From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 05 15:50:17 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 83294 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2007 15:50:16 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2007 15:50:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 88378 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 15:50:23 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 88353 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 15:50:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 88342 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2007 15:50:23 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:50:23 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:50:15 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 90506714065; Thu,  5 Apr 2007 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42059]  New:  - [PATCH] SPD command to safely set postscript page device dictionary
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2007 08:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059

           Summary: [PATCH] SPD command to safely set postscript page device
                    dictionary
           Product: XmlCommons
           Version: 1.x
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XmlStylebook
        AssignedTo: gonzalezjerry@example.com
        ReportedBy: gonzalezjerry@example.com


This patch provides an additional function which sets the page device dictionary
of postcript printer - minimising calls to setpagedevice command which can cause
underlying initgraphics calls (which in turn creates blank pages on some printers).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 05 15:57:02 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 87726 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2007 15:57:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2007 15:57:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 5422 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 15:57:08 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 5407 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 15:57:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 5396 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2007 15:57:08 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:57:08 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:57:01 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id BFFD7714065; Thu,  5 Apr 2007 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42059]  - [PATCH] SPD command to safely set postscript page device dictionary
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2007 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059





------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-05 08:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=19918)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19918&action=view)
patch file

The patch file to provide the additional postscript functionality.

Adrian Cumiskey.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 05 16:01:38 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 90554 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2007 16:01:38 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2007 16:01:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 12755 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 16:01:45 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 12654 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 16:01:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 12588 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2007 16:01:44 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:01:44 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:01:37 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 30A43714065; Thu,  5 Apr 2007 09:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42059]  - [PATCH] SPD command to safely set postscript page device dictionary
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2007 09:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059


gonzalezjerry@example.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-05 09:01 -------
Actually this patch should initially go into the FOP code base before being
later propagated to xmlgraphics.  Please ignore this post - sorry for any
confusion caused.

Adrian Cumiskey.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 05 16:01:58 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 90786 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2007 16:01:54 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2007 16:01:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 13243 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 16:02:01 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 13221 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2007 16:02:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 13210 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2007 16:02:01 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:02:01 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:01:54 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 08E3E71406C; Thu,  5 Apr 2007 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42059]  - [PATCH] SPD command to safely set postscript page device dictionary
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Apr 2007 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42059


gonzalezjerry@example.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED




------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-05 09:01 -------
Closed

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Sat Apr 14 07:52:39 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 96728 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:38 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2007 07:52:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 10683 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:44 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 10621 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 10609 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:44 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:44 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:37 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 804BD714084; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  New:  - Resolver problem
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124

           Summary: Resolver problem
           Product: XmlCommons
           Version: 1.x
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Resolver
        AssignedTo: gonzalezjerry@example.com
        ReportedBy: gonzalezjerry@example.com


Resolver problem

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Sat Apr 14 07:52:53 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 96782 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:53 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2007 07:52:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 10945 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:59 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 10845 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 10834 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2007 07:52:59 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:59 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:52 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 6BA69714085; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  - Resolver problem
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124





------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-14 00:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=19957)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19957&action=view)
f1


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Sat Apr 14 07:53:05 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 96836 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2007 07:53:05 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2007 07:53:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 07:53:11 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 11024 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 07:53:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 11011 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2007 07:53:10 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:53:10 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:53:04 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 47BEF714084; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  - Resolver problem
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:52:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124





------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-14 00:52 -------
Created an attachment (id=19958)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19958&action=view)
f2


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Sat Apr 14 08:03:27 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 97840 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2007 08:03:26 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2007 08:03:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 17868 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 08:03:32 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 17852 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2007 08:03:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 17841 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2007 08:03:32 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:03:32 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:03:25 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id B10B6714084; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  - Resolver problem
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124


gonzalezjerry@example.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-14 01:03 -------
This is Spam! Don't open the attachments! Now we're going to have to do surgery
in Bugzilla, too. I'm going to notify bugzilla-admin.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Mon Apr 16 15:36:05 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 11537 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2007 15:36:03 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2007 15:36:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 20619 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2007 15:36:04 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 20555 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2007 15:36:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 20494 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2007 15:36:04 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:36:04 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e5.ny.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:35:55 -0700
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3GFZYZo026215
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:35:34 -0400
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3GFZXvU477274
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:35:33 -0400
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3GFZHam004073
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:35:17 -0400
Received: from d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3GFZH6X002800
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:35:17 -0400
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com, gonzalezjerry@example.com, gonzalezjerry@example.com,
        gonzalezjerry@example.com
Cc: gonzalezjerry@example.com, gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: Fw: Call for Papers Opens for ApacheCon US 2007
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
From: Michael Glavassevich <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:35:00 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF446 | March 16, 2007) at
 04/16/2007 11:35:16,
	Serialize complete at 04/16/2007 11:35:16
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

In case anyone is interested in participating this year now is the time to 
submit proposals.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com

Rich Bowen <gonzalezjerry@example.com> wrote on 04/16/2007 10:50:54 AM:

> PMCs, please send this announcement to your various users@ and devs@ 
> mailing lists, as appropriate for your particular community. 
> Remember, your project can only be represented at ApacheCon if your 
> community submits talks proposals:
> 
> 
> ----------------------------
> 
> 
> Call for Papers Opens for ApacheCon US 2007
> 
> The Call for Papers is now open for ApacheCon US, to be held November 
> 12-16 at the Peachtree Westin, Atlanta. The conference will consist 
> of two day of tutorials (November 12-13) and three days of regular 
> conference sessions (November 14-16).
> 
> Please log in to the website at http://apachecon.com/html/login.html 
> to submit your proposal. Further details about fees and are 
> avaialable on the CFP form.
> 
> Topics appropriate for submission to this conference are manifold, 
> and may include but are not restricted to:
> 
> * ASF projects
> * ASF-Incubated projects
> * Scripting languages and dynamic content such as Java, Perl, Python, 
> Ruby, XSL, and PHP
> * New technologies and broader initiatives such as Web Services and 
> Web 2.0
> * Security and e-commerce, performance tuning, load balancing, and 
> high availability
> * Business and community issues surrounding the ASF and Open Source
> 
> The paper submission deadline is Monday, 28 April 2007, Midnight GMT.
> 
> Thanks, and we hope to hear from you, and to see you in Atlanta.
> --
> The ApacheCon Planners
> gonzalezjerry@example.com

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Tue Apr 17 09:03:32 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 58403 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:31 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2007 09:03:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 74815 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:38 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 74715 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 74704 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:37 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:37 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:30 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 62C4A714068; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  - Resolver problem
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124


gonzalezjerry@example.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #19957|text/html                   |application/spam
          mime type|                            |
  Attachment #19957|animal-mating.html          |
           filename|                            |
  Attachment #19957|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Tue Apr 17 09:03:45 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 58566 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2007 09:03:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 75735 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:50 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 75632 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 75621 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2007 09:03:50 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:50 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:43 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id A7364714073; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  - Resolver problem
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124


gonzalezjerry@example.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #19958|text/html                   |application/spam
          mime type|                            |
  Attachment #19958|pima-county.html            |
           filename|                            |




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Tue Apr 17 09:04:09 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 58703 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2007 09:04:08 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2007 09:04:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 76078 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 09:04:15 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 75974 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2007 09:04:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 75963 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2007 09:04:14 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:04:14 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.5 required=10.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:04:08 -0700
Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id 095D0714073; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: gonzalezjerry@example.com
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42124]  - Resolver problem
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
Message-Id: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42124





------- Additional Comments From gonzalezjerry@example.com  2007-04-17 02:03 -------
-changed the mime type...now they dont get opened as html pages.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 19 06:52:47 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 6350 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2007 06:52:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2007 06:52:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 10060 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 06:52:47 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 10019 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 06:52:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 9913 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2007 06:52:45 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:52:45 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e36.co.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:52:37 -0700
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3J6qGjs005117
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:52:16 -0400
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3J6qGwh200762
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:52:16 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3J6qGK1004113
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:52:16 -0600
Received: from d03nm120.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm120.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3J6qGvT004110
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:52:16 -0600
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: A few questions about details
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF242 April 21, 2006
From: David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:52:14 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM120/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF32 | October 17, 2006) at
 04/19/2007 00:52:16,
	Serialize complete at 04/19/2007 00:52:16
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0025B4E7852572C2_="
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 0025B4E7852572C2_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

On 
http://xml.apache.org/commons/

I read: 

Issues Jan-02: our current SAX and JAXP code may not pass the current J2EE 
CTS test suite, since we have bugfixes
above what those CTS tests mandate. If you don't know what that is, you 
don't care; otherwise ask on commons-dev for
an update.

So ... I'm asking for an update! :) 

First, does that Jan-02 mean the second day of January this year, or, the 
Month of January in the year 2002 ... in which case, 
I'd assume the comment is completely out of date? 


My _real_ reason for asking, is I would like to confirm or disconfirm that 
the code in xml-apis.jar is the exact same code that would be 
available from it's original sources, 

>From a quick analysis, for example, when I look at the SAX code from 
xml-commons-external-1.3.04-src
and compare it to the SAX code from 
2.0.2 (sax2r3)
There is two extra files in the apache version: 
SecuritySupport.java, and 
SecuritySupport12.java. 

So ... I'm wondering, does this sound right? Hava I made a mistake and 
they really are supposed to be the same? 

Would there be similar small differences in the org.w3c.dom packages and 
javax.xml packages? 

Is there any where these differences are explained or documtned? 

And ... the _real_ reason I want to know all this, is I am working on 
creating OSGi bundles for use with Eclipse. 
And, my end-goal is (mostly) to use the xerces implementation. In which 
case, I assume I would _have_ to use the 
sax APIs from Apache not their original source. And, if I do that, any 
advice on how I should represent the _version_ of those 
sax APIs? Version 83.161.120.1554xxxxxx (just to sort of reflect it came from 
xml-commons version 1.3.04? 

Any advice welcome. 




--=_alternative 0025B4E7852572C2_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">On </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">http://xml.apache.org/commons/</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I read: </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><i>Issues Jan-02: our current SAX and
JAXP code may not pass the current J2EE CTS test suite, since we have bugfixes</i></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><i>above what those CTS tests mandate.
If you don't know what that is, you don't care; otherwise ask on commons-dev
for</i></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><i>an update.</i></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">So ... I'm asking for an update! :)
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">First, does that Jan-02 mean the second
day of January this year, or, the Month of January in the year 2002 ...
in which case, </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I'd assume the comment is completely
out of date? </font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My _real_ reason for asking, is I would
like to confirm or disconfirm that the code in xml-apis.jar is the exact
same code that would be </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">available from it's original sources,
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">From a quick analysis, for example,
when I look at the SAX code from </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">xml-commons-external-1.3.04-src</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">and compare it to the SAX code from
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2.0.2 (sax2r3)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">There is two extra files in the apache
version: </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">SecuritySupport.java, and </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">SecuritySupport12.java. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">So ... I'm wondering, does this sound
right? Hava I made a mistake and they really are supposed to be the same?
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Would there be similar small differences
in the org.w3c.dom packages and javax.xml packages? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Is there any where these differences
are explained or documtned? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And ... the _real_ reason I want to
know all this, is I am working on creating OSGi bundles for use with Eclipse.
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And, my end-goal is (mostly) to use
the xerces implementation. In which case, I assume I would _have_ to use
the </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">sax APIs from Apache not their original
source. And, if I do that, any advice on how I should represent the _version_
of those </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">sax APIs? Version 83.161.120.1554xxxxxx (just
to sort of reflect it came from xml-commons version 1.3.04? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Any advice welcome. </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 0025B4E7852572C2_=--

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 19 06:59:03 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 9110 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2007 06:59:03 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2007 06:59:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 19673 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 06:59:09 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 19573 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 06:59:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 19562 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2007 06:59:09 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:59:09 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e31.co.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:59:02 -0700
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3J6wfor014810
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:58:41 -0400
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3J6wfCm205182
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:58:41 -0600
Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3J6wf9E015363
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:58:41 -0600
Received: from d03nm120.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm120.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3J6wfOg015360
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:58:41 -0600
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: And, one question about the future
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF242 April 21, 2006
From: David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:58:39 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM120/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF32 | October 17, 2006) at
 04/19/2007 00:58:40,
	Serialize complete at 04/19/2007 00:58:40
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00264A7A852572C2_="
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 00264A7A852572C2_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

My question about "the future" is what the plan or goal for making 
xml-apis "match" what ever is in a particular version of JRE's? 

I know in 1.3, they sure didn't, in 1.4, they were close, but not quite, 
and there were differences between IBM's and Sun's (not sure about 
others). 

And ... not sure about 1.5 ... maybe they match exactly? 

So, my question is, is there a real efffort to be sure they match exactly 
for any particular future generation of JRE's, or, 
is it a deliberate plan to allow your selves the flexibility to differ 
from current JRE's, so you can, if desired, get a "head start" , 
so to speak, on new specs? 

Again, any insights welcome. 


--=_alternative 00264A7A852572C2_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My question about &quot;the future&quot;
is what the plan or goal for making xml-apis &quot;match&quot; what ever
is in a particular version of JRE's? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I know in 1.3, they sure didn't, in
1.4, they were close, but not quite, and there were differences between
IBM's and Sun's (not sure about others). </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And ... not sure about 1.5 ... maybe
they match exactly? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">So, my question is, is there a real
efffort to be sure they match exactly for any particular future generation
of JRE's, or, </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">is it a deliberate plan to allow your
selves the flexibility to differ from current JRE's, so you can, if desired,
get a &quot;head start&quot; , </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">so to speak, on new specs? </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Again, any insights welcome. </font>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 00264A7A852572C2_=--

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 19 11:32:00 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 7645 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2007 11:31:59 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2007 11:31:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 26182 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 11:32:05 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 26170 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 11:32:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 26159 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2007 11:32:05 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:32:05 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:31:57 -0700
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3JBWT6r001025
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:32:29 -0400
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3JBVaAu475158
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:31:36 -0400
Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3JBVajs018626
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:31:36 -0400
Received: from d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3JBVa8M018618
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:31:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Cc: David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Subject: Re: A few questions about details
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
From: Michael Glavassevich <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:31:34 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF446 | March 16, 2007) at
 04/19/2007 07:31:35,
	Serialize complete at 04/19/2007 07:31:35
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi David,

David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com> wrote on 04/19/2007 02:52:14 
AM:
 
> On 
> http://xml.apache.org/commons/ 
> 
> I read: 
> 
> Issues Jan-02: our current SAX and JAXP code may not pass the 
> current J2EE CTS test suite, since we have bugfixes 
> above what those CTS tests mandate. If you don't know what that is, 
> you don't care; otherwise ask on commons-dev for 
> an update. 
> 
> So ... I'm asking for an update! :) 
> 
> First, does that Jan-02 mean the second day of January this year, 
> or, the Month of January in the year 2002 ... in which case, 
> I'd assume the comment is completely out of date? 

The Jan-02 there means January 2002. The front page is horribly out of 
date.

> My _real_ reason for asking, is I would like to confirm or 
> disconfirm that the code in xml-apis.jar is the exact same code 
thatwould be 
> available from it's original sources, 

It is not. The Apache version contains many bug fixes and improvements.

> From a quick analysis, for example, when I look at the SAX code from 
> xml-commons-external-1.3.04-src 
> and compare it to the SAX code from 
> 2.0.2 (sax2r3) 
> There is two extra files in the apache version: 
> SecuritySupport.java, and 
> SecuritySupport12.java. 
> 
> So ... I'm wondering, does this sound right? Hava I made a mistake 
> and they really are supposed to be the same? 

That's right. The SecuritySupport classes are only in the Apache version.
 
> Would there be similar small differences in the org.w3c.dom packages
> and javax.xml packages? 

Yes.

> Is there any where these differences are explained or documtned? 

Many of the differences are documented in the change log here [1].

> And ... the _real_ reason I want to know all this, is I am working 
> on creating OSGi bundles for use with Eclipse. 
> And, my end-goal is (mostly) to use the xerces implementation. In 
> which case, I assume I would _have_ to use the 
> sax APIs from Apache not their original source. And, if I do that, 
> any advice on how I should represent the _version_ of those 
> sax APIs? Version 83.161.120.1554xxxxxx (just to sort of reflect it came 
> from xml-commons version 1.3.04? 

1.3.04 represents the version of xml-commons-external as a whole. 
83.161.120.1554 might confuse folks; not sure how you can represent that in a 
self describing way.

> Any advice welcome.

[1] 
http://xml.apache.org/commons/changes.html#version_xml-commons-external-1.3.04


Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Thu Apr 19 11:58:15 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 19914 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2007 11:58:15 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2007 11:58:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 74430 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 11:58:21 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 74411 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2007 11:58:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 74400 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2007 11:58:21 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:58:21 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e4.ny.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:58:14 -0700
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3JBvrxW007689
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:57:53 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3JBvrv3358142
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:57:53 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3JBvrMo005023
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:57:53 -0400
Received: from d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3JBvr3n005016
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:57:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Cc: David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Subject: Re: And, one question about the future
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
From: Michael Glavassevich <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:57:51 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF446 | March 16, 2007) at
 04/19/2007 07:57:53,
	Serialize complete at 04/19/2007 07:57:53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi David,

David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com> wrote on 04/19/2007 02:58:39 
AM:

> 
> My question about "the future" is what the plan or goal for making 
> xml-apis "match" what ever is in a particular version of JRE's? 
> 
> I know in 1.3, they sure didn't, in 1.4, they were close, but not 
> quite, and there were differences between IBM's and Sun's (not sure 
> about others). 
> 
> And ... not sure about 1.5 ... maybe they match exactly? 
> 
> So, my question is, is there a real efffort to be sure they match 
> exactly for any particular future generation of JRE's, or, 
> is it a deliberate plan to allow your selves the flexibility to 
> differ from current JRE's, so you can, if desired, get a "head start" , 
> so to speak, on new specs? 

The effort is to release compatible versions of the SAX, DOM and JAXP 
APIs. xml-commons-externals 1.3.x should match what the JAXP 1.3 (which is 
included in Java 5) spec requires. It also contains additional interfaces 
which aren't required in the JRE.

> Again, any insights welcome.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com


From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Mon Apr 23 02:50:18 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 95461 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2007 02:50:18 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 02:50:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 13323 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2007 02:50:24 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 13221 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2007 02:50:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 13206 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2007 02:50:24 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:50:24 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:50:16 -0700
Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e32.co.us.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3N2kk9b003949
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:46:46 -0400
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3N2na0w148450
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:49:36 -0600
Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3N2nZsL031410
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:49:36 -0600
Received: from d03nm120.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm120.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3N2nZHb031407
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:49:35 -0600
In-Reply-To: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
To: Michael Glavassevich <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Cc: gonzalezjerry@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: And, one question about the future
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF242 April 21, 2006
From: David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:49:34 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM120/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF32 | October 17, 2006) at
 04/22/2007 20:49:35,
	Serialize complete at 04/22/2007 20:49:35
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000F7D0F852572C6_="
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 000F7D0F852572C6_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Thanks, Michael, very helpful ... but, just thought of another question. 

> The effort is to release compatible versions of the SAX, DOM and JAXP 
> APIs. xml-commons-externals 1.3.x should match what the JAXP 1.3 (which 
is 
> included in Java 5) spec requires. It also contains additional 
interfaces 
> which aren't required in the JRE.

I just noticed a JAXP 1.4, that is in Java 6. So .... any plans/thoughts 
about there being an 
xml-comons-externals 1.4? Which, presumably some future version of Xerces 
might need? 
Or ... what? Such as, is the hope/plan that JAXP 1.4 itself will suffice? 



--=_alternative 000F7D0F852572C6_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><tt><font size=2>Thanks, Michael, very helpful ... but, just thought
of another question. </font></tt>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>&gt; The effort is to release compatible versions
of the SAX, DOM and JAXP <br>
&gt; APIs. xml-commons-externals 1.3.x should match what the JAXP 1.3 (which
is <br>
&gt; included in Java 5) spec requires. It also contains additional interfaces
<br>
&gt; which aren't required in the JRE.<br>
</font></tt>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I just noticed a JAXP 1.4, that is in
Java 6. So .... any plans/thoughts about there being an </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">xml-comons-externals 1.4? Which, presumably
some future version of Xerces might need? </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Or ... what? Such as, is the hope/plan
that JAXP 1.4 itself will suffice? </font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 000F7D0F852572C6_=--

From commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com Mon Apr 23 05:50:45 2007
Return-Path: <commonsgonzalezjerry@example.com>
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 32648 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2007 05:50:45 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Apr 2007 05:50:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 25368 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2007 05:50:51 -0000
Delivered-To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 25327 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2007 05:50:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gonzalezjerry@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:gonzalezjerry@example.com>
List-Id: <commons-dev.xml.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list gonzalezjerry@example.com
Received: (qmail 25316 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2007 05:50:51 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:50:51 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0
	tests=INFO_TLD,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gonzalezjerry@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:50:43 -0700
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3N5oEIT001198
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:50:14 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3N5oEII549376
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:50:14 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3N5oEDR012700
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:50:14 -0400
Received: from d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com (d25ml03.torolab.ibm.com [83.161.120.155])
	by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3N5oDVc012684
	for <gonzalezjerry@example.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:50:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <OF13A2D616.F35AE5D7-ON852572C6.0009D8D0-852572C6.000F7DD1@LocalDomain>
To: gonzalezjerry@example.com
Cc: David M Williams <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Subject: Re: And, one question about the future
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
From: Michael Glavassevich <gonzalezjerry@example.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:50:14 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF446 | March 16, 2007) at
 04/23/2007 01:50:13,
	Serialize complete at 04/23/2007 01:50:13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi David,

David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM wrote on 04/22/2007 10:49:34 PM:
 
> Thanks, Michael, very helpful ... but, just thought of another question. 

> 
> > The effort is to release compatible versions of the SAX, DOM and JAXP 
> > APIs. xml-commons-externals 1.3.x should match what the JAXP 1.3 
(which is 
> > included in Java 5) spec requires. It also contains additional 
interfaces 
> > which aren't required in the JRE.
> 
> I just noticed a JAXP 1.4, that is in Java 6. So .... any 
> plans/thoughts about there being an 
> xml-comons-externals 1.4? Which, presumably some future version of 
> Xerces might need? 
> Or ... what? Such as, is the hope/plan that JAXP 1.4 itself will 
suffice?

It's been discussed [1] though no work has been done yet. Xerces will 
eventually need it.

Thanks.

[1] http://marc.info/?t=114360433900012&r=1&w=2

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com
E-mail: gonzalezjerry@example.com



{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}