--- abstract: 'In the paper we discussed the observational aspects of rotation in the Universe on different scales. We show dependence between the angular momentum of the structures and their size. The presented observational situation is that the galaxies, their pairs and compact groups have a non-vanishing angular momentum. In the structures of mass corresponding to groups of galaxies, this feature has not been found, while in the clusters and superclusters alignment of galaxy orientation has been actually found. Also we know that galaxies have net angular momentum due to the fact that we actually measure the rotation curves of galaxies. These facts lead to the conclusion that theories which connect galaxy angular momentum with its surrounding structure are at some extend favored by data. We show that in the light of scenarios of galaxy formations this result could be interpreted as an effect of tidal forces mechanism, but it is also consistent with Li's model, in which galaxies form in the rotating universe. The theoretical and observational aspects of possible global rotation of the Universe were discussed as well.' address: | Institute of Physics, Opole University,\ Oleska48, 45-052 Opole, Poland\ greenemarcia@example.com author: - 'W<span>ł</span>odzimierz God<span>ł</span>owski' title: 'GLOBAL AND LOCAL EFFECTS OF ROTATION: OBSERVATIONAL ASPECTS' --- Introduction ============ Investigating occurrences of rotation in the Universe and its possible consequences is one of the major issues in contemporary astronomy. It involves the question of rotation of individual cosmic structures as well as the question of possible rotation of the entire Universe. The rotating objects in the Universe are found on various scales - from subatomic particles to stars and galaxies - so it is reasonable to ask whether the Universe as a whole does rotate too. If there is the global, or just a large-scale, rotation of the Universe, its effects should be able to be detected in an observational way. In this work, the possible rotational effects at various astronomical scales are discussed and observational data that could be possibly related to rotation are presented. The attempts to observationally confirm that the Universe actually rotates have been ever regarded much skeptically. The first significant evidence for the global rotation of the Universe was provided by Birch (1982). Birch considered position angles and polarization of classic bright double radio sources and found that the differences in position angles and their polarization are correlated with their position on the sky. That study was immediately criticized by Phinney and Webster (1983), who accused Birch of invalid application of statistical methods and stated that his data are inadequate for drawing such far-reaching conclusions. In reply to them, Birch (1983) found that the effect observed by him had been present in the original data of Phinney and Webster, while the validity of Birch's statistics was proved by Kendall and Young (1984). In next work by Phinney et al. (1984), the data were reanalyzed using novel statistical methods and taking into account possible errors and observational uncertainties. The authors concluded that the effect indicated by Birch was confirmed by observations, however its nature was not clear. Bietenholz and Kronberg (1984) and Bietenholz (1986) having extended the sample of analyzed objects did not find any evidence to confirm Birch's effect. Another attempt to empirically confirm the rotation of the Universe was undertaken by Nodland and Ralston (1997a), who studied correlations between the direction and distance to galaxies and the angle $\beta$ between the polarization direction and their larger axis and found an effect which they interpreted as rotation of the polarization plane dependent on the distance. The study immediately provoked discussion on the validity of statistical methods used (Carrol and Field 1997, Loredo et al. 1997, Eisenstein and Bunn 1997, Nodland and Ralston 1997b, see also Ralston and Jain 2004 for later review); it was also indicated that the effect had not been confirmed by analysis of new, better observational data (Wardle et al. 1997, see however that Jain and Ralston 1999 obtained opposite conclusion), and that even if Birch's effect were to be regarded as evidence for a large-scale rotation of the Universe, the value obtained by Birch is too large as compared to the anisotropy found in cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). Potential difficulties in empirical confirmation of rotation of the Universe were mentioned also in a number of theoretical works. Silk (1970) already drew attention to the fact that at present, otherwise than in the early Universe, any dynamic effects of global rotation should be negligible, and the rotational period must exceed the Hubble time, which is a direct consequence of the small anisotropy of CMBR. Later on, Barrow, Juszkiewicz and Sonoda (1985) obtained strict constraints on the value of rotation scalar by investigating some classes of Bianchi models which involve Friedmann' models as their special cases. They demonstrated that for a flat universe there is a limit of $\omega/H_0\sim 2 \times 10^{-5}$ ($\omega\sim 1.5 \times 10^{-15} \, {\rm rad \, yr}^{-1}$). Recently Pontzen and Challinor (2007), examining effects of CMBR polarization induced by global rotation, demonstrated that they could be used to determine constraints on the amount of global rotation. Su and Chu (2009) obtained a limit of this kind from analyzing the 2nd-order Sachs-Wolfe effect, namely that the angular velocity of shear-free rotation of $\Lambda CDM$ universe is less than $\omega \sim 10^{-9} \, {\rm rad \, yr}^{-1}$ at the last scattering surface. This constraint is weaker than that obtained by Barrow, Juszkiewicz and Sonoda (1985) for the flat Bianchi models. Chechin (2010) investigated the rotational effects of cosmic vacuum. Considering the global rotation and the induced rotation of elliptical galaxies, he estimated the value of angular velocity of the Universe in his model as $\, \, \omega \sim 10^{-19} \, {\rm rad \, s}^{-1}$ ($3 \times 10^{-11} \, {\rm rad \, yr}^{-1}$). In the light of the above results the global rotation of the Universe cannot be regarded as confirmed by observations, thus instead of observational confirmation of rotation of the Universe one should rather talk about rotational limits within a given cosmological model. The relativistic models with rotation and geodetics in spacetime behaving according to general relativity were investigated already in the first half of 20th century, beginning from the works of Lanczos (1924), Gamow (1946) and Goedel (1949). Ellis and Olive (1983) as well as Gron and Soleng (1987) demonstrated that the global rotation in inflationary models of the Universe - if any - should be small. Demia<span>ń</span>ski and Griszczuk (1972) discussed solutions of the Einstein equations for the case of flat homogeneous anisotropic space filled with expanding and rotating ideal fluid with non-zero shear, addressing primarily the question how rotation influences the behaviour of matter near the initial singularity. The Einstein equations with rotating fluid were also analyzed in a number of studies by Krasi<span>ń</span>ski (Krasi<span>ń</span>ski 1975, 1997, 1998a,b,c, 1999, 2001a,b). Fil'chenkov (2003, 2005) considered a possibility of cosmological origin of rotation of astronomical objects due to a tunneling effect in quantum cosmology. The dynamics of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) models with global rotation was discussed in Szyd<span>ł</span>owski and God<span>ł</span>owski (2005). The role of rotation of objects in the Universe and its significance for astronomical measurements was analyzed in Vishvakarma (2006). Recently Bratek, Jalocha and Kutschera (2007) found a class of explicit solutions with cylindrical symmetry for differentially rotating gas. Discussion of anisotropic cosmological models with magnetic field and rotation can be found in Demia<span>ń</span>ski and Doroshkevich (2007).Jain, Modgil, and Ralston (2007) examined the Type 1a supernova data in order to determine if it shows any signal of large scale anisotropy. The anisotropy was modeled by an extended Gödel metric (Gödel-Obukhow metric), which incorporated expansion along with rotation. Sousa, Pereira and Silva (2008) considered the relation of energy and momentum density in Goedel's universes, while Akarsu and Kilinc (2010) analyzed locally rotationally symmetric (LRS) Bianchi Type I cosmological models are examined in the presence of dynamically anisotropic dark energy and perfect fluid. Iorio (2010) provided a detailed account of influence of large-scale rotation on the Solar System. The main problem in testing models with non-vanishing rotation is that there are no accepted observables for this purpose to date. It is also worth noting that while there have been established some upper limits for rotation from analysis of CMBR and primeval nucleosynthesis (Goedel 1949, Hawking 1969, Collins and Hawking 1973, Barrow, Juszkiewicz, and Sonoda 1985, Ciufolini and Wheeler 1995, Bunn, Ferreira and Silk 1996, Kogut, Hinshaw and Banday 1997), all these works based on a model involving both shear and rotation, which makes discussing rotation a rather complicated task due to intertwined effects of shear and rotation. Thus it is easier to study a Newtonian equivalent of this model, which allows for rotation with no shear. Cosmological models with dark radiation ======================================= In looking for limits of amount of rotation it is convenient to use Senovilla's formulation of Newtonian cosmology. According to Senovilla, Sopuerta and Szekeres (1998), density and pressure in a Newtonian universe filled with homogeneous fluid will not explicitly depend on spatial variables, while depending on time. It is, however, assumed that fluid velocity depends in a linear manner on spatial variables (Szekeres and Rankin 1977, Senovilla, Sopuerta and Szekeres 1998). In this case, contrary to the general relativity solutions, there are solutions without shear that fulfill the Heckmann-Schucking equations with expansion and rotation. This situation has no equivalent in general relativity, where homogeneous rotating and expanding universes (but non-tilted - the models where vectors of 4-velocity $u^{\mu}$ are not orthogonal to the surface of homogeneity are called "tilted" ones - Obukhov (2000), Obukhov, Chrobok, and Scherfner 2002)) with ideal fluid have to possess a non-vanishing shear (Ellis 1966, King and Ellis 1973, Raychaudhuri 1979, Collins 1985). In a Newtonian universe one can readily derive observables required for cosmological tests. On the other hand, the Newtonian approximation seems a reasonable one, as it is revealed from the CMBR analysis that the Universe is flat or nearly flat (Spergel et al. 2007), and furthermore, for the flat Bianchi I models, for one, the shear scalar decreases more rapidly (with increasing scale factor) than the rotation scalar in an expanding universe with ideal fluid as the field source (Hawking 1969, Ellis 1973, Rothman and Ellis 1986, Li 1998). The motion of fluid in a homogeneous Newtonian universe can be described by the expansion scalar $\theta$, rotation tensor $\omega_{a,b}$, and shear tensor $\sigma_{a,b}$. The global rotation of the Universe consists here in homogeneous fluid rotating as a whole (Li 1998). The equation representing Newtonian cosmologies, with expansion and rotation but without shear, which should be regarded as the principal equation of the Newtonian homogeneous cosmology is called the Heckmann-Schucking equation (Heckmann and Schucking 1959, Heckmann 1961). It was Heckmann (1961) who demonstrated that such a Newtonian model can be constructed in a consistent manner. From observations of distant supernovae of Ia type (Perlmutter et al. 1998, 1999, Riess et al. 1998) as well as measurements of anisotropy of cosmic background (Spergel et al. 2006) it follows that the Universe accelerates its expansion and is of nearly flat geometry. It raises a question if this acceleration is due to rotating fluid and if the results of Ia-type supernovae observations can be explained by the effects of rotation. Distance measurements, such as measuring luminosity distance as a function of redshift z, are sensitive to the spatial geometry of the model and evolution of scale factor. Thus the observed luminosity of a supernova (after taking into account extinction, K-term correction, etc.) will depend on the current density of various components of matter and their equations of state. The Heckmann-Schucking equation in Newtonian cosmology plays an analogical role as the Friedmann equation in relativistic cosmology. From our point of view it is essential that in the Newtonian analogy of Friedmann equation the rotation effect produces a negative term scaling as $(1+z)^4$, which formally corresponds to a presence of (fictitious) fluid of negative density scaling as radiation and thus called "dark radiation". The presence of such a fluid would be much desirable, since, as it was demonstrated by Ichiki et al. (2002), it could contribute to accounting for the discrepancies between the abundances of helium-4 and deuterium theoretically predicted in the model of primordial nucleosynthesis (BBN) and the observed ones. A preliminary analysis (God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski 2003b) showed that while the rotation effects underlied the acceleration of the Universe, they alone are not sufficient to explain the observations of Ia-type supernovae, which would require additionally some kind of "dark energy", for instance, the cosmological constant. It should be noted that the constraints on rotation in God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2003b), which could be derived from supernovae observations at that time, were quite weak. The problem of determining limits on rotation of the Universe was addressed in a more detailed way in the next article (God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski 2006). In analyzing observational effects of rotation, the Heckmann-Schucking equation was used as the simplest model in which they are separated from the other effects and thus the influence of rotation can be considered in a relatively easy way. This work took up observational limits to a negative term of $(1+z)^4$ type in the Friedmann equation (or its Newtonian equivalent - the Heckmann-Schucking equation). The estimation of amount of rotation from the microwave background radiation (CMBR) and primordial nucleosyntheis (BBN) was made assuming the presence of additional, non-interacting fluid - radiation matter (of density parameter $\Omega_{r,0}$). The constant appearing in the Heckmann-Schucking equation was regarded as a curvature constant, which, as the Newtonian cosmology is flat by definition and its curvature constant is zero, was actually a departure from the Newtonian model. However, in that work it was noted that a negative term scaling as $(1+z)^4$ can be present in the Friedmann equation (or its Newtonian equivalent) for a number of reasons. The main interpretations here, apart from a cosmological model with global rotation, are "dark radiation" in Randall-Syndrum's brane scenario (Randal and Sundrum 1999, Vishwakarma and Sing 2003) and the Casimir effect. Unfortunately, on the base of astronomical observations only, it is not possible to distinguish particular components of such a fluid scaling as radiation, as cosmography tests the Universe's properties through the relation $H(z)$, which does not allow for differentiating components if they scale identically with changing of the scale factor. Thus the analysis yields a sum of density parameters of such fluids instead of constraints for pure rotation. So in the work of God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2006) the $\Sigma \Omega_{dr,0}+\Omega_{r,0}$ of density parameters of all (real and fictitious) fluids scaling as radiation was estimated instead. It means that the limit on the net contribution of density parameters from all such fluids, both of positive (as radiation) and negative (as Casimir's effect) energy density. In the analysis, the observations of supernovae (Riess et al. 2004, Astier et al. 2005) as well as those of IIb-type Fanaroff-Riley radio galaxies (Daly and Djorgovski 2004) were used. Combining data from supernovae and radio galaxies to determine values of cosmological parameters was proposed by Daly and Djorgovski (2003), who also noted the fact that for the purpose of investigations of this kind, one had better use coordinate distance (Weinberg 1972) instead of luminosity distance, commonly used in analysing data from supernovae. Coordinate distance, as opposed to luminosity distance does not depend on the value of Hubble constant $H_0$, but only on the density parameters appearing in the model of (real or fictitious) fluids. Using the coordinate distance in the work of God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2006) had also this advantage that it allowed for making a consistent use of the constraints on cosmological parameters derived from the baryon oscillation peak (Eisenstein et al. 2005) and the shift parameter in CMBR (Wang and Tegmark 2004), which do not depend on the value of $H_0$ either. However, while in the case of Fanaroff-Riley IIb-type radio galaxies Daly and Djorgovski provide coordinate distance for each galaxy, for supernovae both Riess et al. (2004) and Astier et al. (2005) give just the value of luminosity module (apparent luminosity minus absolute luminosity), from which one can readily obtain luminosity distance. Still, in order to calculate coordinate distance out of luminosity distance one needs the value of Hubble constant. In God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2006) two samples of supernovae were analyzed, for which luminosity modules had been derived in a somewhat different way. For Astier's sample, they were obtained assuming a priori $H_0=70 \, km \,s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}$ (Astier et al. 2005), and this value was used in calculating coordinate distances for supernovae in this sample, while for Riess's sample the value of Hubble constant should be calculated independently beforehand (in the considered model $H_0=64.4 \, km \,s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}$, or $h=0.644$ was obtained) and then used in further calculations. Eventually, it was shown that the flat model of the Universe with density parameter $\Omega_{m,0}=0.3$ is favoured by observations, while the value of $\Omega_{dr,0}$ parameter is at best estimated as zero, which corresponds to vanishing rotation. Thus the sought-after net negative contribution of fluids scaling as radiation, if any, is small. One can also obtain a limit on the value of density parameter $\Omega_{dr,0}$, which is $\Omega_{dr,0}>-0.00035$ at the confidence level $0.95$, but this means that the sum of density parameter $\Omega_{dr,0}$ and radiation density $\Omega_{r,0}$ ($\Omega_{r,0} \sim 0.0001$, Vishwakarma and Singh (2003)) is also negative. In that case we would have the bouncing scenario instead of the Big Bang scenario (Molina-Paris and Visser 1999, Tippet and Lake 2004, Szyd<span>ł</span>owski et al. 2005), where the Universe does not start its evolution from the Bing Bang, but initially contracts to its minimal size (when the squared Hubble constants is zero), and then begins to expand. It should be noted that for the value $\Omega_{dr,0}=-0.00035$ the Universe would bounce already at the redshift z of about 1200, so the primordial nucleosynthesis would not have a chance to occur. Since the primordial nucleosynthesis is a well-established aspect of cosmology, it imposes strict constraints on the values of $\Omega_{dr,0}$. Basing on the estimates of Ichiki et al. (2003) it can be asserted that at the confidence level of $0.95$, the primordial nucleosynthesis permits the values $-7.22 \times 10^{-5}<\Omega_{dr,0}<0.65 \times 10^{-5}$. So there's a need of determining a stronger limit on the estimated parameter $\Omega_{dr,0}$. Such a possibility is provided by analysing the first peak in the power spectrum of CMBR. It should be stressed that there is a discrepancy between the value of matter density parameter $\Omega_{m,0}$ in God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2006), consistent with the value obtained earlier from supernovae observations (Riess et al. 1998, Perlmutter et al. 1999, Riess et al. 2005), and the value obtained by Spergel et al. (2006) from observations of background radiation ($\Omega_{m,0}=0.24$). Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between the values of Hubble constant used in early studies of the Universe's acceleration based on observations of Ia-type supernovae (Perlmutter et al. 1999, Efstathiou et al. 1999, Vishvakarma 2001) and the values $H_0$ obtained from the CMBR analysis (Spergiel et al. 2007). It is usually accounted for as an effect of uncertainty in determining the zero point for Cepheids used in calibrating the Hubble constant. For instance, Freedman et al. (2001) suggest an inaccuracy of $\pm 8 km/s$ as an effect of systematic errors. However, other researchers, as Tuner (2010a, 2010b), do not confirm that there are such systematic errors involved. By analyzing CMBR, Spergel et al. (2007) determined that the density parameter $\Omega_{m,0}=0.128 \, h^{-2}$. For $\Omega_{m,0}=0.30$ (Perlmutter et al. 1998, 1999, Riess et al. 1998, 2004, 2007) the value of the Hubble constant is $H_0=65 \, km \,s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}$, but then for the flat Universe in the classic scenario of dark cold matter with a cosmological constant ($\Lambda CDM$) there is a discrepancy between the theoretical location of the first peak and the observed one. The proper location of the first peak in this model is obtained for $H_0=73 \, km \,s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}$ ($\Omega_{m,0}=0.24$). In the considered work of God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2006) it was shown that the presence of fluid of negative density scaling as radiation permits to avoid these discrepancies, and so we can get a flat model of the Universe with $\Omega_{m,0}=0.3$ ($H_0=65 \, km \,s^{-1} \, Mpc^{-1}$), consistent with both the Ia-type supernovae and CMBR observations. In this model God<span>ł</span>owski and Szyd<span>ł</span>owski (2006) obtained at the confidence level 0.95 a strict constraint on the sum of density parameters $\Omega_{dr,0}$ of negative fluids scaling as radiation: $-1.05 \times 10^{-5}<\Omega_{dr,0}<-0.5 \times 10^{-5}$. This limit is stronger than that obtained earlier by Ichiki et al. from analysis of nucleosynthesis and CMBR. It should be also stressed that the obtained net value $\Omega_{dr,0}+\Omega_{r,0}$ is greater than zero, which means that the Big Bang scenario and not the bouncing one is valid indeed. Li's model and its predictions ============================== In 1998 Li Li-Xin proposed a model involving galaxy forming in a rotating universe. The very idea that as a consequence of the conservation of angular momentum in a rotating universe, the galaxies acquire its angular momentum during their formation, was already considered by Gamow (1946), Goedel (1949), and later by Colins and Hawking (1973). One of its drawbacks was that it predicted alignment of galaxies' rotational axes, which was not confirmed observationally at that time. Li (1998) explored the issue of galaxy formation in a rotating universe in a more detailed manner. He analysed the model of homogeneous, rotating and expanding universe, filled with ideal fluid, which additionally complies with the laws of energy and angular momentum conservation. In Li's model, when the fluid's equation of state is $p=0$ (dust), the shear scalar $\sigma^2$ decreases with increase of the scale factor as $a^{-6}$ (i.e. $\sigma^2 \sim a^{-6}$), while the rotation scalar $\omega^2$ diminishes more slowly ($\omega^2 \sim a^{-4}$). Thus it is quite reasonable to presume that (for a sufficiently large scale factor) that in comparison with rotation, shear is negligible, since it decreases more rapidly than the rotation scalar with increasing the scale factor. The model is based on the Steigman-Turner equation (Steigman and Turner 1983). Interesting comments on this equation and its applicability can be found in Rothman and Ellis (1986). The relation between the mass of a cosmic structure and its angular momentum is usually expressed by the empirical relation $J\sim M^{5/3}$ (Wesson 1979, 1983, Carrasco, Roth and Serrano 1982, Brosche 1986), which origin has been discussed for a long time. One of the first attempts to account it for was made by Muradyan (1975, 1980), who tried to explain it in terms of the Ambarzumian's superdense cosmogony. Wesson (1981) pointed out its possible role in the unification of gravitation and particle physics and later (Wesson 1983) argued that it is a consequence of self-similarity of Newtonian problem applied to rotating gravitationally bound systems, while Mackrossan (1987) involved thermodynamical consideration for its explanation. Sistero (1983) introduced the problem of rotational velocity of the Universe into considerations. The same line of thought was taken by Corrasco et al. (1982), who viewed the relation $J\sim M^{5/3}$ as a consequence of mechanical equilibrium between the gravitational and rotational energies. Li (1998) indicated that in the model of rotating universe the relation $J\sim M^{5/3}$ is a direct consequence of the law of angular momentum conservation. The correlation between the mass of spiral galaxies and their angular momentum was considered in a detailed manner by a number of authors (e.g. Nordsiek 1973, Dai, Liu and Hu 1978, Cerrasco, Roth and Serrano 1982, Abramyan and Sedrakyan 1985). Investigating this correlation, Li (1998) estimated the Universe's rotation and found the amount close to that obtained earlier by Birch (1982). Heavens and Peacock (1988) show that the relation $J\sim M^{5/3}$ is also a prediction of the tidal torque scenario (such attempts were made, among others, also by Catelan and Theuns 1996). In God<span>ł</span>owski et al. (2003a) it was pointed out that in Li's model the relation between the angular momentum of a cosmic structure and its mass is of a more complicated character than simply $J\sim M^{5/3}$ (which is just its approximation for large masses M). Actually the relation is of the form $J=k\,M^{5/3}-l\,M$, where k and l are constants dependent on the amount of the Universe's rotation, density of matter, size of a protostructure and the moment of its formation, as well as the parameter $\beta$, determined by the mass distribution within the protostructure. Consequently, the relation $J(M)$ has the global minimum $J_{min}$ for the mass $M_{min}$. It was also shown that $M_{min}$ does not depend on the amount of rotation of the Universe, while depending on the size of forming protostructure and the moment of its formation (redshift $z_f$), as well as on the value of parameter $\beta$ (it is presumed to be close to 1). Dark matter was ignored in the considerations, since it was assumed to be collisionless and non-interacting with the observable matter in any other way than by gravitational force. Thus the mass estimates provided below pertain to the mass of dust structures (and not the total mass including dark matter present in galaxies and clusters of galaxies). In the discussed work it was also demonstrated that under reasonable assumptions, the structures of certain masses should possess a vanishing angular momentum. One can then check if the results from observations of galaxy structures are consistent with the predictions of Li's model. But one should have in mind numerous difficulties in theoretical estimating of $M_{min}$. It involves a number of approximations since values of such parameters as mass distribution within the protostructures, their size, and the moment of forming of galaxies and clusters are not known. The latter parameter depends strongly on the accepted scenario of formation of galaxies and their clusters. However assuming some reasonable values of those parameters, one can get some estimate of $M_{min}$. This theoretical minimum should be then confronted with the relevant observational data. From the observational point of view of interest is the absolute value of angular momentum $|J|$, since in general the direction of structures is not known, while one can quite readily identify the situation when angular momentum vanishes or is very small. The vanishing angular momentum J=0 is obtained when the structure's mass is $M_0=2.15 \times M_{min}$. We should keep in mind that Li's model remains valid only provided rotation occurs on a sufficiently large scale. Moreover, due to its scaling properties Li's model can be applied to rotating protostructures of various initial size. Thus our considerations concerning angular momenta of galaxy structures will be also valid in the case of large-scale, but not necessarily global, rotation of the Universe. So the model can be of interest even if we reject the hypothesis of global rotation of the Universe. In God<span>ł</span>owski et al. (2003a) it was attempted to estimate the masses of structures of minimal angular momentum in relation to the size of protostructure. And thus, if we assume that clusters of galaxies arise as a result of collapse protostructure (Sunyaev and Zeldovich 1972, Dorohkevich 1973), then the structures of minimal angular momentum should be of a mass of galaxy clusters. In the case of protostructure of protogalaxy size, its mass should be of an order of globular cluster, while in the case of protosolar cloud it should be comparable to the giant moons of the Solar System. Except for the Moon, the angular momenta of such celestial object are actually smaller than the angular momenta of either planets or asteroids (Wesson 1979). On should note however that formation of the stars inside the galaxy or the formation of a solar system is such complex astrophysical process that extrapolation of Li's (1998) and God<span>ł</span>owski (2003a) results to a protosolar cloud is questionable. It raises a question if there is any possibility to observationally test the predictions of Li's model. Such a possibility is provided by studies of galaxy plane orientation. Galaxy orientation and galaxy formation scenarios ================================================= Studies of galaxy plane orientation were conducted already in 19th century (Abbe 1875). The methods and results of investigations performed up to Second World War can be found in the article of Danver (1942), today only of historical value. The first postwar work was the cited to this day treatise of Holmberg (1946), who compared the numbers of galaxies seen face-on and edge-on, discussed the observational effects related to optical measurements of size of galaxy axes, and proved that the observed excess of edge-on galaxies is just of observational origin. Typical for the early period after the Second World War are the analyses of Wyatt and Brown (1955) and Brown (1964, 1968), devoted to investigating distributions of position angles within the galaxy-rich regions of the sky: Cetus (Wyatt and Brown 1955), Pisces (Brown 1964), and in Hydra, Sextant, Ursa Maior, Virgo and Eridanus (Brown 1968). In his two studies Brown (1964, 1968) discovered a departure from isotropy of position angle distribution. Reinhardt (1970) and Reinhardt and Roberts (1972) analysed distributions of position angles of large semiaxes of the galaxies from the Reference Catalogue of Bright Galaxies (de Vaucouleurs 1964) and found a very weak preference of galaxy plane alignment with the equator plane of the Local Supergalaxy. Nilson (1974) investigated the galaxies brighter than $14.5^m$ from his UGC catalogue (Nilson 1973). His results are consistent with those obtained by Reinhardt and Roberts. However either results are compromised by the presence of galaxies not belonging to the Local Supercluster in the analysed sample. Further important progress in investigations of galaxy plane orientation was made by Hawley and Peebles (1975), who in a detailed manner discussed the method of investigating galaxy orientation through analysing distribution of position angles as well as possible errors and observational effects, in particular the earlier results of Brown, indicating their insufficient certainty due to possible observation errors. Investigating orientation of galaxy planes in space is of importance, as various scenarios of formation and evolution of cosmic structures predict different distributions of angular momenta of galaxies, i.e. provide different predictions concerning orientation of objects at different levels of structure - in particular clusters and superclusters of galaxies. This provides a method for testing scenarios of galaxy formation. One assumes that normals to the galaxies' planes are their axes of rotation, which seems to be quite reasonable, at least for the spiral galaxies. In the scenario of hierarchic clustering (Peebles 1969, Doroshkevich 1970, Dekel 1985) large-scale structures in the Universe form "from bottom up", as a consequence of gravitational interactions between galaxies. This means that galaxies form in the first place and only later group into larger clusters. The galaxies' spin angular momentum arises as an effect of interaction with their neighbours. In original version of this model the orientation of galaxy rotational axes would be random. One should note however that in the hierarchical clustering theory naturally arises the Tidal Torque scenario. In this scenario galaxies have their angular momentum perpendicular to the surrounding structure due to the coupling between the protogalaxy region and surrounding structure. On the other hand, the scenario of primordial turbulences (von Weizsacker 1951, Gamow 1952, developed further by Oziernoy 1978 and Efstathiou and Silk 1983) accounts for the spin angular momentum as a remnant of the primordial whirl and predicts that the rotationalaxes of galaxies would be perpendicular to the main plane of a large-scale structure. Another approach is represented by Zeldovich's pancake model (Sunayev and Zeldovich 1972, Doroshkevich 1973, Shandarin 1974, Doroshkevich, Saar, and Shandarin 1978, Zeldovich 1978), which provides that structures in the Universe form "from up to bottom". In the effect of asymmetrical collapse of a large structure there arises a magnetohydrodynamic shock wave, which causes the structure to fragment as well as imparts galaxies with spin angular momentum. In this scenario the mechanism of gaining angular momentum by galaxies consists in acquiring rotation by a shock wave passing across the protostructure, which gives rise to a coherent, non-random orientation of galaxy planes in space. Thus the model predicts the galaxies' rotational axes to be parallel to the main plane of the structure. It should be stressed that this classic view in which each of the basic scenarios predicts a different alignment of rotational axes of galaxies was later somewhat disturbed. It was shown that in principle in any scenario, including that of hierarchical clustering, can happen a phase of shock wave, which may give rise to alignment of rotational axes. Naturally, the extent of this alignment is differentiated. Two main methods of investigating alignment of galaxy axes have been proposed to date. The first one, consisting in examining distributions of position angles of galaxies, was presented in detail by Hawley and Peebles (1975). Hawley and Peebles (1975), and subsequently Kindl (1987) discussed detailedly the statistical methods they suggested for probing position angle distributions. Unfortunately, the distributions provide reliable data on galaxy plane orientation only for the galaxies observed edge-on. In consequence, the galaxies seen face-on or nearly face-on have to be excluded from the analysis. Furthermore, in studying nearby structures the galaxies have to be located in the vicinity of the structure's main plane. For instance, when considering galaxies belonging to the Local Supercluster (LSC), we should take into account only galaxies located at small supergalactic latitudes B (God<span>ł</span>owski 1994). Jaaniste and Saar (1977, 1978) improved on a novel method proposed by Oepik (1970), which took into account not just galaxy position angles but also their ellipticities (angles of inclination to the line of sight). In this method, using galaxies of any possible orientation and location on the sky, one calculates two angles. One is the angle between the normal to the galaxy's plane and the main plane of the structure (polar angle) and the other one is the angle between the normal projected onto the main plane of the structure and the selected direction on this plane (azimuth angle). For example, in the study of galaxies belonging to the Local Supercluster it can be the line connecting our Galaxy with the centre of the Virgo cluster. After determining those angles, they can be analysed using statistical methods to look for any non-random trends. Unfortunately, in this method for any galaxy there are two possible orientations, corresponding to two possible positions of the normal to the galaxy plane in space. Since usually the sense of galactic angular momentum is not known, there are actually four possible orientations of a galaxy's rotation axis. Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1986) improved on the method of Jaaniste and Sarr (1978), correcting the errors present in their original work, and described the method of analysing distribution of vectors normal to the galaxies' planes, basing on the statistical methods proposed by Hawley and Peebles (1975) and adapting them for the purpose of investigating angle distributions in this case. The methods were further developed in the subsequent works by God<span>ł</span>owski (1993, 1994). In Jaaniste and Sarr's (1978) method one has to take into consideration both the fact that galaxies are flattened spheroids (Holmberg 1946), with their actual ratios of axes depending on their morphological type (Heidmann, Heidmann, de Vaucouleurs 1971), and the Holmberg effect (Holmberg 1946, 1958, 1975, Fouque and Paturel 1985). The Holmberg effect consists in the fact that micrometric measurements of larger and smaller semiaxes of galaxies depend on ellipticity of the image, which in turn creates a necessity of reducing the micrometric axis ratio q to the standard photometric system. Fouque and Paturel (1985) derived the formulae for reduction of galaxy sizes obtained from micrometric measurements in various galaxy catalogues to a uniform system of photometric diameters. How the actual ellipticity and the Holmberg effect influence the results of galaxy orientation analysis was discussed in Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1986, 1989a) and God<span>ł</span>owski (1993, 1994). The methods of investigating of galaxy orientation have been further scrutinized and improved ever since. A critical analysis of the method of investigating spatial orientation of galaxies using their ellipticity was provided in God<span>ł</span>owski and Ostrowski (1999), where it shown that the process of deprojection of galaxies basing on the catalogue data generates significant systematic errors, which have to be taken into account in analysing alignment of galaxy rotation axes. The effect, confirmed by God<span>ł</span>owski, Baier and MacGillivray (1998), and Baier, God<span>ł</span>owski and MacGillivray (2003), could have led to partly distorting the earlier results concerning galaxy orientations. Cabanela and Dickey (1999) indicated difficulties in detecting rotational axis alignment for small samples. Analysing a sample of 54 edge-on galaxies with spin vectors well-determined from HI observations, they demonstrated that even a considerable amount of anisotropy in distribution of galaxy spins within the Perseus cluster, signalled in the work of Cabanel and Aldering (1998), could have well remained undetected. Several variants of the methods mentioned above were used in investigating rotational axis alignment by a number of authors (see e.g. Hu (1995, 1998), Wu (1997, 2006) Aryal Saurer (2000)). Modifications of the original methods were also made in order to adapt them to some particular research problems (Lee and Pen 2001, Brown et al. 2002, Noh and Lee 2006a, 2006b, Trujillo, Carretero and Patiri 2006). And thus Lee and Pen (2001) described their method of investigating intrinsic galaxy alignment in respect to the local tidal shear tensor and discussed in detail the method of determining this tensor as well as examining correlation both between the galaxy spins and between the spins and the local tidal shear tensor. In turn, Brown et al. (2002) discussed a method of investigating intrinsic alignment of ellipticities of galaxies based on their ellipticity variance. Noh and Lee (2006a, 2006b) examined alignment of planes of spiral galaxies seen edge-on in respect to the plane of local "pancake". This plane was determined locally for each individual galaxy, defined as a plane passing through the galaxy and its two nearest neighbours. Trujillo, Carretero and Patri (2006) studied the distribution of angles between rotational axes of galaxies and the vector connecting a given galaxy with the centre of a local "void" (thus introducing a vector normal to the local plane of the structure as defined by the ambient matter). Results of investigations of galaxy orientations in the Local Supercluster and its close neighbourhood. ======================================================================================================= The orientation of galaxies in the Local Supercluster and its close neighbourhood was studied by many researchers. Most of the early works on the alignment of rotational axes (Wyatt and Brown 1955, Brown 1964, 1968, Reinhardt 1970, Reinhardt and Roberts 1972, Nilson 1974, Jaaniste and Saar 1978, MacGillivray et al. 1982a,b, MacGilivray and Dodd 1985a,b, Kapranidis and Sullivan 1983) implied that the galaxies are either oriented in a random way or the galaxies' planes are parallel to the structure's main plane. And thus MacGillivray et al. (1982a,b) scrutinizing the distribution of spiral and irregular galaxies belonging to the Local Supercluster found a weak correlation between the galaxy planes and the main plane of LSC. These results confirmed either the theory of hierarchic clustering or the theory of primordial turbulence. At that time just Jaaniste and Saar (1978), using not only position angles of galaxies but also their inclination, claimed that in LSC there is an excess of galaxies with rotational axes aligned in the equatorial plane of LSC. The question of existing discrepancies between the results of early research on galaxy orientation was discussed in the articles of Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1986) and God<span>ł</span>owski (1993, 1994). They were caused mainly by contamination of the samples with background objects as well as difficulties with proper interpretation of the obtained results due to using the equatorial coordinate system instead of the supergalactic one. For instance, Kapranidis and Sullivan (1983) analysed the density of positions of galactic poles within regions of $30^o \times 30^o$ size for a sample of spiral galaxies in the equatorial coordinate system. The authors claimed that there had been no departure of galactic pole distributions from the expected isotropic distribution, as they found an excess of galactic poles in only two of the analysed regions, while it escaped their notice that these very regions ($\alpha = 195^o, \delta = 15^o$ and ($\alpha = 15^o, \delta = -15^o $) are in the direction to the centre and anticentre of the Virgo cluster (i.e. the centre of the Local Supercluster) respectively, which means that in fact they discovered that the galaxy planes prefer the orientation perpendicular to the plane of the Local Supercluster. The question of proper choice of a coordinate system should be kept in mind when analysing orientation of galaxies in clusters and superclusters other than LSC. In such a case the most appropriate one could be the coordinate system connected to the main plane of the analysed structure (Flin 1994, God<span>ł</span>owski 1995). The importance of proper choice of a coordinate system was also stressed by Bukhari and Cram (2003), Wu (2006), and particularly Aryal, Kandel and Saurer (2006), who showed that that the interpretation of the results of probing galaxy orientation in the Abell 3558 cluster - the core of the Shapley Concentration - depends on the choice of coordinate system. Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1986) and God<span>ł</span>owski (1993, 1994) demonstrated that the planes of galaxies belonging the Local Supercluster are oriented perpendicularly to the main plane of the LSC equator, while the effect depended on the galaxy's morphological type. This result was later confirmed by the study of Parnovski et al. (1994), which found an excess of galaxy rotational axes directed towards $4-6^h, 20-40^o$. The authors recognized that the observed anisotropy is of global character. This is generally consistent with the earlier results of Fliche and Soriau (1990) concerning the orientation of extended galactic HI envelopes and the "cosmic pole" detected in the analysis of remote quasars ($5^h 30^m, \, 7^o$). However, Flin (1995) upon analysis of these results indicated that the observed anisotropy is consistent with the results of Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1986) and is not of global character but specific to LSC. However these results seem to favour the pancake model of Zeldovich, there are arguments that the situation is much more complicated. Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1990) and God<span>ł</span>owski (1993) studied the orientation of galaxies belonging to various substructures of the Local Supercluster, defined basing on the work of Tully (1986) and showed that the orientation is different for different substructures. God<span>ł</span>owski (1994) provides the dependence of orientation on radial velocity of the galaxies under investigation. Furthermore, in Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski (1989a), Kashikawa and Okamura (1992) and in God<span>ł</span>owski (1994) it was shown that the rotational axes of galaxies at low supergalactic latitudes are parallel to the main plane of LSC, while the rotational axes of galaxies at high supergalactic latitudes are perpendicular to that plane. In this case the galaxy rotational axes tend to be directed towards the centre of the Virgo cluster. This effect, confirmed recently by Hu et al. (2006), supports a more complicated hybrid model rather than the simple pancake model. Also the results of Aryal and Saurer (2005a), who found a weak preference of spin directions for the spiral galaxies belonging to the Local Supercluster, do not agree with the predictions of Zeldovich's pancake theory. Aryal and his collaborators in the series of articles (Aryal, Kafle and Saurer 2008, Aryal, Neupane and Saurer 2008, Aryal, Paudel and Saurer 2008, Aryal 2010) analysed various samples of spiral galaxies in the Local Supercluster and its neighbourhood (with radial velocities $V < 5000 km/s$) and found that only the barred spirals manifest alignment of orientation of galactic planes, while the alignment effect depend on their radial velocities. On the other hand, Lambas indicated that the alignment of galaxy orientation can be of local character. Lambas, Groth and Peebles (1988) compared the position angles of elliptical galaxies from the UGC catalogue (Nilson 1973) in respect to the neighbouring large-scale structures and found that they are aligned in the scale at least up to $2^o$, which corresponds to the linear scale $\sim 2 \times h^{-1} \, Mpc$. Next Muriel and Lambas (1992), taking into account the $3D$ distribution of galaxies obtained from their redshifts, determined that the spiral galaxies are oriented towards their nearest neighbours, while the elliptical galaxies are aligned on the scale smaller than $3 h^{-1} \, Mpc$. Also Cabanela and Aldering (1998) noted that the anisotropy they found in the distribution of galaxies belonging to the Perseus Supercluster can be of local, and not global (for the entire supercluster) character. The basic mechanism to generate galaxy rotation in the scenario of hierarchical clustering are the mutual tidal torque interactions (Wesson (1982) and White (1984) - basing on the ideas of Hoyle (1951)). In this scenario the distribution of spin angular momenta of galaxies should be random, but it was shown that the local tidal shear tensor can cause a local alignment of rotational axes (Dubinski 1992, Catelan and Theuns 1996, Lee and Pen 2000, 2001, 2002, Navarro, Abadi and Steinmetz 2004). Along these lines - as consistent with the tidal torque mechanism - were also reinterpreted the earlier results to indicate the alignment of galaxies (e.g. those of Flin and God<span>ł</span>owski 1986). On the other hand, some researchers, as e.g. Brook et al. (2010), still advocate the misalignment of angular momenta that occurs during hierarchical structure formation. Brown et al. (2002) studying ellipticity of galaxies from the Supercosmos survey (mean redshift $z=0.1$) found that they are correlated in the scale between 1 and 100 arc min. The meaning of this observation is not clear, however the authors interpret it as a local effect, consistent with the theory of tidal interactions. Lee and Pen (2002) attempted to measure intrinsic alignment of galaxies out of observational data by the way of reconstructing the tidal shear tensor. However they did find the spin-shear correlation, their results are of doubtful value, due to a high noise level (Lee 2004). Thus the intrinsic correlations between galaxy spins and intermediate principal axes of the tidal shears were confirmed only recently Lee and Erdogdu (2007) and Lee (2010). Navarro, Abadi and Steinmetz (2004), analysing a sample of near spiral galaxies seen edge-on, found that their planes are perpendicular to the main plane of LSC. Lee (2004), who interpreted this fact as consistent with the tidal interactions model, basing on this scenario investigated analytically its consequences for the large-scale orientation of galaxies and found that his predictions agree with the distribution of orientations of nearby spiral galaxies. Trujillo, Carretero and Patiri (2006) determined, by probing the distribution of angles between rotational axes of galaxies and the vector connecting a given galaxy with the centre of a local void, that the spins of spiral galaxies located on the shells of the largest cosmic voids, are perpendicular to the direction towards its centre (i.e. along the direction of the envelope defined by the surrounding matter). Noh and Lee (2006a, 2006b), analysing nearby galaxies from Tully's catalogue (Tully 2000), found alignment of spiral galaxy planes perpendicular to the plane of a local pancake, which they interpret along the lines of the recently proposed scenario of broken hierarchy (Bower et al. 2005). In this scenario, instead of hierarchical clustering on all mass scales, there is an anti-hierarchical clustering on a small scale, since gravitational tidal effects give rise to objects of Zeldovich's pancake type (Zeldovich 1970) rather than objects of spherically collapsing halo. However, contrary to the classic pancake scenario, this effect occurs just locally on a small scale. Hernandez et al. 2007 using sample of 11 597 SDSS galaxies, present formulas to derive an estimate of the halo spin parameters $\lambda$ for any real galaxy, in terms of common observational parameters. For spirals they found a good correlation between empirical values of $\lambda$ and visually assigned Hubble types, showing usefulness of this physical parameter as one of classification tools. Recently, there have been some attempts to investigate galaxy angular momenta on a large scale. Paz, Stasyszyn and Padilla (2008) analysing galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey catalogue found that the galaxy angular momenta are aligned perpendicularly to the planes of large-scale structures, while there is no such effect for the low-mass structures. They interpret this as consistent with their simulations based on the mechanism of tidal interactions. Jones, van der Waygaert and Aragon-Calvo (2010) found that the spins of spiral galaxies located within cosmic web filaments tend to be aligned along the larger axis of the filament, which they interpreted as "fossil" evidence indicating that the action of large scale tidal torques effected the alignments of galaxies located in cosmic filaments. The largest scale alignment was found in the series of paper by Hutsemekers (Hutsemekers 1998, Hutsemekers and Lamy 2001, Hutsemekers et al. 2005) during analyzis of the alignment of quasar polarization vectors. In the paper Hutsemekers et al. (2005), based on a new sample of 355 quasars with significant optical polarization they fount that quasar polarization vectors are not randomly oriented over the sky. The polarization vectors appear coherently oriented or aligned over huge ($\sim$ 1 Gpc) regions of the sky. Furthermore, the mean polarization angle $\theta$ appears to rotate with redshift at the rate of $\sim 30^o$ per Gpc. While interpretations like a global rotation of the Universe can potentially explain the effect, the properties they observed qualitatively correspond to the dichroism and birefringence predicted by photon-pseudoscalar oscillation within a magnetic field. These results usually are not questioned, (with exeptions of Joshi et al. 2007 which not found any effects during analyzis of theirs sample (Jackson et al. 2007)), however the origin of
{'source': 'arXiv_out/1103'}