from langchain.docstore.document import Document def create_prompt(documents, question, response): prompt = f""" I asked someone to answer a question based on one or more documents. Your task is to review their response and assess whether or not each sentence in that response is supported by text in the documents. If supported, identify which sentences in the documents provide that support. Additionally, identify which documents contain useful information for answering the question, and which documents the answer was sourced from. Here are the documents, each of which is split into sentences. Alongside each sentence is associated key, such as '0a.' or '0b.' that you can use to refer to it: {documents} The question was: {question} Here is their response, split into sentences with associated keys: {response} Provide a JSON response with an answer , relevance_explanation, all_relevant_sentence_keys, overall_supported_explanation, overall_supported, sentence_support_information(this can be a json inside a json and with these fields response_sentence_key, explanation, supporting_sentence_keys, fully_supported) and all_utilized_sentence_keys below are the definitions You must respond with a JSON object matching this schema: {{ "answer": "string", "relevance_explanation": "string", "all_relevant_sentence_keys": ["string"], "overall_supported_explanation": "string", "overall_supported": "boolean", "sentence_support_information": [ {{ "response_sentence_key": "string", "explanation": "string", "supporting_sentence_keys": ["string"], "fully_supported": "boolean" }}, ], "all_utilized_sentence_keys": ["string"] }} The relevance_explanation field is a string explaining which documents contain useful information for answering the question. Provide a step-by-step breakdown of information provided in the documents and how it is useful for answering the question. The all_relevant_sentence_keys field is a list of all document sentences keys (e.g. '0a') that are relevant to the question. Include every sentence that is useful and relevant to the question, even if it was not used in the response, or if only parts of the sentence are useful. Ignore the provided response when making this judgement and base your judgement solely on the provided documents and question. Omit sentences that, if removed from the document, would not impact someone's ability to answer the question. The overall_supported_explanation field is a string explaining why the response *as a whole* is or is not supported by the documents. In this field, provide a step-by-step breakdown of the claims made in the response and the support (or lack thereof) for those claims in the documents. Begin by assessing each claim separately, one by one; don’t make any remarks about the response as a whole until you have assessed all the claims in isolation. The overall_supported field is a boolean indicating whether the response as a whole is supported by the documents. This value should reflect the conclusion you drew at the end of your step-by-step breakdown in overall_supported_explanation. In the sentence_support_information field, provide information about the support *for each sentence* in the response. The sentence_support_information field is a list of objects, one for each sentence in the response. Each object MUST have the following fields: - response_sentence_key: a string identifying the sentence in the response. This key is the same as the one used in the response above. 16 - explanation: a string explaining why the sentence is or is not supported by the documents. - supporting_sentence_keys: keys (e.g. '0a') of sentences from the documents that support the response sentence. If the sentence is not supported, this list MUST be empty. If the sentence is supported, this list MUST contain one or more keys. In special cases where the sentence is supported, but not by any specific sentence, you can use the string "supported_without_sentence" to indicate that the sentence is generally supported by the documents. Consider cases where the sentence is expressing inability to answer the question due to lack of relevant information in the provided contex as "supported_without_sentence". In cases where the sentence is making a general statement (e.g. outlining the steps to produce an answer, or summarizing previously stated sentences, or a transition sentence), use the sting "general".In cases where the sentence is correctly stating a well-known fact, like a mathematical formula, use the string "well_known_fact". In cases where the sentence is performing numerical reasoning (e.g. addition, multiplication), use the string "numerical_reasoning". - fully_supported: a boolean indicating whether the sentence is fully supported by the documents. - This value should reflect the conclusion you drew at the end of your step-by-step breakdown in explanation. - If supporting_sentence_keys is an empty list, then fully_supported must be false. - Otherwise, use fully_supported to clarify whether everything in the response sentence is fully supported by the document text indicated in supporting_sentence_keys (fully_supported = true), or whether the sentence is only partially or incompletely supported by that document text (fully_supported = false). The all_utilized_sentence_keys field is a list of all sentences keys (e.g. ’0a’) that were used to construct the answer. Include every sentence that either directly supported the answer, or was implicitly used to construct the answer, even if it was not used in its entirety. Omit sentences that were not used, and could have been removed from the documents without affecting the answer. You must respond with a valid JSON string. Use escapes for quotes, e.g. ‘\\"‘, and newlines, e.g. ‘\\n‘. Do not write anything before or after the JSON string. Do not wrap the JSON string in backticks like ‘‘‘ or ‘‘‘json. As a reminder: your task is to review the response and assess which documents contain useful information pertaining to the question, and how each sentence in the response is supported by the text in the documents. """ return prompt