---
author:
- 'Charles K. C. Lieou'
- Jerome Laurent
- 'Paul A. Johnson'
- Xiaoping Jia
bibliography:
- 'prl\_vf.bib'
title: 'Shear-wave-induced softening and simultaneous compaction in dense granular media through acoustic lubrication at flow heterogeneities – Supplementary Material'
---

Results for traveling pressure waves
====================================

The results for the softening and compaction induced by traveling pressure waves are similar to those for shear waves described in the main manuscript, with some small differences. Equation (7) there remains intact for pressure waves, but with $\beta_s$ replaced by $\beta_p = \alpha (1 + \sqrt{3} M_0 \epsilon_0 \Omega e^{-1 / \chi} / \chi)$, where $M_0$ is the unperturbed P-wave modulus which correspondingly replaces $v_{s0}$ by $v_{p0}$. As such, the traveling P-wave propagates at a velocity $$\dfrac{v_p}{v_{p0}} = \sqrt{\dfrac{\alpha^2 + \omega^2}{\alpha \beta_p + \omega^2}} ,$$ which corresponds to a reduced P-wave modulus $$\dfrac{M}{M_0} = \dfrac{\alpha^2 + \omega^2}{\alpha \beta_p + \omega^2}$$ We use the functional form $$\label{eq:chi}
 \chi(\hat{f}) = \chi_0 + \chi_1 \tanh \left[ \left( \dfrac{p_0}{p} \right)^{1/6} \dfrac{\hat{f}}{\sqrt{3}} \right],$$ to describe the variation of compactivity with strain amplitude under P-wave forcing; this differs from Eq. (10) in the main manuscript by a factor of $1/\sqrt{3}$ in front of $\hat{f}$.

![\[fig:softening\]Measured relative modulus shift $\Delta M / M (\hat{f} \rightarrow 0)$, as a function of input amplitude, for the compressional mode, at several different pressures $p$. The data points are the experimental measurements, while the solids curves are fits obtained from Eq. . Note the difference in the vertical scales in comparison to Fig. 2 in the main manuscript, which shows that shear waves induce about twice as much modulus shift as pressure waves.](fig_p_softening_23x.pdf){width=".4\textwidth"}

Figures \[fig:softening\] and \[fig:compaction\] show the results for the softening and compaction induced by P-waves, mirroring Figs. 2 and 3 in the main manuscript for shear waves. We used identical parameters as in the main manuscript, with one single exception: for P-waves we use $\chi_1 = 0.013$ instead of 0.02 for shear waves, to reflect the observation that the fraction of shear-induced resonance frequency shift is roughly twice that caused by standing pressure waves. This is reasonable because the resolved shear stress for the compressional mode is smaller than for the shear mode with the same stress magnitude, so that pressure waves causes fewer slips and produces fewer STZ soft spots than shear waves of equal amplitude. Interestingly, the compaction under P-wave perturbation is only about 1/10 that under S-wave perturbation.

![\[fig:compaction\]Compaction from the initial volume, induced by pressure waves, as a function of the amplitude $\hat{f}$.](fig_p_compaction_23x.pdf){width=".4\textwidth"}

Choice of parameters
====================

In computing the softening and compaction curves there are six adjustable parameters: $\epsilon_0$, $\epsilon_Z$, $\epsilon_M$, as well as the three parameters $\chi_0$, $\chi_1$, and $p_0$ that appear in the function $\chi (\hat{f})$. Of these, $\epsilon_M$ is the only one that appears in the compaction and not softening calculations. All others appears in both; notably, they appear in the quantity $\hat{m}$ which is computed by solving the linearized equations of motion.

The parameters $\epsilon_0 = 1.5$ and $\epsilon_Z = 0.5$ are regarded as fixed, based on prior STZ studies of granular matter (e.g., @lieou_2012 [@lieou_2014a]). As usual, the values of other parameters are deduced systematically to fit the experimental data by slightly varying them one by one and observing the shift in the curves. Based on past experience with the STZ theory we start out by assuming that $\chi_0 \sim {\cal O} (0.1)$ and $\chi_1 \sim {\cal O} (0.01)$.

Validity of linear approximation in the subyield regime
=======================================================

Note that we have made the approximation $s \ll s_0$ in the evolution equation for the STZ orientational bias $m$ (Eq. (5) in the main manuscript). This is not a valid approximation in flow problems (e.g., @lieou_2012 [@lieou_2014a; @lieou_2014b; @lieou_2015; @lieou_2016; @lieou_2017a]), in which the granular material is unjammed and we are in the post-yield regime. However, insight gained from those problems do provide some insight about the present jammed, weakly-perturbed scenario. In flow problems, it is typically a good approximation to set $\dot{m} = 0$, so that $$m = 
\begin{cases}
 {\cal T}(s), \quad \text{if $(s/s_0) {\cal T}(s) < 0$}; \\
 s_0 / s, \quad \text{if $(s/s_0) {\cal T}(s) \geq 0$}.
\end{cases}$$ This shows that $s_0$ determines the yield stress of the unconsolidated granular pack. In the wave-perturbed granular pack, $m$ oscillates back and forth and $\dot{m} \ne 0$. But it is clear that we are in the subyield regime nevertheless, where the amplitude $\hat{m}$ of the $m$-oscillation increases with the amplitude $\hat{s}$ of the $s$-oscillation. The geometrical interaction between STZs, described by the term $\sim - \hat{m}^2$ in the expression for the volume (Eq. (11)), gives rise to compaction with increasing strain amplitude. In contrast, in the post-yield regime in flow problems, the increase of the STZ density $\Lambda$ and the decrease of the orientational bias $m$ together give rise to dilatancy with increasing stress.

Hysteresis in the linear approximation
======================================

Figure \[fig:s\_hysteresis\] shows the post-transient shear stress $s(t)$ versus shear strain $\gamma(t)$ in the shear-wave experiment, both normalized with respect to their amplitudes, for several normalized drive amplitudes $\hat{f} = 10^{-6}$, $10^{-5}$, and $10^{-4}$, at the pressure $p = 0.071$ MPa. If the compactivity $\chi$ were independent of the driving acoustic amplitude ($\hat{f} = 0$), as in the small-amplitude treatment of oscillatory shear in @perchikov_2014, there can be no elastic softening at the amplitudes probed in the present experiments. Within the linearized approximation described in Eqs. (5) and (6) in the main text, and the stress and displacement evolution equations discussed thereafter, the amplitudes $\hat{u}$, $\hat{\gamma}$, $\hat{s}$, and $\hat{F}$ are linearly related to one another, and the sinusoidal solution represents an ellipse in the $s$-$\gamma$ phase space. It is possible to reproduce hysteresis curves with sharp kinks such as seen in @perchikov_2014, and banana-shaped curves found in the literature (e.g., @jia_2011), once we move beyond the linear approximation. Still, our results still show salient features of hysteresis in dissipative materials. Namely, that the hystereis loop deviates further from a straight line through the origin as the drive amplitude increases, and that the slope of the semi-major axis of the hysteresis loop, which measures the shear modulus, decreases as one increases the amplitude. The result for the pressure-wave experiment is qualitatively similar.

![\[fig:s\_hysteresis\] Linear-approximation hysteresis curves of normalized shear stress $v_{s0} s(t) / (\mu_0 \omega \hat{u})$ versus normalized shear strain $v_{s0} \gamma(t) / (\omega \hat{u})$ for normalized drive amplitudes $\hat{f} = 10^{-6}$, $10^{-5}$, $10^{-4}$, at the pressure $p = 0.071$ MPa.](fig_s_hysteresis_23.pdf){width=".4\textwidth"}

Softening in the zero-frequency and infinite-wavelength limits
==============================================================

We showed in the main text that, with the ratio between the reduced and unperturbed shear moduli $\mu / \mu_0$ given by $$\dfrac{\mu}{\mu_0} = \dfrac{\alpha^2 + \omega^2}{\alpha \beta_s + \omega^2},$$ where $\alpha \equiv 2 R_0 / \tau$, $\beta_s \equiv \alpha (1 + 2 \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \Omega e^{-1 / \chi} / \chi)$ and $\omega$ is the (angular) frequency of the shear wave, we concluded that the STZ event rate $R_0$ had to decrease with increasing pressure in order to arrive at a good fit with the pressure-dependent softening with increasing drive amplitude. A similar result holds for pressure waves). In the zero-frequency limit, or if $\alpha \gg \omega$, the softening behavior is independent of $R_0$. Said differently, we need a sufficiently high frequency $\omega \gtrsim R_0 / \tau$ for the pressure dependence to become apparent. Because $\tau = a \sqrt{\rho_G / p}$ is the inertial time scale and $\omega$ is related to the strain rate, one can think of the "glassy slowing-down" with increasing pressure as an inertial effect.

Perchikov and Bouchbinder @perchikov_2014 studied the physically similar, yet somewhat different, limit of long wavelengths. Their paper was a proof-of-principles study of the response of generic amorphous materials to oscillatory shear, without taking into account pressure dependence. The wave speed for fixed frequency in the long-wavelength limit approaches infinity; it is therefore impossible to discuss the wave-induced softening measured by wave speed drop. Our present work differs in a significantly way; we combine the effects of waves and STZ heterogeneities and demonstrate the pressure-dependent softening and glassy behavior in granular matter in the high-frequency, short-wavelength regime.

{'source': 'arXiv_out/2209'}