@none: "   I just read that they are doing a "fall of the hulks" sort of thing, 
and heard a rumor that they are starting up "Incredible Hulk" again.  I 
currently get a sub to "Hulk", which started out as "Incredible Hulk". 
I have to admit that my enjoyment of the title lagged quite a bit when 
the title changed, and became a lot less "Incredible".
   Can anyone confirm that Incredible will be publishing again soon?"
    @timturnip: "On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:38:01 -0800 (PST), Scott Eiler
<quote>
And not only that, but both Hulk and Incredible Hulk are running
concurrently, with the former title still starring the red Hulk.  But
even that's about to change with the launch of a new "Red Hulk"
on-going series, so then there'll be three.  A long-time Hulk fan
could be forgiven for feeling overwhelmed, as we've also been recently
awarded no less than two Sons of Hulk and two all-new She-Hulks.  I'm
waiting for the addition of a Deadpool Hulk and that'll be about
perfect."
    @ANIM8Rfsk: "<quote>
Did they ever say who Red Hulk is?
As Adam West as Bruce Wayne as Batman said in "Smack in the Middle"  
the second half of the 1966 BATMAN series pilot when Jill St. John 
as Molly as Robin as Molly fell into the Batmobile's atomic pile:  
"What a terrible way to go-go""
    @timturnip: "On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 05:50:36 -0800 (PST), Scott Eiler
<quote>
Yes, in fact Fall Of The Hulks: Gamma strongly hints at the identities
of both the Red Hulk and Red She-Hulk (which, if true, will be a
conclusion somewhat predictable to long-time Hulk devotees)."
    @baines: "Tim Turnip <email_address> wrote in 
news:<email_address>:
<quote>
  By this point, does anyone care anyway?  Other than just idle
curiosity, that is."
    @ANIM8Rfsk: "<quote>
Well, I cared enough to ask, but not enough to read the books.
As Adam West as Bruce Wayne as Batman said in "Smack in the Middle"  
the second half of the 1966 BATMAN series pilot when Jill St. John 
as Molly as Robin as Molly fell into the Batmobile's atomic pile:  
"What a terrible way to go-go""
    @baines: "Anim8rFSK <email_address> wrote in news:ANIM8Rfsk-799C2F.19311704022010
@news.dc1.easynews.com:
<quote>
  Yeah, I count that as idle curiosity.  Something reminds someone
that there is a Red Hulk.  That someone remembers "Hey, they
never revealed his identity before I stopped caring. I wonder if
they've revealed it since."  That someone then asks someone else."
    @timturnip: "On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:44:57 -0600, Billy Bissette
<quote>
It's got me reading the Hulk books again, for really the first time
since the Peter David years (though admittedly much of that lapse was
due to being out of comics altogether).  My interest lies in the
notion that Marvel is seemingly invested in making the Red Hulk (and
his burgeoning franchise) a lasting part of the Marvel Universe and
not just some temporary switcheroo.
The thing I don't like about Red Hulk is not his obscured identity but
his obscured motivations.  It's been an awful lot of time to have a
character in the spotlight without being able to discern why he's
doing any of the things he's doing."
    @ANIM8Rfsk: "<quote>
Yeah, that would be just about right.
As Adam West as Bruce Wayne as Batman said in "Smack in the Middle"  
the second half of the 1966 BATMAN series pilot when Jill St. John 
as Molly as Robin as Molly fell into the Batmobile's atomic pile:  
"What a terrible way to go-go""
    @none: " >  By this point, does anyone care anyway?  Other than just idle
 >curiosity, that is.
   No, I don't, and I've been subscribing and reading monthly for 5+ 
years.  I liked Planet Hulk a LOT, but then I didn't get the whole story 
of World War Hulk in the issues that followed.  Now I'm just annoyed 
with the whole Red Hulk thing.
   However, I will admit to enjoying most of the one page "red, green, 
blue" hulk funnies on the last page, where they make fun of themselves. 
  Not quite enough to make up for the lackluster Red Hulk, but it helps.
   So for me, I'm really hoping this Red Hulk thing ends quickly, and 
they get back to publishing Incredible Hulk (not Hulk), with something 
interesting, like Planet Hulk was."
    @grinningdemon: "<quote>
Incredible Hulk now has a Hulk-less Bruce Banner fighting with his
genius and training Skaar to kill him when he eventually hulks out
again...which will probably be by the end of the Fall of the Hulks."
    @baines: "Ohioguy <email_address> wrote in news:4ggbn.89982$<email_address>:
<quote>
  As long as people keep buying Red Hulk, they'll keep publishing Red
Hulk."
    @timturnip: "On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:22:31 -0600, Billy Bissette
<quote>
The good news is, Incredible Hulk also continues to be published.  It
sucks to have options, doesn't it?"
    @jriddle73: "<quote>
Pak really outdid himself with Planet Hulk, a very Bill
Mantlo-type story, but he apparently overdid himself
with it, as well. World War Hulk was just idiocy
squared, a bad idea from to to bottom, compounded
immeasurably by Pak's idiotic tinkering with the nature of
the Hulk. The perfect recipe for making the Hulk totally
irrelevant. I said so at the time, and, looking at things as
they are now, it sounds as if I actually understated the
case."
    @none: " >The good news is, Incredible Hulk also continues to be published.  It
 >sucks to have options, doesn't it?
   I'll have an option as soon as it shows up in the "subscribe to" list 
on Marvel.com - currently, the only title there is "Hulk".  I can switch 
the title over to any title they show on the Marvel website that you can 
directly subscribe to.  I would have switched it over to She-Hulk, but 
alas, they cancelled that title as well."
{'source': 'USENET', 'other_information': '{"reply_count": 14, "forum_name": "rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe.20140806.mbox"}', 'file': 'data/output/usenet-rec.arts.parquet'}