---
abstract: 'We numerically implement the concept of thermal radiation pumps in realistic photonic circuits and demonstrate their efficiency to control the radiation current, emitted between two reservoirs with equal temperature. The proposed pumping scheme involves a cyclic adiabatic modulation of two parameters that control the spectral characteristics of the photonic circuit. We show that the resulting pumping cycle exhibits maximum radiation current when a cyclic modulation of the system is properly engineered to be in the proximity of a resonance degeneracy in the parameter space of the photonic circuit. A developed Floquet scattering framework, which in the adiabatic limit boils down to the analysis of an instantaneous scattering matrix, is offering an engineering tool for designing and predicting the performance of such thermal pumps. Our predictions are confirmed by time domain simulations invoking an adiabatically driven photonic cavity.'
author:
- 'Lucas J. Fernández-Alcázar'
- Huanan Li
- Mona Nafari
- Tsampikos Kottos
title: Implementation of Optimal Thermal Radiation Pumps using Adiabatically Modulated Photonic Cavities
---

\[sec:introduction\] Introduction
=================================

The subfield of thermal photonics is attracting a lot of attention due to the rapid technological progress in nano-photonics, and the promise that these developments can be utilized for thermal radiation management.@F17 [@LF18; @CV18; @BXNKAK19] In this respect, researchers are challenged to develop novel protocols that tackle a variety of bottlenecks imposed by fundamental limitations dictating thermal radiation. For example, a current research effort aims to bypass the constraints set by Kirchoff's and Planck's laws by capitalizing on the importance of evanescent waves in case of sub-wavelength photonic circuits. @ZF14 [@HSA16; @GBBM18; @BA16; @MST16; @FFFVC18a; @FFFVC18b] In parallel, other studies exploit the applicability of recent proposals for radiation control to daytime passive radiative cooling@RRF13 [@RAZRF14; @GS15; @KJCFM17; @ZMDZLTYY17], radiative cooling of solar cells,@ZRWAF14 [@LSCZF17] energy harvesting, @G12 [@L15; @LPMRBA15; @ZSSB16; @B16; @F18] thermal camouflage,@LBYLQ18 [@K14] etc.

Along these lines, an important milestone for thermal radiation management is the implementation of photonic protocols that allow for a non-reciprocal heat transfer. The majority of these studies rely on magneto-optical effects@A16 [@OMAB19a; @OMAB19b] or non-linearities.@AB13 [@INIT14; @FTZMBBBBAMR18; @KZR15] Only recently, photonic designs that enforce directional radiation transfer via temporal modulations are being explored. @LFAESK19 [@BLF20; @LMRA18; @FAKLK21]

In this paper we consider an adiabatic thermal radiation pump which consists of a silicon-based square resonator exchanging, in the near-field, radiation with two thermal reservoirs which are at the same temperature. Two circular domains of the resonator are adiabatically driven by an out-of-phase periodic modulation. We show that, when the cyclic modulation is engineered in a way that its center, in the parameter space of the system, is in the proximity of a resonance degeneracy, the pumped current acquires a maximum value. It is interesting to point out that, on some occasions, resonance degeneracies have been associated to an exceptional point degeneracy of the spectrum of a (non-Hermitian) effective Hamiltonian describing the system connected to the reservoirs.@LFAESK19 Further design of the pumping cycle for our photonic pump is done following the predictions of a Floquet scattering theory, which, in the adiabatic limit, is utilizing an instantaneous scattering matrix (ISM), and it is confirmed via direct time-domain simulations.

The structure of the paper is as follows. In the next section \[theory\] we present the Floquet scattering formalism and analyze in detail the specific case of adiabatic pumping. Furthermore, utilizing an ISM approximation, we identify conditions which will lead to the design of efficient pumping circles. Based on the insights gained from the ISM Floquet formalism, in section \[cavity\], we design an adiabatic thermal radiation pump using a photonic circuit consisting of a periodically modulated microcavity. The direct time-domain calculations of the radiated thermal current confirm nicely the expectations, thus establishing the ISM Floquet formalism as a useful tool for the design of efficient pumping cycles. Our conclusions are presented at the last section of the paper.

![**Microcavity for adiabatic thermal radiation pumping.-** Scheme of a two dimensional microcavity coupled to two thermal baths at the same temperature $T$. The uniform permittivity $\varepsilon$ filling the cavity undergoes perturbations $\Delta\varepsilon_{1}$ and $\Delta\varepsilon_{2}$ that, when periodically modulated in time, produce a nonzero current between reservoirs. <span data-label="fig1"></span>](fig1){width="35.00000%"}

Theoretical Considerations {#theory}
==========================

Floquet scattering formalism
----------------------------

We consider two thermal reservoirs $\alpha=1,2$ at temperature $T_{\alpha}$ that exchange thermal energy via a periodically modulated photonic circuit. The reservoirs emit radiation with amplitudes $\theta_{\alpha}^{+}(\omega)$ that satisfy the condition $$\left\langle [\theta_{\alpha}^{+}(\omega)]^{*}\theta_{\beta}^{+}(\omega^{\prime})\right\rangle =\frac{1}{2\pi}{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha}
(\omega)\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta(\omega-\omega^{\prime}),\label{correlation}$$ where $\left\langle \cdot\right\rangle $ indicates a thermal ensemble average, and $\left\langle |\theta_{\alpha}^{+}(\omega)]|^2
\right\rangle$ describes the mean number of $\omega$-photons injected from the $\alpha-th$ thermal reservoir to the circuit. The mean photon number is ${\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha}(\omega)=\Phi_{\alpha}(\omega)\cdot\Theta_{\alpha}
(\omega)$ where $\Theta_{\alpha}(\omega)=\left(e^{\frac{\hbar\omega}{k_{B}T_{\alpha}}}-1\right)^{-1}$ and $\Phi_{\alpha}(\omega)$ is a spectral filter function. The later can be used to control the spectral emissivity of the thermal reservoirs and can be achieved via the deposition of photonic crystals that support band-gaps, or their coupling to the photonic circuit via a waveguide or a cavity with cut-off frequencies, etc. @F17 [@LF18; @CV18].

We further assume that the circuit is periodically driven with a set of time-varying parameters ${\vec{x}}(t+\frac{\Omega}{2\pi})=
{\vec{x}}(t)=[x_{1}(t), \cdots,x_{N}(t)]^{T}$ which modulate, for instance, the refractive index of its constituent materials. When radiation at frequency $\omega$ enters into the driven circuit, it can be scattered to other sidebands with frequencies $\omega_{m}
=\omega+m\Omega,$ $m\in Z$. The incoming/outgoing radiations with amplitudes $\theta_{\alpha}^{\pm}(\omega)$ from/towards the reservoir $\alpha$ are related via the Floquet scattering matrix ${\bf S}^{F}$ as follows @MB02 [@LKS18App; @LSK18B] $$\theta_{\alpha}^{-}(\omega)=\sum_{\beta,m}{\bf S}_{\alpha,\beta}^{F}(\omega,\omega_{m})\theta_{\beta}^{+}(\omega_{m}),\label{theta-}$$ where the matrix element ${\bf S}_{\alpha,\beta}^{F}(\omega_{m'},\omega_{m})$ describes the transmission/reflection amplitude of the electromagnetic field entering the reservoir $\alpha$ with frequency $\omega_{m'}$ provided that it was emitted from reservoir $\beta$ with frequency $\omega_{m}$. We furthermore assume that the number of photons is conserved during the Floquet scattering process,@MB02 leading to a unitary Floquet scattering matrix, i.e., $({\bf S}^{F})^{\dagger}{\bf S}^{F}={\bf S}^{F}
({\bf S}^{F})^{\dagger}=I$.

We are now ready to evaluate the average photon current toward the reservoir $\alpha$. The latter takes the form $${\bar{I}}_{\alpha}^{{\rm Ph.}} = \frac{\Omega}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\Omega}}dt\left[\left\langle |\theta^{-}(t)|^{2}
\right\rangle -\left\langle |\theta^{+}(t)|^{2}\right\rangle \right]$$ where $\theta_{\alpha}^{\pm}(t)=\int_{0}^{\infty}\theta_{\alpha}^{\pm}(\omega)e^{-{\mathrm{i}}\omega t} d\omega$ is the complex field amplitude. Specifically, using Eqs. (\[correlation\]) and (\[theta-\]), we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
{\bar{I}}_{\alpha}^{{\rm Ph.}} &= \int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}N_{\alpha}(\omega), \label{eq:Iph} \\
N_{\alpha}(\omega) &= \sum_{\beta,m}|{\bf S}_{\alpha,\beta}^{F}(\omega,\omega_{m})|^{2}{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\beta}
(\omega_{m})-{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha}(\omega),\notag\end{aligned}$$ where $N_{\alpha}(\omega)$ is the photon current density entering reservoir $\alpha$.

Similarly, we can evaluate the corresponding thermal radiation energy. The associated average energy current ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha}$ toward the thermal reservoir $\alpha$ reads: $$\begin{aligned}
{\bar{I}}_{\alpha} &= \int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\hbar\omega N_{\alpha}(\omega),\label{eq:I}\\
 & =\sum_{\beta,m}\int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\hbar\omega_{m}|{\bf S}_{\alpha,\beta}^{F}
(\omega_{m},\omega)|^{2}\left[{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\beta}(\omega)-{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha}(\omega_{m})\right].\notag\end{aligned}$$ where for the second equality we have employed the unitarity of the Floquet scattering matrix ${\bf S}^{F}$. Equations (\[eq:Iph\]) and (\[eq:I\]) extend the Landauer-like formalism developed in the framework of mesoscopic quantum electronics @MB02 to the case of photons and radiative energy currents through time modulated circuits.

Adiabatic limit of thermal radiation
------------------------------------

We can do a further analytical progress with Eq. (\[eq:I\]) in the limit of *adiabatic* modulations, i.e. $\Omega\rightarrow0$, and small temperature gradients. In this case, the Floquet scattering matrix ${\bf S}^{F}={\bf S}^{F,\textrm{ad}}$ can be expressed in terms of the instantaneous scattering matrix $S^{t}(\omega)$ as ${\bf S}^{F,{\rm ad.}}(\omega_{m},\omega) = {\bf S}^{F,{\rm ad.}}(\omega,\omega_{-m})=\frac{\Omega}{2\pi}
\int_{0}^{\frac{2\pi}{\Omega}}dtS^{t}(\omega)e^{{\mathrm{i}}m\Omega t}$. Substitution of this expression in Eq. (\[eq:I\]) allows us to separate the total energy current Eq. (\[eq:I\]) into three distinct contributions: $$\label{contributions}
{\bar{I}}_{\alpha}\approx{\bar{I}}_{\alpha,b}+{\bar{I}}_{\alpha,p}+{\bar{I}}_{\alpha,d}.$$ The first contribution ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,b}$ is due to the temperature gradient between the reservoirs and does not depend on the modulation frequency $\Omega$ $${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,b}=\int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}{\bar{{\cal T}}}(\omega)\hbar\omega\left[{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha^{\prime}}(\omega)-
{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha}(\omega)\right].
\label{Ibias}$$ Here, ${\bar{{\cal T}}}=\frac{\Omega}{2\pi}\int dt|S_{2,1}^{t}(\omega)|^{2}$ is the average transmittance of the frozen system over one modulation cycle. Notice that it is the same for left and right emitted radiation since the reciprocity of the frozen (undriven) system enforces the relation $|S_{2,1}^{t}(\omega)|^{2}=|S_{1,2}^{t}(\omega)|^{2}$.

The second contribution ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,p}$ is the thermal radiative pumped energy flux, which originates from the modulation of the scatterer and is given as $$\bar{I}_{\alpha,p} \approx \frac{\Omega}{2\pi}\int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\hbar\left\{ \omega{\tilde{\Theta}}_{0}(\omega)
\frac{\partial P_{\alpha}}{\partial\omega}+
  P_{\alpha}(\omega) {\tilde{\Theta}}_{0}(\omega)\right\},\label{I_pump}$$ where $\tilde{\Theta}_{0}(\omega)=\left.\tilde{\Theta}_{\alpha}(\omega)\right|_{T_{\alpha}=T_0}$ is associated to a mean temperature $T_0=(T_1+T_2)/2$, and $P_{\alpha}(\omega)={\mathrm{i}}\int dt\left(\frac{dS^{t}}{dt}(S^{t})^{\dagger}\right)_{\alpha,\alpha}$. In the classical limit $\tilde{\Theta}_{0}(\omega)\approx k_{B}T_{0}/(\hbar\omega)$, the integration of the first term of Eq. (\[I\_pump\]) approaches to zero. We note that $\bar{I}_{\alpha,p}$ can be different than zero even in the absence of a temperature gradient. In addition, the direction of the energy current can be easily controlled by the orientation of modulation loop in the parameter space.

Finally, the third term ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,d}$ in Eq. (\[contributions\]), is the analogue of a dissipation term found in adiabatic quantum pumps in condensed matter physics @MB02 [@AEGS01; @AEGS04; @C03] and reads $${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,d}=\frac{\Omega^{2}}{2\pi}\int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\hbar{\tilde{\Theta}}_{\alpha}(\omega)\frac{\partial}
{\partial\omega}\left[\oint_{0}^{2\pi}dx\left(\frac{\partial S^{x}}{\partial x}\frac{\partial(S^{x})^{\dagger}}{\partial x}
\right)_{\alpha,\alpha}\right],\label{Idis}$$ where $x=\Omega t$. In contrast to the pumped current, ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,d}$ is proportional to ${\cal O}(\Omega^{2})$ and its direction does not depend on the orientation of the modulation loop, i.e., the substituting of $\Omega\rightarrow-\Omega$ does not reverse the direction of this current contribution. Moreover, in the adiabatic limit, the dissipative current is negligible as compared to the pumped current which scales as ${\cal O}(\Omega)$. Obviously, the smaller the value of ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha,d}$ the better is the performance of an adiabatic thermal pump.

Adiabatic Pumping Current
-------------------------

Of particular interest is the analysis of the adiabatic energy flux between two reservoirs <span>*at the same temperature*</span>. In such scenario, known as adiabatic thermal radiation pumping @LFAESK19, the thermal radiative flux is dominated by the pumping current contribution. This can be evaluated using Eq. (\[I\_pump\]) and employing the slow modulation $\Omega
\rightarrow0$ limit. We get $$\begin{aligned}
{\bar{I}}_{\alpha} & \approx \frac{\Omega}{2\pi}\int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}\hbar\omega{\tilde{\Theta}}_{0}(\omega)
{\cal A}Q_{\alpha}(\omega),\notag\\
Q_{\alpha}(\omega) & = \lim_{{\cal A}\rightarrow0^{+}}\frac{1}{{\cal A}}\left\{ \frac{1}{\omega}\frac{\partial
\left[\omega P_{\alpha}(\omega)\right]}{\partial\omega}\right\},
\label{eq:IQ}\end{aligned}$$ where $Q_{\alpha}(\omega)$ represents the radiative energy density per pumping area and we have also assumed that the modulation cycle encloses a small area in the parameter space i.e., ${\cal A}=\oint\Pi_{\nu=1}^{N}dX_{\nu}\rightarrow0$. In the derivation of Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]) we have also omitted the dissipative term $I_{\alpha,d}$ since it is proportional to ${\cal O}
(\Omega^2)$.

It is interesting to note that $P_{\alpha}$ (and thus $Q_{\alpha}$) can be given conveniently in terms of the instantaneous scattering matrix $S^{t}$. To better understand this, we parametrize $S^{t}$ as $$\begin{aligned}
S^{t} & =e^{{\mathrm{i}}\varphi^{t}}\begin{bmatrix}\sqrt{R^{t}}e^{{\mathrm{i}}\alpha^{t}} & {\mathrm{i}}\sqrt{1-R^{t}}\\
{\mathrm{i}}\sqrt{1-R^{t}} & \sqrt{R^{t}}e^{-{\mathrm{i}}\alpha^{t}}
\end{bmatrix},\quad0\leq R^{t}\leq1,\label{eq:Sparam}\end{aligned}$$ where $\varphi^{t}$ is the transmission phase, $R^{t}$ is the reflectance, and $\alpha^{t}$ is the phase of the reflection coefficient. With this parametrization, we can show that $$\label{Pfunction}
P_{1}=-P_{2}=\int_{0}^{2\pi/\Omega}dtR^{t}\frac{d\alpha^{t}}{dt},$$ which highlights the geometric character of the pumping operation.@BTTOFA20 [@TWFV20] Eq. \[Pfunction\] also constitutes a dramatic computational simplification for the evaluation of ${\bar I}_{\alpha}$ (compare with Eqs. (\[currentTD1\],\[currentTD\]) below).

On the other hand, the radiative (time-averaged) pumped thermal energy flux ${\bar{I}}_{\alpha}$ during one pumping cycle can be evaluated directly from direct time domain experiments using the following expression@LFAESK19 $${\bar{I}}_{\alpha} \equiv \frac{\Omega}{2\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi/\Omega}dt\int\frac{d\omega}{2\pi}{\cal I}_{x_{0}}(t,\omega)\hbar\omega
{\tilde \Theta}_0(\omega),
\label{currentTD1}$$ where ${\cal I}_{x_{0}}$ is the normalized time-dependent directional net energy current evaluated at some observation position $x_{0}$ between the system and the reservoir. Comparison between Eqs. (\[eq:IQ\],\[currentTD1\]) allow us to identify the radiative energy density (i.e. per area in the parameter space) $Q(\omega)$ to be equal to $$Q(\omega) \equiv \lim_{{\cal A}\rightarrow0}\frac{1}{{\cal A}}\int_{0}^{2\pi/\Omega}dt{\cal I}_{x_{0}}(t,\omega),
\label{currentTD}$$ Clearly, the evaluation of the pumping current via Eq. (\[currentTD\]) requires the knowledge of ${\cal I}_{x_{0}}(t,\omega)$ during the whole period $t\in[0,2\pi/\Omega)$ and for all emission frequencies $\omega$. This is a heavy computational effort in case of adiabatic drivings. For its calculation, we will consider uncorrelated thermal emissions at frequency $\omega$ of unit incident flux from the two reservoirs. In our realistic example below with an adiabatically modulated resonator, we shall utilize both expressions and confirm their equivalence.

Design Rules for Efficient Pumping Circles
------------------------------------------

A careful analysis of the integrand in Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]) allows us to derive a number of design rules for the engineering of efficient adiabatic thermal radiation pumps. First observation stems from the fact that an appropriate design of the spectral filtering function $\Phi(\omega)$ can lead to an enhancement/suppression of specific frequency components of $Q(\omega)$ thus controlling the integral in Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]) and therefore the value of ${\bar I}_{\alpha}$. At the same time, we observe that even in the absence of spectral filtering (i.e. $\Phi_{\alpha}(\omega)=1$), the smooth positive function $\omega{\tilde{
\Theta}}_{0}(\omega)$ introduces a frequency-weight that suppresses the high-frequency components of $Q_{\alpha}$ while enhances its corresponding low-frequency ones. Therefore, knowledge of $Q(\omega)$ through the ISM approximation may guide the design of efficient pumping circles.

Another observation is associated with the dependence of $P(\omega)$ from the scattering parameters, see Eq. (\[Pfunction\]). This dependence allows us to conclude that the main contribution to $\bar{\mathcal I}$ originates from a frequency range around transmission resonances, where $P\left(\omega\right)$ becomes significant due to the rapid changes of the instantaneous reflection phase $\alpha^{t}$ and reflectance $R^t$. It is natural to assume that when a pair of nearby resonances approach one-another, they can further enchance the sensitivity of $\alpha^t$ and $R^t$ on the parameters of the pump, thus increasing the pumping-induced thermal energy flux density $\bar{\cal I}$. These observations will be allowing us to understand and engineer the radiation current of a realistic photonic pump as we will show in the next section.

Microcavity implementation {#cavity}
==========================

We are now ready to evaluate the thermal energy flux for a realistic photonic adiabatic pump consisting of a square optical microcavity, see Fig. \[fig1\]. The cavity has linear length $a=50\mu m$ and it is formed by a dielectric material (silicon) with relative permittivity $\varepsilon=11.6$ (silicon). We assume that the cavity is surrounded with perfect electric conductors (PECs). The cavity is brought in the proximity of two reservoirs with the same temperature $T=300$ K.

We adiabatically drive the cavity by modulating the permittivities $\varepsilon_{1(2)}(t)$ within two embedded circular spots while the permeability $\mu_{0}$ remains constant, see Fig. \[fig1\]. In our simulations below, we will consider the specific modulation protocol $\varepsilon_{1(2)}=\varepsilon(U+\Delta\varepsilon_{1(2)})$ where $(\Delta\varepsilon_{1},\Delta\varepsilon_{2})=\frac{\Delta}{\varepsilon}(-\sin \Omega t,\cos \Omega t)$ and the offset $U$ shifts the driving circle along the line $\varepsilon_{1}=\varepsilon_{2}=
\varepsilon U$ in the parameter space $(\Delta\varepsilon_{1},\Delta\varepsilon_{2})$. This type of time-modulation of the dielectric constant of silicon could be achieved via carrier injection with frequency up to several GHz @RMGT10. Our goal is to design efficient pumping circles using the ISM Floquet formalism and confirm their efficiency by evaluating the pumped current using direct time-domain simulations.

Eigenmode Analysis
------------------

Before analyzing the pumped energy current, we will first describe the spectral properties of the microcavity and the parametric change of the eigenmodes with respect to the permittivity variations $\varepsilon(x,y)=\varepsilon[1+\Delta\varepsilon(x,y)]$. To this end, we first consider the uniform square cavity of size $a$ by setting $\Delta\varepsilon(x,y)=0$. Due to its geometric symmetry, the microcavity presents spectral degeneracies which we will be using for the design of optimal pumping circles.

The spectrum can be evaluated explicitly by solving directly the frequency-domain Maxwell's equations $$\nabla\times\vec{E}=-{\mathrm{i}}\omega\mu_{0}\vec{H}\ ;\ \nabla\times\vec{H}=-{\mathrm{i}}\omega\varepsilon_{0}\vec{E}.\label{Max2}$$ We assume transverse electric (TE) modes of the form $\vec{E}=\vec{E}_{t}(x,y)$, $\vec{H}=\vec{H}_{t}(x,y)+H_{z}(x,y)\hat{z}$, where the vectors $\vec{E}_{t}(x,y)$ and $\vec{H}_{t}(x,y)$ with the subscript $t$ stands for transverse field components in the x-y plane. From Eq. (\[Max2\]), we have $\vec{H}_{t}=0$ and $\vec{E}_{t}=({\mathrm{i}}\omega\varepsilon)^{-1}\nabla_{t}H_{z}\times\hat{z}$, leading to the 2D Helmholtz equation $$\nabla_{t}^{2}H_{z}(x,y)+\omega^{2}\varepsilon\mu_{0}H_{z}(x,y)=0
\label{wave}$$ which when supplemented with the PEC boundary condition, i.e. $\frac{\partial H_{z}}{\partial n}=0$ yields $$H_{z}^{mn}=H_{mn}\cos(k_{x}x)\cos(k_{y}y),\label{sol1}$$ where $k_{x}=m\pi/a$, $k_{y}=n\pi/a$ with $n,m=0,1,2,\cdots$. The corresponding frequency spectrum is $$\omega_{mn}=\frac{\pi}{a\sqrt{\varepsilon\mu_{0}}}\sqrt{m^{2}+n^{2}}\,\quad n,m=0,1,2,\cdots,$$ where $\varepsilon=\varepsilon_{0}\varepsilon_{r}$ is the permitivity, and $a$ is the linear size of the square cavity.

We focus on the two degenerate TE modes with the lowest frequencies $\omega_d/(2\pi)=\omega_{10}/(2\pi)=\omega_{01}/(2\pi)=
(2a\sqrt{\varepsilon\mu_{0}})^{-1}\approx0.8802$ THz, and the corresponding electric field profiles $$\begin{aligned}
\vec{E}^{01}&=E_{x}^{01}\hat{x}\ ;\ E_{x}^{01}={\mathrm{i}}\sqrt{\frac{\mu_{0}}{\varepsilon}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{a}y\right)\notag\\
\vec{E}^{10}&=E_{y}^{10}\hat{y}\ ;\ E_{y}^{01}=-{\mathrm{i}}\sqrt{\frac{\mu_{0}}{\varepsilon}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{a}x\right).
\label{Emodes}\end{aligned}$$ The modification of the permittivities $\varepsilon_{1(2)}$ lifts the degeneracy. Accordingly, the mode profiles will be modified and their electric fields will satisfy the following relation $$\nabla\times\nabla\times\vec{E}=(\omega/c)^{2}(1+\Delta\varepsilon)\vec{E}.\label{eq: modified}$$ We approximate the solution near $\omega_{d}$ via the linear combination $\vec{E}\approx\varphi_{1}\vec{E}^{01}+\varphi_{2}\vec{E}^{10}$, and obtain the following relation using Eq. $$\begin{aligned}
\left(\frac{\omega_{d}^{2}-\omega^{2}}{c^{2}}\right)\left(\varphi_{1}\vec{E}^{01}+\varphi_{2}\vec{E}^{10}\right) & =\left(\frac{\omega}{c}\right)^{2}\Delta\varepsilon\left(\varphi_{1}\vec{E}^{01}+\varphi_{2}\vec{E}^{10}\right),\end{aligned}$$ which, after taking the dot product with the vectors $\vec{E}^{{01}^{*}}$ and $\vec{E}^{{10}^{*}}$ and the subsequent integral over space, yields $$\begin{aligned}
\left(\frac{\omega_{d}^{2}-\omega^{2}}{\omega^{2}}\right)\begin{pmatrix}D^{0} & 0\\
0 & D^{0}
\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\varphi_{1}\\
\varphi_{2}
\end{pmatrix} & =\begin{pmatrix}N^{0} & N^{01}\\
N^{10} & N^{1}
\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\varphi_{1}\\
\varphi_{2}
\end{pmatrix}\label{eq: matrix}\end{aligned}$$ where $D^{0} =\iint \left(\vec{E}^{01}\right)^{*}\cdot\vec{E}^{01}dxdy=\iint \left(\vec{E}^{10}\right)^{*}\cdot\vec{E}^{10}dxdy$, $N^{0} =\iint \left|\vec{E}^{01}\right|^2\Delta\varepsilon dxdy$, $N^{1} =\iint \left|\vec{E}^{10}\right|^2\Delta\varepsilon dxdy$, and $N^{10}=N^{{01}^{*}}=\int\vec{E}^{{10}^{*}}\cdot\vec{E}^{01}\Delta\varepsilon dxdy$.

The existence of the nonzero solution of Eq. allow us to find the frequencies of the perturbed modes: $$\frac{\Delta\omega}{\omega_{d}}\approx-\frac{N^{0}+N^{1}\pm\sqrt{\left(N^{0}-N^{1}\right)^{2}+4N^{01}N^{10}}}{4D^{0}},
\label{freq}$$ where $\Delta\omega=\omega-\omega_{d}$. It is important to notice that $\vec{E}^{01}$ is perpendicular to $\vec{E}^{10}$ which results in $N^{10}=(N^{01})^{*}=0$. Consequently, the splitting of the eigenfrequencies $\Delta\omega$ would vanish when $N^{0}=N^{1}$, producing a <span>*degenerate line*</span> in the parameter space.

The condition $N^{0}=N^{1}$ for degeneracy is not related to the symmetry of the system. For example, consider the case of a material perturbation on two separate domains with $\Delta\varepsilon(x,y)=\Delta\varepsilon_{1}(x,y)+
\Delta\varepsilon_{2}(x,y)$. In this case, we have $$N^{0}-N^{1} = \frac{\mu_{0}}{\varepsilon}\frac{2}{a}\iint dxdy \left[\sin^{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{a}x\right)+
\sin^{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{a}y \right)\right] \cdot \left[\Delta\varepsilon_{1}(x,y)+\Delta\varepsilon_{2}(x,y)\right].$$ Therefore, for a given $\Delta\varepsilon_{1}(x,y)$, we can easily find a $\Delta\varepsilon_{2}(x,y)$ such that $N^{0}-N^{1}=0$. In such case the degeneracy will survive even in the presence of these specific permittivity perturbations which evidently destroy the geometric symmetry of the cavity. Of course, the above claim is correct up to first order perturbation. It is therefore imperative to analyze numerically their existence and even question it in the case that the cavity is coupled to the reservoirs. This latter situation needs additional care since the coupling to the reservoirs introduces an additional perturbation which might destroy the degeneracy of the associated resonant modes.

![Transmittance spectrum $|S_{2,1}|^{2}$ of the cavity (in absence of driving) as a function of frequency $\omega/(2\pi)$ and $U$. The peaks of the transmittance show a resonance degeneracy around $U=1.05$.<span data-label="figSpec"></span>](fig2 "fig:"){width="50.00000%"} \[tb\]

To confirm the conclusions of the perturbation argument, we analyze in detail the transmission spectrum of the cavity in a frequency range containing the two lowest resonances, see Fig. \[figSpec\]. Due to the coupling to the reservoirs, the resonant frequencies are detuned with respect to the eigenfrequencies of the isolated resonator, leading to a destruction of the degenerate line. The position of the resonant modes as a function of the offset parameter $U$ is indicated in Fig. \[figSpec\] with solid and dashed black lines. We are able to identify a degenerate point where the resonances coalesce as a function of the shift parameter $U$. The degeneracy, occurring at $\omega_d/(2\pi)\sim 0.95$THz for an offset value $U_d=1.05$, will be the starting point for the design of an efficient pumping circle.

Pumping Cycles and Optimal Thermal Radiation Currents
-----------------------------------------------------

![Radiative pumped energy density $Q(\omega)$ versus frequency $\omega/(2\pi)$ for different values of $U$. The driving protocol is given by the parametric cycle $\varepsilon_{1(2)}=\varepsilon(U+\Delta\varepsilon_{1(2)})$ where $(\Delta\varepsilon_{1},\Delta\varepsilon_{2})=\frac{\Delta}{\varepsilon}(-\sin x,\cos x)$ for $x\in[0,2\pi)$. The resonant frequencies, fitted from the peaks of $|S_{2,1}|^{2}$, are shown with black solid and dashed lines. The highest values of $Q(\omega)$ are obtained at $U=1$ and $U=1.1$ which are in the neighborhood of the resonance degeneracy. For the calculation of $Q$ we used a parametric area ${\cal A}=\pi(\Delta/\varepsilon)^{2}$, $\Delta=0.2$, $\varepsilon=11.6$, and frequency range $[\omega_{{\rm min}},\omega_{{\rm max}})/(2\pi)=[0.88,1.06)$THz. <span data-label="figQ"></span>](fig3){width="50.00000%"}

We assume that the two thermal reservoirs that are attached to the microcavity are at fixed temperature $T=300$ K. We model these two reservoirs as two identical lumped ports with characteristic impedance $Z_{0}=50$ Ohms and length $\frac{1}{15}a$ (for the specific arrangement see Fig. \[fig1\]). The ports carry time-dependent voltage excitations originating from synthesized noise sources $V_{\alpha}$, which satisfy the correlation relation $\langle V_{\alpha'}(\omega)V_{\alpha}^{*}(\omega^{\prime})\rangle=\frac{2Z_{0}}{\pi}
\hbar\omega\Phi(\omega)\Theta_{C}(\omega)\delta(\omega-\omega^{\prime})\delta_{\alpha,\alpha'}$ with $\Theta_{C}
(\omega)=k_{B}T/(\hbar\omega)$.

In order to isolate the frequency domain where the resonance degeneracy $\omega_d/(2\pi)\approx 0.95THz$ occurs, we have filtered the emission of the baths using a spectral filtering function $\Phi(\omega)=
\theta_{H}(\omega-\omega_{{\rm min}})-\theta_{H}(\omega-\omega_{{\rm max}})$, where $\theta_{H}(\omega)$ is the Heaviside step function, $\omega_{\rm min}/(2\pi)=0.88THz$, and $\omega_{\rm max}/(2\pi)\le1.06THz$ was chosen in a way that maximizes the radiative current.

Next, we calculate the radiative energy density $Q(\omega)$ versus frequency. Although the evaluation of $Q(\omega)$ is a demanding computational task in case of a direct implementation of Eq. (\[currentTD\]), the simplicity of the ISM approach Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]) allows us to perform this task easily for a large number of $U$-values. The results of our calculation is shown in Fig. \[figQ\]. We find that $Q(\omega)$ is significantly enhanced at frequencies $\omega$ which are at the vicinity of the resonance frequencies (indicated with solid and dashed black lines in Fig. \[figQ\]). Importantly, this enhancement turns out to be more pronounced in the neighborhood of the resonance degeneracy around $U_d\approx1.05$. In this case, $Q(\omega)$ becomes symmetric around $\omega_d$ where it acquires its maximum magnitude. For slightly different $U$-values e.g. $U=U_d\pm 0.05$, the $Q(\omega;U)$ becomes anti-symmetric (see Fig. \[figQ\]), developing two resonant peaks symmetrically placed around a particular frequency $\omega_c$ where $Q(\omega_c;U)=0$.

The integration of $Q(\omega)$ with the weight function $\hbar \omega \Theta_{\alpha}(\omega)$ (we assume $\Phi(\omega)=1$) leads to a slightly enhanced contribution of the smaller frequencies in the radiative pumped current ${\bar I}_{\alpha}$, Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]). However, the anti-symmetric shape of $Q(\omega)$ affects the calculation for ${\bar I}_{\alpha}$ such that it turns out to be (almost) zero. Off course, one can further enhance the magnitude of the radiative current by appropriately engineering the spectral filtering function that applies at the reservoirs. In Fig. \[fig4\], we report the thermal radiation current ${\bar I}_{\alpha}$ versus the control parameter $U$ for an example case of a spectral filter such that $\omega_{\rm max} =\omega_d +a\cdot (U-U_d)$, with $a\approx-1.84 \cdot 10^{11}$, that fits the resonances around $U\approx U_d$. Such filtering, enforces a complete suppression of the large $\omega$-contributions to the integral of Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]) leading to a dramatic increase of the radiation current. Since the radiative energy density is also anti-symmetric with respect to the offset parameter $U$ around the degeneracy point $U_d$ the "sign" of the first peak will change as we are moving across $U_d$. As a result the relative position (with respect to $U_d$) of the driving cycle in the parameter space can be used as a reconfigurable "knob" for managing the direction of the pumping flux $\bar{I}$. At the same figure, we also report (red star) the total radiation current using a direct implementation of Eq. (\[currentTD1\],\[currentTD\]) for the case of $U=1$. The corresponding $Q(\omega)$ which has been evaluated via time-domain simulations using Eq. (\[currentTD\]) and it is shown in the inset of Fig. \[fig4\]b. For these simulations, the photonic cavity has been illuminated with uncorrelated excitations of unit flux via the ports, that has been generated using monochromatic voltage sources. Once the steady state is achieved, we integrated the average net power over one modulation cycle to obtain $Q(\omega)$ by employing Eq. (\[currentTD\]). The nice agreement between these two methods (see blue line and red squares in the inset) confirms the efficiency of the instantaneous scattering matrix approach.

![ Total (averaged) pumped radiative energy current ${\bar{I}}$ versus $U$ from the integration in frequency of $Q(\omega)$ according to Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]), blue circles joined through dotted line. The red asterisk indicates the associated radiative energy current from the time domain simulations. (Inset) Average pumped radiative energy density $Q(\omega)$ versus frequency $\omega/(2\pi)$ for $U=1$. The solid blue line is obtained from the scattering parameters through of Eq. (\[eq:IQ\]) and the red square dots are the results of the time domain simulation. For the later we used a modulation frequency $\Omega=0.0125\omega_{0}$ where $\omega_{0}\approx2\pi\times1THz$. We set the total time to $0.5ns$ which contains at least 5 modulation cycles, ensuring a fairly reasonable steady state.<span data-label="fig4"></span>](fig4){width="50.00000%"}

Conclusion
==========

We have developed a Floquet scattering formalism that allows us to design periodic, time-modulation schemes for thermal radiation management. In the adiabatic limit, we arrived to analytical expressions where the net average radiative energy current can be separated into three contributions identified as bias current, pumped energy current, and dissipation due to the driving. All these components have been conveniently expressed in terms of the instantaneous scattering matrix. The resulting expressions allow for an better insight to the problem of radiation management. As an example we have used them to enhance the radiation current in case of an adiabatic thermal pump corresponding to the scenario of thermal reservoirs with equal temperature. We validate the analytical results by performing realistic time domain simulations in a photonic microcavity setup. We show that when a pumping cyclic is designed to operate in the proximity of a spectral degeneracy, the pumped energy flux is dramatically enhanced. Furthermore the direction of the radiative current can be reconfigured by displaying the position of the center of the pumping cycle with respect to the degeneracy point in the parameter space. Our results offer a new computational tool that allow us to design efficient driving protocols for radiation management.

We acknowledge partial support by an ONR Grant No. N00014-16-1-2803, by an NSF Grants No. EFMA-1641109 and by a grant from Simons Collaboration in MPS. L.J.F.-A. acknowledges partial financial support from CONICET.

<span>10</span>

S. Fan, <span>*Thermal photonics and energy applications*</span>, Joule <span>**1**</span>, 264 (2017).

W. Li, S. Fan, <span>*Nanophotonic control of thermal radiation for energy applications*</span>, Opt. Express <span>**26**</span>, 15995 (2018).

J. C. Cuevas, F. J. García-Vidal, <span>*Radiative Heat Transfer*</span>, ACS Photonics <span>**5**</span>, 3896 (2018).

D. G. Baranov, Y. Xiao, I. A. Nechepurenko, A. Krasnok, A. Alu, M. A. Kats, <span>*Nanophotonic engineering of far-field thermal emitters*</span>, Nat. Materials <span>**18**</span>, 920 (2019).

L. Zhu and S. Fan, <span>*Near-complete violation of detailed balance in thermal radiation*</span>, Phys. Rev. B <span>**90**</span>, 220301(R) (2014).

Y. Hadad, J. C. Soric, and A. Alú, <span>*Breaking temporal symmetries for emission and absorption*</span>, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. <span>**113**</span>, 3471 (2016).

J-J Greffet, P. Bouchon, G. Brucoli, F. Marquier, <span>*Light Emission by Nonequilibrium Bodies: Local Kirchhoff Law*</span>, Phys. Rev. X <span>**8**</span>, 021008 (2018).

S. A. Biehs, P. Ben-Abdallah, <span>*Revisiting super-Planckian thermal emission in the far-field regime*</span>, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. <span>**93**</span> 165405 (2016).

S. I. Maslovski, C. R. Simovski, S. A. Tretyakov, <span>*Overcoming blackbody radiation limit in free space: metamaterial superemitter*</span>, New J. Phys. <span>**18**</span>, 013034 (2016).

V. Fernández-Hurtado, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, J. Feist, F. J. García-Vidal, J. C. Cuevas, <span>*Super-Planckian far-field radiative heat transfer*</span>, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. <span>**97**</span>, 045408 (2018).

V. Fernández-Hurtado, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, J. Feist, F. J. García-Vidal, J. C. Cuevas, <span>*Exploring the limits of Super-Planckian far-field radiative heat transfer using 2D materials*</span>, ACS Photonics <span>**5**</span>, 3082 (2018).

E. Rephaeli, A. Raman, S. Fan, <span>*Ultrabroadband photonic structures to achieve high-performance daytime radiative cooling*</span>, Nano Lett. <span>**13**</span>, 1457 (2013).

A. P. Raman, M. A. Anoma, L. Zhu, E. Rephaeli, S. Fan, <span>*Passive radiative cooling below ambient air temperature under direct sunlight*</span>, Nature <span>**515**</span>, 540 (2014).

A. R. Gentle, G. B. Smith, <span>*A subambient open roof surface under the mid-summer*</span>, Sun. Adv. Sci. <span>**2**</span>, 1500119 (2015).

J. Kou, Z. Jurado, Z. Chen, S. Fan, A. J. Minnich, <span>*Daytime radiative cooling using near-black infrared emitters*</span>, ACS Photonics <span>**4**</span>, 626 (2017).

Y. Zhai, Y. Ma, S. N. David, D. Zhao, R. Lou, G. Tan, R. Yang, X. Yin, <span>*Scalable-manufactured randomized glass-polymer hybrid metamaterial for daytime radiative cooling*</span>, Science <span>**355**</span>, 1062 (2017).

L. Zhu, A. Raman, K. X. Wang, M. A. Anoma, S. Fan, <span>*Radiative cooling of solar cells*</span>, Optica <span>**1**</span>, 32 (2014).

W. Li, Y. Shi, K. Chen, L. Zhu, S. Fan, <span>*A comprehensive photonic approach for solar cell cooling*</span> ACS Photonics <span>**4**</span>, 774 (2017)

M. A. Green, <span>*Time-Asymmetric Photovoltaics*</span>, Nano Lett. <span>**12**</span>, 5985 (2012).

A. Lenert, <span>*et al.*</span>, <span>*A nanophotonic solar thermophotovoltaic device*</span>, Nat. Nanotechnol. <span>**9**</span>, 126 (2015).

I. Latella, A. Pérez-Madrid, J. M. Rubi, S.-A. Biehs, and P. Ben-Abdallah, <span>*Heat Engine Driven by Photon Tunneling in Many-Body Systems*</span>, Phys. Rev. App. <span>**4**</span>, 011001 (2015).

Z. Zhou, E. Sakr, Y. Sun, P. Bermel, <span>*Solar thermophotovoltaics: reshaping the solar spectrum*</span>, Nanophotonics <span>**5**</span>, 1 (2016).

D. M. Bierman, <span>*et al.*</span>, <span>*Enhanced photovoltaic energy conversion using thermally based spectral shaping*</span>, Nat. Energy <span>**1**</span>, 16068 (2016).

A. Fiorino, <span>*et al.*</span>, <span>*Nanogap near-field thermophotovoltaics*</span>, Nat. Nanotechnol. <span>**13**</span>, 806 (2018).

Y. Li, X. Bai, T. Yang, H. Luo, C.-W. Qiu, <span>*Structured thermal surface for radiative camouflage*</span>, Nat. Commun. <span>**9**</span>, 273 (2018).

M. A. Kats, <span>*Vanadium dioxide as a natural disordered metamaterial: perfect thermal emission and large broadband negative differential thermal emittance*</span>, Phys. Rev. X <span>**3**</span>, 041004 (2014).

P. Ben-Abdallah, <span>*Photon Thermal Hall Effect*</span>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**116**</span>, 084301 (2016)

A. Ott, R. Messina, P. Ben-Abdallah, S.-A. Biehs, <span>*Radiative thermal diode driven by non-reciprocal surface waves*</span>, Appl. Phys. Lett. <span>**114**</span>, 163105 (2019)

A. Ott, R. Messina, P. Ben-Abdallah, S.-A. Biehs, <span>*Magneto-thermoplasmonics: from theory to applications*</span>, J. Photon. Energy <span>**9**</span>, 032711 (2019)

P. Ben-Abdallah, S.-A. Biehs, <span>*Phase-change radiative thermal diode*</span>, Appl. Phys. Lett. <span>**103**</span>, 191907 (2013).

K. Ito, K. Nishikawa, H. Iizuka, and H. Toshiyoshi, <span>*Experimental investigation of radiative thermal rectifier using vanadium dioxide*</span>, Appl. Phys. Lett. <span>**105**</span>, 253503 (2014).

A. Fiorino, D. Thompson, L. Zhu, R. Mittapally, S.-A. Biehs, O. Bezencenet, N. El-Bondry, S. Bansropun, P. Ben-Abdallah, E. Meyhofer, and P. Reddy, <span>*A Thermal Diode Based on Nanoscale Thermal Radiation*</span>, ACS Nano <span>**12**</span>, 5774 (2018).

C. Khandekar, Z. Lin, and A. W. Rodriguez, <span>*Thermal radiation from optically driven Kerr $(\chi{(3)})$ photonic cavities*</span>, Appl. Phys. Lett. <span>**106**</span>, 151109 (2015).

H Li, L. J. Fernández-Alcázar, F. Ellis, B. Shapiro, T. Kottos, <span>*Adiabatic Thermal Radiation Pumps for Thermal Photonics*</span>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**123**</span>, 165901 (2019).

S. Buddhiraju, W. Li , S. Fan, <span>*Photonic Refrigeration from Time-Modulated Thermal Emission*</span>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**124**</span>, 077402 (2020).

I. Latella, R. Messina, J. M. Rubi, P. Ben-Abdallah, <span>*Radiative Heat Shuttling*</span>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**121**</span>, 023903 (2018).

Lucas J. Fernández-Alcázar, Rodion Kononchuk, Huanan Li, and Tsampikos Kottos, <span>*Extreme Nonreciprocal Near-Field Thermal Radiation via Floquet Photonics*</span>, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**126**</span>, 204101 (2021)

M. Moskalets and M. Büttiker, *Floquet scattering theory of quantum pumps.*, Phys. Rev. B **66**, 205320 (2002).

H. Li, T. Kottos, B. Shapiro, *Floquet-Network Theory of Nonreciprocal Transport*, Phys. Rev. Applied **9**, 044031 (2018).

H. Li, B. Shapiro, T. Kottos, *Floquet scattering theory based on effective Hamiltonians of driven systems*, Phys. Rev. B **98**, 121101(R) (2018).

B. Bhandari, P. Terrén Alonso, F. Taddei, F. von Oppen, R. Fazio, and L. Arrachea, *Geometric properties of adiabatic quantum thermal machines*, Phys. Rev. B **102**, 155407 (2020).

R. Trivedi, A. White, S. Fan, Shanhui, J. Vučković, <span>*Analytic and geometric properties of scattering from periodically modulated quantum-optical systems*</span>, Phys. Rev. A <span>**102**</span>, 033707 (2020).

G. T. Reed, G. Mashanovich, F. Y. Gardes, and D. J. Thomson, *Silicon optical modulators*. Nature Photonics **4**, 518–526 (2010).

J. E. Avron, A. Elgart, G. M. Graf, and L. Sadun, *Optimal Quantum Pumps*, Phys. Rev. Lett. **87**, 236601 (2001).

J. E. Avron, A. Elgart, G. M. Graf, and L. Sadun, *Transport and Dissipation in Quantum Pumps*, Journal of Statistical Physics 116, 425 (2004).

D. Cohen, *Quantum pumping and dissipation: From closed to open systems*, Phys. Rev. B **68**, 201303(R) (2003).

{'source': 'arXiv_out/2106'}