--- abstract: | We present the optical and X-ray properties of 68 galaxy clusters selected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect at 148GHz by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT). Our sample, from an area of 504 square degrees centered on the celestial equator, is divided into two regions. The main region uses 270 square degrees of the ACT survey that overlaps with the co-added $ugriz$ imaging from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) over Stripe 82 plus additional near-infrared pointed observations with the Apache Point Observatory 3.5-meter telescope. We confirm a total of 49 clusters to $z\approx1.3$, of which 22 (all at $z>0.55$) are new discoveries. For the second region the regular-depth SDSS imaging allows us to confirm 19 more clusters up to $z\approx0.7$, of which 10 systems are new. We present the optical richness, photometric redshifts, and separation between the SZ position and the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG). We find no significant offset between the cluster SZ centroid and BCG location and a weak correlation between optical richness and SZ-derived mass. We also present X-ray fluxes and luminosities from the All Sky Survey which confirm that this is a massive sample. One of the newly discovered clusters, at $z=1.1$ (photometric), has an integrated X-ray temperature of $kT_X=7.9\pm1.0$ keV and combined mass of $M_{200a} = 8.2_{-2.5}^{+3.3}\times10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$ placing it among the most massive and X-ray-hot clusters known at redshifts beyond $z=1$. We also highlight the optically-rich cluster 2327 (RCS2 2327) at $z=0.705$ (spectroscopic) as the most significant detection of the whole equatorial sample with a -derived mass of $M_{200a}=1.9_{-0.4}^{+0.6}\times10^{15}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$, in the ranks of the most massive known clusters like El Gordo and the Bullet Cluster. author: - 'Felipe Menanteau, Cristóbal Sifón, L. Felipe Barrientos, Nicholas Battaglia, J. Richard Bond, Devin Crichton, Sudeep Das, Mark J. Devlin, Simon Dicker, Rolando Dünner, Megan Gralla, Amir Hajian, Matthew Hasselfield, Matt Hilton, Adam D. Hincks, John P. Hughes, Leopoldo Infante, Arthur Kosowsky, Tobias A. Marriage, Danica Marsden, Kavilan Moodley, Michael D. Niemack, Michael R. Nolta, Lyman A. Page, Bruce Partridge, Erik D. Reese, Benjamin L. Schmitt, Jon Sievers, David N. Spergel, Suzanne T. Staggs, Eric Switzer, Edward J. Wollack' title: 'The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Physical Properties of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect clusters on the Celestial Equator' --- Introduction ============ Clusters of galaxies are the cosmic signposts for the largest gravitationally bound objects in the Universe. Their formation and evolution as a function of look-back time provides a measurement of cosmological parameters that complements those obtained from observations of the cosmic microwave background [CMB, e.g., @Komatsu2011; @Dunkley2011; @Reichardt2012], Type Ia Supernovae [e.g., @Hicken2009; @Sullivan2011; @Suzuki2012] and baryon acoustic oscillations [e.g., @Percival2010]. The number of clusters as a function of redshift, as demonstrated by X-ray and optically-selected samples [e.g., @Vikhlinin2009; @Rozo2010] provides a strong constraint on both the expansion history of the Universe and the gravitational growth of structure within it [for a recent review see @Allen2011]. The hot gas in galaxy clusters leaves an imprint on the CMB radiation through the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect [SZ; @SZ1972]. The SZ effect has a frequency dependence that produces temperature shifts of the CMB radiation corresponding to a decrement below and an increment above the "null" frequency near 220GHz [@Birkinshaw1999; @Carlstrom2002]. Several experiments are now able to carry out large-area cosmological surveys using the SZ effect. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) and South Pole Telescope (SPT) are providing samples of galaxy clusters over hundreds of square degrees at all redshifts [@Stan09; @Hincks2010; @Menanteau-SZ; @Marriage2011; @Vanderlinde2010; @Williamson2011; @Reichardt2012], while the <span>*Planck*</span> Satellite probes the full sky for clusters up to redshifts of $z\approx0.55$ [@Planck-SZ]. Although modest in size, the new SZ cluster samples have proven useful for constraining cosmological parameters [@Vanderlinde2010; @Sehgal2011; @Reichardt2012; @Hasselfield2012] and have opened a new window into the extreme systems, the most massive clusters at high redshift [e.g., @Foley2011; @Menanteau2012], prompting studies that match their observed numbers with the abundance predictions of the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology [e.g., @Hoyle2011; @Mortonson2011; @Waizmann2012]. ACT is a millimeter-wave, arcminute-resolution telescope [@Fowler2007; @Swetz2011] designed to observe the CMB on arcminute angular scales [@Dunner2012]. The initial set of ACT observations during the 2008 season focused on surveying a 455 deg$^2$ region of the southern sky centered near declination -55$^\circ$ (hereafter "the southern strip"). Our previous work studied 23 high-significance clusters from the southern strip [@Marriage2011] with optical confirmations [@Menanteau-SZ]. One of the highlights of this previous work was the discovery of the spectacular El Gordo (ACT-CL J0102$-$4915) cluster merger system at $z=0.87$ [@Menanteau2012]. During the 2009 and 2010 seasons, ACT mainly surveyed a long, narrow region of the celestial equator that nearly completely overlaps with the publicly-available optical co-added images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) of Stripe 82 [hereafter S82; @Annis2011]. SDSS provides an immediate optical follow-up of clusters that is of high quality, uniform and at a depth sufficient to detect massive clusters to $z\approx1$. This is currently unique for high resolution SZ experiments. Furthermore, the uniform SDSS coverage of S82 has allowed combined CMB-optical studies such as the detection of the SZ decrement from low mass (few $10^{14}$ $M_\odot$) haloes by stacking Luminous Red Galaxies [LRGs, @Hand2011], the first detection of the kinematic SZ effect [@Hand2012], and the cross-correlation of the ACT CMB lensing convergence maps [@Das2011b] and quasars [@Sherwin2012]. While the number density of SZ-selected clusters is a potentially strong cosmological probe, the confirmation of candidates as true clusters and the determination of their masses is the first and most fundamental step. In this paper we provide the optical and near-infrared (NIR) confirmation of SZ cluster candidates from 504 square degrees of the 148GHz ACT 2009-2010 maps of the celestial equator. Over the ACT survey area that overlaps S82 (270deg$^2$) we use the $ugriz$ optical images, supplemented with targeted NIR observations, to identify 49 clusters up to $z\approx1.3$. For targets outside S82 we use the regular-depth SDSS data from Data Release 8 [DR8; @DR8] to confirm 19 clusters. The contiguous coverage provided by SDSS allows us to investigate potential offsets between the clusters optical and SZ centroid position as well as the relation between optical richness and SZ signal. In a companion paper [@Hasselfield2012] we present a full description of the SZ cluster selection technique as well as cosmological implications using the cluster sample. Recently @Reese2012 presented high-resolution follow-up observations with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Array (SZA) for a small sub-sample of the clusters presented here. Throughout this paper we quote cluster masses as $M_{200a}$ (or $M_{500c}$) which corresponds to the mass enclosed within a radius where the overdensity is 200 (500) times the average (critical) matter density. The larger radius associated with with $M_{200a}$, as opposed to $M_{500c}$, is appropriate for studies of the dynamical masses, for example. We assume a standard flat cosmology with $\Omega_m= 0.27$ and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.73$, and $E(z)=\sqrt{\Omega_M (1+z)^3+\Omega_\Lambda}$. We give relevant quantities in terms of the Hubble parameter $H_0 = 70\,h_{70}$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. The assumed cosmology has a small effect on the cluster mass, for example if we assume a canonical scaling of $M\propto E(z)^{-1}$, this implies a $2\%-3\%$ increase between $\Omega_m=0.27$ and $\Omega_m=0.30$ for a flat cosmology at $0.4<z<0.8$. In our analysis we convert masses with respect to average or critical at different overdensities using scalings derived from a @NFW [NFW] mass profile and the concentration-mass relation, $c(M,z)$, from simulations [@Duffy2008]. All magnitudes are in the SDSS $ugriz$ AB system and all quoted errors are 68% confidence intervals unless otherwise stated. Observations ============ The detection of cluster candidates was performed from matched-filtered ACT maps at 148GHz, while confirmation of the clusters was done using a combination of optical and near-infrared (NIR) imaging, and archival X-ray data. In the following sections we describe the procedure followed. SZ observations --------------- \[t\] ![image](ACT-S82-region-2panel.pdf){width="7.4in"} ACT operates at three frequency bands centered at 148GHz (2.0mm), 218GHz (1.4mm) and 270GHz (1.1mm), each band having a dedicated 1024-element array of transition-edge-sensing bolometers. The 270GHz band is not as sensitive as the lower frequency channels and the analysis of it is ongoing although not yet complete. ACT has concluded four seasons of observations (2007-2010) surveying two sky areas: the southern strip near declination $-55^\circ$ and a region over the celestial equator. In this paper, we apply similar techniques as the ones used on the southern strip for SZ cluster detection and optical identification [@Menanteau-SZ; @Marriage2011] to the ACT 148GHz equatorial data. A full description of the map making procedure from the ACT time-ordered data is described in @Dunner2012. Cluster candidates were detected in the 148GHz ACT equatorial maps over a 504deg$^2$ region bounded by $20^h16^m<$RA$<3^h52^m$ and $-2^\circ07'<$Dec.$<+2^\circ18'$ as shown in Figure \[fig:actmap\] as a blue box over the ACT map [@Hasselfield2012]. Nearly fully contained within this region lies the S82 optical imaging area (shown as a red box in Figure \[fig:actmap\]) which spans $20^h40^m<$RA$<4^h0^m$ and $-1^\circ15'<$Dec.$<+1^\circ15'$ and covers 275deg$^2$. The effective overlap between the S82 imaging and the ACT maps is 270deg$^2$ and corresponds to the deepest section of the ACT data in the equatorial survey. This constitutes the core of the data we use in this paper to characterize the SZ selection function. In the ACT region of the maps beyond the S82 coverage we use the normal-depth legacy survey from the SDSS DR8. The effective beam for the 148GHz band for the 2009 and 2010 combined seasons has a FWHM of $1.\!'4$. Here we highlight the principal aspects of the SZ cluster detection procedure described in @Hasselfield2012 to provide context for the characterization of the cluster sample. After subtracting bright sources from the ACT 148GHz source catalog (corresponding to 1% of the map area), the map is match-filtered in the Fourier domain using a set of signal templates based on the Universal Pressure Profile (UPP) of @Arnaud2010 modeled with a generalized NFW profile [@Nagai2007 Appendix A] as a function of physical radius. We use signal templates with FWHM of $0.\!'4$ to $9.\!'2$ in increments of $0.\!'4$ (23 sets) to match-filter the ACT 148GHz maps to optimize signal-to-noise (S/N) on cluster-shaped objects with an SZ spectral signature. Cluster candidates are identified in the filtered maps as pixels with S/N$>4$ using the core scale in which the cluster was most significantly detected. The catalog of cluster candidates contains positions, central decrements ($\Delta T$), and the local map noise level. Candidates seen at multiple filter scales are cross-identified if the detection positions are within $1'$. SDSS Optical Data ----------------- The main optical data set used for the SZ cluster confirmation is the S82 optical imaging that almost completely overlaps with the deepest region of the ACT equatorial maps with an effective area coverage of 270deg$^2$. ACT's survey over S82 is unique for high resolution SZ experiments, since it provides immediate optical follow-up of an extremely high and uniform quality at a depth sufficient to detect massive clusters to $z\approx1$. Beyond this common region we use the shallower single-pass data from DR8 to confidently report cluster identification to $z\approx0.5$. The S82 survey is a 275deg$^2$ stripe (represented by the red box in Figure \[fig:actmap\]) of repeated $ugriz$ imaging centered on the Celestial Equator in the Southern Galactic Cap, as described in @Annis2011. The multi-epoch scanning of the $2^\circ\!\!.5$–wide SDSS camera provides between 20 to 40 visits for any given section of the survey which, after aligning and averaging (i.e., co-adding), results in significantly deeper data. The co-added S82 images reach $\sim2$ magnitudes deeper than the single-pass SDSS data and have a median seeing of $\sim1.\!\!''1$ with a reported 50% completeness for galaxies at $r=23.5$ and $i=23$, while for DR8 this completeness level is reached at $r=21.5$ [@Annis2011]. Photometric calibration has typical variation of $0.5\%$ for $griz$ and $1\%-2\%$ for $u$ across the survey. In Figure \[fig:mr\_z\] we show the detection limits for the S82 and DR8 photometry as compared to the observed magnitudes of early-type galaxies of different luminosities at different redshifts. The co-added, photometrically-calibrated images and catalogs for S82 were released in October 2008 as part of the SDSS Data Release 7 [DR7; @DR7] and are available at the SDSS Data Archive Server (DAS)[^1] and the Catalog Archive Server (CAS),[^2] respectively. The co-added data were run through the SDSS pipelines; the standard SDSS flag set is available for all objects. We retrieved Galactic-extinction-corrected <span>modelMag</span> photometry in all 5 bands for all galaxies from the PhotoObj table designated from runs 106 and 206 under the CAS <span>Stripe82</span> database to create galaxy catalogs, which we split in $0^h20^m$ wide tiles in right ascension with no overlap between them to avoid object duplication. As the <span>Stripe82</span> database does not include spectroscopic information, for each galaxy we used the DR8 CAS database for a spectroscopic redshift, which was ingested into the catalogs if available [@DR8]. In order to optimize and speed up our cluster identification we fetched all $ugriz$ fits images for S82 from run numbers 100006 (North) and 200006 (South) and stored them locally to query later. The pixel scale of the co-added images is $0.\!\!''396$/pixel for all bands. We compute photometric redshifts for all objects in the S82 photometric catalog using the spectral-energy-distribution (SED) based Bayesian Photometric Redshift code [BPZ, @BPZ] with no prior. We use the dust-corrected $ugriz$ <span>modelMag</span> magnitudes and the BPZ set of template spectra described in @Benitez-04, which in turn is based on the templates from @C80 and @K96. This set consists of El, Sbc, Scd, Im, SB3, and SB2 and represents the typical SEDs of elliptical, early/intermediate-type spiral, late-type spiral, irregular, and two types of starburst galaxies, respectively. For the targets with NIR follow-up observations, the catalogs are augmented by including the $K_S$–band imaging. The final results are catalogs with photometric redshifts for all galaxies in S82 augmented by spectroscopic redshifts as available. For a fraction of the SZ cluster candidates outside the common area between the ACT equatorial maps and S82, we use regular-depth SDSS imaging from DR8 to confirm clusters. We also retrieved $ugriz$ Galactic-extinction-corrected <span> modelMag</span> magnitudes for galaxies, but, unlike for the S82, we only query the DR8 CAS database within a radius of $1^\circ$ of each candidate. Similarly we only fetched and combined images from tiles surrounding each candidate to create $10'$ fits images in all 5 bands. Given that the DR8 CAS database provides well-tested training-set-based photometric redshifts we do not compute our own SED-based estimates, as we did for S82, and instead we rely on the ones available in the database. In Section \[sec:redshifts\] we discuss the accuracy of the photometric redshift measurements. Near Infrared Imaging {#sec:APO} --------------------- Additional pointed follow-up NIR observations with the Near-Infrared Camera and Fabry-Perot Spectrometer (NICFPS) on the ARC 3.5-m telescope of the Apache Point Observatory (APO) aided the confirmation of five high redshift clusters with S/N$>4.7$. These clusters did not have a secure optical cluster counterpart in the deep S82 area. The observations were carried out on UT 2010 Oct 27-28, UT 2011 Nov 02 and UT 2011 Nov 06 when the seeing varied between $0.9 -1.\!''4$. NICFPS is equipped with a $1024\times1024$ Hawaii-I RG array with $0.\!''273$ pixels and a $4.\!'58$ square field of view. We obtained between 1800 – 3870s of integration in the $K_S$ band on each candidate, using 30s exposures with 8 Fowler samples per exposure [@Fowler1990], in a repeating 5 point dither pattern with box size $20''$. The individual exposures were dark subtracted, distortion corrected, flat fielded (using a sky flat made from the science frames), and sky subtracted (using a running median method). SExtractor [@SEx] was used to produce object masks used in constructing the sky flat and sky images used in the latter two processing steps. The individual exposures were then astrometrically calibrated using SCAMP [@Bertin2006] and, finally, median combined using SWARP [@Bertin2002]. The photometric zero point (on the Vega system) for each image was bootstrapped from the magnitudes of UKIDSS LAS [@Lawrence2007] sources in each field and transformed into the AB system for consistency with the SDSS data. The estimated uncertainty on the zero point spans the range 0.01 – 0.06 mag, with median 0.02 mag. The final images reach $5\sigma$ depth 18.8 – 20.2 mag (median 19.4 mag; measured within a $3''$ diameter aperture), estimated by placing 1000 apertures in each image at random positions where objects are not detected. In Table \[tab:APO\] we summarize the NIR observations for the confirmed clusters, which we also discuss in Section \[sec:S82\]. For the clusters with NIR imaging, we registered the $K_S$ and optical data to create a detection image from the $\chi^2$ quadratic sum combination of the $i$ and $K_S$–bands using SWARP. Source detection and photometric catalogs were performed using SExtractor [@SEx] in dual-image mode in which sources were identified on the detection images using a $1.5\sigma$ detection threshold, while magnitudes were extracted at matching locations from all other bands. For clusters with NIR imaging, we use the isophotal magnitudes in the new catalogs to compute photometric redshifts using the same procedure described in Section \[sec:redshifts\], with the only variation being the use of six filters instead of five. <span>lccc</span> ACT-CL J0012.0$-$0046 & UT 2011, Nov 02 & 3870 s & $1.36 \pm 0.06$\ ACT-CL J0044.4$+$0113 & UT 2011, Nov 06 & 3600 s & $1.11 \pm 0.03$\ ACT-CL J0336.9$-$0110 & UT 2010, Oct 27 & 3600 s & $1.32 \pm 0.05$\ ACT-CL J0342.0$+$0105 & UT 2010, Oct 28 & 3150 s & $1.07 \pm 0.06$\ ACT-CL J2351.7$+$0009 & UT 2011, Oct 02 & 1800 s & $0.99 \pm 0.03$ \[tab:APO\] X-ray Observations ------------------- We extracted X-ray fluxes for all optically confirmed ACT equatorial clusters using the All-Sky Survey (RASS) data following the same procedure as in @Menanteau-Hughes-09 and @Menanteau-SZ. The raw X-ray photon event lists and exposure maps were downloaded from the MPE <span>*ROSAT*</span> Archive[^3] and were queried with our own custom software. At the ACT SZ position of each cluster, RASS count rates in the $0.5-2$ keV band (corresponding to PI channels 52–201) were extracted from within radii of 3$^\prime$ for the source emission and from within a surrounding annulus (5$^\prime$ to 25$^\prime$ inner and outer radii) for the background emission. The background-subtracted count rates were converted to X-ray luminosity (in the 0.1–2.4 keV band) assuming a thermal spectrum ($kT_X=5$ keV) and the Galactic column density of neutral hydrogen ($N_H$) appropriate to the source position, using data from the Leiden/Argentine/HI Bonn survey [@kalberla05]. In Table \[tab:S82RASS\] and \[tab:DR8RASS\] we show the X-ray fluxes and luminosities for all ACT clusters, regardless of the significance of the RASS detection. Uncertainties are estimated from the count rates and represent statistical errors. Analysis and Results ==================== Our analysis rovides a sample of optically-confirmed SZ clusters from the ACT cluster candidates at 148GHz found in the maps on the celestial equator described in @Hasselfield2012. As an important part of this process we measure the "purity" of the ACT SZ candidate population over S82, that is, the fraction of real clusters as a function of SZ detection significance. Cluster Confirmation Criteria ----------------------------- ![The observed $r$-band magnitudes of $L^*$, $0.4L^*$ and $4L^*$ (BCG) early-type galaxies as a function of redshift. We use $L^*$ as defined @Blanton-03 for the population of red galaxies at $z=0.1$ and allow it to passively evolve with redshift. We show in gray the 50% completeness limits for the SDSS/S82 and DR8 data for galaxies from @Annis2011 reaching $r=23.5$ and $r=21.5$ respectively. For comparison we also show as gray circles the observed $r$-band magnitudes for the BCGs in the SZ southern sample cluster sample reported in @Menanteau-SZ. <span data-label="fig:mr_z"></span>](mr_z.pdf){width="3.9in"} Our confirmation procedure builds upon our previous work on the ACT southern sample [@Menanteau-SZ] and takes advantage of the contiguous and deeper optical coverage available from S82, which allows the systematic and rapid investigation of <span>*all*</span> SZ cluster candidates, unlike for the 2008 ACT data and associated follow-up. The procedure consists of searching for an optical cluster associated with each candidate's SZ decrement. This is relatively straightforward, since in concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmology the halo mass function [e.g., @Tinker2008] predicts that around 90% of massive clusters (i.e., $M_{200a}>3\times10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$), such as the ones that make up the current generation of SZ samples, will lie below $z\approx0.8$ and are therefore accessible for intermediate-depth optical imaging such as in the S82 data set. The optical confirmation requires the detection of a brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) and an accompanying red sequence of cluster members, which are typically early-type galaxies with luminosities less than $L^*$ (the characteristic Schechter luminosity). In Section \[sec:membership\] we discuss our richness criterion for optical confirmation of the sample. We use the completeness limits estimated from simulations by @Annis2011 to determine how far in redshift we can "see" massive clusters in S82. For this, we compare the completeness limits of S82 observations to the expected and observed apparent magnitudes of galaxies <span>*in*</span> clusters as a function of redshift. We estimated the expected apparent galaxy $r$-band magnitude as a function of redshift using $L^*$ as defined for the population of red galaxies by @Blanton-03 at $z=0.1$ and allowing passive evolution according to a solar metallicity @BC03 $\tau=1.0$ Gyr burst model formed at $z_f=5$. We show this relation in Figure \[fig:mr\_z\] for a range of luminosities ($0.4L^*$, $L^*$ and $4L^*$) aimed at representing the cluster members from the faint ones to the BCG. We also show as different gray levels the 50% completeness level as determined by the simulations for the S82 and DR8 samples [@Annis2011]. Figure \[fig:mr\_z\] also shows, for comparison, the apparent $r$-band magnitude of BCGs in the ACT southern cluster sample @Menanteau-SZ. We conclude that we can comfortably detect cluster BCGs in S82 up to $z>1$ and outside S82 to $z=0.7$. A cluster red sequence will be confidently detected to somewhat lower redshifts, $z\approx0.8$ (S82) and $z\approx0.5$ (outside S82), thus satisfying our criteria for optical cluster confirmation. In summary, we search for a BCG and associated red-sequence around each SZ candidate; if this condition is satisfied, we estimate the redshift and richness for the cluster. If the cluster richness satisfies the minimum richness criteria (see Section \[sec:membership\]) we list the candidate as a real cluster. Cluster Redshift Determination {#sec:redshifts} ------------------------------ ![Spectroscopic redshift versus photometric redshift for the sub-sample 37 of ACT equatorial clusters with known spectroscopic redshifts. Circles represent clusters from the S82 area while squares are system outside the S82 area. Error bars show the 68% C.L. uncertainties on the cluster photometric redshift.<span data-label="fig:photo-z"></span>](specz-photoz_S82-DR8.pdf){width="3.6in"} In practice we perform the cluster confirmation by working on $10'\times10'$ wide images centered on the position of the SZ candidate that are created from stitching together nearby S82 tiles in all 5 SDSS bands. Our inspection relies on a custom-created automated software that enables us to interactively search for a BCG and its red cluster sequence using our own implementation of the MaxBCG cluster finder [@MaxBCG] algorithm, as described in @SCSII for the Southern Cosmology Survey [SCS; @SCSI]. This consists of visually selecting the BCG and from that recorded position iteratively choosing cluster member galaxies using the photometric redshifts and a $3\sigma$ clipping algorithm within a local self-defined color-magnitude relation. For candidates with APO $K_S$ follow-up imaging we use 6 bands, which are limited to the $\sim5'\times5'$ field-of-view (FOV) of NICFPS, but otherwise the procedure is the same. Our software aids the precise determination of the BCG by visually flagging all early-type galaxies (i.e., galaxies SED types 0 and 1 from BPZ) that are more luminous than $4L^*$ galaxies, with $L^*$ as defined above. Once the BCG has been established, the next step in the optical confirmation is to define the cluster redshift and color criteria to be used in selecting cluster members as these are required to estimate the richness of the cluster. The determination of the cluster redshift is an iterative process, using our custom-developed tools, that starts with the redshift of the BCG as the initial guess for the cluster's redshift and center. It then estimates the redshift as the mean value of the $N$ brightest early-type galaxies (with $N=7$) within an inner radius of $250\,h^{-1}$kpc (with $H_0=100{\rm\,km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}} \,h$ as defined by MaxBCG) and the redshift interval $\Delta z=0.045(1+z_c)$ where $z_c$ is the redshift of the cluster. The new redshift is used as input and the same procedure is repeated until convergence on the redshift value is achieved, which usually occurs in three iterations or less. The selection of $N=7$ was informed by optimizing cluster redshifts for systems with known spectroscopic redshifts. Uncertainties in the cluster redshifts are determined via bootstrap resampling (10,000 times) of the galaxies selected for the redshift determination. We also explored estimating errors using Monte Carlo realizations of the sample which provided similar results. We note that although our catalogs contain the spectroscopic redshifts available from SDSS, in the procedure described here we only make use of the photometric redshifts, in order to make a direct comparison with the spectroscopic information. Another important advantage of the overlap of ACT with S82 and SDSS is that for all clusters at $z<0.3$ the BCG was spectroscopically targeted by SDSS and has a spectroscopic redshift. Moreover, as BCGs are very luminous objects, in several cases it was possible to match them with a spectroscopic redshift from SDSS to $z\approx0.5$. There are 25 ACT clusters in S82 for which a spectroscopic redshift was available from SDSS for the BCG or the next brightest galaxy in the cluster. For the ACT area outside S82, the CAS DR8 database provides imaging but no spectroscopic redshifts are available from SDSS on this region. Additionally, within the sample presented in this paper, 21 (18 are on S82) S/N$>4.5$ SZ clusters have multi-object spectroscopic follow-up observations using GMOS on Gemini-S as part of our program aimed at obtaining dynamical masses for ACT clusters at $z>0.35$ [@Sifon2012]. The observations were carried out as part of our ongoing programs (GS-2011B-C-1, GS-2012A-C-2 and GS-2012B-C-3) and processed using our custom set of tools as described in @Sifon2012. The full description of the ACT equatorial sample follow-up with Gemini will be described in a future paper (Sifón et al., in prep.). In Figure \[fig:photo-z\] we show that the photometric and spectroscopic redshifts are in good agreement. Thus for clusters without spectroscopic redshifts, up to $z\approx0.8$, we confirm that our photometric ones will be quite accurate. For clusters at $z>0.9$, due to the lack of spectroscopic redshifts, we can only assume that the SDSS well-calibrated photometry provides robust estimates. Both photometric and spectroscopic redshifts for the full cluster sample are given in Tables \[tab:S82sample\] and \[tab:DR8sample\]. Defining Cluster Membership {#sec:membership} --------------------------- In order to have a richness measurement useful to compare across the SZ cluster sample, one must define cluster membership. We follow a similar procedure to that in @SCSII. Once the redshift of the cluster is determined, we use BPZ-defined early-type galaxies within the same $250\,h^{-1}$kpc radius and redshift interval $\Delta z=0.045(1+z_c)$ as above to obtain a local self-defined color-magnitude relation (CMR) for each color combination, $g-r$, $r-i$, and $i-z$ ($z-K_s$ when available) for all cluster members, using a $3\sigma$ clipping algorithm. For the determination of cluster members we use the spectroscopic redshift when available to define $z_c$. We use these spatial and color criteria to determine $N_{\rm 1Mpc}$, the number of galaxies within $1h^{-1}$Mpc of the cluster center as defined by @MaxBCG. Formally, we compute $N_{\rm gal}=N_{\rm 1Mpc}$ by including those galaxies within a projected $1h^{-1}$Mpc from the cluster center and within $\Delta z=0.045(1+z_c)$ that satisfy three conditions: (1) the galaxy must have the SED of an early type according to BPZ, (2) it must have the appropriate color to be a cluster member (i.e., colors within $3\sigma$ of the local CMR for all color combinations) and (3) it must have the right luminosity, dimmer than the BCG and brighter than $0.4L^*$. Additionally we designate cluster members according to the estimated cluster size $R_{200}$, defined as the radius at which the cluster galaxy density is $200\Omega_m^{-1}$ times the mean space density of galaxies in the present Universe. We estimated the scaled radius $R_{200}$ using the empirical relation from @Hansen-05, $R_{200}= 0.156N_{\rm 1Mpc}^{0.6} h^{-1}$Mpc which is derived from the SDSS. Hence $N_{200}$ is the number of galaxies satisfying the above conditions within $R_{200}$. For our richness measurements we estimated the galaxy background contamination and implemented an appropriate background subtraction method following the same procedure described in @SCSI (see section 3.1). We use a statistical removal of unrelated field galaxies with similar colors and redshifts that were projected along the line of sight to each cluster. We estimate the surface number density of ellipticals in an annulus surrounding the cluster (within $4<r<9\,h^{-1}$Mpc) with the same $\Delta z$ as above and the same colors as the cluster members. We measure this background contribution around the outskirts of each cluster and obtain a corrected value $N_{\rm gal}$ which is used to compute $R_{200}$ and then a corresponding value of $N_{200}$. The magnitude of the correction ranges between $10\%-40$% depending on the cluster richness. For the clusters confirmed using APO observations, the smaller FOV of NICFPS precludes us from making a proper background correction for the $N_{\rm gal}$ estimate. Instead we choose a conservative 40% correction factor. In the few cases where the cluster is located near the edge of the optical coverage of S82 and the projected area of a $1h^{-1}$Mpc aperture is not fully contained within the optical data we scale up $N_{\rm gal}$ by the fraction of the missing area. We will refer to the corrected values hereafter. The measured richness value, $N_{\rm gal}$, was used to optically confirm the cluster; we require a numerical value of $N_{\rm gal}>15$. In Table \[tab:S82sample\] and \[tab:DR8sample\] we present the $N_{\rm gal}$ estimated for the S82 and DR8 sample respectively. ![image]({ACT-CL_J0022.2-0036_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0326.8-0043_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0152.7+0100_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0059.1-0049_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J2337.6+0016_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J2129.6+0005_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0014.9-0057_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0206.2-0114_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} The ACT Equatorial SZ Cluster Sample ==================================== Our optical confirmation of SZ candidates has resulted in a new sample of 68 clusters: 49 systems are located in the area overlapping with S82 and 19 clusters on the area that overlaps with the shallower DR8 data. <span>lcccccccl</span> ACT-CL J0022.2$-$0036 & 00:22:13.0 & $-$00:36:33.8 & 0.805 & $0.80 \pm 0.03$ & $65.9\pm8.1$ & 9.8 & 0.124 &\ ACT-CL J0326.8$-$0043 & 03:26:49.9 & $-$00:43:51.7 & 0.448 & $0.45 \pm 0.03$ & $41.7\pm6.5$ & 9.1 & 0.014 & GMBCG J051.70814-00.73104\ ACT-CL J0152.7$+$0100 & 01:52:41.9 & $+$01:00:25.5 & 0.230 & $0.23 \pm 0.02$ & $67.2\pm8.2$ & 9.0 & 0.026 & Abell 0267\ ACT-CL J0059.1$-$0049 & 00:59:08.5 & $-$00:50:05.7 & 0.786 & $0.77 \pm 0.03$ & $41.0\pm6.4$ & 8.4 & 0.064 &\ ACT-CL J2337.6$+$0016 & 23:37:39.7 & $+$00:16:16.9 & 0.275 & $0.28 \pm 0.01$ & $57.8\pm7.6$ & 8.2 & 0.036 & Abell 2631\ ACT-CL J2129.6$+$0005 & 21:29:39.9 & $+$00:05:21.1 & 0.234 & $0.24 \pm 0.01$ & $35.0\pm5.9$ & 8.0 & 0.028 & RX J2129.6+0005\ ACT-CL J0014.9$-$0057 & 00:14:54.1 & $-$00:57:08.4 & 0.533 & $0.52 \pm 0.02$ & $56.2\pm7.5$ & 7.8 & 0.070 & GMBCG J003.72543-00.95236\ ACT-CL J0206.2$-$0114 & 02:06:13.4 & $-$01:14:17.0 & 0.676 & $0.68 \pm 0.02$ & $68.4\pm9.5$ & 6.9 & 0.123 &\ ACT-CL J0342.0$+$0105 & 03:42:02.1 & $+$01:05:07.5 & & $1.07 \pm 0.06$ & $41.2\pm6.3$ & 5.9 & 0.248 &\ ACT-CL J2154.5$-$0049 & 21:54:32.3 & $-$00:49:00.4 & 0.488 & $0.48 \pm 0.02$ & $56.9\pm7.5$ & 5.9 & 0.090 & WHL J215432.2-004905\ ACT-CL J0218.2$-$0041 & 02:18:16.8 & $-$00:41:41.8 & 0.672 & $0.65 \pm 0.03$ & $39.2\pm6.3$ & 5.8 & 0.262 &\ ACT-CL J0223.1$-$0056 & 02:23:10.0 & $-$00:57:08.9 & 0.663 & $0.64 \pm 0.04$ & $50.5\pm7.1$ & 5.8 & 0.159 & in GMB2011\ ACT-CL J2050.5$-$0055 & 20:50:29.7 & $-$00:55:40.6 & 0.622 & $0.60 \pm 0.03$ & $38.6\pm6.2$ & 5.6 & 0.098 & in GMB2011\ ACT-CL J0044.4$+$0113 & 00:44:25.6 & $+$01:12:48.7 & & $1.11 \pm 0.03$ & $73.0\pm8.5$ & 5.5 & 0.258 &\ ACT-CL J0215.4$+$0030 & 02:15:28.5 & $+$00:30:37.3 & 0.865 & $0.73 \pm 0.03$ & $29.5\pm3.8$ & 5.5 & 0.046 &\ ACT-CL J0256.5$+$0006 & 02:56:33.7 & $+$00:06:28.8 & 0.363 & $0.37 \pm 0.01$ & $39.8\pm6.3$ & 5.4 & 0.113 & RX J0256.5+0006\ ACT-CL J0012.0$-$0046 & 00:12:01.8 & $-$00:46:34.5 & & $1.36 \pm 0.06$ & $29.2\pm5.3$ & 5.3 & 0.313 &\ ACT-CL J0241.2$-$0018 & 02:41:15.4 & $-$00:18:41.0 & 0.684 & $0.68 \pm 0.03$ & $50.5\pm7.1$ & 5.1 & 0.040 &\ \ \ ACT-CL J0127.2$+$0020 & 01:27:16.6 & $+$00:20:40.9 & 0.379 & $0.37 \pm 0.02$ & $64.8\pm8.1$ & 5.1 & 0.075 & GMBCG J021.81939+00.34469\ ACT-CL J0348.6$+$0029 & 03:48:36.7 & $+$00:29:33.0 & 0.297 & $0.29 \pm 0.02$ & $29.4\pm5.4$ & 5.0 & 0.142 & GMBCG J057.17821+00.48718\ ACT-CL J0119.9$+$0055 & 01:19:58.1 & $+$00:55:33.6 & & $0.72 \pm 0.03$ & $21.5\pm3.3$ & 5.0 & 0.218 &\ ACT-CL J0058.0$+$0030 & 00:58:05.7 & $+$00:30:58.1 & & $0.76 \pm 0.02$ & $47.0\pm6.8$ & 5.0 & 0.199 &\ ACT-CL J0320.4$+$0032 & 03:20:29.7 & $+$00:31:53.7 & 0.384 & $0.38 \pm 0.02$ & $55.9\pm7.5$ & 4.9 & 0.158 & GMBCG J050.12410+00.53157\ ACT-CL J2302.5$+$0002 & 23:02:35.0 & $+$00:02:34.2 & 0.520 & $0.50 \pm 0.01$ & $61.4\pm7.8$ & 4.9 & 0.080 & GMBCG J345.64608+00.04281\ ACT-CL J2055.4$+$0105 & 20:55:23.2 & $+$01:06:07.5 & 0.408 & $0.41 \pm 0.03$ & $37.7\pm6.1$ & 4.9 & 0.233 & GMBCG J313.84687+01.10212\ ACT-CL J0308.1$+$0103 & 03:08:12.1 & $+$01:03:15.0 & 0.633 & $0.63 \pm 0.03$ & $41.1\pm6.4$ & 4.8 & 0.174 &\ ACT-CL J0336.9$-$0110 & 03:36:57.1 & $-$01:09:48.3 & & $1.32 \pm 0.05$ & $29.1\pm5.1$ & 4.8 & 0.277 &\ ACT-CL J0219.8$+$0022 & 02:19:50.4 & $+$00:22:14.9 & 0.537 & $0.53 \pm 0.02$ & $59.0\pm7.7$ & 4.7 & 0.191 & GMBCG J034.95781+00.37385\ ACT-CL J0348.6$-$0028 & 03:48:39.5 & $-$00:28:16.9 & 0.345 & $0.34 \pm 0.02$ & $56.9\pm7.5$ & 4.7 & 0.095 & GMBCG J057.14850-00.43348\ ACT-CL J2351.7$+$0009 & 23:51:44.6 & $+$00:09:16.2 & & $0.99 \pm 0.03$ & $76.0\pm8.7$ & 4.7 & 0.039 &\ ACT-CL J0342.7$-$0017 & 03:42:42.6 & $-$00:17:08.3 & 0.310 & $0.30 \pm 0.01$ & $36.3\pm6.0$ & 4.6 & 0.132 & GMBCG J055.67773-00.28564\ ACT-CL J0250.1$+$0008 & 02:50:08.4 & $+$00:08:16.4 & & $0.78 \pm 0.03$ & $32.7\pm5.7$ & 4.5 & 0.084 &\ ACT-CL J2152.9$-$0114 & 21:52:55.6 & $-$01:14:53.2 & & $0.69 \pm 0.02$ & $22.7\pm3.9$ & 4.4 & 0.156 &\ ACT-CL J2130.1$+$0045 & 21:30:08.8 & $+$00:46:48.3 & & $0.71 \pm 0.04$ & $21.5\pm3.3$ & 4.4 & 0.554 &\ ACT-CL J0018.2$-$0022 & 00:18:18.4 & $-$00:22:45.8 & & $0.75 \pm 0.04$ & $27.8\pm5.3$ & 4.4 & 0.393 &\ ACT-CL J0104.8$+$0002 & 01:04:55.3 & $+$00:03:36.2 & 0.277 & $0.28 \pm 0.00$ & $64.4\pm8.0$ & 4.3 & 0.235 & MaxBCG J016.23069+00.06007\ ACT-CL J0017.6$-$0051 & 00:17:37.6 & $-$00:52:42.0 & 0.211 & $0.22 \pm 0.01$ & $38.3\pm6.2$ & 4.2 & 0.268 & MaxBCG J004.40671-00.87833\ ACT-CL J0230.9$-$0024 & 02:30:53.8 & $-$00:24:40.9 & & $0.44 \pm 0.03$ & $19.9\pm4.5$ & 4.2 & 0.158 & WHL J023055.3-002549\ ACT-CL J0301.1$-$0110 & 03:01:12.0 & $-$01:10:47.7 & & $0.53 \pm 0.04$ & $24.5\pm5.0$ & 4.2 & 0.260 & in GMB2011\ ACT-CL J0051.1$+$0055 & 00:51:12.8 & $+$00:55:54.4 & & $0.69 \pm 0.03$ & $20.5\pm3.2$ & 4.2 & 0.417 &\ ACT-CL J0245.8$-$0042 & 02:45:51.7 & $-$00:42:16.4 & 0.179 & $0.17 \pm 0.01$ & $40.2\pm6.3$ & 4.1 & 0.038 & Abell 0381\ ACT-CL J2051.1$+$0056 & 20:51:11.0 & $+$00:56:46.1 & 0.333 & $0.35 \pm 0.01$ & $20.2\pm4.5$ & 4.1 & 0.066 & GMBCG J312.79620+00.94615\ ACT-CL J2135.1$-$0102 & 21:35:12.0 & $-$01:03:00.1 & & $0.33 \pm 0.01$ & $68.0\pm8.2$ & 4.1 & 0.242 & GMBCG J323.80763-59-98972\ ACT-CL J0228.5$+$0030 & 02:28:30.4 & $+$00:30:35.7 & & $0.72 \pm 0.02$ & $31.5\pm4.0$ & 4.0 & 0.182 &\ ACT-CL J2229.2$-$0004 & 22:29:07.5 & $-$00:04:11.0 & & $0.61 \pm 0.05$ & $16.4\pm3.9$ & 4.0 & 0.569 &\ ACT-CL J2135.7$+$0009 & 21:35:39.5 & $+$00:09:57.1 & 0.118 & $0.12 \pm 0.00$ & $75.3\pm8.7$ & 4.0 & 0.144 & Abell 2356\ ACT-CL J2253.3$-$0031 & 22:53:24.2 & $-$00:30:30.8 & & $0.54 \pm 0.01$ & $23.0\pm3.4$ & 4.0 & 0.488 &\ ACT-CL J2220.7$-$0042 & 22:20:47.0 & $-$00:41:54.4 & & $0.57 \pm 0.03$ & $34.5\pm5.9$ & 4.0 & 0.277 & in GMB2011\ ACT-CL J0221.5$-$0012 & 02:21:36.6 & $-$00:12:19.8 & 0.589 & $0.57 \pm 0.03$ & $21.2\pm4.6$ & 4.0 & 0.246 & in GMB2011\ \[tab:S82sample\] Clusters in Stripe 82 {#sec:S82} --------------------- In Table \[tab:S82sample\] we present the 49 clusters in the 270deg$^2$ area in S82 along with their redshift information, BCG positions and optical richness. In Figures \[fig:S82clustersa\] and \[fig:S82clustersb\] we show 8 examples of $z<1$ clusters confirmed using the S82 imaging alone, while in Figure \[fig:APOclusters\] we show examples of clusters confirmed using the additional $K_S$-band APO imaging. Optical and NIR images for the full sample are available at <http://peumo.rutgers.edu/act/S82>. We used NED[^4] to search for cluster counterparts for our sample using a $500\,h_{70}^{-1}$kpc matching radius and found that a number of them are well-known $z<0.35$ clusters reported as part of the Abell [@Abell1958], ROSAT All-Sky Galaxy Cluster Survey [NORAS; @RX] and MaxBCG [@MaxBCG] catalogs. Also using NED we found matches for $z<0.55$ systems in the GMBCG [@GMBCG] and WHL [@WHL] optical cluster catalogs. The GMBCG catalog is an improved version of the MaxBCG method which used the SDSS DR7. In Table \[tab:S82sample\] we designate the first reported alternative name for each system. For higher redshift systems we compared our sample with the catalog from @Geach2011 [GMB2011] which uses a red cluster sequence algorithm on the same deep co-added S82 data used in this analysis to detect clusters. We searched for counterparts using the same match radius and found 5 previously reported GMB2011 systems at $0.50<z<0.65$. Beyond $z>0.65$ all SZ confirmed cluster in S82 represent new discoveries, highlighting the power of the SZ effect to discover massive galaxy clusters at high redshift. In summary, of the 49 ACT SZ-selected clusters from S82, 22 are new and lie at $z>0.54$. Our APO follow-up campaigns aided in the confirmation of five new clusters at $z\geq1$ over the S82 region by the addition of the $K_S$ imaging, described in Section \[sec:APO\], to the 5 optical bands. In Figures \[fig:APOclusters\] and \[fig:J0044\] we show the optical and NIR composite images of the 5 clusters at $z\geq1$. In Table \[tab:APO\] we present a summary for the 5 new clusters confirmed with the help of the NIR imaging. Additional Clusters Outside Stripe 82 ------------------------------------- In Table \[tab:DR8sample\] we present the sample of 19 optically confirmed clusters using the $ugriz$ imaging from the SDSS DR8 where we provide the same information as for the S82 sample above. The shallower coverage over the area beyond S82 only allows us to present optical confirmations for an incomplete subsample. As we see from Figure \[fig:mr\_z\], the imaging depth of the DR8 data set can only "see" $L^*$ galaxies up to $z\approx0.5$. Moreover, the DR8 footprint does not fully cover the ACT equatorial region. Within this sky region, which contains 10 new clusters, is located the most significant SZ detection of the whole ACT equatorial sample, 2327 which we discuss in detail in Section \[sec:J2327\]. An approved dedicated optical and NIR follow-up program using the SOAR 4.1-m and APO 3.5-m telescopes in 2012B will provide a more uniform and complete cluster sample for the remaining area outside S82. <span>lcclccccl</span> ACT-CL J2327.4$-$0204 & 23:27:27.6 & $-$02:04:37.4 & 0.705 & $0.69 \pm 0.04$ & $ 61.7\pm 7.9$ & 13.1 & 0.028 & RCS2 2327\ ACT-CL J2135.2$+$0125 & 21:35:18.7 & $+$01:25:27.0 & 0.231 & $0.25 \pm 0.01$ & $ 57.6\pm 7.6$ & 9.3 & 0.184 & Abell 2355\ ACT-CL J0239.8$-$0134 & 02:39:53.1 & $-$01:34:56.0 & 0.375 & $0.35 \pm 0.03$ & $ 84.0\pm 9.2$ & 8.8 & 0.121 & Abell 0370\ ACT-CL J2058.8$+$0123 & 20:58:58.0 & $+$01:22:22.2 & & $0.32 \pm 0.02$ & $ 76.9\pm 8.8$ & 8.3 & 0.361 &\ ACT-CL J0045.2$-$0152 & 00:45:12.5 & $-$01:52:31.6 & 0.545 & $0.55 \pm 0.02$ & $ 53.5\pm 7.3$ & 7.5 & 0.182 &\ ACT-CL J2050.7$+$0123 & 20:50:43.1 & $+$01:23:29.2 & 0.333 & $0.35 \pm 0.03$ & $ 56.5\pm 7.5$ & 7.4 & 0.104 & RXC J2050.7+0123\ ACT-CL J2128.4$+$0135 & 21:28:23.4 & $+$01:35:36.4 & 0.385 & $0.39 \pm 0.03$ & $ 87.2\pm 9.3$ & 7.3 & 0.165 &\ ACT-CL J2025.2$+$0030 & 20:25:12.7 & $+$00:31:33.8 & & $0.34 \pm 0.02$ & $ 56.6\pm 7.5$ & 6.4 & 0.235 &\ ACT-CL J0026.2$+$0120 & 00:26:15.9 & $+$01:20:37.0 & & $0.65 \pm 0.04$ & $ 33.6\pm 5.8$ & 6.3 & 0.196 &\ ACT-CL J2307.6$+$0130 & 23:07:39.9 & $+$01:30:55.8 & & $0.36 \pm 0.02$ & $ 75.5\pm 8.7$ & 6.1 & 0.027 & ZwCl 2305.0+0114\ ACT-CL J2156.1$+$0123 & 21:56:08.5 & $+$01:23:27.3 & 0.224 & $0.21 \pm 0.02$ & $ 64.9\pm 8.1$ & 6.0 & 0.094 & Abell 2397\ ACT-CL J0301.6$+$0155 & 03:01:38.2 & $+$01:55:14.6 & 0.167 & $0.19 \pm 0.01$ & $ 49.4\pm 7.0$ & 5.8 & 0.069 & RXC J0301.6+0155\ ACT-CL J2051.1$+$0215 & 20:51:12.2 & $+$02:15:58.3 & 0.321 & $0.35 \pm 0.02$ & $ 56.4\pm 7.5$ & 5.2 & 0.221 & RXC J2051.1+0216\ ACT-CL J0303.3$+$0155 & 03:03:21.1 & $+$01:55:34.5 & 0.153 & $0.17 \pm 0.01$ & $ 26.1\pm 5.1$ & 5.2 & 0.060 & Abell 0409\ ACT-CL J0156.4$-$0123 & 01:56:24.3 & $-$01:23:17.3 & & $0.45 \pm 0.04$ & $ 37.9\pm 6.2$ & 5.2 & 0.011 &\ ACT-CL J0219.9$+$0129 & 02:19:52.1 & $+$01:29:52.2 & & $0.35 \pm 0.02$ & $ 66.0\pm 8.1$ & 4.9 & 0.154 &\ ACT-CL J0240.0$+$0116 & 02:40:01.7 & $+$01:16:06.4 & & $0.62 \pm 0.03$ & $ 31.9\pm 5.7$ & 4.8 & 0.077 &\ ACT-CL J0008.1$+$0201 & 00:08:10.4 & $+$02:01:12.3 & & $0.36 \pm 0.04$ & $ 44.8\pm 6.7$ & 4.7 & 0.028 &\ ACT-CL J0139.3$-$0128 & 01:39:16.7 & $-$01:28:45.2 & & $0.70 \pm 0.03$ & $ 26.9\pm 5.2$ & 4.3 & 0.549 &\ \[tab:DR8sample\] ![image]({ACT-CL_J0342.0+0105_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0012.0-0046_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J0336.9-0110_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} ![image]({ACT-CL_J2351.7+0009_cplate}.pdf){width="3.5in"} Notable Clusters ---------------- In the following sections we provide detailed information on a selected few individual clusters that are worthy of special attention. ### {#sec:J0044} ![The <span>*XMM-Newton*</span> archival X-ray observations (contours) that serendipitously contain overlaid on the composite optical (S82) and NIR (APO) pseudo-color image. The X-ray observations show its extended nature with a best fit temperature of $kT_X=7.9\pm1.0$ keV for the photometric redshift of $z = 1.11$.<span data-label="fig:J0044"></span>]({ACT-CL_J0044.4+0113_optXray}.pdf){width="3.4in"} appeared serendipitously in an archival observation targeting the SLAC lens object SDSSJ0044+0113 [@Auger2009] taken on Jan 10, 2010 (PI:Treu, ObsID:0602340101). After flare rejection we obtained exposure times of 21ks for each MOS and 15ks for the pn. Our analysis used SAS version 12.0.1. In Figure \[fig:J0044\] we show the composite optical/NIR color image for with the overplotted X-ray surface brightness contours in the 0.5-4.5 keV band shown in white. The cluster is clearly extended and the X-ray surface brightness is above background up to a radius of $\sim$50$^{\prime\prime}$ (439 $h_{70}^{-1}$ kpc). Fits to the integrated spectrum to $R_{500c}$ from a region of radius $1\!'.5$, using a local annular region (covering 2.1$^{\prime}$ to 4.2$^{\prime}$) results in a best fit gas temperature of $kT_X=7.9\pm1.0$ keV and 0.5–2.0 keV band luminosity of $L_X=(4.2\pm0.15)\times10^{44}\,h_{70}^{-2}$erg s$^{-1}$, which assumes the cluster's photometric redshift of $z=1.11$. We use the @Arnaud2005 $M_{500c}-T_X$ scaling relation based on observations to estimate the mass for the cluster, $$M_{500c,T_X} = \frac{M_0}{E(z)}\left(\frac{T_X}{5\,\rm{keV}}\right)^\alpha \, h_{70}^{-1}M_{\odot}$$ with $M_0=(3.84\pm0.14)\times10^{14}$, $\alpha=1.71\pm0.09$. The measured cluster temperature yields a mass of $M_{500c,T_X}=(4.7\pm1.1)\times10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$. This mass is converted to the mass with respect to the average density, $M_{200a} = 8.2_{-2.5}^{+3.3} \times10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$ after scaling from critical to average density using $M_{200a} = 1.77_{-0.17}^{+0.26} \times M_{500c}$. This conversion factor was derived using a NFW mass profile and the concentration-mass relation, $c(M,z)$, from simulations [@Duffy2008] at $z=1.11$ for the mass of the cluster. The reported uncertainties in the conversion factor reflect the $\sigma_{{\rm log}\,c}=0.15$ scatter in the log-normal probability distribution of $c(M,z)$. The X-ray temperature and inferred mass estimates make a remarkable system that is among the most massive and X-ray-hot clusters known beyond $z=1$. The mass and temperature of are comparable to the X-ray-discovered cluster XMMU J2235.3$-$2557 ($z=1.39$) $kT_X=8.6\pm1.3$ keV and $M_{200a}= (8.23\pm1.21) \times 10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$ [@Rosati2009; @Jee2009] and two recent SZ-discovered clusters: SPT-CL J2106$-$5844 ($z=1.13$) with $kT_X = 11.0^{+2.6}_{-1.9}$ keV and $M_{200a}=(1.27\pm0.21)\times10^{15}\,h_{70}^{-1}\,M_\odot$ [@Foley2011] and SPT-CL J0205-5829 ($z=1.32$) with $kT_X = 8.7^{+1.0}_{-0.8}$ keV and $M_{500c} =(4.9\pm0.8)\times10^{14}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$ [@Stalder2012]. ### 2327 (RCS2 2327) {#sec:J2327} ![The <span>*Chandra*</span> X-ray observation for 2327, which shows its extended nature, is overlaid as white contours on the $gr$ optical pseudo-color composite image from GMOS. The X-ray contours cover a dynamic range of a factor of 100 from the peak to the minimum.<span data-label="fig:J2327"></span>]({ACT-CL_J2327.4-0204_optXray}.pdf){width="3.4in"} 2327 is the cluster with the highest significance detection and the strongest SZ signal in the full ACT equatorial sample. The cluster has also been reported as RCS2 2327 by @Gralla2011. Although the cluster is not in S82, the system is rich and bright enough to be detected on the shallower DR8 imaging from which we obtained an accurate photometric redshift estimate of $z=0.69\pm0.05$ and optical richness $N_{\rm gal}=59.2\pm7.7$. We searched for archival data and found imaging and spectroscopy from Gemini/GMOS and X-ray observations from and . We processed the single GMOS pointing (offset $2^\prime$ from the cluster center) in $g$ ($4\times300$s) and $r$ ($4\times300$s) taken on UT 2007 Aug 7 and UT 2007 Dec 26 (GS-2007B-Q-5, PI:Gladders) using our GMOS custom pipeline [@Sifon2012] to create astrometrically corrected co-added images. The GMOS imaging of the central region of the cluster, shown in Figure \[fig:J2327\], confirms the picture from DR8 that 2327 is a very rich cluster, and reveals the presence of several strong lensing features. We also processed the spectroscopic data from the single mask available taken with the B600 grism for a total integration time of 14.4ks of which we were able to process 7.2ks. Unfortunately the setup of the spectroscopic observations only covers the $4000-6800$Å wavelength range hence putting the CaII K-H absorption doublet (rest-frame $\lambda_0=3950$Å) used to secure the redshift of early-type galaxies at the limit of the detector. Nevertheless, we were able to extract redshifts for three cluster galaxies (two of them with \[OII\] emission), for which we obtain a mean redshift of $z=0.705$. A 25ks observation (PI:Gladders, ObsID 7355) was taken in August of 2008 using the ACIS-S array in VFAINT mode. We processed the data using CIAO version 4.4, applying the latest calibrations (CALDB version 4.5.0). VFAINT background rejection was implemented. X-ray point sources were identified and compared to the locations of their optical counterparts, which established that the absolute astronometry of this observation was good ($1''$). Background was subtracted using the blank-sky background files supplied by the CXC. The process included applying an appropriate filter to the source data to remove time intervals of high background. This observation was devoid of any background flares. For making images, point sources were removed and replaced with Poisson distributed counts based on the surrounding level of background or source emission. Exposure maps were created in the soft (0.5-2 keV) band. Figure \[fig:J2327\] shows surface brightness contours of the background-subtracted, exposure-corrected, adaptively-smoothed X-ray data in the 0.5–2 keV band. The X-rays show a strongly peaked distribution centered very close to the BCG. The cluster X-ray isophotes are modestly elliptical with an axial ratio of $\sim$1.2 and little centroid shift. We detect X-ray emission out to a mean radius of $\sim0.\!'8$ ($670\,h^{-1}_{70}$kpc). We use this observation to measure the gas temperature of the cluster. An absorbed <span>phabs\*mekal</span> model yielded a best-fit (source frame) temperature of $kT_X = 11.0_{-1.3}^{+2.0}$ keV from the core-excised spectrum (covering from $0.15 R_{500c}$ to $0.50R_{500c}$ after iterating to obtain $R_{500c}$). We use this value with Eq. 5 in @Vikhlinin2009 to estimate the cluster temperature within $R_{500c}$ which can then be used in the $T_X$-$M_X$ scaling law. We also have obtained an integrated spectrum (covering the full cluster out to a radius of $\sim0.\!'8$. From this we obtain a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}=(6.6\pm0.3)\times10^{45}\, h_{70}^{-2}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Figure \[fig:L-T\] shows the $L_{\rm bol}$-$T_X$ relation with 2327 added as the red point. The smaller grey points show the sample of @Markevitch1998, while the white square and large grey circle show the closest comparison clusters, 1E0657$-$56 and El Gordo. Similarly, the X-ray luminosity of 2327 in the 0.5–2.0 keV band is $L_X=1.39\pm0.05\times10^{45}\,h_{70}^{-2}$erg s$^{-1}$. We follow the prescriptions in @Vikhlinin2009 and apply the $T_X-M_{500c}$ scaling law to the data and obtain a mass of $M_{500c,T_X} = 9.7^{+3.1}_{-1.8}\times 10^{14}h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$. We also investigated the cluster mass from $M_{\rm gas}$ using the scaling law for $M_{500c}-M_{\rm gas}$ at redshift $z=0.6$ from @KVN, which yields a value of $M_{500c,\rm Mgas} = (9.6\pm1.2)\times10^{14}h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$ and implies a gas mass fraction $f_{\rm gas} = 0.12$. Both X-ray derived masses are in good agreement and confirm the view of an exceptional and massive cluster. We use the weighted-average of the $T_X$ and $M_{\rm gas}$ mass estimates to obtain a combined mass for 2327 of $M_{500c} =(1.0\pm0.1)\times10^{15}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$. We convert the combined mass with respect to the average density using the same procedure as for ACT-CL J0044.4$+$0113 in Section \[sec:J0044\] using the scaling $M_{200a}=1.86_{-0.20}^{+0.30}\times M_{500c}$ which produces a mass $M_{200a}=1.9_{-0.4}^{+0.6}\times10^{15}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$. This mass is also consistent with the velocity dispersion of $\approx1400$km s$^{-1}$ presented by @Yee2009[^5] which indicates a dynamical mass of $M_{200a,\rm dyn}\approx2.6\times10^{15}\,h_{70}^{-1}M_\odot$ when applying the same procedure as described below (Section \[sec:J0022\]). In summary, the high SZ-signal, gas temperature, gas mass and velocity dispersion, taken together, establish 2327 as one of the two most massive clusters known at $z>0.6$, the other being El Gordo. ![The X-ray bolometric luminosity vs. temperature for a sample of well-studied clusters taken from @Markevitch1998. The Bullet cluster (1E0657$-$56) and El Gordo are the open square point and gray circle at high temperature and luminosity from @Markevitch2006 and @Menanteau2012 respectively. 2327 is the red circle that shows the remarkable properties of the cluster. The dashed line represents the $L-T$ best-fit from @Markevitch1998.<span data-label="fig:L-T"></span>](L-T.pdf){width="3.6in"} ### ACT-CL J0022.2$-$0036 {#sec:J0022} ACT-CL J0022.2$-$0036 is the highest significance SZ detection on the S82 region of the ACT equatorial sample and has been extensively targeted for our follow-up observations. @Reese2012 recently presented SZA observations of the cluster, while @Miyatake2012 estimated its mass from weak-lensing measurements using Subaru. As part of our spectroscopic follow-up
{'source': 'arXiv_out/1210'}