nityathakkar commited on
Commit
175b169
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 63bdd24

more specific prompt

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. app.py +1 -1
app.py CHANGED
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ If you find such a case, quote the specific statement from the review and provid
194
  Ensure that the quote from the paper specifically answers the claim or request made by the reviewer, and explain why the selected quote is relevant.
195
  If the reviewer has a question, you do not need to respond. If you respond, point to a specific section or quote from the paper and ask “does this provide what you were looking for?”
196
  2. The review does not make any vague, unjustifiable, or unsupported claims.
197
- If there are any vague comments in the review, ask the reviewer to be more specific.
198
  3. If the reviewer claims the paper isn't novel, they should explain why and specify the paper(s) they believe this work is similar to.
199
  If they have not already done this, ask the reviewer to do so.
200
  4. The reviewer does not make any personal attacks against the paper and/or author(s).
 
194
  Ensure that the quote from the paper specifically answers the claim or request made by the reviewer, and explain why the selected quote is relevant.
195
  If the reviewer has a question, you do not need to respond. If you respond, point to a specific section or quote from the paper and ask “does this provide what you were looking for?”
196
  2. The review does not make any vague, unjustifiable, or unsupported claims.
197
+ If there are any vague comments in the review, ask the reviewer to be more SPECIFIC and DETAILED.
198
  3. If the reviewer claims the paper isn't novel, they should explain why and specify the paper(s) they believe this work is similar to.
199
  If they have not already done this, ask the reviewer to do so.
200
  4. The reviewer does not make any personal attacks against the paper and/or author(s).