--- abstract: 'The phenomenology of exchange bias effects observed in <span>*structurally single-phase*</span> alloys and compounds but composed of a variety of coexisting <span>*magnetic phases*</span> such as ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, ferrimagnetic, spin-glass, cluster-glass, disordered magnetic states are reviewed. The investigations on exchange bias effects are discussed in diverse types of alloys and compounds where qualitative and quantitative aspects of magnetism are focused based on macroscopic experimental tools such as magnetization and magnetoresistance measurements. Here, we focus on improvement of fundamental issues of the exchange bias effects rather than on their technological importance.' address: 'Department of Solid State Physics, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700 032, India' author: - 'S Giri, M Patra and S Majumdar' title: Exchange bias effect in alloys and compounds --- 0.5cm **Abbreviations and symbols** 0.3cm Exchange bias EB\ Exchange bias field $H_E$\ Exchange bias magnetization $M_E$\ Cooling field $H_{cool}$\ Maximum field applied for recording magnetic hysteresis loop $H_{max}$\ Field-cooled FC\ Zero-field cooled ZFC\ Saturation magnetization $M_S$\ Magnetic field $H$\ Temperature $T$\ Ferromagnetic FM\ Antiferromagnetic AFM\ Ferrimagnetic FIM\ Pinned ferromagnetic PFM\ Frozen ferromagnetic FFM\ Spin-glass SG\ Cluster-glass CG\ Re-entrant spin-glass RSG\ Rudermann Kittel Kasuya Yosida RKKY\ Resistivity $\rho$\ Magnetoresistance $\left(=~\frac{\rho(H)-\rho(0)}{\rho(0)}\right)$ MR\ Ferromagnetic Curie temperature $T_C$\ Antiferromagnetic Néel temperature $T_N$\ Introduction ============ The exchange bias effect is an old phenomenon which was discovered in 1956 by Meiklejohn and Bean @meik1. They observed a shift of the magnetic hysteresis loop along the field axis at low temperature when Co/CoO core/shell nanoparticles were cooled in a static magnetic field @meik1 [@meik2]. Initially, EB effect was observed in a system composed of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic substances where Curie temperature of the FM component is greater than that of the Néel temperature corresponding to AFM component. When the sample is exposed to a static magnetic field at a temperature ($> T_N$) and cooled through $T_N$ down to low temperature ($\ll T_N$), the FM spins adjacent to AFM spins are coupled to the uncompensated AFM spins. This coupling gives rise to a displacement of magnetic hysteresis loop, a $\sin\theta$ component in the torque curve and high field rotational hysteresis which are the typical manifestations of EB effect as pointed out by Meiklejhon in a review @meik3. After the discovery of EB effect in FM Co/AFM CoO nanostructures the EB has been observed in diverse combinations between FM, AFM, canted AFM, FIM, SG and disordered magnetic components which have been reviewed by different groups @wohl [@schm; @lub; @jacob; @kou; @yel; @march; @nogues1; @berk; @stamp; @kiwi; @binekREV; @coeh; @bobo; @nogues2; @nogues3; @iglesias; @gra]. Recently, the EB effects were also reported even in a combination of hard FM and soft FM layered systems either directly exchange coupling @full [@dume; @gubb; @sort] or coupling through a nonmagnetic interlayer between them @binek-FM-FM [@berg; @zha]. In the latter case, coupling was suggested to arise from the interplay between dipolar and RKKY interactions between the layers. It is important to point out that measurements of minor loops of the soft FM component were required to investigate exchange bias in the above two cases @berg_minor. Investigations on the EB effect have been explored mainly in layered structures and nanoparticles having core-shell nanostructures, addressing different issues on EB phenomenon. Because of the complex mechanisms at different kinds of interfaces, often theoretical interpretations, which are mainly based on macroscopic or phenomenological models, are inadequate. Recently, Monte Carlo simulations or micromagnetic approach @monte-fid [@monte-ig1; @monte-ig2; @monte-hu; @monte-trohi1; @monte-trohi2; @monte-trohi3; @monte-trohi4] have been used to gain deeper insight into microscopic origin of EB effect. However, in most of the cases theories were limited to specific problems where intricate structures at the interfaces were simplified. Until now, EB effects have been exploited in several technological applications such as read head of recording devices @rec-tsa1 [@rec-tsa2; @rec-ton1; @rec-gan1; @rec-lin1; @rec-son1; @rec-liu1; @rec-mac1; @rec-doe1; @rec-mat1; @rec-zha1; @rec-ara1; @rec-tan1; @rec-zha2; @rec-hon1; @rec-sto1], magnetoresistive random access memories (MRRAM) @mr-lea1 [@mr-cro1; @mr-kat1; @mr-weg; @mr-koc; @mr-rus1; @mr-rus2; @mr-sun1; @mr-poh1; @mr-ric1; @mr-smi1; @mr-osh1; @mr-kak1; @mr-li1; @mr-liu1; @mr-par1; @mr-teh1; @mr-wor1; @mr-wor2; @mr-liu2; @mr-zhe1; @mr-zhe2] and it has been proposed for the technological applications in stabilizing magnetization of superparamagnetic nanoparticles @nog-wel1 [@nog-tho1; @nog-sku1; @nog-nog1] or to improve coercivity and energy product of the permanent magnets @sort1_FM-AFM [@sort2_FM-AFM; @sort3_FM-AFM; @sort4_FM-AFM]. The EB effects have been observed in numerous morphologies at the artificial interfaces viz., layer structures @nogues1 [@berk; @nogues2], core-shell nanostructures @iglesias or irregular metal and metal oxide nanostructures @thakur1 [@das], FM nanoparticles embedded in AFM matrix @nogues3 [@nog-sku1; @sort1_FM-AFM; @sort2_FM-AFM; @sort3_FM-AFM; @sort4_FM-AFM; @misra; @dom] which have been focused to develop advanced materials for the applications and to understand the complex EB phenomenology @nogues1 [@berk; @stamp; @kiwi]. However, investigations on the EB effects in structurally single-phase alloys and compounds have been far less. In fact, already in late fifties, Kouvel and coworkers reported extensively on the evidences of EB effects in different of binary alloys involving disordered magnetic states @kou1, SG or CG phases @kou2 [@kou3] and coexisting FM/AFM interactions @kou4 [@kou5; @kou6]. After a long gap, reports on EB effects on structurally single-phase alloys and compounds together with the nanoparticles having FM/AFM/FIM core and disordered magnetic/SG/SG-like shell structures can be found in the literatures (see Refs. \[19\] and \[21\]). Recently, EB effects were also reported in a charge-ordered manganite, Pr$_{1/3}$Ca$_{2/3}$MnO$_3$ by Niebieskikwiat and Salamon where EB was attributed to the spontaneous interfaces between short range FM droplets or clusters embedded in the AFM matrix @nieb. Although few reports of EB in structurally single phase was found including detailed investigation in binary alloys by Kouvel, this report has attracted a renewed attention for investigating EB effects in alloys and compounds having single-phase crystal structure. To date, a fairly substantial volume of works have been reported focusing on different aspects of EB in alloys, intermetallic and oxide compounds. In few of the cases, investigations on EB effects using macroscopic experimental approaches such as magnetization or magnetoresistance have been exploited for understanding qualitative and quantitative aspects of nanoscale magnetic phase separations in structurally single-phase alloys and compounds. Herein, we are motivated in reviewing the EB phenomena in single-phase alloys, intermetallic and oxide compounds. The present review has been organised in the following manner. After this current section (section 1) EB phenomenology is briefly discussed in section 2. In section 3 experimental results of EB effect in alloys and intermetallic compounds are reviewed. In section 4 oxide materials are discussed in the context of EB effect. The EB effect found in structurally single-phase fine particles having magnetic core-shell phase coexistence is reviewed in section 5. Results of EB observed in magnetoresistance is incorporated in section 6. Finally, evaluation of reported experimental results and general concluding remarks, focusing advancement of fundamental understanding and areas needed to be improved are briefly highlighted in section 7. Phenomenology of exchange bias ============================== Basic phenomenology ------------------- The phenomenology of EB effect has been described explicitly in different reviews @wohl [@schm; @lub; @jacob; @kou; @yel; @march; @nogues1; @berk; @stamp; @kiwi; @binekREV; @coeh; @bobo; @nogues2; @nogues3; @iglesias; @gra]. Most of those reviews are mainly focused on the experimental evidences through the manifestation of displacement of magnetic hysteresis loop resulting from the pinning effect at the interface between soft and hard magnetic substances. An example of displaced hysteresis loop is shown in figure 1(d) when the sample comprised of soft and hard magnetic substances is exposed to a static magnetic field during cooling process. As noted in figure 1(d) displacement of magnetic hysteresis loop can be manifested through the horizontal and vertical shifts. The horizontal shift provides $H_E$ whereas $M_E$ is typically estimated from the vertical shift of hysteresis loop at saturation magnetization \[displayed in figure 1(d)\]. The shift is absent while the sample is cooled in zero-field as displayed in figure 1(c). The shift along the field axis is typically negative for positive cooling field and it is positive for negative cooling field. For simplicity, let us consider a bilayer system composed of FM and AFM substances where FM and AFM substances represent soft and hard magnetic substances. The simplified FM/AFM bilayer structure is shown in figure 1(a). When the sample is cooled in a static field through $T_N$ from a temperature, $T_N < T < T_C$ down to low temperature ($T \ll T_N$), a new layer appears at the interface displayed in figure 1(b). This new layer is called as the pinned FM layer consisting of pinned FM spins which gives rise to the displacement of magnetic hysteresis loop. The FM spins adjacent to the interface are pinned by AFM spins in FC mode. The pinned FM layer has an unidirectional anisotropy. The unidirectional anisotropy direction is set by direction of cooling field and is usually set along uniaxial direction of the FM component. Thus, the pinned FM layer provides a new type of anisotropy which has a $K_{ud} \cos(\theta)$ angular dependence rather than the uniaxial anisotropy having $K_{ua} \sin(2\theta)$ dependence. The $\theta$, $K_{ud}$ and $K_{ua}$ are angle between direction of applied magnetic field and anisotropy direction, unidirectional anisotropy constant of pinned FM spins and uniaxial anisotropy constant of the FM component, respectively. Figures 1(e) and 1(f) illustrate typical example of the plots of torque magnetometry, $\Lambda$ with $\theta$ for both the cases where unidirectional anisotropy has a single minimum energy state in contrast to two minima found in case of uniaxial anisotropy. Training effect --------------- Training effect is one of the important experimental evidences which is usually observed in EB systems. Difference between subsequent magnetization reversal loops is called the training effect. This is investigated by successive field cycling at low temperature after the field cooling. The evidence of training effect was first reported in a thin film @pacc. They further proposed that decrease of $H_E$ or $M_E$ satisfies following empirical formula $$H_E - H_E^{\infty} \propto \lambda^{-1/2}$$ where $\lambda$ is the loop index number and $H_E^{\infty}$ the value at $\lambda = \infty$. Two kinds of training effects have been reported: 1) decrease of EB effect for $\lambda <$ 2 @hoff and 2) decrease for $\lambda \geq$ 2 @nogues2 [@iglesias]. Equation (1) can be derived in a series expansion approach which satisfies the second type of training effect i.e. for $\lambda \geq$ 2. The training effect in magnetic hysteresis loop @patraJPCM1 and MR curve @patraJPCM2 has been shown for Nd$_{0.8}$Sr$_{0.2}$CoO$_3$ in figures 2 and 3, respectively. The decreases in $H_E$ are highlighted by the arrows in the insets of the figures. The continuous curves in figure 2 and right inset of figure 3 display fits of the experimental data with equation (1) for $\lambda \geq$ 2. The more generalized interpretation of training effect was recently proposed by Binek with the help of a discretized Landau-Khalatnikov equation @LK where continuous time parameter was replaced by $\lambda$ and arrived at a general recursive formula for $H_E$ or $M_E$ @binek $$H_E (\lambda + 1) - H_E (\lambda) = -\gamma [H_E (\lambda) - H_E (\lambda = \infty)]^3$$ where $\gamma$ is a constant. It is to be noted that equation (1) can be derived from the series expansion of equation (2) where equation (1) is limiting case of equation (2) and can fit the training effect for $\lambda \geq$ 2. On the other hand, equation (2) is a more general form which satisfies the training effect for all $\lambda$. The values of $H_E$ or $M_E$ obtained from the least square fit with $\lambda$ satisfactorily interpret the experimental data using equation (2) for different cases such as layered structures @binek1 [@binek2; @binek3; @binek4; @binek5; @guh; @yang; @ang; @luo1; @yangpy], nanocomposites @tian, bulk Heusler alloys @wang-EB-JAP-TE [@nayak-EB-JPD-TE] and oxide compounds @nieb [@patraJPCM1; @tang-EB-PRB; @BKC-EB-PRB; @patraSSC; @yuaLSCO; @patraJAP]. Equation (2) can also satisfactorily interpret the shift of MR curves, exhibiting EB effect @patraJPCM2 [@vent; @patraEPL]. As seen in figure 2 and right inset of figure 3, the values (filled symbols) as obtained from the fit using equation (2) can satisfactorily match with all the experimental data. Recently, the exponential dependence of training effect with $\lambda$ has been demonstrated in a NiFe/IrMn bilayer @mishra and Pt/Co/Pt/IrMn multilayers films @shi. This training effect was interpreted in terms of metastable magnetic disorder at the magnetically frustrated interface during magnetization reversal process. It is worthwhile to note that the fits using equation (2) and exponential dependence are virtually indistinguishable where exponential bahaviour has more free parameters than equation (2). Minor loop effect ----------------- In case of nanocrystalline compounds, alloys and oxide materials magnetization at high magnetic field (viz., 50 kOe) does not often saturate. In particular, materials involving disordered magnetic and/or glassy magnetic phases or canted spin configuration or a system with large anisotropy do not show saturating trend even for $H >$ 50 kOe. Thus, proper choice of maximum field applied for recording magnetic hysteresis loop, $H_{max}$ is crucial for investigating EB effect. Because small $H_{max}$ may lead to the displacement of magnetic hysteresis loop even for FM and glassy magnetic substances attributed to the irreversible magnetization processes @kle [@gesh1; @gesh2; @luoRES; @gesh3]. In order to avoid minor loop effect $H_{max}$ may be chosen such that $H_{max} > H_{A}$ where $H_{A}$ is anisotropy field of the system @gesh1 [@gesh4; @gesh5; @gesh6; @giriREP]. In order to avoid the overestimated value of EB field and magnetization, the plots of $H_E$ and $M_E$ with $H_{max}$ are found in few literatures @tang-EB-PRB [@yuaLSCO; @gesh1; @luoRES; @giriREP; @noguesJACS; @luo-LBCO-APL; @pi-SRO-APL; @yan-CuZnCr2O4-JAP; @yan-ZnCr2O4-JPCM; @ang-SrPrCoO4-JAP; @xu-MR-EB-JPC; @liu-NCMO-JPD]. In the plots $H_E$ and $M_E$ decrease with increasing $H_{max}$ and the values stabilize at higher $H_{max}$ @tang-EB-PRB [@yuaLSCO; @giriREP; @noguesJACS; @xu-MR-EB-JPC; @liu-NCMO-JPD]. An example of $H_{max}$ dependence of $H_E$ is displayed in figure 4 for LaMn$_{0.7}$Fe$_{0.3}$O$_3$ @giriREP. Magnetic hysteresis loops measured in between different $\pm H_{max}$ are displayed in figure 4(a). The plot of $H_E$ with $H_{max}$ is shown in figure 4(b) which clearly demonstrates that the value of $H_E$ stabilizes for $H_{max} \geq$ 40 kOe. Nogues and his coworkers reported that the vertical shift vanished whereas the horizontal shift displayed a stabilized value of $H_E$ for large $H_{max}$ at 70 kOe for MnO/Mn$_3$O$_4$ nanoparticles having core-shell structures @noguesJACS. In few examples EB effect vanished at high enough $H_{max}$, although interpretation of the results were different @gesh1 [@luoRES; @luo-LBCO-APL; @pi-SRO-APL; @yan-CuZnCr2O4-JAP; @yan-ZnCr2O4-JPCM; @ang-SrPrCoO4-JAP]. Exchange bias effect in alloys and intermetallic compounds ========================================================== The conduction electrons in magnetic alloys and intermetallic compounds lead to stronger and long-range indirect-exchange interaction which is named RKKY interaction. The Hamiltonian involved with the RKKY interaction is $H = J(r) {\rm \overline{S}}_i \cdot {\rm \overline{S}}_j$. When the magnetic impurities or localized moments embed in a sea of conduction electron, it cause a damped oscillation in the susceptibility of conduction electrons and thereby, coupling between ${\rm \overline{S}}_i$ and ${\rm \overline{S}}_j$ is given by $$J(r) = 6\pi ZJ^{2}N(E_{F})\left[\frac{\sin(2{\rm \overline{k}}_{F}r)}{(2{\rm \overline{k}}_{F}r)^{4}} - \frac{\cos(2{\rm \overline{k}}_{F}r)}{(2{\rm \overline{k}}_{F}r)^{3}}\right].$$ In the above expression $Z$ is the number of conduction electrons per atom, $J$ the $s-d$ exchange constant, $N(E_F)$ the density of states at Fermi level, ${\rm \overline{k}}_{F}$ the Fermi wave vector and $r$ the distance between two magnetic impurities. Thus, sign of impurity coupling (positive for FM and negative for AFM interactions) varies with distance ($r$) giving rise to variety of magnetic ground states from Kondo regime, SG, cluster SG, RSG and long range magnetic ordering with increasing concentration of the magnetic impurity @mydosh. Depending on variations of distances between impurity states, coexisting magnetic phases are quite frequently observed in variety of diluted magnetic alloys. Thus, magnetic alloys having coexisting magnetic phases are one of the promising candidates for investigating EB effect. Until now, EB effect has been reported in Laves phase intermetallic compounds, binary alloys and few magnetic shape memory alloys. The trend of experimental experimental results triggers the renewed attention of investigating EB effect in variety of alloys comprised of various coexisting magnetic phases that have well defined ground states. In the next section EB effect in alloys and intermetallic compounds will be reviewed in three following subsections. Laves phase intermetallic compounds and alloys ---------------------------------------------- First signature of EB effect was reported in a Laves phase intermetallic compound, UMn$_2$ @lin-UMn2. When the sample was cooled in a static field, an asymmetry in magnetic hysteresis loop was noticed. This asymmetry was proposed to be a manifestation of EB effect. UMn$_2$ was described as an AFM compound associated with a small parasitic FM component which was attributed to uncompensated sublattice moment or uncompensated domain wall magnetization, although absence of long range magnetic ordering was confirmed recently by $^{55}$Mn NMR and NQR investigations @giri-NMR-NQR. Very recently, an interesting observation of EB effect has also been reported for R$_{1-x}$Gd$_x$Al$_2$ @EB-thamiz-TOM [@EB-thamiz-EPL] and Sm$_{0.975}$Gd$_{0.025}$Cu$_4$Pd @grover1 in the vicinity of compensation temperature, at which ZFC magnetization changed its sign. Analogous to that observed in sign change of magnetization, change in sign of $H_E$ was noticed close to compensation temperature in polycrystalline, Sm$_{0.98}$Gd$_{0.02}$Al$_2$, polycrystalline, Pr$_{0.8}$Gd$_{0.2}$Al$_2$ and single crystalline, Nd$_{0.75}$Gd$_{0.25}$Al$_2$. An example of temperature dependence of EB field ($H_{exch}$) and corresponding effective coercivity ($H_{C}^{eff}$) are displayed in figure 5 for single crystalline, Nd$_{0.75}$Gd$_{0.25}$Al$_2$ @EB-thamiz-EPL. Below compensation temperature $H_E$ almost vanished for Sm$_{0.98}$Gd$_{0.02}$Al$_2$ and Nd$_{0.75}$Gd$_{0.25}$Al$_2$ whereas a small value of $H_E$ was observed in Pr$_{0.8}$Gd$_{0.2}$Al$_2$, exhibiting increasing trend of $H_E$ with decreasing temperature. Above a threshold field, the conduction electron polarization was also found to reverse its sign at the compensation temperature. The authors suggested that this effect was correlated with the observed phase reversal in $H_E$. Here, interesting temperature dependence of $H_E$ probes insight into the microscopic views of coexisting magnetic structures in the vicinity of compensation temperature of these alloys. Similar to that observed in those Laves phase compounds, rare earth based intermetallics, SmScGe and NdScGe also exhibited EB effect near-zero net magnetization with substitutions of 6-9 atomic % of Nd and 25 atomic % of Gd, respectively @EB-kulk-JPD. These magnetically ordered materials with 'no-net' magnetization and appreciable conduction electron polarization displayed signature of $H_E$ which could be tuned by the substitution. Recently, Kulkarni <span>*et al*</span>. has demonstrated variety of EB phenomenology in FM Sm intermetallic compounds viz., SmCu$_4$Pd, SmPtZn, SmCd, SmZn, SmScGe and SmAl$_2$ having different crystallographic structures @grover1. They suggested that EB was ascribed to compensation between local 4$f$-orbital and 4$f$-spin contribution of the magnetic moment of Sm$^{3+}$. Signature of EB was observed in amorphous ErCo$_2$ film due to field cooling. The EB effect was found to increase with decreasing temperature down to 4 K, which started from 400 K being the highest available temperature @EB-oner-PhysicaB. The EB was proposed to arise from exchange interaction at the microscopic interfaces between antiferromagnetically correlated subdomains and ferromagnetically correlated subdomains of Er atoms. Magnetic hysteresis measured in a bulk amorphous alloy with composition Nd$_{60}$Fe$_{30}$Al$_{10}$ cooled in an external field of 100 kOe revealed existence of strong unidirectional anisotropy over a wide temperature range @EB-hong-JMMM. The $H_E$ was considerably high ($\sim$ 8 kOe) at 4.2 K. The existence of this anisotropy was suggested due to magnetic ordering having two secondary antiferromagnetic phases. Binary alloys ------------- Kouvel and his co-workers extensively reported the evidences of exchange anisotropy in few binary alloys such as Ni-Mn @kou1 [@kou3; @kou5; @kou6; @kou7], Cu-Mn @kou7, Ag-Mn @kou2, Co-Mn @kou4 and Fe-Mn @kou5 alloys where some of them have classically well-defined magnetic ground states. Kouvel summarized his works in a review where he demonstrated that exchange anisotropy in variety of binary alloys was attributed to coexistence of FM and AFM or SG phases @kou. The most extensively studied materials are solid solution of Ni-Mn alloys where magnetic ground state as well as exchange anisotropy was changed systematically with increasing Mn concentration. Disordered polycrystalline Ni-Mn alloys of about 20, 25 and 30 atomic percent Mn were cooled from 300 K down to 1.8 K in a magnetic field and their magnetic hysteresis loops were found to be displaced from the origin. The displacement of the loops decreased monotonically and vanished at around $\sim$ 25, $\sim$ 35 and $\sim$ 75 K for 20, 25 and 30 atomic percent Mn, respectively. Torque magnetometry exhibited the unidirectional anisotropy. The evidence of EB anisotropy was also noticed for higher Mn concentration with composition Ni$_3$Mn @kou7. When nickel in composition, Ni$_3$Mn was partially replaced by Fe, a strong exchange anisotropy was observed in alloys for less than about 50 atomic percent Fe @kou5. At higher iron concentrations exchange anisotropy disappeared and it was a simple antiferromagnet. They further proposed that Fe-Ni exchange coupling was strongly FM while both Fe-Mn and Fe-Fe interactions were antiferromagnetic. Similar to that observed in Ni-Mn alloys, Co-Mn alloys of about 25, 30 and 35 atomic percent Mn exhibited signature of exchange anisotropy @kou4. This behaviour was suggested to arise from exchange anisotropy between regions having FM and AFM spin alignments. It was shown that this result combined with statistical compositional fluctuations inherent to a disordered alloy provided a plausible model of exchange anisotropy in these materials. A significant evidence of EB anisotropy was reported in Al-Fe alloys with 50 % and 30 % of Al which was interpreted due to coexistence of ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism in Al-Fe alloys @kou8. Kouvel proposed that anisotropy was complicated in nature which was different from the simplified model proposed in Co/CoO nanostructures. Kouvel further demonstrated signature of EB effect in classical SG systems such as Cu-Mn and Ag-Mn alloys @kou [@kou2]. Magnetic hysteresis loops were displaced from their symmetrical positions around the origin when alloys having 5-30 % Mn in Cu and 10-25 % Mn in Ag were cooled in a static magnetic field. The displacement of hysteresis loop was found to decrease with increasing temperature and its disappearance was found close to the transition temperature. The displacement in magnetic hysteresis loops was described in terms of EB effect. The coexistence of AFM and FM interactions between Mn atoms having different phase separation between them was proposed to interpret EB effect. Heusler alloys -------------- Magnetic Heusler alloys with composition, X$_2$YZ having face-centered cubic crystal structure undergoing a martensitic transition display variety of interesting functional properties @manosa1 [@manosa2]. These effects are commonly interpreted as a consequence of strong coupling between structural and magnetic properties. Associated with this first-order magnetostructural transition these materials also display magnetic shape-memory properties. First example of magnetic shape-memory properties was found in Ni$_2$MnGa single crystal @ulla. The details of magnetostructural properties in magnetic shape memory alloys are beyond the scope of this review. Herein, we focus on observation of EB effect in few magnetic shape memory alloys. ### Cu-Mn-Al alloy The alloy with composition Cu$_{44.7}$Mn$_{20.6}$Al$_{37.7}$ ranging in between Heusler phase and $\kappa$ phase first exhibited signature of EB anisotropy @koga-EB-JPCS. The authors suggested that high coercive force, displaced and constricted hysteresis loops observed in this alloy were attributed to exchange anisotropy interactions between FM domains of Heusler phase and AFM Mn-rich domains. ### Ni-Mn-Sb alloys The evidence of EB effect was recently reported by Khan <span>*et al*</span>. in bulk polycrystalline Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{25+x}$Sb$_{25-x}$ shape memory alloys @khan-EB-APL. The horizontal shifts in hysteresis loops up to $\sim$ 248 Oe were observed for cooling the sample in 50 kOe magnetic field at low temperature. The observed EB phenomenon was attributed to coexistence of AFM and FM exchange interactions in the system. The results provided direct evidence of coexisting magnetic phases in polycrystalline Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{25+x}$Sb$_{25-x}$ from EB effect at low temperature. It was noticed that $H_E$ increased from 174 to 248 Oe with increasing Mn concentration ranging $x$ from 12 to 13.5. The detailed composition dependent EB effect and magnetostructural phase diagram were proposed in Ni-Mn-Sb alloys where EB was reported for 10 $\leq x \leq$ 16 in Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{25+x}$Sb$_{25-x}$ @khan-EB-JPCM. They further demonstrated that temperature, at which EB effect vanished, was found to increase with $x$. In the above composition EB effect ascribed to coexistence of FM and AFM interactions below EB blocking temperature at 100 K was reported at $x$ = 13 @rao-EB-JPD. The EB blocking temperature was defined by a temperature, above which $H_E$ vanished. The strong EB effect has also been reported at $x$ = 13 in Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{25+x}$Sb$_{25-x}$ as a consequence of Co substitution in Ni-site @nayak-EB-JPD-TE. Large EB in Ni$_{50-x}$Co$_{x}$Mn$_{38}$Sb$_{12}$ for $x$ = 0, 2, 3, 4, 5 was attributed to coexistence of FM and AFM phases in the martensitic phase. The $H_E$ was found to increase with increasing $x$. The maximum value of $H_E$ was reported to be $\sim$ 480 Oe at $T$ = 3 K for $x$ = 5 after cooling in 50 kOe which is the highest value reported so far in any Heusler alloys. The increase of AFM coupling resulting from Co substitution was suggested to be responsible for enhancement of EB. They further suggested that phase coexistence appeared due to supercooling of high temperature ferromagnetism and predominant AFM components in the martensitic phase. Training effect was observed which could be satisfactorily analyzed by the empirical formula given in equation (1). Note that $H_E$ involved with the training effect could be analyzed for all $\lambda$ (index number) values unlike other observations where equation (1) typically satisfies $H_E$ with $\lambda$ plots for $\lambda \geq$ 2 @nogues2 [@iglesias]. ### Ni-Mn-In alloys The EB was observed in bulk polycrystalline Ni-Mn-In alloy with composition Ni$_{49.5}$Mn$_{34.5}$In$_{16}$ where FM and AFM phases coexist in the martensitic state @wang-EB-JAP-TE. The $H_E$ and $H_C$ were strongly dependent on temperature. Training effect was investigated which was found to be very small. The mechanism of training effect in this alloy was attributed to depinning of uncompensated AFM spins. They suggested that FM and AFM domains coupled at the interfaces resulted in the EB effect. The signature of EB was also observed in slightly different composition with Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{35}$In$_{15}$ which was suggested due to coexistence of FM and AFM interactions @jing-EB-JALCOM. The $H_E$ vanished above 120 K, close to temperature, around which a distinct peak was noticed in the ZFC magnetization. The EB effect has been investigated in bulk Heusler alloys, Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{50-x}$In$_x$ with 14.5 $\leq x \leq$ 15.2 @pathak-EB-JMMM. The $H_E$ was found to increase sharply with $x$. It showed almost unchanged value of $H_E$ in the range 14.8 $< x <$ 15.2 and then it showed a sharp decrease at $x$ = 15.2. The EB effect has also been investigated in Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{35}$In$_{15-y}$Si$_{y}$ alloys with $y$ = 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 where the effect of Si substitution on EB phenomenon was probed @pathak-EB-IEEE-TOM. The $H_E$ was increased with Si substitution and maximum $H_E$ was observed to be $\sim$ 170 Oe for $x$ = 4 at 5 K for $H_{cool}$ at 50 kOe. ### Ni-Mn-Sn alloys The EB was also reported by Li <span>*et al*</span>. in an another FM shape memory alloy with composition Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{36}$Sn$_{14}$ @li-EB-APL. Analogous to that observed in Ni-Mn based alloys, Ni-Mn-Sn alloy showed a strong temperature dependence of EB effect that decreases sharply with increasing temperature and vanished well below the martensitic transition. Systematic change of EB effect has been reported in Mn-rich Ni-Mn-Sn alloys with composition Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{50-x}$Sn$_x$ as a result in variation of $x$ @khan-EB-JAP. The $H_E$ was found to decrease considerably with increasing $x$ from 14 to 16. This observation was suggested due to coexistence of AFM and FM coupling in the system. They further noted a double-loop structure while cooling the sample in ZFC condition and it was attributed to a striped domain-type structure formed by FM regions of the system. The EB effect associated with the double-loop structure was also noticed in more Mn-rich alloys, Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{50-x}$Sn$_x$ with $x$ = 9 and 11 @chat-EB-JPC. It was observed that EB effect was considerably larger for $x$ = 11 than $x$ = 9. Strong $H_{cool}$ dependence of $H_E$ was observed which exhibited a sharp rise with increasing $H_{cool}$ initially, decreases sharply showing a peak in $H_{cool}$ dependence of $H_E$ and then it shows a slow decreasing trend with further increase in $H_{cool}$. Strong frequency dependence of ac susceptibility results clearly demonstrated SG-like behaviour close to EB blocking temperature, above which EB effect was vanished. The EB effect involved with RSG state at low temperature was reported in Ni$_{50}$Mn$_{34}$Sn$_{16}$ where RSG state was confirmed based on frequency dependence of ac susceptibility results @chat-EB-PRB. The ac susceptibility study indicated an onset of SG freezing near step-like anomaly with a clear frequency shift and RSG was envisaged in terms of coexisting FM and glassy magnetic phases at low temperature at least in field-cooled state. An example of the shift in magnetic hysteresis loop is demonstrated in figure 6(a) where the sample was cooled in different $H_{cool}$. Since a step-like feature was observed in temperature dependence of ZFC magnetization around 80 K, the sample was field cooled from 300 K and 80 K. Field cooling from 300 and 80 K practically did not show any significant difference which is highlighted in figure 6(b). When sample was cooled from 40 K which was below the step-like feature (spin freezing temperature) in temperature dependence of ZFC magnetization, EB effect was not observed. Thus, the EB effect was proposed due to pinning effect at the FM and SG-like interface, unlike rest of the reports found among Ni-Mn based magnetic shape memory alloys where EB effect has been suggested at the FM/AFM interfaces. The SG-like features in the frequency dependence of ac susceptibility was suggested due to spin-frustration attributed to competing FM and AFM interactions at the interfaces. Open issues ----------- The EB effects have been investigated in few binary alloys, Laves phase compounds and Heusler alloys where different aspects of magnetism were focused from EB effect. Evidence of EB effect close to zero magnetization in temperature dependence of ZFC magnetization and change of sign of $H_E$ associated with the change of sign of magnetization observed in few rare earth intermetallic compounds are fascinating @EB-thamiz-TOM [@EB-thamiz-EPL]. Because it can probe coexisting magnetic phases close to significant temperature correlated to the magnetism. The reported experimental results in binary alloys arise some fundamental issues. Kouvel and his group clearly demonstrated evidence of EB phenomenology in diluted binary alloys such as Cu-Mn and Ag-Mn alloys @kou [@kou2] which has been recognised as canonical SG systems @mydosh. This opened up a fundamental issue to reinvestigate magnetic ground state of the canonical SG system or to reinvestigate mechanism of the EB phenomenology in classical SG systems. Thus, EB mechanism in variety of classical SG alloys and oxides needs to be explored extensively. It is noteworthy that evidences of EB effect in Ni-Mn based shape memory alloys are involved with Mn-rich compositions. It has been argued that short-range AFM correlation actually develops and/or becomes stronger in the martensitic phase of Mn-rich Ni-Mn-based shape-memory alloys @enko-AFM [@kren-AFM; @brown-AFM]. However, signature of EB phenomenology in Mn-rich alloys further confirms existence of AFM interactions in the martensitic phase in addition to FM interaction. Until now, few literatures are reported mainly focused on Ni-Mn based Heusler alloys which have been reviewed herein. Still plenty of scopes of exploring EB effect in the magnetic shape memory alloys remain open for understanding the underline mechanism in magnetic shape memory alloys. Exchange bias effect in oxide materials ======================================= Exchange bias in spontaneously phase separated oxides ----------------------------------------------------- ### Mixed-valent manganites having perovskite structure #### A. Charge ordered manganites First evidence of EB effect in mixed valent manganites having perovskite structure was reported in Pr$_{1/3}$Ca$_{2/3}$MnO$_3$ by Niebieskikwiat and Salamon @nieb. This signature in a spontaneously phase separated system created a renewed attention for investigating EB effect in structurally single-phase compounds. When the sample was field cooled down to 5 K, a shift in magnetic hysteresis loop was noticed after subtracting the linear AFM component from experimentally obtained hysteresis loop. An example of shifted loop in the field (horizontal) and magnetization (vertical) axes are shown in figure 7. Training effect was noticed which was satisfactorily analysed by equation (1) for $\lambda \geq$ 2 and equation (2). In order to correlate the relation between horizontal and vertical shifts they proposed a simplified exchange interaction model where single domain FM clusters or droplets were embedded in an AFM matrix, analogous to that considered for single domain FM nanoparticles embedded in a non-FM matrix. Since it behaves like a single domain FM particles without interparticle interaction, the magnetization reversal takes place having forward switching frequency ($\nu_{+}$) and backward switching frequency ($\nu_{-}$). The number of particles switching forward (backward) is given by $\nu_{+} \tau$ ($\nu_{-} \tau$), where $\tau \sim 10^2 - 10^3$ s is typical measurement time. Thus, the change of magnetization associated with switching process is $$M_E/M_S = (\nu_{+} - \nu_{-})\tau$$ where $\nu_{\pm} = \nu_0 \exp[U_{\pm}/k_{B}T]$ with $U_{\pm} \approx KV \pm \mu H_E$. Here, $K$ is the anisotropy constant per unit volume, $V$ the volume of FM cluster, $\mu$ the magnetic moment of FM cluster, $k_{B}$ the Boltzmann constant and $\nu_0$ the switching attempt frequency typically found to be $\sim 10^9$ s. Replacing above parameters in equation (4) the expression is given by $$M_E/M_S = -2\nu_0\tau \exp(KV/k_{B}T)\sinh(\mu H_E/k_{B}T).$$ If $M_E, H_E, M_S$ and $\mu$ are known, $K$ can be determined from the above expression. For $\mu H_E < k_{B}T$ equation (5) can be found in simplified form as $$M_E/M_S \propto -H_E.$$ For Pr$_{1/3}$Ca$_{2/3}$MnO$_3$ the ratio, $\mu H_E/k_{B}T$ was found to be lower than 0.9 which indicated that short range FM clusters embedded in the AFM matrix had a single domain character in this charge ordered compound. Niebieskikwiat and Salamon further proposed a simplified formula to characterize $H_{cool}$ dependence of the shifts in terms of $H_E$ or $M_E$ as $$-H_E \propto M_E/M_S \propto J_i\left[\frac{J_i\mu_0}{(g\mu_B)^2} L\left(\frac{\mu H_{cool}}{k_{B}T_f}\right) + H_{cool}\right].$$ $J_i$ is the interface exchange constant, $g \approx$ 2 the gyromagnetic ratio, $\mu_B$ the Bohr magnetron. $\mu_0$ is the magnetic moment of core Mn spin where $\mu$ is moment of the FM clusters having $\mu$ = $N_v\mu_0$ and $N_v$ is number of spins within the FM clusters. The fit of $H_{cool}$ dependence of the shifts with equation (7) provides the value of $J_i$ and $N_v$. Average size of short range FM clusters are obtained from $N_v$ which was found to be $\sim$ 10 Å for Pr$_{1/3}$Ca$_{2/3}$MnO$_3$ @nieb in accordance with the small angle neutron scattering results @gran-ND [@henn-ND1; @henn-ND2; @henn-ND3]. Thus, systematic investigation of EB effect can provide quantitative estimate in accordance with the results obtained from neutron scattering experiment. It is important to point out that the experimental results and discussions of EB effect in Pr$_{1/3}$Ca$_{2/3}$MnO$_3$ was reported based on the vertical shifts at field, $H$ = 0. This shift is often source of errors for calculating $M_E$ in the EB system. For example, Nogues and his coworkers demonstrated that the vertical shift at different $H_{max}$ showed a decreasing trend with increasing $H_{max}$ and it vanished at $H_{max}$ = 70 kOe for MnO/Mn$_3$O$_4$ nanostructures @noguesJACS. Whereas a considerable stabilized value of the horizontal shift was observed at $H_{max}$ = 70 kOe, confirming the EB effect. To avoid ambiguity ascribed to minor loop effect it is reasonable to estimate the vertical shift at $M_S$ @nogues-ver-shift. In case of structurally single-phase alloys and compounds magnetization does not often saturate even at large $H_{max}$. In such a case plot of the vertical shift at different $H_{max}$ settles the issue where stabilized value of the vertical shift at large $H_{max}$ confirms the EB effect. The signature of EB effect was noticed in an another charge ordered manganite, Nd$_{0.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ where EB effect was attributed to coupling between FM and AFM clusters @prok-EB-JMMM. The coexistence of Griffiths phase and EB effect has been observed in nanocrystalline La$_{1-x}$Ca$_{x}$MnO$_3$ ($x$ = 0.50, 0.67 and 0.75) where charge ordered state in the bulk counterpart were suppressed by decreasing grain size @zhou-EB-JAP. Moreover, field dependent magnetization revealed that short-range AFM region was still present in those nanoparticles which coupled to FM phase developed in nanocrystalline compound, leading to the EB phenomenology. #### B. Exchange bias ascribed to the rare-earth moment in Eu$_{0.5}$R$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ ($R$ = Pr and Sm) Recently, a strong evidences of EB were observed in new series of bulk polycrystalline manganites with composition, Eu$_{0.5}$Pr$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ @arindam and Eu$_{0.5}$Sm$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ @arindam1. An example of the negative and positive shifts for 10 and -10 kOe cooling field is shown in figure 8 for Eu$_{0.5}$Pr$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ which is typical manifestation of the EB effect. The shift was absent for zero-field cooling. A large $H_E$ of $\sim$ 1 kOe was observed at 5 K for $H_{cool}$ = 5 kOe. Interestingly, training effect was absent which is demonstrated in figure 9 at 5 K. Inset of figure further highlights that hysteresis loop exactly repeats even after third field cycling. The results were suggested due to stable interface moment involved with the EB phenomenon. It was noted that $H_E$ vanished above $T_{R}$ corresponding to ordering of rare-earth moment where EB effect was suggested due to pinning effect at the interface between disordered AFM and FM components. The signature of FM component was observed below $T_{R}$ in ZFC magnetization ($M_{ZFC}$). It is to be noted that signature of $T_{R}$ was observed by broad maximum in the plot of $M_{FC}/M_{ZFC}$ vs. $T$ which shown in the inset of figure 8. $M_{ZFC}$ and $M_{FC}$ are the ZFC and FC magnetization. Since anisotropy of rare-earth moment is typically larger than Mn-moment, $H_E$ reasonably vanished close to $T_R$, analogous to that observed in Co/CoO nanostructures where $T_N$ corresponding to highly anisotropic AFM CoO is less than $T_C$ corresponding to less anisotropic FM Co. The EB effect in Eu$_{0.5}$Sm$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ also displays similar results where FM-like transition at $T_R$ in Eu$_{0.5}$Pr$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ exhibits FIM behaviour in Eu$_{0.5}$Sm$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ @arindam1. #### C. Other manganites The EB effect was recently reported in single crystal of Gd$_{2/3}$Ca$_{1/3}$MnO$_3$. This was attributed to spontaneously phase separated inhomogeneous ferrimagnetism @haber-EB-JMMM. The EB effect was strongly dependent on direction of external magnetic field which changed its sign at the compensation temperature around 16 K. The EB effect was observed in a spontaneous lamellar FM/AFM phase separated manganite, Y$_{0.2}$Ca$_{0.8}$MnO$_3$ @qian-EB-APL. The $H_{cool}$ dependence of $H_E$ showed that $H_E$ was decreased to 37 % of the value for increasing $H_{cool}$ from 10 kOe to 60 kOe. The $H_E$ was also found to be proportional to inverse of $M_S$, suggesting that $H_E$ was inversely proportional to the size of FM domain. The EB effect associated with the CG-like and SG-like states has been reported in $L_{0.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$MnO$_3$ ($L$ = Y, Y$_{0.5}$Sm$_{0.5}$ and Y$_{0.5}$La$_{0.5}$) @BKC-EB-PRB. Training effect was observed and analysed by equation (1) for $\lambda \geq$ 2 and equation (2). Cooling field dependence of EB effect showed that $H_E$ was found to increase sharply and then it decreased due to growth of FM cluster. The EB effect was suggested at the FM and SG-like interfaces. The effect of Mn-site substitution and EB effect have been investigated in La$_{1-y}$Mn$_{1-x}$Fe$_{x}$O$_3$ @patra-EPJB07 [@de-JPD08; @thakur-JPCM08] and Bi$_{0.4}$Ca$_{0.6}$Mn$_{1-x}$Ti$_x$O$_3$ @zhu-JPD09. First report of EB effect as a result of Mn-site substitution was found in LaMn$_{0.7}$Fe$_{0.3}$O$_3$ @patra-EPJB07. It was noticed that EB effect was observed only at 30 % of Fe substitution which was absent for other compositions with different percentage of Fe content. The model proposed in CG-like state comprised of short range FM clusters embedded in a SG-like matrix was suggested at low temperature for this compound where EB was proposed due to pinning effect at the FM and SG interface. The $H_E$ was vanished close to spin-freezing temperature. The average size of FM cluster was $\approx$ 25 Å as estimated from the analysis of $H_{cool}$ dependence of $H_E$ at 5 K using equation (7). The $H_E$ was found to decrease up to 45 % for an increase of $H_{cool}$ from 5 kOe to 12 kOe. Grain size effect on EB was investigated on LaMn$_{0.7}$Fe$_{0.3}$O$_3$ with average size 20, 90 and 300 nm @thakur-JPCM08. The $H_E$ decreased considerably with an increase of particle size and weak EB effect was still observed for the particle with 300 nm average size. It was notable to point out that finite size effect of $H_E$ as a function of $H_{cool}$ showed anomalous behaviour. The results are displayed in figure 10. The values of $H_E$ were considerably larger for the particles with 90 nm size than the particles having 20 nm size for $H_{cool} \leq$ 4 kOe. The values of $H_E$ for the particles having 20 nm size overshoot the value of $H_E$ of the particles with 90 nm size for $H_{cool} >$ 4 KOe. The results clearly demonstrate that grain size effect of $H_E$ strongly depends on cooling field. It has also been noticed that larger $H_E$ was involved with larger $H_C$ which is displayed in the inset of figure 10. Inset of the figure further showed that initially increase of $H_E$ is associated with increase of $H_C$, The slope of increase of $H_C$ is considerably decreased while $H_E$ decreases with $H_{cool}$ in the high-field region of the plot. With increasing grain size average size of FM clusters was proposed to increase, resulting in considerable decrease of $H_E$. From the fits of $H_{cool}$ dependence of EB effect using equation (7) average sizes of the short range FM clusters were $\approx$ 10 and $\approx$ 30 Å for the samples with grain size 20 and 90 nm, respectively. The $H_{cool}$ dependences of $H_E$ and fits of the experimental data using equation (7) are shown in figure 10. Signature of EB effect was also noticed in La$_{0.87}$Mn$_{0.7}$Fe$_{0.3}$O$_3$ @de-JPD08. The effect was found to be weaker for La-deficient, La$_{0.87}$Mn$_{0.7}$Fe$_{0.3}$O$_3$ than La-stoichiometric, LaMn$_{0.7}$Fe$_{0.3}$O$_3$ where weaker $H_E$ was proposed to be associated with the larger size ($\approx$ 63 Å) of short range FM clusters. Thus results of EB phenomenon provide a significant information that La-deficiency in these compounds leads to the increase of FM clusters. The EB has also been investigated in charge ordered compound, Bi$_{0.4}$Ca0$_{0.6}$Mn$_{1-x}$Ti$_{x}$O$_3$ (0 $\leq x \leq$ 0.2) @zhu-JPD09. The EB parameters were strongly depending on Ti substitution. In particular, $H_E$ showed a nonmonotonic variation with a maximum at Bi$_{0.4}$Ca$_{0.6}$Mn$_{0.92}$Ti$_{0.08}$O$_3$. The EB has been interpreted in terms of density of FM nanodomains superposed on the AFM matrix. The results suggested that it was possible to tune EB through Mn-site substitution in charge ordered manganites by controlling density of FM nanodomains. ### Mixed-valent cobaltites having perovskite structure #### A. La$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ The mixed-valent cobaltites with perovskite structure experience a delicate interplay between charge, spin state, transport, magnetic and structural degrees of freedom, exhibiting a complex phase separation scenario @wu-PS-PRB [@stau-PS-PRB]. First evidence of EB effect was attributed to the spontaneous phase separation as reported in cobaltites, La$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ by Tang <span>*et al*</span>. @tang-EB-PRB [@tang-EB-JAP]. Training effect was investigated and was satisfactorily analysed by using equation (1) for $\lambda \geq$ 2 and equation (2). Maximum EB effect was found in La$_{0.88}$Sr$_{0.12}$CoO$_3$ where $H_E$ was decreased to 40 % for an increase of $H_{cool}$ from 20 kOe to 50 kOe @tang-EB-JAP. In order to confirm EB effect attributed to grain interior spontaneous phase separation, investigation was performed in a single crystal with composition, La$_{0.82}$Sr$_{0.18}$CoO$_3$ where EB effect was ascribed to pinning effect at the FM and SG interface @huang-EB-JPCM. The analysis of $H_{cool}$ dependence of $H_E$ using equation (7) provided coupling constant $\approx$ -0.68 meV at the interface between FM and SG phases and average size of FM clusters $\approx$ 0.9 nm. The $H_{cool}$ and $H_{max}$ dependences of EB effect were further investigated in La$_{0.82}$Sr$_{0.18}$CoO$_3$ @yuaLSCO. The $M_E$ was found to vanish whereas $H_E$ was $\sim$ 450 Oe at 3 K for $\left|H_{max}\right| \geq$ 40 kOe. They further investigated $H_{cool}$ dependence of training effect which could be analysed by equation (1) and equation (2). The results indicated suppression of SG region with increasing $H_{cool}$ that played a significant role in decrease of $H_E$. Grain size effect on magnetic CG properties of La$_{0.88}$Sr$_{0.12}$CoO$_3$ was investigated for the samples with 35, 135 and 240 nm grain sizes where systematic observation of EB effect was exploited to probe microscopic insight of the grain interior spontaneous phase separation scenario @patra-EB-JPCM10. The bulk compound is a CG compound composed of short range FM clusters embedded in the SG matrix at low temperature @wu-PS-PRB. The short range FM clusters were still retained in the nanocrystalline form with average size 35 nm associated with the SG component which was confirmed by considerable EB effect. The EB effect manifested by the shift of hysteresis loop was observed due to field cooling where the effect was found to be weakened monotonously with decreasing grain size. The decrease in fraction of FM component was found to be correlated with the weakening of EB effect with decreasing grain size. The $H_{cool}$ dependence of $H_E$ and $M_E$ scaled by $M_S$ ($M_E/M_S$) were investigated (figure 11). Inset of figure 11(a) exhibits the plots of $H_C$ with $H_{cool}$ where initial sharp rise of $H_E$ are associated with increase of $H_C$. Eventually $H_C$ shows a decreasing trend with increasing $H_{cool} \geq$ 10 kOe, analogous to that observed in the $H_E$ vs $H_{cool}$ plot. The plot of $M_E/M_S$ shows similar $H_{cool}$ dependence up to 10 kOe which is demonstrated in the inset of figure 11(b) by linear plot of $M_E/M_S$ against $H_E$. For $H_{cool} \geq$ 10 kOe plot deviates from the linearity. According to equation (6) linear plot for $\mu H_E < k_B T$ indicates single domain structure of the FM clusters. It was suggested that growth of FM clusters and $\mu$ were increased with increasing $H_{cool}$ where the relation, $\mu H_E < k_B T$ did not hold for $H_{cool} \geq$ 10 kOe. Furthermore, $H_E$ \[figure 12(a)\] and $H_C$ \[inset of figure 12(a)\] were found to decrease linearly with $H_{cool}$ above 10 kOe. It is notable that $H_E$ decreases to 60% for sizes $\sim$ 135 nm and $\sim$ 240 nm whereas it decreases to 50% for 35 nm with the increase of $H_{cool}$ from 10 to 50 kOe. The decrease of $H_E$ was suggested to be associated with growth of FM clusters in accordance with the model proposed by Meiklejohn and Bean @meik3 $$H_E = J_{ex}/(M_{FM} \times t_{FM}).$$ $J_{ex}$ is the exchange constant across the FM/AFM interface per unit area, $M_{FM}$ the magnetization and $t_{FM}$ the thickness of the FM layer. The increase of $M_{FM}$ associated with increase of $t_{FM}$ in denominator of the above expression decreases the magnitude of $H_E$. It was further suggested that increase of M$_{50}$ (magnetization at 50 kOe) with increasing $H_{cool}$ indicated the rise of average size of FM clusters due to increase of $H_{cool}$ for $H_{cool} >$ 10 kOe. The values of $H_E$ against 1/$M_{50}$ are plotted in figure 12(b) for all the particles. It was evident from the plots that the values of $H_E$ were inversely proportional to $M_{50}$, i.e. average size of FM clusters. The slope defined as $dH_{E}/d(M_{50}^{-1})$ was found to increase with increasing grain size \[see figure 12(b)\], indicating that EB effect for particles having largest average size is more sensitive to inverse of $M_S$ or $H_{cool}$. #### B. Nd$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ Similar to that observed in La$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$, the series of cobaltites, Nd$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ also displays spontaneous phase separation scenario @stau-PS-PRB. For low doping range (0 $< x <$ 0.18) SG or CG state has been proposed with resistivity showing a semiconducting temperature dependence. With further increase in hole doping the short range FM clusters begin to coalesce above a percolation threshold ($x >$ 0.18) to attain magnetic long range ordering and start to show metallic conductivity in the ordered state. The coexistence of FIM and FM ordering was reported for 0.20 $\leq x \leq$ 0.60. The spontaneous phase separation scenario and EB effect were recently investigated in Nd$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ @patraJPCM1 [@patraSSC]. Below the percolation threshold the EB effect was attributed to pinning effect at the interface between FM and SG phases @patraSSC. The $H_E$ and $M_E$ showed training effect which was in accordance with equation (1) for $\lambda \geq$ 2 and equation (2). The plot of $M_E/M_S$ against $H_E$ was linear for $H_{cool}$ in the range 0 $\leq H_{cool} \leq$ 50 kOe which indicated single domain structure of the FM clusters below the percolation limit. The EB effect was also performed at $x$ = 0.20 and 0.40 where maximum EB effect was observed close to the percolation threshold at $x$ = 0.20 @patraJPCM1. This was attributed to FM and FIM interface where $H_E$ vanished close to FIM ordering temperature. It was noted that the linear plot of $M_E/M_S$ with $H_E$ was also observed at $x$ = 0.20 close to the percolation threshold which confirmed single domain structure of the FM clusters. In fact, single domain structure of FM clusters was also observed even well above the percolation threshold at $x$ = 0.40. The analysis of $H_{cool}$ dependence of $M_E/M_S$ using equation (7) provided average size of the FM clusters $\sim$ 20 Å and $\sim$ 40 Å for $x$ = 0.20 and 0.40, respectively. #### C. Pr$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ The EB effect was recently observed in Pr$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$CoO$_3$ close to the percolation threshold ($x$ = 0.25) at $x$ = 0.20 and 0.30 where stronger effect was noticed in $x$ = 0.30 @patraJAP. Training effect was observed which could be analysed by equation (1) for $\lambda \geq$ 2 and equation (2). The linear behaviour of $H_E$ with $M_{E}/M_{S}$ in agreement with equation (6) indicated single domain structure of the FM clusters where EB effect was attributed to pinning effect at the FM/SG interface. The considerable decrease of $H_E$ ($\sim$ 66%) was observed for an increase in $H_{cool}$ from 7.5 to 50 kOe. The decrease of $H_E$ above $H_{cool}$ = 7.5 kOe was correlated with the growth of FM clusters in accordance with equation (8). ### Other oxides with perovskite structure #### A. Ferrites Signature of EB effect in multiferroic BiFeO$_3$ film @all-APL09 [@leb-PRB10] opens up a fundamental question whether structurally single-phase BiFeO$_3$ is a magnetically inhomogeneous material. The EB effect has also been observed in bulk, Bi$_{1-x}$La$_{x}$FeO$_3$ with $x$ = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.20
{'source': 'arXiv_out/1107'}