content: I wonder why "28 Days Later" is proclaimed a groundbreaking take on zombie horror. Could it be because it offers neither zombies nor much horror? Granted, the rage infected living are the closest equivalent to real zombies. Unfortunately, they play just a minor role.The movie has only a few scenes that are moderately scary, but short-lived and all over before something truly frightening would ever happen.More often the film is tedious.And contrary to what you might have heard there is nothing new here.After the main characters meet the soldiers it's getting worse, much worse. It's as though that second part belongs to a totally different film (one I definitely wouldn't want to see).Oh, and regarding the social commentary ... blah, blah, blah ... I'm not impressed - it's nothing new under the sun, either.You may think a 1 star rating a bit harsh, but it equals my huge disappointment with this so-called "horror" movie.