CRF/example/basenp/test.data

Rockwell NNP B
International NNP I
Corp. NNP I
's POS B
Tulsa NNP I
unit NN I
said VBD O
it PRP B
signed VBD O
a DT B
tentative JJ I
agreement NN I
extending VBG O
its PRP$ B
contract NN I
with IN O
Boeing NNP B
Co. NNP I
to TO O
provide VB O
structural JJ B
parts NNS I
for IN O
Boeing NNP B
's POS B
747 CD I
jetliners NNS I
. . O

Rockwell NNP B
said VBD O
the DT B
agreement NN I
calls VBZ O
for IN O
it PRP B
to TO O
supply VB O
200 CD B
additional JJ I
so-called JJ I
shipsets NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
planes NNS I
. . O

These DT B
include VBP O
, , O
among IN O
other JJ B
parts NNS I
, , O
each DT B
jetliner NN I
's POS B
two CD I
major JJ I
bulkheads NNS I
, , O
a DT B
pressure NN I
floor NN I
, , O
torque NN B
box NN I
, , O
fixed VBN B
leading VBG I
edges NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
wings NNS I
and CC O
an DT B
aft JJ I
keel NN I
beam NN I
. . O

Under IN O
the DT B
existing VBG I
contract NN I
, , O
Rockwell NNP B
said VBD O
, , O
it PRP B
has VBZ O
already RB O
delivered VBN O
793 CD B
of IN O
the DT B
shipsets NNS I
to TO O
Boeing NNP B
. . O

Rockwell NNP B
, , O
based VBN O
in IN O
El NNP B
Segundo NNP I
, , O
Calif. NNP B
, , O
is VBZ O
an DT B
aerospace NN I
, , I
electronics NNS I
, , I
automotive JJ I
and CC I
graphics NNS I
concern VBP I
. . O

Frank NNP B
Carlucci NNP I
III NNP I
was VBD O
named VBN O
to TO O
this DT B
telecommunications NNS I
company NN I
's POS B
board NN I
, , O
filling VBG O
the DT B
vacancy NN I
created VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
death NN I
of IN O
William NNP B
Sobey NNP I
last JJ B
May NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Carlucci NNP I
, , O
59 CD B
years NNS I
old JJ O
, , O
served VBN O
as IN O
defense NN B
secretary NN I
in IN O
the DT B
Reagan NNP I
administration NN I
. . O

In IN O
January NNP B
, , O
he PRP B
accepted VBD O
the DT B
position NN I
of IN O
vice NN B
chairman NN I
of IN O
Carlyle NNP B
Group NNP I
, , O
a DT B
merchant NN I
banking NN I
concern NN I
. . O

SHEARSON NNP B
LEHMAN NNP I
HUTTON NNP I
Inc NNP I
. . I

Thomas NNP B
E. NNP I
Meador NNP I
, , O
42 CD B
years NNS I
old JJ O
, , O
was VBD O
named VBN O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
operating VBG I
officer NN I
of IN O
Balcor NNP B
Co. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
Skokie NNP I
, , I
Ill. NNP I
, , I
subsidiary NN I
of IN O
this DT B
New NNP I
York NNP I
investment NN I
banking NN I
firm NN I
. . O

Balcor NNP B
, , O
which WDT B
has VBZ O
interests NNS B
in IN O
real JJ B
estate NN I
, , O
said VBD O
the DT B
position NN I
is VBZ O
newly RB O
created VBN O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Meador NNP I
had VBD O
been VBN O
executive JJ B
vice NN I
president NN I
of IN O
Balcor NNP B
. . O

In IN O
addition NN B
to TO O
his PRP$ B
previous JJ I
real-estate NN I
investment NN I
and CC I
asset-management NN I
duties NNS I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Meador NNP I
takes VBZ O
responsibility NN B
for IN O
development NN B
and CC O
property NN B
management NN I
. . O

Those DT B
duties NNS I
had VBD O
been VBN O
held VBN O
by IN O
Van NNP B
Pell NNP I
, , O
44 CD B
, , O
who WP B
resigned VBD O
as IN O
an DT B
executive JJ I
vice NN I
president NN I
. . O

Shearson NNP B
is VBZ O
about IN O
60%-held JJ O
by IN O
American NNP B
Express NNP I
Co NNP I
. . O

Great NNP B
American NNP I
Bank NNP I
, , O
citing VBG O
depressed JJ B
Arizona NNP I
real JJ I
estate NN I
prices NNS I
, , O
posted VBD O
a DT B
third-quarter JJ I
loss NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
59.4 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
2.48 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

A DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
, , O
the DT B
savings NNS I
bank VBP I
had VBD O
earnings NNS B
of IN O
$ $ B
8.1 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
33 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

For IN O
the DT B
nine CD I
months NNS I
, , O
it PRP B
had VBD O
a DT B
loss NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
58.3 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
2.44 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
after IN O
earnings NNS B
of IN O
$ $ B
29.5 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
1.20 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
in IN O
the DT B
1988 CD I
period NN I
. . O

Great NNP B
American NNP I
said VBD O
it PRP B
increased VBD O
its PRP$ B
loan-loss NN I
reserves NNS I
by IN O
$ $ B
93 CD I
million CD I
after IN O
reviewing VBG O
its PRP$ B
loan NN I
portfolio NN I
, , O
raising VBG O
its PRP$ B
total JJ I
loan NN I
and CC I
real JJ I
estate NN I
reserves NNS I
to TO O
$ $ B
217 CD I
million CD I
. . O

Before IN O
the DT B
loan-loss NN I
addition NN I
, , O
it PRP B
said VBD O
, , O
it PRP B
had VBD O
operating VBG B
profit NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
10 CD I
million CD I
for IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
. . O

The DT B
move NN I
followed VBD O
a DT B
round NN I
of IN O
similar JJ B
increases NNS I
by IN O
other JJ B
lenders NNS I
against IN O
Arizona NNP B
real JJ I
estate NN I
loans NNS I
, , O
reflecting VBG O
a DT B
continuing VBG I
decline NN I
in IN O
that DT B
market NN I
. . O

In IN O
addition NN B
to TO O
the DT B
increased VBN I
reserve NN I
, , O
the DT B
savings NNS I
bank VBP I
took VBD O
a DT B
special JJ I
charge NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
5 NN I
million CD I
representing VBG O
general JJ B
and CC I
administrative JJ I
expenses NNS I
from IN O
staff NN B
reductions NNS I
and CC O
other JJ B
matters NNS I
, , O
and CC O
it PRP B
posted VBD O
a DT B
$ $ I
7.6 CD I
million CD I
reduction NN I
in IN O
expected VBN B
mortgage NN I
servicing NN I
fees NNS I
, , O
reflecting VBG O
the DT B
fact NN I
that IN O
more JJR B
borrowers NNS I
are VBP O
prepaying VBG O
their PRP$ B
mortgages NNS I
. . O

Arbitragers NNS B
were VBD O
n't RB O
the DT B
only RB I
big JJ I
losers NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
collapse NN I
of IN O
UAL NNP B
Corp. NNP I
stock NN I
. . O

Look VB O
at IN O
what WP B
happened VBD O
to TO O
UAL NNP B
's POS B
chairman NN I
, , O
Stephen NNP B
M. NNP I
Wolf NNP I
, , O
and CC O
its PRP$ B
chief JJ I
financial JJ I
officer NN I
, , O
John NNP B
C. NNP I
Pope NNP I
. . O

On IN O
a DT B
day NN I
some DT B
United NNP I
Airlines NNPS I
employees NNS I
wanted VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Wolf NNP I
fired VBD O
and CC O
takeover NN B
stock NN I
speculators NNS I
wanted VBD O
his PRP$ B
scalp NN I
, , O
Messrs. NNP B
Wolf NNP I
and CC I
Pope NNP I
saw VBD O
their PRP$ B
prospective JJ I
personal JJ I
fortunes NNS I
continue VBP O
to TO O
plummet VB O
as IN O
shares NNS B
of IN O
UAL NNP B
, , O
United NNP B
's POS B
parent NN I
company NN I
, , O
dived VBD O
$ $ B
24.875 CD I
on IN O
the DT B
Big NNP I
Board NNP I
to TO O
close VB O
at IN O
$ $ B
198 CD I
. . O

Including VBG O
Monday NNP B
's POS B
plunge NN I
, , O
that WDT B
has VBZ O
given VBN O
the DT B
two CD I
executives NNS I
paper NN B
losses NNS I
of IN O
$ $ B
49.5 CD I
million CD I
, , O
based VBN O
on IN O
what WP B
they PRP B
would MD O
have VB O
realized VBN O
had VBN O
the DT B
pilots NNS I
and CC I
management-led JJ I
buy-out NN I
of IN O
UAL NNP B
gone VBN O
through IN O
at IN O
$ $ B
300 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

When WRB O
bank NN B
financing NN I
for IN O
the DT B
buy-out NN I
collapsed VBD O
last JJ B
week NN I
, , O
so RB O
did VBD O
UAL NNP B
's POS B
stock NN I
. . O

Even RB O
if IN O
the DT B
banks NNS I
resurrect VBP O
a DT B
financing NN I
package NN I
at IN O
$ $ B
250 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
the DT B
two CD I
executives NNS I
would MD O
still RB O
get VB O
about RB B
$ $ I
25 CD I
million CD I
less JJR O
than IN O
they PRP B
stood VBD O
to TO O
gain VB O
in IN O
the DT B
initial JJ I
transaction NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Wolf NNP I
owns VBZ O
75,000 CD B
UAL NNP I
shares NNS I
and CC O
has VBZ O
options NNS B
to TO O
buy VB O
another DT B
250,000 CD I
at IN O
$ $ B
83.3125 CD I
each DT B
. . O

In IN O
the DT B
$ $ I
300-a-share JJ I
buyout NN I
, , O
that WDT B
totaled VBD O
about RB B
$ $ I
76.7 CD I
million CD I
. . O

By IN O
yesterday NN B
's POS B
close NN I
of IN O
trading NN B
, , O
it PRP B
was VBD O
good JJ O
for IN O
a DT B
paltry JJ I
$ $ I
43.5 CD I
million CD I
. . O

Of IN O
course NN B
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Wolf NNP I
, , O
48 CD B
years NNS I
old JJ O
, , O
has VBZ O
some DT B
savings NNS I
. . O

He PRP B
left VBD O
his PRP$ B
last JJ I
two CD I
jobs NNS I
at IN O
Republic NNP B
Airlines NNPS I
and CC O
Flying NNP B
Tiger NNP I
with IN O
combined VBN B
stock-option NN I
gains NNS I
of IN O
about RB B
$ $ I
22 CD I
million CD I
, , O
and CC O
UAL NNP B
gave VBD O
him PRP B
a DT B
$ $ I
15 CD I
million CD I
bonus NN I
when WRB O
it PRP B
hired VBD O
him PRP B
. . O

His PRP$ B
1988 CD I
salary NN I
was VBD O
$ $ B
575,000 CD I
, , O
with IN O
a DT B
$ $ I
575,000 CD I
bonus NN I
. . O

The DT B
40-year JJ I
old JJ I
Mr. NNP I
Pope NNP I
has VBZ O
n't RB O
changed VBN O
jobs NNS B
enough RB O
-- : O
at IN B
least JJS I
the DT I
right NN I
ones NNS I
-- : O
to TO O
stash VB O
away RB O
that DT B
kind NN I
of IN O
money NN B
. . O

United NNP B
paid VBD O
him PRP B
a DT B
$ $ I
375,000 CD I
bonus NN I
to TO O
lure VB O
him PRP B
away RB O
from IN O
American NNP B
Airlines NNPS I
, , O
and CC O
he PRP B
was VBD O
paid VBN O
a DT B
salary NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
342,122 CD I
last JJ B
year NN I
with IN O
a DT B
$ $ I
280,000 CD I
bonus NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Pope NNP I
owns VBZ O
10,000 CD B
UAL NNP I
shares NNS I
and CC O
has VBZ O
options NNS B
to TO O
buy VB O
another DT B
150,000 CD I
at IN O
$ $ B
69 CD I
each DT B
. . O

That DT B
came VBD O
to TO O
a DT B
combined VBN I
$ $ I
37.7 CD I
million CD I
under IN O
the DT B
$ $ I
300-a-share JJ I
buy-out NN I
, , O
but CC O
just RB B
$ $ I
21.3 CD I
million CD I
at IN O
yesterday NN B
's POS B
close NN I
. . O

Of IN O
the DT B
combined VBN I
$ $ I
114.4 CD I
million CD I
the DT B
two CD I
men NNS I
were VBD O
scheduled VBN O
to TO O
reap VB O
under IN O
the DT B
buy-out NN I
, , O
they PRP B
agreed VBD O
to TO O
invest VB O
in IN O
the DT B
buy-out NN I
just RB B
$ $ I
15 CD I
million CD I
, , O
angering VBG O
many NN B
of IN O
the DT B
thousands NNS I
of IN O
workers NNS B
asked VBD O
to TO O
make VB O
pay NN B
concessions NNS I
so RB O
the DT B
buy-out NN I
would MD O
be VB O
a DT B
success NN I
. . O

United NNP B
's POS B
directors NNS I
voted VBD O
themselves PRP B
, , O
and CC O
their PRP$ B
spouses NNS I
, , O
lifetime NN B
access NN I
to TO O
the DT B
Friendly NNP I
Skies NNPS I
-- : O
free JJ B
first-class JJ I
travel NN I
, , O
and CC O
$ $ B
20,000 CD I
a DT B
year NN I
for IN O
life NN B
as IN O
well RB O
. . O

Conceivably RB O
, , O
in IN O
a DT B
scaled-back JJ I
buy-out NN I
, , O
they PRP B
could MD O
be VB O
bumped VBN O
back RB O
to TO O
coach NN B
seats NNS I
for IN O
life NN B
. . O

Thomas NNP B
H. NNP I
Johnson NNP I
, , O
president NN B
of IN O
the DT B
Coatedboard NNP I
division NN I
of IN O
Mead NNP B
Corp. NNP I
, , O
was VBD O
named VBN O
president NN B
of IN O
Manville NNP B
Forest NNP I
Products NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
Manville NNP I
unit NN I
, , O
and CC O
senior JJ B
vice NN I
president NN I
of IN O
Manville NNP B
Corp NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Johnson NNP I
succeeds VBZ O
Harry NNP B
W. NNP I
Sherman NNP I
, , O
who WP B
resigned VBD O
to TO O
pursue VB O
other JJ B
interests NNS I
, , O
in IN O
both DT B
positions NNS I
. . O

Manville NNP B
is VBZ O
a DT B
building NN I
and CC I
forest NN I
products NNS I
concern VBP I
. . O

US PRP B
Facilities NNP I
Corp. NNP I
said VBD O
Robert NNP B
J. NNP I
Percival NNP I
agreed VBD O
to TO O
step VB O
down RB O
as IN O
vice NN B
chairman NN I
of IN O
the DT B
insurance NN I
holding VBG I
company NN I
. . O

`` `` O
There EX B
was VBD O
a DT B
difference NN I
of IN O
opinion NN B
as IN O
to TO O
the DT B
future NN I
direction NN I
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
, , O
'' '' O
a DT B
spokeswoman NN I
said VBD O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Percival NNP I
declined VBD O
to TO O
comment VB O
. . O

In IN O
a DT B
statement NN I
, , O
US PRP B
Facilities NNPS I
said VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Percival NNP I
's POS B
employment NN I
contract NN I
calls VBZ O
for IN O
him PRP B
to TO O
act VB O
as IN O
a DT B
consultant NN I
to TO O
the DT B
company NN I
for IN O
two CD B
years NNS I
. . O

He PRP B
will MD O
also RB O
remain VB O
a DT B
director NN I
, , O
US PRP B
Facilities NNPS I
said VBD O
, , O
but CC O
wo MD O
n't RB O
serve VB O
on IN O
any DT B
board NN I
committees NNS I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Percival NNP I
will MD O
be VB O
succeeded VBN O
on IN O
an DT B
interim JJ I
basis NN I
by IN O
George NNP B
Kadonada NNP I
, , O
US PRP B
Facilities NNPS I
chairman NN I
and CC I
president NN I
. . O

In IN O
the DT B
same JJ I
statement NN I
, , O
US PRP B
Facilities NNPS I
also RB O
said VBD O
it PRP B
had VBD O
bought VBN O
back RB O
112,000 CD B
of IN O
its PRP$ B
common JJ I
shares NNS I
in IN O
a DT B
private JJ I
transaction NN I
. . O

Terms NNS B
were VBD O
n't RB O
disclosed VBN O
. . O

The DT B
buy-back NN I
represents VBZ O
about IN B
3 CD I
% NN I
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
shares NNS I
, , O
based VBN O
on IN O
the DT B
3.7 CD I
million CD I
shares NNS I
outstanding JJ O
as IN O
of IN O
Sept. NNP B
30 CD I
. . O

In IN O
national JJ B
over-the-counter JJ I
trading NN I
yesterday NN B
, , O
US PRP B
Facilities NNPS I
closed VBD O
at IN O
$ $ B
3.625 CD I
, , O
unchanged JJ O
. . O

Three CD B
leading VBG I
drug NN I
companies NNS I
reported VBD O
robust JJ B
third-quarter JJ I
earnings NNS I
, , O
bolstered VBN O
by IN O
strong JJ B
sales NNS I
of IN O
newer JJR B
, , I
big-selling JJ I
prescriptions NNS I
drugs NNS I
that WDT B
provide VBP O
hefty JJ B
profit NN I
margins NNS I
. . O

Merck NNP B
& CC I
Co. NNP I
reported VBD O
a DT B
25 CD I
% NN I
increase NN I
in IN O
earnings NNS B
; : O
Warner-Lambert NNP B
Co. NNP I
's POS B
profit NN I
rose VBD O
22 CD B
% NN I
and CC O
Eli NNP B
Lilly NNP I
& CC I
Co. NNP I
's POS B
net JJ I
income NN I
rose VBD O
24 CD B
% NN I
. . O

The DT B
results NNS I
were VBD O
in IN O
line NN B
with IN O
analysts NNS B
' POS B
expectations NNS I
. . O

Merck NNP B
& CC I
Co NNP I
. . I

Merck NNP B
, , O
Rahway NNP B
, , O
N.J. NNP B
, , O
continued VBD O
to TO O
lead VB O
the DT B
industry NN I
with IN O
a DT B
strong JJ I
sales NNS I
performance NN I
in IN O
the DT B
human NN I
and CC I
animal NN I
health-products NNS I
segment VBP I
. . O

A DT B
stronger JJR I
U.S. NNP I
dollar NN I
reduced VBD O
third-quarter JJ B
and CC I
first-nine-month JJ I
sales NNS I
growth NN I
2 CD B
% NN I
and CC I
3 CD I
% NN I
, , O
respectively RB O
. . O

International JJ B
sales NNS I
accounted VBD O
for IN O
47 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
total JJ B
company NN I
sales NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
nine CD I
months NNS I
, , O
compared VBN O
with IN O
50 CD B
% NN I
a DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

Sales NNS B
for IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
rose VBD O
to TO O
$ $ B
1.63 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
1.47 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

Mevacor NNP B
, , O
Merck NNP B
's POS B
new JJ I
cholesterol-lowering JJ I
drug NN I
, , O
had VBD O
higher JJR B
vsales NNS I
than IN O
any DT B
other JJ I
prescription NN I
medicine NN I
has VBZ O
ever RB O
achieved VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
in IN O
the DT B
year NN I
following VBG O
introduction NN B
, , O
the DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
. . O

The DT B
drug NN I
was VBD O
introduced VBN O
in IN O
West NNP B
Germany NNP I
this DT B
year NN I
. . O

Intense JJ B
competition NN I
, , O
however RB O
, , O
led VBN O
to TO O
unit NN B
sales NNS I
declines NNS I
for IN O
a DT B
group NN I
of IN O
Merck NNP B
's POS B
established VBN I
human NN I
and CC I
animal-health NN I
products NNS I
, , O
including VBG O
Aldomet NNP B
and CC I
Indocin NNP I
. . O

In IN O
New NNP B
York NNP I
Stock NNP I
Exchange NNP I
composite JJ I
trading NN I
yesterday NN B
, , O
Merck NNP B
shares NNS I
closed VBD O
at IN O
$ $ B
75.25 CD I
, , O
up IN O
50 CD B
cents NNS I
. . O

Warner-Lambert NNP B
Co NNP I
. . I

Warner-Lambert NNP B
, , O
Morris NNP B
Plains NNP I
, , O
N.J. NNP B
, , O
reported VBD O
sales NNS B
that WDT B
were VBD O
a DT B
record NN I
for IN O
any DT B
quarter NN I
and CC O
the DT B
eighth JJ I
quarter NN I
in IN O
a DT B
row NN I
of IN O
20 CD B
% NN I
or CC I
more RBR I
per-share JJ I
earnings NNS I
growth NN I
. . O

Spurred VBN O
by IN O
growth NN B
in IN O
world-wide JJ B
sales NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
prescription NN I
drugs NNS I
, , O
Warner-Lambert NNP B
said VBD O
1989 CD B
will MD O
be VB O
the DT B
best JJS I
year NN I
in IN O
its PRP$ B
history NN I
, , O
with IN O
per-share JJ B
earnings NNS I
expected VBN O
to TO O
increase VB O
more JJR B
than IN I
20 CD I
% NN I
to TO O
about RB B
$ $ I
6.10 CD I
. . O

Sales NNS B
for IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
rose VBD O
to TO O
$ $ B
1.11 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
1.03 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

Prescription-drug NN B
world-wide JJ I
sales NNS I
rose VBD O
9 CD B
% NN I
in IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
340 CD I
million CD I
; : O
U.S. NNP B
sales NNS I
rose VBD O
15 CD B
% NN I
. . O

The DT B
segment NN I
's POS B
growth NN I
was VBD O
led VBN O
by IN O
sales NNS B
of IN O
the DT B
cardiovascular JJ I
drugs NNS I
Lopid NNP B
, , O
a DT B
lipid NN I
regulator NN I
, , O
and CC O
Dilzem NNP B
, , O
a DT B
calcium NN I
channel NN I
blocker NN I
. . O

World-wide JJ B
sales NNS I
of IN O
Warner-Lambert NNP B
's POS B
non-prescription JJ I
health-care NN I
products NNS I
, , O
such JJ O
as IN O
Halls NNP B
cough NN I
tablets NNS I
, , O
Rolaids NNP B
antacid NN I
, , O
and CC O
Lubriderm NNP B
skin NN I
lotion NN I
, , O
increased VBN O
3 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
362 CD I
million CD I
in IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
; : O
U.S. NNP B
sales NNS I
rose VBD O
5 NN B
% NN I
. . O

Confectionery JJ B
products NNS I
sales NNS I
also RB O
had VBD O
strong JJ B
growth NN I
in IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
. . O

World-wide JJ B
sales NNS I
of IN O
Trident NNP B
gum NN I
, , O
Certs NNP B
breath NN I
mints NNS I
, , O
and CC O
Clorets NNP B
gum NN I
and CC I
breath NN I
mints NNS I
, , O
increased VBN O
12 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
277 CD I
million CD I
. . O

Warner-Lambert NNP B
shares NNS I
closed VBD O
at IN O
$ $ B
109.50 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
up IN O
$ $ B
1.50 CD I
, , O
in IN O
Big NNP B
Board NNP I
composite JJ I
trading NN I
yesterday NN B
. . O

Eli NNP B
Lilly NNP I
& CC I
Co NNP I
. . I

Lilly NNP B
attributed VBD O
record NN B
third-quarter JJ I
and CC I
nine-month JJ I
results NNS I
to TO O
world-wide JJ B
gains NNS I
for IN O
pharmaceuticals NNS B
, , O
medical JJ B
instruments NNS I
and CC O
plant-science NN B
products NNS I
despite IN O
poor JJ B
exchange NN I
rates NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
dollar NN I
that WDT B
slowed VBD O
sales NNS B
abroad RB O
. . O

Earnings NNS B
continued VBD O
to TO O
pace VB O
sales NNS B
because IN O
of IN O
a DT B
lower JJR I
tax NN I
rate NN I
, , O
profit NN B
from IN O
the DT B
renegotiation NN I
of IN O
the DT B
debt NN I
instrument NN I
received VBD O
from IN O
Faberge NNP B
Inc. NNP I
in IN O
connection NN B
with IN O
Lilly NNP B
's POS B
sale NN I
of IN O
Elizabeth NNP B
Arden NNP I
Inc. NNP I
in IN O
1987 CD B
, , O
and CC O
net JJ B
proceeds NNS I
from IN O
the DT B
settlement NN I
of IN O
patent NN B
litigation NN I
at IN O
Lilly NNP B
's POS B
Hybritech NNP I
Inc. NNP I
unit NN I
. . O

Third-quarter JJ B
sales NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
Indianapolis NNP I
, , I
Ind. NNP I
, , I
company NN I
rose VBD O
11 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
1.045 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
940.6 CD I
million CD I
. . O

Nine-month JJ B
sales NNS I
grew VBD O
12 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
3.39 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
3.03 CD I
billion CD I
a DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

Sales NNS B
of IN O
Prozac NNP B
, , O
an DT B
anti-depressant NN I
, , O
led VBN O
drug-sales NNS B
increases NNS I
. . O

Higher JJR B
sales NNS I
of IN O
pesticides NNS B
and CC O
other JJ B
plant-science NN I
products NNS I
more JJR O
than IN O
offset VB O
a DT B
slight JJ I
decline NN I
in IN O
the DT B
sales NNS I
of IN O
animal-health NN B
products NNS I
to TO O
fuel VB O
the DT B
increase NN I
in IN O
world-wide JJ B
agricultural JJ I
product NN I
sales NNS I
, , O
Lilly NNP B
said VBD O
. . O

Advanced NNP B
Cardiovascular NNP I
Systems NNP I
Inc. NNP I
and CC O
Cardiac NNP B
Pacemakers NNPS I
Inc. NNP I
units NNS I
led VBD O
growth NN B
in IN O
the DT B
medical-instrument JJ I
systems NNS I
division NN I
. . O

Lilly NNP B
shares NNS I
closed VBD O
yesterday NN B
in IN O
composite JJ B
trading NN I
on IN O
the DT B
Big NNP I
Board NNP I
at IN O
$ $ B
62.25 CD I
, , O
down RB O
12.5 CD B
cents NNS I
. . O

Reuben NNP B
Mark NNP I
, , O
chairman NN B
of IN O
Colgate-Palmolive NNP B
Co. NNP I
, , O
said VBD O
he PRP B
is VBZ O
`` `` O
comfortable JJ O
'' '' O
with IN O
analysts NNS B
' POS B
estimates NNS I
that IN O
third-quarter JJ B
earnings NNS I
rose VBD O
to TO O
between IN B
95 CD I
cents NNS I
and CC I
$ $ I
1.05 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

That DT B
compares VBZ O
with IN O
per-share JJ B
earnings NNS I
from IN O
continuing VBG B
operations NNS I
of IN O
69 CD B
cents NNS I
the DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
; : O
including VBG O
discontinued VBN B
operations NNS I
, , O
per-share NN B
was VBD O
88 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
year NN I
ago RB O
. . O

The DT B
per-share JJ I
estimates NNS I
mean VBP O
the DT B
consumer-products NNS I
company NN I
's POS B
net JJ I
income NN I
, , O
increased VBN O
to TO O
between IN B
$ $ I
69.5 CD I
million CD I
and CC I
$ $ I
76 CD I
million CD I
, , O
from IN O
$ $ B
47.1 CD I
million CD I
the DT B
year-before JJ I
period NN I
. . O

Analysts NNS B
estimate VBP O
Colgate NNP B
's POS B
world-wide JJ I
third-quarter JJ I
sales NNS I
rose VBD O
about IN B
8 CD I
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
1.29 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Mark NNP I
attributed VBD O
the DT B
earnings NNS I
growth NN I
to TO O
strong JJ B
sales NNS I
in IN O
Latin NNP B
America NNP I
, , O
Asia NNP B
and CC O
Europe NNP B
. . O

Results NNS B
were VBD O
also RB O
bolstered VBN O
by IN O
`` `` B
a DT I
very RB I
meaningful JJ I
'' '' I
increase NN I
in IN O
operating VBG B
profit NN I
by IN O
Colgate NNP B
's POS B
U.S. NNP I
business NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Mark NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

Operating NN B
profit NN I
at IN O
Colgate NNP B
's POS B
U.S. NNP I
household NN I
products NNS I
and CC I
personal-care JJ I
businesses NNS I
jumped VBD O
25 CD B
% NN I
in IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Mark NNP I
added VBD O
. . O

He PRP B
said VBD O
the DT B
improvement NN I
was VBD O
a DT B
result NN I
of IN O
cost NN B
savings NNS I
achieved VBN O
by IN O
consolidating VBG O
manufacturing NN O
operations NNS B
, , O
blending VBG O
two CD B
sales NNS I
organizations NNS I
and CC O
focusing VBG O
more RBR O
carefully RB O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
promotional JJ I
activities NNS I
. . O

The DT B
estimated VBN I
improvement NN I
in IN O
Colgate NNP B
's POS B
U.S. NNP I
operations NNS I
took VBD O
some DT B
analysts NNS I
by IN O
surprise NN B
. . O

Colgate NNP B
's POS B
household NN I
products NNS I
business NN I
, , O
which WDT B
includes VBZ O
such JJ B
brands NNS I
as IN O
Fab NNP B
laundry NN I
detergent NN I
and CC O
Ajax NNP B
cleanser NN I
, , O
has VBZ O
been VBN O
a DT B
weak JJ I
performer NN I
. . O

Analysts NNS B
estimate VBP O
Colgate NNP B
's POS B
sales NNS I
of IN O
household NN B
products NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
were VBD O
flat JJ O
for IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
, , O
and CC O
they PRP B
estimated VBD O
operating VBG B
margins NNS I
at IN O
only RB B
1 CD I
% NN I
to TO I
3 CD I
% NN I
. . O

`` `` O
If IN O
you PRP B
could MD O
say VB O
their PRP$ B
business NN I
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
was VBD O
mediocre JJ O
, , O
but CC O
great JJ O
everywhere RB O
else RB O
, , O
that WDT B
would MD O
be VB O
fine JJ O
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Bonita NNP B
Austin NNP I
, , O
an DT B
analyst NN I
with IN O
Wertheim NNP B
Schroder NNP I
& CC I
Co NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
But CC O
it PRP B
's VBZ O
not RB O
mediocre JJ O
, , O
it PRP B
's VBZ O
a DT B
real JJ I
problem NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Mark NNP I
conceded VBD O
that IN O
Colgate NNP B
's POS B
domestic JJ I
business NN I
, , O
apart RB O
from IN O
its PRP$ O
highly RB O
profitable JJ O
Hill NNP B
's POS I
Pet NNP O
Products NNPS O
unit NN O
, , O
has VBZ O
lagged VBN O
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
've VBP O
done VBN O
a DT B
lot NN I
to TO O
improve VB O
-LCB- ( B
U.S. NNP I
. . I
-RCB- ) I
results NNS I
, , O
and CC O
a DT B
lot NN I
more JJR I
will MD O
be VB O
done VBN O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Mark NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

`` `` O
Improving VBG O
profitability NN B
of IN O
U.S. NNP B
operations NNS I
is VBZ O
an DT B
extremely RB I
high JJ I
priority NN I
in IN O
the DT B
company NN I
. . O
'' '' O

To TO O
focus VB O
on IN O
its PRP$ B
global JJ I
consumer-products NNS I
business NN I
, , O
Colgate NNP B
sold VBD O
its PRP$ B
Kendall NNP I
health-care NN I
business NN I
in IN O
1988 CD B
. . O

H. NNP B
Anthony NNP I
Ittleson NNP I
was VBD O
elected VBN O
a DT B
director NN I
of IN O
this DT B
company NN I
, , O
which WDT B
primarily RB O
has VBZ O
interests NNS B
in IN O
radio NN B
and CC I
television NN I
stations NNS I
, , O
increasing VBG O
the DT B
number NN I
of IN O
seats NNS B
to TO O
five CD B
. . O

Osborn NNP B
also RB O
operates VBZ O
Muzak NNP B
franchises NNS I
, , O
entertainment NN B
properties NNS I
and CC O
small JJ B
cable-television NN I
systems NNS I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Ittleson NNP I
is VBZ O
executive NN B
, , O
special JJ B
projects NNS I
, , O
at IN O
CIT NNP B
Group NNP I
Holdings NNP I
Inc. NNP I
, , O
which WDT B
is VBZ O
controlled VBN O
by IN O
Manufacturers NNP B
Hanover NNP I
Corp NNP I
. . O

The DT B
Boston NNP I
Globe NNP I
says VBZ O
its PRP$ B
newly RB I
redesigned VBN I
pages NNS I
have VBP O
a DT B
`` `` I
crisper NN I
'' '' I
look VB I
with IN O
revamped VBN B
fixtures NNS I
aimed VBN O
at IN O
making VBG O
the DT B
paper NN I
`` `` O
more RBR O
consistent JJ O
'' '' O
and CC O
`` `` O
easier JJR O
to TO O
read VB O
. . O
'' '' O

Maybe RB O
so RB O
-- : O
if IN O
you PRP B
can MD O
find VB O
where WRB O
your PRP$ B
favorite JJ I
writer NN I
went VBD O
. . O

Beantown NNP B
scribes NNS I
, , O
who WP B
spare VB O
no DT B
invective NN I
when WRB O
taking VBG O
on IN O
local JJ B
luminaries NNS I
such JJ O
as IN O
Michael NNP B
`` `` I
Pee NNP I
Wee NNP I
'' '' I
Dukakis NNP I
, , O
or CC O
New NNP B
England NNP I
Patriots NNPS I
Coach NNP I
Raymond NNP I
`` `` I
Rev. NNP I
Ray NNP I
'' '' I
Berry NNP I
, , O
yesterday NN B
poured VBD O
ridicule NN B
on IN O
new JJ B
drawings NNS I
of IN O
Globe NNP B
columnists NNS I
that WDT B
replaced VBD O
old JJ B
photos NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
revamped VBN I
pages NNS I
this DT B
week NN I
. . O

By IN O
late JJ B
last JJ I
night NN I
, , O
Globe NNP O
Managing NNP O
Editor NNP O
Thomas NNP B
Mulvoy NNP I
, , O
bending VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
will MD I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
troops NNS I
, , O
scrapped VBD O
the DT B
new JJ I
drawings NNS I
. . O

For IN O
a DT B
few JJ I
days NNS I
at IN O
least JJS O
, , O
he PRP B
says VBZ O
, , O
no DT B
pictures NNS I
or CC I
drawings NNS I
of IN O
any DT B
kind NN I
will MD O
adorn VB O
the DT B
columns NNS I
. . O

Trouble NN B
was VBD O
, , O
nobody NN B
thought VBD O
they PRP B
looked VBD O
right NN O
. . O

Globe NNP B
columnist NN I
Mike NNP I
Barnicle NNP I
-- : O
in IN O
the DT B
second JJ I
attack NN I
on IN O
his PRP$ B
employer NN I
in IN O
as IN B
many JJ I
weeks NNS I
-- : O
averred VBD O
that IN O
his PRP$ B
shadowy JJ I
countenance NN I
was VBD O
so RB O
bad JJ O
, , O
it PRP B
looked VBD O
`` `` O
like IN O
a DT B
face NN I
you PRP B
'd MD O
find VB O
on IN O
a DT B
bottle NN I
of IN O
miracle NN B
elixir NN I
that WDT B
promises VBZ O
to TO O
do VB O
away RB O
with IN O
diarrhea NN B
in IN O
our PRP$ B
lifetime NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Barnicle NNP I
reminded VBD O
readers NNS B
that IN O
he PRP B
still RB O
has VBZ O
n't RB O
forgiven VBN O
Globe NNP B
management NN I
for IN O
questioning VBG O
a DT B
$ $ I
20 CD I
expense NN I
chit NN I
he PRP B
submitted VBD O
for IN O
parking VBG O
his PRP$ B
car NN I
while IN O
chasing VBG O
a DT B
story NN I
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
thought VBD O
-LCB- ( O
the DT B
drawing VBG I
-RCB- ) O
a DT B
cross NN I
between IN O
someone NN B
you PRP B
'd MD O
spot VB O
whipping VBG O
open JJ O
his PRP$ B
trench NN I
coat NN I
... : O
or CC O
a DT B
guy NN I
who WP B
boasted VBD O
he PRP B
'd MD O
been VBN O
Charles NNP B
Manson NNP I
's POS B
roommate NN I
for IN O
the DT B
last JJ I
19 CD I
years NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
said VBD O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Barnicle NNP I
was VBD O
hardly RB O
kinder JJR O
to TO O
the DT B
renderings NNS I
of IN O
colleagues NNS B
Michael NNP B
Madden NNP I
-LRB- ( O
`` `` O
appears VBZ O
to TO O
be VB O
a DT B
pervert NN I
'' '' O
-RRB- ) O
, , O
Will MD B
McDonough NNP I
-LRB- ( O
`` `` O
looks VBZ O
as IN O
if IN O
he PRP B
drove VBD O
for IN O
Abe NNP B
Lincoln NNP I
'' '' O
-RRB- ) O
or CC O
Bella NNP B
English NNP I
, , O
whose WP$ B
`` `` I
little JJ I
girl NN I
now RB O
screams VBZ O
hysterically RB O
every DT B
time NN I
she PRP B
sees VBZ O
a DT B
newspaper NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Lynn NNP B
Staley NNP I
, , O
the DT B
Globe NNP I
's POS B
assistant NN I
managing VBG I
editor NN I
for IN O
design NN B
, , O
acknowledges VBZ O
that IN O
the DT B
visages NNS I
were VBD O
`` `` O
on IN O
the DT B
low JJ I
end NN I
of IN O
the DT B
likeness NN I
spectrum NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Rival NNP B
Boston NNP I
Herald NNP I
columnist NN I
Howie NNP I
Carr NNP I
, , O
who WP B
usually RB O
rails VBZ O
at IN O
Statehouse NN B
`` `` I
hacks NNS I
'' '' I
and CC I
nepotism NN I
, , O
argued VBD O
that IN O
the DT B
new JJ I
drawings NNS I
were VBD O
designed VBN O
to TO O
hide VB O
Mr. NNP B
Madden NNP I
's POS B
`` `` I
rapidly RB I
growing VBG I
forehead NN I
'' '' I
and CC O
the DT B
facial JJ I
defects NNS I
of IN O
`` `` B
chinless JJ I
'' '' I
Dan NNP I
Shaughnessy NNP I
, , O
a DT B
Globe NNP I
sports NNS I
columnist NN I
. . O

`` `` O
But CC O
think VBP O
of IN O
the DT B
money NN I
you PRP B
, , O
the DT B
reader NN I
, , O
will MD O
save VB O
on IN O
Halloween NNP B
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Barnicle NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
Instead RB O
of IN O
buying VBG O
masks NNS B
for IN O
your PRP$ B
kids NNS I
, , O
just RB O
cut VB O
out RP O
the IN B
columnists NNS I
' POS B
pictures NNS I
... : O
. . O

Deeply RB O
ingrained JJ O
in IN O
both DT O
the DT B
book NN I
review NN I
`` `` I
Kissing VBG O
Nature NNP B
Good-bye UH B
'' '' O
by IN O
Stephen NNP B
MacDonald NNP I
-LRB- ( O
Leisure NNP B
& CC I
Arts NNP I
, , O
Sept. NNP B
27 CD I
-RRB- ) O
and CC O
the DT B
books NNS I
reviewed VBN O
is VBZ O
the DT B
assumption NN I
that IN O
global JJ B
warming NN I
is VBZ O
entirely RB O
a DT B
result NN I
of IN O
human JJ B
activity NN I
. . O

Is VBZ O
such JJ B
a DT I
view NN I
justified VBN O
? . O

In IN O
the DT B
absence NN I
of IN O
humans NNS B
, , O
would MD O
the DT B
Earth NNP I
enjoy VB O
a DT B
constant JJ I
climate NN I
over IN O
the DT B
long JJ I
term NN I
? . O

Clearly RB O
not RB O
. . O

About IN B
20,000 CD I
years NNS I
ago RB O
the DT B
last JJ I
ice NN I
age NN I
ended VBD O
. . O

Enormous JJ B
ice NN I
sheets NNS I
retreated VBD O
from IN O
the DT B
face NN I
of IN O
North NNP B
America NNP I
, , O
northern JJ B
Europe NNP I
and CC O
Asia NNP B
. . O

This DT B
global JJ I
warming NN I
must MD O
have VB O
been VBN O
entirely RB O
natural JJ O
-- : O
nobody NN B
would MD O
blame VB O
it PRP B
on IN O
a DT B
few JJ I
hundred CD I
thousand CD I
hunter-gatherers NNS I
hunting NN O
mammoths NNS B
and CC O
scratching VBG O
around IN O
in IN O
caves NNS B
. . O

Furthermore RB O
, , O
no DT B
bell NN I
has VBZ O
yet RB O
rung VBN O
to TO O
announce VB O
the DT B
end NN I
of IN O
this DT B
immense JJ I
episode NN I
of IN O
natural JJ B
global JJ I
warming NN I
. . O

It PRP B
is VBZ O
probably RB O
continuing VBG O
and CC O
may MD O
well RB O
account VB O
for IN O
most RBS B
of IN O
, , O
or CC O
all DT B
of IN O
, , O
present-day JJ B
global JJ I
warming NN I
. . O

I PRP B
bow VBP O
to TO O
no DT B
one CD I
in IN O
my PRP$ B
regard NN I
for IN O
our PRP$ B
terrestrial JJ I
heritage NN I
, , O
but CC O
if IN O
we PRP B
are VBP O
serious JJ O
about IN O
global JJ B
warming NN I
we PRP B
must MD O
look VB O
at IN O
the DT B
big JJ I
picture NN I
and CC O
not RB O
allow VB O
the DT B
Dominant NNP I
Culture NNP I
to TO O
lock VB O
us PRP B
into IN O
the DT B
capitalist-exploiters-greedy-American-consumers-global JJ I
- : I
warming NN I
scenario NN I
as IN O
the DT B
sole JJ I
model NN I
for IN O
discussion NN B
. . O

Jocelyn NNP B
Tomkin NNP I
Astronomy NNP B
Department NNP I
University NNP B
of IN O

The DT B
Internal NNP I
Revenue NNP I
Service NNP I
plans VBZ O
to TO O
restructure VB O
itself PRP B
more JJR O
like IN O
a DT B
private JJ I
corporation NN I
. . O

In IN O
addition NN B
, , O
the DT B
tax-collecting JJ I
agency NN I
says VBZ O
that IN O
it PRP B
will MD O
take VB O
the DT B
unusual JJ I
step NN I
of IN O
looking VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
private JJ I
sector NN I
to TO O
fill VB O
two CD B
new JJ I
high-level JJ I
positions NNS I
to TO O
guide VB O
the DT B
120,000-employee JJ I
agency NN I
: : O
a DT B
comptroller NN I
to TO O
oversee VB O
daily JJ B
finances NNS I
and CC O
a DT B
chief JJ I
information NN I
officer NN I
to TO O
update VB O
the DT B
information NN I
system NN I
, , O
which WDT B
includes VBZ O
probably RB B
the DT I
largest JJS I
computer NN I
data NNS I
base VBP I
in IN O
the DT B
world NN I
. . O

The DT B
IRS NNP I
also RB O
said VBD O
that IN O
it PRP B
would MD O
create VB O
the DT B
position NN I
of IN O
chief JJ B
financial JJ I
officer NN I
, , O
who WP B
will MD O
be VB O
hired VBN O
from IN O
within IN O
the DT B
agency NN I
. . O

IRS NNP B
Commissioner NNP I
Fred NNP I
T. NNP I
Goldberg NNP I
said VBD O
the DT B
changes NNS I
are VBP O
intended VBN O
to TO O
bring VB O
`` `` O
accountability NN B
'' '' O
to TO O
the DT B
agency NN I
, , O
which WDT B
has VBZ O
an DT B
annual JJ I
budget NN I
of IN O
more JJR B
than IN I
$ $ I
5 NN I
billion CD I
and CC O
collects VBZ O
about RB B
$ $ I
1 CD I
trillion CD I
a DT B
year NN I
. . O

`` `` O
My PRP$ B
assessment NN I
and CC O
everyone NN B
's POS B
assessment NN I
is VBZ O
that IN O
we PRP B
do VBP O
not RB O
have VB O
the DT B
kinds NNS I
of IN O
information NN B
that WDT B
let VBP O
us PRP B
responsibly RB O
and CC O
effectively RB O
formulate VB O
and CC O
execute VB O
our PRP$ B
budget NN I
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Goldberg NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

`` `` O
And CC O
we PRP B
do VBP O
n't RB O
have VB O
internal JJ B
controls NNS I
and CC I
discipline NN I
that IN B
we PRP B
need VBP O
to TO O
have VB O
to TO O
spend VB O
$ $ B
5 NN I
billion CD I
properly RB O
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Goldberg NNP I
, , O
who WP B
took VBD O
over IN O
as IN O
head NN B
of IN O
the DT B
IRS NNP I
in IN O
July NNP B
, , O
has VBZ O
been VBN O
disturbed VBN O
by IN O
what WP B
he PRP B
considers VBZ O
the DT B
inefficiency NN I
, , I
waste NN I
and CC I
lack NN I
of IN O
coordination NN B
among IN O
the DT B
branches NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
vast JJ I
federal JJ I
agency NN I
. . O

The DT B
IRS NNP I
operates VBZ O
on IN O
a DT B
computer NN I
system NN I
designed VBN O
in IN O
1961 CD B
, , O
which WDT B
it PRP B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
trying VBG O
to TO O
modernize VB O
for IN O
years NNS B
. . O

And CC O
the DT B
agency NN I
, , O
which WDT B
operated VBD O
throughout IN O
fiscal JJ B
1989 CD I
with IN O
a DT B
$ $ I
360 CD I
million CD I
budget NN I
shortfall NN I
, , O
has VBZ O
been VBN O
under IN O
a DT B
hiring VBG I
freeze NN I
since IN O
last JJ B
fall NN I
. . O

The DT B
new JJ I
commissioner NN I
says VBZ O
that IN O
closer JJR B
scrutiny NN I
of IN O
how WRB O
the DT B
agency NN I
uses VBZ O
its PRP$ B
resources NNS I
will MD O
go VB O
a DT B
long JJ I
way NN I
toward IN O
enhancing VBG O
its PRP$ B
ability NN I
to TO O
collect VB O
more JJR B
tax NN I
revenue NN I
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
think VBP O
that IN O
you PRP B
will MD O
see VB O
a DT B
significant JJ I
improvement NN I
in IN O
the DT B
budget NN I
formulation NN I
and CC I
execution NN I
process NN I
which WDT B
, , O
in IN O
turn NN B
, , O
I PRP B
believe VBP O
will MD O
result VB O
in IN O
a DT B
significant JJ I
increase NN I
in IN O
revenue NN B
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
said VBD O
. . O

The DT B
IRS NNP I
hopes VBZ O
to TO O
fill VB O
the DT B
new JJ I
positions NNS I
soon RB O
. . O

Customarily RB O
, , O
it PRP B
would MD O
appoint VB O
career NN B
civil JJ I
servants NNS I
from IN O
within IN O
the DT B
agency NN I
, , O
but CC O
Mr. NNP B
Goldberg NNP I
said VBD O
he PRP B
plans VBZ O
to TO O
`` `` O
scour VBP O
the DT B
world NN I
'' '' O
for IN O
the DT B
chief JJ I
information NN I
officer NN I
and CC O
the DT B
comptroller NN I
. . O

Although IN O
the DT B
jobs NNS I
will MD O
probably RB O
pay VB O
between IN B
$ $ I
70,000 CD I
and CC I
$ $ I
80,000 CD I
a DT B
year NN I
, , O
IRS NNP B
officials NNS I
are VBP O
confident JJ O
that IN O
they PRP B
can MD O
attract VB O
top-notch JJ B
candidates NNS I
from IN O
the DT B
private JJ I
sector NN I
. . O

`` `` O
You PRP B
're VBP O
telling VBG O
someone NN B
they PRP B
can MD O
spend VB O
the DT B
next JJ I
three CD I
or CC I
four CD I
or CC I
five CD I
or CC I
six CD I
years NNS I
of IN O
their PRP$ B
life NN I
bringing VBG O
about IN O
the DT B
most RBS I
difficult JJ I
and CC I
costly JJ I
modernization NN I
of IN O
an DT B
information NN I
system NN I
on IN O
the DT B
civil JJ I
side NN I
ever RB O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Goldberg NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

`` `` O
On IN O
the DT B
comptroller NN I
side NN I
, , O
you PRP B
're VBP O
developing VBG O
and CC O
making VBG O
work NN O
financial JJ B
controls NNS I
governing VBG O
a DT B
$ $ I
6 CD I
billion CD I
budget NN I
. . O

When WRB O
Maj. NNP B
Moises NNP I
Giroldi NNP I
, , O
the DT B
leader NN I
of IN O
the DT B
abortive JJ I
coup NN I
in IN O
Panama NNP B
, , O
was VBD O
buried VBN O
, , O
his PRP$ B
body NN I
bore VBD O
several JJ B
gunshot NN I
wounds NNS I
, , O
a DT B
cracked VBN I
skull NN I
and CC O
broken VBN B
legs NNS I
and CC I
ribs NNS I
. . O

They PRP B
were VBD O
the DT B
signature NN I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
adversary NN I
, , O
Panamanian JJ B
leader NN I
Manuel NNP I
Antonio NNP I
Noriega NNP I
. . O

The DT B
rebel NN I
officer NN I
's POS B
slow JJ I
and CC I
painful JJ I
death NN I
, , O
at IN O
the DT B
headquarters NN I
of IN O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
Battalion-2000 NN I
squad NN I
, , O
was VBD O
personally RB O
supervised VBN O
by IN O
Gen. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
, , O
says VBZ O
a DT B
U.S. NNP I
official NN I
with IN O
access NN B
to TO O
intelligence NN B
reports NNS I
. . O

Leaping VBG O
into IN O
rages VBZ B
, , O
sinking VBG O
into IN O
bouts NNS B
of IN O
drunkenness NN B
and CC I
mistrust NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
has VBZ O
put VBN O
to TO O
death NN B
some DT B
70 CD I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
troops NNS I
involved VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
coup NN I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
U.S. NNP B
officials NNS I
monitoring NN O
crematoriums NNS B
and CC O
funeral NN B
parlors NNS I
in IN O
Panama NNP B
City NNP I
. . O

He PRP B
is VBZ O
now RB O
changing VBG O
the DT B
place NN I
he PRP B
sleeps VBZ O
every DT B
night NN I
, , O
sometimes RB B
more JJR I
than IN I
once RB I
a DT B
night NN I
. . O

His PRP$ B
meals NNS I
are VBP O
most RBS O
often RB O
prepared VBN O
by IN O
women NNS B
he PRP B
trusts VBZ O
-- : O
his PRP$ B
full-time JJ I
mistress NN I
, , O
Vicky NNP B
Amado NNP I
, , O
and CC O
her PRP$ B
mother NN I
, , O
Norma NNP B
. . O

And CC O
he PRP B
is VBZ O
collecting VBG O
the DT B
names NNS I
of IN O
those DT B
who WP B
telephoned VBD O
the DT B
coup-makers NNS I
to TO O
congratulate VB O
them PRP B
during IN O
their PRP$ B
brief JJ I
time NN I
in IN O
control NN B
of IN O
his PRP$ B
headquarters NN I
. . O

More JJR B
enemies NNS I
to TO O
be VB O
dealt VBN O
with RB O
. . O

In IN O
the DT B
two CD I
weeks NNS I
since IN O
the DT B
rebellion NN I
, , O
which WDT B
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
hesitantly RB O
backed VBD O
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
has VBZ O
been VBN O
at IN O
his PRP$ B
most RBS I
brutal JJ I
- : I
and CC I
efficient JJ I
- : I
in IN O
maintaining VBG O
power NN B
. . O

Yet RB O
, , O
while IN O
the DT B
failed VBN I
coup NN I
is VBZ O
a DT B
major JJ I
U.S. NNP I
foreign JJ I
policy NN I
embarrassment NN I
, , O
it PRP B
is VBZ O
merely RB B
the DT I
latest JJS I
chapter NN I
in IN O
a DT B
byzantine JJ I
relationship NN I
between IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
and CC O
Washington NNP B
that IN B
stretches NNS O
back RB O
three CD B
decades NNS I
. . O

America NNP B
's POS B
war NN I
on IN O
the DT B
dictator NN I
over IN O
the DT B
past JJ I
two CD I
years NNS I
, , O
following VBG O
his PRP$ B
indictment NN I
on IN O
drug NN B
charges NNS I
in IN O
February NNP B
1988 CD I
, , O
is VBZ O
the DT B
legacy NN I
of IN O
that DT B
relationship NN I
. . O

Before IN O
American JJ B
foreign JJ I
policy NN I
set VBN O
out IN O
to TO O
destroy VB O
Noriega NNP B
, , O
it PRP B
helped VBD O
create VB O
him PRP B
out IN O
of IN O
the DT B
crucible NN I
of IN O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
long JJ I
history NN I
of IN O
conspirators NNS B
and CC I
pirates NNS I
. . O

For IN O
most RBS B
of IN I
the DT I
past JJ I
30 CD I
years NNS I
, , O
the DT B
marriage NN I
was VBD O
one CD B
of IN O
convenience NN B
. . O

In IN O
1960 CD B
, , O
for IN O
example NN B
, , O
when WRB O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
both DT O
a DT B
cadet NN I
at IN O
an DT B
elite NN I
military JJ I
academy NN I
in IN O
Peru NNP B
and CC O
a DT B
spy-in-training NN I
for IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
Defense NNP I
Intelligence NNP I
Agency NNP I
, , O
he PRP B
was VBD O
detained VBN O
by IN O
Lima NNP B
authorities NNS I
for IN O
allegedly RB O
raping VBG O
and CC O
savagely RB O
beating VBG O
a DT B
prostitute NN I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
a DT B
U.S. NNP I
Embassy NNP I
cable NN I
from IN O
that DT B
period NN I
. . O

The DT B
woman NN I
had VBD O
nearly RB O
died VBN O
. . O

But CC O
U.S. NNP B
intelligence NN I
, , O
rather RB O
than IN O
rein NN O
in IN O
or CC O
cut NN O
loose JJ O
its PRP$ B
new JJ I
spy NN I
, , O
merely RB O
filed VBN O
the DT B
report NN I
away RB O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
tips NNS I
on IN O
emerging VBG B
leftists NNS I
at IN O
his PRP$ B
school NN I
were VBD O
deemed VBN O
more RBR O
important JJ O
to TO O
U.S. NNP B
interests NNS I
. . O

From IN O
that DT B
point NN I
on IN I
, , O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
would MD O
make VB O
a DT B
practice NN I
of IN O
overlooking VBG O
the DT B
Panamanian NNP I
's POS B
misadventures NNS I
. . O

The DT B
U.S. NNP I
has VBZ O
befriended VBN O
and CC O
later RB O
turned VBD O
against IN O
many JJ B
dictators NNS I
, , O
but CC O
none NN B
quite RB O
so RB O
resourceful JJ O
. . O

The DT B
55-year-old NNP I
Mr. NNP I
Noriega NNP I
is VBZ O
n't RB O
as RB O
smooth JJ O
as IN O
the DT B
shah NN I
of IN O
Iran NNP B
, , O
as RB O
well-born JJ O
as IN O
Nicaragua NNP B
's POS B
Anastasio NNP I
Somoza NNP I
, , O
as RB O
imperial JJ O
as IN O
Ferdinand NNP B
Marcos NNP I
of IN O
the DT B
Philippines NNP I
or CC O
as RB O
bloody JJ O
as IN O
Haiti NNP B
's POS B
Baby NNP I
Doc NNP I
Duvalier NNP I
. . O

Yet RB O
he PRP B
has VBZ O
proved VBN O
more RBR O
resilient JJ O
than IN O
any DT B
of IN O
them PRP B
. . O

And CC O
out IN O
of IN O
necessity NN B
: : O
The DT B
U.S. NNP I
can MD O
make VB O
mistakes NNS B
and CC O
still JJ O
hope NN O
to TO O
remove VB O
him PRP B
from IN O
power NN B
, , O
but CC O
a DT B
single JJ I
error NN I
on IN O
his PRP$ B
part NN I
could MD O
cost VB O
him PRP B
his PRP$ B
life NN I
. . O

`` `` O
The DT B
U.S. NNP I
underestimated VBD O
Noriega NNP B
all DT O
along IN O
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Ambler NNP B
Moss NNP I
, , O
a DT B
former JJ I
Ambassador NNP I
to TO O
Panama NNP B
. . O

`` `` O
He PRP B
has VBZ O
mastered VBN O
the DT B
art NN I
of IN O
survival NN B
. . O
'' '' O

In IN O
keeping VBG O
with IN O
America NNP B
's POS B
long JJ I
history NN I
of IN O
propping VBG O
up IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
, , O
recent JJ B
U.S. NNP I
actions NNS I
have VBP O
extended VBN O
rather RB O
than IN O
shortened VBN O
his PRP$ B
survival NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
might MD O
have VB O
fallen VBN O
of IN O
his PRP$ B
own JJ I
weight NN I
in IN O
1988 CD B
because IN O
of IN O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
dire JJ I
economic JJ I
situation NN I
, , O
says VBZ O
Mr. NNP B
Moss NNP I
, , O
but CC O
increasing VBG B
external JJ I
pressure NN I
has VBZ O
only RB O
given VBN O
him PRP B
additional JJ B
excuses NNS I
for IN O
repression NN B
, , O
and CC O
a DT B
scapegoat NN I
for IN O
his PRP$ B
own JJ I
mismanagement NN I
. . O

`` `` O
If IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
had VBD O
sat VBN O
back RB O
and CC O
done VBN O
nothing NN B
, , O
he PRP B
might MD O
not RB O
have VB O
made VBN O
it PRP B
through IN O
1988 CD B
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Moss NNP I
contends VBZ O
. . O

Perhaps RB O
most RBS O
important JJ O
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
allies NNS I
have VBP O
intervened VBN O
to TO O
encourage VB O
-- : O
in IN O
some DT B
cases NNS I
, , O
to TO O
demand VB O
-- : O
that IN O
the DT B
dictator NN I
maintain VB O
his PRP$ B
grip NN I
of IN O
the DT B
throne NN I
. . O

One CD B
Colombian JJ I
drug NN I
boss NN I
, , O
upon IN O
hearing NN O
in IN O
1987 CD B
that IN O
Gen. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
negotiating VBG O
with IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
to TO O
abandon VB O
his PRP$ B
command NN I
for IN O
a DT B
comfortable JJ I
exile NN I
, , O
sent VBD O
him PRP B
a DT B
hand-sized JJ I
mahogany NN I
coffin NN I
engraved VBN O
with IN O
his PRP$ B
name NN I
. . O

`` `` O
He PRP B
is VBZ O
cornered VBN O
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
the DT B
Rev. NNP I
Fernando NNP I
Guardia NNP I
, , O
who WP B
has VBZ O
led VBN O
Catholic NNP B
Church NNP I
opposition NN I
against IN O
Noriega NNP B
. . O

`` `` O
The DT B
Americans NNPS I
have VBP O
left VBN O
him PRP B
without IN O
a DT B
way NN I
out RB I
. . O

It PRP B
is VBZ O
easy JJ O
to TO O
fight VB O
when WRB O
you PRP B
do VBP O
n't RB O
have VB O
any DT B
other JJ I
option NN I
. . O
'' '' O

His PRP$ B
chief JJ I
advantage NN I
in IN O
the DT B
fight NN I
: : O
his PRP$ B
intimate JJ I
knowledge NN I
of IN O
American JJ B
ways NNS I
and CC I
weaknesses NNS I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
often RB O
tells VBZ O
friends NNS B
that WDT O
patience NN B
is VBZ O
the DT B
best JJS I
weapon NN I
against IN O
the DT B
gringos NNS I
, , O
who WP B
have VBP O
a DT B
short JJ I
attention NN I
span NN I
and CC O
little JJ B
stomach NN I
for IN O
lasting VBG B
confrontation NN I
. . O

The DT B
U.S. NNP I
discovered VBD O
the DT B
young JJ I
Tony NNP I
Noriega NNP I
in IN O
late JJ B
1959 CD I
, , O
when WRB O
he PRP B
was VBD O
in IN O
his PRP$ B
second JJ I
year NN I
at IN O
the DT B
Chorrillos NNP I
Military NNP I
Academy NNP I
in IN O
Lima NNP B
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
former JJ B
U.S. NNP I
intelligence NN I
officials NNS I
. . O

The DT B
contact NN I
occurred VBD O
through IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
half-brother NN I
, , O
a DT B
Panamanian JJ I
diplomat NN I
based VBN O
in IN O
Peru NNP B
named VBD O
Luis NNP B
Carlos NNP I
Noriega NNP I
Hurtado NNP I
. . O

Luis NNP B
Carlos NNP I
, , O
knowing VBG O
that IN O
helping VBG O
the DT B
Americans NNPS I
could MD O
advance VB O
the DT B
career NN I
of IN O
any DT B
Panamanian JJ I
officer NN I
, , O
relayed VBD O
Tony NNP B
's POS B
reports NNS I
on IN O
the DT B
leftist JJ I
tendencies NNS I
he PRP B
observed VBD O
among IN O
his PRP$ B
fellow NN I
students NNS I
and CC O
, , O
more RBR O
important JJ O
, , O
among IN O
his PRP$ B
officers NNS I
and CC I
instructors NNS I
. . O

A DT B
spy NN I
was VBD O
born VBN O
. . O

It PRP B
was VBD O
a DT B
heady JJ I
experience NN I
for IN O
the DT B
pockmarked JJ I
and CC I
slightly RB I
built VBN I
Mr. NNP I
Noriega NNP I
, , O
who WP B
was VBD O
known VBN O
to TO O
his PRP$ B
friends NNS I
as IN O
Cara NNP B
la FW I
Pina NNP I
-- : O
pineapple NN B
face NN I
. . O

Born VBN O
the DT B
illegitimate JJ I
son NN I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
father NN I
's POS B
maid NN I
, , O
he PRP B
was VBD O
raised VBN O
on IN O
the DT B
mean NN I
streets NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
central JJ I
market NN I
district NN I
of IN O
Panama NNP B
City NNP I
. . O

Tony NNP B
was VBD O
four CD B
years NNS I
older JJR O
than IN O
most RBS B
of IN O
his PRP$ B
fellow NN I
cadets NNS I
, , O
and CC O
gained VBD O
admission NN B
to TO O
the DT B
academy NN I
because IN O
his PRP$ B
brother NN I
had VBD O
falsified VBN O
his PRP$ B
birth NN I
certificate NN I
. . O

He PRP B
considered VBD O
himself PRP B
intellectually RB O
superior JJ O
to TO O
his PRP$ B
Peruvian JJ I
peers NNS I
, , O
many NN O
of IN O
whom WP B
were VBD O
wayward JJ B
sons NNS I
sent VBN O
by IN O
their PRP$ B
well-off JJ I
families NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
highly RB I
disciplined VBN I
, , I
French-modeled JJ I
academy NN I
as IN O
a DT B
sort NN I
of IN O
reform NN B
school NN I
. . O

In IN O
his PRP$ B
peaked VBD I
military JJ I
cap NN I
and CC I
neatly RB I
pressed VBN I
, , I
French-made JJ I
uniform NN I
, , O
Noriega NNP B
felt VBD O
more RBR O
respected VBN O
and CC O
powerful JJ O
than IN O
ever RB B
in IN O
his PRP$ B
underprivileged JJ I
life NN I
, , O
friends NNS B
from IN O
the DT B
period NN I
say VBP O
. . O

`` `` O
He PRP B
had VBD O
an DT B
elegant JJ I
uniform NN I
with IN O
gold NN B
buttons NNS I
in IN O
a DT B
country NN I
where WRB O
there EX B
was VBD O
a DT B
cult NN I
of IN O
militarism NN B
, , O
where WRB O
officers NNS B
were VBD O
the DT B
elite NN I
with IN O
special JJ B
privileges NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
recalls VBZ O
Darien NNP B
Ayala NNP I
, , O
a DT B
fellow NN I
student NN I
in IN O
Peru NNP B
and CC O
a DT B
lifelong JJ I
friend NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
relationship NN I
to TO O
American JJ B
intelligence NN I
agencies NNS I
became VBD O
contractual JJ O
in IN O
either DT B
1966 CD I
or CC I
1967 CD I
, , O
intelligence NN B
officials NNS I
say VBP O
. . O

His PRP$ B
commanding NN I
officer NN I
at IN O
the DT B
Chiriqui NNP I
Province NNP I
garrison NN I
, , O
Major NNP B
Omar NNP I
Torrijos NNP I
, , O
gave VBD O
him PRP B
an DT B
intriguing JJ I
assignment NN I
: : O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
would MD O
organize VB O
the DT B
province NN I
's POS B
first JJ I
intelligence NN I
service NN I
. . O

The DT B
spy NN I
network NN I
would MD O
serve VB O
two CD B
clients NNS I
: : O
the DT B
Panamanian JJ I
government NN I
, , O
by IN O
monitoring VBG O
political JJ B
opponents NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
region NN I
, , O
and CC O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
, , O
by IN O
tracking VBG O
the DT B
growing VBG I
Communist NNP I
influence NN I
in IN O
the DT B
unions NNS I
organized VBN O
at IN O
United NNP B
Fruit NNP I
Co. NNP I
's POS B
banana NN I
plantations NNS I
in IN O
Bocas NNP B
del NNP I
Toros NNP I
and CC O
Puerto NNP B
Armuelles NNP I
. . O

United NNP B
Fruit NNP I
was VBD O
one CD B
of IN O
the DT B
two CD I
largest JJS I
contributors NNS I
to TO O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
national JJ I
income NN I
. . O

Satisfying VBG O
its PRP$ B
interests NNS I
was VBD O
a DT B
priority NN I
for IN O
any DT B
Panamanian JJ I
leader NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
initial JJ I
retainer NN I
was VBD O
only RB B
$ $ I
50 CD I
to TO I
$ $ I
100 CD I
a DT B
month NN I
, , O
plus CC O
occasional JJ B
gifts NNS I
of IN O
liquor NN B
or CC I
groceries NNS I
from IN O
the DT B
American NNP I
PX NNP I
, , O
a DT B
former JJ I
intelligence NN I
official NN I
says NNS O
. . O

It PRP B
was VBD O
modest JJ B
pay NN I
by IN O
American JJ B
standards NNS I
, , O
but CC O
a DT B
healthy JJ I
boost NN I
to TO O
his PRP$ B
small JJ I
military JJ I
salary NN I
, , O
which WDT B
fellow NN B
officers NNS I
remember VBP O
as IN O
having VBG O
been VBN O
$ $ B
300 CD I
to TO I
$ $ I
400 CD I
monthly JJ O
. . O

`` `` O
He PRP B
did VBD O
it PRP B
very RB O
well RB O
, , O
'' '' O
recalls VBZ O
Boris NNP B
Martinez NNP I
, , O
a DT B
former JJ I
Panamanian JJ I
colonel NN I
who WP B
managed VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
and CC O
his PRP$ B
operation NN I
. . O

`` `` O
He PRP B
started VBD O
building VBG O
the DT B
files NNS I
that WDT B
helped VBD O
him PRP B
gain VBP O
power NN B
. . O
'' '' O

A DT B
National NNP I
Guard NNP I
job NN I
assumed VBN O
by IN O
Capt. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
in IN O
1964 CD B
-- : O
as IN O
chief NN B
of IN O
the DT B
transit NN I
police NN I
in IN O
David NNP B
City NNP I
, , O
capital NN B
of IN O
the DT B
Chiriqui NNP I
Province NNP I
-- : O
was VBD O
tailor-made JJ O
for IN O
an DT B
aspiring JJ I
super-spy NN I
. . O

By IN O
pressuring VBG O
taxi NN B
and CC I
bus NN I
drivers NNS I
who WP B
needed VBD O
licenses NNS B
, , O
he PRP B
gained VBD O
a DT B
ready JJ I
cache NN I
of IN O
information NN B
. . O

He PRP B
knew VBD O
which WDT B
local JJ I
luminaries NNS I
had VBD O
been VBN O
caught VBN O
driving VBG O
drunk JJ O
, , O
which WDT B
had VBD O
been VBN O
found VBN O
with IN O
their PRP$ B
mistresses NNS I
. . O

This DT B
proved VBD O
particularly RB O
valuable JJ O
to TO O
the DT B
Panamanian JJ I
government NN I
in IN O
1967 CD B
, , O
when WRB O
union NN B
leaders NNS I
were VBD O
planning VBG O
a DT B
May NNP I
Day NNP I
march NN I
that IN B
the DT B
government NN I
feared VBD O
could MD O
turn VB O
violent JJ O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
had VBD O
learned VBN O
that IN O
a DT B
local JJ I
union NN I
leader NN I
was VBD O
sleeping VBG O
with IN O
the DT B
wife NN I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
deputy NN I
. . O

So RB O
he PRP B
splashed VBD O
the DT B
information NN I
on IN O
handbills NNS B
that IN B
he PRP B
distributed VBD O
throughout IN O
the DT B
banana-exporting JJ I
city NN I
of IN O
Puerto NNP B
Armuelles NNP I
, , O
which WDT B
was VBD O
ruled VBN O
by IN O
United NNP B
Fruit NNP I
Co NNP I
. . O

The DT B
campaign NN I
so RB O
divided VBD O
union NN B
leaders NNS I
that IN O
the DT B
government NN I
found VBD O
them PRP B
far RB O
easier JJR O
to TO O
control VB O
. . O

`` `` O
It PRP B
was VBD O
like IN O
a DT B
play NN I
on IN O
Broadway NNP B
, , O
'' '' O
recalls VBZ O
Mr. NNP B
Martinez NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
Noriega NNP B
managed VBD O
the DT B
whole JJ I
thing NN I
. . O

He PRP B
was VBD O
superb JJ O
. . O

Noriega NNP B
was VBD O
an DT B
expert NN I
at IN O
bribing VBG O
and CC O
blackmailing VBG O
people NNS B
. . O
'' '' O

During IN O
his PRP$ B
years NNS I
in IN O
Chiriqui NNP B
, , O
however RB O
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
also RB O
revealed VBD O
himself PRP B
as IN O
an DT B
officer NN I
as RB O
perverse JJ O
as IN O
he PRP B
was VBD O
ingenious JJ O
. . O

Rodrigo NNP B
Miranda NNP I
, , O
a DT B
local JJ I
lawyer NN I
and CC I
human-rights JJ I
monitor NN I
, , O
recalls VBZ O
an DT B
intoxicated JJ I
Noriega NNP I
visiting VBG O
prisoners NNS B
in IN O
their PRP$ B
cells NNS I
at IN O
the DT B
5th NNP I
Zone NNP I
Garrison NNP I
headquarters NN I
in IN O
David NNP B
, , O
where WRB O
he PRP B
had VBD O
his PRP$ B
offices NNS I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
would MD O
order VB O
them PRP B
all DT O
to TO O
take VB O
off IN O
their PRP$ B
clothes NNS I
and CC O
run VB O
around IN O
the DT B
courtyard NN I
naked JJ O
, , O
laughing VBG O
at IN O
them PRP B
and CC O
then RB O
retreating VBG O
to TO O
his PRP$ B
office NN I
. . O

`` `` O
People NNS B
started VBD O
wondering VBG O
if IN O
something NN B
was VBD O
wrong JJ O
with IN O
him PRP B
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Miranda NNP I
recalls VBZ O
. . O

But CC O
through IN O
this DT B
period NN I
, , O
so RB O
far RB O
as IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
military NN I
was VBD O
concerned VBN O
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
a DT B
model NN I
recruit NN I
. . O

He PRP B
signed VBD O
up IN O
for IN O
intelligence NN B
and CC I
counter-intelligence JJ I
training NN I
under IN O
American JJ B
officers NNS I
at IN O
Fort NNP B
Gulick NNP I
in IN O
Panama NNP B
in IN O
July NNP B
1967 CD I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
a DT B
copy NN I
of IN O
a DT B
1983 CD I
resume NN I
with IN O
details NNS B
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
has VBZ O
since IN O
classified VBN O
as IN O
secret NN O
. . O

He PRP B
flew VBD O
to TO O
Fort NNP B
Bragg NNP I
, , O
N.C. NNP B
, , O
in IN O
September NNP B
of IN O
that DT B
year NN I
for IN O
a DT B
course NN I
in IN O
psychological JJ B
operations NNS I
, , O
returning VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
School NNP I
of IN O
the DT B
Americas NNP I
in IN O
Panama NNP B
for IN O
a DT B
two-month JJ I
course NN I
called VBN O
`` `` O
military JJ B
intelligence NN I
for IN O
officers NNS B
. . O
'' '' O

Some DT B
American JJ I
officers NNS I
interpreted VBD O
his PRP$ B
eagerness NN I
and CC I
studiousness NN I
as IN O
a DT B
sign NN I
of IN O
loyalty NN B
, , O
but CC O
they PRP B
did VBD O
so RB O
falsely RB O
. . O

He PRP B
rose VBD O
to TO O
chief NN B
of IN O
intelligence NN B
in IN O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
socalled JJ I
G-2 NN I
in IN O
1970 CD B
after IN O
providing VBG O
populist JJ O
dictator NN O
Torrijos NNP B
the DT B
critical JJ I
support NN I
to TO O
defeat VB O
a DT B
coup NN I
attempt NN I
against IN O
him PRP B
a DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

He PRP B
became VBD O
Gen. NNP B
Torrijos NNP I
's POS B
inseparable JJ I
shadow NN I
, , O
and CC O
the DT B
holder NN I
of IN O
all DT B
Panama NNP I
's POS B
secrets NNS I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
, , O
by IN O
now RB B
a DT B
lieutenant NN I
colonel NN I
, , O
expanded VBD O
his PRP$ B
contacts NNS I
to TO O
include VB O
the DT B
Cubans NNPS I
-- : O
not RB O
to TO O
mention VB O
the DT B
Israelis NNPS I
, , O
the DT B
Taiwanese JJ I
and CC O
any DT B
other JJ I
intelligence NN I
service NN I
that WDT B
came VBD O
knocking VBG O
. . O

When WRB O
U.S. NNP B
diplomats NNS I
complained VBD O
to TO O
the DT B
CIA NNP I
of IN O
Col. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
moonlighting NN I
, , O
intelligence NN B
experts NNS I
always RB O
insisted VBD O
that IN O
his PRP$ B
allegiance NN I
was VBD O
first JJ O
to TO O
the DT B
Americans NNPS I
. . O

`` `` O
Early RB O
on IN O
in IN O
the DT B
State NNP I
Department NNP I
, , O
we PRP B
took VBD O
to TO O
calling VBG O
him PRP B
the DT B
rent-a-colonel NN I
, , O
in IN O
tribute NN B
to TO O
his PRP$ B
ability NN I
to TO O
simultaneously RB O
milk NN O
the DT B
antagonistic JJ I
intelligence NN I
services NNS I
of IN O
Cuba NNP B
and CC O
the DT B
United NNP I
States NNPS I
, , O
'' '' O
recalls VBZ O
Francis NNP B
J. NNP I
McNeil NNP I
, , O
who WP B
, , O
as IN O
deputy NN B
assistant NN I
secretary NN I
of IN O
state NN B
for IN O
inter-American JJ B
affairs NNS I
, , O
first JJ O
ran VBD O
across IN O
reports NNS B
about IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
in IN O
1977 CD B
. . O

`` `` O
Some DT B
of IN O
us PRP B
wondered VBD O
how WRB O
our PRP$ B
intelligence NN I
people NNS I
could MD O
put VB O
so RB B
much JJ I
stock NN I
in IN O
his PRP$ B
information NN I
when WRB O
he PRP B
was VBD O
just RB O
as IN O
close RB O
to TO O
the DT B
Cubans NNPS I
. . O
'' '' O

Even RB O
at IN O
this DT B
early JJ I
stage NN I
, , O
drugs NNS B
caused VBD O
additional JJ B
concerns NNS I
. . O

During IN O
the DT B
Nixon NNP I
administration NN I
, , O
the DT B
Drug NNP I
Enforcement NNP I
Administration NNP I
became VBD O
dismayed VBN O
at IN O
the DT B
extent NN I
of IN O
the DT B
G-2 NN I
's POS B
connections NNS I
to TO O
arrested VBN B
drug NN I
traffickers NNS I
. . O

One CD B
DEA NNP I
agent NN I
drew VBD O
up IN O
a DT B
list NN I
of IN O
five CD B
options NNS I
for IN O
dealing VBG O
with IN O
Col. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
, , O
one CD O
of IN O
which WDT B
was VBD O
assassination NN B
. . O

The DT B
head NN I
of IN O
the DT B
DEA NNP I
at IN O
the DT B
time NN I
, , O
John NNP B
Ingersoll NNP I
, , O
scotched VBD O
the DT B
assassination NN I
plan NN I
. . O

But CC O
he PRP B
did VBD O
fly VB O
to TO O
Panama NNP B
to TO O
scold VB O
dictator NN B
Torrijos NNP I
on IN O
the DT B
drug NN I
ties NNS I
of IN O
Panamanian JJ B
officials NNS I
, , O
including VBG O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Ingersoll NNP I
later RB O
recalled VBD O
that IN O
Gen. NNP B
Torrijos NNP I
seemed VBD O
afraid JJ O
to TO O
act VB O
on IN O
the DT B
concerns NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
Everybody NN B
was VBD O
afraid JJ O
of IN O
him PRP B
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Ingersoll NNP I
says VBZ O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
became VBD O
an DT B
even RB I
greater JJR I
threat NN I
in IN O
1976 CD B
, , O
when WRB O
U.S. NNP B
intelligence NN I
services NNS I
discovered VBN O
that IN O
he PRP B
had VBD O
been VBN O
buying VBG O
recordings NNS B
of IN O
electronically RB B
monitored VBN I
conversations NNS I
from IN O
three CD B
sergeants NNS I
working VBG O
for IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
Army NNP I
's POS B
470th NNP I
Military NNP I
Intelligence NNP I
Group NNP I
. . O

The DT B
tapes NNS I
included VBD O
wiretaps NNS B
of IN O
Gen. NNP B
Torrijos NNP I
's POS B
own JJ I
phone NN I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
American JJ B
intelligence NN I
officials NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
caught VBD O
him PRP B
with IN O
his PRP$ B
hands NNS I
on IN O
our PRP$ B
cookie NN I
jar NN I
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
former JJ B
CIA NNP I
Director NNP I
Stansfield NNP I
Turner NNP I
. . O

For IN O
the DT B
first JJ I
time NN I
, , O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
considered VBD O
cutting VBG O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
from IN O
its PRP$ B
intelligence NN I
payroll NN I
-- : O
and CC O
the DT B
deliberations NNS I
were VBD O
intense JJ O
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Turner NNP I
says VBZ O
. . O

`` `` O
In IN O
the DT B
world NN I
of IN O
intelligence NN B
, , O
if IN O
you PRP B
want VBP O
to TO O
get VB O
information NN B
, , O
you PRP B
get VBP O
it PRP B
from IN O
seedy JJ B
characters NNS I
. . O

The DT B
question NN I
is VBZ O
how WRB O
much JJ O
you PRP B
get VBP O
tied VBN O
in IN O
with IN O
seedy JJ B
characters NNS I
so IN O
they PRP B
can MD O
extort VB O
you PRP B
. . O
'' '' O

Intelligence NN B
officials NNS I
to TO O
this DT B
day NN I
worry NN O
whether IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
sold VBD O
sensitive JJ B
information NN I
on IN O
the DT B
recordings NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
Cubans NNPS I
or CC O
others NNS B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Turner NNP I
was VBD O
troubled JJ O
enough RB O
to TO O
cancel VB O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
contract NN I
with IN O
the DT B
rent-a-colonel NN I
at IN O
the DT B
beginning NN I
of IN O
the DT B
Carter NNP I
administration NN I
. . O

The DT B
U.S. NNP I
soon RB O
found VBD O
new JJ B
cause NN I
for IN O
concern NN B
: : O
gun-running JJ B
. . O

Prosecutors NNS B
in IN O
Southern NNP B
Florida NNP I
indicted VBD O
five CD B
Panamanians NNS I
on IN O
charges NNS B
of IN O
illegally RB O
running VBG O
arms NNS B
to TO O
Sandinista NNP B
rebels NNS I
trying VBG O
to TO O
overthrow VB O
the DT B
Nicaraguan JJ I
government NN I
of IN O
Mr. NNP B
Somoza NNP I
. . O

They PRP B
included VBD O
one CD B
of IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
closest JJS I
friends NNS I
and CC I
business NN I
partners NNS I
, , O
Carlos NNP B
Wittgreen NNP I
. . O

And CC O
the DT B
investigators NNS I
were VBD O
quickly RB O
closing VBG O
in IN O
on IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
himself PRP B
. . O

At IN O
the DT B
time NN I
, , O
though RB O
, , O
in IN O
1979 CD B
, , O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
was VBD O
once RB O
again RB O
flirting VBG O
with IN O
its PRP$ B
longtime JJ I
Latin NNP I
American JJ I
spy NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
made VBD O
plans NNS B
to TO O
fly VB O
to TO O
Washington NNP B
for IN O
a DT B
meeting NN I
with IN O
his PRP$ B
counterpart NN I
at IN O
the DT B
Pentagon NNP I
. . O

Dade NNP B
County NNP I
and CC I
federal JJ I
authorities NNS I
, , O
learning VBG O
that IN O
he PRP B
intended VBD O
to TO O
fly VB O
through IN O
Miami NNP B
, , O
made VBN O
plans NNS B
to TO O
arrest VB O
him PRP B
on IN O
the DT B
gun-running JJ I
charges NNS I
as RB O
soon RB O
as IN O
he PRP B
hit VBD O
U.S. NNP B
soil NN I
. . O

It PRP B
was VBD O
a DT B
Friday NNP I
in IN O
June NNP B
. . O

The DT B
Pentagon NNP I
foiled VBD O
the DT B
plan NN I
. . O

According VBG O
to TO O
military JJ B
officers NNS I
at IN O
the DT B
time NN I
, , O
word NN B
was VBD O
passed VBN O
to TO O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
by IN O
his PRP$ B
American JJ I
hosts NNS I
that IN O
the DT B
police NN I
would MD O
be VB O
waiting VBG O
. . O

On IN O
Monday NNP B
, , O
U.S. NNP B
officials NNS I
received VBD O
a DT B
routine NN I
, , I
unclassified JJ I
message NN I
from IN O
the DT B
military JJ I
group NN I
commander NN I
in IN O
Panama NNP B
. . O

`` `` O
Due JJ O
to TO O
health NN B
reasons NNS I
, , O
Lt. NNP B
Col. NNP I
Noriega NNP I
has VBZ O
elected VBN O
to TO O
postpone VB O
his PRP$ B
visit NN I
to TO O
Washington NNP B
, , O
'' '' O
it PRP B
read VBP O
. . O

Prosecutors NNS B
in IN O
Miami NNP B
received VBD O
yet RB B
another DT I
setback NN I
. . O

Their PRP$ B
original JJ I
indictment NN I
against IN O
Mr. NNP B
Wittgreen NNP I
, , O
the DT B
friend NN I
of IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
, , O
and CC O
the DT B
other JJ I
four CD I
was VBD O
dismissed VBN O
on IN O
a DT B
technicality NN I
. . O

But CC O
now RB O
, , O
along IN O
with IN O
reindicting VBG O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
pal NN I
, , O
they PRP B
intended VBD O
to TO O
charge VB O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
himself PRP B
, , O
on IN O
allegations NNS B
that IN O
he PRP B
was VBD O
involved VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
illegal JJ I
trading NN I
of IN O
some DT B
$ $ I
2 CD I
million CD I
in IN O
arms NNS B
. . O

In IN O
January NNP B
1980 CD I
, , O
Jerome NNP B
Sanford NNP I
, , O
as IN O
assistant NN B
U.S. NNP I
attorney NN I
, , O
was VBD O
summoned VBN O
to TO O
a DT B
meeting NN I
with IN O
a DT B
Federal NNP I
Bureau NNP I
of IN O
Investigation NNP B
agent NN O
assigned VBN O
to TO O
the DT B
Bureau NNP I
of IN O
Alcohol NN B
, , I
Tobacco NNP I
and CC I
Firearms NNP I
in IN O
Miami NNP B
. . O

Panamanian JJ O
dictator NN O
Torrijos NNP B
, , O
he PRP B
was VBD O
told VBN O
, , O
had VBD O
granted VBN O
the DT B
shah NN I
of IN O
Iran NNP B
asylum NN B
in IN O
Panama NNP B
as IN O
a DT B
favor NN I
to TO O
Washington NNP B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Sanford NNP I
was VBD O
told VBN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
friend NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Wittgreen NNP I
, , O
would MD O
be VB O
handling VBG O
the DT B
shah NN I
's POS B
security NN I
. . O

It PRP B
would MD O
n't RB O
be VB O
a DT B
good JJ I
idea NN I
to TO O
indict VB O
him PRP B
-- : O
much RB O
less JJR O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
, , O
the DT B
prosecutor NN I
was VBD O
told VBN O
. . O

After IN O
prodding VBG B
from IN O
Mr. NNP B
Sanford NNP I
, , O
U.S. NNP B
Attorney NNP I
Jack NNP I
Eskenazi NNP I
pleaded VBD O
with IN O
Justice NNP B
Department NNP I
officials NNS I
in IN O
Washington NNP B
to TO O
let VB O
the DT B
indictment NN I
proceed VB O
. . O

`` `` O
Unfortunately RB O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Eskenazi NNP I
wrote VBD O
in IN O
a DT B
letter NN I
, , O
`` `` O
those DT B
of IN O
us PRP B
in IN O
law NN B
enforcement NN I
in IN O
Miami NNP B
find NN O
ourselves PRP B
frequently RB O
attempting VBG O
to TO O
enforce VB O
the DT B
laws NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
United NNP I
States NNPS I
but CC O
simultaneously RB O
being VBG O
caught VBN O
between IN O
foreign JJ B
policy NN I
considerations NNS I
over IN O
which WDT B
we PRP B
have VBP O
no DT B
control NN I
. . O
'' '' O

The DT B
letter NN I
, , O
along IN O
with IN O
a DT B
detailed VBN I
prosecution NN I
memo NN I
, , O
sat VBD O
on IN O
the DT B
desks NNS I
of IN O
Justice NNP B
officials NNS I
for IN O
months NNS B
before IN O
the DT B
case NN I
died VBD O
a DT B
quiet JJ I
death NN I
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
think VBP O
if IN O
we PRP B
had VBD O
been VBN O
allowed VBN O
to TO O
go VB O
ahead RB O
then RB O
we PRP B
would MD O
n't RB O
have VB O
the DT B
problems NNS I
we PRP B
have VBP O
now RB O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Sanford NNP I
says VBZ O
. . O

`` `` O
If IN O
he PRP B
had VBD O
been VBN O
found VBN O
guilty JJ O
, , O
we PRP B
could MD O
have VB O
stopped VBN O
him PRP B
. . O
'' '' O

In IN O
August NNP B
1983 CD I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
took VBD O
over IN O
as IN O
General NNP B
and CC O
de-facto JJ B
dictator NN I
of IN O
Panama NNP B
, , O
having VBG O
maneuvered VBN O
his PRP$ B
way NN I
to TO O
the DT B
top JJ I
only RB B
two CD I
years NNS I
after IN O
the DT B
mysterious JJ I
death NN I
in IN O
a DT B
plane NN I
crash NN I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
old JJ I
boss NN I
Omar NNP I
Torrijos NNP I
. . O

Soon RB O
, , O
the DT B
military NN I
became VBD O
a DT B
veritable JJ I
mafia NN I
controlling VBG O
legal JJ B
and CC I
illegal JJ I
businesses NNS I
. . O

The DT B
Reagan NNP I
administration NN I
also RB O
put VB O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
G-2 NN I
back RB O
on IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
payroll NN I
. . O

Payments NNS B
averaged VBD O
nearly RB B
$ $ I
200,000 CD I
a DT B
year NN I
from IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
Defense NNP I
Intelligence NNP I
Agency NNP I
and CC O
the DT B
CIA NNP I
. . O

Although IN O
working VBG O
for IN O
U.S. NNP B
intelligence NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
hardly RB O
helping VBG O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
exclusively RB O
. . O

During IN O
the DT B
Reagan NNP I
years NNS I
he PRP B
expanded VBD O
his PRP$ B
business NN I
and CC I
intelligence NN I
contacts NNS I
with IN O
the DT B
Cubans NNPS I
and CC O
the DT B
Sandinistas NNPS I
. . O

He PRP B
allegedly RB O
entered VBD O
into IN O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
first JJ I
formal JJ I
business NN I
arrangement NN I
with IN O
Colombian JJ B
drug NN I
bosses NNS I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
Floyd NNP B
Carlton NNP I
, , O
a DT B
pilot NN I
who WP B
once RB O
worked VBD O
for IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
and CC O
who WP B
testified VBD O
before IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
grand JJ I
jury NN I
in IN O
Miami NNP B
that WDT B
would MD O
ultimately RB O
indict VB O
the DT B
Panamanian JJ I
on IN O
drug NN B
charges NNS I
. . O

But CC O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
convinced VBN O
the DT B
Reagan NNP I
White NNP I
House NNP I
would MD O
n't RB O
act VB O
against IN O
him PRP B
, , O
recalls VBZ O
his PRP$ B
close NN I
ally NN I
Jose NNP B
Blandon NNP I
, , O
because IN O
he PRP B
had VBD O
an DT B
insurance NN I
policy NN I
: : O
his PRP$ B
involvement NN I
with IN O
the DT B
Contra NNP I
rebels NNS I
in IN O
Nicaragua NNP B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Blandon NNP I
says VBZ O
the DT B
general JJ I
allowed VBN O
the DT B
Contras NNPS I
to TO O
set VB O
up IN O
a DT B
secret JJ I
training NN I
center NN I
in IN O
Panama NNP B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
also RB O
conveyed VBD O
intelligence NN B
from IN O
his PRP$ B
spy NN I
operation NN I
inside IN O
the DT B
Nicaraguan JJ I
capital NN I
of IN O
Managua NNP B
. . O

And CC O
on IN O
at IN B
least JJS I
one CD I
occasion NN I
, , O
in IN O
the DT B
spring NN I
of IN O
1985 CD B
, , O
he PRP B
helped VBD O
arrange VB O
a DT B
sabotage NN I
attack NN I
on IN O
a DT B
Sandinista NNP I
arsenal NN I
in IN O
Nicaragua NNP B
. . O

Although IN O
, , O
his PRP$ B
help NN I
for IN O
the DT B
Contra NNP I
cause NN I
was VBD O
limited JJ O
, , O
it PRP B
was VBD O
enough RB O
to TO O
win VB O
him PRP B
important JJ B
protectors NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
Reagan NNP I
administration NN I
, , O
says VBZ O
Sen. NNP B
Patrick NNP I
Leahy NNP I
, , O
a DT B
Vermont NNP I
Democrat NNP I
who WP B
then RB O
served VBN O
on IN O
the DT B
Senate NNP I
Intelligence NNP I
Committee NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
Noriega NNP B
played VBD O
U.S. NNP B
intelligence NN I
agencies NNS I
and CC O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
government NN I
like IN O
a DT B
violin NN I
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
says VBZ O
. . O

An DT B
incident NN I
in IN O
1984 CD B
suggested VBD O
one CD B
additional JJ I
means NNS I
by IN O
which WDT B
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
might MD O
have VB O
maintained VBN O
such JJ B
influence NN I
with IN O
Washington NNP B
-- : O
by IN O
compromising VBG O
U.S. NNP B
officials NNS I
. . O

Curtin NNP B
Windsor NNP I
, , O
then RB O
the DT B
ambassador NN I
to TO O
Costa NNP B
Rica NNP I
, , O
recalls VBZ O
being VBG O
invited VBN O
to TO O
Panama NNP B
by IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
brother NN I
Luis NNP B
Carlos NNP I
for IN O
a DT B
weekend NN I
of IN O
deep JJ B
sea NN I
fishing NN I
and CC O
`` `` O
quiet JJ B
, , I
serious JJ I
conversation NN I
'' '' O
on IN O
the DT B
Aswara NNP I
Peninsula NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Windsor NNP I
notified VBD O
Everett NNP B
E. NNP I
Briggs NNP I
, , O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
ambassador NN I
to TO O
Panama NNP B
, , O
of IN O
the DT B
invitation NN I
. . O

`` `` O
Briggs NNP B
screamed VBD O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Windsor NNP I
recalls VBZ O
. . O

He PRP B
says VBZ O
Mr. NNP B
Briggs NNP I
told VBD O
him PRP B
he PRP B
was VBD O
being VBG O
set VBN O
up IN O
for IN O
a DT B
`` `` I
honey NN I
trap NN I
, , O
'' '' O
in IN O
which WDT B
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
would MD O
try VB O
to TO O
involve VB O
him PRP B
in IN O
an DT B
orgy NN I
and CC O
then JJ O
record NN O
the DT B
event NN I
`` `` O
with IN O
sound NN B
and CC I
video NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Briggs NNP I
, , O
on IN O
vacation NN B
after IN O
resigning VBG O
his PRP$ B
position NN I
at IN O
the DT B
National NNP I
Security NNP I
Council NNP I
, , O
could MD O
n't RB O
be VB O
reached VBN O
for IN O
comment NN B
. . O

As IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
political JJ I
troubles NNS I
grew VBD O
, , O
so RB O
did VBD O
his PRP$ B
offers NNS I
of IN O
assistance NN B
to TO O
the DT B
Contras NNPS I
, , O
an DT B
apparent JJ I
attempt NN I
to TO O
curry VB O
more JJR B
favor NN I
in IN O
Washington NNP B
. . O

For IN O
instance NN B
, , O
he PRP B
helped VBD O
steal VB O
the DT B
May NNP I
1984 CD I
Panamanian JJ I
elections NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
ruling NN I
party NN I
. . O

But CC O
just RB B
one CD I
month NN I
later RB O
, , O
he PRP B
also RB O
contributed VBD O
$ $ B
100,000 CD I
to TO O
a DT B
Contra NNP I
leader NN I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
documents NNS B
released VBN O
for IN O
Oliver NNP B
North NNP I
's POS B
criminal JJ I
trial NN I
in IN O
Washington NNP B
, , O
D.C NNP B
. . O

Yet RB O
, , O
his PRP$ B
political JJ I
setbacks NNS I
mounted VBN O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
accused VBN O
of IN O
ordering VBG O
in IN O
1985 CD B
the DT B
beheading NN I
of IN O
Hugo NNP B
Spadafora NNP I
, , O
his PRP$ B
most RBS I
outspoken JJ I
political JJ I
opponent NN I
and CC O
the DT B
first JJ I
man NN I
to TO O
publicly RB O
finger NN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
on IN O
drug NN B
trafficking NN I
charges NNS I
. . O

He PRP B
then RB O
ousted VBD O
President NNP B
Nicholas NNP I
Ardito NNP I
Barletta NNP I
, , O
a DT B
former JJ I
World NNP I
Bank NNP I
official NN I
with IN O
close NN B
ties NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
, , O
after IN O
Mr. NNP B
Barletta NNP I
tried VBD O
to TO O
create VB O
a DT B
commission NN I
to TO O
investigate VB O
the DT B
murder NN I
. . O

And CC O
, , O
all PDT B
the DT I
while NN I
, , O
Panama NNP B
's POS B
debt NN I
problems NNS I
continued VBD O
to TO O
grow VB O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
was VBD O
growing VBG O
desperate JJ O
. . O

In IN O
late JJ B
1986 CD I
, , O
he PRP B
made VBD O
an DT B
offer NN I
he PRP B
thought VBD O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
could MD O
n't RB O
refuse VB O
. . O

As IN O
recounted VBN O
in IN O
a DT B
stipulation NN I
that WDT B
summarized VBD O
government NN B
documents NNS I
released VBN O
for IN O
the DT B
North NNP I
trial NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
offered VBD O
to TO O
assassinate VB O
the DT B
Sandinista NNP I
leadership NN I
in IN O
exchange NN B
`` `` O
for IN O
a DT B
promise NN I
to TO O
help VB O
clean JJ O
up IN O
Noriega NNP B
's POS B
image NN I
and CC O
a DT B
commitment NN I
to TO O
lift VB O
the DT B
-LCB- ( I
U.S. NNP I
. . I
-RCB- ) I
ban NN I
on IN O
military JJ B
sales NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
Panamanian NNP I
Defense NNP I
Forces NNPS I
. . O
'' '' O

`` `` O
North NNP B
, , O
'' '' O
the DT B
document NN I
went VBD O
on IN O
, , O
referring VBG O
to TO O
Oliver NNP B
North NNP I
, , O
`` `` O
has VBZ O
told VBN O
Noriega NNP B
's POS B
representative NN I
that IN O
U.S. NNP B
law NN I
forbade VBD O
such JJ B
actions NNS I
. . O

The DT B
representative NN I
responded VBD O
that IN O
Noriega NNP B
had VBD O
numerous JJ B
assets NNS I
in IN O
place NN B
in IN O
Nicaragua NNP B
and CC O
could MD O
accomplish VB O
many JJ B
essential JJ I
things NNS I
, , O
just RB O
as IN O
Noriega NNP B
had VBD O
helped VBN O
-LCB- ( O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
. . O
-RCB- ) O
the DT B
previous JJ I
year NN I
in IN O
blowing VBG O
up IN O
a DT B
Sandinista NNP I
arsenal NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Col. NNP B
North NNP I
conveyed VBD O
the DT B
request NN I
to TO O
his PRP$ B
superiors NNS I
and CC O
to TO O
Assistant NNP O
Secretary NNP O
of IN O
State NNP B
Elliot NNP O
Abrams NNP O
, , O
who WP B
relayed VBD O
it PRP B
to TO O
Secretary NNP O
of IN O
State NNP B
George NNP O
Shultz NNP O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
proposal NN I
was VBD O
turned VBN O
down RB O
. . O

And CC O
Mr. NNP B
Shultz NNP I
curtly RB O
told VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Abrams NNP I
that IN O
the DT B
general NN I
should MD O
be VB O
told VBN O
that IN O
only RB B
he PRP I
could MD O
repair VB O
his PRP$ B
tarnished VBN I
image NN I
. . O

The DT B
end NN I
of IN O
the DT B
marriage NN I
was VBD O
at IN O
hand NN B
. . O

Within IN O
weeks NNS B
the DT B
unfolding VBG I
Iran-Contra NNP I
scandal NN I
took VBD O
away RB O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
's POS B
insurance NN I
policy NN I
. . O

The DT B
death NN I
of IN O
CIA NNP O
Director NNP O
William NNP B
Casey NNP I
and CC O
resignation NN B
of IN O
Oliver NNP B
North NNP I
allowed VBD O
anti-Noriega JJ B
political JJ I
forces NNS I
to TO O
gain VB O
influence NN B
. . O

Public JJ B
protests NNS I
against IN O
him PRP B
were VBD O
triggered VBN O
in IN O
June NNP B
1987 CD I
due JJ O
to TO O
charges NNS B
by IN O
Diaz NNP B
Herrera NNP I
, , O
his PRP$ B
former JJ I
chief NN I
of IN O
staff NN B
, , O
that IN O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
had VBD O
stolen VBN O
the DT B
1984 CD I
election NN I
and CC O
had VBD O
ordered VBN O
the DT B
killing NN I
of IN O
Messrs. NNP B
Spadafora NNP I
and CC I
Torrijos NNP I
. . O

Few NNP B
American JJ I
officials NNS I
were VBD O
willing JJ O
any RB O
longer RB O
to TO O
defend VB O
him PRP B
. . O

Lawyers NNS B
in IN O
Miami NNP B
-- : O
this DT B
time NN I
working VBG O
virtually RB O
without IN O
impediment NN B
-- : O
prepared VBN O
to TO O
have VB O
him PRP B
indicted VBN O
on IN O
drug NN B
charges NNS I
in IN O
February NNP B
1988 CD I
. . O

During IN O
negotiations NNS B
with IN O
American JJ B
officials NNS I
in IN O
May NNP B
1988 CD I
over IN O
proposals NNS B
to TO O
drop VB O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
indictments NNS I
in IN O
exchange NN B
for IN O
his PRP$ B
resignation NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
often RB O
asked VBD O
almost RB O
plaintively RB O
how WRB O
the DT B
Americans NNPS I
, , O
whom WP B
he PRP B
had VBD O
helped VBN O
for IN O
so RB B
many JJ I
years NNS I
, , O
could MD O
turn VB O
against IN O
him PRP B
. . O

Now RB O
, , O
neither DT B
side NN I
-- : O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
nor CC O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
-- : O
has VBZ O
an DT B
easy JJ I
out RB I
. . O

President NNP B
Bush NNP I
has VBZ O
sworn VBN O
to TO O
bring VB O
him PRP B
to TO O
justice NN B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
believes VBZ O
he PRP B
has VBZ O
n't RB O
any DT B
alternative NN I
but CC O
to TO O
continue VB O
clutching VBG O
to TO O
power VB B
. . O

It PRP B
is VBZ O
a DT B
knock-out JJ I
battle NN I
-- : O
perhaps RB O
to TO O
the DT B
death NN I
. . O

In IN O
the DT B
end NN I
, , O
is VBZ O
Mr. NNP B
Noriega NNP I
the DT B
political JJ I
equivalent NN I
of IN O
Frankenstein NNP B
's POS B
monster NN I
, , O
created VBN O
by IN O
a DT B
well-intentioned JJ I
but CC I
misguided JJ I
foreign JJ I
power NN I
? . O

Not RB O
quite RB O
, , O
Sen. NNP B
Leahy NNP I
contends VBZ O
. . O

`` `` O
For IN O
short-term JJ B
gains NNS I
, , O
people NNS B
were VBD O
willing JJ O
to TO O
put VB O
up IN O
with IN O
him PRP B
. . O

That DT B
allowed VBN O
him PRP B
to TO O
get VB O
stronger JJR O
and CC O
stronger JJR O
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
says VBZ O
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
do VBP O
n't RB O
think VB O
we PRP B
created VBD O
him PRP B
as RB O
much JJ O
as IN O
we PRP B
fed VBD O
him PRP B
, , O
nurtured VBD O
him PRP B
and CC O
let VB O
him PRP B
grow VB O
up VB O
to TO O
be VB O
big JJ O
and CC O
strong JJ O
. . O

UPJOHN NNP B
Co. NNP I
reported VBD O
that IN O
third-quarter JJ B
net JJ I
income NN I
rose VBD O
to TO O
$ $ B
96 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
52 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
from IN O
$ $ B
89.6 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
49 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
a DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

Yesterday NN B
's POS B
edition NN I
provided VBD O
analysts NNS B
' POS B
estimates NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
company NN I
when WRB O
actual JJ B
earnings NNS I
were VBD O
available JJ O
. . O

Industrial JJ B
production NN I
declined VBD O
0.1 CD B
% NN I
in IN O
September NNP B
, , O
reinforcing VBG O
other JJ B
signs NNS I
that IN O
the DT B
manufacturing NN I
sector NN I
continues VBZ O
its PRP$ B
slowing NN I
trend NN I
. . O

The DT B
Federal NNP I
Reserve NNP I
Board NNP I
said VBD O
output NN B
of IN O
the DT B
nation NN I
's POS B
factories NNS I
, , I
mines NNS I
and CC I
utilities NNS I
expanded VBN O
at IN O
an DT B
annual JJ I
rate NN I
of IN O
1.3 CD B
% NN I
in IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
, , O
substantially RB O
slower JJR O
than IN O
the DT B
3.3 CD I
% NN I
annual JJ I
rate NN I
in IN O
the DT B
second JJ I
quarter NN I
. . O

`` `` O
Capital NNP B
spending NN I
and CC I
exports NNS I
, , O
which WDT B
have VBP O
been VBN O
the DT B
driving VBG I
force NN I
in IN O
this DT B
expansion NN I
, , O
are VBP O
showing VBG O
clear JJ B
signs NNS I
of IN O
having VBG O
the DT B
steam NN I
taken VBN O
out IN O
of IN O
them PRP B
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Robert NNP B
Dederick NNP I
, , O
economist NN B
for IN O
Northern NNP B
Trust NNP I
Co. NNP I
in IN O
Chicago NNP B
. . O

The DT B
new JJ I
reports NNS I
of IN O
sluggishness NN B
, , O
which WDT B
were VBD O
foreshadowed VBN O
by IN O
an DT B
earlier RBR I
Labor NNP I
Department NNP I
report NN I
that IN O
manufacturing NN B
payrolls NNS I
dropped VBN O
by IN O
105,000 CD B
in IN O
September NNP B
, , O
give VB O
the DT B
Fed NNP I
another DT B
reason NN I
to TO O
further VB O
ease VB O
its PRP$ B
grip NN I
on IN O
credit NN B
and CC O
lower JJR O
interest NN B
rates NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
They PRP B
need VBP O
to TO O
do VB O
something NN B
about IN O
this DT B
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Maury NNP B
Harris NNP I
, , O
economist NN B
at IN O
PaineWebber NNP B
Group NNP I
Inc NNP I
. . O

The DT B
Fed NNP I
also RB O
said VBD O
U.S. NNP B
industry NN I
operated VBN O
at IN O
83.6 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
capacity NN B
last JJ B
month NN I
, , O
down RB O
from IN O
83.8 CD B
% NN I
in IN O
August NNP B
. . O

Measures NNS B
of IN O
manufacturing NN B
activity NN I
fell VBD O
more JJR O
than IN O
the DT B
overall JJ I
measures NNS I
. . O

Factory NN B
output NN I
dropped VBD O
0.2 CD B
% NN I
, , O
its PRP$ B
first JJ I
decline NN I
since IN O
February NNP B
, , O
after IN O
having VBG O
been VBN O
unchanged JJ O
in IN O
October NNP B
. . O

Factories NNS B
operated VBN O
at IN O
83.7 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
capacity NN B
, , O
the DT B
lowest JJS I
rate NN I
in IN O
more JJR B
than IN I
a DT I
year NN I
and CC O
down RB O
from IN O
84.1 CD B
% NN I
in IN O
September NNP B
. . O

The DT B
declines NNS I
mainly RB O
reflected VBD O
widespread JJ B
weakness NN I
in IN O
durable JJ B
goods NNS I
, , O
those DT B
intended VBN O
to TO O
last VB O
more JJR B
than IN I
three CD I
years NNS I
. . O

The DT B
biggest JJS I
drop NN I
was VBD O
recorded VBN O
by IN O
primary JJ B
metals NNS I
producers NNS I
, , O
a DT B
category NN I
that WDT B
includes VBZ O
the DT B
steel NN I
industry NN I
. . O

Output NN B
of IN O
business NN B
equipment NN I
was VBD O
unchanged JJ O
in IN O
September NNP B
. . O

Production NN B
of IN O
factory NN B
equipment NN I
, , O
one CD B
indication NN I
of IN O
the DT B
strength NN I
of IN O
manufacturers NNS B
' POS B
investment NN I
spending NN I
, , O
fell VBD O
0.3 CD B
% NN I
. . O

Some DT B
economists NNS I
expect VBP O
further JJ B
declines NNS I
in IN O
investment NN B
spending NN I
. . O

`` `` O
Whenever WRB O
corporate JJ B
profits NNS I
are VBP O
weak JJ O
that WDT B
means VBZ O
capital NN B
spending NN I
is VBZ O
going VBG O
to TO O
soften VB O
subsequently RB O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Harris NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

`` `` O
You PRP B
have VBP O
n't RB O
seen VBN O
the DT B
full JJ I
effect NN I
of IN O
that DT B
yet RB O
. . O
'' '' O

A DT B
decline NN I
in IN O
truck NN B
production NN I
more JJR O
than IN O
offset VB O
a DT B
sharp JJ I
rise NN I
in IN O
auto NN B
assemblies NNS I
, , O
the DT B
Fed NNP I
noted VBD O
. . O

Analysts NNS B
do VBP O
n't RB O
expect VB O
the DT B
September NNP I
surge NN I
in IN O
auto NN B
production NN I
to TO O
be VB O
repeated VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
coming VBG I
months NNS I
. . O

Here RB B
is VBZ O
a DT B
summary NN I
of IN O
the DT B
Federal NNP I
Reserve NNP I
Board NNP I
's POS B
report NN I
on IN O
industrial JJ B
production NN I
in IN O
September NNP B
. . O

The DT B
figures NNS I
are VBP O
seasonally RB O
adjusted VBN O
. . O

142.3 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
the DT B
1977 CD I
average JJ I
. . O

Robin NNP B
Honiss NNP I
, , O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive JJ I
officer NN I
of IN O
this DT B
bank NN I
holding VBG I
company NN I
, , O
was VBD O
elected VBN O
to TO O
the DT B
additional JJ I
posts NNS I
of IN O
chairman NN B
, , O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive NN I
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
New NNP I
England NNP I
Savings NNP I
Bank NNP I
subsidiary NN I
. . O

William NNP B
R. NNP I
Attridge NNP I
resigned VBD O
those DT B
posts NNS I
, , O
as RB O
well RB O
as IN O
a DT B
seat NN I
on IN O
NESB NNP B
's POS B
board NN I
. . O

NESB NNP B
is VBZ O
also RB O
the DT B
parent NN I
of IN O
Omnibank NNP B
. . O

Lung-cancer NN B
mortality NN I
rates NNS I
for IN O
people NNS B
under IN O
45 CD B
years NNS I
of IN O
age NN B
have VBP O
begun VBN O
to TO O
decline VB O
, , O
federal JJ B
researchers NNS I
report VBP O
. . O

The DT B
drop NN I
is VBZ O
particularly RB O
large JJ O
for IN O
white JJ B
males NNS I
, , O
although IN O
black JJ B
males NNS I
and CC O
white JJ B
and CC I
black JJ I
women NNS I
also RB O
show VBP O
lower JJR B
mortality NN I
rates NNS I
. . O

A DT B
report NN I
in IN O
this DT B
week NN I
's POS B
issue NN I
of IN O
the DT B
Journal NNP I
of IN O
the DT B
National NNP I
Cancer NNP I
Institute NNP I
also RB O
projects VBZ O
that IN O
overall JJ B
U.S. NNP I
mortality NN I
rates NNS I
from IN O
lung NN B
cancer NN I
, , O
the DT B
leading VBG I
cause NN I
of IN O
cancer NN B
death NN I
, , O
should MD O
begin VB O
to TO O
drop VB O
in IN O
several JJ B
years NNS I
if IN O
cigarette NN B
smoking NN I
continues VBZ O
to TO O
abate VB O
. . O

The DT B
report NN I
, , O
which WDT B
comes VBZ O
25 CD B
years NNS I
after IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
Surgeon NNP I
General NNP I
issued VBD O
a DT B
report NN I
warning NN O
against IN O
the DT B
dangers NNS I
of IN O
smoking NN B
, , O
is VBZ O
the DT B
strongest JJS I
indication NN I
to TO O
date VB B
that IN O
the DT B
reduction NN I
in IN O
smoking NN B
is VBZ O
leading VBG O
to TO O
lower JJR B
death NN I
rates NNS I
from IN O
lung NN B
cancer NN I
. . O

`` `` O
What WP B
this DT B
is VBZ O
saying VBG O
is VBZ O
that IN O
the DT B
surgeon NN I
general NN I
's POS B
message NN I
is VBZ O
having VBG O
an DT B
impact NN I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Melvyn NNP B
Tockman NNP I
, , O
an DT B
epidemiologist NN I
at IN O
the DT B
Johns NNP I
Hopkins NNP I
School NNP I
of IN O
Hygiene NNP B
and CC O
Public NNP B
Health NNP I
in IN O
Baltimore NNP B
. . O

The DT B
National NNP I
Cancer NNP I
Institute NNP I
report NN I
compares VBZ O
mortality NN B
rates NNS I
of IN O
two CD B
groups NNS I
of IN O
people NNS B
between IN O
the DT B
ages NNS I
of IN O
35 CD B
and CC I
44 CD I
a DT B
decade NN I
apart RB O
. . O

The DT B
death NN I
rate NN I
from IN O
lung NN B
cancer NN I
of IN O
white JJ B
males NNS I
aged VBN O
35 CD B
to TO O
44 CD B
in IN O
the DT B
mid-1970s NNS I
was VBD O
13.4 CD B
per IN O
100,000 CD B
, , O
but CC O
the DT B
mortality NN I
rate NN I
of IN O
the DT B
same JJ I
age NN I
group NN I
in IN O
the DT B
mid-1980s NNS I
was VBD O
9.6 CD B
, , O
a DT B
decline NN I
of IN O
28.7 CD B
% NN I
. . O

Measured VBN O
the DT B
same JJ I
way NN I
, , O
the DT B
decline NN I
for IN O
black JJ B
males NNS I
was VBD O
14.2 CD B
% NN I
. . O

The DT B
drop NN I
in IN O
mortality NN B
rates NNS I
for IN O
women NNS B
was VBD O
less RBR O
steep JJ O
-- : O
8.9 CD B
% NN I
for IN O
blacks NNS B
and CC O
5.3 CD B
% NN I
for IN O
whites NNS B
. . O

The DT B
study NN I
, , O
by IN O
Susan NNP B
Devesa NNP I
, , O
William NNP B
Blot NNP I
and CC O
Joseph NNP B
Fraumeni NNP I
of IN O
the DT B
institute NN I
's POS B
staff NN I
, , O
also RB O
shows VBZ O
that IN O
the DT B
incidence NN I
of IN O
lung NN B
cancer NN I
as RB O
well RB O
as IN O
the DT B
death NN I
rate NN I
declined VBD O
over IN O
the DT B
decade NN I
for IN O
all DT B
groups NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
35-44 JJ I
age NN I
bracket NN I
, , O
except IN O
black JJ B
men NNS I
. . O

Although IN O
lung-cancer NN B
mortality NN I
rates NNS I
are VBP O
increasing VBG O
for IN O
the DT B
nation NN I
as IN O
a DT B
whole NN I
, , O
the DT B
report NN I
projects VBZ O
that IN O
death NN B
rates NNS I
will MD O
begin VB O
to TO O
decline VB O
in IN O
the DT B
1990s CD I
for IN O
men NNS B
and CC O
after IN O
the DT B
year NN I
2000 CD I
for IN O
women NNS B
. . O

Lung-cancer NN B
mortality NN I
rates NNS I
increase VBP O
with IN O
age NN B
and CC O
are VBP O
continuing VBG O
to TO O
rise VB O
for IN O
all DT B
age NN I
groups NNS I
over IN O
55 NN B
, , O
with IN O
sharp JJ B
increases NNS I
for IN O
everybody NN B
but CC O
white JJ B
men NNS I
. . O

But CC O
Dr. NNP B
Fraumeni NNP I
, , O
one CD B
of IN O
the DT B
authors NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
report NN I
, , O
said VBD O
`` `` O
the DT B
declining VBG I
rates NNS I
we PRP B
're VBP O
seeing VBG O
for IN O
younger JJR B
people NNS I
we PRP B
believe VBP O
may MD O
be VB O
a DT B
harbinger NN I
of IN O
declining VBG B
mortality NN I
in IN O
the DT B
future NN I
. . O
'' '' O

However RB O
, , O
he PRP B
stressed VBD O
that IN O
the DT B
improvement NN I
depends VBZ O
on IN O
a DT B
continued VBN I
reduction NN I
in IN O
smoking NN B
. . O

`` `` O
Even RB O
though IN O
these DT B
favorable JJ I
trends NNS I
in IN O
lung-cancer NN B
mortality NN I
affect NN O
all DT B
sex NN I
and CC I
race NN I
groups NNS I
, , O
they PRP B
ca MD O
n't RB O
be VB O
taken VBN O
for IN O
granted VBN O
, , O
'' '' O
the DT B
report NN I
says NNS O
. . O

`` `` O
Smoking NNP B
prevention NN I
programs NNS I
should MD O
reach VB O
larger JJR B
segments NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
population NN I
, , O
especially RB B
children NNS I
, , I
adolescents NNS I
and CC I
minorities NNS I
. . O
'' '' O

An DT B
editorial NN I
in IN O
the DT B
NCI NNP I
Journal NNP I
says VBZ O
the DT B
report NN I
of IN O
declining VBG B
lung-cancer NN I
mortality NN I
`` `` I
among IN O
young JJ B
men NNS I
and CC I
women NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
indicates VBZ O
that IN O
we PRP B
finally RB O
may MD O
be VB O
winning VBG O
the DT B
battle NN I
-- : O
this DT B
even RB O
in IN O
a DT B
country NN I
where WRB O
the DT B
tobacco NN I
industry NN I
spends VBZ O
over IN B
$ $ I
2 CD I
billion CD I
a DT B
year NN I
for IN O
promotion NN B
of IN O
the DT B
addictive JJ I
habit NN I
of IN O
smoking NN B
. . O
'' '' O

But CC O
the DT B
editorial NN I
, , O
by IN O
Jan NNP B
Stjernsward NNP I
of IN O
the DT B
World NNP I
Health NNP I
Organization NNP I
, , O
notes VBZ O
that DT O
tobacco NN B
consumption NN I
and CC I
lung-cancer NN I
mortality NN I
rates NNS I
are VBP O
rising VBG O
in IN O
developing VBG B
countries NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
Non-smoking NN B
should MD O
be VB O
established VBN O
as IN O
the DT B
norm NN I
of IN O
social JJ B
behavior NN I
'' '' O
around IN O
the DT B
world NN I
, , O
the DT B
editorial NN I
says VBZ O
, , O
through IN O
the DT B
enactment NN I
of IN O
laws NNS B
that WDT B
limit VBP O
advertising VBG B
, , O
boost VB O
tobacco NN B
prices NNS I
and CC O
promote VB O
anti-smoking JJ B
education NN I
. . O

Asked VBN O
for IN O
comment NN B
, , O
Walker NNP B
Merryman NNP I
, , O
a DT B
vice NN I
president NN I
of IN O
the DT B
Tobacco NNP I
Institute NNP I
, , O
said VBD O
new JJ B
efforts NNS I
to TO O
restrict VB O
tobacco NN B
advertising NN I
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
could MD O
violate VB O
the DT B
First NNP I
Amendment NNP I
protection NN I
of IN O
free JJ B
speech NN I
. . O

According VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
American NNP I
Cancer NNP I
Society NNP I
, , O
smoking NN B
is VBZ O
responsible JJ O
for IN O
85 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
the DT B
lung-cancer NN I
cases NNS I
among IN O
men NNS B
and CC O
75 CD B
% NN I
among IN O
women NNS B
. . O

The DT B
NCI NNP I
report NN I
attributes VBZ O
the DT B
differences NNS I
in IN O
mortality NN B
rates NNS I
by IN O
race NN B
to TO O
different JJ B
smoking NN I
patterns NNS I
. . O

A DT B
higher JJR I
proportion NN I
of IN O
black JJ B
men NNS I
smoke VBP O
than IN O
white JJ B
men NNS I
. . O

While IN O
nearly RB B
equal JJ I
percentages NNS I
of IN O
black JJ B
and CC I
white JJ I
women NNS I
currently JJ O
smoke NN O
, , O
in IN O
both DT B
sexes NNS I
more JJR B
whites NNS I
have VBP O
given VBN O
up IN O
smoking NN B
than IN O
blacks NNS B
. . O

In IN O
comparing VBG O
changes NNS B
in IN O
mortality NN B
rates NNS I
over IN O
the DT B
past JJ I
decade NN I
, , O
the DT B
NCI NNP I
study NN I
looked VBD O
only RB O
at IN O
blacks NNS B
and CC I
whites NNS I
. . O

Asians NNS B
and CC O
native JJ B
Americans NNPS I
were VBD O
n't RB O
studied VBN O
; : O
Hispanics NNPS B
were VBD O
included VBN O
with IN O
whites NNS B
. . O

Recent JJ B
changes NNS I
in IN O
average JJ B
annual JJ I
age-specific JJ I
lung-cancer NN I
rates NNS I
per IN O
100,000 CD B
population NN I
by IN O
race NN B
and CC I
sex NN I
. . O

White NNP B
Males NNPS I

White NNP B
Females NNPS I

Black NNP B
Males NNPS I

Black NNP B
Females NNPS I

Directors NNS B
elected VBD O
R. NNP B
Marvin NNP I
Womack NNP I
, , O
currently JJ O
vice NN B
president\/product NN I
supply NN I
, , I
purchasing VBG I
, , O
to TO O
head VB O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
Washington NNP I
, , I
D.C. NNP I
, , I
office NN I
. . O

As IN O
vice NN B
president\/national-government NN I
relations NNS I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Womack NNP I
will MD O
work VB O
with IN O
P&G NNP B
's POS B
top JJ I
management NN I
and CC O
with IN O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
government-relations NNS I
staff VBP I
`` `` O
to TO O
represent VB O
P&G NNP B
's POS B
interests NNS I
at IN O
the DT B
federal JJ I
level NN I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
John NNP B
G. NNP I
Smale NNP I
, , O
chairman NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive JJ I
officer NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Smale NNP I
said VBD O
the DT B
appointment NN I
`` `` O
recognizes VBZ O
the DT B
growing VBG I
influence NN I
of IN O
government NN B
on IN O
our PRP$ B
business NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Womack NNP I
, , O
53 CD B
years NNS I
old JJ O
, , O
has VBZ O
been VBN O
with IN O
the DT B
big JJ I
producer NN I
of IN O
household NN B
products NNS I
, , O
food NN B
and CC O
pharmaceuticals NNS B
for IN O
30 CD B
years NNS I
. . O

Traders NNS B
trying VBG O
to TO O
profit VB O
from IN O
the DT B
recent JJ I
volatility NN I
in IN O
financial JJ B
markets NNS I
invaded VBD O
the DT B
Nasdaq NNP I
over-the-counter JJ I
market NN I
, , O
prompting VBG O
even RB B
more JJR I
swings NNS I
in IN O
stock NN B
prices NNS I
. . O

After IN O
gaining VBG O
strength NN B
during IN O
a DT B
brief JJ I
run-up NN I
when WRB O
trading NN B
began VBD O
, , O
the DT B
Nasdaq NNP I
Composite NNP I
Index NNP I
weakened VBD O
under IN O
selling VBG B
pressure NN I
. . O

The DT B
forces NNS I
at IN O
work NN B
included VBD O
computer-guided JJ B
trading NN I
, , O
as RB O
well RB O
as IN O
profit-driven CD B
market NN I
makers NNS I
and CC O
institutional JJ B
investors NNS I
who WP B
had VBD O
bought VBN O
stock NN B
on IN O
the DT B
cheap NN I
during IN O
the DT B
recent JJ I
correction NN I
. . O

During IN O
the DT B
last JJ I
two CD I
hours NNS I
of IN O
trading NN B
, , O
the DT B
composite JJ I
almost RB O
drew VBD O
even RB O
on IN O
the DT B
day NN I
before IN O
slipping VBG O
again RB O
. . O

The DT B
Nasdaq NNP I
Composite NNP I
closed VBD O
down RB O
1.05 CD B
, , O
or CC O
0.2 CD B
% NN I
, , O
to TO O
459.93 CD B
. . O

The DT B
action NN I
was VBD O
confined VBN O
to TO O
Nasdaq NNP B
's POS B
biggest JJS I
and CC I
most RBS I
liquid JJ I
stocks NNS I
, , O
traders NNS B
said VBD O
. . O

The DT B
Nasdaq NNP I
100 CD I
Index NNP I
began VBD O
the DT B
day NN I
at IN O
449.89 CD B
, , O
lost VBD O
2 CD B
% NN I
at IN O
one CD B
point NN I
, , O
and CC O
was VBD O
up IN O
0.4 CD B
% NN I
at IN O
another DT B
. . O

The DT B
barometer NN I
of IN O
the DT B
biggest JJS I
nonfinancial JJ I
stocks NNS I
settled VBD O
at IN O
448.49 CD B
, , O
off IN O
1.40 CD B
. . O

Its PRP$ B
counterpart NN I
, , O
the DT B
Nasdaq NNP I
Financial NNP I
Index NNP I
, , O
was VBD O
weak JJ O
for IN O
most RBS B
of IN O
the DT B
day NN I
, , O
sliding VBG O
2.51 CD B
to TO O
453.57 CD B
by IN O
the DT B
end NN I
of IN O
trading NN B
. . O

The DT B
volatility NN I
was VBD O
dizzying JJ O
for IN O
traders NNS B
. . O

`` `` O
The DT B
market NN I
must MD O
have VB O
turned VBN O
up IN O
and CC O
down RB O
15 CD B
different JJ I
times NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
commented VBD O
Lance NNP B
Zipper NNP I
, , O
head NN B
of IN O
OTC NNP B
trading NN I
at IN O
Kidder NNP B
Peabody NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
Every DT B
time NN I
you PRP B
thought VBD O
it PRP B
was VBD O
going VBG O
into IN O
a DT B
rally NN I
it PRP B
gave VBD O
up IN O
, , O
and CC O
every DT B
time NN I
you PRP B
thought VBD O
it PRP B
would MD O
rally VB O
it PRP B
came VBD O
down RB O
. . O

This DT B
is VBZ O
a DT B
tough JJ I
market NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Zipper NNP I
said VBD O
the DT B
market NN I
is VBZ O
still RB O
settling VBG O
down RB O
after IN O
the DT B
recent JJ I
correction NN I
. . O

Most JJS B
of IN O
trading NN B
action NN I
now RB O
is VBZ O
from IN O
professional JJ B
traders NNS I
who WP B
are VBP O
trying VBG O
to TO O
take VB O
advantage NN B
of IN O
the DT B
price NN I
swings NNS I
to TO O
turn VB O
a DT B
quick JJ I
profit NN I
, , O
he PRP B
and CC O
other JJ B
traders NNS I
said VBD O
. . O

`` `` O
Everybody NN B
's POS O
confused VBN O
and CC O
no DT B
one CD I
has VBZ O
an DT B
opinion NN I
that WDT B
lasts VBZ O
longer RB O
than IN O
30 CD B
seconds NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Zipper NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
A DT B
lot NN I
of IN O
the DT B
professional JJ I
traders NNS I
are VBP O
just RB O
going VBG O
back RB O
and CC O
forth RB O
. . O

They PRP B
're VBP O
just RB O
as IN O
confused VBN O
. . O
'' '' O

William NNP B
Rothe NNP I
, , O
head NN B
of IN O
OTC NNP B
trading NN I
at IN O
Alex NNP B
. . I
Brown NNP I
& CC I
Sons NNP I
, , O
in IN O
Baltimore NNP B
, , O
said VBD O
program NN B
trading NN I
is VBZ O
keeping VBG O
the DT B
markets NNS I
unsettled JJ O
. . O

He PRP B
believes VBZ O
that IN O
the DT B
volatile JJ I
conditions NNS I
created VBN O
by IN O
program NN B
trading NN I
has VBZ O
`` `` O
thoroughly RB O
confused VBN O
'' '' O
investors NNS B
about IN O
where WRB O
the DT B
market NN I
is VBZ O
headed VBN O
. . O

Program NN B
trading NN I
is VBZ O
`` `` O
benefiting VBG O
a DT B
few JJ I
to TO O
the DT B
detriment NN I
of IN O
many JJ B
and CC O
I PRP B
wish VBP O
someone NN B
would MD O
do VB O
something NN B
about IN O
it PRP B
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
complained VBD O
. . O

Trading NN B
activity NN I
cooled VBN O
off IN O
from IN O
Monday NNP B
's POS B
sizzling JJ I
pace NN I
. . O

Share NN B
turnover NN I
subsided VBD O
to TO O
161.5 CD B
million CD I
. . O

Advancing VBG B
and CC I
declining VBG I
issues NNS I
finished VBD O
about IN O
even RB O
. . O

Of IN O
the DT B
4,345 CD I
stocks NNS I
that WDT B
changed VBD O
hands NNS B
, , O
1,174 CD B
declined VBD O
and CC O
1,040 CD B
advanced VBD O
. . O

One CD B
big JJ I
technology NN I
issue NN I
, , O
Novell NNP B
, , O
rode VBD O
the DT B
roller NN I
coaster NN I
. . O

The DT B
stock NN I
, , O
which WDT B
finished VBD O
Monday NNP B
at IN O
29 CD B
1\/2 CD I
, , O
traded VBD O
as RB O
high JJ O
as IN O
29 CD B
3\/4 CD I
and CC O
as RB O
low JJ O
as IN O
28 CD B
3\/4 CD I
before IN O
closing VBG O
at IN O
29 CD B
1\/4 CD I
, , O
down RB O
1\/4 CD B
. . O

It PRP B
was VBD O
a DT B
jarring VBG I
day NN I
for IN O
investors NNS B
in IN O
Genetics NNP B
Institute NNP I
. . O

The DT B
stock NN I
tumbled VBD O
2 CD B
3\/4 CD I
on IN O
news NN B
that IN O
it PRP B
might MD O
have VB O
to TO O
take VB O
a DT B
charge NN I
against IN O
earnings NNS B
if IN O
it PRP B
ca MD O
n't RB O
successfully RB O
resolve VB O
a DT B
dispute NN I
with IN O
its PRP$ B
European JJ I
licensee NN I
, , O
Boehringer NNP B
Mannheim NNP I
, , O
over IN O
its PRP$ B
anti-anemia NN I
drug NN I
, , O
EPO NNP B
. . O

The DT B
stock NN I
recovered VBD O
somewhat RB O
to TO O
finish VB O
1 CD B
1\/4 CD I
lower JJR O
at IN O
26 CD B
1\/4 CD I
. . O

In IN O
a DT B
statement NN I
, , O
Genetics NNP B
Institute NNP I
said VBD O
the DT B
dispute NN I
with IN O
Boehringer NNP B
centers NNS O
on IN O
questions NNS B
of IN O
the DT B
usability NN I
of IN O
certain JJ B
batches NNS I
of IN O
EPO NNP B
material NN I
valued VBN O
at IN O
$ $ B
13.6 CD I
million CD I
. . O

Earlier RBR O
this DT B
week NN I
, , O
Genetics NNP B
Institute NNP I
reported VBD O
wider JJR B
losses NNS I
in IN O
its PRP$ B
fiscal JJ I
third JJ I
quarter NN I
ended VBN O
Aug. NNP B
31 CD I
. . O

Price NNP B
Co. NNP I
jumped VBD O
2 CD B
1\/4 CD I
to TO O
44 CD B
on IN O
1.7 CD B
million CD I
shares NNS I
. . O

The DT B
wholesaler NN I
of IN O
cash NN B
and CC I
carry VB I
merchandise NN I
reported VBD O
fiscal JJ B
fourthquarter NN I
earnings NNS I
that WDT B
were VBD O
better JJR O
than IN O
analysts NNS B
had VBD O
expected VBN O
. . O

The DT B
company NN I
also RB O
pleased VBD O
analysts NNS B
by IN O
announcing VBG O
four CD B
new JJ I
store NN I
openings NNS I
planned VBN O
for IN O
fiscal JJ B
1990 CD I
, , O
ending VBG O
next JJ B
August NNP I
. . O

That DT B
will MD O
bring VB O
the DT B
total NN I
for IN O
the DT B
year NN I
to TO O
10 CD B
, , O
from IN O
five CD B
during IN O
fiscal JJ B
1989 CD I
. . O

`` `` O
Every DT B
year NN I
we PRP B
've VBP O
been VBN O
waiting VBG O
for IN O
stepped-up JJ B
expansion NN I
from IN O
the DT B
company NN I
. . O

The DT B
news NN I
could MD O
n't RB O
have VB O
been VBN O
better JJR O
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Linda NNP B
Kristiansen NNP I
, , O
a DT B
Dean NNP I
Witter NNP I
Reynolds NNP I
analyst NN I
, , O
in IN O
an DT B
interview NN I
. . O

Intermec NNP B
, , O
a DT B
maker NN I
of IN O
optical JJ B
character-recognition NN I
devices NNS I
, , O
also RB O
reported VBD O
higher JJR B
third-quarter JJ I
earnings NNS I
. . O

Its PRP$ B
shares NNS I
added VBD O
3\/4 CD B
to TO O
30 CD B
3\/4 CD I
. . O

But CC O
favorable JJ B
earnings NNS I
was VBD O
n't RB O
a DT B
guarantee NN I
that IN O
a DT B
stock NN I
's POS B
price NN I
would MD O
improve VB O
yesterday NN B
. . O

MCI NNP B
Communications NNPS I
tumbled VBD O
2 CD B
5\/8 CD I
to TO O
42 CD B
3\/8 CD I
on IN O
4.7 CD B
million CD I
shares NNS I
even RB O
though IN O
the DT B
telecommunications NNS I
giant NN I
reported VBD O
a DT B
63 CD I
% NN I
increase NN I
in IN O
third-quarter JJ B
profit NN I
. . O

CoreStates NNP B
Financial NNP I
slipped VBD O
3\/8 CD B
to TO O
43 CD B
1\/8 CD I
in IN O
active JJ B
trading NN I
after IN O
reporting VBG O
that IN O
third-quarter JJ B
earnings NNS I
improved VBN O
to TO O
$ $ B
1.27 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
from IN O
$ $ B
1.15 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
a DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

However RB O
, , O
the DT B
bank NN I
holding VBG I
company NN I
's POS B
loan-loss NN I
reserves NNS I
rose VBD O
to TO O
$ $ B
177.3 CD I
million CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
154 CD I
million CD I
a DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

A&W NNP B
Brands NNP I
lost VBD O
1\/4 CD B
to TO O
27 CD B
. . O

But CC O
its PRP$ B
thirdquarter JJ I
earnings NNS I
rose VBD O
to TO O
26 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
from IN O
18 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
last JJ B
year NN I
. . O

Capital NNP B
Associates NNPS I
dropped VBD O
1 CD B
to TO O
5 VB B
3\/8 CD I
. . O

The DT B
company NN I
, , O
which WDT B
leases VBZ O
technology NN B
equipment NN I
, , O
reported VBD O
substantially RB B
lower JJR I
net JJ I
income NN I
for IN O
its PRP$ B
fiscal JJ I
first JJ I
quarter NN I
, , O
which WDT B
ended VBN O
Aug. NNP B
31 CD I
. . O

Robert NNP B
M. NNP I
Jelenic NNP I
, , O
39 CD B
, , O
was VBD O
named VBN O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
operating VBG I
officer NN I
of IN O
this DT B
closely RB I
held VBN I
publisher NN I
. . O

The DT B
post NN I
had VBD O
been VBN O
vacant JJ O
for IN O
more JJR B
than IN I
a DT I
year NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Jelenic NNP I
had VBD O
been VBN O
executive JJ B
vice NN I
president NN I
for IN O
operations NNS B
. . O

In IN O
addition NN B
, , O
Ralph NNP B
Ingersoll NNP I
II NNP I
, , O
43 CD B
, , O
chairman NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive NN I
, , O
said VBD O
he PRP B
would MD O
take VB O
on IN O
additional JJ B
responsibilities NNS I
as IN O
editor NN B
in IN O
chief NN B
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
. . O

John NNP B
Wilpers NNP I
resigned VBD O
as IN O
editor NN B
in IN O
chief NN B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Ingersoll NNP I
remains VBZ O
editor NN B
in IN O
chief NN B
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
recently RB I
launched VBN I
daily JJ I
, , O
the DT B
St. NNP I
Louis NNP I
Sun NNP I
. . O

Also RB O
, , O
Jean NNP B
B. NNP I
Clifton NNP I
, , O
28 CD B
, , O
was VBD O
named VBN O
executive JJ B
vice NN I
president NN I
, , O
treasurer NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
financial JJ I
officer NN I
. . O

Michael NNP B
Applebaum NNP I
resigned VBD O
after IN O
less JJR B
than IN I
a DT I
year NN I
in IN O
the DT B
posts NNS I
. . O

Ms. NNP B
Clifton NNP I
had VBD O
been VBN O
executive NN B
financial JJ I
assistant NN I
to TO O
the DT B
chairman NN I
. . O

Certainly RB O
conservative JJ B
environmentalists NNS I
can MD O
defend VB O
their PRP$ B
limited JJ I
government NN I
position NN I
by IN O
differentiating VBG O
between IN O
Old NNP B
Environmentalism NNP I
and CC O
New NNP B
Environmentalism NNP I
-LRB- ( O
`` `` O
Journalists NNS B
and CC I
Others NNS I
for IN O
Saving VBG O
the DT B
Planet NNP I
, , O
'' '' O
by IN O
David NNP B
Brooks NNP I
, , O
editorial NN B
page NN I
, , O
Oct. NNP B
5 NN I
-RRB- ) O
. . O

Old NNP B
Environmentalism NNP I
involved VBD O
microbe NN B
hunters NNS I
and CC O
sanitationists NNS B
. . O

It PRP B
started VBD O
with IN O
improvements NNS B
in IN O
hygiene NN B
made VBD O
possible JJ O
by IN O
affordable JJ B
soap NN I
and CC O
washable JJ B
underwear NN I
during IN O
the DT B
Industrial NNP I
Revolution NNP I
. . O

Then RB O
cast-iron NN B
sewer NN I
pipe NN I
and CC O
the DT B
flush JJ I
toilet NN I
were VBD O
followed VBN O
by IN O
sewage NN B
- : I
and CC I
water-treatment NN I
plants NNS I
toward IN O
the DT B
end NN I
of IN O
the DT B
19th JJ I
century NN I
. . O

Medicine NNP B
in IN O
the DT B
19th JJ I
century NN I
was VBD O
dedicated VBN O
mostly RB O
to TO O
combating VBG O
sepsis NN B
and CC O
diagnostic JJ B
analysis NN I
. . O

Then RB O
the DT B
20th JJ I
century NN I
saw VBD O
the DT B
evolution NN I
of IN O
private-sector JJ B
wonder NN I
drugs NNS I
, , O
which WDT B
promulgated VBD O
medical JJ B
therapy NN I
. . O

The DT B
process NN I
dramatically RB O
increased VBD O
our PRP$ B
average JJ I
life NN I
expectancy NN I
, , O
eliminated VBN O
much JJ B
pain NN I
and CC O
constantly RB O
improved VBN O
health NN B
and CC I
well-being NN I
. . O

Most JJS B
public-health JJ I
measures NNS I
were VBD O
handled VBN O
at IN O
the DT B
local JJ I
level NN I
. . O

New NNP B
Environmentalism NNP I
probably RB O
started VBD O
in IN O
1962 CD B
with IN O
the DT B
publication NN I
of IN O
Rachel NNP B
Carson NNP I
's POS B
book NN I
`` `` O
Silent NNP B
Spring NNP I
. . O
'' '' O

Shortly RB O
thereafter RB O
, , O
hysterical JJ B
articles NNS I
began VBD O
to TO O
appear VB O
predicting VBG O
that WDT O
advanced VBD B
industrial JJ I
societies NNS I
would MD O
produce VB O
a DT B
blackened VBN I
, , I
uninhabitable JJ I
planet NN I
possibly RB O
by IN O
the DT B
turn NN I
of IN O
the DT B
century NN I
. . O

These DT B
apocalyptic JJ I
predictions NNS I
were VBD O
advanced VBN O
by IN O
such JJ B
stalwarts NNS I
as IN O
Paul NNP B
Ehrlich NNP I
, , O
Barry NNP B
Commoner NNP I
, , O
Rene NNP B
Dubois NNP I
and CC O
George NNP B
Wald NNP I
. . O

Writing VBG O
in IN O
the DT B
1960s CD I
Ms. NNP B
Carson NNP I
suggested VBD O
that IN O
the DT B
human JJ I
race NN I
could MD O
be VB O
eliminated VBN O
in IN O
20 CD B
years NNS I
, , O
and CC O
Mr. NNP B
Wald NNP I
suggested VBD O
that DT O
life NN B
on IN O
earth NN B
might MD O
end VB O
by IN O
1985 CD B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Ehrlich NNP I
predicted VBD O
unprecedented JJ B
famine NN I
by IN O
1980 CD B
. . O

There EX B
were VBD O
many RB B
more JJR I
. . O

Thousands NNS B
of IN O
chemical NN B
products NNS I
were VBD O
categorized VBN O
as IN O
carcinogenic JJ O
, , O
with IN O
recommendations NNS B
that IN O
they PRP B
be VBP O
banned VBN O
from IN O
industrial JJ B
use NN I
because IN O
they PRP B
produced VBD O
malignant JJ B
tumors NNS I
in IN O
overdosed VBN B
rats NNS I
. . O

Unknown JJ O
before IN O
1960 CD B
were VBD O
the DT B
inconclusive JJ I
effects NNS I
of IN O
acid NN B
rain NN I
, , O
greenhouse NN B
warming NN I
and CC O
ozone NN B
depletion NN I
, , O
all DT O
of IN O
which WDT B
required VBD O
burgeoning VBG B
political JJ I
power NN I
and CC O
gargantuan JJ B
expense NN I
. . O

Meanwhile RB O
, , O
the DT B
New NNP I
Environmentalists NNS I
systematically RB O
opposed VBN O
the DT B
methods NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
Old NNP I
Environmentalists NNS I
. . O

Local JJ B
pollution NN I
problems NNS I
require VBP O
cheap JJ B
energy NN I
and CC O
capital NN B
for IN O
their PRP$ B
solution NN I
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
New NNP I
Environmentalists NNS I
oppose VBP O
private JJ B
wealth NN I
creation NN I
-LRB- ( O
which WDT B
, , O
they PRP B
claim VBP O
, , O
depletes VBZ O
natural JJ B
resources NNS I
-RRB- ) O
and CC O
nuclear JJ B
power NN I
-LRB- ( O
even RB O
though IN O
it PRP B
would MD O
counteract VB O
the DT B
greenhouse NN I
effect NN I
-RRB- ) O
. . O

They PRP B
are VBP O
in IN O
the DT B
forefront NN I
of IN O
opposing VBG O
the DT B
search NN I
for IN O
new JJ B
landfills NNS I
and CC I
methods NNS I
of IN O
incineration NN B
and CC O
even RB O
oppose VB O
new JJ B
methods NNS I
of IN O
research NN B
such JJ O
as IN O
genetic JJ B
engineering NN I
. . O

New NNP B
Environmentalism NNP I
is VBZ O
an DT B
emotional JJ I
attack NN I
on IN O
proven VBN B
methods NNS I
of IN O
improving VBG O
our PRP$ B
quality NN I
of IN O
life NN B
and CC O
a DT B
bid NN I
for IN O
political JJ B
power NN I
. . O

Let VB O
's POS B
rationalize VB O
our PRP$ B
priorities NNS I
by IN O
solving VBG O
pollution NN B
problems NNS I
at IN O
the DT B
local JJ I
level NN I
as IN O
heretofore RB O
. . O

Harry NNP B
Lee NNP I
Smith NNP I
Alpharetta NNP B
, , O
Ga NNP B
. . O

Your PRP$ B
story NN I
missed VBD O
some DT B
essential JJ I
points NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
conference NN I
on IN O
`` `` O
The DT B
Global NNP I
Environment NNP I
: : O
Are VBP O
We PRP B
Overreacting VBG O
? . O
'' '' O

First NNP O
and CC O
foremost JJ O
, , O
the DT B
vignettes NNS I
presented VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
various JJ I
scientists NNS I
represent VBP O
a DT B
general JJ I
consensus NN I
among IN O
specialists NNS B
working VBG O
in IN O
the DT B
respective JJ I
aspects NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
global JJ I
environment NN I
. . O

Consider VB O
, , O
for IN O
example NN B
, , O
the DT B
greenhouse NN I
effect NN I
and CC O
climate NN B
change NN I
; : O
numerous JJ B
blue-ribbon JJ I
scientific JJ I
committees NNS I
, , O
including VBG O
one CD B
from IN O
the DT B
National NNP I
Academy NNP I
of IN O
Science NNP B
, , O
judge NN O
there EX B
is VBZ O
a DT B
greater JJR I
than IN I
50 CD I
% NN I
probability NN I
of IN O
a DT B
grave JJ I
problem NN I
in IN O
the DT B
offing NN I
. . O

The DT B
point NN I
was VBD O
to TO O
answer VB O
the DT B
question NN I
in IN O
the DT B
conference NN I
title NN I
, , O
not RB O
to TO O
try VB O
to TO O
create VB O
news NN B
stories NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
event NN I
itself PRP I
. . O

Nor CC O
was VBD O
it PRP B
intended VBD O
to TO O
dictate VB O
a DT B
set NN I
of IN O
prescriptive JJ B
solutions NNS I
, , O
although IN O
various JJ B
points NNS I
were VBD O
raised VBN O
. . O

Each DT B
speaker NN I
was VBD O
asked VBN O
to TO O
address VB O
a DT B
specific JJ I
topic NN I
, , O
not RB O
deliver VB O
a DT B
point NN I
of IN O
view NN B
. . O

Each DT B
scientist NN I
independently RB O
concluded VBD O
society NN B
and CC I
government NN I
are VBP O
underreacting VBG O
when WRB O
it PRP B
comes VBZ O
to TO O
substantive JJ B
policy NN I
change NN I
. . O

This DT B
leads VBZ O
to TO O
a DT B
very RB I
special JJ I
sense NN I
of IN O
urgency NN B
. . O

If IN O
the DT B
media NNS I
decide VBP O
to TO O
work VB O
harder JJR O
at IN O
educating VBG O
the DT B
public NN I
about IN O
these DT B
complex JJ I
and CC I
technical JJ I
issues NNS I
, , O
that IN B
hardly RB O
can MD O
be VB O
termed VBN O
non-objective JJ B
journalism NN I
. . O

The DT B
environment NN I
can MD O
no RB O
longer RB O
be VB O
a DT B
normal JJ I
issue NN I
, , O
to TO O
be VB O
dealt VBN O
with IN O
on IN O
a DT B
business-as-usual JJ I
basis NN I
with IN O
comfortable JJ B
increments NNS I
of IN O
change NN B
. . O

We PRP B
have VBP O
literally RB O
altered VBN O
the DT B
chemistry NN I
and CC I
physics NN I
of IN O
our PRP$ B
planet NN I
's POS B
atmosphere NN I
. . O

This DT B
portends VBZ O
consequences NNS B
from IN O
what WP B
we PRP B
have VBP O
already RB O
done VBN O
that WDT B
will MD O
be VB O
very RB O
destabilizing VBG O
to TO O
social JJ B
and CC I
economic JJ I
systems NNS I
. . O

The DT B
problems NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
environment NN I
are VBP O
so RB O
interrelated VBN O
, , O
so RB O
inextricably RB O
entwined VBN O
with IN O
our PRP$ B
current JJ I
way NN I
of IN O
life NN B
and CC O
so RB O
large JJ O
that IN O
it PRP B
is VBZ O
unlikely JJ O
we PRP B
will MD O
be VB O
able JJ O
to TO O
address VB O
them PRP B
effectively RB O
unless IN O
major JJ B
changes NNS I
are VBP O
made VBN O
in IN O
less JJR B
than IN I
10 CD I
years NNS I
. . O

The DT B
consensus NN I
from IN O
the DT B
scientific JJ I
community NN I
is VBZ O
that IN O
there EX B
is VBZ O
sufficient JJ B
evidence NN I
to TO O
advise VB O
major JJ B
policy NN I
changes NNS I
. . O

No DT O
, , O
we PRP B
are VBP O
not RB O
overreacting VBG O
. . O

Thomas NNP B
E. NNP I
Lovejoy NNP I
Assistant NNP B
Secretary NNP I
for IN O
External NNP B
Affairs NNP I
Smithsonian NNP B
Institution NNP I

Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
Inc. NNP I
, , O
fulfilling VBG O
its PRP$ B
dismal JJ I
earnings NNS I
forecast NN I
for IN O
1989 CD B
, , O
said VBD O
its PRP$ B
third-quarter JJ I
net JJ I
income NN I
fell VBD O
68 CD B
% NN I
on IN O
flat JJ B
revenue NN I
. . O

Stung VBN O
by IN O
higher JJR B
marketing NN I
costs NNS I
and CC O
slowing VBG B
volume NN I
growth NN I
, , O
the DT B
giant NN I
Coke NNP I
bottling NN I
operation NN I
said VBD O
net NN B
fell VBD O
to TO O
$ $ B
12.7 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
six CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
from IN O
$ $ B
39.9 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
26 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
the DT B
year NN I
earlier RBR O
. . O

The DT B
results NNS I
met VBD O
estimates NNS B
of IN O
analysts NNS B
, , O
who WP B
had VBD O
already RB O
slashed VBN O
their PRP$ B
projections NNS I
after IN O
the DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
in IN O
late JJ B
August NNP I
that IN O
its PRP$ B
1989 CD I
earnings NNS I
could MD O
tumble VB O
as RB B
much JJ I
as IN I
37 CD I
% NN I
. . O

A DT B
company NN I
spokesman NN I
said VBD O
yesterday NN B
that IN O
Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
sticks NNS O
by IN O
its PRP$ B
1989 CD I
forecast NN I
. . O

Third-quarter JJ B
revenue NN I
was VBD O
flat JJ O
at IN O
$ $ B
1.02 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

The DT B
year-ago JJ I
results NNS I
, , O
however RB O
, , O
included VBD O
the DT B
operations NNS I
of IN O
a DT B
bottling NN I
business NN I
, , O
which WDT B
was VBD O
sold VBN O
last JJ B
December NNP I
. . O

Excluding VBG O
that DT B
bottling NN I
business NN I
, , O
Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
' POS B
volume NN I
, , O
measured VBN O
by IN O
cases NNS B
of IN O
soda NN B
, , O
rose VBD O
only RB B
1 CD I
% NN I
. . O

The DT B
volume NN I
is VBZ O
well RB O
below IN O
the DT B
industry NN I
's POS B
4 CD I
% NN I
to TO I
5 VB I
% NN I
growth NN I
rate NN I
of IN O
recent JJ B
years NNS I
, , O
but CC O
in IN O
line NN B
with IN O
other JJ B
soft-drink NN I
companies NNS I
for IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
. . O

The DT B
latest JJS I
third-quarter JJ I
volume NN I
also RB O
compares VBZ O
with IN O
a DT B
very RB I
strong JJ I
10 CD I
% NN I
growth NN I
in IN O
the DT B
year-ago JJ I
quarter NN I
. . O

Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
blamed VBD O
the DT B
lower JJR I
volume NN I
on IN O
its PRP$ B
soft-drink NN I
prices NNS I
, , O
which WDT B
were VBD O
about IN O
3 CD O
% NN O
higher JJR O
in IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
. . O

Consumers NNS B
have VBP O
been VBN O
accustomed VBN O
to TO O
buying VBG O
soft-drinks NNS B
at IN O
discounted VBN B
prices NNS I
for IN O
several JJ B
years NNS I
. . O

Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
said VBD O
it PRP B
had VBD O
to TO O
boost VB O
spending NN B
for IN O
trade NN B
and CC I
dealer NN I
incentives NNS I
to TO O
try VB O
to TO O
keep VB O
volumes NNS B
from IN O
slipping VBG O
. . O

The DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
it PRP B
expects VBZ O
consumers NNS B
will MD O
adjust VB O
to TO O
higher-priced JJ B
soft JJ I
drinks NNS I
. . O

A DT B
spokesman NN I
attributed VBD O
the DT B
bulk NN I
of IN O
a DT B
14 CD I
% NN I
increase NN I
in IN O
selling VBG B
, , I
administrative JJ I
and CC I
general JJ I
expenses NNS I
-- : O
to TO O
$ $ B
324.9 CD I
million CD I
-- : O
to TO O
marketing NN B
costs NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
They PRP B
're VBP O
out IN O
there RB B
promoting VBG O
like IN O
crazy JJ O
, , O
trying VBG O
to TO O
get VB O
prices NNS B
up IN O
by IN O
promotion NN B
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Roy NNP B
Burry NNP I
, , O
an DT B
analyst NN I
with IN O
Kidder NNP B
, , I
Peabody NNP I
& CC I
Co NNP I
. . O

For IN O
the DT B
nine CD I
months NNS I
, , O
Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
' POS B
net NN I
fell VBD O
31 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
65 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
39 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
from IN O
$ $ B
93.8 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
63 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

Revenue NN B
was VBD O
flat JJ O
at IN O
about RB B
$ $ I
2.97 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
, , O
which WDT B
is VBZ O
49%-owned JJ O
by IN O
Coca-Cola NNP B
Co. NNP I
, , O
also RB O
said VBD O
it PRP B
repurchased VBD O
about IN B
1.2 CD I
million CD I
of IN O
its PRP$ B
common JJ I
shares NNS I
during IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
. . O

The DT B
buy-back NN I
is VBZ O
part NN B
of IN O
a DT B
25-million-share JJ I
repurchase NN I
plan NN I
, , O
under IN O
which WDT B
Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
so RB O
far RB O
has VBZ O
acquired VBN O
a DT B
total NN I
of IN O
9.7 CD B
million CD I
shares NNS I
. . O

Separately RB O
, , O
Purchase NNP B
, , I
N.Y.-based JJ I
PepsiCo NNP I
Inc. NNP I
, , O
as IN O
expected VBN O
, , O
said VBD O
fiscal JJ B
third-quarter JJ I
net NN I
rose VBD O
11 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
269.3 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
1.02 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
from IN O
$ $ B
241.6 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
91 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

Sales NNS B
rose VBD O
25 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
3.90 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
3.13 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

The DT B
year-ago JJ I
quarter NN I
's POS B
results NNS I
include VBP O
an DT B
after-tax JJ I
charge NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
5.9 CD I
million CD I
from IN O
the DT B
sale NN I
of IN O
a DT B
winery NN I
in IN O
Spain NNP B
. . O

In IN O
composite JJ B
trading NN I
on IN O
the DT B
New NNP I
York NNP I
Stock NNP I
Exchange NNP I
, , O
Coca-Cola NNP B
Enterprises NNPS I
closed VBD O
at IN O
$ $ B
16.375 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
down RB O
62.5 CD B
cents NNS I
. . O

PepsiCo NNP B
closed VBD O
at IN O
$ $ B
58.50 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
up IN O
$ $ B
1.375 CD I
. . O

L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
Corp. NNP I
is VBZ O
expected VBN O
to TO O
reach VB O
an DT B
agreement NN I
in IN O
principle NN B
this DT B
week NN I
to TO O
sell VB O
Merksamer NNP B
Jewelers NNP I
Inc. NNP I
to TO O
management NN B
, , O
say VBP O
executives NNS B
familiar JJ O
with IN O
the DT B
talks NNS I
. . O

L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
, , O
based VBN O
in IN O
Atlanta NNP B
, , O
filed VBN O
for IN O
Chapter NN B
11 CD I
bankruptcy NN I
protection NN I
earlier RBR O
this DT B
year NN I
. . O

Currently RB O
, , O
its PRP$ B
parent NN I
company NN I
, , O
Hooker NNP B
Corp. NNP I
of IN O
Sydney NNP B
, , O
Australia NNP B
, , O
is VBZ O
being VBG O
managed VBN O
by IN O
a DT B
court-appointed JJ I
liquidator NN I
. . O

It PRP B
is VBZ O
expected VBN O
that IN O
GE NNP B
Capital NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
financial-services NNS I
subsidiary NN I
of IN O
General NNP B
Electric NNP I
Co. NNP I
, , O
will MD O
provide VB O
much NN O
of IN O
the DT B
funding NN I
for IN O
the DT B
proposed VBN I
leveraged JJ I
buy-out NN I
of IN O
Merksamer NNP B
, , O
based VBN O
in IN O
Sacramento NNP B
, , O
Calif NNP B
. . O

A DT B
spokesman NN I
for IN O
GE NNP B
Capital NNP I
declined VBD O
to TO O
comment VB O
. . O

GE NNP B
Capital NNP I
has VBZ O
a DT B
working VBG I
relationship NN I
with IN O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
. . O

It PRP B
is VBZ O
providing VBG O
$ $ B
50 CD I
million CD I
in IN O
emergency NN B
financing NN I
to TO O
the DT B
company NN I
and CC O
has VBZ O
agreed VBN O
to TO O
buy VB O
as RB B
much JJ I
as IN O
$ $ B
75 CD I
million CD I
in IN O
receivables NN B
from IN O
B. NNP B
Altman NNP I
& CC I
Co. NNP I
and CC O
Bonwit NNP B
Teller NNP I
, , O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
's POS B
two CD I
fully RB I
owned VBN I
department-store NN I
chains NNS I
. . O

Sam NNP B
Merksamer NNP I
, , O
chief JJ B
executive JJ I
officer NN I
of IN O
the DT B
nationwide JJ I
jewelry NN I
chain NN I
, , O
and CC O
Sanford NNP B
Sigoloff NNP I
, , O
chief JJ B
executive NN I
of IN O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
both DT B
declined VBD O
to TO O
comment VB O
. . O

Currently RB O
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Merksamer NNP I
owns VBZ O
20 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
the DT B
company NN I
; : O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
acquired VBD O
its PRP$ B
80 CD I
% NN I
interest NN I
in IN O
the DT B
firm NN I
in IN O
May NNP B
1986 CD I
. . O

At IN O
the DT B
time NN I
, , O
the DT B
Merksamer NNP I
chain NN I
had VBD O
11 CD B
stores NNS I
in IN O
operation NN B
. . O

Today NN B
, , O
there EX B
are VBP O
77 CD B
units NNS I
, , O
all DT B
located VBN O
in IN O
shopping NN B
malls NNS I
. . O

In IN O
recent JJ B
weeks NNS I
Mr. NNP B
Merksamer NNP I
has VBZ O
approached VBN O
a DT B
number NN I
of IN O
his PRP$ B
suppliers NNS I
and CC O
asked VBD O
them PRP B
to TO O
provide VB O
letters NNS B
of IN O
intent NN B
saying VBG O
they PRP B
will MD O
continue VB O
shipping VBG O
merchandise NN B
to TO O
the DT B
chain NN I
following VBG O
the DT B
buy-out NN I
, , O
say VBP O
those DT B
familiar NN O
with IN O
the DT B
situation NN I
. . O

This DT B
year NN I
, , O
a DT B
number NN I
of IN O
retail JJ B
leveraged JJ I
buyouts NNS I
have VBP O
failed VBN O
, , O
causing VBG O
jitters NNS B
among IN O
suppliers NNS B
, , O
and CC O
Mr. NNP B
Merksamer NNP I
apparently RB O
wanted VBD O
assurances NNS B
that IN O
he PRP B
wo MD O
n't RB O
have VB O
delivery NN B
problems NNS I
. . O

For IN O
the DT B
year NN I
ended VBN O
June NNP B
30 CD I
, , I
1989 CD I
, , O
Merksamer NNP B
Jewelers NNPS I
had VBD O
$ $ B
62 CD I
million CD I
of IN O
revenue NN B
and CC O
operating VBG B
profit NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
2.5 CD I
million CD I
. . O

The DT B
jewelery NN I
chain NN I
was VBD O
put VBN O
up IN O
for IN O
sale NN B
in IN O
June NNP B
. . O

According VBG O
to TO O
those DT B
familiar NN O
with IN O
the DT B
situation NN I
, , O
other JJ B
bidders NNS I
included VBD O
Ratners NNP B
Group NNP I
PLC NNP I
of IN O
London NNP B
and CC O
Kay NNP B
Jewelers NNP I
Inc NNP I
. . O

First NNP B
Boston NNP I
Corp. NNP I
is VBZ O
advising VBG O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
on IN O
the DT B
sale NN I
of IN O
the DT B
Merksamer NNP I
business NN I
. . O

Merksamer NNP B
was VBD O
the DT B
first JJ I
in IN O
a DT B
series NN I
of IN O
retail JJ B
acquisitions NNS I
made VBN O
by IN O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
. . O

The DT B
company NN I
was VBD O
founded VBN O
in IN O
Sacramento NNP B
in IN O
1929 CD B
by IN O
two CD B
brothers NNS I
, , O
Ralph NNP B
and CC I
Walter NNP I
Merksamer NNP I
, , O
who WP B
operated VBD O
as IN O
DeVon NNP B
's POS B
Jewelers NNPS I
. . O

In IN O
1979 CD B
, , O
the DT B
pair NN I
split NN O
the DT B
company NN I
in IN O
half NN B
, , O
with IN O
Walter NNP B
and CC O
his PRP$ B
son NN I
, , O
Sam NNP B
, , O
agreeing VBG O
to TO O
operate VB O
under IN O
the DT B
Merksamer NNP I
Jewelery NNP I
name NN I
. . O

The DT B
sale NN I
of IN O
Merksamer NNP B
Jewelers NNPS I
is VBZ O
subject NN O
to TO O
approval NN B
by IN O
Judge NNP B
Tina NNP I
Brozman NNP I
of IN O
U.S. NNP B
Bankruptcy NNP I
Court NNP I
. . O

As IN O
earlier RBR O
reported VBD O
, , O
L.J. NNP B
Hooker NNP I
this DT B
week NN I
received VBD O
a DT B
$ $ I
409 CD I
million CD I
bid NN I
for IN O
its PRP$ B
three CD I
shopping NN I
malls NNS I
, , O
plus CC O
other JJ B
properties NNS I
from IN O
a DT B
consortium NN I
led VBN O
by IN O
Honolulu NNP B
real-estate NN I
investor NN I
Jay NNP I
Shidler NNP I
and CC O
A. NNP B
Boyd NNP I
Simpson NNP I
, , O
an DT B
Atlanta NNP I
developer NN I
and CC O
former JJ B
L.J. NNP I
Hooker NNP I
senior JJ I
executive NN I
. . O

The DT B
offer NN I
, , O
which WDT B
did VBD O
n't RB O
include VB O
the DT B
Merksamer NNP I
chain NN I
, , O
is VBZ O
being VBG O
reviewed VBN O
by IN O
Mr. NNP B
Sigoloff NNP I
. . O

Robert NNP B
J. NNP I
Regal NNP I
was VBD O
named VBN O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive JJ I
officer NN I
of IN O
this DT B
company NN I
's POS B
Universal-Rundle NNP I
Corp. NNP I
unit NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Regal NNP I
had VBD O
been VBN O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive NN I
of IN O
RBS NNP B
Industries NNP I
Inc NNP I
. . O

Robert NNP B
H. NNP I
Carlson NNP I
, , O
previous JJ B
president NN I
and CC I
chief JJ I
executive NN I
of IN O
Universal-Rundle NNP B
, , O
will MD O
assume VB O
the DT B
title NN I
of IN O
chairman NN B
of IN O
the DT B
unit NN I
, , O
a DT B
vitreous-china NN I
maker NN I
. . O

The DT B
days NNS I
may MD O
be VB O
numbered VBN O
for IN O
animated JJ B
shows NNS I
featuring VBG O
Alf NNP B
, , O
the DT B
Karate NNP I
Kid NNP I
and CC O
the DT B
Chipmunks NNPS I
. . O

NBC NNP B
, , O
a DT B
leader NN I
in IN O
morning NN B
, , I
prime-time JJ I
and CC I
late JJ I
night NN I
programs NNS I
but CC O
an DT B
also-ran NN I
on IN O
Saturday NNP B
mornings NNS I
, , O
when WRB O
children NNS B
rule VBP O
the DT B
TV NN I
set VBN I
, , O
is VBZ O
contemplating VBG O
getting VBG O
out IN O
of IN O
the DT B
cartoon NN I
business NN I
. . O

Instead RB O
, , O
network NN B
officials NNS I
say VBP O
, , O
it PRP B
may MD O
`` `` O
counterprogram VB O
'' '' O
with IN O
shows VBZ B
for IN O
an DT B
audience NN I
that WDT B
is VBZ O
virtually RB O
ignored VBN O
in IN O
that DT B
time NN I
period NN I
: : O
adults NNS B
. . O

`` `` O
There EX B
is VBZ O
talk VB B
of IN O
some DT B
revamping VBG I
and CC O
we PRP B
're VBP O
certainly RB O
heading VBG O
in IN O
the DT B
direction NN I
of IN O
less JJR B
and CC I
less JJR I
animation NN I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Joseph NNP B
S. NNP I
Cicero NNP I
, , O
vice NN B
president NN I
of IN O
finance NN B
and CC I
administration NN I
for IN O
National NNP B
Broadcasting NNP I
Co. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
unit NN I
of IN O
General NNP B
Electric NNP I
Co NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Cicero NNP I
said VBD O
that IN O
NBC NNP B
Entertainment NNP I
president NNP I
Brandon NNP I
Tartikoff NNP I
, , O
who WP B
declined VBD O
to TO O
be VB O
interviewed VBN O
, , O
is VBZ O
`` `` O
looking VBG O
at IN O
options NNS B
now RB O
and CC O
may MD O
put VB O
some DT B
things NNS I
into IN O
the DT B
schedule NN I
by IN O
mid-season NN B
. . O
'' '' O

He PRP B
declined VBD O
to TO O
elaborate VB O
. . O

NBC NNP B
's POS B
options NNS I
could MD O
range VB O
from IN O
news-oriented JJ B
programming NN I
to TO O
sports NNS B
shows VBZ I
, , O
although IN O
the DT B
network NN I
declined VBD O
to TO O
comment VB O
. . O

One CD B
major JJ I
NBC NNP I
affiliate NN I
, , O
KCRA NNP B
in IN O
Sacramento NNP B
, , O
plans VBZ O
to TO O
cancel VB O
the DT B
NBC NNP I
Saturday NNP I
morning NN I
line-up NN I
as IN O
of IN O
January NNP B
and CC O
replace VB O
it PRP B
with IN O
a DT B
local JJ I
newscast NN I
. . O

The DT B
one-hour JJ I
program NN I
will MD O
be VB O
repeated VBN O
with IN O
updates NNS B
throughout IN O
Saturday NNP B
mornings NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
feel VBP O
there EX B
is VBZ O
an DT B
opportunity NN I
for IN O
an DT B
audience NN I
that WDT B
is VBZ O
not RB O
being VBG O
served VBN O
by IN O
any DT B
network NN I
, , O
so IN O
we PRP B
want VBP O
to TO O
take VB O
the DT B
lead NN I
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
KCRA NNP B
's POS B
general JJ I
manager NN I
, , O
John NNP B
Kueneke NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
do VBP O
n't RB O
need VB O
cartoons NNS B
anymore RB O
. . O

They PRP B
only RB O
accounted VBD O
for IN O
5 NN B
% NN I
, , O
at IN O
best JJS O
, , O
of IN O
the DT B
station NN I
's POS B
total JJ I
revenues NNS I
. . O
'' '' O

An DT B
NBC NNP I
spokesman NN I
says VBZ O
the DT B
network NN I
will MD O
`` `` O
closely RB O
monitor VB O
'' '' O
the DT B
Sacramento NNP I
situation NN I
, , O
and CC O
says VBZ O
it PRP B
is VBZ O
the DT B
only JJ I
station NN I
to TO O
defect VB O
. . O

Spokesmen NNS B
for IN O
the DT B
television NN I
networks NNS I
of IN O
CBS NNP B
Inc. NNP I
and CC O
Capital NNP B
Cities\/ABC NNP I
Inc. NNP I
, , O
say VBP O
there EX B
are VBP O
no DT B
plans NNS I
to TO O
alter VB O
the DT B
children NNS I
's POS B
line-up NN I
on IN O
Saturday NNP B
mornings NNS I
. . O

The DT B
youthful JJ I
audience NN I
for IN O
Saturday NNP B
programming NN I
is VBZ O
no RB O
longer RB O
dependent JJ O
on IN O
the DT B
networks NNS I
. . O

There EX B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
a DT B
surge NN I
in IN O
syndicated VBN O
children NNS B
's POS I
shows VBZ O
to TO O
independent JJ B
stations NNS I
, , O
as RB O
well RB O
as IN O
competition NN B
from IN O
videocassettes NNS B
for IN O
kids NNS B
and CC O
from IN O
cable NN B
outlets NNS I
such JJ O
as IN O
Nickelodeon NNP B
and CC O
the DT B
Disney NNP I
Channel NNP I
. . O

At IN O
the DT B
same JJ I
time NN I
, , O
there EX B
appears VBZ O
to TO O
be VB O
a DT B
market NN I
for IN O
news-oriented JJ B
programming NN I
; : O
Turner NNP B
Broadcasting NNP I
System NNP I
Inc. NNP I
's POS B
Cable NNP I
News NNP I
Network NNP I
has VBZ O
its PRP$ B
highest JJS I
ratings NNS I
, , O
outside IN O
of IN O
prime JJ B
time NN I
, , O
on IN O
Saturday NNP B
mornings NNS I
. . O

NBC NNP B
has VBZ O
on IN O
previous JJ B
occasions NNS I
considered VBN O
replacing VBG O
cartoons NNS B
with IN O
a DT B
Saturday NNP I
version NN I
of IN O
`` `` O
Today NN B
, , O
'' '' O
which WDT B
is VBZ O
produced VBN O
by IN O
NBC NNP B
News NNP I
. . O

The DT B
network NN I
's POS B
own JJ I
production NN I
company NN I
, , O
NBC NNP B
Productions NNPS I
, , O
supplies VBZ O
a DT B
half-hour NN I
family-oriented JJ I
show NN I
titled VBN O
`` `` O
Saved NNP O
By IN O
The DT B
Bell NNP I
. . O
'' '' O

NBC NNP B
Productions NNPS I
or CC O
NBC NNP B
News NNP I
could MD O
supply VB O
the DT B
network NN I
with IN O
other JJ B
Saturday NNP I
morning NN I
shows VBZ I
, , O
a DT B
move NN I
that WDT B
would MD O
control VB O
costs NNS B
. . O

Animated JJ B
shows NNS I
, , O
which WDT B
are VBP O
made VBN O
by IN O
outside IN B
production NN I
companies NNS I
, , O
cost NN O
the DT B
network NN I
about RB B
$ $ I
300,000 CD I
per IN O
episode NN B
. . O

Rohm NNP B
& CC I
Haas NNP I
Co. NNP I
said VBD O
third-quarter JJ B
net JJ I
income NN I
skidded VBD O
35 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
32.6 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
49 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

In IN O
the DT B
year-earlier JJ I
quarter NN I
, , O
the DT B
chemicals NNS I
company NN I
had VBD O
net NN B
of IN O
$ $ B
49.8 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
75 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

Sales NNS B
were VBD O
$ $ B
623 CD I
million CD I
, , O
up IN O
0.5 CD B
% NN I
from IN O
$ $ B
619.8 CD I
million CD I
a DT B
year NN I
ago RB O
. . O

Rohm NNP B
& CC I
Haas NNP I
, , O
which WDT B
plans VBZ O
to TO O
start VB O
operating VBG O
seven CD B
new JJ I
production NN I
units NNS I
this DT B
year NN I
, , O
attributed VBD O
the DT B
profit NN I
slide NN I
partly RB O
to TO O
higher JJR B
start-up JJ I
expense NN I
. . O

The DT B
company NN I
also RB O
cited VBD O
the DT B
stronger JJR I
dollar NN I
, , O
which WDT B
cuts VBZ O
the DT B
value NN I
of IN O
overseas JJ B
profit NN I
when WRB O
it PRP B
is VBZ O
translated VBN O
into IN O
dollars NNS B
. . O

In IN O
addition NN B
, , O
the DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
, , O
it PRP B
was VBD O
hurt VBN O
by IN O
higher JJR B
than IN I
previous-year JJ I
costs NNS I
for IN O
raw JJ B
materials NNS I
, , O
though IN O
those DT B
costs NNS I
have VBP O
declined VBN O
since IN O
the DT B
second JJ I
quarter NN I
. . O

Incrementally RB B
higher JJR I
production NN I
of IN O
those DT B
chemicals NNS I
which WDT B
remain VBP O
in IN O
heavy JJ B
demand NN I
also RB O
has VBZ O
forced VBN O
up IN O
costs NNS B
, , O
such JJ O
as IN O
overtime NN B
pay NN I
. . O

For IN O
the DT B
nine CD I
months NNS I
, , O
Rohm NNP B
& CC I
Haas NNP I
net NN I
totaled VBD O
$ $ B
155 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
2.33 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
down RB O
17 CD B
% NN I
from IN O
$ $ B
187.8 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
2.82 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
a DT B
year NN I
ago RB O
. . O

Sales NNS B
rose VBD O
5.2 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
2.04 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
1.94 CD I
billion CD I
the DT B
previous JJ I
year NN I
. . O

In IN O
New NNP B
York NNP I
Stock NNP I
Exchange NNP I
composite JJ I
trading NN I
, , O
Rohm NNP B
& CC I
Haas NNP I
closed VBD O
at IN O
$ $ B
33 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
down RB O
$ $ B
1.75 CD I
. . O

Michael NNP B
A. NNP I
Gaskin NNP I
, , O
55 NN B
years NNS I
old JJ O
, , O
was VBD O
named VBN O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive JJ I
officer NN I
of IN O
this DT B
manufacturer NN I
of IN O
industrial JJ B
robots NNS I
, , O
succeeding VBG O
Walter NNP B
K. NNP I
Weisel NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Weisel NNP I
, , O
49 CD B
, , O
resigned VBD O
as IN O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive NN I
and CC O
will MD O
work VB O
on IN O
special JJ B
projects NNS I
, , O
said VBD O
John NNP B
J. NNP I
Wallace NNP I
, , O
chairman NN B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Gaskin NNP I
formerly RB O
was VBD O
president NN B
and CC O
chief JJ B
executive NN I
of IN O
Taylor NNP B
& CC I
Gaskin NNP I
Inc. NNP I
and CC O
was VBD O
a DT B
director NN I
of IN O
Prab NNP B
Robots NNP I
since IN O
1985 CD B
. . O

Stephen NNP B
N. NNP I
Wertheimer NNP I
was VBD O
named VBN O
managing VBG B
director NN I
and CC O
group NN B
head NN I
of IN O
investment NN B
banking NN I
in IN O
Asia NNP B
, , O
based VBN O
in IN O
Tokyo NNP B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Wertheimer NNP I
, , O
38 CD B
years NNS I
old JJ O
, , O
had VBD O
been VBN O
a DT B
first JJ I
vice NN I
president NN I
in IN O
the DT B
industrial JJ I
group NN I
in IN O
investment NN B
banking NN I
. . O

He PRP B
succeeds VBZ O
Everett NNP B
Meyers NNP I
, , O
who WP B
resigned VBD O
in IN O
May NNP B
. . O

This DT B
is VBZ O
written VBN O
to TO O
correct VB O
a DT B
misquotation NN I
in IN O
your PRP$ B
Oct. NNP I
3 CD I
article NN I
`` `` O
Deaths NNP B
From IN O
Advanced NNP B
Colon NNP I
Cancer NNP I
Can MD O
Be VB O
Reduced NNP O
by IN O
Using VBG O
Two CD B
Drugs NNS I
. . O
'' '' O

In IN O
this DT B
article NN I
, , O
I PRP B
was VBD O
alleged VBN O
to TO O
have VB O
said VBD O
, , O
`` `` O
Any DT B
patient NN I
with IN O
high-risk JJ B
colon NN I
cancer NN I
is VBZ O
really RB O
getting VBG O
short JJ B
shrift NN I
if IN O
he PRP B
's VBZ O
not RB O
getting VBG O
this DT B
therapy NN I
. . O
'' '' O

I PRP B
did VBD O
n't RB O
say VB O
this DT B
, , O
and CC O
I PRP B
'm VBP O
totally RB O
opposed VBN O
to TO O
the DT B
philosophy NN I
expressed VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
quote NN I
. . O

I PRP B
have VBP O
not RB O
offered VBN O
and CC O
will MD O
not RB O
offer VB O
routine JJ B
therapy NN I
with IN O
the DT B
two CD I
drugs NNS I
, , O
levamisole NN B
and CC I
5-fluorouracil JJ I
, , O
to TO O
any DT B
of IN O
my PRP$ B
colon-cancer NN I
patients NNS I
. . O

With IN O
this DT B
treatment NN I
we PRP B
have VBP O
reduced VBN O
deaths NNS B
in IN O
high-risk JJ B
colon NN I
cancer NN I
by IN O
one-third NN B
-- : O
but CC O
this DT B
leaves VBZ O
the DT B
two-thirds NNS I
who WP B
are VBP O
dying VBG O
of IN O
cancer NN B
. . O

This DT B
is VBZ O
not RB O
nearly RB O
good JJ O
enough RB O
. . O

I PRP B
believe VBP O
any DT B
physician NN I
who WP B
truly RB O
cares VBZ O
about IN O
cancer NN B
patients NNS I
, , O
both DT B
today NN I
and CC I
tomorrow NN I
, , O
should MD O
offer VB O
the DT B
hope NN I
of IN O
something NN B
better JJR O
than IN O
that DT B
. . O

My PRP$ B
statement NN I
, , O
read VB O
verbatim RB O
from IN O
a DT B
printed VBN I
text NN I
available JJ O
to TO O
all DT B
reporters NNS I
attending VBG O
the DT B
National NNP I
Cancer NNP I
Institute NNP I
news NN I
conference NN I
, , O
was VBD O
the DT B
following VBG I
: : O
`` `` O
New NNP B
clinical JJ I
trials NNS I
are VBP O
already RB O
in IN O
operation NN B
seeking VBG O
to TO O
improve VB O
these DT B
results NNS I
. . O

These DT B
research NN I
protocols NNS I
offer VBP O
to TO O
the DT B
patient NN I
not RB O
only RB O
the DT B
very RB I
best JJS I
therapy NN I
which WDT B
we PRP B
have VBP O
established VBN O
today NN B
but CC O
also RB O
the DT B
hope NN I
of IN O
something NN B
still RB O
better JJR O
. . O

I PRP B
feel VBP O
any DT B
patient NN I
with IN O
high-risk JJ B
cancer NN I
is VBZ O
getting VBG O
short JJ B
shrift NN I
if IN O
he PRP B
is VBZ O
not RB O
offered VBN O
this DT B
opportunity NN I
. . O
'' '' O

We PRP B
have VBP O
very RB B
exciting JJ I
prospects NNS I
for IN O
far RB B
more RBR I
impressive JJ I
advances NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
treatment NN I
of IN O
colon NN B
cancer NN I
during IN O
the DT B
years NNS I
immediately RB O
ahead RB O
. . O

This DT B
hope NN I
, , O
however RB O
, , O
will MD O
never RB O
be VB O
realized VBN O
if IN O
we PRP B
use VBP O
levamisole NN B
and CC I
5-fluorouracil JJ I
as IN O
a DT B
stopping VBG I
point NN I
. . O

Charles NNP B
G. NNP I
Moertel NNP I
M.D NNP I
. . I
Mayo NNP B
Clinic NNP I
Rochester NNP B
, , O
Minn NNP B
. . O

The DT B
oil NN I
and CC I
auto NN I
industries NNS I
, , O
united VBN O
in IN O
their PRP$ B
dislike NN I
of IN O
President NNP B
Bush NNP I
's POS B
proposal NN I
for IN O
cars NNS B
that WDT B
run VBP O
on IN O
alternative NN B
fuels NNS I
, , O
announced VBD O
a DT B
joint JJ I
research NN I
program NN I
that WDT B
could MD O
turn VB O
up IN O
a DT B
cleaner-burning JJ I
gasoline NN I
. . O

Officials NNS B
of IN O
the DT B
Big NNP I
Three CD I
auto NN I
makers NNS I
and CC O
14 CD B
petroleum NN I
companies NNS I
said VBD O
they PRP B
are VBP O
setting VBG O
out IN O
to TO O
find VB O
the DT B
most RBS I
cost-effective JJ I
fuel NN I
for IN O
reducing VBG O
cities NNS B
' POS B
air-pollution NN I
problems NNS I
, , O
with IN O
no DT B
bias NN I
toward IN O
any DT B
fuel NN I
in IN O
particular NN B
. . O

However RB O
, , O
their PRP$ B
search NN I
notably RB O
wo MD O
n't RB O
include VB O
natural JJ B
gas NN I
or CC O
pure JJ B
methanol NN I
-- : O
the DT B
two CD I
front-running JJ I
alternative NN I
fuels NNS I
-- : O
in IN O
tests NNS B
to TO O
be VB O
completed VBN O
by IN O
next JJ B
summer NN I
. . O

Instead RB O
, , O
the DT B
tests NNS I
will MD O
focus VB O
heavily RB O
on IN O
new JJ B
blends NNS I
of IN O
gasoline NN B
, , O
which WDT B
are VBP O
still RB O
undeveloped JJ O
but CC O
which WDT B
the DT B
petroleum NN I
industry NN I
has VBZ O
been VBN O
touting VBG O
as IN O
a DT B
solution NN I
for IN O
automobile NN B
pollution NN I
that WDT B
is VBZ O
choking VBG O
urban JJ B
areas NNS I
. . O

Environmentalists NNS B
criticized VBD O
the DT B
program NN I
as IN O
merely RB B
a DT I
public-relations NNS I
attempt VBP I
to TO O
head VB O
off IN O
a DT B
White NNP I
House NNP I
proposal NN I
to TO O
require VB O
a DT B
million CD I
cars NNS I
a DT B
year NN I
that WDT B
run VBP O
on IN O
cleaner-burning JJ B
fuels NNS I
by IN O
1997 CD B
. . O

While IN O
major JJ B
oil NN I
companies NNS I
have VBP O
been VBN O
experimenting VBG O
with IN O
cleaner-burning JJ B
gasoline NN I
blends NNS I
for IN O
years NNS B
, , O
only RB B
Atlantic NNP I
Richfield NNP I
Co. NNP I
is VBZ O
now RB O
marketing VBG O
a DT B
lower-emission NN I
gasoline NN I
for IN O
older JJR B
cars NNS I
currently RB O
running VBG O
on IN O
leaded JJ B
fuel NN I
. . O

The DT B
initial JJ I
$ $ I
11 CD I
million CD I
research NN I
program NN I
will MD O
conduct VB O
the DT B
most RBS I
extensive JJ I
testing NN I
to TO O
date VB B
of IN O
reformulated VBN B
gasolines NNS I
, , O
said VBD O
Joe NNP B
Colucci NNP I
, , O
head NN B
of IN O
fuels NNS B
and CC I
lubricants NNS I
at IN O
General NNP B
Motors NNPS I
Corp. NNP I
research NN I
laboratories NNS I
. . O

It PRP B
will MD O
compare VB O
21 CD B
different JJ I
blends NNS I
of IN O
gasolines NNS B
with IN O
three CD B
mixtures NNS I
of IN O
up IN B
to TO I
85 CD I
% NN I
methanol NN I
. . O

A DT B
second JJ I
phase NN I
of IN O
research NN B
, , O
which WDT B
is VBZ O
still RB O
being VBG O
planned VBN O
, , O
will MD O
test VB O
reformulated VBN B
gasolines NNS I
on IN O
newer JJR B
engine NN I
technologies NNS I
now RB O
being VBG O
developed VBN O
for IN O
use NN B
in IN O
1992 CD B
or CC I
1993 CD I
cars NNS I
. . O

There EX B
was VBD O
no DT B
cost NN I
estimate NN I
for IN O
the DT B
second JJ I
phase NN I
. . O

`` `` O
The DT B
whole JJ I
idea NN I
here RB I
is VBZ O
the DT B
automobile NN I
and CC I
oil NN I
companies NNS I
have VBP O
joint JJ B
customers NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Keith NNP B
McHenry NNP I
, , O
a DT B
senior JJ I
vice NN I
president NN I
of IN O
technology NN B
at IN O
Amoco NNP B
Corp NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
And CC O
we PRP B
are VBP O
looking VBG O
for IN O
the DT B
most RBS I
cost-effective JJ I
way NN I
to TO O
clean VB O
up IN O
the DT B
air NN I
. . O
'' '' O

But CC O
David NNP B
Hawkins NNP I
, , O
an DT B
environmental JJ I
lawyer NN I
with IN O
the DT B
Natural NNP I
Resources NNP I
Defense NNP I
Council NNP I
, , O
said VBD O
the DT B
research NN I
appears VBZ O
merely RB O
to TO O
be VB O
a DT B
way NN I
to TO O
promote VB O
reformulated VBN B
gasoline NN I
. . O

Oil NNP B
and CC I
auto NN I
companies NNS I
supported VBD O
a DT B
move NN I
on IN O
Capitol NNP B
Hill NNP I
last JJ B
week NN I
to TO O
gut VB O
Mr. NNP B
Bush NNP I
's POS B
plans NNS I
to TO O
require VB O
auto NN B
makers NNS I
to TO O
begin VB O
selling VBG O
alternative-fueled JJ B
cars NNS I
by IN O
1995 CD B
. . O

Instead RB O
, , O
a DT B
House NNP I
subcommittee NN I
adopted VBD O
a DT B
clean-fuels NNS I
program VBP I
that WDT B
specifically RB O
mentions VBZ O
reformulated VBN B
gasoline NN I
as IN O
an DT B
alternative NN I
. . O

The DT B
Bush NNP I
administration NN I
has VBZ O
said VBD O
it PRP B
will MD O
try VB O
to TO O
resurrect VB O
its PRP$ B
plan NN I
when WRB O
the DT B
House NNP I
Energy NNP I
and CC I
Commerce NNP I
Committee NNP I
takes VBZ O
up IN O
a DT B
comprehensive JJ I
clean-air JJ I
bill NN I
. . O

William NNP B
Seidman NNP I
, , O
chairman NN B
of IN O
the DT B
Federal NNP I
Deposit NNP I
Insurance NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
said VBD O
Lincoln NNP B
Savings NNP I
& CC I
Loan NNP I
Association NNP I
should MD O
have VB O
been VBN O
seized VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
government NN I
in IN O
1986 CD B
to TO O
contain VB O
losses NNS B
that IN B
he PRP B
estimated VBD O
will MD O
cost VB O
taxpayers NNS B
as RB B
much JJ I
as IN I
$ $ I
2 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
, , O
who WP B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
the DT B
nation NN I
's POS B
top JJ I
bank NN I
regulator NN I
, , O
inherited VBD O
the DT B
problems NNS I
of IN O
Lincoln NNP B
, , O
based VBN O
in IN O
Irvine NNP B
, , O
Calif. NNP B
, , O
after IN O
his PRP$ B
regulatory JJ I
role NN I
was VBD O
expanded VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
new JJ I
savings-and-loan JJ I
bailout NN I
law NN I
. . O

He PRP B
made VBD O
his PRP$ B
comments NNS I
before IN O
House NNP B
Banking NNP I
Committee NNP I
hearings NNS I
to TO O
investigate VB O
what WP B
appears VBZ O
to TO O
be VB O
the DT B
biggest JJS I
thrift NN I
disaster NN I
in IN O
a DT B
scandal-ridden JJ I
industry NN I
. . O

The DT B
inquiry NN I
also RB O
will MD O
cover VB O
the DT B
actions NNS I
of IN O
Charles NNP B
Keating NNP I
Jr. NNP I
, , O
who WP B
is VBZ O
chairman NN B
of IN O
American NNP B
Continental NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
Lincoln NNP B
's POS B
parent NN I
, , O
and CC O
who WP B
contributed VBD O
heavily RB O
to TO O
several JJ B
U.S. NNP I
senators NNS I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
told VBD O
the DT B
committee NN I
that IN O
the DT B
Resolution NNP I
Trust NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
the DT B
agency NN I
created VBN O
to TO O
sell VB O
sick JJ B
thrifts NNS I
, , O
has VBZ O
studied VBN O
Lincoln NNP B
's POS B
examination NN I
reports NNS I
by IN O
former JJ B
regulators NNS I
dating VBG O
back RB O
to TO O
1986 CD B
. . O

`` `` O
My PRP$ B
staff NN I
indicated VBD O
that WDT O
had VBD O
we PRP B
made VBD O
such JJ B
findings NNS I
in IN O
one CD B
of IN O
our PRP$ B
own JJ I
institutions NNS I
, , O
we PRP B
would MD O
have VB O
sought VBN O
an DT B
immediate JJ I
cease-and-desist JJ I
order NN I
to TO O
stop VB O
the DT B
hazardous JJ I
operations NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

When WRB O
Lincoln NNP B
was VBD O
seized VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
government NN I
, , O
for IN O
example NN B
, , O
15 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
its PRP$ B
loans NNS I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
250 CD I
million CD I
, , O
were VBD O
to TO O
borrowers NNS B
who WP B
were VBD O
buying VBG O
real JJ B
estate NN I
from IN O
one CD B
of IN O
American NNP B
Continental NNP I
's POS B
50 CD I
other JJ I
subsidiaries NNS I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
government NN I
did VBD O
n't RB O
step VB O
in IN O
until IN O
six CD B
months NNS I
ago RB O
, , O
when WRB O
thrift NN B
officials NNS I
put VBP O
Lincoln NNP B
into IN O
conservatorship NN B
-- : O
the DT B
day NN I
after IN O
American NNP B
Continental NNP I
filed VBD O
for IN O
Chapter NN B
11 CD I
bankruptcy NN I
protection NN I
from IN O
creditors NNS B
. . O

The DT B
bankruptcy NN I
filing NN I
, , O
the DT B
government NN I
has VBZ O
charged VBN O
in IN O
a DT B
$ $ I
1.1 CD I
billion CD I
civil JJ I
lawsuit NN I
, , O
was VBD O
part NN B
of IN O
a DT B
pattern NN I
to TO O
shift VB O
insured VBN B
deposits NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
parent NN I
company NN I
, , O
which WDT B
used VBD O
the DT B
deposits NNS I
as IN O
a DT B
cache NN I
for IN O
real-estate NN B
deals NNS I
. . O

The DT B
deposits NNS I
that WDT B
have VBP O
been VBN O
transferred VBN O
to TO O
other JJ B
subsidiaries NNS I
are VBP O
now RB O
under IN O
the DT B
jurisdiction NN I
of IN O
the DT B
bankruptcy NN I
court NN I
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
think VBP O
it PRP B
's VBZ O
fairly RB O
clear JJ O
-LCB- ( O
Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
-RCB- ) O
knew VBD O
, , O
'' '' O
that IN O
regulators NNS B
were VBD O
set VBN O
to TO O
seize VB O
Lincoln NNP B
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
said VBD O
. . O

Further JJ B
investigation NN I
, , O
he PRP B
said VBD O
, , O
may MD O
result VB O
in IN O
further JJ B
actions NNS I
against IN O
Lincoln NNP B
's POS B
executives NNS I
, , O
said VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
, , O
`` `` O
including VBG O
fraud NN B
actions NNS I
. . O
'' '' O

Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
, , O
for IN O
his PRP$ B
part NN I
, , O
has VBZ O
filed VBN O
suit NN B
alleging VBG O
that IN O
regulators NNS B
unlawfully RB O
seized VBN O
the DT B
thrift NN I
. . O

Leonard NNP B
Bickwit NNP I
, , O
an DT B
attorney NN I
in IN O
Washington NNP B
for IN O
Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
, , O
declined VBD O
to TO O
comment VB O
on IN O
the DT B
hearings NNS I
, , O
except VB O
to TO O
say VB O
, , O
`` `` O
We PRP B
will MD O
be VB O
responding VBG O
comprehensively RB O
in IN O
several JJ B
forums NNS I
to TO O
each DT B
of IN O
these DT B
allegations NNS I
at IN O
the DT B
appropriate JJ I
time NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Lincoln NNP B
's POS B
treatment NN I
by IN O
former JJ B
thrift NN I
regulators NNS I
, , O
in IN O
an DT B
agency NN I
disbanded VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
new JJ I
law NN I
, , O
has VBZ O
proved VBN O
embarrassing JJ O
for IN O
five CD B
senators NNS I
who WP B
received VBD O
thousands NNS B
of IN O
dollars NNS B
in IN O
campaign NN B
contributions NNS I
from IN O
Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
said VBD O
yesterday NN B
, , O
for IN O
example NN B
, , O
that IN O
Sen. NNP B
Dennis NNP I
DeConcini NNP I
-LRB- ( O
D. NNP B
, , O
Ariz. NNP B
-RRB- ) O
, , O
who WP B
received VBD O
$ $ B
48,100 CD I
in IN O
contributions NNS B
from IN O
Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
, , O
phoned VBD O
Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
to TO O
request VB O
that IN O
he PRP B
push VBP O
for IN O
a DT B
sale NN I
of IN O
Lincoln NNP B
before IN O
it PRP B
would MD O
be VB O
seized VBN O
. . O

After IN O
the DT B
government NN I
lawsuit NN I
was VBD O
filed VBN O
against IN O
Lincoln NNP B
, , O
Sen. NNP B
DeConcini NNP I
returned VBD O
the DT B
campaign NN I
contributions NNS I
. . O

The DT B
senator NN I
's POS B
spokesman NN I
said VBD O
yesterday NN B
that IN O
he PRP B
pushed VBD O
for IN O
the DT B
sale NN I
of IN O
Lincoln NNP B
because IN O
`` `` O
hundreds NNS B
of IN O
Arizona NNP B
jobs NNS I
-LCB- ( O
at IN O
Lincoln NNP B
-RCB- ) O
were VBD O
on IN O
the DT B
line NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Senate NNP B
Banking NNP I
Committee NNP I
Chairman NNP I
Donald NNP I
Riegle NNP I
-LRB- ( O
D. NNP B
, , O
Mich NNP B
. . I
-RRB- ) O
has VBZ O
also RB O
returned VBN O
contributions NNS B
he PRP B
received VBD O
from IN O
Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
a DT B
year NN I
ago RB O
. . O

Sens. NNP O
John NNP O
Glenn NNP O
-LRB- ( O
D. NNP B
, , O
Ohio NNP B
-RRB- ) O
, , O
John NNP O
McCain NNP O
, , O
-LRB- ( O
R. NNP B
, , O
Ariz. NNP B
-RRB- ) O
and CC O
Alan NNP O
Cranston NNP O
-LRB- ( O
D. NNP B
, , O
Calif. NNP B
-RRB- ) O
also RB O
received VBD O
substantial JJ B
contributions NNS I
from IN O
Mr. NNP B
Keating NNP I
and CC O
sought VBD O
to TO O
intervene VB O
on IN O
behalf NN B
of IN O
Lincoln NNP B
. . O

House NNP B
Banking NNP I
Committee NNP I
Chairman NNP I
Henry NNP I
Gonzalez NNP I
-LRB- ( O
D. NNP B
, , O
Texas NNP B
-RRB- ) O
said VBD O
Sen. NNP B
Cranston NNP I
volunteered VBD O
to TO O
appear VB O
before IN O
the DT B
House NNP I
committee NN I
, , O
if IN O
necessary JJ O
. . O

But CC O
a DT B
committee NN I
staff NN I
member NN I
said VBD O
the DT B
panel NN I
is VBZ O
unlikely JJ O
to TO O
pursue VB O
closely RB O
the DT B
role NN I
of IN O
the DT B
senators NNS I
. . O

At IN O
the DT B
hearing NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Seidman NNP I
said VBD O
the DT B
RTC NNP I
has VBZ O
already RB O
pumped VBN O
$ $ B
729 CD I
million CD I
into IN O
Lincoln NNP B
for IN O
liquidity NN B
. . O

He PRP B
also RB O
held VBD O
out IN O
little JJ B
hope NN I
of IN O
restitution NN B
for IN O
purchasers NNS B
of IN O
$ $ B
225 CD I
million CD I
in IN O
American NNP B
Continental NNP I
subordinated VBD I
debt NN I
. . O

Some DT B
of IN O
those DT B
debtholders NNS I
have VBP O
filed VBN O
a DT B
suit NN I
, , O
saying VBG O
they PRP B
believed VBD O
they PRP B
were VBD O
buying VBG O
government-insured JJ B
certificates NNS I
of IN O
deposit NN B
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
have VBP O
no DT B
plans NNS I
at IN O
this DT B
time NN I
to TO O
pay VB O
off IN O
those DT B
notes NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
said VBD O
. . O

Eastern NNP B
Airlines NNPS I
' POS B
creditors NNS I
committee NN I
, , O
unhappy JJ O
with IN O
the DT B
carrier NN I
's POS B
plans NNS I
for IN O
emerging VBG O
from IN O
bankruptcy-law NN B
proceedings NNS I
, , O
asked VBD O
its PRP$ B
own JJ I
experts NNS I
to TO O
devise VB O
alternate JJ B
approaches NNS I
to TO O
a DT B
reorganization NN I
. . O

Representatives NNS B
of IN O
the DT B
accounting NN I
firm NN I
of IN O
Ernst NNP B
& CC I
Young NNP I
and CC O
the DT B
securities NNS I
firm NN I
of IN O
Goldman NNP B
, , I
Sachs NNP I
& CC I
Co. NNP I
, , O
hired VBN O
by IN O
creditors NNS B
to TO O
consult VB O
on IN O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
financial JJ I
plans NNS I
, , O
told VBD O
the DT B
committee NN I
in IN O
a DT B
private JJ I
meeting NN I
yesterday NN B
that IN O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
latest JJS I
plan NN I
to TO O
emerge VB O
from IN O
bankruptcy-law NN B
protection NN I
is VBZ O
far RB O
riskier JJR O
than IN O
an DT B
earlier RBR I
one CD I
which WDT B
won VBD O
the DT B
creditors NNS I
' POS B
approval NN I
. . O

According VBG O
to TO O
one CD B
person NN I
present JJ O
at IN O
the DT B
meeting NN I
, , O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
new JJ I
plan NN I
is VBZ O
financially RB O
`` `` O
overly RB O
optimistic JJ O
. . O
'' '' O

Asked VBN O
about IN O
the DT B
consultants NNS I
' POS B
reports NNS I
, , O
an DT B
Eastern NNP I
spokeswoman NN I
said VBD O
`` `` O
we PRP B
totally RB O
disagree VBP O
. . O
'' '' O

She PRP B
said VBD O
they PRP B
have VBP O
`` `` O
oversimplified VBN O
and CC O
made VBD O
some DT B
erroneous JJ I
assumptions NNS I
that WDT B
make VBP O
their PRP$ B
analysis NN I
completely RB O
off-base JJ O
. . O
'' '' O

At IN O
a DT B
later JJ I
news NN I
conference NN I
here RB I
, , O
Frank NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
, , O
chairman NN B
of IN O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
parent NN I
Texas NNP I
Air NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
said VBD O
Eastern NNP B
was VBD O
exceeding VBG O
its PRP$ B
goals NNS I
for IN O
getting VBG O
back RB O
into IN O
operation NN B
and CC O
predicted VBD O
it PRP B
would MD O
emerge VB O
from IN O
Chapter NN B
11 CD I
protection NN I
from IN O
creditors NNS B
early JJ B
next JJ I
year NN I
, , O
operating VBG O
with IN O
more JJR B
service NN I
than IN O
it PRP B
originally RB O
had VBD O
scheduled VBN O
. . O

He PRP B
insisted VBD O
, , O
as IN O
he PRP B
has VBZ O
before RB O
, , O
that IN O
creditors NNS B
would MD O
be VB O
paid VBN O
in IN O
full JJ O
under IN O
the DT B
plan NN I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
made VBD O
no DT B
mention NN I
of IN O
creditors NNS B
' POS B
negative JJ I
response NN I
to TO O
his PRP$ B
plan NN I
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
're VBP O
in IN O
the DT B
process NN I
of IN O
discussing VBG O
an DT B
amended VBN I
plan NN I
with IN O
the DT B
creditors NNS I
and CC O
anticipate VB O
filing NN O
that WDT B
amended VBD I
plan NN I
shortly RB O
, , O
'' '' O
Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
told VBD O
reporters NNS B
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
're VBP O
meeting VBG O
and CC O
surpassing VBG O
our PRP$ B
goals NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
added VBD O
. . O

In IN O
July NNP B
, , O
Eastern NNP B
and CC O
its PRP$ B
creditors NNS I
agreed VBD O
on IN O
a DT B
reorganization NN I
plan NN I
that WDT B
called VBD O
for IN O
Eastern NNP B
to TO O
sell VB O
$ $ B
1.8 CD I
billion CD I
in IN O
assets NNS B
and CC O
to TO O
emerge VB O
from IN O
bankruptcy-law NN B
protection NN I
at IN O
two-thirds NNS B
its PRP$ I
former JJ I
size NN I
. . O

But CC O
after IN O
selling VBG O
off IN O
pieces NNS B
such JJ O
as IN O
its PRP$ B
East NNP I
Coast NNP I
shuttle NN I
, , O
its PRP$ B
Philadelphia NNP I
hub NN I
and CC O
various JJ B
planes NNS I
, , O
Eastern NNP B
hit VBD O
a DT B
stumbling VBG I
block NN I
. . O

It PRP B
could MD O
n't RB O
sell VB O
its PRP$ B
South JJ I
American JJ I
routes NNS I
, , O
one CD B
of IN O
the DT B
major JJ I
assets NNS I
marked VBN O
for IN O
disposal NN B
. . O

Those DT B
routes NNS I
, , O
valued VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
creditors NNS I
' POS B
professionals NNS I
at IN O
about RB B
$ $ I
400 CD I
million CD I
, , O
were VBD O
to TO O
be VB O
sold VBN O
to TO O
AMR NNP B
Corp. NNP I
's POS B
American NNP I
Airlines NNPS I
. . O

A DT B
last-minute JJ I
snag NN I
in IN O
negotiations NNS B
with IN O
AMR NNP B
, , O
over IN O
an DT B
unrelated JJ I
lawsuit NN I
between IN O
American NNP B
and CC O
another DT B
Texas NNP I
Air NNP I
unit NN I
, , O
caused VBD O
the DT B
deal NN I
to TO O
collapse VB O
. . O

Eastern NNP B
ultimately RB O
decided VBD O
it PRP B
would MD O
have VB O
to TO O
keep VB O
and CC O
operate VB O
the DT B
routes NNS I
itself PRP B
, , O
which WDT B
would MD O
leave VB O
it PRP B
with IN O
less JJR B
cash NN I
for IN O
its PRP$ B
reorganization NN I
. . O

It PRP B
also RB O
would MD O
leave VB O
Eastern NNP B
a DT B
bigger JJR I
carrier NN I
than IN O
the DT B
scaled-down JJ I
one CD I
proposed VBN O
under IN O
the DT B
initial JJ I
plan NN I
. . O

Those DT B
changes NNS I
in IN O
its PRP$ B
condition NN I
meant VBD O
the DT B
reorganization NN I
plan NN I
previously RB O
presented VBD O
to TO O
creditors NNS B
would MD O
have VB O
to TO O
be VB O
revamped VBN O
. . O

Since IN O
then RB B
, , O
Eastern NNP B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
negotiating VBG O
with IN O
creditors NNS B
over IN O
revisions NNS B
, , O
but CC O
the DT B
creditors NNS I
committee NN I
has VBZ O
been VBN O
having VBG O
problems NNS B
with IN O
the DT B
revisions NNS I
. . O

The DT B
committee NN I
has VBZ O
two CD B
groups NNS I
of IN O
experts NNS B
it PRP B
calls VBZ O
on IN O
to TO O
analyze VB O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
plans NNS I
. . O

Both DT B
said VBD O
the DT B
new JJ I
plan NN I
would MD O
n't RB O
work VB O
. . O

Ernst NNP B
& CC I
Young NNP I
said VBD O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
plans NNS I
will MD O
miss VB O
its PRP$ B
projections NNS I
of IN O
earnings NNS B
before IN O
interest NN B
, , I
tax NN I
and CC I
depreciation NN I
by IN O
$ $ B
100 CD I
million CD I
, , O
and CC O
that IN O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
plan NN I
presented VBD O
no DT B
comfort NN I
level NN I
, , O
according VBG O
to TO O
a DT B
source NN I
present JJ O
at IN O
yesterday NN B
's POS B
session NN I
. . O

Experts NNS B
from IN O
Goldman NNP B
Sachs NNP I
estimated VBD O
Eastern NNP B
would MD O
miss VB O
the DT B
same JJ I
mark NN I
by IN O
$ $ B
120 CD I
million CD I
to TO I
$ $ I
135 CD I
million CD I
, , O
the DT B
source NN I
said VBD O
. . O

The DT B
experts NNS I
said VBD O
they PRP B
expected VBD O
Eastern NNP B
would MD O
have VB O
to TO O
issue VB O
new JJ B
debt NN I
to TO O
cover VB O
its PRP$ B
costs NNS I
, , O
and CC O
that IN O
it PRP B
would MD O
generate VB O
far RB B
less JJR I
cash NN I
than IN O
anticipated VBN O
. . O

Other JJ B
costs NNS I
also RB O
would MD O
increase VB O
, , O
including VBG O
maintenance NN B
, , O
because IN O
Eastern NNP B
has VBZ O
an DT B
older JJR I
fleet NN I
. . O

At IN O
the DT B
news NN I
conference NN I
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
and CC O
Eastern NNP B
President NNP I
Phil NNP I
Bakes NNP I
presented VBD O
a DT B
far RB I
rosier JJR I
assessment NN I
. . O

Flanked VBN O
by IN O
flight NN B
attendants NNS I
, , O
pilots NNS B
and CC O
gate NN B
agents NNS I
dressed VBN O
in IN O
spiffy JJ B
new JJ I
blue JJ I
uniforms NNS I
, , O
they PRP B
said VBD O
Eastern NNP B
has VBZ O
exceeded VBN O
its PRP$ B
operational JJ I
goals NNS I
and CC O
is VBZ O
filling VBG O
its PRP$ B
seats NNS I
. . O

Starting VBG O
next JJ B
month NN I
, , O
Eastern NNP B
will MD O
begin VB O
flying VBG O
775 CD B
flights NNS I
daily JJ O
instead RB O
of IN O
the DT B
previously RB I
announced VBN I
700 CD I
, , O
they PRP B
said VBD O
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Bakes NNP I
declined VBD O
to TO O
give VB O
out IN O
Eastern NNP B
's POS B
daily JJ I
losses NNS I
, , O
but CC O
said VBD O
he PRP B
did VBD O
n't RB O
expect VB O
Eastern NNP B
would MD O
have VB O
to TO O
dip VB O
into IN O
the DT B
cash NN I
from IN O
asset NN B
sales NNS I
currently RB O
held VBN O
in IN O
escrow NN B
. . O

These DT B
accounts NNS I
hold VBP O
several JJ B
hundred CD I
million CD I
dollars NNS I
, , O
primarily RB O
from IN O
asset NN B
sales NNS I
. . O

The DT B
plan NN I
Eastern NNP B
hopes VBZ O
to TO O
pursue VB O
, , O
he PRP B
said VBD O
, , O
calls VBZ O
for IN O
Eastern NNP B
to TO O
have VB O
$ $ B
390 CD I
million CD I
in IN O
cash NN B
by IN O
year NN B
's POS B
end NN I
. . O

Both DT O
he PRP B
and CC O
Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
predicted VBD O
that DT B
plan NN I
might MD O
be VB O
confirmed VBN O
in IN O
January NNP B
. . O

As IN O
to TO O
negotiations NNS B
with IN O
creditors NNS B
, , O
Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
said VBD O
in IN O
remarks NNS B
after IN O
the DT B
conference NN I
`` `` O
we PRP B
'll MD O
have VB O
to TO O
see VB O
how WRB O
they PRP B
-LCB- ( O
talks NNS B
-RCB- ) O
come VB O
along IN O
. . O
'' '' O

However RB O
, , O
he PRP B
added VBD O
, , O
`` `` O
it PRP B
's VBZ O
not RB O
a DT B
requirement NN I
that IN O
the DT B
plan NN I
be VB O
accepted VBN O
by IN O
creditors NNS B
. . O

It PRP B
must MD O
be VB O
accepted VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
court NN I
. . O
'' '' O

Under IN O
bankruptcy NN B
law NN I
, , O
Eastern NNP B
has VBZ O
exclusive JJ B
rights NNS I
for IN O
a DT B
certain JJ I
period NN I
to TO O
develop VB O
its PRP$ B
own JJ I
reorganization NN I
plan NN I
. . O

That DT B
deadline NN I
has VBZ O
been VBN O
extended VBN O
once RB O
and CC O
could MD O
be VB O
extended VBN O
again RB O
. . O

If IN O
Eastern NNP B
can MD O
get VB O
creditor NN B
support NN I
, , O
court NN B
confirmation NN I
of IN O
its PRP$ B
plan NN I
could MD O
be VB O
relatively RB O
swift JJ O
. . O

But CC O
creditors NNS B
are VBP O
free JJ O
to TO O
press VB O
for IN O
court NN B
approval NN I
of IN O
their PRP$ B
own JJ I
plan NN I
, , O
or CC O
the DT B
court NN I
could MD O
ignore VB O
both DT B
sides NNS I
and CC O
draw VB O
its PRP$ B
own JJ I
. . O

In IN O
any DT B
event NN I
, , O
some DT B
people NNS I
familiar JJ O
with IN O
the DT B
case NN I
question NN O
whether IN O
the DT B
court NN I
will MD O
act VB O
by IN O
January NNP B
as IN O
forecast NN O
by IN O
Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
and CC O
Mr. NNP B
Bakes NNP I
. . O

Eastern NNP B
sought VBD O
bankruptcy-law NN B
protection NN I
a DT B
few JJ I
days NNS I
after IN O
a DT B
crippling JJ I
strike NN I
began VBD O
March NNP B
4 CD I
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Lorenzo NNP I
told VBD O
reporters NNS B
the DT B
reorganization NN I
Eastern NNP B
is VBZ O
pursuing VBG O
would MD O
create VB O
a DT B
carrier NN I
85 CD B
% NN I
to TO I
90 CD I
% NN I
of IN O
the DT B
size NN I
of IN O
the DT B
pre-bankruptcy NN I
Eastern NNP I
. . O

He PRP B
projected VBD O
it PRP B
would MD O
be VB O
operating VBG O
about IN B
1,000 CD I
flights NNS I
a DT B
day NN I
by IN O
late JJ B
spring NN I
, , O
only RB O
slightly RB O
fewer JJR O
than IN O
the DT B
carrier NN I
's POS B
old JJ I
volume NN I
of IN O
1,050 CD B
a DT B
day NN I
. . O

HOPES NNS B
OF IN O
SIMPLIFYING VBG O
the DT B
corporate JJ I
minimum JJ I
tax NN I
before IN O
1990 CD B
are VBP O
weakening VBG O
. . O

The DT B
method NN I
of IN O
calculating VBG O
the DT B
20 CD I
% NN I
tax NN I
, , O
paid VBN O
if IN O
it PRP B
exceeds VBZ O
tax NN B
figured VBD O
the DT B
regular JJ I
way NN I
, , O
is VBZ O
due JJ O
for IN O
a DT B
change NN I
in IN O
1990 CD B
, , O
thanks VBZ B
to TO O
1986 CD B
's POS B
tax NN I
act NN I
. . O

But CC O
most RBS B
experts NNS I
agree VBP O
that IN O
the DT B
concept NN I
that WDT B
is VBZ O
to TO O
be VB O
introduced VBN O
drags VBZ O
in IN O
great JJ B
complexity NN I
; : O
they PRP B
have VBP O
been VBN O
trying VBG O
to TO O
head VB O
it PRP B
off IN O
this DT B
year NN I
. . O

Ways NNS B
and CC I
Means NNP I
Chairman NNP I
Rostenkowski NNP I
backed VBD O
a DT B
simplification NN I
plan NN I
in IN O
the DT B
pending VBG I
House NNP I
tax NN I
bill NN I
, , O
but CC O
the DT B
plan NN I
turns VBZ O
out IN O
to TO O
be VB O
a DT B
big JJ I
revenue NN I
loser NN I
. . O

Now RB O
the DT B
Senate NNP I
's POS B
stripped-down JJ I
bill NN I
omits VBZ O
any DT B
proposal NN I
to TO O
deal VB O
with IN O
the DT B
corporate JJ I
tax NN I
. . O

Proponents NNS B
of IN O
simplification NN B
fear NN O
that IN O
the DT B
chances NNS I
of IN O
getting VBG O
it PRP B
into IN O
the DT B
final JJ I
bill NN I
are VBP O
waning VBG O
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
hear VBP O
it PRP B
has VBZ O
low JJ B
priority NN I
on IN O
the DT B
House NNP I
side NN I
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Samuel NNP B
Starr NNP I
of IN O
Coopers NNP B
& CC I
Lybrand NNP I
, , I
CPAs NNS I
. . O

If IN O
the DT B
law NN I
is VBZ O
n't RB O
changed VBN O
, , O
he PRP B
says VBZ O
, , O
`` `` O
we PRP B
are VBP O
left VBN O
staring VBG O
at IN O
rules NNS B
that WDT B
are VBP O
almost RB O
impossible JJ O
to TO O
implement VB O
, , O
because IN O
there EX B
are VBP O
so RB B
many JJ I
complex JJ I
depreciation NN I
calculations NNS I
to TO O
do VB O
. . O
'' '' O

But CC O
Congress NNP B
still RB O
could MD O
resolve VB O
the DT B
issue NN I
with IN O
other JJ B
legislation NN I
this DT B
year NN I
or CC O
next JJ B
, , O
Starr NNP B
adds VBZ O
. . O

HUGO NNP B
'S VBZ B
RAVAGES NNS I
may MD O
be VB O
offset VB O
by IN O
immediate JJ B
claims NNS I
for IN O
tax NN B
refunds NNS I
. . O

This DT B
law NN I
aids VBZ O
hurricane-wracked JJ B
locales NNS I
named VBN O
by IN O
the DT B
president NN I
as IN O
disaster NN B
areas NNS I
, , O
as RB O
well RB O
as IN O
regions NNS B
so RB O
designated VBN O
after IN O
other JJ B
1989 CD I
disasters NNS I
. . O

It PRP B
lets VBZ O
victims NNS B
elect VBP O
to TO O
deduct VB O
casualty NN B
losses NNS I
on IN O
either DT O
1989 CD B
or CC O
amended VBN B
1988 CD I
returns NNS O
, , O
whichever WDT B
offers VBZ O
the DT B
larger JJR I
tax NN I
benefit NN I
; : O
they PRP B
have VBP O
until IN O
April NNP B
16 CD I
to TO O
choose VB O
. . O

Amending VBG O
a DT B
1988 CD I
return NN I
to TO O
claim VB O
a DT B
refund NN I
brings VBZ O
cash NN B
faster RBR O
; : O
but CC O
for IN O
personal JJ B
losses NNS I
, , O
there EX B
are VBP O
other JJ B
factors NNS I
to TO O
consider VB O
, , O
notes NNS O
publisher NN B
Prentice NNP I
Hall NNP I
. . O

A DT B
loss NN I
-- : O
after IN O
insurance NN B
recoveries NNS I
-- : O
is VBZ O
deductible JJ O
only RB O
to TO O
the DT B
extent NN I
that IN O
it PRP B
exceeds VBZ O
$ $ B
100 CD I
and CC O
that IN O
the DT B
year NN I
's POS B
total JJ I
losses NNS I
exceed VBP O
10 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
adjusted VBN B
gross JJ I
income NN I
; : O
victims NNS B
may MD O
pick VB O
the DT B
year NN I
when WRB O
income NN B
is VBZ O
lower JJR O
and CC O
deductions NNS B
higher JJR O
. . O

In IN O
filing VBG O
an DT B
original JJ I
-LRB- ( I
not RB I
amended VBN I
-RRB- ) I
return NN I
, , O
a DT B
couple NN I
should MD O
consider VB O
whether IN O
damaged VBN B
property NN I
is VBZ O
owned VBN O
jointly RB O
or CC O
separately RB O
and CC O
whether IN O
one CD B
spouse NN I
has VBZ O
larger JJR B
income NN I
; : O
that WDT B
may MD O
determine VB O
whether IN O
they PRP B
should MD O
file VB O
jointly RB O
or CC O
separately RB O
. . O

THE DT B
IRS NNP I
DELAYS VBZ O
several JJ B
deadlines NNS I
for IN O
Hugo NNP B
's POS B
victims NNS I
. . O

Returns NNS B
for IN O
1988 CD B
from IN O
people NNS B
with IN O
six-month JJ B
filing NN I
extensions NNS I
were VBD O
due JJ O
Monday NNP B
, , O
but CC O
the DT B
IRS NNP I
says VBZ O
people NNS B
in IN O
the DT B
disaster NN I
areas NNS I
wo MD O
n't RB O
be VB O
penalized VBN O
for IN O
late JJ B
filing NN I
if IN O
their PRP$ B
returns NNS I
are VBP O
marked VBN O
`` `` O
Hugo NNP B
'' '' O
and CC O
postmarked VBN O
by IN O
Jan. NNP B
16 CD I
. . O

Interest NN B
will MD O
be VB O
imposed VBN O
on IN O
unpaid JJ B
taxes NNS I
, , O
but CC O
late-payment NN B
penalties NNS I
on IN O
the DT B
returns NNS I
will MD O
be VB O
waived VBN O
if IN O
the DT B
balance NN I
due JJ O
and CC O
paid VBN O
is VBZ O
10 CD B
% NN I
or CC I
less JJR I
of IN O
the DT B
liability NN I
. . O

IRS NNP B
Notice NN I
89-136 CD I
describes VBZ O
this DT B
and CC O
other JJ B
deadline NN I
relief NN I
for IN O
Hugo NNP B
's POS B
victims NNS I
. . O

Among IN O
the DT B
provisions NNS I
: : O
Fiscal-year JJ B
taxpayers NNS I
with IN O
returns NNS B
due JJ O
last JJ B
Monday NNP I
wo MD O
n't RB O
be VB O
penalized VBN O
if IN O
they PRP B
file VBP O
-- : O
or CC O
request VB O
an DT B
extension NN I
-- : O
and CC O
pay VB O
tax NN B
due JJ O
by IN O
Nov. NNP B
15 CD I
. . O

Excise-tax JJ B
returns NNS I
due JJ O
by IN O
Oct. NNP B
31 CD I
or CC O
Nov. NNP B
30 CD I
may MD O
be VB O
delayed VBN O
to TO O
Jan. NNP B
16 CD I
. . O

Extensions NNS B
ca MD O
n't RB O
be VB O
granted VBN O
for IN O
filing VBG O
employment-tax JJ B
returns NNS I
due JJ O
Oct. NNP B
31 CD I
or CC O
for IN O
depositing VBG O
withheld VBN B
taxes NNS I
, , O
but CC O
late JJ B
penalties NNS I
will MD O
be VB O
abated VBN O
for IN O
deposits NNS B
made VBN O
by IN O
Nov. NNP B
15 CD I
. . O

The DT B
notice NN I
also RB O
grants VBZ O
relief NN B
for IN O
certain JJ B
estate-tax JJ I
returns NNS I
. . O

ONE-DAY JJ B
JAUNTS NNS I
in IN O
a DT B
chartered JJ I
boat NN I
were VBD O
perks NNS B
for IN O
permanent JJ B
staffers NNS I
of IN O
American NNP B
Business NNP I
Service NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
Costa NNP I
Mesa NNP I
, , I
Calif. NNP I
, , I
supplier NN I
of IN O
temporary JJ B
workers NNS I
. . O

The DT B
IRS NNP I
denied VBD O
cost NN B
deductions NNS I
because IN O
few NN B
of IN O
the DT B
temps NNS I
got VBD O
to TO O
go VB O
aboard RB O
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
Tax NNP I
Court NNP I
said VBD O
the DT B
limitations NNS I
were VBD O
reasonable JJ O
and CC O
realistic JJ O
and CC O
allowed VBD O
the DT B
deductions NNS I
. . O

USED-CAR NN B
BUYERS NNS I
who WP B
try VBP O
to TO O
avoid VB O
sales NNS B
tax VB I
by IN O
understating VBG O
prices NNS B
paid VBN O
in IN O
private JJ B
deals NNS I
are VBP O
the DT B
targets NNS I
of IN O
a DT B
New NNP I
York NNP I
drive NN I
. . O

Estimating VBG O
that IN O
the DT B
state NN I
may MD O
lose VB O
$ $ B
15 CD I
million CD I
a DT B
year NN I
, , O
officials NNS B
announced VBD O
the DT B
filing NN I
of IN O
15 CD B
criminal JJ I
actions NNS I
and CC O
`` `` O
hundreds NNS B
'' '' O
of IN O
civil JJ B
penalties NNS I
. . O

WHEN WRB O
AN DT B
IRA NNP I
OWNER NNP I
dies VBZ O
, , O
the DT B
trustee NN I
of IN O
the DT B
individual JJ I
retirement NN I
account NN I
must MD O
file VB O
forms NNS B
5498 CD I
reporting VBG O
market NN B
values NNS I
relating VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
decedent NN I
and CC O
each DT B
beneficiary NN I
, , O
with IN O
copies NNS B
to TO O
the DT B
executor NN I
and CC I
beneficiaries NNS I
. . O

IRS NNP B
Revenue NN I
Procedure NN I
89-52 CD I
describes VBZ O
the DT B
reporting VBG I
requirements NNS I
. . O

BIGGER JJR O
THAN IN O
A DT B
BREADBOX NN I
was VBD O
this DT B
cash NN I
hoarder NN I
's POS B
reputation NN I
for IN O
honesty NN B
. . O

People NNS B
often RB O
cite VBP O
frugality NN B
and CC O
distrust NN B
of IN O
banks NNS B
to TO O
justify VB O
cash NN B
caches NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
IRS NNP I
. . O

Gregory NNP B
Damonne NNP I
Brown NNP I
of IN O
Fremont NNP B
, , O
Calif. NNP B
, , O
a DT B
hardworking JJ I
, , I
reclusive JJ I
young JJ I
bachelor NN I
, , O
told VBD O
that DT B
story NN I
to TO O
the DT B
Tax NNP I
Court NNP I
. . O

But CC O
judges NNS B
usually RB O
find VBP O
the DT B
real JJ I
aim NN I
is VBZ O
to TO O
escape VB O
tax NN B
on IN O
hidden VBN B
income NN I
; : O
and CC O
the DT B
IRS NNP I
said VBD O
Brown NNP B
must MD O
have VB O
had VBN O
such JJ B
income NN I
-- : O
although IN O
it PRP B
uncovered VBD O
no DT B
source NN I
-- : O
because IN O
he PRP B
deposited VBD O
$ $ B
124,732 CD I
in IN O
a DT B
bank NN I
account NN I
in IN O
1982-84 CD B
while IN O
reporting VBG O
income NN B
of IN O
only RB B
$ $ I
52,012 CD I
. . O

Brown NNP B
's POS B
story NN I
: : O

The DT B
deposits NNS I
came VBD O
from IN O
savings NNS B
kept VBD O
in IN O
a DT B
Tupperware NNP I
breadbox NN I
; : O
he PRP B
saved VBD O
$ $ B
47,000 CD I
in IN O
1974-81 CD B
by IN O
living VBG O
with IN O
family NN B
members NNS I
and CC O
pinching VBG O
pennies NNS B
and CC O
$ $ B
45,000 CD I
of IN O
secret JJ B
gifts NNS I
from IN O
his PRP$ B
remorseful JJ I
father NN I
, , O
who WP B
had VBD O
abandoned VBN O
the DT B
family NN I
in IN O
1955 CD B
. . O

Brown NNP B
had VBD O
no DT B
proof NN I
; : O
but CC O
testimony NN B
of IN O
his PRP$ B
mother NN I
and CC I
stepmother NN I
about IN O
his PRP$ B
father NN I
and CC O
of IN O
an DT B
ex-employer NN I
about IN O
his PRP$ B
honesty NN I
and CC I
habits NNS I
satisfied VBD O
a DT B
judge NN I
that IN O
Brown NNP B
was VBD O
truthful JJ O
and CC O
his PRP$ B
tale NN I
of IN O
gifts NNS B
was VBD O
possible JJ O
. . O

The DT B
IRS NNP I
offered VBD O
no DT B
evidence NN I
of IN O
hidden VBN B
sources NNS I
of IN O
taxable JJ B
income NN I
, , O
so RB O
Judge NNP B
Shields NNP I
rejected VBD O
its PRP$ B
claims NNS I
. . O

BRIEFS NNS B
: : I

Asked VBN O
how WRB O
he PRP B
made VBD O
charitable JJ B
gifts NNS I
of IN O
$ $ B
26,350 CD I
out IN O
of IN O
reported VBN B
two-year JJ I
income NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
46,892 CD I
, , O
Thomas NNP B
H. NNP I
McFall NNP I
of IN O
Bryan NNP B
, , O
Texas NNP B
, , O
told VBD O
the DT B
Tax NNP I
Court NNP I
he PRP B
had VBD O
understated VBN O
his PRP$ B
income NN I
. . O

The DT B
court NN I
rejected VBD O
his PRP$ B
incredible JJ I
claims NNS I
, , O
denied VBD O
his PRP$ B
deductions NNS I
, , O
and CC O
imposed VBD O
a DT B
negligence NN I
penalty NN I
... : O
. . O

Rep. NNP B
Schaefer NNP I
-LRB- ( O
R. NNP B
, , O
Colo. NNP B
-RRB- ) O
entered VBD O
a DT B
bill NN I
to TO O
exempt VB O
from IN O
tax NN B
rewards NNS B
for IN O
tips NNS B
leading VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
arrest NN I
of IN O
violent JJ B
criminals NNS I
. . O

Kay NNP B
Peterson NNP I
mounts NNS O
her PRP$ B
bicycle NN I
and CC O
grinds VBZ O
up IN O
yet RB B
another DT I
steep NN I
, , I
rocky JJ I
path NN I
seemingly RB O
suitable JJ O
only RB O
for IN O
mountain NN B
goats NNS I
. . O

After IN O
a DT B
tortuous JJ I
climb NN I
, , O
she PRP B
is VBZ O
rewarded VBN O
by IN O
a DT B
picture-postcard NN I
vista NN I
: : O
a DT B
glade NN I
of IN O
golden JJ B
aspens NNS I
under IN O
an DT B
azure JJ I
Indian-summer JJ I
sky NN I
. . O

This DT B
place NN I
is VBZ O
12 CD B
miles NNS I
into IN O
the DT B
back JJ I
country NN I
-- : O
a DT B
day-long JJ I
trudge NN I
for IN O
a DT B
hiker NN I
, , O
but CC O
reached VBD O
by IN O
Ms. NNP B
Peterson NNP I
and CC O
six CD B
others NNS I
in IN O
a DT B
mere JJ I
two CD I
hours NNS I
of IN O
pedaling VBG O
fat-tired JJ B
mountain NN I
bikes NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
This DT B
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Ms. NNP B
Peterson NNP I
, , O
`` `` O
is VBZ O
what WP B
it PRP B
's VBZ O
all DT O
about IN O
. . O
'' '' O

Twelve CD B
hundred CD I
miles NNS I
away RB O
, , O
rangers NNS B
at IN O
a DT B
Napa NNP I
County NNP I
, , I
Calif. NNP I
, , I
state NN I
park NN I
are VBP O
among IN O
the DT B
many JJ I
who WP B
do VBP O
n't RB O
quite RB O
share VBP O
the DT B
enthusiasm NN I
. . O

This DT B
summer NN I
, , O
speeding VBG B
bikers NNS I
were VBD O
blamed VBN O
for IN O
an DT B
accident NN I
in IN O
the DT B
Napa NNP I
County NNP I
park NN I
, , O
in IN O
which WDT B
a DT B
horse NN I
-- : O
spooked VBN O
on IN O
a DT B
trail NN I
that WDT B
was VBD O
closed VBN O
to TO O
bikers NNS B
-- : O
broke VBD O
its PRP$ B
leg NN I
. . O

The DT B
animal NN I
had VBD O
to TO O
be VB O
destroyed VBN O
; : O
the DT B
bikers NNS I
fled VBD O
and CC O
were VBD O
never RB O
found VBN O
. . O

In IN O
numerous JJ B
parks NNS I
near IN O
San NNP B
Francisco NNP I
, , O
rangers NNS B
have VBP O
been VBN O
forced VBN O
to TO O
close VB O
trails NNS B
, , O
set VBN O
up IN O
speed NN B
traps NNS I
and CC O
use NN O
radar NN B
guns NNS I
to TO O
curb VB O
fast RB B
and CC I
reckless JJ I
riding NN I
. . O

They PRP B
have VBP O
even RB O
sent VBN O
helicopters NNS B
in IN O
pursuit NN B
of IN O
bikers NNS B
after IN O
hikers NNS B
and CC I
equestrians NNS I
complained VBD O
they PRP B
were VBD O
being VBG O
driven VBN O
from IN O
trails NNS B
. . O

`` `` O
We PRP B
were VBD O
being VBG O
overrun VBN O
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Steve NNP B
Fiala NNP I
, , O
trails NNS B
coordinator NN I
of IN O
the DT B
East NNP I
Bay NNP I
Regional NNP I
Park NNP I
District NNP I
. . O

Two CD B
years NNS I
ago RB O
, , O
the DT B
district NN I
decided VBD O
to TO O
limit VB O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
to TO O
fire VB B
roads NNS I
in IN O
its PRP$ B
65,000 CD I
hilly JJ I
acres NNS I
. . O

From IN O
about IN B
200,000 CD I
six CD B
years NNS I
ago RB O
, , O
the DT B
number NN I
of IN O
mountain NN B
bikes NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
is VBZ O
expected VBN O
to TO O
grow VB O
to TO O
10 CD B
million CD I
in IN O
1990 CD B
. . O

At IN B
least JJS I
half PDT I
that DT I
growth NN I
will MD O
have VB O
come VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
past JJ I
three CD I
years NNS I
alone RB O
. . O

The DT B
controversy NN I
kicked VBD O
up IN O
by IN O
the DT B
proliferation NN I
of IN O
these DT B
all-terrain JJ I
bicycles NNS I
is VBZ O
one CD B
of IN O
the DT B
most RBS I
divisive JJ I
storms NNS I
to TO O
blow VB O
through IN O
the DT B
national JJ I
conservation NN I
movement NN I
in IN O
recent JJ B
memory NN I
. . O

Bikers NNS B
-- : O
many NN B
of IN O
them PRP B
ardent JJ B
environmentalists NNS I
-- : O
proclaim VB O
their PRP$ B
sport NN I
an DT B
efficient JJ I
, , I
safe JJ I
, , I
fitness-promoting JJ I
way NN I
to TO O
get VB O
back RB O
to TO O
nature NN B
, , O
while IN O
asserting VBG O
a DT B
right NN I
, , O
as IN O
taxpayers NNS B
, , O
to TO O
pedal VB O
on IN O
public JJ B
lands NNS I
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
' POS B
burgeoning VBG I
numbers NNS I
, , O
safety NN B
concerns NNS I
and CC O
fear NN B
that IN O
they PRP B
damage VBP O
fragile JJ B
landscapes NNS I
have VBP O
prompted VBN O
pleas NNS B
, , O
from IN O
the DT B
Sierras NNPS I
to TO O
the DT B
Eastern NNP I
Seaboard NNP I
, , O
to TO O
ban VB O
them PRP B
from IN O
the DT B
back JJ I
country NN I
. . O

Key NNP O
to TO O
the DT B
issue NN I
is VBZ O
that IN O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
, , O
in IN O
skillful JJ B
hands NNS I
, , O
can MD O
go VB O
virtually RB O
anywhere RB O
, , O
and CC O
in IN O
reckless JJ B
hands NNS I
can MD O
become VB O
vehicles NNS B
of IN O
terror NN B
. . O

An DT B
adept JJ I
bicyclist NN I
can MD O
leap VB O
from IN O
a DT B
dead JJ I
stop NN I
to TO O
the DT B
top NN I
of IN O
a DT B
picnic NN I
table NN I
without IN O
losing VBG O
balance NN B
. . O

Such JJ B
skills NNS I
allow VBP O
riders NNS B
to TO O
fly VB O
down RB O
treacherous JJ B
mountain NN I
grades NNS I
at IN O
speeds NNS B
of IN O
up IN B
to TO I
40 CD I
miles NNS I
an DT B
hour NN I
-- : O
a DT B
thrill NN I
for IN O
the DT B
cyclist NN I
but CC O
a DT B
nightmare NN I
for IN O
unsuspecting JJ B
hikers NNS I
or CC I
equestrians NNS I
. . O

For IN O
harried VBN B
public-land JJ I
managers NNS I
across IN O
the DT B
nation NN I
, , O
the DT B
response NN I
is VBZ O
increasingly RB O
to TO O
shut VB O
the DT B
gates NNS I
. . O

The DT B
state NN I
of IN O
California NNP B
, , O
following VBG O
the DT B
lead NN I
of IN O
some DT B
regional JJ I
parks NNS I
, , O
recently RB O
adopted VBN O
regulations NNS B
that WDT B
closed VBD O
nearly RB B
all DT I
hiking VBG I
paths NNS I
in IN O
state NN B
parks NNS I
to TO O
mountain NN B
bicycles NNS I
. . O

The DT B
move NN I
largely RB O
consigns VBZ O
them PRP B
to TO O
roads NNS B
used VBN O
by IN O
motorized JJ B
vehicles NNS I
. . O

Most JJS B
other JJ I
states NNS I
have VBP O
enacted VBN O
similar JJ B
bans NNS I
. . O

The DT B
bikes NNS I
are VBP O
unwelcome JJ O
on IN O
trails NNS B
in IN O
national JJ B
parks NNS I
. . O

Even RB B
the DT I
U.S. NNP I
Forest NNP I
Service NNP I
, , O
whose WP$ B
lenient JJ I
`` `` I
multiple-use JJ I
'' '' I
philosophy NN I
permits VBZ O
motorized VBN B
vehicles NNS I
on IN O
thousands NNS B
of IN O
miles NNS B
of IN O
its PRP$ B
trails NNS I
across IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
, , O
has VBZ O
begun VBN O
to TO O
close VB O
some DT B
lands NNS I
to TO O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
, , O
including VBG O
major JJ B
portions NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
popular JJ I
Pacific NNP I
Crest NNP I
Trail NNP I
, , O
which WDT B
stretches VBZ O
from IN O
California NNP B
to TO O
Canada NNP B
. . O

Often RB O
these DT B
closings NNS I
come VBP O
after IN O
vigorous JJ B
anti-bike JJ I
lobbying NN I
by IN O
conservation NN B
organizations NNS I
, , O
the DT B
politically RB I
potent JJ I
Sierra NNP I
Club NNP I
among IN O
them PRP B
. . O

Sierra NNP B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
instrumental JJ O
in IN O
securing VBG O
a DT B
number NN I
of IN O
the DT B
California NNP I
bans NNS I
. . O

It PRP B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
waging VBG O
an DT B
all-out JJ I
campaign NN I
to TO O
beat VB O
back RB O
a DT B
proposal NN I
, , O
pushed VBN O
by IN O
Utah NNP B
bike NN I
groups NNS I
, , O
to TO O
allow VB O
the DT B
cycles NNS I
in IN O
federally RB B
designated VBN I
wilderness NN I
areas NNS I
, , O
where WRB O
they PRP B
are VBP O
now RB O
prohibited VBN O
. . O

Yet RB O
Sierra NNP B
's POS B
hard-line JJ I
stance NN I
has VBZ O
created VBN O
something NN B
of IN O
a DT B
rift NN I
in IN O
the DT B
organization NN I
, , O
which WDT B
estimates VBZ O
that IN O
17 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
its PRP$ B
500,000 CD I
members NNS I
own JJ O
mountain NN B
bikes NNS I
. . O

Pressure NN B
from IN O
these DT B
members NNS I
prompted VBD O
the DT B
club NN I
recently RB O
to TO O
soften VB O
its PRP$ B
anti-bike JJ I
rhetoric NN I
; : O
it PRP B
no RB O
longer RB O
, , O
for IN O
example NN B
, , O
lumps VBZ O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
into IN O
the DT B
same JJ I
category NN I
as IN O
motorcycles NNS B
and CC O
other JJ B
terrain-marring JJ I
off-road JJ I
vehicles NNS I
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
club NN I
still RB O
insists VBZ O
that IN O
public JJ B
lands NNS I
ought MD O
to TO O
be VB O
closed VBN O
to TO O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
unless IN O
studies NNS B
indicate VBP O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
wo MD O
n't RB O
injure VB O
the DT B
environment NN I
or CC O
other JJ B
users NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
have VBP O
a DT B
mountain NN I
bike NN I
, , O
yet RB O
as IN O
a DT B
hiker NN I
I PRP B
've VBP O
been VBN O
run VB O
off IN O
the DT B
road NN I
by IN O
kids NNS B
careening VBG O
down RP O
a DT B
fire NN I
trail NN I
on IN O
them PRP B
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Gene NNP B
Coan NNP I
, , O
an DT B
official NN I
at IN O
Sierra NNP B
's POS B
headquarters NN I
in IN O
San NNP B
Francisco NNP I
, , O
echoing VBG O
the DT B
concerns NNS I
of IN O
many JJ B
members NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
People NNS B
who WP B
feel VBP O
that IN O
cyclists NNS B
should MD O
be VB O
banned VBN O
from IN O
an DT B
area NN I
are VBP O
n't RB O
looking VBG O
at IN O
the DT B
whole JJ I
picture NN I
, , O
'' '' O
complains VBZ O
Mark NNP B
Langton NNP I
, , O
associate JJ B
editor NN I
of IN O
Mountain NNP B
and CC I
City NNP I
Biking NNP I
magazine NN I
in IN O
Canoga NNP B
Park NNP I
, , O
Calif NNP B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Langton NNP I
is VBZ O
among IN O
the DT B
legions NNS I
of IN O
bikers NNS B
who WP B
got VBD O
their PRP$ B
first JJ I
taste NN I
of IN O
wilderness NN B
as IN O
hikers NNS B
or CC I
backpackers NNS I
. . O

He PRP B
says VBZ O
fellow NN B
bikers NNS I
show VBP O
the DT B
same JJ I
concern NN I
for IN O
the DT B
land NN I
that IN B
they PRP B
demonstrated VBD O
as IN O
hikers NNS B
; : O
many JJ B
are VBP O
appalled VBN O
that IN O
the DT B
conservation NN I
community NN I
would MD O
suddenly RB O
consider VB O
them PRP B
the DT B
enemy NN I
. . O

To TO O
fight VB O
back RB O
, , O
activists NNS B
such JJ O
as IN O
Mr. NNP B
Langton NNP I
are VBP O
forming VBG O
groups NNS B
to TO O
lobby VB O
land NN B
managers NNS I
over IN O
access NN B
issues NNS I
and CC O
undertake VB O
education NN B
programs NNS I
to TO O
show VB O
that IN O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
can MD O
responsibly RB O
share VB O
trails NNS B
. . O

Mr. NNP B
Langton NNP I
's POS B
group NN I
, , O
Concerned NNP B
Off-Road NNP I
Bicyclists NNPS I
Association NNP I
, , O
mounted VBN O
petition NN B
drives NNS I
to TO O
help VB O
keep VB O
open JJ O
certain JJ B
Santa NNP I
Monica NNP I
Mountain NNP I
trails NNS I
designated VBN O
for IN O
closing VBG B
. . O

Biking NNP B
groups NNS I
in IN O
Montana NNP B
, , I
Idaho NNP I
, , I
Michigan NNP I
and CC I
Massachusetts NNP I
have VBP O
won VBN O
similar JJ B
concessions NNS I
, , O
says VBZ O
Tim NNP B
Blumenthal NNP I
, , O
mountain NN B
bike NN I
editor NN I
of IN O
Bicycling NNP B
magazine NN I
. . O

These DT B
groups NNS I
have VBP O
been VBN O
trying VBG O
to TO O
improve VB O
the DT B
mountain NN I
biker NN I
's POS B
image NN I
; : O
in IN O
the DT B
San NNP I
Francisco-area JJ I
park NN I
district NN I
where WRB O
a DT B
ranger NN I
was VBD O
clobbered VBN O
by IN O
a DT B
cyclist NN I
this DT B
summer NN I
bikers NNS B
have VBP O
formed VBN O
a DT B
volunteer NN I
patrol NN I
to TO O
help VB O
rangers NNS B
enforce VB O
regulations NNS B
, , O
and CC O
to TO O
school VB O
riders NNS B
in IN O
proper JJ B
trail NN I
etiquette NN I
. . O

Even RB B
staunch JJ I
anti-bike JJ I
Sierra NNP I
members NNS I
concede VBP O
that IN O
10 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
all DT B
riders NNS I
cause VBP O
most RBS B
of IN O
the DT B
problems NNS I
. . O

While IN O
some DT B
are VBP O
renegade NN B
riders NNS I
who WP B
simply JJ O
scorn NN O
regulations NNS B
, , O
much JJ B
bad JJ I
riding NN I
simply RB O
reflects VBZ O
ignorance NN B
that WDT B
can MD O
be VB O
corrected VBN O
through IN O
`` `` O
education NN B
and CC O
peer NN B
pressure NN I
, , O
'' '' O
says VBZ O
Jim NNP B
Hasenauer NNP I
, , O
a DT B
director NN I
of IN O
the DT B
International NNP I
Mountain NNP I
Biking NNP I
Association NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
I PRP B
think VBP O
we PRP B
're VBP O
making VBG O
progress NN B
. . O
'' '' O

Few JJ B
would MD O
have VB O
foreseen VBN O
such JJ B
a DT I
furor NN I
when WRB O
, , O
a DT B
decade NN I
ago RB O
, , O
some DT B
Marin NNP I
County NNP I
bicycle NN I
enthusiasts NNS I
created VBD O
a DT B
hybrid JJ I
bike NN I
using VBG O
fat JJ B
tires NNS I
, , O
lightweight JJ B
metallurgy NN I
and CC O
multi-gear JJ B
technology NN I
. . O

They PRP B
wanted VBD O
a DT B
machine NN I
that WDT B
would MD O
allow VB O
them PRP B
to TO O
pedal VB O
into IN O
rugged JJ B
terrain NN I
then RB O
inaccessible JJ O
to TO O
cycles NNS B
. . O

They PRP B
got VBD O
a DT B
machine NN I
more RBR O
responsive JJ O
, , O
more RBR O
stable JJ O
and CC O
in IN O
many JJ B
ways NNS I
easier JJR O
to TO O
ride VB O
than IN O
the DT B
thin-tired JJ I
racing NN I
bikes NNS I
that IN B
then RB O
were VBD O
the DT B
rage NN I
. . O

When WRB O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
first JJ O
entered VBD O
mass NN B
production NN I
in IN O
1981 CD B
, , O
they PRP B
were VBD O
dismissed VBN O
as IN O
a DT B
fad NN I
. . O

Last JJ B
year NN I
, , O
25 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
the DT B
10 CD I
million CD I
bicycles NNS I
sold VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
were VBD O
mountain NN B
bikes NNS I
. . O

In IN O
California NNP B
, , O
a DT B
bellwether NN I
market NN I
, , O
they PRP B
accounted VBD O
for IN O
more JJR B
than IN I
80 CD I
% NN I
of IN O
all DT B
bike NN I
sales NNS I
. . O

The DT B
majority NN I
of IN O
the DT B
bikes NNS I
never RB O
even RB O
make VB O
it PRP B
into IN O
the DT B
high JJ I
country NN I
. . O

City NN B
dwellers NNS I
love VBP O
them PRP B
because IN O
they PRP B
shift VBP O
smoothly RB O
in IN O
traffic NN B
, , O
bounce VB O
easily RB O
over IN O
curbs NNS B
and CC O
roll NN O
through IN O
road NN B
glass NN I
with IN O
far RB B
fewer RBR I
flat JJ I
tires NNS I
than IN O
racing VBG B
bikes NNS I
. . O

Crested NNP B
Butte NNP I
, , O
population NN B
1,200 CD I
, , O
is VBZ O
a DT B
bastion NN I
of IN O
the DT B
sport NN I
. . O

By IN O
one CD B
estimate NN I
, , O
everyone NN B
here RB I
under IN O
50 CD B
owns VBZ O
at IN B
least JJS I
one CD I
bike NN I
. . O

The DT B
town NN I
is VBZ O
home NN B
to TO O
the DT B
Mountain NNP I
Bike NNP I
Hall NNP I
of IN O
Fame NNP B
and CC O
it PRP B
hosts VBZ O
the DT B
annual JJ I
Fat NNP I
Tire NNP I
Bike NNP I
Week NNP I
. . O

This DT B
summer NN I
, , O
the DT B
jamboree NN I
attracted VBN O
more JJR B
visitors NNS I
than IN O
the DT B
busiest JJS I
week NN I
of IN O
the DT B
town NN I
's POS B
winter NN I
ski NN I
season NN I
. . O

David NNP B
Lindsey NNP I
, , O
chairman NN B
of IN O
the DT B
Fat NNP I
Tire NNP I
Bike NNP I
celebration NN I
, , O
muses VBZ O
that IN O
the DT B
bike NN I
's POS B
popularity NN I
may MD O
be VB O
a DT B
combination NN I
of IN O
technology NN B
and CC I
nostalgia NN I
. . O

`` `` O
The DT B
mountain NN I
bike NN I
feels VBZ O
as RB O
comfortable JJ O
as IN O
the DT B
` `` I
paperboy NN I
' '' I
bike NN I
you PRP B
had VBD O
as IN O
a DT B
kid NN I
, , O
but CC O
it PRP B
can MD O
do VB O
so RB B
much RB I
more JJR I
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
says VBZ O
. . O

The DT B
following VBG I
issues NNS I
were VBD O
recently RB O
filed VBN O
with IN O
the DT B
Securities NNP I
and CC I
Exchange NNP I
Commission NNP I
: : O

Canada NNP B
's POS B
Province NNP I
of IN O
Nova NNP B
Scotia NNP I
, , O
shelf NN B
offering NN I
of IN O
up IN B
to TO I
$ $ I
550 CD I
million CD I
of IN O
debentures NNS B
. . O

Golar NNP B
Gas NNP I
Holding NNP I
Co. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
subsidiary NN I
of IN O
Gotaas-Larsen NNP B
Shipping NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
offering NN B
of IN O
$ $ B
280 CD I
million CD I
first JJ I
preferred JJ I
ship NN I
mortgage NN I
notes NNS I
, , O
via IN O
Merrill NNP B
Lynch NNP I
Capital NNP I
Markets NNPS I
. . O

H.F. NNP B
Ahmanson NNP I
& CC I
Co. NNP I
, , O
offering NN B
of IN O
four CD B
million CD I
shares NNS I
of IN O
noncumulative JJ B
convertible JJ I
preferred JJ I
stock NN I
, , O
Series NNP B
B. NNP I
, , O
via IN O
Goldman NNP B
, , I
Sachs NNP I
& CC I
Co NNP I
, , O
First NNP B
Boston NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
and CC O
Merrill NNP B
Lynch NNP I
. . O

Shared NNP B
Technologies NNP I
Inc. NNP I
, , O
offering NN B
of IN O
2.5 CD B
million CD I
common JJ I
shares NNS I
, , O
via IN O
Smetek NNP B
, , I
Van NNP I
Horn NNP I
& CC I
Cormack NNP I
Inc. NNP I
and CC O
Oakes NNP B
, , I
Fitzwilliams NNP I
& CC I
Co NNP I
. . O

Stock-market NN B
tremors NNS I
again RB O
shook VBD O
bond NN B
prices NNS I
, , O
while IN O
the DT B
dollar NN I
turned VBD O
in IN O
a DT B
mixed VBN I
performance NN I
. . O

Early JJ B
yesterday NN I
, , O
investors NNS B
scrambled VBD O
to TO O
buy VB O
Treasury NNP B
bonds NNS I
for IN O
safety NN B
as IN O
stock NN B
prices NNS I
plummeted VBD O
and CC O
fears NNS B
mounted VBN O
of IN O
a DT B
replay NN I
of IN O
Friday NNP B
. . O

But CC O
stocks NNS B
later RB O
recovered VBD O
, , O
erasing VBG O
most RBS B
of IN O
their PRP$ B
early JJ I
declines NNS I
. . O

That DT B
cut NN O
short VB O
the DT B
rally NN I
in IN O
Treasury NNP B
bonds NNS I
and CC O
depressed JJ O
prices NNS B
moderately RB O
below IN O
late JJ B
Monday NNP I
's POS B
levels NNS I
. . O

The DT B
Dow NNP I
Jones NNP I
Industrial NNP I
Average NNP I
, , O
down RB O
more JJR B
than IN I
60.25 CD I
points NNS I
early RB O
in IN O
the DT B
day NN I
, , O
finished VBD O
18.65 CD B
points NNS I
lower JJR O
at IN O
2638.73 CD B
. . O

Long-term NNP B
Treasury NNP I
issues NNS I
declined VBD O
about IN B
half PDT I
a DT I
point NN I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
5 NN I
for IN O
each DT B
$ $ I
1,000 CD I
face NN I
amount NN I
. . O

`` `` O
The DT B
stock NN I
market NN I
clearly RB O
is VBZ O
leading VBG O
the DT B
bond NN I
markets NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Jack NNP B
Conlon NNP I
, , O
an DT B
executive JJ I
vice NN I
president NN I
at IN O
Nikko NNP B
Securities NNP I
. . O

`` `` O
People NNS B
are VBP O
breathing VBG O
a DT B
major JJ I
sigh NN I
of IN O
relief NN B
that IN O
the DT B
world NN I
did VBD O
n't RB O
end VB O
Monday NNP B
morning NN I
'' '' O
or CC O
yesterday NN B
. . O

Gold NNP B
, , O
a DT B
closely RB I
watched VBN I
barometer NN I
of IN O
investor NN B
anxiety NN I
, , O
was VBD O
little RB O
changed VBN O
. . O

The DT B
dollar NN I
initially RB O
fell VBD O
against IN O
other JJ B
major JJ I
currencies NNS I
on IN O
news NN B
that IN O
the DT B
U.S. NNP I
trade NN I
deficit NN I
surged VBD O
in IN O
August NNP B
to TO O
$ $ B
10.77 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
dollar NN I
later RB O
rebounded VBD O
, , O
finishing VBG O
slightly RB O
higher JJR O
against IN O
the DT B
yen NN I
although IN O
slightly RB O
lower JJR O
against IN O
the DT B
mark NN I
. . O

Federal NNP B
Reserve NNP I
officials NNS I
sent VBD O
another DT B
signal NN I
of IN O
their PRP$ B
determination NN I
to TO O
shore VB O
up IN O
investor NN B
confidence NN I
. . O

In IN O
an DT B
apparent JJ I
attempt NN I
to TO O
keep VB O
a DT B
lid NN I
on IN O
short-term JJ B
interest NN I
rates NNS I
, , O
the DT B
Fed NNP I
once RB O
again RB O
pumped VBN O
money NN B
into IN O
the DT B
banking NN I
system NN I
. . O

But CC O
the DT B
Fed NNP I
move NN I
was VBD O
a DT B
small JJ I
gesture NN I
, , O
traders NNS B
said VBD O
. . O

Fed JJ B
officials NNS I
appear VBP O
reluctant JJ O
to TO O
ease VB O
their PRP$ B
credit NN I
grip NN I
any DT O
further JJ O
because IN O
a DT B
bold JJ I
move NN I
does VBZ O
n't RB O
appear VB O
necessary JJ O
, , O
several JJ B
investment NN I
managers NNS I
said VBD O
. . O

The DT B
Fed NNP I
has VBZ O
allowed VBN O
a DT B
key JJ I
short-term JJ I
interest NN I
rate NN I
to TO O
decline VB O
about IN B
one-quarter NN I
percentage NN I
point NN I
. . O

The DT B
federal JJ I
funds NNS I
rate NN I
on IN O
overnight JJ B
loans NNS I
between IN O
banks NNS B
has VBZ O
been VBN O
hovering VBG O
around IN O
8 CD B
3\/4 CD I
% NN I
, , O
down RB O
from IN O
9 CD B
% NN I
previously RB O
. . O

Although IN O
stocks NNS B
have VBP O
led VBN O
bonds NNS B
this DT B
week NN I
, , O
some DT B
traders NNS I
predict VBP O
that DT B
relationship NN I
will MD O
reverse VB O
during IN O
the DT B
next JJ I
few JJ I
weeks NNS I
. . O

Nikko NNP B
's POS B
Mr. NNP I
Conlon NNP I
fears VBZ O
a DT B
huge JJ I
wave NN I
of IN O
Treasury NNP B
borrowing NN I
early JJ B
next JJ I
month NN I
will MD O
drive VB O
down RB O
Treasury NNP B
bond NN I
prices NNS I
. . O

That DT B
, , O
coupled VBN O
with IN O
poor JJ B
third-quarter JJ I
corporate-earnings NNS I
comparisons NNS I
, , O
`` `` O
will MD O
make VB O
trouble NN B
for IN O
the DT B
equity NN I
market NN I
for IN O
the DT B
next JJ I
two CD I
to TO I
three CD I
months NNS I
, , O
'' '' O
he PRP B
says VBZ O
. . O

But CC O
several JJ B
other JJ I
traders NNS I
contend VBP O
investors NNS B
have VBP O
overreacted VBN O
to TO O
junk-bond NN B
jitters NNS I
, , O
and CC O
that IN O
stock NN B
prices NNS I
will MD O
continue VB O
to TO O
recover VB O
. . O

`` `` O
They PRP B
shot NN O
the DT B
whole JJ I
orchestra NN I
just RB O
because IN O
the DT B
piano NN I
player NN I
hit VBD O
a DT B
bad JJ I
note NN I
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
Laszlo NNP B
Birinyi NNP I
, , O
president NN B
of IN O
Birinyi NNP B
Associates NNP I
Inc. NNP I
, , O
referring VBG O
to TO O
the DT B
stock NN I
market NN I
's POS B
plunge NN I
Friday NNP B
on IN O
news NN B
of IN O
trouble NN B
in IN O
financing VBG O
the DT B
UAL NNP I
Corp NNP I
. . I
buy-out NN I
. . O

In IN O
major JJ B
market NN I
activity NN I
: : O
Treasury NNP B
bond NN I
prices NNS I
fell VBD O
. . O

The DT B
yield NN I
on IN O
30-year NNP B
Treasury NNP I
bonds NNS I
climbed VBD O
back RB O
above IN O
8 CD B
% NN I
, , O
ending VBG O
the DT B
day NN I
at IN O
8.03 CD B
% NN I
. . O

The DT B
dollar NN I
was VBD O
mixed VBN O
. . O

Late JJ B
yesterday NN I
in IN O
New NNP B
York NNP I
, , O
the DT B
dollar NN I
rose VBD O
to TO O
142.75 CD B
yen NN I
from IN O
141.80 CD B
yen NN I
Monday NNP B
, , O
but CC O
fell VBD O
to TO O
1.8667 CD B
marks NNS I
from IN O
1.8685 CD B
marks NNS I
. . O

The DT B
Consumer NNP I
News NNP I
and CC I
Business NNP I
Channel NNP I
cable NN I
network NN I
and CC O
U.S. NNP B
News NNP I
& CC I
World NNP I
Report NNP I
have VBP O
formed VBN O
a DT B
joint JJ I
venture NN I
to TO O
produce VB O
cable NN B
program NN I
versions NNS I
of IN O
special JJ B
issues NNS I
of IN O
the DT B
magazine NN I
. . O

The DT B
programs NNS I
will MD O
run VB O
on IN O
the DT B
cable NN I
network NN I
the DT B
Sunday NNP I
evening NN I
immediately RB O
prior RB O
to TO O
the DT B
release NN I
of IN O
the DT B
special JJ I
issue NN I
of IN O
U.S. NNP B
News NNP I
& CC I
World NNP I
Report NNP I
. . O

CNBC NNP B
is VBZ O
a DT B
joint JJ I
venture NN I
of IN O
the DT B
National NNP I
Broadcasting NNP I
Co. NNP I
, , O
a DT B
unit NN I
of IN O
General NNP B
Electric NNP I
Co. NNP I
, , O
and CC O
Cablevision NNP B
System NNP I
Corp NNP I
. . O

Advertisers NNS B
will MD O
be VB O
offered VBN O
an DT B
advertising NN I
package NN I
, , O
which WDT B
for IN O
a DT B
single JJ I
price NN I
, , O
will MD O
include VB O
time NN B
on IN O
the DT B
CNBC NNP I
program NN I
and CC O
ad NN B
pages NNS I
in IN O
the DT B
special JJ I
guides NNS I
. . O

CNBC NNP B
will MD O
produce VB O
six CD B
, , I
one-hour JJ I
programs NNS I
, , O
beginning VBG O
in IN O
April NNP B
1990 CD I
. . O

The DT B
first JJ I
program NN I
scheduled VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
joint JJ I
venture NN I
is VBZ O
`` `` O
The DT O
1990 CD O
Homeowner NNP B
's POS I
Guide NNP O
. . O
'' '' O

Other JJ B
programs NNS I
and CC I
special JJ I
issues NNS I
will MD O
be VB O
based VBN O
on IN O
themes NNS B
of IN O
health NN B
, , O
jobs NNS B
, , O
personal JJ B
finance NN I
, , O
the DT B
best JJS I
colleges NNS I
, , O
and CC O
investments NNS B
. . O

The DT B
programs NNS I
will MD O
be VB O
written VBN O
and CC O
produced VBN O
by IN O
CNBC NNP B
, , O
with IN O
background NN B
and CC I
research NN I
provided VBN O
by IN O
staff NN B
from IN O
U.S. NNP B
News NNP I
& CC I
World NNP I
Report NNP I
. . O

Skoal NNP B
Daze NNP I

I PRP B
've VBP O
learned VBD O
the DT B
hard JJ I
way NN I
that IN O
too RB B
much JJ I
booze NN I
Takes VBZ O
revenge NN B
the DT B
next JJ I
day NN I
about IN O
nine CD B
; : O
No DT B
wonder NN I
I PRP I
say VBP O
, , O
`` `` O
I PRP B
drink VBP O
to TO O
your PRP$ B
health NN I
'' '' O
-- : O
It PRP B
certainly RB O
is VBZ O
n't RB O
to TO O
mine VB B
! . O

-- : B
George NNP I
O. NNP I
Ludcke NNP I
. . I

Spaced NNP O
Out IN O

Those DT B
supermarket NN I
tabloids NNS I
Make VBP O
me PRP B
feel VBP O
slow JJ O
Because IN O
I PRP B
still RB O
have VBP O
n't RB O
seen VBN O

-- : B
Bruce NNP I
Kafaroff NNP I
. . I

Daffynition NN B

Repression NN B
: : O
emote VB B
control NN I
. . O

-- : B
Daisy NNP I
Brown NNP I
. . I

Weyerhaeuser NNP B
Co. NNP I
reported VBD O
a DT B
one-time JJ I
gain NN I
and CC O
strong JJ B
wood-product NN I
sales NNS I
that WDT B
offset VBP O
weakness NN B
in IN O
pulp NN B
and CC I
paper NN I
to TO O
fuel VB O
a DT B
15 CD I
% NN I
jump NN I
in IN O
third-quarter JJ B
net JJ I
income NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
166.8 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
78 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

In IN O
the DT B
1988 CD I
third JJ I
quarter NN I
, , O
the DT B
forest-products NNS I
company NN I
reported VBD O
profit NN B
of IN O
$ $ B
144.9 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
69 CD B
cents NNS I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

Sales NNS B
rose VBD O
9 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
2.57 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
2.36 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

For IN O
the DT B
nine CD I
months NNS I
, , O
the DT B
company NN I
posted VBD O
a DT B
14 CD I
% NN I
rise NN I
in IN O
profit NN B
to TO O
$ $ B
469.8 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
2.21 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
, , O
from IN O
$ $ B
410.3 CD I
million CD I
, , O
or CC O
$ $ B
1.95 CD I
a DT B
share NN I
. . O

Sales NNS B
rose VBD O
9 CD B
% NN I
to TO O
$ $ B
7.54 CD I
billion CD I
from IN O
$ $ B
6.95 CD I
billion CD I
. . O

Results NNS B
for IN O
the DT B
1989 CD I
third JJ I
quarter NN I
and CC I
nine CD I
months NNS I
include VBP O
a DT B
pretax JJ I
loss NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
33 CD I
million CD I
from IN O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
business NN I
improvement NN I
and CC I
refocusing NN I
program NN I
, , O
and CC O
a DT B
gain NN I
of IN O
$ $ B
49 CD I
million CD I
on IN O
the DT B
sale NN I
of IN O
a DT B
subsidiary NN I
's POS B
common JJ I
stock NN I
. . O

Forest-products NNS B
operations NNS I
strengthened VBN O
in IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
, , O
while IN O
paper NN B
operations NNS I
were VBD O
dogged VBN O
by IN O
higher JJR B
costs NNS I
, , O
soft JJ B
newsprint NN I
exports NNS I
and CC O
a DT B
strong JJ I
Japanese JJ I
yen NN I
. . O

Some DT B
competing VBG I
forest-products NNS I
firms NNS I
have VBP O
recently RB O
reported VBN O
improved VBN B
results NNS I
due JJ O
to TO O
strong JJ B
pulp NN I
and CC I
paper NN I
business NN I
. . O

Weyerhaeuser NNP B
's POS B
pulp NN I
and CC I
paper NN I
operations NNS I
were VBD O
up IN O
for IN O
the DT B
nine CD I
months NNS I
, , O
but CC O
full-year JJ B
performance NN I
depends VBZ O
on IN O
the DT B
balance NN I
of IN O
operating VBG B
and CC I
maintenance NN I
costs NNS I
, , O
plus CC O
pricing NN B
of IN O
certain JJ B
products NNS I
, , O
the DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
. . O

Looking VBG O
ahead RB O
to TO O
the DT B
fourth JJ I
quarter NN I
, , O
the DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
export NN B
log NN I
and CC I
lumber NN I
markets NNS I
will MD O
be VB O
weak JJ O
, , O
while IN O
panel NN B
and CC I
plywood NN I
markets NNS I
will MD O
be VB O
stronger JJR O
. . O

Pulp NNP B
and CC I
paper NN I
performance NN I
depends VBZ O
on IN O
cost NN B
and CC I
price NN I
variables NNS I
, , O
the DT B
company NN I
said VBD O
. . O

Bankers NNP B
Trust NNP I
New NNP I
York NNP I
Corp. NNP I
became VBD O
the DT B
latest JJS I
major JJ I
U.S. NNP I
bank NN I
to TO O
increase VB O
reserves NNS B
for IN O
its PRP$ B
loans NNS I
to TO O
less-developed JJ B
countries NNS I
, , O
making VBG O
a DT B
$ $ I
1.6 CD I
billion CD I
third-quarter JJ I
addition NN I
to TO O
its PRP$ B
provision NN I
. . O

The DT B
bank NN I
also RB O
said VBD O
it PRP B
expects VBZ O
to TO O
report VB O
a DT B
$ $ I
1.42 CD I
billion CD I
loss NN I
for IN O
the DT B
third JJ I
quarter NN I
and CC O
a DT B
loss NN I
for IN O
the DT B
full JJ I
year NN I
. . O

The DT B
new JJ I
reserves NNS I
bring VBP O
the DT B
company NN I
's POS B
provision NN I
for IN O
loans NNS B
to TO O
Third NNP B
World NNP I
countries NNS I
to TO O
$ $ B
2.6 CD I
billion CD I
, , O
or CC O
85 CD B
% NN I
of IN O
Bankers NNP B
Trust NNP I
's POS B
medium NN I
and CC I
long-term JJ I
loans NNS I
to TO O
these DT B
countries NNS I
. . O

`` `` O
Step NN O
up IN O
to TO O
the DT B
plate NN I
and CC O
take VB O
the DT B
big JJ I
swing NN I
. . O

Get VB O
the DT B
problem NN I
behind IN O
you PRP B
and CC O
do VBP O
n't RB O
look VB O
back RB O
, , O
'' '' O
said VBD O
James NNP B
J. NNP I
McDermott NNP I
, , O
analyst NN B
at IN O
Keefe NNP B
, , I
Bruyette NNP I
& CC I
Woods NNP I
, , O
in IN O
approving VBG O
of IN O
the DT B
move NN I
. . O

Bankers NNP B
Trust NNP I
`` `` O
has VBZ O
had VBN O
the DT B
capacity NN I
to TO O
do VB O
this DT B
for IN O
some DT B
time NN I
, , O
'' '' O
the DT B
analyst NN I
said VBD O
. . O

He PRP B
expects VBZ O
Citicorp NNP B
to TO O
take VB O
a DT B
similar JJ I
step NN I
this DT B
year NN I
. . O

Citicorp NN B
yesterday NN B
reported VBD O
a DT B
9 CD I
% NN I
third-quarter JJ I
earnings NNS I
drop NN I
, , O
which WDT B
analysts NNS B
called VBD O
a DT O
bit NN O
disappointing JJ O
, , O
while IN O
Manufacturers NNP B
Hanover NNP I
Corp. NNP I
posted VBD O
a DT B
$ $ I
789 CD I
million CD I
loss NN I
for IN O
the DT B
quarter NN I
after IN O
adding VBG O
$ $ B
950 CD I
million CD I
to TO O
its PRP$ B
reserve NN I
for IN O
loans NNS B
to TO O
less-developed JJ B
countries NNS I
. . O

Three CD B
other JJ I
major JJ I
U.S. NNP I
banks NNS I
posted VBD O
earnings NNS B
increases NNS I
. . O

Wells NNP B
Fargo NNP I
& CC I
Co. NNP I
of IN O
San NNP B
Francisco NNP I
posted VBD O
a DT B
17 CD I
% NN I
jump NN I
. . O

PNC NNP B
Financial NNP I
Corp. NNP I
, , O
the DT B
parent NN I
of IN O
Pittsburgh NNP B
National NNP I
Bank NNP I
, , O
reported VBD O
net JJ B
income NN I
climbed VBD O
9.8 CD B
% NN I
, , O
while IN O
net JJ B
for IN O
Banc NNP B
One CD I
Corp. NNP I
of IN O
Columbus NNP B
, , O
Ohio NNP B
, , O
grew VBD O
3.8 CD B
% NN I
. . O