--- abstract: 'We present observations and analysis of the broadband afterglow of GRB 071025. Using optical and infrared ($RIYJHK$) photometry, we derive a photometric redshift of $4.4 < z < 5.2$; at this redshift our simultaneous multicolour observations begin at $\sim$30 s after the GRB trigger in the host frame, during the initial rising phase of the afterglow. We associate the light curve peak at $\sim$580 s in the observer frame with the formation of the forward shock, giving an estimate of the initial Lorentz factor $\Gamma_0 \sim 200$. The red spectral energy distribution (even in regions not affected by the Lyman-$\alpha$ break) provides secure evidence of a large dust column. However, the inferred extinction curve shows a prominent flat component between 2000-3000 Å in the rest-frame, inconsistent with any locally observed template but well-fit by models of dust formed by supernovae. Time-dependent fits to the extinction profile reveal no evidence of dust destruction and limit the decrease in the extinction column to $\Delta A_{3000} < 0.54$ mag after $t = 50$ s in the rest frame. Our observations provide evidence of a transition in dust properties at $z \sim 5$, in agreement with studies of high-$z$ quasars, and suggest that SN-formed dust continues to dominate the opacity of typical galaxies at this redshift.' author: - | Daniel A. Perley$^{\ucb}$[^1], J. S. Bloom$^{\ucb}$, C. R. Klein$^{\ucb}$, S. Covino$^{\brera}$, T. Minezaki$^{\ioa}$, P. Wo<span>ź</span>niak$^{\lanl}$, W. T. Vestrand$^{\lanl}$, G. G. Williams$^{\steward}$, P. Milne$^{\steward}$ N. R. Butler$^{\ucb}$, A. C. Updike$^{\clemson}$, T. Krühler$^{\mpig,\univ}$, P. Afonso$^{\mpig}$, A. Antonelli$^{\inaf}$, L. Cowie$^{\ifa}$, P. Ferrero$^{\iac}$, J. Greiner$^{\mpig}$, D. H. Hartmann$^{\clemson}$, Y. Kakazu$^{\iap}$, A. Küpcü Yoldaş$^{\eso}$, A. N. Morgan$^{\ucb}$, P. A. Price$^{\ifa}$, J. X. Prochaska$^{\ucsc}$, Y. Yoshii$^{\ioa}$\ \ $^{\ucb}$<span>Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA.</span>\ $^{\brera}$<span>INAF/Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, via Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate, LC, Italy</span>\ $^{\ioa}$<span>Institute of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan</span>\ $^{\lanl}$<span>Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA</span>\ $^{\steward}$<span>Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA</span>\ $^{\clemson}$<span>Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0978, USA</span>\ $^{\mpig}$<span>Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, D-85748 Garching, Germany</span>\ $^{\univ}$<span>Universe Cluster, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstraße 2, D-85748, Garching, Germany</span>\ $^{\inaf}$<span>INAF/Rome Astronomical Observatory, Via Frascati 33, 00044 Monte Porzio (Roma), Italy</span>\ $^{\ifa}$<span>Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822-1839, USA</span>\ $^{\iac}$<span>Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain</span>\ $^{\iap}$<span>Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, Paris, France</span>\ $^{\eso}$<span>European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-str. 2, 85748, Garching, Germany</span>\ $^{\ucsc}$<span>Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, UCO/Lick Observatory; University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA</span>\ title: 'Evidence for Supernova-Synthesised Dust from the Rising Afterglow of GRB 071025 at z$\sim$5' --- LaTeX<span>L-.36em.3ex-.15em T-.1667em.7ex-.125emX</span> \[firstpage\] \[lastpage\] gamma-rays: bursts — dust, extinction Introduction ============ Starting with the discovery of the 9th magnitude afterglow of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 990123 [@Akerlof+1999], the early-time study of GRB afterglows has presented great promise to elucidate both the nature of the gamma-ray burst phenomenon itself and of the medium surrounding these objects in extremely distant galaxies. Fast-responding telescopes, slewing to the burst location in time to catch the afterglow at or near the time of peak luminosity, can probe the physics of the explosion in the initial seconds as the ultrarelativistic outflow is decelerated by the interstellar medium. Continued observations can then follow the evolution of the reverse and forward shocks for many hours as the afterglow fades away, providing constraints on the still poorly-understood early-time emission processes. In addition, the extreme luminosities at early times <span>[<span>e.g.,</span> @Kann+2007; @Bloom+2009; @Racusin+2008]</span> enable even very small telescopes to provide precise photometric and occasionally spectroscopic measurements of the afterglow spectral energy distribution (SED) and act as a probe of interstellar gas and dust out to the epoch of reionization [@Kawai+2006; @Totani+2006; @Gallerani+2008; @McQuinn+2008; @Greiner+2009a; @Tanvir+2009; @Salvaterra+2009]. And while the usage of early-time SEDs as probes of the interestellar environment is hindered to some extent by the uncertain emission processes acting at these times, they nevertheless can provide constraints on the direct influence of a GRB on its surrounding medium in the form of dust destruction and photoionization [@Waxman+2000; @Fruchter+2001; @Draine+2002; @Perna+2002; @Perna+2003]. At the same time, however, the fleeting and time-variable nature of GRB afterglows poses several challenges for these early-time diagnostics. To maximise sensitivity, the smallest telescopes typically do not employ filter systems and therefore give minimal frequency-domain information. When filters are employed, ordinary telescopes are forced to employ a filter cycle, creating the possibility of confusion between spectral and temporal evolution of the event. Nevertheless, progress has advanced steadily with the commissioning of several simultaneous-colour robotic telescopes. The Peters Automatic Infrared Imaging Telescope (PAIRITEL; @Bloom+2006), online since late 2004, provides simultaneous measurements in the $J$, $H$, and $K_s$-bands every 7.8 s starting within 1–3 minutes of a typical GRB and is the primary subject of this paper. Notable PAIRITEL-followed bursts include GRBs 041219A, 061126, and 080319B [@Blake+2005; @Perley+2008a; @Bloom+2009]. More recently, the seven-channel Gamma-Ray Burst Optical/Near-Infrared Detector (GROND, @Greiner+2008) has also produced simultaneous SEDs of afterglows at over the wavelength range 4000-24000 Å, including in several cases time-dependent SEDs during the afterglow rise and fall [@Kruhler+2008; @Kruhler+2009b] and short-timescale flares [@Kruhler+2009a; @Greiner+2009], and RAPTOR-T has tracked spectral changes during the fading of GRB 080319B in several optical bands simultaneously [@Wozniak+2009]. In all cases, colour evolution appears to be absent or modest, consistent with the lack of strong colour evolution in the generally less constraining measurements by filter-cycling instruments such as the UVOT [@Oates+2009]. Correlation with the gamma-ray prompt emission and with X-ray flares (also thought to be associated with the prompt phase: @Kocevski+2007, @Chincarini+2007) is rare [@Yost+2007], but has been observed in some cases [@Vestrand+2005; @Vestrand+2006; @Page+2007; @Kruhler+2009a; @Racusin+2008; @Klotz+2009]. These multi-band observations are particularly important for distinguishing the predictions of different models for the large variety of light curve behaviors observed at early times: reverse shock [@Sari+1999], energy reinjection [@Rees+1998], prompt emission <span>[<span>e.g.,</span> @Kumar+2000; @Kumar+2008]</span>, outflow deceleration [@Sari+1999b; @Meszaros+2006], spectral breaks moving through the optical bandpass [@Sari+1998], and many others. GRB 071025, detected by the mission [@Gehrels+2004], provides among the best probes of the early-time behavior of a gamma-ray burst to date. While no secure spectroscopic redshift was attained ($z \sim 5.2$ was estimated from a low-quality HIRES optical spectrum at Keck; @Fynbo+2009), the photometric SED presented here shows clear evidence of a Lyman-$\alpha$ break in the observer-frame $R$-band and indicates a photometric redshift of $4.4 < z < 5.2$ (§\[sec:photoz\]), making this among the highest-redshift bursts to date and one of only a few observed in simultaneous colours during prompt emission. Our infrared and optical observations start at $\sim$30 s after the burst in the rest frame and follow the rise, peak, and fall of an afterglow in simultaneous rest-frame optical colours. In this paper, we use this unique data set to test various models for the origin of the early emission and conclude it is likely due to the deceleration of the burst outflow into a uniform-density interstellar medium, allowing estimation of the Lorentz factor $\Gamma$ (§\[sec:rise\]). The $IYJHK$ spectral energy distribution demonstrates the existence of a significant dust column obscuring a star-forming region at $z>4.4$ and provides evidence that the dust at this epoch had different properties from dust that prevails along sightlines in the more nearby universe, in agreement with the study of a high-$z$ QSO by @Maiolino+2004. We suggest that this difference is reflective of an absence of evolved AGB stars in these earliest epochs, and search for (and place stringent limits on) signs of destruction of this dust by radiation from the GRB (§\[sec:colevol\]). Throughout the paper we use the convention $F \propto t^{-\alpha}\nu^{-\beta}$ and assume cosmological parameters $h$ = 0.71, $\Omega_\Lambda$ = 0.7, $\Omega_M$ = 0.3. Observations ============ Swift ----- At 04:08:54 UT on 2007 October 25[^2], the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT, @Barthelmy+2005) on-board detected GRB 071025 and performed a rapid slew to the GRB location, beginning observations with the XRT [@Burrows+2005] at 146 s after the trigger. The BAT light curve is broad and only slowly variable: the flux rises slowly during the first $\sim$80 s and peaks several times before beginning a steady decay at approximately $\sim$130 s. The GRB remains detectable above the background until was forced to slew away from the position due to an Earth constraint at 422 s after the initial trigger. Observations resumed at 3500 s, and tracked the afterglow using the XRT with no further large gaps in temporal coverage for the next $\sim$3 days, after which it became too faint to be detected. Details of our high-energy reduction pipeline are described in detail by @Butler+2007 for the BAT and by @ButlerKocevski2007 for the XRT[^3]. 's Ultra Violet-Optical Telescope (UVOT, @Roming+2005) observed the field starting at 155 s, but detected no significant afterglow signal in any of its seven filters [@GCNR97.1]. The non-detection is consistent with our photometric redshift, as outlined in §\[sec:photoz\]. PAIRITEL Observations --------------------- The robotic infrared observatory PAIRITEL consists of the 1.3-m Peters julieprice@example.com. Hopkins, Arizona, formerly used for the Two Micron All Sky Survey [2MASS; @Skrutskie+2006], re-outfitted with the southern 2MASS camera. PAIRITEL, like 2MASS, makes use of two dichroics to image in the $J$, $H$, and $K_s$ filters simultaneously. PAIRITEL responded to the initial Gamma-ray Burst Coordinate Network (GCN, @Barthelmy+1995) julieprice@example.com s and slewed immediately to the source. Observations began at 162 s and continued uninterrupted until 3812 s, when due to a problem with the observing queue PAIRITEL temporarily slewed to another location. Observations resumed at 9108 s and continued for another two hours. Raw data files were processed using standard IR reduction methods via PAIRITEL Pipeline III and resampled using SWarp [@Bertin+2002] to create final 1.0-arcsec/pix images for final photometry. PAIRITEL's standard observing cycle is to take three 7.8 second exposures in immediate succession at each dither position. While the early afterglow is detected in even the shortest 7.8 second frames, the S/N was too low for reliable photometry, so the shortest exposures reported here consist of 23.4-second "triplestacks", the sum of all three images at each dither position. These images were further binned at successively later times to further improve the S/N. The afterglow position, relative to 2MASS astrometric standards, is $\alpha=355.0711583$, $\delta=+31.778575$ (J2000). Photometry was performed in IRAF[^4] using the `phot` task. Best results were achieved using aperture photometry with an aperture radius of 2.25 in $J$-band, 2.5 in $H$-band, and 2.75 in $K_s$-band. Unfortunately, while conditions during the observations were generally clear, the night was not fully photometric, with variations in the transmission of up to 0.3 mag during the course of observations and additional significant fluctuations in the seeing. Calibration was therefore performed by re-determining the zeropoint for each image individually by comparison to our secondary field standards (§\[sec:calib\]). Fortunately, the field of GRB 071025 is rich in bright field stars, and a total of eight nearby stars (present and well-detected in even short exposures with reference uncertainties of $<$0.05 mag) were used to determine the zero-point. The statistical uncertainty on the zero-point (never more than 0.05 mag) is essentially negligible relative to other sources of error in all cases. Systematic sources of error are addressed in §\[sec:ircal\]. The large plate scale of PAIRITEL (2.0 /pix) and the variable sub-pixel response function of the NICMOS3 arrays creates a significant additional uncertainty in each position beyond ordinary photometric errors, estimated at $\sim$3 percent by @Blake+2008. To quantify this uncertainty as accurately as possible, we constructed light curves for standard stars of different magnitudes in regions of the image free of defects by measuring the image-to-image magnitude variations of bright (source-dominated) stars. An additional uncertainty of approximately $\sim$0.02 mag per position was required to incorporate the observed scatter in the photometry of these objects. Additionally, we examined fainter (sky noise-dominated) stars to compare the IRAF-generated uncertainty to that observed in the zero-pointed light curve, finding the IRAF uncertainties to be too low by about 20% in each filter. Therefore the final uncertainties on our photometry, reported in Table \[tab:ptelphot\], were determined by increasing the IRAF uncertainty by 20% and adding the result in quadrature with 0.02/$\sqrt{N_{\rm pos}}$ mag, where $N_{\rm pos}$ is the number of unique dither positions per stacked image. REM Observations ---------------- GRB 071025 also triggered REM (Rapid-Eye Mount; @Zerbi+2001), a robotic [@Covino+2004] telescope located at the ESO Cerro La Silla observatory (Chile). The REM telescope has a Ritchey-Chretien configuration with a 60 cm f /2.2 primary and an overall f /8 focal ratio in a fast moving alt-azimuth mount providing two stable Nasmyth focal stations. At one of the two foci, the telescope simultaneously feeds, by means of a dichroic, two cameras: REMIR [@Conconi+2004] for the NIR and ROSS [@Tosti+2004] for the optical. Both cameras have a field of view of 10x10 arcmin and imaging capabilities with NIR ($1\mu$, $J$, $H,$ and $K$) and Johnson-Cousins $VRI$ filters. Observations of the GRB 071025 field began at 144 s after the trigger, although this initial $H$-band exposure did not detect the afterglow. The optical camera was unfortunately not operational due to maintenance, so exposures were acquired only in $1\mu$, $J$, $H$, and $K$. The raw frames were corrected for dark, bias, and flat field following standard procedures. Although the burst was at low elevation at the trigger time, seeing conditions were good and photometry was performed using a 3.5 pixel (1.2) aperture. Conditions were not photometric, and so the zeropoint was determined for each image individually in $JHK$ bands using a subset of 2MASS-based standards. The $1\mu$-band (often referred to as $z$ in previous work, though this filter has almost no overlap with the traditional SDSS $z$-band), after taking into account the transmission of the ROSS/REMIR dichroic, is close to the MKO $Y$-band[^5] and so we treated this filter as a $Y$ measurement, using the interpolated magnitudes in Table \[tab:optcal\] (see §\[sec:calib\]) and basing the calibration on four reference stars well-detected in all images. RAPTOR Observations {#sec:raptor} ------------------- The RAPTOR (Rapid Telescopes for Optical Response) experiment [@Vestrand+2002], operated by Los Alamos National Laboratory, consists of a series of small telescopes at the Fenton Hill Observatory in New Mexico. RAPTOR-S is a fully autonomous robotic telescope with a 0.4-m aperture and typical operating focal ratio f/5. It is equipped with a 1000$\times$1000 pixel CCD camera employing a back-illuminated Marconi CCD47-10 chip with 13$\mu$ pixels. RAPTOR-S responded automatically to the localization alert and was on target at 04:10:14.95 UT, 81.3 s after the trigger time (4.2 s after receiving the GRB position). The rapid response sequence of RAPTOR-S consists of nine 5-second images followed by twenty 10-second images and finally 170 30-second images for a total of $\sim$2 hours of coverage (including 5-second intervals between exposures used primarily for readout). In order to improve the S/N ratio, photometry was performed on coadded images. Aperture photometry was performed using the SExtractor package [@Bertin+2002], and the magnitude offsets between epochs were derived using several dozen field stars. Because of the extreme redness of this afterglow, the unfiltered RAPTOR-S observations required a special calibration procedure. Although the effective wavelength of the response curve for RAPTOR-S is close to that of the standard $R$ band, the spectral energy distribution of this burst (§\[sec:photoz\]) indicates a sharp drop in the flux between $I$ and $R$ bands, likely due to the onset of the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest. As a result, most photons detected by RAPTOR-S actually fall in the spectral region covered by the standard $I$ filter. Therefore, we tie the unfiltered data to $I$-band standards from the Lick calibration (§\[sec:calib\]). The offset $(m_{\rm C}-I)_{\rm star}$ between the unfiltered magnitudes and standard $I$ was derived using 7 well-measured stars in the vicinity of the GRB covering a narrow range of colours $0.5 < (R-I) < 0.66$. Assuming that the SED of the burst emission did not change significantly between the time of RAPTOR-S observations and the time when it was measured, we derived an approximate correction to $(m_{\rm C}-I)_{\rm star}$ to account for the extremely red colour of the GRB. We used a K5V model spectrum from @Kurucz1979 as a proxy SED matching the mean colour of our comparison stars. By folding both SEDs with response curves of RAPTOR-S and the standard $I$-band filter we find $(m_{\rm C}-I)_{\rm GRB} = (m_{\rm C}-I)_{\rm star} + 0.74$ mag. The uncertainty of the derived zero point is about 10%; consistent with this, we measure a relatively small offset of $-0.08$ magnitudes between the calibrated RAPTOR magnitudes and an extrapolation from later, filtered $I$-band observations using our light curve model (see §\[sec:lc\]). Table \[tab:phot\] lists the final RAPTOR-S photometry. Super-LOTIS Observations ------------------------ Super-LOTIS (Livermore Optical Transient Imaging System) is a robotic 0.6-m telescope dedicated to the search for optical counterparts of gamma-ray bursts [@Williams+2004; @Williams+2008]. The telescope is housed in a roll-off-roof facility at the Steward Observatory Kitt Peak site near Tucson, Arizona. Super-LOTIS triggered on GRB 071025 and began observations at 04:10:29 UT (95 s after the trigger), acquiring a series of $R$-band frames, which were reduced using standard methods. Unfortunately, because of the optical faintness of the afterglow and high sky background, the quality of the images is poor and even after extensive stacking the detection is marginal, particularly in the earliest few stacks. Photometry was performed using aperture photometry and our Lick $R$-band field calibration as detailed in §\[sec:calib\]. Lick Infrared Observations {#sec:lickir} -------------------------- We acquired an additional series of infrared observations using the 3m Shane telescope at Lick Observatory equipped with the UCLA GEMINI IR camera [@McLean+1993; @McLean+1994]. A total of nine exposures were acquired in $J$ and $K'$ bands simultaneously starting at 04:52:23 UT, integrating for 11 coadds of 20 s each in $J$ and 35 coadds of 6 s each in $K'$. The IR afterglow was still very bright at this time, and is clearly detected with signal-to-noise $S/N > 50$ in individual exposures. Reduction was performed via direct subtraction of temporally adjacent exposures followed by division by a twilight flat. Photometry was performed using IRAF and an aperture of 2 pixels ($1.4 \arcsec$); images were calibrated relative to the PAIRITEL magnitudes of five nearby bright field stars. The response of the $K'$ filter is significantly different from $K_s$ and the GRB exhibits an apparent colour ($H-K \approx 1.0$ that is much redder than any field star used for comparisons (ranging between $H-K = 0.04-0.18$). To correct to $K_s$ for direct comparison to the PAIRITEL data, we use an approximate correction of $K_s \approx K \approx K' - 0.07$ [@Wainscoat+1992], with this correction inferred from the reddest star in Table 1 of that work (Oph S1, $H-K = 0.94$, $K'-K = 0.07^{+0.015}_{-0.025}$). The $K$ to $K_s$ colour term is assumed to be negligible. This is found to produce good agreement between Lick data and coeval PAIRITEL points. However, due to uncertain differences between the Lick, MKO, and other filter sets and the intrinsic GRB spectrum itself the overall calibration offset could be as much as $0.05$ mag, and as a result the Lick $K$ photometry is not used in fitting. MAGNUM Observations ------------------- The MAGNUM (Multicolour Active Galactic NUclei Monitoring) 2.0 m telescope on Haleakala has been carrying out observations of AGN and other variable objects (including GRBs) since 2001 [@Yoshii+2002; @Yoshii+2003; @Kobayashi+2003]. The telescope is equipped with dual optical and infrared channels, allowing simultaneous observations in two bands. We initiated MAGNUM observations starting at 06:59 UT, acquiring a sequence of dithered exposures over the next $\sim$2 hours in a large number of filters, including $RI$ in the optical channel and $YJHK$ in the infrared channel. The MAGNUM FOV is small, and generally only one star was present in the field and away from the chip edge at all dither positions. Therefore only a single star was used to establish the calibration in each filter. In the $H$, $K$, and $Y$-band observations the star at $\alpha$=355.066002, $\delta$=31.793428 was used for this purpose; for $R$, $I$, and $J$ the star at $\alpha$=355.058815 $\delta$=31.780569 was used. The second $Y$-band exposure unfortunately contained no usable reference star. However, comparison of exposures in other filters and at other points in the night suggest that conditions were photometric, and so calibration was achieved by comparison to the first Y-band exposure (with a small aperture correction.) Kuiper Observations {#sec:kuiper} ------------------- Shortly after the GRB trigger, we initiated imaging observations at the 1.54m Kuiper telescope, operated by Steward Observatory and located on Mt. Bigelow. Observations began at 04:37:08 UT and continued until 08:55:41 UT, mostly in the $R$ and $I$ filters with some additional observations in $V$. Images were reduced and combined in IRAF using standard techniques. The $I$-band images were not dithered and so an archival fringe frame was used to subtract the fringe pattern. Photometry was performed in IRAF using secondary standards. Late-Time Afterglow Observations -------------------------------- To try to constrain the late-time ($t > 12$ hr) behavior of this burst, additional follow-up was carried out on the 3.6-m New Technology Telescope julieprice@example.com. We observed the burst location on NTT using the infrared imager SOFI in a series of $J$, $H$, and $K$-band exposures, and additionally in $H$-band only on the following night. Photometry was calibrated relative to our IR secondary standards. GROND is a seven-channel instrument which has been mounted on the ESO 2.2-m telescope at La Silla, Chile, since April 2007. GROND began observations of GRB 071025 on 2007 Oct 26 at 01:50 UT and completed one 8 minute observing block and two 20 minute observing blocks. In total, 9 images were taken in the $g'r'i'z'$ bands and 216 were taken in the NIR. Each NIR image was 10 s long; the optical images varied in length from 137 to 408 s. The images were reduced using the GROND pipeline [@Yoldas+2008], with all images combined into a single stack for each filter. For consistency with other measurements, photometry was performed using aperture photometry calibrated to our secondary standards in $JHK$. For $g'r'i'z'$ bands, images are calibrated directly relative to spectroscopic standard stars SA 114-750 and SA 114-656. Poor agreement is observed between the NTT and GROND observations (and between the overall SED at this time and earlier data) using a standard 1aperture, even though these epochs are effectively coeval. We have re-examined these data and find no clear evidence of problems in the reduction or photometry, although the afterglow appears extended in the N-S direction in the GROND $H$-band frame, suggesting that it might be blended with a nearby source or image artifact. No neighboring source is observed in the NTT imaging, and the deep Keck optical imaging shows no object within $\sim$3$\arcsec$ of the afterglow position (§\[sec:keck\]). However, to guard against this possibility we performed the photometry in the GROND $J$ and $H$ channels and all NTT channels using a small aperture ($0.5$) in all bands. This smaller aperture provides good consistency between the two observations and is used in our analysis. Keck Observations {#sec:keck} ----------------- To help rule out a low-redshift origin for this burst we imaged the field around GRB 071025 with LRIS [@Oke+1995] on the Keck I telescope on 2008 Aug 02 using the $g$ and $R$ filters simultaneously under excellent conditions. Total exposure times were 1050 s in $R$-band and 1140 s in $g$-band. Consistent with the large photometric redshift inferred from the SED, no significant flux due to a host galaxy was detected at the location of the optical/IR afterglow (the nearest object is a pair of faint point-like sources located 3 to the northeast). Forced photometry at the position of the optical afterglow, calibrated using unsaturated secondary standards, gives a limit (3-$\sigma$) of $R > 26.5$ mag, $g > 27.0$ mag. Field Calibrations {#sec:calib} ------------------ To improve upon the photometric accuracy of 2MASS, we stacked together all observations of the GRB field acquired by PAIRITEL during the night of 2007 October 25 UT and calibrated a set of isolated, high-S/N stars present in the field in all or nearly all dither positions relative to 2MASS. These magnitudes were used in place of 2MASS magnitudes directly and are presented in Table \[tab:ircal\]. For the optical filters, on the night of 2009 June 19 we observed the field of GRB 071025 using the Nickel 1m telescope at Lick observatory. Conditions were photometric throughout the night. Three exposures were acquired in $R$-band and one each in $I$ and $g$ band and stars within the field were calibrated by comparison to repeated observations of PG 1633 and PG 2336 [@Landolt1992] at varying airmass, calibrating reference stars within the field. A second calibration was conducted on 2009 Sept 28 using repeated observations of standard fields PG 1633, PG 2336, PG 0213, and SA 110; the results were found to be completely consistent with the June calibration. No field calibration was performed in the $Y$-band. To calibrate the observations in this filter, we derived our own transformation equation for calculating $Y$ magnitudes of reference stars given photometry in nearby bands by fitting a simple linear regression model to the photometry available online at the UKIRT webpage[^6]. (The $Y-J$ colour was fit as a linear function of $J-H$, and the residuals were then fit to a linear function of $I-J$.) The transformation equation $Y = J + 1.104(J-H) - 0.11(I-J) - 0.03$ was found to accurately describe the observed $Y$-band magnitudes for the available standards (with photometry in all four bands) with an RMS of $<0.03$ mag. We therefore applied this equation to calculate the $Y$ magnitudes for secondary standards in the GRB 071025 field using the calibrated $IJH$ photometry. The final calibrated magnitudes for these stars are presented in Table \[tab:optcal\]. Analysis ======== Early-Time Afterglow Evolution: Rise, Fall, and Reddening {#sec:lc} --------------------------------------------------------- All photometric observations of GRB 071025 during the first night are presented in Figure \[fig:lcurve\]. Several features are immediately apparent. First, the afterglow was caught during what appears to be its initial optical rise, brightening by $\sim$1.5 mag from the first detections to the peak in all filters. Second, the evolution is not single-peaked: a limited rebrightening is observed at $\sim$1800 s. Third, the burst is extremely red, with $R-K \sim 6.5$ mag. Finally, no dramatic colour change is evident. This is not to say that there is not finer-scale colour evolution, however—as will be discussed later, the best-fit curves plotted in Figure \[fig:lcurve\] correspond to a chromatic model which is shown to produce a large improvement in $\chi^2$ relative to the monochromatic case. <span>80mm</span> Parameter symbol value ------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------- C1 rising index $\alpha_{\rm 1,r}$ $-1.66 \pm 0.15 $ C1 fading index $\alpha_{\rm 1,f}$ $ 1.73 \pm 0.21 $ C2 rising index $\alpha_{\rm 2,r}$ $-11.0 \pm 2.1 $ C2 fading index $\alpha_{\rm 2,f}$ $ 1.27 \pm 0.04 $ C1 peak time (s) $t_{\rm pk,1}$ $ 575 \pm 42 $ C2 peak time (s) $t_{\rm pk,2}$ $ 1437 \pm 17 $ Ratio of C2/C1 peak flux $F_2$ $ 0.24 \pm 0.03 $ Colour change across C1 peak $\Delta\beta_{\rm 1(rf)}$ $-0.20 \pm 0.14 $ Colour change between C1/C2 $\Delta\beta_{\rm 12}$ $-0.26 \pm 0.12 $ Flux at $t=10000$s $F_R$ $5.76 \pm 1.15 $ $F_I$ $34.4 \pm 3.48 $ $F_Y$ $84.45 \pm 8.66 $ $F_J$ $118.9 \pm 4.79 $ $F_H$ $155.4 \pm 6.26 $ $F_K$ $250.4 \pm 15.1 $ : Light Curve Best-Fit Parameters <span>Summary of free parameters fit in the light curve model. Peak times are for the $J$-band filter. Flux parameters are not corrected for Galactic extinction; uncertainties include added systematics. "C1" refers to the first light-curve component; "C2" refers to the second component.</span> \[tab:lcpar\] ![Early-time multiband optical and infrared light curves of GRB 071025 fit to our empirical light curve model. The afterglow is caught during its rise at $\sim$30 s in its rest frame (assuming $z = 5$), and exhibits a double-peaked structure before fading again as a simple power-law. The RAPTOR unfiltered data has been shifted to match the I-band data. Magnitudes are Vega-based and not corrected for extinction.<span data-label="fig:lcurve"></span>](f1.eps) ![The gamma-ray (BAT) and X-ray light curves (XRT) of GRB 071025, compared to the $J$-band light curve out to late times. The X-ray light curve is rapidly fading during the optical-IR rise, probably due to high-latitude prompt emission (the light curve connects smoothly with the BAT light curve at these times if scaled to the X-ray flux, as shown.) Both optical and X-ray light curves fade with an unbroken decay at late times but with different decay slopes: $\alpha_{\rm opt} = 1.27 \pm 0.04$ versus $\alpha_{\rm X}= 1.56 \pm 0.03$.<span data-label="fig:jxlc"></span>](f2.eps) The empirical model used to fit this burst is described in previous work [@Perley+2008b; @Bloom+2009]. In brief, our method fits all data in all filters simultaneously using a series of summed @Beuermann+1999 broken power-law functions, in this case two per filter. The sharpness parameter $s$ was fixed at 1 (allowing it to vary resulted in insignificant improvement to $\chi^2$). For each component, the pre-break (rising) power-law index $\alpha_{\rm r}$ is constrained to be the same for all filters, as is the post-break (fading) index $\alpha_{\rm f}$. The overall flux-normalization factor in each filter is arbitrary, determined by the best fit to the data. Colour change is modeled by assuming that any overall change takes the form of a variation in the intrinsic spectral index $\beta$, i.e., $F_{\nu,2} = F_{\nu,1} \times (\frac{\nu_2}{\nu_1})^{\Delta\beta12}$. Colour is allowed to vary between components (simply using the above equation to tie the normalised flux parameters of each component) and between rising and falling segments of an individual component (by allowing the break time of the Beuermann function to vary as a function of frequency, using the central frequency of each filter). It should be emphasised that this method makes no assumptions about the overall SED, since only the *variation* in $\beta$ is constrained. Indeed, the fitting method can be used to generate a best-fit observed SED in all available filters, using all available data, at any chosen time (§\[sec:photoz\]). Two components (best-fit parameters are summarized in Table \[tab:lcpar\]) are found to provide an excellent fit to the data.[^7] The light curve brightens quickly between our first detections at 180 s with a power-law of approximately $\alpha_{\rm 1,r} = -1.66 \pm 0.15$ to a smooth peak at 580 s, then fades until about 1200 s. At that point the afterglow briefly rebrightens, peaking again at $\sim$1400 s before fading as a simple power-law ($\alpha_{\rm 2,f} = 1.27 \pm 0.04$) for the remainder of our observations. The $\chi^2$ residual, assuming no colour change, is 222.4 per 154 degrees of freedom (dof). Permitting colour change improves the fit significantly: allowing the parameters $\Delta\beta_{\rm 12}$ (describing the change in intrinsic spectral index between the first and second component after peak) and $\Delta\beta_{\rm 1(rf)}$ (describing the change in intrinsic index between rising and falling portions of the first component) to both vary, $\chi^2$/dof improves to 197.4/152 which (according to the $f$-test) is significant at $>99.9$% confidence. Most of this change is associated with the transition to the second component ($\Delta\beta_{\rm 12} = -0.26 \pm 0.12$, versus a not-significant colour change across the first peak of $\Delta\beta_{\rm 1(rf)} = -0.20 \pm 0.14$) but unfortunately, although the need for overall red-to-blue colour change is clear, its nature cannot be clearly distinguished by this methodology. We will further examine scenarios for this possible colour change in §\[sec:colevol\]. The X-ray light curve (Figure \[fig:jxlc\]) was fit using a similar method (but with only a single "filter", simplifying the process significantly). Again, two summed functions are found to provide an acceptable fit to the data. However, the first component is a rapidly-declining, unbroken power-law with $\alpha_{\rm X,init}=3.1\pm0.2$. This initial segment connects smoothly with the BAT prompt emission, as has been seen for a large majority of bursts [@OBrien+2006]. The optical peaks unfortunately fall during an orbital gap in the XRT coverage, but by the end of the first observations the power-law is already clearly flattening, almost certainly due to the transition from the rapid decay phase [@OBrien+2006] to a standard afterglow [@Nousek+2006]. Coverage resumes approximately an hour later, by which time the X-ray light curve is fading rapidly in an unbroken decay with $\alpha_{\rm X}=1.56 \pm 0.03$. SED and Photometric Redshift {#sec:photoz} ---------------------------- At 10000 s after the burst, the evolution of the light curve has given way to a simple power-law decay dominated by only a single component. Moreover, thanks to the MAGNUM observations, photometry is available in all colours within a relatively short time span surrounding this epoch with high S/N in $JHK$. We therefore choose this time as the extraction point for the overall spectral energy distribution (SED) of this burst, using the model fluxes from our fit as described above. (These fluxes are consistent with the MAGNUM and PAIRITEL photometry measured at this epoch specifically.) All fluxes are corrected for Galactic extinction (relatively small at $E_{B-V} = 0.07$ mag in this direction; @Schlegel+1998.) The $1\sigma$ uncertainty on the fit parameter was combined in quadrature with an estimate of the calibration uncertainty in each filter. In the $J$ and $H$ filters, where the afterglow is comparable in colour to reference stars (which show negligible scatter), we use an uncertainty of 0.04 mag; in $K$ where the afterglow colour is much redder than our reference stars we conservatively increase this to 0.06 mag. This incorporates both the absolute and relative calibration accuracy of 2MASS (estimated at $\sim$0.02 and $0.011$ mag, respectively; @Cohen+2003 and 2MASS online documentation[^8]), effects of variation of the effective wavelength $\lambda_{\rm eff}$ from its reference value due to a non-standard spectrum ($< 0.02$ mag), the possibility of strong absorption from ISM or IGM lines (very likely $< 0.02$ mag), and uncertainties in the extinction correction ($< 0.01$ mag). In $Y$-band, we use an estimate of the photometric scatter of the high-S/N REM reference stars to the interpolated secondary standards (0.1 mag). We also use 0.1 mag in $I$-band due to the redness of the afterglow in this band and the possibility that Lyman-$\alpha$ may be affecting the flux towards the blue filter edge if the redshift is $z>5.0$. In $R$-band a large uncertainty of 0.2 mag is used, although because $R$ is almost certainly heavily blanketed by the Ly-$\alpha$ forest we use this filter only to place a limiting value on the redshift and exclude it from fits to the extinction profile. The resulting SED (fit with various models, explained below) is plotted in Figure \[fig:sed\]. ![Spectral energy distribution of GRB 071025 inferred from our broadband photometry, fit with different extinction models. Note the spectral flattening between $J$ and $H$ that contrasts with red $H-K$ and $I-Y$ colours. (The $R-I$ colour is due to absorption by the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest.) Traditional models (such as SMC-like extinction, shown here as a dotted line) cannot reproduce this feature and give poor fit residuals ($\chi^2$/dof$ = 20.8 / 2$). The supernova-dust model of Maiolino et al. (2004), shown as the solid line, is an excellent fit ($\chi^2$/dof$ = 0.81 / 2$). The dot-dashed line represents the intrinsic afterglow SED (for the SN model) without extinction applied but including our model of the IGM opacity at this redshift.<span data-label="fig:sed"></span>](f3.eps) The sharp dropoff towards the $R$-band is suggestive of high redshift. However, the spectral slope observed even well redward of this apparent break is quite red ($\beta \sim 1.64$, as shown by the dashed straight line in Figure \[fig:sed\]), suggesting that significant extinction is likely present as well. In order to quantitatively constrain the redshift $z$, we fit the data set with a large number of different extinction models (detailed in §\[sec:ext\]) at varying redshifts. Absorption due to the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest is taken into account using a simple model of the average opacity of the IGM as a function of $z$ and $\lambda$ from @Madau+1995. The extinction column $A_V$ and the spectral index $\beta$ were constrained to be positive: negative extinction is unphysical, while a negative spectral index would be both much bluer than any previously observed afterglow and in disagreement with standard afterglow theory [@Sari+1998]. The HIRES spectrum discussed in @Fynbo+2009 shows a trace extending from the limit of the spectral range at 7950 Å down to 7550 Å, blueward of which no flux is detected. While the quality of this spectrum is poor, the nondetection of Lyman-$\alpha$ puts a robust upper limit on the redshift of $z<5.2$, so this was treated as the maximum redshift. Regardless of the extinction law, no known dust curve is able to reproduce the extremely steep $I-R$ slope without invoking Lyman-$\alpha$ blanketing of the $R$-band, which becomes significant at $z \sim 4.0$. Even after including a variety of extinction templates (below), the lower limit on the redshift (95% confidence) is $z>4.4$. Treating redshift as a free parameter, the best-fit $z$ is dependent on the extinction law but is approximately $z=4.8 \pm 0.2$ ($1\sigma$). In the remaining discussion we will assume a fiducial value of $z=5.0$; however, similar conclusions apply to other redshifts within the constrained range ($4.4-5.2$). Extinction Profile {#sec:ext} ------------------ Qualitatively, the SED presented in Figure \[fig:sed\] is unusual among GRB afterglows due to the presence of an apparent inflection: while the $K-H$ and $Y-I$ colours are very red, between $H$ and $J$ bands the slope is quite flat. This flattening is quite significant (e.g., the $H$-band point is more than 0.2 mag below an interpolation between $J$ and $K$) and suggests that the afterglow of GRB 071025 is subject to a complex reddening profile. To try to distinguish different possible models, we therefore fit many different extinction laws to the photometric SED, including Milky Way, LMC, and SMC curves estimated using the parametrization of @Fitzpatrick1999 as implemented in the GSFC IDL astronomy user's library, the starburst-galaxy Calzetti curve [@Calzetti+2000], and the high-$z$ QSO extinction law from @Maiolino+2004. The intrinsic spectral index $\beta$ is free but limited to be $\beta > 0$. A summary of the goodness-of-fit $\chi^2$ for each fit model is presented in Table \[tab:extfits\]. A large family of models, including the Milky Way and Large Magellenic Cloud curves as well as the extinction curves derived from a few recent highly reddened GRBs [@Kruhler+2008; @Prochaska+2009; @Eliasdottir+2009], display a prominent 2175 Å bump. We can strongly rule out such a feature: at the observed redshift, the broad absorption signature would fall in or near the $J$-band. Formal fits using these extinction templates (regardless of $R_V$) return $A_V$ of zero in all cases (our fits do not permit negative extinction.) An SMC-like extinction curve (dotted line in Figure \[fig:sed\]) provides a visually reasonable-looking fit to our data, but the $\chi^2/$dof is julieprice@example.com/2. This is again no surprise: the SMC extinction curve increases rapidly and monotonically with decreasing wavelength and cannot produce the flattening in our SED. The featureless Calzetti law similarly produces a poor fit because it cannot produce the deviations from a power-law evident in the photometry. We also attempted a general fit using the full parameterization of @Fitzpatrick1999, but even if the $\gamma$ and $x_0$ parameters of this model are fixed and the $c_1$ and $R_V$ parameters are tied $c_2$ using e.g. the correlations of @Reichart2001, the solution is underdetermined. If the intrinsic spectral slope $\beta$ is fixed, the solution is exactly determined; for e.g. $\beta=0.65$, we derive $R_V=5.26\pm0.53$, $c_2=0.17\pm0.12$, $c_3<0.2$, $c_4=1.03\pm0.32$, $\chi^2/$dof = 1.49/0. However, this combination of parameters (small $c_2$ and low or zero $c_3$, indicating a shallow near-UV extinction law and negligible 2175Å bump) is unlike any sightline in the local universe observed to date. We also fit the data to the general extinction curve of @LiA+2008, fixing $\beta=0.65$ and $c_4=0$ to avoid underdetermination, but the $c_1$ and $c_3$ parameters did not converge. However, one previously observed extinction law performs extremely well at matching the observed features. @Maiolino+2004 presented observations of the reddened $z=6.2$ broad absorption line quasar SDSSJ104845.05+463713, comparing NIR spectroscopy of the source to optical spectra of low-redshift quasars of the same class to estimate the extinction law. The inferred curve of this object is notable for a distinct flattening between $1800-3000$Å, and was interpreted (and modeled quantitatively) by that paper as the signature of dust synthesised in supernova explosions. We fit a polynomial to the solid ($Z = 10^{-4} Z_{\odot}, M = 25 M_{\odot}$) curve displayed in Figure 2 of that paper and used the resulting extinction curve to fit our observed photometry.[^9] The result is an excellent match ($\chi^2/$dof = 0.81/2) and is shown as the solid line in Figure \[fig:sed\]. The associated extinction column is $A_{3000} = 1.09 \pm 0.20$ mag.[^10] The best-fit value of the intrinsic spectral index $\beta_{\rm IR}$ as inferred at the SED extraction epoch is $\beta_{\rm IR}=0.94 \pm 0.14$, quite typical of other afterglows at this stage. This value is also consistent (albeit only marginally) with the theoretically expected value based on the observed X-ray spectral index (intrinsic $\beta_{\rm X} = 1.15 \pm 0.12$) if a cooling break is present between IR and X-ray bands: in this case $\beta_{\rm IR}$ = $\beta_{\rm X} - 0.5$ = $0.65 \pm 0.12$.) Imposing this constraint as a prior on the fit to $A_V$ and $\beta_{\rm IR}$, we measure $A_V = 1.27 \pm 0.20$ mag. Alternatively, the SED is also consistent with the presence of no cooling break: at the extraction epoch the combined IR-through-X-ray SED is well-fit ($\chi^2$/dof = 1.14/3) by a single power-law with $\beta_{\rm IR,X} = 0.88$ and $A_V = 1.19 \pm 0.20$ of Maiolino dust, both consistent with the values inferred from the optical data alone. However, the X-ray flux at this time is clearly fading faster than the optical light curve (Figure \[fig:lcurve\]): if this is not due to the presence of a moving spectral break such as a cooling break, the spectral index itself would have to be slowly evolving (implying evolution in the electron index $p$). In support of our general conclusion of a significant amout of dust extinction, we note that a large amount of absorption is inferred from the X-ray spectrum also: we measure an equivalent column of $N_{\rm H} = (3.2 \pm 0.8) \times 10^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$. Although the scatter in the ratio of $A_V$/$N_{\rm H}$ for bursts is nearly an order of magnitude, using the average value from @Schady+2007 this column corresponds to an extinction of $A_V \sim 4$ mag. <span>80mm</span> ------------- ----------------- ---------------------- ----------------- ------------------ Dust Model $\beta$ $A_V$ $R_V$ $\chi^2$ $/$ dof mag none $1.64 \pm 0.08$ 0 33.3 / 3 SMC $0.08 \pm 0.42$ $0.12 \pm 20.6$ 2.73 20.8 / 2 MW $1.64 \pm 0.08$ $< 0.07$ 3.1 33.3 / 2 LMC $1.64 \pm 0.08$ $< 0.07$ 3.2 33.3 / 2 GRB080607 $1.64 \pm 0.08$ $< 0.12$ 4.0 33.3 / 2 Calzetti $0.00 \pm 0.80$ $1.42 \pm 0.68$ 4.0 25.3 / 2 Fitzpatrick $0.65$ $2.52 \pm 0.97$ $5.26 \pm 0.53$ 1.49 / 0 Maiolino SN $0.96 \pm 0.14$ $1.09 \pm 0.20$[^11] 0.81 / 2 ------------- ----------------- ---------------------- ----------------- ------------------ : Results of Extinction Fits Summary of key parameters from fits of various dust models to the SED of GRB 071025 as modeled at $t$=10000 s. A redshift of $z=5$ is assumed in all cases. \[tab:extfits\] Further Investigations of the IR Calibration {#sec:ircal} -------------------------------------------- The inferrence of SN-type dust for this object depends sensitively on the accuracy of our photometric calibration, and statements of its significance relative to the SMC fit depend equally critically on the precision in the $JHK$ bands being as good as we claim: the Maiolino model is no longer preferred at $>95$% confidence if, for example, additional uncertainty of $>$0.075 mag (in addition to the systematic uncertainties already applied; §\[sec:photoz\]) is added in quadrature to all SED data points, or if $>$0.1 mag is added to just the $H$-band point (dependence on the other data points is much more robust: an addition of $>$0.2 mag to $K$ is required, and any one of the $J$, $Y$, or $I$ points could be removed completely). Therefore we have scrutinised in detail our infrared calibration procedures with particular emphasis on the PAIRITEL data. Because of the large number of exposures and large number of calibration stars detected at high S/N, the statistical errors on the zeropoint are small. Possible sources of systematic uncertainty (beyond the minor effects we have already discussed and included) we have considered include: **Instrumental colour terms.** PAIRITEL uses the same telescope, filter, and camera system as the 2MASS survey, and so there is no reason to expect colour terms associated with the optics to be present. However, the presence of a significant bandpass difference could cause systematic discrepancies in calibration relative to field stars (see also §\[sec:lickir\]), in particular in $H$ and $K$ bands where the afterglow colour is much redder than any of the bright stars used for calibration. We inspected the magnitudes derived from stars in our deep stack as compared to the stars in 2MASS to search for a correlation between the magnitude offset and colour; none was found. **Strong atmospheric variations in the effective filter bandpass.** The infrared absorption bands associated with water in Earth's atmosphere exhibit time-variability, even within the observational windows. In particular, the exact shape of the $J$-band transmission function depends on the amount of precipitable water vapor (@Cohen+2003; however, the effect is small, with less than 2% variation in relative magnitudes), and the $H$-band contains a water ice absorption band which could introduce similar variations. Time-dependent absorption may therefore introduce temporary colour terms not evident in the all-night stack. Therefore, we carefully inspected the time evolution of the observed zeropoints in all three bands. A small amount (up to 0.3 mag) of total transmission variability is indeed observed during the first 20 minutes, after which the zeropoint in all three bands is nearly constant within uncertainties. No significant variation is observed in the difference between zeropoints in different PAIRITEL bands, nor is any correlation observed between the overall zeropoint and the difference in zeropoints between two bands that would suggest chromatic variations in the transmission. Furthermore, the zeropoint appears constant (within our uncertainties) after $\sim$1400 s (the SED is determined at 10000 s). The MMTO cloud camera [^12] shows no evidence of significant cloud cover at any point during the night, and weather archives indicate warm and stable conditions during the observation. Furthermore, in addition to PAIRITEL (Arizona), the Lick $J$-band (California) and MAGNUM (Hawaii) coeval measurements both give consistent results for the infrared magnitudes, giving additional confidence in our results; in particular both PAIRITEL and MAGNUM $JHK$ data sets show the putative extinction feature independently. Therefore, we have no reason to believe that our SED is significantly affected by absorption features in Earth's atmosphere. **Intrinsic deviation of the GRB spectrum from a power-law.** We have assumed in our fits that the intrinsic spectrum of the GRB was a simple power-law, as generally predicted by synchrotron theory. This assumption could, in principle, be violated. However, the most natural deviation from a power-law SED that might be expected (a spectral break within the optical/IR band) would create downward curvature in the intrinsic SED and actually require additional dust to produce the upward inflection feature that is observed. An SED modeled as the sum of two components (a steep power-law dominating $K-$band and a shallower power-law dominating $J$-band) would produce upward curvature, but cannot reproduce the sharpness of the observed feature unless the spectral index of the steep power-law is unrealistically red ($\beta>4$). Additionally, it would be surprising that both components would rise and fall in synch with each other throughout the complex early evolution of the light curve, as is observed. Indeed, evidence for Maiolino-like dust is observed at every epoch with no significant variation in its strength or wavelength (Figure \[fig:multised\]; also §\[sec:colevol\]) with the exception of the final (GROND+NTT) SED, when the photometic uncertainties are too large to place any strong constraints on the extinction law. ![Time-dependent spectral energy distribution of GRB 071025 inferred after dividing the data into six different windows and re-fitting the flux parameters at each epoch using the light curve model. The resulting SED is then fit for spectral index $\beta$ and extinction column $A_{3000}$ at each epoch individually using a Maiolino extinction profile. The characteristic flattening between $J$- and $H$-bands is observed at every epoch (except at late times, when photometric errors are large) with no significant variation in its strength, increasing our confidence that it is a feature extrinsic to the GRB.<span data-label="fig:multised"></span>](f4.eps) **Absorption from a DLA host system or Lyman-$\alpha$ forest.** If the host galaxy is at the maximum redshift of $z$=5.2, our mean-opacity model of the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest may significantly underestimate the impact of hydrogen absorption on the $I$-band. To represent the most extreme possible case, we reran our dust models after adjusting the $I$-band flux upward by 20% (the approximate maximum dimunition expected in the Kuiper $I$-band filter assuming 100% opacity blueward of 7550Å, the limit on any DLA imposed by the HIRES spectrum) at $z=5.2$. Even in this case, the Maiolino dust profile is strongly preferred ($\chi^2$/dof = 2.5/2, versus 11.9/2 for SMC-like dust.) Discussion ========== Rise of the Forward Shock and Constraints on the Lorentz Factor {#sec:rise} --------------------------------------------------------------- The nearly achromatic first peak in the light curve shows the major hallmarks of the initial rise of the afterglow due to hydrodynamic deceleration of the fireball: a steep rise with no significant evidence of colour change across the peak. Alternative possibilities can be generally ruled out: for example, the transition of the synchrotron peak frequency (which would also produce a peak
{'source': 'arXiv_out/0912'}