@vegan16: "Just finished the 7-2 orbit.
What's neat about all of these paths
is that for any point on the path
e.g. -12.3764,62.2204,-77.3010
there is another point on the path
exactly opposite:
12.3764,-62.2204,77.3010
Thus two equal but opposite electrons
can share. Isn't that sweet?
Here's the pic!
<url>
John"
    @UncleAl0: "<quote>
[snip crap]
Hey psychotic idiot Sefton, when will you do the 355/113 orbit?
Uncle Al
<url>
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
<url>"
    @vegan16: "<quote>
 >>What's neat about all of these paths
 >>is that for any point on the path
 >>e.g. -12.3764,62.2204,-77.3010
 >>there is another point on the path
 >>exactly opposite:
 >>12.3764,-62.2204,77.3010
 >>Thus two equal but opposite electrons
 >>can share. Isn't that sweet?
 >>Here's the pic!
 >><url>
 >>John
Another neat thing is that all of these
orbits must precess through 720 degrees
before they complete.
Therefore one should observe that an electron
must be turned over twice to completely
bring it back to its start:
Do a search electron+720+degrees.
It's a puzzlement but not with this
way of harveyjesse@example.com.
John"
    @vegan16: "<quote>
Here's the 7-2 orbit using a 4-member ring.
It is completely symmetric.
<url>
With only two orbitals.
The higher the rotation, the better the spherical
coverage with fewer electrons.
But which is the S orbital?
7-2 + rotation in the third plane?
9-2+rotation in a third plane?
Higher?
John"
{'source': 'USENET', 'other_information': '{"reply_count": 3, "forum_name": "sci.physics.20140804.mbox"}', 'file': 'data/output/usenet-sci.physics.parquet'}