///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// checkstyle: Checks Java source code and other text files for adherence to a set of rules.
// Copyright (C) 2001-2023 the original author or authors.
//
// This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
// modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
// License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
// version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
//
// This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
// Lesser General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
// License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
// Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

package com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.checks.naming;

import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.api.DetailAST;
import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.api.TokenTypes;
import com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.utils.AnnotationUtil;

/**
 * <p>
 * Checks that method names conform to a specified pattern.
 * </p>
 *
 * <p>Also, checks if a method name has the same name as the residing class.
 * The default is false (it is not allowed). It is legal in Java to have
 * method with the same name as a class. As long as a return type is specified
 * it is a method and not a constructor which it could be easily confused as.
 * Does not check-style the name of an overridden methods because the developer does not
 * have a choice in renaming such methods.
 * </p>
 *
 * <ul>
 * <li>
 * Property {@code format} - Specifies valid identifiers.
 * Type is {@code java.util.regex.Pattern}.
 * Default value is {@code "^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$"}.
 * </li>
 * <li>
 * Property {@code allowClassName} - Controls whether to allow a method name to have the same name
 * as the residing class name. This is not to be confused with a constructor. An easy mistake is
 * to place a return type on a constructor declaration which turns it into a method. For example:
 * <pre>
 * class MyClass {
 *     public void MyClass() {} //this is a method
 *     public MyClass() {} //this is a constructor
 * }
 * </pre>
 * Type is {@code boolean}.
 * Default value is {@code false}.
 * </li>
 * <li>
 * Property {@code applyToPublic} - Controls whether to apply the check to public member.
 * Type is {@code boolean}.
 * Default value is {@code true}.
 * </li>
 * <li>
 * Property {@code applyToProtected} - Controls whether to apply the check to protected member.
 * Type is {@code boolean}.
 * Default value is {@code true}.
 * </li>
 * <li>
 * Property {@code applyToPackage} - Controls whether to apply the check to package-private member.
 * Type is {@code boolean}.
 * Default value is {@code true}.
 * </li>
 * <li>
 * Property {@code applyToPrivate} - Controls whether to apply the check to private member.
 * Type is {@code boolean}.
 * Default value is {@code true}.
 * </li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>
 * To configure the check:
 * </p>
 * <pre>
 * &lt;module name="MethodName"/&gt;
 * </pre>
 * <p>Code Example:</p>
 * <pre>
 * class MyClass {
 *   public void firstMethod1() {} // OK
 *   protected void secondMethod() {} // OK
 *   private void ThirdMethod() {} // violation, method name must match to the
 *                                 // default pattern '^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$'
 *   public void fourth_Method4() {} // violation, method name must match to the
 *                                  // default pattern '^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$'
 * }
 * </pre>
 * <p>
 * An example of how to configure the check for names that begin with
 * a lower case letter, followed by letters, digits, and underscores is:
 * </p>
 * <pre>
 * &lt;module name="MethodName"&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="format" value="^[a-z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$"/&gt;
 * &lt;/module&gt;
 * </pre>
 * <p>Code Example:</p>
 * <pre>
 * class MyClass {
 *   public void myMethod() {} // OK
 *   public void MyMethod() {} // violation, name "MyMethod"
 *                             // should match the pattern "^[a-z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$"
 * }
 * </pre>
 * <p>
 * An example of how to configure the check to allow method names to be equal to the
 * residing class name is:
 * </p>
 * <pre>
 * &lt;module name="MethodName"&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="format" value="^[a-zA-Z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$"/&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="allowClassName" value="true"/&gt;
 * &lt;/module&gt;
 * </pre>
 * <p>Code Example:</p>
 * <pre>
 * class MyClass {
 *   public MyClass() {} // OK
 *   public void MyClass() {} // OK, method Name 'MyClass' is allowed to be
 *                            // equal to the enclosing class name
 * }
 * </pre>
 * <p>
 * An example of how to configure the check to disallow method names to be equal to the
 * residing class name is:
 * </p>
 * <pre>
 * &lt;module name="MethodName"&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="format" value="^[a-zA-Z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$"/&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="allowClassName" value="false"/&gt;
 * &lt;/module&gt;
 * </pre>
 * <p>Code Example:</p>
 * <pre>
 * class MyClass {
 *   public MyClass() {} // OK
 *   public void MyClass() {} // violation, method Name 'MyClass' must not
 *                            // equal the enclosing class name
 * }
 * </pre>
 * <p>
 * An example of how to suppress the check to public and protected methods:
 * </p>
 * <pre>
 * &lt;module name="MethodName"&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="format" value="^[a-z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$"/&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="applyToPublic" value="false"/&gt;
 *    &lt;property name="applyToProtected" value="false"/&gt;
 * &lt;/module&gt;
 * </pre>
 * <p>Code Example:</p>
 * <pre>
 * class MyClass {
 *   public void FirstMethod() {} // OK
 *   protected void SecondMethod() {} // OK
 *   private void ThirdMethod() {} // violation, name 'ThirdMethod' must match
 *                                 // pattern '^[a-z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$'
 *   void FourthMethod() {} // violation, name 'FourthMethod' must match
 *                          // pattern '^[a-z](_?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*$'
 * }
 * </pre>
 * <p>
 * Parent is {@code com.puppycrawl.tools.checkstyle.TreeWalker}
 * </p>
 * <p>
 * Violation Message Keys:
 * </p>
 * <ul>
 * <li>
 * {@code method.name.equals.class.name}
 * </li>
 * <li>
 * {@code name.invalidPattern}
 * </li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * @since 3.0
 */
public class MethodNameCheck
    extends AbstractAccessControlNameCheck {

    /**
     * A key is pointing to the warning message text in "messages.properties"
     * file.
     */
    public static final String MSG_KEY = "method.name.equals.class.name";

    /**
     * Controls whether to allow a method name to have the same name as the residing class name.
     * This is not to be confused with a constructor. An easy mistake is to place a return type on
     * a constructor declaration which turns it into a method. For example:
     * <pre>
     * class MyClass {
     *     public void MyClass() {} //this is a method
     *     public MyClass() {} //this is a constructor
     * }
     * </pre>
     */
    private boolean allowClassName;

    /** Creates a new {@code MethodNameCheck} instance. */
    public MethodNameCheck() {
        super("^[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*$");
    }

    @Override
    public int[] getDefaultTokens() {
        return getRequiredTokens();
    }

    @Override
    public int[] getAcceptableTokens() {
        return getRequiredTokens();
    }

    @Override
    public int[] getRequiredTokens() {
        return new int[] {TokenTypes.METHOD_DEF, };
    }

    @Override
    public void visitToken(DetailAST ast) {
        if (!AnnotationUtil.hasOverrideAnnotation(ast)) {
            // Will check the name against the format.
            super.visitToken(ast);
        }

        if (!allowClassName) {
            final DetailAST method =
                ast.findFirstToken(TokenTypes.IDENT);
            // in all cases this will be the classDef type except anon inner
            // with anon inner classes this will be the Literal_New keyword
            final DetailAST classDefOrNew = ast.getParent().getParent();
            final DetailAST classIdent =
                classDefOrNew.findFirstToken(TokenTypes.IDENT);
            // Following logic is to handle when a classIdent can not be
            // found. This is when you have a Literal_New keyword followed
            // a DOT, which is when you have:
            // new Outclass.InnerInterface(x) { ... }
            // Such a rare case, will not have the logic to handle parsing
            // down the tree looking for the first ident.
            if (classIdent != null
                && method.getText().equals(classIdent.getText())) {
                log(method, MSG_KEY, method.getText());
            }
        }
    }

    /**
     * Setter to controls whether to allow a method name to have the same name as the residing
     * class name. This is not to be confused with a constructor. An easy mistake is to place
     * a return type on a constructor declaration which turns it into a method. For example:
     * <pre>
     * class MyClass {
     *     public void MyClass() {} //this is a method
     *     public MyClass() {} //this is a constructor
     * }
     * </pre>
     *
     * @param allowClassName true to allow false to disallow
     */
    public void setAllowClassName(boolean allowClassName) {
        this.allowClassName = allowClassName;
    }

}
