@tcamp: "Obama and the Democrats have sold this country out !!!
<url>
February 26, 2009
Feds grant eminent domain as collateral to China for U.S. debts!!
Beijing, China  Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China 
have just CONFIRMED to me that the United States of America has tendered 
to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of 
China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as 
collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and 
existing US Currency reserves!
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State 
Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip 
to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial 
obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be 
permitted to physically take  inside the USA  land, buildings, 
factories, perhaps even entire cities - to satisfy the financial 
obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and 
property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have 
given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of 
our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US 
deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
This is an unimaginable betrayal of every man, woman and child in the 
USA. An outrage worthy of violent overthrow.
I am endeavoring to obtain images or copies of the actual document but 
in the interim, several different sources both in the US and in China 
have CONFIRMED this to me.
More details as they become available. . . . . spread the word ASAP.
Why weren't the people of this country told about this BEFORE they did it ?
Where were our congressmen and senators ?"
    @aezael: "On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:21:37 -0500, Ted Campanelli
<quote>
According to the laws of the United States of America if this is true
then Hiliary Clinton and Barack Obama are traitors and according to 
the Constitution should be executed."
    @strabo: "<quote>
This is the real purpose of registration of property with the
county/state which in turn records it with the Department of Commerce.
It gives government an interest.
 >
 >
Some are Socialists and fully behind the concept of imminent domain
to remove property rights. Most others have been bought off or
blackmailed.
The federal government is acting unconstitutionally. It is illegitimate.
Don't support it.
The feds and courts have been expanding the use of imminent domain in
recent years and establishing precedent."
    @not_real: "<quote>
[...] 
Then banning all sorts of weapons will be at the top of the agenda.
Ditto any sort of organizing groups.  Round up any effective
dissidents.  I smell Carl Rove.
For what it's worth, the original source seems to be Hal Turner.
<<url>"
    @not_real: "<quote>
who quotes Bloomberg News
<<url>
who only quotes a Chinese ex-advisor about what the US "should" do.
Feb. 11 (Bloomberg)  China should seek guarantees that its $682
billion holdings of U.S. government debt won�t be eroded by "reckless
policies," said Yu Yongding, a former adviser to the central bank.
The U.S. �should make the Chinese feel confident that the value of the
assets at least will not be eroded in a significant way,� Yu, who now
heads the World Economics and Politics Institute at the Chinese
Academy of Social Sciences, said in response to e-mailed questions
yesterday from Beijing. He declined to elaborate on the assurances
needed by China, the biggest foreign holder of U.S. government debt. 
[...]
China may voice its concerns over U.S. government finances and the
potential for a weaker dollar when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
visits China on Feb. 20, according to He Zhicheng, an economist at
Agricultural Bank of China ...
[...]"
    @gurlee: ""Winston_Smith" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
IS at the top of the agenda. Smell whomever turns you on but get your facts 
here:
<url> "
    @not_real: "<quote>
Thanks for the English lesson but you are wrong.  You snipped your
beloved context exactly the way you always bitch that others do.
"would be permitted" - future tense.
"will be at the top" - future tense.
If-then."
    @gurlee: ""Winston_Smith" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
So what does your bitch Carl Rove smell like anyway? Does he smell like 
Obama? That would be Barack Obama. "
    @gurlee: ""Winston_Smith" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
You tell me, your nose has been stuck up his ass for months. Say, you 
probably smell TMT in there as well. "
    @gurlee: ""Winston_Smith" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
A few...
WS> Obama bitched about Bush and promised to do it right.  He was the better 
way.  Openness, transparency, bipartisan cooperation.
WS> Obama has a clear and definite agenda.
WS> I'd consider it a great favor if you would clue us in as soon as you get 
even a whiff of Obama doing anything like that.
WS> I expect O'Bush will be little better than Bush.
WS> President Obama doesn't HAVE a drug problem.
WS> Obama has socks smarter than those guys.
...
I assume you will have some cites too the next time you run your mouth off. "
    @not_real: "On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 01:24:54 -0600, "Libby Loo" <email_address>
wrote:
<quote>
Great editing.  I'll put you up for a technical Oscar."
    @gunner: "On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:54:30 -0700 (PDT),
<quote>
Liberalism is a mental illness
February 15, 2008 
WASHINGTON � Just when liberals thought it was safe to start
identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is
making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental
disorder.
"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals
relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our
freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new
book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political
Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal
responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government
meet their needs from cradle to grave."
While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made
similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a
life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing
conspiracy."
For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500
patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more
than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic
psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the
University of Chicago.
Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major
candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only
be understood as a psychological disorder.
"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the
vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity
� as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human
nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive,
personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and
social equality on the population � as liberals do. And a legislator
who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules
which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts
their character and reduces them to wards of the state � as liberals
do."
Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of
inferiority in the population by:
� creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
� satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and
compensation;
� augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
� rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to
the will of the government.
"The roots of liberalism � and its associated madness � can be clearly
identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to
adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational
beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind
whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and
seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run
their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully
obvious."
DR. LYLE ROSSITER:
Board-certified in general and forensic psychiatry
Over 35 years of experience
Consultation, evaluation, reports, and testimony
Civil and criminal matters
Expert/consultant for plaintiffs, defendants, and prosecution
"Human nature is bad. Good is a human product�
A warped piece of wood must be steamed and forced
before it is made straight; a metal blade must be put to the whetstone
before it becomes sharp. Since the nature of people is bad, to become corrected
they must be taught by teachers and to be orderly they must acquire ritual
and moral principles."
�Sun Tzu
�"
    @not_real: "<quote>
Gee no cite where this comes from.  Color me surprised by that.
<url>
Several years after a Federally funded study found that conservatism
was a mental disorder a Right Wing psychiatrist has released a book,
timed for the election cycle, claiming the same things about Liberals.
Are we to believe that this is a coincidence?
Little known shrink and political hack Dr. Lyle Rossiter has released
a new book entitled "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of
Political Madness" that is designed to feed the red meat hunger of
Right Wing ideologues at a time when the Conservative movement is on
the ropes after seven years of incompetence and corruption under
George W. Bush.
Most of its claims are not so subtle reversals of the conclusions
reached by four distinguished scholars that were funded by the US
Government in a study to discover the roots of conservatism.
The report "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition" cost
$1.2 million and was supervised by the National Foundation as well as
the National Institutes of Health. It found that conservatism is
essentially a set of neuroses rooted in "fear and aggression,
dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity".
In an article published in the highly respected peer reviewed
scholarly journal "Psychological Bulletin" the authors state:
    "This intolerance of ambiguity can lead people to cling to the
     familiar, to arrive at premature conclusions, and to impose
     simplistic cliches and stereotypes."
Among the sufferers of this heart-breaking malady the researchers
studied President George W. Bush and found him to be a "textbook case"
of the madness. Among the early warning signs that he exhibits is "his
preference for moral certainty and frequently expressed dislike of
nuance." The scientists believe that it was Bush's aversion to shades
of gray and the need for "closure" that led him to ignore intelligence
that contradicted his beliefs about Iraq's non existent WMD's.
At the time that this report came out conservatives were outraged and
dismissed the whole thing as merely the opinion of the scientists
involved. It is highly amusing now to watch conservatives fall all
over themselves to tout Dr. Rossiter unscientific and undocumented
political scree simply because it gives them comfort in the face of
their impending humiliation at the polls come November."
    @gurlee: ""Winston_Smith" <email_address> wrote in message 
news:<email_address>
<quote>
WS > Thanks for posting the cites I asked for, I'm too stupid to remember 
that I said those things.
Make it an Oscar Meyer, you weiner!"
{'source': 'USENET', 'other_information': '{"reply_count": 13, "forum_name": "alt.survival.20140827.mbox"}', 'file': 'data/output/usenet-alt.survival.parquet'}