From anna24@example.org Sun Jun 04 17:52:55 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 93344 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2006 17:52:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2006 17:52:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 92181 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2006 17:52:54 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 92153 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2006 17:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 92142 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2006 17:52:53 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 10:52:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Jun 2006 10:52:53 -0700 Received: from saket (c-+1-525-644-2673.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2006060417523001100fr049e>; Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:52:31 +0000 From: "Srinivas Surapaneni" <anna24@example.org> To: "'Beehive Users'" <anna24@example.org> Subject: getting MessageResources from form bean Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 13:52:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C687DE.2B1B59A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcaH/7AlSL6ha2KsSn2FDAyx42BMaA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C687DE.2B1B59A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit How do I get MessageResources from form bean validate method? I tried Resources.getMessageResources(request). It is giving the MessageResources for the default bundle But I Had 2 bundles in my page flow. Thank You -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.1/355 - Release Date: 6/2/2006 ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C687DE.2B1B59A0-- From anna24@example.org Thu Jun 08 00:42:58 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 65091 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 00:42:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 00:42:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 29991 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 00:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 29862 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 00:42:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 24333 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2006 00:39:46 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,INVALID_DATE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) From: "Reynaldo Ball" <anna24@example.org> To: <anna24@example.org> Subject: To gain new experience Date: Wen, 7 Jun 2006 11:19:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Thread-Index: GpyyPIThth6qUKIadAHw5LHThfbYU3CvKuEB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi User International company "Eurobiz Tour Inc." is well known all over the world in international tours business. We are searching for people,who want to work in our company and reach success fast, using modern life type. Our company wants to become First place in touristic business, i hope you too. This letter is to inform you about our TODAY BEST WORK PROPOSITION in this field of market. You can become our manager and promote our company in your area. The salary is 1000 EUR-3000 EUR per week, your duties are to execute tasks from Sirenis Inc. head office.Poland ,Spain, Slovakia, Germany, France business map. Candidates: 21-60 years old, internet access every day, mobile phone, to be anxious for success. No matter you country and city, send us your mail and get a reply next day! Please send your CV, profiles according this e-mail: anna24@example.org -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Seymour Finley Wen, 7 Jun 2006 11:19:47 +0200 From anna24@example.org Thu Jun 08 00:42:59 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 65094 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 00:42:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 00:42:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 30034 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 00:42:54 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 29946 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 00:42:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 26746 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2006 00:41:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,INVALID_DATE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) From: "Amado Carter" <anna24@example.org> To: <anna24@example.org> Subject: Have 2-3 hours a day Date: Wen, 7 Jun 2006 11:21:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Thread-Index: Udeiek0QCnZ5da6C4P9XXBuIutt4GmxKlvFA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi User International company "Eurobiz Tour Inc." is well known all over the world in international tours business. We are searching for people,who want to work in our company and reach success fast, using modern life type. Our company wants to become First place in touristic business, i hope you too. This letter is to inform you about our TODAY BEST WORK PROPOSITION in this field of market. You can become our manager and promote our company in your area. The salary is 1000 EUR-3000 EUR per week, your duties are to execute tasks from Sirenis Inc. head office.Poland ,Spain, Slovakia, Germany, France business map. Candidates: 21-60 years old, internet access every day, mobile phone, to be anxious for success. No matter you country and city, send us your mail and get a reply next day! Please send your CV, profiles according this e-mail: anna24@example.org *-+*-+*-+*-+*-+*-+*-+*-+*-+*-+*-+ Joshua Larsen Wen, 7 Jun 2006 11:21:30 +0200 From anna24@example.org Thu Jun 08 00:47:41 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 65937 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 00:47:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 00:47:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 32426 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 00:47:40 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 32412 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 00:47:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 30963 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2006 00:43:11 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=10.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,INVALID_DATE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) From: "Gayle Lynn" <anna24@example.org> To: <anna24@example.org> Subject: To apply for this position send us your resume. Date: Wen, 7 Jun 2006 11:23:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Thread-Index: Q3eCfQ2BGQQQDOb2GyFm4ullPAPbobrjwGFu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yo User International company "Eurobiz Tour Inc." is well known all over the world in international tours business. We are searching for people,who want to work in our company and reach success fast, using modern life type. Our company wants to become First place in touristic business, i hope you too. This letter is to inform you about our TODAY BEST WORK PROPOSITION in this field of market. You can become our manager and promote our company in your area. The salary is 1000 EUR-3000 EUR per week, your duties are to execute tasks from Sirenis Inc. head office.Poland ,Spain, Slovakia, Germany, France business map. Candidates: 21-60 years old, internet access every day, mobile phone, to be anxious for success. No matter you country and city, send us your mail and get a reply next day! Please send your CV, profiles according this e-mail: anna24@example.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Monte Newton Wen, 7 Jun 2006 11:23:18 +0200 From anna24@example.org Thu Jun 08 17:04:57 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 83713 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 17:04:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 17:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 3527 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 17:04:56 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 3513 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2006 17:04:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 9860 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2006 14:27:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) To: anna24@example.org Subject: Inferitance of action (method type) forwards MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.3 September 14, 2004 Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> From: Pawel Kozlowski <anna24@example.org> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 16:27:02 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on MUCSMTP2/MUC/AMAEXTMAIL(Release 6.5.5|November 30, 2005) at 08/06/2006 16:27:08, Serialize complete at 08/06/2006 16:27:08 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 004F612FC1257187_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --=_alternative 004F612FC1257187_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksDQoNCkluIG15IGJhc2UgcGFnZSBjb250cm9sbGVyIGNsYXNzIEnigJl2ZSBnb3QgYWJzdHJh Y3QgYWN0aW9uIG1ldGhvZCwgd2l0aCANCmZvcndhcmRzIGRlZmluZWQgbGlrZSB0aGlzOg0KDQpA SnBmLkFjdGlvbigNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBmb3J3YXJkcyA9IHtASnBmLkZvcndhcmQobmFt ZSA9ICJzdWNjZXNzIiwgcGF0aCA9IA0KImVkaXRQYXJhbXMuanNwIikgfSANCiAgICAgICAgKQ0K ICAgICAgICBwdWJsaWMgYWJzdHJhY3QgRm9yd2FyZCBwcmVwYXJlUGFyYW1zRm9yRWRpdGluZygp Ow0KDQpXaGVuIEnigJltIGluaGVyaXRpbmcgZnJvbSB0aGlzIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgYW5kIG92ZXJy aWRlIA0K4oCccHJlcGFyZVBhcmFtc0ZvckVkaXRpbmfigJ0sIGl0IHNlYW1zIGxpa2UgZm9yd2Fy ZHMgZGVmaW5lZCBpbiBhIGJhc2UgY2xhc3MgDQphcmUgbm90IHZpc2libGUgLyBhdmFpbGFibGUg dG8gdGhlIGNoaWxkIGNsYXNzLiBDb3VsZCBzb21lb25lIGNvbmZpcm0gaWYgDQppdCB0aGUgY2Fz ZSwgb3IgbWF5YmUgSeKAmW0gZG9pbmcgc29tZSBzdHVwaWQgbWlzdGFrZS4NCg0KQmVzdCByZWdh cmRzLA0KUGF3ZWwgS296bG93c2tpDQo= --=_alternative 004F612FC1257187_=-- From anna24@example.org Sat Jun 10 02:56:34 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 30927 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2006 02:56:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2006 02:56:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 89449 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 02:56:33 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 89426 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 02:56:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 89415 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2006 02:56:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:56:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:56:31 -0700 Received: from saket (c-+1-525-644-2673.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <20060610025610m13001uu7ge>; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:56:10 +0000 From: "Srinivas Surapaneni" <anna24@example.org> To: "'Beehive Users'" <anna24@example.org> Subject: problem with <netui:rewriteURL> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 22:56:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C68C17.F15035E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 thread-index: AcaMOXeNT9kNFKLZSbutCZKpiIe4zQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C68C17.F15035E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am using <netui:rewriteURL action=3D=94xxxx=94/> in a form =20 When the form is submitted , the above action is generating a link with = all the submitted form values =20 How do I generate a link without the form values? =20 Thank You --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/359 - Release Date: 6/8/2006 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C68C17.F15035E0-- From anna24@example.org Sat Jun 10 03:28:44 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 39832 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2006 03:28:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2006 03:28:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 35374 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 03:28:43 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 35352 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 03:28:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 35341 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2006 03:28:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:28:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:28:41 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so1626041ugf for <anna24@example.org>; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:28:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FMwoeID/N5cq/dm9lpnWBH8L8mmDtag90R2NUMHWCHsw3WQ2Ga46gJrnWPFYh3psVzB/NfK4lkwosSgBE/k5ODbzC9AKrDVNwZlFxUG40IHUpmf9O3LbRgn6c+kH15TFvnZH1GAR9LRqLF6plNCGtJ8UQCY6FVycxYiTnIaENac= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id h6mr3079673ugj; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:28:20 -0600 From: "Thomas Cook" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Re: My own annotation In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pawel, APT is used to process the annotations in Java 1.5. That said, without changing the page flow code you can't just add new things to an annotation, since that would be like changing a class. You could try to define a new set of annotations though and process those with APT though, maybe something like this: @SimpleBusinessLayer(simpleBusinessLayerActions =3D {@SimpleBusinessLayerAction(name=3D"actionName", =85)}, =85) @Jpf.Controller() class ControllerClass { =85 On 5/29/06, Pawel Kozlowski <anna24@example.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to figure out if it would be possible to define my own, > controller-level annotations (sth similar to SimpleAction annotation). I > knead this annotation in order to easily call methods from the business > layer. > > My flows have no logic, only calls to the business layer. That's why I > want to avoid writing a lot of basic method actions =96 instead I would l= ike > to have sth like: > > @Jpf.Controller(simpleBusinessLayerActions =3D > {@SimpleBusinessLayerAction(name=3D"actionName", =85)}, =85) > class ControllerClass { > =85 > > Is it possible to modify Beehivie in order to achieve a described effect? > Or more generally, how (and where) Jpf annotations are processed? > > Would be grateful for any help. > > Best regards, > Pawel Kozlowski > From anna24@example.org Sat Jun 10 14:58:43 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 31258 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2006 14:58:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2006 14:58:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 90832 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 14:58:42 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 90813 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2006 14:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 90802 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2006 14:58:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:58:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rwcrmhc14.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:58:37 -0700 Received: from saket (c-+1-525-644-2673.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <20060610145816m1400dgun6e>; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 14:58:16 +0000 From: "Srinivas Surapaneni" <anna24@example.org> To: "'Beehive Users'" <anna24@example.org> Subject: RE: problem with <netui:rewriteURL> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:58:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcaMOXeNT9kNFKLZSbutCZKpiIe4zQAZKYtw In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This issue is not a rewriteURL issue I am using beehive Grid. I am using the buildQueryParams of the beehive grid to get the paging = and sorting parameters to build the url The parameters it is returning is including all the values in the form -----Original Message----- From: Srinivas Surapaneni [mailto:anna24@example.org]=20 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:56 PM To: 'Beehive Users' Subject: problem with <netui:rewriteURL> I am using <netui:rewriteURL action=3D=94xxxx=94/> in a form =20 When the form is submitted , the above action is generating a link with = all the submitted form values =20 How do I generate a link without the form values? =20 Thank You --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/359 - Release Date: 6/8/2006 =20 --=20 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/359 - Release Date: 6/8/2006 =20 --=20 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/360 - Release Date: 6/9/2006 =20 From anna24@example.org Wed Jun 14 00:53:00 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 95493 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 00:53:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 00:53:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 32962 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 00:52:59 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 32663 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 00:52:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 32652 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 00:52:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:52:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sccrmhc13.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:52:57 -0700 Received: from saket (c-+1-525-644-2673.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2006061400523601300fkrj6e>; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:52:36 +0000 From: "Srinivas Surapaneni" <anna24@example.org> To: "'Beehive Users'" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Expression evaluation Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:52:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C68F2B.55F7D9B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcaPTNxzJWvmsyuJS+2qQCPficyjNQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C68F2B.55F7D9B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there any way to get the real object using expression evaluator for container.item? -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C68F2B.55F7D9B0-- From anna24@example.org Wed Jun 14 01:03:04 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 15416 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 01:03:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 01:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 40957 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 01:03:03 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 40940 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 01:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 40929 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 01:03:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:03:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0102.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:03:02 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s10so11218wxc for <anna24@example.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:02:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Lk4DDKQ1XumWfy2UjqtjOwOF3K1Q/Kqnx8ge+d/ADmdcwTu1aMjF4S3HoLILHEw8EWW96SH3k6YeBIVZPrpiH4OYTdlnpcWaS//Pnhx+SZWZnC7acjWz/BBd7weg2PXrtFUdiintKNxqd1H29sP+xn9XIbmpxzQ12UCc3kb3VQ8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 17mr103801wxw; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:02:41 -0700 From: "Eddie O'Neil" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Re: Expression evaluation In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N What do you mean by "real object"? The "container" object is present in the JspContext as are all JSP 2.0 implicit objects, so you can always just get ahold of it in scriptlet. But why? It's best to avoid code in the page :), so why do you need to code directly against this object? Eddie On 6/13/06, Srinivas Surapaneni <anna24@example.org> wrote: > Is there any way to get the real object using expression evaluator for > container.item? > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 > > > From anna24@example.org Wed Jun 14 01:21:14 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 61576 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2006 01:21:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jun 2006 01:21:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 55606 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 01:21:13 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 55308 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jun 2006 01:21:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 55297 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jun 2006 01:21:12 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:21:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sccrmhc15.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:21:11 -0700 Received: from saket (c-+1-525-644-2673.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTP id <20060614012050015005he9me>; Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:20:50 +0000 From: "Srinivas Surapaneni" <anna24@example.org> To: "'Beehive Users'" <anna24@example.org> Subject: RE: Expression evaluation Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:21:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcaPTkoYciNQ7nPmRCeh4x8/ZK/SqAAAkPkA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Eddie We talked about using tag files for building reusable components. But I want to use <netui> elements with dataSource attribute in the tag file I want to evaluate the container.item to the real (ie) pageFlow.list[xxx].xxxx and pass it to the tag file and use for the dataSource attribute in the tag file Thank You Srinivas -----Original Message----- From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:anna24@example.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:03 PM To: Beehive Users Subject: Re: Expression evaluation What do you mean by "real object"? The "container" object is present in the JspContext as are all JSP 2.0 implicit objects, so you can always just get ahold of it in scriptlet. But why? It's best to avoid code in the page :), so why do you need to code directly against this object? Eddie On 6/13/06, Srinivas Surapaneni <anna24@example.org> wrote: > Is there any way to get the real object using expression evaluator for > container.item? > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 > > > -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.3/362 - Release Date: 6/12/2006 From anna24@example.org Sat Jun 17 15:20:26 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 2770 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2006 15:20:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2006 15:20:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 6469 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2006 15:20:25 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 6217 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2006 15:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 6206 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2006 15:20:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 08:20:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 08:20:23 -0700 Received: from saket (c-71-199-187-5.hsd1.ga.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <20060617151959m1100b0rq6e>; Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:20:03 +0000 From: "Srinivas Surapaneni" <anna24@example.org> To: "'Beehive Users'" <anna24@example.org> Subject: jsp:include issues Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:20:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01C69200.030F2FA0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcaSIYeJqWF6NdneR3isxUI3LgMQrw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Message-Id: <anna24@example.org> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C69200.030F2FA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Eddie This is regarding the actionForm variable in request scope in jsp's There is a bug that was fixed where dataSource is not working in the <jsp:include> But it is still not working if I use the actionForm in JSTL. it is only working for dataSource I cloned the bug and You put a comment that is working as expected Don't you think that actionForm should be available in requestScope whether it is jsp, <jsp:include> or tag files? ${dataGrid} is also not working in JSP tag files We customized the sort and page using tag files and we have to explicity pass the dataGrid as the attribute to the tag files Is this also the normal behavior. Do you want me to file a bug in JIRA on this issue? Thank You -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006 ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C69200.030F2FA0-- From anna24@example.org Mon Jun 19 14:03:49 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 96034 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2006 14:03:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2006 14:03:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 30702 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 14:03:47 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 30540 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 14:03:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 30518 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2006 14:03:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:03:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0102.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:03:44 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s10so822728wxc for <anna24@example.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:03:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ibu2bT9fbDiUMh/HP7YoBjd/dPn+uDp98TphJaPlmHgu0sErtHuReb/wUdM2023atBPvr3kr+WBlt6Va6C4RL1/pjx4LjynkST0pHnMHDizD4OuhAPVpJJjP+uVet9OZfiwtB+x9nNesDf+biFrhJsSQL3r+ibGckB81pTexfr8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v7mr2186742wxa; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:03:23 -0600 From: "Eddie O'Neil" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Developers" <anna24@example.org>, "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Fwd: ApacheCon US 2006 CFP, second notice In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Apologies for the cross posting -- given the different audiences, it seems appropriate in this case. Message about ApacheCon US 2006 below. Eddie ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rich Bowen <anna24@example.org> Date: Jun 18, 2006 7:44 PM Subject: ApacheCon US 2006 CFP, second notice To: anna24@example.org Dear PMC members, Please forward the following message to your development, user, and other appropriate mailing lists, for your projects, to solicit papers for our upcoming conference in Austin, Texas. If you want your project to be represented in the content of the conference, it is crucial that your project submit papers to be considered for the schedule. The most common answer to "why were there no talks about ..." is "none were submitted." Thanks. --------------------------------- Call for Papers for ApacheCon US 2006 is currently open! ApacheCon US 2006 will be held at the Hilton Hotel in Austin, Texas, October 9-13, 2006. The ASF and the conference producer=97Full Circle Productions=97 invite the Open Source community to send in session and tutorial proposals for ApacheCon US 2006. Please check the web site for details http://www.us.apachecon.com To submit a proposal, visit http://us.apachecon.com/cfp-form.html The deadline for submitting is June 28, 2006 ApacheCon US Team --------------------------------------- -- Rich Bowen anna24@example.org From anna24@example.org Mon Jun 19 22:55:56 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 96146 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2006 22:55:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2006 22:55:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 23925 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 22:55:55 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 23621 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2006 22:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 23606 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2006 22:55:54 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:55:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ussjmh01.bea.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:55:53 -0700 Received: from ussjfe01.amer.bea.com (ussjfe01b.bea.com [83.161.120.155]) by ussjmh01.bea.com (Switch-3.0.5/Switch-3.0.0) with ESMTP id k5JMtMo6008760 for <anna24@example.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:55:30 -0700 Received: from repbex02.amer.bea.com ([83.161.120.155]) by ussjfe01.amer.bea.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:55:28 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: arrayMaxLength required > 0? Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:55:26 -0700 Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: arrayMaxLength required > 0? Thread-Index: AcaT83SJuH6aUhFxSLyWzPXaB/w7dg== From: "Jeremiah Johnson" <anna24@example.org> To: <anna24@example.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jun 2006 22:55:28.0220 (UTC) FILETIME=[756001C0:01C693F3] X-PMX-Version: 83.161.120.155621, Antispam-Engine: 83.161.120.155, Antispam-Data: 283.161.120.155433 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I have a DB Control that returns an array; the default number max rows is 1024, but I don't want to limit the rows on this call. I can't change arrayMaxLength to zero, so I have to use a magic number in the annotation (i.e. arrayMaxLength=3D300000). I can put in an enhancement request, but I wonder if there is something that I am missing about requiring the arrayMaxLength to be greater than zero. Is there a reason for the current constraint? Thank you. - jeremiah _______________________________________________________________________ Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it. From anna24@example.org Tue Jun 20 14:24:48 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 14664 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 14:24:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 14:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 89334 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 14:24:47 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 89305 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 14:24:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 89286 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2006 14:24:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:24:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:24:45 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d80so1454054pyd for <anna24@example.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:24:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=SQ/PYd5NlM6RAhKpMy+B1bAanSE+m9JxzUQ6XEmpUIxzaDh2g6Dn14pW7CwPot/aoxoNXF08eUE6jvalX5rjV81HJEIdEv+HAVL/Yvca67r5UrhsMWYpf5f7LH6pwTPksB6+lW9HG/zYHL1jnojiZDLdhAqCnRQcESn6OAAtrFY= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id m12mr9803781pyn; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:24:24 +0200 From: "Giovanni Motta" <anna24@example.org> To: "anna24@example.org" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Inheritance of java controls in pageflows. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4461_29123852.1150813464553" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_4461_29123852.1150813464553 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, i'm new to the list. I'm trying to build a pageflows hierarchy (pageflow PF1 defines java control C1 and an action A1 that internally performs a call to a method of C1, pageflow PF2 inherits directly from PF1 and performs a forward to A1 ). All is done through annotations, no custom instanciation. I'm developing with BEA 9.2 tools, but I'm using a tomcat 5.5.9 server for project requirements. The application starts fine on PF2, invokes action A1 of PF1 with no problem, but when the java control C1 is first used, i see with the debug tool it is not instanciated (null) . Also, during initialization of pageflow P2, i see in console output the exception reported. It seems like no client initializer class is found for P2, but i'm wondering if it's ordinary stuff, since i see the client initializer class is built for pageflow P1, that in effect is the owner of the java control...Bug??? Apart from this, i would like to know if someone else has already developed something similar and can produce a sample code. Reading beehive 1.0.1 documentation, it seems this kind of inheritance should be fully supported. Problems with the container? Any points? Thanks in advance to who will answer. Exception follows: [INFO] FlowController - Handling exception in onCreate(), FlowController operazione1.Operazione1Controller@1d6e3d2 Throwable: * org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.ControlFieldInitializationException*: Exception occurred while initializing control field operazione1.Operazione1Controller in /operazione1/Operazione1Controller.jpf. Stack Trace: * org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.ControlFieldInitializationException*: Exception occurred while initializing control field operazione1.Operazione1Controller in /operazione1/Operazione1Controller.jpf. at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.internal.JavaControlUtils.initJavaControls (*JavaControlUtils.java:177*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowManagedObject.create(* PageFlowManagedObject.java:83*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.FlowController.create(* FlowController.java:556*) at org.*apache*.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowController.create(* PageFlowController.java:405*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.FlowControllerFactory.createPageFlow(* FlowControllerFactory.java:294*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.getFlowController (*PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:603*) at org.*apache* .beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processInternal(* PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:508*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.process(* PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:838*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.AutoRegisterActionServlet.process(* AutoRegisterActionServlet.java:634*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowActionServlet.process(* PageFlowActionServlet.java:156*) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet(*ActionServlet.java:507*) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:689*) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:802*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(* ApplicationFilterChain.java:252*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(* ApplicationFilterChain.java:173*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(* ApplicationDispatcher.java:672*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(* ApplicationDispatcher.java:463*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(* ApplicationDispatcher.java:398*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(* ApplicationDispatcher.java:301*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.internal.DefaultForwardRedirectHandler.forward (*DefaultForwardRedirectHandler.java:127*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.doForward(* PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:1797*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processPageFlowRequest (*PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:732*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processInternal(* PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:469*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.process(* PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:838*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.AutoRegisterActionServlet.process(* AutoRegisterActionServlet.java:634*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowActionServlet.process(* PageFlowActionServlet.java:156*) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet(*ActionServlet.java:507*) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:689*) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:802*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(* ApplicationFilterChain.java:252*) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(* ApplicationFilterChain.java:173*) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(* StandardWrapperValve.java:213*) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(* StandardContextValve.java:178*) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(*StandardHostValve.java :126*) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(*ErrorReportValve.java :105*) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(* StandardEngineValve.java:107*) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(*CoyoteAdapter.java :148*) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(*Http11Processor.java :856*) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection (*Http11Protocol.java:744*) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(* PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527*) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(* LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80*) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(* ThreadPool.java:684*) at java.lang.Thread.run(*Thread.java:595*) Caused by: *java.lang.ClassNotFoundException*: anna24@example.org(* WebappClassLoader.java:1332*) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(* WebappClassLoader.java:1181*) at org.apache.beehive.controls.api.bean.Controls.initializeClient(* Controls.java:131*) at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.internal.JavaControlUtils.initJavaControls (*JavaControlUtils.java:172*) ... 42 more ------=_Part_4461_29123852.1150813464553-- From anna24@example.org Tue Jun 20 15:03:18 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 37357 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 15:03:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 15:03:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 97499 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 15:03:18 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 97232 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 15:03:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 97219 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2006 15:03:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:03:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:03:16 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so3037238uge for <anna24@example.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:02:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q/x6v3ugtm126f4U+2ioA/YRh0bklG5QNRpk0yavcmeJWrZP4HdFZwX+C5F0ng0TxbFKoYFm1db/wiTUoT24X7r+1R8n/UQr4UMAb0mHZLNwlh9cDwkl/fRQYm9Gwky9eTfoLO4hiZBdIM+nWwfTQCLx+1S7JpVWJ/C6q7pkwHA= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id r11mr2663761hur; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:02:54 -0600 From: "Chad Schoettger" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Re: arrayMaxLength required > 0? In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Jeremiah, It appears that this is a bug in the code. The control checker used to validate JDBC control annotation values is enforcing that arrayMaxLength > 0 , but the runtime code is fine with that value and in that particular case will cause the array size to be unlimited. Go ahead a file a JIRA bug on this issue and I'll start looking at a fix. - Chad On 6/19/06, Jeremiah Johnson <anna24@example.org> wrote: > I have a DB Control that returns an array; the default number max rows > is 1024, but I don't want to limit the rows on this call. I can't > change arrayMaxLength to zero, so I have to use a magic number in the > annotation (i.e. arrayMaxLength=300000). > > I can put in an enhancement request, but I wonder if there is something > that I am missing about requiring the arrayMaxLength to be greater than > zero. Is there a reason for the current constraint? > > Thank you. > > - jeremiah > _______________________________________________________________________ > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, > and have received this message in error, please immediately return this > by email and then delete it. > From anna24@example.org Tue Jun 20 18:41:33 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 38178 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 18:41:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 18:41:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 83322 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 18:41:32 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 83292 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 18:41:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 83281 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2006 18:41:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:41:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:41:31 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id e30so1682290pya for <anna24@example.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IBJvMw1vQaUafS8CAsyQUUi27qxSAL0B8jMDRRqc9KoNg0SvNxRMJj9P0Y9EPfUwzBcTkfi5cm7oFmuJsCnbkauAk8S9FZ81ylZS2E/LSm7oM4/eGP1jixQBaNgLyXyvN8oGV+uEqZ2V34eTPaMS90RAwkD98l1z3DTfweXBNb0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id f13mr7418681pyl; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:41:10 -0700 From: "perry anderson" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Re: arrayMaxLength required > 0? In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9424_13731278.1150828870670" References: <anna24@example.org> <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_9424_13731278.1150828870670 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline i can't wait to get back to the world of java programming/design & developement i've been lost in the "netherworlds" of movie stars and world politcs and how i am getting sooooooo annnoooyyyeeeddd gotta start looking out for myself have a nice day - perry On 6/20/06, Chad Schoettger <anna24@example.org> wrote: > > Hi Jeremiah, > > It appears that this is a bug in the code. The control checker used > to validate JDBC control annotation values is enforcing that > arrayMaxLength > 0 , but the runtime code is fine with that value and > in that particular case will cause the array size to be unlimited. > > Go ahead a file a JIRA bug on this issue and I'll start looking at a fix. > > - Chad > > On 6/19/06, Jeremiah Johnson <anna24@example.org> wrote: > > I have a DB Control that returns an array; the default number max rows > > is 1024, but I don't want to limit the rows on this call. I can't > > change arrayMaxLength to zero, so I have to use a magic number in the > > annotation (i.e. arrayMaxLength=300000). > > > > I can put in an enhancement request, but I wonder if there is something > > that I am missing about requiring the arrayMaxLength to be greater than > > zero. Is there a reason for the current constraint? > > > > Thank you. > > > > - jeremiah > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated > > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, > > and have received this message in error, please immediately return this > > by email and then delete it. > > > -- Perry Anderson ---------------------------------------- anna24@example.org +1-525-644-2673 day +1-525-644-2673 evening +1-525-644-2673 fax ---------------------------------------- ------=_Part_9424_13731278.1150828870670-- From anna24@example.org Tue Jun 20 19:59:15 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 70350 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 19:59:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 19:59:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 3793 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 19:59:14 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 3775 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2006 19:59:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 3764 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2006 19:59:13 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:59:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nz-out-0102.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:59:10 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x3so1435890nzd for <anna24@example.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=TA/FQMqy7BqILR9pV4PYV8EqQnVCIPtoVXQiQowsfez/3XRrUX9ufCYobWgNnFBuSflhAazMFYCSls47DRJqV14VLhE967adzAOPe1Rm3W8xMsiLf/YEVBEvIsRfDmW9YHkEkWbdVUZEMzn6UQou5TIuLx9TPWZg4qJpal6TU6s= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q61mr6079892nzi; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:58:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:58:49 -0600 From: "Carlin Rogers" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Re: Inheritance of java controls in pageflows. In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10179_31033380.1150833529267" References: <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_10179_31033380.1150833529267 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Giovanni, The only issue I'm aware of is tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1060 where a package protected control in a parent page flow is not being initialized when using a derived page flow inheriting from the parent. In this case it throws an NPE when the base class method tries to access the control because the control was never initialized. The non-initialization is similar to your experience but I think different. Your stack trace indicates a problem in the initializeClient() method of org.apache.beehive.controls.api.bean.Controls. The call to the ClassLoader loadClass() is throwing a ClassNotFoundException for the class file of your generated ClientInitializer, operazione1.Operazione1ControllerClientInitializer. You mentioned that you noticed that the ClientInitializer is built. Is the class file in build/WEB-INF/classes/? Is it just an issue with the deployment in your Tomcat 5.5.9 configuration. If you have a simple repro case, you can log a separate JIRA issue. Thanks, Carlin On 6/20/06, Giovanni Motta <anna24@example.org> wrote: > > Hi all, i'm new to the list. > I'm trying to build a pageflows hierarchy (pageflow PF1 defines java > control > C1 and an action A1 that internally performs a call to a method of C1, > pageflow PF2 inherits directly from PF1 and performs a forward to A1 ). > All > is done through annotations, no custom instanciation. > I'm developing with BEA 9.2 tools, but I'm using a tomcat 5.5.9 server for > project requirements. > The application starts fine on PF2, invokes action A1 of PF1 with no > problem, but when the java control C1 is first used, i see with the debug > tool it is not instanciated (null) . > Also, during initialization of pageflow P2, i see in console output the > exception reported. > It seems like no client initializer class is found for P2, but i'm > wondering > if it's ordinary stuff, since i see the client initializer class is built > for pageflow P1, that in effect is the owner of the java control...Bug??? > > Apart from this, i would like to know if someone else has already > developed > something similar and can produce a sample code. > Reading beehive 1.0.1 documentation, it seems this kind of inheritance > should be fully supported. > Problems with the container? Any points? > > Thanks in advance to who will answer. > > Exception follows: > > [INFO] FlowController - Handling exception in onCreate(), FlowController > operazione1.Operazione1Controller@1d6e3d2 > > Throwable: * > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.ControlFieldInitializationException*: > Exception occurred while initializing control field > operazione1.Operazione1Controller in > /operazione1/Operazione1Controller.jpf. > > Stack Trace: > * > > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.ControlFieldInitializationException*: > Exception occurred while initializing control field > operazione1.Operazione1Controller in > /operazione1/Operazione1Controller.jpf. > > at > > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.internal.JavaControlUtils.initJavaControls > (*JavaControlUtils.java:177*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowManagedObject.create(* > PageFlowManagedObject.java:83*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.FlowController.create(* > FlowController.java:556*) > > at org.*apache*.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowController.create(* > PageFlowController.java:405*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.FlowControllerFactory.createPageFlow > (* > FlowControllerFactory.java:294*) > > at > > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.getFlowController > (*PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:603*) > > at org.*apache* > .beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processInternal(* > PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:508*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.process(* > PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:838*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.AutoRegisterActionServlet.process(* > AutoRegisterActionServlet.java:634*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowActionServlet.process(* > PageFlowActionServlet.java:156*) > > at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet(*ActionServlet.java:507*) > > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:689*) > > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:802*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(* > ApplicationFilterChain.java:252*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(* > ApplicationFilterChain.java:173*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(* > ApplicationDispatcher.java:672*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(* > ApplicationDispatcher.java:463*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(* > ApplicationDispatcher.java:398*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(* > ApplicationDispatcher.java:301*) > > at > > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.internal.DefaultForwardRedirectHandler.forward > (*DefaultForwardRedirectHandler.java:127*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.doForward(* > PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:1797*) > > at > > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processPageFlowRequest > (*PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:732*) > > at > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processInternal > (* > PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:469*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.process(* > PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:838*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.AutoRegisterActionServlet.process(* > AutoRegisterActionServlet.java:634*) > > at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowActionServlet.process(* > PageFlowActionServlet.java:156*) > > at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doGet(*ActionServlet.java:507*) > > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:689*) > > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(*HttpServlet.java:802*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(* > ApplicationFilterChain.java:252*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(* > ApplicationFilterChain.java:173*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(* > StandardWrapperValve.java:213*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(* > StandardContextValve.java:178*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(* > StandardHostValve.java > :126*) > > at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(* > ErrorReportValve.java > :105*) > > at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(* > StandardEngineValve.java:107*) > > at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(*CoyoteAdapter.java > :148*) > > at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(*Http11Processor.java > :856*) > > at > > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection > (*Http11Protocol.java:744*) > > at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(* > PoolTcpEndpoint.java:527*) > > at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(* > LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:80*) > > at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(* > ThreadPool.java:684*) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(*Thread.java:595*) > > Caused by: *java.lang.ClassNotFoundException*: > operazione1.Operazione1ControllerClientInitializer > > at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(* > WebappClassLoader.java:1332*) > > at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(* > WebappClassLoader.java:1181*) > > at org.apache.beehive.controls.api.bean.Controls.initializeClient(* > Controls.java:131*) > > at > > org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.internal.JavaControlUtils.initJavaControls > (*JavaControlUtils.java:172*) > > ... 42 more > > ------=_Part_10179_31033380.1150833529267-- From anna24@example.org Wed Jun 21 07:38:47 2006 Return-Path: <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 93286 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2006 07:38:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2006 07:38:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 72417 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2006 07:38:47 -0000 Delivered-To: anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 72125 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2006 07:38:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact anna24@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:anna24@example.org> List-Id: <user.beehive.apache.org> Reply-To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Delivered-To: mailing list anna24@example.org Received: (qmail 72114 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2006 07:38:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:38:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of anna24@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:38:44 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c31so1748251pyd for <anna24@example.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=I1Ns3XqBAikL9zi2WLNqwjwPKv1OOMbJJIY83+8ukI9kf3VTG89zofsPRAGI1dgClNw2KpiuacGByv2HhnI6902+zSk6idS80cWuiVK9Xqdn9uT6g04J7ISQYVaz9zJhEx0HUY4tRW2WDToW9CMkimf6lfql6stFTSTrx/0mvTI= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id f12mr10758028pym; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <anna24@example.org> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:38:23 +0200 From: "Giovanni Motta" <anna24@example.org> To: "Beehive Users" <anna24@example.org> Subject: Re: Inheritance of java controls in pageflows. Cc: "Carlin Rogers" <anna24@example.org> In-Reply-To: <anna24@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15850_19540809.1150875503484" References: <anna24@example.org> <anna24@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_15850_19540809.1150875503484 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks Carlin, i realized my explanation was not clear... I noticed the ClientInitializer is built only for 'father' pageflow P1 (the base class), the one that holds the action and the control to be executed. For pageflow P2 that inherits from P1, ClientInitializer is NOT generated...I don't know if it is a bug the fact of not to generate it, or else the fact of look for it in this particular case, where the ClientInitializer is generated for the base class... I think my problem is quite similar to the one you mentioned, i also get a NPE when the control is referenced by base class, but i noticed also that other exception i reported. It is logged and probably handled by the framework, since it doesn't stop execution...maybe it should??? Could you point me to JIRA (some kind of bug tracker, i suppose?). Many thanks, regards. Giovanni. 2006/6/20, Carlin Rogers <anna24@example.org>: > > Hi Giovanni, > > The only issue I'm aware of is tracked in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-1060 where a package > protected > control in a parent page flow is not being initialized when using a > derived > page flow inheriting from the parent. In this case it throws an NPE when > the > base class method tries to access the control because the control was > never > initialized. The non-initialization is similar to your experience but I > think different. Your stack trace indicates a problem in the > initializeClient() method of > org.apache.beehive.controls.api.bean.Controls. The call to the ClassLoader > loadClass() is throwing a ClassNotFoundException for the class file of > your > generated ClientInitializer, > operazione1.Operazione1ControllerClientInitializer. You mentioned that you > noticed that the ClientInitializer is built. Is the class file in > build/WEB-INF/classes/? Is it just an issue with the deployment in your > Tomcat 5.5.9 configuration. If you have a simple repro case, you can log a
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}