@nospam: "Hi,
This is a folluw-up from the html group because it was considered 
off-topic there.
I am wondering why (half of the) squared images are not aligned on the 
right of the text in Internet Explorer (using <img ... align="right" />. 
I thought this was supported even in IE. In FF and Opera it works fine.
<url>
Please don't bother about the few javascript errors (non-CDATA) in the 
validator.
Mucht thanks for any suggestions."
    @anonymous: "<quote>
CSS:
.imgleft {
   float: left;
}
.imgright {
   float: right;
}
HTML:
<p>
<span class="imgright">
<img height="99" border="2" width="99" alt="to siemens building with
robots" src="<url>
</span
On the photos you can see some shots of us developing our LEGO vehicles
in ...
</p>
<p>
<span class="imgleft">
<img height="99" border="2" width="99" alt="Cheakith Chandranna with
water?" src="<url>
</span>
On Friday we took the plane to Bratislava (that was cheaper), ...
</p>
   -bts
   -Friends don't let friends drive Windows"
    @nospam: "Beauregard T. Shagnasty schreef:
<quote>
Yes I know that (and usually do it that way if I code it myself) but I 
wanted to use the automatically generated align=left and align=right 
attributes generated by the editor. So no changes to the HTML itself if 
possible."
    @jkorpela: "Scripsit Roderik:
<quote>
No it isn't. You started a new thread, apparently after you deciced to 
post an excuse there, claiming that your posting was HTML related, 
despite that having been disproved (by a reference to non-CSS 
rendering).
Nobody should bother with the problem before you do your homework as 
explained in the previous discussion.
Please do not fix your forged From field before you have a clue. Thank 
you in advance.
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
<url> "
    @nospam: "Jukka K. Korpela schreef:
<quote>
Well it is prob. both html and css related, although since the align 
attribute is part of html it looked to be most safe to post in the html 
group. Since so. didn't like it there I posted it here and noticed this 
in advance not to get flamed about cross-posting or whatever.
Why is that? If I don't want the page to be valid xhtml that is my 
choice, and if you don't want to help me because of that that is your 
choice, but please don't judge for everybody else. I usually tend to 
make things valid however but it should be worth the effort. It will 
take to many hours of work for now and I think the problem is not 
related to that, most of it is valid and 6 errors are related to one 
thing that is wrong. Since I can't edit the html directly it will be 
time consuming to change such a thing.
Well I have no clue, so I don't fix that then."
    @lws4art: "<quote>
Maybe you should learn what crossposting and multiposting is before you 
continue your faux pas...
<url>
Crossposting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<url>
Multiposting vs Crossposting
Take care,
Jonathan
-
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
<url>"
    @doraymeRidThis: "<quote>
Yes, that is the point. Now we know it is either something to do with 
your doctype or stylesheets. So this is what to do: if you are confident 
about the your doctype (I would *not* be with IE), prepare a test case 
that elimninates one of the 8 css sheets you have and see if the problem 
disappears. And so on up to and including the embedded css. Once you 
track the sheet down, the rest should be easy, and if it is not, come 
back here with the minimal case that exhibits the problem.
dorayme"
    @nospam: "dorayme schreef:
<quote>
I have to give the credits to BootNic for pointing me on the style 
reset. The robots and the trip itself was a lot of fun indeed :-)"
    @nospam: "Jonathan N. Little schreef:
<quote>
Read that second post and was quite astonished. "outside the USA most of 
us pay per second of downloading time", in every country I have stayed 
(and haven't been to USA ever) it was all broadband connections with 
unlimited download (years ago). In the past (6 - 10 years ago) people 
had dial-up connections (my small village was actually one of the last 
to get broadband access) but even then with plain text messages and only 
a limited amount of crosspost it hardly matters compared to all movies 
and content rich news and entertainment people download (on average!). I 
think it is really a bit dated. Ok, some parts of the world might be a 
bit behind but they might also have a very limited amount of computers.
However I understand the point made, it is a good practice and I should 
strive to conform to it. However the message was already posted in the 
other group before I knew from the feedback it was better to post it here."
{'source': 'USENET', 'other_information': '{"reply_count": 8, "forum_name": "comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets.20150116.mbox"}', 'file': 'data/output/usenet-comp.infosystems.parquet'}