text: Just an update: Andrew P provided some great feedback which I've finally
  got all merged into the feature branch [1][2][3]. Many thanks again --
  it was some really nice feedback.
  @Stack: do you have review/thoughts pending?
  Anyone else maybe thinking in the back of their head, but haven't said
  anything yet?
  I would like to keep pushing on this, but I also don't want to call a
  premature vote to merge.
  - Josh
  [1]
  [2]
  [3]
  Josh Elser wrote:
  > I published a current copy of the book -- check out the new chapter on
  > the feature to start [1]. Then, to walk through using the feature, I'd
  > take a look at this comment[2] which has a little script to create some
  > tables/quotas and tries to step you a (contrived) example workflow.
  >
  > LMK if you have more specific questions. Happy to answer directly or
  > point you to the code to let you answer it yourself :)
  >
  > [1]
  > [2]
  >
  >
  >
  > Stack wrote:
  >> Sounds like an excellent idea to me. If I were to take a tour over the
  >> quotas feature, how would you direct my perambulations Josh?
  >> Thanks,
  >> St.Ack
  >>
  >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Josh Elser<elserj@apache.org> wrote:
  >>
  >>> Hi folks,
  >>>
  >>> Here's a formal thread for discussion on merging the space quota feature
  >>> (presently in the branch HBASE-16961[1]) into master. The tl;dr on the
  >>> feature is that this extends the RPC quota feature to include
  >>> configurable
  >>> limits on the size of tables and namespaces. Please check the
  >>> archives for
  >>> earlier discussion on design if you'd like a more in-depth recap.
  >>>
  >>> So far, our Ted and Vlad have devoted cycles to reviewing the code and
  >>> have given their +1's (Ted along the way, Vlad after the fact).
  >>> Thanks to
  >>> both of them.
  >>>
  >>> Outstanding, I have to commit the feedback from Vlad (due to PreCommit
  >>> being hosed -- INFRA-13985), and rebase on top of master once more
  >>> (these
  >>> have been rather clean/easy to do). Since both of these tasks are pretty
  >>> minor, I figured we can start the discussion now
  >>>
  >>> Thoughts/Opinions? Objections? Approvals? Cat-photos?
  >>>
  >>> - Josh
  >>>
  >>> [1]
  >>>
  >>