From wdonovan@example.net Mon Jan 03 20:56:57 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 32095 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 20:56:57 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 20:56:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 71607 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 20:56:57 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 71270 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 20:56:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: moderator for wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 80440 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 18:46:19 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=bhP5e/JsvGBGXKfxmqwTQ4vJFM6hOzSK8DjRRIo30dE=;
        b=SR3JbYC92Lu34cbW9kBDwPjvi40QpDzKsWNaB0/fcWXy3GHI6/LWhbdyX03oaZ36d7
         ddTbfdQolfUnzmI+v+U/JofQ4Slq1ySvF7Xbwpb7yooflKZZnVcuocbmueE9redFuB/u
         qYaeyY2UNyps5GOfj4RkYG7bsoeq5KBA3lVGs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        b=TwJfxP/gm2AnY6kUMIZNDUydNdnaTHq9DdLfxrKBs1Gqd01OD5Uio3QwA1d+G1wF1r
         6L2UJhpXllY13skfhuGOhHblW9QQRj6PrkWUBUANvQCSKz24Eb3faZVO/UD66cX0Holi
         9ahs/5tZhmutfMw84KTng1InaJ4MlkLQa2/No=
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: pablo fernandez <wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:45:30 -0300
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Continuous Testing
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016365ee7249bb6ba0498f58fdb
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0016365ee7249bb6ba0498f58fdb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey Buildr Crew!

Just wondering if you were planning to support a "Continuous Testing" task.
It will be something like cc but that also runs your test suite (like
autotest).

I think this would rock. I'm even volunteering for the job if it's not
planned and you guys want the feature in.

Pablo

PS: Thanks for creating buildr.

--0016365ee7249bb6ba0498f58fdb--

From wdonovan@example.net Mon Jan 03 21:35:37 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 50789 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2011 21:35:37 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2011 21:35:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 10115 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 21:35:36 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 10082 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2011 21:35:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 10074 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2011 21:35:36 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:35:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:35:29 +0000
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so13757173wwd.17
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:35:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=gTpAoiU0D3rt/39tPzXF1JMrpE+yKJjImYvfiq8W370=;
        b=gEpgmtZgv4d3wbDFvWo3Jx6SSIwTtSkx2usdiUbgql6tS9W4YoDAAH/GsPD+FPLmw8
         Q2ouZgfFsph7jh5qiLk3D5XPVziZcD/pI5W/PMa/HrSq3yJo49FiY+VBNl4j3Oh/UKOH
         4rm//99SJU5GL2pubjzRiXX1xSFbMnB/h5wyY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=VhvfKwqRl2TSPwOtjB+zqBA0YzzF8eqqWFjIEPM8MbhgXJipwBxoEEM6eKeZucjTr3
         FB9LScdcz120u245ZKSEKH1MZSy9HblusDLVdfDSQwB936h/9zLz7WffrFocy94ntx7w
         AhWmgCqJx2H39cGwdfWC62ZN3pHY9KJWKf7rc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id gh15mr12102070wbb.207.1294090508620;
 Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:35:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:35:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
References: <wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 13:35:08 -0800
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Continuous Testing
From: Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdfc97812d43a0498f7edcf
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--000e0cdfc97812d43a0498f7edcf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think the idea was brought up but nobody's started working on it.

Be our guest! :)

alex

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:45 AM, pablo fernandez <wdonovan@example.net
> wrote:

> Hey Buildr Crew!
>
> Just wondering if you were planning to support a "Continuous Testing" task.
> It will be something like cc but that also runs your test suite (like
> autotest).
>
> I think this would rock. I'm even volunteering for the job if it's not
> planned and you guys want the feature in.
>
> Pablo
>
> PS: Thanks for creating buildr.
>

--000e0cdfc97812d43a0498f7edcf--

From wdonovan@example.net Tue Jan 11 19:43:56 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 98499 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 19:43:56 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 19:43:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 1866 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:43:56 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 1831 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:43:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 1822 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 19:43:55 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:43:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web31607.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:43:47 +0000
Received: (qmail 73289 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2011 19:43:26 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1294775006; bh=K7hjMH7V034avnxjpGhSyX72sMQCkcughKvp+8wRxBI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wURNBswlYEdLeIPFFSsZY2Bi02oXOP13ZU1btnEkiZjdXJNucOdNhy/SsNx2LGKbk2sK34Sv/U5eVfvjMUkh7d5zySVCW654QQTyH9dfNmKsjrA5xC5f0MAB6he+2PME0BIdaF4iB/T08WaAbgo5hhlCMRlZfzMAnhbLbh/AJ9k=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=z/rMGSOnygG+8NfFxDmaqDxEqmSplEVkZCtP5O7vcFhnsLazcLuoBq72zOR28WtUOhz7e9gDofBzq2fozvkiEdvQ0fQ1y84pRqPtQuGtSiPGyOTilOHBlVdA/PYg492GtHwW1Q70HcstwIkkV6Wq+vzxLyYytSMxCnm/PabJrl8=;
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
X-YMail-OSG: LlQ17tMVM1lxSnqQGswaHQ2gLxUCwKzu0Yj_5H5EubfQybb
 orgHzvLm7ScnfNhB7.qSSl9nYGMspf.SM2PuJBAP7Tdh725iqkUyGpMTdTxh
 _IxLlvH0zTfrdhLy3M3I4TlK99DKt82tpNoOnUaFBe5RARVEpqSjykuloNMr
 79yBROf0gXtmPDpfYMlS5e7A5wfYojtDcEVcsjysIXHP.x_OzexDYrcktr2z
 vKohaDuuHxoH73G52G9xaiexdUk9y.V.W07NDJ0u5ByDnqLf6.Pw.mP3CwgF
 USn2U3et4RjcuPO8tpk_DU51gKThULzcVo2NUEd4zvpXNAkpvjjhQnoxu2n4
 O0YER1nk0oHQZfJ.accqfuOF97tg.RlGiS9dS5V4.9Pn3w7.eEO0TD6f.7EI
 nFrZH1jZuXupc
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web31607.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:43:26 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.1555259
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:43:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Chiaming Hsu <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Buildr idea / idea7x failed on ruby 1.9.x  --  String no long has method sort
To: wdonovan@example.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I ran into an issue today where idea / idea7x project generations uses method 
sort on String.  This won't work for ruby 1.9.x:

$ buildr idea7x
(in /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea, development)
Writing 
/home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/ruby1.9-idea-test-7x.ipr
Writing 
/home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/subproject/ruby1.9-idea-test-subproject-7x.iml

Buildr aborted!
NoMethodError : undefined method `sort' for "src/test/java":String

(See full trace by running task with --trace)
$


Is this a known issue?  I saw a ticket for ruby 1.9 compatibility.  Should I add 
a comment to that ticket or open a new bug under IDE integration?

Cheers,
Chiaming Hsu

From wdonovan@example.net Tue Jan 11 19:55:16 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 3838 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 19:55:16 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 19:55:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 19815 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:55:15 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 19763 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 19:55:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 19755 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 19:55:15 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:55:15 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:55:09 +0000
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so21237020wwd.17
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:54:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=QNJHcjPrH24f/J5I8gwUx72jP/FB83sGFveoELNgwvE=;
        b=LQlyE+bgEJsy5I4pC2UM6TKobNST6bdwr0IGPb4HCKdsOFJU6a77NfP+tDu7G4AREn
         A9drfa3cvPZmTZ/6NCO6ZTZg8sYRrveCA4RSpRQXFB3XXuucaFCz4ckGndggJugCafB2
         hK7aSxy2W0SHP+MTMp+BWz0GDmCdsFQcnmEXM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Age9iqx2tFCzYVVftcrrZ+d4Lpaul8G8ppJz1CWA72zPC3e8nACfVeTH1rWJ1SR3Uy
         Y9yB2TU2+7BrWqQEDi8V2Y6KVKxDLOYlQqt2B02+LeZYRGd+d1XQh5gcDqYD5jhpHQHv
         sScGHl5HL9ibBXhOO6RPmw5vihldH+7qnfbYA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a9mr51316wbj.24.1294775687818; Tue, 11
 Jan 2011 11:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:54:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
References: <wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:54:47 -0800
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Buildr idea / idea7x failed on ruby 1.9.x -- String no long has
 method sort
From: Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44c3cefaebd04999774c9

--001485f44c3cefaebd04999774c9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Chiaming,

Thanks for reporting this.  I think it's better open a separate issue.

alex

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Chiaming Hsu <wdonovan@example.net> wrote:

> I ran into an issue today where idea / idea7x project generations uses
> method
> sort on String.  This won't work for ruby 1.9.x:
>
> $ buildr idea7x
> (in /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea, development)
> Writing
> /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/ruby1.9-idea-test-7x.ipr
> Writing
>
> /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/subproject/ruby1.9-idea-test-subproject-7x.iml
>
> Buildr aborted!
> NoMethodError : undefined method `sort' for "src/test/java":String
>
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> $
>
>
> Is this a known issue?  I saw a ticket for ruby 1.9 compatibility.  Should
> I add
> a comment to that ticket or open a new bug under IDE integration?
>
> Cheers,
> Chiaming Hsu
>

--001485f44c3cefaebd04999774c9--

From wdonovan@example.net Tue Jan 11 20:32:29 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 28627 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 20:32:29 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 20:32:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 77690 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 20:32:29 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 77633 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 20:32:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 77625 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 20:32:29 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:32:29 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:32:22 +0000
Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so3241561wwi.5
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:32:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ZCyPsBt9apAJZdMcdddP/5ofcKVY++I8RQbYPOGMT9g=;
        b=l8YnsfN/kS989/ygPVMKzsQo9F+9b8DsRTQTbKMMM5O/OtvFvCZ3m2FjlVre+Hzot/
         bbn/GfNMcTjgThlMTXXVJtdVi4oV9o4tB/UqWWobInw3M+89A1D4vn53yLn8wi8rEBxS
         AE/fNhiXKjAvHSc34LZJ/kPD5lx57UWoGipw4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Bs/hNKv3AMQBiWrkQDXaaPLjzD4JQTxeLu1dCHKvsKGWUzEqc17K2yrLkJq7+xKl0s
         orftQaBIWog7LpiMveonp729CseyZWmMQfM9wM5CauEadBxXjQiy3KyCB0iPAbEfLuj6
         YrQDsULcdODrV+LZIKGskrDzK9qwNd5WGd9GQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z36mr3365383wej.43.1294777921253;
 Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:32:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: wdonovan@example.net
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:32:01 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
References: <wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 07:32:01 +1100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 13jREbBNsqoi5RCzgQI9lcqyyjc
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Buildr idea / idea7x failed on ruby 1.9.x -- String no long has
 method sort
From: Peter Donald <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The idea plugin in trunk has completely rewritten and may or may not
suffer from this problem anymore. If you could checkout the latest
version of buildr in trunk and try this to see if it is still a
problem then that would be muh appreciated.

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chiaming Hsu <wdonovan@example.net> wrote:
> I ran into an issue today where idea / idea7x project generations uses me=
thod
> sort on String. =A0This won't work for ruby 1.9.x:
>
> $ buildr idea7x
> (in /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea, development)
> Writing
> /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/ruby1.9-idea-test-7x.ip=
r
> Writing
> /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/subproject/ruby1.9-idea=
-test-subproject-7x.iml
>
> Buildr aborted!
> NoMethodError : undefined method `sort' for "src/test/java":String
>
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> $
>
>
> Is this a known issue? =A0I saw a ticket for ruby 1.9 compatibility. =A0S=
hould I add
> a comment to that ticket or open a new bug under IDE integration?
>
> Cheers,
> Chiaming Hsu
>



--=20
Cheers,

Peter Donald

From wdonovan@example.net Tue Jan 11 21:38:14 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 64657 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2011 21:38:14 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2011 21:38:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 93437 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 21:38:14 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 93384 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2011 21:38:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 93376 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2011 21:38:13 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:38:13 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:38:05 +0000
Received: (qmail 78218 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2011 21:37:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1294781863; bh=UDVEIKu4vzGPrqTE3EQbrJ3kz1xlu2bK+BAIXSzbdFU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b/yFefn/cge4oUg6kD7Hw64SbXhnThprKR7Jv2PTY8jnRUnSyYUIqPEYdwFids09qjEOaIYKdrkhQJR7ew6d84cCKZeMFTNWn3Nlr8gWLVRE3sZtMpVI4hWEwYeejSR/m3IsaYF+ZOh5cRbt9NjG/gJ9HibWVvxpweo+ZCxpUiI=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=o7/jI97S/oi0kpjQrZNSUP0mpxmPw8wb6nocyo2RsmmgdsO1eYWdW8AjXOsoLqIZVbGwUttfxZ+PNCUuAtur6+wdn3WRqfXT4GGimQ6wQFOry4Qph/uuELL8ZXqBin46PgpZ8qwNyTu6RbYgjpJZuNlHdERn35eDuAtHCn2rTz4=;
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
X-YMail-OSG: HENF.y0VM1lC.puNxgA6TpC1Piz8VF4eP7QOhs1Grj840G5
 MCaRhGqVFkBfmI69Y4S1nWzpTj3NoIqm.O8AIZAstMyUSAEcPAr4mg3YvrvX
 IrtsclDoQQdd0mH5rJowBGkp3xeHi44d9Tt2hnON2cE.uGnlde.CG5Y8lqaW
 m6e8r2FQFD.7SmetCKj9zNcqOZ.UCRNlZ4IEdHgDQ4wQ5wZaFEYstK5gHmur
 NqiGCNtu1k7JZoePBbLVyx3yvoWM_3cFBSik8M861vwdaACG1JWInWLSUPMy
 hjCCOXRxPc6BzbObWl0iqHJ0ksA3kxmekbTEynTQYPqiQ3XmcqvdU68DR5rA
 _UDdKclP8bhZbdfv_LLY5c5kj07JBBqHb51aXONk9X.dEEsIDUgE4eNwvZVD
 wF_6iaLYd_c8-
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web31606.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:37:43 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.1555259
References: <wdonovan@example.net> <wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
From: Chiaming Hsu <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Buildr idea / idea7x failed on ruby 1.9.x -- String no long has method sort
To: wdonovan@example.net
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I got the code from SVN trunk head.  This latest revision does not have idea / 
idea7x goals anymore.  They become idea:clean / idea:generate, and both of which 
work without problems under 1.9.1p378

I take that this is not an issue on trunk, then.

Cheers,
Chiaming Hsu




----- Original Message ----
From: Peter Donald <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Sent: Tue, January 11, 2011 12:32:01 PM
Subject: Re: Buildr idea / idea7x failed on ruby 1.9.x -- String no long has 
method sort

The idea plugin in trunk has completely rewritten and may or may not
suffer from this problem anymore. If you could checkout the latest
version of buildr in trunk and try this to see if it is still a
problem then that would be muh appreciated.

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Chiaming Hsu <wdonovan@example.net> wrote:
> I ran into an issue today where idea / idea7x project generations uses method
> sort on String.  This won't work for ruby 1.9.x:
>
> $ buildr idea7x
> (in /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea, development)
> Writing
> /home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/ruby1.9-idea-test-7x.ipr
> Writing
>/home/camyhsu/code/bug-submit/buildr/ruby1.9-idea/subproject/ruby1.9-idea-test-subproject-7x.iml
>l
>
> Buildr aborted!
> NoMethodError : undefined method `sort' for "src/test/java":String
>
> (See full trace by running task with --trace)
> $
>
>
> Is this a known issue?  I saw a ticket for ruby 1.9 compatibility.  Should I 
>add
> a comment to that ticket or open a new bug under IDE integration?
>
> Cheers,
> Chiaming Hsu
>



-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald


From wdonovan@example.net Fri Jan 28 05:55:21 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 6154 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2011 05:55:19 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jan 2011 05:55:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 3746 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 05:55:19 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 3688 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2011 05:55:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 3680 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2011 05:55:17 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:55:17 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 05:55:11 +0000
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2999896wwd.17
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:54:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Zp6R8/XpHoccP0/LL5HjpdhoBTQqdWFGAuUz8hKPZ8c=;
        b=Z1f0t7gCqPLHovaUTGpb5YRhkvvH0EzZ35CH1EhgjhXHQMf17hRT4wHX+QdIMUaZqq
         STbgLkGgqIdtdaVoWQ/5nDjW72HlwakiUMp6YEqfg1jTsAnEpX3/VrxE+gA8La4oLyag
         1TusbdiYh+MclNRhwXa3T++JCyxj+d4rfFpfw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=GE+WEmKBN5w7szkKpzBG2S/IcE6G8yJQ48z6bsVBfleG9kY+GviRbXuHJl9jQ4OMwg
         BbHDVteAPtVJh8BCgZXdQ3zawx1zrWTB0/byMoFqWQ9/gc8Z29vr9YPg5NEbV97sn9a8
         zBIVrqvH2aOx0aBHw6tGnPjO+n2jgFSwtTOh8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id o17mr2173317wbu.111.1296194089538;
 Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:54:49 -0800
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Buildr 1.4.5 next week?
From: Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net>
To: dev <wdonovan@example.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00148537ab92445659049ae1b4ea

--00148537ab92445659049ae1b4ea
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm thinking about releasing Buildr 1.4.5 towards end of next week.  I want
to keep pushing regular releases out and I think we have a fair number of
issues/changes that would benefit our users.

If you want to get anything else in this release or feel the timing isn't
right, please shout.

alex

--00148537ab92445659049ae1b4ea--

From wdonovan@example.net Mon Jan 31 00:40:41 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 34617 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 00:40:41 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 00:40:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 3814 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 00:40:41 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 3749 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 00:40:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 3741 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 00:40:40 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:40:40 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:40:32 +0000
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so5339440wwd.17
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:40:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=AuLzF5pflXDsHWGxPUWeoq9G0fluHuj6jOHxb+k8tc8=;
        b=i2XyMiifTBmZf1i3+mtCP+YekLXIt9uI7ZHfjoJq2fXDZSisfQbVdkO5h7PLmBuVSu
         fYTDx/YIRj5fLaTx0vB+ej2ugolSO9BBJDbCStkGzLwTY3b7x5zXa1+m+oEwz+kVbOjo
         dhAZAoUPp1ojCKMKgsE7bueb14Ld1Lh5HN5O0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=G4WHmCHMesantnIji80A9qxfX1lzQ8fRS+Z6MJU5M9bCZ235pNvv9Ca0OtAy5bfFkj
         HVZc5jJKibN/Spkik7dJ+xhMAkZtFgcVStEPOMcZVXjf0Q8jbQ7iRTea6+3RCjjdugSm
         Jfi7mowua/O2DPgtO3TgVkI2GBE0rDWMJBQj0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id k54mr10219608wem.58.1296434412364;
 Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:40:12 -0800 (PST)
Sender: wdonovan@example.net
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:40:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
References: <wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:40:12 +1100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: o5mKptghO3DmyWzvKs0imYs2BdQ
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Buildr 1.4.5 next week?
From: Peter Donald <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016363ba5ab9fa5b0049b19a859
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0016363ba5ab9fa5b0049b19a859
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

I tested it out on all our builds and only found one issue. JIRA is
down for system maintenance right nowso I have attached a patch to
address this but am away from the computer with the key to access svn
atm. So if you could make sure this change gets in before release I am
+1 for a release. The message for the commit should be something like

------------------------------------
Ensure that the IDEA module is generated correctly when the module
contains no java files.

Without this change the output directory would be the project root
which would end up being excluded as a result. This problem was caused
by the refactor of the plugin prior to migrating it into buildr core.
------------------------------------

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net> wr=
ote:
> I'm thinking about releasing Buildr 1.4.5 towards end of next week. =A0I =
want
> to keep pushing regular releases out and I think we have a fair number of
> issues/changes that would benefit our users.
>
> If you want to get anything else in this release or feel the timing isn't
> right, please shout.

--=20
Cheers,

Peter Donald

--0016363ba5ab9fa5b0049b19a859--

From wdonovan@example.net Mon Jan 31 06:07:32 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 80744 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 06:07:32 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 06:07:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 1662 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 06:07:32 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 1585 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 06:07:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 1567 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 06:07:29 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:07:29 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-wy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:07:24 +0000
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so5249658wyf.17
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:07:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=vrY/Qkv13Dr41CLWFZMvj7e319aiaj9wqZ7OMS4I0Yg=;
        b=vqTzvhW1fXMK4aSvUZeiq80SbwMZutH3uPNzARfgVm3L5HlMIWLQYdBjBCAYHdRl5y
         wHhuTruBn0AzjITs0y14+edwTGQcbm2KtF3JjTriZOQ1aLTFC3/yJiseT9Rgm3S7+av2
         PepMYGEM3dPtFJOofQxHj1eZbbHLItlay7/vQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=IdV6lkTvwchwbbYG6ipRSOV8YStj1qvNkgMolafYuS38LZXW0/u+VjoJRMzkpur0MS
         3tF3t7ya+9SLIEOtcNMULh51gPUjX8TklMJpT4q90cNmGZV5d6ixWW0aCwySqr4fN4Qn
         ObIKb64swGUSBvjFQd7qXMvqkeSHzUztJUvfw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id p4mr5741909wbu.140.1296454022872; Sun,
 30 Jan 2011 22:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:07:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
References: <wdonovan@example.net>
	<wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:07:02 -0800
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Buildr 1.4.5 next week?
From: Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e659f3ee803e16049b1e39af

--0016e659f3ee803e16049b1e39af
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sure.

Just to be clear, I'm aiming for a release candidate on Sunday (Feb. 6th) so
we have another 7 days to get changes/fixes into the codebase.

alex


On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Peter Donald <wdonovan@example.net>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tested it out on all our builds and only found one issue. JIRA is
> down for system maintenance right nowso I have attached a patch to
> address this but am away from the computer with the key to access svn
> atm. So if you could make sure this change gets in before release I am
> +1 for a release. The message for the commit should be something like
>
> ------------------------------------
> Ensure that the IDEA module is generated correctly when the module
> contains no java files.
>
> Without this change the output directory would be the project root
> which would end up being excluded as a result. This problem was caused
> by the refactor of the plugin prior to migrating it into buildr core.
> ------------------------------------
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net>
> wrote:
> > I'm thinking about releasing Buildr 1.4.5 towards end of next week.  I
> want
> > to keep pushing regular releases out and I think we have a fair number of
> > issues/changes that would benefit our users.
> >
> > If you want to get anything else in this release or feel the timing isn't
> > right, please shout.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Peter Donald
>

--0016e659f3ee803e16049b1e39af--

From wdonovan@example.net Mon Jan 31 21:05:13 2011
Return-Path: <wdonovan@example.net>
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 99884 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2011 21:05:13 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2011 21:05:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 98538 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:05:13 -0000
Delivered-To: wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 98509 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2011 21:05:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact wdonovan@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:wdonovan@example.net>
List-Id: <dev.buildr.apache.org>
Reply-To: wdonovan@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list wdonovan@example.net
Received: (qmail 98501 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2011 21:05:12 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:05:12 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wdonovan@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:05:06 +0000
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so6241832iwn.17
        for <wdonovan@example.net>; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:04:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=RYZUoXskNxjz2xBvZ3mNX2sgAG7mteDwc96W929b+OQ=;
        b=ukr7azH+AQVXgexCS8UA/pDH56IFQLHezYcIBLJT1H2yUV+bUI0gkwjZRAcrf8mOUn
         06lFobMNCsHESxM1czH+o0x2kxss69VOOO9zqz3QtgKK22QbOYzrRPzvvASPFhK/Krtm
         adhC5ZpHuRcFTxJpSudijYLwf5JN6eRKRi1Oc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=nBGJtt6reVAztKZLAVr3vUrtcO0kKQxRnkZatxZs/kTXcUVkjQ2rmJP0kPOlSRraBA
         2Jy9r30CljrGF+cj/BrT5tVhJfsAawr+ztftx2qn/4vOToh7nTRyVC8JXlBtF9/euqzU
         1fEPQ8d8KGr7wD69p2vQ7AVvNWaarSidq3d0U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id hu4mr8435128icb.425.1296507884728;
 Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:04:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:04:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <wdonovan@example.net>
References: <wdonovan@example.net>
	<wdonovan@example.net>
	<wdonovan@example.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:04:44 +0100
Message-ID: <wdonovan@example.net>
Subject: Re: Buildr 1.4.5 next week?
From: Tammo van Lessen <wdonovan@example.net>
To: wdonovan@example.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi Alex,

is there a chance to get the BUILDR-486 in the one or the other way
into the next release? I'm fine with making the changes private to not
expose a public API to live with it. But having the build dependencies
listed in the pom is a nice addendum IMO.

Also I had an issue with the svn release function, I hope that I can
find some time to dig into that.

Tammo

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:07, Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net> wrot=
e:
> Sure.
>
> Just to be clear, I'm aiming for a release candidate on Sunday (Feb. 6th)=
 so
> we have another 7 days to get changes/fixes into the codebase.
>
> alex
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Peter Donald <wdonovan@example.net>wro=
te:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tested it out on all our builds and only found one issue. JIRA is
>> down for system maintenance right nowso I have attached a patch to
>> address this but am away from the computer with the key to access svn
>> atm. So if you could make sure this change gets in before release I am
>> +1 for a release. The message for the commit should be something like
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>> Ensure that the IDEA module is generated correctly when the module
>> contains no java files.
>>
>> Without this change the output directory would be the project root
>> which would end up being excluded as a result. This problem was caused
>> by the refactor of the plugin prior to migrating it into buildr core.
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Alex Boisvert <wdonovan@example.net>
>> wrote:
>> > I'm thinking about releasing Buildr 1.4.5 towards end of next week. =
=A0I
>> want
>> > to keep pushing regular releases out and I think we have a fair number=
 of
>> > issues/changes that would benefit our users.
>> >
>> > If you want to get anything else in this release or feel the timing is=
n't
>> > right, please shout.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Peter Donald
>>
>



--=20
Tammo van Lessen - wdonovan@example.net - http://www.taval.de


{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}