From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun  1 00:28:44 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 325B241E8
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed,  1 Jun 2011 00:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 69680 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:28:44 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 69648 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 00:28:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 69640 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 00:28:44 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:44 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.2 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nm5-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:33 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2011 00:28:12 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by tm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2011 00:28:12 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by omp1024.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2011 00:28:11 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 53283 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jun 2011 00:28:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1306888091; bh=GdqokNZcom1Vk8C0iPLesv/idTXIzfBfnPG95mh8cXM=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zcm5why+J4+VIGfzpFgYPrLqEvDizOWNm8M7hVqPtL8w6yn4mAwihyx+aUiYj4mgFySxZacmQn7S04k5iTF2rf+JTsUqkdmdSaQY/EM8GWkrb2UVJ2drerulUzFnAih0b7x+Yv5YWZGXGdWjw3mAK3V0Bz4FsAllDjmtrAJxltk=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=fPjuvfoRqRT89CRaxmQsKAezxQbhQeZ+YaNns+RGgXBZDxGJlGIN2B18gQe8zntHZRLEQoCRYbJRcUPQE2bcADOfFTfss0mqfKasnSV8S8cDOphwQPG71u2KaxGMn8HDUsWGPgyqU06lJ4nPanQa4D2jL3CnjM118cphwXWD7Ug=;
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
X-YMail-OSG: XiOlADUVM1kUrlmP5UUGvgwPW.6qBszpzN6ztPpPohWJWMD
 6yCij5kDlO4XmYoF5ng5F3wOS_GEbkcRF8DZdt8QkvUH1WhJvCNmomUUQHNM
 X1FqCV__gIH0ca0UHtUesq7uZRyKz6iKiGL2ZYIT0iTs4RXJLwexwxtTCXb1
 sxQXmQs4QNo3MoYXTviVasOe_sQ6TAxni2eSIdY7fJdvyOoCO6Qg2Ow3azFa
 h9tfnRM7hHSKTn.1BPmQ_fdl9_9wWMs1wV.KngTWMIkcSw3bFNOcQJRvKmvz
 iOPRkYlCipk1cIqejsOJTftcANbxOQmBu9flVj_M2gy25ZLQu5yTXGU_U4Uj
 3HZcGnChGiRuTsa7hxTLu2aY_gtc-
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web120113.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:11 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.1554355
References: <davisamy@example.org> <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan King <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Possible to Test Groovy Code with RSpec/JRuby?
To: davisamy@example.org
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

> Just require 'buildr/groovy', put your groovy files under  src/main/groovy

Do you know why buildr pulls in groovy 1.7.5 even though I set the buildfile to 
pull version 1.8.0 via:

GROOVY = transitive('org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:jar:1.8.0')
compile.with GROOVY

> and your rspec files under src/test/spec 

Did you mean src/spec? 

> One word of caution, though, the integration is fragile  because JRuby and
> RSpec have been moving targets and I don't think many  people have been using
> RSpec to test Java/Groovy stuff.   The code is  good but it's heavily
> dependent on the environment configuration being right  -- I believe the
> magic combination is JRuby v1.5.6, RSpec 2.1.0, with the  jruby 0.1 gem
> installed.

Thanks for the warning; so far it 'works,' but should it start to get 
troublesome, I'll probably switch over to easyb.

-Dan

From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun  1 01:42:45 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 103AE48A3
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed,  1 Jun 2011 01:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 32619 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:42:45 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 32461 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 01:42:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 32453 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 01:42:44 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:42:44 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:42:36 +0000
Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so5980672wyb.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=aLfmnlBUOMs1d435kSZhnOmKgntwMZR9YJWMk/L3fuU=;
        b=IH1ph4pvlrSUTtjVg+McvvXkVGAEtPLGaAOgNtWMc3axt2N2Jg/CtVXi4C6rb8XxH7
         4h0G2coIUcwAhB/YmYPHqggJNjwfIj6UhJ2hcezg+J2OGFouR/HPTwWZRzNz0whXizo3
         rIac86R2vSdqAtgAWGjvRfSsjtmWuLdr43X6E=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=xklA6uKd4GRwy//ZLrXFpNYq+ce6dQK93BCW6Q2C6icWPKfzBJ8fvvyzWc1PrhtyvO
         bzL1bvLPMpH3TIH2Yh1vwN7xHQTAnNCvMvDrONXlOSwIxDr7t7Xe1N6deBSz07+D8POG
         HaPi3sbHaWz4no58aJqPkz+KwflzmHeV/i1Hc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id t73mr511425weq.10.1306892536618; Tue,
 31 May 2011 18:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2011 18:42:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
	<davisamy@example.org>
	<davisamy@example.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 18:42:16 -0700
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Possible to Test Groovy Code with RSpec/JRuby?
From: Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015176f1a6467a00d04a49ca1b5
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0015176f1a6467a00d04a49ca1b5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Dan King <davisamy@example.org> wrote:

> > Just require 'buildr/groovy', put your groovy files under
>  src/main/groovy
>
> Do you know why buildr pulls in groovy 1.7.5 even though I set the
> buildfile to
> pull version 1.8.0 via:
>
> GROOVY = transitive('org.codehaus.groovy:groovy:jar:1.8.0')
> compile.with GROOVY
>

You have to override the plugin's default version; otherwise you're just
adding yet-another-version of Groovy on the classpath (a sure recipe for
failure!).  Instead, add the following near the top of your buildfile:

Buildr888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4REQUIRES.groovy.version = '1.8.0'

> and your rspec files under src/test/spec
>
> Did you mean src/spec?
>

Yes, sorry.


> > One word of caution, though, the integration is fragile  because JRuby
> and
> > RSpec have been moving targets and I don't think many  people have been
> using
> > RSpec to test Java/Groovy stuff.   The code is  good but it's heavily
> > dependent on the environment configuration being right  -- I believe the
> > magic combination is JRuby v1.5.6, RSpec 2.1.0, with the  jruby 0.1 gem
> > installed.
>
> Thanks for the warning; so far it 'works,' but should it start to get
> troublesome, I'll probably switch over to easyb.
>

Unfortunately, I wouldn't qualify the easyb integration as easier to work
with... if you get into trouble, I'd rather fix the rspec integration
(assuming that's your preferred option).

good luck,
alex

--0015176f1a6467a00d04a49ca1b5--

From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun  1 13:04:52 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5883F6994
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed,  1 Jun 2011 13:04:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 95626 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 13:04:52 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 95557 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2011 13:04:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 95549 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2011 13:04:51 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:04:51 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nm3-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 13:04:42 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by nm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2011 13:04:21 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2011 13:04:21 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by omp1056.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2011 13:04:21 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 39469 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jun 2011 13:04:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1306933461; bh=RLBvC9ypMw8IXaede8vJMo+KOvorjBElFQ5orJa6DcU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aNIJEDz1bExlvqfpm2Ay4zm4QWfTnN2Y8w9Ld1Y4q4xEnIc2ntm8zn2Rthm4fDVxcgvvcFwK7afxnGpXNF2+BgQhrTk+r68b7cxCkiMDxPZQDBtti9ZLlQFsN9cUBlMs8obvnlj9dCTbjho4Si94ASXYtgULt2NkbzLDYCGaG4k=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=05gbg21J5KXw0rVtrOmwe2QsqVtMD+kMDidgqUT3Zreul2rNBZZH8Zn0lq3ws8VxEA1PuuEA5fQL6ItXzMdddvxc04CMwQ6lXDYMfm/PWEnjtNoFg2DIk3QbhBN5yjr0CDa/9P8nzBj1Oig3ZeTzLB0Wz17yECmCu+FkPi0DAvU=;
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
X-YMail-OSG: vl8jdFAVM1luvVScR081AUUJ9VZVA_0NrkhTDihjDKR87Zw
 U9.oliiM4jfpahJPkEQDplaizuTxZiBcVpLH5kQazsfhDtKRrCHQ0D8Ops9j
 _6V27HOz2ov5N4pccEhbYqppgI8KmYwSHQt_Aj1lRwTF7ZI7ej1.M4FjlV2R
 3dGpfrFJ9XM9wWJ2LJOigVlrD1RFbqyl9rErAdi5W3wnY6WFIaS.McIBBgzE
 ag7BHeFvYhBoPT93fVEO.CWdrMEt.bdN2lUs_fed0qU6EMVwvlS1NrMJ.Xq2
 UUQpelNAwePaN.Sq._6rjcYWcgDXWX0Uu6Q0JvG2GCr3L3C6fWtOYm_5vDMZ
 qCJQd8eX_NJka2rFT16JPpXiRW24-
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web120118.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:04:21 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/570 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.1554355
References: <davisamy@example.org> <davisamy@example.org> <davisamy@example.org> <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 06:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan King <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Possible to Test Groovy Code with RSpec/JRuby?
To: davisamy@example.org
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> You have to override the plugin's default version;  otherwise you're just

> adding yet-another-version of Groovy on the classpath  (a sure recipe for
> failure!).  Instead, add the following near the top  of your buildfile:
 
> Buildr888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4REQUIRES.groovy.version =  '1.8.0'

Was this information available in buildr's documentation? I searched for a while 
yesterday and didn't find anything.

> Unfortunately, I wouldn't qualify the easyb  integration as easier to work
> with... if you get into trouble, I'd rather fix  the rspec integration
> (assuming that's your preferred option).

I'll keep that in mind and yes, RSpec is my preferred option.

Speaking of options, do you know how to pass options to RSpec? The "Languages" 
section of the documentation states that I can use the :format option, but it 
does not state how to. I assumed I had to use -- test.using :format => ['doc'] 
-- but that didn't work. 


Lastly, when I run -- buildr test -- the reports directory (under the project 
root directory) always contains an empty (0 bytes) file whereas the reports 
directory under target contains a yaml file that indicates which *_spec files 
passed/failed. From buildr's documentation I thought that the 
/project-root/reports directory would, by default, contain an html 
representation of the test results. Am I mistaken?

Thanks for all the clarifications; I appreciate it.

Best,
Dan


From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun  8 15:09:14 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 263724994
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2011 15:09:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 9323 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 15:09:14 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 9290 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 15:09:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 9277 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 15:09:13 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:09:13 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:09:05 +0000
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so831953iwn.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=T7boGp1r5qjFZ7CjzlaMxCAqyMELAkA0EMAWMlfNUoM=;
        b=E+kwK+FU5Qm9Yr6FlF5C8XL6aM33IQrkmlT/CDOVqa3k5P8H2buL93MfxPK1GXyZ9T
         kO3jfnvy4dFSAD7J90YFygc9hQG8wcJAqDOIPs+I3f/OhT/ew19i9/5SRgMZIjFm8bUP
         w1W6E19LFbgW5lPWsmx+TiTdnvTorctbrB6tg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=rMSCAfJB1pGv7BU/gcp1mkwpZe8N6B165r4BQs6aat3tfgQ3YCnPahwDcfzlJMHO6m
         AJdOjltsj95LUekQmXwNMgaGxRGjevY9jOeZeRttTiqQO7rUnli7uzBTSBugpwpb/+fI
         N9DL8m87DlcPVMFwngKi6LT5Hzg6c9zjDRLR8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q10mr11426574ibi.25.1307545724223; Wed,
 08 Jun 2011 08:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:08:44 -0500
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Creating packages without version
From: Allen Riddle <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015176f0a686b809c04a534b664
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0015176f0a686b809c04a534b664
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

All,

I'm trying to create a jar in builder that doesn't have a version number
stamped at the end of the jar name.  Is there a way to do this?  Thanks.

--0015176f0a686b809c04a534b664--

From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun  8 15:14:48 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 656C84473
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2011 15:14:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 31496 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 15:14:48 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 31456 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 15:14:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 31448 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 15:14:48 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:14:48 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:14:40 +0000
Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so712379wyb.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=VktqH4j7on6owgddSDEuZ1gj6KVTyrdFdjRqFySSFUY=;
        b=YwmSFfmmxmpK59uJKHOWf5nHY6CtBPCcoPCBoGGEAisOIGWnNcWk9nqLT0TLxeoilC
         IqTfBOgfsdcnvb8xuqCW2yIN8VpiKJxy37Bdd+sv9UPVqi2eZFEgTO6EQR8+YfnCdsnx
         9ByqiDoIf8DpYsfVGOg6A/ojoCsAp6vRpIKb4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=pb8uDTNxu5aaeh4zqO69xsx7GRzdR/9oL2f+bYh95eAZgojVPD1bX9mz1S9MEXftnh
         wkbsL2iQyoZXiZMuNnMTNP9GDGOzy40r5xFxA9gfXMoKl40ARX8bxRja2gb4VJBhKTdU
         A1ZNWSIwyB+CJtQLUCCIKZocHDHJC41rxYhso=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j51mr7201134wes.94.1307546060380;
 Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:14:20 -0700
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Creating packages without version
From: Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301fb73374dbc404a534caa5
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--20cf301fb73374dbc404a534caa5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Allen Riddle <davisamy@example.org> wrote:

> I'm trying to create a jar in builder that doesn't have a version number
> stamped at the end of the jar name.  Is there a way to do this?  Thanks.
>

You can pass an explicit filename:

package(:jar, :file => 'foo.jar')

alex

--20cf301fb73374dbc404a534caa5--

From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun  8 18:16:26 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 310A44DFE
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed,  8 Jun 2011 18:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 11975 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 18:16:26 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 11937 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jun 2011 18:16:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 11929 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jun 2011 18:16:26 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:16:26 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:16:18 +0000
Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so1070593iwn.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Cd3QGu1AAGqduGhVLYyjEooZ2iFL7iSQAtCN79FjrhI=;
        b=Q1lWq9dAWTL4j49C93vWPH9SfquwtLUx6EG2G0AiAzDW2msOaIGharCo+aWaoFVbS8
         8v+tohApHoZhU6uGcGRc7fp/k7jLo6CE24GAneiXNXaYRbjPl2eI2V/WZOL+cT0nJ69f
         nDj8WtM0oUbP3uP6xWMp3C/Ryo4X9H9OmIbHw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=WU2u9aOa0GUkxAPlYme1ODeETbN4uQ/NB9wFR3i8Rh3/ZirycH/pGl2Uyu16iOYRXq
         gc5mgNv53qNYJN7qL2Q0Wm45sznXPXyVIeXm8Htg9ijySfnO7MBgWOki+8/iz2AIQwS5
         OSWEpGHSY4ZvOIBqr2v6fvOj5KnHLEv0iRjLY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e19mr3073919icl.134.1307556956866; Wed,
 08 Jun 2011 11:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
	<davisamy@example.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:15:56 -0500
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Creating packages without version
From: Allen Riddle <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30334699f006e204a53753f8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--20cf30334699f006e204a53753f8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Excellent, thank you!

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Allen Riddle <davisamy@example.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to create a jar in builder that doesn't have a version number
> > stamped at the end of the jar name.  Is there a way to do this?  Thanks.
> >
>
> You can pass an explicit filename:
>
> package(:jar, :file => 'foo.jar')
>
> alex
>

--20cf30334699f006e204a53753f8--

From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun 15 12:05:48 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FE934FC7
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:05:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 2585 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:05:48 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 2531 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2011 12:05:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 2523 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2011 12:05:47 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:05:47 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-yx0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:05:42 +0000
Received: by yxt33 with SMTP id 33so364133yxt.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=kizdRuuqPgU5Y/OU5HW5uTSgrZFRADEEf6hMwaFJnbY=;
        b=g2Y5GnxxxV2Ixw6LopfOV5LEXoTHgKJT5/Hf23zdCSUgHn21hjPjMIwaziR6lPgzzp
         adS94uy/tkL/tlt0fwqxmSvSp0bPRubjk5xX9LJsGNYEhX2Ax2ZENVry+87CripEbROA
         ot402XBEQb7GEeKsFIRUviEZhGnKqS62kAWiw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=kHkR1vC5AGHdYUMyZhltnj0qfvtvv2qNnDYg5iF5FCGbh+P1CSX0UjW87rvXbOapxw
         M6ICqlmbt5K+zTMN5u+vrAL2tohZvxQxPkz91s+skHrs7jJ3Bpu6NbbJ3sqLNunZZQ+R
         qiUiGUE6ne+jj3so1vrz8KiR5KqioFj0KSbyQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j47mr596245yhn.383.1308139520576; Wed,
 15 Jun 2011 05:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:35:20 +0530
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Javadoc option errors
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyYy1BbmRyw6kgTGF2ZXJkacOocmU=?= <davisamy@example.org>
To: users <davisamy@example.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello everyone,

We faced a problem in my team. This issue was experienced with Buildr
1.4.4 (IIRC, it happened with 1.4.5 too).

We have:

  package :javadoc
  package :jar
  package :sources

However, we have two problems that arise:
1- The created package with the javadoc is a .zip instead of a .jar file
2- The pom file is not generated

Are we doing something wrong?

Regards,
--=20
Marc-Andr=C3=A9 LAVERDI=C3=88RE
"Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete,
not lacking anything." -James 1:4
http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/
mlaverd.theunixplace.com

From davisamy@example.org  Sun Jun 19 04:57:36 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D26447D2
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:57:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 92933 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 04:57:35 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 92881 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2011 04:57:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 92873 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2011 04:57:32 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:57:32 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:57:26 +0000
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so617138wyj.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=VSdgmArDuMU1EA+L4KZcvGOIRsVZIqOHHrb9Umjq0KE=;
        b=GzUFux1igsx8Z0r4FT7W6PmpDIj7QIRHStTdabzFDvsOUz0pHnk/iORh5nwUa/3+7g
         7y5ieMYtNCsJy9GW9ccQGRwGaRqCy5v0XeZBopP068swxmmCwfAWK3QxIzv1N9XYp/R8
         y/0QqhnHcQf3JJ/XlH6/BcmLb91e+x9EAE55k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=OXz7+Ipv7E+8eRFxDkaHL0V+8CpYVGXxpManQves+YKgkxKMdpCPFQRRRp5kEAhK1A
         Ne/fvLI++6tdxgYV9rvXl8CN/gJkZsAkJ4QAXpmGYJH5JdGR+ZtLUnpQt9X6ODJPTCei
         wG47H8jIXCS0WfoahcSFLU++L1cg+LEI3cOxQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id r58mr3431502weq.109.1308459425517;
 Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:57:05 -0700
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Javadoc option errors
From: Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd47e7642d22c04a6097392
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--000e0cd47e7642d22c04a6097392
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Marc-Andr=E9,

package :javadoc correctly produces a .jar on buildr 1.4.5.

The .pom should be generated for your main .jar package.  No .pom is
generated for the javadoc artifact.

Does this help?
alex


2011/6/15 Marc-Andr=E9 Laverdi=E8re <davisamy@example.org>

> Hello everyone,
>
> We faced a problem in my team. This issue was experienced with Buildr
> 1.4.4 (IIRC, it happened with 1.4.5 too).
>
> We have:
>
>  package :javadoc
>  package :jar
>  package :sources
>
> However, we have two problems that arise:
> 1- The created package with the javadoc is a .zip instead of a .jar file
> 2- The pom file is not generated
>
> Are we doing something wrong?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Marc-Andr=E9 LAVERDI=C8RE
> "Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete=
,
> not lacking anything." -James 1:4
> http://asimplediscipleslife.blogspot.com/
> mlaverd.theunixplace.com
>

--000e0cd47e7642d22c04a6097392--

From davisamy@example.org  Tue Jun 21 18:38:52 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05B0C4CC2
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:38:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 8930 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:38:51 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 8823 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:38:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 8806 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 18:38:50 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:38:50 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:38:44 +0000
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so65918wyj.17
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Yrnuf0nVeGCB+2nKuhBroUJwavF6smXIYpsdQiW7lxc=;
        b=NKNRtiFsmYfQKvEKCyOnLj5w+U5XjsXBiPj/51VTjpXp+1gLvyaitapSGANXeVF+l3
         oe3gj37lJ4wryKkyRKJznMZRDTBsoPSc2V859iLrwiBYdCz3Pykfv22EhVWmA9PHcSHo
         TtHA8wm93FdYLEVCvHPE1toOLbfCJWo/Ktvas=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=lGVFGHUM4mSkofjgimXgydHFw4d4xn3oxpPU9b7NE7T3gKocOuyGismXuvLjpBryXP
         VMPWNhKYEnhbLcV5ZOhxSPFPdyObFHwa9onD1O2RcXFCPczeV1x2J34qVm5gO75qXsA5
         tZo+iBWu4ElR8x6aSxe+y3shKPs4bmtWHkOYw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id o5mr1108309wei.94.1308681503881; Tue,
 21 Jun 2011 11:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:38:23 -0700
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
From: Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org, dev <davisamy@example.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6dd98fc29bac304a63d280f
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0016e6dd98fc29bac304a63d280f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden
that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time.  In case you
haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with a
restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby
1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies.   There is no
plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to
rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on JtestR
means the feature doesn't support its own weight.

VOTE
[ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
[ ] +/- 0  No opinion
[ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR
maintenance)

If anybody wants to step up and maintain JtestR integration, I would advise
converting it into a plugin separate from Buildr's core.   I believe a
separate release cycle would probably serve users better in any case.

thanks,
alex

--0016e6dd98fc29bac304a63d280f--

From davisamy@example.org  Tue Jun 21 18:44:01 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D7714ED1
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 20831 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:44:01 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 20804 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 18:44:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 20796 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 18:44:01 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:44:01 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:43:53 +0000
Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so63811iye.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
         :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to
         :x-mailer;
        bh=MpRR6dyNvMqoa1iccZZL332ns9c+hi9dCkLfH9IO2Nw=;
        b=Bzvbm17t306RcB7uprZZHnhdfgG7WeYbOiEsJtPMbe1UG0FvtVoM9+Dhd61heh8ta9
         52RQReZfgXKMFuvx1qfcVXMTaiP/a/RKgGVAiZ9fszKNxsVLeEiGN8CQTDUYQnIf2l5g
         HV0gYfQ5aBA+hebu+QoIDMzWC3X8IqDA1+TFc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=uGgDtL+S7cx+F8uOSC6g/z/0/1KlYyWxPwJqjBooWWcSoXQ+M9dwhWYW72P2NP7YS/
         xL+HuD4khpy8kfR3KL+lNXEbbxu/0LLX76xBChxqnzbYO73Cl5l15xE7mku1xepIr1uW
         yoD4fAzn8zlPdnT8/SDb46b4mS21gcqyP8qsE=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a8mr7161571icy.525.1308681811285;
        Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-99-141-27-220.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net [83.161.120.155])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8sm7007759icy.9.283.161.120.155.43.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Rhett Sutphin <davisamy@example.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
From: Rhett Sutphin <davisamy@example.org>
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:43:28 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Nonbinding +1 from me. I originally used JTestR when I started using =
buildr (long ago), but I found that buildr's built-in rspec support was =
better.

Rhett

On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:

> As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance =
burden
> that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time.  In case =
you
> haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible =
with a
> restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to =
JRuby
> 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies.   There =
is no
> plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR =
to
> rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on =
JtestR
> means the feature doesn't support its own weight.
>=20
> VOTE
> [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
> [ ] +/- 0  No opinion
> [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to =
JtestR
> maintenance)
>=20
> If anybody wants to step up and maintain JtestR integration, I would =
advise
> converting it into a plugin separate from Buildr's core.   I believe a
> separate release cycle would probably serve users better in any case.
>=20
> thanks,
> alex


From davisamy@example.org  Tue Jun 21 19:47:12 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3330746D2
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:47:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 45850 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:47:12 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 45811 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 19:47:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 45802 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 19:47:11 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:47:11 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:47:06 +0000
Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so351339bwz.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Jz2vsOFE6XKLK0/ypMjrJ0dnEDO+3ouyK+e4DAtOWdc=;
        b=NrjCSFXcvFdPdUvBoWLw3jEwQ7WF64MVnOVfQgWRTpV0C+Hdy3x1H35CVVQozgIC7O
         zlUG3AxPmm0Xkhd1xDH4AaZ6XEPo4QV4XkqhiVkz6kg4QSFW6grpy4/KtLhQWOK+sRY+
         6HxyLlGoiEDHhCEaENfTsNBnCXxtEL6t0Zygs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=EXTGjZKCqn3qD8602dB9okdbnjz28GoCxhgdHdchZPogdSKyYjF3HfrHDOSqxx2oIm
         b53XsjVj0slZLtZ0zNMPGYfIxz4Yx6b7iAatzlCCNkZ7qHcogRw7jKMSF6eYYEMkpLaS
         TlRWQM3QQMkUfunnNwiH8mBI7sqD6dm81KYZk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n13mr2885624bku.198.1308685605536;
 Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: davisamy@example.org
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:46:45 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NF8BzR91vJ2V1Rn8UiSQpT6PDOM
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
From: Lacton <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org> wr=
ote:
> As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden
> that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time. =A0In case y=
ou
> haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with a
> restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby
> 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies. =A0 There i=
s no
> plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to
> rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on JtestR
> means the feature doesn't support its own weight.
>
> VOTE
> [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
> [ ] +/- 0 =A0No opinion
> [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR
> maintenance)
>
> If anybody wants to step up and maintain JtestR integration, I would advi=
se
> converting it into a plugin separate from Buildr's core. =A0 I believe a
> separate release cycle would probably serve users better in any case.
>
> thanks,
> alex
>

From davisamy@example.org  Tue Jun 21 21:47:46 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA0244A77
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 54949 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:47:45 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 54920 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:47:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 54912 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:47:45 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:47:45 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:47:39 +0000
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so238242wyj.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=k22pJIYOYUY5H2EWiZKQj1srvQnUpOxCCvteX6bCQsw=;
        b=po7fnGC0ENNh132wo42QawNi+6GQICtFklXIJyGMSKCZ42givIMTG+67azRaq1OitP
         BwrQSfNozVH3LfUSRZUZI5t0aBdCCLat6LTBAAux/714ZujW1WKpMgTN+/vOvo9DtCVB
         yiSrLYh9bCtvZrx2JI3onBjOQWu+TZH5SO1qE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=x9Qpsji5We3iZgKecJnfQGeleoHOEqMObOIFgAnGQIRRgKmRwaXTAwCuTPflV1crK5
         QM3nyWDDdhmyKcOvWRrsmcPyQhrJgt8nijHwfv2jb9qhBwkUHzeAsfeZuDxU7HthKqf4
         Df4ct6kxe7eMTYsPVdsbMOpsD5NXnFZYY7v/U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x57mr1329052wes.10.1308692839256; Tue,
 21 Jun 2011 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: davisamy@example.org
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:47:19 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YgAZlQ6ZZlG6RsltSupl7yhmAD4
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
From: Peter Donald <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org> wr=
ote:
> As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden
> that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time. =A0In case y=
ou
> haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with a
> restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby
> 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies. =A0 There i=
s no
> plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to
> rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on JtestR
> means the feature doesn't support its own weight.
>
> VOTE
> [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
> [ ] +/- 0 =A0No opinion
> [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR
> maintenance)

+1

--=20
Cheers,

Peter Donald

From davisamy@example.org  Tue Jun 21 21:53:30 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC35C43C1
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:53:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 66204 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:53:30 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 66173 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 21:53:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 66165 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 21:53:30 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:53:30 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-vw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:53:25 +0000
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so288805vws.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=wMEaD98DmnUB1tljQA8mw975m3VW65GeZl40mq6to8E=;
        b=H5TyEIh2cuT93tvkqzwKE6ut+NruNAQyos4bXTc+d3EZj2I2lTyelm3+hqI4LOoM/M
         8PWQNxqrdZRpnDmuHfPqi1XRLsX4fjJQtqTMcGrTIBx7t6zc2fjokNxzUGjw4Io4MkrM
         sXd/bjfFiGU+fWWXOstyhQyZ9E6UizYQdFsTg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=SssMKooOI4rLlWvDk+noWpjbeT8rbyf0sJie8MzMiob206GpYW2+DhaQF86ZCdnv29
         obqRU7tAnx2tyDZTosEq361+2uokxSZmFTvHfvlWoYNuMiUOAl10Lpi3J9758yMsIanA
         RFtgixEqcpnOF7t7TmLudHA/25Ps08QrESue8=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id bn19mr470715vdc.13.1308693183064; Tue,
 21 Jun 2011 14:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Sender: davisamy@example.org
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org> <davisamy@example.org>
From: Antoine Toulme <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:52:43 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mQLqOthgqQ-iH59Q9JqpZC4qRFU
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b197f4beafa04a63fe03e

--bcaec51b197f4beafa04a63fe03e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 21:47, Peter Donald <davisamy@example.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org>
> wrote:
> > As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden
> > that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time.  In case you
> > haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with a
> > restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby
> > 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies.   There is
> no
> > plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to
> > rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on JtestR
> > means the feature doesn't support its own weight.
> >
> > VOTE
> > [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
> > [ ] +/- 0  No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR
> > maintenance)
>
> +1
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Peter Donald
>

--bcaec51b197f4beafa04a63fe03e--

From davisamy@example.org  Tue Jun 21 22:11:09 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE6B24004
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:11:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 92056 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 22:11:09 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 92031 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 22:11:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 92015 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 22:11:09 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:11:09 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-qw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:11:02 +0000
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so168643qwc.17
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from
         :subject:date:to;
        bh=OlRyoH5s+8ofsYQQ5Ral8Bzavy1AOPBZbqSIasZyLA0=;
        b=IJHz5OtUKUOBoqnt6CjJolIgv8UJlSohg35sm9noKDZsBAkSRqRNiqvPAqmQzsP8+y
         qwTYSbGeuBkAJHjYNn+186MtY4ou+Gq3ztg2UCDwa0K0CVfmqYFSkl/YkzVgVCR4JwLj
         IGQzhIBas0O6FSlozwsLGm7DG0ejohW0yOFZg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to;
        b=kH9WXEpbN1gjWvEwFQNL/nvpstMh3OWShJWlRYITy2skRwx+GQAG1pE/x7bIWVqZGg
         A6aKiG00hv4+jU4PXUpZX5CIpM7+kMYgtBsU/9vbePswFk1R7bx7odNCNq2jw5t9bYxp
         sqJbgiCo95OAd1DZNzvYY8uIsWrY+SqN7Qkg4=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id ee1mr5443588qab.109.1308694240945;
        Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (mobile-198-228-195-013.mycingular.net [83.161.120.155])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm5251705qcb.34.283.161.120.155.10.39
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: <davisamy@example.org>
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <davisamy@example.org>
Cc: "davisamy@example.org" <davisamy@example.org>,
 dev <davisamy@example.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A5220p)
From: Chris Samuel <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:10:34 -0400
To: "davisamy@example.org" <davisamy@example.org>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

+1

On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org> wrote:

> As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden
> that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time.  In case you
> haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with a
> restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby
> 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies.   There is no
> plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to
> rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on JtestR
> means the feature doesn't support its own weight.
> 
> VOTE
> [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
> [ ] +/- 0  No opinion
> [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR
> maintenance)
> 
> If anybody wants to step up and maintain JtestR integration, I would advise
> converting it into a plugin separate from Buildr's core.   I believe a
> separate release cycle would probably serve users better in any case.
> 
> thanks,
> alex

From davisamy@example.org  Wed Jun 22 01:16:36 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4465C41A0
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:16:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 86279 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 01:16:35 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 86205 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2011 01:16:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 85993 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2011 01:16:35 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:16:35 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-pw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:16:29 +0000
Received: by pwj5 with SMTP id 5so451261pwj.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ONAosUtotJhiSmHLyg2fkpyekUD17vSFrRKl1ehTsl8=;
        b=gIiZaBKgDattE+hDbEkqQdpoXHA10ZkW9SQnl65H3+Zi5IloEVixbrB+4Gh0aN6VHs
         4H2HtH4OkikrGgfY6zX/qXzp+jStavfRXmqMxjujCPGFu4N+eKs52C/EieihwdWibYBq
         xFDzLkl9ms2ezOIbnqhYrZwemMu62UoBnYOYg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=JQSyny6msqfSRrFjeU0/fxamtrwbEoBhr+HZYAVq5OtiIWcTwEOTANRgkVTqJXGovM
         xAdJGbWg0x+GovoUCbZcj9dwuBTx7AVrsfCwhfhfEJY1ggC2L0zFfe4/uSDoSm8wU9Gc
         blNvVRs9SSQFsUG2FbiRnxAiJ3RYCznUs/1Lw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s7mr39306pbl.86.1308705367280; Tue, 21
 Jun 2011 18:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
	<davisamy@example.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:16:07 -0400
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: VOTE: Remove JtestR support
From: "Jesus M. Rodriguez" <davisamy@example.org>
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

+1 as I didn't even know JTestR was there.

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Chris Samuel <davisamy@example.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Alex Boisvert <davisamy@example.org> wrot=
e:
>
>> As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden
>> that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time. =C2=A0In ca=
se you
>> haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with =
a
>> restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby
>> 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies. =C2=A0 The=
re is no
>> plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to
>> rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on Jtest=
R
>> means the feature doesn't support its own weight.
>>
>> VOTE
>> [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support
>> [ ] +/- 0 =C2=A0No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR
>> maintenance)
>>
>> If anybody wants to step up and maintain JtestR integration, I would adv=
ise
>> converting it into a plugin separate from Buildr's core. =C2=A0 I believ=
e a
>> separate release cycle would probably serve users better in any case.
>>
>> thanks,
>> alex
>

From davisamy@example.org  Thu Jun 23 00:58:30 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFF2667F4
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 33425 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:58:29 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 33385 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 00:58:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 33377 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 00:58:28 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:58:28 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nm24-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:58:18 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by nm24.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2011 00:57:57 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by tm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2011 00:57:57 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by omp1028.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2011 00:57:57 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 99823 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jun 2011 00:57:57 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308790677; bh=g9gbzPSAWAvqf3BQGWmKZ9QWpRYwloGwyIYA3lgLrMg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XHCBxOt920bxJ4nFZnOpKsr7f96rz6yj/LXfYUE4E9xaC/9RL77rkIajGXWB1qmUls1zAIs6Irq33GAmHpD2kLLkSfR+1XdcYWfOx9Y6ggtkotgbACb9POArZC9O/cCqMidu+AYHTONKtCSwDk7N9rsrghb7tofLNFoIhoolEaw=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=LLVfmBrvCB9IN24A+i3ghqabGOcbRHLdDhqL1o3Ysmqxr019Ujw3GKjS7Qlcg+skDlWsdOwTyBN5FXnCrw/nkhiQ0h8UiV0PT5nYpV0KGlPkBmTpYqZqIOpHrMvzLOADF0+kEAFEDv+UV2HJ/LltS2JhbGub04+/u6KCdE0eu5M=;
X-YMail-OSG: u2f9yz8VM1kA.ZUAJK8AycSrdOb.1rvOLky_2HnpxwqgvJ4
 ODUtzc9yfmM_STxoDGkbNKjWSeFRUeQZolvkjv_WUKiT1hs67FhxnsAlBhy2
 a2AcI.hXM3Zxf7Bd2Z7W_tU6WkxTZf9yLwG204OgTQLlO6_qTvdOlhmvrxk6
 vE0vsNzsCwJFuY3H_gTubfdo4Q7q6L8NH6H6ZFACvdS2IpVCSy3QJBOMPDB6
 Rsh56PUQxrBFIElRK7J7DslWEimgbzt0OTWf1gt2kscHsyoOpb24YJpOspMd
 u88zcc0sGaUPXIwVsOfNdKlytJOJwHPhLNEA.h9pLYdbPo_aNaQ--
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web120108.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:57:57 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/572 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.1557740
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan King <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Adding Groovy Runtime to Groovy App Jar
To: davisamy@example.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi,

How can I include 'groovy-all-1.8.0.jar' to my groovy application, which I'm 
packaging as a jar? 


I've already added:

Buildr888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4REQUIRES.groovy.version='1.8.0'

Thanks.

-Dan


From davisamy@example.org  Thu Jun 23 07:57:18 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CE1A41C3
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:57:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 38552 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 07:57:10 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 37449 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 07:57:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 37333 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 07:56:59 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:56:59 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of davisamy@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-vw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:56:53 +0000
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so1980059vws.17
        for <davisamy@example.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to
         :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=7GAHtFW4yILOv2f+OdgSBdhS4ebIBsy0CFRfUCOUFb4=;
        b=Wu9yKDyu0pc3uu3BaAKThwOfakVFU7Nlx706Vp37RWTJWknycZ2M+Hk6ZfcQimLj9Y
         TN/40xTvu3scXH97z+8EKMndat88ncxiA38HcEBnx2p+ZKg/VKieV77e7nsAzd8pb4GT
         Sah3w/G0R66uchOgujsvDjkxi5HIBeI8xVev4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=cTDKDqHHMOFrlY1RVVCqWTJWwjjb+a9kUdYz+7F6A0YRq3DdZXjOGxKwpCe1Xf4Osy
         1H0I+k9yp3mCBl9YOth8TN43g3DILwGpeNGSovhUvjsp9LIMp8qO2+opPMY5gi3vEjoP
         3nXcEWM5frImupd5L7kMJlbh58dTsDHP5Dqv0=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id ef2mr2299365vdb.293.1308815792096; Thu,
 23 Jun 2011 00:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Sender: davisamy@example.org
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
References: <davisamy@example.org>
From: Antoine Toulme <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:56:12 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: X17v-XoMf5zzn1WTUiU1ZCmEsxo
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Adding Groovy Runtime to Groovy App Jar
To: davisamy@example.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307f35285d449004a65c6c1d

--20cf307f35285d449004a65c6c1d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If you would like to include it as a jar inside your jar (?), you can use
this:

package(:jar).include(artifact(GROOVY), :path => "lib").

I committed a simple integration test that shows the use of include with
:path:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/buildr/trunk/tests/include_path/

It's more likely that you want to merge it, in which case this will work:
package(:jar).merge artifact(GROOVY))

I'll add a test for merge as well.

Antoine

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 00:57, Dan King <davisamy@example.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> How can I include 'groovy-all-1.8.0.jar' to my groovy application, which
> I'm
> packaging as a jar?
>
>
> I've already added:
>
> Buildr888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4REQUIRES.groovy.version='1.8.0'
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Dan
>
>

--20cf307f35285d449004a65c6c1d--

From davisamy@example.org  Thu Jun 23 22:16:34 2011
Return-Path: <davisamy@example.org>
X-Original-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [83.161.120.155])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E76F4E47
	for <davisamy@example.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:16:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 20125 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 22:16:34 -0000
Delivered-To: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 20015 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2011 22:16:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact davisamy@example.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Post: <mailto:davisamy@example.org>
List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: davisamy@example.org
Delivered-To: mailing list davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 20007 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2011 22:16:33 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:16:33 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nm25-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:16:24 +0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by nm25.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2011 22:16:03 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2011 22:16:03 -0000
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by omp1017.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2011 22:16:03 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: davisamy@example.org
Received: (qmail 34636 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jun 2011 22:16:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1308867363; bh=ccemY/Uel2gqilu3fFtvLLQBKBK/VYF3Qd7DO2tFHpk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=j3syQaNOtYIQpSkt9smNGdqtbyWwmGzjQYy0zBVeugBlxSegRnUgpYpBPYMzVuGjtAbawrq0ib8PjSst1wsf5Yk4B8y3GOk3cKteun/dfl7Mjtp9MP6ay/L3kvNFh7lidsZhEaHNO8N9IFeyWmEP2TRkqOrS03DDA3yATpZp8rs=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=00AVdm8oKgzXIvm+1XAAgsVZ/F81l44Bm9P6mZFcWX9IGIDxWJuST92co4xMkghcSo0wZpTMs9emwXgzMqi1dNPdZIV0Kg1eOemMRWJ9MhiBNH46oKG/CmMaCzd0d7D8PmZGGr/WGBYsdDpNyl66tdG8Jbpfx5XZBxDgFiAthUA=;
X-YMail-OSG: 6F5VbbMVM1lAzpgzIJQ4h5OAe4YWQiuMM360k5F.hiKsBCw
 yCrebSMW2Ypllh43OlW32LAILI71a_rustSg4sOFqWbVhF_zF167c7TyoS1_
 NkuGNRllK3Di9zlcaWZrLZ6KHcjypBtv3igoGQZNlgKMg.dUYTNNCVCnnAy.
 rCkg9sd_g2kYNB8pUKLQdkGnq0d4G7qfaUOpSMzphoFK4kHrluKcrUvRVGzY
 Btz2dtkxeq9VcDbyZvo.X9xnQdZ_2uN_tYRetXoBwzx293vhajH6zHriFPCH
 a0Ftnbb7jTWbxy2_cYHHauLvyXcZf1oIksBPCaqLH_GqrDd4BxgoSYMZW3Gd
 lyb61V2WD8z9IIttQSFPmWFptliMuSEDbSfrkl8BkoSYDFFANnlNl2dDhmgl
 9yZ7SRejO0vF8dvcHlx9VpLimH1KPv_qGYnmtuboWBMP77Adp.44lNK5BtV4
 hgyn2ac70.ZQuKUgUDK9S3TSHoulULvzlWrvj5Qes6eacw2Kgo3dBqyEJGaa
 oMrZfrri78BwI4tRSwxQyiDx4HheMC6qhQwTQjeQkHmYEucYdpGL60wF7hVR
 qlyGn.ptUD0v8fvszsZICuM4VWpNxrjyd
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web120114.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:16:02 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/572 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.1557740
References: <davisamy@example.org> <davisamy@example.org>
Message-ID: <davisamy@example.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan King <davisamy@example.org>
Subject: Re: Adding Groovy Runtime to Groovy App Jar
To: davisamy@example.org, davisamy@example.org
In-Reply-To: <davisamy@example.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

> If you would like to include it as a jar inside your jar (?), you can  use

> this:
> 
> package(:jar).include(artifact(GROOVY), :path =>  "lib").
> 
> I committed a simple integration test that shows the use of  include  with
> :path:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/buildr/trunk/tests/include_path/
> 
> It's  more likely that you want to merge it, in which case this will  work:
> package(:jar).merge artifact(GROOVY))
> 
> I'll add a test for merge  as well.
> 
> Antoine

I tried "including" and "merging", but unfortunately, neither worked. Below is 
my buildfile; do you see what's wrong? Also, rather than downloading a new 
"groovy-all" artifact, how can I use the one already downloaded by buildr 
itself? Thanks.

require 'buildr/groovy'

GROOVY_VERSION = '1.8.0'
Buildr888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4Groovy888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4REQUIRES.groovy.version="#{GROOVY_VERSION}"

repositories.remote << 'http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/'
repositories.remote << 'http://download.java.net/maven/2/'
repositories.remote << 'http://repository.codehaus.org/'

GROOVY_ALL = "org.codehaus.groovy:groovy-all:#{GROOVY_VERSION}"

define 'xc' do
    project.version = '1.0.0'
    test.using :rspec
    package(:jar).merge(artifact(GROOVY_ALL))
end

# End of Buildfile

-Dan



{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}