@a202010: ""classical mechanics" simply does not work as the 'best explanation'
when applied to teh behaviors of very small things, like electrons,
and, so-called "quantum mechanics" was developed to provide a more
correct explanation for phenomenon associated with
very small objects and light.
as the moon travels around the earth
any electrostatic interaction/s
will be buried under the much
larger gravitational forces.
if you shrink the earth and moon
to very tiny proportions,
there comes some point when
the gravitational forces
are somewhat comparable to
the electrostatic interactions.
at this point, the gravtitational forces
would be so small and not enough to hold
the earth and moon in orbit about each other,
and the tendency would be for the
moon to fly away from the earth
sort of like, if you had a ball on
a string and were spinning it
around your finger,
and, if you cut the string,
the ball would go flying off away from you.
but now, with the really
very tiny moon and earth
with a gravitational force that
would tend towards them flying apart,
the electorstatic interaction starts
to play a significant role
and the two bodies, with nearly
equal and opposite charges
are being held together by this force, while
at the same time, trying to fly apart from
each other because the gravity is very
weakly unable to hold them together,
but, the two bodies do not simply become
glued together and form a de facto single body,
because, in this dimensional range,
the two forces, gravity and
electrostatic interactions
are so ideally matched
that, the flying apart
and the attracting together
are bound up in a "harmonic oscillation"
sort of like the electrostatic interaction
constitutes what amounts to a tiny spring
string which holds the two together even
as they would be flying apart.
and the two oscillate with "harmonics"
very much like the "harmonics"
of musical instrumentation.
the "music of the spheres,"
as it were.
one thing of note
is that this specific interaction
is so very specific
that it -can't- "evolve"
there is no gradualism possible here,
it's either this, very specific dynamic interplay,
or nothing at all,
and i mean, NO jessicadavidson@example.com.
it's not at all like, gravity and electromagnetism
-can- gradually arrive at these
specific dimensional qualities.
and without the stuff being there,
there is no fact of gravity
and electromagnetism to begin,
anything.
but even if one were to suggest that gravity
and electromagnetism could both be slightly
different quantitatively and still give
us -a- material universe,
there is no opportunity for this to happen from the onset.
from the onset, it's either this or nothing.
more than just a coincidence....[?]
it's like, -before- _their_ beginning,
they =already= have peculiar values.
so, to suggest that the universe evolves
when the entire structual backing of the
universe does not evolve may be
unlearned and speculative.
and the -replicative- nature of the DNA mechanism
tends to falsify the contention that this mechanism
is -inventive- and, short of an inventive mechanism,
we may cite some inventive -intelligence- to account for,
one, the living replicative mechanism appearing in the first place,
and two, this non-innovative mechanism producing more complex organisms
in the face of environmental stressors that deteriorate
and degrade its functionality.
one would be contending that the 'degradative influence'
-is- the 'inventive influence' and this seems contradictory.
so, by this reckoning, 'science' should now adopt
the 'theory' that some unseen guiding conscious influence
is manufacturing human beings from available resources
based upon some "source image" that [they] hold
in [their] wallet, as this is
the "better explanantion""
    @a202010: "interatively wobbling amid the complex plane.
        T = {T^2 + (G + gi)}
as i wobble, i stay in the plane
my heart maintains it's rhythm...
see, there are possible numbers
in the set of (G + gi) where the
magnitude, or distance from 0, of T
will not diverge to infinity.
'i' = [square root of (-1)]
a so-called 'imaginary number'
at T = 0 , you get;
T(2) = 0^2 + (G + gi)
or T = (G + gi)
plug that into T and
do the operation again;
T(3) = (G + gi)^2 + (G = gi)
where (G + gi) is a constant
number in the complex plane.
which is to say, for each set of
repeated operations, (G + gi) is
constant and T varies.
well, for many numbers, the magnitude
of T soon diverges to infinity.
but there are number sets of (G + gi),
for which, the magnitude of T doesn't diverge.
T just wobbles not too far from zero.
those numbers are called 'the mandelbrot set'
and if you graph this set,
you get the funny picture that
looks sort of like a heart.
a 'cardioid' of sorts."
    @a202010: "we suggest that God resembles a "Rock" 
in what way does God resembles a "Rock"?
the -type- of memory impression 
that you gain when you inspect some 
artifact as 'concrete' as a rock, 
is left behind by the Holy Spirit.
you distance yourself from a rock that 
you have inspected, you carry a memory 
impression of that rock with you 
wherever you go.
you meet Jesus thru the Holy Spirit 
and you carry away a definite 
memory impression that Lives.
one minor difference,
your memory of a granite stone is static, 
and your memory of Christ thru the 
Holy Spirit is dynamic."
{'source': 'USENET', 'other_information': '{"reply_count": 2, "forum_name": "alt.discordia.20141031.mbox"}', 'file': 'data/output/usenet-alt.discordia.parquet'}