--- abstract: 'Distance education has expanded significantly over the last decade, but the natural sciences have lagged in the implementation of this instructional mode. he abrupt onset of the COVID-19 pandemic left educational institutions scrambling to adapt curricula to distance modalities. With projected effects lasting through the 2020–21 academic year, this problem will not go away soon. Analysis of the literature has elucidated the costs and benefits of, as well as obstacles to, the implementation of e-learning, with a focus undergraduate physics education. Physics faculty report that a lack of time about research-driven innovation is their primary to implementing it. In response, this paper is intended to help physics lecturers and lab instructors re-think their courses . This paper serves as an all-in-one guide of recommendations successful distanced educational practices, with an emphasis on smartphones and social media. These technologies were chosen for their utility in a virtual environment. Additionally, this paper can as a resource for university administrators to adapt to the changing needs associated with new teaching modalities.' author: - 'Daniel J. O'Brien' title: 'Feynman, Lewin, and Einstein Download Zoom: A Guide for Incorporating E-Teaching of Physics in a Post-COVID World' --- Introduction ============ Despite much debate, no consensus has been formed in the literature as to a universal definition of e-learning. @Singh2019 [@Moore2011; @GuriRosenblit2005] For the purposes of this paper, it is defined as "technology-based learning in which learning materials are delivered electronically to remote learners via a computer network." @Zhang2004 E-learning can be divided into two categories: asynchronous and synchronous. The former is commonly implemented through a combination of pre-recorded videos, email, and discussion boards. The latter is usually implemented through a combination of videoconferencing and chat platforms (Zoom, WebEx, Skype, etc.). @Hrastinski2008 Within the literature, "virtual" learning often refers to synchronous methods, whereas "online" refers to asynchronous. From 2002–2016, distance enrollment at higher education institutions rose dramatically, averaging an increase of 18.5% per year, largely driven by e-learning. Meanwhile, on-campus enrollment dropped by 6.4% between 2012–2016. @Seaman2018 [@Allen2003] When compared to students in other fields, undergraduate physical science students consistently rank near the bottom in terms of the ratio of online to in-person classes taken. In the 2015–16 academic year, for example, although 43.1% of the entire U.S. undergraduate population took an online course, only 32.8% of students in the physical sciences did so.@NCES2018 However, a few universities have housed online physics classes for decades, demonstrating the field's ability to thrive over time. @Kortemeyer2017 [@Lambourne2007; @Lambourne2005; @Adams2003] The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted academic institutions, causing most US universities to shut down on-campus classes and ousting students from their dormitories before the scheduled end of the 2019–20 school year. In an attempt to maintain instructional continuity, teachers turned to videoconferencing and recordings of lectures, labs, and office hour sessions. This change may be particularly detrimental to students within STEM subjects due to at-home students' lack of access to instructional technologies critical to STEM learning. @Sintema2020 This pandemic may therefore act as a motivator for physics faculty and administrators to update curricula, adopt novel teaching modalities, and embrace research-based innovations. This change is not unreasonable; a survey of U.S. physics faculty found that 92% reported that their department encouraged improving instruction. Nearly half (48%) of the surveyed faculty reported that they currently use at least one research-based innovation strategy in their teaching. Unfortunately, 53% of those answering replied that the principal reason for not using more research-driven innovations in their classroom is a lack of time (especially time to research and implement changes). As a response, the aim of this manuscript is to act as a brief but thorough guide for educators. an explanation for some of the above trends, specific guidance for implementing techniques and systems in physics. First, the benefits of, barriers to, and key factors for the implementation of physics e-learning will be discussed. Next, . Following that, the smartphone will be introduced as an important educational tool for physics e-learning. The smartphone can be very useful for both doing science (data collection, analysis, demonstrations) as well as facilitating other technologies, such as social media. Applications of social media in the traditional and virtual classrooms are then presented, and their use is examined in depth. Other technologies for e-learning are then briefly introduced. Finally, the need for extensive institutional support to facilitate e-learning has been widely recognized and thoroughly researched. Consequently, a guide for administrators on the success in this implementation is presented. In all, it is the goal of this manuscript to act as an easy-to-read comprehensive guide e-learning in the physics community. Benefits, barriers, and key factors =================================== E-learning has a well-documented array of benefits and drawbacks. @Zhang2004 [@Arkorful2015] Notably, it widens access to education and offers opportunities for pedagogical improvements by instructors. @Mayadas2009 However, due to its drawbacks, e-learning is plagued by low-retention rates. @Packham2004 [@Rosenthal2013; @Murphy2017] In recent years, studies have identified some areas where e-learning may be advantageous for *physics* teaching, especially through the use of smartphones, online learning systems, and social media ach of can be implemented in the classroom for specific tasks—e.g. by facilitating group interaction and feedback loops, or by encouraging interest in coursework. @Zhai2019 [@Zhu2012] By pairing these technologies with research-driven innovations, e-learning can be made more effective for physics education, as will be elaborated upon in the following sections. As previously mentioned, electronic instruction of physics faces specific barriers not found amongst teaching of the social sciences, humanities, and other natural sciences. First, e-learning is less and less effective for science education that requires hands-on (e.g. laboratory) instruction. @Arkorful2015 Additionally, students often find it difficult to visualize physical phenomena, especially those in 3-D (like the right-hand rule), through a screen. @Kustusch2016 From a structure standpoint, teachers tend to have low with technologies required for e-teaching physics. @Badia2019 These factors, when paired with the lack of community students feel in online classes, contribute to higher withdrawal rates for online undergraduate introductory physics courses than in-person classes. @Faulconer2018 With these many costs and benefits in mind, it becomes clear that certain e-learning are key to its success. These are well-documented and extensively studied. @Sun2008 [@Selim2007] The primary factors for successful and equitable e-learning include that: 1. professional training is crucial and has been shown to improve teachers' acceptance of technology for physics instruction; @Zhai2019 [@Zhai2018] 2. real-time tech support is essential to successful instruction; @Chow2017 3. participation in small-group collaborative learning correlates with deeper learning, teamwork, and can increase students' sense of community; @Brindley2009 4. mechanisms to directly combat high dropout rates for e-learners must be developed, including communication with lower-achieving students; @Njenga2010 and 5. inequalities should be considered when implementing e-learning, effect on technology. Addressing demographic concerns =============================== If e-learning is to be implemented equitably, economic concerns . The abrupt shift to an e-learning environment caused by COVID-19-induced closures generated significant difficulties for lower income families across the globe. These closures "disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, in particular students with disabilities and those reliant on their educational institution for food, shelter, residency, and safety." @Berger2020 Income-driven disparities are worse in urban centers like New York City, where 10% of students were homeless or had unstable housing last year. @VanLacker2020 [@NCHE2020] These cities are especially vulnerable to COVID resurgences due to high population densities. Data also shows that home computer availability in the U.S. scales with household income. @Anderson2018 Alternatively, smartphone access is nearly ubiquitous amongst both teens and adults nearly uniform amongst people of varying gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Smartphones also have utility in addressing other demographic differences, such as empowering visually and hearing impaired students. @Coca2017 The smartphone is evidently a key tool to physics education in the wake of COVID-19, and will be more thoroughly in the following section. It is well known that sex and gender inequality is rampant in the sciences, especially in physics. Although the percentage of female scientific authors increased substantially from 12% in 1955 to 35% in 2005, both physics and math still had female representations of 15%. @Huang2020 Additionally, within the classroom, female students have fewer successful learning and identity-forming experiences than males. @Hazari2010 Gender and socioeconomic differences can also be found in the use of technology for e-learning. @Porter2006 Although it has been shown that there is no difference in scientific literacy across genders, males may show better performance in science practices because of their formed from daily activity. @Pramuda2019 Multiple studies have shown gender differences in perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude towards use.@Padilla-Melendez2013 [@Wong2012; @Moran2010; @Pynoo2011; @Rasimah2011; @Teo2011; @Sumak2011] Educators should therefore communicate with their students to identify deficiencies in technological aptitude and comfort before electronic course instruction. They should utilize feedback loops integrated into learning management systems to continuously address the needs of underrepresented and disadvantaged students. These support structures must be designed and backed by the educational institutions, as teachers rarely have the resources or time to both develop their own feedback systems and implement them within the classroom. Lastly, when considering partial campus returns, household internet availability, technology access, and difficult home situations must be considered in selecting populations that will be allowed to return for on-campus instruction. These actions will assist making science education more accessible and inequality prevalent in the sciences. Smartphones as educational tools ================================ Over the last decade, cell phones have increasingly distracted students in the classroom. However, when teachers permit their use, smartphones can be effectively transformed into a . They can facilitate the use of social media and learning management systems within and outside of the traditional classroom, and effectively complement other technologies. @Ott2017 Researchers have advocated for smartphone use in teaching, arguing that smartphones offer benefits of "rich content deliverability, knowledge sharing, and dynamic learning activities where students can expect to experience multiple channels of interactions in learning."@Buchholz2016 [@Anshari2017] Comprehensive lists of the advantages of smartphone use in the classroom are readily available.@Coca2017 [@Attewell2005; @Kolb2011; @Duncan2012] uch advantages include ability to encourage collaborative learning, students' existing familiarity with smartphones, and the fact that 96% of young adults (aged 18–29) in the U.S. own smartphones.@PewMobile2019 Additionally, if implemented properly, smartphone use can raise curiosity content while simultaneously and no dependence on gender, self-concept, or experimental experience.@Sans2015 [@Hochberg2018] This section will elaborate on the physics-specific uses and advantages of smartphones for e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Smartphones are especially use in laboratory settings due to their multitude of high-precision sensors and analysis tools. As described by Kolb, "many teachers are discovering that a basic cell phone can be the Swiss army knife of digital learning tools."@Kolb2011 Such sensors include sound meters, accelerometers, magnetometers, proximeters, gyroscopes, photometers, cameras, GPS, and barometers. @Vieyra2020 In order to access directly, a host of physics toolbox and lab function apps have been developed. include the Physics Toolbox Sensor Suite, phyphox, Sensor Kinetics, Sensors Toolbox, and Sensors Pro. The former four are available as free apps (some with premium versions), while the latter is paid. Table I contains a list of smartphone-based lab experiments that can be used in undergraduate (and high school) introductory physics labs with little other equipment. These experiments are particularly relevant for planning post-COVID, on campus/small group learning, where smartphones can be employed to limit the use of shared equipment. Table II contains a similar list, but specifically geared towards smartphone-based lab experiments that can be conducted outside of the lab jonathanowens@example.com. These experiments should be adapted .@Kozminski2014 process for implementing such a transition has been explicitly laid out.@Holmes2019 It has been shown that smartphone experiments "may be more effective in improving students' understanding of acceleration with respect to traditional 'cookbook' and real-time experiments," with the most significant improvements seen students' critical deductive thinking capability designing their own experiments.@Mazzella2016 In order to carry out this approach, teachers are encouraged to adapt the POE method (predict-observe-explain) for smartphone-based experiments—have students predict the results of an experiment, collect data with smartphone sensors, and explain the resulting phenomenon theoretically. By allowing students to utilize this method in association with familiar smartphone technology, improvements in conceptual understanding of underlying phenomena can be achieved. The smartphone can be utilized in lecture sections as well. For example, the slow motion camera has been used center of mass rotation, the Doppler effect, a frustrated Newton's cradle, the falling chimney effect, and tautochrones. @Lincoln2017 The smartphone can be paired with external sensors like a thermal imaging camera to demonstrate phenomena such as work and energy transfer within the body. @Kubsch2017 Additionally, pairing smartphones with a smart student response system can promote active physics learning in the classroom. @Coca2017 These uses of smartphones will help transform it into a device with utility in the virtual classroom and laboratory. Subject Topic, Citation ---------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Kinematics Gravitational Acceleration @Pili2018a Dynamics Static Friction @Kapucu2018 Dynamics Kinetic Friction @Coban2019 [@Baldock2016] Dynamics Atwood Machine @Lopez2018 Work & Energy Energy Conservation @Namchanthra2019 [@Pierratos2018] Impulse & Momentum Collisions @Vogt2014 Impulse & Momentum Impulse @Ayop2017 Impulse & Momentum Ballistic Pendula @Sanders2020 Impulse & Momentum Collisions/Magnetism @Seeley2018 Oscillations & Waves Spring Constants @Pili2018b [@Pili2019] Oscillations & Waves Simple/Damped Oscillations @Sans2013 [@CastroPalacio2013] Oscillations & Waves Harmonic Series @Jaafar2016 Oscillations & Waves Doppler Effect @GomezTejedor2014 Rotation Rotational Motion @Porn2016 Rotation Coriolis Acceleration @Shakur2016 Rotation Angular Acceleration/Spinning Discs @Gomes2018 Rotation Damped Rotational Motion @Klein2017 Fluids & Pressure Fluid Mechanics @Goy2017 Fluids & Pressure Surface Tension/Dispersion Relation @Wei2015 Thermal Physics Introductory Thermodynamics @Silva2018 Electricity Skin Depth Effect @Rayner2017 Electricity Eddy Currents @Tomasel2012 Magnetism Faraday's Law @Soares2019 Magnetism Inductive Metal Detector @Sobral2018 Magnetism Basic Magnetism @Arribas2015 [@Ogawara2017] Magnetism Collisions/Magnetism @Seeley2018 Magnetism Eddy Currents @Tomasel2012 Light Malus' Law @Rosi2020 [@Monteiro2017] Light Absorption / Scattering @Malisorn2019 Light Lens Equation @Freeland2020 Light Brewster's Angle @Chiang2019 Light Linear Light Source @Salinas2018 Light Properties of EM Waves @Onorato2020 Quantum Mechanics Double-Slit @Ghalila2018 Quantum Mechanics e/m Experiment @Pirbhai2019 Astronomy Astronomy & Seasons @Durelle2017 Materials Physics Polymer Physics @Vandermarliere2016 Electronics Oscilloscopes @Forinash2012 : Smartphone-based lab experiments \[bosons\] Subject Topic, Citation ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kinematics Gravitational Acceleration @Schwarz2013 Kinematics Free Fall @Vogt2012 [@Kim2020; @Kuhn2016] Kinematics Basic Kinematics @Testoni2016 Dynamics Air Resistance @Azhikannickal2019 Dynamics Drag Coefficient @Fahsl2018 Impulse & Momentum Collisions @deJesus2016 Impulse & Momentum Conservation of Momentum @Pereira2017 Oscillations & Waves Acoustics @Kuhn2013 Oscillations & Waves Pendula @Kuhn2012 Oscillations & Waves Speed of Sound @Hellesund2019 [@Parolin2013; @Yavuz2015; @Staacks2019] Oscillations & Waves Mechanical Wave Physics @Bonato2017 Oscillations & Waves Acoustic Resonance @Monteiro2018 Oscillations & Waves Sound Directivity @Hawley2018 Oscillations & Waves Acoustic Modeling @Thees2017 Oscillations & Waves Pressure Waves @Muller2016 Oscillations & Waves Hooke's Law @Smith2019 Rotation Rolling Motion @Dilek2019 Rotation Radial Acceleration @Vogt2013 Rotation Phase Space @Monteiro2014 Rotation Parallel Axis Theorem @Salinas2019 Rotation Angular Velocity @Pili2018c Rotation Mechanics @Chevrier2013 Rotation Centripetal Acceleration @Mau2016 Fluids & Pressure Stevin's Law @Macchia2016 Fluids & Pressure Atmospheric Pressure Profiles @Monteiro2016 Fluids & Pressure Fluid Dynamics @Smith2019 Light Ray Optics @Girot2020 Special Relativity Time Dilation @Underwood2016 Nuclear & Particle Physics Radiation @Kuhn2014 Astronomy Orbital Angular Velocity @Meisner2014 : Smartphone-based at-home experiments \[bosons\] Integrating social media in "the classroom" =========================================== The social media (SM) presents an intriguing opportunity physics inside and outside of the traditional classroom. SM comprises an array of online tools through which users can quickly create and share content digitally—e.g. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Wikipedia. The integration of SM within the learning environment students self-agency their learning and career planning. Despite these positive , most universities continue to rely on more conservative, established learning management systems and environments. prevents educators from capitalizing on and associated social skills that students bring into the classroom.@McLoughlin2010 o comply with these laws while using SM, instructors should never share grades, records, or personal information via platforms not maintained by the university. Furthermore, faculty who use SM for e-learning should discuss and include a statement in their syllabi about proper conduct and expectations for online privacy, consult their university SM/privacy guidelines.@Rodriguez2011 [@Joosten2012] Other reservations held by faculty about the implementation of SM in the classroom include the following:@Manca2016 [@Bouhnik2014; @Hasiloglu2020; @Moran2012; @Buchanan2013; @Cao2013; @Anderson2018] 1. Not all students have smartphone access (although, in the U.S., $\sim$95% do). 2. Cultural/Social— show reluctance because: - there is a perceived erosion of traditional roles and difficulties in managing relationships with students; - ; and - language barriers . 3. Pedagogical— 4. Administrative/Institutional—Instructors show reluctance because success is reliant on financial investment and institutional support provided by the university (elaborated in final section). Not all instructors hesitate to employ SM in the classroom, and its uses vary by field. In a survey of 459 secondary teachers, almost all teachers used SM in the class. There were some differences in the modes of use; for example, teachers in the natural sciences used SM less often for the facilitation of self-regulated learning.@Matzat2015 Conversely, another study showed that university faculty used SM less (41% at least one tool on a monthly basis). Younger faculty used SM more than their colleagues, particularly Twitter—though it was concluded that age differences require further investigation. Math, computer science, and natural science faculty used SM less than those in humanities and social sciences. @Manca2016 The tendency for natural science faculty to use SM less than their colleagues is attributed to "a lack of relevant content on social media sites for their particular discipline." @Moran2012 The dearth of relevant content has been explained by a trend in faculty consuming rather than producing digital resources (which requires a large time investment). @Hargittai2008 Science faculty, as a result, tend to prefer blogs/Wikipedia and Youtube/Vimeo information sources to promote collaborative learning, rather than Facebook/Twitter type communication SM channels. @Manca2016 o demonstrate the effectiveness of SM within the classroom and to address the barriers presented previously, . One principle of high-impact online education is faculty/teaching assistants providing timely feedback to students outside of class. This task can be assisted through SM communication channels or example, WhatsApp can facilitate student-teacher interaction within online college courses. @Amry2014 Connecting with students outside of classroom hours through WhatsApp can permit physics teachers to identify problems that are not recognized during the traditional class hours.@Klieger2019 Other similar messaging apps including Slack, Discord, GroupMe, and Google Hangouts can replace WhatsApp with similar functionality. Overall, SM helps teachers share information, questions, and insights to promote curiosity in physics. @Hasiloglu2020 Perhaps of most importance, lack of community is often blamed for the high withdrawal rates of online learning. @Hart2012 Microblogging (e.g. Twitter) has been shown to combat this flaw, strengthening a sense of community in virtual classes within higher education. @Hsu2011 Classroom-specific Twitter threads can be used to provide updates and facilitate academic conversations in a manner familiar to students. @Page2015 [@Burden2014] WhatsApp can be employed student-student messaging and sharing of ideas. @Amry2014 Similarly, the use of Facebook groups for sharing ideas and support, asking questions, and participating in discussions has been shown to promote a virtual student learning community. @Schoper2017 integration of SMespecially through inclusive technologies such as the smartphonecan be key to battling low retention rates in virtual education during the COVID-19-induced closures. Research on innovative practices is crucial for adapting to changing learning environments. haring of effective practices can assist in the re-thinking of pedagogiescould shift attitudes from resistance to a welcomeness in using SM to assist and improve physics teaching in higher education. Other Novel At-Home Techniques ============================== Smartphone use a promising way to do physics at home, but other technologies can be used in complement with smartphones or replace them for various e-learning tasks when they are unsuitable. For example, experimental kits provide students the opportunity to conduct physics right on the kitchen table, and can be instructor-provided or student-assembled. Such kits have been implemented in the classroom, @Gibney2016 for massive open online courses (MOOCs), @DeBoer2019 in open universities, @Kennepohl2017 for in-class demonstrations, @Stpanka2015 and for experimental distance learning. @Long2012 [@Hendricks2009] Kits can even be paired with smartphones as data collection and analysis devices to increase student comfort with the experiments. Given physical laboratory equipment, experiments can also be conducted remotely. Virtual and remote labs have been around since commercialized internet became prevalent across the world, and their use has expanded significantly over time. @Heradio2016 [@Gomes2009] These are *real* experiments housed at hosting institutions accessed and controlled by individual users through the internet.@Ma2006 [@Matarrita2016] One such facility is FARLabs, led by La Trobe University, which allows users to remotely access lab technologies for real-time experiments. @Hoxley2014 Some researchers are endeavoring to promote remote labs through sharing economy platforms such as LabsLand. @Orduna2016 Remote experiments can be used to teach many aspects of physics, for example, radioactivity @Jona2013 and electronics. @Tawfik2012 Such a platform provides clear financial advantages over physical analogs better student access to equipment, scheduling flexibility, a wider range of possible assignments and activities, and more opportunities for student-student collaboration.@Zubia2012 For instructional demonstrations of concepts and simple experiments simulations can be extremely useful. Simulations have been used in the physics classroom for many years, @Jimoyiannis2001 and much research has been conducted on successful approaches for their use. @Wieman2008 Two such simulation bases are the PhET project developed by the University of Colorado and PhysClips of the University of New South Wales. @Wieman2010 [@Hatsidimitris2012] Many simulations and other resources can also be found on The Physics Source at AAPT's ComPADRE site. @MacIsaac2006 Simulations can be especially advantageous for instructors struggling with the extra preparation time required for online courses. Lastly, @Thompson2011 Whereas YouTube videos—such as those generated by Physics Girl, minutephysics, etc.—might be used by students intermittently, the consistent use of resources such as Khan Academy and HyperPhysics can fill gaps in student knowledge, or act as a support system for a .@Lindstrom2015 Lists of similar online resources can be found readily.@Kettle2013 Recommendations for institutional administrators ================================================ Whereas this manuscript is , effective recommendations for implementing e-learning necessarily include an administrative component. @Toquero2020 The effectiveness of pandemic-induced e-learning will depend on educational institutions realigning with and embracing the necessary structural changes associated with it. @Njenga2010 [@Peppard2004] Such changes are outlined below. 1. Online mental health and medical services should be expanded. @Sahu2020 It was found that 20–35% of the 2,530 surveyed students and workers at a Spanish university reported moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress after COVID-19 school closures. @Gonzalez2020 Similarly, nearly half (46%) of Australian young people studying at home are "vulnerable to adverse effects on their educational outcomes, nutrition, physical movement, social, and emotional wellbeing." @Brown2020 Universities (and other educational institutions) are recommended to: - expand the availability of online counseling services; and - encourage faculty to employ technology as a means to increase interactivity, enrich learning, and enhance the student experience, . 2. Direct financial investment into e-learning should be a priority. @Njenga2010 An analysis of blended learning at one university showed that student satisfaction was best predicted by the availability of university resources. @Calderon2012 Another study showed that the top faculty-identified needs for successful e-learning are multimedia development support and real-time help desks. @Chow2017 Universities are recommended to: - make expenditures related to internet access necessary for hybrid approaches; @Guri-Rosenblit2006 [@MacKeogh2001] - engage in hiring or contracting of support staff for IT; @Chow2017 and - ensure proper compensation for instructors; ( important for quality online instruction @Mihhailova2006). 3. Pedagogical research, data collection, and evidence-based practices focused on e-learning should be expanded. Student feedback can be motivated by effective communication mechanisms integrated into a student's online learning space, @Hatziapostolou2010 [@Jara2010] and has been shown to be of great value in improving blended course quality. @Calderon2012 Universities are recommended to: - ntegrat easy-access course feedback into virtual learning management system "close the feedback loop"; and - adopt a hiring and promotion process that factors in teaching achievement through student feedback. This will help incentivize research-driven innovation and teaching practices in the classroom. 4. Teacher training capabilities for multiple modes of e-learning should be expanded. @Njenga2010 Training is essential to the effective delivery of electronic physics instruction, @Afzal2015 and has been demonstrated to lead to instructors' enthusiastic acceptance of mobile technology for teaching.@Zhai2018 [@Zhai2019] A general outline of the contributions necessary from administrators, faculty, and students is offered in Fig. \[fig1\]. As learning institutions resume education during COVID-19, aculty should encourage these recommendations success of education under circumstances induced by the pandemic. \[h!\] ![A graphical representation of support mechanisms for improving e-teaching and e-learning of physics at the university level (color online)<span data-label="fig1"></span>](Daniel_OBrienFig01.pdf "fig:"){width="\linewidth"} Conclusions =========== The COVID-19 pandemic thrust learners and educators across the world into a new environment, in which e-learning became the foremost method of education. As the community is unsure about how this pandemic will persist, it is of paramount importance to embrace e-learning in physics education. First, demographic concerns were addressed, including technology's association with income and gender differences in physics. Consideration of demographics is key to the equitable implementation of e-learning. t was proposed that adopting research-driven innovation will help teachers adapt curricula to the changing needs of students in the wake of the pandemic. The smartphone was explored as an educational tool in the classroom and its range of sensors and apps for use in the laboratory . Nearly 80 examples of smartphone-based lab and at-home introductory physics experiments were and sorted by subject. Following , a guide for the use of social media as a classroom tool was presented. While smartphones and social media are key for some aspects of e-learning, other technologies like remote labs and experimental kits can complement their use effectively. Lastly, a guide for institutional administrators highlight the need for online mental health/medical services, financial investment in e-learning, pedagogical research initiatives, and teacher training. This manuscript should be utilized by the physics community as a whole to help guide the of fruitful electronic learning practices. Much thanks to A. J. Nijdam, P. Johnson, and L. Doughty (Georgetown), S. Fisher (William & Mary), and A. Sedlack (NIH) for careful review of the manuscript, as well as my advisor, M. Paranjape, for encouraging me in undertaking this project. Thank you to both the NSF for current funding through award number CBET-1938995, the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists-Metro Washington Chapter, and the Forster Family Foundation for general research funding. <span>999</span> V. Singh and A. Thurman, "How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018)," Am. J. Distance Educ., **33** (4), 289–306 (2019). J. L. Moore, C. Dickson-Deane, and K. Galyen, "e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?," Internet High. Educ., **14** (2), 129-135 (2011). S. Guri-Rosenblit, " 'Distance education' and 'e-learning': Not the same thing," High. Educ., **49**, 467–493 (2005). D. Zhang, J. L. Zhao, L. Zhou, and J. F. Nunamaker, "Can e-learning replace classroom learning?," Commun. ACM, **47** (5), 75–79 (2004). S. Hrastinski, "A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes," EDUCAUSE Q., **31** (4), 51–55 (2008). J. E. Seaman, E. I. Allen, and J. Seaman, *Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States*, Wellesley, MA: The Babson Survey Group (2018). E. I. Allen and J. Seaman, *Sizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2002 and 2003*, Needham, MA: Sloan-C (2003). T. D. Snyder, C. de Brey, and S. A. Dillow, *Digest of Education Statistics 2018* (NCES 2020-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC (2019). G. Kortemeyer, "Lessons from (almost) 25 years of hybrid and online physics courses at Michigan State University," EdMedia + Innovate Learning, Washington, DC (2017). R. Lambourne, "Laboratory-based teaching and the Physics Innovations Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning," Eur. J. Phys., **28** (3), S29–S36 (2007). R. Lambourne, "Einstein at a distance," Eur. J. Phys., **26** (6), S135–S140 (2005). N. D. Adams, "Teaching Introductory Physics Online," ERIC, ED478781 (2003). E. J. Sintema, "Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education," Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Tech. Ed., **16** (7), 1–6 (2020). M. Dancy and C. Henderson, "Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty," Am. J. Phys., **78** (10), 1056–1063 (2010). C. Henderson and M. H. Dancy, "Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics," Phys. Rev. Spec. Top.-Phys. Educ. Res., **3** (2), 1–14 (2007). V. Arkorful and N. Abaidoo, "The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education," Int. J. Instruct. Technol. Distance Learn., **12** (1), 29–36 (2015). A. F. Mayadas, J. Bourne, and P. Bacsich, "Online education today," Science, **323** (5910), 85–89 (2009). G. Packham, P. Jones, C. Miller, and B. Thomas, "E-learning and retention: key factors influencing student withdrawal," Educ. Train., **46** (6/7), 335–342 (2004). C. A. Murphy and J. C. Stewart, "On-Campus students taking online courses: Factors associated with unsuccessful course completion," Internet High. Educ., **34**, 1–9 (2017). A. Rosenthal, "The Trouble with Online College," *New York Times*, Feb. 19, 2013. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/opinion/the-trouble-with-online-college.html X. Zhai, M. Li, and S. Chen, "Examining the uses of student-led, teacher-led, and collaborative functions of mobile technology and their impacts on physics achievement and interest," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., **28**, 310–320 (2019). C. Zhu, "Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Learning," J. Educ. Technol. Soc., **15** (1), 127–136 (2012). M. B. Kustusch, "Assessing the impact of representational and contextual problem features on student use of right-hand rules," Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., **12** (1), 010102 (2016). A. Badia, D. Martín, and M. Gómez, "Teachers' Perceptions of the Use of Moodle Activities and Their Learning Impact in Secondary Education," Technol. Know. Learn., **24**, 483–499 (2019). E. K. Faulconer, J. C. Griffith, B. Wood, S. Acharyya, and D. Roberts, "A Comparison of Online, Video Synchronous, and Traditional Learning Modes for an Introductory Undergraduate Physics Course," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., **27**, 404–411 (2018). P-C. Sun, R. J. Tsai, G. Finger., Y-Y. Chen, and D. Yeh, "What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction," Comput. Educ., **50** (4), 1183–1202 (2008). H. M. Selim, "Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models," Comput. Educ., **49** (2), 396–413 (2007). X. Zhai, M. Zhang, and X. Zhang, "Understanding the relationship between levels of mobile technology use in high school physics classrooms and the learning outcome," Brit. J. Educ. Technol., **50** (2), 750–766 (2018). A. S. Chow and R. A. Croxton, "Designing a Responsive e-Learning Infrastructure: Systemic Change in Higher Education," Am. J. Distance Educ., **31** (1), 20–42 (2017). J. E. Brindley, L. M. Blaschke, and C. Walti, "Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment," Int. Rev. Res. Open. Dis., **10** (3), 1–18 (2009). J. K. Njenga and L. C. H. Fourie, "The myths about e-learning in higher education," Brit. J. Educ. Technol., **41** (2), 199–212 (2010). Z. D. Berger, N. G. Evans, A. L. Phelan, and R. D. Silverman, "Covid-19: control measures must be equitable and inclusive," W. Van Lacker and Z. Parolin, "COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making," Lancet, **5** (5), E243–244 (2020). Federal Data Summary: School Years 2015–16 through 2017–18, Greensboro, NC: National Center for Homeless Education (2020). M. Anderson and J. Jiang, "Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018," Pew Research Center (2018). Pew Research Center. *Mobile Fact Sheet*. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/ (2019). Accessed Sept. 22, 2020. D. M. Coca and J. Slisko, "Software Socrative and Smartphones as Tools For Implementation of Basic Processes of Active Physics Learning in Classroom: An Initial Feasibility Study With Prospective Teachers," Eur. J. Phys. Educ., **4** (2), 17–24 (2017). J. Huang, A. J. Gates, R. Sinatra, and A-L. Barabási, "Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines," P. Natl. A. Sci. USA., **117** (9), 4609–4616 (2020). Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M-C. Shanahan, "Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice," J. Res. Sci. Teach., **47** (8), 978–1003 (2010). C. E. Porter and N. Donthu, "Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics," **59** (9), 999–1007 (2006). A. Pramuda, Mundilarto, H. Kuswanto, and S. Hadiati, "Effect of Real-time Physics Organizer Based Smartphone and Indigenous Technology to Students' Scientific Literacy Viewed from Gender Differences," Int. J. Instr., **12** (3), 253–270 (2019). A. Padilla-Meléndez, A. R. del Aguila-Obra, and A. Garrido-Moreno, "Perceived playfulness, gender differences, and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario," Comput. Educ., **63**, 306–317 (2013). K-T. Wong, T. Teo, and S. Russo, "Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model," Australas. J. Educ. Tec., **28** (7), 1190–1207 (2012). M. Moran, M. Hawkes, and O. El Gayar, " Tablet personal computer integration in higher education: Applying the unified theory of acceptance and use technology model to understand supporting factors," J. Educ. Comput. Res., **42** (1), 70–101 (2010). B. Pynoo et al., "Predicting secondary school teachers' acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study," Comp. Hum. Beh., **27** (1), 568–575 (2011). C. M. Y. Rasimah, A. Ahmad, and H. Zaman, "Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology," Australas. J. Educ. Tec., **27** (8), 1369–1387 (2011). T. Teo, "Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test," Comput. Educ., **57** (4), 2432–2440 (2011). B. Šumak, M. Heričko, M. Pušnik, and G. Polančič, "Factors Affecting Acceptance and Use of Moodle: and Empirical Study Based on TAM," Informatica, **35**, 91–100 (2011). T. Ott, "Mobile phones in school: From disturbing objects to infrastructure for learning," Ph.D. thesis, Göteborgs universitet, 2017. A. Buchholz, B. Perry, L. Beck Weiss, D. Cooley, "Smartphone Use and Perceptions among Medical Students and Practicing Physicians," J. MTM., **5** 27–32 (2016). M. Anshari, M. N. Almunawar, M. Shahrill, D. K. Wicaksono, and M. Huda, "Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?," Educ. Inf. Technol., **22**, 3063–3079 (2017). J. Attewell, "Mobile technologies and learning: A technology update and m-learning project summary," London: Learning and Skills Development Agency. (2005) L. Kolb, "Adventures with cell phones," Educ. Leadership, **68** (5), 46–55 (2011). D. K. Duncan, A. R. Hoekstra, B. R. Wilcox, "Digital devices, distraction, and new student performance: Does in-class cell phone use reduce learning?," Astr. Educ. Rev., **11** (1), (2012). J. A. Sans et al. "Smartphone: a new device for teaching Physics," 1st International Conference on Higher Education Advances, Valencia, Spain (2015). K. Hochberg, J. Kuhn, and Andreas M''uller, "Using Smartphones as Experimental Tools—Effects on Interest, Curiosity, and Learning in Physics Education," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., **27**, 385–403 (2018). R. Vieyra, C. Vieyra, A-M. Pendrill, and B. Xu, "Gamified physics challenges for teachers and the public," Phys. Educ., **55** (4), 1–7 (2020). K. Alexandros, L. Panagiotis, T. Serafeim, T. Pavlos, and V. Athanasios, "Possible Technical Problems Encountered by The Teacher in The Incorporation of Mobile Phone Sensors in The Physics Lab," Eur. J. Phys. Educ., **11** (2), 5–23 (2020). J. Kozminski et al., *AAPT Recommendations for the Undergraduate Physics Laboratory Curriculum* College Park, MD: AAPT (2014). N. G. Holmes and E. M. Smith, "Operationalizing the AAPT Learning Goals for the Lab," Phys. Teach., **57**, 296–299 (2019). U. Pili, R. Violanda, and C. Ceniza, "Measurement of g using a magnetic pendulum and a smartphone magnetometer," Phys. Teach., **56**, 258–259 (2018). S. Kapucu, "A simple experiment to measure the maximum coefficient of static friction with a smartphone," Phys. Educ., **53** (5), 1–3 (2018). A. Çoban and M. Erol, "Teaching and determination of kinetic friction coefficient using smartphones," Phys. Educ., **54** (2), 1–5 (2019). C. Baldock and R. Johnson, "Investigation of kinetic friction using an iPhone," Phys. Educ., **51** (6), 1–6 (2016). D. Lopez, I. Caprile, F. Corvacho, and O. Reyes, "Study of a variable mass Atwood's machine using a smartphone," Phys. Teach., **56** 182–183 (2018). W. Namchanthra et al., "Analyzing a torsion pendulum using a smartphone's sensors: mechanical energy conservation approach," Phys. Educ., **54** (6), 1–8 (2019). T. Pierratos and H. M. Polatoglou, "Study of the conservation of mechanical energy in the motion of a pendulum using a smartphone," Phys. Educ., **53** (1), 1–5 (2018). P. Vogt and J. Kuhn, "Analyzing collision processes with the smartphone acceleration sensor," Phys. Teach., **52**, 118–119 (2014). S. K. Ayop, "Analyzing Impulse Using iPhone and Tracker," Phys. Teach., **55**, 480–481 (2017). J. C. Sanders, "The effects of projectile mass on ballistic pendulum displacement," Am. J. Phys., **88** (5), 360–364 (2020). L. Seeley and E-H. Shin, "Colliding without touching: Using magnets and copper pipe fittings to explore the energetics of a completely inelastic collision," Am. J. Phys., **86** (9), 712–717 (2018). U. Pili, "A dynamic-based measurement of a spring constant with a smartphone light sensor," Phys. Educ., **53** (3), 1–3 (2018). U. Pili and R. Violanda, "Measuring a spring constant with a magnetic spring-mass oscillator and a telephone pickup," Phys. Educ., **54** (4), 1–3 (2019). J. A. Sans, F. J. Manjón, A. L. J. Pereira, J. A. Gomez-Tejedor, and J. A. Monsoriu, "Oscillations studied with the smartphone ambient light sensor," Eur. J. Phys., **34** (6), 1349–1354 (2013). J. C. Castro-Palacio, L. Velázquez-Abad, M. H. Giménez, and J. A. Monsoriu, "Using a mobile phone acceleration sensor in physics experiments on free and damped harmonic oscillations," Am. J. Phys., **81** (6), 472–475 (2013). R. Jaafar, S. K. Ayop, A. T. Ismail, K. K. Hon, A. N. M. Daud, and M. H. Hashim, "Visualization of Harmonic Series in Resonance Tubes Using a Smartphone," Phys. Teach., **54**, 545–547 (2016). J. A. Gómez-Tejedor, J. C. Castro-Palacio, and J. A. Monsoriu, "The acoustic Doppler effect applied to the study of linear motions," Eur. J. Phys., **35** (2), 1–9 (2014). R. P''orn and Mats Braskén, "Interactive modeling activities in the classroom—rotational motion and smartphone gyroscopes," Phys. Educ., **51** (6), 1–7 (2016). A. Shakur and J. Kraft, "Measurement of Coriolis Acceleration with a Smartphone," Phys. Teach., **54**, 288–290 (2016). M. S. M. N. F. Gomes, P. Martín-Ramos, P. S. P. da Silva, and M. R. Silva, "The 'spinning disk touches stationary disk' problem revisited: an experimental approach," Eur. J. Phys., **39** (4), 1–10 (2018). P. Klein, A. M''uller, S. Gr''ober, A. Molz, and J. Kuhn, "Rotational and frictional dynamics of the slamming of a door," Am. J. Phys., **85** (1), 30–37 (2017). N-A. Goy et al., "Surface tension measurements with a smartphone," Phys. Teach., **55**, 498–499 (2017). M. Wei et al., "The study of liquid surface waves with a smartphone camera and an image recognition algorithm," Eur. J. Phys., **36** (6), 1–8 (2015). M. R. Silva, P. Martín-Ramos, and P. P. da Silva, "Studying cooling curves with a smartphone," Phys. Teach., **56**, 53–55 (2018). J. Rayner, "Using a Cell Phone to Investigate the Skin Depth Effect in Salt Water," Phys. Teach., **55**, 83–86 (2017). F. G. Tomasel and M. C. Marconi, "Rolling magnets down a conductive hill: Revisiting a classic demonstration of the effects of eddy currents," Am. J. Phys., **80** (9), 800–803 (2012). A. A. Soares and T. O. Reis, "Studying Faraday's law of induction with a smartphone and personal computer," Phys. Educ., **54** (5), 1–7 (2019). G. A. Sobral, "Development of a metal detector for smartphones and its use in the teaching laboratory," Phys. Educ., **53** (4), 1–10 (2018). E. Arribas, I. Escobar, C. P. Suarez, A. Najera, and A. Beléndez, "Measurement of the magnetic field of small magnets with a smartphone: a very economical laboratory practice for introductory physics courses," Eur. J. Phys., **36** (6), 1–11 (2015). Y. Ogawara, S. Bhari, and S. Mahrley, "Observation of the magnetic field using a smartphone," Phys. Teach., **55**, 184–185 (2017). T. Rosi and P. Onorato, "Video analysis-based experiments regarding Malus' law," Phys. Educ., **55** (4), 1–5 (2020). M. Monteiro, C. Stari, C. Cabeza, and A. C. Martí, "The Polarization of Light and Malus' Law Using Smartphones," Phys. Teach., **55**, 264–266 (2017). K. Malisorn et al., "Demonstration of light absorption and light scattering using smartphones," Phys. Educ., **55** (1), 1–8 (2020). J. Freeland, V. R. Krishnamurthi, and Y. Wang, "Learning the lens equation using water and smartphones/tablets," Phys. Teach., **58**, 360–361 (2020). C-M. Chiang and H-Y. Cheng, "Use smartphones to measure Brewster's angle," Phys. Teach., **57**, 118–119 (2019). I. Salinas, M. H. Giménez, J. A. Monsoriu, and J. C. Castro-Palacio, "Characterization of linear light sources with the smartphone's ambient light sensor," Phys. Teach., **56**, 562–563 (2018). P. Onorato and L. M. Gratton, "Measuring the Raman spectrum of water with a smartphone, laser diodes and diffraction grating," Eur. J. Phys., **41** (2), 1–14 (2020). H. Ghalila et al., "Hands-on experimental and computer laboratory in optics: the Young double slit experiment," SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, San Diego, CA (2018). M. Pirbhai, "Smartphones and Tracker in the e/m experiment," Phys. Educ., **55** (1), 1–5 (2020). J. Durelle, J. Jones, S. Merriman, and A. Balan, "A smartphone-based introductory astronomy experiment: Seasons investigation," Phys. Teach., **55**, 122–123 (2017). J. Vandermarlière, "On the inflation of a rubber balloon," Phys. Teach., **54**, 566–567 (2016). K. Forinash and R. F. Wisman, "Smartphones as portable oscilloscopes for physics labs," Phys. Teach., **50**, 242–243 (2012). O. Schwarz, P. Vogt, and J. Kuhn, "Acoustic measurements of bouncing balls and the determination of gravitational acceleration," Phys. Teach., **51**, 312–313 (2013). P. Vogt and J. Kuhn, "Analyzing free fall with a smartphone acceleration sensor," Phys. Teach., **50**, 182–183 (2012). J. Kim et al., "A Measurement of Gravitational Acceleration Using a Metal Ball, a Ruler, and a Smartphone," Phys. Teach., **58**, 192–194 (2020). J. Kuhn, P. Vogt, and F. Theilmann, "Going nuts: Measuring free-fall acceleration by analyzing the sound of falling metal pieces," Phys. Teach., **54** 182–183 (2016). L. A. Testoni and G. Brockington, "The use of smartphones to teach kinematics: an inexpensive activity," Phys. Educ., **51** (6), 1–7 (2016). E. Azhikannickal, "Sports, Smartphones, and Simulation as an Engaging Method to Teach Projectile Motion Incorporating Air Resistance," Phys. Teach., **57**, 308–311 (2019). C. Fahsl and P. Vogt, "Determination of the drag resistance coefficients of different vehicles," Phys. Teach., **56**, 324–325 (2018). V. L. B. de Jesus and D. G. G. Sasaki, "Modelling of a collision between two smartphones," Phys. Educ., **51** (5), 1–7 (2016). V. Pereira, P. Martín-Ramos, P. P. da Silva, and M. R. Silva, "Studying 3D collisions with smartphones," Phys. Teach., **55**, 312–313 (2017). J. Kuhn and P. Vogt, "Analyzing acoustic phenomena with a smartphone microphone," Phys. Teach., **51**, 118–119 (2013). J. Kuhn and P. Vogt, "Analyzing spring pendulum phenomena with a smart-phone acceleration sensor," Phys. Teach., **50**, 504–505 (2012). S. Hellesund, "Measuring the speed of sound in air using a smartphone and a cardboard tube," Phys. Educ., **54** (3), 1–5 (2019). S. O. Parolin and G. Pezzi, "Measuring the speed of sound in air using a smartphone and a cardboard tube," Phys. Teach., **51**, 508–509 (2013). A. Yavuz, "Measuring the speed of sound in air using smartphone applications," Phys. Educ., **50** (3), 281–284 (2015). S. Staacks, S. Hutz, H. Heinke, and C. Stampfer, "Simple Time-of-Flight Measurement of the Speed of Sound Using Smartphones," **57**, 112–113 (2019). J. Bonato, L. M. Gratton, P. Onorato, and S. Oss, "Using high speed smartphone cameras and video analysis techniques to teach mechanical wave physics," Phys. Educ., **52** (4), 1–5 (2017). M. Monteiro, C. Stari, C. Cabeza, A. C. Marti, "A bottle of tea as a universal Helmholtz resonator, Phys. Teach., **56**, 644–645 (2018). S. H. Hawley and R. E. McClain, "Visualizing Sound Directivity via Smartphone Sensors," Phys. Teach., **56**, 72–74 (2018). M. Thees, K. Hochberg, J. Kuhn, and M. Aeschlimann, "Adaptation of acoustic model experiments of STM via smartphones and tablets," **55**, 436–437 (2017). A. M''uller, M. Hirth, and J. Kuhn, "Tunnel pressure waves – A smartphone inquiry on rail travel," **54**, 118–119 (2016). R. P. Smith and E. H. Matlis, "Gravity-driven fluid oscillations in a drinking straw," Am. J. Phys., **87** (6), 433–435 (2019). U. Dilek and S. K. Şeng''oren, "A new position sensor to analyze rolling motion using an iPhone," Phys. Educ., **54** (4), 1–4 (2019). P. Vogt and J. Kuhn, "Analyzing radial acceleration with a smartphone acceleration sensor," Phys. Teach., **51** 182–183 (2013). M. Monteiro, C. Cabeza, and A. C. Martí, "Exploring phase space using smartphone acceleration and rotation sensors simultaneously," **35** (4), 1–9 (2014). I. Salinas, M. H. Gimenez, J. A. Monsoriu, and J. A. Sans, "Demonstration of the parallel axis theorem through a smartphone," **57**, 340–341 (2019). U. Pili and R. Violanda, "Measuring average angular velocity with a smartphone magnetic field sensor," Phys. Teach. **56**, 114–115 (2018). J. Chevrier, L. Madani, S. Ledenmat, and A. Bsiesy, "Teaching classical mechanics using smartphones," Phys. Teach., **51**, 376–377 (2013). S. Mau, F. Insulla, E. E. Pickens, Z. Ding, and S. C. Dudley, "Locating a smartphone's accelerometer," Phys. Teach., **54**, 246–247 (2016). S. Macchia, "Analyzing Stevin's law with the smartphone barometer," Phys. Teach., **54**, 373 (2016). M. Monteiro, P. Vogt, C. Stari, V. Cabeza, and A. C. Marti, "Exploring the atmosphere using smartphones," Phys. Teach., **54**, 308–309 (2016). A. Girot, N-A. Goy, A. Viliquin, and U. Delabre, "Studying Ray Optics with a Smartphone," Phys. Teach., **58**, 133–135 (2020). B. Underwood and Y. Zhai, "Moving Phones Tick Slower: Creating an Android App to Demonstrate Time Dilation," Phys. Teach., **54**, 277–279 (2016). J. Kuhn, A. Molz, S. Gr''ober, and J. Fr''ubis, "iRadioactivity – Possibilities and Limitations for Using Smartphones and Tablet PCs as Radioactive Counters," **52**, 351–356 (2014). M. Meißner and H. Haertig, "Smartphone Astronomy," Phys. Teach., **52**, 440–441 (2014). A. Mazzella and I. Testa, "An investigation into the effectiveness of smartphone experiments on students' conceptual knowledge about acceleration," Phys. Educ., **51**, 1–10 (2016). J. Lincoln, "Enhancing physics demos using iPhone slow motion," Phys. Teach., **55**, 588–589 (2017). M. Kubsch, J. Nordine, and D. Hadinek, "Using smartphone thermal cameras to engage students? misconceptions about energy," Phys. Teach., **55**, 504–505 (2017). C. McLoughlin and M. J. W. Lee, "Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software," Australas. J. Educ. Tec., **26** (1), 28–43 (2010). J. E. Rodriguez, "Social Media Use in Higher Education: Key Areas to Consider for Educators," J. Online Learn. Teach., **7** (4), 539–550 (2011). T. Joosten, *Social media for educators: Strategies and best practices* (Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, NJ, 2012). S. Manca and M. Ranieri, "Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education," Comput. Educ., **95**, 216–230 (2016). D. Bouhnik and M. Deshen, "WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students," J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., **13**, 217–231 (2014). M. A. Haşiloğlu, H. S. Çalhan, and M. E. Ustaoğlu, "Determining the Views of the Secondary School Science Teachers about the Use of Social Media in Education," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., **29**, 346–354 (2020). M. Moran, J. Seaman, and H. Tinti-Kane, "Blogs, wikis, podcasts and Facebook: How today's higher education faculty use social media," Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions and Babson Survey Research Group (2012). T. Buchanan, P. Sainter, and G. Saunders, "Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption," J. Comput. High. Educ., **25**, 1–11 (2013). Y. Cao, H. Ajjan, and P. Hong, "Using social media applications for educational outcomes in college teaching: A structural equation analysis," Brit. J. Educ. Technol., **44** (4), 581–593 (2013). U. Matzat and E. M. Vrieling, "Self-regulated learning and social media – a 'natural alliance'? Evidence on students' self-regulation of learning, social media use, and student-teacher relationship," Learn. Media Technol., **41** (1), 73–99 (2015). E. Hargittai and G. Walejko, "The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age," Inform. Commun. Soc., **11** (2), 239–256 (2008). W. Bao, "COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University," Hum. Beh. Emerging Technol., **2** (2), 113–115 (2020). A. B. Amry, "The Impact of WhatsApp mobile social learning on the achievement and attitudes of female students compared with face to face learning in the classroom," Eur. Sci. J., **10** (22), 116–136 (2014). A. Klieger and L. Goldsmith. "Expanding physics learning beyond classroom boundaries—a case study," Phys. Educ., **55** (2), 1–6 (2020). C. Hart, "Factors Associated With Student Persistence in an Online Program of Study: A Review of the Literature," J. Interact. Online Learn., **11** (1), 19–42 (2012). Y-C. Hsu and Y-H. Ching, "Microblogging for Strengthening a Virtual Learning Community in an Online Course," Knowl. Man. E-Learn., **3** (4), 585–598 (2011). K. Page, "Using social media in a high school physics class," Phys. Teach., **53**, 184–185 (2015). T. Burden, "K-12 Teachers Uncertain about How to Connect with Students and Parents via Social Media, Reveals University of Phoenix Survey," (2014). Available at https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140114005604/en/K-12-Teachers-Uncertain-Connect-Students-Parents-Social. S. E. Schoper and A. R. Hill, "Using Facebook to Promote a Virtual Learning Community: A Case Study," J. Learn. Space., **6** (1), 34–39 (2017). E. Gibney, " 'Open-hardware' pioneers push for low-cost lab kit: conference aims to raise awareness of shared resources for building lab equipment," Nature, **531**, 147–148 (2016). J. DeBoer, C. Haney, S. Zahra Atiq, C. Smith, and D. Cox, "Hands-on engagement online: using a randomised control trial to estimate the impact of an at-home lab kit on student attitudes and achievement in a MOOC," Eur. J. Eng. Educ., **44** 1–2, 234–252 (2019). D. K. Kennepohl, "Providing Effective Teaching Laboratories at an Open Laboratory," Int. J. Innov. Online Educ., **1** (4), (2017). Š. Kubínová and J. Šlégr, "Physics demonstrations with the Arduino board," Phys. Educ., **50** (4), 472–474 (2015). J. M. Long, B. P. Horan, and R. Hall, "Undergraduate electronics students' use of home experiment kits for distance education," Proc. 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX (2012). R. W.
{'source': 'arXiv_out/2008'}