Zhaorun commited on
Commit
bbb3390
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f0c9ee0

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +5 -3
README.md CHANGED
@@ -11,17 +11,19 @@ pinned: false
11
 
12
  Project page: https://mj-bench.github.io/
13
 
14
- ![Dataset Overview](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench.github.io/main/static/images/dataset_overview.png)
15
-
16
-
17
  While text-to-image models like DALLE-3 and Stable Diffusion are rapidly proliferating, they often encounter challenges such as hallucination, bias, and the production of unsafe, low-quality output. To effectively address these issues, it is crucial to align these models with desired behaviors based on feedback from a multimodal judge. Despite their significance, current multimodal judges frequently undergo inadequate evaluation of their capabilities and limitations, potentially leading to misalignment and unsafe fine-tuning outcomes.
18
 
19
  To address this issue, we introduce MJ-Bench, a novel benchmark which incorporates a comprehensive preference dataset to evaluate multimodal judges in providing feedback for image generation models across four key perspectives: **alignment**, **safety**, **image quality**, and **bias**.
20
 
 
 
21
  Specifically, we evaluate a large variety of multimodal judges including
22
 
23
  - 6 smaller-sized CLIP-based scoring models
24
  - 11 open-source VLMs (e.g. LLaVA family)
25
  - 4 and close-source VLMs (e.g. GPT-4o, Claude 3)
 
 
 
26
 
27
  We are actively updating the [leaderboard](https://mj-bench.github.io/) and you are welcome to submit the evaluation result of your multimodal judge on [our dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench) to [huggingface leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench-Leaderboard).
 
11
 
12
  Project page: https://mj-bench.github.io/
13
 
 
 
 
14
  While text-to-image models like DALLE-3 and Stable Diffusion are rapidly proliferating, they often encounter challenges such as hallucination, bias, and the production of unsafe, low-quality output. To effectively address these issues, it is crucial to align these models with desired behaviors based on feedback from a multimodal judge. Despite their significance, current multimodal judges frequently undergo inadequate evaluation of their capabilities and limitations, potentially leading to misalignment and unsafe fine-tuning outcomes.
15
 
16
  To address this issue, we introduce MJ-Bench, a novel benchmark which incorporates a comprehensive preference dataset to evaluate multimodal judges in providing feedback for image generation models across four key perspectives: **alignment**, **safety**, **image quality**, and **bias**.
17
 
18
+ ![Dataset Overview](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench.github.io/main/static/images/dataset_overview.png)
19
+
20
  Specifically, we evaluate a large variety of multimodal judges including
21
 
22
  - 6 smaller-sized CLIP-based scoring models
23
  - 11 open-source VLMs (e.g. LLaVA family)
24
  - 4 and close-source VLMs (e.g. GPT-4o, Claude 3)
25
+ -
26
+ ![Evaluation result](https://github.com/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench.github.io/blob/main/static/images/radar_plot.png)
27
+
28
 
29
  We are actively updating the [leaderboard](https://mj-bench.github.io/) and you are welcome to submit the evaluation result of your multimodal judge on [our dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench) to [huggingface leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/MJ-Bench/MJ-Bench-Leaderboard).