Produced by Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) LATER QUEENS OF THE FRENCH STAGE [Illustration: _Sophie Arnould._ _Printed by J. B. Grange_ (_Wallace Collection_)] LATER QUEENS OF THE FRENCH STAGE BY H. NOEL WILLIAMS AUTHOR OF âQUEENS OF THE FRENCH STAGE,â âMADAME RÃCAMIER AND HER FRIENDS,â âMADAME DE POMPADOUR,â âMADAME DE MONTESPAN,â âMADAME DU BARRY,â ETC. [Illustration: colophon] LONDON AND NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS 45 ALBEMARLE STREET, W. 1906 TO A. M. BROADLEY CONTENTS PAGE I. SOPHIE ARNOULD 1 II. MADEMOISELLE GUIMARD 99 III. MADEMOISELLE RAUCOURT 143 IV. MADAME DUGAZON 195 V. MADEMOISELLE CONTAT 223 VI. MADAME SAINT-HUBERTY 263 INDEX 345 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS SOPHIE ARNOULD (_Photogravure_) _Frontispiece_ _After the painting by_ GREUZE _in the Wallace Collection at Hertford House_ GLUCK _To face page_ 56 _After the painting by_ N. F. DUPLESSIS SOPHIE ARNOULD â 72 _From an engraving by_ PRUDâHON _after the drawing by_ CÅURÃ MARIE MADELEINE GUIMARD â 112 _From an engraving by_ GERVAIS _after the painting by_ BOUCHER MLLE. RAUCOURT â 160 _From an engraving by_ RUOTTE _after the painting by_ GROS, _in the collection of_ Mr. A. M. BROADLEY MADAME DUGAZON â 202 _From an engraving by_ MONSALDI _after the painting by_ JEAN BAPTISTE ISABEY LOUISE CONTAT â 240 _After the painting by_ DUTERTRE MADAME SAINT-HUBERTY â 288 _From an engraving by_ COLINET _after the painting by_ LE MOINE LATER QUEENS OF THE FRENCH STAGE I SOPHIE ARNOULD In her unpublished _MÃ©moires_,[1] which she began, but never completed, and only a few pages of which--possibly all that she wrote--have been preserved, Sophie Arnould tells us that she was born in 1745, âin the same alcove in which Admiral Coligny had been assassinated two hundred years before.â As a matter of fact, the celebrated singer was born on February 14, 1745, and it was not until some years after her birth that her parents removed to the HÃ´tel de Ponthieu, Rue BÃ©thisy, then known as the Rue des FossÃ©s-Saint-Germain lâAuxerrois.[2] Sophieâs parents belonged to the upper _bourgeoisie_, and at the time of her birth appear to have been in comfortable circumstances. Her father, Jean Arnould, was a worthy man, whose worldly ambitions were limited to securing a comfortable competence, retiring from business, and purchasing some Government or municipal office and the social distinction which went with it. Her mother, however, had received an excellent education, âwhich, joined to her natural intelligence,â says Sophie, ârendered her in society the most amiable and interesting of women.â She affected literary society and numbered among her friends and acquaintances Voltaire, Fontenelle, who, a few days before his death, called to show her the manuscript of one of the great Corneilleâs tragedies, Piron, the Comte de Caylus, Moncrif, the AbbÃ© (afterwards the Cardinal) de Bernis, Diderot, and dâAlembert. So impressed was Madame Arnould by the conversation of these celebrities, that she determined to make her little girl a prodigy of learning. Sophieâs education began almost as soon as she was out of her cradle. She was precocious and learned quickly. At four, she declares, she could read; at seven she wrote better than at the time of penning her _MÃ©moires_, and at the same age could read music at sight without any difficulty. The infant prodigy was petted and spoiled to the top of her bent, âdressed up in silk and satin, with marcasite necklace and flowers in her hair.â When the child was four or five years old she attracted the attention of the Princess of Modena, wife of the Prince de Conti, from whom, however, she was separated. Madame de Conti, lonely and bored, without husband, lover, child, or occupation, took a violent fancy to Sophie, and begged Madame Arnould to let her have the little girl to live with her. Madame Arnould consented, and Sophie became the plaything of the eccentric princess, âwho dragged her about everywhere as she might have her little dog,â now nursing her on her knee, now setting her down to the harpsichord, now taking her visiting in her carriage, now summoning her to her salon to amuse her guests, and anon, if she happened to be in an ill-humour, turning her out into the ante-chamber to play with the yawning lackeys. No pains were spared with Sophieâs education, and the best masters of the day were engaged to teach her all the arts and accomplishments. Before she was twelve, she could both write and speak her own language correctly--a rare accomplishment in those days outside literary circles,[3] and was familiar with Latin or Italian; while she could sing like a professional. Her musical talents were not destined to remain long hidden. When the time for her first communion drew near, she was placed in the Ursuline Convent at Saint-Denis, the _supÃ©rieure_ of which was a fellow townswoman and friend of Madame Arnould. Here she sang in the choir, and with such astonishing success that Court and town flocked to hear her, and Voltaire, from his retreat at Ferney, wrote to his little friend a letter congratulating her on her twofold success as a vocalist and a first communicant; an epistle which Madame Arnould, who did not share the Patriarchâs views on matters of religion, promptly committed to the fire, although the Duc de Nivernais begged for a copy on his knees. On leaving Saint-Denis, Sophie returned to live with Madame de Conti, who, delighted by the notice which she had attracted, provided her with the most celebrated music-masters to be found in France: Balbatre gave her lessons on the harpsichord, and the famous JÃ©liotte--JÃ©liotte, the pride of the Opera!--JÃ©liotte, âthe happy and discreet conqueror of all the fair ladies in Paris!â--condescended to sing with her. Sophie proved herself worthy of her teachers. It was then the fashion, among ladies of rank, to do penance during Lent by retiring to one of the many convents in Paris or its neighbourhood. Some of the visitors were, of course, sincerely desirous of benefiting by the services, the conversation of the nuns, and the opportunities for meditation which these peaceful abodes afforded; but to the majority the practice would appear to have been regarded merely as a kind of rest cure. There was nothing at all austere or conventual about the life for such as these. They rose late, walked in the gardens, dined on plain but well-cooked food, received visits from their friends, attended a service or two, supped, and retired early to bed; and if their souls did not greatly benefit, the early hours and simple fare worked wonders with their complexions. They had, too, an opportunity of listening to some very beautiful singing; for, during Holy Week, the convents vied with one another in engaging the finest voices of the Opera to reinforce their choirs, and the services of such singers as JÃ©liotte, ChassÃ©, and Mlles. Fel, Chevalier, and Anna Tonelli were always in great request. At the beginning of Holy Week 1757, Madame de Conti, who, as became an Italian princess, was very strict in her observance of Lent, arrived at the Abbey of PanthÃ©mont, where she found the community in a state of consternation. The convent in question had not deemed it necessary to enlist the services of any of the stars of the Opera, as it numbered among its inmates a nun with an exceptionally beautiful voice. But alas! she had suddenly been taken ill, and it was feared that it would be impossible to replace her. Half fashionable Paris would be coming on Holy Wednesday to hear the _TenebrÃ¦_ sung, and there would be no one capable of singing it. The abbess fell upon Madame de Contiâs neck and wept tears of mortification. The princess bade her not despair, told her of the talent of her little _protÃ©gÃ©e_, and suggested that she should be sent for; a proposal to which the grateful abbess readily consented. Holy Wednesday came, and with it a great crowd of visitors. At the beginning of the service Sophie was a little nervous, but quickly recovered her presence of mind, and sang so divinely that her hearers were enraptured, and some, in spite of the solemnity of the place, could not refrain from applause. The following day there was not a vacant seat in the church; while on Good Friday the doors were literally besieged, and more than two hundred carriages were turned back. Those who had succeeded in gaining admission had every reason to congratulate themselves on their good fortune, for Sophie sang the _Miserere_ of Lalande, and with such exquisite pathos that there was scarcely a dry eye in the congregation.[4] Paris was as delighted as if it had found a new fashion. All the Faubourg Saint-Germain wended its way to the HÃ´tel de Conti to congratulate the princess upon the possession of this little wonder with her angelic voice. The Court was scarcely less interested and, finally, the Queen, the pious Marie Leczinska, who lived in a little world of her own and seldom troubled herself about what was happening in the one outside, expressed a desire to see Sophie. âOn your account,â remarked Madame de Conti to the radiant girl, âher Majesty condescends to remember my existence.â (The said Majesty did not approve of ladies who lived apart from their husbands.) Nevertheless, the Queen had to be obeyed, and so the princess, who was proud of her _protÃ©gÃ©e_ and, in truth, far from displeased with so striking a tribute to her discernment, ordered her coach and set out for Versailles. On reaching the ChÃ¢teau, Madame de Conti and Sophie were conducted to Marie Leczinskaâs apartments, where the Queen almost immediately joined them. Her Majesty smiled very graciously upon the girl, and kissed her forehead, murmuring: âShe is indeed very pretty!â Then several portfolios of music were put before her, and she was bidden to choose what she would like to sing, and not to be afraid; a somewhat unnecessary exhortation, since never was there a more self-possessed young person. Sophie, quite undismayed by the presence of her royal auditor, forthwith assailed a very difficult piece, and had scarcely finished when the Queen, who was herself a musician of no mean attainments, remarked to Madame de Conti: âI should like to have her, cousin; you will give her up to me, will you not?â meaning that she wished to make her one of her Musicians of the Chamber. Afterwards refreshments were brought in, and the Queen, having complimented the young singer and bestowed upon her a friendly pat with her fan, took her departure. But there was another Queen of France: Madame de Pompadour, to wit, who had already expressed a wish to hear Sophie sing; a wish which could no more be ignored than that of Marie Leczinska. On the morrow of the interview with the Queen, Madame du Hausset, the favouriteâs _femme de chambre_, presented herself at the HÃ´tel de Conti, bearing a letter from her mistress to the princess, requesting the loan of little Mlle. Arnould till the evening. This request caused Madame de Conti considerable embarrassment. What one called then â_les grandes convenances_â forbade her to present Sophie to both the crowned and the uncrowned Queen of France. On the other hand, a refusal would mortally offend the latter, who was an extremely awkward person to offend, as a great many people, from Princes of the Blood and Ministers of State to ballad-mongers, had found to their cost. The poor lady was at a loss what to do. Finally, she sought refuge in a compromise. Sophie should go to Versailles again, but, on this occasion, not in her patronessâs company, but in that of her mother. So Madame Arnould was sent for and told to take her daughter, as from Madame de Conti, to the favourite; and the princess congratulated herself on having emerged with credit from a very embarrassing situation. Madame de Pompadour received her visitor very graciously, and remarked that âmother and daughter were the very picture of one another,â after which, saying that the King had sent for her, and that she would return in a few minutes, she left them to themselves. In the room in which they sat were two magnificent harpsichords, one of which had been decorated with charming pictures by Boucher. This instrument attracted Sophieâs attention, and, while Madame de Pompadour was absent, she stepped up to it, ran her fingers over the keys, and began to sing. The marchioness, returning at that moment, listened entranced to the girlâs singing until she had finished, when she exclaimed: âMy dear child, _le bon Dieu_ has made you for the theatre; you were born, formed as one ought to be for it: you will not tremble before the public.â Then their hostess conducted them through her apartments, where Sophie appears to have been particularly struck by the favouriteâs sumptuous bed, with its green and gold hangings and gold fringes, raised, like a throne, upon a daÃ¯s, and enclosed within a semi-circular balustrade of gold and marble, the exact counter-part, in fact, of the Queenâs own couch. The marchioness begged her to sing again, and, delighted with her sweet voice, smilingly inquired who were her masters; to change countenance, however, when she heard their names, for they were the same whom she had engaged for her idolised little daughter, Alexandrine dâÃtoiles, who had died some years before. As Sophie and her mother were taking their leave, Madame de Pompadour drew the latter aside, and said in a low voice: âIf the Queen should ask for your daughter for the music of the Chamber, do not have the imprudence to consent. The King goes from time to time to these little family concerts, and, instead of giving this child to the Queen, you will have made a present of her to the King.â Then she turned to Sophie, and, having examined the lines in the girlâs forehead and hand, said to her gravely: âYou will make a charming princess!â A few days after these visits, Madame Arnould received a communication from the Gentlemen of the Chamber to the effect that her Majesty had deigned to admit the demoiselle Sophie Arnould into her private company of musicians and singers, at a salary of one hundred louis; Madame Arnould received a similar appointment, at the same salary as her daughter. Hardly had the good lady had time to master the contents of this document, when there came a second of a much less welcome nature. It was a _lettre de cachet_, informing her that by the express order of the King, the demoiselle Sophie Arnould was attached to his Majestyâs company of musicians, and, in particular, to his theatre of the Opera. On reading this, the poor mother burst into tears. She had no objection to her daughter singing before the virtuous Marie Leczinska, but the Opera was a very different matter. No young girl could hope to preserve her virtue for long at the AcadÃ©mie Royale de Musique, the rules of which emancipated its members from parental control. Rather than see her child ruined, she resolved to consign her to a convent, and, accordingly, hurried off to Madame de Conti to implore her assistance. Madame de Conti promised to do all in her power to save Sophie from the danger which threatened her, and took the girl to her friend the Abbess of PanthÃ©mont. âI bring you,â said she, âthis young girl, of whom the Gentlemen of the Chamber wish to make an actress; a decision which does not meet with my approval. Conceal her for me in some little corner of your convent, until I have had an opportunity of speaking to the King.â To which the discreet abbess replied: âPrincess, salvation is possible in every profession. I cannot bring myself to thwart the wishes of the King, to whom I owe my abbey. Go and see the abbesses of Saint-Antoine and Val-de-GrÃ¢ce: perhaps, in this matter, they will have more courage than myself.â Madame de Conti tried Saint-Antoine and Val-de-GrÃ¢ce; but at both she received the same answer as at PanthÃ©mont; and was reluctantly forced to the conclusion that further attempts in the same direction offered but very small prospect of success. There remained, however, another way of escape: marriage. Sophie had an admirer--a devoted and, what was more to the point, an eligible admirer--a certain Chevalier de MalÃ©zieux, who asked nothing better than to give her the protection of his name. In his day, M. de MalÃ©zieux had been a noted _vainqueur de dames_, but that day, alas! was long past, and though he strove manfully to repair the ravages of time by the aid of an ingenious toilette, the only result of his efforts was to give him the appearance of a majestic ruin. Madame de Conti had, at first, regarded this veteran dandyâs attentions to her _protÃ©gÃ©e_ with scant favour, and, meeting the old gentleman one day at the Arnouldsâ house, charitably related for his benefit the story of a prince of her own family, who had imprudently contracted a marriage at the age of eighty, and had died the same night. Still, a day or two later, she told Sophie that she might do worse than take charge of the chevalier and his infirmities, provided that he would agree to settle his whole fortune upon her; and after the arrival of the _lettre de cachet_ from Versailles, and her abortive attempts to secure the girlâs admission to a convent, actually proposed to send for M. de MalÃ©zieux, and have the marriage celebrated there and then. Madame Arnould, however, did not altogether approve of such haste, while Sophie shed tears enough to melt the heart of the sternest parent; and the matter, therefore, remained in abeyance. Nevertheless, the chevalier, encouraged by Madame de Conti, pressed his suit with ardour, dyed his eyebrows, rouged his cheeks, âshaved twice a day,â and, one fine morning, presented himself at the Arnouldsâ house, bearing the draft of a marriage-contract, in which the whole of his property, amounting to some 40,000 livres a year, was settled upon Sophie. The prospect of so advantageous a settlement in life for her daughter was a temptation greater than any self-respecting mother could be expected to resist, and though M. Arnould declined to force the girl into a marriage which was distasteful to her, his wife lost no opportunity of sounding the praises of M. de MalÃ©zieux--or rather of M. de MalÃ©zieuxâs income--in Sophieâs reluctant ear. That young lady, however, only pouted, and when her antiquated admirer strove to soften her heart towards him by citing the example of Madame de Maintenon, who, when a young and beautiful girl, no older than Sophie herself, had espoused the crippled poet Scarron, replied, laughing: âI will make a similar marriage to-morrow, on condition that my husband will begin by being a cripple, and end by being a king.â[5] And so poor M. de MalÃ©zieuxâs contract was never signed, and no alternative now remained for Madame Arnould but to allow Sophie to enter the Opera, trusting that, for some time to come, her services would only be required for the Concerts of Sacred Music which were given during Lent. This hope, however, was not realised, for the directors of the Opera happened to be just at that time on the look-out for some novelty to divert the attention of their patrons from the mediocrity of the pieces with which they had lately been provided, and, accordingly, on December 15, 1757, the young singer was called upon to make her first bow to the public. It was a very modest _dÃ©but_--merely the singing of an air introduced into an opera-ballet by Mouret, entitled _Les Amours des Dieux_.[6] Nevertheless, restricted as were the girlâs opportunities on this occasion, she quickly became a public favourite; indeed, the eagerness to see and hear her was so great that on the evenings on which she appeared, the doors of the theatre were besieged, and FrÃ©ron sarcastically observed that âhe doubted whether people would give themselves so much trouble to enter Paradise.â âMlle. Arnould,â says the _Mercure de France_ of the following January, which was but the feeble echo of the enthusiasm of the public, âcontinues her _dÃ©but_ in _Les Amours des Dieux_, with great and well-deserved success. She attracts the public to such an extent that the Thursday has become the most brilliant day at the Opera, altogether effacing the Friday. The second air which she sings affords her more scope for the display of her talent than the first. She possesses at once a charming face, a beautiful voice, and warmth of sentiment. She is full of expression and of soul. Her voice is not only tender, but passionate. In a word, she has received all the gifts of Nature, and, in order to perfect them, she receives all the resources of Art.â At the beginning of the New Year, Sophie appeared in a second piece, called _La ProvenÃ§ale_, in which she confirmed the favourable impression she had created in _Les Amours des Dieux_. âMlle. Arnould,â says the _Mercure_, âsang the _ProvenÃ§ale_ with the ingenuous charm of her age. In this rÃ´le she had only one important song. It is the monologue (â_Mer paisible_â...), into which she threw all the expression that it demanded. The crowded houses which have followed it up to Lent are proofs of the pleasure which she gives the public.â In the following April the young actress reaped the reward of her success by receiving her first important part, that of Venus in _ÃnÃ©e et Lavinie_, a tragic opera in five acts by Fontenelle, music by Dauvergne.[7] The confidence reposed in her was not misplaced, and she received as much applause as she had previously obtained in ariettas and pastorals. Such was her success indeed that she was speedily promoted to the principal rÃ´le, and the admiring critic of the _Mercure_, who had already spoken in high terms of the new singerâs rendering of Venus, consecrated to her the following article: âOn Tuesday, April 13, Mlle. Arnould played the rÃ´le of Lavinie for the first time. Her success was complete. The tragic indeed seems to be the _genre_ most suited to her. It is, at any rate, that in which she has appeared to most advantage. Her gestures are noble without arrogance and expressive without grimaces. Her acting is vivacious and animated, and yet never departs from the natural. This excellent actress has already partially corrected herself of a kind of slowness, which is only suitable to the arietta. Bad examples had led her astray. We invite her to pay heed to no one but herself, if she wishes to approach nearer and nearer to perfection.â âSo great a success renders it almost needless for us to observe that Mlle. Arnould has retained this rÃ´le; that she has brought back the public to the Opera; finally, that she has adorned _ÃnÃ©e et Lavinie_ with an appearance of novelty.â Some months later the _Mercure_ returns to the subject of _ÃnÃ©e et Lavinie_, and observes that Mlle. Arnould played the latter part âwith that intelligence, that dignity, those natural and touching graces which enchant the public.â âHappily,â continues the critic, âshe has depended upon her own impulses before allowing herself to be intimidated by all the little prejudices of the art. Model as a _dÃ©butante_, she reanimates the lyric stage and appears to communicate her soul to those who have the modesty and the talent to imitate her.â Towards the end of June of that year, Sophie created a trio of small parts in an opera-ballet in three acts, entitled _Les FÃªtes de Paphos_.[8] CollÃ©, that most exacting of critics, is very severe on this piece, but, at the same time, has nothing but praise for Sophie, who appears to have covered herself with glory. âAt the first representation,â he writes, âthe music of this ballet was thought pitiable, and it would not have survived six, if it had not been for a young actress who made her first appearance this winter, and who, in four months, has become the queen of the theatre. Never have I seen combined in the same actress more grace, more truth of sentiment, dignity of expression, intelligence, and fire. Never have I seen grief more charmingly expressed. She can depict the deepest horror without her countenance losing one feature of its beauty. She would be twice as great an actress as Mlle. Le Maure,[9] if she only possessed two-thirds of her voice, and Mlle. Le Maure will always be regarded as a great artiste. I speak of Mlle. Sophie Arnould, who is not yet nineteen years old.â[10] The voice of Sophie Arnould was very far from being a powerful one. âNature,â she says in her _MÃ©moires_, âhad seconded this taste [the taste for music] with a tolerably agreeable voice, weak but sonorous, though not extremely so. But it was sound and well-balanced, so that, with a clear pronunciation and without any defect save a slight lisp, which could hardly be considered a fault, not a word of what I sang was lost, even in the most spacious buildings.â She might have added, without fear of contradiction, that her voice was infinitely sweet and that she possessed the gift of imparting to it wonderful pathos and expression. âShe brought to harmony, emotion, to the song, compassion, to the play of the voice, sentiment. She charmed the ear and touched the heart. All the domain of the tender drama, all the graces of terror, were hers. She possessed the cry, and the tears, and the sigh, and the caresses of the pathetic.... What art, what genius, must there have been to wrest so many harmonies from a contemptible voice, a feeble throat.â[11] Another important factor in Sophieâs success is to be found in the fact that she was not only a great singer, but an accomplished actress, which great singers rarely are. When Madame Arnould had found that she had no alternative but to allow her daughter to enter the Opera, she had, like a sensible woman, decided that, since to the Opera Sophie must go, nothing which could possibly make for her success in her profession should be neglected, and had sent her to take lessons in singing from Mlle. Fel, and in acting from Mlle. Clairon. The girl had not failed to benefit by the teaching of the famous _tragÃ©dienne_, and her command of facial expression and the dignity and grace of her movements would have reflected credit on a veteran member of the ComÃ©die-FranÃ§aise, while for a _dÃ©butante_ of the lyric stage they were little short of extraordinary. And yet, with all her vocal and histrionic talents, it may be doubted whether Sophie would so speedily have attained the dazzling position in the estimation of both the public and the critics which was now hers, had she not been fortunate enough to possess physical attractions of a high order. If we are to judge of her appearance solely by her portraits by La Tour and Greuze, she must have been a very pretty woman. In the former, which the excellent engraving by Bourgeois de la RichardiÃ¨re has helped to popularise, Sophie is depicted at the moment when she is about to sing. Her lips are parted; her eyes, fine and full of expression, and surmounted by arched eyebrows, are turned imploringly heavenward; while her face, which is oval in shape, with small and regular features, wears a look at once charming and pathetic. In the Greuze portrait--now in the Wallace Collection at Hertford House--the actress is dressed in white, with a large black hat decorated with a white plume. Her elbow rests on a chair, her chin on the back of her hand; her expression is nonchalant and slightly _ennuyÃ©_. These portraits, as we have already remarked, are those of a very pretty woman; but it should be added that the pen-portraits which some of her contemporaries have left of Sophie are not altogether in accord with the crayon of La Tour or the brush of Greuze--nor yet with the description which the lady gives us of her own charms[12]--and we are, therefore, inclined to think that both artists have rather idealised their subject, a practice not uncommon with portrait-painters in the eighteenth century or, for that matter, in much later times. CollÃ© and Grimm, it is true, both speak of Sophie as beautiful, though without condescending to particulars; but, on the other hand, Madame VigÃ©e Lebrun asserts that the beauty of her face was spoiled by her mouth, while one of the inspectors of the Lieutenant of Police describes her skin as âblack and dry.â That curious work _LâEspion anglais_ confirms the artist and the inspector: âTo tell the truth, there is nothing remarkable about her; her face is long and thin; she has a villainously ugly mouth, prominent teeth, standing out from the gums, and a black and greasy skin.â The writer adds, however, that she possessed âtwo fine eyes,â a feature which also impressed Madame Lebrun, who says that they gave their owner âa piquant look,â and were âindicative of the wit which had made her celebrated.â But two fine eyes, as one of her biographers very justly observes, count for much, especially when animated by the intelligence, the feeling, and the passion which belonged to Sophie; and no sooner did she appear upon the stage than a host of _soupirants_ gathered about her. For some months, however, they sighed in vain. The guardian of the Golden Fleece was not more vigilant or more awe-inspiring than Madame Arnould. Every evening she escorted her daughter to the theatre, remained in her dressing-room while the mysteries of her toilette were being performed, accompanied her to the corner of the stage, and then waited in the wings until the young actress made her exit, when she again took charge of her. She seemed to have as many eyes as Argus himself. If an admirer bolder than the rest ventured to approach Sophie, before he had uttered half a dozen words down would swoop the watchful mother, with a freezing: â_Allons! laissez la petite en repos, sâil vous plait, Monsieur!_â before which the luckless gallant fled incontinently. If a _poulet_ were despatched, it was invariably intercepted and returned to the sender, with a message which made him feel supremely foolish. âShe is not a woman at all,â exclaimed the indignant Duc de Fronsac, after one of these rebuffs; âshe is a veritable watch-dog!â But even the most intelligent of watch-dogs cannot always discriminate between friend and foe. The danger came from a quarter whence the poor mother least expected it. She herself admitted the wolf into the sheepfold. For some time past, matters had not gone well with the Arnoulds; M. Arnould had become involved in some disastrous speculations, which had swallowed up the greater part of his fortune, and a long and serious illness had made further inroads upon his resources. Accordingly, about the time that Sophie made her _dÃ©but_ at the Opera, he removed from the Rue du Louvre to the HÃ´tel de Lisieux, Rue FossÃ©s-Saint-Germain-lâAuxerrois, and converted his new residence into an inn, where âpersons from the provinces were accommodated at thirty sols a night.â[13] To this inn there came, one fine day in the spring of 1758, a handsome young man of about five and twenty, who informed the Arnoulds that his name was Dorval, that he was an artist by profession, and that he had just arrived from Normandy, to study painting and get a play produced. M. Dorval was a model guest. He never grumbled about his food or his wine, never questioned the amount of his bills, never returned home with an unsteady gait or accompanied by undesirable acquaintances, as did so many young provincials who aspired to imitate the vices of the fine gentlemen of the capital. And then he was so ingenuous, so friendly, and had such charming manners. He knew nothing of the ways of Paris, he said, but, _morbleu!_ he had heard that it was a terribly wicked place and full of snares and pitfalls for unwary youth. Would M. Arnould do him the favour of taking care of his purse? Would Madame have the complaisance to do the same for his lace? Ah! it was indeed a fortunate hour which had led him to the HÃ´tel de Lisieux! The good people might have thought it a little singular that a young man with so well-filled a purse and such fine lace should have selected so unpretentious a hostelry as theirs for a lengthy stay; also that, although he never looked askance at the menus of the HÃ´tel de Lisieux, he was constantly receiving hampers containing fish, game, truffles, and choice wines, which, he said, came from his fond parents in Normandy, and begged his hosts and their daughter to share with him. But M. Dorval quite disarmed suspicion--if any existed--by reading the letters he received from home to the sympathetic Madame Arnould, and, besides, innkeepers have more important matters requiring their attention than the investigation of the private affairs of their guests, particularly those who give no trouble, pay regularly, and are so agreeable and open-handed as was this young Norman. M. Dorval overwhelmed Madame Arnould with attention; he had literary tastes, and recognised in her a kindred soul. To Sophie he was also attentive, though not more so than good-breeding required. In a short time he had become quite a friend of the family, dining and supping with them, escorting the ladies to the Opera and home again at the conclusion of the performance, and spending the rest of the evening in their company. One night, after playing a couple of games of backgammon with M. Arnould, Dorval pleaded an insupportable headache and retired to his modest apartment. Soon afterwards a man in a lackeyâs livery entered the house by means of a false key, knocked at his door, and informed him that all was ready. Dorval emerged from his room, and was joined by Sophie. The pair crept noiselessly down the stairs, across the courtyard and into the street, at the corner of which a coach was awaiting them. Dorval helped the girl in and took his seat beside her; the driver cracked his whip; the coach rolled away. Sophie was carried off! Terrible was the consternation at the HÃ´tel de Lisieux the following morning. Madame Arnould was like one distraught; M. Arnould, who had not yet fully recovered from his recent illness, had a serious relapse. As for the Chevalier de MalÃ©zieux, when the news was communicated to him he took to his bed and never left it again, dying of grief--or, perhaps, of wounded vanity. In Paris, nothing else was talked of but the elopement of the queen of the Opera, and many were the wagers made about the identity of the fortunate individual who had borne away the coveted prize. All uncertainty was soon at an end. Two days later a letter was brought to the HÃ´tel de Lisieux, signed Louis, Comte de Brancas-Lauraguais, in which the writer offered his apologies to M. and Madame Arnould for the deception he had been obliged to practise upon them, and concluded by a formal promise to espouse their daughter--if he should ever become a widower! Madame Arnould dried her tears; M. Arnouldâs illness took a favourable turn. Since Sophie had been carried off, it was at least some consolation to learn that her abductor was a man of rank and wealth, and not a mere middle-class libertine; one, too, who, without doubt, was only prevented from giving his name and all that went with it to the object of his affection by the unfortunate circumstance that he was already provided with a wife. The worthy pair quite forgot their disgrace as they thought of the brilliant future which awaited their daughter, when the earth should have closed over poor, delicate Madame de Lauraguais--she lived till 1793, and her career was ended by the guillotine--and the countâs father, the old Duc de Lauraguais, should have gone the way of all flesh. Why, if the Fates were kind, ere many months had passed Sophie might be a countess--nay, a duchess! And so when, in due course, the prodigal daughter came, in a magnificent coach, to pay a visit of courtesy to her parents, she found, instead of tears and reproaches, caresses and pardon. Such was the moral code of the year of grace 1758! * * * * * Louis LÃ©on FÃ©licitÃ© de Brancas, Comte de Lauraguais, the first lover of Sophie Arnould, was a singular creature. âHe has all possible talents and all possible eccentricities,â wrote Voltaire, while CollÃ© describes him as âthe most serious fool in the kingdom.â His conceit was stupendous, his extravagance unbounded, his energy and versatility truly astonishing; he dabbled in everything and confidently believed that he excelled in whatever he might choose to undertake. Now he was composing tragedies intended to eclipse the masterpieces of Corneille and Racine; now making experiments in chemistry or anatomy which were to completely revolutionise those sciences; anon writing treatises in favour of inoculation, or endeavouring to bring about reforms in the theatre,[14] or riding in horse-races.[15] The violence with which he advocated his own views and his unsparing denunciations of all who ventured to differ from him, no matter how highly placed they might be, were perpetually bringing him into collision with the authorities, and he was several times exiled or imprisoned, only to resume his eccentric career the moment his punishment was at an end. The stories about him are numberless. On one occasion he wrote a comedy, entitled _La Cour du Roi PÃ©taud_, and coaxed his unsuspecting father to persuade the Comte de Saint-Florentin, the Minister of the Kingâs Household, to direct the ComÃ©die-Italienne to produce it. The order was on the point of being sent, when one of Saint-Florentinâs secretaries, happening to glance through the play, discovered, to his horror, that it was nothing less than a clever and biting satire on certain idiosyncrasies of his Most Christian Majesty Louis XV. himself, which, had it been represented, would most certainly have entailed banishment or the Bastille on all concerned in its production.[16] On another, he appeared, at four oâclock in the morning, at the lodging of two poor but talented young chemists, hustled them into a coach which was in waiting, and carried them off to SÃ¨vres, where he had a little house, in which he was in the habit of conducting his chemical experiments. Leading his companions to the laboratory, he addressed them as follows: âMessieurs, I wish you to make certain experiments; you will not leave this house until they are completed. Adieu; I shall return a week hence; you will find here everything you require; the servants have orders to attend to your wants; set to work.â So saying, he locked them in and went away. When he returned, the young chemists communicated to him the result of their labours, a discovery of some little importance, upon which he offered them a sum of money if they would agree to surrender to him the credit of having made it. âYou,â said he, âhave genius, and you want money. I have money, and I want genius. Let us strike a bargain. You shall have clothes to wear, and the glory shall be mine.â The young chemists consented, and Lauraguais went about boasting everywhere of the discovery he had made; and such, says Diderot, who tells the story, was his conceit that he soon succeeded in persuading himself that it was he to whom the credit really belonged, and that the young men had done nothing, except render him some merely mechanical assistance.[17] A third story of this extraordinary man is even more amusing than the preceding one. He appears to have had a theory that it would be possible for a person to support life entirely on a diet of forced fruit, provided that they were kept in the same temperature as was required for the production of what they consumed. He, therefore, persuaded one of his mistresses to allow herself to be shut up in a green-house and fed upon grapes, pine-apples, and so forth. This regimen, as may be supposed, did not agree with the lady, who soon declared that she was starving. âUngrateful girl!â exclaimed the disgusted count. âCan you complain of not having sufficient to eat--a trivial matter at best--while you are thus abundantly supplied with the luxuries that every one longs for?â So eccentric a character as Lauraguais was hardly calculated to make any woman happy, whether wife or mistress, and Sophie declared long afterwards that the count âhad given her two million kisses and caused her to shed four million tears.â Nevertheless, the _liaison_ was a tolerably long one, and, for the first three years, in the course of which the actress presented her lover with two children, we are assured that they were a most affectionate couple. By the police-reports of the time, Sophie is represented as an extravagant, grasping and avaricious woman, who cared for the count only so long as he was able and willing to gratify her innumerable caprices. Extravagant she no doubt was, but in regard to the other and graver charge, she would appear to have been maligned, that is to say, if we are to place any reliance in the following anecdote related by Diderot: âFor some days past a rumour has been current that Mlle. Arnould is dead, but it requires confirmation. In the meanwhile, the AbbÃ© Raynal has made me her funeral oration, by relating to me some fragments of a conversation which passed between her and Madame Portail [the wife of a president of the Parliament of Paris], in which, it appears, the latter played the part of a wanton, and the little actress that of an honest woman: ââIs it possible, Mademoiselle, that you have no diamonds?â ââNo, Madame, nor do I think them necessary for a little _bourgeoise_ of the Rue du Four.â ââThen, I presume, you have an allowance?â ââAn allowance! Why should I have that, Madame? M. de Lauraguais has a wife, children, a position to maintain, and I do not see that I could honourably accept the smallest part of a fortune which legitimately belongs to others.â ââOh, _par ma foi_! If I were in your place, I should leave him.â ââThat may be, but he likes me, and I like him. It may have been imprudent to take him, but, since I have done so, I shall keep him.â âI do not recollect the remainder of the conversation, but I have an idea that it was as dishonourable on the part of the presidentâs wife as honourable on the part of the actress.â[18] If Lauraguais really was so generous a protector as the police-reports and those writers who accept them would have us believe, it is certainly rather surprising to find on November 13, 1759, when the countâs passion for his mistress was undoubtedly at a very high temperature, the sieur Jean Baptiste Delamarre, tipstaff to the ChÃ¢telet de Paris, acting on behalf of the sieur Jean Baptiste Desper, perruquier, requiring the attendance of a commissary of police to witness an execution upon the goods of the demoiselle Madeleine Sophie Arnould, residing on the first floor of a house in the Rue de Richelieu. The said demoiselle, it appeared, had, twelve months before, taken the apartment in question, on a lease for three, six, or nine years, at an annual rental of 2400 livres; but the perruquier had not as yet seen any part of that sum. The goods seized were left in the charge of one Chevalier, fruiterer of the Rue TraversiÃ¨re, parish of Saint-Roch, from whom, we may presume, Sophie or Lauraguais subsequently redeemed them.[19] * * * * * After her elopement with the Comte de Lauraguais, Sophie became more than ever the idol of the public, and, for the next few years, might without exaggeration have parodied the famous _mot_ of _le Grand Monarque_ and exclaimed: â_LâOpÃ©ra, câest moi!_â Never, declared both public and critics, had the heroines of lyrical tragedy: the PsychÃ©s, the Proserpines, the ThisbÃ©s, the Iphises, and the ClÃ©opÃ¢tres, found so worthy a representative, and, no matter how insipid the opera which related the story of their woes might happen to be, the young singer was always sure of an enthusiastic reception. The patrons of the Palais-Royal seemed indeed as if they could not have enough of her; the directors, who owed to her popularity their increased receipts, were at her feet; every one adored her, or pretended to do so, and every one trembled before her epigrams. For side by side with her reputation as a singer and actress, Sophie was building up another reputation, and one which was to endure long after her stage triumphs had been forgotten: that of a _diseur de bons mots_, and of _bons mots_ of a peculiarly caustic kind. Few indeed were the wits of her time--and they were plentiful enough in the eighteenth century--who cared to cross swords with her, and such was the dread which her sharp tongue inspired that people imagined they detected a sarcasm lurking even in her most innocent remark, as the following incident will show. It was the custom of the Royal Family of France to dine in public (_au grand couvert_) on certain days of the week, and any respectably dressed person was permitted to view his Most Christian King partaking of his soup or his venison. In the days of Louis XIV., who, if his sister-in-law, the Princess Palatine, is to be believed, was in the habit of disposing at a single meal of as much as would suffice an ordinary person for at least three,[20] a dinner _au grand couvert_ must have been a spectacle worth going a long way to see; but as âthe Well-Belovedâ had no pretensions to emulate the gastronomic feats of his predecessor, the ceremony was now shorn of much of its former interest. Sophie, who had never yet enjoyed a near view of her sovereign, expressed one day a desire to attend one of these dinners, and a noble admirer, accordingly, conducted her to Versailles and into the Salon de Grand Couvert, where he placed her exactly opposite the King. His Majesty was in the act of raising his glass to his lips when he caught her eye. At the same moment Sophie remarked, half-involuntarily, to her companion: âThe King drinks!â Louis, who had heard much of the young ladyâs biting wit, was apparently under the impression that these simple words were intended as a covert jest at his expense, and became so embarrassed that every one present noticed it. Finally, he motioned to Sophie to withdraw, which she did, reflecting that a reputation as a wit sometimes has its drawbacks. To appreciate the witticisms of Sophie Arnould as they deserve, they must be read in the language in which they were uttered, for, when translated, the point of many of them--plays upon names and so forth--is lost. Not a few, too, of her most pungent sayings will scarcely bear reproduction in a modern work, for her wit was essentially the wit of the _coulisses_, whose frequenters were seldom at any pains to curb their tongues, even in the presence of the highest in the land. Fortunately, however, there still remain a considerable number of _mots_ which may be rendered into English with tolerable fidelity and without injuring the susceptibilities of even the most fastidious of readers. Sophie was an inveterate punster, a form of wit more appreciated in the eighteenth century than it is to-day. Here is one, however, which most of us will find it hard not to forgive. The Duc de Bouillon became so enamoured of the charms of a young singer named Mlle. Laguerre that, in the course of three months, he was reported to have squandered upon her no less a sum than 800,000 livres. This prodigality greatly exasperated the creditors of the duke, who complained to the King himself, with the result that the infatuated nobleman received orders to retire to his country-seat. A few days later, some one, meeting Sophie, happened to inquire after the health of Mlle. Laguerre. âI do not know how she is at present,â was the reply; âbut for the last month the poor child has been living entirely on soup (_bouillon_).â This same Mlle. Laguerre created the principal rÃ´le in Picciniâs _IphigÃ©nie en Tauride_, produced on January 22, 1781. At the first performance she sang admirably and contributed largely to the enthusiastic reception it received; but on the second evening her efforts were but too obviously inspired by wine. â_Mon Dieu!_â exclaimed Sophie. âThis is not Iphigenia in Tauris; it is Iphigenia in Champagne!â Mlle. Laguerre was only one among many of Sophieâs colleagues to suffer from the sharpness of that ladyâs tongue.
{'title': 'Later Queens of the French Stage by H. Noel Williams', 'source': 'Project Gutenberg', 'lang': 'en'}