content: I found that in at least one case mentioned in this book, information given to readers was not necessarily true. Was this book written after researching past newspaper articles or was it really from experience? I now realize how John Q. Public is lead by the nose into believing whatever hype will sell. Once again, the public is lead on a lynching, without the complete truth available. Look out for the boogyman - he still makes money for some people. I am disappointed in the book, knowing that if one case was based on public hype, how can I believe anything else in the book?