---
abstract: 'We performed a coincidence measurement of two nucleons emitted from the nonmesonic weak decay (NMWD) of $^{5}_{\Lambda}$He formed via the $^{6}$Li($\pi^+$,$K^+$) reaction. The energies of the two nucleons and the pair number distributions in the opening angle between them were measured. In both $np$ and $nn$ pairs, we observed a clean back-to-back correlation coming from the two-body weak reactions of $\Lambda p \to n p$ and $\Lambda n \to n n$, respectively. The ratio of the nucleon pair numbers was $N_{nn}/N_{np}$=0.45$\pm$0.11(stat)$\pm$0.03(syst) in the kinematic region of $\cos\theta_{NN} < -0.8$. Since each decay mode was exclusively detected, the measured ratio should be close to the ratio of $\Gamma(\Lambda p\to np)$/$\Gamma(\Lambda n\to nn)$. The ratio is consistent with recent theoretical calculations based on the heavy meson/direct quark exchange picture.'
author:
- 'B. H. Kang'
- 'S. Ajimura'
- 'K. Aoki'
- 'A. Banu'
- 'H. Bhang'
- 'T. Fukuda'
- 'O. Hashimoto'
- 'J. I. Hwang'
- 'S. Kameoka'
- 'E. H. Kim'
- 'J. H. Kim'
- 'M. J. Kim'
- 'T. Maruta'
- 'Y. Miura'
- 'Y. Miyake'
- 'T. Nagae'
- 'M. Nakamura'
- 'S. N. Nakamura'
- 'H. Noumi'
- 'S. Okada'
- 'Y. Okayasu'
- 'H. Outa'
- 'H. Park'
- 'P. K. Saha'
- 'Y. Sato'
- 'M. Sekimoto'
- 'T. Takahashi'
- 'H. Tamura'
- 'K. Tanida'
- 'A. Toyoda'
- 'K. Tsukada'
- 'T. Watanabe'
- 'H. J. Yim'
title: Exclusive Measurement of the Nonmesonic Weak Decay of  Hypernucleus
---

A free $\Lambda$ hyperon decays almost totally into a pion and a nucleon, which is a mesonic weak decay process (; $\Delta q \sim 100 MeV/c$). However, a $\Lambda$ hyperon bound in a nucleus will eventually decay through either a mesonic or a nonmesonic weak decay process (; $\Delta q \sim 400 MeV/c$). NMWD, in which a $\Lambda$ decays via a weak interaction with neighboring nucleon(s), becomes possible only inside the nucleus. The simplest and long assumed NMWD modes have been the one-nucleon (1$N$) induced ones, namely $\Lambda p\to np$ and $\Lambda n \to nn$, whose partial decay widths are denoted as  and , respectively. The study of NMWD is of fundamental importance, since it provides a unique way of exploring the strangeness-changing, baryon-baryon weak interaction. In addition, the two-nucleon (2$N$) induced NMWD ($\Lambda NN \to nNN$; ) has been predicted in theoretical calculations, although its experimental identification has not yet been achieved.

There has been a long standing "puzzle" concerning the  ratio of NMWD of $\Lambda$ hypernuclei. Until a few years ago the experimental ratios had been reported to be close to or larger than unity, while the most naive one-pion-exchange (OPE) model with $\Delta I$=1/2 rule predicts very small ratios of 0.05$-$0.20. Other decay mechanisms beyond the OPE model have been considered to explain the large $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratio. The most relevant are: 1) The heavy-meson-exchange (HME) mechanism in which exchanges of mesons heavier than pions (especially kaons) are considered, 2) The direct-quark exchange (DQ) mechanism where the short range $\Lambda N \rightarrow NN$ decay is described using quark degrees of freedom, violating the $\Delta I=1/2$ rule, and in a different context 3) the inclusion of a two-nucleon induced decay ($\Lambda NN \rightarrow nNN$) mechanism. Refer to the recent review article @ref:Alb02 for the details of various models and their results in terms of NMWD widths. It was recently found that in all previous theoretical work there had been an error in the K exchange amplitude and its correction significantly increased theoretical values of the  ratio. After the correction was included, the DQ model gave 0.70 for the ratio in 5lam @ref:Sas00. The HME model calculation also predicted an increased value of up to 0.34$-$0.46 @ref:Par01. These calculations still underestimate the reported values of $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratios for light hypernuclei, although the large experimental errors (e.g. 0.93$\pm$0.55 for $^5_{\Lambda}$He @ref:Szy91) prevented any definite conclusion being reached. Accurate measurements of the $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratio are still awaited.

Concerning the $\Gamma_n$/$\Gamma_p$ ratio, most of the previous experiments measured energetic protons only and the ratio was estimated without any experimental information on neutrons and low energy protons @ref:Szy91 [@ref:Has02; @ref:Sat03]. Thus the result might be much affected by missing the low energy protons caused by the re-scattering process of protons inside the nucleus (Final-State Interaction; FSI) and the possible existence of the two-nucleon induced decay modes. Both of these processes may induce the quenching of energetic proton numbers above the detection threshold, thus overestimating the $\Gamma_n/\Gamma_p$ ratio. Important progress has been made through the accurate measurement of neutron spectra from the NMWD of  (the KEK-PS E369 experiment) @ref:Kim03. A neutron spectrum from the weak decay of  was measured with an order of magnitude improvement in the statistics and signal-to-background ratio compared to the results of a previous experiment @ref:Szy91. This result opened a door to directly comparing the yields of neutrons to protons from the NMWD. Very recently we reported the simultaneously measured spectra of neutrons and protons emitted from NMWD of 5lam and  @ref:Oka04 with much higher statistics than those of the previous experiments @ref:Szy91 [@ref:Kim03]. The neutron to proton yield ratios for both hypernuclei obtained with high threshold energy (60 MeV) are approximately equal to two, which suggests a  ratio of about 0.5, namely $\Lambda p \rightarrow n p$ channel dominance. However, the results still contained some uncertainties due to residual FSI effects and a possible contribution from 2$N$-induced NMWD.

To resolve these experimental difficulties, it is important to clearly identify the two-body decay kinematics of $\Lambda n \to n n$ and $\Lambda p \to n p$. To identify these decay channels unambiguously, we have measured in coincidence two nucleons emitted back-to-back. Here we chose $^5_\Lambda$He hypernuclei because the effect of FSI is expected to be small in such light hypernuclei. The yields of pair coincidences, $Y_{np}$ and $Y_{nn}$, can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned}
  \label{eq:NNpair}
    Y_{nn} (cos \theta)&=& Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ r_n~ \e_{nn}(cos \theta)~
       f_n^2, \label{eq:Ynn} \\
    Y_{np} (cos \theta)&=& Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ r_p~ \e_{np}(cos \theta)~ 
       f_n~ f_p, \label{eq:Ynp}\end{aligned}$$

where $Y_{hyp},~b_{nm}$ and $r_{n(p)}$ are the number of 5lam produced, the branching ratio for NMWD of 5lam and $\Gamma_{n(p)}/\Gamma_{nm}$, respectively. The $\e_{np}$ (= $\Omega_{np} \e_n  \e_p$) and $\e_{nn}$(= $\Omega_{nn}  \e_n^2$) are the overall efficiencies for detecting $np$ and $nn$ pairs including the detector acceptance where $\Omega_{NN}$ and $\e_N$ are the detector solid angle for the nucleon pair $NN$ and the efficiency for each nucleon $N$. The $f_{n(p)}$ is the reduction factor due to FSI on the yield of neutrons or protons in the energy range above 30 MeV. Since the 1$N$-induced NMWD is a two-body interaction and emits nucleons with much higher momentum than the nuclear Fermi momentum, one can expect that the two emitted nucleons are strongly back-to-back correlated in their opening angle, $\theta$, shown in Fig. \[fig:setup\], and have their energy-sum $E_{sum}$ close to the Q-value (153 MeV) of the NMWD process, if the $1N$-induced NMWD process occurs without FSI. We were able to reject most of the events due to FSI and 2$N$ processes by requiring strict conditions on the angular and energy-sum correlation. $Y_{nn}$ and $Y_{np}$ are proportional to $r_n$ and $r_p$ as shown in Eqs. \[eq:Ynn\] and \[eq:Ynp\].

The $r_n/r_p$ ratio, which is identical to the   ratio, is obtained from the ratio $Y_{nn}/Y_{np}$ as $$\begin{aligned}
  \label{eq:gngp}
  \frac{r_n}{r_p} \left( = \frac{N_{nn}}{N_{np}} \right)
  &=&  
  \frac{\{Y_{nn}~/~Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ \epsilon_{nn}\}}
       {\{Y_{np}~/~Y_{hyp}~ b_{nm}~ \epsilon_{np}\}}
       \cdot \frac{f_n~f_p}{f_n^2} \nonumber\\
       &=&  \frac{Y_{nn}~ \Omega_{np}~ \epsilon_p}
             {Y_{np}~ \Omega_{nn}~ \epsilon_n}\end{aligned}$$ since $Y_{hyp}b_{nm}$ is the total number of NMWD, $N_{nn}$ and $N_{np}$ are the normalized pair yields per NMWD for full solid angle and unit efficiency. We can assume that protons and neutrons suffer the same FSI effect in the nucleus, i.e. $f_n = f_p$ because of the charge symmetry of the $NN$ interaction. By taking the ratio of the $nn$-to-$np$ pair yields, many systematic error sources, like $Y_{hyp}$, $b_{nm}$, $\epsilon_n$ and $f_n$, cancel and we do not need to know the branching ratio of the 2$N$ contribution to get the  ratio from the pair yield ratio. In previous experiments, $b_{nm}$ and $f_n$ were sources of large errors in the  ratio. Now we directly obtain the $\Gamma_n / \Gamma_p$ ratio from experimental quantities.

The experiment (E462) was carried out at the K6 beam line of KEK-PS using a 1.05 GeV/c $\pi^+$ beam to induce the  reaction. Momenta of both the beam pion and the produced kaon were measured with $\sigma_p/p\sim 10^{-3}$ resolution using the K6 beam spectrometer and the Superconducting Kaon Spectrometer (SKS). They were then used to reconstruct the excitation energy spectrum of the hypernucleus produced @ref:Fuk95.

![\[fig:setup\] Detector setup for the coincidence measurement of neutrons and protons emitted from NMWD in KEK-PS E462.](setup.eps)

The setup detecting the particles from the weak decay of  is shown in Fig. \[fig:setup\]. It has three sets of decay-particle counters, two located on the top and bottom of the target for a back-to-back coincidence measurement and one at the side to cover the solid angle for non back-to-back events. Each of the top and bottom coincidence counter sets consists of fast timing counters (T2), a drift chamber (PDC), veto or stop timing counters (T3) and neutron counter arrays (T4). The side counter is similar but without the PDC.

Neutral particles, $\gamma$'s and neutrons, were measured in T4 together with T3 as veto counters. The particle identification was done in the TOF spectra, from T1 to T4. The charged decay particles were identified by the three measured variables, $\Delta E$, TOF and $E$ which denote the energy loss per unit length measured by the T2 counter, the time-of-flight between T2 and T3 and the ADC sum of sequentially fired counters, respectively. Protons and pions were clearly identified, and the pion contamination in the proton gate was less than 1%. The detection thresholds were $\sim$10 MeV for neutrons and $\sim$30 MeV for protons. The neutron detection efficiency of the neutron counter system, $\epsilon_n$, was calculated by a Monte Carlo simulation with a modified version of the <span>DEMONS</span> @ref:Dem92 code, which is applicable to a multi-element neutron detector and has been tested to reproduce various experimental data @ref:Kim03. For charged particle analysis, only the central segments of T2 and T3 were used for more accurate determination of the acceptance and particle identification. Further details of the decay-particle counters are described in Ref. @ref:Oka04.

![\[fig:inclusive\] The hypernuclear excitation energy spectra for $^{6}_{\Lambda}$Li for (a) inclusive, (b) $np$-pair coincidence and (c) $nn$-pair coincidence measurements.](excitation.pair.eps)

The inclusive $^{6}_\Lambda {\rm Li}$ excitation energy spectrum derived from the pion and kaon momenta is shown in Fig. \[fig:inclusive\](a). Figs. \[fig:inclusive\](b) and \[fig:inclusive\](c) are the spectra in coincidence with nucleon pairs, $np$ and $nn$, respectively. Since the ground state of 6lam is above the $^{5}_\Lambda {\rm He} + p$ threshold, it promptly decays to  by emitting protons of several MeV. The vertical lines show the applied gate for the measurement of the decay of $^{5}_\Lambda {\rm He}$. The enhanced yield in the quasi-free $\Lambda$ region of the $nn$ coincidence excitation spectrum over that of the $np$ pairs is considered to be due to two-neutron emission via the absorption of  from mesonic decay of quasi-free $\Lambda$s.

In Figs. \[fig:pair\](a) and \[fig:pair\](b), the distributions of the $np$ and $nn$ pair yields are seen in the energy sum of the pair nucleons. In the figure only the pair events in which each of the nucleons has an energy above 30 MeV are counted. The hatched histograms show the contamination due to the absorption of $\pi^-$ emitted from the mesonic decay. The amount of contamination was estimated by referring to the $\pi^-$ absorption from mesonic decay of quasi-free $\Lambda$ formation events. The energy-sum resolution $\sigma_{E_{sum}}$ for $np$ and $nn$ pairs was estimated to be 12 MeV and 16 MeV, respectively, for the typical cases. The energy resolution of neutron deteriorates rapidly in the high energy region, while that of proton is stable with respect to its energy. In the energy-sum spectrum of $np$ pairs, one can see the peak located around expected value. The sharp peak indicates that the effect of FSI is not severe and two-body 1$N$ NMWD is the major process. Note that the back-to-back kinematic condition has not yet been applied to these energy-sum spectra.

The upper panels of Figs. \[fig:pair\](c) and \[fig:pair\](d) show the yields of the $np$ and $nn$ coincidence events, $Y_{np}$ and $Y_{nn}$, as a function of the opening angle between the two nucleons ($\theta_{np}$ and $\theta_{nn}$). They are not yet normalized for acceptance and efficiency. The angular resolutions were estimated to be $\sigma_{\cos(\theta_{np})} = 0.018$ and $\sigma_{\cos(\theta_{nn})} = 0.026$ at $\cos\theta = -0.9$. A total of 90 and 30 events were observed in the back-to-back angular region of $\cos\theta < -0.8$ indicated as the vertical dashed lines for the $np$ and $nn$ pair yields, respectively.

![\[fig:pair\] (a) and (b) : The yields of the $np$ and $nn$ coincidence events, $Y_{np}$ and $Y_{nn}$, as a function of the energy-sum $E_{sum}$ for the pair nucleons. The yields are not normalized for efficiency yet. (c) and (d) : The upper panel shows the yields of the $NN$ coincidence events, $Y_{NN}$, plotted as a function of the the opening angle between two nucleons ($\theta_{NN}$). The lower panel depicts the normalized yields of the $np$ and $nn$ coincidence per NMWD.](pair.eps)

The lower two panels in Figs. \[fig:pair\](c) and \[fig:pair\](d) show the angular correlation of nucleon pairs, where the vertical scale is normalized for full solid angle and unit efficiency ($N_{np}$ and $N_{nn}$ in Eq. \[eq:gngp\]). They are normalized with the simulated event-by-event efficiency, $\e_{NN}(cos \theta)$. The $b_{nm}$ value, 0.429$\pm$0.012$\pm$0.005, derived from the $\pi^-$ and $\pi^0$ branching ratios measured in the present experiment @ref:Oka03 [@ref:Kam03] and drastically improved from the previous 34% error @ref:Szy91. This accurate $b_{nm}$ value made it possible to normalize the pair yields per NMWD without introducing significant systematic error so that the measured $N_{NN}$ angular correlation of $nn$ and $np$ pairs can be directly compared to those of the FSI model calculation @ref:Gar03.

Back-to-back peaking at $\cos\theta < -0.8$, which is the signature of a two-body final state, is clearly observed in the angular correlation for both $np$ and $nn$ pairs. This is the first clean observation of  and  1$N$-induced NMWD processes.

Next we discuss the $N_{nn}/N_{np}$ ratio in the back-to-back kinematic region ($\cos\theta < -0.8$), because the acceptance beyond there decrease rapidly. In this kinematic region, the ratio $\Gamma_n /\Gamma_p$ simply becomes the $N_{nn}/N_{np}$ ratio as shown in Eq. \[eq:gngp\] assuming the same FSI on neutrons and protons. Possible differences in the FSI on neutrons and protons would not be significant due to the smallness of the FSI itself in the residual nucleus, $^4 \rm{He}$ or $^4 \rm{H}$ @ref:Gar03. The similar spectral shape of the neutron and proton single spectra observed in the same experiment supports this assumption @ref:Oka04. Comparing the yield of $N_{nn}$ and $N_{np}$ in the $cos \theta < -0.8$ region, we obtained $$\begin{aligned}
  \label{eq:rnrp}
   \frac{\Gamma_n}{\Gamma_p} 
  \simeq \frac{N_{nn}}{N_{np}}
  = 0.45\pm0.11 (stat) \pm0.03 (syst). \end{aligned}$$ The systematic error of about 7% is mainly from the ambiguity of neutron detection efficiency, 6%. The  ratio is determined for the first time from exclusive measurement of each NMWD channel by detecting both emitted nucleons in coincidence in order to remove the ambiguities of the FSI and 2$N$ NMWD contributions inherent in all the previous measurements. This ratio agrees well with the recent theoretical ratios of the direct quark interaction and the heavy meson exchange models @ref:Sas00 [@ref:Par01]. Although the $\Gamma_n /\Gamma_p$ ratio is found to be smaller than previous values, it is still well above the OPE prediction. It is now clear that one needs additional shorter-range mechanisms, such as DQ and/or HME, to explain this strangeness-changing baryon-baryon weak interaction.

In summary, we have measured for the first time the energy-sum and the angular correlation of two nucleon pairs, $nn$ and $np$, emitted in the NMWD of 5lam. We have clearly observed a distinct $nn$ and $np$ back-to-back correlation coming from a one-nucleon induced decay mode. We have determined the  of NMWD of 5lam accurately and unambiguously from the pair number ratio, $N_{nn}/N_{np}$, in the back-to-back kinematics region, which is almost free from the effects of FSI and 2$N$-induced NMWD contributions.

We are grateful to K.Nakamura and KEK-PS staff for their support of our experiment and stable operation of the KEK-PS. Authors, BHK and HB, acknowledge support from grants KOSEF(R01-2005-000-10050-0) and KRF(2003-070-C00015).

W. M. Alberico, G. Garbarino, Phys. Rep. <span>**369**</span>, 1-109 (2002), and references therein. K. Sasaki, T. Inoue, and M. Oka, Nuc. Phys. A <span>**669**</span>, 331 (2000); A <span>**678**</span>, 455 (2000). A. Parreño and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. C <span>**65**</span>, 015204 (2001). J. J. Szymanski <span>*et al.*</span>, Phys. Rev. C <span>**43**</span>, 849 (1991). O. Hashimoto <span>*et al.*</span>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**88**</span>, 042503 (2002). Y. Sato <span>*et al.*</span>, Phys. Rev. C <span>**71**</span>, 025203 (2005). J. H. Kim <span>*et al*</span>, Phys. Rev. C <span>**68**</span>, 065201 (2003) S. Okada <span>*et al.*</span>, Phys. Lett. B <span>**597**</span>, 249 (2004). T. Fukuda <span>*et al.*</span>, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods A <span>**361**</span>, 485 (1995). R. C. Byrd <span>*et al.*</span>, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A <span>**313**</span>, 437(1992). S. Okada <span>*et al.*</span>, Nucl. Phys. A <span>**752**</span>, 178c (2005). S. Kameoka <span>*et al.*</span>, Nucl. Phys. A <span>**752**</span>, 173c (2005). G. Garbarino, A. Parreño, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**91**</span>, 112501 (2003).

{'source': 'arXiv_out/nucl-ex0509015_extract_gngp'}