answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"28"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2013.06.022 | The IPCE spectrum exhibits a maximum of 45% for the dye 3 at 685 nm while this value is lowest in the case of homoleptic system 1 (28%). | What is IPCE? | 48547 |
{
"text": [
"3.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.04.017 | By optimizing the morphology of perovskite film, the fill factor (FF) increased from 30.44% to 55.20%, enhancing the power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 3.23% to 7.44%. | What is the value of PCE? | 2594 |
{
"text": [
"11.52"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.071 | From (b), the JSC of PSC dropped by about 21% from 11.52 mA/cm2 to 9.07 mA/cm2 with about 17% decrease of FF from 0.78 to 0.65, and the PCE degrade from 8.4% to 5.08% and 60.4%of its original value was kept. | What is ? | 5543 |
{
"text": [
"22.72mA·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.005 | This phenomenon helps form a compact homogenous perovskite film but not does influence electrons to inject into the TiO2 layer (Jsc, 22.72mA·cm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 10773 |
{
"text": [
"541mV"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.12.020 | The DSSCs sensitized by LJJ101 exhibits a conversion efficiency of 4.6% with a Jsc of 12.1mA/cm2, an Voc of 541mV and a FF of 71%. | What is the value of Voc? | 36752 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.085 | A 1000 W metal halide lamp served as a light source, and its light intensity was adjusted to simulated 1.5 AM at 100 mW/cm2 with a Si photo detector fitted with a Ka-5 filter as a reference, calibrated at NREL, USA. | What is the value of light intensity? | 51778 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13367B | The pairs of anodic and cathodic currents, corresponding to the oxidation and reduction of I−/I3−, respectively, are assigned to the redox reaction shown in eqn (2). | What is redox reaction? | 70779 |
{
"text": [
"24h"
],
"answer_start": [
473
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.101 | Several small crystallites form some kind of diffusion barrier layer in the film after immersion; this type of change in the morphology of the ZnO film is assumed to have arisen due to the formation of aggregations of N3 dye molecules with Zn2+ ions on the surface of the film, caused by the immersion of the ZnO film in N3 dye solution for a prolonged time a and b shows SEM images of the ZnO film at different magnifications, after its dipping in CYC-B1 dye solution for 24h; c and d shows SEM images of the ZnO film at different magnifications, after immersion in CYC-B1 dye solution for 48h. | What is the value of time? | 42490 |
{
"text": [
"9.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | The DSSCs using the graphene CE combined with the heteroleptic Ru complex C106TBA as sensitizer produced a high PCE of 9.54%, surpassing the DSSCs using Pt CE (9.14%).Pt is known as the best catalyst for the regeneration of the I3−/I− electrolyte. | What is the value of PCE? | 66610 |
{
"text": [
"5.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2010.05.003 | PZn-MT sensitized cell exhibits η=5.55% with Jsc=12.83mAcm−2, Voc=0.64V, and ff=0.68, while PZn-HT sensitized one shows a higher η=5.80% with Jsc=13.71mAcm−2, Voc=0.63V, and ff=0.67, and PZn-EDOT sensitized one yields the highest η=6.47% with Jsc=15.59mAcm−2, Voc=0.64V, and ff=0.65. | What is the value of η? | 26448 |
{
"text": [
"0.75%"
],
"answer_start": [
401
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.07.013 | thus clearly shows that the Rct2 values are much smaller in the case of the DSSCs with ZnO@TiO2-NWs, compared to those of the cells with pristine ZnO-NWs; these results are in consistency with the higher values of VOC, FF and η of the DSSCs with ZnO@TiO2-NWs, than those of the cells with pristine ZnO-NWs ( that the optimal sensitization time is 15 min for ZnO-NWs, corresponding to an efficiency of 0.75%, and the optimal sensitization time is 30 min for ZnO@TiO2-NWs, corresponding to an efficiency of 1.17%. | What is the value of η? | 50720 |
{
"text": [
"1.17%"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
} | 10.1016/j.jiec.2011.11.116 | As shown in , PCE of OE-DSSC (η= 1.17%) is higher than that of CE-DSSC (η= 0.63%). | What is the value of PCE? | 53086 |
{
"text": [
"74.95%"
],
"answer_start": [
194
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA07462C | Small increases in short-circuit current (JSC) (from 22.7 to 23.1 mA cm−2) and open-circuit voltage (VOC) (from 1.03 to 1.08 V), and a substantial enhancement in fill factor (FF) (from 67.97 to 74.95%) were obtained, leading to a marked improvement in the efficiency of the devices. | What is the value of FF? | 20781 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.044 | All of H-ACNF parameters except for Jsc is higher than those of ACNF, showing Jsc of 14.5 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.73 V, FF of 62%, η of 6.58%. | What is the value of Voc? | 38524 |
{
"text": [
"76.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA08900K | The pristine CsPbBr3-based PSC achieved a PCE of 7.29% (Voc = 1.40 V, Jsc = 6.84 mA cm−2, FF = 76.1%), and the PCE significantly improved to 9.06% using CsPb0.97Tb0.03Br3 as the light harvester; other parameters also elevated. | What is the value of FF? | 17849 |
{
"text": [
"0.78V"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.01.118 | Combined with the optimized ZnO concentration to suppress electrons recombination, energy conversion efficiency of 9.00% can be obtained with Jsc of 16.70mAcm−2, Voc of 0.78V and FF of 0.69, which is 44.4% higher than those of DSSCs based on P25 particles, and substantially higher than other TiO2/ZnO morphologies as well.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have attracted significant research interests as a promising alternative for the third generation photovoltaic device due to their low cost, simple fabrication procedures and relatively high energy conversion efficiency. | What is the value of Voc? | 58688 |
{
"text": [
"746 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
279
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00068E | The power conversion efficiencies increased significantly compared to the simple phenothiazine dye C6PTZ (η = 4.16%, Jsc = 8.33 mA cm−2, Voc = 703 mV and FF = 0.71) for D7 (η = 5.87%, Jsc = 10.77 mA cm−2, Voc = 718 mV and FF = 0.76) and D8 (η = 6.63%, Jsc = 12.01 mA cm−2, Voc = 746 mV and FF = 0.74). | What is the value of Voc? | 64922 |
{
"text": [
"14.97±0.39mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.11.037 | Experimentally, the 336nm devices yielded the highest Jsc (14.97±0.39mA/cm2), which is coherent with the simulation result. | What is the value of Jsc? | 10824 |
{
"text": [
"388mV"
],
"answer_start": [
272
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.050 | Compound b-glc, which is the only compound in this series containing a carboxylic unit, presents the lowest VOC value (280mV), followed by compounds a-glc (359mV) and c-glc (358mV), which possess only catechol linker units, and finally, compounds d-glc (382mV) and e-glc (388mV), possessing a catechol, together with electron donating methoxy groups.), the carboxylated compound (b-glc) is the worst performing dye, with an overall efficiency of 0.26%. | What is the value of VOC? | 28371 |
{
"text": [
"5.73%"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.005 | Graphene nanoplatelets have also exhibited promising electrocatalytic activity towards I3−reduction in optically-semitransparent thin films with a good PCE of 5.73% and a fill factor of 0.65 in DSSCs The potent role of CNT composites (either metallic or polymers) as counter electrodes for DSSCs has been demonstrated CNTs decorated with Co and Ni nanoparticles as counter electrodes; accordingly, they reported the best PCEs of 7.75% and 8.39%, respectively CNT-Co and -Ni composites exhibited improved electrocatalytic activities relative to platinum-based counter electrodes. | What is the value of PCE? | 35147 |
{
"text": [
"0 h"
],
"answer_start": [
253
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.008 | The other chemicals with analytical grade were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Plant (Shanghai, China).Pristine MWCNTs were oxidized by ultrasonication in a concentrated sulfuric acid/nitric acid mixture (3:1, v/v) at 20 °C for a certain time (0 h, 2 h, 6 h and 8 h). | What is the value of time? | 26608 |
{
"text": [
"7.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | With CoS/rGO as CE, the DSSC achieved a PCE of 9.39%, which was increased by 27.93% compared with the DSSC with Pt CE (7.34%). | What is the value of PCE? | 66692 |
{
"text": [
"iodide/triiodide"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05154H | S4, the color of the bare Au@Ag NR colloidal solution become light and transparent eventually, and we speculated that bare nanorods were easily corroded by the iodide/triiodide redox couple. | What is redox couple? | 64313 |
{
"text": [
"220 to 330"
],
"answer_start": [
14
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.08.003 | The band from 220 to 330 nm was assigned to the characteristic absorption of TiO2 and the POT adsorption band in the UV light region. | What is TiO2? | 39589 |
{
"text": [
"0.09 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09304G | Finally, gold (Au) metal contacts were evaporated onto the sample as top electrodes to create a 0.09 cm2 active area.To study the film texture and thickness of the deposited films, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S4160 Hitachi Japan) and atomic force microscopy (AFM, Veeco PCResearch USA) were used. | What is the value of active area? | 19467 |
{
"text": [
"3.99%"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.05.015 | Thus, increasing the press time at 125 MPa resulted in a slight enhancement of η from 3.99% to 4.21%. | What is the value of η? | 58699 |
{
"text": [
"16.05 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
324
]
} | 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.03.006 | The values of Jsc, Voc, FF and η are calculated and summarized in that the open-circuit voltage (Voc) values of all NiS(NPs)/PEDOT-PSS CE – based DSSCs are relatively close to one another, ranging between 0.74 and 0.77 V, whereas the short-current density (Jsc) based DSSCs are significantly increased from 14.02 mA/cm2 to 16.05 mA/cm2 with the increase of NiS(NPs) to 0.3 g. | What is the value of Jsc? | 50099 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
203
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA06393G | Both Bode plots and Tafel polarization curves were recorded by assembling symmetric dummy cells consisting of Pt CE|solid-state electrolyte|Pt CE.The photovoltaic test of the DSSC with an active area of 0.25 cm2 was carried out by measuring the photocurrent–voltage (J–V) characteristic curves using a CHI660E electrochemical workstation under irradiation from simulated solar light produced by a 100 W xenon arc lamp (XQ-500 W) in an ambient atmosphere. | What is the value of active area? | 67029 |
{
"text": [
"8.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA04020E | Maximum power conversion efficiency (η) of 8.08% was obtained with 6 vol% of silica particles in the sensitized layer. | What is the value of η? | 62259 |
{
"text": [
"0.93V"
],
"answer_start": [
144
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.019 | As the volume ratio of ammonia is increased to 4%, the device exhibits the best performance among all the devices with a PCE of 15.5%, a Voc of 0.93V, a Jsc of 20.9mA/cm2 and an FF of 79.4%. | What is the value of Voc? | 5791 |
{
"text": [
"18.75%"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.002 | Devices with ICTH1 and ICTH2 showed superior photovoltaic performance (PCE 17.91% and 18.75%, with active area of 2.04 and 2.18cm2 respectively for the devices based on ICTH1 and ICTH2) with higher Jsc, Voc and FF values (Jsc, Voc and FF values are 24.56mA/cm2, 1.01V, 0.722 and 24.78mA/cm2, 1.03V, 0.735, respectively for the PSCs with ICTH1 and ICTH2 HTMs) compared to the devices employing spiro-OMeTAD (PCE 14.74%, with active area of 1.84cm2, Jsc, Voc and FF values are 23.63mA/cm2, 0.92V and 0.678) as HTM. | What is the value of PCE? | 9005 |
{
"text": [
"9.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA12558A | The DSSCs employing Co–Cu–WSx, Co–WSx, Co–CuSx and Pt CEs exhibit progressively decreasing PCEs of 9.61%, 9.14%, 8.56% and 8.24%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 74293 |
{
"text": [
"8.24%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA16276A | In particular, for the DSSC with CA-PDMS, a significantly increased PCE value of ∼8.24% was obtained compared to that (PCE ≈ 7.45%) for the reference DSSC, exhibiting a large PCE enhancement percentage of ∼10.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 74064 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2011.10.038 | The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of the cells were recorded using a potentiostat/galvanostat (CHI, model 440) under 100mWcm−2 light intensity. | What is the value of light intensity? | 37678 |
{
"text": [
"0.798V"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.04.113 | In this case, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 4.73mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.798V and a fill factor (FF) of 76.5 are obtained, which gives an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 2.89%. | What is the value of Voc? | 9609 |
{
"text": [
"2.81%"
],
"answer_start": [
206
]
} | 10.1039/C3CP51941D | When the sintering temperature increased from room temperature to 500 °C, the values of VOC, JSC, and η increased initially and then decreased slightly, with the optimal values of 0.68 V, 9.53 mA cm−2, and 2.81% after 450 °C calcination. | What is the value of η? | 73606 |
{
"text": [
"JK2(E1)"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.032 | When the E2 electrolyte was used in SQ1 sub-cell, the JK2(E1)/SQ1(E2) tandem cell demonstrated a slight decrease in the Jsc from 15.93 to 15.65 mA cm−2 but an obvious rise in the Voc from 0.66 to 0.69 V, corresponding to an improvement of ca. | What is electrolyte? | 51987 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.037 | As a result, the DSSC based on the graphene/PEDOT:PSS counter electrode showed high power conversion efficiency of 7.86% under a simulated sunlight illumination of 100mWcm−2 (AM 1.5), which is comparable with the performance of the DSSC based on Pt counter electrode (7.31%).► The graphene flakes are highly dispersed on PEDOT:PSS (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrenesulfonate) matrix. | What is the value of illumination? | 57617 |
{
"text": [
"0.55 V"
],
"answer_start": [
296
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.09.001 | FT100 (FT67) exhibited the strongest (weakest) intermolecular interaction with iodides, corresponding with the results of dye+–I− species.Substitutions of one or two H atoms in the 2-pheylpridiminato (L, ) ligand of FT dye with F or CF3 groups enhances Voc of DSSC using I−/I3− redox couple from 0.55 V (FT67) up to 0.70 V (FT100, ). | What is the value of Voc? | 47646 |
{
"text": [
"1.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
234
]
} | 10.1039/C4FD00155A | We have further used a TiO2 nanorod (NR) array as a base structure for this LPD-TiO2 nanolayer to support the CH3NH3PbI3 photoactive layer, and achieved a significantly boosted photocurrent density without obviously compromising Voc (1.01 V), promoting the cell efficiency from 3.67% to 8.61%.To prepare TiO2 nanolayers by the LPD method, the reaction solutions were firstly prepared by dissolving 0.05 M (NH4)2TiF6 and 0.15 M boric acid (H3BO3) in distilled water. | What is the value of Voc? | 16332 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.074 | CuS/WS2 and CuS/ MoS2 CEs achieved high PCEs of 8.21% and 7.12%, respectively, under a simulated solar illumination of 100mWcm−2 (AM 1.5). | What is the value of illumination? | 58125 |
{
"text": [
"15.24mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.062 | It is notable that higher Jsc (15.24mAcm−2), FF (0.6627) and excellent photoelectric conversion efficiency (7.10%) were exhibited for DSSC with Co9S8/rGO as the counter electrode, which might be attributed to higher special surface, abundant exposed active sites and excellent electrical conductivity. | What is the value of Jsc? | 33370 |
{
"text": [
"48.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.10.129 | As for gel-DSC, the Jsc, Voc, and FF values are 13.07 mA cm−2, 0.638 V, and 48.9%, respectively, corresponding to an overall energy conversion efficiency of 4.08%. | What is the value of FF? | 52876 |
{
"text": [
"20.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1039/C9SC01184F | Thiophene-based Z26 exhibited an impressive PCE of 20.1%. | What is the value of PCE? | 21433 |
{
"text": [
"18.40%"
],
"answer_start": [
206
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103866 | Compare to undoped PEDOT:PSS, the PSC device made from 1.5wt% EMIC-treated PEDOT:PSS has increased Voc from 1.01V to 1.04V, Jsc from 21.93mAcm−2 to 23.91mAcm−2, FF from 0.69 to 0.74, and PCE from 15.28% to 18.40%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8843 |
{
"text": [
"10.12 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.021 | It could be seen that with incorporation of 0.32 wt% CNT in photoanode, the JSC increases from 8.75 to 10.12 mA/cm2 (15.71%), the VOC decreases from 690 to 680 mV (−1.45%), and the fill factor reduces from 58% to 56% (−3.45%). | What is the value of JSC? | 41995 |
{
"text": [
"7.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.130 | The DSSC based on the PEDOT CE polymerized with 0.05 M of EDOT and 0.1 M of LiClO4 shows a PCE of 7.42%, which is comparable to that of Pt CE based-solar cell (7.41%). | What is the value of PCE? | 36893 |
{
"text": [
"6.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC04649A | Impressive PCE values of 15.0% and 16.1% were recorded for devices based on a standard CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite and mixed perovskite, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 16826 |
{
"text": [
"0.712 V"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1039/C3CE40321A | The 3D/1D TNS/TNR sample shows η of 5.39% (Jsc = 11.70 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.712 V, FF = 62%). | What is the value of Voc? | 66062 |
{
"text": [
"1.35%"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1016/j.jlumin.2015.01.054 | The DSSC using ZnO electrode sensitized by mixed dyes provided JSC=5.6 mA cm−2, VOC=0.606 V, FF=0.53 and maximum energy conversion efficiency (η) of 1.35% on illuminating the cell with visible light of 150 mW cm−2 intensity.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) are promising solar energy harvesting devices for the generation of electricity In general, DSSCs consist of a semiconductor electrode (usually thin film of ZnO or TiO2) with one kind of dye adsorbed onto its surface. | What is the value of η? | 36628 |
{
"text": [
"59.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.159 | It can be seen in that better performance is exhibited by the DSSC with electrode 2, with the Voc, FF, Jsc, and η being 0.730 V, 59.2%, 8.35 mA cm−2, and 3.61%, respectively; the performance of this cell exceeds greatly over that of the cell with electrode 1 (η= 1.56%). | What is the value of FF? | 35720 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.105415 | The active area of device controlled to 0.16cm2.Measurement and characterization: The AFM image scanned by an atomic force microscope (AFM, Agilent 7500). | What is the value of active area? | 7348 |
{
"text": [
"17.9mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.010 | The performance of cells where the perovskite was grown for 30min (Voc=950mV, Jsc=17.9mAcm−2, FF=65.7%, PCE=11.2%) and the best case of 1h (Voc=967mV, Jsc=19.5mAcm−2, FF=67.5%, PCE=12.7%) was very similar. | What is the value of Jsc? | 5304 |
{
"text": [
"85mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
209
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.060 | The photocurrent–voltage (I–V) characteristics of the DSSCs were measured using a solar simulator (Model 69907, Oriel) and Keithley source meter (2420) under illumination of AM 1.5G light with an intensity of 85mWcm−2, a mask with a window of 0.15cm2 was clipped on the TiO2 side to define the active area of the cells.The influence of H2SO4 concentration used for polymerization on the morphology of PANI films was investigated by SEM measurements. | What is the value of solar? | 53389 |
{
"text": [
"8.20%"
],
"answer_start": [
365
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE00599J | Pristine TIPS-pentacene based devices gave enhanced PV performance after aging (under dark conditions) resulting in predominantly increased Jsc and Voc, while the fill factor remains unaltered.The devices fabricated with TIPS-pentacene in pristine form gave a competitive PCE (11.5%) while the one doped with LiTFSI and t-BP as additives attained an average PCE of 8.20%. | What is the value of PCE? | 20657 |
{
"text": [
"6.76%"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.004 | Sensitizer DH-16, the upgraded version of DH-13, gives the highest PCE up to 6.76% which can be attributed to the synergistic effect of tert-butyl-capped donor and benzothiadiazole-contained π-linker that enhanced Voc and Jsc simultaneously. | What is the value of PCE? | 56679 |
{
"text": [
"0.93 V"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA04414C | A best PCE of 15.86%, corresponding to a JSC of 22.69 mA cm−2, a VOC of 0.93 V, and a FF of 0.75, is achieved. | What is the value of VOC? | 20084 |
{
"text": [
"13.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.128 | Here, in , PSCs based on TDB-TiO2 ETL exhibit a PCE of 13.9% with Jsc of 20.8mAcm−2, Voc of 1.06V and FF of 63%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8737 |
{
"text": [
"0.054%"
],
"answer_start": [
190
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.008 | Furthermore, the YK-1-based device exhibited a higher incident photon to charge carrier efficiency (IPCE) of 0.064%, with Voc=105mV, Jsc=2.33mAcm−2, and FF=27.9%, while YK-2 only reached to 0.054%, due to the low Jsc for YK-2. | What is the value of PCE? | 36195 |
{
"text": [
"598 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/C2CE25356A | When a pure ZnO hierarchical structure is used as the photoanode material, the cell has a low Jsc of 7.8 mA cm−2 and Voc of 598 mV. | What is the value of Voc? | 62917 |
{
"text": [
"632 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA13273A | It is notable that TC200 which showed the highest Voc of 691 mV has the highest recombination resistance of 20.21 Ω compare to Voc and R2 of 632 mV and 15.09 Ω for the pristine device, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 76092 |
{
"text": [
"0.067cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110029 | The active area for all the devices was 0.067cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 10218 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.043 | The slightly higher Rs values of the Cu2XSnS4 (X=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn and Cd) may be due to poor adhesion of the films to the FTO substrate. | What is substrate? | 24298 |
{
"text": [
"0.67 V"
],
"answer_start": [
299
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.11.030 | The electrochemical activity of the CNT may be explained in terms of the size of surface area as it is known that the large surface area of carbon materials can enhanced electrochemical activity From the CNT-electrolyte DSSCs, in the case of the SWCNT-electrolyte DSSC, Voc and Jsc were observed as 0.67 V and 9.11 mA/cm2, Voc and Jsc of the MWCNT-electrolyte DSSC were 0.68 V and 10.23 mA/cm2, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 26974 |
{
"text": [
"6.35%"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA20769C | When a slightly weaker donor of hexyloxy instead of DPA was attached to PTZ skeleton to generate PZ-4 dye, the highest conversion efficiency (η = 6.35%, Voc = 0.69 V, Jsc = 13.53 mA cm−2) of its device was achieved. | What is the value of η? | 61090 |
{
"text": [
"7.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE41888J | with a phenyl-DPP sensitizer, they further improved the PCE to 7.7% with the use of Dye 34. | What is the value of PCE? | 71492 |
{
"text": [
"9.78mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
170
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104015 | The corresponding PCE of the best performing device increases from 9.53% (Voc=1.423V, Jsc=9.35mAcm−2 and FF=71.63%) to a breakthrough performance 10.91% (Voc=1.498V, Jsc=9.78mAcm−2 and FF=74.47%) under reverse scanning (see ). | What is the value of Jsc? | 7576 |
{
"text": [
"3.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA06823H | Ripening of the DSCs occurs and after 7 days, the dependence of η on the halo-substituent is I > Cl ≈ F ≈ Br; the highest η is 3.16% for [Cu(1)(5)]+ compared to 7.63% for N719 (a relative efficiency of 41.4% versus N719 set at 100%). | What is the value of η? | 75600 |
{
"text": [
"14.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
239
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA09691J | The device parameters are summarized in Table 1.Perovskite solar cells fabricated with the GA process exhibited no photocurrent hysteresis when devices measured in the reverse and forward scanning directions, showing nearly the same PCEs (14.0% vs. | What is the value of PCE? | 23154 |
{
"text": [
"0.92 V"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00237G | The VOC of the hybrid tandem solar cell is close to the sum of the VOC of the perovskite (0.92 V) and the polymer (0.66 V) subcells owing to the efficient recombination at interconnecting layers and negligible voltage loss for aligning the Fermi level between the subcells. | What is the value of VOC? | 22757 |
{
"text": [
"19.16 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.171 | Increasing the concentration of TiCl4 to 200 mM resulted in a substantially improved Jsc of 19.16 mA/cm2 and FF of 59%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 8557 |
{
"text": [
"756 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.055 | Clearly, the cells based on CoSe2-180 and NiSe2-180 obtained PCE values of 8.16% (Jsc of 16.35 mA cm−2 and a Voc of 758 mV) and 7.78% (Jsc of 15.49 mA cm−2 and a Voc of 756 mV), respectively, which were both significantly lower than that of Ni-Co-Se-180 (9.04%). | What is the value of Voc? | 46830 |
{
"text": [
"1.03V"
],
"answer_start": [
310
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227267 | This can thank to the increased conductivity of NiOx HTL after 3% Eu doping, which make a better balance between holes and electrons transportation inside the inverted PSC.As compared above, the inverted PSC using 3% Eu:NiOx HTL exhibits the highest PCE of 15.06% in our case with a JSC of 21.96mAcm−2, VOC of 1.03V and FF of 66.6%. | What is the value of VOC? | 5507 |
{
"text": [
"14.03mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.055 | Among the DSSCs with a light scattering layer in the photoanode, the higher η and Jsc values respectively of 7.50% and 14.03mAcm−2 were achieved for the case with HTiO2 in its photoanode, as compared with those for the cells with CTiO2 and the commercial TiO2 as the light scatterers. | What is the value of Jsc? | 34219 |
{
"text": [
"8.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA03451A | However, when the two rigid D–π–A branches are connected, the DSSC device incorporating a double branched dye isomer gives a dramatically improved η of 8.1% for D1 (Jsc = 14.83 mA cm−2, Voc = 755 mV, FF = 0.72), 7.5% for D2 (Jsc = 13.21 mA cm−2, Voc = 756 mV, FF = 0.75), and 6.6% for D3 (Jsc = 12.00 mA cm−2, Voc = 752 mV, FF = 0.73). | What is the value of η? | 68994 |
{
"text": [
"2.69%"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM30254C | However, replacing the triphenylethylene carbazole unit with a more twisted triphenylethylene phenothiazine unit to construct P2, the performance of DSSC based on P2 improved (η = 2.69%, Jsc = 5.27 mA cm−2, Voc = 711 mV, and ff = 0.72). | What is the value of η? | 61721 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14305H | 0.150 ± 0.002 μm well-dispersed sub-micrometer-sized BZO sphere arrays as the over-layer) on the fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrate. | What is substrate? | 72671 |
{
"text": [
"7.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
239
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA10269C | By incorporating the NHs-B PDMS into the outer glass of DSSCs as a protective AR layer, the JSC was not only enhanced to 16.52 mA cm−2, but also the IPCE spectrum was increased, thus leading to the improved PCE value of 7.56% (i.e., PCE = 7.15% for the reference DSSC). | What is the value of PCE? | 62015 |
{
"text": [
"16.92%"
],
"answer_start": [
607
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA03608J | 3a presents the best current density–voltage (J–V) curves of the as-fabricated devices measured under AM 1.5 G solar irradiance (100 mW cm−2) in both reverse and forward scan directions; related photovoltaic parameters, namely, open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current density (Jsc), and fill factor (FF), are summarized in Table 1.As can be seen from the table, the PII2T8T-based PVSC delivered superior PCE of 18.34% (measured under reverse scan direction) with Voc of 1.09 V, Jsc of 21.53 mA cm−2, FF of 0.78, and negligible J–V hysteresis, outperforming the reference PEDOT:PSS-based PVSC (PCE 16.92%; Voc: 1.02 V; Jsc: 21.38 mA cm−2; FF: 0.78). | What is the value of PCE? | 19573 |
{
"text": [
"18.25mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.080 | The quantum efficiency of the TiO2 modified PSC is higher than that of unmodified one, which can explain the obvious increasement of Jsc from 14.50mA/cm2 to 18.25mA/cm2 after TiO2 modification as can be seen in In order to study the effect of relative humidity in the fabrication process on the cell performance, the relative humidity was changed from 55% to 40%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1528 |
{
"text": [
"2.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE02510A | The device with 1 at% IZO CBLs showed a maximum PCE of 3.3% compared to the PCE of 2.94% for the device with i-ZnO CBLs. | What is the value of PCE? | 73177 |
{
"text": [
"15.8mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2015.11.003 | As listed in , the DSSC based on the sample prepared for 70h shows the Jsc of 15.8mA/cm2, whereas the DSSCs based on samples prepared for 25 and 50h exhibit the Jsc of 11.1 and 13.6mA/cm2, respectively, showing 35.0% and 10.0% increase in Jsc compared to the sample prepared for 25 and 50h, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 59312 |
{
"text": [
"17.66 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.08.051 | A similar trend was observed in the Jsc value, which increased from 16.58 mA/cm2 to 17.66 mA/cm2 and then dropped to 17.03 mA/cm2, respectively at 70 min and 120 min. | What is the value of Jsc? | 27005 |
{
"text": [
"19.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.105387 | However, the optimum PCE of 19.22% is obtained for the MAPbI3 added with 9mg/ml NPB, although the FF is slightly decline compared to introducing 6mg/ml NPB. | What is the value of PCE? | 8006 |
{
"text": [
"1.1 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.05.003 | The compact layer solution is dropped on the TCO glass with an initial speed 1000 rpm for 10 s and a final speed 2000 rpm for 20 s with an active area of 1.1 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 36664 |
{
"text": [
"70%"
],
"answer_start": [
271
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC01687A | The increase in Van der Waals forces in Py2C6 results in better absorption than in PyC6 and PMII, leading to the best inhibitive effect.The outstanding advantage of the electrolyte with Py2C6 lies in the fill factor (FF) of up to 79.6%, which is obviously higher than 60–70%, the commonly-found value in ssDSSCs. | What is the value of FF? | 71854 |
{
"text": [
"5.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA23451D | The Jsc, Voc, and η values of T120–pH1.0-based DSSC were improved by 28.2% (from 10.84 to 13.90 mA cm−2), 5.0% (from 0.717 to 0.753 V), and 31.5% (from 3.91 to 5.14%), compared to P25-based DSSC, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 71427 |
{
"text": [
"1.09V"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.064 | Here, we demonstrate that Voc and FF of PSCs can be significantly improved from 1.03 to 1.09V and from 0.71 to 0.75, respectively, by modifying TiO2 with 4-tert-butyl pyridine (t-BP), resulting in 9% improvement in PCE from 16.14% to 17.58% for the best performing devices. | What is the value of Voc? | 5820 |
{
"text": [
"5.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2010.05.003 | PZn-MT sensitized cell exhibits η=5.55% with Jsc=12.83mAcm−2, Voc=0.64V, and ff=0.68, while PZn-HT sensitized one shows a higher η=5.80% with Jsc=13.71mAcm−2, Voc=0.63V, and ff=0.67, and PZn-EDOT sensitized one yields the highest η=6.47% with Jsc=15.59mAcm−2, Voc=0.64V, and ff=0.65. | What is the value of η? | 26453 |
{
"text": [
"6.51 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
248
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.10.013 | The device with 0.8 wt.% RGO in TNTs produced the highest power conversion efficiency of 4.26%, exhibiting a Voc of 0.696 V, Jsc of 9.54 mA cm− 2 and FF of 71.5% compared to bare DSSCs (only with TNTs) having a PCE of 2.85%, Voc of 0.647 V, Jsc of 6.51 mA/cm2, and FF of 67.6%.Along with the Jsc, there is also consistent increment in Voc (maximum of 50 mV) with RGO in all devices. | What is the value of Jsc? | 56112 |
{
"text": [
"15.71%"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.009 | Furthermore, the high PCE was recorded on rigid ITO substrate in dopant-free i-PSCs (PCE ~ 15.71%) and BHJ IOSCs (PCE ~ 8.74%). | What is the value of PCE? | 7677 |
{
"text": [
"12"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.08.014 | (c) shows another DSSC (device D20 + RSP) having the two-layer TiO2 nanoparticle electrode for comparison, including a 12-μm-thick D20 as the main absorption layer, and a 4-μm-thick RSP as the back-scattering/reflection layer.(a) and (b) shows the I–V characteristics and IPCE characteristics, respectively, of the DSSCs having different TiO2 electrodes. | What is TiO2? | 27681 |
{
"text": [
"48.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02960A | As for HTM–M1, with its higher hole mobility, there is an apparent improvement in the device performance, with a Jsc of 20.5 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.84 V and a FF of 48.2%. | What is the value of FF? | 15626 |
{
"text": [
"0.925V"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.010 | The best-performing planar PSC, using 1.5mol% F4-TCNQ doped Spiro-OMeTAD, has achieved a PCE of 12.93% with a Jsc of 19.04mAcm-2, a Voc of 0.925V and a FF of 0.73, which is comparable to that of 14.32% for reference device with Li-TFSI and tBP as dopants for Spiro-OMeTAD. | What is the value of Voc? | 1086 |
{
"text": [
"8.74%"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.009 | Furthermore, the high PCE was recorded on rigid ITO substrate in dopant-free i-PSCs (PCE ~ 15.71%) and BHJ IOSCs (PCE ~ 8.74%). | What is the value of PCE? | 7693 |
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
26
]
} | 10.1039/C8ME00036K | For the perovskite layer, MAPbI3 perovskite was deposited by spin coating a solution of PbI2 (1.2 M, TCI) and methylammonium iodide (1.15 M, dyesol) in a mixed solvent of DMF:DMSO (4:1) at 1000 rpm for 10 s and 6000 rpm for 30 s. | What is perovskite? | 12693 |
{
"text": [
"1.05V"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2019.03.003 | MAPbI3 based device exhibits a Voc of 1.00V, while it reaches 1.05V when the perovskite bandgap is increased to 1.61 and 1.64eV. | What is the value of Voc? | 3733 |
{
"text": [
"2.73 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
18
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.07.003 | The dye2 gave Jsc 2.73 mA/cm2, Voc of 450 mV and FF of 51% with Pin 30 mW/cm2 leading power conversion efficiency 2.10%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 28888 |
{
"text": [
"10.00%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1039/C6SE00041J | Therefore, the η varies automatically from 9.32% for the NP sample to 10.00% for the SM, 10.66% for the HM and 9.86% for the NR cell.It is well-known that the Jsc can be explained by the following equation:whereq is the elementary charge, I0 is light intensity, LHE(λ) is light harvesting efficiency, φinj is electron injection efficiency, and ηc is electron collection efficiency. | What is the value of η? | 65900 |
{
"text": [
"1000Wm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
362
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.12.125 | The reference DSSCs made with the use of each of 5 different titania raw materials were also prepared using a similar procedure and labelled as RM1, RM2, RM3, RM4 and RM5.The photovoltaic characteristics of the cells were measured using a Sun 2000 class A Solar Simulator (Abet Technologies) equipped with an AM 1.5G filter, with the light intensity adjusted at 1000Wm−2 using a silicon reference cell (ReRa Systems). | What is the value of Solar? | 45836 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.