From charlesabbott@example.net Thu Jan 08 13:17:39 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 34730 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2009 13:17:39 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2009 13:17:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 32009 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2009 13:17:39 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 31767 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2009 13:17:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 31758 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2009 13:17:38 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:17:38 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of charlesabbott@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:17:28 +0000
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f40so5460571fka.1
        for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:17:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-disposition;
        bh=i8JPdW7vq0uPqCwFY2OWEOzGEGMVFDbW4NsIUcByX3o=;
        b=dilT54DuM0DA2B70UimtGgOgkMmrMINr5AMTOHtcgVEN/pUWTf99ob/OTpDGbfOgPU
         /p+Jkm9X4oku9R5Th2n2rEJg7/7LZqo3FxgiIF1V7OK6QptN57O/7f5OyXC703xL1YlQ
         Td/tGEJ7P3klq5IcoeagDYPjwD+ZkRvVnCTY0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=YQUta7gtoCiBlq+MvE9sazGwGKJyUc34aUCmaoN3DMCnL/nje05e44gCRaQoxaW5wX
         BfJzUEwfJzX0JnSjNTZYogHv73hSyiPrzNcyTZu05LLA9f/mkUOGQKE8+pzcX6e7ycZi
         48lLx1LbEK5zbcZ6vNi+ijbtR1lJfcirkGjJk=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x19mr9325557bkq.136.1231420628553;
        Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 05:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:17:08 +0000
From: "Sian January" <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: JSR-200 - Any news?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi Geir,

Just wondering if there's been any progress on getting the TCK for JSR-200?

Thanks,

Sian

-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

From charlesabbott@example.net Thu Jan 08 14:00:47 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 60589 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2009 14:00:45 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jan 2009 14:00:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 81793 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2009 14:00:41 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 81709 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2009 14:00:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 81696 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2009 14:00:40 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:00:40 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-08.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:00:31 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACA1CD05A9
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Thu,  8 Jan 2009 09:00:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: Re: JSR-200 - Any news?
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:00:05 -0500
References: <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

No.  I will call the members of the scholarship board today.

geir

On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Sian January wrote:

> Hi Geir,
>
> Just wondering if there's been any progress on getting the TCK for  
> JSR-200?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> -- 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with  
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire  
> PO6 3AU


From charlesabbott@example.net Tue Jan 13 03:34:17 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 80554 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 03:34:16 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 03:34:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 63585 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 03:34:16 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 63448 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 03:34:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 63439 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2009 03:34:15 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:34:15 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:34:07 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1ED9223E3AA
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:33:41 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Subject: 'no' votes cast for JSR-314, JSR-315, JSR-322
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:33:40 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Comment attached to vote :

The Apache Software Foundation's vote is based on the point of view  
that this spec lead - Sun - is in violation of the JSPA

http://www.apache.org/jcp/sunopenletter.html

and therefore shouldn't be allowed to start or continue another JSR  
until the above matter is resolved.

This vote is not a comment on the technical merits of the JSR.  If not  
for the issue of the spec lead, the ASF would have otherwise voted  
"yes".



From charlesabbott@example.net Tue Jan 13 11:58:21 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 69205 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 11:58:20 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 11:58:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 79736 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 11:58:20 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 79517 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 11:58:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 79508 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2009 11:58:19 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:58:19 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of charlesabbott@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:58:09 +0000
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f40so6873620fka.1
        for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:57:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=Dj02SDoRtdCHCdp5ph8/vWFCERzKCYpqQNwAXqgdWd8=;
        b=Dj+Tj0eitnOm6r6m4mh71U/Sh4do24aTxiUgSjtb0PvkPDQdAFTJXnkurcxkQjwKvH
         St3ovg2f322IIl6xWn9LEaQWc1DaUzJ6HPBWc51s7YNu+I8PNrAlWPPlqLBopKg8QDOM
         XrU047zsNdf9/gmzdlszOJrj1tlBeRqmMhLTc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=MngtRK9pJq3VtGsXDoEbKQzKC4fXUEmsz7NS7QdbjiEnV/gCCCKdQcScTZiAwLeppG
         Rw0MMCMjDC3bSHZQO0+6da9gA8OGgdTnMvLTKdDFOMr37QjEu27Y7k2THk+Ett0wolpX
         Q044gVe5GUbWZ6GqOvj46bnXKjQHlU9rIxP2c=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id i12mr10410337bko.45.1231847869266;
        Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:57:49 +0000
From: "Sian January" <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: Re: JSR-200 - Any news?
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <charlesabbott@example.net>
	 <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Thanks Geir, did you manage to get through at all on the phone last week?


2009/1/8 Geir Magnusson Jr. <charlesabbott@example.net>:
> No.  I will call the members of the scholarship board today.
>
> geir
>
> On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Sian January wrote:
>
>> Hi Geir,
>>
>> Just wondering if there's been any progress on getting the TCK for
>> JSR-200?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sian
>>
>> --
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>



-- 
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

From charlesabbott@example.net Tue Jan 13 17:29:33 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 5024 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2009 17:29:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2009 17:29:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 34842 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 17:29:26 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 33684 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2009 17:29:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 33649 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2009 17:29:23 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:29:23 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rgminet11.oracle.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:29:13 +0000
Received: from acsinet13.oracle.com (acsinet13.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rgminet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0DHUWQ1013213
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:30:33 GMT
Received: from acsmt702.oracle.com (acsmt702.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by acsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0DHTQOC004461;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:29:27 GMT
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (/83.161.120.155)
	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
	with ESMTP ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:28:46 +0000
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:28:43 -0700
From: "Scott O'Bryan" <charlesabbott@example.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MyFaces Discussion <charlesabbott@example.net>,
        MyFaces Development <charlesabbott@example.net>, charlesabbott@example.net,
        charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: [Announce] Release of Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0 Beta
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsmt702.oracle.com [83.161.120.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A010204.496CCF50.0020,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

The Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge team is pleased to announce the 
release of Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge 1.0.0-beta.  This release is 
intended as a development release and is not intended to be use in 
production environments.

The Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project is intended to be the 
Reference Implementation for the specifications produced under JSR-301.  
Portlet Bridge 1.x releases will address the Bridge for JSF 1.2 and 
Portlet 1.0 while Portlet Bridge 2.x released will address the Bridge 
for JSF 1.2 and Portlet 2.0.  Future projects will be added as 
Portlet/JSF version increase.

The binary and source distributions of this release are available on the 
website:
http://myfaces.apache.org/portlet-bridge/download.html.

Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge is available in the central Maven 
repository under Group ID "org.apache.myfaces.portlet-bridge"

Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310733&styleName=Html&version=12313058

Enjoy!

Scott O'Bryan


From charlesabbott@example.net Thu Jan 15 16:39:22 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 84212 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2009 16:39:21 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2009 16:39:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 26496 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2009 16:39:21 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 26371 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2009 16:39:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 26361 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2009 16:39:20 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:39:20 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO server.dankulp.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:39:11 +0000
Received: by server.dankulp.com (Postfix, from userid 5000)
	id 34A4F243003C; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:38:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr0 (2008-06-10) on
	server.dankulp.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Msg-File: /tmp/mailfilter.Hv8J8s2I39
Received: from houdfrazierc.americas.progress.com (c-24-91-141-225.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [83.161.120.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.dankulp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B6D197C02E;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:38:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Kulp <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: Re: Latest JAX-RS TCK.....
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:38:41 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
Cc: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <charlesabbott@example.net>,
 Patrick Curran <charlesabbott@example.net>,
 Patrick Curran <charlesabbott@example.net>
References: <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5-gr0


Geir,

Was their any follow up to the JAX-RS tck?

Thanks!
Dan


On Thursday 18 December 2008 2:25:25 pm Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> I think I have that one now - I'll sign and fax back this evening when
> I get home
>
> geir
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 November 2008 9:38:50 pm Patrick Curran wrote:
> >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >>> On Nov 6, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>>> Also, any news on the JAXRS TCK?
> >>>
> >>> No.  our application for it and support has been acknowledged, but
> >>> that's the last I heard.
> >>>
> >>> geir
> >>
> >> It's coming. I need one more approval, and then we need to draw up
> >> yet
> >> another license agreement. Hopefully we can get this done within a
> >> week
> >> or so.
> >>
> >> -- Patrick
> >
> > Any more news on this?    One of the CXF engineers is really itching
> > to start
> > on this after the new year.
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > charlesabbott@example.net
> > http://dankulp.com/blog



-- 
Daniel Kulp
charlesabbott@example.net
http://dankulp.com/blog

From charlesabbott@example.net Thu Jan 15 22:40:32 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 5689 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2009 22:40:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jan 2009 22:40:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 74712 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2009 22:40:31 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 74627 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2009 22:40:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 74618 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2009 22:40:30 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:40:30 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rgminet13.oracle.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:40:19 +0000
Received: from acsinet13.oracle.com (acsinet13.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rgminet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0FMefs1030143
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:40:43 GMT
Received: from acsmt707.oracle.com (acsmt707.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by acsinet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0FMeYQd026345
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:40:35 GMT
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (/83.161.120.155)
	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
	with ESMTP ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:39:52 +0000
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:39:45 -0800
From: michael freedman <charlesabbott@example.net>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: Apache Software Foundation as "Supporter" of a JSR to define the
 Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2?
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------030408000406000806000004"
X-Source-IP: acsmt707.oracle.com [83.161.120.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.496FBB3A.014B:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030408000406000806000004
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Folks,
  I am the spec lead for JSR 301: the Portlet Bridge specification for 
JavaServer Faces 1.2.  The RI work for this JSR is being done at Apache 
in the PortletBridge subproject within MyFaces.  For the past year I 
have been working under the assumption that I could produce both the 
Portlet 1.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification and the 
Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 under this single JSR.  This 
assumption had been vetted by the JCP.  Unfortunately they misunderstood 
the methodology I planned to use which called for separate release dates 
of the specifications.  They now tell me I need a new JSR to address 
this second specification.  As I have an already prepared Early (Public) 
Draft and a corresponding implementation we are in the process of 
releasing an alpha version of in the Apache PortletBridge subproject, I 
would like to get this JSR kicked off/started as quickly as possible to 
avoid delays down the line.  I have attached the new JSR proposal.  This 
is a more targeted version of the original 301 proposal.  The next step 
before submitting to the JCP is to get a list of companies/individuals 
that "support" this JSR so I can list them with the proposal. The Apache 
Software Foundation was listed in the original proposal and as we are 
doing the impl here hope I can list it again.  Can you let me know 
(asap) whether I can include the Apache Software Foundation as a supporter?
    -Mike-

--------------030408000406000806000004
Content-Type: text/html;
 name="JSR_JSF_Portlet2.0Bridge.html"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="JSR_JSF_Portlet2.0Bridge.html"
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--------------030408000406000806000004--

From charlesabbott@example.net Fri Jan 16 02:38:17 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 34952 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2009 02:38:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2009 02:38:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 22466 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2009 02:38:08 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 22379 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jan 2009 02:38:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 22370 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jan 2009 02:38:08 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:38:08 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rgminet12.oracle.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:37:56 +0000
Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rgminet12.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0G2bCF7016514
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:37:13 GMT
Received: from acsmt701.oracle.com (acsmt701.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0G2bWqc030293
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:37:33 GMT
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (/83.161.120.155)
	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
	with ESMTP ; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:37:30 -0800
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:37:08 -0700
From: "Scott O'Bryan" <charlesabbott@example.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: Re: Apache Software Foundation as "Supporter" of a JSR to define
 the Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2?
References: <charlesabbott@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsmt701.oracle.com [83.161.120.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.496FF2EC.0037,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I would encourage Apache to support this JSR proposal as well.

I'm not an Apache Member, but I am a PMC for the MyFaces project and the 
project lead for the MyFaces Portlet Bridge.  With JSR-301 Oracle has 
proven quite effectively that they can work with the open process and 
with Apache in general.  They even worked with the JCP to modify the 
license on the JSR-301proposed final draft to remove the "terms of use" 
clause at the request of Apache.

Also, the MyFaces Portlet Bridge project has already started work on the 
implementation of the Portlet 2.0 bridge and it would be nice for Apache 
to show their support for the bridge projects going forward.  :)

Just my 2 cents.

Scott

michael freedman wrote:
> Folks,
>  I am the spec lead for JSR 301: the Portlet Bridge specification for 
> JavaServer Faces 1.2.  The RI work for this JSR is being done at 
> Apache in the PortletBridge subproject within MyFaces.  For the past 
> year I have been working under the assumption that I could produce 
> both the Portlet 1.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification and 
> the Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 under this single 
> JSR.  This assumption had been vetted by the JCP.  Unfortunately they 
> misunderstood the methodology I planned to use which called for 
> separate release dates of the specifications.  They now tell me I need 
> a new JSR to address this second specification.  As I have an already 
> prepared Early (Public) Draft and a corresponding implementation we 
> are in the process of releasing an alpha version of in the Apache 
> PortletBridge subproject, I would like to get this JSR kicked 
> off/started as quickly as possible to avoid delays down the line.  I 
> have attached the new JSR proposal.  This is a more targeted version 
> of the original 301 proposal.  The next step before submitting to the 
> JCP is to get a list of companies/individuals that "support" this JSR 
> so I can list them with the proposal. The Apache Software Foundation 
> was listed in the original proposal and as we are doing the impl here 
> hope I can list it again.  Can you let me know (asap) whether I can 
> include the Apache Software Foundation as a supporter?
>    -Mike-
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>       Title:   Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 Specification
>
>
>       Summary:
>
> The Portlet 2.0 Bridge defines the semantics of a JSR 286 portlet that 
> proxies for JSF 1.2 artifacts.  
>
>
>       Section 1: Identification
>
> Submitting Member: Oracle Corporation
> Name of Contact Person: Don Deustch
> E-Mail Address: charlesabbott@example.net
> Telephone Number: 2264589854
> Fax Number:
>
> Name of Specification Lead:  Michael Freedman
> E-Mail Address: charlesabbott@example.net
> Telephone Number: 2264589854
> Fax Number:
>
>
> Initial Group Membership [list]
>
> Supporting this JSR [list]:
>
>
>
>       Section 2: Request
>
>
>         2.1 Describe proposed specification:
>
> The Java Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 Specification 
> defines the required behavior of a  control environment designed to 
> run in a JSR 286 portlet and JSF 1.2 runtime.  Its control behavior 
> allows a JSF application/view to be accessed as a Java portlet.
>
> Because the portlet bridge lies between the portlet container and the 
> Faces runtime, its behavior and function depends on the semantics each 
> expresses and supports.  Differing versions of either the Portlet 
> specification or the Faces specification requires a distinct bridge 
> specification and implementation to fully express all available 
> function.  Though JSR 301 in defining the Portlet 1.0 Bridge for 
> JavaServer Faces 1.2 provides a solid base for a Portlet 2.0 bridge 
> the following new features in portlet 2.0 require a distinguished 
> specification:
>
>     * ability to serve a resource directly from a portlet
>     * ability to send and receive events
>     * ability to define and operate on public render parameters
>     * ability to wrap portlet requests and response objects
>     * ability to use dispatch.forward.
>
>
>         2.2 What is the target Java platform?
>
> At a minimum any platform that supports JSR 286 portlets and 
> JavaServer Faces 1.2.  Each of these dependent systems have a minimum 
> requirement of running in a Java EE 5.x environment.
>
>
>         2.3 The Executive Committees would like to ensure JSR
>         submitters think about how their proposed technology relates
>         to all of the Java platform editions. Please provide details
>         here for which platform editions are being targeted by this
>         JSR, and how this JSR has considered the relationship with the
>         other platform editions
>
> At a minimum any platform that supports JSR 286 portlets and 
> JavaServer Faces 1.2.  Each of these dependent systems have a minimum 
> requirement of running in a Java EE 5.x environment.
>
>
>         2.4 Should this JSR be voted on by both Executive Committees?
>
> No.
>
>
>         2.5 What need of the Java community will be addressed by the
>         proposed specification?
>
> This will standardize the execution of JSF artifacts as portlets 
> providing consistency and interoperability which should greatly 
> enhance the desirability of implementing portlets in JSF.
>
>
>         2.6 Why isn't this need met by existing specifications?
>
> JSR 301: The Portlet 1.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 defines the 
> function of a bridge running in a Portlet 1.0 and Faces 1.2 
> environment.  Portlet 2.0 introduces a wide variety of new features 
> that Faces applications can and/or should access.  This specification 
> builds on the base of the Portlet 1.0 specification to expose these 
> new features.  In addition its explicitly tuned to the tweaks and 
> clarifications defined in Portlet 2.0 to provide a more effective and 
> natural expression of behavior than could be achieved in Portlet 1.0.
>
>
>         2.7 Summarize the underlying technology or technologies:
>
> The Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer faces 1.2 provides a 
> transformation service, mapping between JSR portlet semantics and JSF 
> MVC semantics. This specification standarizes this mapping behavior, 
> though not the mapping implementation.
>
>
>         2.8 Is there a proposed package name for the API specification?
>
> javax.portlet.faces package name will be used for API specifications.
>
>
>         2.9 Are there any dependencies on OS, I/O, CPUs?
>
> No.
>
>
>         2.10 Are there any security issues that can't be addressed by
>         the existing security model?
>
> No.
>
>
>         2.11 Are there internationalization/localization issues?
>
> No.
>
>
>         2.12 Are there any existing specifications that might become
>         obsolete, depracted, or need revision as a result of this work?
>
> No.
>
>
>         2.13 Please describe the anticipated schedule of this
>         specification:
>
> To be determined by the expert group, initial target is to have a 
> working EG by spring 2009, an early public draft by spring 2009, a 
> complete public draft by fall 2009 and a final version by mid 2010.
>
>
>         2.14 Please describe the anticipated working model for the
>         Expert Group:
>
> E-mail discussion, teleconferencing as needed (likely regular -- 
> weekly/bi-weekly), and occasional face-2-face meetings.
>
>
>         2.15 It is important to the success of the community and each
>         JSR that the work of the Expert Group be handled in a manner
>         which provides the community and the public with insight into
>         the work the Expert Group is doing, and the decisions that the
>         Expert Group has made. The Executive Committees would like to
>         ensure Spec Leads understand the value of this transparency
>         and ask that each JSR have an operating plan in place for how
>         their JSR will address the involvement of the community and
>         the public. Please provide your plan here, and refer to the
>         Spec Lead Guide for a more detailed description and a set of
>         example questions you may wish to answer in your plan.
>
> Transparency will be achieved by releasing regular (early) public 
> drafts of the specification as the work progresses and by tracking, 
> updating and posting an accurate schedule.
>
>
>         2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will be delivered,
>         i.e. as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone,
>         or both. Include version information for the profile or
>         platform in your answer.
>
> stand-alone
>
>
>         2.17 Please state the rationale if previous versions are
>         available stand-alone and you are now proposing in 2.16 to
>         only deliver RI and TCK as part of a profile or platform
>         edition (See sections 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 of the JCP 2 document).
>
> The license will be a free-of-charge open source license compatible 
> with Java EE licensing.
>
>
>       Section 3: Contributions
>
>
> List existing documents, specifications, or implementations that 
> describe the technology.  Please include links to publically available 
> material.
>
> JSR 301: Portlet 1.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 (Proposed Final 
> draft) <http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=301>
>
> JSR 268: Java Portlet Specification 2.0 
> <http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=286>
>
> JSR 252: JavaServer Faces Specification 1.2 
> <http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=252>
>
>
> This is an implementation of Portlet 2.0 Bridge on which the first 
> Early Public Draft of the specification will likely be based:  
>
> Apache MyFaces Portlet 2.0 Bridge implementation 
> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/portlet-bridge/core/trunk_2.0.x>
>
>
>       Section 4: Additional Information
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


From charlesabbott@example.net Sun Jan 18 19:49:49 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 78368 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2009 19:49:48 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2009 19:49:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 46062 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2009 19:49:48 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 45940 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2009 19:49:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 45931 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2009 19:49:47 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:49:47 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp101.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:49:37 +0000
Received: (qmail 99371 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2009 19:49:15 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer;
  b=24uZWPDmtGHF3DbIwDh4hhsKfolGKRTf7VMHDjTTA2XOmo9uhi1TDoE5Tx51NpR9iF6KMvtWN+0fdG6Gh3wXOajqSXoxagH4nMQ8Pt1uHts0WZ/3e2xSe2uOlEIHEIpD1scQsozPqniT5EWp53mGlzVrN1c7h9ln7LyqzoAfiKw=  ;
Received: from unknown (HELO ?83.161.120.155?) (charlesabbott@example.net with plain)
  by smtp101.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2009 19:49:15 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: Rotta.YVM1ku9yCfxuAhKa0KU_C.0GYLi0UmH4otfYtob70jHsY3TWWUNzH_kEokELQs9fSHaoML2VTgqWGmnx5pKk_5433lWT3Gp082MUCO8Y2PDofoEDGhY8Bmn3T5I6Yh2dBYVhh8kmZFj4VizpN2MBoMCDF8xdC2X6tsZVapZ_uE9wdeY1RMO4A1vQErPwO2PwkLE4W0DmTBYy4ZrsYJaw--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
From: David Jencks <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:49:13 -0800
References: <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Any progress on this one?

thanks
david jencks

On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

>
> Thx for the reminder.  I've sent the application for the license  
> (full disclosure - this reminded me).
>
> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending  
> approval by the board.
>
> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward.
>
> geir
>
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> It's been a week.... any progress on this?
>>
>> many thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> of course!
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> Geir,
>>>>
>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to test (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196 
>>>> ).  The final release of this spec was on 10 Oct 2007.  Could you  
>>>> please see if we can get the tck for it?
>>>>
>>>> many thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


From charlesabbott@example.net Sun Jan 18 20:09:07 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 81219 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2009 20:09:06 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2009 20:09:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 54708 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2009 20:09:06 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 54618 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2009 20:09:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 54609 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2009 20:09:06 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:09:06 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-08.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:08:56 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C04BD05A7
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:08:27 -0500 (EST)
References: <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net>
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: "charlesabbott@example.net" <charlesabbott@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii;
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (5G77)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5G77)
Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:08:19 -0500
Cc: "charlesabbott@example.net" <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Nope, nor 200.  There's a stall somewhere.  I'm digging.



On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks <charlesabbott@example.net>  
wrote:

> Any progress on this one?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>>
>> Thx for the reminder.  I've sent the application for the license  
>> (full disclosure - this reminded me).
>>
>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending  
>> approval by the board.
>>
>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward.
>>
>> geir
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this?
>>>
>>> many thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> of course!
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Geir,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to test (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196 
>>>>> ).  The final release of this spec was on 10 Oct 2007.  Could  
>>>>> you please see if we can get the tck for it?
>>>>>
>>>>> many thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

From charlesabbott@example.net Mon Jan 19 16:44:57 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 69419 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2009 16:44:56 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2009 16:44:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 92413 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2009 16:44:55 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 92310 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2009 16:44:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 92296 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2009 16:44:55 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:44:55 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of charlesabbott@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:44:46 +0000
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so519622qwh.59
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:44:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=jX13r/DXayQqA1yyQHfb0K12JirxJvVOYltfbtjp6z8=;
        b=agQhsrT1tKeu4OVIATK0t1Vi6EI+fYJyt+dGmbKaayHlhqyPpgLosT3ffRjg6Hj0IB
         2CpHZhw2+fFUk8l3XgpBnX294azIt6i1Jp+iepEzr92JlTjURhxcHxmEAzvE9nv6VclY
         10Eu9chAZhlJKdr91QnkGNe0W8SbeJKPMsXkU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=DPTfF44msK5NWF/oDvnEwYtasnlfKLkMkTMg0dHdltJoEZQUtqNJ6UwZuaQlG61a98
         1fnM0xCVMimWf5prR9lM4uIFUSpjmmZBRhY2g5FLcQATq244YEYSVYYgeJeGwe/bq5Ox
         ut4wr7tsVD28SnrUWF6hGiz2OpmwsZumJE0OQ=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q17mr6100754qaq.58.1232383464985;
        Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:44:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?83.161.120.155? (128.Red-81-36-43.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.161.120.155])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm224349qwg.55.283.161.120.155.44.22
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:44:20 +0100
From: jean-frederic clere <charlesabbott@example.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: charlesabbott@example.net
CC: charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: Re: TCK for Tomcat
References: <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Filip at Apache wrote:
> work out the NDA with Geir, and then I can deliver you the actual files

The NDA is done. Ready for the next steps.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> Filip
> 
> jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to run the TCK on Tomcat. I think the following 
>> standalone TCKs are needed: Servlet, JSP, Common Annotations and EL.
>>
>> How should I process?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jean-Frederic
>>
> 
> 


From charlesabbott@example.net Tue Jan 20 21:23:52 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 80715 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2009 21:23:50 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2009 21:23:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 8353 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2009 21:23:43 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 8181 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2009 21:23:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 8059 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2009 21:23:42 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:23:42 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rgminet13.oracle.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:23:32 +0000
Received: from rgminet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rgminet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0KLNwAo007953
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:23:59 GMT
Received: from acsmt707.oracle.com (acsmt707.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rgminet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id n0KLN8Eh005064;
	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:23:10 GMT
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (/83.161.120.155)
	by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
	with ESMTP ; Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:23:06 +0000
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:22:39 -0700
From: "Scott O'Bryan" <charlesabbott@example.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: MyFaces Discussion <charlesabbott@example.net>,
        MyFaces Development <charlesabbott@example.net>, charlesabbott@example.net,
        charlesabbott@example.net
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache MyFaces Portetlet Bridge 2.0.0 Alpha
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: acsmt707.oracle.com [83.161.120.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090209.497640BC.0168,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

The Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge team is pleased to announce the 
release of Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-alpha.  This release is 
intended as a development release and is not intended to be use in 
production environments.

The Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge project is intended to be the 
Reference Implementations for the JSF Portlet Bridge projects.  Portlet 
Bridge 2.x released will address the Bridge for JSF 1.2 and Portlet 
2.0.  Future projects will be added as Portlet/JSF version increase.

The binary and source distributions of this release are available on the 
website:
http://myfaces.apache.org/portlet-bridge/download.html.

Apache MyFaces Portlet Bridge is available in the central Maven 
repository under Group ID "org.apache.myfaces.portlet-bridge"

Release Notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310733&styleName=Html&version=12312992

Enjoy!

Scott O'Bryan


From charlesabbott@example.net Thu Jan 29 18:02:43 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 18417 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2009 18:02:42 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2009 18:02:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 69851 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2009 18:02:42 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 69753 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2009 18:02:41 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 69744 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2009 18:02:41 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:02:41 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp103.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:02:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 25502 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2009 18:02:08 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer;
  b=efLKckKgMbzxmk1iPPjC/kkrcXcXvfQTb7LwGpuqxycSjv0gS9x8yBjtF6ELoXuv139G2FNwxyxY4A3+j7uuSXD1I21jqpAywJ+rtvXH5zOTboOHIdL1B5ljwUlqB/PQOnZTVCZZTSUbzjtZo0eU/Jy/lhUUei+mdvOHwW/CyG4=  ;
Received: from unknown (HELO ?83.161.120.155?) (charlesabbott@example.net with plain)
  by smtp103.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2009 18:02:07 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: 2OONQB0VM1kpNTptcq1BQ1Nlrs9P._Ibykqwq21af6TGQIPxg6dTjI1LQiO9HbJBx89hVrePf79sBzSMTZ59pbQ12kRdOYHXjF2oSMXQmaA0aWEQggvWh8FQSqqHk4.0okY6US.M8K1.roY7lHTADt9QkGiA_BVwagAg2Ywx_wk9pUV4jrp.uLwVCwLpLs4EvlbeX2PG7fRhe1cRuABf3u9evA--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
From: David Jencks <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:02:06 -0800
References: <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ?

thanks
david jencks

On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> Nope, nor 200.  There's a stall somewhere.  I'm digging.
>
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks <charlesabbott@example.net>  
> wrote:
>
>> Any progress on this one?
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thx for the reminder.  I've sent the application for the license  
>>> (full disclosure - this reminded me).
>>>
>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending  
>>> approval by the board.
>>>
>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward.
>>>
>>> geir
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this?
>>>>
>>>> many thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> of course!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Geir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to test  
>>>>>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196).  The final release of  
>>>>>> this spec was on 10 Oct 2007.  Could you please see if we can  
>>>>>> get the tck for it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> many thanks
>>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>


From charlesabbott@example.net Thu Jan 29 19:09:07 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 58271 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2009 19:09:07 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jan 2009 19:09:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 97512 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2009 19:09:06 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 97396 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jan 2009 19:09:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 97387 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jan 2009 19:09:06 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:09:06 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of charlesabbott@example.net)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:08:57 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC17523E3AA
	for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:08:30 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <charlesabbott@example.net>
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
In-Reply-To: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:08:29 -0500
References: <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net> <charlesabbott@example.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I have!

Current status on outstanding :

311: waiting for "executive signature" on the license  (I dropped off  
a signed copy a little over a week or so ago when I was in bay area)

200: there is no standalone TCK for this JSR.  I've suggested that  
they make one, or just give us the Java SE5 TCK.  THe spec lead was  
required to deliver a TCK for this.

196: waiting on internal Sun legal for a license for us to sign.

geir



On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote:

> Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>> Nope, nor 200.  There's a stall somewhere.  I'm digging.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks <charlesabbott@example.net>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Any progress on this one?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thx for the reminder.  I've sent the application for the license  
>>>> (full disclosure - this reminded me).
>>>>
>>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending  
>>>> approval by the board.
>>>>
>>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward.
>>>>
>>>> geir
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this?
>>>>>
>>>>> many thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> of course!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Geir,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to  
>>>>>>> test (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196).  The final release  
>>>>>>> of this spec was on 10 Oct 2007.  Could you please see if we  
>>>>>>> can get the tck for it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> many thanks
>>>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>


From charlesabbott@example.net Sat Jan 31 04:09:41 2009
Return-Path: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 30524 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2009 04:09:40 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2009 04:09:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 90231 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2009 04:09:39 -0000
Delivered-To: charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 90118 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2009 04:09:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact charlesabbott@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: charlesabbott@example.net
list-help: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:charlesabbott@example.net>
List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list charlesabbott@example.net
Received: (qmail 90109 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2009 04:09:39 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:09:39 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of charlesabbott@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:09:31 +0000
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so324589ywe.59
        for <charlesabbott@example.net>; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:09:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=+9wWmvzWUDm1dQJjhHimALWlFVfqSKfwyZ/4JZLsMPE=;
        b=h5Wc1PcuYumg/rlgl6/gVZRXEB1/0hsRm4a6naYb9YsuTrkW++2bB2HldxXlMA0ODS
         f+hjr3QsU39W9Q8RBL+qAM+ow87sbbF7wJUmKRuNisUaznzC5BiLGZuIK0QuRKOXqjBr
         tXl1Xh+PDJPiezDQE5T5pPX5h7JBTajWVH8bE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=Avg8wmDXVILt21vgI1vcITcrFyQ5sjevfov+Mql4vGyvB3F2dNScTetxF021t3vltW
         J76hEseq+6baiXvxpTVFCKaFNPupH5u/5sXGJIR3UOeaI+avKR5UEMmq2L+hmRLp5vsR
         xyCLqBy+yqYvwsf0W3IxIW/Z5b3B/lCwCEp4E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b6mr264900ibd.33.1233374950219; Fri, 30 
	Jan 2009 20:09:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:09:10 -0500
Message-ID: <charlesabbott@example.net>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] MyFaces Core v1.2.6 Release
From: Leonardo Uribe <charlesabbott@example.net>
To: charlesabbott@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215048d6fc85f300461bf7b17
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--002215048d6fc85f300461bf7b17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the release of MyFaces Core
1.2.6.

MyFaces Core is a JavaServer(tm) Faces 1.2 implementation as specified by
JSR-252.  MyFaces Core has passed Sun's JSR-252 TCK and is 100% compliant
with the JSR-252 specification.

MyFaces Core 1.2.6 is available in both binary and source distributions.

    * http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html

MyFaces Core is also available in the central Maven repository under Group
ID "org.apache.myfaces.core".

Release Notes - MyFaces Core - Version 1.2.6

Bug

    * [MYFACES-2082] - id attribute for html components on JSF 1.2 could be
set via an rtexprvalue (but not by a ValueExpression)
    * [MYFACES-2135] - Remove @Deprecated annotations inserted on api
methods, since this annotation is runtime type and changes method signature
(a tck test fails if this annotation is present)

Task

    * [MYFACES-2037] - Activate add shared dependency to myfaces core impl
instead unpack shared using a property different to -DperformRelease=true

regards

Leonardo Uribe

--002215048d6fc85f300461bf7b17
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br>The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the release of MyFaces C=
ore 1.2.6.<br><br>MyFaces Core is a JavaServer(tm) Faces 1.2 implementation=
 as specified by JSR-252.&nbsp; MyFaces Core has passed Sun&#39;s JSR-252 T=
CK and is 100% compliant with the JSR-252 specification. <br>
<br>MyFaces Core 1.2.6 is available in both binary and source distributions=
.<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * <a href=3D"http://myfaces.apache.org/download=
.html">http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html</a><br><br>MyFaces Core is a=
lso available in the central Maven repository under Group ID &quot;org.apac=
he.myfaces.core&quot;.<br>
<br>Release Notes - MyFaces Core - Version 1.2.6<br><br>Bug<br><br>&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp; * [MYFACES-2082] - id attribute for html components on JSF 1.2 c=
ould be set via an rtexprvalue (but not by a ValueExpression)<br>&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp; * [MYFACES-2135] - Remove @Deprecated annotations inserted on api =
methods, since this annotation is runtime type and changes method signature=
 (a tck test fails if this annotation is present)<br>
<br>Task<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; * [MYFACES-2037] - Activate add shared d=
ependency to myfaces core impl instead unpack shared using a property diffe=
rent to -DperformRelease=3Dtrue<br><br>regards<br><br>Leonardo Uribe<br>

--002215048d6fc85f300461bf7b17--


{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}