content: I am fed up with this misappropriation of a perfectly good word, 'liberalism'.From the Cambridge Dictionary:liberal (POLITICS) adjective (of a political party or a country) believing in or allowing more personal freedom and a development towards a fairer sharing of wealth and power within society.liberal (SOCIETY) adjective respecting and allowing many different types of beliefs or behaviour a liberal society/church/ideological position/person.Okay, how does that equate to the type of thing Boortz rants endlessly on about? Answer: it doesn't.Liberals believe in freedom and choice tempered by social responsibility. What Boortz thinks he's talking about is communism, of a type which barely exists in the world any more. And the idea that - in the US context - the Democratic party aspires to control every aspect of individual lives is ludicrous.But then, what's more ludicrous still is that, instead of laughing at this book, people take it seriously!