--- abstract: 'Lithium thioindate (LiInS$_{2}$) is a new nonlinear chalcogenide biaxial material transparent from 0.4 to 12 $\mu$m, that has been successfully grown in large sizes and good optical quality. We report on new physical properties that are relevant for laser and nonlinear optics applications. With respect to AgGaS(e)$_2$ ternary chalcopyrite materials, LiInS$_{2}$ displays a nearly-isotropic thermal expansion behavior, a 5-times larger thermal conductivity associated with high optical damage thresholds, and an extremely low intensity-dependent absorption allowing direct high-power downconversion from the near-IR to the deep mid-IR. Continuous-wave difference-frequency generation (5-11$\,\mu$m) of Ti:sapphire laser sources is reported for the first time.' author: - 'S. Fossier, S. Salaün, J. Mangin and O. Bidault' - 'I. Thénot and J.-J. Zondy' - 'W. Chen' - 'F. Rotermund' - 'V. Petrov' - 'P. Petrov and J. Henningsen' - 'A. Yelisseyev, L. Isaenko and S. Lobanov' - 'O. Balachninaite' - 'G. Slekys' - 'V. Sirutkaitis' title: 'Optical, vibrational, thermal, electrical, damage and phase-matching properties of lithium thioindate' --- \[sec: introduction\]Introduction ================================= The intensive search for new nonlinear materials for the generation of coherent tunable radiation in the mid-IR ($2-20\,\mu$m), a spectral range of importance for molecular spectroscopy, atmospheric sensing and various opto-electronic devices, remains a continuing challenge. In contrast with the oxides (with IR transmission range not exceeding $\sim 5\,\mu$m) that attracted much attention lately, such deep mid-IR materials cannot be grown by well mastered hydrothermal, flux or Czochralski methods. Instead the more complex Bridgman-Stockbarger growth technique in sealed (high-pressure) ampoules, with volatile and chemically reactive starting components, is the only method used to produce large size single domain crystals, and this certainly hampered their development all the more that special post-growth treatments are needed to restore stoichiometry and improve their optical quality. To date, only few suitable nonlinear crystals combining an extended transparency from the visible/near-IR to the deep mid-IR and large enough birefringence to allow phase-matching over the whole transparency range are available. The majority of these compounds belong to the ternary chalcogenide semi-conductors of the A$^{\text{I}}$B$^{\text{III}}$C$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ family, where A=Cu, Ag; B=Al, Ga, In; C=S, Se, Te @bhar. Except for AgInS$_2$, which can exist in both the tetragonal and orthorhombic phases @shay, these crystallize in the chalcopyrite (CuFeS$_{2}$) structure with $I\bar{4}2d$ space group and tetragonal symmetry (class) $\bar{4}2m$ but only few of them possess sufficient birefringence. Most of the commercially available nonlinear crystals (AgGaS$_{2}$ or AGS, AgGaSe$_{2}$ or AGSe, ZnGeP$_{2}$ or ZGP, GaSe, CdSe) or more confidential ones (HgGa$_{2}$S$_{4}$ or HGS, Ag$_{3}$AsS$_{3}$ or proustite, Tl$_{3}$AsSe$_{3}$ or TAS) have their advantages and drawbacks @dmitriev. Despite their higher nonlinearity compared with the oxides, one limitation stems from their low energy bandgap, which prevents the use of pump lasers below 1 $\mu$m due to severe linear and two-photon absorption and associated thermal effects. ZGP has a high nonlinearity (72 pm/V) and thermal conductivity but requires pump wavelength above 2 $\mu$m due to its residual absorption in the near-IR. The noble metal compounds (AGS, AGSe) have the lowest residual absorption, but their poor thermal conductivity due to low-energy phonon spectrum limits their performance, especially in cw applications @stoll [@lee; @douillet1; @douillet2]. Furthermore, their thermal expansion is anisotropic along the direction parallel and perpendicular to the optic axis, which is a source of thermo-mechanical stresses. CdSe's transparency extends up to $18\mu$m but its low birefringence and nonlinearity limit its phase-matching capability. GaSe is a soft, cleaving compound that cannot be cut at directions different from the optical axis, further its large birefringence results in severe walk-off limitations. Two new materials belonging to the A$^{\text{I}}$B$^{\text{III}}$C$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ chalcogenide family, where the metal cations are replaced with the lighter alkali metal (A=Li), can now be added to this limited list: LiInS$_{2}$ or lithium thioindate (LIS) and LiInSe$_{2}$ or lithium selenoindate (LISe). They were shown to crystallize with the $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structure (orthorhombic Pna2$_{1}\,\equiv$ $C_{2v}^9$ symmetry, point group $mm2$), which is a distorted superstructure of the wurtzite type, as early as 1965 @hoppe. Hence, contrary to the other mid-IR compounds, these new materials are biaxial and isostructural to, e.g., KTiOPO$_{4}$ (KTP). The linear and nonlinear properties of LIS were briefly studied by Boyd and co-workers in the early 70's, using small and poor quality samples @boyd, but very few works (mainly focused on its optical bandgap characterization and photoluminescence spectra @kamijoh [@kamijoh2; @nozaki; @kuriyama1; @kuriyama-kt; @kuriyama2]) have followed since until recently due to problems associated to its reliable growth in larger sizes allowing to design good optical quality single domain elements for practical applications @golovei. Thin films of LiInS$_2$ on glass and silicon substrates were also characterized @saitoh. The growth problems, associated with the high chemical activity of Li, were solved recently @isaenko-vasilyeva and large crystals (up to 20 mm in length) of high optical quality became available for practical nonlinear optical applications @assl [@knippels; @rotermund]. To our knowledge, there is only one other group which has succeeded previously in synthesizing this material with comparable size @schumann, but this work was also stopped recently. While only non-phase-matched second-harmonic generation (SHG) was used by Boyd and co-workers to determine the nonlinear properties of LIS @boyd, the first phase-matched SHG experiment using the tunable output of a pulsed LiNbO$_{3}$-OPO near 2.5 $\mu$m was reported only recently @assl. The range of fundamental wavelengths was extended to $6\,\mu$m using the radiation from a free-electron laser and ZGP-frequency doubler @knippels and rough estimation of the effective nonlinear coefficients was extracted from those measurements. Direct parametric down-conversion in the range $4.8-9\,\mu$m, using a femtosecond (200 fs) Ti:sapphire amplifier as the pump source, was simultaneously reported with an upper-bound value of the two-photon absorption (TPA) at 800 nm of $\beta$=0.04 cm /GW @rotermund, owing to the high bandgap energy of LIS @kuriyama1 [@kuriyama-kt; @schumann; @eifler]. Such a value is about 100 times less than the value for AGS or 1000 times less than for megan53@example.net $\mu$m @pearl. These preliminary experiments allowed to assess the potential of LIS over the existing mid-IR materials, and justify the need for a complete characterization of its optical properties. In this paper, we report new results from an intensive investigation campaign involving a network of laboratories in Europe, on the characterization of the main properties relevant for laser applications: structure and transmission (Section \[sec: growth\]), specific heat, thermal expansion and thermo-optic coefficients (Section \[sec: thermal\]), accurate lattice phonon spectra (Section \[sec: vibrational\]), electro-optic and piezo-electric constants (Section \[sec: electro-piezo\]), linear optical and thermo-optic dispersions (Section \[sec: linear\]), phase-matching predictions (Section \[sec: phase-matching\]), nonlinear coefficients (Section \[sec: meas-deff\]), parametric down-conversion (Section \[sec: down-conv\]) and optical damage thresholds (Section \[sec: damage\]). The results presented here show that LIS is superior to the existing chalcopyrites in terms of high-power deep mid-IR down-conversion applications pumped directly from the near IR. The preliminary work on LISe has just started and will not be reported here @isaenko-petrov. \[sec: growth\]Composition, structure and transmission ====================================================== Single-domain crystals of LIS are grown by the Bridgman-Stockbarger technique in a vertical setup with counter-pressure on seeds along (001) and (010) directions @hoppe [@boyd; @kamijoh; @isaenko-vasilyeva; @kovach; @kish84; @bruckner]. The directed crystallization is performed from a melt of elemental Li, In and S. In the melt zone the temperature is maintained at $\sim 1100\,$K and decreases to $\sim 900\,$K in the growth zone. The charged ampoules are moved in an optimal thermal gradient of $10-15\,$K/cm at a rate of $\sim 10\,$mm/day. This technique allows the growth of crystal ingots with diameters up to $20\,$mm and lengths up to 50mm @isaenko-vasilyeva. Although sometimes colorless to a great extent, the as-grown ingots are usually milky because of small inclusions of various phases and it is necessary to anneal them in Li$_{2}$S or S$_{2}$ vapor at temperature close to the melting point ($T_{\mbox{\footnotesize{melt}}}\sim 1000^{\circ}$C) @isaenko-vasilyeva. The crystal coloration after the thermal post-growth treatment changes then from almost colorless (or slightly yellow) for as-grown, to salmon-rose tinge depending on the growth and post-growth treatment conditions and chemical composition. Optical elements with aperture up to $1\,$cm$^{2}$ and length up to $15\,$mm could be prepared for optical measurements or for nonlinear frequency conversion. ![\[fig: lis-struc\] Fragment of the orthorhombic unit cell structure (the box frame gives the orientation of the unit cell). The 3 empty areas materialized with light grey spheres indicate the location of octapores.](fig1.eps){width="6cm"} Precise chemical analysis - using differential dissolution techniques (DDT) and inductively-coupled plasma (ICP) method - showed that the composition of colorless (or yellow tinge) and rose samples is Li$_{0.98}$In$_{1.03}$S$_{2.00}$ (Li$_{0.96}$In$_{1.06}$S$_{1.98}$) and Li$_{0.86}$In$_{1.04}$S$_{1.98}$ respectively @isaenko-vasilyeva. Lithium deficit ($N_{\mbox{\footnotesize{Li}}}:N_{\mbox{\footnotesize{In}}}<1$) is observed for all samples, the annealed rose ones being characterized by a higher sulfur content ($N_{\mbox{\footnotesize{Li+In}}}:N_{\mbox{\footnotesize{S}}}<1$). The band-structure nature of LIS has been confirmed to be of the *direct* type (direct transitions between parabolic bands) @kuriyama1 [@kuriyama-kt]. The forbidden band gap values estimated by us ($E_{g}=3.72$ and 3.57 eV at 80K and 300K, respectively, which are in good agreement with previous measurements @kuriyama1 [@kuriyama-kt; @schumann; @eifler]), the position of the long-wave edge of transparency ($13\mu$m at an absorption of 6 cm$^{-1}$) and the crystal symmetry group were found identical for all crystal colorations although small variations in lattice parameters due to point defects were also observed @zakopane [@zakospie]. A detailed and general structural analysis of A$^{\text{I}}$B$^{\text{III}}$C$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ compounds, where A$^{\text{I}}$ is an alkali metal such as Li, has been given by Kish *et al* @kish87. A fragment of the structure of LIS is shown in Fig. \[fig: lis-struc\] (see Figs. 2.1.1-2.1.2 in Ref. @bruckner for the full unit cell representation). It is formed by LiS$_{4}$ and InS$_{4}$ tetrahedrons and the S$^{2-}$ ions are arranged in hexagonal packing with tetragonal and octahedral cavities (tetra- and octapores) @kish87. Compared to the denser chalcopyrite structure of AGS or AGSe @feigelson, the $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structure of Li-chalcogenides allows the presence of empty cavities within the unit cell volume. The less dense $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structure allows in particular doping with rare-earth (RE) active ions which can be hosted inside the octapores. Such a preliminary doping experiment with Nd$^{3+}$ ions was previously reported with the aim of investigating RE:LIS potential as a self down-converting material @ico. The values of the orthorhombic lattice parameters are $a=6.874(1)\mbox{\AA}$, $b=8.033(2)\mbox{\AA}$, $c=6.462(1)\mbox{\AA}$ for as-grown colorless LIS, and $a=6.890(1)\mbox{\AA}$, $b=8.053(1)\mbox{\AA}$, $c=6.478(1)\mbox{\AA}$ for slightly yellowish samples. They are slightly lower than the values reported by Hoppe @hoppe and Boyd *et al* @boyd or Kamijoh *et al* @kamijoh [@kamijoh2] and Kish *et al* @kish85, but most closely to the last one. They modify to $a=6.896(1)\mbox{\AA}$, $b=8.058(2)\mbox{\AA}$, $c=6.484(4)\mbox{\AA}$ for rose annealed samples. Concomitantly, the density changes from $\rho=3.52$g/cm$^{3}$ to $\rho=3.44$g/cm$^ {3}$. We have chosen $c<a<b$ where $c$ is the polar two-fold axis which coincides with the selection of Boyd *et al* @boyd. This convention satisfies the recommendation of Roberts @roberts for unique designation of the orthorhombic class $mm2$. Note that in the following, in contrast to Roberts @roberts and the ANSI/IEEE Standard @ire-standard, we do not introduce an additional frame for reporting the nonlinear tensor properties but for simplification and in accordance with the tradition use the crystallographic $abc$ frame for reporting the nonlinear optical susceptibility (see Section \[sec: phase-matching\]). Also, instead of small case letters $xyz$, as suggested by Roberts @roberts, we use the capital letters $XYZ$ for designation of the principal optical axes such that $n_X<n_Y<n_Z$. Since for LIS one has $n_{b}<n_{a}<n_{c}$ the principal frame assignment will be $X\leftrightarrow b$, $Y\leftrightarrow a$ and $Z\leftrightarrow c$. ![\[fig: ftir\] Polarized transmission spectra of an annealed LIS sample (thickness 5 mm), not corrected for the Fresnel loss.](fig2.eps){width="7cm"} Fig. \[fig: ftir\] shows the polarized transmission spectra of a thick ($L=5\,$mm) annealed optical element. Depending on the growth and annealing conditions, some absorption bands due to the various point defects - in particular excess sulfur ions occupying interstitial sites - may limit the transmission window in the visible side. These visible bands, responsible for the rose coloration of the annealed samples, restrict the range of high-transmission ($T\sim70\%$) to $0.8 - 8.1\mu$m. The post-growth thermal treatment, however, improves considerably the transparency within the above window. The absorption coefficient $\alpha(\lambda)$ within the full transparency window deduced from the spectra amounts to 0.1 - 0.15 cm$^{-1}$. These values are overestimated, since from direct laser line transmission experiments using various laser sources in the range $0.78-2.53\,\mu$m and several samples the average residual absorption of a typical annealed sample was found to be lower. At $2.53\,\mu$m, e.g., the total loss coefficient (absorption and scattering) estimated amounts to $0.05\,$cm$^{-1}$. At $780\,$nm the loss coefficient measured with a diode laser source ranged between 0.05 and 0.2 cm$^{-1}$ depending on the strength of the weak point-defects related bands @isaenko-vasilyeva seen also in Fig. \[fig: ftir\]. \[sec: thermal\] Thermal and thermo-optic properties ==================================================== The thermally-related properties of a new nonlinear material are crucial in assessing its potential in real nonlinear conversion devices pumped by high power cw or pulsed lasers. The performance of devices based on mid-IR chalcogenides is often limited by deleterious thermal effects (lensing, expansion) @stoll [@douillet2; @pearl]. The thermal figure of merit of a material can be defined by the quantity $\eta=(\text{d}n/\text{d}T)/K$ where $\text{d}n/\text{d}T$ is the thermo-optic index variation and $K$ is the thermal conductivity. The larger this quantity the more severe are the thermal limitations. A second thermal quantity, $\tau_D=w_0C_p/4K$ where $C_p$ is the mass specific heat of the material and $w_0$ is the beam radius, gives the characteristic time of heat diffusion outside the pumped volume. The larger this diffusion time, the stronger the thermal lensing effects @douillet2. It is hence important to know $C_p, K$ and $\text{d}n/\text{d}T$. In addition, the thermo-optic coefficients are needed to predict phase-matching performance in $\chi^{(2)}$ interactions. Let us point out that no data has been published on the thermal properties of single domain crystalline LIS. \[subsec: specheat\] Specific heat at constant pressure ------------------------------------------------------- Using Al$_2$O$_3$ as a reference we estimated $C_p(T=300K)=92.9 \pm 1.1\,$J/mol/K for crystalline rose colour LIS (57.91mg) which is only slightly higher than what has been previously measured for polycrystalline LIS (90J/mol/K) in Ref. @kuhn. The temperature dependence in the \[-160$^\circ$C; 210$^\circ$C\] range could be fitted by $$C_p(T)=710-11-5446\times T^{-1}-187540\times T^{-2}$$ where $T$ is in Kelvin. The general theoretical expression of $C_{p}\,(T)$ for anharmonic solids is $$\label{eq: cpt} C_{p}\,(T)=12R\left[F(x_{D})+\sum_{k=1}^{N}c_{k}T^{k}\right]$$ where $R$ is the molar gas constant, $x_{D}=T_{D}/T$ ($T_{D}$ is the Debye temperature) and $F(x_{D})$ is the Debye function describing the temperature dependence in the harmonic lattice vibration approximation, $$\label{eq: fxd} F_{}(x_{D})=\frac{3}{x_{D}^{3}}\int_{0}^{x_{D}}\frac{x^{4}e^{x}dx}{(e^{x}-1)^{2}}.$$ The value of $N$ and the absolute magnitudes of the coefficients $c_{k}$ in the sum expansion in (\[eq: cpt\]) can be considered as a measure of the degree of lattice anharmonicity, while the sign of $c_{k}$ is essentially determined by the shape of the interatomic potential. In Eq. (\[eq: cpt\]), the leading coefficients $c_{1}$ and $c_{3}$ were found negative for all A$^{\text{I}}$B$^{\text{III}}$C$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ chalcogenide compounds, and the magnitude of $c_{k}$ was found $\sim10$ times higher and independent of the anion C$^{2-}$ for Li-compounds. This means that the anharmonic contribution of the lattice potential energy is much stronger in LiInC$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ compounds ($N=4$ in Eq. \[eq: cpt\]) than in A$^{\text{I}}$B$^{\text{III}}$C$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ chalcopyrite compounds ($N=3$). In LIS, this is related to the specific nature of the Li-S bond, which is about twice weaker than the In-S bond @sobota. As a consequence, the temperature dependence of $C_{p}$(LIS) is much weaker than for AgInS$_{2}$ and AGSe @neumann, and the resulting $C_{p}(T)$ values for LIS are the lowest of all chalcogenides. By a calorimetric absorptance ($A$) measurement the absorption coefficient $\alpha$ can be estimated from $A=mC_p\Delta T/P\Delta t=1-\exp(-\alpha L)$ where $m$ is the mass in mol, $\Delta T$ is the temperature rise, $P$ is the laser power and $\Delta t$ is the irradiation time. We irradiated at 1064nm an annealed LIS sample of dimension $5\times 5\times 5\,$mm$^3$ cut at 28$^\circ$ from the $c$ crystallographic axis for light propagation in the a-c plane (mass $m=0.438\,\text{g} =2.356\times 10^{-3}\,$mol) and obtained an absorption coefficient of $\alpha=0.037\,$cm$^{-1}$ (compare Section \[sec: growth\]). \[subsec: thermal-expansion\] Thermal expansion ----------------------------------------------- The principal thermal expansion and thermo-optic coefficients were determined by using the absolute interferometric dilatometer and the experimental procedure described in Ref. @dilatometer. A two-beam modified Mach-Zehnder interferometer arrangement is employed for dilatation measurements, while thermo-optic coefficients are obtained using the same set-up by recording changes in optical thickness of a sample acting as a thermal scanning Fabry-Perot interferometer, with the natural reflectivity of the two opposite parallel facets. Three parallelepipedic samples of dimension $5\times5\times8$ mm$^{3}$ cut along the crystallographic axes $a$, $b$ and $c$ ($L=8\,$mm) were used for these measurements. The samples were subjected to linear temperature ramps of $0.2^{\circ}$C/min in the range $-20^{\circ}$C - $+100^{\circ}$C. ![\[fig: thermal-expansion\] Thermal expansion coefficients of LIS along the axes $X\equiv b, Y\equiv a, Z\equiv c$ from $-20^{\circ}$C to $+100^{\circ}$C.](fig3.eps){width="7cm"} In a given temperature interval $dT$ the linear thermal expansion coefficients are defined as $$\label{eq: alphai} \alpha_{i}=\frac{1}{L_{i}}\frac{dL_{i}}{dT}$$ where $L_{i}$ is the sample length along the direction $i$, with $i=a,b,c$. To be consistent with our assignment of the principal optical axes $X,Y,Z$ in Section \[sec: linear\], we shall once and for all make the substitutions $X\equiv b, Y\equiv a, Z\equiv c$ in the following. For the measurement of the thermal expansion the light source of the absolute interferometric dilatometer was a frequency stabilized 2-mW He-Ne laser. A plot of the experimental data is reported in Fig. \[fig: thermal-expansion\]. A linear fit of the data gives the following temperature dependence of the linear thermal expansion coefficients, $$\begin{aligned} \alpha_{X}=1.61\times 10^{-5}+1.4\times 10^{-8}T, \label{eq: alphax}\\ \alpha_{Y}=0.89\times 10^{-5}+0.7\times 10^{-8}T, \label{eq: alphay}\\ \alpha_{Z}=0.66\times 10^{-5}+0.9\times 10^{-8}T, \label{eq: alphaz}\end{aligned}$$ where $T$ is the temperature ($^{\circ}$C). The deviation of experimental values from these fits are less than $10^{-6}\,$K$^{-1}$. At $T=20^{\circ}$C we have $\alpha_{X}=1.64\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$, $\alpha_{Y}=0.90\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$ and $\alpha_{Z}=0.68\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$, respectively. Such values are of the same order of magnitude (or even less) than those for AGS ($\alpha_{\parallel c}=1.25\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$, $\alpha_{\perp c}=-1.32\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$) @korczak and AGSe ($\alpha_{\parallel c}=1.68\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$, $\alpha_{\perp c}=-0.78\times10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$) @iseler. However, the main difference with those chalcopyrites is that LIS does not display their anomalous thermal expansion behaviour (opposite sign of $\alpha$ along the two orthogonal directions) that is a major source of thermo-mechanical stress in high power applications @feigelson. In contrast, LIS expands in the same direction as temperature increases and exhibits a rather weak temperature dependence. This favorable situation is related to the specific nature of the weak Li-S bond already evoked in the previous subsection. \[subsec: thermo-optic\] Thermo-optic coefficients -------------------------------------------------- We shall again make use of the labels $X\equiv b, Y\equiv a, Z\equiv c$ denoting the principal optical axes to describe the change of the index of refraction versus temperature, for a light polarized along one of these principal axes and propagating along another principal direction. For a light wave polarized along direction $p_j$ and propagating along direction $e_i$, we define the coefficient $\gamma_{ji}$ related to thermal changes in optical thickness (path) by $$\label{eq: gammaji} \gamma_{ji}=\frac{1}{n_{j}L_{i}}\frac{d(n_{j}L_{i})}{dT}$$ where $n_{j}$ and $L_{i}$ are respectively the refractive index and the length of the sample, with $i,j$ = X, Y or Z and $i\neq j$. The normalized thermo-optic coefficients $\beta_{j}=\frac{1}{n_{j}}\frac{dn_{j}}{dT}$ are derived from (\[eq: alphai\]) and (\[eq: gammaji\]) and given by $$\label{eq: betaj} \beta_{j}=\gamma_{ji}-\alpha_{i}.$$ As evident from Eq.(\[eq: betaj\]), the knowledge on the values of the thermal expansion is prerequisite for the interferometric determination of the thermo-optic coefficients at a given wavelength. For the orthorhombic symmetry of LIS it can be seen that each $\beta_{j}$ may be obtained for two directions of light propagation. This has been performed at four laser wavelengths, and the resulting linear fits to $$\beta_{j}(\lambda,T)=a_{1}(\lambda)+a_{2}(\lambda)T \label{eq: betaj-fit}$$ where $T$ is measured in $^\circ$C are summarized in Table \[tab: table1\]. The indicated uncertainties in the parameters $a_{1}$ and $a_{2}$ represent the deviation from the mean value determined from the two possible propagation directions $e_i$ for a given orientation $p_j$ of light polarization. At $\lambda=1064\,$nm and $T=20^{\circ}\,$C, one has $dn_{X}/dT=3.725\times 10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$, $dn_{Y}/dT=4.545\times 10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$, $dn_{Z}/dT=4.467 \times 10^{-5}\,$K$^{-1}$. Compared with the thermo-optic coefficients of AGS @updated-thermooptic, these values are about 5 times lower. Dispersion relations based on those wavelength-dependent data will be derived in Subsection \[subsec: thermo-optic-dispersion\]. <span>cccc</span> $\lambda$ ($\mu$m) & $\beta_{j}\, (^\circ \text{C}^{-1})$ & $10^{5}a_{1}\, (^\circ \text{C}^{-1})$ & $10^{8}a_{2}\, (^\circ \text{C}^{-2})$\ \ & $\beta_{X}$ & 3.41 $\pm$ 0.06 & 3.1 $\pm$ 0.3\ 0.4765 & $\beta_{Y}$ & 4.11 $\pm$ 0.07 & 4.6 $\pm$ 0.9\ & $\beta_{Z}$ & 4.08 $\pm$ 0.02 & 4.7 $\pm$ 0.4\ & $\beta_{X}$ & 2.28 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1.5 $\pm$ 0.4\ 0.6328 & $\beta_{Y}$ & 2.76 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.1 $\pm$ 0.4\ & $\beta_{Z}$ & 2.69 $\pm$ 0.01 & 2.4 $\pm$ 0.1\ & $\beta_{X}$ & 1.75 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.06\ 1.0642 & $\beta_{Y}$ & 2.10 $\pm$ 0.11 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.5\ & $\beta_{Z}$ & 2.03 $\pm$ 0.08 & 1.3 $\pm$ 0.1\ & $\beta_{X}$ & 1.50 $\pm$ 0.07 & 0.7 $\pm$ 0.17\ 3.392 & $\beta_{Y}$ & 1.83 $\pm$ 0.14 & 1.1 $\pm$ 0.5\ & $\beta_{Z}$ & 1.73 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.0 $\pm$ 0.02\ \[sec: vibrational\] Vibrational properties =========================================== The vibrational properties have been investigated by means of Raman spectroscopy and infrared reflectivity in polarized light at room temperature. The group theory analysis shows that, at the zone centre for the $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structure, the 48 normal phonon modes are distributed among the various irreducible representations of the C$_{2v}^9$ factor group as follows: $$\label{eq: group} \Gamma^{vib}=12\text{A}_{1}+12\text{A}_{2}+12\text{B}_{1}+12\text{B}_{2}.$$ The three acoustic phonon modes have A$_{1}$, B$_{1}$ and B$_{2}$ symmetries; the 45 remaining (optical) modes are Raman-active. A$_{1}$ modes will be active when the experimental configuration selects a diagonal $aa$, $bb$ or $cc$ component of the Raman tensor, while the selection of $ba$, $ca$ and $cb$ components will respectively allow the observation of the optical phonons of A$_{2}$, B$_{1}$ and B$_{2}$ symmetry. A$_{2}$-type phonons being infrared inactive, the IR-reflectivity spectra should then contain 11 polar modes of each A$_{1}$, B$_{1}$ and B$_{2}$ symmetries, with dipole moment respectively parallel to $c$, $a$ and $b$ crystallographic axes. In theory, every optical phonon may then be observed by means of IR-reflectivity and/or Raman-scattering. Nonetheless, depending on various factors such as the more or less polar character of bonds, even an active mode may be unobservable. To obtain results on every phonon type, we used two LIS rose-tinge samples cut from the same ingot, with sizes $4\times 4\times 5\,$mm$^{3}$ and parallel optically polished facets (4x4 mm$^{2}$) normal to $a$ and $c$ axes. Infrared reflection spectra were recorded in the spectral range 18.3 - 600 cm$^{-1}$, and this whole range of data was used to adjust the parameters of the dielectric permittivity model shown in Eq.(\[eq: permitt\]). The experimental spectra, recorded at quasi-normal incidence (at an angle of incidence of $6^{\circ}$) with an electric field polarization parallel to $a$, $b$ and $c$ axes, are shown in Fig. \[fig: reflect\] (symbols). As can be seen from these graphs, each reflectivity spectrum is rather complex and exhibits several more or less overlapping bands, and the high-energy band(s) in each polarization generally show some additional structure (slight inflexion in the band shape) that suggests, in addition to a strong mode, the presence of several other modes contributing to the same band. Actually, from the numerical analysis of the experimental results, it is found that for each direction of polarization, there are three polar modes in the high frequency band (350 - 420 cm$^{-1}$) and medium frequency band (250-350 cm$^{-1}$) and the remaining five polar modes, not all observable in Fig. \[fig: reflect\], are in the low frequency region ($<250$ cm$^{-1}$). ![\[fig: reflect\] Infrared reflection curves (symbols) recorded with polarized light with an electric field parallel to the crystallographic axes $a$ - B$_{1}$ modes -, $b$ - B$_{2}$ modes - and $c$ - A$_{1}$ modes. The continuous lines represent in each case the best-fit reflectivity curves calculated with the model in Eqs.(\[eq: permitt\])-(\[eq: reflectivity\]).](fig4.eps){width="7cm"} Polarized micro-Raman spectra were recorded using a Raman spectrometer equipped with a confocal microscope and a liquid-N$_2$ cooled CCD detector in the region 12 - 600 cm$^{-1}$ in triple substractive configuration with an 1800 gr/mm grating. To increase the quality and resolution of the spectra, we chose to use the 647nm red line of an argon-krypton laser (P=100 mW) which experiences lower absorption loss than a green laser @photonicwest). To avoid possible influence of surface defects, the confocal microscope focused the laser beam at a depth of 60$\mu$m under the surface. A scattering geometry will be described by the notation $e_{1}(p_{1}p_{2})e_{2}$ @porto where $e_{i}$ identifies the propagation direction of the laser light, polarized along $p_{i}$, $e$ and $p$ being $a, b$ or $c$ crystallographic axes; the subscripts $i=1$ and 2 refer to incident and scattered beams respectively. Fig. \[fig: raman\] shows some of the experimental spectra. The Raman spectra are dominated by a strong mode of A$_{1}$ symmetry at $\sim268$ cm$^{-1}$, also apparent in the IR reflectivity spectra for E//$b$ and E//$c$. ![\[fig: raman\] Polarized Raman spectra (shifted for reasons of clarity) recorded at room temperature. The experimental configurations $b(aa)b$, $c(bb)c$, $b(cc)b$ correspond to A$_1$ modes, $c(ba)c$ to A$_2$ modes, $b(ca)b$ to B$_1$ modes and $a(cb)a$ to B$_2$ modes.](fig5.eps){width="7cm"} Due to the respective mass of the atoms, high (low) frequency modes obviously imply movements of Li-S (In-S) bonds. Phonons of medium frequency (250-350 cm$^{-1}$), visible in both IR-reflectivity and Raman scattering, are attributed to In-S bonds @eifler while those of highest frequency (above 350 cm$^{-1}$, Fig. \[fig: reflect\]) that give rise to strong IR bands but no observable Raman line are due to weaker Li-S bonds @sobota. Polar modes TO$\approx$LO splitting observed in the infrared measurements for any of the explored polarizations is rather important in the high frequency region (strong IR-bands) which attests for a high polar (ionicity) character of Li-S bonds in this crystal. The splitting decreases with the phonon frequency to become so small for low frequency modes that no corresponding band appears in the reflectivity spectrum which indicates a mostly covalent character of the In-S bonds. However, even if a phonon cannot be observed by means of IR-reflectivity, its Raman activity may be high, which is the case for modes lying below $100$ cm$^{-1}$. Actually intense Raman lines appear in the low and mid-frequency region, when almost no line can be detected above roughly 350 cm$^{-1}$. In order to fit the experimental IR-reflectivity spectra, and get the best-fit reflectivity curves (lines in Figure \[fig: reflect\], in a good agreement with experimental points) we used the so-called *four-parameter model*, convenient to represent even asymmetrical and wide bands @salaun. This model expands the factorized form of the dielectric permittivity function as $$\label{eq: permitt} \varepsilon(\omega)=\epsilon^{'}-i\varepsilon^{"}= \varepsilon_{\infty}\prod_{j=1}^{N}\frac{\Omega_{j,\text{LO}}^{2}-\omega^{2}+i\gamma_{j,\text{LO}}\,\omega} {\Omega_{j,\text{TO}}^{2}-\omega^{2}+i\gamma_{j,\text{TO}}\,\omega}$$ to fit a reflectivity curve described by the Fresnel formula $$\label{eq: reflectivity} R(\omega)=\left|\frac{\sqrt{\varepsilon(\omega)}-1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon(\omega)}+1}\right|^{2}.$$ In the $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structure, the model implies for a given polarization $N$ damped oscillators, the number $N$ being at most equal to 11 (number of theoretically observable modes, predicted in this structure by group theory analysis). The $j$-th damped oscillator represents the $j$-th observed infrared active couple of modes, characterized by four adjustable parameters, namely the longitudinal $\Omega_{j,\text{LO}}$ and transverse $\Omega_{j,\text{TO}}$ angular frequencies, and the corresponding damping frequencies $\gamma_{j,\text{LO}}$ and $\gamma_{j,\text{TO}}$. The high-frequency limit values of the dielectric constant is also adjusted to yield $\varepsilon_{\infty}$(A$_{1}$)=3.99, $\varepsilon_{\infty}$(B$_{1}$)=4.09, $\varepsilon_{\infty}$(B$_{2}$)=3.97. \[htb\] -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Table \[tab: table2\] lists the wavenumbers $\bar{\nu}_{j}=\Omega_{j}/2\pi c$ and damping rates $\bar{\gamma}_{j}=\gamma_{j}/2\pi c$ (expressed in cm$^{-1}$) of the observed optical phonons deduced from IR-reflectivity and/or Raman scattering experiments, assigned to the various irreducible representations of the C$_{2v}^9$ factor group. These data allow to compute the linear dielectric properties of LIS in the far-IR range, using Eq.(\[eq: permitt\]). Typically, TO and LO frequencies deduced from IR-reflectivity experiments are determined to better than 1 cm$^{-1}$. The precision of a Raman-active phonon frequency is also generally better than 1 cm$^{-1}$, except for broad and low-intensity lines for which it decreases to 2 cm$^{-1}$. The transverse or longitudinal character of the Raman-active modes for A$_1$, B$_1$ and B$_2$ symmetries has been determined with the help of the IR reflectivity results where this TO or LO character is immediate. Non-observed IR-active modes indicate a small TO$\approx$LO splitting and generally did not allow an accurate determination of TO and LO frequencies from Raman spectra, but only of a mean value labelled by TO$\approx$LO. A few Raman lines have been attributed to an interference by an intense line active in another geometry. These Raman results complement those from previous studies performed with unpolarized @eifler [@kovach; @bruckner] and polarized light @dorday. The accurate determination of the frequencies in Table \[tab: table2\] allows to estimate the interatomic bonding force constants in LIS, using the theoretical considerations developed by Neumann about the correlation between the vibrational modes of compounds with sphalerite, chalcopyrite and $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structures @neuman-mod. According to this model the vibrational spectrum of a crystal with $\beta$-NaFeO$_{2}$ structure contains two sphalerite-like modes the TO-frequencies of which are nearly independent of the polarization direction. Further, one of these sphalerite-like modes always corresponds to the highest $\bar{\nu}_{\text{TO}}$ frequency found in the IR reflectivity spectra. If the interaction between the atoms is restricted to next-nearest neighbors which is justified by the high bond ionicities in Li -containing ternary compounds, the wavenumbers of the transverse optical modes of these sphalerite-like modes in LiB$^{\text{III}}$C$_{2}^{\text{VI}}$ are given by @neuman-nu $$\label{eq: nu-TO} \bar{\nu}_{TO,k}^{2}=\frac{1}{\pi^{2}c^{2}}(\alpha_{k}-\delta\alpha_{k}) \left(\frac{1}{m_{k}}+\frac{1}{m_{\text{C}}}\right)$$ with the superscript $k=$ in the first parenthesis denoting Li-C or B-C cation-anion bonds (in the present case, $C=$S and $B=$In). Here $c$ is the speed of light, $\alpha_{k}$ the mechanical bond-stretching force constant, $m_{k}$ the mass of the cation and $m_{\text{C}}$ the mass on the chalcogen anion (C=S$^{2-}$). The quantity $\delta\alpha_{k}$ accounts for the fact that in the case of IR active modes the local atomic displacements give rise to a non-vanishing net dipole moment per unit cell and thus, to additional dipole-dipole interactions. It is given by $\delta\alpha_{k}=\sqrt{3}(e_{k})^{2}/(16\varepsilon_{0}s_{k}^{3})$, where $s_{k}$ is the average bond length ($s_{Li-S}=0.2438$ nm, $s_{In-S}=0.2452$ nm), $e_{k}=0.28ef_{k}(Z_{k}+Z_{C})$ is an effective charge depending on the bond ionicity $f_{k}$ and the valences of the cation and anion participating to the bond. In Ref. @sobota, from an unpolarized IR reflectivity spectrum of polycrystalline LIS restricted to the region 200 - 400 cm$^{-1}$, the highest-frequency TO/LO mode identified corresponds to 356/406 cm$^{-1}$ and the second TO/LO sphalerite-like mode to 323/334 cm$^{-1}$. Actually from the inspection of Table \[tab: table2\], the highest-frequency sphalerite-like modes with nearly identical frequencies in B$_{1}$ and B$_{2}$ symmetries are respectively the 400.4/408.6 cm$^{-1}$ and 398.6/410.4 cm$^{-1}$ (this mode is not observed in A$_{1}$). The second sphalerite-like mode is recognized from Table \[tab: table2\] as the 323.7/333.7 cm$^{-1}$ (A$_{1}$), 318.3/334.6 cm$^{-1}$ (B$_{1}$), 324.6/329.8 cm$^{-1}$ (B$_{2}$), close to the value identified in Ref. @sobota. The Li-S bond force constant deduced from Eq.(\[eq: nu-TO\]) by Sobotta *et al* @sobota, $\alpha_{Li}=24.7$ N/m, is then underestimated by $(400.4/356)^{2}=24$% while the In-S bond force constant, deduced from the second sphalerite-like mode remains unchanged to $\alpha_{In}=53.4$ N/m. But even with this slight correction, the Li-S bond remains still about twice weaker than the In-S bond. In contrast the strength of the Ag-C$^{\text{VI}}$ bond in chalcopyrite compounds is more comparable to that of the B$^{\text{III}}$-C$^{\text{VI}}$ bonds @sobota, underlining the specific nature of the lithium-chalcogen bond in crystals with tetrahedral coordination of the atoms. As a consequence, the increased lattice phonon energy of LIS, as compared with AGS or AGSe, favors heat dissipation, hence a higher thermal conductivity is expected. Indeed, an unpublished measurement of LIS thermal conductivity yielded $K_{a}=6.0$ W/(m$\cdot$K), $K_{b}=6.2$ W/(m$\cdot$K) and $K_{c}=7.6$ W/(m$\cdot$K) @ebbers, i.e. 5 times larger than for AGS and of the same magnitude as for LiNbO$_{3}$. A last important feature from the vibrational spectra is that the phonon spectrum for LIS is located at wavenumbers below 410 cm$^{-1}$. The IR wavelength cut-off (8.1 $\mu$m) in Fig. \[fig: ftir\] quite exactly corresponds to three times this highest energy phonon. The long wavelength shape of the transmission curves - and limit of the transparency range - seems then to be simply due to multiphonon processes. It is worth mentioning that, although the vibrational investigations have used rose tinge samples, the phonon spectrum should not depend on coloration since all LIS samples display the same IR cutoff edge, with or without annealing. \[sec: electro-piezo\] Piezo-electric and electro-optic coefficients ==================================================================== \[subsec: apparent-eo\] Apparent electro-optic coefficients ----------------------------------------------------------- The measurement of electro-optic coefficients involves the determination of changes in optical thickness when applying an electric field to the material. LIS belongs to the symmetry class $mm2$ for which the electro-optic tensor exhibits 5 nonzero components, namely $r_{13}$, $r_{23}$, $r_{33}$, $r_{42}$ and $r_{51}$ @ire-standard. In this subsection we will describe the electro-optic effect in the principal optic frame where $XYZ$ are the axes of the index ellipsoid which as we shall see in the next section coincide with the crystallographic $bac$ axes. We will address only the $r_{i3}$'s coefficients that can be obtained by applying a field $E_{3}$ along the $Z$-axis which does not lead to a rotation of the ellipsoid. Optical interferometric methods may be advantageously used in this case for their determination. An applied electric field $\mathbf{E}$, with respective components $(E_{1}, E_{2}, E_{3})$ along the principal axes $(X, Y, Z)$, will modify the index ellipsoid according to $$\begin{aligned} (n_{X}^{-2}+r_{13}E_{3})X^{2}+(n_{Y}^{-2}+r_{23}E_{3})Y^{2} \nonumber\\ +(n_{Z}^{-2}+r_{33}E_{3})Z^{2} +2r_{42}E_{2}YZ+2r_{51}E_{1}XZ=1.\end{aligned}$$ The new indices $n_{i}(E_{3})$ ($i\equiv1,2,3\equiv X,Y,Z$) are given by $$n_{i}(E_{3})=n_{i}-\frac{1}{2}n_{i}^{3}r_{i3}E_{3}$$ where $\delta(n_{i})=-\frac{1}{2}n_{i}^{3}r_{i3}E_{3}$ represents the variation of the refractive index $n_{i}$. Due to the piezo-electric effect the field $E_{3}$ will also generate a variation $\delta(L_{j})$ of the crystal thickness $L_{j}$ along a given direction $e_j$ such that $$\label{eq: dej} \delta(L_{j})=L_{j}\bar{d}_{3j}E_{3}$$ where $\bar{d}_{3j}$ ($j=1,2,3$) are components of the piezo-electric tensor @ire-standard. For a light wave propagating along direction $e_j$ and polarized along direction $p_i$ of the crystal the variation $\delta(n_{i}L_{j})$ of the optical path $n_{i}L_{j}$ induced by an applied electric field $E_{3}$ will be $$\delta(n_{i}L_{j})=n_{i}L_{j}\left(\bar{d}_{3j}-\frac{1}{2}n_{i}^{2}r_{i3}\right)E_{3}.$$ We define the *effective* electro-optic coefficients as $$\label{eq: ri3-eff} r_{i3}^{\text{eff}}=-\frac{2}{n_{i}^{2}}\left(\bar{d}_{3j}-\frac{1}{2}n_{i}^{2}r_{i3}\right)$$ with $j=1,2$, which represent in fact the (apparent) electro-optic coefficients obtained in most experiments where the piezo-electric contribution is ignored. The measurements of the $r_{i3}^{\text{eff}}$'s were performed by using the technique of Phase-modulated Thermal Scanning Interferometry (PTSI) @sandrine-these. In this method, as for the measurements of thermo-optic coefficients, the sample acts as a Fabry-Perot thermal scanning interferometer in which phase modulation is achieved by applying an AC field $E_{3}$ along the Z axis. Various configurations of light polarization $(E_{X}, E_{Y}, E_{Z})$ and wave vector $\mathbf{k}$ $(k_{X}, k_{Y})$ were used to determine the apparent electro-optic coefficients of LIS. The two LIS samples of aperture $5\times 5\,$mm$^2$ used for the thermo-optic data measurements with lengths $L=8\,$mm along the X and Y propagation axes were supplied with gold evaporated electrodes on their Z facets. The low frequency (480 Hz) applied voltage was 200 V peak-to-peak and linear temperature ramps of $0.2^{\circ}$C/min were used from $20^{\circ}$C to $55^{\circ}$C. Measurements of apparent electro-optic coefficients were performed at $1.064\,\mu$m by using a 100mW TEM$_{00}$ single-frequency Nd:YAG laser. In the scanned temperature interval a constant value has been observed for each of them; they are summarized in Table \[tab: table3\]. <span>cc</span> $i$ & $r_{i3}^{eff}$ (pm/V)\ \ 1 & 2.18$\pm$0.04\ 2 & 2.82$\pm$0.33\ 3(X) & 0.93$\pm$0.03\ 3(Y) & 0.11$\pm$0.02\ These data feature a quite weak electro-optic effect in LIS and the large discrepancy observed between $r_{i3(X)}^{\text{eff}}$ and $r_{i3(Y)}^{\text{eff}}$ suggests a strong contribution of the piezo-electric effect to the apparent electro-optic one. \[subsec: pure-eo\] Piezo-electric and pure electro-optic coefficients ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The non-vanishing piezo-electric coefficients $\bar{d}_{31}$, $\bar{d}_{32}$ and $\bar{d}_{33}$ were measured by using the modified Mach-Zehnder arrangement of the absolute interferometric dilatometer in a manner similar to the one employed for dilatation measurements. Phase modulation of the interference pattern is performed by applying to the samples the same voltage and same thermal scanning procedure as described previously. The algebraic sign of the coefficients was attributed according to the ANSI/IEEE Standard 176-1987 on piezo-electric crystals @ire-standard and we have found in pm/V units and in the XYZ frame: $\bar{d}_{31}=-5.6\pm 0.1$ , $\bar{d}_{32}=-2.7\pm 0.2$ and $\bar{d}_{33}=+7.5\pm 0.2$. From Equation (\[eq: ri3-eff\]) we determine the pure electro-optic coefficients $r_{13}=1.0\,$pm/V, $r_{23}=0.4\,$pm/V and $r_{33}=-1.3\,$pm/V which reveals a rather small true electro-optic effect compared to the piezo-electric one. The relative uncertainty in these values is close to 15%. These measurements confirm that, as AGS or AGSe, LIS is a poor candidate for electro-optic or piezo-electric based devices. A comparison of our results with earlier data of Negran *et al* @negran cannot be meaningful since the $r_{13}$, $r_{23}$ and $r_{33}$ that were measured there did not account for the piezo-electric contribution and were not determined independently, but as a linear combination. \[subsec: soref\] Comparison of the electro-optic and pyroelectric coefficients ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From the anharmonic oscillator model developed by Garrett @garrett, Soref @soref yields a semi-empirical relationship between the pyroelectric coefficient at constant stress ($p^{\,\sigma}=\left(\frac{\Delta P_{s}}{\Delta T}\right)_{\sigma}$) and the second-order electronic susceptibility $\chi^{(2)}$ describing the linear (true) electro-optic effect: $$p^{\,\sigma}=\chi^{(2)}(\omega\pm0;\omega,0)2C_{v}\frac{\epsilon_{0}m_{e}^{2}(\omega_{e}^{2}-\omega^{2})^{2}}{\mu\omega_{i}^{2}N_Ae^{2}}\left(\frac{3A+B}{C+3D}\right).$$ The pyroelectric coefficient $p^{\sigma}$ gives the variation of the spontaneous polarization $\Delta P_{s}$ induced by a temperature variation $\Delta T$. The parameters $m_{e}$ and $e$ are the mass and charge of the electron, $\omega_{e}$ and $\omega_{i}$ are respectively the electronic and ionic resonance frequencies, $C_{v}$ is the molar specific heat at constant volume (which differs from the specific heat at constant pressure $C_{p}$ measured in Subsection \[subsec: specheat\] by a negligible quantity) and $N_A$ the Avogadro number. The constant terms $A, B, C$ and $D$ are the coefficients related to the third order expansion of the crystal potential energy in the electronic and ionic coordinate system $q_{e}$ and $q_{i}$ @soref. The ratio $(3A+B)/(C+3D)$ indicates the extent to which the predominant ionic contribution to the anharmonic potential at $\omega\approx \omega_{i}$ differs from the predominant electronic one at $\omega>>\omega_{i}$. This ratio is expected to be constant whatever the material, suggesting a linear relationship between the electro-optic and pyroelectric coefficients. This hypothesis was verified for a few known materials, mostly of the oxide type @soref. By using $C_{v}=C_{p}$ and $\chi_{333}^{(2)}=n_{3}^{4}r_{33}$ from the previous subsection, the pyroelectric coefficient measured previously @bidault as a function of temperature and its value extrapolated at 300 K, $p^{\,\sigma}=6\times10^{-10}$ C$\cdot$ cm$^{-2}\,$K$^{-1}$, we observe that Soref's hypothesis is confirmed for the ternary semiconductor LIS, as it was already shown for the binary one CdS @soref. We note also that a rather good estimate of the pyroelectric effect may be deduced from electro-optic measurements and vice versa, but this requires at first an accurate determination of the piezo-electric contribution. \[sec: linear\] Linear optical and thermo-optic dispersions =========================================================== We now address, in light of the vibrational spectra results, the most important data for a nonlinear material: linear optical and thermo-optic dispersion relations that allow to predict accurately the phase-matching directions and temperature tunability. \[subsec: sellmeier\] Sellmeier equations at room-temperature ------------------------------------------------------------- The only available dispersion data of LIS, measured using the minimum deviation technique, were compiled by Boyd *et al* in 1973 @boyd and fitted to one-pole (UV) Sellmeier equations @ebbers-report reproduced also in Refs. @rotermund [@grechin; @grechin2]. Although the accuracy of their index determination was not reported, from subsequent nonlinear phase-matched conversion experiments it appeared that the Sellmeier equations based on their data are accurate to predict the birefringence (via angle acceptance bandwith measurements @assl), but fail to predict accurately the absolute phase-matching directions. Discrepancies of several degrees from the expected phase-matching angles were reported @knippels. Such deviations cannot be attributed to the X-ray sample orientation uncertainties ($\pm0.5^{\circ}$). Furthermore, we have checked that the phase-matching angles, and hence the linear refractive indices, are independent of crystal coloration or exact stoichiometry. Following the standard convention for assigning the principal axes ($X, Y, Z$) to the crystallographic axes ($a, b, c$), e.g. $n_{X}<n_{Y}<n_{Z}$, one has $X\leftrightarrow b$, $Y\leftrightarrow a$ and $Z\leftrightarrow c$ for LIS since $n_{b}<n_{a}<n_{c}$. A phase-matching direction will be labelled by ($\theta, \varphi$), where $\theta$ is the angle of the wavevector respective to the polar $Z$ axis and $\varphi $ is the azimuthal angle between its projection in the $X-Y$ plane and the $X$ axis. To refit the Sellmeier equations given in Ref. @ebbers-report, we have used the experimental type-II (eoe, oeo) SHG angles measured in the fundamental wavelength range $\lambda\in [2.5 - 6]\,\mu$m @knippels [@photonicwest], supplemented with new recent data derived from type-II (eoe) difference-frequency generation (DFG) in the X-Y plane (see subsection \[subsec: dfg\]), where in the wavelength-tuning mode, mid-IR down-conversion in the range $\lambda_1\in [6.6-7]\,\mu$m was achieved at normal incidence. Table \[tab: table4\] compiles the experimental phase-matching data used to derive the following room-temperature ($T=20^\circ$C) two-pole Sellmeier equations, valid over the full transparency window, using a nonlinear least-square fit of the data, $$\begin{aligned} n_{X}^{2}=6.686059 + \frac{0.1385833}{\lambda^{2}-0.05910334}+\frac{2047.46509}{\lambda^{2}-897.7476}, \label{eq: sellmz1} \\ n_{Y}^{2}=7.095493 + \frac{0.1422326}{\lambda^{2}-0.06614640}+\frac{2511.08936}{\lambda^{2}-988.2024}, \label{eq: sellmz2} \\ n_{Z}^{2}=7.256327 + \frac{0.15072}{\lambda^{2}-0.06823652}+\frac{2626.10840}{\lambda^{2}-983.0503}. \label{eq: sellmz3}\end{aligned}$$ \[ht\] <span>cccccc</span> & &\ & $\lambda_{1}$ & $\lambda_{2}$ & $\lambda_{3}$ & Measured & Calculated\ SHG & 2366 & 2366 & 1183 & (90,82.1) & (90,83.908)\ (XY: $eoe$)& 2469 & 2469 & 1234.5 & (90,73.1) & (90,72.755)\ & 2527 & 2527 & 1263.5 & (90,69.8) & (90,69.235)\ & 2583 & 2583 & 1291.5 & (90,67.4) & (90,66.507)\ & 2900 & 2900 & 1450 & (90,57.9) & (90,56.884)\ & 3400 & 3400 & 1700 & (90,50.7) & (90,50.543)\ & 3700 & 3700 & 1850 & (90,48.3) & (90,49.392)\ & 3900 & 3900 & 1950 & (90,49.0) & (90,49.381)\ & 4450 & 4450 & 2225 & (90,51.6) & (90,51.772)\ & 4950 & 4950 & 2475 & (90,56.3) & (90,56.543)\ & 5350 & 5350 & 2675 & (90,62.8) & (90,62.227)\ & 5550 & 5550 & 2775 & (90,66.0) & (90,65.916)\ & 5750 & 5750 & 2875 & (90,69.1) & (90,70.508)\ & 5900 & 5900 & 2950 & (90,71.4) & (90,75.006)\ \ SHG & 2542.7 & 2542.7 & 1371.35 & (35.4,90) & (36.452,90)\ (YZ: $eoo$)& 2552.7 & 2552.7 & 1276.35 & (34.0,90)& (34.684,90)\ & 2570.4 & 2570.4 & 1285.2 & (31.0,90) & (31.508,90)\ & 2587 & 2587 & 1293.5 & (28.7,90) & (28.435,90)\ & 2602.3 & 2602.3 & 1301.15 & (25.9,90) & (25.481,90)\ & 2606.7 & 2606.7 & 1303.35 & (25.1,90) & (24.592,90)\ & 2631.4 & 2631.4 & 1315.7 & (19.6,90) & (19.211,90)\ \ DFG & 6585.14 & 872.240 & 770.220 & (90,42) & (90,42.170)\ (XY: eoe) & 6623.95 & 865.801 & 765.716 & (90,42) & (90,42.145)\ & 6719.87 & 850.443 & 754.905 & (90,42) & (90,42.076)\ & 6762.44 & 843.761 & 750.162 & (90,42) & (90,42.046)\ & 6832.63 & 833.187 & 742.629 & (90,42) & (90,41.992)\ & 6899.92 & 822.391 & 734.810 & (90,42) & (90,41.967)\ & 6989.56 & 810.827 & 726.544 & (90,42) & (90,41.863)\ ![\[fig: indices\] Principal refractive indices of LiInS$_{2}$ as computed from Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]). The inset plots show the UV and mid-IR portions on an expanded scale and also a comparison with a calculation based on the Sellmeier expansions from Ref. @ebbers-report (dashed lines).](fig6.eps){width="7cm"} In Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]), the wavelengths are expressed in microns. The three IR wavelength poles $\lambda_{IR}(X)=29.96\,\mu$m, $\lambda_{IR}(Y)=31.44\,\mu$m, $\lambda_{IR}(Z)=31.35\,\mu$m (i.e. $\bar{\nu}(X)=333.7\,$cm$^{-1}$, $\bar{\nu}(Y)=318.1\,$cm$^{-1}$, $\bar{\nu}(Z)=318.9\,$cm$^{-1}$) correspond to the medium-frequency phonon band-centers of symmetry B$_{2}$, B$_{1}$ and A$_{1}$ respectively, attributed to the In-S vibrations (see Table \[tab: table2\]). We note that another two-pole Sellmeier set of equations that recently appeared @badikov2 is based on the old index data of Boyd et al. @boyd while the mid-IR poles were not associated with phonon frequencies. Fig. \[fig: indices\] displays the principal indices of refraction deduced from Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]). No index crossing ($n_{o}(\lambda)=n_{e}(\lambda)$) is found in the blue part of the dispersion data, in contrast with the uniaxial AGS @updated-thermooptic. The two optic axes, lying in the X-Z plane, determine the propagation directions where the index of refraction is independent of the polarization. The angle between the two optic axes is $2V_{Z}$ where $V_{Z}$ is the angle of each axis with the polar Z-axis. $V_{Z}$ is wavelength-dependent and can be calculated from @dmitriev $$\label{eq: optic-axis} \sin V_{Z}=\frac{n_{Z}(n_{Y}^{2}-n_{X}^{2})^{1/2}}{n_{Y}(n_{Z}^{2}-n_{X}^{2})^{1/2}}.$$ ![\[fig: optic-axis\] Angle $V_{Z}$ between the optic axes and the Z-axis in LIS calculated with the Sellmeier expansion of Ref. @ebbers-report (dashed line), and the new Sellmeier expansion (Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\])) (solid line).](fig7.eps){width="7cm"} Fig. \[fig: optic-axis\] plots $V_{Z}$ as a function of the wavelength, using Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]) (solid line) and using the Sellmeier equations of Ref. @ebbers-report (dashed line). Let us note the different behavior for $\lambda < 1\,\mu$m (absence of a retracing behavior). Note that although the principal indices on which the old dispersion relations are based were measured from the minimum deviation technique in 1973 @boyd, the absorption coefficient of the prism samples used then was quite different (much larger than in Fig. \[fig: ftir\] up to about $2.5\,\mu$m) which obviously is the reason for the difference observed in Fig. \[fig: optic-axis\]. Since $V_{Z}>45^{\circ}$ LIS is a negative biaxial crystal. At longer wavelengths it can be regarded as quasi-uniaxial, which is a consequence of the fact that the two indices $n_{Y}$ and $n_{Z}$ are very close. Therefore no phase-matching can be expected for propagation directions in the vicinity of the X-principal axis. The agreement between the experimental phase-matching data used to derive Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]) and the calculated ones is illustrated in Fig.\[fig: shg-pm\] (solid lines) and Table \[tab: table4\]. The accuracy of phase-matching angle prediction is $\pm 1.5^{\circ}$. The eight last SHG points in Fig. \[fig: shg-pm\] were discarded from the nonlinear fit for obvious lack of reliability. Only a two-pole form leads to the smallest residual discrepancies between calculated and experimental data, while the former one-pole Sellmeier equations @ebbers-report are unable to predict SHG near the cut-off wavelength of $\sim 6\,\mu$m. Let us note that there is a discrepancy of $\sim +6^\circ$ between the experimental phase-matching angles for SHG in the Y-Z plane and the ones calculated with the old Sellmeier equation, which means that the Y-Z birefringence given by Eqs. (\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]) is more accurate. The previous one-pole Sellmeier equations also predict DFG wavelengths $\sim +40\,$nm longer than experimentally observed. Under the usual designation $\lambda_1\geq \lambda_2>\lambda_3$ the FWHM DFG angular acceptance (FWHM) measured at fixed wavelengths was $\Delta\varphi=0.19^\circ$ for a crystal length of 10 mm, i.e. much smaller than the uncertainty on crystal orientation ($\pm 0.5^{\circ}$). Hence the uncertainty ($\pm1\,$nm at maximum) of wavelength measurement in Table \[tab: table4\] cannot explain the $\sim 40\,$nm shift observed with the previous Sellmeier equations, confirming the increased accuracy in dispersion provided by Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]). ![\[fig: shg-pm\] Phase-matching angles for type-II ($eoe$ or $oee$) SHG in the X-Y principal plane (main frame) and type-II ($oeo$ or $eoo$) SHG in the Y-Z plane (inset frame) of LIS. The fundamental source for $\lambda<2.65\,\mu$m ($\lambda>2.75\,\mu$m, respectively) is the idler wave of a Nd:YAG-pumped nanosecond LiNbO$_{3}$ parametric oscillator (the frequency-doubled radiation from a Free-Electron Laser). The symbols refer to experiments while the solid lines are calculated from Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]). The dashed lines are computed from the Sellmeier equations of Refs. @ebbers-report.](fig8.eps){width="7cm"} \[subsec: thermo-optic-dispersion\] Thermo-optic dispersion relations --------------------------------------------------------------------- The thermo-optic coefficients $\beta_{j}$ \[Eq. (\[eq: betaj-fit\])\] are functions of both temperature $T$ (in $^\circ$C) and wavelength $\lambda$ (in $\mu$m). In analogy with the index dispersion equations at room-temperature (see previous subsection) the parameters $a_{k}(\lambda)$ ($k=1, 2$) in Table \[tab: table1\] are fitted according to the following two-pole functional form, $$\label{eq: beta-coeff} a_{k}(\lambda)=C_{0,k}+\frac{C_{1,k}}{\lambda^{2}-\lambda_{01,k}^{2}}+\frac{C_{2,k}}{\lambda^{2}-\lambda_{02,k}^{2}}.$$ Table \[tab: table5\] compiles the fitting parameters $C_{0,k}, C_{1,k}, C_{2,k}$, $\lambda_{01,k}$ and $\lambda_{02,k}$. \[t\] <span>ccccccc</span> $a_{k}(\lambda)$ & $p_i$ & $C_0$ & $C_1$ & $C_2$ & $\lambda_{01}$ &$\lambda_{02}$\ \ & X & 2.899680$\times10^{-5}$ &0.2033761$\times10^{-5}$&297.0535$\times10^{-5}$ &0.3475601&14.86755\ $a_{1}$ & Y & 2.478267$\times10^{-5}$ &0.2612463$\times10^{-5}$&122.3207$\times10^{-5}$ &0.3391212&13.91854\ & Z & 3.315830$\times10^{-5}$ &0.2555208$\times10^{-5}$&364.9813$\times10^{-5}$ &0.3451539&15.44113\ \ & X & 1.987083$\times10^{-8}$ &0.1860292$\times10^{-8}$&250.0777$\times10^{-8}$ &0.3886392&14.25991\ $a_{2}$ & Y & 0.1523235$\times10^{-8}$&0.2601335$\times10^{-8}$&-191.8712$\times10^{-8}$&0.3969192&14.79803\ & Z &-06564806$\times10^{-8}$ &0.4291068$\times10^{-8}$&-343.1015$\times10^{-8}$&0.3435849&14.94811 According to the definition $\beta_{j}=\frac{1}{n_{j}}\frac{dn_{j}}{dT}$, the index of refraction at a given temperature $T$ will be given by $$\begin{aligned} \frac{n(\lambda,T)}{n(\lambda,T_{0})}&=& \exp\left[a_{1}(\lambda)(T-T_{0})+a_{2}(\lambda)\frac{(T-T_{0})^{2}}{2}\right] \nonumber\\ &\simeq & 1+a_{1}(\lambda)(T-T_{0})+a_{2}(\lambda)\frac{(T-T_{0})^{2}}{2} \label{eq: nT}\end{aligned}$$ where $T_{0}=20^{\circ}$C and $n(\lambda,T_{0})$ is given by Eqs.(\[eq: sellmz1\])-(\[eq: sellmz3\]). These thermo-optic dispersion relations will have to be refined by experimental temperature phase-matching data in the future. Relations (\[eq: beta-coeff\]) with the constant values in Table \[tab: table5\] would provide a suitable basis for such a refit procedure. They predict a FWHM temperature acceptance of $\Delta TL=248^{\circ}$C$\cdot$cm ($L$: crystal length) at room temperature for the type-II (eoe) SHG at the fundamental $\lambda=2.5\,\mu$m in the X-Y plane. Hence LIS is expected to be very stable against self-induced thermal effects. As a counterpart, its temperature tunability is expected to be somewhat limited. However for the DFG of near-IR sources ($\lambda_{3}=754.905\,$nm, $\lambda_{2}=850.443\,$nm, see Table \[tab: table4\]), the FWHM temperature acceptance is predicted to be only $\Delta TL=46^{\circ}$C$\cdot$cm. \[sec: phase-matching\] Phase-matching investigations ====================================================== \[subsec: deff\] Effective nonlinearity and Hobden classification ----------------------------------------------------------------- The phase-matching loci and the effective nonlinearity for LIS will be analyzed in the XYZ-principal optic axis frame, but the tensor elements of the nonlinear susceptibility are defined traditionally, in accordance with ANSI/IEEE Std 176-1987 @ire-standard, in the $abc$-crystallographic frame where $c$ is the polar two-fold axis as in Ref. @boyd. The chosen convention $n_{X}<n_{Y}<n_{Z}$ in order to have the two optic axes in the X-Z principal plane affects therefore the expressions for the effective second order nonlinearity $d_{\text{eff}}$. The general form of the contracted $\mathbf{d}^{(2)}$ tensor for the orthorhombic class $mm2$ reads as $$\label{eq: d-tensor} \mathbf{d}^{(2)}=\left( \begin{array}{cccccc} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & d_{15} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & d_{24} & 0 & 0 \\ d_{31} & d_{32} & d_{33} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array}\right).$$ For an arbitrary propagation direction assuming collinear interaction and neglecting the spatial walk-off effect analytical expressions for $d_{\text{eff}}$ can be derived in our conventions from the general formulae presented by Dmitriev *et al* @dmitriev2, $$\label{eq: deff-ssf} \begin{split} d_{\text{eff}}^{\,ssf} &= \;2\,d_{15}\sin\theta \cos\delta\, (\cos\theta \sin\varphi \sin\delta -\cos\varphi \cos\delta ) \\ &\times (\cos\theta \sin\varphi \cos\delta +\cos\varphi \sin\delta )\\ &+ \;2\,d_{24}\sin\theta \cos\delta\, (\cos\theta \cos\varphi \cos\delta -\sin\varphi \sin\delta ) \\ &\times (\cos\theta \cos\varphi \sin\delta +\sin\varphi \cos\delta )\\ &+ \;\;\;d_{31}\sin\theta \sin\delta\, (\cos\theta \sin\varphi \cos\delta+\cos\varphi\sin\delta)^{2}\\ &+ \;\;\;d_{32}\sin\theta \sin\delta\, (\cos\theta \cos\varphi \cos\delta -\sin\varphi\sin\delta)^{2}\\ &+\;\;\;d_{33}\sin^{3}\theta\cos^{2}\delta\sin\delta \end{split}$$
{'source': 'arXiv_out/physics0307082_extract_lis-arxiv'}