Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
🚀 Qwen2.5-3B Fine-Tuned on BBH (Formal Fallacies) - Model Card
|
2 |
+
📌 Model Overview
|
3 |
+
Model Name: Qwen2.5-3B Fine-Tuned on BBH (Formal Fallacies)
|
4 |
+
Base Model: Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct
|
5 |
+
Fine-Tuned Dataset: BBH (BigBench Hard) - Formal Fallacies
|
6 |
+
Task: Logical Reasoning & Deductive Validity Classification
|
7 |
+
Fine-Tuning Objective: Improve the model’s ability to classify logical arguments as valid or invalid based on deductive reasoning principles.
|
8 |
+
📌 Dataset Information
|
9 |
+
This model was fine-tuned on the Formal Fallacies subset of the BigBench Hard (BBH) dataset.
|
10 |
+
|
11 |
+
Dataset characteristics:
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
Task Type: Deductive reasoning & formal logic classification
|
14 |
+
Input Format: Logical argument statements presented in natural language
|
15 |
+
Target Labels: "valid" or "invalid"
|
16 |
+
Example:
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
Input:
|
19 |
+
"Here comes a perfectly valid argument: First, being a cousin of Chris is sufficient for not being a son of Kermit. We may conclude that whoever is not a son of Kermit is a cousin of Chris."
|
20 |
+
|
21 |
+
Target: "invalid"
|
22 |
+
|
23 |
+
This dataset evaluates a model’s ability to identify logically valid vs. invalid arguments, which is crucial for AI-assisted legal analysis, debate systems, and automated theorem proving.
|