text: [Cyrill Gorcunov - Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:19:58PM +0300]| [James Chapman - Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 03:05:13PM +0000]| | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:| | > [Cyrill Gorcunov - Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:13:59PM +0300]| | > | [James Chapman - Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:06:08AM +0000]| | > | | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:| | > | | > - Each tunnel and appropriate lock are inside own namespace now.| | > | | > - pppox code allows to create per-namespace sockets for| | > | | > both PX_PROTO_OE and PX_PROTO_OL2TP protocols. Actually since| | > | | > now pppox_create support net-namespaces new PPPo... protocols| | > | | > (if they ever will be) should support net-namespace too otherwise| | > | | > explicit check for &init_net would be needed.| | | | Ok, I tested this in my L2TP setup. The first ppp session setup fails| | because the PPPIOCNEWUNIT ioctl returns -EEXIST. I think the problem is| | the logic in ppp_create_interface(), which does the following to create| | a new ppp interface:| | | | /* Initialize the new ppp unit */| | ppp->file.index = unit;| | sprintf(dev->name, "ppp%d", unit);| | | | ret = register_netdev(dev);| | | | Looks like there is more work to do in the ppp changes.| | | | -- | | James Chapman| | Katalix Systems Ltd| | | Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development| |...Btw James did connection work without these patches? Onpure net-next-2.6 tree? I've some bad feeling that thisfail is related to different patch. Just to be sure. - Cyrill -