---
author:
- Sutirtha Mukherjee
- Kwon Park
title: 'Adiabatic Path from Fractional Chern Insulators to the Tao-Thouless State: Supplemental Material'
---

<span>**Tight-binding Models**</span>

We focus on two tight-binding models with one in the checkerboard lattice @Sun11 and the other in the kagome lattice @Tang11.

First, the Hamiltonian for the checkerboard lattice model is written as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
H_{\rm checker} = \sum_{\bf k} 
( c_{a {\bf k}}^\dagger \;\; c_{b {\bf k}}^\dagger ) 
H_{\bf k} 
\left( 
\begin{array}{c}
c_{a {\bf k}} \\
c_{b {\bf k}} 
\end{array}
\right),
\label{H_checker1}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
H_{\bf k} &= -\left[ (t_1^\prime+t_2^\prime)(\cos{k_x} + \cos{k_y})+4t^{\prime\prime} \cos{k_x} \cos{k_y} \right] I 
\nonumber\\
&- 4t \cos{\phi} \cos{k_x \over 2} \cos{k_y \over 2} \sigma_x 
- 4t \sin{\phi} \sin{k_x \over 2} \sin{k_y \over 2} \sigma_y 
\nonumber\\
&- \left[ (t_1^\prime-t_2^\prime)(\cos{k_x} - \cos{k_y})+M \right] \sigma_z,
\label{eq:H_checker2}\end{aligned}$$ where $c_{a {\bf k}}$ and $c_{b {\bf k}}$ are the electron annihilation operators at momentum ${\bf k}$ for sub-lattices $a$ and $b$, respectively, $I$ is the identity matrix, and $\sigma_{x,y,z}$ are the Pauli matrices. As written above, $H_{\rm checker}$ is not of the proper Bloch form, which needs to be addressed in order to obtain the correct Chern number. $H_{\rm checker}$ can be brought to the proper Bloch form via the gauge transformation of $c_{b {\bf k}} \to e^{-i(k_x-k_y)/2} c_{b {\bf k}}$ @Regnault11. Finally, the value of $M$ controls the phase transition between topologically trivial and non-trivial situations.

For the set of parameters with $t=1$, $t_1^\prime=-t_2^\prime={1/(2 + \sqrt{2})}$, $t^{\prime\prime} = 1/(2 + 2 \sqrt{2})$, $\phi = \pi/4$, and $M=0$, $H_{\rm checker}$ generates a gapped energy spectrum containing two energy bands with Chern numbers $C= \pm 1$. The upper energy band with $C= - 1$ has a bandwidth of nearly 1/30 of the band gap and thus can serve as a Chern flat band suitable for the realization of fractional Chern insulators (FCIs).

Second, the Hamiltonian for the kagome lattice model is written as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
H_{\rm kagome} = \sum_{\bf k} 
( c_{a {\bf k}}^\dagger \;\; c_{b {\bf k}}^\dagger \;\;  c_{c {\bf k}}^\dagger ) 
H_{\bf k} 
\left( 
\begin{array}{c}
c_{a {\bf k}} \\
c_{b {\bf k}} \\
c_{c {\bf k}}
\end{array}
\right),
\label{eq:H_kagome1}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
H_{\bf k} = 
\left( 
\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & h_{12}({\bf k}) & h_{13}({\bf k}) \\
h_{12}^*({\bf k}) & 0 & h_{23}({\bf k}) \\
h_{13}^*({\bf k}) & h_{23}^*({\bf k}) & 0
\end{array}
\right)
\label{eq:H_kagome2}\end{aligned}$$ with nonzero matrix elements of $H_{\bf k}$ given by $$\begin{aligned}
h_{12}({\bf k}) &=  -2(t_1-i\lambda_1)\cos{k_1 \over 2} -2 (t_2+i\lambda_2)\cos{\left({k_2\over 2} + {k_3\over 2}\right)}  ,
\nonumber\\
h_{13}({\bf k}) &= -2(t_1+i\lambda_1)\cos{k_2 \over 2} -2(t_2-i\lambda_2)\cos{\left({k_3 \over 2}-{k_1 \over 2}\right)} ,
\nonumber\\
h_{23}({\bf k}) &=  -2(t_1-i\lambda_1)\cos{k_3 \over 2} -2 (t_2+i\lambda_2)\cos{\left({k_1 \over 2}+{k_2 \over 2}\right)} ,
\label{eq:H_kagome3}\end{aligned}$$ where $k_1 = k_x$, $k_2 = (k_x+\sqrt{3}k_y)/2$, and $k_3 = k_2-k_1$. Similar to $H_{\rm checker}$, $H_{\rm kagome}$ can be brought to the proper Bloch form via the gauge transformation of $c_{b {\bf k}} \to e^{-i k_1/2}c_{b {\bf k}}$ and $c_{c {\bf k}} \to e^{-i k_2/2}c_{c {\bf k}}$.

For the set of parameters with $t_1=1$, $t_2=-0.3$, $\lambda_1 = 0.28$, and $\lambda_2 = 0.2$, $H_{\rm kagome}$ generates a gapped energy spectrum containing three bands with Chern numbers $C=1,0,-1$. The bottom energy band with $C=1$ has a bandwidth of nearly 1/52 of the band gap against the middle energy band, serving as a Chern flat band suitable for the realization of FCIs.

<span>**Matrix elements of the electron-electron interaction**</span>

We begin by writing the electron-electron interaction operator in the real space as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{U}  =   {1 \over 2} \sum_{a,b} \sum^\prime_{i ,j}  U({\bf r}^a_i-{\bf r}^b_j) {\cal P}_{\rm CFB} |{\bf r}^a_i, {\bf r}^b_j \rangle \langle {\bf r}^a_i, {\bf r}^b_j | {\cal P}_{\rm CFB},
\label{eq:U_real}\end{aligned}$$ where $a, b$ and $i, j$ denote sublattice and unit cell indices, respectively. The prime indicates that the summation is restricted so that $i \neq j$ if $a = b$. The ket state $| {\bf r}^a_i \rangle$ represents the position eigenstate at ${\bf r}^a_i$.

The projection operator to a given Chern flat band, ${\cal P}_{\rm CFB}$, modifies the position eigenstates as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
{\cal P}_{\rm CFB} | {\bf r}^a_i \rangle = \sum_{\bf k} 
u^{*}_a({\bf k})
e^{i \theta^a_{\bf k}} 
e^{i {\bf k} \cdot {\bf r}_i^a} 
| {\bf k} \rangle , 
\label{eq:r_projection}\end{aligned}$$ where $u_a({\bf k})$ is the $a$-sublattice amplitude of the Bloch eigenstate with momentum ${\bf k}$ projected to the Chern flat band. The phase factor $e^{i \theta^a_{\bf k}}$ is due to the gauge transformation required to bring the Hamiltonian to the proper Bloch form.

By using the above momentum space representation of projected position eigenstates, we can rewrite the electron-electron interaction operator in the momentum space as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{U}  =   \sum_{{\bf k}_1,{\bf k}_2,{\bf k}_3,{\bf k}_4}  \langle{\bf k}_1, {\bf k}_2| \hat{U} |{\bf k}_3, {\bf k}_4\rangle 
c^\dagger_{{\bf k}_1} c^\dagger_{{\bf k}_2} c_{{\bf k}_3} c_{{\bf k}_4} ,
\label{eq:U_momentum}\end{aligned}$$ where $\langle {\bf k}_1, {\bf k}_2 | \hat{U} | {\bf k}_3, {\bf k}_4 \rangle$ is the matrix element of the electron-electron interaction in terms of momentum eigenstates:

$$\begin{aligned}
\langle {\bf k}_1, {\bf k}_2 | \hat{U} | {\bf k}_3, {\bf k}_4 \rangle = 
\sum_{a, b} \sum_{\delta{\bf r}} 
\delta_{{\bf k}_1+{\bf k}_2, {\bf k}_3+{\bf k}_4} 
U( \delta{\bf r} )  
e^{i({\bf k}_2-{\bf k}_4) \cdot \delta{\bf r}} 
e^{i (\theta^a_{{\bf k}_1}+\theta^b_{{\bf k}_2}-\theta^a_{{\bf k}_3}-\theta^b_{{\bf k}_4})} 
u^*_a ({\bf k}_1) u^*_b ({\bf k}_2) u_a ({\bf k}_3) u_b ({\bf k}_4) ,
\label{eq:U_matrix_element_momentum}\end{aligned}$$

where $\delta{\bf r}={\bf r}^a_i-{\bf r}^b_j$ is the relative position vector.

Meanwhile, we can still rewrite the electron-electron interaction operator via the Wannier-Stark ladder (WSL) eigenstate representation as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
\hat{U}  =   \sum_{\kappa_i,\kappa_j,\kappa_k,\kappa_l}  \langle \kappa_i, \kappa_j | \hat{U} | \kappa_k, \kappa_l \rangle 
c^\dagger_{\kappa_i} c^\dagger_{\kappa_j} c_{\kappa_k} c_{\kappa_l} ,
\label{eq:U_WSL}\end{aligned}$$ where $\langle \kappa_i, \kappa_j | \hat{U} | \kappa_k, \kappa_l \rangle$ is the matrix element of the electron-electron interaction in terms of WSL eigenstates:

$$\begin{aligned}
\langle \kappa_i, \kappa_j | \hat{U} | \kappa_k, \kappa_l \rangle &=
\sum_{{\bf k}_1, {\bf k}_2, {\bf k}_3, {\bf k}_4} 
\langle {\bf k}_1, {\bf k}_2 | \hat{U} | {\bf k}_3, {\bf k}_4 \rangle
%\nonumber\\
\phi^*_{\kappa_i}({\bf k}_1) \phi^*_{\kappa_j}({\bf k}_2)  \phi_{\kappa_k} ({\bf k}_3) \phi_{\kappa_l}({\bf k}_4),
\label{eq:U_matrix_element_WSL}\end{aligned}$$

where $\phi_{\kappa}({\bf k})$ is related with WSL eigenstates via $\phi_{\kappa}({\bf k})= \phi^{\rm WSL}_{n,k_\perp}(k_\parallel)$ with $\kappa=2\pi n+k_\perp$ and ${\bf k}=k_\parallel \hat{e}_\parallel+k_\perp \hat{e}_\perp$. See the main text for the explicit definition of $\phi^{\rm WSL}_{n,k_\perp}(k_\parallel)$.

The physical form of the electron-electron interaction can be varied by changing $U(\delta {\bf r})$ in Eq. . In the case of the nearest-neighbor interaction, $U(\delta {\bf r})$ is chosen to be $U^{\rm NN}(\delta {\bf r})$, which is nonzero only if $\delta {\bf r}$ is the relative position vector connecting between nearest-neighboring sites. In the case of the Coulomb interaction, $U(\delta {\bf r})$ is chosen to be $U^{\rm Coul}(\delta {\bf r})$, which is the usual $1/r$ potential except for an important modification due to the existence of image charges induced by the periodic boundary condition.

Specifically, following Bonsall and Maradudin @Bonsall77, we can write $U^{\rm Coul}(\delta {\bf r})$ as follows:

$$\begin{aligned}
U^{\rm Coul}(\delta{\bf r}) = 
\sum_{{\bf R}_l} {e^2 \over | \delta{\bf r}+{\bf R}_l |} 
={e^2 \over \sqrt{a_c}} \sum_{{\bf G} \neq 0}  e^{-i {\bf G} \cdot \delta{\bf r}} \varphi_{-{1 \over 2}}{\left( {|{\bf G}|^2 a_c \over 4\pi} \right)} 
+{e^2 \over \sqrt{a_c}} \sum_{{\bf R}_l} \varphi_{-{1\over 2}}{\left( {\pi \over a_c} |\delta{\bf r}+{\bf R}_l |^2  \right)} ,\end{aligned}$$

where ${\bf R}_l  = l_1 N_1 \hat{e}_1+l_2 N_2 \hat{e}_2$ with $\hat{e}_1$ and $\hat{e}_2$ being the primitive unit cell vectors of the underlying lattice, ${\bf G}$ is the corresponding reciprocal lattice vectors, $a_c$ is the area of the unit cell, and $\varphi_n(x)=\int_1^{\infty} dt~{t^n} e^{-xt}$.

![image](SMFig1_spectrum.pdf){width="1.8\columnwidth"}

<span>**Results for the kagome lattice model**</span>

In this section, we provide results for the kagome lattice model, which mirror those of the checkerboard lattice model.

<span>**Adiabatic path.**</span> Figure \[fig:spectrum\_kagome\] shows the comparison between the energy spectra of the nearest-neighbor and Coulomb interactions in the kagome lattice as a function of $(N_x,N_y)$ for $N=8$ and $N_s=24$. Specifically, it is shown in Fig. \[fig:spectrum\_kagome\] <span>**a**</span> that the triple-degenerate ground state manifold (GSM) collapses if one takes the thin torus limit with the nearest-neighbor interaction. On the other hand, it is shown in Fig. \[fig:spectrum\_kagome\] <span>**e**</span> that the triple-degenerate GSM remains intact in the case of the Coulomb interaction all the way through the most thin torus limit of the given finite-size system.

Similar to what is done for the checkerboard lattice model, we investigate the adiabatic continuity of the triple-degenerate GSM in the 2D bulk by transforming the electron-electron interaction from the nearest-neighbor to Coulomb interaction via $U(\lambda)=(1-\lambda)U^{\rm NN}+\lambda U^{\rm Coul}$. Figure \[fig:spectrum\_kagome\] <span>**i**</span> shows the energy gap between the third and fourth lowest energies as a function of $\lambda$, which remains intact in the 2D bulk, i.e., at $(N_x,N_y)=(6,4)$, while collapsing in the thin torus limit, i.e., at $(N_x,N_y)=(24,1)$. Note that exactly the same behavior has been obtained in the checkerboard lattice model.

![ <span>**Topological winding of Wannier-Stark ladder eigenstates.**</span> Here, the effective electric field is applied along the $x$ direction. (<span>**a**</span>) Wave packet center position $\langle x \rangle$ of WSL eigenstates as a function of $k_y$ in the Chern flat band of the kagome lattice model, which is the bottom energy band with the Chern number $C=1$ as indicated in the top panel. Note that the topological winding with positive slope confirms $C=1$. (<span>**b**</span>) Similar plot in the topologically trivial band, which is the middle energy band with $C=0$ as indicated in the top panel. As one can see, there is no winding. Blue dots represent the wave packet center positions obtained at zero test flux, which are shifted along red lines with the insertion of the test flux. Here, $N_x=N_y=6$. <span data-label="fig:winding_kagome"></span>](SMFig2_winding.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

<span>**Topological basis.**</span> Figure \[fig:winding\_kagome\] shows the topological winding of WSL eigenstates in the kagome lattice, which manifests itself via the wave packet center position of WSL eigenstates as a function of the conserved momentum.

Specifically, it is shown in Fig. \[fig:winding\_kagome\] <span>**a**</span> that the wave packet center position of WSL eigenstates winds up as a function of the conserved momentum in the Chern flat band. On the other hand, it is shown in Fig. \[fig:winding\_kagome\] <span>**b**</span> that there is no winding in the the topological trivial band.

![ <span>**Overlap between fractional Chern insulators and the Tao-Thouless state.**</span> Open symbols denote the degeneracy-averaged square of overlap between the exact Coulomb ground and Tao-Thouless states, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm TT}$, in the 1/3-filled Chern flat band of the kagome lattice model as a function of $r_a$. Continuous lines denote the similar overlap in the 1/3-filled LL. Note that, here, LL eigenstates are constructed in the torus geometry with oblique unit cells, which match the shape of those in the kagome lattice. <span data-label="fig:Tao-Thouless_kagome"></span>](SMFig3_Tao-Thouless.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

<span>**Evolution to the Tao-Thouless state.**</span> Figure \[fig:Tao-Thouless\_kagome\] shows the degeneracy-averaged square of overlap between the exact Coulomb ground and Tao-Thouless states, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm TT}$, in the 1/3-filled Chern flat band of the kagome lattice model as a function of $r_a$.

As one can see, the behavior of ${\cal O}^2_{\rm TT}$ in the kagome lattice model is almost exactly the same as that in the checkerboard counterpart. That is, first, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm TT}$ becomes essentially unity at sufficiently large $r_a$, confirming that the exact Coulomb ground state evolves to the Tao-Thouless state even in the kagome lattice model. Second, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm TT}$ follows almost exactly the behavior of the similar overlap in the 1/3-filled LL, which is constructed in the torus geometry with oblique unit cells. Again, it is shown that the 1/3-filling FCI behaves just like the Laughlin state in the kagome lattice model.

![ <span>**Overlap between fractional Chern insulators and the Chern-Laughlin state.**</span> Here, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm CL}$ denotes the degeneracy-averaged square of overlap between the exact Coulomb ground and Chern-Laughlin states in the 1/3-filled Chern flat band of the kagome lattice model as a function of the effective electric field strength, or the Bloch frequency $\Omega/t$. Color-coded arrows on the right side indicate ${\cal O}^2_{\rm TT}$ of the corresponding systems with different aspect ratios, which can be grouped as "Thin Torus" and "2D Bulk." <span data-label="fig:Chern-Laughlin_kagome"></span>](SMFig4_Chern-Laughlin.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

<span>**Incorporating quantum fluctuations.**</span> Figure \[fig:Chern-Laughlin\_kagome\] shows the degeneracy-averaged square of overlap between the exact Coulomb ground and Chern-Laughlin states, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm CL}$, in the 1/3-filled Chern flat band of the kagome lattice model as a function of $\Omega/t$ for different aspect ratios.

Here, essentially the same three features are obtained as those obtained in the checkerboard lattice model. First, ${\cal O}^2_{\rm CL}$ is always maximized in the limit of $\Omega$, meaning that the exact Coulomb ground state is best described by the Chern-Laughlin state with maximally-localized WSL eigenstates even in the kagome lattice model. Second, quantum fluctuations take up a dominant portion of the exact Coulomb ground state in the 2D bulk. Third, regardless of the aspect ratio, the exact Coulomb ground state is well described by the Chern-Laughlin state, which is constructed via incorporating appropriate quantum fluctuations into the Tao-Thouless state.

Finally, it is confirmed in the kagome lattice that, in the 2D bulk, the Chern-Laughlin state still provides an excellent description of the 1/3-filling FCI even for the nearest-neighbor interaction with basically the same level of the overlap for "2D Bulk" systems in Fig. \[fig:Chern-Laughlin\_kagome\].

We would like to mention that our overlap values are slightly different from those previously obtained in the same kagome lattice model, while basically the same in the checkerboard counterpart @Wu12_Gauge-fixed. This discrepancy is mainly due to the fact that, in the case of the kagome lattice model, we have used a different set of system parameters in the Hamiltonian from that in previous studies. We have chosen our set of system parameters to make the energy dispersion of the Chern flat band as flat as possible rather than simply ignoring it.

K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Nearly Flat-Bands with Nontrivial Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**106**</span>, 236803 (2011).

E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett. <span>**106**</span>, 236802 (2011).

N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional Chern Insulator, Phys. Rev. X <span>**1**</span>, 021014 (2011).

L. Bonsall and A. A. Maradudin, Some static properties of a two-dimensional Wigner crystal, Phys. Rev. B. <span>**15**</span>, 1959 (1977).

Y.-L. Wu, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Gauge-fixed Wannier wave functions for fractional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B <span>**86**</span>, 085129 (2012).

{'source': 'arXiv_out/2109'}