Title of Invention: Distribution network monitoring and control system Abstract: A distribution network monitoring and control system for monitoring and controlling a distribution network system including monitoring and control means for taking in an information and for outputting a control information for the switches thereof, status grasping means for judging charging and outage state of the distribution network system, switch status take-in means for taking in status of the switches in a range to which power was transmitted when the fault was generated, fault section judging means for judging a fault section according to a fault information, and fault section expanding means for expanding a fault section to a load side when status of the switches at the load side of the fault section cannot be taken out and for notifying an expanded fault section to the fault section judging means. The fault section judging means decides the expanded fault section as the fault section. The distribution network monitoring and control system further includes, fault processing means for isolating the fault section from the distribution network system and for executing recovering operation to an outage section, and recovering procedure preparation means for preparing a recovering operation procedure to the outage section. Detailed Description: Part general_description_paragraphs: Part CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS: This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from the prior Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-69321, filed on Mar. 14, 2003; the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Part BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION: 1. Field of the Invention This invention relates to a distribution network monitoring and control system for monitoring and controlling the system status of a distribution network system. 2. Description of the Background A Distribution Management System (DMS) and distribution network equipments for judging a fault generated in a distribution network system are classified into a Current Sensing System (CSS) and a Voltage Sensing System (VSS). CSS is a system which is used widely in Europe and America. CSS judges a fault section based on the action of an Over Current Relay (OCR) provided in each switch. A switch for CSS is called a CSW. Hereafter, this switch is referred to as a CSW. A CSW is composed of a switch (SW), a terminal unit (FTU) with communication function and OCR function and a battery. CSS judges a fault section based on the action state of OCR provided in the switch, and executes an isolation of the fault section and recovering operation to the non-faulted section. VSS is a system which is used widely in Japan. VSS judges a fault section by a Fault Detecting Relay (FDR) provided in each switch. A switch for VSS is called a VSW. Hereafter, this switch is referred to as a VSW. A VSW is composed of a switch (SW) and a terminal unit (FTU) with communication function and FDR function. A FDR is provided with a function to open a switch automatically when no voltage state is detected, a function to close the switch when voltage is applied, and a function to make locked state when no voltage state is detected within a predetermined time after closing the switch and to keep the opened state even if voltage is applied again. VSS executes isolation of the fault section and recovering operation to the section of power source side from the fault section by a trip, a reclosing, a re-trip and a re-reclosing of a feeder circuit breaker (FCB) and the function of FDR. Then DMS executes a recovering operation to the section of the load side from the fault section. FIG. 34 shows one example of the construction of a distribution network monitoring and control system having a fault section judging means to judge a fault section when a fault is generated in a distribution line in a CSS type distribution network system which is monitored and controlled using CSWs. As shown in FIG. 34, a distribution network monitoring and control system 1A is composed of: a monitoring and control means 11 to take in the information of distribution network equipments such as CSWs (hereafter, simply referred to as switches) of a CSS type distribution network system 2 and to output control information for the switches thereof; a status grasping means 12 to judge charging and outage state of CSS type distribution network system 2 according to the information on distribution network equipments taken by monitoring and control means 11; a switch status take-in means 13 to take in the status of the switches in a range to which power was so far transmitted through a feeder causing a fault, as required when the status grasping means 12 judged that a fault was generated; a CSS type fault section judging means 14A to judge a fault section according to the fault information of the switches taken in by switch status take-in means 13; a fault processing means 15 to isolate the fault section detected by CSS type fault section judging means 14A from CSS type distribution network system 2 and to transmit power to an outage section other than the fault section (hereafter, referred to as a recovering operation); and a CSS type recovering procedure preparation means 16A to prepare a recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the fault section on the assumption that the switches are to be controlled. Further, switches are provided with batteries and so constructed that they are controllable even in the outage section. Monitoring and control means 11 receives a distribution network equipment information from CSS type distribution network system 2, and when it is found that the equipment status is changed (hereafter, called as the status change) based on a difference from the information received last time, monitoring and control means 11 notifies status grasping means 12 of the status change content. Further, monitoring and control means 11 outputs control signals to distribution network equipments composing CSS type distribution network system 2 upon request for control. Status grasping means 12 judges charging/outage state and fault generation of CSS type distribution network system 2 according to the distribution network equipment information notified from monitoring and control means 11. When it is judged that the fault is generated, status grasping means 12 notifies the generation of the fault to switch status take-in means 13, and after a certain time passed from the generation of the fault, status grasping means 12 requests CSS type fault section judging means 14A to judge the fault section. Switch status take-in means 13 searches switches in a range to which power was so far transmitted before a fault through the feeder that caused a fault according to the notification from status grasping means 12, requests monitoring and control means 11 to take in the status of the searched switches, and receives the result of the taken-in status through status grasping means 12. CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges a fault section according to the switch fault information received from status grasping means 12 in response to a fault section judging request from status grasping means 12, and notifies fault processing means 15 of the result. Fault processing means 15 sends a request for control to isolate the fault section and a request for control to provide a recovering operation to non-faulted outage section to monitoring and control means 11, and receives the controlled result through status grasping means 12. CSS type recovering procedure preparation means 16A prepares a recovering procedure to non-faulted outage section in response to a request from fault processing means 15, and notifies the result to fault processing means 15. FIG. 35 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the fault section judging process executed in conventional distribution network monitoring and control system 1A. In FIG. 35, FIG. 35(a) shows a timing chart of the fault section judging process and FIG. 35(b) shows the construction of a part of CSS type distribution network system 2. In FIG. 35(b), a feeder circuit breaker FCB, switches SW1-SW9 and a tie switch TSW are provided in CSS type distribution network system 2. Furthermore, for each switch, the type of the switch (remote controlled switch or remote controlled switch (tie switch)) is shown with different symbol. Here, it is assumed that a fault is generated in a section between switches SW5 and SW6. In FIG. 34 and FIG. 35, distribution network monitoring and control system 1A detects an initial breaking of feeder circuit breaker FCB by status grasping means 12, and judges the generation of distribution line fault (FIG. 35(a) at a time {circle around (2)}). When a distribution line fault is generated, relays of switches SW1-SW4 at the power source side from a fault section act, and distribution network monitoring and control system 1A grasps the fault information of switches SW1-SW4 (the relay action state) by the status change notice from switches SW1-SW4 (FIG. 35(a) at times {circle around (1)}, {circle around (3)}, {circle around (5)} and {circle around (7)}). The relay actions of switches SW1-SW4 may be distinguished for fault factors, such as short circuit, ground circuit, etc. In this case, distribution network monitoring and control system 1A is notified of the information on the relay actions for each factor. Thereafter, the circuit is reclosed by the function of feeder circuit breaker FCB (FIG. 35(a) at a time {circle around (4)}). When a fault continues, feeder circuit breaker FCB is tripped again (FIG. 35(a) at a time {circle around (6)}). After passing a determined time from the generation of fault (hereafter, called as a time Tdet) (FIG. 35(a) at a time {circle around (8)})), distribution network monitoring and control system 1A executes a forced polling by switch status take-in means 13, receives a fault information of switch SW5 in addition to the fault information of switches SW1-SW4, previously received by the status change notice, takes the status of all the switches in a range to which power was transmitted before the fault through the feeder causing the fault, and grasps the fault information of all the switches that are needed to judge a fault section. CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges a section between switches SW5-SW6 as a fault section that is a load side section of switch SW5 (hereafter, referred to a fault factor switch) located most close to the load side among the switches which notified the fault information (FIG. 35(a) at a time {circle around (9)}). Distribution network monitoring and control system 1A isolates a fault section by opening switches SW5-SW6 adjacent to the fault section, and then, by closing a feeder circuit breaker FCB, recovers an outage section at the power source side from the fault section (hereafter, referred to as a power source side non-faulted section) by fault processing means 15. An outage section at a load side from the fault section (hereafter, referred to as a load side non-faulted section) is recovered by preparing a recovering procedure in consideration of the distribution line allowable current of the recovered distribution line by CSS type recovering procedures preparation means 16A. FIG. 36 shows one example of the construction of a distribution network monitoring and control system 1V having a fault section judging means to judge a fault section when a fault is generated in a distribution line in a VSS type distribution network system 3 which is monitored and controlled using VSWs. In FIG. 36, the same component elements as those shown in FIG. 34 are assigned with the same reference numerals and a detailed explanation thereof will be omitted. As shown in FIG. 36, distribution network monitoring and control system 1V is composed of: monitoring and control means 11; status grasping means 12; switch status take-in means 13; a VSS type fault section judging means 14V that searches a switch that is locked for making for no-voltage during the detection time period from the information of taken-in VSWs (hereafter, called simply as switches) and judges the load side of the searched switch as a fault section; fault processing means 15; and a VSS type recovering procedure preparation means 16V to prepare recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the fault section on the assumption that the switches are to be controlled. Further, as the switches in the outage section cannot be controlled, it is necessary to control the switches in order from the power source side. VSS type fault section judging means 14V searches switches in the input lock state from the taken-in information of the switches, judges the load side of the searched switch as a fault section in response to a fault section judging request from status grasping means 12, and notifies fault processing means 15 of the fault section judging result. VSS type recovering procedure preparation means 16V prepares a recovering procedure to non-faulted outage section in response to a request from fault processing means 15, and notifies the result to fault processing means 15. In the fault section judging process by the above-mentioned conventional distribution network monitoring and control system 1A, out of CSWs of which the fault information is notified, a load side section of switch SW5 located most close to the load side is judged to be a fault section. However, when the status of a load side switch of the judged fault section could not be taken, that switch might possibly detect fault information, and in the case that the fault information was detected, a fault section may be erroneously judged. When a self-line loop route, which is a state in which the number of feeders that supply power to a loop circuit is one, is adjacent to the load side of a judged fault section or when a judged fault section is in a self-line loop route, which side becomes a load side section cannot be determined unless the flowing direction of power in the self-line loop route is known. Therefore, a fault section may possibly be judged erroneously. When a distribution network system before a fault is an other line loop route, which is a state in which the number of feeders which supply power to a loop circuit is two or more, fault information is detected through switches on routes to all feeder circuit breakers FCB from a fault section. In the fault section judging process by the conventional technology, a fault is judged by a feeder circuit breaker FCB that is lastly tripped out of feeder circuit breakers FCB in the other line loop. Then, a load side section of the switch which is most close to the load side from that feeder circuit breaker FCB out of switches of which faults were notified is judged as a fault section, and thus, a fault section may be erroneously judged. When a plurality of fault factors are generated simultaneously and a plurality of fault factors are on the same route from a tripped feeder circuit breaker FCB, only a load side section of a switch which is most close to the load side is judged to be a fault section, regardless a fault factor, out of switches of which faults are notified according to the fault section judgment of the conventional technology. Accordingly, as the other fault factors are not judged, a fault section may be erroneously judged. When factors for an intermittent fault, which is a fault that is generated and recovered repeatedly within a short time period, exist in a plurality of sections, only a load side section of a switch which is most close to the load side is judged to be a fault section out of switches of which faults are notified according to the fault section judgment of the conventional technology. Accordingly, as fault factors during the intermediate time cannot be judged, a fault section may be erroneously judged. When a fault section was erroneously judged as described above, feeder circuit breaker FCB might be tripped in the recovering operation to a non-faulted section at a power source side or in the recovering operation to a non-faulted section at a load side, causing the extension of an outage time and the expansion of an outage section. Further, in a mixed type distribution network system wherein CSWs and VSWs are provided in mix, there are problems described below. That is, when there is provided only one function of either a VSS type fault processing system or a CSS type fault processing system, a fault section may not be detected depending on a system status when a fault is generated. Also, when only an recovering procedure preparation system that is the same system as that of a fault section judging system is selectable, a recovering procedure may not be prepared. In addition, when a fault is judged as an intermittent fault, a fault section cannot be judged by a VSS type fault processing system but the whole sections are judged as fault sections. Thus, the fault section judgment may not be made in a pre-selected fault processing system. Further, according to the fault section judging result by either a VSS type fault processing system or a CSS type fault processing system, fault sections may not be limited sufficiently. Furthermore, in the case of a VSS type fault processing system, reclosing is indispensable. Accordingly, even in the case that a fault section can be judged according to a CSS type fault processing system, because feeder circuit breaker FCB is reclosed for a VSS type fault processing system, feeder circuit breaker FCB is tripped again, and an outage time of non-faulted section at the power source side becomes long. Part SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION: It is an object of this invention to provide a distribution network monitoring and control system which can adequately and accurately judge a fault section even when the status of switches at a load side of a judged fault section is not taken in. According to an aspect of this invention, there is provided a distribution network monitoring and control system for monitoring and controlling a CSS type distribution network system provided with CSWs, including, monitoring and control means for taking in an information of the CSWs of the CSS type distribution network system and for outputting a control information for the CSWs thereof, status grasping means for judging charging and outage state of the CSS type distribution network system according to the information on the CSWs taken by the monitoring and control means, switch status take-in means for taking in status of the CSWs in a range to which power was so far transmitted through a feeder causing a fault, when the status grasping means judged that the fault was generated, CSS type fault section judging means for judging a fault section according to a fault information of the CSWs taken in by the switch status take-in means, and fault section expanding means for receiving an information of the fault section from the CSS type fault section judging means, for expanding a fault section to a load side, when status of the CSWs at the load side of the fault section cannot be taken in, and for notifying an expanded fault section to the CSS type fault section judging means. The CSS type fault section judging means decides the expanded fault section notified from the fault section expanding means as the fault section. The distribution network monitoring and control system further includes, fault processing means for isolating the fault section decided by the CSS type fault section judging means from the CSS type distribution network system and for executing recovering operation to an outage section other than the fault section, and CSS type recovering procedure preparation means for preparing a recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the fault section on a assumption that the CSWs are to be controlled. According to another aspect of this invention, there is provided a distribution network monitoring and control system for monitoring and controlling a mixed type distribution network system provided with VSWs and CSWs in mix including, monitoring and control means for taking in an information of the VSWs and the CSWs of the mixed type distribution network system and for outputting a control information for the VSWs and the CSWs thereof, status grasping means for judging charging and outage state of the mixed type distribution network system according to the information on the VSWs and the CSWs taken by the monitoring and control means, and switch status take-in means for taking in status of the VSWs and the CSWs in a range to which power was so far transmitted through a feeder causing a fault, when the status grasping means judged that the fault was generated. The distribution network monitoring and control system further includes, fault processing system selecting means for selecting either a VSS type fault processing system or a CSS type fault processing system when a fault section judging request is received from the status grasping means, VSS type fault section judging means for judging a fault section according to a fault information of the VSWs taken in by the switch status take-in means when the VSS type fault processing system is selected by the fault processing system selecting means, CSS type fault section judging means for judging a fault section according to a fault information of the CSWs taken in by the switch status take-in means when the CSS type fault processing system is selected by the fault processing system selecting means, fault processing means for isolating the fault section decided by a selected one of the VSS type fault section judging means and the CSS type fault section judging means from the mixed type distribution network system and for executing recovering operation to an outage section other than the fault section, VSS type recovering procedure preparation means for preparing a recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the fault section on a assumption that the VSWs are to be controlled when the VSS type fault processing system is selected and CSS type recovering procedure preparation means for preparing a recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the fault section on a assumption that the CSWs are to be controlled when the CSS type fault processing system is selected. According to still another aspect of this invention, there is provided a distribution network monitoring and control system for monitoring and controlling a mixed type distribution network system provided with VSWs and CSWs in mix including, monitoring and control means for taking in an information of the VSWs and the CSWs of the mixed type distribution network system and for outputting a control information for the VSWs and the CSWs thereof, status grasping means for judging charging and outage state of the mixed type distribution network system according to the information on the VSWs and the CSWs taken by the monitoring and control means, switch status take-in means for taking in status of the VSWs and the CSWs in a range to which power was so far transmitted through a feeder causing a fault, when the status grasping means judged that the fault was generated, VSS type fault section judging means for judging a fault section according to a fault information of the VSWs taken in by the switch status take-in means, CSS type fault section judging means for judging a fault section according to a fault information of the CSWs taken in by the switch status take-in means. The distribution network monitoring and control system further includes, fault section comparing and judging means for judging a fault section by comparing results executed simultaneously by the VSS type fault section judging means and the CSS type fault section judging means, fault processing means for isolating the fault section decided by the mixed type distribution network system fault section comparing and judging means from the mixed type distribution network system and for executing recovering operation to an outage section other than the fault section, VSS type recovering procedure preparation means for preparing a recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the fault section on a assumption that the VSWs are to be controlled and CSS type recovering procedure preparation means for preparing a recovering operation procedure to the outage section other than the proper fault section on a assumption that the CSWs are to be controlled. Part DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION: Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views, the detailed explanation thereof will be omitted. The embodiments of this invention will be described below. First Embodiment FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a first embodiment of this invention. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, a fault section expanding means 17 is added to conventional distribution network monitoring and control system 1A shown in FIG. 34 which monitors and controls CSS type distribution network system 2. Fault section expanding means 17 is to expand a fault section when fault information is not taken from the switches. Fault section expanding means 17 receives information on a fault section from CSS type fault section judging means 14A after CSS type fault section judging means 14A executes the fault section judging process. When the status of the switches at the load side adjacent to the fault section cannot be taken in, fault section expanding means 17 further expands a fault section to a load side, and notifies the expanded fault section to CSS type fault section judging means 14A. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the fault section judging process executed in distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the first embodiment. FIG. 2 shows the construction of a part of CSS type distribution network system 2. In FIG. 2, a feeder circuit breaker FCB, switches SW1-SW9 and a tie switch TSW are provided in CSS type distribution network system 2. Furthermore, for each switch, the type of the switch (remote controlled switch, remote controlled switch (tie switch), or non-remote controlled switch) is shown with different symbol. Here, it is assumed that a fault is generated in a section between switches SW7 and SW8. Distribution network monitoring and control system 1A detects an initial breaking of feeder circuit breaker FCB by status grasping means 12. When a distribution line fault is generated, the relay action information is notified from switches SW1, SW3 and SW4 of CSS type distribution network system 2. The circuit is reclosed by the function of feeder circuit breaker FCB, and when a fault continues, feeder circuit breaker FCB is tripped again. Distribution network monitoring and control system 1A takes in the status of the switches in a range to which power was transmitted before the fault from the feeder causing the fault, based on the request of switch status take-in means 13 after passing determined time Tdet from the generation of the fault. CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges a section between switches SW4-SW7 that is a load side section of fault factor switch SW4 out of those switches of which fault information is notified as a fault section. However, when an actual fault section is a section between switches SW7-SW9 and the relay action of switch SW7 at the load side of the judged fault section cannot be taken for transmission error, generation of no response, etc., CSS type fault section judging means 14A is not able to judge the actual fault section. When the relay action status of the switch at the load side of the fault section cannot be obtained, fault section expanding means 17 treats that switch similarly as a non-remote controlled switch, and further expands a section that is to be judged as a fault section to a switch at a further load side or a terminal section. FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing one example of the process executed in fault section expanding means 17. In distribution network monitoring and control system 1A, fault section expanding means 17 virtually simulates fault information, information on on/off status of switches, attributes of switches (remote controlled/non-remote controlled), and equipment information including mutual connection information between distribution sections, and executes the following processes. First, when fault factor switch SW4 is opened in the distribution network system before fault, a load side outage section is searched and remote controlled switches belonging to the searched load side outage section are searched (a step S1). Then, out of the remote controlled switches belonging to the load side outage section switches of which relay action status could be taken are treated as being in an open state (steps S1a and S2), and switches of which relay action status could not be taken for transmission error, no response, etc. are treated as being in a closed state (steps S1a and S3). Thereafter, a load side charged section when fault factor switch SW4 is closed is searched (a step S4), and the charged section is treated as a fault section. The process executed in fault section expanding means 17 shown in FIG. 3 will be explained in detail below. Here, it is assumed that a fault is generated in a section between switches SW7 and SW8 in FIG. 2. As described above, the fault factor switch is switch SW4, and a number N1 of the fault factor switches is “1”. Accordingly, the loop shown in step S1 is executed only one time. Next, a load side outage section is searched, and sections between switches SW4 and tie switch TSW shown in FIG. 2 are decided as a load side outage section. Then, as a result of the search of the remote controlled switches included in the load side outage section, switches SW7 and SW9 are found to be remote controlled switches. Accordingly, a number N2 of the remote controlled switches is “2”, and the loop shown in step S1a is executed two times for remote controlled switches SW7 and SW9. In a first loop of step S1a, as the relay action status of switch SW7 cannot be taken in, switch SW7 is treated as being in a closed state in step S3. In a second loop of step S1a, as the relay action status of switch SW9 can be taken in, switch SW9 is treated as being in an open state in step S2. After the completion of the second loop of step S1a, a load side charged section when fault factor switch SW4 is closed is searched (a step S4), and the charged section which is a section between switches SW4 and SW9 is treated as a fault section. Fault section expanding means 17 judges a section between switches SW4-SW9 as a fault section, because switch SW7 is in the state of no response as shown in FIG. 2. Thereafter, distribution network monitoring and control system 1A opens switches SW4 and SW9 adjacent to the fault section, isolates the fault section, and recovers a power source side non-faulted section by closing feeder circuit breaker FCB by fault processing means 15. As for restoring load side non-faulted section, CSS type recovering procedure preparation means 16A prepares the recovering procedure in consideration of the recovering distributing line allowable current of the recovered distribution line, and recovers the load side non-faulted section. According to the embodiment described above, even if the status of the switches at a load side of the judged fault section could not be taken, it becomes possible to make a more adequate and accurate judgment of fault section by expanding a fault section to a further load side remote controlled switch or to a terminal section. Second Embodiment Next, a second embodiment of this invention will be explained referring to FIG. 4. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, a self-line loop judging means 18 is added to distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1. Self-line loop judging means 18 judges whether or not a self-line loop is present in CSS type distribution network system 2, and when there is a self-line loop, self-line loop judging means 18 treats switches in the self-line loop route as non-remote controlled switches. Self-line loop judging means 18 judges whether or not a self-line loop is present in CSS type distribution network system 2 before fault by receiving system information before fault from CSS type fault section judging means 14A before making the judgment on a fault section. When there is a self-line loop, switches in the self-line loop route in CSS type distribution network system 2 are treated as non-remote controlled switches in distribution network monitoring and control system 1A. Thereafter, a fault section is judged by CSS type fault section judging means 14A and fault section expanding means 17. FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining the fault section judging process executed in distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the second embodiment. FIG. 5 shows the construction of a part of CSS type distribution network system 2. In FIG. 5, a feeder circuit breaker FCB, switches SW1-SW8, SW10 and tie switches SW9 and TSW are provided in CSS type distribution network system 2. Furthermore, for each switch, the type of the switch (remote controlled switch, remote controlled switch (tie switch) opened, non-remote controlled switch, or remote controlled switch (tie switch) closed) is shown with different symbol. Here, it is assumed that a fault is generated in a section K4 or a section K9. CSS type distribution network system 2 shown in FIG. 5 is in the state of a self-line loop as tie switch SW9 is closed. When a distribution line fault is generated, distribution network monitoring and control system 1A receives relay action information of switches SW1, SW3 and SW10 from switch status take-in means 13 as fault information, and judges the load side section of switch SW10 which is most close to the load side as a fault section by CSS type fault section judging means 14A. However, as switch SW10 is the switch in the self-line loop route as shown in FIG. 5, the flowing direction of power is not known, and therefore, whether a load side section is a section K4 or a section K9 cannot be specified. Further, because of in the self-line loop state, the fault information of switches in the self-line loop route may not be notified correctly. Self-line loop judging means 18 expands fault sections by treating switches in the self-line loop route as non-remote controlled switches before judging fault sections by CSS type fault section judging means 14A. FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing one example of the process executed in self-line loop judging means 18. In distribution network monitoring and control system 1A, self-line loop judging means 18 virtually simulates fault information, information on on/off state of switches, attributes of switches, and equipment information including mutual connection information between distribution sections, and executes the following processes. In the explanations of the flow chart using FIG. 6 and the following drawings, only main points are described, and the description of the other points are omitted so as to avoid the duplicated explanation. Please refer to the description in the flow charts for the detailed explanation. First, self-line loop points of applicable distribution lines are searched (a step S5). Then, when both side sections from the loop points are searched to the power source side (a step S6), switches at sections which are not overlapped each other are treated as switches in the loop route, and all switches in the loop route are treated as non-remote controlled switches (a step S7). In FIG. 5, self-line loop judging means 18 treats switches SW4, SW8, SW9 and SW10 within the self-line loop route as non-remote controlled switches. CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges fault sections disregarding the relay's action of switch SW10 because switch SW10 is treated as a non-remote controlled switch, and section K3 is judged as a fault section. Thereafter, sections K3, K4, K8 and K9 are judged as fault sections by fault section expanding means 17. According to this embodiment as described above, even when the fault factor switch is a switch within the self-line loop route, it is possible to judge all sections in the self-line loop route including the fault factor switch. Thereby it is possible to judge the fault section more adequately and accurately. Third Embodiment Next, a third embodiment of this invention will be explained referring to FIG. 7. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 7, an other line loop judging means 19 to judge a fault in other line loop is added to distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1. Other line loop judging means 19 judges the state of other line loop in distribution network system 2 before fault, by receiving a trip notification of the feeder circuit breaker and system information before fault from state grasping means 12. Thereafter, when other line loop judging means 19 judges that a fault is generated in the other line loop, CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges that all sections are fault sections FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining the fault section judging process executed in distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the third embodiment. In FIG. 8, FIG. 8(a) shows a timing chart of the fault section judging process and FIG. 8(b) shows the construction of a part of CSS type distribution network system 2. In FIG. 8(b), feeder circuit breakers FCB1 and FCB2, switches SW1-SW5 and a tie switch TSW are provided in CSS type distribution network system 2. Furthermore, for each switch, the type of the switch is shown with different symbol. Here, it is assumed that a fault is generated in a section K6 between switches SW4 and SW5. CSS type distribution network system 2 shown in FIG. 8(b) is in the state of the other line loop. When a fault is generated in section K6, feeder circuit breakers FCB1 and FCB2 are tripped. Distribution network monitoring and control system 1A does not judge that a fault is generated because the outage is not generated when distribution circuit breaker FCB1 is opened by the status grasping means 12. But distribution network monitoring and control system 1A judges that a fault is generated because the outage is generated when feeder circuit breaker FCB2 is opened by the status grasping means 12. Distribution network monitoring and control system 1A takes in the status of switches SW1-SW5 and tie switch TSW by switch status take-in means 13 and recognizes that the relays of all switches are acting. In this case, CSS type fault section judging means 14A erroneously judges that a section K1 which is a load side section of a fault factor switch is a fault section according to taken-in fault information of all the switches. Here, other line loop judging means 19 judges whether or not a fault is generated in the other line loop. When a fault is generated in the other line loop, other line loop judging means 19 judges that all sections are in the fault state. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing one example of the process executed in other line loop judging means 19. Other line loop judging means 19 judges whether or not an outage is generated when feeder circuit breaker FCB1 or FCB2 is opened (a step S8), and when the outage is not generated, judges that a fault is generated in the other line loop, places feeder circuit breaker FCB1 or FCB2 of a mating loop line under a loop control state (a step S9), and sets a loop control timer (a step S10). Other line loop judging means 19 judges whether or not applicable feeder circuit breaker FCB1 or FCB2 is under the control state when outage is generated by opening feeder circuit breaker FCB1 or FCB2 (a step S11), and judges that a fault is generated in the other line loop when the feeder circuit breaker FCB1 or FCB2 is under the loop control state (a step S12). Further, whether or not the state under loop control continues for a definite time Tlop is judged (a step S13) and when the state continues for more than definite time Tlop, the state under loop control is reset (a step S14). In FIG. 8, other line loop judging means 19 judges that a fault is generated in the other line loop because the trip of feeder circuit breaker FCB2 is generated (FIG. 8(a) at a time {circle around (2)}) during the loop control state. Then, after a time Tdet passed, a fault section is judged because feeder circuit breaker FCB2 is in the open state, and all sections are judged to be fault sections because the fault is generated in other line loop. According to this embodiment as described above, in the fault section judgment under the other line loop state, all sections can be judged as fault sections when the fault is generated in other line loop, and thus, fault sections can be judged adequately and accurately. Fourth Embodiment Next, a fourth embodiment of this invention will be explained referring to FIG. 10. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 10, a fault factor judging means 20 is added to distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1. Fault factor judging means 20 is to judge fault factor for every fault information from a plurality of different fault informations of switches. Fault factor judging means 20 classifies the fault informations into the relay action state for every fault factor before judging a fault section by CSS type fault section judging means 14A in response to a notice from status grasping means 12, and fault section is judged by CSS type fault section judging means 14A for every fault factor. FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining the fault section judging process executed in distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the fourth embodiment. FIG. 11 shows the construction of a part of CSS type distribution network system 2. In FIG. 11, a feeder circuit breaker FCB, switches SW1-SW5, and a tie TSW are provided in CSS type distribution network system 2. Furthermore, for each switch, the type of the switch is shown with different symbol. In CSS type distribution network system 2 shown in FIG. 11, it is assumed that a short-circuit fault is generated in a section K3 and a ground fault is generated in a section K4. Distribution network monitoring and control system 1A receives a plurality of different fault informations of switches by switch status take-in means 13. CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges a load side section K4 only of switch SW3 which is most close to the load as a fault section among switches of which fault informations were received without taking into consideration of the type of the fault information. Here, fault factor judging means 20 enables the fault section judgment for every fault factor by judging a fault section for each fault factor. FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing one example of the process executed in fault factor judging means 20. In distribution network monitoring and control system 1A, fault factor judging means 20 virtually simulates fault information, information on on/off state of switches, attributes of switches, and equipment information including mutual connection information between distribution sections, and executes the following processes. First, a simulated system is prepared in which any relay other than an objective action relay is cleared off for each type of action relay (a step S15). Then, fault factor judging means 20 notifies CSS type fault judging means 14A of the virtually simulated system, and a fault section is judged (a step S16) in CSS type fault judging means 14A. Thus, it becomes possible to determine a fault section for each fault factor. In FIG. 11, fault factor judging means 20 first requests the judgment of a fault section due to a ground fault notified by an OCG relay (Over Current of Ground Relay) to CSS type fault section judging means 14A, and CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges that a fault is generated in section K4. Then, fault factor judging means 20 requests the judgment of a fault section due to a short-circuit fault notified by OC relay (Over Current Relay) to CSS type fault section judging means 14A, and CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges that a fault is generated in section K3. Thus, it is possible to judge that the fault sections are section K3 and section K4. According to this embodiment as described above, a fault section can be judged for every type of fault information even when a plurality of fault information are received from CSWs, and thus, fault section can be judged adequately and accurately. Fifth Embodiment Next, a fifth embodiment of this invention will be explained referring to FIG. 13. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 13, an intermittent fault judging means 21 is added to distribution network monitoring and control system 1A of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1. Intermittent fault judging means 21 is to detect a fault section even in the case of a reclosing success fault. When the fault is judged as an intermittent fault, intermittent fault judging means 21 judges fault section detecting results within a certain time period as being all fault sections. Intermittent fault judging means 21 is notified of a trip of feeder circuit breaker FCB from status grasping means 12. Further, when the reclosing is successful, intermittent fault judging means 21 is notified of the fault-section judged by CSS type fault section judging means 14A, stores the fault section and places it under the intermittent fault control. When intermittent fault judging means 21 is notified of the trip of feeder circuit breaker FCB from status grasping means 12 during the intermittent fault control, intermittent fault judging mean 21 judges that the fault is an intermittent fault. Thereafter, CSS type fault section judging means 14A takes out all fault sections stored in intermittent fault judging means 21 and notifies them to fault processing means 15. FIG. 14 is a diagram for explaining the fault section judging process executed in distribution network monitoring and control system 1A in the fifth embodiment. In FIG. 14, FIG. 14(a) shows a timing chart of the fault section judging process and FIG. 14(b) shows the construction of a part of CSS type distribution network system 2. In FIG. 14(b), a feeder circuit breaker FCB, switches SW1-SW8 and a tie switch TSW are provided in CSS type distribution network system 2. Furthermore, for each switch, the type of the switch is shown with different symbol. Here, it is assumed that a first fault is generated in a section between switches SW3 and SW4 and a second fault is generated in a section between switches SW4 and SW5. In CSS type distribution network system 2 shown in FIG. 14(b), distribution network monitoring and control system 1A detects an initial trip of feeder circuit breaker FCB by status grasping means 12 (FIG. 14(a) at a time {circle around (1)}). When a distribution line fault is generated, the relay actions are notified to distribution network monitoring and control system 1A from the switches of CSS type distribution network system 2. When the circuit is reclosed by the function of feeder circuit breaker FCB (FIG. 14(a) at a time {circle around (2)}) and the reclosing is successful, according to the conventional technology, the fault section judgment is not carried out, the fault information of switches is cleared off and the fault processing is terminated. Thereafter, when a second trip is caused (FIG. 14(a) at a time {circle around (5)}) and feeder circuit breaker FCB at a time after time Tdet from the trip is in the open state, CSS type fault section judging means 14A executes the judgment of fault section, and judges a section between switches SW4-SW5 as a fault section. However, if there is a factor for intermittent fault in a section between switches SW3-SW4, feeder circuit breaker FCB may possibly be tripped when feeder circuit breaker FCB is closed for the recovery of the power source side. A method to judge an intermittent fault by intermittent fault judging means 21 will be explained below. In order to deal with an intermittent fault, distribution network monitoring and control system 1A takes in the status of switches located in a range to which power was transmitted before the fault through the feeder that generated the fault at a time after a determined time passed from the generation of the fault by switch status take-in means 13 even when the circuit was reclosed successfully (FIG. 14(a) at a time {circle around (3)}). CSS type fault section judging means 14A judges a section between switches SW3 to SW4 that is a load side section of the fault factor switch as a fault section out of CSWs of which fault information was notified, and notifies the judged fault section to intermittent fault judging means 21. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing one example of the process executed in intermittent fault judging means 21. When fault sections are notified, intermittent fault judging means 21 stores the notified fault section
{'bibliographic_information': "{'country': 'US', 'doc-number': '10796106', 'kind': 'B2', 'date': '20040310', 'invention_title': 'Distribution network monitoring and control system'}", 'source_file': './grant/2005/ipg051108.xml', 'source_data': 'USPTO-Grant'}