Edwin Salguero
chore: enterprise-grade project structure, robust .gitignore, and directory cleanup
9289e29
| # π€ Cursor PR Review Guide for Dependabot PRs | |
| ## π― **Quick Start: Review All 12 Dependabot PRs** | |
| ### **Step 1: Run the Automated Review Script** | |
| ```bash | |
| # Make the script executable | |
| chmod +x review_dependabot_prs.sh | |
| # Run the review workflow | |
| ./review_dependabot_prs.sh | |
| ``` | |
| This script will: | |
| - β Run local tests first | |
| - β Test Docker builds | |
| - β Open each PR in your browser | |
| - β Guide you through review decisions | |
| - β Log all decisions for tracking | |
| ## π **Cursor-Specific Review Workflow** | |
| ### **Method 1: Using Cursor's GitHub Integration** | |
| #### **Open All PRs in Cursor:** | |
| ```bash | |
| # In Cursor command palette (Cmd+Shift+P): | |
| GitHub: View Pull Requests | |
| ``` | |
| #### **Review Each PR:** | |
| 1. **Select PR** from the list | |
| 2. **Review changes** in side-by-side diff | |
| 3. **Add comments** using Cursor's inline commenting | |
| 4. **Use AI assistance** for code review | |
| 5. **Approve or request changes** | |
| ### **Method 2: Direct PR URLs** | |
| #### **EAName Repository PRs:** | |
| ```bash | |
| # In Cursor command palette: | |
| GitHub: Open Pull Request from URL | |
| # Then paste these URLs one by one: | |
| https://github.com/EAName/algorithmic_trading/pull/6 | |
| https://github.com/EAName/algorithmic_trading/pull/5 | |
| https://github.com/EAName/algorithmic_trading/pull/4 | |
| https://github.com/EAName/algorithmic_trading/pull/3 | |
| https://github.com/EAName/algorithmic_trading/pull/2 | |
| https://github.com/EAName/algorithmic_trading/pull/1 | |
| ``` | |
| #### **ParallelLLC Repository PRs:** | |
| ```bash | |
| # Same process for ParallelLLC: | |
| https://github.com/ParallelLLC/algorithmic_trading/pull/6 | |
| https://github.com/ParallelLLC/algorithmic_trading/pull/5 | |
| https://github.com/ParallelLLC/algorithmic_trading/pull/4 | |
| https://github.com/ParallelLLC/algorithmic_trading/pull/3 | |
| https://github.com/ParallelLLC/algorithmic_trading/pull/2 | |
| https://github.com/ParallelLLC/algorithmic_trading/pull/1 | |
| ``` | |
| ## π **Review Checklist for Each PR** | |
| ### **Critical PRs (Review First):** | |
| #### **1. Python 3.13 Update (PR #6)** | |
| **Priority: HIGH** | |
| ```bash | |
| # Check for breaking changes | |
| - [ ] All dependencies compatible with Python 3.13 | |
| - [ ] No deprecated features used | |
| - [ ] Performance impact minimal | |
| - [ ] Trading logic unaffected | |
| ``` | |
| #### **2. Docker Action Updates (PRs #2, #4)** | |
| **Priority: MEDIUM** | |
| ```bash | |
| # Check CI/CD pipeline | |
| - [ ] Docker builds still work | |
| - [ ] Image size reasonable | |
| - [ ] Security improvements | |
| - [ ] No breaking changes | |
| ``` | |
| #### **3. GitHub Actions Updates (PRs #1, #3, #5)** | |
| **Priority: LOW** | |
| ```bash | |
| # Check workflow compatibility | |
| - [ ] Actions still function | |
| - [ ] No deprecated features | |
| - [ ] Performance improvements | |
| - [ ] Security enhancements | |
| ``` | |
| ## π€ **Using Cursor's AI for PR Review** | |
| ### **AI-Assisted Review Commands:** | |
| #### **1. Ask AI to Review Changes:** | |
| ```bash | |
| # In Cursor chat: | |
| "Review this PR for breaking changes and security issues" | |
| ``` | |
| #### **2. Check for Trading-Specific Issues:** | |
| ```bash | |
| # In Cursor chat: | |
| "Check if these dependency updates affect our trading algorithms or risk management" | |
| ``` | |
| #### **3. Validate CI/CD Pipeline:** | |
| ```bash | |
| # In Cursor chat: | |
| "Verify that these GitHub Actions updates won't break our CI/CD pipeline" | |
| ``` | |
| ### **AI Review Prompts:** | |
| #### **For Python 3.13 Update:** | |
| ``` | |
| "Review this Python 3.13 update for: | |
| 1. Breaking changes in our trading dependencies | |
| 2. Performance impact on our algorithms | |
| 3. Security improvements | |
| 4. Compatibility with our Docker setup" | |
| ``` | |
| #### **For GitHub Actions Updates:** | |
| ``` | |
| "Review these GitHub Actions updates for: | |
| 1. Workflow compatibility | |
| 2. Security improvements | |
| 3. Performance enhancements | |
| 4. Any deprecated features" | |
| ``` | |
| ## π **Review Decision Matrix** | |
| ### **Approve If:** | |
| - β No breaking changes detected | |
| - β Tests pass locally | |
| - β Docker builds successfully | |
| - β Security improvements included | |
| - β Performance maintained or improved | |
| ### **Request Changes If:** | |
| - β Breaking changes found | |
| - β Tests fail | |
| - β Docker build fails | |
| - β Security vulnerabilities introduced | |
| - β Performance degradation | |
| ### **Comment Only If:** | |
| - π¬ Minor concerns that don't block approval | |
| - π¬ Suggestions for future improvements | |
| - π¬ Questions about implementation | |
| - π¬ Documentation requests | |
| ## π‘οΈ **Trading-Specific Review Criteria** | |
| ### **Risk Management:** | |
| - [ ] No changes to risk calculation logic | |
| - [ ] Position limits still enforced | |
| - [ ] Drawdown protection maintained | |
| - [ ] Compliance requirements met | |
| ### **Performance:** | |
| - [ ] Algorithm execution time unchanged | |
| - [ ] Memory usage reasonable | |
| - [ ] CPU utilization acceptable | |
| - [ ] API response times maintained | |
| ### **Security:** | |
| - [ ] No new vulnerabilities introduced | |
| - [ ] API keys still secure | |
| - [ ] Authentication mechanisms intact | |
| - [ ] Data encryption maintained | |
| ## π― **Efficient Review Strategy** | |
| ### **Batch Review Approach:** | |
| #### **Phase 1: Critical Updates (30 minutes)** | |
| 1. **Python 3.13 Update** - Test thoroughly | |
| 2. **Docker Updates** - Verify builds | |
| 3. **Security Updates** - Validate improvements | |
| #### **Phase 2: Standard Updates (15 minutes)** | |
| 1. **GitHub Actions** - Quick compatibility check | |
| 2. **Minor Dependencies** - Standard review | |
| 3. **Documentation Updates** - Verify accuracy | |
| #### **Phase 3: Approval (5 minutes)** | |
| 1. **Approve safe updates** | |
| 2. **Request changes for issues** | |
| 3. **Merge approved PRs** | |
| ## π **Review Template** | |
| ### **For Each PR, Use This Template:** | |
| ```markdown | |
| ## PR Review: [PR Title] | |
| ### β What I Reviewed: | |
| - [ ] Code changes | |
| - [ ] Dependency updates | |
| - [ ] Breaking changes | |
| - [ ] Security implications | |
| - [ ] Performance impact | |
| - [ ] Local testing | |
| - [ ] Docker build | |
| ### π Findings: | |
| - **Breaking Changes**: [Yes/No] | |
| - **Security Issues**: [Yes/No] | |
| - **Performance Impact**: [None/Minor/Major] | |
| - **Test Results**: [Pass/Fail] | |
| ### π¬ Comments: | |
| [Add any specific comments or suggestions] | |
| ### β Decision: | |
| - [ ] **Approve** - Safe to merge | |
| - [ ] **Request Changes** - Issues found | |
| - [ ] **Comment Only** - Minor concerns | |
| ``` | |
| ## π **Quick Commands for Cursor** | |
| ### **Keyboard Shortcuts:** | |
| ```bash | |
| Cmd+Shift+P # Command palette | |
| Cmd+Shift+G # Source control | |
| Cmd+Enter # Submit review | |
| Cmd+Shift+Enter # Approve PR | |
| Cmd+/ # Toggle comment | |
| ``` | |
| ### **Useful Commands:** | |
| ```bash | |
| GitHub: View Pull Requests | |
| GitHub: Open Pull Request from URL | |
| GitHub: Review Pull Request | |
| GitHub: Add Comment to Pull Request | |
| ``` | |
| ## β **Success Metrics** | |
| ### **Review Goals:** | |
| - **Time**: Complete all 12 PRs in < 1 hour | |
| - **Quality**: 100% of critical issues caught | |
| - **Safety**: No breaking changes merged | |
| - **Efficiency**: Use AI assistance for 80% of reviews | |
| ### **Quality Checklist:** | |
| - [ ] All PRs reviewed within 24 hours | |
| - [ ] No critical issues missed | |
| - [ ] All approved PRs pass CI/CD | |
| - [ ] Documentation updated as needed | |
| - [ ] Team notified of any issues | |
| --- | |
| **Ready to start? Run `./review_dependabot_prs.sh` to begin the automated review workflow!** |