From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 03:17:50 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 56710 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 03:17:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 03:17:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 93431 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 03:17:52 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 93405 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 03:17:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 93394 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 03:17:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 May 2008 20:17:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:17:04 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so528914fgb.27 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sat, 31 May 2008 20:17:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WR0/zUz6hmcrHMgJhfEblhrBb6jZffmSX4EPKjAcKW0=; b=Su02yyUOTFzmiJqjvMt9V+0j1qP5xxFmXvmJcXHtc9JXO/fjFotKEvW8vYwT05KCgoKDy4dJz0jN8SGjJCy9dL1d9Ks9Ap7eJn5vwvFf37pT/TFBzDyZQCT2yxxFORmeyXTVQbn67L9BSvEM2QLDCOC9Aho7uosEQoP1E+J22Gs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XXE80+JNJ7bV3g2sxD2GxFOsrYBqHZOjHlZ2sCWHbFMWpExa8/BAOUGqwnFbjRgXngFbGWRFAniYzcQLnny+28GMrC0flMPWWQyLX5aXvf5V94crecJmM9rkDI0PbiyK/QTgqqQgNx+SQngTuWmMw1eXjtDxtaSFiU+qhSlnKvw= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a11mr172443buf.47.1212290239523; Sat, 31 May 2008 20:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 31 May 2008 20:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 08:47:19 +0530 From: "=?UTF-8?B?Tm9ibGUgUGF1bCDgtKg=?= =?UTF-8?B?4LWL4LSs4LS/4LSz4LWN4oCNIOCkqOCli+CkrOCljeCks+CljQ==?=" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "Solr1.3" by HossMan In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org BTW , how can I get the list of methods which are not used? Let us see then what can be added as tests --Noble On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > : BinaryResponseWriter, FastInputStream and FastOutputStream are part of > : the new binary format. The distributed search tests cover most of > : *what is used* because the SearchHandler uses that instead of the XML > : one. > > If there's code that's not used let's remove it. if the code is needed, > then let's write tests for it. The fact that it's the fundemental > underpinnings of distributed search just makes it more important to have > good tests, not just to know it's working correctly now, but to ensure we > will be able to improve it later and know we arent' breaking anything. > > > > -Hoss > > -- --Noble Paul From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 07:43:06 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 12392 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 07:43:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 07:43:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 52131 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 07:43:08 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 52097 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 07:43:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 52085 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 07:43:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:43:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FS_REPLICA X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:42:28 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A10A234C133 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <123230931.1212306165105.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:42:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Updated: (SOLR-561) Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) In-Reply-To: <290569142.1209981535598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noble Paul updated SOLR-561: ---------------------------- Attachment: SOLR-561.patch The first cut. very crude , but worx .No OS specific commands The design for snapshoot , snappull is same as described in the design overview snapinstall is done the following way * write out a file index.properties in dataDirectory. * call commit command * The SolrCore is modified. A new method getNewIndexDir() is added. It loads the properties file (if exists, else fall back to the old behavior), read a property 'index' and return * Any new SolrIndexWriter, SolrIndexSearcher is loaded from the new index dir * Old ones continue to use the old index dir . getindexDir() returns the index dir used by the current SolrIndexReader/SolrIndexWriter Use the following configuration in master # register snapshooter {code:xml} <listener event="postCommit" class="solr.SnapShooter"> <bool name="wait">true</bool> </listener> {code} # register replication Handler {code:xml} <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" /> {code} # register a new ResponseWriter {code:xml} <queryResponseWriter name="filestream" class="org.apache.solr.request.CustomBinaryResponseWriter"/> {code} In the Slave # register the replication handler {code:xml} <requestHandler name="/replication" class="solr.ReplicationHandler" > <str name="masterUrl">http://localhost:8080/solr/replication</str> <str name="pollInterval">00:00:30</str> </requestHandler> {code} > Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-561 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: replication > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Environment: All > Reporter: Noble Paul > Attachments: SOLR-561.patch > > > The current replication strategy in solr involves shell scripts . The following are the drawbacks with the approach > * It does not work with windows > * Replication works as a separate piece not integrated with solr. > * Cannot control replication from solr admin/JMX > * Each operation requires manual telnet to the host > Doing the replication in java has the following advantages > * Platform independence > * Manual steps can be completely eliminated. Everything can be driven from solrconfig.xml . > ** Adding the url of the master in the slaves should be good enough to enable replication. Other things like frequency of > snapshoot/snappull can also be configured . All other information can be automatically obtained. > * Start/stop can be triggered from solr/admin or JMX > * Can get the status/progress while replication is going on. It can also abort an ongoing replication > * No need to have a login into the machine > This issue can track the implementation of solr replication in java -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 08:05:15 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 16006 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 08:05:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 08:05:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 56674 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 08:05:16 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 56649 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 08:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 56638 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 08:05:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:05:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FS_REPLICA X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 08:04:28 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1090B234C133 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 01:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1113142401.1212307485066.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 01:04:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Thomas Peuss (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-561) Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) In-Reply-To: <290569142.1209981535598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601450#action_12601450 ] Thomas Peuss commented on SOLR-561: ----------------------------------- A library like "Quartz" (http://www.opensymphony.com/quartz/) would give you the possibility to provide both types of schedules (HH:MM:SS and cron like). Quartz uses the ASF 2.0 license. So there are at least no licensing issues. I have not looked at the code but it is possible to do snapshots/snappull at a certain time (e.g. every day 1am)? Quartz would give you the possibility to do that as well. Quartz would even provide scenarios like _every 1st monday of the month_. > Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-561 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: replication > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Environment: All > Reporter: Noble Paul > Attachments: SOLR-561.patch > > > The current replication strategy in solr involves shell scripts . The following are the drawbacks with the approach > * It does not work with windows > * Replication works as a separate piece not integrated with solr. > * Cannot control replication from solr admin/JMX > * Each operation requires manual telnet to the host > Doing the replication in java has the following advantages > * Platform independence > * Manual steps can be completely eliminated. Everything can be driven from solrconfig.xml . > ** Adding the url of the master in the slaves should be good enough to enable replication. Other things like frequency of > snapshoot/snappull can also be configured . All other information can be automatically obtained. > * Start/stop can be triggered from solr/admin or JMX > * Can get the status/progress while replication is going on. It can also abort an ongoing replication > * No need to have a login into the machine > This issue can track the implementation of solr replication in java -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 08:27:10 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 18211 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 08:27:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 08:27:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 68804 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 08:27:11 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 68769 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 08:27:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 68758 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 08:27:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:27:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FS_REPLICA X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 08:26:24 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5CC234C133 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 01:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <198878511.1212308805713.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 01:26:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-561) Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) In-Reply-To: <290569142.1209981535598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601451#action_12601451 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-561: --------------------------------- Thomas: This is something that can be considered. But , I am still not very convinced that people use it that way. It is going to introduce some dependency on a new library. Let us see if there is enough demand from users *note* :All the operations can be triggerred using http get. So a _wget_ from cron can do the trick in the current form > Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-561 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: replication > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Environment: All > Reporter: Noble Paul > Attachments: SOLR-561.patch > > > The current replication strategy in solr involves shell scripts . The following are the drawbacks with the approach > * It does not work with windows > * Replication works as a separate piece not integrated with solr. > * Cannot control replication from solr admin/JMX > * Each operation requires manual telnet to the host > Doing the replication in java has the following advantages > * Platform independence > * Manual steps can be completely eliminated. Everything can be driven from solrconfig.xml . > ** Adding the url of the master in the slaves should be good enough to enable replication. Other things like frequency of > snapshoot/snappull can also be configured . All other information can be automatically obtained. > * Start/stop can be triggered from solr/admin or JMX > * Can get the status/progress while replication is going on. It can also abort an ongoing replication > * No need to have a login into the machine > This issue can track the implementation of solr replication in java -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 09:37:09 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 29111 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 09:37:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 09:37:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 98227 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 09:37:11 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 98194 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 09:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 98182 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 09:37:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:37:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FS_REPLICA X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:36:23 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2493F234C133 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <658320646.1212313005148.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 02:36:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Thomas Peuss (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-561) Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) In-Reply-To: <290569142.1209981535598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601457#action_12601457 ] Thomas Peuss commented on SOLR-561: ----------------------------------- {quote} Thomas: This is something that can be considered. But , I am still not very convinced that people use it that way. It is going to introduce some dependency on a new library. Let us see if there is enough demand from users {quote} The basic functionality is much more important of course (and much harder to do). {quote} note :All the operations can be triggerred using http get. So a wget from cron can do the trick in the current form {quote} OK. Then ignore my comment. :-) > Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-561 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: replication > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Environment: All > Reporter: Noble Paul > Attachments: SOLR-561.patch > > > The current replication strategy in solr involves shell scripts . The following are the drawbacks with the approach > * It does not work with windows > * Replication works as a separate piece not integrated with solr. > * Cannot control replication from solr admin/JMX > * Each operation requires manual telnet to the host > Doing the replication in java has the following advantages > * Platform independence > * Manual steps can be completely eliminated. Everything can be driven from solrconfig.xml . > ** Adding the url of the master in the slaves should be good enough to enable replication. Other things like frequency of > snapshoot/snappull can also be configured . All other information can be automatically obtained. > * Start/stop can be triggered from solr/admin or JMX > * Can get the status/progress while replication is going on. It can also abort an ongoing replication > * No need to have a login into the machine > This issue can track the implementation of solr replication in java -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 17:58:36 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 50773 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 17:58:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 17:58:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 80538 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 17:58:38 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 80493 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 17:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 80482 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 17:58:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 10:58:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:57:49 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id C9A0A71C428; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C5371C322 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "SolrTomcat" by NoblePaul In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : Adding the configuration as a comment in the actual web.xml is Ok, but : then users should be informed that as an option (on the wiki). A user : may never come to know that there is this comment in the web.xml which : is an alternative way of specifying the solr home folder. That is 100% exactly why i don't wnat this info on a wiki page about "configuring" solr -- if you don't already know what a web.xml file is, then you shouldn't be told about this information. it is not a viable way to specify the solr home for typical users who might get confused into thinking the web.xml is a "configuration" file they should edit -- it's not. it's part of the application, if you are customizing the application then fine, edit it as much as you want, edit the source code as much as you wnat to -- but users that expect things to just work when they upgrade will be really pissed off if they've muck with their web.xml based on this information. I've pulled the info from SOlrTomcat and added it to a new HackingSolr page instead. -Hoss From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 18:58:17 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 69301 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 18:58:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 18:58:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 8753 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 18:58:19 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 8721 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 18:58:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 8710 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 18:58:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:58:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:57:22 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id CB7A071C3A8; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8B071C28E for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:57:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: Wiki loading time In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : I looked at it, and like it. The one thing I needed was a someone with some : credentials to try changing the template... (it was just before new years) : : but then i got distracted and busy... Doh! ... i see now your last update saying you needed help from someone in the "confluence-admin" group. I'm guessing with the holidays i missed that. The only reason i was put in the confluence-admin group was because i was the PMC member who requested the wiki be created. Now that Ryan is in the PMC (and the most likely to work on this at some point in the future) I've added him as well. For any one who'se curious, these are the previous discussions... http://www.nabble.com/Confluence-wiki-vs-MoinMoin-to14207960.html http://www.nabble.com/Solr-CWIKI-ready-for-experimenting-to14476646.html -Hoss From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 19:02:03 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 70569 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 19:02:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 19:02:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 10136 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:02:04 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 10096 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:02:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 10085 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 19:02:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:02:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:01:10 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 967EE71C267; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9479971C07A for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:01:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: Wiki loading time In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : So would you suggest creating all new documentation on Confluence or : there are tools to migrate stuff existing on MoinMoin? there wasn't any plan to migrate anything from MoinMoin ... the initial plan was to use COnfluence to replace the *site* (instead of forrest) then primary motivation being that then it would be easier to add new content to the main site, which could be included in releases, both for committers, as well as for community members who sign CLAs (for legal reasons, content from people who havne't signed CLAs can't be included in a release, which is why we can't included snapshots of the current wiki in releases, MoinMoin doesn't have access controls to let us distinguish "cla-users" from users who self create accounts. -Hoss From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 19:10:07 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 74443 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 19:10:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 19:10:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 16847 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 16817 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:10:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 16806 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 19:10:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:10:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:09:15 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 6F9B871C1D4; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D16671C003 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:09:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: Wiki loading time In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org FWIW: I removed the dynamic macros from the front page, and it's now *noticibly* faster. : : Is it just me, or does the wiki front page : : (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage) take a really long time to load? : : I suspect that has to do with the two dynamicly loaded lists: all request : handlers, all response writers. : : it makes the wiki easier to manage, but it's probably slower (i'm guessing : MoinMoin doesn't cache those "FullSearch" calls. -Hoss From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 19:33:17 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 79201 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 19:33:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 19:33:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30261 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:33:18 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 30233 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:33:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 30222 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 19:33:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:33:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:32:30 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 5A16471C346; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570C571C2C1 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:32:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: Extended Facet In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> References: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : : Looking into the code I found out that all the field types implement : FieldType, that's fine, but maybe we can refactor that so we have more : levels like: ...the goal being that then your extended facet code could add the extra stats when it sees that the field type extends NumericFieldType? That seems fine to me ... but a more robust solution might be to just introspec toObject() method on the fieldtype, and test if that extends Number (then your code will work even if people write their own field types that don't extend NumericFieldType) That assumes you are using toObject to get the values to do computation on ... if you're using ValueSources then you don't have to worry about it at all -- every field supports it, even the non numeric ones (using OrdFieldSource) .. if the user asks you to give him the standard deviation of a string field i think it's fine to give back a bogus answer (or you could put a special case in and return "not applicable" if the ValueSource is an OrdFieldSource) -Hoss From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 19:50:14 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 83143 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 19:50:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 19:50:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 37634 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:50:16 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 37603 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 19:50:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 37592 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 19:50:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:50:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:49:27 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 6212071C40B; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486371C3B0 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:49:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "Solr1.3" by HossMan In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : BTW , how can I get the list of methods which are not used? : : Let us see then what can be added as tests Oh sorry ... i didn't add the link did i? http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/clover/ ...click any class name in hte left nav, and it will syntax highlight what statements in the class aren't fully covered (statements don't get partial highlighlighting, so if there is a complex conditional or something the whole thing will be highlighted even if one clause is getting tested) -Hoss From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 20:04:11 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 85079 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 20:04:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 20:04:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 44315 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 20:04:12 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 44290 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 20:04:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 44279 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 20:04:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:04:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:03:25 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81754234C12D for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1561404477.1212350626528.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:03:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-586) Maven - Solrj Artifact Publishing In-Reply-To: <1716248802.1212076785156.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601493#action_12601493 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-586: ------------------------------- {quote} So given the above process, it seems like it would be relatively simple to standardize this process by: 1) Including the solr-common and solrj pom files w/ the dist. 2) Automating the periodic installation of the artifacts to a central repo, such as the ibiblio repo. {quote} I don't use Maven, but i'm +1 to the idea. FWIW: this is the same basic approach lucene-java took ... most committers were hesitant to rip out the ant build files they were use to in order to use maven to build with, but changes were made to at least generate poms and help automate publishing jars and POMs to the Apache maven repository (which is mirrored by ibiblio) > Maven - Solrj Artifact Publishing > --------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-586 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-586 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Reporter: Spencer Crissman > Priority: Minor > Attachments: solr-common.pom.xml, solrj.pom.xml > > > I know there is an issue open (SOLR-19) for getting a solr build going under Maven. This issue differs from that in that it does not concern the build process of the solr project, but rather simple dependency management for maven projects that depend on the solr artifacts. I've outlined a way to easily incorporate solrj + dependencies into your own maven projects, in hopes that others doing this find it useful. > This issue's purpose is twofold: > 1) Let others know the process. > 2) Open the idea of whether this can be streamlined/incorporated into the standard build in some manner. > Depending on Solrj in a Maven Project > 1) Build a 1.3 snapshot. > 1.1) Check out the code from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/ > 1.2) Build using "ant dist" > 2) Install the artifacts into your maven repo, using the included pom files. > 2.1) Move to your dist/apache-solr-1.3-dev/dist directory. > 2.2) Copy the attached pom files into this directory. > 2.3) Install solr-common into your repo. > ex) mvn install:install-file -Dfile=apache-solr-common-1.3-dev.jar -DpomFile=solr-common.pom.xml > 2.4) Install solrj into your repo. > ex) mvn install:install-file -Dfile=apache-solr-solrj-1.3-dev.jar -DpomFile=solrj.pom.xml > 3) Use Solrj in your existing Maven projects by including it as a dependency in your own pom.xml > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.lucene.solr</groupId> > <artifactId>solrj</artifactId> > <version>1.3-SNAPSHOT</version> > </dependency> > > So given the above process, it seems like it would be relatively simple to standardize this process by: > 1) Including the solr-common and solrj pom files w/ the dist. > 2) Automating the periodic installation of the artifacts to a central repo, such as the ibiblio repo. > If those steps were performed, then creating a (maven) project based on solrj would be super simple: just #3 from above. Since most custom developments are probably for the clients, it seems like simplifying this would be a nice step to take. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Sun Jun 01 20:22:31 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 87694 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 20:22:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 20:22:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 54212 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 20:22:33 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 54179 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2008 20:22:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 54168 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2008 20:22:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:22:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO spunkymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:21:38 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [83.161.120.155]) by spunkymail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BFA21386 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <richardgriffin@example.net> From: Grant Ingersoll <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) Subject: Re: Wiki loading time Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:21:58 -0400 References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 Thanks Hoss! On Jun 1, 2008, at 3:09 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > FWIW: I removed the dynamic macros from the front page, and it's now > *noticibly* faster. > > : : Is it just me, or does the wiki front page > : : (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage) take a really long time > to load? > : > : I suspect that has to do with the two dynamicly loaded lists: all > request > : handlers, all response writers. > : > : it makes the wiki easier to manage, but it's probably slower (i'm > guessing > : MoinMoin doesn't cache those "FullSearch" calls. > > > -Hoss > From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Mon Jun 02 04:25:15 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 77518 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 04:25:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 04:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 25515 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 04:25:17 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 25486 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 04:25:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 25475 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2008 04:25:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:25:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:24:28 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so796738fgb.27 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:24:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8wg6rxMESH+TlnF95ROGCOljuDBEihdfx/wGzXwsBIs=; b=Iwb1DgXoNjRsGX8FwNQM1Q4uHYPELYMnvrDUT8orL0EaRVKDW8L27Wil5dzsABXef/CpzPFaWVRwxQL3jClU3dtQGnWkRue80swKOtCzLIeLiLXjH8oPE9poSz0sjXAWeqR+d3d+y4LIJ8muwCafMeqEWaQIKS/7QgcbDh81hqQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rvHgidTmgUchITj8NzLZIygWX8i+xKILeqrerGjw/OEs6UE2zdXbsmTDkYfn7ZHz5VkRWvjUOH0wsgtDvhSp/5NZ3GWLBn17aTyFsfw9ptcQC+qX5bqQX3kGFVGqg6Uu5SI2vpzPXa0xJJsKfvgJOtH5xhEQaadTBCuFdDAFYEk= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j1mr802084buc.15.1212380683438; Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 21:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:54:43 +0530 From: "=?UTF-8?B?Tm9ibGUgUGF1bCDgtKg=?= =?UTF-8?B?4LWL4LSs4LS/4LSz4LWN4oCNIOCkqOCli+CkrOCljeCks+CljQ==?=" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "Solr1.3" by HossMan In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Let us remove BinaryResponseWriter from the list. The reason why it is has very-low coverage is because # There are two methods implemented by the class which are there in the interface but not used and the total lines itself is too small # One instanceof added for completeness 88 0 if (o instanceof Document) { 89 0 return getDoc((Document) o); 90 } 91 92 0 return o; # The only lines which I am not sure are the following. I think the check may be redundant 131 3320 FieldType ft = schema.getFieldTypeNoEx(fieldName); 132 3320 Object val; 133 3320 if (ft==null) { // handle fields not in the schema 134 0 if (f.isBinary()) val = f.binaryValue(); 135 0 else val = f.stringValue(); 136 } else { 137 3320 val = useFieldObjects ? ft.toObject(f) : ft.toExternal(f); 138 } everything else is fine --Noble On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Apache Wiki <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Solr Wiki" for change notification. > > The following page has been changed by HossMan: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solr1%2e3 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > == TODO: Misc == > > * resolve multicore logging prefix. I think otis suggested moving to the end for consistent log file parsers {{{ core.log.info(core.getLogId()+ ... }}} > - * code coverage reports are generally low, but some of the new classes in 1.3 that have frighteningly low coverage -- in many cases these seem like pretty important classes and/or high profile plugins. numbers below as of May 26... > + * [http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/clover/ code coverage reports] are generally low, but some of the new classes in 1.3 that have frighteningly low coverage -- in many cases these seem like pretty important classes and/or high profile plugins. numbers below as of May 26... > * BinaryResponseWriter (66.7%) > * BoostedQuery (53.8%) > * BoostedQuery.CustomScorer (50%) > -- --Noble Paul From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Mon Jun 02 08:34:19 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 48824 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 08:34:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 08:34:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 25235 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 08:34:18 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 25210 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 08:34:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 25198 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2008 08:34:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:34:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of richardgriffin@example.net does not designate 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:33:28 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so32748ywj.5 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x6mr7013057ybj.163.1212395610493; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 01:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 01:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 09:33:30 +0100 From: "Andrew Savory" <richardgriffin@example.net> Sender: richardgriffin@example.net To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Re: [Solr Wiki] Update of "SolrTomcat" by NoblePaul In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_21162_12921660.1212395610456" References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4fc0fee526efece5 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_21162_12921660.1212395610456 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, 2008/5/31 Chris Hostetter <richardgriffin@example.net>: > I think you are being a little too presumptuious about the user base ... > just because people use a java app doesn't mean they understand the > internals of how a WAR or JAR file works -- nor should they. Some feedback from the user base. We build Solr from source (to include our site-specific customisations), and modify the web.xml before it goes into the war. I wouldn't be surprised if other people do similar. (I was on-site with a bank not so long ago, who deployed to Websphere by unarchiving wars, patching files, rearchiving and then deploying. Not best practice, but common practice.) Andrew. -- richardgriffin@example.net / richardgriffin@example.net http://www.andrewsavory.com/ ------=_Part_21162_12921660.1212395610456-- From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Mon Jun 02 09:05:16 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 57761 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 09:05:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 09:05:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 57666 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 09:05:17 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 57639 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 09:05:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 57628 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2008 09:05:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:05:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:04:29 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id z74so480698pyg.9 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=Q6d+254LOzPepFNmp05QmWq1drr+/8MQZKdKqUbJ3HQ=; b=dnDRn41WD0406imvZc2wwP/2dcXfWPKrIi6a4AR+sknjqueCOcZiGjDxms+K5uazWo7lIOqir0smamSNovxeldSJ+q30gC6haUmEkqwio6YfqdkPjo8PzaIdGtmLHWkMKKBaPNQsYcSeRieo/uv/Pv6nwZ8eeyfYApHt1weBZ48= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=wGKoFGn7GS6rfzzgZDZixY6Q5jSwl1Ftjqq4iT1zl2IJ9QiOjW5eUbdy4t6alyf4lPqIHO2NJw4tbtdfvOyMiWUSQyrs1hjH0c//aItEe5KBpmxaTL//o7C2RTqXq5S+fmoqxXXyq8XKXQq1IgIsTGs04u62uNzkU0OajuDmdg4= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a1mr9325764waf.25.1212397485301; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:04:45 +0200 From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" <richardgriffin@example.net> Sender: richardgriffin@example.net To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Marking myself inactive (was: svn commit: r662366...) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 95cdf08922b4f910 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Solr people, On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:56 AM, <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > Author: bdelacretaz > Date: Mon Jun 2 01:56:41 2008 > New Revision: 662366... As you can see I have marked myself inactive on the http://lucene.apache.org/solr/who.html page (should be updated in a few hours) - it's been almost a year since I did anything for Solr, and with 1504 unread messages in my Solr inbox folder, it's about time ;-) It's been a pleasure working with you guys, and meeting some of richardgriffin@example.net. I'll be around, but my work has changed a lot since last year, and I don't use Solr in my current projects. The few projects that I did during my short involvement with Solr are still running strong, keep up the good work! -Bertrand From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Mon Jun 02 11:56:09 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 1427 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 11:56:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 11:56:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 51830 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 11:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 51805 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 11:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 51793 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2008 11:56:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 04:56:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1998.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FS_REPLICA X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:55:23 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35205234C130 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 04:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1591718642.1212407745216.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 04:55:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Updated: (SOLR-561) Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) In-Reply-To: <290569142.1209981535598.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noble Paul updated SOLR-561: ---------------------------- Attachment: SOLR-561.patch This patch includes * a new method in ReplicationHandler _filechecksum_ , which can return the checksums of a given list of files in a snapshot * The snappuller will request for the checksums of the files if the name and size are same (compared to the current index) * Only if the checksums are different the file is downloaded * Other files are copied from the current index > Solr replication by Solr (for windows also) > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-561 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-561 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: replication > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Environment: All > Reporter: Noble Paul > Attachments: SOLR-561.patch, SOLR-561.patch > > > The current replication strategy in solr involves shell scripts . The following are the drawbacks with the approach > * It does not work with windows > * Replication works as a separate piece not integrated with solr. > * Cannot control replication from solr admin/JMX > * Each operation requires manual telnet to the host > Doing the replication in java has the following advantages > * Platform independence > * Manual steps can be completely eliminated. Everything can be driven from solrconfig.xml . > ** Adding the url of the master in the slaves should be good enough to enable replication. Other things like frequency of > snapshoot/snappull can also be configured . All other information can be automatically obtained. > * Start/stop can be triggered from solr/admin or JMX > * Can get the status/progress while replication is going on. It can also abort an ongoing replication > * No need to have a login into the machine > This issue can track the implementation of solr replication in java -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Mon Jun 02 12:28:17 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 19568 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 12:28:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 12:28:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 11184 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 12:28:19 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 11163 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 12:28:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 11152 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2008 12:28:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 05:28:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1999.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:27:23 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD4C234C132 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1740122293.1212409665174.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 05:27:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ryan McKinley (JIRA)" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (SOLR-139) Support updateable/modifiable documents In-Reply-To: <30063871.1170576125525.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601614#action_12601614 ] Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-139: ------------------------------------ the biggest reason this patch won't work is that with SOLR-559, the DirectUpdateHandler2 does not keep track of pending updates -- to get this to work again, it will need to maintain a list somewhere. Also, we need to make sure the API lets you grab stored fields from somewhere else -- as is, it forces you to store all fields for all documents. > Support updateable/modifiable documents > --------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-139 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-139 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: update > Reporter: Ryan McKinley > Assignee: Ryan McKinley > Attachments: Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, Eriks-ModifiableDocument.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, getStoredFields.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-IndexDocumentCommand.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-ModifyInputDocuments.patch, SOLR-139-XmlUpdater.patch, SOLR-269+139-ModifiableDocumentUpdateProcessor.patch > > > It would be nice to be able to update some fields on a document without having to insert the entire document. > Given the way lucene is structured, (for now) one can only modify stored fields. > While we are at it, we can support incrementing an existing value - I think this only makes sense for numbers. > for background, see: > http://www.nabble.com/loading-many-documents-by-ID-tf3145666.html#a8722293 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From solr-richardgriffin@example.net Mon Jun 02 13:05:50 2008 Return-Path: <solr-richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 37007 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 13:05:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 13:05:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 81218 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 13:05:51 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 81191 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2008 13:05:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: <solr-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: richardgriffin@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 81180 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2008 13:05:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:05:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:05:03 +0000 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so50433rne.4 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 02 Jun
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}