---
abstract: 'By combining optical spin injection techniques with transport spectroscopy tools, we demonstrate a spin-photodetector allowing for the electrical measurement and active filtering of conduction band electron spin at room temperature in a simple non-magnetic GaAsN semiconductor structure. By switching the polarization of the incident light from linear to circular, we observe a spin dependent photoconductivity change reaching up to 40 % without the need of an external magnetic field. The spin dependent photoconductivity change relies on the efficient spin filtering effect of conduction band electrons on N-induced Ga self-interstitial deep paramagnetic centers.'
author:
- 'F. Zhao'
- 'A. Balocchi'
- 'A. Kunold'
- 'J. Carrey'
- 'H. Carrère'
- 'T. Amand'
- 'N. Ben Abdallah'
- 'J.C. Harmand'
- 'X. Marie'
date: today
title: 'Spin-dependent photoconductivity in non magnetic semiconductors at room temperature'
---

The development of Giant Magneto Resistance and Tunnel Magneto Resistance devices based on thin ferromagnetic metals played a crucial role in the evolution of computer memory and storage technology @baibich_giant_1988 [@parkin_giant_2004].

![(color online). a) Schematic view of the GaAsN structure used for the photoconductivity measurements. Red and blue circles indicate spin-down or spin-up states of both the CB photogenerated electrons and the resident paramagnetic center electrons. Grey circles represent the unpolarized photogenerated holes. b) The spin photoconductivity change ($\Delta \sigma/\sigma$) as a function of the polarization state of the excitation light on samples I (black circles) and II (grey circles). c) Schematic representation of the spin states of the conduction band photogenerated electrons and deep centers at t= 0, just after the $\Sigma^{+}$ excitation laser pulse. For simplicity we assume here that the photogenerated electron spin polarization is P$_{cir}$=100%. In (d) and (e) the spins configurations are presented respectively for a $\Sigma^{+}$ excitation (once the centers have been dynamically polarized) or for a $\Sigma^{X}$.](figure1.pdf){width="45.00000%"}

Recent propositions and realizations of electronic devices based on the spin of electrons instead of its charge, have been likewise driving intensive investigations on the spin physics in semiconductors @awschalom_semiconductor_2002. A large number of new spintronic devices including spin-transistors, spin-LEDs and spin-lasers have been proposed @fiederling_injection_1999 [@awschalom_semiconductor_2002; @jonker_electrical_2007]. Experimental results using all-electrical @jedema2002 [@appelbaum2007], all optical @kato2004 or hybrid electrical/optical @ohno_electrical_1999 [@crooker2005] techniques have been reported. The development of a simple, temperature insensitive, all-semiconductor approach for the conversion of the spin information carried by photons into an electrical signal, namely a spin photodetector, has however been so far mainly unsuccessful. Very few and modest results in this direction have been demonstrated: a spin-dependent conductivity change <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>$\approx$ 0.1 % at cryogenic temperatures and under the application of an external magnetic field have been reported in Si or Ge @lepine1972 [@dersch1983]or a <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>$\approx$ 2% has been measured in hybrid ferromagnetic/semiconductor structures @hovel2008.\
In this Letter we report on an approach to the spin photodetection problem, leading to the observation of a sizeable Spin Dependent Photoconductivity (SDP) reaching up to <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>$=\left[\right.$ <span>$\sigma^+$</span>- <span>$\sigma^X$</span>$\left.\right]$ / <span>$\sigma^X$</span>= 40 %, at room temperature and without the need of an external magnetic field or ferromagnetic layers, using thin films of GaAsN semiconductor. Here $\sigma^+$ ($\sigma^X$) is the sample photoconductivity for a circular $\Sigma^+$ (linear $\Sigma^X$) excitation light polarization. We demonstrate that the electron conductivity can be simply modulated by controlling the spin orientation of the optically injected electrons, which reflects the polarization state of the optical excitation. These results are due to a power switchable Spin Dependent Recombination (SDR) effect of Conduction Band (CB) electrons on N-induced deep paramagnetic centers @kalevich2005, evidenced and exploited here, in transport measurements. The same phenomenon confers the structure spin filter characteristics for CB electrons, allowing for a high degree of spin polarized electrical current.\
We present here the results for two samples: sample I is composed of a 50 nm thick Silicon doped (doping density n$_{Si}=2\times 10^{18} cm^{-3}$) GaAs$_{0.979}$N$_{0.021}$ layer. Sample II is a nominally undoped, 100 nm thick GaAs$_{0.993}$N$_{0.007}$. Both samples were grown under the same conditions by molecular beam epitaxy at T=410$^{\circ}$C on a (001) semi-insulating GaAs substrate. The growth was terminated with a 10 nm GaAs cap layer and no post-growth rapid thermal annealing was performed. We have observed similar effects in other (doped or undoped) samples with N composition varying in the range 0.7 % to 2.6 %. The excitation light was provided by a Ti:Sa laser in mode-locked regime yielding the generation of 1.5 ps pulses at a repetition frequency of 80 MHz at 840 nm. The laser was focused to a $\approx$ 150 $\mu$m diameter spot (FWHM), in between two Ag electrodes @note_electrodes deposited onto the sample surface 0.8 mm apart \[Fig. 1(a)\]. The laser light, either circularly (right $\Sigma^+$ or left $\Sigma^-$) or linearly ($\Sigma^X$ or $\Sigma^Y$) polarized, was modulated by a mechanical chopper at 3 kHz and the sample conductivity was measured synchronously using a lock-in amplifier from the voltage drop at the terminals of a 10 k$\Omega$ load resistor placed in series with the sample. A constant voltage in the range 0 $<V<$ 12 volts was applied between the sample electrodes. We measured a linear dependence of the photoconductivity on the laser light intensity under $\Sigma^{X,Y}$ light in the investigated average intensity range 50 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>$< I <$1000 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>. Fig. 1(b) (black circles) displays the SDP measured at room temperature, where we observe a photoconductivity change <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>as large as 30% under an excitation intensity $I\approx$ 850 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>and an applied voltage of 1.5 V on sample I. As an example grey circles in Fig. 1(b) reproduce the same experiment performed on sample II, containing a lower Nitrogen concentration; a much smaller SDP is measured. We have also performed the same experiment on GaAs samples, grown under the same conditions as sample I and II but without N; no modulation of $\Delta \sigma/\sigma$ at all was observed. This demonstrates that the effect observed in Fig. 1(b) is related to the N incorporation into GaAs. The sample conductivity increases significantly when the excitation light is circularly polarized, i.e. when a population of spin-polarized electrons is photogenerated. We emphasize that no external magnetic field is applied here. Let us recall that the excitation with linearly polarized light leads to the photogeneration of an equal number of spin-down and spin-up electrons. In contrast, when the excitation light is circularly polarized, due to the optical selection rules, the relative concentration of optically generated spin-down to spin-up electrons is 3 to 1, leading to a maximum spin polarization of photogenerated electrons P$_{s}$ = 50% @optical_orientation [@note_holes].\
The strong photoconductivity modulation observed in Fig. 1(b) is due to a very efficient CB electron SDR effect @lepine1972 [@weisbuch_spin_1974] on N-induced Ga self interstitial deep paramagnetic centers, recently identified @wang2009. The mechanism is schematically presented in Fig. 1(c). If the photogenerated CB electron and the paramagnetic center resident electron have the same spin orientation, the photogenerated electron cannot be captured by the center. On the contrary, when their relative spin orientation are antiparallel, the capture will be efficient since a singlet can be formed on the center \[Fig. 1(c)\]: the recombination time of the photocreated electrons depends on the relative spin orientation of the free electron and of the electron resident on the center. Since the capture on the center is spin-dependent but the recombination process of the electrons trapped on the center with unpolarized holes is spin independent, the center resident electrons dynamically acquire a common spin polarization characterized by a spin relaxation time longer than both the CB electron spin and radiative recombination times @kalevich2005. Any CB electron trapping is now suppressed \[Fig. 1(d)\] an a large CB electron density can be sustained. Besides, if a CB electron relaxes its spin, it will be likewise rapidly filtered out (i.e. captured by the polarized centers) and a stable spin polarized electron population is favored. No paramagnetic center polarization can however be achieved with a linear excitation \[Fig. 1(e)\] as the now unpolarized CB electrons will be rapidly depleted through the same centers: the SDR is suppressed leading to a much smaller CB electronic population. This phenomenon is exploited here by photocurrent experiments and serves the role of an electrical probe of the degree of circular polarization of the incident light.\
A precise information on the CB electron polarization degree is consequently possible by a measurement of the electrical current intensity flowing through an external circuit. This is more clearly visible in Fig. 2 where the SDP is plotted against a continuous variation of the excitation laser polarization state from linear to circular, by continuously rotating the $\lambda/4$ retarder waveplate through which the linearly polarized laser passes. Like the electrical counterpart of an optical circular polarization analyzer, the GaAsN layer exhibits a Malus-type law SDP curve $\Delta\sigma(\theta)/\sigma=\left(\sigma(\theta)-\sigma^X \right)/\sigma^X= \left(\Delta\sigma/\sigma\right)\cdot \sin^{2}(2\theta)$, $\theta$ being the angle of the laser linear polarization direction with respect to the $\lambda/4$ waveplate neutral axis.\

![(color online). Sample I. The SDP angular dependence $\left(\Delta\sigma(\theta)/\sigma\right)$ (black circles) as a function of the angle between the laser linear polarization orientation and the quarter waveplate neutral axis, the latter taken as the origin of the angle axis. The solid red line is a fit to the data (see text). <span data-label="figure2"></span>](figure2.pdf){width="45.00000%"}

![Sample I. a) Room temperature SDP intensity dependence. b) The room temperature i-V curve (triangles) and the corresponding SDP signal (circles). The excitation intensity is I=570 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>. In both figures, solid and dashed lines are guides to the eyes.<span data-label="figure3"></span>](figure3.pdf){width="50.00000%"}

The validity of the SDR-based interpretation is remarkably confirmed by the observation in Fig. 3(a) of a laser excitation intensity dependence of the SDP change with the features typical of the SDR effect @zhao_JOP. This intensity law is indeed well interpreted in terms of the SDR model since, as expected, the centers can be effectively polarized only if the photogenerated carrier density is of the order of the deep center one @zhao_JOP. This is exactly what we observe in Fig. 3(a). At very low excitation intensities ($I\leq$ 200 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>) the SDP can no more be modulated by a light polarization change. The saturation and the slight decrease of <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>observed for very large excitation intensity (I$>$500 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>) correspond to a regime where the photogenerated carrier density is much higher than the deep center one. All these results clearly confirm that the variation of the photoconductivity as a function of the polarization of the excitation light observed in Fig. 1(b) is due to the change of the CB electron density (due the change of the recombination rate) and not to a spin-dependent change of the carrier mobility @lepine1972. We have finally investigated the influence of the external voltage on the SDP for a fixed excitation intensity \[I= 570 <span>W$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$</span>, reported in Fig. 3(b)\] in order to evidence the spin filtering properties of the GaAsN leayer. When the voltage (and hence the total current, both optically and electrically injected) increases, <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>decreases. As expected, <span>$\Delta \sigma /  \sigma$ </span>is maximum and reaches  40% at low voltages: the device operates here as a very efficient spin filter. By increasing the voltage (V$\geq$ 5 volts), we still observe a significant spin filtering effect of the current flowing between the electrodes, though the number of unpolarized electrically injected CB electrons grows significantly partially limiting the efficiency of the SDR effect.\
In conclusion, we have evidenced a sizeable SDR-driven Spin Dependent Photoconductivity effect at room temperature in non magnetic dilute nitride GaAsN structures. This effect allows for the realization of a very simple optoelectronic spin detector which can electrically trace the optically induced electron spin population. The same SDR-based effect can be exploited to spin filter electrically injected carrier from a biasing circuit. We believe that these results show the potential of these dilute nitride materials to generate spin-polarized current at room temperature with non-magnetic electrodes. We thank V. Kalevich, W. Chen and I. Buyanova for useful discussions. A. Kunold acknowledges financial support from CONACyT and Rectoría UAM-A from his sabbatical year from UAM-A. N. Ben Abdallah acknowledges support from QUATRAIN(BLAN07-2 212988) funded by the French ANR and from the Marie Curie Project DEASE: MEST-CT-2005-021122 of the European Union.

<span>20</span> natexlab\#1<span>\#1</span>bibnamefont \#1<span>\#1</span>bibfnamefont \#1<span>\#1</span>citenamefont \#1<span>\#1</span>url \#1<span>`#1`</span>urlprefix\[2\]<span>\#2</span> \[2\]\[\]<span>[\#2](#2)</span>

, , , , , , , , , ****, ().

, , , , , , , ****, ().

, , , ** (, , ), ed.

, , , , , , , ****, ().

, , , , , ****, ().

, , , ****, ().

, , , ****, ().

, , , , ****, ().

, , , , , , ****, ().

, , , , , , , ****, ().

, ****, ().

, , , ****, ().

, , , , , , , , , , , ****, ().

, , , , , , , , ****, ().

, ** (, , ).

.

, ****, ().

, , , , , , , , , ****, ().

, , , , , , , , , ****, ().

{'source': 'arXiv_out/0907'}