#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.12.4+dfsg-4build1 => 5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5)
<blaze[m]> \o/
<lubot> <mitya57> @x_sun [like https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-76588], This is now fixed in eoan-proposed.
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-07
<rbegin> Is there a ppa with Qt 5.13.1 for ubuntu?
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5chart (focal-proposed/universe) [5.11.3+dfsg-1 => 5.11.3+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: python-poppler-qt5 (focal-proposed/universe) [0.24.2-3build5 => 0.24.2-3build6] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5 (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.3+dfsg-2 => 5.12.3+dfsg-2build1] (kubuntu, qt5)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5webengine (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.1-2 => 5.12.1-2build1] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5webengine [source] (focal-proposed) [5.12.1-2build1]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted python-poppler-qt5 [source] (focal-proposed) [0.24.2-3build6]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [source] (focal-proposed) [5.12.3+dfsg-2build1]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5chart [source] (focal-proposed) [5.11.3+dfsg-1build1]
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5 (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.3+dfsg-2build1 => 5.12.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [source] (focal-proposed) [5.12.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5chart (focal-proposed/universe) [5.11.3+dfsg-1build1 => 5.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5chart [source] (focal-proposed) [5.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-21
<r41nm4n> * #bacula :Cannot send to nick/channel
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtwebkit-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.212.0~alpha3-3 => 5.212.0~alpha3-5] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtwebsockets-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-1 => 5.12.5-2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.4+dfsg-4ubuntu1 => 5.12.5+dfsg-2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtlocation-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.4+dfsg-1 => 5.12.5+dfsg-2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qttools-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-1 => 5.12.5-2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-1 => 5.12.5-3] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtsensors-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.4-1 => 5.12.5-2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync)
<RikMills> :)
<mitya57> RikMills: this was the easy part, mostly getting the docs built as the packaging work was already done in Debian :)
<mitya57> I didn't prepare the whole transition in a PPA because I want this to land before autosyncs start.
<RikMills> mitya57: yeah, I saw you were working hard there. thank you so much, as always!
<mitya57> (because otherwise sources synced from Debian will dep-wait on missing qttools)
<mitya57> no problem :)
<RikMills> I guess abi rebuilds to do when things open. I will do what you don't or have not time for
<mitya57> Thanks.
<mitya57> Yes, rebuilds can be done directly to archive.
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-25
<lubot> <RikMills> Archive is open
<lubot> <mitya57> Great!
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: qt5reactor [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5-2] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted qt5reactor [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.5-2]
<lubot>  was removed by: RikMills
<lubot> <RikMills> Qtwebengine requires a manual upload?
<lubot> <mitya57> I'll do it now.
<lubot> <RikMills> Thanks. I poked a few depwaits
<lubot> <RikMills> In file included from /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-s390x-linux-gnu/Telegram_pch/stdafx.h:121: â¦ /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/obj-s390x-linux-gnu/Release/../../Telegram/SourceFiles/config.h:180:2: error: #error "Only little endian is supported!" â¦   180 | #error "Only little endian is supported!" â¦       |  ^~~~~
<lubot> <mitya57> It is going to be RMed in Debian
<lubot> <RikMills> Right. Ok. git blame says that line is 3 years old, but guess some other reason for it to fail now then
<lubot> <mitya57> Fwd from mitya57: After more investigation: the check is old, our maintainer used to patch it to change #error to #warning but he no longer does that now.
<lubot> <mitya57> Fwd from mitya57: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/telegram-desktop/commit/86d77755e0d40220e3d592b312d28315e134664f - here that hunk of the patch was removed
<lubot> <mitya57> According to the maintainer it never really worked on big endian.
<lubot> <RikMills> ok ð
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-27
<lubot> <RikMills> doing some no change rebuilds. I may need help if some go south :P
<lubot> <mitya57> Thank you very much! If you want, I can join your efforts when I wake up completely :)
<lubot> <RikMills> Looks like I only have pyotherside and pyside2 to do. Upload, that is.
<lubot> <RikMills> Done. lets see if anything goes 'boom'
<lubot> <mitya57> \o/
<lubot> <RikMills> Great. fctix-qt5 being in this transition just caused Kubuntu iso to fail to build. oh well, not as if there is much new befroe this hits anyway
<lubot> <RikMills> deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin needs fixing again for new qt version
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 or does that just need a sync?
<lubot> <RikMills> Looks like it? https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/d/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin/deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin_5.0.1-2_changelog
<lubot> <mitya57> Just a sync, yes
<lubot> <RikMills> done
<lubot> <mitya57> Thanks
<lubot> <RikMills> hopefully that will be it for builds, apart from removing s390x on telegram
<lubot> <RikMills> and qgis has new binaries, as that version hasn't got through proposed yet
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 debian removed pyside in unstable, but left python-ghost and yubikey-piv-manager that depends on it!?
<lubot> <mitya57> Yes, that was ScottK :)
<lubot> <mitya57> I can file RM bugs for them. Or feel free to do that yourself.
<lubot> <RikMills> In debian?
<lubot> <mitya57> Yes
<lubot> <mitya57> Ubuntu picks up Debian removals automatically, right?
<lubot> <RikMills> If you could then, the debian BTS still likes to ignore my emails!
<lubot> <mitya57> Will do when I get back to my PC
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Ubuntu picks up Debian removals automatically, right?], No, need to make a request here as well
<lubot> <mitya57> Then can you do that, please?
<lubot> <RikMills> I can when they are gone in debian, yes :)
<lubot> <mitya57> Right, makes sense
<lubot> <mitya57> And we really need to remove qtwebkit in Ubuntu
<lubot> <RikMills> yes
<lubot> <RikMills> I want to get new phonon in, and that requires pyside and friends to be gone
<lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [If you could then, the debian BTS still likes to ignore my emails!], Filed debian #943672 and debian #943673
<ubottu> Debian bug 943672 in ftp.debian.org "RM: python-ghost -- ROM; not in testing, not installable since 2019-09-11" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/943672
<ubottu> Debian bug 943673 in ftp.debian.org "RM: yubikey-piv-manager -- RoQA; Not in testing, not installable since 2019-09-11, Python 2 only" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/943673
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 thanks!
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: pyqt5webengine [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.1-4] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: pyqt5webengine [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.1-4] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: pyqt5webengine [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.1-4] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: pyqt5webengine [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.1-4] (no packageset)
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted pyqt5webengine [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.12.1-4]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted pyqt5webengine [armhf] (focal-proposed) [5.12.1-4]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted pyqt5webengine [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.12.1-4]
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted pyqt5webengine [i386] (focal-proposed) [5.12.1-4]
<lubot> <RikMills> both transition trackers now at 100%. I guess just got a bazillion more tests to go
<lubot> <mitya57> Thank you for handling that!
<lubot> <RikMills> no problem. I have the largest vested interest :P
<lubot> <RikMills> I really want to get on to uploading new plasma/frameworks/apps etc
<lubot> <RikMills> looks like we are entangled with a few things. not overly suprising given the massive amount autosynced
<lubot> <mitya57> Same thing in Debian
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-29
<lubot> <mitya57> Qt 5.12.6 is planned for November 15th
<lubot> <mitya57> It should be easy but I want to make a series of uploads to (Debian) NEW queue to fix some bugs, and prepare new release only after that.
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-30
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 what happened to python-pyqt5.qtwebengine?
<lubot> <mitya57> It was removed but then re-added.
<lubot> <RikMills> calibre/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: python-pyqt5.qtwebengine (>= 5.12.1-4+b1)
<lubot> <mitya57> That's because we don't have +b1
<lubot> <mitya57> So we need to either no-change upload pyqt5webengine with higher version, or lower the dependency in calibre.
<lubot> <RikMills> calibre should be easier for now?
<lubot> <mitya57> +b1 is Debian's suffix for rebuilds.
<lubot> <mitya57> Maybe
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Maybe], Oh, that is seperate now isn't it. Bumping that may be better then. As build1 > b1 I think?
<lubot> <mitya57> There is a + so I'm not sure
<lubot> <RikMills> I can ask dpkg
<lubot> <RikMills> $ if $(dpkg --compare-versions "5.12.1-4build1" "lt" "5.12.1-4+b1"); then echo true; fi â¦ true
<lubot> <RikMills> damn
<lubot> <RikMills> not sure if we can add to the +b1 and still have it autosync?
<lubot> <mitya57> Don't worry about autosyncs, I can sync it manually when needed.
<lubot> <RikMills> 5.12.1-4+b1build1 seem ok?
<lubot> <mitya57> Why not just +b1?
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Why not just +b1?], good point!
<lubot> <RikMills> doing that then
<lubot> <mitya57> Thank you!
<lubot> <RikMills> Not going to work. When building the source the +b1 gets removed from the .dsc file, so gets rejected on upload.
<lubot> <mitya57> Will +b1build1 work then?
<lubot> <mitya57> If not, then better fix on calibre side.
<lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Will +b1build1 work then?], It did :)
<lubot> <mitya57> Ok
<lubot> <mitya57> Thanks again
<lubot> <RikMills> NP. More things to fix, but at least that should be ok
-queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu2.3 => 5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu2.4] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)
<lubot> <RikMills> Just as we get close to migration, autosync dumps more things to stop it. ð
<valorie> of course
<lubot> <RikMills> Yep. Time for ð´ I think. See where we are in the morning!
<valorie> sweet dreams, RikMills
#ubuntu-qt 2019-10-31
<lubot> <RikMills> @RikMills [Just as we get close to migration, autosync dumps more things to stop it. ð], And the same just happened again. I ****ing give up
<lubot> <RikMills> Sorry. Just very annoying. ð¤£

{'channel': 'ubuntu-qt', 'month': 10}