Update app.py

app.py

@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ STRICT REQUIREMENTS:
             logger.error("No content received from Anthropic API")
             return "Error: No content received from API", None, None
         
-        response_text = message.content[0].text
+                response_text = message.content[0].text
         logger.debug("Successfully received response from Anthropic API")
 
         # Execute SymPy code and append results
@@ -530,10 +530,6 @@ STRICT REQUIREMENTS:
         logger.debug("Successfully created temporary files")
         
         return response_text, questions_path, full_path
-            
-    except Exception as e:
-        logger.error(f"Error generating question: {str(e)}")
-        return f"Error: {str(e)}", None, None
         
 def extract_and_run_sympy_code_simple(response_text):
     """
@@ -605,8 +601,7 @@ def check_and_resolve_discrepancy(initial_response, sympy_output):
         If the two answers are inconsistent with each other then please:
         1. Identify which solution is correct
         2. Explain the error in the incorrect solution
-        3. Provide a revised COMPLETE solution that fixes any errors, does not refer to SymPy, 
-and does not refer to the Original solution even if this means large parts of the Original solution are repeated.
+        3. Provide a revised complete solution from the beginning that fixes any errors and does not refer to SymPy
 
 Original solution:
 {initial_response}
@@ -635,15 +630,31 @@ Please maintain the same LaTeX formatting as the original solution."""
             resolution_text += "\n\nNew SymPy Verification Results:\n```\n" + new_sympy_output + "\n```"
         
         # Determine if there was a discrepancy that required a revised solution
-        has_discrepancy = "revised complete solution" in resolution_text.lower()
+        # Check for various phrasings that indicate a revised solution
+        revision_phrases = ["revised complete solution", "revised solution", "correct complete solution", "corrected solution"]
+        has_discrepancy = False
+        found_phrase = None
+        
+        for phrase in revision_phrases:
+            if phrase in resolution_text.lower():
+                has_discrepancy = True
+                found_phrase = phrase
+                break
         
         # Extract revised solution if it exists
         revised_solution = None
-        if has_discrepancy:
+        if has_discrepancy and found_phrase:
             # Look for the revised solution after the explanation
-            solution_parts = resolution_text.split("revised complete solution", maxsplit=1)
+            solution_parts = resolution_text.split(found_phrase, maxsplit=1)
             if len(solution_parts) > 1:
                 revised_solution = solution_parts[1].strip()
+            
+            # Add additional check for solutions that might appear after "here's the"
+            if not revised_solution and "here's the" in solution_parts[0].lower():
+                solution_parts = resolution_text.split("here's the", maxsplit=1)
+                if len(solution_parts) > 1:
+                    revised_solution = solution_parts[1].strip()
+                    has_discrepancy = True
         
         return resolution_text, has_discrepancy, revised_solution
             
@@ -669,7 +680,7 @@ Please:
 
 If you find any issues:
 1. Clearly explain what is incorrect or missing
-2. Provide a COMPLETE corrected solution
+2. Provide a COMPLETE CORRECTED solution
 3. Maintain the same LaTeX formatting as the original
 4. Include any missing assumptions or conditions
 5. If relevant, provide corrected SymPy code