From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Sun May 1 03:01:47 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C393B29F3 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sun, 1 May 2011 03:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75246 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 03:01:46 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 75109 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 03:01:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 75021 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2011 03:01:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 03:01:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO pekmac.local) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 03:01:38 +0000 Received: from pekmac.local (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by pekmac.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345B74A8CB0 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:01:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:01:16 -0500 From: Peter Karman <swansonlinda@example.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: swansonlinda@example.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] FType_Equals This change: ================================ r1085159 | marvin | 2011-03-24 17:02:51 -0500 (Thu, 24 Mar 2011) | 4 lines LUCY-138 ftype_equals.patch Have FType_Equals() return false whenever classes for "self" and "other" don't match. ================================ is causing some of my existing code to break. The change was this: Index: core/Lucy/Plan/FieldType.c =================================================================== --- core/Lucy/Plan/FieldType.c (revision 1085158) +++ core/Lucy/Plan/FieldType.c (revision 1085159) @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ { FieldType *evil_twin = (FieldType*)other; if (evil_twin == self) return true; + if (FType_Get_VTable(self) != FType_Get_VTable(evil_twin)) return false; if (self->boost != evil_twin->boost) return false; if (!!self->indexed != !!evil_twin->indexed) return false; if (!!self->stored != !!evil_twin->stored) return false; When I add some verbosity to the resulting error message: Index: core/Lucy/Plan/Schema.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ // If the field already has an association, verify pairing and return. if (existing) { if (FType_Equals(type, (Obj*)existing)) { return; } - else { THROW(ERR, "'%o' assigned conflicting FieldType", field); } + else { THROW(ERR, "'%o' cannot be %o because already assigned \ conflicting FieldType %o", field, existing, type); } } if (FType_Is_A(type, FULLTEXTTYPE)) { I get this, for example: 'foo' cannot be Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4FullTextType@0x000000010190d870 because already assigned conflicting FieldType Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ullTextType@0x000000010193bfe0 All of which makes me think that the comparison being done isn't really between classes, as the commit message claims, because the objects compared are, in fact, instances of the same class. What am I missing? -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . swansonlinda@example.org From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Sun May 1 04:43:54 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 475E82E6E for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sun, 1 May 2011 04:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97886 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:43:52 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 97814 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 04:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 97805 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2011 04:43:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:43:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 04:43:40 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QGOPW-0002ge-5p; Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:37:34 -0700 Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:37:34 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org, swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] FType_Equals On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:01:16PM -0500, Peter Karman wrote: > This change: > ================================ > r1085159 | marvin | 2011-03-24 17:02:51 -0500 (Thu, 24 Mar 2011) | 4 lines > > LUCY-138 ftype_equals.patch > Have FType_Equals() return false whenever classes for "self" and "other" don't > match. > ================================ > > is causing some of my existing code to break. Mmm, yes, I can see why this might be happening. Some of our backwards compatibility stubs are not providing enough backwards compatibility. That changeset implements an important bugfix, though. We discovered the problem it addresses after corrupting an index because we didn't detect that a field type had changed from one subclass to another and throw an error before the damage was unrecoverable. :( Without that patch, Lucy will let you change a field to a different type -- say one that uses a different posting format -- so long as the other tests within FType_Equals return true. That's bad, because as soon as the indexing session completes, you start trying to read from old segments using the wrong posting codec and Lucy crashes. > 'foo' cannot be Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4FullTextType@0x000000010190d870 because already > assigned conflicting FieldType Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ullTextType@0x000000010193bfe0 > > > > All of which makes me think that the comparison being done isn't really between > classes, as the commit message claims, because the objects compared are, in > fact, instances of the same class. > > What am I missing? They aren't quite the same -- they both start with "Lucy" and end with "FullTextType", but in between, one has "FieldType" and the other has "Plan". When we moved FullTextType from KinoSearch888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4FullTextType to KinoSearch888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ullTextType, we installed a compatibility stub subclass at the old location so that code like this would continue to work: my $type = KinoSearch888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4FullTextType->new(%args); However, the classes aren't exactly the same -- the FieldType variant now subclasses the Plan variant -- and after the commit in question, FType_Equals() won't treat them as equivalent. Probably the best solution for Lucy is to rip out all the compatibility stub subclasses that were inherited from KinoSearch. You should make sure that all new code uses the Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4* variant. If you have conflicting field type classes in your active code, you should fix that and hopefully the problem will go away. If you don't, then you're hitting a problem that arises because within the schema file, the class name for stock FullTextType fields is not recorded -- they are just stored as "type":"fulltext". This is a little complicated to explain and it will go away if we remove the compat stubs, so I'll hold off on the long version until we see whether Plan A works for you. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Sun May 1 11:47:20 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5B3A2E49 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sun, 1 May 2011 11:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56479 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 11:47:20 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 56448 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2011 11:47:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 56440 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2011 11:47:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 11:47:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO pekmac.local) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 May 2011 11:47:14 +0000 Received: from pekmac.local (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by pekmac.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D514A8E58 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sun, 1 May 2011 06:46:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 06:46:54 -0500 From: Peter Karman <swansonlinda@example.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: swansonlinda@example.org References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] FType_Equals Marvin Humphrey wrote on 4/30/11 11:37 PM: > They aren't quite the same -- they both start with "Lucy" and end with > "FullTextType", but in between, one has "FieldType" and the other has "Plan". ah! thanks. better eyes than mine. > > If you have conflicting field type classes in your active code, you should fix > that and hopefully the problem will go away. perfect. that was it. thanks. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . swansonlinda@example.org From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 2 02:19:49 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2298933F7 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 02:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47563 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 47541 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:19:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 47533 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 02:19:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:19:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:19:41 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QGide-0007Zq-4r for swansonlinda@example.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 19:13:30 -0700 Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 19:13:30 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] C code formatter On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:38:56PM -0700, Nathan Kurz wrote: > If "--add-brackets" is compatible with "--keep-one-line-statements", > I'd love if it could be added as well. While figuring out how to work around some of AStyle's bugs and quirks, I've come to understand that it is not that sophisticated at C parsing. Some of the hacks I put in to defeat AStyle idiosyncrasies involve blatant C syntax errors. With that in mind, I would prefer to keep "--add-brackets" out of the astylerc file, so that AStyle's scope is limited to whitespace only. It has a decent rep for not destroying your code, but I'd prefer to play it conservative. Nevertheless, as part of LUCY-141, I ran autoformatting with "--add-brackets" enabled, carefully checked the output and committed the change. We could conceivably do that again -- I'd just like to make sure that AStyle's work gets supervised properly. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 2 02:34:24 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B99FE3868 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 02:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53900 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 53875 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 53867 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 02:34:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:34:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:34:16 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QGirn-0007aP-8u for swansonlinda@example.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 19:28:07 -0700 Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 19:28:07 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] C code formatter On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 09:31:41PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY-141 > > There are still some kinks to work out. All kinks have been worked out, LUCY-141 has been resolved, and I've updated the 0.1.0 release TODO list. Two notes: * The idea of a "run_astyle.pl" script has been expanded into "lucytidy.pl" which wraps multiple formatters and can be run on the entire Lucy source tree. * http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/LucyStyleGuide has been updated, and no longer refers to the HTTPD style guide (which wasn't followed closely by the KinoSearch code base anyway). It may not be thorough enough now, but it warns about the swansonlinda@example.org. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 2 02:52:06 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 312F330AF for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 02:52:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64542 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:52:06 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 64520 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:52:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 64506 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 02:52:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:52:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:51:57 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QGj8t-0007bF-2p; Sun, 01 May 2011 19:45:47 -0700 Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 19:45:47 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org, swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] FType_Equals On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 06:46:54AM -0500, Peter Karman wrote: > > If you have conflicting field type classes in your active code, you should fix > > that and hopefully the problem will go away. > > perfect. that was it. Cool, glad that worked out. :) With r1098463, the bogus compatibility code supporting the following legacy-classes-which-never-existed has been ripped out: Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4FullTextType # should be Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ullTextType Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4StringType # should be Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4StringType Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4ieldTyp888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4BlobType # should be Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4lobType Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Schema # should be Lucy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Plan888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Schema Attempting to use any of them will now produce an immediate crash. I had overlooked that compat code when migrating the namespace. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 2 02:58:59 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B5BF3164 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 02:58:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66475 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:58:59 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 66424 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 02:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 66416 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 02:58:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gw0-f47.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 02:58:51 +0000 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so1971344gwb.6 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sun, 01 May 2011 19:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e5mr9016549yhn.157.1304305108064; Sun, 01 May 2011 19:58:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 1 May 2011 19:58:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> From: Nathan Kurz <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 19:58:08 -0700 Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] C code formatter On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> wr= ote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:38:56PM -0700, Nathan Kurz wrote: >> If "--add-brackets" is compatible with "--keep-one-line-statements", >> I'd love if it could be added as well. > > While figuring out how to work around some of AStyle's bugs and quirks, I= 've > come to understand that it is not that sophisticated at C parsing. =C2=A0= Some of > the hacks I put in to defeat AStyle idiosyncrasies involve blatant C synt= ax > errors. > > With that in mind, I would prefer to keep "--add-brackets" out of the ast= ylerc > file, so that AStyle's scope is limited to whitespace only. =C2=A0It has = a decent > rep for not destroying your code, but I'd prefer to play it conservative. > > Nevertheless, as part of LUCY-141, I ran autoformatting with "--add-brack= ets" > enabled, carefully checked the output and committed the change. =C2=A0We = could > conceivably do that again -- I'd just like to make sure that AStyle's wor= k > gets supervised properly. That sounds like a fine compromise to me. Thanks! --nate From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 2 15:49:27 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F23AF37D5 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 15:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39827 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 15:49:27 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 39777 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 15:49:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 39769 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 15:49:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:49:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 15:49:19 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QGvH7-0002xV-J0 for swansonlinda@example.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 08:43:05 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 08:43:05 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Simplifying the Query Parser On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:16:33PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > The others are all solvable by tightening up the parser: > > > > * Currently field names must match /[0-9A-Za-z_]+/. We should require > > them to be identifiers, i.e. they must not start with a number: > > /[A-Za-z_][0-9A-Za-z_]*/ > > * QueryParser should use single-token lookahead to enforce that field name > > constructs must be followed by something sensible. > > And if it's not, what then? If it's not, as in the forward slash following the colon in 'http://www.apache.org/', then we consume the whole thing as a leaf -- typically resulting in a phrase query. > What if it's sensible but the field doesn't exist (or is private)? For now, we just use the field name. Starting in 0.2.0, I think we should consider parsing such constructs as NoMatchQueries. But that's a more involved change. > > This issue should not block 0.1.0, which is almost done. > > Well, if the handling of PHP888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Interpreter is a bug, should that not be fixed > before 0.1.0? Yes, I agree. With r1096201 and r1096207, the two changes proposed above have been implemented. There is no change in behavior unless set_heed_colons() has been invoked. If heed_colons is true, then the following query strings will now produce sensible results: http://www.apache.org/ 10:30 PHP888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Interpreter This will still produce an unexpected result: mailto:swansonlinda@example.org Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 2 16:28:31 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B5623D84 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 16:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24503 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 16:28:31 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 24472 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2011 16:28:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 24464 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2011 16:28:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 16:28:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of swansonlinda@example.org) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp.kineticode.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2011 16:28:23 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-24-21-128-239.hsd1.or.comcast.net [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.kineticode.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A24C508349 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 2 May 2011 09:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: "David E. Wheeler" <swansonlinda@example.org> In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 09:28:02 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Simplifying the Query Parser On May 2, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >>> The others are all solvable by tightening up the parser: >>>=20 >>> * Currently field names must match /[0-9A-Za-z_]+/. We should = require >>> them to be identifiers, i.e. they must not start with a number: >>> /[A-Za-z_][0-9A-Za-z_]*/ >>> * QueryParser should use single-token lookahead to enforce that = field name >>> constructs must be followed by something sensible. >>=20 >> And if it's not, what then? >=20 > If it's not, as in the forward slash following the colon in > 'http://www.apache.org/', then we consume the whole thing as a leaf -- > typically resulting in a phrase query. Great. Wouldn't work for mailto:swansonlinda@example.org, though. >> What if it's sensible but the field doesn't exist (or is private)? >=20 > For now, we just use the field name. Starting in 0.2.0, I think we = should > consider parsing such constructs as NoMatchQueries. But that's a more > involved change. What does that mean? >>> This issue should not block 0.1.0, which is almost done. =20 >>=20 >> Well, if the handling of PHP888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Interpreter is a bug, should that not = be fixed >> before 0.1.0? >=20 > Yes, I agree. >=20 > With r1096201 and r1096207, the two changes proposed above have been > implemented. There is no change in behavior unless set_heed_colons() = has been > invoked. If heed_colons is true, then the following query strings = will now > produce sensible results: >=20 > http://www.apache.org/ > 10:30 > PHP888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Interpreter >=20 > This will still produce an unexpected result: >=20 > mailto:swansonlinda@example.org Sounds like a great improvement, thanks! David From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Wed May 4 20:37:27 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC203F6C for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90655 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:37:27 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 90567 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:37:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 83357 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 20:32:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf8" Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 20:31:51 +0000 From: swansonlinda@example.org To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-Id: <swansonlinda@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on lucy-site-staging VGhlIEJ1aWxkYm90IGhhcyBkZXRlY3RlZCBhIG5ldyBmYWlsdXJlIG9uIGJ1aWxkZXIgbHVjeS1z aXRlLXN0YWdpbmcgd2hpbGUgYnVpbGRpbmcgQVNGIEJ1aWxkYm90LgpGdWxsIGRldGFpbHMgYXJl IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoKIGh0dHA6Ly9jaS5hcGFjaGUub3JnL2J1aWxkZXJzL2x1Y3ktc2l0ZS1z dGFnaW5nL2J1aWxkcy8yMAoKQnVpbGRib3QgVVJMOiBodHRwOi8vY2kuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy8KCkJ1 aWxkc2xhdmUgZm9yIHRoaXMgQnVpbGQ6IGJiLWNtcy1zbGF2ZQoKQnVpbGQgUmVhc29uOiBzY2hl ZHVsZXIKQnVpbGQgU291cmNlIFN0YW1wOiBbYnJhbmNoIGluY3ViYXRvci9sdWN5L3NpdGVdIDEw OTk1OTQKQmxhbWVsaXN0OiBtYXJ2aW4KCkJVSUxEIEZBSUxFRDogZmFpbGVkIGNvbXBpbGUKCnNp bmNlcmVseSwKIC1UaGUgQnVpbGRib3QKCg== From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Wed May 4 20:37:27 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3576F3F71 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90724 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:37:27 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 90584 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:37:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 84652 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 20:33:14 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf8" Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 20:32:53 +0000 From: swansonlinda@example.org To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-Id: <swansonlinda@example.org> Subject: [lucy-dev] buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on lucy-site-staging VGhlIEJ1aWxkYm90IGhhcyBkZXRlY3RlZCBhIHJlc3RvcmVkIGJ1aWxkIG9uIGJ1aWxkZXIgbHVj eS1zaXRlLXN0YWdpbmcgd2hpbGUgYnVpbGRpbmcgQVNGIEJ1aWxkYm90LgpGdWxsIGRldGFpbHMg YXJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoKIGh0dHA6Ly9jaS5hcGFjaGUub3JnL2J1aWxkZXJzL2x1Y3ktc2l0 ZS1zdGFnaW5nL2J1aWxkcy8yMQoKQnVpbGRib3QgVVJMOiBodHRwOi8vY2kuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy8K CkJ1aWxkc2xhdmUgZm9yIHRoaXMgQnVpbGQ6IGJiLWNtcy1zbGF2ZQoKQnVpbGQgUmVhc29uOiBz Y2hlZHVsZXIKQnVpbGQgU291cmNlIFN0YW1wOiBbYnJhbmNoIGluY3ViYXRvci9sdWN5L3NpdGVd IDEwOTk1OTUKQmxhbWVsaXN0OiBtYXJ2aW4KCkJ1aWxkIHN1Y2NlZWRlZCEKCnNpbmNlcmVseSwK IC1UaGUgQnVpbGRib3QKCg== From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Wed May 4 20:45:25 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E3A6332C for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 20:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99558 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:45:25 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 99537 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 20:45:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 93083 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 20:41:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf8" Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 20:41:23 +0000 From: swansonlinda@example.org To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-Id: <swansonlinda@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on lucy-site-staging VGhlIEJ1aWxkYm90IGhhcyBkZXRlY3RlZCBhIG5ldyBmYWlsdXJlIG9uIGJ1aWxkZXIgbHVjeS1z aXRlLXN0YWdpbmcgd2hpbGUgYnVpbGRpbmcgQVNGIEJ1aWxkYm90LgpGdWxsIGRldGFpbHMgYXJl IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoKIGh0dHA6Ly9jaS5hcGFjaGUub3JnL2J1aWxkZXJzL2x1Y3ktc2l0ZS1z dGFnaW5nL2J1aWxkcy8yMgoKQnVpbGRib3QgVVJMOiBodHRwOi8vY2kuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy8KCkJ1 aWxkc2xhdmUgZm9yIHRoaXMgQnVpbGQ6IGJiLWNtcy1zbGF2ZQoKQnVpbGQgUmVhc29uOiBzY2hl ZHVsZXIKQnVpbGQgU291cmNlIFN0YW1wOiBbYnJhbmNoIGluY3ViYXRvci9sdWN5L3NpdGVdIDEw OTk2MDAKQmxhbWVsaXN0OiBtYXJ2aW4KCkJVSUxEIEZBSUxFRDogZmFpbGVkIGNvbXBpbGUKCnNp bmNlcmVseSwKIC1UaGUgQnVpbGRib3QKCg== From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Wed May 4 22:12:56 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 207163161 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6884 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 6853 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:12:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 76863 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 21:56:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf8" Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:56:29 +0000 From: swansonlinda@example.org To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-Id: <swansonlinda@example.org> Subject: [lucy-dev] buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on lucy-site-staging VGhlIEJ1aWxkYm90IGhhcyBkZXRlY3RlZCBhIHJlc3RvcmVkIGJ1aWxkIG9uIGJ1aWxkZXIgbHVj eS1zaXRlLXN0YWdpbmcgd2hpbGUgYnVpbGRpbmcgQVNGIEJ1aWxkYm90LgpGdWxsIGRldGFpbHMg YXJlIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdDoKIGh0dHA6Ly9jaS5hcGFjaGUub3JnL2J1aWxkZXJzL2x1Y3ktc2l0 ZS1zdGFnaW5nL2J1aWxkcy8yMwoKQnVpbGRib3QgVVJMOiBodHRwOi8vY2kuYXBhY2hlLm9yZy8K CkJ1aWxkc2xhdmUgZm9yIHRoaXMgQnVpbGQ6IGJiLWNtcy1zbGF2ZQoKQnVpbGQgUmVhc29uOiBz Y2hlZHVsZXIKQnVpbGQgU291cmNlIFN0YW1wOiBbYnJhbmNoIGluY3ViYXRvci9sdWN5L3NpdGVd IDEwOTk2MTcKQmxhbWVsaXN0OiBtYXJ2aW4KCkJ1aWxkIHN1Y2NlZWRlZCEKCnNpbmNlcmVseSwK IC1UaGUgQnVpbGRib3QKCg== From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Wed May 4 22:20:41 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2473936C6 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Wed, 4 May 2011 22:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20660 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:20:41 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 20634 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 22:20:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 20616 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 22:20:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:20:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 22:20:33 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QHkKe-00031U-2M for swansonlinda@example.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:14:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:14:08 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on lucy-site-staging On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:56:29PM +0000, swansonlinda@example.org wrote: > Blamelist: marvin > > Build succeeded! I've been fiddling with the CMS website. The problem seems to have been related to generation of the "sitemap.html" file, though I'm not sure exactly what I did that made buildbot start failing. We don't need a sitemap, so I just attempted to disable it... and that seems to have done the trick. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Thu May 5 18:59:32 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D28C2E82 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Thu, 5 May 2011 18:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32316 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:59:32 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 32288 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 32280 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 18:59:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:59:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:59:24 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QI3fR-00077r-CM for swansonlinda@example.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:52:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:52:53 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] Apache CMS-based Lucy site is live Greets, The Lucy website based on the Apache CMS is now live. http://incubator.apache.org/lucy/ By design, it has approximately the same graphic identity as <http://www.apache.org/> -- color scheme, text design, general layout, etc. However some of the details are different: rigid rather than fluid layout, more careful alignment of elements. I plan one further major design mod: the addition of a left-aligned vertical nav bar with links to Lucy-specific resources like the old Forrest site had. We'll then be able to organize a multi-page site. I think it might be to our benefit to go through and purge all use of inherited CSS from www.apache.org, as well. The design is pretty basic, and there's a lot of extra stuff in <http://www.apache.org/css/style.css> and its dependencies that we can live without. Editing the site content is easy when you use the Apache internal CMS interface -- some of you who have commit rights on other projects may already know how to use it. Editing the design templates was swansonlinda@example.org. The Apache CMS documentation has all the necessary info, but it's a little scattered, and the setup you have to do in preparation for generating pages locally under the default configuration is surprisingly complicated.[1] To lower the barrier to entry, I've simplified our CMS plugin view.pm file so that it uses only modules which are bundled with the CMS. All you need to generate pages locally are two svn checkouts: the Lucy site and the CMS. I plan to create an EditLucySite page on the Lucy wiki with recipes for both modifying content and modifying templates. Marvin Humphrey [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref.html#local-build From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Thu May 5 21:30:19 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1A9D223B for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Thu, 5 May 2011 21:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73029 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:30:19 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 73010 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2011 21:30:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 73002 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2011 21:30:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:30:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 May 2011 21:30:12 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QI61N-0007FV-4y for swansonlinda@example.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 14:23:41 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 14:23:41 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] 0.1.0 release prep Greets, In my assessment, the Lucy source tree is now ready for a Release Manager to begin the release process described at <http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseGuide>, working towards a provisional release date of May 12, 2011 -- one week from today. Here is my review of the release preparation tasks listed at <http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleasePrep>, which are the collective responsibility of the Lucy community rather than the RM: [x] RAT passes: <http://ci.apache.org/projects/lucy/rat-output.html>. [x] No open issues assigned to this release: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY/fixforversion/12315575>. [x] Copyright notices are up-to-date. [x] CHANGES file is up-to-date, save for the insertion of the release date. [x] LICENSE and NOTICE look good to me. [x] Portability: builds and tests clean on OS X and CentOS under GCC, and on Windows 7 under MSVC. [x] Extended tests: The test_valgrind build target passes on OS X. The only remaining items on our 0.1.0 TODO list relate to our web presence: http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/Release-0.1-incubating The Lucy website needs some more work (including the addition of a "Downloads" page), our wiki needs gardening, and we must get ready to publish html-ified versions of the Perl binding documentation as soon as the release is out -- but IMO none of those should block starting release process. Chris Mattmann, are you still willing and able to take on the role of RM? Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Fri May 6 14:53:09 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51A823C46 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 14:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91057 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 14:53:09 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 91008 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 14:53:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 91000 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 14:53:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 14:53:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 14:53:00 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p46EqbrY011260 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO) for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:52:37 -0700 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:52:37 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <swansonlinda@example.org> To: "swansonlinda@example.org" <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:52:20 -0700 Thread-Topic: [lucy-dev] Apache CMS-based Lucy site is live Thread-Index: AcwL/T06UNefW7/kTmSnv0zBorXCtA== Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155] X-Source-Sender: swansonlinda@example.org X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Apache CMS-based Lucy site is live Marvin, frickin' awesome work, per usual! Cheers, Chris On May 5, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, >=20 > The Lucy website based on the Apache CMS is now live. >=20 > http://incubator.apache.org/lucy/ >=20 > By design, it has approximately the same graphic identity as > <http://www.apache.org/> -- color scheme, text design, general layout, et= c. > However some of the details are different: rigid rather than fluid layout= , > more careful alignment of elements. >=20 > I plan one further major design mod: the addition of a left-aligned verti= cal > nav bar with links to Lucy-specific resources like the old Forrest site h= ad. > We'll then be able to organize a multi-page site. >=20 > I think it might be to our benefit to go through and purge all use of > inherited CSS from www.apache.org, as well. The design is pretty basic, = and > there's a lot of extra stuff in <http://www.apache.org/css/style.css> and= its > dependencies that we can live without. >=20 > Editing the site content is easy when you use the Apache internal CMS > interface -- some of you who have commit rights on other projects may alr= eady > know how to use it. =20 >=20 > Editing the design templates was swansonlinda@example.org. The Apache CMS > documentation has all the necessary info, but it's a little scattered, an= d the > setup you have to do in preparation for generating pages locally under th= e > default configuration is surprisingly complicated.[1] >=20 > To lower the barrier to entry, I've simplified our CMS plugin view.pm fil= e so > that it uses only modules which are bundled with the CMS. All you need t= o > generate pages locally are two svn checkouts: the Lucy site and the CMS. >=20 > I plan to create an EditLucySite page on the Lucy wiki with recipes for b= oth > modifying content and modifying templates. >=20 > Marvin Humphrey >=20 > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/cmsref.html#local-build >=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: swansonlinda@example.org WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Fri May 6 14:55:22 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74D653D3E for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 14:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96025 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 14:55:22 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 95997 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 14:55:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 95989 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 14:55:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 14:55:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 14:55:15 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p46EsgKS012282 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO) for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:54:53 -0700 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Fri, 6 May 2011 07:54:41 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <swansonlinda@example.org> To: "swansonlinda@example.org" <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 07:54:24 -0700 Thread-Topic: [lucy-dev] 0.1.0 release prep Thread-Index: AcwL/YcmBEvgm1rTROmcmnP8vDkFXg== Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155] X-Source-Sender: swansonlinda@example.org X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] 0.1.0 release prep Hi Marvin, Sure I'll try and spend some time this weekend on it... Cheers, Chris On May 5, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, >=20 > In my assessment, the Lucy source tree is now ready for a Release Manager= to > begin the release process described at > <http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseGuide>, working towards a provisional > release date of May 12, 2011 -- one week from today. >=20 > Here is my review of the release preparation tasks listed at > <http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleasePrep>, which are the collective > responsibility of the Lucy community rather than the RM: >=20 > [x] RAT passes: <http://ci.apache.org/projects/lucy/rat-output.html>. > [x] No open issues assigned to this release: > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY/fixforversion/12315575>. > [x] Copyright notices are up-to-date. > [x] CHANGES file is up-to-date, save for the insertion of the release da= te. > [x] LICENSE and NOTICE look good to me. > [x] Portability: builds and tests clean on OS X and CentOS under GCC, an= d > on Windows 7 under MSVC. > [x] Extended tests: The test_valgrind build target passes on OS X. >=20 > The only remaining items on our 0.1.0 TODO list relate to our web presenc= e: >=20 > http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/Release-0.1-incubating >=20 > The Lucy website needs some more work (including the addition of a "Downl= oads" > page), our wiki needs gardening, and we must get ready to publish html-if= ied > versions of the Perl binding documentation as soon as the release is out = -- > but IMO none of those should block starting release process. >=20 > Chris Mattmann, are you still willing and able to take on the role of RM? >=20 > Marvin Humphrey >=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: swansonlinda@example.org WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Fri May 6 19:51:08 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E46D638D8 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 19:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12657 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:51:07 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 12628 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 19:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 12620 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 19:51:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:51:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-pv0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:50:58 +0000 Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so1626350pvc.6 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id f1mr5329196pbq.428.1304711437323; Fri, 06 May 2011 12:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bester.local ([83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z6sm2326493pbp.63.283.161.120.155.50.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 May 2011 12:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 12:50:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105061240190.5457@bester> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] 0.1.0 release prep : In my assessment, the Lucy source tree is now ready for a Release Manager to : begin the release process described at : <http://wiki.apache.org/lucy/ReleaseGuide>, working towards a provisional : release date of May 12, 2011 -- one week from today. Since Lucy has not had any releases to date, and has never publicly advertised the existence of http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucy/KEYS (which currently has no keys in it) it would probably be a good idea if Lucy just jumped in and started using the new infra managed key system that was recently rolled out. As i understand it, the detailed docs are still being written, but all committers should have recieved an email about it within the past week. Committers can add their key details to their account info... https://id.apache.org/ ...and that should automaticly get added to this generated keys file... https://people.apache.org/keys/group/lucy.asc ...which lives at a consistent URL that can be refrenced on the website, and in README for verifying release signatures. -Hoss From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Fri May 6 22:52:38 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA5D03579 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 22:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5878 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 22:52:38 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 5856 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 22:52:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 5848 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 22:52:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 22:52:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 22:52:32 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QITmW-0002xZ-Bq for swansonlinda@example.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 15:45:56 -0700 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 15:45:56 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <swansonlinda@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <swansonlinda@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] 0.1.0 release prep On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 07:54:24AM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Sure I'll try and spend some time this weekend on it... Sweet. :) We've worked hard to minimize the tasks assigned to the RM, and I hope that pays off by making things easy for you. We should plan to have lots of different people serve as release managers over time. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Fri May 6 23:47:06 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79A665C5 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Fri, 6 May 2011 23:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41644 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 23:47:06 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 41609 invoked by uid 500); 6 May 2011 23:47:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 41601 invoked by uid 99); 6 May 2011 23:47:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:47:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 May 2011 23:47:01 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <swansonlinda@example.org>) id 1QIUdF-0002zO-7a for swansonlinda@example.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 16:40:25 -0700 Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 16:40:25 -0700 From: Marvin Humphrey <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> References: <swansonlinda@example.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105061240190.5457@bester> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105061240190.5457@bester> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] 0.1.0 release prep On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:50:33PM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote: > Since Lucy has not had any releases to date, and has never publicly > advertised the existence of http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/lucy/KEYS > (which currently has no keys in it) it would probably be a good idea if > Lucy just jumped in and started using the new infra managed key system > that was recently rolled out. FYI, I just initialized the "lucy" dist directory and that KEYS file yesterday so that the instructions for the RM in the ReleaseGuide wiki page would make sense. We have no investment in preserving the KEYS file. Unless someone here objects within the next day or so, I'll go zap it (after giving a heads-up on #asfinfra in case that causes alarm bells to ring). > As i understand it, the detailed docs are still being written, but all > committers should have recieved an email about it within the past week. There's been a flurry of activity today on the subject on (I think) the infra list. It seems that the new setup may not yet have all the kinks worked out. Fortunately, Chris Mattmann has made many Apache releases and is as well-prepared as anyone could be to move forward amid the untidyness. For now, I've added a note to the relevant section of ReleaseGuide indicating that the situation is in flux. I'll update the page for real when proper documentation appears to replace <http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keys-policy>. > Committers can add their key details to their account info... > > https://id.apache.org/ > > ...and that should automaticly get added to this generated keys file... > > https://people.apache.org/keys/group/lucy.asc > > ...which lives at a consistent URL that can be refrenced on the website, > and in README for verifying release signatures. Right now there's no info in our README file about verifying signatures. I checked the following pages to see if I'd missed such a requirement, but came up empty: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html http://www.apache.org/dev/openpgp.html http://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html It looks like our soon-to-be-created "Downloads" web page is where this info normally goes: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-download-pages.html#remind-users My preference would be to include verification instructions on our "Downloads" page, and possibly in a detached README file within our dist directory (like <http://apache.cs.utah.edu/lucene/java/README.html>) but not within the top-level README in the source tarball. I'm a little concerned that confusion might arise when we reuse that README unaltered in downstream distribution archives such as the CPAN tarball -- clearly the signatures won't match up against those tarballs/gemfiles/etc. In any case, I don't think we should block the release process waiting to update our top-level README until infra gets the keys situation sorted out. Cheers, Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org Mon May 9 05:35:32 2011 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnswansonlinda@example.org> X-Original-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA0C1487B for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 05:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67966 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 05:35:32 -0000 Delivered-To: swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 67872 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2011 05:35:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact swansonlinda@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:swansonlinda@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: swansonlinda@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list swansonlinda@example.org Received: (qmail 67859 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2011 05:35:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 05:35:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 May 2011 05:35:18 +0000 Received: by ywg8 with SMTP id 8so1842006ywg.6 for <swansonlinda@example.org>; Sun, 08 May 2011 22:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a63mr6850095yhi.311.1304919297156; Sun, 08 May 2011 22:34:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 8 May 2011 22:34:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Nathan Kurz <swansonlinda@example.org> Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 22:34:37 -0700 Message-ID: <swansonlinda@example.org> To: swansonlinda@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [lucy-dev] Dependency injection and customizing a scorer I'd love to spend a little time discussing how one would actually go about customizing a scorer. It's not something I'm actually able to spend time doing right now, but it seems like a good time to start discussing
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}