---
abstract: 'We have analyzed archival  and  observations of the $\gamma$-ray radio-quiet pulsar 1826 and its pulsar wind nebula. The pulsar spectrum can be described by a power-law model with a photon index $\Gamma\approx1$. We find that the nebular spectrum softens with increasing distance from the pulsar, implying synchrotron cooling. The empirical interstellar absorption–distance relation gives a distance of $\approx3.5$ kpc to 1826. We also discuss the nebula geometry and association between the pulsar, the very high energy source HESS J1826$-$130, the supernova remnant candidate G18.45$-$0.42 and the open star cluster Bica 3.'
author:
- |
    Anna V. Karpova$^{1}$[^1], Dmitry A. Zyuzin$^{1}$[^2] and Yuriy A. Shibanov$^{1}$\
    $^{1}$Ioffe Institute, Politekhnicheskaya 26, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia
bibliography:
- 'j1826.bib'
date: 'Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ'
title: 'X-ray studies of the gamma-ray pulsar 1826 and its pulsar wind nebula with  and '
---

\[firstpage\]

stars: neutron – pulsars: general – pulsars: individual: PSR 1826

Introduction {#intro}
============

The  observatory opened a new window in the studies of $\gamma$-ray emission from compact objects. To date, the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard   has detected more than 200 rotation powered pulsars[^3]. Multiwavelength observations of pulsars allow researchers to study the pulsar emission geometry, particle acceleration mechanisms in the pulsar magnetosphere and pulsar emission efficiencies as a function of energy [e.g. @takata2017]. They are also important for investigation of the thermal emission from pulsar surfaces [e.g. @kargaltsev2007]. Since more than a quarter of  pulsars is radio-quiet, X-ray observations play a key role in understanding their properties [e.g. @marelli2013; @marelli2015]. Investigations in this band can reveal their pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) and associated supernova remnants (SNRs). Studies of the latter objects, in turn, provide additional information about pulsar parameters (e.g. ages, distances, proper motions, geometries) and interaction of relativistic pulsar winds with the ambient medium [e.g., @gaensler2006; @kargaltsev2017].

The young and energetic radio-quiet PSR 1826  was one of the first pulsars discovered in $\gamma$-rays using blind frequency searches in  data [@abdo2009]. This is one of the brightest radio-quiet $\gamma$-ray pulsars listed in the last  catalog [3FGL J1826.1$-$1256; @acero2015]. It has a period $P=110.2$ ms, a spin-down luminosity $\dot{E}=3.6\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$, a characteristic age $\tau_c=14$ kyr and a surface magnetic field $B=3.7\times10^{12}$ G. Judging by these parameters the pulsar belongs to a group of 'Vela-like' pulsars. The distance ('pseudo'-distance) to  was estimated to be $\sim1.2$ kpc [@marelliphd] using the empirical relation between the distance and the $\gamma$-ray flux above 100 MeV [@SazParkinson2010]. This estimate is known to be very uncertain. @ray2011 performed precise $\gamma$-ray timing analysis improving the accuracy of the pulsar's  position. Its coincidence with an X-ray point-like source previously detected with  [@roberts2007] implied that the latter is the  counterpart. Detection in the  data of X-ray pulsations with the pulsar period from the point source [@Li2018apjl] confirmed its pulsar nature. Analyzing  data, @marelliphd showed that  has a flat X-ray spectrum described by a power law (PL) with the photon index $\Gamma=0.79\pm0.39$.

Before the pulsar's discovery, the *Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics (ASCA)* observatory revealed a $\sim 15$ arcmin X-ray nebula AX J1826.1$-$1300, presumably a PWN, detected within the error-box of a bright previously unidentified $\gamma$-ray source 3EG J1826$-$1302 [@roberts2001]. Observations with  [@roberts2007] resolved in the nebula beside the pulsar, a faint, remarkably long trail-like PWN (G18.5$-$0.4) and a stellar cluster Bica 3[^4]. G18.5$-$0.4 is connected to the pulsar and extended by $\sim 4$ arcmin south-west from it. Owing to its shape, it was referred to as the Eel nebula [@roberts2007]. @marelliphd found that its X-ray emission extracted within 20 arcsec from the pulsar has a PL spectrum with $\Gamma=0.86\pm0.39$, which is marginally steeper than that of . @roberts2007 also noted, that there is a 90 cm radio emission, which may be related to the Eel by its morphology, and the absence of associated mid-infrared emission implies a non-thermal origin. Using  data, @ackermann2011 performed the maximum likelihood spectral fits for the  off-pulse emission and did not find any signature of the PWN in the GeV range.

At the same time, Eel together with  overlap with the extended TeV source HESS J1826$-$130 which was previously considered to be a part of the brighter TeV PWN HESS J1825$-$137 [@anguner2017o; @hesscollaboration2018]. The source has a very hard spectrum similar to that of the Vela X PWN, which can be produced by uncooled electrons with the spectral index close to 2.0 and a cut-off energy at around 70 TeV generated by the PSR$+$PWN system [@anguner2017o]. The TeV source was proposed to be associated with the Eel [@roberts2007], although a firm conclusion was not possible, in part due to the uncertainty of the distance to the pulsar [@hesscollaboration2018].

HESS J1826$-$130 also partially overlaps with the SNR G18.6$-$0.2 [@brogan2006] which may indicate their association [@hesscollaboration2018]. However, the latter is unlikely since this SNR has a significantly smaller size and a large offset from the TeV source center.

In the radio and mid-infrared, @anderson2017 detected a shell-like SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42. We found that its position and size are well compatible with the Eel and HESS J1826$-$130, making its association with these objects possible.

Here we report the simultaneous X-ray analysis of archival  and   observations of  and its PWN. The details of observations and imaging are described in Section \[sec:data\]. The spectral analysis is presented in Section \[sec:spectra\]. We discuss the results in Section \[sec:discussion\]. Based on the interstellar absorption versus distance relation we obtain a new distance estimation to the PSR$+$PWN system of $\approx 3.5$ kpc. We consider G18.45$-$0.42 as the best SNR candidate for possible association with the  and its PWN. The summary is given in Section \[sec:summary\].

\[h\]<span>0.495</span>

\[h\]<span>0.495</span>

\[h\]<span>0.497</span>

\[h\]<span>0.493</span>

X-ray data and imaging {#sec:data}
======================

A 140 ks  observation of  field was carried out on 2014 October 11 (ObsID 0744420101, PI Razzano). European Photon Imaging Camera Metal Oxide Semiconductor (EPIC-MOS) data were obtained in the Full Frame mode using the medium optical filter, while the EPIC-pn camera was operated in the Small Window mode with the thin optical filter[^5]. We also used  Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS-I) observations performed on 2003 February 17 (ObsID 3851, PI Romani, exposure time 15.1 ks, off-axis observation) and on 2007 July 26 (ObsID 7641, PI Roberts, exposure time 74.8 ks). We used the <span>xmm-sas</span> v.16.0.0 and <span>ciao</span> v.4.9 tools to reduce the data.

The  data were reprocessed using the <span>chandra\_repro</span> tool. In the top left panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\] we show the field of view (FoV) of the ACIS-I[^6] detector in the 0.5–10 keV band created by the <span>ciao fluximage</span> tool from the longest  dataset (ObsID 7641). The '+' symbol marks the pulsar position (RA = 18260856, Dec = $-$1256349) obtained using the <span>wavdetect</span> tool. The Eel trail extending south-west from  and a fainter diffuse emission from the rest south part of the PWN are seen, along with brighter emission from the open star cluster Bica 3.

The  data were reduced by the <span>emchain</span> and <span>epchain</span> tools and periods of background flares were excluded by the <span>espfilt</span> task with default parameters for the pn data and the <span>mos-filter</span> command for the MOS data (the latter also runs <span>espfilt</span>). The resulting exposures are 77.5, 81.2 and 49.8 ks for MOS1, MOS2 and pn, respectively. The EPIC-pn FoV in the 0.5–10 keV band is shown in the top right panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]. Since this camera was operated in the Small Window mode, it does not cover the whole PWN. For comparison, its FoV is shown in the  image.

To obtain a wider and deeper image of the pulsar field, we combined data from both MOS detectors. To do this, we utilize the  Extended Source Analysis Software [<span>esas</span>; @cookbook]. The MOS images and exposure maps were generated by <span>mos-spectra</span> tool (MOS1 CCDs 3 and 6 are no longer used, since they have been damaged by micrometeorites). Quiescent particle background (QPB) images were created by the <span>mos\_back</span> task. Then MOS QPB-background subtracted and exposure corrected images were combined and adaptively smoothed by the <span>adapt</span> tool using 150 counts for the smoothing kernel. The resulting image in the 0.5–10 keV band is shown in the bottom left panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]. This is the deepest up-to-date soft X-ray image of the pulsar field. The PWN emission, as well as the open star cluster Bica 3, is more visible than in the ACIS image. Positions and extents of SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42, HESS J1826$-$130 and SNR G18.6$-$0.2 are shown by circles. The former two strongly overlap with each other and with the X-ray PWN, indicating their possible association, as has been mentioned in Section \[intro\], while the latter one has a large angular distance offset, suggesting that it is an unrelated object.

To reveal the nebula emission better, we removed point-like sources detected by the <span>cheese</span> task in the  data and by the <span>wavdetect</span> command in the  datasets. We refilled the resulting holes with values of the surrounding background emission using the <span>ciao dmfilth</span> tool. The exclusion of  distorts the shape of the PWN so it was not removed. The resulting image smoothed using the smoothing kernel of 150 counts is presented in the bottom right panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]. In the  data, the Eel trail is detected up to 6 arcmin from the pulsar, while in the less-sensitive  observations only up to 4 arcmin. Fainter diffusive nebula emission in the south may be somewhat blended with Bica 3. Overall, the nebula resembles a cometary-like tail behind  which is typical for PWNe created by fast-moving pulsars [@kargaltsev2017].

Spectral analysis {#sec:spectra}
=================

To perform pulsar spectral analysis, we extracted spectra from MOS and pn data using the <span>evselect</span> tool and the 15-arcsecs radius circle around the    position[^7]. For the background, we used the region free from any sources (top right panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]). The <span>rmfgen</span> and <span>arfgen</span> tasks were applied to generate the redistribution matrix and ancillary response files. The spectra were grouped to ensure 20 counts per energy bin. We also extracted the  spectrum from the longest /ACIS-I dataset utilizing the <span>ciao specextarct</span> tool and the 2-arcsecs radius circle (the short off-axis  observation provides much smaller number of counts and was neglected). It was also grouped to ensure 20 counts per energy bin. We obtained 352(MOS1)+383(MOS2)+739(pn)+207(ACIS) source counts in the 0.5–10 keV band. The  spectra contains both the pulsar and the adjacent PWN emission, due to the broad wings of the  point spread function (PSF). Thus, we generated the response files for a point source as well as for an extended source. To constrain the PWN contribution in the  spectra, we extracted its spectrum from the  data using an annulus with inner and outer radii of 2.5 and 15 arcsec. This resulted in 206 source counts which were grouped to ensure 20 counts per energy bin. To analyse the  spectra, we tried two different models: a power-law (PL) model which describes non-thermal magnetosphere emission and a black body (BB) model which describes thermal emission from the pulsar surface. The pulsar model was convolved with the response files for a point source. The PWN contribution was described by the PL model convolved with the response files for an extended source. We added a constant factor in the models, which represents the relative normalization between  and  detectors.

To perform spatial-resolved spectral analysis of the Eel nebula at a larger scale, we extracted source and background spectra from the MOS data using regions shown and numbered in the right panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\][^8]. Point sources were excluded from these regions. The spectra of the regions were grouped to ensure 30 counts per energy bin and were analysed using PL models.

All spectra (including the pulsar, the adjacent PWN, i.e. within 15 arcsec from the pulsar and its more distant regions) were fitted simultaneously in the 0.5–10 keV band using <span>xspec</span> v.12.9.1 and assuming a common value of the absorption column density $N_{\rm H}$. For photoelectric absorption, the <span>xspec</span> Tuebingen-Boulder interstellar medium (ISM) absorption model <span>tbabs</span> with the <span>wilm</span> abundances [@wilms2000] was used. We found that both PL and BB models chosen for the pulsar can describe its spectra well. However, the BB model resulted in temperature $T\approx1.4$ keV which is too large for pulsar thermal emission either from the whole stellar surface or a polar cap [see e.g. @vigano2013]. Thus, we rejected this model. The resulting best-fitting parameters are presented in Tables \[tab:psrpar\] and \[tab:pwnpar\]. We obtained $\chi^2=511$ for 549 degrees of freedom (d.o.f.). The spectra of the pulsar and the adjacent PWN are shown in Fig. \[fig:psrspec\]. The examples of the PWN spectra from the regions 1 and 4 are shown in Fig. \[fig:pwnspec\].

We also tried to use the BB+PL model for the pulsar, but this did not lead to substantial improvements of the fit statistics: <span>ftest</span> command provided a probability of about 0.4 that the improvements occurred by chance.

  Column density $N_{\rm H}$, $10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$                    $2.2^{+0.2}_{-0.2}$
  ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------
  Pulsar photon index $\Gamma^{\rm psr}$                            $0.92^{+0.25}_{-0.24}$
  Pulsar flux $F_X^{\rm psr}$, $10^{-13}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$    $1.04^{+0.14}_{-0.13}$
  PWN photon index $\Gamma^{\rm pwn}$                               $1.20^{+0.24}_{-0.23}$
  PWN flux $F_X^{\rm pwn}$, $10^{-13}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$       $0.85^{+0.10}_{-0.09}$
  Cross-normalization constant                                          $1.14\pm0.13$
  $\chi^2$($N_{\rm bins}$)                                                 94(114)

  : Best-fitting parameters for  and adjacent PWN (i.e. within 15 arcsec from the pulsar) emission. All errors are at 90% confidence. Unabsorbed fluxes $F_X$ in the 0.5–10 keV band were calculated using <span>xspec</span> convolution model <span>cflux</span>. $N_{\rm bins}$ = number of spectral bins. The cross-normalization constant was fixed at 1 for  spectra and free for  spectra.<span data-label="tab:psrpar"></span>

  Region                                                                                 1                        2                        3                        4                        5                        6
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
  Net counts (MOS1/2)                                                                 500/513                  435/476                  185/239                  953/1036                 464/479                  337/369
  Photon index $\Gamma$                                                        $1.34^{+0.18}_{-0.17}$   $1.99^{+0.23}_{-0.22}$   $2.44^{+0.41}_{-0.37}$   $1.76^{+0.16}_{-0.16}$   $2.54^{+0.33}_{-0.31}$   $2.58^{+0.36}_{-0.32}$
  PL normalization $K_{\rm PL}$, $10^{-5}$ ph s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$ keV$^{-1}$     $2.2^{+0.6}_{-0.5}$      $3.9^{+1.2}_{-0.9}$      $2.7^{+1.2}_{-0.9}$      $6.7^{+1.5}_{-1.2}$      $2.7^{+1.2}_{-0.9}$      $5.5^{+2.2}_{-1.5}$
  Flux $F_X$, $10^{-13}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$                                $2.07^{+0.16}_{-0.17}$   $1.87^{+0.24}_{-0.19}$   $0.96^{+0.27}_{-0.18}$   $3.99^{+0.34}_{-0.29}$   $2.30^{+0.58}_{-0.38}$   $1.88^{+0.50}_{-0.33}$
  Area, arcmin$^{2}$                                                                    1.4                      1.5                      1.3                      3.3                      3.0                      2.2
  Distance from the pulsar, arcmin                                                      1.3                      2.2                      3.1                      3.2                      4.0                      5.6
  $\chi^2$($N_{\rm bins}$)                                                             60(63)                   46(62)                   39(40)                  116(128)                  81(92)                   74(68)

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

Discussion {#sec:discussion}
==========

Distance to  {#subsec:dist}
------------

To constrain the parameters of the pulsar and its PWN, it is necessary to know the distance.

The only available 'pseudo'-distance estimate $D\sim 1.2$ kpc [@marelliphd] is known to be uncertain within a factor of 2–3. Assuming a 100 per cent efficiency in $\gamma$-rays, we obtain $D\approx9.4$ kpc. However, this value can be even larger, accounting for an unknown emission beaming factor. Using the pulsar galactic coordinates $(l,b)=(18.56,-0.38)$ and assuming that it lies inside the Galactic disk with a half-thickness of 100 pc, the maximum $D$ is $\sim 15$ kpc if the pulsar is located near the disk edge.

A more reliable distance estimate can be obtained by using the empirical relation between the distance and the interstellar reddening $E(B-V)$ in the pulsar direction. According to the extinction map by @schlafly2011[^9], the total Galactic $E(B-V)$ in this direction is about 15.5. The reddening to  can be derived from the column density $N_{\rm H}$ value utilizing the relation $N_{\rm H}=(8.9\pm 0.4)\times E(B-V)\times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ [@foight2016]. $N_{\rm H}$ obtained from the X-ray spectral analysis (Table \[tab:psrpar\]) transforms to $E(B-V)=2.45\pm0.19$ (1$\sigma$ errors). This is much smaller than the total Galactic value and implies that the pulsar is much closer than the Galactic disk edge in its direction. We compared the obtained $E(B-V)$ with the extinction map by @Marshall2006, which is based on Two-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) stars photometry along with the Besançon model of population synthesis. The $E(B-V)$–distance relation was constructed using the <span>python</span> package <span>mwdust</span> [@Bovy2016]. The resulting $D$ lies in the range of 3.4–3.6 kpc. This is compatible with the distance estimate of 3 kpc based on the pulsar X-ray luminosity, though such estimate is very uncertain [@roberts2009]. We adopt 3.5 kpc as a reasonable value in our following estimates.

Pulsar {#subsec:psr}
------

The  spectrum can be described by the PL model. The obtained photon index and flux (Table \[tab:psrpar\]) are in agreement with the results of @marelliphd, who used only  data. Addition of the  data allowed us to constrain these parameters better. They are different from the results by @Li2018apjl since they used only the MOS data and did not take into account the PWN contribution in the pulsar aperture.

The pulsar non-thermal X-ray luminosity $L_{X}=(1.5\pm 0.2)\times10^{32}D^{2}_{3.5}$ erg s$^{-1}$ and efficiency $\eta_{X}=L_{ X}/\dot{E}=(4.2\pm0.5)\times10^{-5}D^{2}_{3.5}$ in the 0.5–10 keV band, where $D_{3.5}$ is the distance in the units of 3.5 kpc. The values obtained are typical for pulsars with similar ages and spin-down luminosities, although they are by an order of magnitude higher than those of the Vela pulsar, which is known as a very inefficient non-thermal emitter [e.g., @kargaltsev2008]. The ratio between the $\gamma$-ray [@marelliphd] and the non-thermal unabsorbed X-ray fluxes of the pulsar is ${\rm log}(F_\gamma/F_X)\approx3.5$. This is in agreement with the value of 3.5$\pm$0.5 derived for radio-quiet $\gamma$-ray pulsars [@abdo2013; @marelli2015].

We estimated the  surface temperature adding the BB component to the pulsar non-thermal spectral model and adopting a neutron star (NS) radius of 13$D_{3.5}$ km. We obtained a 3$\sigma$ upper limit on the temperature of $\approx0.1$ keV, which is consistent with predictions of standard NS cooling scenarios for a 14 kyr star [@yakovlev2004].

PWN {#subsec:pwn}
---

The spectrum of the PWN within $\approx$ 15 arcsec from the pulsar, with the photon index $\Gamma$ = 1.2$\pm$0.2 (see Table \[tab:psrpar\]), is hard. The same is observed in other PWNe powered by Vela-like pulsars [@Bykov2017SSRv]. The index increases to $\approx$2.5 with the distance from the pulsar (Table \[tab:pwnpar\]). Such spectral steepening is observed for some other PWNe and suggests synchrotron cooling [e.g. @reynolds2017; @slane2017hb]. The total PWN luminosity is about $L_{X} \approx 2\times10^{33}$ $D_{3.5}^{2}$ erg s$^{-1}$. This corresponds to the X-ray efficiency of $5.6\times10^{-4}D_{3.5}^{2}$, which is typical for PWNe.

\[h\]<span>1.</span> (-200,40) <span>![3 arcmin $\times$ 3 arcmin  X-ray image of the pulsar vicinity in 0.5–10 keV range smoothed with a 25 pixel Gaussian kernel. The '+' symbol shows the pulsar position. The 'jet' and 'counter-jet' are marked. The 30 arcsec $\times$ 30 arcsec image part, enclosed by the cyan dashed box and smoothed with a 3 pixel Gaussian kernel, is enlarged in the inset. The possible PWN torus and the base part of the 'jet' are marked. <span data-label="fig:torus"></span>](torus-jet.eps "fig:")</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

\[h\]<span>1.</span>

@roberts2009 noticed X-ray structures in the pulsar's near vicinity, which can be interpreted as the PWN torus and jet. By considering the  data, we confirm the presence of the presumed torus around the pulsar, with the radius of about 5 arcsec, likely seen edge on, and the north-east jet directed along the torus axis (the insert of Fig. \[fig:torus\]). In Fig. \[fig:proj\] we show spatial profiles along these structures, compared with the point spread function (PSF). The latter was generated using <span>chart</span> [@chart] and <span>marx</span> tools and the  best-fitting spectral model (Table \[tab:psrpar\])[^10]. Emission excesses over the PSF wings corresponding to the torus and jet structures adjacent to the PSF core are clearly seen. Such structures are observed in other young PWNe, including the Vela PWN. In the latter case, the size of the torus is about 2 arcmin [@Velasize]. At a distance of 3.5 kpc, this would transform to $\approx10$ arcsec, which is compatible with the observed dimension of the presumed  torus, suggesting that it is a real PWN structure. Assuming that, we can estimate the upper limit of the radius of the pulsar wind termination shock (TS) which should be smaller than the torus: $R_{\rm TS} \lesssim 2.6\times 10^{17} D_{3.5}$ cm. This is comparable with that of the Vela PWN [$5\times10^{16}$ cm; @kargaltsev2008]. The respective lower limit on the ambient matter pressure is P$_{\rm amb}$ $\approx \dot{E}(4 \pi c R^{2}_{\rm TS})^{-1}$ $\approx$ $0.14\times 10^{-9}(R_{\rm TS}/2.6\times10^{17}~{\rm cm})^{-2}$ dyn cm$^{-2}$. This value is typical for Vela-like pulsars located inside their host SNRs [@2007ApJ...660.1413K]. For , this host could be the SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42 (see details below).

At a larger scale, we see that the jet mentioned above is bent towards the east, representing the 'Eel head' (the main panel of Fig. \[fig:torus\]). @roberts2009 referred it as a 'forward jet'. The longer 'Eel body' extending about 6 arcmin ($\approx$ 6D$_{3.5}$ pc) south-west of the pulsar can be interpreted as a 'counter-jet', which transforms at larger distances to a trail behind the pulsar moving in roughly the opposite direction. The corresponding geometry is shown in the top panel of Fig. \[fig:2x2\]. The bending of the forward jet could be due to ram pressure if the vector of the pulsar velocity directs approximately to the north. A similar interpretation is considered for the Vela PWN, where the pulsar  and the matter flow initiated by the SNR reverse shock are likely working together to bend the PWN jets [@Kargaltsev2015SSRv]. To conclude, the Eel appears to be a mixed type morphology PWN containing a torus, jets and a trail.

Note that @kargaltsev2017 suggested another geometry of the system, which is shown in the bottom panel of Fig. \[fig:2x2\] (see also their fig. 6). The corresponding  position angle (P.A.) is $\sim$330 deg. However, this geometry cannot describe the long PWN trail. Moreover, only the jet is clearly bent while the counter-jet is not.

Connection between  PWN, the SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42, the open cluster Bica 3 and HESS J1826$-$130 {#subsec:psr-snr}
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 and the Eel nebula are located in the complex region containing the SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42, the TeV source HESS J1826$-$130 and the open stellar cluster Bica 3 (Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]). Below we discuss possible associations between them.

It was proposed earlier that HESS J1826$-$130 is a TeV counterpart to the  PWN [@roberts2007; @anguner2017o]. This suggestion is natural, since there are similar Vela-like systems. One remarkable example is PSR J1823$-$13 [$\dot{E}=2.8\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$, $\tau=21$ kyr; @pavlov2008]. Measurements of this pulsar's  allowed authors to understand its connection with HESS J1825$-$137. @pavlov2008 suggested that the latter is produced by relic electrons emitted by the pulsar when it was younger and more powerful. Another example is the young and energetic pulsar J1357$-$6429 ($\dot{E}=3.1\times10^{36}$ erg s$^{-1}$, $\tau=7.3$ kyr). The pulsar and its PWN are projected onto the extended TeV source HESS J1356$-$645 [@abramowski2011; @chang2012]. @chang2012 proposed the most plausible explanation of the TeV and radio emission as arising from a relic PWN.

The Eel-TeV-source association is also supported by the fact that the PWN X-ray and TeV luminosities, $L_X\approx 2\times10^{33}$ $D_{3.5}^{2}$ erg s$^{-1}$ (this paper) and $L_\gamma\approx 1.5\times10^{33}$ $D_{3.5}^{2}$ erg s$^{-1}$ [@hesscollaboration2018], are consistent with the $L_{\gamma \rm >TeV}$ versus $L_X$ and $L_{\gamma \rm >TeV}/L_X$ versus age distributions of other X-$\gamma$-ray PWNe [@kargaltsev2013]. In addition, if we assume that the TeV source is the relic PWN of J1826 then Bohm diffusion can be the main process of the particle escape and the source expansion. On the time-scale of 14 kyr the particles will diffuse to a distance of $40B_{-6}^{-1/2} (1+0.144 B^{2}_{-6})^{-1/2}$ pc, where $B_{-6}$ is the magnetic field in $\mu$G [@kargaltsev2013]. For the visible TeV source size of about $9 D_{3.5}$ pc, this translates to a magnetic field of about 5 $\mu$G, which is a typical value for PWNe.

There is some displacement between the TeV source centres and the pulsars in the systems noticed above, which is usually explained by the effect of the SNR reverse shock on the PWN and/or by the pulsar  [@blondin2001]. The same situation is observed for  and HESS J1826$-$130 (Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]). Their displacement could be explained naturally by assuming that the SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42 is the pulsar host remnant.  is located about 7.5 arcmin off the remnant centre and projects onto its shell (Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]). If the pulsar was born near the G18.45$-$0.42 centre, for an age of $\approx 14$ kyr its  has to be $\approx 32t^{-1}_{14}$ mas yr$^{-1}$, implying the pulsar transverse velocity of $\approx 530D_{3.5}$ km s$^{-1}$. The latter value is consistent with the pulsar velocity distribution [@hobbs2005]. The  P.A. in this case is $\sim$5 deg, which is compatible with the geometry explaining the Eel structure presented in the top panel of Fig. \[fig:2x2\]. The alternative geometry (the bottom panel of Fig. \[fig:2x2\]) considered by @kargaltsev2017 raises a question about the  host SNR. In this case, the pulsar cannot be associated with any remnant found around it (Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\]).

If G18.45$-$0.42 is the real SNR related with the pulsar, its observed radius is $\sim$ 8D$_{3.5}$ pc. At the age of about 14 kyr, it has to be entered into the pressure driven snow-plough phase. Using the SNR evolution code [@leahy2017] with typical ISM number density of 0.5–2 cm$^{-3}$ and supernova explosion energy of $10^{51}$ erg we obtain the blast wave shock radius of about 12–14 pc. Accounting for uncertainties in the age and distance, this is compatible with the observed radius. Deeper study of G18.45$-$0.42 is necessary to confirm its SNR nature and the association with  and to estimate its distance and age.

We have tried to measure the pulsar   using both  observations, providing a time base of 4.4 yr. To perform the astrometric transformation, we used stars detected in both datasets by the <span>wavdetect</span> tool with significance $>9\sigma$ (sources detected at chips edges were excluded). The short observation was registered to the long one as described in the   manual[^11]. We obtained only an upper limit on the pulsar position shift of $\lesssim0.7$ arcsec corresponding to a non-informative  limit of $\lesssim160$ mas yr$^{-1}$ as compared to the expected value of $\approx32$ mas yr$^{-1}$ estimated above. The are two reasons for such a rude result. The first one is the short exposure of the  observation (ObsID 3851) leading to a non-sufficient signal to noise ratio of $\approx 6$. The second is that in this observation the pulsar was exposed at $\approx5.5$ arcmin from the telescope aim-point, where the point source localization accuracy degrades significantly. Additional  observations are necessary to measure the .

The Bica 3 position coincides with the center of G18.45$-$0.42 which makes it a likely birthplace of this presumed SNR. According to the OPENCLUST catalogue [@dias2002], the distance to the cluster is about 1.6 kpc. We extracted the cluster spectrum from MOS2 data using the region shown in the bottom right panel of Fig. \[fig:j1826comb\] (in the case of MOS1, Bica 3 is projected on the disabled CCD). It can be described by the absorbed model of collisionally-ionized diffuse gas <span>apec</span> with column density $N_{\rm H}=7.6^{+1.7}_{-1.4}\times10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ and temperature $T=6.3^{+2.2}_{-1.5}$ keV, typical for open clusters [e.g., @2019ApJ...871..116S]. $N_{\rm H}$ is about three times lower than the value obtained for and consistent with the smaller distance to the cluster. Further studies are needed to verify whether G18.45$-$0.42 is associated with Bica 3 or .

Star clusters can be sources of TeV emission [e.g. @bednarek2007]. However, currently only two open clusters are known to be associated with TeV sources[^12]. This makes the direct connection of HESS J1826$-$130 with Bica 3 unlikely. On the other hand, we can suggest that HESS J1826$-$130 is the TeV counterpart to G18.45$-$0.42 basing on their positions and extents.

Summary {#sec:summary}
=======

We have analysed the  and  observations of the young $\gamma$-ray radio-quiet pulsar  and its PWN. The pulsar spectrum can be described by the PL model with a photon index $\Gamma\approx1$ and the PWN spectrum becomes softer with the distance from the pulsar. We also estimated the distance to  to be $\approx$3.5 kpc, using the empirical relation between the distance and interstellar absorption by @Marshall2006.

 can be associated with the recently discovered SNR candidate G18.45$-$0.42. This implies the pulsar transverse velocity of $\approx 530D_{3.5}$ km s$^{-1}$, which is consistent with the pulsars velocity distribution, and the pressure driven snowplough phase of the remnant.

The Eel nebula appears to be a mixed-type morphology PWN containing a torus, jets and a trail. One of the jets is bent by the ram pressure, due to the pulsar  vector not coinciding with the jet direction. Such geometry explains the PWN morphology and supports the association with G18.45$-$0.42.

The TeV source HESS J1826$-$130 overlaps with the +PWN system as well as with G18.45$-$0.42 and the open star cluster Bica 3. Comparing the Eel X-ray and HESS J1826$-$130 $\gamma$-ray luminosities with those of other X-$\gamma$-ray PWNe suggests the TeV source is the relic PWN of . However, we cannot exclude the possibility that G18.45$-$0.42 can be the HESS J1826$-$130 counterpart (or partially contribute to TeV emission).

Based on the spatial coincidence of G18.45$-$0.42 and Bica 3, the latter can be the birthplace for the presumed SNR. The distance estimate to the open cluster is significantly lower than the distance to which is confirmed by the X-ray spectral analysis. In this case G18.45$-$0.42 cannot be associated with the pulsar.

The pulsar  measurement is necessary to solve the question about the Eel nebula's morphological type. Together with confirmation of the G18.45$-$0.42 SNR nature this can help to understand the relations between the pulsar, G18.45$-$0.42, HESS J1826$-$130 and Bica 3.

After this paper submission, the work by @duvidovich2019 was published. Authors used the same  data to analyse the  and Eel emission. They also found that the spectra of both objects can be described by power laws and the PWN spectrum softens with increasing distance from . They also argued that HESS J1826$-$130 is likely produced by Eel. However, they did not use  data and performed spectral analysis of only the brightest part of Eel. There are no new distance constraint in their work and they did not discuss the compact nebula morphology and the connections between , G18.45$-$0.42, HESS J1826$-$130 and Bica 3.

Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements .unnumbered}
================

We thank the anonymous referee for useful comments. The work of AVK and DAZ was supported by RF Presidential Programme MK$-$2566.2017.2. DAZ thanks Pirinem School of Theoretical Physics for hospitality. The work of YAS was supported by the Fundamental Research Program of Presidium of the RAS P-12. The scientific results reported in this article are based on data obtained from the  Data Archive and observations obtained with *XMM-Newton*, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and the USA (NASA).

\[lastpage\]

[^1]: E-mail: elizabeth54@example.net

[^2]: E-mail: elizabeth54@example.net

[^3]: <https://confluence.slac.stanford.edu/display/GLAMCOG/Public+List+of+LAT-Detected+Gamma-Ray+Pulsars>

[^4]: Bica 3 can be found in the New Optically Visible Open Clusters and Candidates Catalog [OPENCLUST; @dias2002]; <https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/W3Browse/all/openclust.html>

[^5]: [ https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/xmm-newton/technical-details-epic]( https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/xmm-newton/technical-details-epic)

[^6]: <http://asc.harvard.edu/proposer/POG/html/chap6.html>

[^7]: The aperture size was selected using the <span>eregionanalyse</span> tool.

[^8]: We studied that part of the PWN which is covered by both MOS detectors (in the south-west it is partially projected onto a disabled MOS1 CCD). We did not use  data for the nebula spectral analysis due to the gaps between ACIS-I CCDs.

[^9]: <https://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/DUST/>

[^10]: For details see <http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/PSFs/chart2/index.html>

[^11]: <http://cxc.harvard.edu/ciao/threads/reproject_aspect/>

[^12]: According to the catalog for Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy [@tevcat1]; <http://tevcat.uchicago.edu/>. The association of HESS J1848$-$018 with the star-forming region W43 is in question and it has been also considered as a PWN candidate [@acero2013].

{'source': 'arXiv_out/1906'}