text: Talk:Open Historical Map
  What is the status of this project? And why has the website been down? Cheers! –Todrobbins (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
  The machine that was hosting OHM died and finding a new home has been trying. Should be up shortly. --Muninn project (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
  For the latest information, see the OHM mailing list Currently still down. --SomeoneElse (talk) 12:41, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
  Time/history/life cycle concepts
  Was there any discussion regarding this? There is a pretty decent Comparison of life cycle concepts. The use of start_date and end_date that was suggested in the transcript ( ) seems to be the worst choice for a rich historic map. RicoZ (talk) 12:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  After some thinking I think that in most case the date namespace suffix is the way to go for most historic features. It is already routinely used with name=*, fully compatible with all existing tags and does not break backward compatibility of anything. A slight disadvantage is moderate data duplication and not easy to search for keys marked this way (a regexp is needed). RicoZ (talk) 11:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  Going to try and fix some bad links in section 4 that have spious extra charcters at the end that are causing problems.
  I've been tring to find links to OHM pages of documentation and support details after one account locked up for no clear reason and kept being sent via the links to OSM and OHM (update on migration failiures). The link given when I was locked out was only for the OSM support and so they naturaly couldn't help with a OHM based problem. If volountiers needed to fix port link fails or at least compile a list of them for others to work though let me know. {OHM - HGovanus/fgovanus} --Govanus (talk) 18:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)