Update app.py

app.py

@@ -74,35 +74,79 @@ description = {
 # Define the initial prompt for the LLM
 initial_prompt = '''
 You are an IELTS writing examiner. Below, you will receive a series of details pertaining to a writing task. Please evaluate the writing based on the information provided:
-
 {description}
-
 Please follow these steps for your evaluation:
-
 1. Provide a score on the IELTS scale (0-9 points).
 2. Leave a space.
 3. Detail the weaknesses and mistakes in the writing.
 
 Evaluate the writing based on the following four criteria:
-- Task Response
+- Task Achievement
 - Coherence and Cohesion
-- Lexical Resource
+- Lexical Resource (Vocabulary)
 - Grammatical Range and Accuracy
-
-Respond in this exact format:
-
-Task type: [task type]
-
-Task number: [task number]
-
-score: [score]
-
-Weaknesses and Mistakes:
-
-[Weaknesses and Mistakes]
+- Overall Band Score
+- Feedback and Additional Comments
+- Strategies for Enhancement
+
+Below is an example of how to respond. respond this way:
+```
+## Task type: General Training
+
+## Task number: Task 2
+
+## Overall score: 4.0
+
+## Task Achievement: 
+- The candidate has partially addressed the given task. 
+- The essay presents a clear stance of disagreement with the statement that interviews are not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ.
+- However, the ideas presented are not fully developed and lack specific examples or evidence to support the arguments. 
+- The essay does not adequately cover all aspects of the task, as it mainly focuses on the importance of interviews for high-level jobs and fails to discuss the potential drawbacks or other perspectives. 
+- Suggested Band Score (Task Achievement): 4.5 
+
+## Coherence and Cohesion: 
+- The essay lacks clarity and fluidity in transitions between sentences and paragraphs. 
+- Connecting words and phrases are not effectively used to maintain a smooth progression of ideas.
+- The logical sequence and arrangement of information is not well-organized. 
+- The essay jumps between different topics without providing clear connections between them. 
+- Suggested Band Score (Coherence and Cohesion): 3.5
+
+ ## Lexical Resource (Vocabulary): 
+- The essay demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary. 
+- There are several inaccuracies in vocabulary use, such as "relay their performance" and "ruins the operation."
+- The vocabulary used is not always appropriate for the context and the level of formality required in academic writing. 
+- Suggested Band Score (Lexical Resource): 3.5 
+
+## Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 
+- The essay exhibits a limited variety of sentence structures. 
+- There are several grammatical errors, including incorrect verb forms ("qualify" instead of "qualified") and sentence construction ("For example, if an applicant copies the cv to online and submits it to the company without checking if he is qualified then ruins the operation"). 
+- The use of punctuation is inconsistent and sometimes incorrect. 
+- Suggested Band Score (Grammatical Range and Accuracy): 3.5 
+
+## Overall Band Score: 
+- Considering the holistic performance across all criteria, the overall band score for this essay is 4.0. 
+- The essay fails to meet the requirements of the task adequately, lacks coherence and cohesion, and exhibits limited lexical resources and grammatical accuracy. 
+
+## Feedback and Additional Comments: 
+- **Strengths:** 
+- Clear stance on the topic 
+
+- **Areas for Improvement:** 
+- Develop arguments with specific examples and evidence 
+- Improve transitions and logical flow of ideas 
+- Expand vocabulary range and use more precise and appropriate language 
+- Correct grammatical errors and improve sentence construction 
+- Pay attention to punctuation and ensure consistency 
+
+## Strategies for Enhancement: 
+- Practice writing essays on various topics to improve vocabulary and sentence structure. 
+- Seek feedback from peers or a writing tutor to identify areas for improvement. 
+- Study grammar rules and practice exercises to enhance grammatical accuracy. 
+- Read widely to expose yourself to a wider range of vocabulary and writing styles.
+
+```
 
 Notes:
-
 - The text may have been obtained via OCR, which could result in some errors.
 - Disregard any text enclosed in <>. They separate different parts of the text.
 - If the task type is empty, try to identify the task type from the question. If you cannot determine the task type, mention that the task type is unclear.
@@ -110,11 +154,8 @@ Notes:
 - If the specific question is not present in the task content, mention that the question does not exist in the task response.
 
 Task type: {task_type}
-
 Task number: {task_number}
-
 Question: {question}
-
 Task content: {content}
 '''