text: From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
  Date: 2001-03-15 20:54:52
  on 3/15/01 8:39 PM, Mark Rodgers at mark.rodgers_at_[hidden] wrote:
  [SNIP]
  > IMHO changing the names of the classes, changing their interfaces, moving one
  > into a detail namespace, providing new typedefs,and adding much more
  > comprehensive test coverage combine to make this quite different library than
  > that submitted, and I think we should review the result to ensure that we are
  > happy with the test coverage, for example.
  [TRUNCATE]
  I was wondering this myself. I'm going to post a new version soon, right
  after downloading & reviewing Boost 1.21.1 and considering Beman's
  suggestions.
  There's no other libraries on-deck ("deque"?), right? Would it be OK if we
  go through the process again with the new archive? If there's another
  review imminent, I guess CRC-2 could go after that, since CRC-1 just went.
  (Can multiple, independent reviews go on at the same time?)
  --