From tika-julie68@example.com Mon Mar 01 09:17:28 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 59700 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2010 09:17:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Mar 2010 09:17:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 3886 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 17:17:28 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 3825 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2010 17:17:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 3817 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2010 17:17:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:17:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:17:27 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2D2234C4A9 for <julie68@example.com>; Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:17:07 +0000 (UTC) From: "Dave Meikle (JIRA)" <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Subject: [jira] Commented: (TIKA-385) Incorrect handling of hyperlinks in .docx In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12839458#action_12839458 ] Dave Meikle commented on TIKA-385: ---------------------------------- This is the default behaviour in POI - see XWPFHyperlinkDecorator[0]. This currently has a TODO for outputting the link in the correct location, so we could have a go at fixing that in POI to correct it, or indeed just implement our own in the meantime. Does anyone know of a reason as to why it would just be <link_url> in the output? For internal links maybe? Cheers, Dave [0] http://poi.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/poi/xwpf/model/XWPFHyperlinkDecorator.html > Incorrect handling of hyperlinks in .docx > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: TIKA-385 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-385 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Bug > Components: parser > Affects Versions: 0.6 > Environment: Linux, java version "1.6.0_17", Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04) > Reporter: Liam O'Boyle > Attachments: Internal_Search_Test.docx > > > Hyperlinks are incorrectly parsed in at least some office 2007 word files. The attached file is one example. > There are two problems with the handling > - an incorrectly formatted link is generated, instead of <a href="http://somewhere"> you get <http://somewhere> > - the link is in the incorrect location in the extracted text; the links in the attached document end up at the end of the paragraph that they were originally in the middle of > Both of these issues cause problems later on when using Tika with Solr > - the incorrect links are not picked up by the built in HTML filter classes > - the garbled text order creates unhelpful snippets when highlighting -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From tika-julie68@example.com Tue Mar 02 21:55:57 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 76503 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2010 21:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 21:55:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 74867 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 21:55:48 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 74804 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2010 21:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 74796 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2010 21:55:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:55:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:55:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417A9234C4BE for <julie68@example.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:55:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kenny Neal (JIRA)" <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Subject: [jira] Created: (TIKA-386) Tika relies on X11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Tika relies on X11 ------------------ Key: TIKA-386 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-386 Project: Tika Issue Type: Bug Components: parser Affects Versions: 0.6 Environment: RHEL 5.1, JRE 1.6 Reporter: Kenny Neal I am receiving the following error when I try to process some rtf documents: Mar 02 2010 15:17:34 ERROR [Thread-10] (DefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler.java:14) com.sprt.jawen.DefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler - Thread [Thread-10] will terminal execution due to an uncaught exception: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class julie68@example.com(Native Method) at java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source) at java.awt.Toolkit$2.run(Unknown Source) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Unknown Source) at java.awt.Toolkit.getEventQueue(Unknown Source) at java.awt.EventQueue.isDispatchThread(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.reclaim(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.addAttribute(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext$NamedStyle.addAttribute(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext$NamedStyle.setName(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext$NamedStyle.<init>(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.addStyle(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.<init>(Unknown Source) at javax.swing.text.DefaultStyledDocument.<init>(Unknown Source) at org.apache.tika.parser.rtf.RTFParser.parse(RTFParser.java:44) I do not have a gui in this application. Do I have to for the RTF Parser to work? I searched the existing issues and didn't see this one being reported by anyone else. Googling seems to indicate a possible work around... Adding a JRE parameter of -Djava.awt.headless=true Is this the only way to resolve this? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From tika-julie68@example.com Wed Mar 03 11:15:26 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 70938 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 11:15:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 11:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20992 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 11:15:19 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 20922 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 11:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 20913 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 11:15:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:15:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:15:10 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <julie68@example.com>) id 1NmmXR-0005Df-RA for julie68@example.com; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:14:49 -0800 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 03:14:49 -0800 (PST) From: Wick2804 <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Subject: Streaming files diectly to Tika MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: julie68@example.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We would like to stream files directly to Tika, rather than writing them to temporary store and passing the location to Tika. Is this possible? We currently extract our files from an Archive so have them in memory ready for loading into Solr through Tika, our current implementation has to write these bytearrays to temporary files to be loaded which seems a little wasteful. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Streaming-files-diectly-to-Tika-tp27766884p27766884.html Sent from the Apache Tika - Development mailing list julie68@example.com. From tika-julie68@example.com Wed Mar 03 13:36:19 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 18410 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2010 13:36:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2010 13:36:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 86530 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 13:36:11 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 86460 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2010 13:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 86449 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2010 13:36:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:36:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-fx0-f221.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:36:03 +0000 Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so605519fxm.5 for <julie68@example.com>; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:35:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=0bidZFZEuiM6u2NfEM0Urd1YqjFNePmzvtBoVD5+tHc=; b=a4uqnu2UPrQ1XjDPusLh8qx9sgV+oTX1rw1L7dO0TIo1/922dFeWLkBB7mEtrgW6ia RlRCMfzAqhisSAuDXUOcLKULtdWWDFIj7UNHGK20R4Xe4JXa8Es3MIzaNmJr4twK1ub5 AJPEP4OPK3H16z1ZToLMXN7rlIRzFuVkBt6VM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=DEwvlx/SsQyZmaXlc9WX5Hv1hf3TPeeCUv2qsqAqfMDzzwFQ77XUGvLRDbq95hQZq8 VKolANrTYGbJUL0K1w8erhK6MP5QamBWM4vhA87sdGsWWX2sACmIFNNtBZnHs80sS7W1 gAh2wYKXD6XPFjum5UFzbvrirzEYw7ZzJUw0U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q8mr168983fgk.3.1267623343316; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:35:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> References: <julie68@example.com> From: Jukka Zitting <julie68@example.com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:35:23 +0100 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Subject: Re: Streaming files diectly to Tika To: julie68@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Wick2804 <julie68@example.com> wrote: > We would like to stream files directly to Tika, rather than writing them to > temporary store and passing the location to Tika. Is this possible? Yes, all the key interfaces in Tika accept the input document as an InputStream. BR, Jukka Zitting From tika-julie68@example.com Tue Mar 09 23:01:19 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 35328 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 23:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 23:01:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 73105 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 23:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 73030 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 23:00:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 72674 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 23:00:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:00:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:00:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3786234C4BC for <julie68@example.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:00:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Subject: [jira] Resolved: (TIKA-386) Tika relies on X11 In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jukka Zitting resolved TIKA-386. -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.7 Assignee: Jukka Zitting In revision 921182 I added a catch for this NoClassDefFoundError and wrapped it into a more appropriate TikaException. There's not much more we can do about this while we use the javax.swing.text.rtf library for RTF parsing. See TIKA-282 for the similar earlier issues where an alternative RTF parser library is being sought. > Tika relies on X11 > ------------------ > > Key: TIKA-386 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-386 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Bug > Components: parser > Affects Versions: 0.6 > Environment: RHEL 5.1, JRE 1.6 > Reporter: Kenny Neal > Assignee: Jukka Zitting > Fix For: 0.7 > > > I am receiving the following error when I try to process some rtf documents: > Mar 02 2010 15:17:34 ERROR [Thread-10] (DefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler.java:14) com.sprt.jawen.DefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler - Thread [Thread-10] will terminal execution due to an uncaught exception: > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class sun.awt.X11.XToolkit > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > at java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source) > at java.awt.Toolkit$2.run(Unknown Source) > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > at java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Unknown Source) > at java.awt.Toolkit.getEventQueue(Unknown Source) > at java.awt.EventQueue.isDispatchThread(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.SwingUtilities.isEventDispatchThread(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.reclaim(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.addAttribute(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext$NamedStyle.addAttribute(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext$NamedStyle.setName(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext$NamedStyle.<init>(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.addStyle(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.StyleContext.<init>(Unknown Source) > at javax.swing.text.DefaultStyledDocument.<init>(Unknown Source) > at org.apache.tika.parser.rtf.RTFParser.parse(RTFParser.java:44) > I do not have a gui in this application. Do I have to for the RTF Parser to work? I searched the existing issues and didn't see this one being reported by anyone else. > Googling seems to indicate a possible work around... Adding a JRE parameter of -Djava.awt.headless=true Is this the only way to resolve this? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From tika-julie68@example.com Thu Mar 11 13:00:22 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 43670 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 13:00:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 13:00:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 31162 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 12:59:49 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 30640 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 12:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 30618 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 12:59:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:59:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:59:47 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54880234C4C6 for <julie68@example.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:59:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Piotr B. (JIRA)" <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Subject: [jira] Created: (TIKA-387) htmlparser throws IllegalCharsetNameException MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 htmlparser throws IllegalCharsetNameException --------------------------------------------- Key: TIKA-387 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-387 Project: Tika Issue Type: Bug Components: parser Affects Versions: 0.6 Reporter: Piotr B. Charset.isSupported throws IllegalCharsetNameException if charset name is malformed. HtmlParser tries to retrieve a charset from http_equiv section, so tika shouldn't suppose this charset to be valid and should catch that exception. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From tika-julie68@example.com Thu Mar 11 14:54:24 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 48857 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2010 14:54:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2010 14:54:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 21067 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 14:53:50 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 21029 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2010 14:53:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 21021 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2010 14:53:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790F5234C4BF for <julie68@example.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:53:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ken Krugler (JIRA)" <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (TIKA-387) htmlparser throws IllegalCharsetNameException In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ken Krugler updated TIKA-387: ----------------------------- Attachment: CharsetUtils.java Piotr - thanks for reporting this. I'd run into the same issue, and created some utilities in Bixo that I'd forgotten needed to be rolled into Tika. I've attached the file, will turn this into a patch soon. This also contains code that fixes up common "broken charset name" problems I'd run into while using Bixo to do a big crawl. > htmlparser throws IllegalCharsetNameException > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: TIKA-387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-387 > Project: Tika > Issue Type: Bug > Components: parser > Affects Versions: 0.6 > Reporter: Piotr B. > Attachments: CharsetUtils.java > > > Charset.isSupported throws IllegalCharsetNameException if charset name is malformed. HtmlParser tries to retrieve a charset from http_equiv section, so tika shouldn't suppose this charset to be valid and should catch that exception. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 17:38:41 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 56761 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 17:38:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 17:38:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 44416 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 17:38:02 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 44286 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 17:38:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 43941 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 17:38:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:38:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:37:59 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o2CHbb4a028006 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:37:38 -0800 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:37:37 -0800 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <julie68@example.com> To: "julie68@example.com" <julie68@example.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:37:34 -0800 Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP Thread-Index: AcrCCrLgjodqQg3mVkaJW9iT78tRdQ== Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155] X-Source-Sender: julie68@example.com X-AUTH: Authorized Hey Guys, If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community view on this since I think it likely makes sense: * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) that are useable not just in the context of search * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, I'll tr= y and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the discussions an= d call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what they think too. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: julie68@example.com WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 18:21:13 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 70205 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 18:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 18:21:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 3613 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 18:20:35 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 3553 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 18:20:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 3545 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 18:20:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:20:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:20:33 +0000 Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so954652wwb.35 for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:20:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ax5ibi12rL4gfc2L10BHXLPfywUYrk4mKRN+mvAAx8I=; b=Z83hs8QeAW1XtmZivjIyruEfcgd+ravuuG1f7YBmulyf9KRRc5Pxip0MvG0E97goe1 y+RLIQyiQn321TuqpAUxU3aCIPLut39yBhPmW7bdn+pkZuMUVErQTiKIV2AzdIeBsGyx fV29fxq3Enbp03IT0yBtuYW1vR4RoMxS0I6CA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=dJcOMWmufp2k4pUxvYqu6+/La/c031KOGkDGHfylTYeSSh8esjxTk6O2IoW7csz/aM ZQWBLnHYvIi7GZfCAOfbTgVQr0JY3rQmPbegf1yEK557CHPg8laa6Umhev2r5FWNqS2H sjnFxQRZEogsUDmrlauH8rzlD/gwK3tTIiwlI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e14mr1007413wef.85.1268418012247; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:20:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> References: <julie68@example.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me_Charron?= <julie68@example.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:52 +0100 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP To: julie68@example.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6daaff90bfba904819e95cf --0016e6daaff90bfba904819e95cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, I really think it makes sense since Tika is not a search component, but really a toolkit for documents parsing and analysis. I know it's not the vote time, but it's +1 for me. Best regards J=E9r=F4me [image: Webpulse] *J=E9r=F4me CHARRON* Directeur Technique 0675742890 staragora.com <http://www.staragora.com.fr> - shopreflex.fr<http://www.shopreflex.fr> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 18:37, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < julie68@example.com> wrote: > Hey Guys, > > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community vie= w > on this since I think it likely makes sense: > > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) th= at > are useable not just in the context of search > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, I'll > try > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the discussions > and > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what th= ey > think too. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: julie68@example.com > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > --=20 J=E9r=F4me Charron Directeur Technique @ WebPulse Tel: 765.867.9606 <=3D ** NEW ** eMail : julie68@example.com http://www.webpulse.fr/ http://www.shopreflex.com/ http://www.staragora.com/ --0016e6daaff90bfba904819e95cf-- From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 19:17:29 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 90272 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 19:17:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 19:17:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 15384 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 19:16:50 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 15304 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 19:16:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 15054 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 19:16:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.troja.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E0BD3600C for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:16:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian julie68@example.com Received: from mail.troja.net ([83.161.120.155]) by localhost (megaira.troja.net [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jdrALj5q6aIz for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:16:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from VEGA (port-83-236-62-54.dynamic.qsc.de [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.troja.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9967D36003 for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:16:20 +0100 (CET) From: "Uwe Schindler" <julie68@example.com> To: <julie68@example.com> References: <julie68@example.com> In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:16:44 +0100 Message-ID: <007d01cac218$8de3f150$a9abd3f0$@de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcrCCrLgjodqQg3mVkaJW9iT78tRdQADdiig Content-Language: de +1 ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: julie68@example.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:julie68@example.com] > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 6:38 PM > To: julie68@example.com > Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP > > Hey Guys, > > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community > view > on this since I think it likely makes sense: > > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) > that > are useable not just in the context of search > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, > I'll try > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the > discussions and > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what > they > think too. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: julie68@example.com > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 20:02:47 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 1120 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 20:02:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 20:02:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 93039 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 20:02:09 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 93003 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 20:02:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 92995 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 20:02:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:02:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-fx0-f216.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:02:07 +0000 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1557394fxm.5 for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:01:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=USBtg17fr37zzwzjfVns10X8LVHVLgF88rAlfm4o1D8=; b=EsWcBh3h6vkWgkRFLQJVCuQBnjz7nSY2uQciPMosAILeuIWdokkc2Epvas79osjFD+ h/SMv70gFXHPq2pQthv9ujaGKzuu1TxFsGITjDn0WiaKu8itvhfmBRM7CH1xvrLJFi0e Y99tYIXHiv0ynvZORzLTYd1YUi1LC9zYNr9KM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gs3FXgAr8DuPXS5jcSAxLWG/M2jGHEuLy1g3OjjY2kQ0GcpypfT/tV4dLR3gAMa544 eC8PZIwg+rgsD0Q/y8xPjMisPmPrpHh5bI3yOymPIgCCBLdDei4/3UQ6AsxpQnUPYU5E /8ywCtx269iPQAaVwJRLlnzGU5ubUswv1rop8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id h15mr564629hbf.46.1268424106481; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:01:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <007d01cac218$8de3f150$a9abd3f0$@de> References: <julie68@example.com> <007d01cac218$8de3f150$a9abd3f0$@de> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:01:46 +0000 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP From: Julien Nioche <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f03c8a4a99bb0481a00091 --001485f03c8a4a99bb0481a00091 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think it makes perfect sense. +1 from me too Julien -- DigitalPebble Ltd http://www.digitalpebble.com On 12 March 2010 19:16, Uwe Schindler <julie68@example.com> wrote: > +1 > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: julie68@example.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:julie68@example.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 6:38 PM > > To: julie68@example.com > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP > > > > Hey Guys, > > > > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's > > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community > > view > > on this since I think it likely makes sense: > > > > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) > > that > > are useable not just in the context of search > > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, > > I'll try > > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > > > > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the > > discussions and > > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple > > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what > > they > > think too. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Senior Computer Scientist > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > Email: julie68@example.com > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > --001485f03c8a4a99bb0481a00091-- From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 20:52:03 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 12395 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 20:52:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 20:52:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 56690 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 20:51:25 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 56653 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 20:51:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 56645 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 20:51:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:51:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO prxy.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:51:23 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (account julie68@example.com HELO [83.161.120.155]) by prxy.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 130428736 for julie68@example.com; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:52:57 -0800 Message-Id: <julie68@example.com> From: Ken Krugler <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:51:02 -0800 References: <julie68@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) +1 On Mar 12, 2010, at 9:37am, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned > it's > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the > community view > on this since I think it likely makes sense: > > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, > parsing) that > are useable not just in the context of search > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, > I'll try > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the > discussions and > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a > couple > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see > what they > think too. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: julie68@example.com > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > -------------------------------------------- Ken Krugler 765.867.9606 http://bixolabs.com e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 20:58:30 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 14465 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 20:58:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 20:58:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 71663 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 20:57:52 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 71612 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 20:57:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 71604 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 20:57:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:57:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-pw0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:57:50 +0000 Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so133625pwi.35 for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:57:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x6mr3127184wax.54.1268427449080; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:57:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> References: <julie68@example.com> <julie68@example.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:57:29 -0500 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP From: Michael McCandless <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Mike On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Ken Krugler <julie68@example.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mar 12, 2010, at 9:37am, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's >> worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community vi= ew >> on this since I think it likely makes sense: >> >> * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars >> * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) >> that >> are useable not just in the context of search >> * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, I'll >> try >> and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) >> >> What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the discussions >> and >> call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple >> weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what >> they >> think too. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: julie68@example.com >> WWW: =A0 http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> > > -------------------------------------------- > Ken Krugler > 765.867.9606 > http://bixolabs.com > e l a s t i c =A0 w e b =A0 m i n i n g > > > > > From tika-julie68@example.com Fri Mar 12 22:36:36 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 37774 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2010 22:36:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2010 22:36:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 95449 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 22:35:58 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 95396 invoked by uid 500); 12 Mar 2010 22:35:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 95388 invoked by uid 99); 12 Mar 2010 22:35:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:35:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:35:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ww0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 17so1101837wwb.35 for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:35:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=s+YfQF7LjtvaRIXWoRxVbBEm7vJvl+L/WKZHXlx0E7Y=; b=i6LZFxmuGErShxWl0JHmz4r3JLejFPzdNqJil/eMDLh8WKiRymhEWm3KTGXn5pIU+9 LO+3li6weZLzrBxGM9o7GX5fSKKOIpaGE/oy/Ltr9HdpFSY3nTHgnW9XatH/JS5Nrbb8 yqeNYqSqOuvX2ycLIfYosrMf+V+UDnaTLTBfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RGspmGH7AAPickg1kqsHgCpNRlgwtu0XhQ+3x7eoXEnl/cXoXt90Hi6GMH9UZmGEEM /FYCyagAV4Xt8SErG8QOjKVeK7T/lmxk3omHAUWNQGvNb3wVcQhlFg75/DMHqbQWN6RB OU6m8xZHsPKTncJv4sL+w+Ba51WbbcybEDyII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id d5mr53515wef.147.1268433332550; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:35:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> References: <julie68@example.com> <julie68@example.com> <julie68@example.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:35:32 -0500 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP From: Benson Margulies <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d784583540cc0481a226d3 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d784583540cc0481a226d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 from a sporadic patcher. On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Michael McCandless < julie68@example.com> wrote: > +1 > > Mike > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Ken Krugler > <julie68@example.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Mar 12, 2010, at 9:37am, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > > >> Hey Guys, > >> > >> If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's > >> worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community > view > >> on this since I think it likely makes sense: > >> > >> * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > >> * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) > >> that > >> are useable not just in the context of search > >> * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, I'll > >> try > >> and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > >> > >> What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the discussions > >> and > >> call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple > >> weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what > >> they > >> think too. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Senior Computer Scientist > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >> Email: julie68@example.com > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > >> > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > Ken Krugler > > 765.867.9606 > > http://bixolabs.com > > e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g > > > > > > > > > > > --0016e6d784583540cc0481a226d3-- From tika-julie68@example.com Sat Mar 13 07:25:10 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 48618 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 07:25:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 07:25:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 67027 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 07:24:31 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 66901 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 07:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 66887 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 07:24:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:24:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-fx0-f216.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:24:21 +0000 Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1842763fxm.5 for <julie68@example.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:24:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NAYdGdVeIIYdaDtS3/0JDLLedEVKQK92AYlj3czAq/E=; b=DjXzU4/lSTLd5YZN/4/U7IvOdHYAWMsG2XWxhmaMQWXJrFQ01q2V/Z93QaJzsz6jLs Hc9/aGjgXRmylxNgSiNmBxmmBZdsRRGyA2Vk0QnHL93p5OVH+iizAqLhNILhDSdBZMcr WopvZv0If++YHdrrKMVdoibqlk6VNpF9iwduM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BhqL8ulm68roW9KUFJEc8iCB7Kwr86J6oxvWEGW35ZUyGMQOW0zfMAFvvt/CqcaazW 59a4SsBOfI8VGWhwrUhLqTFWtNdhyBS8eJAJaFIeChVA4DvWUUICcZ5LE2/gBh+A1Elv oUy3xk+1UgUNsR9g2DPetWSvPz6QXmvB9feH8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w15mr2215095faj.70.1268465041282; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (cable-static-138-82.eblcom.ch [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 19sm4252053fkr.46.283.161.120.155.24.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:24:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:23:59 +0100 From: Felix Meschberger <julie68@example.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155pre) Gecko/20100120 Shredder/3.0.2pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: julie68@example.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP References: <julie68@example.com> In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds reasonable to me as an outsider, TIKA user and reader on this list. Regards Felix On 12.03.2010 18:37, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community view > on this since I think it likely makes sense: > > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) that > are useable not just in the context of search > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, I'll try > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the discussions and > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what they > think too. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: julie68@example.com > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > From tika-julie68@example.com Sat Mar 13 11:36:01 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 82428 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 11:36:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 11:36:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 70562 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 11:35:22 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 70484 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 11:35:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 70476 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 11:35:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:35:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:35:13 +0000 Received: (qmail 19866 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 11:34:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (83.161.120.155) by smtpauth22.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (83.161.120.155) with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2010 11:34:49 -0000 Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:34:45 +0100 From: Andrzej Bialecki <julie68@example.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: julie68@example.com Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP References: <julie68@example.com> In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2010-03-12 18:37, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community view > on this since I think it likely makes sense: > > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) that > are useable not just in the context of search > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, I'll try > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) > > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the discussions and > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a couple > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what they > think too. Makes sense, +1. -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: julie68@example.com From tika-julie68@example.com Sat Mar 13 12:11:45 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 87308 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 12:11:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2010 12:11:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 85717 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 12:11:05 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 85663 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2010 12:11:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 85654 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2010 12:11:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:11:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gw0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:10:59 +0000 Received: by gwaa11 with SMTP id a11so753144gwa.35 for <julie68@example.com>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:10:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=zIPcBTNinJbF5aOtzyYtTeQqVtI4jjICH2nmWU7msFA=; b=lNfZqnRfA6QpnIe+czYVkWLIAtD3XbEr0zWMH49Ff4LEC4XMhlqd602u8GcaJvB1kj Qttm7qe8+ZEX+aHy+NsNsGvKz+dxmQZTIk1EKVJP4pDPj2lPrSEKqxSi620nxflhHwrd wFSNkCJXMjI4ZDlhUbHnkP3Oi2S0syBo8lAgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Z/LXYT+rQB2HMco1e1+an4fWe1l+c0fkqIAmLsYzgmGknUSKO9HoIsrzLwrVOVcSBs q/ltZXpUAU26t/nUSwAxWwnvxW8Mq/1nl/nXrH0cM9oa7bkP4pzICTS2aEhgANv6HJ64 7M9Tj8LvJyuHLT43ZuiIguxbhkxI7Baivebao= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w6mr623775ann.248.1268482237320; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:10:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-065-013-152-164.sip.rdu.bellsouth.net [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm1467633gxk.12.283.161.120.155.10.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:10:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: Grant Ingersoll <julie68@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP From: Grant Ingersoll <julie68@example.com> In-Reply-To: <julie68@example.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:10:35 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <julie68@example.com> References: <julie68@example.com> To: julie68@example.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Makes sense to me. Tika is cranking these days and while it's great to = have in Lucene, it makes more sense on it's own from an ASF = organizational standpoint. -Grant=20 On Mar 12, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, >=20 > If you're on general@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned = it's > worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community = view > on this since I think it likely makes sense: >=20 > * Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars > * Tika provides functionality (mime type, language detection, parsing) = that > are useable not just in the context of search > * We are moving forward as a community (0.7 release hopefully soon, = I'll try > and cut a release within the next 2 weeks of that) >=20 > What does the community think? I can take the outcome of the = discussions and > call a VOTE (if it makes sense), then take that to the PMC (in a = couple > weeks after some of the other discussions have died down) and see what = they > think too. >=20 > Cheers, > Chris >=20 >=20 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: julie68@example.com > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >=20 >=20 From tika-julie68@example.com Mon Mar 15 09:28:49 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 5777 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 09:28:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 09:28:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13512 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 09:28:03 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 13381 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 09:28:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 13373 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2010 09:28:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:28:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO dev-MTA2.mimecast.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:51 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (host86-168-195-143.range86-168.btcentralplus.com [83.161.120.155]) by dev-MTA2.mimecast.com; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:29 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/83.161.120.155205 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:27:25 +0000 Subject: Detector results for Excel formats From: Simon Tyler <julie68@example.com> To: <julie68@example.com> Message-ID: <julie68@example.com> Thread-Topic: Detector results for Excel formats Thread-Index: AcrEIbj86tRtOnpVmE+llSKo/nTB0A== Mime-version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: 110031509272900202 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3351490049_442180" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --B_3351490049_442180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I am doing some testing of Tika 0.6 and noticed some odd results for the testEXCEL.xls file included in the test suite. 100 calls to the following code: is =3D new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(filename)); Metadata metadata =3D new Metadata(); metadata.set(Metadata.RESOURCE_NAME_KEY, filename); =20 String type =3D tika.detect(is, metadata); Results in different matches as application/msword or application/vnd.ms-excel julie68@example.com. Is this expected? Is there a way to mitigate it? Simon --B_3351490049_442180-- From tika-julie68@example.com Tue Mar 16 13:29:43 2010 Return-Path: <tika-julie68@example.com> Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 17541 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2010 13:29:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2010 13:29:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 74039 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 13:29:43 -0000 Delivered-To: julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 73857 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2010 13:29:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact julie68@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:julie68@example.com> List-Id: <tika-dev.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: julie68@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list julie68@example.com Received: (qmail 73618 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2010 13:29:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:29:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of julie68@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-yw0-f174.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:29:36 +0000 Received: by ywh4 with SMTP id 4so1720128ywh.5 for <julie68@example.com>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:29:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:x-mailer; bh=biZnOdMZ0Bb3HWC5nT1obzkVsmyNpdWoVXAMLnuGSig=; b=Aqpb7jYzR1kQvdIhvEvhJLJbRqH/+UOInTodmt1e8o87wmc4y63N1M+UPzKM6KpjGt 4R867R+MklV0Xt9QwMdEcfv6zHdna48pEgXIqbqvqVDYZlaGgiejBlb31bm9bUvUC7eb 56o/CZDVynvYfpjj52Fetlq4f6QlYeFqhLeCQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:x-mailer; b=fx/8OAQfIy5zvkmFVGJrFJCMxyfdVMohxERRIx2UR94A6T8VKRpPdalzkuE2UM7t4s +aCKazHRXkSF0nB0kJ1Dz79vBjZJqPUZTnOhcvdgesX0n5xJRes8gnK8gFP1QhOvT3Ai iBe24WBWwtStL9wKNf7cDm2dz5M4h4BxJPHww= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 7mr2248026agk.79.1268746154757; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-065-013-152-164.sip.rdu.bellsouth.net [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm1357831ywf.35.283.161.120.155.29.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Grant Ingersoll <julie68@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Tika as TLP From: Grant Ingersoll <julie68@example.com>
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}