--- abstract: 'VLA observations and <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum observations are presented of the barred-spiral galaxy NGC 3145. In optical images NGC 3145 has stellar arms that appear to cross, forming "X"-features. Our radio continuum observations rule out shock fronts at three of the four "X" features, and our data provide evidence of gas motions perpendicular to the disk of NGC 3145. In large portions of NGC 3145, particularly in the middle-to-outer disk, the line-profiles are skewed. Relative to the disk, the gas in the skewed wing of the line-profiles has $z$-motions away from us on the approaching side of the galaxy and $z$-motions of about the same magnitude ($\sim 40$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) toward us on the receding side. These warping motions imply that there has been a perturbation with a sizeable component perpendicular to the disk over large spatial scales. Two features in NGC 3145 have velocities indicating that they are out-of-plane tidal arms. One is an apparent branch of a main spiral arm on the northeastern side of NGC 3145; the velocity of the branch is $\sim 150$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> greater than the spiral arm where they appear to intersect in projection. The other is the arm on the southwestern side that forms three of the "X"-features. It differs in velocity by $\sim 56$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> from that of the disk at the same projected location. observations are presented also of the two small companions NGC 3143 and PGC 029578. Based on its properties (enhanced SFR, emission 50% more extended on its northeastern side, etc.), NGC 3143 is the more likely of the two companions to have interacted with NGC 3145 recently. A simple analytic model demonstrates that an encounter between NGC 3143 and NGC 3145 is a plausible explanation for the observed warping motions in NGC 3145.' author: - | Michele Kaufman, Elias Brinks, Curtis Struck, Bruce G. Elmegreen,\ and Debra M. Elmegreen title: 'A Warp in Progress: and Radio Continuum Observations of the Spiral NGC 3145' --- Introduction ============ at a distance of 54.8 Mpc is a barred spiral galaxy with grand-design spiral arms and some peculiar stellar morphology. In the Hubble Atlas of Galaxies, @sandage61 writes about NGC 3145 "There is a single faint arm in the southwest quadrant which crosses one of the regular arms nearly at right angles. This is a very rare feature of galaxies ..." We were intrigued by this description and by the presence of three additional places where stellar arms also appear to cross, forming "X"-features, in NGC 3145. The goal of this paper is to understand these puzzling features by investigating what is happening in the interstellar gas at the "X"-features and elsewhere in the galaxy. NGC 3145 has two smaller companions: the barred spiral and the Sdm galaxy . We refer to these three galaxies as the NGC 3145 triplet. The top panel in Figure\[B.Features\] displays a $B$-band image of NGC 3145 with some of the optical oddities marked, and the bottom panel displays the <span>*Hubble Space Telescope*</span> (HST) $R$-band image of the southern half of this galaxy. On the southern side of the galaxy, arms cross and outline an apparent optical triangle with base $12''$, height $15''$, and apices labelled $a$ (the eastern apex), $b$ (the southern apex), and $c$ (the western apex). We refer below to this feature as the <span>*triangle*</span>. Sandage's peculiar arm outlines the eastern edge of the <span>*triangle*</span>. It crosses the inner spiral arm, forming an "X"-feature at apex $a$; at apex $b$ it produces another "X"-feature. At the location marked $f$ in Figure\[B.Features\], it creates what looks like another "X"-feature. The inner spiral arm, which has a major dust lane along its concave side, outlines the northern edge of the <span>*triangle*</span>, connecting apices $a$ and $c$. Another arm connects apices $b$ and $c$ to form the western edge of the <span>*triangle*</span>. At apex $b$ it meets Sandage's peculiar arm. Southward of apex $b$ the two arms diverge, and Sandage's peculiar arm extends to the west. We call the latter the western antenna and label it $e$ in this Figure. On the northeastern side of NGC 3145, we label as Feature $d$ the location where a feature that optically looks like a spiral-arm branch departs from the main spiral arm. We shall refer to this as the <span>*branch*</span> even though the data presented here suggest that it is a tidal arm. In his study of caustic waveforms in two dimensions, @struck90 notes that the <span>*triangle*</span> in NGC 3145 resembles a swallowtail caustic. In a swallowtail caustic, five intersecting star streams create a triangular region outlined by arms plus two thin antennae emerging from one of the triangle's vertices. In his study, swallowtail caustics develop within expanding pseudo-rings. Gas streams do not pass through each other without colliding and shocking. To study the above optical anomalies and look for other unusual features in the gas, we made Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA)[^1] observations of the NGC 3145 triplet and <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span>radio continuum observations of NGC 3145. We use the radio continuum image to check on whether there are strong shock fronts at the "X"-features as would be expected if the intersecting arms are in the same plane. The purpose of the data is to look for evidence of gas flows in extra-planar gas and gas flows perpendicular to the disk over large spatial scales, e.g., are there multiple components in the line profiles. For edge-on galaxies displacements above the disk would be obvious. Since the inclination $i$ of NGC 3145 is $50\degr - 55\degr$, we get only indirect information. <span>lccc</span> Morphological type & SB(rs)bc & SB(s)b & Sdm\ Right ascension (J2000) & $10^h 10^m 09\fs869$ & $10^h 10^m 03\fs98$ & $10^h 10^m 02\fs32$\ Declination (J2000) & $-12\degr 26' 01\farcs6$ & $-12\degr 34' 52\farcs9$ & $-12\degr 38' 51\farcs6$\ $v_{\rm sys}$(helio) (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & $3652 \pm 6$ & $3536$ & $3586 \pm 30$\ Isophotal major diameter $D_{25} $ & $194'' \pm 13''$ & $52'' \pm 8.7''$ & $102'' \pm 16.6''$\ $D_{25}$ diameter (kpc) & 51 & 14 & 27\ $B_T$ (RC3) (mag) & $12.54 \pm 0.13$ & $14.9 \pm 0.20$ &\ Corrected $B_T^0$ & 11.82 & 14.46 &\ Galactic $A_B$ & 0.234 & 0.244 & 0.25\ $M_B$ (mag) & $-21.87$ & $-19.2$ &\ $B$ (Fick Obs.) (mag) & & 15.2 & 16.6\ $R$ (Fick Obs.) (mag) & & 13.7 & 15.3\ $(B - V)_T^0$ & 0.63 & 0.50 &\ $(K_s)_{\rm total}$ (mag) & $8.62 \pm 0.029$ & $11.46 \pm 0.11$ &\ $J_{\rm total} $ & $9.59 \pm 0.017$ & $12.20 \pm 0.05$ &\ $i$ from axis ratio & $55\degr$ & $35\degr$ & $68\degr$\ Major Axis PA from $K_s$ & $205\degr$ & $225\degr$ &\ Projected separation from NGC 3145 (kpc) & 0 & 141 & 204\ Distance (Mpc) & 54.8 & 54.8 & 54.8\ Scale (pc per $1''$) & 262 & 262 & 262\ . NGC 3145 is one of the 11 galaxies in the seminal study by @rubin78 on extended rotation curves of high-luminosity spiral galaxies. @rubin82 include NGC 3145 in their study of the rotational properties of Sb/bc galaxies from optical observations of the rotation curves along the major axis. Their data are used by @persic91 in fitting a universal rotation curve to spiral galaxies. Our observations are the first determination of the velocity field image of NGC 3145 and the kinematic parameters derived from it. It is important to know if gas flows perpendicular to the disk have a significant effect on its rotation curve. From the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), we adopt a redshift-based distance for NGC 3145 of 54.8 Mpc, which is cosmology-corrected to the 3 K microwave background reference frame with $H_0$ = 73 kpc s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_m$ = 0.27, and $\Omega_\lambda$ = 0.73 . Then $1''$ = 262 pc. Table\[basic.optical\] lists basic optical and near-infrared properties of the NGC 3145 triplet from the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database and includes data from the Third Reference Catalogue [@deVau91] and from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (<span>*2MASS*</span>) [@skrut06]. In the literature, there is not very much data about the two companions, and the determination of their systemic velocities has had a checkered history. Our observations resolve the issues about the systemic velocities of the companions and provide values of their masses. Our velocity field image of PGC 029578 allows us to calculate its dynamical mass. All of the velocities listed in this paper are heliocentric and use the optical definition of the nonrelativistic Doppler shift. Section 2 describes our VLA observations, data reduction, and additional images used in this paper. Section 3 discusses the broad-band optical, <span>H$\alpha$</span>, radio continuum, and infrared properties of NGC 3145. Section 4 presents the properties of NGC 3145. Section 5 presents our results on the two companions. Section 6 summarizes and discusses our conclusions. A simple analytic model for the encounter is given in the Appendix. \[observe\] Observations and data reduction =========================================== Observations ------------- We observed the NGC 3145 triplet in at the VLA for 4.75 hr (on target) in C configuration on 1993 July 16 and for 1 hr in D configuration on 1993 October 31. The phase calibrator was 0941-080. For the D configuration observations 3C 286 served as the flux standard and bandpass calibrator. For the C configuration observations 3C 48 and 3C 286 were the flux standards and bandpass calibrators. The phase center was R.A., decl. (2000) = 10 10 06.915, -12 29 46.80. We used on-line Hanning smoothing. emission is present for heliocentric velocities 3407 to 3919 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. For the correlator mode, we adopted the same type of 4IF (intermediate frequency) mode used by @elmegreen95 for observations of NGC 2207/IC 2163. Thus we made simultaneously (a) observations with a channel width of 21.13 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> in IFC and IFD (left circular polarization) and (b) observations with a channel width of 5.28 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> in IFA and IFB (right circular polarization). The line-free channels of the data taken with 21.13 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution provide the continuum to subtract from the higher velocity-resolution data. The latter had no line-free channels at the low frequency end and only a short range of line-free channels at the high frequency end. In retrospect, this was not the best choice of correlator mode for the NGC 3145 observations because of beam squint, as explained below. The AIPS software package was used for the data reduction and analysis. The 4 IFs plus two configurations resulted in 8 $uv$ data sets. In each of these, two channels suffered radio frequency interference (RFI) which occurred at different frequencies in the various data sets. To correct for this, we made a continuum image from the line-free channels of IFC and IFD and subtracted the clean components of the brighter continuum sources from every channel in each of the 8 $uv$ data sets. Then for the channels affected by RFI, we interactively clipped any signal above 1 to 2 Jy. For each $uv$ data set separately, we generated "dirty" data cubes of line plus residual continuum emission, subtracted the residual continuum obtained from IFC and IFD, and cleaned the cubes. Then combining the data from C and D configurations, we repeated the mapping and cleaning and merged the IFs to create one cube with 21.13 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution and one with 5.28 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution. After inspection, we decided to omit the 5.28 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution data taken with D configuration because beam squint, i.e., a slight difference in pointing between the left and right polarization detectors, caused a problem for the D-configuration data when the continuum derived from IFC plus IFD was subtracted from the observations made with IFA and IFB. Since beam squint is less of a problem for C-configuration, we kept the C-configuration data cubes with 5.28 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution, but to increase the S/N we averaged the channels to 10.57 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution. <span>lcccc</span> Configuration & C + D & C + D & C & C\ Channel width (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & 21.13 & 21.13 & 10.57 & 5.28\ Weighting & Natural & Robust 0.1 & Natural & Natural\ PSF (FWHM, PA) & $30\farcs6 \times 18\farcs4, -31\degr$ & $22\farcs0 \times 14\farcs7, - 28\degr$ & $ 27\farcs3 \times 16\farcs6, - 29\degr$ & $27\farcs3 \times 16\farcs6, -29\degr$\ Pixel Size & $5''$ & $5''$ & $5''$ & $5''$\ Number of channels & 32 & 32 & 52 & 104\ $T_b/I$ (K/<span>mJybeam$^{-1}$</span>) & 1.10 & 1.92 & 1.37 & 1.37\ $\sigma_{\rm rms}$ (<span>mJybeam$^{-1}$</span>) & 0.50 & 0.58 & 0.74 & 1.04\ To select areas of genuine emission, we convolved the cube made with natural weight and 21.1 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> channels to $60''$ resolution, clipped bhale@example.net times its rms noise, and retained regions of emission only if the feature appeared in at least two adjacent velocity channels. The resulting cube was applied as a blanking mask to the other cubes. Table\[HIcubes\] lists properties of our four final data subcubes. The one with highest sensitivity is Cube 1, made from C plus D configuration data with natural weighting and 21.1 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution. The one with highest spatial resolution is Cube 2, made from C plus D configuration data with Robust = 0.1 in the AIPS task IMAGR and 21.1 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution. The cube with highest velocity-resolution (and the largest rms noise) is Cube 4 made from C configuration data alone with natural weighting and 5.28 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution. Cube 3 was made from Cube 4 by averaging the channels to 10.57 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution to reduce the rms noise. For the line-of-sight column density image displayed in the figures below, we convolved the zeroth moment image made from Cube 2 to a circular $22''$ (HPBW) beam and corrected for primary-beam attentuation. This correction factor has a mean value of 1.04 at the location of NGC 3145, 1.07 at the location of NGC 3143, and 1.26 at the location of PGC 029578. For NGC 3145, we find the integrated line flux $S$(HI) is 20.4 Jy <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, which corresponds to an mass $M$(HI) of $1.4 \times 10^{10}$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. Our value of $S$(HI) for NGC 3145 is 30% greater than the Parkes All Sky Survey value [@doyle05] of 15.4 Jy <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. For NGC 3143, we find $S$(HI) is 0.91 Jy <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, and thus $M$(HI) = $6.5 \times 10^8$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. As we shall see below, NGC 3143 is somewhat deficient in . For PGC 029578, we find $S$(HI) is 4.7 Jy <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, and thus $M$(HI) = $3.3 \times 10^9$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. Radio Continuum Observations at <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> ----------------------------------------------------------- With the VLA, we observed NGC 3145 in the radio continuum at a central frequency of 4860.1 MHz for 1 hr (on target) in C configuration on 1994 October 21 and for 48 min in D configuration on 1995 May 13. The observations were made with one IF bhale@example.net MHz and the bhale@example.net MHz, each with a 50 MHz bandwidth. The phase center was R.A., decl.(2000) = 10 10 09.995, -12 26 01.90, within $2''$ of the NGC 3145 nucleus. The phase calibrator was 0941-080, and the flux calibrator was 3C 286. The smaller galaxies NGC 3143 and PGC 029578 were too far from the phase center to be detected. The AIPS software was used for the data reduction. After calibrating the $uv$ data from each VLA configuration separately and checking the separate maps, we combined the $uv$ data from the two configurations and ran the AIPS task IMAGR with ROBUST = 0 to make and clean a map with synthesized beam $7.4'' \times 5.5''$ (HPBW) and BPA = $12\degr$. A surface brightness of 1 <span>mJybeam$^{-1}$</span> corresponds to $T_b$ = 1.275 K, and the rms noise $\sigma_{\rm rms}$ is 0.0224 <span>mJybeam$^{-1}$</span>, equivalent to $T_b$ = 0.029 K. The mean correction for primary beam attenuation in NGC 3145 is a factor of 1.009. We also convolved this image to a circular beam of $7.5''$ (HPBW). In this image, displayed in the figures below, a surface brightness of 1 <span>mJybeam$^{-1}$</span> corresponds to $T_b$ = 0.920 K and the rms noise is 0.0228 <span>mJybeam$^{-1}$</span>, equivalent to $T_b$ = 0.021 K. For NGC 3145 we find a total flux density $S_\nu$(4.86 GHz) = $9.1 \pm 0.3$ mJy. Additional Data --------------- We use <span>H$\alpha$</span>, broad-band optical, and infrared images that other observers and facilities have made available on-line. Table\[PSF\] lists the FWHM of the point-spread functions (PSFs) of these images. The continuum-subtracted <span>H$\alpha$</span> image of NGC 3145 is from @banfi93 and is not flux-calibrated. The $B$ image in Figure\[B.Features\] is from @sandage94. Whenever we refer to a $B$ image of NGC 3145 without further specification, we mean this image. We use the other $B$ images described below when we need a larger field. We obtained a WFPC2, F606W ($R$-band) Hubble Space Telescope (<span>*HST*</span>) image from the <span>*Hubble Legacy Archive*</span>[^2]. @martini03 made these <span>*HST*</span> observations to study circumnuclear dust, but in addition to the central regions, the field covers the southern half of NGC 3145. <span>lc</span> Carnegie Atlas of Galaxies $B$ & $1.3'' \times 1.2''$\ <span>*MDM*</span> $B$ & $2.3'' \times 1.9''$\ <span>*MDM*</span> $V$ & $1.9'' \times 1.6''$\ <span>*MDM*</span> $R$ & $1.7'' \times 1.5''$\ Burrell-Schmidt $B$ & $4.1''$\ <span>*HST*</span> WFPC2 $R$ & $0.20'' \times 0.18''$\ DSS IIIaJ & $5.4'' \times 4.4''$\ <span>H$\alpha$</span> & $\sim 1''$\ <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum & $7.4'' \times 5.5''$\ <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum & $7.5''$\ $N$(HI) & $22''$\ <span>*WISE*</span> 12 & $9.2'' \times 8.4''$\ <span>*WISE*</span> 22 & $18'' \times 17''$\ We obtained from the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive infrared images of NGC 3145 taken by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (<span>*WISE*</span>). We also use data from <span>*2MASS*</span>. Paul Eskridge took $B$, $V$, and $R$ images of NGC 3145 for us at the 1.3 m telescope of the Michigan-Dartmouth-M.I.T. Observatory (MDM) on 1999 March 25. These images, taken under non-photometric conditions, are a little trailed and a little underexposed. We took a $B$ image with the Burrell-Schmidt telescope at Kitt Peak on 1993 January 29 and use this for NGC 3143. These images were bias subtracted, flat-fielded, combined, and sky-subtracted with standard IRAF procedures. For PGC 029578 we use a IIIaJ (4680 Å) Digitized Sky Survey (DSS) image from Space Telescope Science Institute. Philip Appleton took $B$ and $R$ images for us of NGC 3143 and PGC 020578 at the 0.6 m telescope of the Fick Observatory of Iowa State University, and he measured the (Johnson) $B$ and $R$ magnitudes listed in Table\[basic.optical\] for these two galaxies. Broad-band Optical, <span>H$\alpha$</span>, Radio Continuum, and Infrared Properties of NGC 3145 ================================================================================================ Throughout this section we use for deprojection of NGC 3145 the values of the position angle (PA) of the major axis and the inclination $i$ of the disk from Table\[basic.optical\]. Our kinematic data in Section 4.2 find a value for the major axis PA consistent with the isophotal value in this table and a somewhat smaller value of $i$. Broad-band Optical ------------------ The <span>*HST*</span> $R$-band image of the southern half of NGC 3145, displayed in the bottom panel of Figure\[B.Features\], affords a detailed view of some of the optical oddities marked in the top panel of that figure. The larger box encloses the <span>*triangle*</span>, and the smaller box is on the western antenna. Sets of line-profiles from these two boxes will be displayed and discussed in Section 4.2.2. Heading north from apex $c$ of the <span>*triangle*</span> is a region of complex dust loops and feathers. <span>*HST*</span> images of Sb and Sc galaxies often reveal dust feathers crossing spiral arms [@la; @vigne06]. Numerical models of spiral galaxies by @kim02, @kim06, and @shetty06 reproduce feathers and spurs as sheared structures resulting from magneto-Jeans instabilities as gas flows through a spiral shock, and @lee12 and @lee14 present an analytic discussion of the feathering instability of spiral arms for a thin disk with magnetic fields and self-gravitating gas. The dust feathers in this region of NGC 3145 are spaced 0.3 to 0.7 kpc apart and are probably produced by this mechanism. It is not clear whether this mechanism accounts for the dust loops in this part of NGC 3145. We shall refer to this region as the region of complex dust loops. Sandage's peculiar arm, which outlines the eastern edge of the <span>*triangle*</span>, is prominent in the HST image. Crossed by a number of dust feathers, it has a dust lane along part of its outer edge and another along part of its inner edge. This arm looks to be in front of the inner spiral arm, which it crosses at apex $a$, and thus in front of the disk. Figure\[az\] is a display of the $B$ image in polar coordinates after deprojection into the plane of NGC 3145. In this image, the <span>*triangle*</span> is a prominent feature, and Sandage's peculiar arm has quite a different slope than the spiral arms, consistent with it being a material arm in front of the disk. The <span>*branch*</span> starting at Feature $d$ is also visible in this image. Its slope in this polar-coordinate diagram is about the same as that of Sandage's peculiar arm between apices $a$ and $b$. The arm which outlines the western edge of the <span>*triangle*</span> and connects apices $c$ and $b$ winds in opposite sense to every other arm in NGC 3145 (see Figures\[B.Features\] and \[az\]); it increases in radius cw whereas all the other arms increase in radius ccw. It is less prominent in the $R$-band <span>*HST*</span> image than in the $B$ image of Figures\[B.Features\] and \[az\]. In our MDM images of NGC 3145, this arm decreases in prominence from $B$ to $V$ to $R$. This suggests it is dominated in $B$ by somewhat younger stars. In Figure\[B.Features\] there is also a string of bluish clumps crossing Sandage's peculiar arm at Feature $f$ ($6''$ north of apex $a$) and continuing, quasi-parallel to the northern edge of the <span>*triangle*</span>, to the southern part of the region of compex dust loops. This string of clumps is not evident in the <span>*HST*</span> image. From <span>*2MASS*</span> $K_s$ isophotes, the position angle (PA) of the major axis of the bar is 60. The region of complex dust loops and the location where the <span>*branch*</span> (feature $d$ in Figure\[B.Features\]) departs from the spiral arm are on opposite sides of the galaxy at somewhat different distances from the nucleus and roughly along the same PA as the major axis of the bar. Radio Continuum, <span>H$\alpha$</span>, and mid-IR --------------------------------------------------- For NGC 3145, the NRAO/VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) [@condon98] lists a total flux density $S_\nu$(1.4 GHz) of $21.5 \pm 2.3$ mJy. Since we find $S_\nu$(4.86 GHz) = $9.1 \pm 0.3$ mJy, the global spectral index $\alpha$ of NGC 3145 = $-0.7 \pm 0.1$ , which is typical of normal spirals. For normal galaxies with a spectal index in this range, the expression in @condon92 for the ratio of free-free to total flux density gives a thermal fraction at <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> for a galaxy as a whole of 20% to 25%. Usually in spiral galaxies, the extended emission along the spiral arms is predominantly nonthermal, and only where knots occur is the emission mainly free-free. Young star-forming complexes appear as <span>H$\alpha$</span> sources and knots of <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum emission in NGC 3145. The <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum is also used to search for possible shock fronts. The left panel in Figure\[6cm\] displays in greyscale and contours the <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum image with $7.5''$ (= 2.0 kpc) resolution. In the right panel, these contours are overlaid on a greyscale display of the <span>H$\alpha$</span> image (which has a resolution of $\sim 1''$ = 260 pc). In Figure\[B.6cm\], the <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> contours are overlaid on the $B$ image in greyscale to show where the radio continuum emission is located relative to the features marked in Figure\[B.Features\]. The <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> knots tend to lie along the brighter parts of the $B$-band spiral arms, and several coincide with <span>H$\alpha$</span> clumps, but not all of the brighter <span>H$\alpha$</span> clumps are seen as <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission knots. The two brightest <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> clumps lie on the inner and brighter of the two $B$-band spiral arms in the north and have flux densities $S_\nu$(6 cm) = $0.44 \pm 0.04$ mJy for the northwestern clump and $0.41 \pm 0.04$ mJy for the northern clump. Neither of these is at the "X"-features marked in Figure\[B.Features\]. In Figure\[HST.6cm\], contours from our <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum image with higher resolution ($7.4'' \times 5.5''$ HPBW) are overlaid on the portion of the $HST$ image containing the region of complex dust loops. This region has <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> flux density $S_\nu$(6 cm) = $0.73 \pm 0.06$ mJy. Although there is <span>H$\alpha$</span>emission here, some of the extended <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission may be from shocks associated with the dust loops and feathers. The <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> clump centered where a large dust loop or shell seems to cross another feature here has $S_\nu$(6 cm) = $0.21 \pm 0.03$ mJy. The following properties of Sandage's peculiar arm, the <span>*triangle*</span>, and the "X"-features are apparent from a comparison of Figures\[6cm\], \[B.6cm\], and \[B.Features\]. There is a radio continuum knot at Feature $f$ (labelled in Figure\[6cm\]), which is where the string of blue clumps intersects Sandage's peculiar arm. North of Feature $f$ there is extended <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum emission along Sandage's peculiar arm. This is probably mainly synchrotron emission from shocked gas, since extended radio emission from arms in galaxies is usually nonthermal. We interpret this <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission feature to mean that the portion of Sandage's arm from Feature $f$ northwards is in the disk. The <span>H$\alpha$</span> emission, including the Feature $f$ knot, is faint, perhaps due to extinction, but the 12 emission (see Figure\[12micron\]) from this general area is relatively bright. The <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio emission here contrasts with that from the <span>*triangle*</span>. Aside from an <span>H$\alpha$</span> and <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum star-forming clump between apices $a$ and $b$ on Sandage's peculiar arm, the <span>*triangle*</span>, including apices $a$ and $b$, is not prominent in the <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio continuum. Emission at <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> from the region of complex dust loops partly overlaps apex $c$, but the latter does not appear as a distinct clump at <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span>. We conclude that <span>*there are no shocks at the arm-crossing "X"'s of the triangle, and thus the arms that appear to cross at the apices of the triangle must be in different planes.*</span> Thus, whereas the part of Sandage's peculiar arm from Feature $f$ northwards appears to be in the disk, the part of this arm that forms the eastern side of the <span>*triangle*</span> is not in the disk. The distribution of the brighter <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission in NGC 3145 has a somewhat ring-like appearance, composed of the brighter portions of the $B$-band spiral in the northern half of the galaxy, the section of Sandage's peculiar arm north of Feature $f$, and connections between these (see Figures\[6cm\] and \[B.6cm\]). This contrasts with the distribution of 12 emission. In Figure\[12micron\], contours of the <span>*WISE*</span> 12 emission are overlaid on the <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio image in greyscale. The locations of the nucleus, apex $a$, and apex $b$ are denoted by a plus sign, a five-pointed star, and a small triangle symbol, resp. The brightest 12 sources are at the locations of a) the northern <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> clump on the spiral arm north of the nucleus, b) the region of complex dust loops, and c) the nucleus. Aside from these three sources, the brightest 12 emission is from the central hole in the distribution of <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission. Similarly, with the <span>*WISE*</span> 22 image, whose resolution is a factor of 2 worse than the 12 image, the brightest emission is from the central hole in the <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> distribution and from the northern <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> clump on the spiral arm. Thus there is a lot of warm dust in the inner disk/bar/bulge of NGC 3145 but not a similar concentration of cosmic-ray electrons. In Section 3.1 we noted that the arm outlining the western edge of the <span>*triangle*</span> decreases in prominence from $B$ to $V$ to $R$. Since this arm is not prominent in <span>H$\alpha$</span> either, it appears that optical emission from this arm may be dominated by $A$ and/or $B $ stars. This may help constrain the age of this feature. Feature $d$ in Figure\[B.Features\] marks where the <span>*branch*</span> departs from the main spiral arm on the northeastern side of NGC 3145. Since there is no string of <span>H$\alpha$</span> knots along the <span>*branch*</span>, it does not meet the definition of a spur as given by @la [@vigne06]. A clump prominent in <span>H$\alpha$</span> and <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission lies on the main spiral arm near this point. In Section 4.2.2, we shall see that there is a large difference in velocity between the spiral arm and the <span>*branch*</span> at feature $d$. Properties of NGC 3145 ======================= Images ------- Figure\[HI.triplet\] displays the line-of-sight column density $N$(HI) image of the three galaxies in the system in greyscale and contours with $22''$ resolution. Table\[HIproperties\] lists the basic properties of the NGC 3145 triplet from our observations. <span>lccc</span> Velocity Range of HI emission (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & 3407 to 3919 & 3491 to 3581 & 3407 to 3623\ Heliocentric $v_{\rm sys}$ (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & $3655.9 \pm 0.2$ & $3530 \pm 5$ & $3512 \pm 5$\ PA of receding major axis:\ Kinematic & $205.44\degr \pm 0.06\degr$ & & $270\degr \pm 3\degr$\ Isophotal & $204\degr \pm 2\degr$ & $235\degr \pm 5\degr$ & $283\degr \pm 5\degr$\ PA of kinematic minor axis & $-60\degr \pm 2\degr$ & $\sim 0\degr$ & $173\degr \pm 3\degr$\ Kinematic $i$ & $50.3\degr \pm 0.3\degr$ & &\ Isophotal $i$ & $55\degr \pm 1\degr$ & $\leq 35\degr$ & $61\degr \pm 2\degr$\ HI diameter & $262'' \pm 2''$ & $52'' \pm 2''$ & $122'' \pm 2''$\ HI diameter/$D_{25}$ & $1.35 \pm 0.09$ & $1.00 \pm 0.17$ & $1.20 \pm 0.20$\ Integrated HI flux $S$(HI) (Jy <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & 20.4 & 0.91 & 4.72\ $M$(HI) (<span>$M_{\sun}$</span>) & $1.44 \times 10^{10}$ & $6.5 \times 10^8$ & $3.33 \times 10^9$\ Dynamical mass $M_{\rm dyn}$ (<span>$M_{\sun}$</span>) & $5.0 \times 10^{11}$ & & $2.2 \times 10^{10}$\ $M$(HI)/$M_{\rm dyn}$ & 0.029 & & 0.13\ Maximum HI column density (<span>atomscm$^{-2}$</span>) & $2.3 \times 10^{21}$ & $7.0 \times 10^{20}$ & $1.8 \times10^{21}$\ In the top panel of Figure\[N(HI).N3145\] $N$(HI) contours are overlaid on the $B$ image of NGC 3145 in greyscale. The distribution of emission from NGC 3145 is not axisymmetric; it consists of three major concentrations plus fainter extended emission and a trough $6''$ to $26''$ southeast of the nucleus. The brightest concentration is northeast of the nucleus and includes Feature $d$. This region has an mass $M$(HI) = $1.8 \times 10^9$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. It is elongated to the south, not along the main spiral arm but along the <span>*branch*</span> or a bit to the east of it. At $20''$ south of Feature $d$, the emission from the <span>*branch*</span> is still bright, whereas the emission from the spiral arm is near the trough. We conclude in Section 4.2.2 that this major concentration cannot be a single entity. The second brightest concentration is southwest of the nucleus and has $M$(HI) = $1.4 \times 10^9$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span> if we omit its southern tail along the spiral arm. The third brightest concentration lies on the northwestern part of the two northern spiral arms, and its brightest part coincides with the most luminous <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> clump in the galaxy. Its $M$(HI) = $6 \times 10^8$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. These masses are comparable to those of massive clouds in a number of interacting galaxy pairs - see @kaufman99 and references therein. This suggests that the massive concentrations in NGC 3145 could have resulted from an encounter. The total $M$(HI) of NGC 3145 is $1.4 \times 10^{10}$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. Its ratio of $M$(HI)/$L_{\rm B}$ = 0.17 <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>$L_{\sun}^{-1}$, which is close to the median value for galaxies of the same Hubble type (Sbc) in @roberts94. The NGC 3145 first moment image (often called the velocity field) is displayed as contours overlaid on the <span>*MDM*</span> $B$ image in greyscale in the bottom panel of Figure\[N(HI).N3145\]. The velocity dispersion image, uncorrected for the velocity gradient across the synthesized beam, is displayed in greyscale with velocity-field contours overlaid in the left panel of Figure\[vel.disp\], and the velocity dispersion image after correction for the velocity gradient is displayed in greyscale with $N$(HI) contours overlaid in the right panel of Figure\[vel.disp\]. The first moment and velocity dispersion images are from the cube with lowest rms noise (Cube 1) and are blanked where $N$(HI) $\leq 1.9 \times 10^{20}$ <span>atomscm$^{-2}$</span>. A plus symbol marks the location of the nucleus. In the velocity-dispersion figures (and in other figures below), the locations of apex $a$ and apex $b$ of the <span>*triangle*</span> are denoted by the five-pointed star and the small triangle symbol, resp. The velocity field exhibits some mild irregularities but not the highly distorted velocity fields found in some interacting galaxies, e.g. NGC 2207 [@elmegreen95] or NGC 2535 [@kaufman97]. Along the <span>*branch*</span> there are kinks (or wiggles) in the velocity contours. At the arms where the <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> radio emission is prominent in Figure\[6cm\], there is no evidence from Figure\[N(HI).N3145\], or from one made from the C-array data with 10 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution, of kinks (or wiggles) in the isovelocity contours due to streaming motions. If the radial component of streaming motions dominates, such kinks should be <span>**u**</span>-shaped on the western side and <span>**n**</span>-shaped on the eastern side of the galaxy. Either the somewhat ring-like distribution of <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission is not expanding or our observations have too low a spatial resolution to reveal an expansion. A resonance ring produced by a bar would not be expanding. The velocity dispersion image that is corrected for the velocity gradient across the synthesized beam has particularly high values for the velocity dispersion <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> at apex $a$ of the <span>*triangle*</span> and in the region of the complex dust loops. For the oddities labelled in Figure\[B.Features\], Section 4.2.2 compares numerical values of <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> before and after this correction. High values for the corrected <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> may result, in part, because the line-of-sight intercepts gas at various altitudes above the disk and at various radial distances, in addition to streaming motions on small spatial scales and turbulence within the disk. Analysis of Motions -------------------- ### Large Scale Anomalies We use the AIPS program GAL to fit a model rotation curve to the first moment image of NGC 3145 and determine its kinematic parameters. The routine assumes a flat disk in rotation. The residuals from such a fit may reveal whether significant parts of the the galaxy are not in a flat disk or have motions other than rotation. We first used GAL to fit a Brandt model [@brandt60] rotation curve to our first moment image of the disk as a whole. It finds a kinematic center within $1''$ of the optical nucleus, a systemic velocity $v_{\rm sys}$ = $3655.9 \pm 0.2$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, close to the optical value of $3652 \pm 6$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, and a position angle of the receding major axis PA = $205.4\degr \pm 0.06\degr$, consistent with the isophotal value of 205 from <span>*2MASS*</span> $K_{\rm s}$ and from the $N$(HI) outer isophotes. <span>lcccc</span> whole disk & $46.1 \pm 0.2$ & $286.8 \pm 0.9$ & $74.6 \pm 0.5$ & $1.44 \pm 0.02$\ NNE Major Axis & $50.6 \pm 0.3$ & $271.4 \pm 1.0$ & $76.5 \pm 0.9$ & $1.28 \pm 0.03$\ SSW Major Axis & $50.1 \pm 0.3$ & $271.4 \pm 1.1$ & $68.6 \pm 0.5$ & $1.84 \pm 0.03$\ On the other hand, the velocity-residual field exhibits a curious asymmetry on and near the minor axis. In Figure\[vel.resid\] , the residual velocity image (observed minus model) is displayed in greyscale and contours, and the locations of the kinematic center, apex $a$, and apex $b$ are denoted by the plus sign, the five-pointed star, and the small triangle symbols, resp. Lines are drawn in this figure to divide the galaxy into four quadrants: these are centered on the receding major axis in the SSW, the near-side (relative to us) minor axis in the WNW, the approaching major axis in the NNE, and the far-side minor axis in the ESE. On the near-side minor axis, the residual velocities are receding from us, whereas on the far-side minor axis, the residual velocities are approaching us. The minor axis is where radial or $z$-motions (perpendicular to the disk) would be most apparent. The observed asymmetry would be consistent with radial inflow or with $z$-motions. The asymmetry region overlaps part of the ring-like distribution of <span>$\lambda 6$ cm</span> emission, so if the motions producing the asymmetry were radial, this would argue against an expanding pseudo-ring because it would have to be a contracting pseudo-ring instead. We conclude below that the more likely explanation is $z$-motions. The residual velocities have somewhat greater magnitude on the WNW minor axis (25 to 62 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) than on the ESE minor axis ($-19$ to $-27$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>). At the location of the <span>*triangle*</span>, the residual velocities are small $\simeq 4$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. With the values of the kinematic center and systemic velocity fixed as above, we used GAL to fit separate Brandt rotation curves to the receding and approaching major-axis quadrants. The results are listed in Table\[galfit\] and displayed in Figure\[rot.curve\]. Brandt curves are good fits to the major axis quadrants, and for values of the face-on radius $R \geq 30''$, they yield velocity differences of less than 5% between the approaching and the receding sides. The solution for the major axis quadrants gives a value for the inclination $i = 50.3\degr \pm 0.3\degr$, (a little smaller than the isophotal value $i = 55\degr$ from the <span>*2-MASS*</span> isophotes and the $N$(HI) outer isophotes) and a maximum velocity of the rotation curve $v_{\rm max} = 271 \pm 1$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. This maximum occurs at $R_{\rm max}$ = $68.6''$ = 18 kpc on the receding side and $76.5''$ = 20 kpc on the approaching side. To provide more information about noncircular motions, Figure\[profiles.north\] displays line profiles, spaced $15''$ apart (i.e, every third spatial pixel) from Cube 1 for the entire northern half of NGC 3145. Figure\[profiles.south\] does the same for the entire southern half of the galaxy. At distances $\gtrsim 35''$ from the nucleus, the line profiles on and near the approaching major axis (NNE side) consist of a large amplitude, narrow peak with an asymmetric, extended, high velocity wing, and the line profiles on and near the receding major axis (SSW) side consist of a large amplitude, narrow peak with an asymmetric, extended, low velocity wing. Since observed motions on a major axis cannot contain a contribution from radial inflow or radial outflow, the possible interpretations of the skewed wings in these profiles are out-of-plane gas in a thick disk with a slower rotation speed than the thin disk or $z$-motions of gas moving away from us (relative to the disk) on the approaching major axis and towards us (relative to the disk) on the receding major axis. As we find kinematic oddities on the minor axis as well as on the major axis, the simplest explanation for both is $z$-motions. Given the optical oddities that suggest out-of-plane arms in this galaxy, it is not surprising to find motions perpendicular to the disk. Taken together with the asymmetry in the residual velocities on and near the minor axis (see Figure\[vel.resid\]), it seems that relative to the disk, there is gas with $z$-motions away from us on and near the NNE major axis and near the WNW minor axis and $z$-motions towards us on and near the SSW major axis and near the ESE minor axis. This anti-symmetry of the $z$-motions suggests the disk is undergoing warping as a result of a close passage by a companion. We detect these warping motions out to a radius of at least $105''$. For the line-profiles near the major axis that consist of just a major peak plus a skewed tail, we fit the sum of two Gaussians to each profile in the two boxes marked in Figure\[vel.resid\]. These $35'' \times 35''$ boxes are centered approximately at $R_{\rm max}$ on the major axis, and we shall refer to them as the $R_{\rm max}$ boxes We assume that the large-amplitude peak in the profile is from gas in the disk and that the skewed tail is from gas moving perpendicular to the disk. The goals are to determine some information about the gas involved in the $z$-motions and to determine how much the rotation curve derived from the velocity field at these positions is affected by the $z$-motions. Let the subscript 1 refer to the parameters from the Gaussian fit at the large-amplitude peak in each line profile and subscript 2 refer to the parameters from the Gaussian fit to the skewed tail. Table\[Rmax.box\] lists the mean values from the two-Gaussian fits to the following parameters for the $R_{\rm max}$ boxes: (a) the difference $v_1 - v_2$ in the line-of-sight central velocities of the Gaussians, (b) the difference $v - v_1$ between the velocity $v$ of the velocity field in the first moment image and the central velocity $v_1$ of the large-amplitude peak, (c) the FWHM widths of the Gaussians, and (d) the ratio $N({\rm HI})_2/N({\rm HI})_1$ of the column densities. Locations with bad solutions or large uncertainties are omitted. The uncertainty attached to each mean is the mean of the Gaussian uncertainties. Also listed are the values of the standard deviation $s$ of the sample. <span>lccccc</span> $v - v_1$ (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & $-15\pm 1$ & $\pm 4$ && $12 \pm 1$ & $\pm 6$\ $v_1 - v_2$ (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & $47 \pm 7$ & $\pm 11$ && $-37 \pm 3$ & $\pm 7$\ $(FWHM)_1$ (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & $41 \pm 5$ & $\pm 6$ && $31 \pm 4$ & $\pm 3$\ $(FWHM)_2$ (<span>km s$^{-1}$</span>) & $67 \pm 12$ & $\pm 10 $ && $50 \pm 9$ & $\pm 10$\ $N({\rm HI})_2/N({\rm HI})_1$ & $0.4 \pm 0.1$ & $\pm 0.2$ && $0.9 \pm 0.2$ & $\pm 1.0$\ On the receding major-axis, the mean value of $v - v_1$ for the $R_{\rm max}$ box is $-15 \pm 1$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> with $s$ = 4 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, and for positions closest to the major axis the mean is $-11$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> with $s$ = 2 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. On the approaching major axis, the mean value of $v - v_1$ for the $R_{\rm max}$ box is $12 \pm 1$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>with $s$ = 6 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, and for positions closest to the major axis the mean is 8 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> with $s = 3$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. Therefore the correction for this effect on $v_{\rm max} \sin i $ amounts to only about 5%, which is negligible. For a spherically symmetric mass distribution, the dynamical mass $M_{\rm dyn}(R)$ within face-on radius $R$ is $M_{\rm dyn}(R)$ = $R (v_{\rm rot})^2/G$ = $2.33 \times 10^5 R (v_{\rm rot})^2$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span> for $R$ in kpc and circular velocity $v_{\rm rot}$ in <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>. We fit the velocity data in the major axis quadrants out to $R$ =$127''$ = 33.3 kpc, which is (approximately) the extent of significant major-axis emission in the $N$(HI) image. At this radius, the fitted curves in Figure\[rot.curve\] have an average $v_{\rm rot}$ = $252 \pm 6$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, which gives a dynamical mass $M_{\rm dyn}$ = $5.0 \times 10^{11}$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>. Since $M$(HI) = $1.4 \times 10^{10}$ <span>$M_{\sun}$</span>, accounts for only 3% of the dynamical mass out to this radius. The radius of $127''$ that we use for $M_{\rm dyn}$ is greater than the Holmberg radius of $103''$ used by @faber79 for $M_{\rm dyn}$. At R = $103''$ our data have an average $v_{\rm rot}$ of $263 \pm 3$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, which is only 5% greater than the value of 250 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> used by @faber79. Thus aside from the difference in the adopted distance of NGC 3145, our value for $M_{\rm dyn}$ out to the Holmberg radius is consistent with theirs. The magnitude of the difference $|v_1 -v_2|$ in the line-of-sight central velocities in the $R_{\rm max}$ box on the receding side $47 \pm 7$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> is marginally consistent, within the uncertainties, with its magnitude $37 \pm 3$ <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> in the $R_{\rm max}$ box on the approaching side. This is compatible with the suggestion that the skewed tail in these line profiles was produced by the same mechanism on both sides of the galaxy. On both sides, the FWHM width of the Gaussian fit to the line profile is about 20 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> broader for the skewed tail than for large amplitude peak. The larger velocity width for the skewed tail could result from a velocity gradient along the flow . For the ratio $N({\rm HI})_2/N({\rm HI})_1$ of the column densities from the Gaussian fits, we restrict to positions where the propagated uncertainty in this ratio is less than 50%; this eliminates about half of the positions in the above boxes. Then for the $R_{\rm max}$ box on the receding side, the mean value of $N({\rm HI)}_2/N({\rm HI})_1$ = $0.4 \pm 0.1$ with standard deviation $s$ of the sample = 0.2 and range = 0.2 to 0.9. For the $R_{\rm max}$ box on the approaching side, the mean value of this ratio = $0.9 \pm 0.2$ with $s$ = 1.0 and range = 0.20 to 3.5. We conclude that the amount of gas involved in the $z$-motions is not insignificant but varies considerably with position. Another way of analyzing the velocities in NGC 3145 is to look at the image of the skewness of the line-profiles in Figure\[skewness\]. The parameter displayed is the dimensionless Fisher-Pearson coefficient of skewness $$g_1 = \frac{m_3}{(\sigma_{\rm v})^3}$$ where $m_3$ is the third moment of the velocity data. For a sample of size $n$, $g_1$ needs to be multiplied by a correction factor $$\frac{[n(n-1)]^{1/2}}{n-2}.$$ For Cube 1, this correction factor varies from 1.06 near the center to 1.2 in the outskirts of NGC 3145. In Figure\[skewness\], regions in green have negligible skewness of the line-profiles, i.e., $|g_1| < 0.5$, and the rest of the galaxy has moderate to high skewness of the line-profiles. This image demonstrates that (1) most of the half of the galaxy from position angle PA = $60\degr$ to PA = $240\degr$ has negative skewness of the line-profiles, i.e., gas moving towards us relative to the disk. (2) In the other half of the galaxy there are large areas of positive skewness, i.e., gas moving away from us relative to the disk. ### Small Scale Anomalies We study the various oddities marked in Figure\[B.Features\] by inspecting their line-profiles. For NGC 3145, we find the line-profiles to be more revealing than position-velocity diagrams are. <span>lcc</span> apex $a$ & 94 & 68\ opp. apex $a$ & 60 & 40\ \ apex $b$ & 50 & 36\ opp. apex $b$ & 41 & 38\ \ apex $c$ & 50 & 36\ opp. apex $c$ & 57 & 50\ \ <span>*triangle*</span> (mean) & 72 & 49\ opp. <span>*triangle*</span> (mean) & 50 & 37\ \ Feature $f$ &111 & 83\ opp. Feature $f$ & 98 & 85\ \ complex dust-loops (mean) & 93 & 79\ Feature $d$ (mean) & 71 & 59\ western antenna (mean) & 54 & 46\ For features of interest, Table\[corr.disp\] lists values of <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> of the gas before and after correction for the mean velocity gradient across the PSF. These are from Cube 1, the cube with 21 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> velocity resolution. The correction for these features decreases the velocity dispersion by 15% to 32%. For comparison, this Table also contains the values of <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span>at the diametrically-opposite locations of some of the features. These are listed as "opp. apex $a$," "opp. apex $b$," etc. Since the line-profiles are not corrected for the velocity gradient, one does well to keep in mind the size of the correction to <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span>when viewing the line-profiles since a large velocity gradient plus finite spatial resolution artificially broaden a line-profile. Our method of correcting the velocity dispersion is less accurate in regions, such as near the galaxy center, where the velocity gradient changes significantly across the PSF. This inaccuracy contributes to the very high values of the corrected <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> in part of the region of complex dust loops and at Feature $f$ (see velocity contours in Figure\[N(HI).N3145\]). All of the corrected values of <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> for the features in Table\[corr.disp\] (36 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> to 68 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span>, if we exclude Feature $f$ and the region of complex dust loops) are large compared to the values of 6 - 13 <span>km s$^{-1}$</span> found by @kamphuis93 for the gas in undisturbed spirals, but are comparable to the high values of <span>$\sigma_{\rm v}$</span> measured in some galaxy pairs undergoing close encounters [@elmegreen95; @kaufman97; @kaufman99]. The clearest situation is Feature $d$ in Figure\[B.Features\] . Figure\[branch\] displays line-profiles, spaced $5''$ apart, for Feature $d$ and its surroundings. The panel labelled "d" is where the branch and the main spiral arm appear to intersect, and the panel just below it is where the <span>*branch*</span> departs from the spiral arm. The four panels in the upper right corner of Figure\[branch\] (i.e., the intersection of rows 4 and 5, with
{'source': 'arXiv_out/1504'}