#ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-01 <Admiral_Chicago> asac: are you around? <Ubulette> asac, I have seamonkey 1.1.7 ready (3 MSA), too bad 1.1.6 is still unsponsored. <Ubulette> i'm sick of this, I'm thinking about dropping it. noone seems to care <[reed]> "sponsor"? <Ubulette> [reed], yep, i'm not allowed to push releases myself in ubuntu. I depend on already approved guys <[reed]> ah <[reed]> asac can't sponsor? <Ubulette> sure but someone else wanted to do it, like weeks ago <[reed]> ah <bluekuja> Ubulette, around? <bluekuja> Ubulette, it FTBFS in hardy <bluekuja> Ubulette, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/2403/ <bluekuja> Ubulette, builds fine with gutsy but that's the problem with hardy <asac> Admiral_Chicago: here <bluekuja> asac, seamonkey FTBFS in hardy <asac> bluekuja: we need a patch <asac> take it from firefox 2 in hardy <asac> gtk has changed :) <bluekuja> :) <bluekuja> I'll tell that to Ubulette <bluekuja> so he can prepare a fix <asac> bluekuja: just add it build and upload <asac> wait a sec <bluekuja> did you see the error? <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/bz344818_att264996.patch <asac> yes ... the patch fixes it <bluekuja> ok, I'm quite off, so I'll do it tomorrow or monday <asac> is the package ok= <asac> ? <asac> (otherwise)? <bluekuja> yes, the final paths are ok, there is a strange linda warning <asac> which? <bluekuja> W: seamonkey-dev; File /usr/lib/pkgconfig/seamonkey-nspr.pc contained in /usr/lib of Architecture: all package. <bluekuja> and some other long desc ones, we can just skip <bluekuja> it installs fine <bluekuja> it works fine <bluekuja> (on gutsy) <asac> ok ... no need to bother about thta <bluekuja> ok <bluekuja> so we just need to add that patch <bluekuja> and we can upload it <asac> bluekuja: yes, i can upload it if you don't get to it tomorrow ... just let me know <bluekuja> asac, ok, I'll try to handle it tomorrow evening <bluekuja> if not, gonna ping you <asac> ok ... let me know <asac> thanks <bluekuja> perfect, and sorry for the delay <bluekuja> asac, too many stuff to do nowadays <asac> yeah ... not a problem ... next time you can probably do it faster because the package isn't really new to you anymore :) <asac> after all its a big one :) <bluekuja> yeah <bluekuja> an hour to build is a lot <bluekuja> and anyway that's my fault, had really a lot to do plus school/sport <asac> right ... hopefully this can be migrated to xulrunner ... but doesn't look like it will happen for hardy <bluekuja> yea, going to drink something in the town centre now <asac> have fun <bluekuja> thanks alex <bluekuja> :) <bluekuja> what about you? <asac> not today ;) <bluekuja> :) <bluekuja> have a great evening! <bluekuja> cu tomorrow :) <asac> thanks cu <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10619116/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-hppa.lightning-sunbird_0.7%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <Adri2000> hi <Adri2000> I'd like to know on what we should build-depend today in hardy, firefox-dev, libxul-dev, xulrunner-1.9-dev? <asac> Adri2000: which application? <Adri2000> asac: blam <asac> well xulrunner-1.9-dev is preferred and only supported option for hardy <asac> otherwise libxul-dev <Adri2000> asac: Debian b-d on libxul-dev and I changed that to firefox-dev during the feisty development cycle <asac> firefox-deb will be gone in the ed <asac> Adri2000: you should port that application to xulrunner-1.9 :) <asac> needs some coding though <Adri2000> errr... blam is mono :s * Adri2000 wonders why he touched blam <Adri2000> well I'll try to build it with xulrunner-1.9 and see if it actually ftbfs <asac> it will <asac> (fail) <Adri2000> is there a doc somewhere about how to do the transition? <asac> will finish it tomorrow <asac> stay tune <asac> d <Adri2000> ok <Adri2000> asac: when you say xulrunner-1.9-dev is the only one supported in hardy, that means xulrunner-1.9 is/will be in main while xulrunner is in universe for hardy? <Adri2000> asac: blam built fine with xulrunner-1.9-dev... #ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-02 <shirish> anybody up? <shirish> Ubulette: are u up m8? <asac> Adri2000: i cannot blieve it does ... you need to use libxul-embedding-1.9.pc (for pkg-config) <Jazzva> asac: you there? <asac> Jazzva: yep <Jazzva> asac: Well, the exam week is over, so I'll be mostly back on track from now on :)... I'll take a look at two bugs, now that I'm free :) <asac> cool <asac> Jazzva: planned to do more merges? <Jazzva> Hmm, sure :). Just to fix the debdiff for ksimus. And when I come back from town, gotta go and get a new jacket. <asac> yeah ... was more a general question ... not a request for instant action ;) <Jazzva> LOL... Ok, to rephrase the answer: yeah, sure :). <Jazzva> Ok, have to go now. I'll submit this debdiff tonight, after I give it another look :). <bluekuja> heya asac <Ubulette> hi <bluekuja> heya Ubulette <bluekuja> did you read what I've written you yesterday? <Ubulette> ftbfs in hardy ? yes. something changed in hardy since i last touched seamonkey. I have a patch <Ubulette> I see asac has a patch too. did you use it or did you want me to do it ? <asac> Ubulette: pleaes apply the one in people.ubuntu.com <asac> its the one from firefox ... so our patches stay in synch <Ubulette> ok <asac> Ubulette: i haven't done it... once bluekuja tells me that he cannot sponsor, I will do it later tonight. <bluekuja> asac, if Ubulette provides a working branch <bluekuja> I gonna check that <asac> Ubulette: remember to update any 99_configure patch <Ubulette> yep <Ubulette> asac, just read your patch, looks like a mix between my fix for Xrender/cairo in xul 936-429-9875 and that new missing X libs, right ? probably our gtk debs are no longer depending on those X libs <asac> yes ... its the upstream patch afaik <asac> the one you have was the initial uipstream one i guess <asac> not sure though <asac> i think mine is the right :) ... if you think its not then i can take another look <bluekuja> Ubulette, let me know when done <bluekuja> so I can try building <bluekuja> I'm off now <Ubulette> bluekuja, do you want me to just update the branch or could you wait 50min that I rebuild here ? <bluekuja> Ubulette, well, if you think updating the branch will fix the FTBFS <bluekuja> you can just update and let me building <bluekuja> but I'm off for an hour, so you can build it on your own <bluekuja> while I'm off <Ubulette> asac, did you have to touch builddeps in rules ? <Ubulette> i'd better rebuild here 1st. to be sure <asac> touch builddeps? no <asac> ok now movie! <bluekuja> Ubulette, back <Ubulette> bluekuja, i'm building, just to be sure <bluekuja> ok, perfect <Adri2000> asac: err... dunno what I did yesterday, but indeed I did not built it with xulrunner-1.9-dev. I did with libxul-dev. <Adri2000> asac: what's the status of xulrunner-1.9 in debian? are debian packages going to be migrated to xulrunner-1.9 soon? <Ubulette> bluekuja, seems good here. <bluekuja> Ubulette, ok <bluekuja> Ubulette, I branch it out <bluekuja> build <bluekuja> and if works, I gonna upload it <Ubulette> bluekuja, pull --overwrite <bluekuja> yes <jdhore> Ubulette, howdy...are you around? I have a question or 2 i'd like to ask you if you don't mind <Ubulette> jdhore, hi <Ubulette> asac, bluekuja : I've got some news from gnomefreak <bluekuja> Ubulette, share them :) <bluekuja> Ubulette, ? <bluekuja> Ubulette, and anyway it seems gnomefreak is disappeared <bluekuja> since days <Ubulette> he said he thought you and I were talking about doing iceape 1.1.6 for gutsy, so that's why he complained "a little" but that not why he disappeared since. he said "my well ran dry and my car blew head gasket" <jdhore> I can't tell if those are euphemisms for anything, but a car blowing a head gasket is a pain <bluekuja> jdhore, exactly <bluekuja> Ubulette, damn it :/ <jdhore> It costs like $2000 to fix :( <bluekuja> Ubulette, Its not nice to hear that from him <bluekuja> Ubulette, tarball changed? <Ubulette> ? <Ubulette> which one ? <bluekuja> Ubulette, seamonkey one <bluekuja> I didnt re-download it <bluekuja> so I assume its the same as before <bluekuja> e.g you changed stuff in debian/ only <Ubulette> yep <bluekuja> ok, perfect <Ubulette> let me md5 my tarball <bluekuja> k <Ubulette> d1cafc81aaffc871f0e31baec97025c4 seamonkey_1.1.6+nobinonly.orig.tar.gz <bluekuja> d1cafc81aaffc871f0e31baec97025c4 seamonkey_1.1.6+nobinonly.orig.tar.gz <Ubulette> good <bluekuja> building <bluekuja> the package is signed <bluekuja> and ready to be uploaded <bluekuja> just need to run a test-build <bluekuja> Ubulette, I'm going to have a showa <bluekuja> in the meantime <Ubulette> k <bluekuja> bbl <Ubulette> asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=629574 <Ubulette> bluekuja, finished ? <bluekuja> Ubulette, still building <bluekuja> but I guess it's at the end <bluekuja> Ubulette, gonna ping you when built <Ubulette> so you're slower than ppa and me ;) <bluekuja> lol, strange, usually it takes 30 mins <bluekuja> Ubulette, but I'm building something else <bluekuja> that's why :/ <Ubulette> lol <bluekuja> :D <bluekuja> Ubulette, built <Ubulette> run ? <bluekuja> now let me install <bluekuja> the binary <bluekuja> Ubulette, runs fine <Ubulette> excellent <bluekuja> Ubulette, uploading <Ubulette> thx <bluekuja> Ubulette, I hope my connection won't get stuck while pushing orig <bluekuja> :) <Ubulette> what's your up spead ? <bluekuja> 4800 kb/s <Ubulette> upload ? <bluekuja> 1 mb/s <bluekuja> I guess <bluekuja> but up speed doesnt matter <bluekuja> because sometimes it get stuck without reasons <bluekuja> damn connection :) <bluekuja> Ubulette, OMG <bluekuja> it's still uploading <Ubulette> 40M :) <bluekuja> yep^^ <Ubulette> that's why I've asked you your upload speed <bluekuja> :P <Ubulette> hmm. my ipod is not automounted <bluekuja> how long for pushing? * bluekuja would like to sleep :) <Ubulette> for me, just a few minutes <bluekuja> connection? <Ubulette> adsl, 6.5Mbps down, 1Mbps up <bluekuja> quite the same then <Ubulette> hmm, usb key mot mounted either. I guess I need to reboot <bluekuja> Ubulette, damn! <bluekuja> stuck now <Ubulette> eh <Ubulette> bluekuja, so, what did you do ? <bluekuja> Ubulette, I've re-uploaded <bluekuja> Ubulette, it's finishing <bluekuja> Ubulette, <bluekuja> Successfully uploaded packages. <bluekuja> Not running dinstall. <Ubulette> great <Ubulette> thanks a lot <bluekuja> Ubulette, np, and sorry for the HUGE delay on this <bluekuja> Ubulette, it will go inside NEW now <Ubulette> as long as it's finally done, i'm ok :) <Ubulette> NEW is manual right ? <bluekuja> NEW: seamonkey_1.1.6+nobinonly.orig.tar.gz <bluekuja> NEW: seamonkey_1.1.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.diff.gz <bluekuja> NEW: seamonkey_1.1.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.dsc <bluekuja> Ubulette, yes <bluekuja> Ubulette, archive admins will check that <bluekuja> Ubulette, ok going to sleep <bluekuja> cu tomorrow! <bluekuja> cya <Ubulette> 'night #ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-03 <asac> morning <asac> bug 53397 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 53397 in pedro "convert libpedro not to use cliadmin" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53397 <asac> bug 53387 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 53387 in wpasupplicant "Manual WPA networks doesn't connect at boot" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/53387 <asac> Adri2000: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XulrunnerGecko (was it you who asked for a porting guide?) <asac> Ubulette_: wanna review? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XulrunnerGecko <Ubulette_> asac, yep <Ubulette_> s/an sdk/a SDK/ <asac> right :) <asac> anything else? <asac> (except that the yelp example currently breaks < 1.9 support which i will eventually fix) <asac> ? <Ubulette_> there's no such thing as /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions <Ubulette_> we need to patch to have 2 ext dirs <asac> right ... the document should reflect the final state <asac> i tried to use xulrunner-addons/plugins with totem ... it wasn't considered by firefox 3.0 for some reason <asac> do we need to patch it as well? <asac> firefox-addons/plugins worked though <Ubulette_> in glue, i would have mentioned unstable only in the remark, as upstream recommend to not use those <Ubulette_> in glue, you have two "1." bullets <asac> yeah i am aware of the numbering glitch <asac> for unstable the point is that most do require unstable :) <asac> i wanted to outline the most common way to do things <Ubulette_> "differntly" typo <asac> yeah just saw that :) <asac> fixed <asac> same for "may configure" => "many configure" <asac> anything else? otherwise i will update with your comments <Ubulette_> seems ok <asac> ok ... thanks. Maybe at some points the examples should be split up in a case collection, so people can better find a solutoin for their specific case <asac> but for that i would need to know more cases :) <Ubulette> bug 160942 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 160942 in firefox-3.0 "Ugly gtk theme buttons in web content in Granparadiso" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/160942 <Ubulette> indeed, not fixed <asac> not fixed? <asac> isn't it themed or what? <asac> or doesn't update without restart? <Ubulette> even by default <Ubulette> clearly visible in the "Log Out" button in LP <Ubulette> kind of missing transparency for widget backgrounds <Ubulette> bug 164123 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 164123 in firefox-3.0 "Firefox 3 Gran Paradiso need upgrade" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164123 <Ubulette> asac, will you do it ? <asac> yes, will send the xulrunner 1.9 we have in hardy to -proposed i guess <asac> the changes are too intrusive to just shove it to -security :) <Ubulette> seamonkey is still in NEW <asac> well ... what do you expect <asac> NEW always take 1-a few days <Ubulette> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=285465 <asac> good <asac> your patch? <Ubulette> no <Ubulette> mozilla bug 400382 <ubotu> Mozilla bug 400382 in WebDAV "make webdav code link with xpcom_glue instead of xpcom directly, convert to frozen linkage" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400382 <Ubulette> just landed today <asac> good thing ... but i would be more happy about mailnews :) <Ubulette> yep, but it's a full example for your spec <asac> Ubulette: i opened the .dev branch again ... anything you want to add as well for the update? <Ubulette> a few fixes from b2 <asac> feel free to add if its not "update to b2" <Ubulette> for some reason, ff3 depends on libnspr4-0d (>= 936-429-9875) <Ubulette> while it should be >= 4.7.0~cvs <Ubulette> it comes from ${shlibs:Depends} <asac> yeah ... a bug in nspr4-dev i guess <asac> not sure though ... are there any new symbols? <Ubulette> I don't remember <asac> we should bump it then i guess ... wasn't there another bug? <Ubulette> someone told me that my debs are pulling gnome libs, i'm checking if it's me, b2 or what <Ubulette> mozilla bug 404514 <ubotu> Mozilla bug 404514 in Widget: Gtk "Native GTK active button look" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404514 <Ubulette> mozilla bug 406075 <ubotu> Mozilla bug 406075 in Widget: Gtk "Firefox does not use native toolbar separator" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406075 <Ubulette> mozilla bug 404751 <ubotu> Mozilla bug 404751 in Widget: Gtk "Change menu spacing to match native GTK apps" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404751 <Ubulette> http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2007/11/30/trunk-to-close-on-december-4th-for-firefox-3-beta-2/ <Adri2000> asac: yes, thanks for the link <asac> Adri2000: let me know how far you got :) <Ubulette> damn, totem is now split in 2 by upstream <asac> the package still combines them i guess <Adri2000> asac: well, I don't know if I will do the transition or just alexanderlisa@example.com... blam is a universe package and that would create a big delta with debian. what's the status of xulrunner 1.9 in debian? <asac> Adri2000: yeah the big delta is the idea... debian will probably take ages to adopt xulrunner 1.9 <asac> hmm anyone knows a website that opens a new window? <DarkMageZ> only subscriber only stuff. <asac> thanks i wrote a testcase for now :) <Ubulette> asac, is your patch for totem complete ? <asac> yes i think so <asac> at least for what is in the hardy totem package <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/03_totem_xulrunner19.patch <Ubulette> did you test the plugin ? <asac> yes <Ubulette> i'd like to drop my patch for bug 131658 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 131658 in totem "[gutsy] totem browser-plugin makes firefox-granparadiso crash" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/131658 <asac> well :) ... not completely ... just tested if it displays properly <asac> let me push the xulrunner-porting branch <asac> i wanted to add every patch i have so far ... but here we go <asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-porting <asac> hmm takes a minute to synch <asac> or maybe another minute :) ? <asac> ok its up <Ubulette> i'm kind of stuck with totem, until hardy ships 2.21.4, or until I package totem-pl-parser myself <asac> hardy has 2.21.something <Ubulette> 2.21.3 <asac> yeah <asac> so they split it in 2.21.4? <Ubulette> No package 'totem-plparser' found <asac> so they split it in 2.21.4? <asac> or when did they do it? <Ubulette> in 2.21.3+cvs <asac> ok <asac> then ask lool how he wants it to be packaged :) <asac> you can get him in #ubuntu-desktop or #ubuntu-mobile <Ubulette> lool ? <asac> yes ... his nick <asac> he is the maintainer ... debian + ubuntu <asac> you can even speak french :) <asac> loic <Ubulette> oh, thought it was seb128 <asac> ... no idea who is official maintainer here :) ... but lool is probably the right to ask as he is "upstream" maintainer in debian <asac> so real packaging changes belong to his domain <Ubulette> well, i should not have asked anything there :( <Adri2000> asac: except if you want to transition blam yourself, I'll just upload it with xul 1.8, as I don't really have enough time (and probably skills) to make it work with xulrunner 1.9 <asac> k <macogw> what happened to firefox 3? an update killed it a couple days ago. any idea when it'll be fixed? <Ubulette> hardy ? gutsy ? <macogw> gutsy <macogw> it says Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9a8 and 1.9a8. <macogw> i googled it, and a post on ubuntuforums from a while ago showed up. the cause then was the xulrunner version <Ubulette> that means your firefox 3 is not matching your xulrunner 1.9 <Ubulette> macogw, please show me: apt-cache madison firefox-3.0 xulrunner-1.9 <macogw> ooo i think i see it <macogw> i installed Sugar <macogw> and the xulrunner in Sugar is slightly newer than the one in the regular repos <Ubulette> yep, the sugar guys took our package from hardy <macogw> madison is a neat command <macogw> hm <macogw> any way i can force ff3 to use the older xulrunner? <macogw> or would installing ff3 from hardy be better? <Ubulette> it should match. too much differences between a8 and b1 <macogw> but i mean can i make the current ff i have use the xulrunner 1.9a8 instead of a9 or should i look for the ff3 package from hardy and install that? <Ubulette> we will push both b1 to gutsy in a few days <macogw> ok <Ubulette> i still have some gutsy debs in my ppa <Ubulette> irefox-3.0 - 3.0~alpha9~cvs20071012t0843-0ubuntu1~mt1~fta1 <Ubulette> I can push b1 for gutsy in my ppa if you're not afraid of ppas <macogw> sure <Ubulette> ok, i'll do that. it will take a few hours to build though <Ubulette> keep a look at https://edge.launchpad.net/~fta/+archive <macogw> thanks <macogw> i kinda wish there was a shorthand for PPAs...like how you can put main multiverse universe on one line, if you could list the PPAs all together, thatd be neat #ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-04 <macogw> Ubulette: thank you! <Ubulette> np <Mirv> asac: hi. any plan on when to include the Finnish and Russian translations for ubufox? (the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/139380 ) <ubotu> Launchpad bug 139380 in ubufox "Untranslated strings in ubufox" [Undecided,Confirmed] <Mirv> also, the https://code.launchpad.net/ubufox/ page is a bit fuzzy with so many branches.. is "main" or "ubuntu" the trunk, or which.. <Mirv> Danial Abmarov's branch has the ru-ru and fi-FI locales, so they could be merged from there most easily <asac> Mirv: yes we should clean up the ubufox branches <asac> the point about the translations is that it should be done by rosetta <asac> (for hardy) <asac> in gutsy it was my fault <Mirv> yep, Rosetta is easier for most, I originally provided those indeed for gutsy <asac_> damn connection <asac> \o/ i am back <asac> well ... not for long as it looks like <asac> Ubulette_: which changes did you want to land for the b1 update? <asac> let me know ... i could pull them for this update <asac> or are those b2 only? * asac gateway updated ... rebooting <persia> Hi. I'm just trolling lintian output, and wanted to request a Maintainer: change from "Ubuntu-Mozilla-Team" to "Ubuntu Mozilla Team" to address some of http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/lintian/reports/Tmaintainer-not-full-name.html <asac> ok so its just sunbird? <persia> Well, 4 packages, but it looks that way. I don't know how the sources are organised. <asac> same source <persia> Easy then :) Thanks. <asac> persia: fixed in bzr <persia> Excellent! Now to do something about the rest of the output :) <asac> xulrunner MIR submitted <asac> lets see <bluekuja> asac, ciao alex <bluekuja> Ubulette_, seamonkey accepted <bluekuja> if you didnt notice <asac> bluekuja: yes ... thanks <bluekuja> asac, sorry for the delay <Ubulette> hi <janimo> Ubulette: do you know what --enable-safe-browsing does in xulrunner-1.9 config options? <janimo> Ubulette: removing it made pyxpcom work fine whereas it crashed if left in. This is with the OLPC browser's python interface to xulrunner <Ubulette> that's the anti-fishing feature <Ubulette> janimo, did you open a bug upstream ? <janimo> didn;t cross my mind TBH <janimo> I am not sure it's an upstream bug or feature or caused by ubuntu patches or what <Ubulette> i don't think it's our patches <asac> ok back :) <asac> where is janimo? <asac> who is janimo? <asac> := <asac> :) <Ubulette> the guys doing Sugar debs <Ubulette> -s <asac> ah <asac> so url-classifier breaks pyxpcom? <asac> strange <Ubulette> he said safe-browsing <asac> well ... we don't build with safe browsing, but url-classifier <asac> so i think its the classifier :) * asac wonders if the problem is still there with our branch <Ubulette> we *do* safe browsing <asac> in xul? <Ubulette> yep <asac> oh right ... we should use --enable-url-classifier ... but its the same from what i saw in code <asac> (same for xul) <asac> lets wait for him to return :) <Ubulette> still no advocate for prism <asac> really? <asac> didn't persia look at it? <Ubulette> persia said it's a really good package but he can't test it as he's not a user of the webapps web sites <Ubulette> he did the review, but no test <asac> did he comment on revu? <Ubulette> he contacted me by email <Ubulette> and we've discussed a lot on irc <Ubulette> but my last update has no comment at all <asac> ok i will try to remember to bug him tomorrow on that <asac> he should drop his packaging comments <asac> to revu <asac> then we will find a sponsor <Ubulette> he's in JST so he'll be here soon <asac> JST? <Ubulette> it's 8:30am JST <asac> what corner of the world is that? <asac> must be pretty boring there :) <Ubulette> japan <asac> oh <asac> ok <asac> Japan standard time :) <asac> well i will probably be off ... but i think he is a hobbiest ... so best to catch in his after work hours ... aka tomorrow <Ubulette> i should try my japanese on him ;) <asac> hehe <asac> if its not too bad :) <Ubulette> in fact, he said "I live on JST", not i'm in japan or i'm japanese so I don't know if he speaks japanese at all ;) <asac> yeah :) <asac> probably he just has adjusted his day-live to be night-live and vv <asac> @time tokyo <ubotu> Current time in Asia/Tokyo: December 05 2007, 08:35:29 - Next meeting: Xubuntu meeting in 20 hours 54 minutes <Ubulette> install intlclock :) <asac> heh <asac> :) <asac> i am happy with the bot ;) <Ubulette> http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/intlclock.png <asac> if we cannot get feedback from persia, i can sponsor prism <asac> we already achieved what we wanted ... get them to know you <asac> if we do that a few more times they know you good enough ;) <Ubulette> I can post seamonkey 1.1.7 there too <asac> isn't it NEWed already? <asac> bluekuja said it was NEWed <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey/1.1.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 <asac> ok .... but the bins for i386 are not in NEw <asac> so they should be available already <asac> \o/ <Ubulette> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/seamonkey/ <Ubulette> strange <asac> hmm ... lets review that tomorrow :) <Ubulette> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+queue?queue_state=3&queue_text=seamonkey <asac> yes ... looks good <asac> are you interested in security ? <Ubulette> that's part of my real job <asac> the one thing i like about mozilla is that its big enough ... has had enough security issues to pursue statistical analysis on it :) <asac> http://www.st.cs.uni-sb.de/softevo/vulnerabilities.php <asac> its not the first paper that looks into security stats based on mozilla :) <asac> http://www.st.cs.uni-sb.de/publications/files/neuhaus-tr-2007.pdf <asac> thats the actual paper <Ubulette> nice chart <Ubulette> interesting <asac> yeah ... i find table 1 on page 5 interesting .) <asac> i remember how much pain it was to backport security fixes for nsCSSFrameConstructor <asac> and how easy all those js things were <asac> :) #ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-05 <asac> i would rank nsCSSFrameConstructor at least at #2 <Ubulette> did you follow the memory fragmentation threads in ff3 ? <Ubulette> the last one is http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/12/04/vlad-and-analysis-of-dtrace-was-used/ <Ubulette> 1st was http://blog.pavlov.net/2007/11/10/memory-fragmentation/ <[reed]> asac / Ubulette: ping <asac> [reed]: ? <[reed]> asac: so, looks like we're going to have (for now) a build dependency on libgnomeui-dev but not a runtime dependency <[reed]> for Fx3 <asac> cool <asac> (or not so cool, depending on what is done now :)) <[reed]> so, I guess some rules file on your side will need to be updated with that <[reed]> well, until a patch landed today, it was both a build+runtime dependency ;p <[reed]> now just a build <asac> ok i see <asac> [reed]: do you have any screenshot how ffox 3 beta looks like on win? <asac> or is it still the same theme as before on windows? <[reed]> asac: same as before <[reed]> for now <[reed]> the new theme hasn't landed <[reed]> it's still in-progress <[reed]> win is way behind Linux and Mac this time <asac> but its the same direction? e.g. use stock icons? <[reed]> no <[reed]> only Linux is using stock icons <[reed]> both mac and win aren't <asac> ok, so the windows theme can probably used under linux as well? <[reed]> yes <asac> ok thats important <[reed]> why? :) <[reed]> who wants to use winstripe? <asac> one main argument to use firefox in distros is to provide a bridge for window users <[reed]> when you could use gnomestripe! <asac> so they feel like "home" when browsing <[reed]> ew <[reed]> but the new winstripe is going to be radically different, as far as using icons that will look completely out of place on Linux <[reed]> they will be very much XP/Vista based <asac> hmm <[reed]> and icons will be different between XP and Vista <asac> and new mac theme will be completely different as well? <[reed]> yes, it will look like a normal OS X app <asac> ok, lets hope that users that switch from win to linux to mac can still recognize each app as firefox <asac> (which is the main point of having the same theme everywhere i guess) <[reed]> yeah, did you read faaborg's blog post on that? <asac> nope :) ... its just my concern about all this :) <[reed]> let me get the link <asac> you have an url? <[reed]> yeah <[reed]> that's what I meant by "the link" <[reed]> :) <[reed]> one sec <[reed]> http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2007/11/15/the-shape-of-things-to-come/ <[reed]> read the "Platform Integration vs. Cross Platform Identity" part <asac> thanks <[reed]> and have a laugh at faaborg's expense on the phallic symbol he attempts to use as a demonstration <[reed]> s/on the/at the/ <asac> lets see how this "shape for X-platform identity" will work out. <Ubulette> hey guys <Ubulette> doesn't xulrunner 1.8.1.* deserve a security update like ff2 ? <asac> it does ... but its in universe :) <Ubulette> !info xulrunner debian <ubotu> xulrunner: XUL + XPCOM application runner. In component universe, is optional. Version 156.14.161.142-2ubuntu5 (gutsy), package size 273 kB, installed size 980 kB <asac> didn't we update xulrunner for 936-429-9875 <asac> ? <Ubulette> I did 936-429-9875 2 or 3 weeks ago <Ubulette> a merge from debian <Ubulette> !info xulrunner unstable <ubotu> xulrunner: XUL + XPCOM application runner. In component main, is optional. Version 156.14.161.142-1 (unstable), package size 270 kB, installed size 964 kB <asac> right ... there is a new merge waiting :) <asac> http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html <Ubulette> !info xulrunner experimental <ubotu> xulrunner: XUL + XPCOM application runner. In component universe, is optional. Version 156.14.161.142-2ubuntu5 (gutsy), package size 273 kB, installed size 980 kB <asac> 156.14.161.142-1 <Ubulette> I think i'll do it then <Ubulette> unless someone beat me to it <asac> but still thats not a security update for gutsy <Ubulette> !info xulrunner gutsy <ubotu> xulrunner: XUL + XPCOM application runner. In component universe, is optional. Version 156.14.161.142-2ubuntu5 (gutsy), package size 273 kB, installed size 980 kB <Ubulette> why ? <asac> yeah ... upgrading from 936-429-9875 to 936-429-9875 is a huge bump <asac> well ... xulrunner isn't used as gecko provider in gutsy <asac> so i apparently just merged it once during gutsy cycle <Ubulette> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/xulrunner/releases/ lol <asac> yeah ... they don't provide updates ;) <Ubulette> ok, i'm leaving for work <Ubulette> asac, if you have the chance, could you please see with persia for prism ? he'll be gone when I'll return <asac> Ubulette: will do <asac> Ubulette: ok i advocated prism <asac> maybe ask for upload in -motu if nothing happens <armin76> bumb <asac> ? <asac> [reed]: any idea what is planned for self-signed certs? <asac> will it stay the way its currently handled? <[reed]> I don't see why not. It seems fine to me <[reed]> you can easily accept them <asac> (e.g. just get an error page that tells you to add the domain to exceptions) <asac> how? <asac> there is no user-guidance to do that (last time i looked) <[reed]> look again <[reed]> :) <asac> in b2? <[reed]> in a current nightly, yes <[reed]> but most of this was in b1 <[reed]> some new stuff has been added <[reed]> we haven't really had complaints about it at all since the exception stuff was added <asac> oh ... latest-nightly doesn't have any icons at all for me here :) <asac> (any of those that are stock ones now) <asac> [reed]: ok the exception thing is now fine <asac> thanks <[reed]> hmm <[reed]> oh, latest-nightly <[reed]> check back tomorrow :) <[reed]> you must not have libgnomeui installed <[reed]> by tomorrow, I mean in two hours or so <[reed]> when nightlies run ;) <asac> i am running gnome <asac> so i have libgnomeui <[reed]> are you sure? <[reed]> are you 64-bit? <asac> yes <asac> right :) <asac> i remember now <[reed]> ubotu: 162993 <ubotu> Sorry, I don't know anything about 162993 - try searching on http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi <[reed]> lp ubotu: 162993 <[reed]> er <asac> [reed]: btw, the exception dialog rocks imo ... but i am not a usability expert <[reed]> lp 162993 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 162993 in firefox "ia32-libs missing 32-bit gnome libraries needed for gtk stock icons" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/162993 <[reed]> but the fix made today should help you, too <asac> [reed]: so which icons should be used if there is no libgnomeui? <[reed]> check out an hourly <[reed]> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/tinderbox-builds/fx-linux-tbox-trunk/firefox-3.0b2pre.en-US.linux-i686.tar.bz2 <[reed]> check that out <[reed]> see if you have icons <asac> [reed]: ok one more thing ... will the great new addons manager happen for firefox 3.0? <[reed]> define "great new addons manager" <asac> do you know what i refer to? <[reed]> not really <asac> let me see if i can find it <[reed]> there's work to be done on it, such as integration with AMO <[reed]> but most stuff has already been done besides that <asac> [reed]: "great new..." == http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox:Add-ons_Manager_UI <[reed]> yeah, that's the AMO integration <[reed]> that's coming <[reed]> it's blocked on AMO actually getting a working API <[reed]> which is about 99% done <asac> [reed]: ok, point is i talked with mconnor about getting an apt backend into source base <[reed]> like what ubufox has? <asac> problem was that nothing had happened at that time so we agreed to revisit when things are there * [reed] actually has never used ubufox <asac> yes, but for real ... like a multi-backend so you can add other search databases <asac> and install methods <asac> so the backend is already there? <[reed]> I've never used any distro-made Mozilla product <[reed]> hehe <[reed]> either Mozilla official or build my own :) <[reed]> anyway <[reed]> what backend? <[reed]> apt? <asac> you should ... ubuntu rocks for mozillas :) <[reed]> nah, you are too far behind :) <asac> no ... the backend for AMO <[reed]> ah <[reed]> not in the browser, no <[reed]> I don't think so, at least * [reed] looks <asac> well, we provide 3.0 builds for you ... but I guess you want nightlies :) <[reed]> considering I commit fixes myself, I want to be able to use those fixes asap <[reed]> :p <[reed]> are there any changes that you've made for ubuntu that are general enough to go upstream? <[reed]> for Firefox <[reed]> I really want to make sure you are upstreaming stuff <[reed]> mozilla bug 404024 <ubotu> Mozilla bug 404024 in Extension/Theme Manager "Add AMO integration pane" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404024 <[reed]> so, doesn't look like work has started <asac> [reed]: thats the idea ... i want to do it general enough, but for that I wanted code that is at least close to final * asac looking at bugs <[reed]> anyway <[reed]> I have an exam in less than 4 hours <[reed]> and I haven't studied <[reed]> so <[reed]> later :) <asac> [reed]: ok thanks for the info so far ... cu later :) <asac> good luck <asac> better start to switch context now I guess <[reed]> bad armin76 for making me look at Firefox stuff <[reed]> armin76: bsmedberg already gave you sr+ <[reed]> so, you can just set sr+ yourself as a carryover <[reed]> I'm gone again <armin76> err <armin76> he said i should sr him with that change? <[reed]> no, he said you can have sr=bsmedberg if you make that change <[reed]> you made it, he already granted it with the understanding that you would make it <[reed]> so, you can carry it over <[reed]> so, you just need review from timeless <[reed]> as you already have superreview from bsmedberg <armin76> ah <armin76> sorry, i'm not used to this stuff <BUGabund1> hya <BUGabund1> any FF devs here? <BUGabund1> just got a strange error on an hardy test machine <Ubulette> back <Ubulette> BUGabund1, just ask your question, instead of waiting for an ack ;) <Ubulette> asac, http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/seamonkey/ ?? i don't get it. where are the debs ? <asac> no idea :) <asac> in queue nEW ? <asac> maybe there is an archive issue? <Ubulette> no, they are DONE <Ubulette> asac, i've merged xul. building.. if it's ok, i'll post a debdiff or an interdiff <asac> good <Ubulette> done <Ubulette> asac, bug 174219 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 174219 in xulrunner "Please merge xulrunner 156.14.161.142-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/174219 <Ubulette> i wanted to merge ruby-gnome2 (so it unlocks kaze on some arches) but it's a sync, not a merge <asac> Ubulette: he? <Ubulette> ? <asac> Ubulette: you have to request a sync then <Ubulette> bug 174243 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 174243 in ruby-gnome2 "Please sync ruby-gnome2 0.16.0-10 (universe) from Debian Sid (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/174243 <asac> ok <asac> have you followed procedures in wiki? <Ubulette> i think so <asac> ok <Ubulette> but that's not fun <asac> hmm .. shouldn't you subscribe some other role as well? <asac> ah you need someone to confirm first, right? <asac> then subscribe ubuntu-archive ? <Ubulette> no, for the sync, i'm done. motu will subscribe ubuntu-archive <asac> k <asac> does the previous merger know about that? <Ubulette> that's bluekuja, he told me a while ago "fell free to do it" <asac> hell ... when did i get the merge for igerman98 <Ubulette> ? <asac> i am listed as last merger of that package on main.html #ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-06 <asac> hi <Ubulette> yop <asac> has prism been sponsored? are seamonkey binaries finally there? <Ubulette> no, no <asac> Ubulette: <asac> Get:1 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main seamonkey-browser 1.1.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 [10.4MB] <asac> 38% [1 seamonkey-browser 4030204/10.4MB 38%] <asac> works for me <Ubulette> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/seamonkey/ ? <asac> apparently nothing to bother about <asac> strange <asac> pool/main/s/seamonkey/seamonkey-browser_1.1.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb <asac> thats ppa? <Ubulette> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/s/seamonkey/ <Ubulette> lol, half in main, half in universe <asac> strange <asac> well thats possible to do ... but why did it happen for seamonkey <asac> must have been an accident i guess <Ubulette> I don't know. <Ubulette> i have to go now. see you <asac> cu <asac> Ubulette: xul 1.9 tree closes in a few hours <asac> :) <asac> let me know if there are other fixes for b1 <Ubulette> hi <Ubulette> asac, so, what do we do about cairo ? <Ubulette> did you read my answer to the bug ? <asac> Ubulette: bug? <asac> lets see <Ubulette> bug 164640 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 164640 in firefox-3.0 "Build Firefox 3 against a subpixel-patched cairo" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164640 <asac> bug 152210 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 152210 in xulrunner-1.9 "xulrunner ships its own copy of cairo" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/152210 <Ubulette> oh <asac> why is that firefox-3.0? * asac reassigning <Ubulette> i don't know. someone triaged it that way <asac> is it a dupe? <asac> yes :) <asac> so whats the upstream bug <asac> i mean the main problem is that we cannot build against system cairo <asac> but why is that still the case ;) <Ubulette> there's a patch in the bug <asac> well ... the bug wants to add the patch to xulrunner ... i would prefer to not use the xulrunner cairo at all <Ubulette> but look at bonsai, 6 months of patches lost if we use system cairo <asac> b=404092, upgrade cairo to 1.5.2-55 <asac> how can i find the diff they have? * asac looking at bug <Ubulette> ask vlad :) <Dragonath> hi, is this the place to ask when I have a weird problem with thunderbird (and am using kubuntu 7.10)? <asac> wtf ... we are still at cairo 1.4.something ... even in hardy ;) <Ubulette> yes (but not me) :P <Ubulette> asac, yes <asac> Dragonath: ? <Ubulette> 1.5.* is for dev releases <Dragonath> thunderbird doesn't want to show my e-mails' message body <asac> Dragonath: start in safe-mode from command-line: thunderbird -safe-mode <Dragonath> it downloads the subject, shows the message body in that weird popup thing, and then shows me a blank when I click on it <asac> Dragonath: try that first <Dragonath> same thing <asac> i don't understand what you mean by "weird popup thing" <Dragonath> no errors in console <Dragonath> when I get the mail, a small window shows on the bottom right side of the screen, showing small bits of the mails received <asac> is that reproducible? with every mail or just with some? <Dragonath> well, it's been like this for almost two days now I think <Dragonath> a GTA newsletter thing just came in, doesn't show the contents at all <asac> can you still read mail? <Dragonath> it even displays the button where I can click Show Images, but nothing shows even when I click <asac> e.g. by opening mails the normal way? <Dragonath> well I can read them by logging in to the webmail inbox from where I download them <Dragonath> otherwise, bar the subjects, I can't really read any mail <asac> ok <asac> which extensions do you use? <asac> any? <Dragonath> I have one for exporting filters <Dragonath> that's all <asac> and I guess disabling that doesn't help ... hmm <Dragonath> problems really started a few weeks ago when I upgraded to 7.10 - trying to read mail just gave me some could not find error <Dragonath> yet I checked the innards of the inbox file and found the mails there <asac> do you use the thunderbird that is shipped by ubuntu? or did you install it manually at some point? <Dragonath> I installed it manually <asac> yeah ... well, thats not supported by this channel ... anyway, I would try to backup your profile folder and remove the .msf files .. then see if starting thunderbird helps <asac> or try to compact the folders <Dragonath> ok <Dragonath> when did they start shipping thunderbird with ubuntu? 7.04? <asac> since the beginning i guess <Dragonath> hmm then it doesn't make sense that I had to install it manually <Dragonath> both ubuntu and kubuntu had thunderbird? <asac> not by default <asac> you can install through Applications -> Add/Remove ... <Dragonath> ok <asac> if you want to switch you need to copy your profile directory: $HOME/.thunderbird => $HOME/.mozilla-thunderbird <asac> you can also create a link i guess <Dragonath> the profile directory is the whole /mozilla-thunderbird or the subfolder in it? <asac> the whole <asac> it should be .thunderbird in your home directory <Dragonath> ah ok <Dragonath> it's mozilla-thunderbird <asac> the one used by ubuntu build is .mozilla-thunderbird <asac> with a . ? <Dragonath> ok <Dragonath> yes <asac> yeah ... if you did the backup, remove the .msf files and restart tbird <asac> (stop before) <Dragonath> ok <asac> Ubulette: so nothing for this b1 update? <Ubulette> oh, hold on. a few (tiny) things <Ubulette> can i pull ? <Ubulette> is that .dev ? <asac> yes <asac> which things do you want to change? <Ubulette> Add Homepage: and Vcs-Bzr: fields in control file <asac> yes ... go ahead <asac> which homepage? <Dragonath> ok, I think I might have to wipe all the stuff and do a reinstall again <asac> upstream? <Dragonath> thanks for help though <asac> hmm <asac> ok <Dragonath> good night (it's night here) :) <asac> u2 <Ubulette> pushed <Ubulette> !info prism <ubotu> Package prism does not exist in gutsy <Ubulette> !info prism hardy <ubotu> Package prism does not exist in hardy <Ubulette> pfff <asac> yes, tomorrow i will sponsor then <asac> i think we generated enough awareness for this upload <asac> Ubulette: so which main things are missing for our xulrunner package becoming stable <Ubulette> python <asac> one important thing i received so far is libxul-embedding-unstable.pc <asac> so other .pc files can easily Requires: the unstable cflags <asac> yeah right ... we have python <Ubulette> but it will be ubuntu specific right ? <Ubulette> unless you post it upstream <asac> i hop e we can send it upstream <Ubulette> i doubt benjamin will agree <asac> otherwise my build system patches would not be good for upstream <asac> s <asac> lets see <asac> ok .pc files <asac> is one thing ... what about obsolete headers? <asac> thats an upstream bug to not ship them in unstable, right? <asac> i mean they duplicate all other stable headers in unstable <asac> why not the obsolete headers <asac> ? <Ubulette> obsolete headers ? <asac> yes there is a obsolete dir in the stable include dir, but not in the unstable one <asac> those are needed for epiphany for instance <asac> (iirc) <Ubulette> I see duplicates .h, not .idl <Ubulette> looks like a bug to me <asac> you mean like no stable idls in unstable? <asac> hmm nsIFactory.idl is in both <asac> ok ... we have still the addons issue <asac> e.g. plugins is only read from one location <asac> (or was it extensions?) <Ubulette> extensions <Ubulette> plugins are not shared.. yet <asac> he? <asac> so extensions work? <asac> but plugins don't, right? <Ubulette> ok, idl are dupe too <asac> yes, still obsolete is missing in unstable includedir <asac> at least for me <Ubulette> no. I mean: ff3 is using /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins and /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/extensions <asac> and /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions is not considered? <Ubulette> obsolete, why would you want that ? <asac> because some apps still use it :) <Ubulette> so far, there's no /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions <asac> and if they use unstable as well you have to add two pkg-config --cflags <asac> which is ugly as well <asac> i have no problem with it <asac> but sounds wrong imo to not put them in unstable <Ubulette> unstable just mean "not frozen yet", while obsolete is just obsolete = don't use it <Ubulette> +s <asac> yeah ... still stable headers go to unstable as well <asac> so obsolete should too <Ubulette> i think stable in unstable is a bug <asac> you could also understand unstable as "discouraged to use" ... which would make unstable a better candidate for obsolete then stable is <Ubulette> or it's wanted to be easier <asac> yes ... its for ease ... e.g. so just one pkg-config statement is enough <Ubulette> no, I just watched a video from benjamin. unstable = not frozen <Ubulette> you'd better hurry if you want to submit patches upstream. b2 is close <Ubulette> it may even be too late <asac> Tree is now closed for Beta 2 Bake Period. Only P1 blocking1.9 bugs or bugs with approvalM10 may land during this time. <asac> :) <Ubulette> yep <Ubulette> 2 weeks, still no prism. so much for "we love new packages, contribute to motu" <Ubulette> http://www.jonobacon.org/?p=1082 <asac> bug 174219 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 174219 in xulrunner "Please merge xulrunner 156.14.161.142-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/174219 <asac> is my <Ubulette> is your ? <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~dholbach/sponsoring/ <asac> i have to do those that i am responsible for <asac> now that i think of it :) ... does prism have a bug and is ubuntu-universe-sponsors assigned? <Ubulette> bug 172484 <ubotu> Launchpad bug 172484 in ubuntu "Please package Prism" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/172484 <Ubulette> why is lool responsible (with you) for xulrunner ? <asac> yeah in future ubuntu-revu needs to be subscribed to get revu review ... and once that is done ubuntu-universe-sponsors <asac> sorry for not teaching you that properly ;) <asac> Ubulette: no idea ... why lool <asac> he is interested in general desktop things? #ubuntu-mozillateam 2007-12-07 <Ubulette_> <asac> sorry for not teaching you that properly ;) <Ubulette_> <asac> Ubulette: no idea ... why lool <Ubulette_> <Ubulette> well, it's not in any MOTU specs. <asac> Ubulette: uploading xulrunner <asac> Ubulette: please set the merge bug to fix released once all archs have built <asac> thanks <asac> Ubulette: prism uploaded as well <Ubulette> thx <Ubulette> for xul, it will be difficult because of hppa <asac> ? <asac> well ... if all _supported_ archs are build <asac> does xulrunner really fail on hppa? <asac> (1.8)? <armin76> if you didn't add the patch it does <asac> xulrunner 1.8? <asac> oh ... damn i missed the 1.9 patch? <asac> hmmm ... there is no bug listed for that in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9 <asac> Ubulette: prism was rejected because copyright needs to ship MPL <asac> can you fix it ... so i can reupload? <armin76> hppa under linux support is not in the head branch, so if you don't add yourself the support, it doesn't work :) <asac> armin76: i know ... but you did a patch for that, right? <armin76> asac: i didn't do the patch :) <armin76> i just updated it to be included in the head branch <armin76> but yes, there's a patch debian already applies and gentoo as well <asac> for 1.8 <asac> ok <armin76> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/src/patchsets/mozilla-firefox/936-429-9875/004_mozilla-hppa.patch?view=markup <asac> 1.8 will be more or less gone in hardy <asac> well ... xulrunner 1.8 should contain it then, because we merge it from debian <asac> firefox 2 doesn't * asac lunch <asac> Ubulette: xul 1.9 is in main now ... congrats <asac> now the hard work begins :) <asac> Admiral_Chicago: you pinged me the other week? <asac> (iirc) <asac> Ubulette: ok is the prism branch ready for distribution now? * asac building prism <Admiral_Chicago> asac: i had a question, its resolved now <asac> Admiral_Chicago: ok ... sorry, but i forgot and just remembered today :) <Admiral_Chicago> thanks anyways <asac> Ubulette: ok i uploaded without your ack <asac> :) <cwong1_> asac: ping <asac> cwong1_: pong <asac> good morning ;) <cwong1_> I just uploaded the ff30+midbrowser source archive to launchpad <asac> ah <asac> lets see <cwong1_> sorry about the screw up. I click on the wrong file the first try <cwong1_> :( <asac> yeah ... no problem. was too obvious to be serious ;) <cwong1_> it should be about 43.mb in size <asac> yes it is <cwong1_> Can you take a look at the hildonize menu problem that I reported in the bug? <cwong1_> Jimmy has mentioned that some interfaces has changed in FF3.0. That could be the cause of the problem. <asac> wow the client.mk is <asac> Repository revision: 156.14.161.142.2.2 /cvsroot/mozilla/client.mk,v <asac> Sticky Tag: FIREFOX_2_0_0_6_RELEASE (revision: 156.14.161.142.2.2) <asac> what is going on? <asac> cwong1_: lets hope that the other files are all from the right branch <asac> otherwise its too broken to be not-painful * asac producing the diff (somehow) <cwong1_> asac: I think he copy the one from 936-429-9875 branch and modified it. I will ask him when he gets in. <asac> he copied what? <cwong1_> the client.mk <asac> how can that happen? <asac> if you get 3.0b1 from cvs you will have the new one <asac> if you get the upstream source tarball it will have the right one as well <asac> ... anyway, lets see what the diff looks like and if its applicable against a *real* 3.0b1 <cwong1_> hmm.. I will have to chat with him when he gets in. <cwong1_> I built it and i did see some feature only available in ff3.0b1 like page zoom. <asac> yeah ... i have no idea whats going on <asac> lets hope that its just old CVS directories <asac> and not half-half <asac> (source) <asac> ok it seems that all CVS directories are not updated ... so cvs diff is not really helpful i guess <asac> i will try to replace them with the b1 CVS directories <cwong1_> ok. I will chat with him when he gets in and find out exactly what he did. <cwong1_> asac: btw do you know when the final FF3.0 scheduled to be release? <asac> find -type d -name CVS | xargs rm -r <asac> :) <asac> cp -r * ../mozilla/ <asac> lets hope they match :) <asac> cwong1_: its not yet decided ... january or february i guess <cwong1_> keep my fingers crossed :) <asac> \o/ at
{'channel': 'ubuntu-mozillateam', 'month': 12}