Steven Tang
Commit all
69fb171
|
Confidence NN B |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
pound NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
widely RB O |
|
expected VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
take VB O |
|
another DT B |
|
sharp JJ I |
|
dive NN I |
|
if IN O |
|
trade NN B |
|
figures NNS I |
|
for IN O |
|
September NNP B |
|
, , O |
|
due JJ O |
|
for IN O |
|
release NN B |
|
tomorrow NN B |
|
, , O |
|
fail VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
show VB O |
|
a DT B |
|
substantial JJ I |
|
improvement NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
July NNP B |
|
and CC I |
|
August NNP I |
|
's POS B |
|
near-record JJ I |
|
deficits NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Chancellor NNP O |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
Exchequer NNP I |
|
Nigel NNP O |
|
Lawson NNP O |
|
's POS B |
|
restated VBN I |
|
commitment NN I |
|
to TO O |
|
a DT B |
|
firm NN I |
|
monetary JJ I |
|
policy NN I |
|
has VBZ O |
|
helped VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
prevent VB O |
|
a DT B |
|
freefall NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
sterling NN B |
|
over IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
past JJ I |
|
week NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
But CC O |
|
analysts NNS B |
|
reckon VBP O |
|
underlying VBG B |
|
support NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
sterling NN B |
|
has VBZ O |
|
been VBN O |
|
eroded VBN O |
|
by IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
chancellor NN I |
|
's POS B |
|
failure NN I |
|
to TO O |
|
announce VB O |
|
any DT B |
|
new JJ I |
|
policy NN I |
|
measures NNS I |
|
in IN O |
|
his PRP$ B |
|
Mansion NNP I |
|
House NNP I |
|
speech NN I |
|
last JJ B |
|
Thursday NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
This DT B |
|
has VBZ O |
|
increased VBN O |
|
the DT B |
|
risk NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
government NN I |
|
being VBG O |
|
forced VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
increase VB O |
|
base NN B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
to TO O |
|
16 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
their PRP$ B |
|
current JJ I |
|
15 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
level NN I |
|
to TO O |
|
defend VB O |
|
the DT B |
|
pound NN I |
|
, , O |
|
economists NNS B |
|
and CC O |
|
foreign JJ B |
|
exchange NN I |
|
market NN I |
|
analysts NNS I |
|
say VBP O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
The DT B |
|
risks NNS I |
|
for IN O |
|
sterling NN B |
|
of IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
bad JJ I |
|
trade NN I |
|
figure NN I |
|
are VBP O |
|
very RB O |
|
heavily RB O |
|
on IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
down JJ I |
|
side NN I |
|
, , O |
|
'' '' O |
|
said VBD O |
|
Chris NNP B |
|
Dillow NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
senior JJ B |
|
U.K. NNP I |
|
economist NN I |
|
at IN O |
|
Nomura NNP B |
|
Research NNP I |
|
Institute NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
If IN O |
|
there EX B |
|
is VBZ O |
|
another DT B |
|
bad JJ I |
|
trade NN I |
|
number NN I |
|
, , O |
|
there EX B |
|
could MD O |
|
be VB O |
|
an DT B |
|
awful JJ I |
|
lot NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
pressure NN B |
|
, , O |
|
'' '' O |
|
noted VBD O |
|
Simon NNP B |
|
Briscoe NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
U.K. NNP B |
|
economist NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
Midland NNP B |
|
Montagu NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
a DT B |
|
unit NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
Midland NNP B |
|
Bank NNP I |
|
PLC NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Forecasts NNS B |
|
for IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
trade NN I |
|
figures NNS I |
|
range VBP O |
|
widely RB O |
|
, , O |
|
but CC O |
|
few JJ B |
|
economists NNS I |
|
expect VBP O |
|
the DT B |
|
data NNS I |
|
to TO O |
|
show VB O |
|
a DT B |
|
very RB I |
|
marked VBN I |
|
improvement NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
# # I |
|
2 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
-LRB- ( I |
|
$ $ I |
|
3.2 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
-RRB- ) I |
|
deficit NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
current JJ I |
|
account NN I |
|
reported VBD O |
|
for IN O |
|
August NNP B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
August NNP I |
|
deficit NN I |
|
and CC O |
|
the DT B |
|
# # I |
|
2.2 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
gap NN I |
|
registered VBN O |
|
in IN O |
|
July NNP B |
|
are VBP O |
|
topped VBN O |
|
only RB O |
|
by IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
# # I |
|
2.3 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
deficit NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
October NNP B |
|
1988 CD I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Sanjay NNP B |
|
Joshi NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
European JJ B |
|
economist NN I |
|
at IN O |
|
Baring NNP B |
|
Brothers NNPS I |
|
& CC I |
|
Co. NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
said VBD O |
|
there EX B |
|
is VBZ O |
|
no DT B |
|
sign NN I |
|
that IN O |
|
Britain NNP B |
|
's POS B |
|
manufacturing NN I |
|
industry NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
transforming VBG O |
|
itself PRP B |
|
to TO O |
|
boost VB O |
|
exports NNS B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
At IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
same JJ I |
|
time NN I |
|
, , O |
|
he PRP B |
|
remains VBZ O |
|
fairly RB O |
|
pessimistic JJ O |
|
about IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
outlook NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
imports NNS B |
|
, , O |
|
given VBN O |
|
continued VBD B |
|
high JJ I |
|
consumer NN I |
|
and CC I |
|
capital NN I |
|
goods NNS I |
|
inflows NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
He PRP B |
|
reckons VBZ O |
|
the DT B |
|
current JJ I |
|
account NN I |
|
deficit NN I |
|
will MD O |
|
narrow VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
only RB B |
|
# # I |
|
1.8 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
in IN O |
|
September NNP B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
However RB O |
|
, , O |
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
Dillow NNP I |
|
said VBD O |
|
he PRP B |
|
believes VBZ O |
|
that IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
reduction NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
raw JJ B |
|
material NN I |
|
stockbuilding VBG I |
|
by IN O |
|
industry NN B |
|
could MD O |
|
lead VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
a DT B |
|
sharp JJ I |
|
drop NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
imports NNS B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Combined VBN O |
|
with IN O |
|
at IN B |
|
least JJS I |
|
some DT I |
|
rebound NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
exports NNS B |
|
after IN O |
|
August NNP B |
|
's POS B |
|
unexpected JJ I |
|
decline NN I |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
deficit NN I |
|
could MD O |
|
narrow VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
as RB B |
|
little JJ I |
|
as IN I |
|
# # I |
|
1.3 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
Briscoe NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
who WP B |
|
also RB O |
|
forecasts VBZ O |
|
a DT B |
|
# # I |
|
1.3 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
current JJ I |
|
account NN I |
|
gap NN I |
|
, , O |
|
warns VBZ O |
|
that IN O |
|
even RB O |
|
if IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
trade NN I |
|
figures NNS I |
|
are VBP O |
|
bullish JJ O |
|
for IN O |
|
sterling NN B |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
currency NN I |
|
wo MD O |
|
n't RB O |
|
advance VB O |
|
much JJ B |
|
because IN O |
|
investors NNS B |
|
will MD O |
|
want VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
see VB O |
|
further JJ B |
|
evidence NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
turnaround NN I |
|
before IN O |
|
adjusting VBG O |
|
positions NNS B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Nevertheless RB O |
|
, , O |
|
he PRP B |
|
noted VBD O |
|
, , O |
|
`` `` O |
|
No DT B |
|
one PRP I |
|
will MD O |
|
want VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
go VB O |
|
into IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
trade NN I |
|
figures NNS I |
|
without IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
flat JJ I |
|
position NN I |
|
'' '' O |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
pound NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Meanwhile RB O |
|
, , O |
|
overall JJ B |
|
evidence NN I |
|
on IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
economy NN I |
|
remains VBZ O |
|
fairly RB O |
|
clouded VBN O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
In IN O |
|
his PRP$ B |
|
Mansion NNP I |
|
House NNP I |
|
speech NN I |
|
, , O |
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
Lawson NNP I |
|
warned VBD O |
|
that IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
further JJ I |
|
slowdown NN I |
|
can MD O |
|
be VB O |
|
expected VBN O |
|
as IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
impact NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
last JJ I |
|
rise NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
interest NN B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
earlier RBR B |
|
this DT I |
|
month NN I |
|
takes VBZ O |
|
effect NN B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
U.K. JJ B |
|
base NN I |
|
rates NNS I |
|
are VBP O |
|
at IN O |
|
their PRP$ B |
|
highest JJS I |
|
level NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
eight CD B |
|
years NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
But CC O |
|
consumer NN B |
|
expenditure NN I |
|
data NNS I |
|
released VBD O |
|
Friday NNP B |
|
do VBP O |
|
n't RB O |
|
suggest VB O |
|
that IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
U.K. NNP I |
|
economy NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
slowing VBG O |
|
that DT O |
|
quickly RB O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
figures NNS I |
|
show VBP O |
|
that DT O |
|
spending NN B |
|
rose VBD O |
|
0.1 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
third JJ I |
|
quarter NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
second JJ I |
|
quarter NN I |
|
and CC O |
|
was VBD O |
|
up IN O |
|
3.8 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
year NN I |
|
ago RB O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
This DT B |
|
compares VBZ O |
|
with IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
1.6 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
rise NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
second NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
first JJ I |
|
quarter NN I |
|
and CC O |
|
a DT B |
|
5.4 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
increase NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
second JJ I |
|
quarter NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
1988 CD B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
Dillow NNP I |
|
said VBD O |
|
the DT B |
|
data NNS I |
|
show VBP O |
|
the DT B |
|
economy NN I |
|
`` `` O |
|
is VBZ O |
|
still RB O |
|
quite RB O |
|
strong JJ O |
|
, , O |
|
'' '' O |
|
but CC O |
|
suggestions NNS B |
|
that IN O |
|
much NN B |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
spending NN I |
|
went VBD O |
|
on IN O |
|
services NNS B |
|
rather RB O |
|
than IN O |
|
consumer NN B |
|
goods NNS I |
|
should MD O |
|
reduce VB O |
|
fears NNS B |
|
of IN O |
|
more JJR B |
|
import NN I |
|
rises NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Certainly RB O |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
chancellor NN I |
|
has VBZ O |
|
made VBN O |
|
it PRP B |
|
clear JJ O |
|
that IN O |
|
he PRP B |
|
is VBZ O |
|
prepared VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
increase VB O |
|
interest NN B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
again RB O |
|
if IN O |
|
necessary JJ O |
|
to TO O |
|
both DT O |
|
ensure VB O |
|
that IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
substantial JJ I |
|
slowdown NN I |
|
does VBZ O |
|
take VB O |
|
place NN B |
|
and CC O |
|
that DT O |
|
sterling NN B |
|
does VBZ O |
|
n't RB O |
|
decline VB O |
|
further JJ O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Thursday NNP B |
|
, , O |
|
he PRP B |
|
reminded VBD O |
|
his PRP$ B |
|
audience NN I |
|
that IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
government NN I |
|
`` `` O |
|
can MD O |
|
not RB O |
|
allow VB O |
|
the DT B |
|
necessary JJ I |
|
rigor NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
monetary JJ B |
|
policy NN I |
|
to TO O |
|
be VB O |
|
undermined VBN O |
|
by IN O |
|
exchange NN B |
|
rate NN I |
|
weakness NN I |
|
. . O |
|
'' '' O |
|
|
|
Analysts NNS B |
|
agree VBP O |
|
there EX B |
|
is VBZ O |
|
little JJ B |
|
holding NN O |
|
sterling NN B |
|
firm NN O |
|
at IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
moment NN I |
|
other JJ O |
|
than IN O |
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
Lawson NNP I |
|
's POS B |
|
promise NN I |
|
that IN O |
|
rates NNS B |
|
will MD O |
|
be VB O |
|
pushed VBN O |
|
higher JJR O |
|
if IN O |
|
necessary JJ O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
And CC O |
|
, , O |
|
they PRP B |
|
warn VBP O |
|
, , O |
|
any DT B |
|
further JJ I |
|
drop NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
government NN I |
|
's POS B |
|
popularity NN I |
|
could MD O |
|
swiftly RB O |
|
make VB O |
|
this DT B |
|
promise NN I |
|
sound NN O |
|
hollow JJ O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Sterling NNP B |
|
was VBD O |
|
already RB O |
|
showing VBG O |
|
some DT B |
|
signs NNS I |
|
of IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
lack NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
confidence NN B |
|
in IN O |
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
Lawson NNP I |
|
's POS B |
|
promise NN I |
|
Friday NNP B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
In IN O |
|
European JJ B |
|
trading NN I |
|
it PRP B |
|
declined VBD O |
|
to TO O |
|
$ $ B |
|
1.5890 CD I |
|
and CC O |
|
2.9495 CD B |
|
marks NNS I |
|
from IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
1.5940 CD I |
|
and CC O |
|
2.9429 CD B |
|
marks NNS I |
|
late JJ B |
|
Thursday NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Economists NNS B |
|
suggested VBD O |
|
that IN O |
|
if IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
pound NN I |
|
falls VBZ O |
|
much JJ B |
|
below IN O |
|
2.90 CD B |
|
marks NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
government NN I |
|
will MD O |
|
be VB O |
|
forced VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
increase VB O |
|
rates NNS B |
|
to TO O |
|
16 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
, , O |
|
both DT O |
|
to TO O |
|
halt VB O |
|
any DT B |
|
further JJ I |
|
decline NN I |
|
and CC O |
|
ensure VB O |
|
that IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
balance NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
monetary JJ B |
|
policy NN I |
|
remains VBZ O |
|
unchanged JJ O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Friday NNP B |
|
's POS B |
|
Market NNP I |
|
Activity NN I |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
dollar NN I |
|
posted VBD O |
|
gains NNS B |
|
in IN O |
|
quiet JJ B |
|
trading NN I |
|
as IN O |
|
concerns NNS B |
|
about IN O |
|
equities NNS B |
|
abated VBN O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Foreign JJ B |
|
exchange NN I |
|
dealers NNS I |
|
said VBD O |
|
that IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
currency NN I |
|
market NN I |
|
has VBZ O |
|
begun VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
distance VB O |
|
itself PRP B |
|
from IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
volatile JJ I |
|
stock NN I |
|
exchange NN I |
|
, , O |
|
which WDT B |
|
has VBZ O |
|
preoccupied VBN O |
|
the DT B |
|
market NN I |
|
since IN O |
|
Oct. NNP B |
|
13 CD I |
|
, , O |
|
when WRB O |
|
the DT B |
|
Dow NNP I |
|
Jones NNP I |
|
Industrial NNP I |
|
Average NNP I |
|
plunged VBD O |
|
more JJR B |
|
than IN I |
|
190 CD I |
|
points NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Currency NN B |
|
analysts NNS I |
|
predict VBP O |
|
that IN O |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
coming VBG I |
|
week NN I |
|
the DT B |
|
foreign JJ I |
|
exchange NN I |
|
market NN I |
|
will MD O |
|
shift VB O |
|
its PRP$ B |
|
focus NN I |
|
back RB O |
|
to TO O |
|
economic JJ B |
|
fundamentals NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
keeping VBG O |
|
a DT B |
|
close NN I |
|
eye NN I |
|
out IN O |
|
for IN O |
|
any DT B |
|
signs NNS I |
|
of IN O |
|
monetary JJ B |
|
easing NN I |
|
by IN O |
|
U.S. NNP B |
|
Federal NNP I |
|
Reserve NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Late RB O |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
New NNP I |
|
York NNP I |
|
trading NN I |
|
day NN I |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
dollar NN I |
|
was VBD O |
|
quoted VBN O |
|
at IN O |
|
1.8578 CD B |
|
marks NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
up IN O |
|
from IN O |
|
1.8470 CD B |
|
marks NNS I |
|
late JJ B |
|
Thursday NNP I |
|
in IN O |
|
New NNP B |
|
York NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
U.S. NNP I |
|
currency NN I |
|
was VBD O |
|
also RB O |
|
changing VBG O |
|
hands NNS B |
|
at IN O |
|
142.43 CD B |
|
yen NN I |
|
, , O |
|
up IN O |
|
from IN O |
|
141.70 CD B |
|
yen NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
New NNP B |
|
York NNP I |
|
late JJ B |
|
Thursday NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
In IN O |
|
Tokyo NNP B |
|
on IN O |
|
Monday NNP B |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
U.S. NNP I |
|
currency NN I |
|
opened VBD O |
|
for IN O |
|
trading NN B |
|
at IN O |
|
141.95 CD B |
|
yen NN I |
|
, , O |
|
up IN O |
|
from IN O |
|
Friday NNP B |
|
's POS B |
|
Tokyo NNP I |
|
close NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
141.35 CD B |
|
yen NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
On IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
Commodity NNP I |
|
Exchange NNP I |
|
in IN O |
|
New NNP B |
|
York NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
gold NN B |
|
for IN O |
|
current JJ B |
|
delivery NN I |
|
settled VBD O |
|
at IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
367.30 CD I |
|
an DT B |
|
ounce NN I |
|
, , O |
|
up IN O |
|
20 CD B |
|
cents NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Estimated VBN B |
|
volume NN I |
|
was VBD O |
|
a DT B |
|
light NN I |
|
2.4 CD I |
|
million CD I |
|
ounces NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
In IN O |
|
early JJ B |
|
trading NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
Hong NNP B |
|
Kong NNP I |
|
Monday NNP B |
|
, , O |
|
gold NN B |
|
was VBD O |
|
quoted VBN O |
|
at IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
366.50 CD I |
|
an DT B |
|
ounce NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
East NNP B |
|
Rock NNP I |
|
Partners NNP I |
|
Limited NNP I |
|
Partnership NNP I |
|
said VBD O |
|
it PRP B |
|
proposed VBD O |
|
to TO O |
|
acquire VB O |
|
A.P. NNP B |
|
Green NNP I |
|
Industries NNP I |
|
Inc. NNP I |
|
for IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
40 CD I |
|
a DT B |
|
share NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
In IN O |
|
an DT B |
|
Oct. NNP I |
|
19 CD I |
|
letter NN I |
|
to TO O |
|
A.P. NNP B |
|
Green NNP I |
|
's POS B |
|
board NN I |
|
, , O |
|
East NNP B |
|
Rock NNP I |
|
said VBD O |
|
the DT B |
|
offer NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
subject NN O |
|
to TO O |
|
the DT B |
|
signing NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
merger NN I |
|
agreement NN I |
|
by IN O |
|
no DT O |
|
later RB O |
|
than IN O |
|
Oct. NNP B |
|
31 CD I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
letter NN I |
|
, , O |
|
attached VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
a DT B |
|
filing NN I |
|
with IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
Securities NNP I |
|
and CC I |
|
Exchange NNP I |
|
Commission NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
said VBD O |
|
the DT B |
|
approval NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
also RB O |
|
contingent JJ O |
|
upon IN O |
|
obtaining VBG O |
|
satisfactory JJ B |
|
financing NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
An DT B |
|
A.P. NNP I |
|
Green NNP I |
|
official NN I |
|
declined VBD O |
|
to TO O |
|
comment VB O |
|
on IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
filing NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
$ $ I |
|
40-a-share JJ I |
|
proposal NN I |
|
values VBZ O |
|
the DT B |
|
company NN I |
|
at IN O |
|
about RB B |
|
$ $ I |
|
106.6 CD I |
|
million CD I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
A.P. NNP B |
|
Green NNP I |
|
currently RB O |
|
has VBZ O |
|
2,664,098 CD B |
|
shares NNS I |
|
outstanding JJ O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Its PRP$ B |
|
stock NN I |
|
closed VBD O |
|
at IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
38 CD I |
|
, , O |
|
up IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
1.875 CD I |
|
, , O |
|
in IN O |
|
national JJ B |
|
over-the-counter JJ I |
|
trading NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
company NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
a DT B |
|
Mexico NNP I |
|
, , I |
|
Mo. NNP I |
|
, , I |
|
maker NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
refractory JJ B |
|
products NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
East NNP B |
|
Rock NNP I |
|
also RB O |
|
said VBD O |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
filing NN I |
|
that IN O |
|
it PRP B |
|
boosted VBD O |
|
its PRP$ B |
|
stake NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
A.P. NNP B |
|
Green NNP I |
|
to TO O |
|
8.7 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
It PRP B |
|
now RB O |
|
holds VBZ O |
|
233,000 CD B |
|
A.P. NNP I |
|
Green NNP I |
|
common JJ I |
|
shares NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
including VBG O |
|
30,000 CD B |
|
shares NNS I |
|
bought VBD O |
|
last JJ B |
|
Thursday NNP I |
|
for IN O |
|
$ $ B |
|
35.50 CD I |
|
to TO I |
|
$ $ I |
|
36.50 CD I |
|
a DT B |
|
share NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
New NNP B |
|
York-based JJ I |
|
John NNP I |
|
Kuhns NNP I |
|
and CC I |
|
Robert NNP I |
|
MacDonald NNP I |
|
control NN O |
|
East NNP B |
|
Rock NNP I |
|
Partners NNP I |
|
Inc. NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
the DT B |
|
sole JJ I |
|
general JJ I |
|
partner NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
East NNP B |
|
Rock NNP I |
|
Partners NNP I |
|
L.P NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
sole JJ I |
|
limited JJ I |
|
partner NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
partnership NN I |
|
is VBZ O |
|
Westwood NNP B |
|
Brick NNP I |
|
Lime NNP I |
|
Inc. NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
an DT B |
|
indirect JJ I |
|
subsidiary NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
Westwood NNP B |
|
Group NNP I |
|
Inc NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Both DT O |
|
Westwood NNP B |
|
Brick NNP I |
|
and CC O |
|
Westwood NNP B |
|
Group NNP I |
|
are VBP O |
|
based VBN O |
|
in IN O |
|
Boston NNP B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Freight NN B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
declining VBG O |
|
for IN O |
|
most RBS B |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
decade NN I |
|
because IN O |
|
of IN O |
|
competition NN B |
|
spurred VBN O |
|
by IN O |
|
deregulation NN B |
|
, , O |
|
are VBP O |
|
bottoming VBG O |
|
out IN O |
|
, , O |
|
turning VBG O |
|
upward RB O |
|
and CC O |
|
threatening VBG O |
|
to TO O |
|
fuel VB O |
|
inflation NN B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Trucking NNP B |
|
, , I |
|
shipping VBG I |
|
and CC I |
|
air-freight NN I |
|
companies NNS I |
|
have VBP O |
|
announced VBN O |
|
rate NN B |
|
increases NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
scheduled VBN O |
|
for IN O |
|
this DT B |
|
fall NN I |
|
or CC O |
|
early JJ B |
|
next JJ I |
|
year NN I |
|
, , O |
|
reflecting VBG O |
|
higher JJR B |
|
costs NNS I |
|
and CC O |
|
tightened VBD B |
|
demand NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
freight NN B |
|
transport NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Major JJ B |
|
shippers NNS I |
|
say VBP O |
|
they PRP B |
|
expect VBP O |
|
freight NN B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
to TO O |
|
rise VB O |
|
at IN O |
|
least JJS O |
|
as RB O |
|
fast RB O |
|
as IN O |
|
inflation NN B |
|
and CC O |
|
maybe RB O |
|
faster RBR O |
|
in IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
next JJ I |
|
few JJ I |
|
years NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
That DT B |
|
's VBZ O |
|
a DT B |
|
big JJ I |
|
change NN I |
|
from IN O |
|
recent JJ B |
|
years NNS I |
|
when WRB O |
|
freight NN B |
|
haulage NN I |
|
was VBD O |
|
a DT B |
|
bright JJ I |
|
spot NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
U.S. NNP B |
|
productivity NN I |
|
, , O |
|
helping VBG O |
|
to TO O |
|
restrain VB O |
|
inflation NN B |
|
and CC O |
|
make VB O |
|
U.S. NNP B |
|
industry NN I |
|
more RBR O |
|
competitive JJ O |
|
abroad RB O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
Demand NN B |
|
has VBZ O |
|
caught VBN O |
|
up IN O |
|
with IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
supply NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
certain JJ B |
|
types NNS I |
|
of IN O |
|
freight NN B |
|
transportation NN I |
|
, , O |
|
and CC O |
|
rates NNS B |
|
are VBP O |
|
starting VBG O |
|
to TO O |
|
move VB O |
|
up IN O |
|
'' '' O |
|
at IN O |
|
a DT B |
|
rate NN I |
|
`` `` O |
|
close RB O |
|
to TO O |
|
or CC O |
|
slightly RB O |
|
more JJR O |
|
than IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
inflation NN I |
|
rate NN I |
|
, , O |
|
'' '' O |
|
said VBD O |
|
Clifford NNP B |
|
Sayre NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
director NN B |
|
of IN O |
|
logistics NNS B |
|
at IN O |
|
Du NNP B |
|
Pont NNP I |
|
Co NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Shippers NNS B |
|
surveyed VBN O |
|
recently RB O |
|
by IN O |
|
Ohio NNP B |
|
State NNP I |
|
University NNP I |
|
said VBD O |
|
they PRP B |
|
expect VBP O |
|
their PRP$ B |
|
freight-transport JJ I |
|
, , I |
|
storage NN I |
|
and CC I |
|
distribution NN I |
|
costs NNS I |
|
to TO O |
|
rise VB O |
|
about IN B |
|
4 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
this DT B |
|
year NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Only RB B |
|
10 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
250 CD I |
|
shippers NNS I |
|
polled VBN O |
|
expected VBN O |
|
their PRP$ B |
|
freight-transport JJ I |
|
costs NNS I |
|
to TO O |
|
decrease VB O |
|
, , O |
|
compared VBN O |
|
with IN O |
|
30 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
who WP B |
|
had VBD O |
|
looked VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
freight VB B |
|
transport NN I |
|
to TO O |
|
reduce VB O |
|
costs NNS B |
|
in IN O |
|
past JJ B |
|
years NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
This DT B |
|
is VBZ O |
|
the DT B |
|
first JJ I |
|
year NN I |
|
since IN O |
|
transportation NN B |
|
deregulation NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
1980 CD B |
|
that IN O |
|
we PRP B |
|
have VBP O |
|
had VBN O |
|
such JJ B |
|
a DT I |
|
dramatic JJ I |
|
and CC I |
|
broad-based JJ I |
|
upturn NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
perceived VBN B |
|
transportation NN I |
|
rates NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
'' '' O |
|
said VBD O |
|
Bernard NNP B |
|
LaLonde NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
a DT B |
|
transportation NN I |
|
logistics NNS I |
|
professor NN I |
|
at IN O |
|
Ohio NNP B |
|
State NNP I |
|
in IN O |
|
Columbus NNP B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
deregulation NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
railroads NNS B |
|
and CC I |
|
trucking NN I |
|
companies NNS I |
|
that WDT B |
|
began VBD O |
|
in IN O |
|
1980 CD B |
|
enabled VBD O |
|
shippers NNS B |
|
to TO O |
|
bargain VB O |
|
for IN O |
|
transportation NN B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Carriers NNP B |
|
could MD O |
|
use VB O |
|
their PRP$ B |
|
equipment NN I |
|
more RBR O |
|
efficiently RB O |
|
, , O |
|
leading VBG O |
|
to TO O |
|
overcapacity NN B |
|
they PRP B |
|
were VBD O |
|
eager JJ O |
|
to TO O |
|
fill VB O |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Shippers NNS B |
|
cut VBP O |
|
about RB B |
|
$ $ I |
|
35 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
from IN O |
|
their PRP$ B |
|
annual JJ I |
|
, , I |
|
inter-city JJ I |
|
truck NN I |
|
and CC I |
|
rail NN I |
|
costs NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
to TO O |
|
about RB B |
|
$ $ I |
|
150 CD I |
|
billion CD I |
|
, , O |
|
or CC O |
|
about IN B |
|
6.4 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
gross JJ B |
|
national JJ I |
|
product NN I |
|
, , O |
|
down RB O |
|
from IN O |
|
8 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
GNP NNP B |
|
in IN O |
|
1981 CD B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
But CC O |
|
with IN O |
|
much NN B |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
inefficiency NN I |
|
squeezed VBN O |
|
out IN O |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
freight-transport JJ I |
|
system NN I |
|
, , O |
|
rising VBG B |
|
costs NNS I |
|
are VBP O |
|
likely JJ O |
|
to TO O |
|
be VB O |
|
reflected VBN O |
|
directly RB O |
|
in IN O |
|
higher JJR B |
|
freight NN I |
|
rates NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
Shippers NNS B |
|
are VBP O |
|
saying VBG O |
|
` `` O |
|
the DT B |
|
party NN I |
|
's POS O |
|
over IN O |
|
, , O |
|
' '' O |
|
'' '' O |
|
said VBD O |
|
Mr. NNP B |
|
LaLonde NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
Shippers NNS B |
|
wo MD O |
|
n't RB O |
|
be VB O |
|
able JJ O |
|
to TO O |
|
look VB O |
|
for IN O |
|
transportation-cost JJ B |
|
savings NNS I |
|
as IN O |
|
they PRP B |
|
have VBP O |
|
for IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
last JJ I |
|
eight CD I |
|
or CC I |
|
nine CD I |
|
years NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Transport NN B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
wo MD O |
|
n't RB O |
|
be VB O |
|
an DT B |
|
opportunity NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
offsetting VBG O |
|
cost NN B |
|
increases NNS I |
|
in IN O |
|
other JJ B |
|
segments NNS I |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
economy NN I |
|
. . O |
|
'' '' O |
|
|
|
Robert NNP B |
|
Delaney NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
a DT B |
|
consultant NN I |
|
at IN O |
|
Arthur NNP B |
|
D. NNP I |
|
Little NNP I |
|
Inc. NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
Cambridge NNP B |
|
, , O |
|
Mass. NNP B |
|
, , O |
|
said VBD O |
|
`` `` O |
|
We PRP B |
|
've VBP O |
|
gotten VBN O |
|
all PDT B |
|
the DT I |
|
benefits NNS I |
|
of IN O |
|
deregulation NN B |
|
in IN O |
|
freight-cost JJ B |
|
reductions NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Now RB O |
|
we PRP B |
|
are VBP O |
|
starting VBG O |
|
to TO O |
|
see VB O |
|
real JJ B |
|
freight-rate JJ I |
|
increases NNS I |
|
as IN O |
|
carriers NNS B |
|
replace VBP O |
|
equipment NN B |
|
, , O |
|
pay VB O |
|
higher JJR B |
|
fuel NN I |
|
costs NNS I |
|
and CC O |
|
pay VB O |
|
more JJR B |
|
for IN O |
|
labor NN B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
You PRP B |
|
'll MD O |
|
see VB O |
|
carriers NNS B |
|
try VB O |
|
to TO O |
|
recoup VB O |
|
some DT B |
|
of IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
price NN I |
|
cutting VBG I |
|
that WDT B |
|
occurred VBD O |
|
previously RB O |
|
. . O |
|
'' '' O |
|
|
|
Not RB B |
|
everyone NN I |
|
believes VBZ O |
|
that IN O |
|
the DT B |
|
good JJ I |
|
times NNS I |
|
are VBP O |
|
over IN O |
|
for IN O |
|
shippers NNS B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
`` `` O |
|
There EX B |
|
's VBZ O |
|
still RB O |
|
a DT B |
|
lot NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
pressure NN B |
|
on IN O |
|
rates NNS B |
|
in IN O |
|
both DT B |
|
rail NN I |
|
and CC I |
|
truck NN I |
|
, , O |
|
'' '' O |
|
said VBD O |
|
Gerard NNP B |
|
McCullough NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
lecturer NN B |
|
in IN O |
|
transportation NN B |
|
at IN O |
|
Massachusetts NNP B |
|
Institute NNP I |
|
of IN O |
|
Technology NNP B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Less-than-truckload JJ B |
|
companies NNS I |
|
, , O |
|
which WDT B |
|
carry VBP O |
|
the DT B |
|
freight NN I |
|
of IN O |
|
several JJ B |
|
shippers NNS I |
|
in IN O |
|
each DT B |
|
truck NN I |
|
trailer NN I |
|
, , O |
|
discounted VBD O |
|
away RB O |
|
a DT B |
|
4.7 CD I |
|
% NN I |
|
rate NN I |
|
increase NN I |
|
implemented VBD O |
|
last JJ B |
|
April NNP I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
The DT B |
|
carriers NNS I |
|
were VBD O |
|
competing VBG O |
|
fiercely RB O |
|
for IN O |
|
market NN B |
|
share NN I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
Railroad-rate JJ B |
|
increases NNS I |
|
are VBP O |
|
likely JJ O |
|
to TO O |
|
be VB O |
|
restrained VBN O |
|
by IN O |
|
weakening VBG B |
|
rail-traffic JJ I |
|
levels NNS I |
|
and CC O |
|
keen JJ B |
|
competition NN I |
|
for IN O |
|
freight NN B |
|
from IN O |
|
trucks NNS B |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
An DT B |
|
official NN I |
|
at IN O |
|
Consolidated NNP B |
|
Freightways NNP I |
|
Inc. NNP I |
|
, , O |
|
a DT B |
|
Menlo NNP I |
|
Park NNP I |
|
, , I |
|
Calif. NNP I |
|
, , I |
|
less-than-truckload JJ I |
|
carrier NN I |
|
, , O |
|
said VBD O |
|
rate NN B |
|
discounting NN I |
|
in IN O |
|
that DT B |
|
industry NN I |
|
has VBZ O |
|
begun VBN O |
|
to TO O |
|
`` `` O |
|
stabilize VB O |
|
. . O |
|
'' '' O |
|
|
|
Consolidated NNP B |
|
Freightways NNP I |
|
plans VBZ O |
|
to TO O |
|
raise VB O |
|
its PRP$ B |
|
rates NNS I |
|
5.3 CD B |
|
% NN I |
|
late JJ B |
|
this DT I |
|
year NN I |
|
or CC O |
|
early JJ B |
|
next JJ I |
|
year NN I |
|
, , O |
|
and CC O |
|
at IN B |
|
least JJS I |
|
two CD I |
|
competitors NNS I |
|
have VBP O |
|
announced VBN O |
|
similar JJ B |
|
increases NNS I |
|
. . O |
|
|
|
|