answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"0.98"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | The device based on an ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PFI/MAPbI3/PC60BM/Al structure yielded an enhanced performance (PCE = 11.7%, Jsc = 16.7 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.982 V, FF = 0.705) compared to that of an ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3/PC60BM/Al-based device (PCE = 8.1%, Jsc = 14.1 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.835 V, FF = 0.685). | What is ? | 13257 |
{
"text": [
"0.318 V"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.06.017 | Under the same condition, the DPP-II-sensitized cell gives a Jsc value of 3.36 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.318 V, and a ff of 0.48, corresponding to the η value of 0.51% (see ). | What is the value of Voc? | 41597 |
{
"text": [
"1.52%"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1039/C3NJ40962G | The η of the self-assembled SnO2 nanosphere photoanode (SnO2 DLAs DSSC) is 1.52%, which is higher than those of the mixed SnO2 (SnO2 NSAs + MS DSSC). | What is the value of η? | 69930 |
{
"text": [
"7.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.034 | The power conversion efficiency (PCE) based on the optimized thickness of TiO2 photoelectrodes was up to 7.13% under standard AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW/cm2).Mesoporosity provides the ideal large specific surface area but many applications as well as desire long-range electronic transport channel Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have captured great attention during the past two decades as a potential, cost-effective alternative to silicon solar cells with the advantages of high efficiency, low cost, environment friendly, simple fabrication process Mesoporous TiO2 microspheres, as one of the desired nanomaterials to meet the above requirements, have been deemed to successful photoelectrodes for DSSCs ; meanwhile the microsphere structure has superior light scattering capacity Fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, ⿼7 Ω/2) glasses were pursued from Nippin Sheet Glass Co., Ltd. | What is the value of PCE? | 23972 |
{
"text": [
"16"
],
"answer_start": [
53
]
} | 10.1039/C8NJ02658K | The active working area of the TiO2 electrodes was 0.16 cm2. | What is TiO2? | 70513 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.10.036 | The absorbance of N719 dye solution is obtained from literature The charge reaction transfer between TiO2 and redox electrolyte is a single electron reactionin which kf and kb are forward and backward reaction rates. | What is ? | 51554 |
{
"text": [
"16.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
221
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.11.031 | The untreated device shows a severe PCE deviation of 18.5% from 9.58% at forward scan to 11.35% at reverse scan; while the MATS treated device shows a dramatically reduced deviation of 0.5% from 16.19% at forward scan to 16.27% at reverse scan. | What is the value of PCE? | 10755 |
{
"text": [
"0.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
213
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.015 | As a result, the meta-substituted dyes yielded a narrower IPCE spectrum, a lower Jsc value, and consequently a smaller η value.Overall conversion efficiencies of the para substituted dyes (4.12%, 1.78%, 2.92% and 0.83%) higher than meta substituted dyes (2.23%, 0.48%, 1.27% and 0.08%) as shown in . | What is the value of η? | 53156 |
{
"text": [
"16.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
218
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.060 | Solar cell devices with quadruple cation RbCsMAFA perovskite show the typical PCE of 19.1% (short-circuit current density JSC = 22.4mA-cm-2, open circuit voltage VOC = 1.17V and fill factor FF = 73%), compared to PCE =16.5% of double cation MAFA and triple cation perovskites RbMAFA (PCE = 17.1%)/CsMAFA (PCE = 17.9%). | What is the value of PCE? | 4470 |
{
"text": [
"0.12 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05988G | The active area of this electrode was fixed at 0.12 cm2.The microscopic morphology and crystallinity were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta 450) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, D/Max-2400, Rigaku), respectively. | What is the value of active area? | 17941 |
{
"text": [
"0.52 V"
],
"answer_start": [
207
]
} | 10.1039/C5CP03371C | CTSQ-2 sensitized solar cells fabricated under similar conditions with the same electrolyte composition (EL1) displayed a relatively lower photovoltaic efficiency of 2.23% (μ) with Jsc = 6.76 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.52 V and FF = 0.64 which is mainly attributed to the lower Jsc value. | What is the value of Voc? | 64491 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.018 | The large semicircle in the Nyquist plots represents the interfacial charge transfer resistance (Rct) at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface. | What is ? | 31023 |
{
"text": [
"0.20%"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.06.009 | The I–V curves (b) show that the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) and solar energy-to-electricity conversion yield (η) of co-sensitized DSSC based on YM-2 and NI-6 (1.00mAcm−2 and 0.20%) or YNI-2 (1.55mAcm−2 and 0.40%) are also much lower than those of DSSC based on only NI-6 (4.76mAcm−2 and 1.47%) or only YNI-2 (5.64mAcm−2 and 2.02%), but is similar to those of DSSC based on only YM-2 (1.51mAcm−2 and 0.31%). | What is the value of η? | 24483 |
{
"text": [
"840 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02509A | As compared to our previously reported dye WW-6 (Jsc = 17.16 mA cm−2, Voc = 840 mV, FF = 0.738 and PCE = 10.6%), the bay-NP functionalized dye WW-7 only showed a moderate PCE of 4.4% (Fig. | What is the value of Voc? | 66367 |
{
"text": [
"14.51 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
32
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2009.04.005 | A maximum η value of 7.26% (Jsc=14.51 mA/cm2, Voc=0.70V, FF=0.715) is achieved under simulated AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW/cm2) with a DSSC based on SD2 dye with one hexyl-substituted thiophene as π-conjugated unit, which reached ∼87% of an N719-based DSSC (8.32%) fabricated and measured under the same conditions. | What is the value of Jsc? | 33869 |
{
"text": [
"13.26%"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR04692H | The main cell parameters are listed in Table 2.The sV2O5 based device exhibited the best performance with a PCE of 13.26%, which is slightly lower than the PEDOT:PSS based device (14.13%). | What is the value of PCE? | 21889 |
{
"text": [
"8.4 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.056 | S corresponds to the active area A of the cell when flat (8.4 cm2) and decreases with RCURV as:When the illumination is constant, the total light power striking the cell is proportional to S (RCURV), so that P/P0 for a cell that maintains its electrical characteristics unchanged when curved would follow the trend of S (RCURV) reported in As can be noted however, the P values we extracted experimentally, show a different trend. | What is the value of active area? | 24188 |
{
"text": [
"7.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.01.022 | As a core dye, AZ6 yields a PCE of 7.18% (Jsc=15.57mAcm−2, Voc=709.0mV, and FF=0.65). | What is the value of PCE? | 45481 |
{
"text": [
"W1"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.037 | Devices D1–D4 mean the DSSC with working electrodes W1–W4, respectively. | What is electrodes? | 38253 |
{
"text": [
"0.63 V"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ01673B | At this condition, Jsc, Voc and FF values as high as 9.52 mA cm−2, 0.63 V and 0.37 respectively, were achieved. | What is the value of Voc? | 74201 |
{
"text": [
"15.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.011 | The pristine devices exhibit a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.28 mA cm-2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.94 eV, a fill factor (FF) of 0.72, reaching a PCE of 15.06%. | What is the value of PCE? | 4740 |
{
"text": [
"5.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.059 | At shorter or longer deposition times than 60s the current density drops significantly while there is a slight change in VOC.In the latter cases the PCE were determined to be 5.4%, 6.0%, 5.3%, 4.0% for deposition time of 30, 60, 180, 300s, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 43572 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2013.11.003 | Platinum counter electrodes were deposited from a commercial platinum paste (Solaronix, platinum catalyst T/SP) on a FTO glass substrate, which was subsequently heat treated at 400 °C for 30 min in air. | What is substrate? | 52762 |
{
"text": [
"15.80mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.020 | JSC of SCs with 1min DMSO-treated PEDOT:PSS tremendously increased from 7.58mA/cm2 to 15.80mA/cm2 compared with PVD-PbI2 SCs. | What is the value of JSC? | 4126 |
{
"text": [
"0.09Ωcm2"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.05.003 | The Rct values according to the EC were calculated as 0.91, 0.13, 0.15, and 0.09Ωcm2 for Pt-CE, SeGnP-CE, TeGnP-CE and SbGnP-CE, respectively, and are compared in (b). | What is the value of Rct? | 34861 |
{
"text": [
"8.39%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP02530G | However, the cell co-sensitized by 1/N719 and 2/N719 exhibited the better overall conversion efficiency (η) of 7.82% (with Jsc = 18.13 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.74 V, and FF = 0.58) and 8.39% (with Jsc = 18.40 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.75 V, and FF = 0.61), which are 19.94% and 28.68% higher than that of cells individually sensitized by N719. | What is the value of η? | 63714 |
{
"text": [
"5.98%"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.053 | But for the CsBr-rich film-based cells, the average and champion PCE drop to 5.98% and 6.69% with a much reduced Jsc of 7.16 mA/cm2, a Voc of 1.225 V and a FF of 0.763. | What is the value of PCE? | 3031 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.08.021 | Current density−voltage (J−V) characteristics of the solar cells were measured using an Oriel 150W solar simulator with AM1.5G (AM: air mass, G: global) filters at 100mWcm−2. | What is the value of solar? | 9693 |
{
"text": [
"17.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09661H | Early in 2014, the PCEs of PSCs were further increased to 16.2% and 16.7% by using the spiro-OMeTAD derivatives as the HTM, which subsequently grew to 17.01% via controlling the size of the MAPbI3 cuboids. | What is the value of PCE? | 16896 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.04.012 | Overall, the additional ultrathin layer of anatase TiO2 has increased the collection efficiency, diffusion coefficient, electron density and electron lifetime resulting in higher conversion efficiency of the fabricated DSC. | What is ? | 36940 |
{
"text": [
"6.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
16
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE41888J | The best PCE of 6.55% was obtained for Dye 38 with a pyrazine acceptor. | What is the value of PCE? | 71494 |
{
"text": [
"1.47mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
174
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.106 | The surface area and dye adsorption of the single-crystal rutile TNRs are increased significantly, the Jsc and η of single-crystal rutile TNRs based DSSCs are increased from 1.47mAcm−2 and 0.52±0.03% to 9.03mAcm−2 and 4.14±0.07% respectively.Compared to P25 TiO2 nanoparticles based DSSCs, the light-harvesting efficiency of the single-crystal rutile TNRs based DSSCs is higher. | What is the value of Jsc? | 31415 |
{
"text": [
"0.74 V"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1039/C4QO00285G | The improved Jsc of 13.9 mA cm−2 and Voc of 0.74 V, and the decreased fill factor (FF) of 0.68 were obtained in the K-5 cell, which produced the highest η of 7.0% under the same conditions. | What is the value of Voc? | 62687 |
{
"text": [
"7.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA08744A | The tandem solar cell yields a PCE of up to 7.0% with a VOC of 1.89 V and FF of 0.56. | What is the value of PCE? | 12212 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.085 | Thus, ZnO seeding on FTO substrate is beneficial to achieve aligned ZnO NTs and for the better photovoltaic performance of fabricated DSSCs. | What is substrate? | 51775 |
{
"text": [
"0.778 V"
],
"answer_start": [
194
]
} | 10.1016/j.partic.2010.08.013 | The monolayer P25 electrode showed a Jsc of 12.32 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.738 V and a conversion efficiency of 5.36%, whereas the bilayer DSC-P25/A electrode achieved a Jsc of 14.78 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.778 V and a conversion efficiency of 6.63%. | What is the value of Voc? | 54666 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.140 | Therefore, to improve the performance of DSSCs, it is necessary to reduce the sheet resistance of ITO-silica mats and to prevent a leak current by forming a thin blocking layer of TiO2 or Al2O3 to cover the surface of the ITO-silica mats. | What is ? | 40415 |
{
"text": [
"0.78 V"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.025 | It has an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.78 V, fill factor (FF) of 63.63% and short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 16.34 mA cm−2. | What is the value of Voc? | 49762 |
{
"text": [
"6.53%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.086 | While the DSSCs with FeTa2O6/SC, CoTa2O6/SC, and CuTa10O26/SC CEs yield remarkable PCEs of 6.85%, 6.79%, and 6.53%, respectivey, which are higher than that of DSSC with Pt electrode. | What is the value of PCE? | 43715 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR04739H | Meanwhile, it was found that both PSCs with AZO/CuNWs/AZO and the FTO electrode showed typical hysteresis behavior of PSCs (Fig. | What is ? | 23065 |
{
"text": [
"75.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
174
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP06953C | The PSC without GQDs exhibits a PCE of 16.29%, with a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 21.48 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.01 V and a fill factor (FF) of 75.04%. | What is the value of FF? | 12304 |
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
300
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09543K | The IDIC based devices exhibit a best PCE of 19.1% with a short circuit current density (JSC) of 23.0 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.08 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 77.0%, which are higher than those of the TiO2 based devices with a maximum PCE of 17.4%, a JSC of 22.2 mA cm−2, a VOC of 1.05 V and a FF of 74.1% (Table 1). | What is the value of VOC? | 19803 |
{
"text": [
"7.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
368
]
} | 10.1039/B906687J | The as-prepared H01 dye is employed as a sensitizer in a dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cell, and the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), and fill factor (ff) of the device under AM 1.5 (100 mW cm−2) irradiation, are 15.22 mA cm−2, 0.67 V, and 0.72, respectively, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (Eff) of 7.33%.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) have received increasing attention over the past two decades because of strong industrial interest related to their potential low cost, easy preparation, and relatively high light-to-electric energy conversion efficiencies. | What is the value of Eff? | 76772 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA11081E | The CH3NH3PbI3−xClx film was formed by spin coating the prepared solution onto the m-TiO2/c-TiO2/FTO substrate at 5000 rpm for 50 s, then annealed at 70 °C for 30 min in ambient air, followed by 100 °C for 60 min in ambient air. | What is substrate? | 20682 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02769E | We then correlate this material knowledge with the electrical performance of the planar glass/ITO/e-beam TiO2/MAPI0.6Br0.4/poly(triaryl amine) (PTAA)/Au solar cells (Fig. | What is ITO? | 16156 |
{
"text": [
"9.95%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR00301J | As a result, the solar cells containing 10% Sn (CH3NH3Sn0.1Pb0.9I3) perovskite films made via the thermal plus DMSO vapor-assisted thermal annealing exhibited an average PCE of 9.95% and the maximum PCE of 10.25%. | What is the value of PCE? | 14630 |
{
"text": [
"7.52%"
],
"answer_start": [
196
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.199 | The DSSCs fabricated with the conventional Pt counter electrode resulted in 8% power conversion efficiency (PCE); whereas the DSSCs prepared with lipase prepared E-MWCNT counter electrode reached 7.52% power conversion efficiency (b). | What is the value of PCE? | 53309 |
{
"text": [
"8.53%"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.jmst.2014.03.010 | Due to the synergistic effect between anatase and rutile, the highest η of 8.53% (in ) is obtained for 1% Nb–TiO2 containing a small amount of rutile and a higher photoelectric conversion efficiency of 8.77% (in ) is achieved for 2% Nb–TiO2 with a small amount of rutile. | What is the value of η? | 55854 |
{
"text": [
"0.49 V"
],
"answer_start": [
297
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.06.012 | For comparison, DSSCs with working electrodes fabricated from commercial anatase titania exhibited the short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 10.52 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.53 V, and filling factor (FF) of 0.44 while those of DSSC using TNT as electrode material were 10.23 mA/cm2, 0.49 V and 0.40, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 57536 |
{
"text": [
"16.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
158
]
} | 10.1039/C7QM00221A | All these features contribute to a higher efficiency (18.3%) of the PSCs with the PPDI-F3N interlayer relative to the control devices without the interlayer (16.7%) as well as improved stability and a reduced hysteresis effect.Organic–inorganic lead halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted growing attention lately, since their power conversion efficiency (PCE) has rapidly increased up to 22%. | What is the value of PCE? | 17750 |
{
"text": [
"13.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.099 | By contrast, the overall PCE of the PSC prepared by doping of 0.03mol L−1 ILPF6 ionic liquid into the precursor solution is significantly enhanced to 13.01%. | What is the value of PCE? | 1277 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoms.2019.03.004 | Carbon nanomaterials were also investigated as the auxiliary binder of TiO2 paste and gelator of gel electrolyte of DSSCs. | What is ? | 42196 |
{
"text": [
"21h"
],
"answer_start": [
376
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.026 | More photosensitizer molecules can be adsorbed when immersion time is increased, which also increase the light harvesting efficiency To investigate the effect of the thickness of ZnO photo-anodes when N-719 is used as a photosensitizer in DSSCs, different layers of ZnO nanoparticles were coated onto FTO glasses to prepare photo-anodes, which were then immersed in N-719 for 21h (a) show that the thickness of each layer of TiO2 nanoparticles is ∼10μm.(a) compares the I-V characteristics obtained from DSSCs from different thicknesses of ZnO nanoparticles coated onto the FTO glasses. | What is the value of time? | 34475 |
{
"text": [
"9.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.018 | The PSC based on mesoporous ZrO2 spacer layer obtains the short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 20.2 mA cm−2 and photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.72%, which are 23.17% and 59.12% higher than those of PSCs based on mesoporous Al2O3 spacer layer, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 592 |
{
"text": [
"4.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
172
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.028 | The bifacial DSSCs with high transparent N-doped, S-doped and N/S dual-doped GFs as CEs exhibit dramatically enhanced power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 3.74%, 3.86% and 4.22% under front-side illumination compared to that of pristine graphene as CEs. | What is the value of PCE? | 46322 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1039/B416461J | The maximum efficiency attained by KI–PVK, 2.42%, is backed up by a high Voc of 0.71 V, which is close to the voltage range of the dye-sensitized liquid-junction cells of highest performance. | What is the value of Voc? | 71129 |
{
"text": [
"4.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.113 | Typically, the DSSC with 1.5wt.% Bi2Te3 exhibits the highest η of 4.27%, which is increased by 44.3% compared with that of the bare ZnO film. | What is the value of η? | 42585 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1039/C3NR01604H | The liquid electrolyte used here was acetonitrile solution containing the I3−/I− redox couple (60–70 wt% acetonitrile, 20–25 wt% 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, 1–4 wt% LiI, 5–10 wt% tert-butylpyridine and 1–4 wt% I2), which is commercially available (CJX-EH, CasJuxin Solar Technology Co., Ltd., China). | What is redox couple? | 65583 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.049 | Hence, the DSSC based on TiO2 nanoplates as SL showed a notable improvement in the overall power conversion efficiency.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is ? | 45085 |
{
"text": [
"6.25mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
282
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.056 | The dimeric spiro-dye T1T showed device performance, which is 1.6 fold higher than its structural isomeric analogue TT1, of 3.9% with a Voc and Jsc of 0.593V and 9.09mA/cm2, respectively, whereas for the isomeric analogue TT1 a device performance of 2.45% (Voc of 0.568V and Jsc of 6.25mA/cm2) under simulated 1 Sun (100mW/cm2) condition. | What is the value of Jsc? | 27996 |
{
"text": [
"0.647V"
],
"answer_start": [
392
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.05.021 | The detailed photovoltaic parameters, such as short-circuit current density (Jsc, mA/cm2), open-circuit voltage (Voc, V), fill factor (ff, %) and efficiency (η, %) of DSSC devices, are shown in TEMPO-I (device A)- and TEMPO-III (device B)-based cells (without BIMI electrolyte) exhibited efficiencies of approximately 2.17% (Jsc=5.69mA/cm2, Voc=0.622V, FF=61%) and 2.38% (Jsc=5.94mA/cm2, Voc=0.647V, FF=61%), respectively, under 1 sunlight illumination. | What is the value of Voc? | 25879 |
{
"text": [
"3.5"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.03.037 | The height of ZnO nanowire arrays is only 3.5 μm in our experiment. | What is ZnO? | 46936 |
{
"text": [
"14.53mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.033 | When the C-3 electrode is used as the counter electrode, the cell exhibits a Jsc of 14.53mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.680V and an FF of 0.64, yielding an overall conversion efficiency of 6.32%, which is comparable to that of 6.69% for the corresponding device with Pt counter electrode. | What is the value of Jsc? | 55053 |
{
"text": [
"5.32%"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.11.062 | The overall PCE of the newly developed PVdF-co-HFP:SCLCP-based polymer electrolyte was 5.32% (at 1:1 weight ratio of SCLCP:PVdF-co-HFP). | What is the value of PCE? | 45535 |
{
"text": [
"0.657 V"
],
"answer_start": [
252
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.080 | Thus, the DSSC containing BMISO3CF3 has smaller Rdiff and longer electron lifetime, which resulted in the best cell performance, in which the short-circuit current (JSC), open-circuit voltage (VOC), conversion efficiency (η) and FF were 10.18 mA cm−2, 0.657 V, 4.11% and 0.615, respectively, as listed in The DSSCs are also measured by EIS in the dark to elucidate correlation of the electron transport at TiO2/electrolyte interface with anions of ionic liquids are shown in . | What is the value of VOC? | 30399 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.07.029 | As shown in c, the device with a structure of FTO/TiO2/CsPbBrI2/Spiro-OMeTAD/MoO3/Ag also shows a relatively high PCE of 9.17%, suggesting a wide application of the method into different systems. | What is ? | 7885 |
{
"text": [
"4mm2"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.03.020 | Therefore, a mask was cling to the cell to define a 3.14mm2 active area, while for the rest devices, the masks were not used during the J-V measurements. | What is the value of active area? | 4041 |
{
"text": [
"7.71%"
],
"answer_start": [
321
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00192D | It is found that the device without graphene exhibited an η value of 5.45% (with Jsc = 12.63 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.69 V, and FF = 0.62), and the GR-1 and GR-2 devices based on the constructed TiO2 films with a gradient graphene content exhibited an η value of 6.82% (with Jsc = 15.54 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.71 V, and FF = 0.62) and 7.71% (with Jsc = 17.11 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.72 V, and FF = 0.63), respectively. | What is the value of η? | 74086 |
{
"text": [
"0.54 V"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA15340A | In contrast, the 2-loaded cell has a Jsc of 19.02 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.54 V, FF of 0.590, and η of 6.06%. | What is the value of Voc? | 71958 |
{
"text": [
"0.550V"
],
"answer_start": [
281
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.08.020 | The thiophene derivative 3a exhibits a higher value compared to 3c and 3d which is in accordance with their optical and electronic properties On the other hand, dye 3b shows the best performance of all dyes, presenting an efficiency of 2.49%, with a JSC of 6.92mA/cm2 and a VOC of 0.550V. | What is the value of VOC? | 34388 |
{
"text": [
"0.733 V"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.10.011 | Strikingly, Cell-PMNTA/S is distinguished by a Jsc of 13.91 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.733 V, a FF of 67.97% and a PCE of 6.93%. | What is the value of Voc? | 50598 |
{
"text": [
"0.11%"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA01286K | The I–V curves show that the Jsc and η values for YM-1 (1.36 mA cm−2 and 0.29%) and YM-2 (1.51 mA cm−2 and 0.31%) are much higher than those for YM-3 (0.75 mA cm−2 and 0.11%) (Fig. | What is the value of η? | 71200 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1039/C4FD00128A | The active area of each device was about 0.25 cm2.The crystal structures of the perovskite and PbI2 films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max 2200 diffractometer with CuKα radiation). | What is the value of active area? | 22617 |
{
"text": [
"18.0 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR00288A | However, the FLG/TiO2 composite photoanodes have a smaller value of 18.0 Ω for the Rct compared with 23.1 Ω of the pure TiO2 nanocrystal photoanode (Table 1), which clearly implies that the enhanced transfer of the charge carriers between the TiO2 film and electrolyte with the decoration of the FLG is due to the perfect mobility of charger carriers of the FLG. | What is the value of Rct? | 69034 |
{
"text": [
"63.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA06925E | The PVSC based on NiOx/ICBA presents a PCE of 10.54%, with a Voc of 1.24 V, an FF of 63.08%, and a Jsc of 13.49 mA cm−2. | What is the value of FF? | 17984 |
{
"text": [
"10.85 ± 1.25%"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR04739H | Meanwhile, the comparable FTO-based PSCs with other identical layers showed relatively higher performance (best PCE = 12.49% and average PCE = 10.85 ± 1.25%) than the PSCs fabricated with the AZO/CuNW/AZO electrode. | What is the value of PCE? | 23073 |
{
"text": [
"0.65 V"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1039/C4DT03102D | Using bare TiO2 as a photoelectrode and CoS as a counter electrode, the fabricated cell exhibited Jsc and Voc values of 9.31 mA cm−2 and 0.65 V, respectively, resulting in a low efficiency of 4.43%. | What is the value of Voc? | 75334 |
{
"text": [
"4.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00113G | The best performance was obtained using CH3NH3Sn0.5Pb0.5I3 perovskite and a PCE of 4.18% with a Voc of 0.42 V, FF of 0.50 and Jsc of 20.04 mA cm−2 was reported. | What is the value of PCE? | 21068 |
{
"text": [
"7.48%"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA10718D | Remarkably, the DSSC based on o-CoSe2 delivered the highest PCE (9.34%) compared to c-CoSe2 (8.91%), the Co3Se4 NTs (8.44%), Pt (8.15%) and the Co3Se4 NPs (7.48%) under the same conditions; the Jsc values of the o-CoSe2, c-CoSe2 and Co3Se4 NTs, Pt, and the Co3Se4 NPs were 17.35, 16.60, 16.10, 15.52 and 14.66 mA cm−2, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 68164 |
{
"text": [
"13.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.017 | The primary solar cell’s structure is FTO/ITO/Perovskite/PEDOT:PSS/Au which has achieved a power conversion efficiency of η∼13.94%. | What is the value of η? | 5595 |
{
"text": [
"0.93 ± 0.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA04313A | The perovskite solar cell without a C60 interface layer only achieved a PCE of 7.88 ± 0.26% with a Voc of 0.93 ± 0.01 V, a Jsc of 16.87 ± 0.07 mA cm−2, and an FF of 50.15 ± 1.56%. | What is the value of Voc? | 12772 |
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
215
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.154 | Then the TiO2 film was cooled to 80 °C, and subsequently immersed into a 5 × 10−4M solution of N719 dye (Solaronix SA, Switzerland) in acetonitrile/tert-butanol (volume ratio 1:1) for 22 h.A DSC with active area of 0.16 cm2 used for photovoltaic performance test was fabricated with a photoanode, a counter electrode, and an electrolyte containing 0.06 M of LiI, 0.6 M 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide, 0.03 M I2, 0.5 M 4-tert-butyl pyridine, and 0.1 M guanidinium thiocyanate in acetonitrile. | What is the value of active area? | 43373 |
{
"text": [
"Ag"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09231K | Cathode interface evaluations revealed that a compact and smooth interface contact between perovskite/PCBM and the Ag top electrode is formed by inserting Bphen:Ir(MDQ)2(acac) in the device. | What is electrode? | 13988 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
161
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.08.011 | Among the spacer thickness studied, the best performance of the cell was obtained at the spacer thickness of 120 μm yielding η of 1.26% (Jsc, 3.04 mA cm−2, Voc, 0.73 V and ff 0.57). | What is the value of Voc? | 33660 |
{
"text": [
"0.686 V"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.047 | In this study, by using gas-assisted deposition method, we have successfully prepared dense and smooth (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 active layer, resulting in 25% improvement in VOC (from 0.548 V to 0.686 V) and 17% improvement in power conversion efficiency (from 0.070% to 0.082%), compared with the conventional 1-step method.Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have attracted much attention due to their rapidly-increased and high power conversion efficiency (PCE). | What is the value of VOC? | 4389 |
{
"text": [
"65.6±6.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.11.005 | PSCs employing ZnChl-2 as HTM give the highest photovoltaic performance with an average PCE of 13.06% (PCE=13.06±0.72%, Jsc=21.67±1.50mA·cm−2, and FF=65.6±6.1%). | What is the value of FF? | 6019 |
{
"text": [
"Ag"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR06812C | So, the overall perovskite device structures are ITO/ZnO, C-ZnO or P-ZnO ETL/MA0.57FA0.38Rb0.05PbI3 perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag (Fig. | What is ITO? | 20471 |
{
"text": [
"4.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.12.015 | For the VNBs without graphene modification, PCE of 4.94%, Voc of 790 mV,Jsc of 13.6 mA cm−2, and FF of 0.46. | What is the value of PCE? | 29616 |
{
"text": [
"0.59 V"
],
"answer_start": [
247
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.027 | where Vmax and Jmax are voltage and current density for maximum power output, respectively while Is is the intensity of the incident light (mW/cm2)., a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 7.71 mA/cm2, an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0.59 V and the conversion efficiency (η) of 2.11% for Bi–TiO2 electrode were obtained. | What is the value of Voc? | 35361 |
{
"text": [
"0.46%"
],
"answer_start": [
283
]
} | 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.10.016 | CaCO3/TiO2 based DSSC show improved photo-electrochemical properties compared to the bare TiO2 based DSSC as CaCO3 coating on TiO2 forms an energy barrier, and, consequently suppressing the charge recombination, and, thus, improving the overall energy conversion efficiency (η) from 0.46% to 1.44% under the illumination of simulated light of 100mW/cm2.The threat of depletion of the natural resources is driving us to identify alternative sources of energy that are environment friendly. | What is the value of η? | 41472 |
{
"text": [
"1.06V"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | The Y-doping TiO2 nanorod array perovskite solar cells with the Y/Ti molar ratio of 3% exhibited a photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of 18.11% along with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.06V, short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 22.50mAcm−2 and fill factor (FF) of 76.16%, while the un-doping TiO2 nanorod array perovskite solar cells gave a PCE of 16.42% along with Voc of 1.04V, Jsc of 21.66mAcm−2 and FF of 72.97%.Y-doping TiO2 nanorod arrays were successfully prepared by hydrothermal methods using the aqueous grown solution of 38mM titanium isopropoxide and 6M hydrochloric acid with the Y/Ti molar ratios of 0%, 3%, 5%. | What is the value of Voc? | 1554 |
{
"text": [
"8.00%"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA19587C | 2, it can be observed that the device-to-device variation was smaller in the formic acid-treated solar cells, and the averaged PCE increased from 8.00% (pristine) to 9.22% (treated), corresponding to a 15.3% improvement in the PCE. | What is the value of PCE? | 12658 |
{
"text": [
"2.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM10993F | The best performance achieved was for dyeOMe using an immersion time of 6 hours to yield an η value of 2.9%. | What is the value of η? | 74769 |
{
"text": [
"6.28%"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA05955A | A superior PCE of 16.28% based on the as-prepared rGO is obtained, resulting in an increment by approximately 33% compared with 12.26% of the device based on GO-1 as mentioned. | What is the value of PCE? | 18311 |
{
"text": [
"21.01 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.10.037 | While the performance of device based on T-Perovskite increased to 16.61% (the average of which is 16.07%), with improved reverse JSC, VOC and FF of 21.01 mA/cm2, 1.04V, and 0.76, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 5896 |
{
"text": [
"945 mA"
],
"answer_start": [
257
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE01724B | Subsequently, a joint European project termed ‘ColorSol’ was established to develop DSPs for BIPV applications; DSPs of areas up to ∼14000 cm2 (serially connected individual modules with areas of ∼900 cm2) resulted in η values of ∼3.6% (VOC ∼ 4.55 V, ISC ∼ 945 mA, FF ∼ 0.56) with respect to total area under 1 sun conditions (η = 4.6% with respect to its active area). | What is the value of ISC? | 68579 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.073 | Since the semi-circle at high frequency had been reported to be related to the resistance at counter electrode/electrolyte interface, the FTO substrate/TiO2 adhesive layer contact and TiO2 adhesive layer/TiO2 porous film contact a), in the pristine electrospun nanofiber film, TiO2 nanofibers stacked with each other loosely and many macropores existed between them. | What is substrate? | 28719 |
{
"text": [
"10.48mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1016/j.apt.2018.12.010 | Consequently, Cell-P25 has a Jsc of 7.90mAcm−2 and a Voc of 0.762V, which are inferior to these of Cell-NTs (10.48mAcm−2 and 0.835V). | What is the value of Jsc? | 32444 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.102 | The results indicate that the PSTM+STHS based cell shows an obvious 14.6% increase of PCE (7.79% with a Jsc of 17.49 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.73 V and FF of 0.61) as compared to the single layered PSTM photoelectrode with the same thickness of ∼6.9 μm, providing the specific evidence for taking full advantages of the superior dye adsorption, fast charge collection as well as strong light harvesting simultaneously. | What is the value of Voc? | 24652 |
{
"text": [
"11.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC05238C | Overall, the photovoltaic performance of the DPA–ANT–DPA based device achieves the highest PCE of 11.5% among all these materials without any additives, whereas the BTPA-3-based device exhibits a close PCE of 9.81% using Li-TFSI and tBP as dopants. | What is the value of PCE? | 15016 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.