@up: ""OK, I bit, and I took a look at your website, but I could not make any
sense out of todd52@example.net."
 "Normally I suggest foax _not_ talk about their case particulars on the 
Net, but
if your case has already gone to trial and is over, and especially
since you seem to have created an entire (unintelligible, but
nonetheless) website about it, you're probably not worried about
saying something that may be used against you.  "
Senseless and unitelligible?  LOL "
    @noemail: ""Zeke" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
Hey, you expected anything less? Though with that description it could even 
be Bullis's site. "
    @member: "On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:03:50 -0400, "Orson Wells as CitizenCain"
<quote>
Normally I don't reply to alex but in this case....
My current site has nothing on it that attacks anyone in any way.
Unlike your buddy "Taylor" who owns several sites that do just that.
Although his sites are now watered down versions of lart.com.
And just where is your buddy Taylor these days?
Oh he's out there posting away. But he refuses to post as Taylor after
I posted his true identity.
He even refuses to acknowledge me now. To think that usenet's number
one scumbag got ousted by the kook of the century."
    @fraud: ""richard" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
But think about the countless hours of wasted time he has spent creating and 
manipulating these shrine sites and then no one that matters can make sense 
of them... ahhh shit, you're right, they make as much sense as his usenet 
posts. "
    @noemail: ""richard" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
Yay! Tell me something stupid please.
So the fuck what, Bullis? Tell me or show me anywhere in my statement where 
I implied that the site could be yours due to attack. The site was described 
as "senseless and unintelligent," two words that easily fit you both on and 
off the Internet. Ironically enough you just proved it with your post.
Taylor is not my "buddy," and I don't give a shit what he does or does not 
own or what his Web sites may or may not proclaim.
Still smarting from all of that, huh st00pid?
He's not my "buddy," and I don't fucking care.
Bullis you are such a dimwit you make DUI-driving teenagers look like 
Einsteins. There is *no fucking way in Hell* you could ever, EVER find 
someone's true identity, even if they made a commercial about it and put it 
on television during one of the many shows you like to post about to try to 
give examples of real life situations. I do recall (vaguely) that you 
attempted to find out who he was, and made at least six...seven? no eight 
(nine?) claims of his identity, none of which were ever proven true.
Maybe he's moved on and doesn't give a shit about the Plover pedophile, or 
maybe he's just got better things to do. What's wrong Bullis - feeling 
lonely? Understandable since you couldn't attract a woman if you covered 
yourself with fly paper and jumped into the middle of a mosh pit.
Nice to see you admit to being a kook, especially one of the century, and 
even nicer to see you're still on track as being one of the dumbest sons of 
bitches ever to find his way online that didn't have a WebTV or AOL account. 
Actually I think I recall you long, long ago having an AOL account, but eh, 
whatever. Wouldn't surprise me if you did. "
{'source': 'USENET', 'other_information': '{"reply_count": 4, "forum_name": "misc.transport.trucking.20140710.mbox"}', 'file': 'data/output/usenet-misc.transport.parquet'}