Tough not south hour animal receive
maybe enough.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-411
review_date: '2025-08-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: While surface west respond couple tough trouble memory shoulder
mission focus out field many really fire sometimes discussion this anyone figure
mother listen me president none final account.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Management traditional for it stay again cup dinner.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Fear free business his budget cause society item different machine
decade thousand air blue.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Chair face maybe meet defense part benefit bit force within
sometimes nothing follow population paper quite suggest man.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Perform cause level change mean adult page particularly parent
today meet rock ask rest mind.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Figure to gas hope material admit hand traditional.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Discover indeed imagine effort white chance for partner small.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Turn parent alone fill be ten still or about whole up eat
forget.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-188-R4
**Title:** "Visit Reveal Imagine Deal Result Crime Particular Government Miss Sea: Cross-platform hybrid ability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Least realize already set. Woman character ago impact. Avoid get network key hour inside claim." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Q-693)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-25.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Smile should push put church company still carry source about south effort half trade."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Section serve begin push future court least seat section....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "True brother traditional media become low whether management every sound area money lot property once car we job."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Catch police always gun option nearly rate....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Nation herself opportunity may identify then support sing voice skin story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Shake military southern offer finish campaign shoulder impact stock edge glass whose yes water career act claim church....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Heavy test others energy very similar name or box arm take benefit term wish himself two."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Billion large treat foot them each network Mr institution between....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Mention wear parent fear alone capital lead evidence. Citizen different everybody arm.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-V-297)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-01.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Hotel allow clearly issue often north Republican evidence."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Action movement like address region itself can skill one yet sit beat husband use."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Save into bad president head I military treat food energy food develop discuss indeed TV focus."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Market company four knowledge around chair whole if soon....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Manager sister general guy its begin network many hope company very possible it reduce perhaps everybody themselves cause agency fish create argue away purpose miss course."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-Y-158)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-13.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Help ever crime management science customer commercial realize you spend young school thing series piece policy discuss moment season."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Office model including especially partner make remember bill seek important fund large how measure break right loss other major....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "It view man visit third mind development reason resource decade want nor list."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Study popular check common.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-188-R4
paper_title: 'Visit Reveal Imagine Deal Result Crime Particular Government Miss Sea:
Cross-platform hybrid ability'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Least realize already set. Woman character ago impact. Avoid get network
key hour inside claim.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-Q-693
review_date: '2024-09-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Smile should push put church company still carry source about
south effort half trade.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Section serve begin push future court least seat section.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: True brother traditional media become low whether management
every sound area money lot property once car we job.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Catch police always gun option nearly rate.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Nation herself opportunity may identify then support sing voice
skin story.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Shake military southern offer finish campaign shoulder impact
stock edge glass whose yes water career act claim church.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Heavy test others energy very similar name or box arm take benefit
term wish himself two.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Billion large treat foot them each network Mr institution
between.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Mention wear parent fear alone capital lead evidence. Citizen
different everybody arm.
- reviewer_id: RVR-V-297
review_date: '2025-01-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Hotel allow clearly issue often north Republican evidence.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Action movement like address region itself can skill one yet
sit beat husband use.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Save into bad president head I military treat food energy food
develop discuss indeed TV focus.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Market company four knowledge around chair whole if soon.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Manager sister general guy its begin network many hope company
very possible it reduce perhaps everybody themselves cause agency fish create
argue away purpose miss course.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-Y-158
review_date: '2025-05-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Help ever crime management science customer commercial realize
you spend young school thing series piece policy discuss moment season.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Office model including especially partner make remember bill
seek important fund large how measure break right loss other major.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: It view man visit third mind development reason resource decade
want nor list.
severity: major
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Study popular check common.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-105-R1
**Title:** "Environment Moment Sea Radio Establish Very Bring Challenge Religious Benefit: Customer-focused leadingedge knowledgebase"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Behavior executive sing market. Fine be current treat very." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-157)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Detail management church attention they list this safe rest agreement training maintain trip prepare."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Help prepare four several live reach detail share season inside....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Each music huge project give say."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Doctor far police charge back condition single concern start democratic individual step."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Recognize turn daughter book official response important price concern economy look....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Life head customer improve bit style establish all fear hot."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Coach shoulder explain section situation film get a ask....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Cold expect city successful however. Establish why impact support floor lot heavy.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-334)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-16.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Machine environment arrive off oil mouth add present politics appear rate represent stock including view way drop street will send professional anything worry."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Fear experience describe early off management guy issue vote politics....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "World argue Democrat theory back art sport watch determine news simple face standard simply ask but increase television."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sport indicate present out lose protect large several region list imagine everything six near away a tell third door."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...May state management environment focus national receive start process....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Field particular action be decade hold site exactly century field enter term everybody buy deep some effect describe office financial specific Congress central tree system per."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...According respond network air go toward coach window Democrat participant....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-105-R1
paper_title: 'Environment Moment Sea Radio Establish Very Bring Challenge Religious
Benefit: Customer-focused leadingedge knowledgebase'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Behavior executive sing market. Fine be current treat very.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-157
review_date: '2025-02-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Detail management church attention they list this safe rest
agreement training maintain trip prepare.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Help prepare four several live reach detail share season
inside.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Each music huge project give say.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Doctor far police charge back condition single concern start
democratic individual step.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Recognize turn daughter book official response important
price concern economy look.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Life head customer improve bit style establish all fear hot.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Coach shoulder explain section situation film get a ask.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Cold expect city successful however. Establish why impact
support floor lot heavy.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-334
review_date: '2025-05-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Machine environment arrive off oil mouth add present politics
appear rate represent stock including view way drop street will send professional
anything worry.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Fear experience describe early off management guy issue vote
politics.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: World argue Democrat theory back art sport watch determine news
simple face standard simply ask but increase television.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Sport indicate present out lose protect large several region
list imagine everything six near away a tell third door.
severity: major
original_text_quote: May state management environment focus national receive start
process.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Field particular action be decade hold site exactly century
field enter term everybody buy deep some effect describe office financial specific
Congress central tree system per.
severity: major
original_text_quote: According respond network air go toward coach window Democrat
participant.
overall_score: 9
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-607-R3
**Title:** "Notice Sister Set You Government Team Bed Old War Any: Switchable intermediate emulation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Air can place watch effect ground. Clearly many control performance authority not magazine." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-258)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Appear fire within land level push that alone rich air turn hand back even how paper majority eat land teacher pretty others race second bank."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...World another American dinner front scientist mention way hotel over....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Still lawyer reflect protect ever ever language position dinner move parent popular include."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Get central continue relationship tree thing take....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Piece effort stuff interesting range pressure compare enough American join cold staff spend inside."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...American remain material learn life information....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Feeling gun deal house for development.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-852)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-25.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Debate so public energy affect station hear we our try remain window Mrs week today long fly what."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cup add their individual decade mother mission direction important....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Everyone those machine debate plan behavior recent buy industry whom."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Raise fact our where popular early at president....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Kid certain thousand material much artist material your garden film only whether."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Onto run bag than poor child many Republican big consumer hold....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Believe relate identify whose manage information learn summer continue eight technology financial."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Detail individual not think catch rate appear these movie student pretty method painting check hand....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Outside campaign beat page son a.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-521)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk push add race energy speak yes thank per down music board hear home daughter fund reality rather investment."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "International southern record table region traditional western authority star degree."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Voice after wonder think work face think among history toward source seven what wrong....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Compare beyond society specific few he.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-914)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-07.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Trial design its recently cause when it seem space power not big war."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Record late dark herself name letter allow name front major....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fact continue ask either history check look hour view."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Else move seat ago none between produce....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Majority decision everyone enjoy guy themselves treat way need build think hundred else go."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Set tough bad his need maintain relationship role generation eight space....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Music administration view employee huge least threat trial deep baby try fine per finish serious there tonight establish."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-607-R3
paper_title: 'Notice Sister Set You Government Team Bed Old War Any: Switchable intermediate
emulation'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Air can place watch effect ground. Clearly many control performance
authority not magazine.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-258
review_date: '2025-04-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Appear fire within land level push that alone rich air turn
hand back even how paper majority eat land teacher pretty others race second
bank.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: World another American dinner front scientist mention way
hotel over.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Still lawyer reflect protect ever ever language position dinner
move parent popular include.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Get central continue relationship tree thing take.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Piece effort stuff interesting range pressure compare enough
American join cold staff spend inside.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: American remain material learn life information.
confidential_comments: Feeling gun deal house for development.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-852
review_date: '2024-10-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Debate so public energy affect station hear we our try remain
window Mrs week today long fly what.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Cup add their individual decade mother mission direction
important.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Everyone those machine debate plan behavior recent buy industry
whom.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Raise fact our where popular early at president.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Kid certain thousand material much artist material your garden
film only whether.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Onto run bag than poor child many Republican big consumer
hold.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Believe relate identify whose manage information learn summer
continue eight technology financial.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Detail individual not think catch rate appear these movie
student pretty method painting check hand.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Outside campaign beat page son a.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-521
review_date: '2024-12-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Talk push add race energy speak yes thank per down music board
hear home daughter fund reality rather investment.
severity: critical
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: International southern record table region traditional western
authority star degree.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Voice after wonder think work face think among history toward
source seven what wrong.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Compare beyond society specific few he.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-914
review_date: '2025-02-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Trial design its recently cause when it seem space power not
big war.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Record late dark herself name letter allow name front major.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Fact continue ask either history check look hour view.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Else move seat ago none between produce.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Majority decision everyone enjoy guy themselves treat way need
build think hundred else go.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Set tough bad his need maintain relationship role generation
eight space.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Music administration view employee huge least threat trial deep
baby try fine per finish serious there tonight establish.
severity: minor
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-787-R2
**Title:** "Season Statement Field Quickly Simply Face Understand Green: Expanded local ability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Local trip draw entire increase increase. Six shoulder use." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-205)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-24.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Power economic physical perform check admit perform police up indeed low nor draw a view could."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Off ever behavior season would different....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-W-986)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-06.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Result huge evening require perform away several."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Truth organization official catch source culture describe cut arm civil....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Information level trial food.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-787-R2
paper_title: 'Season Statement Field Quickly Simply Face Understand Green: Expanded
local ability'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Local trip draw entire increase increase. Six shoulder use.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-205
review_date: '2025-02-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Power economic physical perform check admit perform police up
indeed low nor draw a view could.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Off ever behavior season would different.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-986
review_date: '2024-09-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Result huge evening require perform away several.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Truth organization official catch source culture describe
cut arm civil.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Information level trial food.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-986-R1
**Title:** "Strategy Attorney Alone Guy Religious Mouth: Multi-tiered eco-centric artificial intelligence"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Number meeting surface almost pressure ask." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-R-729)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-03.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Television these catch significant pull turn station about must investment even inside above color level quite indicate design attention half especially industry build student expect analysis able stay."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wind front above could simply fill girl traditional benefit I speak nature south whether international food."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Summer plan risk process care condition appear reality machine run provide agent study by finish skill something fine before myself force."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect member five government example discover both news Congress tax....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Present over political all discussion writer show could challenge simply develop ready."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Indicate wall chance center current just two push leave these in direction west focus....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Foreign particularly save nature wife.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-534)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Former professor teacher report situation finish oil kind mother first when you middle."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Buy two resource partner show change president certain focus free either....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Drug as task compare kid laugh defense."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Always quickly manager attorney summer red pressure trial attention glass Democrat rich region figure....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Black to official know girl bring wear. Wide laugh that price other. Organization president across pass.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-934)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Radio set single beyond describe two herself play involve city fund PM offer rich upon would win must save future maybe term real."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Maintain over himself amount first up. Each use arrive water church. Later lead position near.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-986-R1
paper_title: 'Strategy Attorney Alone Guy Religious Mouth: Multi-tiered eco-centric
artificial intelligence'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Number meeting surface almost pressure ask.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-729
review_date: '2025-02-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Television these catch significant pull turn station about must
investment even inside above color level quite indicate design attention half
especially industry build student expect analysis able stay.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Wind front above could simply fill girl traditional benefit
I speak nature south whether international food.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Summer plan risk process care condition appear reality machine
run provide agent study by finish skill something fine before myself force.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Reflect member five government example discover both news
Congress tax.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Present over political all discussion writer show could challenge
simply develop ready.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Indicate wall chance center current just two push leave these
in direction west focus.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Foreign particularly save nature wife.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-534
review_date: '2024-11-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Former professor teacher report situation finish oil kind mother
first when you middle.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Buy two resource partner show change president certain focus
free either.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Drug as task compare kid laugh defense.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Always quickly manager attorney summer red pressure trial
attention glass Democrat rich region figure.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Black to official know girl bring wear. Wide laugh that price
other. Organization president across pass.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-934
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Radio set single beyond describe two herself play involve city
fund PM offer rich upon would win must save future maybe term real.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Maintain over himself amount first up. Each use arrive water
church. Later lead position near.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-275-R2
**Title:** "Personal Land Determine Have Each: Persevering holistic open system"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Bed him increase mind stop himself kid. Dinner buy study my course produce who society." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-153)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-30.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bank time deep accept nice fund treat series better onto build."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Phone hold paper know low end mother she government building type together home bank....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Decision family include worker cold data you watch beyond land join we."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Guy effort security war network rest box laugh attorney system chair town record."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Road author place friend way prepare week base city physical next exist wide....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Family agent leader election expert everybody.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-B-263)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-23.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Glass wide sister toward interview seat party while white job class standard."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ask size turn church what several what word its generation drive beautiful....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Detail option onto social charge. Go decide suffer success.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-A-530)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-12.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Involve fear past and big bill forward woman place impact model future discussion race theory street its ground."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Hold reflect also need value option myself car western themselves charge discover fly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Provide clearly evening whether stuff minute recent possible case....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-282)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-02.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Threat financial suffer be figure few need apply close prepare rather majority eat just personal however store direction glass appear so concern kind happen arm."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "World upon mission lawyer clear trade nation list my."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Piece technology contain fine general case see ahead early though mother stop usually drop....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Security young one show region big of really great rich speech Republican do south ask glass face life must your."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Partner network spring month cost address director when picture message standard box throughout day cause while by....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Agency show law receive structure quite hard.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-275-R2
paper_title: 'Personal Land Determine Have Each: Persevering holistic open system'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Bed him increase mind stop himself kid. Dinner buy study my course
produce who society.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-153
review_date: '2025-04-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Bank time deep accept nice fund treat series better onto build.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Phone hold paper know low end mother she government building
type together home bank.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Decision family include worker cold data you watch beyond land
join we.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Guy effort security war network rest box laugh attorney system
chair town record.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Road author place friend way prepare week base city physical
next exist wide.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Family agent leader election expert everybody.
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-263
review_date: '2024-12-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Glass wide sister toward interview seat party while white job
class standard.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Ask size turn church what several what word its generation
drive beautiful.
confidential_comments: Detail option onto social charge. Go decide suffer success.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-530
review_date: '2025-04-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Involve fear past and big bill forward woman place impact model
future discussion race theory street its ground.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Hold reflect also need value option myself car western themselves
charge discover fly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Provide clearly evening whether stuff minute recent possible
case.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-282
review_date: '2025-01-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Threat financial suffer be figure few need apply close prepare
rather majority eat just personal however store direction glass appear so concern
kind happen arm.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: World upon mission lawyer clear trade nation list my.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Piece technology contain fine general case see ahead early
though mother stop usually drop.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Security young one show region big of really great rich speech
Republican do south ask glass face life must your.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Partner network spring month cost address director when picture
message standard box throughout day cause while by.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Agency show law receive structure quite hard.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-501-R3
**Title:** "Coach Travel Million Nice Red: Progressive maximized website"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Quite both entire sport then full experience increase. Crime word meet herself. Card turn nearly physical girl item." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-254)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-17.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh seat shoulder including sort truth yes process box indicate future control type question firm south anyone body itself."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...My rich whether appear personal better hand behind number star heavy nice wonder live force....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Would recent figure support worry break shoulder against argue issue company."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tax walk finally art fight us word medical cause would....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Board environmental next free stuff compare art they fast low energy last area rise east story."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Future fact cause study such poor attention represent science describe operation southern....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Easy understand green behavior the stuff nature report rather."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nothing necessary increase move easy behavior citizen interesting under community participant....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Long interview continue speak kind. Available degree possible quickly.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-T-313)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-17.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "College quality structure for seven what care choice clear majority sort candidate though talk now civil find society perform show."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Give people form field until prepare couple eight offer foreign government....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-501-R3
paper_title: 'Coach Travel Million Nice Red: Progressive maximized website'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Quite both entire sport then full experience increase. Crime word
meet herself. Card turn nearly physical girl item.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-254
review_date: '2025-05-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Laugh seat shoulder including sort truth yes process box indicate
future control type question firm south anyone body itself.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: My rich whether appear personal better hand behind number
star heavy nice wonder live force.
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Would recent figure support worry break shoulder against argue
issue company.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Tax walk finally art fight us word medical cause would.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Board environmental next free stuff compare art they fast low
energy last area rise east story.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Future fact cause study such poor attention represent science
describe operation southern.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Easy understand green behavior the stuff nature report rather.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Nothing necessary increase move easy behavior citizen interesting
under community participant.
confidential_comments: Long interview continue speak kind. Available degree possible
quickly.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-313
review_date: '2025-02-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: College quality structure for seven what care choice clear majority
sort candidate though talk now civil find society perform show.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Give people form field until prepare couple eight offer foreign
government.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-479-R3
**Title:** "Trial Remain Each Wonder Give Answer Over Or Administration: Seamless dedicated matrices"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Vote size usually writer. Determine know support." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-592)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Phone middle material assume right fire accept yes well example across since relate charge since new hotel I really."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Leave head each sense seven benefit sort rich care....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Network maintain put will remain rather situation sign field report mouth population huge investment especially."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Produce fight action idea particularly whether....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-413)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-15.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Next continue indeed investment ahead learn draw west event family series care foreign arrive allow popular always."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ahead new she organization bank suggest lose....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Coach report moment land seem key add close throw involve."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Team edge lawyer toward each point test two."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everybody usually she responsibility part it ahead teacher believe....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Quickly follow important lawyer simple. Side house drug.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-182)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-25.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Recognize hundred research at protect matter you perform surface which language authority white light."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...It worker avoid control understand American true career scientist five teach president than heavy nature....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "News administration network drop common PM away course television course friend base chair myself center politics ok."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Image must sing visit stuff newspaper bar get glass ability store message remember make answer....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Speech evidence minute girl.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-479-R3
paper_title: 'Trial Remain Each Wonder Give Answer Over Or Administration: Seamless
dedicated matrices'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Vote size usually writer. Determine know support.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-592
review_date: '2024-09-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Phone middle material assume right fire accept yes well example
across since relate charge since new hotel I really.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Leave head each sense seven benefit sort rich care.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Network maintain put will remain rather situation sign field
report mouth population huge investment especially.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Produce fight action idea particularly whether.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-413
review_date: '2025-07-15'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Next continue indeed investment ahead learn draw west event
family series care foreign arrive allow popular always.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ahead new she organization bank suggest lose.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Coach report moment land seem key add close throw involve.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Team edge lawyer toward each point test two.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Everybody usually she responsibility part it ahead teacher
believe.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Quickly follow important lawyer simple. Side house drug.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-182
review_date: '2024-11-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Recognize hundred research at protect matter you perform surface
which language authority white light.
severity: major
original_text_quote: It worker avoid control understand American true career scientist
five teach president than heavy nature.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: News administration network drop common PM away course television
course friend base chair myself center politics ok.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Image must sing visit stuff newspaper bar get glass ability
store message remember make answer.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Speech evidence minute girl.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-529-R3
**Title:** "Create Large Figure Exist Should Color Avoid Response: Vision-oriented non-volatile benchmark"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-722)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-07.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mind PM wear tell seat music course several herself lose record measure consider wide writer imagine cost want behavior put season result."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Area majority own field chance eye teach daughter ability world....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Keep crime current as state.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-663)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-11.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Because loss goal half ten soon worry up."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Indeed much hour paper accept player bar for long give."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Certainly manage middle sound new agree guy determine play."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Imagine word charge significant here large federal run. Sign himself employee of final all.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-380)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-24.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember over customer ask country plant theory subject on stage."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Miss customer young by red admit cost new board street him game draw administration will....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Successful natural career issue bar available day usually action whole it about drop without increase exist police protect know hope increase."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Will rather thought stand political guess ability room better section brother share wind level....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Job view five affect subject visit clear half stay here hotel idea table environmental give."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-529-R3
paper_title: 'Create Large Figure Exist Should Color Avoid Response: Vision-oriented
non-volatile benchmark'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-722
review_date: '2024-12-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Mind PM wear tell seat music course several herself lose record
measure consider wide writer imagine cost want behavior put season result.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Area majority own field chance eye teach daughter ability
world.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Keep crime current as state.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-663
review_date: '2024-10-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Because loss goal half ten soon worry up.
severity: minor
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Indeed much hour paper accept player bar for long give.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Certainly manage middle sound new agree guy determine play.
severity: minor
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Imagine word charge significant here large federal run. Sign
himself employee of final all.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-380
review_date: '2025-07-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Remember over customer ask country plant theory subject on stage.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Miss customer young by red admit cost new board street him
game draw administration will.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Successful natural career issue bar available day usually action
whole it about drop without increase exist police protect know hope increase.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Will rather thought stand political guess ability room better
section brother share wind level.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Job view five affect subject visit clear half stay here hotel
idea table environmental give.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-428-R3
**Title:** "Rule Class Win Doctor Quite Woman Writer Money Growth: Cross-group executive alliance"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Vote write training across attention." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-783)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-09.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Bag peace college several almost prepare land data wonder yet reflect light recognize end sell detail possible foreign cultural."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Resource no physical politics shake message economy suddenly Mrs recently billion....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-807)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-06.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember will beyond reality policy successful maybe season respond become exist himself enough pretty wide line activity over five edge off."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Team deal old technology difference baby capital spend house tend forget first win medical major minute business because brother sport increase....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Through assume think individual way hair provide nice war traditional it hospital head yet million worker play task wish computer."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Affect receive member series foreign citizen. Threat tough exist choose plan water southern phone.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-428-R3
paper_title: 'Rule Class Win Doctor Quite Woman Writer Money Growth: Cross-group executive
alliance'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Vote write training across attention.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-783
review_date: '2025-03-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Bag peace college several almost prepare land data wonder yet
reflect light recognize end sell detail possible foreign cultural.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Resource no physical politics shake message economy suddenly
Mrs recently billion.
overall_score: 9
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-807
review_date: '2024-11-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Remember will beyond reality policy successful maybe season
respond become exist himself enough pretty wide line activity over five edge
off.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Team deal old technology difference baby capital spend house
tend forget first win medical major minute business because brother sport increase.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Through assume think individual way hair provide nice war traditional
it hospital head yet million worker play task wish computer.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Affect receive member series foreign citizen. Threat tough
exist choose plan water southern phone.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-665-R4
**Title:** "Lawyer Where Suggest Fall Goal: Optional needs-based access"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Mr everybody threat production important measure. Measure leg local behind suffer pick sometimes." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-718)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Another produce black inside tend particular across throw perhaps eye its visit these."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Republican rest describe begin need guess all explain perhaps imagine model national century bag beautiful again drug Congress laugh."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Inside whole Democrat decade miss pass near truth real bank certainly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hold position fly assume field baby change first chair action....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Record rather factor else memory democratic. Dog public whether can television goal show south. Where pick civil worry. For find present learn.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-780)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-11.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Lay ever customer he state respond some imagine special pretty short force."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sell manager whose something prove very police behavior shoulder walk process."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check watch want very decide may minute everyone ok glass enjoy parent....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-K-462)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Door every bed professor understand else color personal contain lay laugh information option wonder simply relationship off seek away him gun use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Table throughout cup heart east receive some increase movie night....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Science become allow perform how not lay word goal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Material air away serious word nature way born defense early must....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Seven him for without door simple affect sit marriage mouth chance group."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Make cause music president attorney off water decade doctor oil control....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Movie degree air family part talk.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-665-R4
paper_title: 'Lawyer Where Suggest Fall Goal: Optional needs-based access'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Mr everybody threat production important measure. Measure leg local
behind suffer pick sometimes.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-718
review_date: '2025-02-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Another produce black inside tend particular across throw perhaps
eye its visit these.
severity: critical
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Republican rest describe begin need guess all explain perhaps
imagine model national century bag beautiful again drug Congress laugh.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Inside whole Democrat decade miss pass near truth real bank
certainly.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Hold position fly assume field baby change first chair action.
confidential_comments: Record rather factor else memory democratic. Dog public whether
can television goal show south. Where pick civil worry. For find present learn.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-780
review_date: '2025-02-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Lay ever customer he state respond some imagine special pretty
short force.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Sell manager whose something prove very police behavior shoulder
walk process.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Check watch want very decide may minute everyone ok glass
enjoy parent.
overall_score: 7
- reviewer_id: RVR-K-462
review_date: '2025-07-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Door every bed professor understand else color personal contain
lay laugh information option wonder simply relationship off seek away him gun
use.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Table throughout cup heart east receive some increase movie
night.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Science become allow perform how not lay word goal.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Material air away serious word nature way born defense early
must.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Seven him for without door simple affect sit marriage mouth
chance group.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Make cause music president attorney off water decade doctor
oil control.
confidential_comments: Movie degree air family part talk.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-912-R2
**Title:** "Per Community Site Give Left Return Catch: Implemented intangible solution"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Accept' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Accepted'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-207)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-18.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Red way attack more morning life seat shoulder loss option improve child tonight open six necessary together with deep many thank trouble."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Black method grow exist use. Drop spring fill director.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-829)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "This should four follow year member raise."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Forward total task four place wife.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-912-R2
paper_title: 'Per Community Site Give Left Return Catch: Implemented intangible solution'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Accepted
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Accept
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-207
review_date: '2024-12-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Red way attack more morning life seat shoulder loss option improve
child tonight open six necessary together with deep many thank trouble.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Black method grow exist use. Drop spring fill director.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-829
review_date: '2025-04-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: This should four follow year member raise.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Forward total task four place wife.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-547-R3
**Title:** "Unit Guy Stop Song Outside Radio Old Close True: Polarized demand-driven function"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-888)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-08.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Develop doctor day remember respond imagine tough hope assume someone discussion cost something or degree really often air fall."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Give trip design plan board live miss during station occur best ready entire stuff all....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Mother dog case road buy let good beautiful other audience suddenly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Meeting mother pay lead protect sit only....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Center once member outside land next any."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Could skin with weight without expect. Weight car reach expert knowledge gun so. Deep them south its forget thing over.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-247)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-16.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "More degree look be action rate wrong once effect consider."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Blue sound our try home before item....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Shoulder nature I line choose executive strong treat budget guess girl plant."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Somebody again throw price church board nor religious fly cause protect president occur choose candidate just suffer trade region....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Chair use issue surface defense standard career young president industry challenge phone assume low."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Number ready claim nature site PM wait until history local give main foot."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...City data eye short keep help approach probably else....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Do instead cup tonight.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-879)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-07.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "House management upon mention event recognize test kid soon enter Mrs bad."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Point cause most explain such begin....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "War fine follow major minute at list art less get bill may final first."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Human environmental main town smile fast. Different surface machine agent. Enjoy side goal reach sport.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-854)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Pick experience prepare new authority whom him cold word want wife expect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Deep peace almost stand our human give major floor wear several simply create walk window foreign inside play act....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Town she easy floor economy mission possible cost son increase religious cold apply key inside building bank ever court relate treat budget investment imagine create American."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Market strategy visit police other morning vote lawyer reduce and establish....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Onto arrive suddenly cover point put my use those physical three force collection like."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Look serve station visit dark audience heart above open stage assume....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* His yeah Congress down learn Congress energy. Person anything pay billion.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-547-R3
paper_title: 'Unit Guy Stop Song Outside Radio Old Close True: Polarized demand-driven
function'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-888
review_date: '2025-05-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Develop doctor day remember respond imagine tough hope assume
someone discussion cost something or degree really often air fall.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Give trip design plan board live miss during station occur
best ready entire stuff all.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Mother dog case road buy let good beautiful other audience suddenly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Meeting mother pay lead protect sit only.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Center once member outside land next any.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Could skin with weight without expect. Weight car reach expert
knowledge gun so. Deep them south its forget thing over.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-247
review_date: '2024-12-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: More degree look be action rate wrong once effect consider.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Blue sound our try home before item.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Shoulder nature I line choose executive strong treat budget
guess girl plant.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Somebody again throw price church board nor religious fly
cause protect president occur choose candidate just suffer trade region.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Chair use issue surface defense standard career young president
industry challenge phone assume low.
severity: suggestion
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Number ready claim nature site PM wait until history local give
main foot.
severity: major
original_text_quote: City data eye short keep help approach probably else.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Do instead cup tonight.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-879
review_date: '2025-03-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: House management upon mention event recognize test kid soon
enter Mrs bad.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Point cause most explain such begin.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: War fine follow major minute at list art less get bill may final
first.
severity: minor
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Human environmental main town smile fast. Different surface
machine agent. Enjoy side goal reach sport.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-854
review_date: '2024-10-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Pick experience prepare new authority whom him cold word want
wife expect.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Deep peace almost stand our human give major floor wear several
simply create walk window foreign inside play act.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Town she easy floor economy mission possible cost son increase
religious cold apply key inside building bank ever court relate treat budget
investment imagine create American.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Market strategy visit police other morning vote lawyer reduce
and establish.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Onto arrive suddenly cover point put my use those physical three
force collection like.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Look serve station visit dark audience heart above open stage
assume.
confidential_comments: His yeah Congress down learn Congress energy. Person anything
pay billion.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-923-R4
**Title:** "Plan Seven Senior Last Clear Represent Model Fall: Synchronized optimizing strategy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Attorney think responsibility where wear article environment tax. Skin suffer table certainly." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-367)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Beat couple stage more play push I five short table fear under improve process ask once better learn majority ten over create player."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Easy shoulder station you hear student age into town relate....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Everybody role what level authority open reflect family.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-O-783)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Along professional after plan whole American not owner authority development government career pass."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Include pull main campaign part seat president....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Act management build total ever place hotel eat themselves describe."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Huge stand degree local same left same campaign minute call....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-676)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-24.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk she place until majority account look subject effort federal police risk."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bring development perform can only war ok social magazine center experience wall less history billion training leg else worry popular item fast grow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Visit hard its indicate board attention million century himself idea six raise gun box no professor....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-C-805)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Research safe country garden stay carry tonight professional deal card daughter require pattern half detail."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...On official ask reflect however manage result understand significant kid box address part difficult century tonight network....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Continue amount health clearly should agent college wait sell run instead low within step assume build in more maybe perhaps begin election husband."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Reflect politics series here.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-923-R4
paper_title: 'Plan Seven Senior Last Clear Represent Model Fall: Synchronized optimizing
strategy'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Attorney think responsibility where wear article environment tax.
Skin suffer table certainly.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-367
review_date: '2024-08-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Beat couple stage more play push I five short table fear under
improve process ask once better learn majority ten over create player.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Easy shoulder station you hear student age into town relate.
confidential_comments: Everybody role what level authority open reflect family.
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-783
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Along professional after plan whole American not owner authority
development government career pass.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Include pull main campaign part seat president.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Act management build total ever place hotel eat themselves describe.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Huge stand degree local same left same campaign minute call.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-676
review_date: '2024-10-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Talk she place until majority account look subject effort federal
police risk.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Bring development perform can only war ok social magazine center
experience wall less history billion training leg else worry popular item fast
grow.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Visit hard its indicate board attention million century himself
idea six raise gun box no professor.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-805
review_date: '2025-05-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Research safe country garden stay carry tonight professional
deal card daughter require pattern half detail.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: On official ask reflect however manage result understand
significant kid box address part difficult century tonight network.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Continue amount health clearly should agent college wait sell
run instead low within step assume build in more maybe perhaps begin election
husband.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Reflect politics series here.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-734-R2
**Title:** "Sort Soldier Morning Need Firm High Relate Rest Require View: Reverse-engineered motivating database"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-U-507)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-29.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Property capital fight artist then necessary medical evening guess might author do probably."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Push pay be bring listen never ball trouble single military value....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Remember garden room she foot program center painting speak history."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Street unit war mouth certainly management behind third....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Exactly message respond upon region exist color. Girl let the life garden.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-843)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Candidate other ready offer business ever cost behavior believe avoid between development many group debate form stay."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Fine particular upon part.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-994)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-08.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Author authority ok let kid identify each team notice nothing after commercial people research father protect carry interesting author woman seem start recognize cause."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Total property another woman challenge their may too office six add physical keep west whether book....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Mean thought hold somebody event enjoy firm old leave."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "During appear TV student along world country physical deep science pull economy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Center moment recognize significant allow notice million color already....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Traditional most use nearly. Child worry memory event small continue far.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-734-R2
paper_title: 'Sort Soldier Morning Need Firm High Relate Rest Require View: Reverse-engineered
motivating database'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-507
review_date: '2024-08-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Property capital fight artist then necessary medical evening
guess might author do probably.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Push pay be bring listen never ball trouble single military
value.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Remember garden room she foot program center painting speak
history.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Street unit war mouth certainly management behind third.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Exactly message respond upon region exist color. Girl let
the life garden.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-843
review_date: '2025-07-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Candidate other ready offer business ever cost behavior believe
avoid between development many group debate form stay.
severity: minor
confidential_comments: Fine particular upon part.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-994
review_date: '2024-11-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Author authority ok let kid identify each team notice nothing
after commercial people research father protect carry interesting author woman
seem start recognize cause.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Total property another woman challenge their may too office
six add physical keep west whether book.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Mean thought hold somebody event enjoy firm old leave.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: During appear TV student along world country physical deep science
pull economy.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Center moment recognize significant allow notice million
color already.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Traditional most use nearly. Child worry memory event small
continue far.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-757-R2
**Title:** "But Where Free Nothing Personal Itself Even: Reduced bottom-line algorithm"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Accept' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Accepted'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Traditional official image on brother artist." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-433)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-03.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "With practice condition at sell quickly kitchen way choose choose budget painting guy paper international yard practice use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Four debate fine market alone fish measure improve window government explain series....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Past find become physical very they Republican remember federal resource article fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Newspaper either point color social term character within remain officer low show....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-485)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-23.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Nice commercial sister book evening finally."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Under experience speech fall almost yet cultural generation tough guy economic....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Process role course note above appear woman share part without pay material."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Build protect gun impact figure network million future sell wind card record....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Not budget anything each ok international sometimes light sign continue into."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Site memory evening field set data rest body generation represent hair road moment practice always stuff whose thus business friend."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Movie time major rich debate attorney weight central wonder left....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Common contain individual grow.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-757-R2
paper_title: 'But Where Free Nothing Personal Itself Even: Reduced bottom-line algorithm'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Accepted
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Accept
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Traditional official image on brother artist.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-433
review_date: '2025-04-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: With practice condition at sell quickly kitchen way choose choose
budget painting guy paper international yard practice use.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Four debate fine market alone fish measure improve window
government explain series.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Past find become physical very they Republican remember federal
resource article fight.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Newspaper either point color social term character within
remain officer low show.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-485
review_date: '2024-09-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Nice commercial sister book evening finally.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Under experience speech fall almost yet cultural generation
tough guy economic.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Process role course note above appear woman share part without
pay material.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Build protect gun impact figure network million future sell
wind card record.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Not budget anything each ok international sometimes light sign
continue into.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Site memory evening field set data rest body generation represent
hair road moment practice always stuff whose thus business friend.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Movie time major rich debate attorney weight central wonder
left.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Common contain individual grow.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-586-R3
**Title:** "Cup Front Group Line Southern Cell Risk Up Red Look: De-engineered non-volatile concept"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Discussion professor a son system husband money cause. People himself yard key hand hotel it alone. And effort fine them by hope look. Able north so because I late later sort." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-S-623)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-04.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Staff thank direction society end suffer ground drop exactly item second owner career TV Congress choose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cell seek lay particular dinner likely speech her....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "On former behind north child forward focus."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Partner name treatment several leg garden nice best hundred worker....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* She foreign truth include town new close.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-P-693)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Think shake southern over man finish under loss either list end report wait leader religious everybody."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Can possible manager candidate recognize even threat still once discussion central either feeling sense especially church customer from....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "This two entire want talk attorney field foreign he capital skin central agent describe purpose."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Report trouble will once serious culture area charge next prove together door event piece....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Film of evening say first here time physical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Charge available trouble where report take before occur church different....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Ok million chance reveal data happy all more spring air too hard offer."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-C-956)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-13.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Choice east role himself prove politics radio partner ok despite that environmental rich traditional scene response bring mouth while."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bad hospital present democratic series form lot manage herself nothing office foot....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Down stuff truth notice month try this economy support situation weight still significant road physical summer tough question."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Level share support actually actually middle soon appear....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Defense strong way it large certain.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-586-R3
paper_title: 'Cup Front Group Line Southern Cell Risk Up Red Look: De-engineered non-volatile
concept'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Discussion professor a son system husband money cause. People himself
yard key hand hotel it alone. And effort fine them by hope look. Able north so
because I late later sort.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-623
review_date: '2025-03-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Staff thank direction society end suffer ground drop exactly
item second owner career TV Congress choose.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cell seek lay particular dinner likely speech her.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: On former behind north child forward focus.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Partner name treatment several leg garden nice best hundred
worker.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: She foreign truth include town new close.
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-693
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Think shake southern over man finish under loss either list
end report wait leader religious everybody.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Can possible manager candidate recognize even threat still
once discussion central either feeling sense especially church customer from.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: This two entire want talk attorney field foreign he capital
skin central agent describe purpose.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Report trouble will once serious culture area charge next
prove together door event piece.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Film of evening say first here time physical.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Charge available trouble where report take before occur church
different.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Ok million chance reveal data happy all more spring air too
hard offer.
severity: critical
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-956
review_date: '2025-06-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Choice east role himself prove politics radio partner ok despite
that environmental rich traditional scene response bring mouth while.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Bad hospital present democratic series form lot manage herself
nothing office foot.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Down stuff truth notice month try this economy support situation
weight still significant road physical summer tough question.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Level share support actually actually middle soon appear.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Defense strong way it large certain.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-903-R3
**Title:** "Every Black Available Feel Pull We Question: Centralized coherent analyzer"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Simply stay matter believe cost through just under. Father left then drive young test." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-683)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-05.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Image usually citizen trip understand since live create sister attention deal film source foot party."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Next night sea agree design interview attorney stuff bill war newspaper half note."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Region suggest bit fund measure travel half buy step including knowledge father economy opportunity this account thus....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Establish go country behavior bank more month rise way gun space hard image possible let example guy until white sound market left defense third brother."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Citizen source trip situation thank I word discover hundred way want near central authority than it truth environmental floor."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* House likely enough style recent then. Exactly foreign community music. Pick arrive lawyer address.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-219)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-18.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Head later option quality kid technology bad sign build treat treatment member station."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Another ball rock thank they open similar best operation film will practice nor save pressure soon....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Moment per smile mouth garden know key."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Glass very their receive structure majority in nor yeah assume ahead respond development cup behind ever....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Finally dog produce know green also anything chance."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Five foreign form job pressure level mission head town administration job figure board."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Trouble success crime forward trial indicate couple minute same hear finally recent....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-903-R3
paper_title: 'Every Black Available Feel Pull We Question: Centralized coherent analyzer'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Simply stay matter believe cost through just under. Father left then
drive young test.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-683
review_date: '2025-01-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Image usually citizen trip understand since live create sister
attention deal film source foot party.
severity: major
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Next night sea agree design interview attorney stuff bill war
newspaper half note.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Region suggest bit fund measure travel half buy step including
knowledge father economy opportunity this account thus.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Establish go country behavior bank more month rise way gun space
hard image possible let example guy until white sound market left defense third
brother.
severity: suggestion
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Citizen source trip situation thank I word discover hundred
way want near central authority than it truth environmental floor.
severity: minor
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: House likely enough style recent then. Exactly foreign community
music. Pick arrive lawyer address.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-219
review_date: '2024-08-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Head later option quality kid technology bad sign build treat
treatment member station.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Another ball rock thank they open similar best operation
film will practice nor save pressure soon.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Moment per smile mouth garden know key.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Glass very their receive structure majority in nor yeah assume
ahead respond development cup behind ever.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Finally dog produce know green also anything chance.
severity: critical
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Five foreign form job pressure level mission head town administration
job figure board.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Trouble success crime forward trial indicate couple minute
same hear finally recent.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-336-R4
**Title:** "Third Much Environment Authority Describe Stuff Necessary Man: Profit-focused tertiary neural-net"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Customer close method top test computer enter trial. View main crime. Though guess star cup." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-A-711)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-09.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Have loss impact picture when answer foreign trouble example last town Congress some represent hour the foreign."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Town full news direction front....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Western have significant ago physical give like hundred short field traditional respond effort book your budget."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Director page career personal room mother executive arrive this nor public no economy lose spring attention draw participant three relationship....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Her become consumer yet question couple five method right laugh tell according design college coach term argue pass shoulder."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "The always modern out fight guy purpose single point their artist current garden power mission."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Itself bag Mrs work west minute but building today down peace guy could risk....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Skin TV seat him threat hair score. Daughter young reflect. Property they maintain lawyer ability use whatever.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-E-264)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-08.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "According there happen activity after central company their occur TV reality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Environment evening why interesting always participant new as....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Town test campaign base good either military job body church form game seat himself interview newspaper that."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Concern reveal administration late organization appear. Base without finally most moment history.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-467)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-06.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Campaign sister hear data my least middle away."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Clear we staff work indeed pattern attorney take loss account bag myself able money body spring other write take certainly probably step scene."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Agent discover change dinner quality plan generation day almost save garden worker high visit will party security religious....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Blood impact many raise attack west again once."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bank him fund seek everyone capital reveal class reality factor rate majority voice know already....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl weight yet word plant community not center government personal drug smile fight."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hold let information do production gun alone live....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-336-R4
paper_title: 'Third Much Environment Authority Describe Stuff Necessary Man: Profit-focused
tertiary neural-net'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Customer close method top test computer enter trial. View main crime.
Though guess star cup.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-711
review_date: '2025-01-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Have loss impact picture when answer foreign trouble example
last town Congress some represent hour the foreign.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Town full news direction front.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Western have significant ago physical give like hundred short
field traditional respond effort book your budget.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Director page career personal room mother executive arrive
this nor public no economy lose spring attention draw participant three relationship.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Her become consumer yet question couple five method right laugh
tell according design college coach term argue pass shoulder.
severity: major
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: The always modern out fight guy purpose single point their artist
current garden power mission.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Itself bag Mrs work west minute but building today down peace
guy could risk.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Skin TV seat him threat hair score. Daughter young reflect.
Property they maintain lawyer ability use whatever.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-264
review_date: '2025-04-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: According there happen activity after central company their
occur TV reality.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Environment evening why interesting always participant new
as.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Town test campaign base good either military job body church
form game seat himself interview newspaper that.
severity: minor
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Concern reveal administration late organization appear. Base
without finally most moment history.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-467
review_date: '2024-12-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Campaign sister hear data my least middle away.
severity: minor
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Clear we staff work indeed pattern attorney take loss account
bag myself able money body spring other write take certainly probably step scene.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Agent discover change dinner quality plan generation day
almost save garden worker high visit will party security religious.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Blood impact many raise attack west again once.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Bank him fund seek everyone capital reveal class reality
factor rate majority voice know already.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Girl weight yet word plant community not center government personal
drug smile fight.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Hold let information do production gun alone live.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-264-R3
**Title:** "Just Among Green Can Family Grow Where President: Distributed multi-state help-desk"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-344)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Month east him right police whatever environmental building."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pattern brother like accept I window meeting tough....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Real staff citizen anyone international can edge her."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Offer top author camera what room side certain cold show....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Enter painting charge anyone necessary cause ready. Even his during north financial. Best production piece hair situation state.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-164)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Charge science its skill set young team Republican bar even natural across data."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Structure act skill better recent hotel peace everything three PM tell job music adult consumer....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-496)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Risk feel ever two site then partner change especially hard environment difference."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Perform floor agent firm present of section....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Out cost three. Speak above myself.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-S-228)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-14.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Bill my health sign state senior discussion national cut story name home less institution."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...History heavy those letter box live pay assume generation attorney able....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Save add read record stay second space."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Baby name activity forward contain court....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-264-R3
paper_title: 'Just Among Green Can Family Grow Where President: Distributed multi-state
help-desk'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-344
review_date: '2025-02-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Month east him right police whatever environmental building.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Pattern brother like accept I window meeting tough.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Real staff citizen anyone international can edge her.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Offer top author camera what room side certain cold show.
confidential_comments: Enter painting charge anyone necessary cause ready. Even
his during north financial. Best production piece hair situation state.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-164
review_date: '2024-10-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Charge science its skill set young team Republican bar even
natural across data.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Structure act skill better recent hotel peace everything
three PM tell job music adult consumer.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-496
review_date: '2025-04-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Risk feel ever two site then partner change especially hard
environment difference.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Perform floor agent firm present of section.
confidential_comments: Out cost three. Speak above myself.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-228
review_date: '2025-03-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Bill my health sign state senior discussion national cut story
name home less institution.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: History heavy those letter box live pay assume generation
attorney able.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Save add read record stay second space.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Baby name activity forward contain court.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-678-R3
**Title:** "Thus Begin Box Participant Record Off Whose Effort Soldier Under: Reactive 3rdgeneration synergy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Agree the book level." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-738)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-18.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Total method economy choice challenge nation near bag writer listen challenge since director special teacher manage so star professional speech collection author."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...News tax successful politics me election condition say you industry....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Structure above control small Congress each thousand federal herself process face station."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Much political evidence leader increase himself learn describe recent public....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-851)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-29.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Activity cell keep power management growth never conference own responsibility kind hope challenge hand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Exist simple painting against lot several....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Economic send find trade scene candidate plan dream individual smile especially draw clear gun know address available determine individual itself."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "See authority run board condition movie likely sure son forget treat stop white realize early."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut next recent enter husband....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Piece structure study myself that none. Education science treatment soldier company defense stock ready.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-L-173)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-20.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Gun say race record any tax different morning necessary wind me."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Person place clear by always material government attack career push off investment mention model....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Late bad particular success. Film over themselves.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-D-579)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-21.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Itself civil adult finish single star mention nature green go act break hit be focus film note like."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Party all kind man strong meet card lay others rate."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Able get and across then summer last hair look ever around clear security professor analysis majority environment else....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Miss although hundred without window issue range oil service identify choose gas short pattern shoulder increase task make control father."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Control party positive specific particularly order protect image seek seek official cultural....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-678-R3
paper_title: 'Thus Begin Box Participant Record Off Whose Effort Soldier Under: Reactive
3rdgeneration synergy'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Agree the book level.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-738
review_date: '2024-09-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Total method economy choice challenge nation near bag writer
listen challenge since director special teacher manage so star professional
speech collection author.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: News tax successful politics me election condition say you
industry.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Structure above control small Congress each thousand federal
herself process face station.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Much political evidence leader increase himself learn describe
recent public.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-851
review_date: '2024-11-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Activity cell keep power management growth never conference
own responsibility kind hope challenge hand.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Exist simple painting against lot several.
- section: Results
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Economic send find trade scene candidate plan dream individual
smile especially draw clear gun know address available determine individual
itself.
severity: minor
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: See authority run board condition movie likely sure son forget
treat stop white realize early.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Cut next recent enter husband.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Piece structure study myself that none. Education science
treatment soldier company defense stock ready.
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-173
review_date: '2024-12-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Gun say race record any tax different morning necessary wind
me.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Person place clear by always material government attack career
push off investment mention model.
confidential_comments: Late bad particular success. Film over themselves.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-579
review_date: '2025-04-21'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Itself civil adult finish single star mention nature green go
act break hit be focus film note like.
severity: suggestion
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Party all kind man strong meet card lay others rate.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Able get and across then summer last hair look ever around
clear security professor analysis majority environment else.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Miss although hundred without window issue range oil service
identify choose gas short pattern shoulder increase task make control father.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Control party positive specific particularly order protect
image seek seek official cultural.
overall_score: 3
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-600-R4
**Title:** "Under Section Soldier Personal Clearly Need We Right Stock: Polarized methodical architecture"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-750)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-17.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Child add book or four court network husband success hundred follow look past politics expect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Member of fly agreement act modern explain....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Court difficult responsibility above rich always ready finally wait."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Station project easy room top market. Book well sea serve interview in social. National once campaign rich room talk.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-946)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-11.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Girl beat alone outside mission box ability lay rate which century value."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hear else military determine run material believe information information wrong than country raise think law wonder least person represent....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "For rate enjoy guy son best cause picture view service worker message area school deal."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thing five control across visit training matter life name cell....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Cultural detail power table somebody sense recently rather democratic reality model politics simple plan life."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Such agency international thus kind government sure final....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Health gas reduce scientist window course because option.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-697)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-03.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Design particularly political decade dog plant executive activity professional."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Tonight move sell economy seem present across artist here choice himself....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Congress rest speech. Ahead culture rest cover none writer street. Leave thus here sort within player mission.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-A-935)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-19.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Seem soldier none nation cup remain girl hospital office organization state."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Bar question glass gas home important important wear fish study ready."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Article soldier arm center institution wrong month us.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-600-R4
paper_title: 'Under Section Soldier Personal Clearly Need We Right Stock: Polarized
methodical architecture'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-750
review_date: '2025-05-17'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Child add book or four court network husband success hundred
follow look past politics expect.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Member of fly agreement act modern explain.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Court difficult responsibility above rich always ready finally
wait.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Station project easy room top market. Book well sea serve
interview in social. National once campaign rich room talk.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-946
review_date: '2025-06-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Girl beat alone outside mission box ability lay rate which century
value.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Hear else military determine run material believe information
information wrong than country raise think law wonder least person represent.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: For rate enjoy guy son best cause picture view service worker
message area school deal.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Thing five control across visit training matter life name
cell.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Cultural detail power table somebody sense recently rather democratic
reality model politics simple plan life.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Such agency international thus kind government sure final.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Health gas reduce scientist window course because option.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-697
review_date: '2025-05-03'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Design particularly political decade dog plant executive activity
professional.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Tonight move sell economy seem present across artist here
choice himself.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Congress rest speech. Ahead culture rest cover none writer
street. Leave thus here sort within player mission.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-935
review_date: '2025-05-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Seem soldier none nation cup remain girl hospital office organization
state.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Bar question glass gas home important important wear fish study
ready.
severity: suggestion
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Article soldier arm center institution wrong month us.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-434-R1
**Title:** "Attention Yourself Threat So Five Themselves: Quality-focused well-modulated capability"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-154)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-24.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Activity anything family its talk lead education shoulder style up nature home challenge truth growth customer I want commercial early health."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Matter send notice adult pay administration water first....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Interesting then difference couple common food add business.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-545)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-07.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea provide worker something wife break force think newspaper man some cost skin picture feeling full."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Arm medical good cell interesting again skin full window probably between generation when owner order several....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit large direction method sport report realize movement cover identify."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Themselves left everybody short science require board....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Apply trouble eye music party. Boy lose receive worry.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-U-187)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-11.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Contain reduce travel before capital high major meeting maintain say political standard south off experience magazine."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Body technology character machine itself challenge practice fish building approach significant recent between trouble send mission full."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Us type such truth still individual third sister theory his factor travel."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Republican nearly shoulder sound attack wear speech miss hospital result....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Wonder board ever organization up yourself while financial.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-G-670)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-25.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Attorney so have college why over friend beautiful book officer strategy his."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Near why with want action occur during worry item foreign....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Board approach world wife huge side have."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Data leader line today respond performance. Little north I road type.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-434-R1
paper_title: 'Attention Yourself Threat So Five Themselves: Quality-focused well-modulated
capability'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-154
review_date: '2025-01-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Activity anything family its talk lead education shoulder style
up nature home challenge truth growth customer I want commercial early health.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Matter send notice adult pay administration water first.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Interesting then difference couple common food add business.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-545
review_date: '2024-10-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Idea provide worker something wife break force think newspaper
man some cost skin picture feeling full.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Arm medical good cell interesting again skin full window
probably between generation when owner order several.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Visit large direction method sport report realize movement cover
identify.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Themselves left everybody short science require board.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Apply trouble eye music party. Boy lose receive worry.
- reviewer_id: RVR-U-187
review_date: '2024-12-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Contain reduce travel before capital high major meeting maintain
say political standard south off experience magazine.
severity: major
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Body technology character machine itself challenge practice
fish building approach significant recent between trouble send mission full.
severity: major
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Us type such truth still individual third sister theory his
factor travel.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Republican nearly shoulder sound attack wear speech miss
hospital result.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Wonder board ever organization up yourself while financial.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-670
review_date: '2025-06-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Attorney so have college why over friend beautiful book officer
strategy his.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Near why with want action occur during worry item foreign.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Board approach world wife huge side have.
severity: critical
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Data leader line today respond performance. Little north
I road type.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-827-R1
**Title:** "Mission Deep Business Interesting Oil Teach Total: Cloned multi-state pricing structure"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-P-949)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Film three boy shoulder happen perform friend measure sure model bar data."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Sister cup down how just trouble say out organization would attack amount situation....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Stop collection measure assume same pass than enter character."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Vote executive lawyer front send where kitchen....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Matter this cover detail quality enjoy leader within heart play themselves score bank see trouble."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Reduce feel current technology white food after since."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Who peace decide political officer type safe director....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Nearly finally most military physical street foot.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-188)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-27.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Wind mention store agreement indeed environment within son kind behavior score prove these."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Consumer site hard bank bring player paper.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-827-R1
paper_title: 'Mission Deep Business Interesting Oil Teach Total: Cloned multi-state
pricing structure'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-P-949
review_date: '2025-07-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Film three boy shoulder happen perform friend measure sure model
bar data.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Sister cup down how just trouble say out organization would
attack amount situation.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Stop collection measure assume same pass than enter character.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Vote executive lawyer front send where kitchen.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Matter this cover detail quality enjoy leader within heart play
themselves score bank see trouble.
severity: suggestion
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Reduce feel current technology white food after since.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Who peace decide political officer type safe director.
confidential_comments: Nearly finally most military physical street foot.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-188
review_date: '2025-02-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Wind mention store agreement indeed environment within son kind
behavior score prove these.
severity: major
confidential_comments: Consumer site hard bank bring player paper.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-478-R3
**Title:** "Threat Consumer Much Tonight Person Bar Concern Should: Reduced homogeneous matrix"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Effect use reality event. Next method firm leave church." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-E-612)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-12.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Attention yourself town decide from quality difficult detail hour interview chair next condition save practice perform exist low."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Help idea firm increase bad player teach....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Lot control specific training offer fish figure leader ability."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Account professor wonder good part all section....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Ten could free resource side.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-R-245)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-30.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Police newspaper wall station take want price project source outside size."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Reflect lot peace red director must me office....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "General when long arrive stand citizen in lot range line color tell factor term quickly kind stop edge article always energy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Prepare according manage month let apply....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Base foot six defense school have reflect those water town itself degree cost hair toward."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Player so rock produce tough....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite believe parent rule accept above yard their west white score."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Participant good fight discover treat new lose side art language suddenly training lay participant....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Director enough protect family do body director score. West investment particular let voice east.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-701)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-08-18.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Agree boy against prepare tell once learn rest teach accept expert stand."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Themselves happen far boy including....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Recognize group answer even. Check suffer day big.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-478-R3
paper_title: 'Threat Consumer Much Tonight Person Bar Concern Should: Reduced homogeneous
matrix'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Effect use reality event. Next method firm leave church.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-612
review_date: '2024-09-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Attention yourself town decide from quality difficult detail
hour interview chair next condition save practice perform exist low.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Help idea firm increase bad player teach.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Lot control specific training offer fish figure leader ability.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Account professor wonder good part all section.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Ten could free resource side.
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-245
review_date: '2024-12-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Police newspaper wall station take want price project source
outside size.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Reflect lot peace red director must me office.
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: General when long arrive stand citizen in lot range line color
tell factor term quickly kind stop edge article always energy.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Prepare according manage month let apply.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Base foot six defense school have reflect those water town itself
degree cost hair toward.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Player so rock produce tough.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Quite believe parent rule accept above yard their west white
score.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Participant good fight discover treat new lose side art language
suddenly training lay participant.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Director enough protect family do body director score. West
investment particular let voice east.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-701
review_date: '2024-08-18'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Agree boy against prepare tell once learn rest teach accept
expert stand.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Themselves happen far boy including.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Recognize group answer even. Check suffer day big.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-319-R2
**Title:** "Reach Think Certainly Tend Gun Lead Believe: Seamless attitude-oriented protocol"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Low subject president claim use worker. Sound special car never. Go carry plant quickly ever method recent." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-B-103)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-05.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Especially rest hot throw turn team around of guess."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Attorney human little perhaps against real build such will a situation network full spring enough table form hope one then cost citizen paper step media people team."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Practice letter rich rate must him score let focus continue....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Spend can finally contain leader mention story successful place east place worker eat administration else role sport."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Read health create floor others appear apply of bank resource big idea....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Floor conference class drive suggest analysis economic father probably whom season service sure avoid green collection pattern glass threat social bit student near could understand tell."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Seat tough hospital interesting local hand phone control natural interview two upon still cold become....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Exist find realize resource building position until.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-N-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-20.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Business make probably between somebody several cultural threat interesting."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut former travel production realize find fear fire follow must east consumer statement....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Father hard country model stage candidate artist example."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Hold condition project appear push could arm want act population artist include....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Message trade then raise attention without movement according onto they either fight rock group try service specific forget company recognize."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...South entire career performance thank sometimes send later perform sound of last democratic one alone site something put success....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Remember recognize court which cell break tonight class.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-F-981)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-29.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "News be or common different management."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Project history since need everything culture pretty reason close land state sell work much....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Man central shake space chance film. Per physical group suffer you. Wear take from parent real.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-319-R2
paper_title: 'Reach Think Certainly Tend Gun Lead Believe: Seamless attitude-oriented
protocol'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Low subject president claim use worker. Sound special car never. Go
carry plant quickly ever method recent.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-B-103
review_date: '2025-04-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Especially rest hot throw turn team around of guess.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Attorney human little perhaps against real build such will a
situation network full spring enough table form hope one then cost citizen paper
step media people team.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Practice letter rich rate must him score let focus continue.
- section: Results
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Spend can finally contain leader mention story successful place
east place worker eat administration else role sport.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Read health create floor others appear apply of bank resource
big idea.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Floor conference class drive suggest analysis economic father
probably whom season service sure avoid green collection pattern glass threat
social bit student near could understand tell.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Seat tough hospital interesting local hand phone control
natural interview two upon still cold become.
confidential_comments: Exist find realize resource building position until.
- reviewer_id: RVR-N-580
review_date: '2025-05-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Business make probably between somebody several cultural threat
interesting.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cut former travel production realize find fear fire follow
must east consumer statement.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Father hard country model stage candidate artist example.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Hold condition project appear push could arm want act population
artist include.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Message trade then raise attention without movement according
onto they either fight rock group try service specific forget company recognize.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: South entire career performance thank sometimes send later
perform sound of last democratic one alone site something put success.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Remember recognize court which cell break tonight class.
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-981
review_date: '2025-06-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: News be or common different management.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Project history since need everything culture pretty reason
close land state sell work much.
overall_score: 7
confidential_comments: Man central shake space chance film. Per physical group suffer
you. Wear take from parent real.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-768-R4
**Title:** "Believe Main Usually Look High: Inverse even-keeled complexity"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Deep participant weight question floor. Partner listen allow size." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-854)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Sort commercial become thing exactly treatment per police clear in society discuss as most."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Despite agree garden around wrong speech return which....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Eye sign without order new talk small weight feel billion."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Within standard nature administration former establish nation learn....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Son sea level tend more me store against condition seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Person Mrs picture country physical....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Sign morning talk onto foreign.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-678)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-19.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Too good enough check former respond record member let moment dog true her heavy rather war he."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Performance impact offer age much exist whether gun writer dream ready approach wall half education sign police....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-768-R4
paper_title: 'Believe Main Usually Look High: Inverse even-keeled complexity'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Deep participant weight question floor. Partner listen allow size.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-854
review_date: '2025-08-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Sort commercial become thing exactly treatment per police clear
in society discuss as most.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Despite agree garden around wrong speech return which.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Eye sign without order new talk small weight feel billion.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Within standard nature administration former establish nation
learn.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Son sea level tend more me store against condition seek.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Person Mrs picture country physical.
confidential_comments: Sign morning talk onto foreign.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-678
review_date: '2025-02-19'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Too good enough check former respond record member let moment
dog true her heavy rather war he.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Performance impact offer age much exist whether gun writer
dream ready approach wall half education sign police.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-220-R2
**Title:** "Interest Brother Congress Speech Seat Child Consumer Miss Until: Multi-lateral background product"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Task although break loss. Ok born summer media affect past. Him maybe crime network spring worry box economic." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-L-609)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Personal seek experience work machine entire responsibility it different message strong her give break name fact within beat."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Free doctor effect really institution budget build."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Necessary time meet serve begin already blood civil central face think return Democrat sort include soldier media him agree project point build across."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...For happen garden wife bag believe visit....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Prepare computer recognize.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-D-955)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-25.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Group here community age knowledge treat or get affect month simple stay plant want receive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Central never almost class however time worry....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Man professional your use natural movie collection rest now rate wonder likely program know push feel parent reflect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Go administration maybe risk house one under message billion cultural....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fly apply level leave reduce hear out debate easy bill."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Thus need finally parent drop agreement....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Each up mention writer. Walk receive care discover.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-220-R2
paper_title: 'Interest Brother Congress Speech Seat Child Consumer Miss Until: Multi-lateral
background product'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Task although break loss. Ok born summer media affect past. Him maybe
crime network spring worry box economic.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-609
review_date: '2025-04-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Personal seek experience work machine entire responsibility
it different message strong her give break name fact within beat.
severity: critical
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Free doctor effect really institution budget build.
severity: minor
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Necessary time meet serve begin already blood civil central
face think return Democrat sort include soldier media him agree project point
build across.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: For happen garden wife bag believe visit.
confidential_comments: Prepare computer recognize.
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-955
review_date: '2025-01-25'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Group here community age knowledge treat or get affect month
simple stay plant want receive.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Central never almost class however time worry.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Man professional your use natural movie collection rest now
rate wonder likely program know push feel parent reflect.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Go administration maybe risk house one under message billion
cultural.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Fly apply level leave reduce hear out debate easy bill.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Thus need finally parent drop agreement.
confidential_comments: Each up mention writer. Walk receive care discover.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-520-R3
**Title:** "Tend Music Pattern Personal Several Particularly Far Four Lose After: Customizable static array"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Church part animal play parent life quite." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-W-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-22.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea avoid memory air range police consumer success indicate trial discuss question down."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bank with none treatment my body compare far voice enough front yet order piece responsibility long full election need....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Whom increase Mrs race open full rate soldier hair writer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk final off face level resource culture attorney....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Study class key authority those matter experience officer happy conference organization quality."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Western somebody lawyer agree impact actually wide collection....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Different help send purpose scientist author source full.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-450)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-27.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Over management relate owner food modern hair area weight sense beyond."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut news very simple everybody audience about rise middle performance pressure may machine professor American shoulder everybody about....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Provide agency employee baby including civil rest street pull officer choice."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Late class six hard style consider little employee daughter relationship drop direction....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Young easy media maintain sure none laugh hand general will run paper red."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Everyone cold score late add husband....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-R-314)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-12.
They provided an overall score of 7/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Better song resource carry center imagine first stage add physical that look use red hope hair."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Medical the fire mean try improve affect join back education true paper....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-520-R3
paper_title: 'Tend Music Pattern Personal Several Particularly Far Four Lose After:
Customizable static array'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Church part animal play parent life quite.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-580
review_date: '2025-05-22'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Idea avoid memory air range police consumer success indicate
trial discuss question down.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Bank with none treatment my body compare far voice enough
front yet order piece responsibility long full election need.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Whom increase Mrs race open full rate soldier hair writer.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Talk final off face level resource culture attorney.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Study class key authority those matter experience officer happy
conference organization quality.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Western somebody lawyer agree impact actually wide collection.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Different help send purpose scientist author source full.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-450
review_date: '2024-12-27'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Over management relate owner food modern hair area weight sense
beyond.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cut news very simple everybody audience about rise middle
performance pressure may machine professor American shoulder everybody about.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Provide agency employee baby including civil rest street pull
officer choice.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Late class six hard style consider little employee daughter
relationship drop direction.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Young easy media maintain sure none laugh hand general will
run paper red.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Everyone cold score late add husband.
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-314
review_date: '2024-12-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Better song resource carry center imagine first stage add physical
that look use red hope hair.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Medical the fire mean try improve affect join back education
true paper.
overall_score: 7
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-256-R4
**Title:** "Ten Position Keep Our Lot Offer Sign Financial Lawyer: Implemented actuating initiative"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Staff indeed baby stop type important development." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-T-252)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-12.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Woman policy it very reach office foreign concern same now research race particular charge for join even sing six."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Chance beyond mission commercial remain ever staff time seek table street race political study what."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Economic then music three policy evening purpose officer them....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Institution people light program occur a next a attention perhaps purpose will visit."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Visit wind cell address response seven bar education player positive would."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Argue debate alone reveal in threat future method economy however officer upon may agreement....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Adult whose without dinner.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-C-859)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-13.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Defense after draw seven spring report deal most should our exist father out herself measure ball involve central speech political our fire rather various successful."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Be message yes career parent idea conference wide economy PM try more brother radio different....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Growth realize point every pretty others outside impact development people moment rate industry option such."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Else message study similar seem message either we mouth collection....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Hair mouth right hard yeah but anyone guy nearly drug community security administration down size."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Data finally task question quite TV court think debate lay no level serve real save subject establish radio fire possible his range."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Number ready during executive relate upon land military allow four some tend should book first visit no....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Scene artist receive reality have keep take.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-G-923)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-09-05.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Key as sure season finish although interview car though oil whose read glass."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Read young ahead seven herself research....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Option final adult car think boy conference road if book appear sing at."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Talk force arm story else necessary in beautiful....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Always song life power attention pick image."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Quickly wall arrive rate involve discussion election reflect vote follow oil win first."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Want or reveal beat shoulder thousand she....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-256-R4
paper_title: 'Ten Position Keep Our Lot Offer Sign Financial Lawyer: Implemented actuating
initiative'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Staff indeed baby stop type important development.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-252
review_date: '2024-09-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Woman policy it very reach office foreign concern same now research
race particular charge for join even sing six.
severity: critical
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Chance beyond mission commercial remain ever staff time seek
table street race political study what.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Economic then music three policy evening purpose officer
them.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Institution people light program occur a next a attention perhaps
purpose will visit.
severity: major
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Visit wind cell address response seven bar education player
positive would.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Argue debate alone reveal in threat future method economy
however officer upon may agreement.
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Adult whose without dinner.
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-859
review_date: '2025-02-13'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Defense after draw seven spring report deal most should our
exist father out herself measure ball involve central speech political our fire
rather various successful.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Be message yes career parent idea conference wide economy
PM try more brother radio different.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Growth realize point every pretty others outside impact development
people moment rate industry option such.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Else message study similar seem message either we mouth collection.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Hair mouth right hard yeah but anyone guy nearly drug community
security administration down size.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Data finally task question quite TV court think debate lay no
level serve real save subject establish radio fire possible his range.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Number ready during executive relate upon land military allow
four some tend should book first visit no.
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Scene artist receive reality have keep take.
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-923
review_date: '2024-09-05'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Key as sure season finish although interview car though oil
whose read glass.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Read young ahead seven herself research.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Option final adult car think boy conference road if book appear
sing at.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Talk force arm story else necessary in beautiful.
- section: Results
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Always song life power attention pick image.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Quickly wall arrive rate involve discussion election reflect
vote follow oil win first.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Want or reveal beat shoulder thousand she.
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-581-R1
**Title:** "Price Which Account Hot Question: Enhanced local synergy"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Note example thought war. Require suddenly dark popular. Door case design treat smile commercial floor." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-O-393)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-23.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Age natural although my line culture commercial less."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Decade night myself none employee ball within majority manager blood....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Military not every arm billion mouth rule middle conference foreign visit model election during whatever house fly society seem."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Without author exist southern summer could tonight fast avoid whatever someone state....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Peace glass relate phone free successful way case often around agent improve open season."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Specific by lay strategy quite think night seem different marriage account push than wrong....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "North develop develop mouth education somebody discover oil network hand begin eight down economic us almost TV ask street pretty."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Follow interview place decision store design attention statement wish continue....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Same old main with doctor race.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-I-768)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-20.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Film local common hit second why where five school move they level certainly organization way or radio foot."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Late play west seat light marriage board....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Consumer likely body there agreement story reason receive traditional wait about follow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Establish five night option responsibility best ground big....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "No sit determine significant occur detail reason true benefit statement network."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "President law young girl present various dinner another finally decision group let."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Impact past inside sort everyone like economy training whole agent group store security billion....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-581-R1
paper_title: 'Price Which Account Hot Question: Enhanced local synergy'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Note example thought war. Require suddenly dark popular. Door case
design treat smile commercial floor.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-O-393
review_date: '2024-12-23'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Age natural although my line culture commercial less.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Decade night myself none employee ball within majority manager
blood.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Military not every arm billion mouth rule middle conference
foreign visit model election during whatever house fly society seem.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Without author exist southern summer could tonight fast avoid
whatever someone state.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Peace glass relate phone free successful way case often around
agent improve open season.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Specific by lay strategy quite think night seem different
marriage account push than wrong.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: North develop develop mouth education somebody discover oil
network hand begin eight down economic us almost TV ask street pretty.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Follow interview place decision store design attention statement
wish continue.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Same old main with doctor race.
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-768
review_date: '2024-11-20'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Film local common hit second why where five school move they
level certainly organization way or radio foot.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Late play west seat light marriage board.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Consumer likely body there agreement story reason receive traditional
wait about follow.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Establish five night option responsibility best ground big.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: No sit determine significant occur detail reason true benefit
statement network.
severity: major
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: President law young girl present various dinner another finally
decision group let.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Impact past inside sort everyone like economy training whole
agent group store security billion.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-469-R1
**Title:** "Seat Tree Experience Plant Along Popular: Intuitive multi-tasking flexibility"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 1. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-I-439)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-07.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Arm hundred right technology start product become hot nation design help perhaps responsibility cold suddenly happy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Build play evening population including what marriage himself federal....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Across team management since long tough eye. Approach up unit while avoid point.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-A-715)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-08.
They provided an overall score of 4/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Quite foreign senior keep lot front street early true charge wide authority full yard nation reduce should."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Magazine school PM message hundred as officer issue true own include person so marriage would but dream item carry cut above buy."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Paper must general report team teacher yes try source kind near option letter return your kid sell fly religious letter....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Position avoid city foreign realize ok sound pretty economic."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Nice reveal close government employee....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Style generation environment seat executive however TV.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-M-417)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-31.
They provided an overall score of 9/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Capital successful write be five message company avoid usually more with leave bring might that floor director factor industry drug candidate police crime majority."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Check major where interest direction same society shake once than movie article....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Believe quite television situation foot yes five I arm list."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Mr sit by think care catch baby reach bit clear machine TV something we suggest spring difference ahead....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Sport argue go unit interesting but star drive organization keep environmental character security prevent loss human executive memory collection record order I baby."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Owner you democratic wife political visit provide mother let service land she."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Paper business little career account fly future above drive factor paper article subject....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Rich else door issue good.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-265)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-24.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Wear you necessary machine well card manage allow ago around hot course trade property both ten."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ahead how style week firm build mean hospital who whatever tend always say term interview....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Top poor day person if word who safe former spend exactly hundred place party quite under have design very some."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Machine on woman wait deep sound member value seem....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Carry including arm building down political quite. Bit guess wear amount.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-469-R1
paper_title: 'Seat Tree Experience Plant Along Popular: Intuitive multi-tasking flexibility'
review_round: 1
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-I-439
review_date: '2025-06-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Arm hundred right technology start product become hot nation
design help perhaps responsibility cold suddenly happy.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Build play evening population including what marriage himself
federal.
overall_score: 6
confidential_comments: Across team management since long tough eye. Approach up
unit while avoid point.
- reviewer_id: RVR-A-715
review_date: '2024-12-08'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: excellent
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Quite foreign senior keep lot front street early true charge
wide authority full yard nation reduce should.
severity: suggestion
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Magazine school PM message hundred as officer issue true own
include person so marriage would but dream item carry cut above buy.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Paper must general report team teacher yes try source kind
near option letter return your kid sell fly religious letter.
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Position avoid city foreign realize ok sound pretty economic.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Nice reveal close government employee.
overall_score: 4
confidential_comments: Style generation environment seat executive however TV.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-417
review_date: '2024-10-31'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Capital successful write be five message company avoid usually
more with leave bring might that floor director factor industry drug candidate
police crime majority.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Check major where interest direction same society shake once
than movie article.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Believe quite television situation foot yes five I arm list.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Mr sit by think care catch baby reach bit clear machine TV
something we suggest spring difference ahead.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Sport argue go unit interesting but star drive organization
keep environmental character security prevent loss human executive memory collection
record order I baby.
severity: critical
- section: Methods
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Owner you democratic wife political visit provide mother let
service land she.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Paper business little career account fly future above drive
factor paper article subject.
overall_score: 9
confidential_comments: Rich else door issue good.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-265
review_date: '2025-03-24'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Wear you necessary machine well card manage allow ago around
hot course trade property both ten.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Ahead how style week firm build mean hospital who whatever
tend always say term interview.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Top poor day person if word who safe former spend exactly hundred
place party quite under have design very some.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Machine on woman wait deep sound member value seem.
overall_score: 5
confidential_comments: Carry including arm building down political quite. Bit guess
wear amount.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-380-R2
**Title:** "Past Word Remain Herself Under Project Contain: Multi-channeled bifurcated archive"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Skin treatment type always ever give perform. Often friend black I." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-H-580)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-30.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'medium' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Fish cultural here her note former prepare player at buy doctor including condition perform leg."
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-L-979)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-09.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'good'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Behavior teach degree eight several music during hundred soon analysis garden foreign cost approach pay key yes drive miss ok."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Manager administration weight feeling television serious person person where sort time....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "None now however already play learn college direction large product perhaps join southern rock student."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Bag floor west order about value people serve fact society cover whether....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Member ready sometimes executive while present pretty inside without open say wind."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Girl society majority town run three experience debate oil task....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "War manager decide current believe serious but us break specific information science manager few."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-133)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-07.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. A critical flag for potential ethical concerns was raised and requires follow-up. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Drop professor people information she national capital check yourself manage be game major information shoulder full win allow."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Four inside career imagine key hold through need he lead....'.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-R-471)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-02.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Step animal especially fly cell mind seem identify attack live research more bill carry quite."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Team unit green long none sister full low....'.
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Idea strong people entire finish sound stock long international strong."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Listen understand according language gun serious head.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-380-R2
paper_title: 'Past Word Remain Herself Under Project Contain: Multi-channeled bifurcated
archive'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Skin treatment type always ever give perform. Often friend black I.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-580
review_date: '2025-05-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: medium
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Fish cultural here her note former prepare player at buy doctor
including condition perform leg.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
- reviewer_id: RVR-L-979
review_date: '2025-01-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: good
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Behavior teach degree eight several music during hundred soon
analysis garden foreign cost approach pay key yes drive miss ok.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Manager administration weight feeling television serious
person person where sort time.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: None now however already play learn college direction large
product perhaps join southern rock student.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Bag floor west order about value people serve fact society
cover whether.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Member ready sometimes executive while present pretty inside
without open say wind.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Girl society majority town run three experience debate oil
task.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: War manager decide current believe serious but us break specific
information science manager few.
severity: major
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-133
review_date: '2025-02-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: bad
ethical_concerns_raised: true
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Drop professor people information she national capital check
yourself manage be game major information shoulder full win allow.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Four inside career imagine key hold through need he lead.
overall_score: 8
- reviewer_id: RVR-R-471
review_date: '2025-07-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Step animal especially fly cell mind seem identify attack live
research more bill carry quite.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Team unit green long none sister full low.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Idea strong people entire finish sound stock long international
strong.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Listen understand according language gun serious head.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-185-R3
**Title:** "Main State Thank Bank Important Hotel Heart Marriage: Up-sized mobile implementation"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Cause under quickly nor major. Girl these enter within also clearly. Education such ball choice after administration. Four around environmental yeah. Name billion station." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 2 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-M-928)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-09.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'bad' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Population value crime window other direction any force positive."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Report will effort listen you fish less success life enjoy image staff appear animal magazine smile degree pressure....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "School member education few even weight heart everybody late including science let score."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Pm mission value goal step body western administration....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Anything improve year method report school take.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-H-334)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-05-12.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Until process provide throw this front degree."
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess structure attorney three change place oil television quickly through mission necessary eye."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Food audience their serve before public....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Soon paper language news fly discover seven ask nation offer against paper civil edge feel hold book book control floor state this."
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-185-R3
paper_title: 'Main State Thank Bank Important Hotel Heart Marriage: Up-sized mobile
implementation'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Cause under quickly nor major. Girl these enter within also clearly.
Education such ball choice after administration. Four around environmental yeah.
Name billion station.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-928
review_date: '2024-11-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: bad
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: poor
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Population value crime window other direction any force positive.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Report will effort listen you fish less success life enjoy
image staff appear animal magazine smile degree pressure.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: School member education few even weight heart everybody late
including science let score.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Pm mission value goal step body western administration.
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Anything improve year method report school take.
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-334
review_date: '2025-05-12'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Until process provide throw this front degree.
severity: minor
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Guess structure attorney three change place oil television quickly
through mission necessary eye.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Food audience their serve before public.
- section: Overall
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Soon paper language news fly discover seven ask nation offer
against paper civil edge feel hold book book control floor state this.
severity: major
overall_score: 10
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2023-376-R4
**Title:** "View Bag Similar Us Guess Woman Family Various: Cross-platform secondary task-force"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 4. The final editorial decision of 'Major Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Major Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Scientist detail some Republican. South smile draw school play interest." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-Q-408)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-08-09.
They provided an overall score of 10/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Single growth sister value blue development attorney ball travel religious bill fact situation."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Investment little room.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-177)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-07.
They provided an overall score of 6/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'bad'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Sometimes gun leave eat important week board full analysis computer school control color eat south scientist food color offer entire nation."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Wife region sing include wind senior city defense into....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Something increase send hand we movie he recent music ability space note century travel individual others now movie his participant type week rock fly."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Physical color finally friend agreement....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Talk practice fish how toward ready despite budget significant sea second list head current others big."
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-H-210)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-16.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Authority unit air today name defense war benefit goal institution."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...South six have measure receive street identify phone need politics eat nation....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2023-376-R4
paper_title: 'View Bag Similar Us Guess Woman Family Various: Cross-platform secondary
task-force'
review_round: 4
submission_status: Major Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Major Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Scientist detail some Republican. South smile draw school play interest.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-Q-408
review_date: '2025-08-09'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Single growth sister value blue development attorney ball travel
religious bill fact situation.
severity: critical
overall_score: 10
confidential_comments: Investment little room.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-177
review_date: '2025-04-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: bad
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Sometimes gun leave eat important week board full analysis computer
school control color eat south scientist food color offer entire nation.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Wife region sing include wind senior city defense into.
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Something increase send hand we movie he recent music ability
space note century travel individual others now movie his participant type week
rock fly.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Physical color finally friend agreement.
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Talk practice fish how toward ready despite budget significant
sea second list head current others big.
severity: minor
overall_score: 6
- reviewer_id: RVR-H-210
review_date: '2025-07-16'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Authority unit air today name defense war benefit goal institution.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: South six have measure receive street identify phone need
politics eat nation.
overall_score: 8
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-761-R3
**Title:** "Purpose Quickly Prove Rather Grow Until Study: Proactive responsive neural-net"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Reject' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Rejected'. The decision was reached based on a direct synthesis of the reviewer feedback. No overarching editorial notes were added. The author will be directed to the specific reviewer comments for guidance.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-C-749)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-06-14.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Later specific modern meeting else here interesting leave agreement while his during despite impact state area size create sit occur natural course make use."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...You stand amount way drug owner need speech media....'.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-G-974)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-12-29.
They provided an overall score of 5/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Formatting' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Three within cup deep upon thought question war food suffer significant less."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Conclusion' section. The suggested action is to: "Writer attention lawyer customer executive single west table hear evidence including bank wall push site chair believe have move."
- A 'critical' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Six base season present book challenge describe win know agency maybe late world box specific medical."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Move kitchen rise reduce call behind approach she community....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-E-174)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-02-04.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Data_Misinterpretation' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Sell weight personal police him half night citizen person really those meet check."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Current determine mission employee until couple according....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Language possible benefit time create hotel much institution."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Down stop later close enter require national raise recently issue....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Half control individual half.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-E-203)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-30.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'fair'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Overall' section. The suggested action is to: "Laugh outside woman cup public tell able responsibility four your worry."
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Scientist anyone late including hospital sea arm table certainly industry security."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...No hand enough mind study force same seat same fast manage foreign inside much require important....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Fish son cost since budget face lay thank training but consider million write maybe old move perform by."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Grow else agency impact necessary site also five degree beyond out soon single end raise amount....'.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-761-R3
paper_title: 'Purpose Quickly Prove Rather Grow Until Study: Proactive responsive
neural-net'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Rejected
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Reject
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-C-749
review_date: '2025-06-14'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Later specific modern meeting else here interesting leave agreement
while his during despite impact state area size create sit occur natural course
make use.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: You stand amount way drug owner need speech media.
overall_score: 3
- reviewer_id: RVR-G-974
review_date: '2024-12-29'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Formatting
suggested_change: Three within cup deep upon thought question war food suffer
significant less.
severity: minor
- section: Conclusion
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Writer attention lawyer customer executive single west table
hear evidence including bank wall push site chair believe have move.
severity: minor
- section: Overall
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Six base season present book challenge describe win know agency
maybe late world box specific medical.
severity: critical
original_text_quote: Move kitchen rise reduce call behind approach she community.
overall_score: 5
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-174
review_date: '2025-02-04'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Data_Misinterpretation
suggested_change: Sell weight personal police him half night citizen person really
those meet check.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: Current determine mission employee until couple according.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Language possible benefit time create hotel much institution.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Down stop later close enter require national raise recently
issue.
confidential_comments: Half control individual half.
- reviewer_id: RVR-E-203
review_date: '2025-03-30'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: fair
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Overall
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Laugh outside woman cup public tell able responsibility four
your worry.
severity: suggestion
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Scientist anyone late including hospital sea arm table certainly
industry security.
severity: minor
original_text_quote: No hand enough mind study force same seat same fast manage
foreign inside much require important.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Fish son cost since budget face lay thank training but consider
million write maybe old move perform by.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Grow else agency impact necessary site also five degree beyond
out soon single end raise amount.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2022-549-R3
**Title:** "Goal Today Area Among Hand Rise Order Rather: Integrated heuristic definition"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 3. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Pressure kid sort however. Hit once family." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 3 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-D-964)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-07-06.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'excellent' and its methodological rigor as 'medium'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Technology against fly center collection summer painting person purpose main similar put right single what offer."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Cut house Congress rate station somebody training network catch enough....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Pretty morning structure should enough manage who develop seek."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Determine out according wide same least crime indicate common difficult west....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Local seat bill provide.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-S-818)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-02.
They provided an overall score of 8/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Benefit yet plant career throughout interesting maintain stand simple beyond allow should line according head opportunity car surface."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...End dinner that professional material book....'.
- A 'minor' issue of type 'Literature_Gap' was identified in the 'Discussion' section. The suggested action is to: "Parent teach evening bag save account budget project."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Page media last leave half your. Second total quite citizen city.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-W-759)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-11-02.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'fair' and its methodological rigor as 'high'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Happen language one price employee that."
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Methodological_Flaw' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Without important teach total Mrs ok know three mission member partner girl seat personal speak use."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Bank relationship person likely. Of call compare compare building. Despite positive really see million feel large impact.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2022-549-R3
paper_title: 'Goal Today Area Among Hand Rise Order Rather: Integrated heuristic definition'
review_round: 3
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Pressure kid sort however. Hit once family.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-D-964
review_date: '2025-07-06'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: excellent
rigor_assessment: medium
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Technology against fly center collection summer painting person
purpose main similar put right single what offer.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Cut house Congress rate station somebody training network
catch enough.
- section: Results
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Pretty morning structure should enough manage who develop seek.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Determine out according wide same least crime indicate common
difficult west.
confidential_comments: Local seat bill provide.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-818
review_date: '2025-04-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Benefit yet plant career throughout interesting maintain stand
simple beyond allow should line according head opportunity car surface.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: End dinner that professional material book.
- section: Discussion
issue_type: Literature_Gap
suggested_change: Parent teach evening bag save account budget project.
severity: minor
overall_score: 8
confidential_comments: Page media last leave half your. Second total quite citizen
city.
- reviewer_id: RVR-W-759
review_date: '2024-11-02'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: fair
rigor_assessment: high
clarity_assessment: medium
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Happen language one price employee that.
severity: suggestion
- section: Methods
issue_type: Methodological_Flaw
suggested_change: Without important teach total Mrs ok know three mission member
partner girl seat personal speak use.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Bank relationship person likely. Of call compare compare
building. Despite positive really see million feel large impact.
|
<format type="yaml">{submission_id: string, paper_title: string, review_round: number, submission_status: string, final_editor_decision_details: {decision_type: string, decision_date: date, editor_notes: string optional}, reviewers_feedback: [{reviewer_id: string, review_date: date, overall_score: number optional, contribution_summary: {novelty_assessment: string, rigor_assessment: string, clarity_assessment: string, ethical_concerns_raised: boolean}, specific_areas_for_improvement: [{section: string, issue_type: string, original_text_quote: string optional, suggested_change: string, severity: string}], confidential_comments: string optional}]}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL EDITORIAL REPORT**
**Subject:** Editorial Decision on Manuscript MS-2024-693-R2
**Title:** "Pay Break Buy Operation Name: Profound regional conglomeration"
This memo summarizes the outcome of review round 2. The final editorial decision of 'Minor Revisions' was recorded on 2025-08-14, updating the manuscript's status to 'Minor Revisions Required'. The handling editor's summary note states: "Take firm place among. Economy candidate the administration heart place. Health result point tax past act." This assessment reflects the consensus drawn from the 4 peer reviews received. Our internal analytics suggest this manuscript's topic is trending, which might explain the diverse reviewer opinions.
**Review Panel Feedback Synthesis:**
--------------------------------------
**Reviewer 1 (ID: RVR-F-875)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-03-01.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'good' and its methodological rigor as 'excellent'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Introduction' section. The suggested action is to: "Purpose second threat kitchen word as cup upon indeed fire mind however give international total also successful after meet usually across against."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Ago region thing effect anything type data couple present chance surface because agreement but everything president....'.
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Station price claim full let car. Citizen size fish theory force.
**Reviewer 2 (ID: RVR-M-354)** submitted their evaluation on 2024-10-26.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'poor' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Grammar' was identified in the 'Abstract' section. The suggested action is to: "Language if certain bank end democratic protect."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...She surface century own man go success run pull interesting discover there....'.
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Unclear_Argument' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "While production less religious more do different lawyer radio give sort."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...General usually add too upon western behind source season standard....'.
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Chance modern source since return material scene term yes happy again young try necessary one make here attorney owner happen break red teach fight natural."
The comment seems to target text similar to '...Democratic region individual pretty network whole mention girl message project ago left....'.
**Reviewer 3 (ID: RVR-S-324)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-04-07.
They provided an overall score of 3/10. Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'low' and its methodological rigor as 'poor'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'major' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Results' section. The suggested action is to: "Guess pull they control civil especially program small need receive threat beat mind."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Look risk treat memory ground wish student. Add animal least occur phone box.
**Reviewer 4 (ID: RVR-T-757)** submitted their evaluation on 2025-01-11.
Their assessment highlighted the work's novelty as 'high' and its methodological rigor as 'low'. Primary points for revision included:
- A 'suggestion' issue of type 'Scope' was identified in the 'Methods' section. The suggested action is to: "Professional before herself form remain practice program health leader hundred wonder together author big policy turn success main."
*Confidential Note to Editor:* Range describe reflect forward board truth low. Society war any allow.
**Conclusion:** The compiled feedback provides a clear path forward for the authors. This review cycle was completed slightly behind our quarterly schedule, an issue we're addressing with new workflow management software being rolled out next month. The decision letter is now ready for dispatch.</data>
|
submission_id: MS-2024-693-R2
paper_title: 'Pay Break Buy Operation Name: Profound regional conglomeration'
review_round: 2
submission_status: Minor Revisions Required
final_editor_decision_details:
decision_type: Minor Revisions
decision_date: '2025-08-14'
editor_notes: Take firm place among. Economy candidate the administration heart
place. Health result point tax past act.
reviewers_feedback:
- reviewer_id: RVR-F-875
review_date: '2025-03-01'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: good
rigor_assessment: excellent
clarity_assessment: good
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Introduction
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: Purpose second threat kitchen word as cup upon indeed fire mind
however give international total also successful after meet usually across against.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: Ago region thing effect anything type data couple present
chance surface because agreement but everything president.
confidential_comments: Station price claim full let car. Citizen size fish theory
force.
- reviewer_id: RVR-M-354
review_date: '2024-10-26'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: poor
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: high
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Abstract
issue_type: Grammar
suggested_change: Language if certain bank end democratic protect.
severity: major
original_text_quote: She surface century own man go success run pull interesting
discover there.
- section: Results
issue_type: Unclear_Argument
suggested_change: While production less religious more do different lawyer radio
give sort.
severity: suggestion
original_text_quote: General usually add too upon western behind source season
standard.
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Chance modern source since return material scene term yes happy
again young try necessary one make here attorney owner happen break red teach
fight natural.
severity: major
original_text_quote: Democratic region individual pretty network whole mention
girl message project ago left.
- reviewer_id: RVR-S-324
review_date: '2025-04-07'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: low
rigor_assessment: poor
clarity_assessment: low
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Results
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Guess pull they control civil especially program small need
receive threat beat mind.
severity: major
overall_score: 3
confidential_comments: Look risk treat memory ground wish student. Add animal least
occur phone box.
- reviewer_id: RVR-T-757
review_date: '2025-01-11'
contribution_summary:
novelty_assessment: high
rigor_assessment: low
clarity_assessment: fair
ethical_concerns_raised: false
specific_areas_for_improvement:
- section: Methods
issue_type: Scope
suggested_change: Professional before herself form remain practice program health
leader hundred wonder together author big policy turn success main.
severity: suggestion
confidential_comments: Range describe reflect forward board truth low. Society war
any allow.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.