answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"6.44%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.097 | The FF decreased to 0.621 and 0.623, and the η decreased to 6.31% and 6.44% for the cells with the PANI/FTO and the Pt/FTO, respectively.The major concern for the application of alternative counter electrodes to conventional platinized TCOs in DSSCs is long-term stability. | What is the value of η? | 54077 |
{
"text": [
"1.08 V"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00656C | The resultant perovskite solar cells showed an efficiency of 17.04% with Jsc, Voc, and FF of 22.71 mA cm−2, 1.08 V, and 69.58%.In addition to the four scalable deposition techniques described in Section 5, screen printing has been reported to be suitable for depositing thicker films such as mesoporous TiO2, ZrO2 and the carbon counter electrode in perovskite solar cells.In summary, this review covered the critical and comprehensive studies from fundamental solution chemistry pertaining to nucleation and crystal growth, to solution-processed photovoltaic applications focusing on mostly non-scalable spin-coating and scalable deposition techniques. | What is the value of Voc? | 16549 |
{
"text": [
"4.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.155 | As a result, the devices with SiPc4 or SiPc6 show a maximum PCE of 4.2%, which is improved by 10% compared to that of the P3HT:PCBM control cell. | What is the value of PCE? | 51461 |
{
"text": [
"3.12mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.08.012 | The I–V curves show that the Jsc value of SAT-2 (4.20mAcm−2) is higher than that of SAT-1 (3.12mAcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 47933 |
{
"text": [
"4.69%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.scib.2018.11.004 | As a result, the PCE in FTO/TiO2/MAPbI3/CuI/Au PSCs was enhanced from 4.69% to 6.14%.Methylammonium iodide (MAI) was synthesized following the previously reported method. | What is the value of PCE? | 785 |
{
"text": [
"709 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1039/C2TA00494A | In contrast, the photovoltaic parameters of DSC using a 22.1 μm thick P25 nanoparticle film showed a JSC of 13.43 mA cm−2, a VOC of 709 mV, and a FF of 0.58 to give a η of 5.57%. | What is the value of VOC? | 77093 |
{
"text": [
"12.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
230
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | This enhanced the crystalline morphology of the perovskite absorber by creating a more homogenized and crystallized perovskite region, leading to a device performance with a PCE of 11.7% by using pristine HTM Sp01, while a PCE of 12.3% was achieved with HTM Sp01 and added Li-TFSI and TBP.Table 2 compares the photovoltaic performances of meso-structured PSCs based on commercial HTMs with spiro-OMeTAD.Recently, Qin and co-workers designed a new organic HTM based on a quinolizino acridine core and compared its properties with the commercially available HTM Sp01. | What is the value of PCE? | 12997 |
{
"text": [
"13.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
7
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA13582C | A η of 13.19% is still obtained, as shown in Table 2.IPCE spectra of the CH3NH3PbI3(Cl) devices were shown in Fig. | What is the value of η? | 20155 |
{
"text": [
"0.2 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.021 | DSSCs with an active area of 0.2 cm2 were tested. | What is the value of active area? | 46359 |
{
"text": [
"11.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA23359C | As a result, the PCE of corresponding devices is enhanced from 11.0% to 14.9% by replacing 10% FA+ ions of FAPbI3 with Cs+ ions. | What is the value of PCE? | 13897 |
{
"text": [
"0.85 V"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR06240J | In contrast, the device with the TIPD layer shows enhanced Voc, Jsc, FF, and the overall PCE, which is 0.85 V, 15.10 mA cm−2, 68.2%, and 8.75%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 12345 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
203
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.128 | a shows the PL intensity of TiO2 films, where TT-TiO2 films have a superior quenching efficiency, which demonstrates that TT-TiO2 films have better interface contact and superior electron transport with FTO Thus, Ti precursor can affect the interface contact between TiO2 films and FTO, and the improved interface contact is beneficial for enhancing the electron transport from TiO2 ETL to FTO substrate b displays the steady-state photoluminescence (PL) of perovskite films on various FTO/TiO2 substrates to investigate their charge transfer kinetics. | What is substrate? | 8739 |
{
"text": [
"10.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
16
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05057J | A better PCE of 10.2% was obtained for Device K with a Voc of 0.90 V, a Jsc of 18.1 mA cm−2, and an FF of 64% when a C-PCBSD interlayer was adopted. | What is the value of PCE? | 21138 |
{
"text": [
"2.89 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1039/C1EE01059J | In the case of Ca, Cb and Cc, the Rct are 2.29, 3.42 and 2.89 Ω, respetively. | What is the value of Rct? | 76205 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
199
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.07.082 | The electrolyte solution was prepared by the reported recipe Current density–voltage (J–V) characteristics of the DSSCs were measured using an electrometer (KEITHLEY 2400) under AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2) provided by a solar simulator (1 KW xenon with AM 1.5 filter, PEC-L01, Peccel Technologies). | What is the value of illumination? | 36589 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.048 | This can be attribute to that the honeycomb-like nanostructure accepts electrolyte filling in it, which can support a mass of catalytic active sites for the I3−/I− redox reaction. | What is redox reaction? | 53484 |
{
"text": [
"9.39%"
],
"answer_start": [
233
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.01.013 | The cell prepared using sputtered platinum on FTO substrate as counter electrode displayed open circuit voltage VOC of 0.69V,short circuit current density JSC of 20.11mAcm−2, fill factor (FF) of 0.67 and conversion efficiency (η) of 9.39% respectively. | What is the value of η? | 27343 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
205
]
} | 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.02.012 | Photocurrent-voltage (I–V) characteristics of the sample were measured using electrochemical analyzer (CHI 660C Instruments) under AM 1.5G solar simulator as light source with an illumination intensity of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of solar? | 51507 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
192
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.03.003 | Photocurrent–voltage characteristics of the DSSCs were obtained by a Keithley model 2400 digital source meter using an Oriel 91192 solar simulator equipped with AM 1.5 filter and intensity of 100 mW/cm2. | What is the value of solar? | 36985 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
144
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.136 | The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves of assembled DSSCs were measured under AM 1.5G simulated solar light and the cell active area was 0.16cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 57854 |
{
"text": [
"2h"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152856 | Regarding the dye-loading time, the amount of dye-loading increases in every sample by increasing the dipping time but the photovoltaic parameters of the sample with a dye-loading time of 2h is more promising than the other cells. | What is the value of time? | 52583 |
{
"text": [
"0.42 V"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.027 | Under similar test cell conditions, we have observed an efficiency of 1.09% (JSC= 3.90 mA cm−2, VOC= 0.42 V and ff= 0.66) using Pc-Org-1 as sensitizer. | What is the value of VOC? | 33928 |
{
"text": [
"1cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.065 | A voltage of 15V was applied during the deposition process resulting in each FTO glass coated with GO-TiO2 nanocomposite material of 1cm2 active area. | What is the value of active area? | 55134 |
{
"text": [
"16.24mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
431
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.04.003 | For comparison, control groups sensitized by AZ360 or AZ362 were fabricated, which produce PCEs of 6.60% (Jsc=14.92mAcm−2, Voc=680.1mV, and FF=0.65) and 7.00% (Jsc=15.56mAcm−2, Voc=690.1mV, and FF=0.65), respectively.Next, different molar percentages of SE (10%, 30%, and 50%) were added into AZ362 for optimizing co-sensitized conditions, and corresponding devices exhibit PCEs of 7.46% (Jsc=15.91mAcm−2, Voc=700.0mV), 7.65% (Jsc=16.24mAcm−2, Voc=720.0mV), and 7.26% (Jsc=14.97mAcm−2, Voc=688.8mV), respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 56068 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00141J | The dye has significantly higher Voc, Jsc and PCE values than the mono-anchored congener, SD (DD: 6.08%, 13.20 mA cm−2, 0.69 V; SD: 4.56%, 10.95 mA cm−2, 0.65 V).Highly twisted dual D–A unit sensitizers were also developed by Wong (BPDTA and BTTA) (Fig. | What is the value of Voc? | 67466 |
{
"text": [
"17.32%"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.029 | For the 2D/3D stacking structure (PEAI concentration: 0.5mM), the device shows a Voc of 1.10V, an FF of 77.10%, and a Jsc of 21.07mAcm−2, leading to an improved PCE of 17.32%. | What is the value of PCE? | 10372 |
{
"text": [
"6.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.081 | The MoS2 coupled rGO CE annealed at 90°C for 1h showed the best performance with PCE of 8.1% when compared to Pt CE which showed PCE of 6.8%. | What is the value of PCE? | 29289 |
{
"text": [
"0.12 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.045 | The thickness and active area of the films were controlled at ∼10 μm and 0.12 cm2 by pasting a plastic tape around the edge of the FTO substrate. | What is the value of active area? | 58241 |
{
"text": [
"5 h"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.07.006 | It was found that the overall energy conversion efficiency reached 5.78% at 4.5 h and then decreased when the dye-loading time increased from 3, 4.5, 5 to 12 h. | What is the value of time? | 30860 |
{
"text": [
"1.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
263
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA11881B | Additionally, the increased deposition duration led to an increase of dye loading capability, and the hybrid structures showed increased Jsc values (from 1.01 to 4.40 mA) and increased Voc values (from 0.67 to 0.71 V), thus enhancing the PCE values from 0.49% to 1.83%. | What is the value of PCE? | 74754 |
{
"text": [
"817.6 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.07.032 | The reduced recombination of the TCNF-based DSSC leads to the high Voc obtained under light, which is 839.7 mV, and higher than that of the TNP-based DSSC (817.6 mV) ( shows the IPCE spectra of the three fabricated DSSC devices in the wavelength region 300–900 nm. | What is the value of Voc? | 56504 |
{
"text": [
"0.55V"
],
"answer_start": [
272
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.079 | With the aim to achieve the optimal conversion efficiency, the double D–π–A branches linked by isolation group of n-hexyl chain resulting two separate light harvesting system was introduced to construct UY3, the performance of the solar cell improved (Jsc=9.44mAcm−2, Voc=0.55V, ff=0.63, η=3.24%), partially realizing our idea. | What is the value of Voc? | 26704 |
{
"text": [
"CoS2"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.07.040 | The DSSC with the novel ternary CoIn2S4 CE achieved a PCE of 8.83%, which was higher than that of binary CoS2 (6.47%) and binary In2.77S4 (0.46%) CEs, even was higher than that of traditional Pt CE (8.19%). | What is CE? | 51484 |
{
"text": [
"Zn2SnO4"
],
"answer_start": [
11
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09661H | This makes Zn2SnO4 a promising candidate as an electron-conducting material for high efficiency flexible PSC applications.Additionally, Shin's group chose Ti instead of TiO2 as an efficient barrier layer to deposit directly on ITO–PET flexible substrates through RF magnetic sputtering and the resulting flexible PSCs without any metal oxide layer presented a high PCE of ∼8.39% (Table 1). | What is ITO? | 16923 |
{
"text": [
"64%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05057J | A better PCE of 10.2% was obtained for Device K with a Voc of 0.90 V, a Jsc of 18.1 mA cm−2, and an FF of 64% when a C-PCBSD interlayer was adopted. | What is the value of FF? | 21137 |
{
"text": [
"0.66 V"
],
"answer_start": [
385
]
} | 10.1039/C9CP01032G | The co-sensitized devices with DTP, i.e.N3 + DTP (η = 5.44% JSC = 14.25 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.62 V, and FF = 61.21%), and DTB, i.e.N3 + DTB (η = 5.43%, JSC = 13.13 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.61 V, and FF = 67.94%), showed a slightly higher PCE than the N3 dye alone (η = 5.39%, JSC = 14.39 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.60 V, and FF = 61.98%) whereas with DTNi.e., N3 + DTN (η = 5.32%, JSC = 14.63 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.66 V, and FF = 54.80%), it showed a lower PCE. | What is the value of VOC? | 69949 |
{
"text": [
"4.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1039/C2EE22657J | With the incorporation of AuNR@Ag2S (0.88% wt, device 2), the PCE slightly increased to 4.5%. | What is the value of PCE? | 74345 |
{
"text": [
"5.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.03.002 | As listed in , an excellent η= 5.83% was achieved in presence of 36 wt% PEGDME (Jsc= 12.1 mA cm−2, Voc= 671 mV, ff= 0.718). | What is the value of η? | 45069 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
190
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.135 | The EIS data were measured with a Compactstat electrochemistry analyzer (IVIUM Technologies) with a frequency range from 0.01 Hz to 0.1 MHz and a potential modulation of 0.2 V under AM 1.5 (100 mW/cm2) light illumination. | What is the value of illumination? | 56174 |
{
"text": [
"0.59 V"
],
"answer_start": [
209
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.095 | An overall solar to electrical energy conversion efficiency (η) of about 4.71% was achieved in the ZnO/SnO2 nanoneedle based DSSC; with a current density (Jsc) of 9.8 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.59 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.57 that is much higher than that of both the ZnO nanoneedle based DSSC (η= 2.87%, Jsc= 7.8 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.52 V, FF = 0.49), and ZnO nanorod based DSSC (η= 1.04%, Jsc= 3.66 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.52 V, FF = 0.48).Such a core/shell nanoneedle structure makes the ZnO/SnO2 nanoneedle photoanode possess different advantages in the following two aspects; which have greatly benefited the performance of the ZnO-based DSSCs. | What is the value of Voc? | 40506 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.02.023 | The photoanode used in this work was an 8 μm thick TiO2 film sensitized with N719 dye. | What is photoanode? | 40049 |
{
"text": [
"0.77 V"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.016 | DSSC based on BT-TiO2-RGO 30 s (bamboo-type TiO2 nanotubes modified with RGO via EPD time of 30 s) delivers the highest energy conversion efficiency (6.01%) with Voc of 0.77 V, Jsc of 12.51 mA cm−2 and FF of 0.62 (), which represents a 13.8% increase in cell efficiency compared to that of DSSC based on unmodified BT-TiO2 nanotube array (5.28%). | What is the value of Voc? | 49140 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.02.001 | The parameters derived from (a) are: the open circuit voltage of 748mV and a short-circuit current density of 7.28mAcm−2 under illumination with light of 100mWcm−2 intensity. | What is the value of illumination? | 33211 |
{
"text": [
"0.65 V"
],
"answer_start": [
203
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA07893A | 4a that the K60 sensitized DSSC showed a PCE of 6.26% (with Jsc = 14.95 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.59 and FF = 0.71), while DSSC sensitized with mixed K60 + Y1 showed PCE of 8.19% (with Jsc = 18.26 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.65 V and FF = 0.69). | What is the value of Voc? | 68056 |
{
"text": [
"9.77 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.apt.2017.08.012 | Whereas, the solar cells fabricated using AB-TiO2 and RT-TiO2 displayed an energy conversion efficiency of 6.26% and 4.91%, Jsc of 11.91 mA/cm2 and 9.77 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.74 V and 0.73 V, and FF of 0.71 and 0.69, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 48742 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.03.218 | The optimal Jsc of 14.72mAcm−2 and PCE of 6.94% are obtained in the DSSC with 10wt% TNT-Au, significantly higher than those of the DSSC with pure TiO2 photoanode by 24.3% and 21.8%, respectively. | What is ? | 45650 |
{
"text": [
"4.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
158
]
} | 10.1039/C1CC12772A | The NN-ZnO cell shows a short current density (Jsc) of 12.6 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 628 mV, fill factor (FF) of 0.51, and thus η reaches up to 4.0%. | What is the value of η? | 77119 |
{
"text": [
"746 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C5TC03623B | Under the same conditions, CPD-2 gave a much lower PCE of 5.21% (Jsc = 9.76 mA cm−2, Voc = 746 mV, FF = 0.72), mainly due to the decreased Jsc value. | What is the value of Voc? | 69664 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.099 | Noted that both dyes CD1 and CD2 exhibit more positive Eox than the I−/I3− redox couple (∼0.42V vs. | What is redox couple? | 43090 |
{
"text": [
"0.64 V"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.175 | Obviously, both the Rct and τe were in good agreement with the changing tendencies of Voc values obtained in J-V curves: PTZ-1 (0.71 V) >PTZ-3 (0.69 V) >PTZ-2 (0.64 V).As mentioned above, in spite of the high ε of organic dyes PTZ-2 and PTZ-3, the narrow spectra response limit the light absorption in the visible region leading to lower efficiencies compared to the ruthenium complex N719. | What is the value of Voc? | 40891 |
{
"text": [
"573 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | For 4b the best cell featured a VOC of 573 mV, JSC of 0.75 mA cm−2, FF of 0.28 and PCE of 0.12%. | What is the value of VOC? | 70937 |
{
"text": [
"0.78 V"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.007 | For a completely flexible DSSCs assembled by Nb2O5 coated TiO2 NWAs/2.0 mol% Er3+-1.0 mol% Yb3+ codoped TiO2 NPs photoanode, Jsc and Voc reached 15.32 mA·cm−2, 0.78 V, respectively, thus obtaining an improved photoelectric efficiency of 8.10%. | What is the value of Voc? | 41663 |
{
"text": [
"74.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
145
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA05008E | This downward shifting in the VBM position might affect the enhancement of both the Jsc (from 18.73 to 20.84 mA cm−2) and the FF (from 65.73% to 74.64%) according to a recent study by Wang et al. | What is the value of FF? | 22280 |
{
"text": [
"15.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05226A | By contrast, the corresponding mesoscopic mixed halide perovskite device prepared on a 200 nm thick mesoporous TiO2 scaffold showed a PCE of 15.8% and 15.9%, for forward and reverse scans, respectively.Reporting independently, Wu et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 16010 |
{
"text": [
"5.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1039/C7CP00612H | The DSSCs fabricated with D1 and D2 as sensitizers showed overall PCEs of 6.33% and 5.03%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 70799 |
{
"text": [
"72.97%"
],
"answer_start": [
427
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | The Y-doping TiO2 nanorod array perovskite solar cells with the Y/Ti molar ratio of 3% exhibited a photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of 18.11% along with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.06V, short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 22.50mAcm−2 and fill factor (FF) of 76.16%, while the un-doping TiO2 nanorod array perovskite solar cells gave a PCE of 16.42% along with Voc of 1.04V, Jsc of 21.66mAcm−2 and FF of 72.97%.Y-doping TiO2 nanorod arrays were successfully prepared by hydrothermal methods using the aqueous grown solution of 38mM titanium isopropoxide and 6M hydrochloric acid with the Y/Ti molar ratios of 0%, 3%, 5%. | What is the value of FF? | 1543 |
{
"text": [
"0.903V"
],
"answer_start": [
293
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.305 | In the standard case using the MAPbI3-xClx perovskite cell, the photovoltaic parameters of Voc, the short-circuit current density, Jsc, fill factor, FF, power conversion efficiency, η, average power conversion efficiency, ηave, series resistance, Rs, shunt resistance, Rsh were obtained to be 0.903V, 13.5mAcm−2, 0.516, 6.30%, 5.79%, 10.1Ωcm2 and 239Ωcm2 as listed in . | What is the value of Voc? | 5093 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
26
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.06.023 | with above dye-sensitized TiO2 photoanode, gel electrolyte film and Pt counter electrode. | What is photoanode? | 38527 |
{
"text": [
"4.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
230
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2016.04.044 | It is note that X66 exhibit a lowest PCE among these dyes, a result can be attributed to the poor light harvesting ability, less stability and argument charge recombination (see next section).The PCE of X66–69 ranges from 1.65 to 4.21%, which is similar to other DTP dyes with similar structure. | What is the value of PCE? | 24991 |
{
"text": [
"611 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA04407J | The Voc of devices based on TJ101R (795 mV) is much higher than devices based on TJ101 (646 mV) and TJ102 (611 mV) in the absent of CDCA. | What is the value of Voc? | 66494 |
{
"text": [
"10.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
158
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA02036H | With 0.75 wt% graphene concentration in the NC, the device has exhibited an improvement in Jsc from 15.54 mA cm−2 to 19.97 mA cm−2, and the PCE from 7.01% to 10.34%. | What is the value of PCE? | 18926 |
{
"text": [
"0.410V"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100256 | In comparison, compounds without a methoxy substituent in the molecule recorded lower solar conversion efficiencies (0.035–0.051%) and lower Voc values (0.350–0.410V). | What is the value of Voc? | 23339 |
{
"text": [
"18 h"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.07.006 | The DSSC with ZO0.1 sample having dye adsorption time 18 h exhibits the highest PCE of 0.70% with Jsc of 5.43 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.42 V and τe of 93.8 μs.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is the value of time? | 23689 |
{
"text": [
"0.1589 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00788A | The cell active area was tested with a mask of 0.1589 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 70478 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.013 | The MoO3 samples were prepared on glass substrates to carry out this study. | What is substrate? | 54782 |
{
"text": [
"2.50%"
],
"answer_start": [
203
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA27211H | The photoelectric conversion efficiencies (η) of PVWs based on 0 h (PVW-0), 3.5 h (PVW-3.5), 8.5 h (PVW-8.5), 13.5 h (PVW-13.5), 20 h (PVW-20), and 25 h of anodization (PVW-25) were 3.63%, 1.65%, 1.71%, 2.50%, 2.71%, and 2.64%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 67723 |
{
"text": [
"1110 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1039/C6EE00462H | The measured Voc was found to be 1109 mV for device A and 1110 mV for device B, resulting in high power conversion efficiencies close to 15% (15.1% for device A and 14.70% for device B). | What is the value of Voc? | 14964 |
{
"text": [
"0s"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.133 | However, the situation changes reversely when Rs becomes too large, and an exception happens as etching time is prolonged to 300s. | What is the value of time? | 35228 |
{
"text": [
"14.70 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2013.08.006 | As the thickness of P25 film increases from 7.97 μm to 14.3 μm, the open-circuit voltage (Voc) is almost the same, while the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) ascends from 12.00 mA/cm2 to 14.70 mA/cm2, with the fill factor (FF) staying at around 0.65, and PCE increases from 5.73% to 6.61%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 37903 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.040 | Photocurrent-photovoltage (J-V) of the DSSC was measured under 100mWcm−2 with AM 1.5 illuminations (Zolix SS150), and the light intensity was calibrated using a Si solar cell (National Institute of Metrology, China).XRD patterns of as-prepared CoS2/RGO, bare CoS2, RGO and GO were performed to confirm the phase purity and crystal phase structure of samples as shown in . | What is the value of light intensity? | 25076 |
{
"text": [
"0.72 V"
],
"answer_start": [
197
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.002 | Alternatively, it may be due to defects at the counter electrode interface, and other interfacial behavior in the fabricated solar cells (The DSSC with SRGO CE exhibits JSC of 12.20 mA/cm2, VOC of 0.72 V and FF of 0.44. | What is the value of VOC? | 55433 |
{
"text": [
"8.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA06490A | The DSSCs with Co0.85Se CEs on the plasma-treated FTO showed a Jsc value of 16.25 mA cm−2 and an FF value of 67.78%, and thus, the highest η value of 8.04%, which is higher than that (7.66%) for the DSSCs with the Pt CE, and also superior to that of the device with Co0.85Se CEs on the pristine FTO.Previous studies have demonstrated that a counter electrode usually affects three aspects of cell performance: the first is the electrical property or sheet resistance; the second is the electrochemical property or catalysis efficiency, which is determined typically by the inverse of charge transfer resistance; and the last is the optical property or reflection of illumination. | What is the value of η? | 72115 |
{
"text": [
"19.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1039/C9SC01184F | A 3D structured dispiro-oxepine derivative DDOF was designed using a 3-step synthetic route and showed a PCE of 19.4% with improved long-term stability compared with spiro-OMeTAD. | What is the value of PCE? | 21418 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.061 | This suggests that CYC-B6S anchored TiO2 possesses higher electron lifetime than N3 anchored TiO2. | What is ? | 25590 |
{
"text": [
"10.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.11.012 | The perovskite devices with optimized meniscus printed films with and without vacuum process show a PCE of 10.1% and 2.3% respectively (with active area of 0.1cm2). | What is the value of PCE? | 1282 |
{
"text": [
"17.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
319
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06718B | The power conversion efficiencies (η) of the MAPbI3−xClx mixed halide perovskite solar cells with different solvent compositions were 14.7% (forward scan), 15.2% (reverse scan), and 12.62 ± 1.24% (average) for the 10:0 sample; 16.7% (forward scan), 17.2% (reverse scan), and 14.60 ± 1.40% (average) for the 9:1 sample; 17.8% (forward scan), 18.3% (reverse scan), and 16.08 ± 1.28% (average) for the 8:2 sample; and 15.5% (forward scan), 15.9% (reverse scan), and 13.63 ± 1.25% (average) for the 7:3 sample. | What is the value of η? | 18358 |
{
"text": [
"6.77%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE41888J | They found that those moieties helped suppress charge recombination and aggregation resulting in a reasonable PCE of 6.77%. | What is the value of PCE? | 71474 |
{
"text": [
"18.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2019.03.003 | The as-prepared perovskite solar cell resulted in a PCE of 18.2% with a Jsc of 24.5mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.996V and a FF of 0.748 under 1 sun AM 1.5G illumination. | What is the value of PCE? | 3723 |
{
"text": [
"4.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.122 | It is noted that the 814% enhancement of PCE in s-DSCs is much higher than 27% enhancement of PCE in the liquid-state DSCs (l-DSCs) with the same compact layer thickness of 85 nm (PCE of 4.06%). | What is the value of PCE? | 24165 |
{
"text": [
"15.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA18648J | The device that used the 180 nm spiro-MeOTAD layer showed best power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.5% with 23.5 mA cm−2 of short-circuit current (JSC), 1.02 V of open-circuit voltage (VOC) and 64.7% of fill factor (FF). | What is the value of PCE? | 16151 |
{
"text": [
"5.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01383C | Having the smallest carbon grid lines, sample 6 shows the lowest Jsc of 11.32 mA cm−2, and the corresponding average PCE is only 5.08%. | What is the value of PCE? | 14366 |
{
"text": [
"15.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.06.031 | The F100M0-based device only showed 15.16% power conversion efficiency (PCE) measured from reverse scan direction. | What is the value of PCE? | 11681 |
{
"text": [
"1.029%"
],
"answer_start": [
254
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.123 | The quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized photovoltaic fiber providing maximum performance is that with a 50wt.% P123 membrane, 29.7μm-thick TiO2 layer and 500μm twist pitch length, and exhibits a performance of Jsc=2.117mAcm−2, Voc=0.6932V, FF=0.7015, and η=1.029%. | What is the value of η? | 50485 |
{
"text": [
"0.71V"
],
"answer_start": [
234
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2014.01.001 | Dye K-2 with thienylfuran as a π-bridge showed a slightly higher conversion efficiency of 6.73% than that of the bithiophene π-bridge based dye K-1 (6.62%), being mainly ascribed to the higher Jsc and Voc for K-2 dye (12.49mAcm−2 and 0.71V) than that of K-1 dye (12.40mAcm−2 and 0.70V). | What is the value of Voc? | 50363 |
{
"text": [
"8.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.apt.2018.05.024 | In virtue of the superior JSC of up to 14.11mAcm−2 and VOC of up to 0.82V, the scattering layer of TiO2-CSSs can indeed succeed in enhancing the overall PCE to 8.27%. | What is the value of PCE? | 32756 |
{
"text": [
"1.11"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1039/C6NR02276F | used graphite paste and reported a 1.11% efficiency. | What is ? | 18886 |
{
"text": [
"3.99%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM15055C | An efficiency of η = 4.12% has been attained in a DSSC with 20 layers of MWCNT webs, whereas by using a CoS based CE a slightly lower efficiency (η = 3.99%) was measured. | What is the value of η? | 66429 |
{
"text": [
"95 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC03874C | [Ru(bpy)2(H5)] achieves values of VOC = 95 mV and ff = 34–36%. | What is the value of VOC? | 76458 |
{
"text": [
"60s"
],
"answer_start": [
45
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.002 | When the treatment time was increased beyond 60s, Jsc began to decrease. | What is the value of time? | 53884 |
{
"text": [
"16.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
14
]
} | 10.1039/C6MH00160B | Mean PCEs are 16.1% and 17.7% respectively (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 19201 |
{
"text": [
"39.4"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.02.080 | From the curve of △OD at the wavelength of 633nm versus the applied potential of −0.7V (see c), the calculated CE value was 39.4cm2/C for the commercial FTO, 48.7cm2/C for the bare FTO, and 56.2cm2/C for CA15-FTO. | What is CE? | 47357 |
{
"text": [
"8.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
367
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.040 | Another possible factor contributing to the lower PCE is the batch to batch variation in the quality of the interfacial materials (C60 and BCP).The incorporation of EA cations into the 2D/3D film significantly improves the overall performance of the solar cells, which display a VOC of 0.51/0.51V, a JSC of 23.75/23.60 (mAcm−2), a FF of 0.70/0.69, and a PCE of 8.40%/8.31% at forward/reverse sweep. | What is the value of PCE? | 39 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA26301A | To make a counter electrode, 20 nm of Pt thin film was deposited to cleaned surface of FTO glass substrate. | What is substrate? | 72044 |
{
"text": [
"14.35%"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09231K | It is worth noting that the device based on a Bphen:Ir(MDQ)2(acac) interfacial layer exhibits a Voc of 0.94 V, a very high FF of 0.74 and thus yields an average PCE of 14.35%. | What is the value of PCE? | 13991 |
{
"text": [
"4.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA21296K | As a result, both the Jsc and Voc of the hierarchical composite photoanode based cell are greatly enhanced and an η of 4.88% is obtained which is attributed to the strong light harvesting capability, fast electron transport and high electron collection efficiency. | What is the value of η? | 74676 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.04.059 | The efficiency test was conducted under AM 1.5G illumination with the incident light intensity of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of illumination? | 36603 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.057 | The electrons are quickly transferred to BTNR, which allow efficient electron transfer to the FTO substrate, and the holes are captured by reduced species in the electrolyte (d) schematically illustrates the energy levels of the components in DSSC. | What is substrate? | 51102 |
{
"text": [
"1.14 V"
],
"answer_start": [
144
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA03022K | The best PTAA device achieved a PCE of 10.28% in reverse scanning, with a current density (Jsc) of 13.31 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.14 V and fill factor (FF) of 0.68. | What is the value of Voc? | 13911 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.024 | Differences between illumination through either the glass substrate or the IZO rear electrode can be observed in the absorptance spectra, which can be attributed to light scattering at the rough interfaces of the perovskite layer and the TiO2 scaffold. | What is substrate? | 339 |
{
"text": [
"1.634 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.04.081 | The η of the DSSC using TiO2 thin film electrode was about 0.455% with a 1.634 mA/cm2 JSC, 0.596 eV VOC, and 46.6% FF; while the η of the DSSC using ZnO/TiO2 thin film electrode reached 2.163% with a 12.388 mA/cm2JSC, 0.478 eV VOC, and 36.5 FF. | What is the value of JSC? | 39306 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.