text: On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 13:30, Skylar Thompson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:28:11AM +0100, Joe Radinger wrote: > > hi > >? > > It kind of depends on your hardware and disk usage. In many cases, however, > ext3 has higher performance because it can serialize operations. hmm hardware is a p2 350 mhz with 120gb (linux) + 20gb (beos and windows thus not used :))), with 256 mb ram. its not the fastest machine on earth, but its ok for normal user-stuff, compiling and so on. system load drops never under 1.0 as i almost everytime compile (niced). average file size is not too big, as i dont have to much big files, but some directories are quite crowded (thousands of files). maybe i should try and benchmark my system. any suggestions? > > i didnt activate debugging (jbd). > > > > b) is reiserfs compatible with ext3? > > You can have it compiled into the same kernel and run it on the same > computer as ext3, if that's what you mean. > > > is it possible use both journaling filesystems at the same time (of > > course on different partitions :)) > > Yes. I'm doing that right now, in addition to using XFS for source > libraries and JFS for temporary stuff. > > > i think i remember some talks about namespace-collisions. > > I don't recall anything like that. I've been using both ext3 and ReiserFS > since the 2.4.5 kernel. Maybe it was before that? sure it was some time ago. > -- > -- Skylar Thompson (skylar attglobal net) thanks for answering (to all of you) joe
  Attachment:
  signature.asc
  Description: This is a digitally signed message part