From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 02:30:58 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 40952 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 02:30:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 02:30:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 36217 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 02:31:08 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 36123 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 02:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 36115 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 02:31:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:31:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:31:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 40724 invoked by uid 1845); 1 Jul 2009 02:30:32 -0000 Date: 1 Jul 2009 02:30:32 -0000 Message-ID: <hmurphy@example.net> From: hmurphy@example.net To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 790005 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Geronimo Revision: 790005 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090630/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090630 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 39 minutes 7 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jun 30 21:43:07 EDT 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 484M/1013M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) ================================= Assembly: tomcat ================================= See full test results and logs at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090630/logs-2100-tomcat/ [INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from apache.snapshots [INFO] Using assembly artifact: org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided [INFO] Using geronimoHome: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT [INFO] Installing assembly... [INFO] Expanding: /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target [INFO] Starting Geronimo server... [INFO] Selected option set: default [INFO] Redirecting output to: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log [INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server... [INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:43.132 [INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}] [INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/testing/testsuite-testing.pom [INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}] [INFO] Starting 36 test builds [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy SUCCESS (0:01:05.712) [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell SUCCESS (0:00:32.909) [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws SUCCESS (0:00:37.680) [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown SUCCESS (0:00:20.945) [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic RUNNING [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic SUCCESS (0:06:35.800) [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:01:28.037) Java returned: 1 [INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:01:54.844) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:53.261) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal SUCCESS (0:00:54.889) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:46.583) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests SUCCESS (0:00:33.569) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:35.256) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests SUCCESS (0:00:37.478) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:09.992) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:01:02.857) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:52.588) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client SUCCESS (0:00:28.991) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests SUCCESS (0:00:52.739) [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security RUNNING [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security SUCCESS (0:00:52.282) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps SUCCESS (0:00:33.436) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets SUCCESS (0:00:32.533) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces SUCCESS (0:00:34.656) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-tomcat RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-tomcat SUCCESS (0:00:24.313) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward SUCCESS (0:00:39.887) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references SUCCESS (0:00:43.964) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:05.847) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests SUCCESS (0:00:58.445) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests SUCCESS (0:00:39.133) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests SUCCESS (0:00:50.364) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests SUCCESS (0:00:54.945) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests SUCCESS (0:01:00.984) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests SUCCESS (0:00:57.255) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests SUCCESS (0:02:14.392) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests SUCCESS (0:01:02.808) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests SUCCESS (0:00:39.452) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests SUCCESS (0:01:00.611) [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] Test Summary (0:37:09.638) [INFO] Passed: 35 [INFO] Failed: 1 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] The following tests failed: [INFO] * console-testsuite/advanced - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/advanced/build.log [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR Assembly: jetty ================================= See full test results and logs at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090630/logs-2100-jetty/ [INFO] Installing assembly... [INFO] Expanding: /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target [INFO] Starting Geronimo server... [INFO] Selected option set: default [INFO] Redirecting output to: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log [INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server... [INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:44.497 [INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}] [INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/testing/testsuite-testing.pom [INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}] [INFO] Starting 36 test builds [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy SUCCESS (0:01:03.117) [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell SUCCESS (0:00:33.653) [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws SUCCESS (0:00:36.886) [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown SUCCESS (0:00:20.906) [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic RUNNING [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic SUCCESS (0:06:20.765) [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:00:20.576) Java returned: 1 [INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:02:03.016) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:53.099) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal SUCCESS (0:00:51.304) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:48.318) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests SUCCESS (0:00:35.098) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:35.816) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests SUCCESS (0:00:38.016) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:00:45.786) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:01:01.651) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:46.910) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client SUCCESS (0:00:30.117) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests FAILURE (0:00:50.139) Java returned: 1 [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security RUNNING [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security FAILURE (0:00:47.538) Java returned: 1 [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps SUCCESS (0:00:35.707) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets SUCCESS (0:00:33.342) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-jetty RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-jetty SUCCESS (0:00:25.774) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces SUCCESS (0:00:35.687) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward SUCCESS (0:00:39.773) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references SUCCESS (0:00:44.861) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:07.287) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests SUCCESS (0:01:01.599) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.975) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests SUCCESS (0:00:50.679) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests SUCCESS (0:00:54.983) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests SUCCESS (0:00:56.178) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests SUCCESS (0:01:00.907) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests FAILURE (0:01:27.216) Java returned: 1 [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:55.911) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests SUCCESS (0:00:42.574) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests SUCCESS (0:01:02.584) [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] Test Summary (0:34:32.943) [INFO] Passed: 32 [INFO] Failed: 4 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] The following tests failed: [INFO] * console-testsuite/advanced - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/advanced/build.log [INFO] * enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/build.log [INFO] * security-testsuite/test-security - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/security-testsuite/test-security/build.log [INFO] * webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests/build.log [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR Samples: trunk ================================= Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090630/samples-2100.log Build status: OK From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 05:03:53 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 67400 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 05:03:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 05:03:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 98691 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:04:03 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 98600 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:04:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 98592 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 05:04:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:04:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hmurphy@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:03:54 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so261800and.40 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:03:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QzeYVVOU4JQ3EQBhBAy9XexyE1kHK89TlJUVpGLArKw=; b=AerH1njfXboEW2whrK3+IXsm09usYHSfXVd1mnij9eoGLG15JZomJlZ+53v3uhT8yI mciisTrx9sspOElVTkd9m2U9z/a5Ei9oc965U6x055qasnegjnYnEFgjTKwzTdsqRrAO sV3FRto66ME1y6HOlHv7UYc3cPQWnZ8REq128= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Gu21RTdmbRD9bRQAC70Fq/Y4CY1p4TSc32BccPYKJtQ2reU4GUs9gUYUwCekvj6YzY CE6Nh/2tD8F6b5+5YJytSkY01K8pQLQx9dImvJ6LMv6/MvomjPIEcDR3HTaFKdKwC6AY qtzCPALyHi2vV6X8Z+bbHkIi16AiLYYXKaLCA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id r12mr2120224ibd.21.1246424613793; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:03:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <hmurphy@example.net> References: <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:03:33 -0400 Message-ID: <hmurphy@example.net> Subject: Re: admin console and prompting From: Jarek Gawor <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If Dojo is only used to display a nice box in this case, I think we should just get rid off it and use the regular dialog boxes. Jarek On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ivan<hmurphy@example.net> wrote: > I checked the codes of ConfirmMessageTag, its main purpose is to import Dojo > js file and some styles for showing Dojo box. > 1. When dojo is not installed, I do not think the confirm box could work. > For the showConfirmMessage function uses some Dojo components. > 2. The name seems not conformable with its function. I agree that we should > change it to be more valid. > Ivan > > 2009/6/30 Jarek Gawor <hmurphy@example.net> >> >> Hi, >> >> While debugging the console testsuites I realized that the admin >> console was no longer prompting when uninstalling a given module (or >> stopping or restarting). I tracked down the problem to >> ConfirmMessageTag.java where it was pointing to wrong locations for >> Dojo resources. Now, I have a few of questions about this >> ConfirmMessageTag that I'm hoping somebody will be able to answer: >> >> 1) Is it necessary for ConfirmMessageTag to use Dojo? Or at least can >> we make it so that it still works (displays prompts) when Dojo is not >> installed? >> >> 2) The ConfirmMessageTag injects a <style/> element into the page body >> (within <body/>). But from what I can tell (and I checked this with >> jslint) the <style/> elements only should appear within the <head/> >> element. Things seems to work the way they are now but I'm wondering >> if we should change this to be more valid. >> >> Jarek > > > > -- > Ivan > From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 05:30:50 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 76991 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 05:30:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 05:30:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16142 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:31:00 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 16040 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 05:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 16031 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 05:30:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:30:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hmurphy@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-px0-f187.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:30:51 +0000 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so680784pxi.27 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:30:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=av6IxZffFNR0+dBcK9tdvdfw+bG7PKnDjuYYuxpLDYY=; b=QIMVJoIeyg/HUaoQiWRFkYFixL0yR2I+ekp18ARoT8guB4cc3xw+cm+eKFFDKM79sj 8cioA7F/JmN/VY+g2yHBgYPUYYQqc+ERI2Qp2b4YHjkQTmtOqDzMfMCBirMaPTsm6OoW xsdFgySoD+hsd/+oSyg3LlTfYsFFaSYGGaG/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=P1e7H77oXafJdfhHgBxy2tvTDyjxe5+8t7IyVntMAge+yjTj1ijI17LXlSBvfrvOOq 9dRy6Bn2uMEQjsOUj4kPWQb2f9Ffy7doO/hCc/htY/X26A42TTSof4aeDJrpBS85ftSj RnEl9UZ/3cE82CXSKLn2bEAcquBZSglqOadRU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id k2mr14746137wad.181.1246426230606; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:30:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <hmurphy@example.net> References: <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:30:30 +0800 Message-ID: <hmurphy@example.net> Subject: Re: admin console and prompting From: Ivan <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646c7b6b6dc98046d9e3889 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00163646c7b6b6dc98046d9e3889 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, the regular dialog boxes are also OK. I remembered that I had discussed it with the patch contributor Jeff, our final result is that since more and more portlets are using Dojo, why not use it :-) I also wish the console would use Dojo to do some validation stuff in the future. Ivan 2009/7/1 Jarek Gawor <hmurphy@example.net> > If Dojo is only used to display a nice box in this case, I think we > should just get rid off it and use the regular dialog boxes. > > Jarek > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ivan<hmurphy@example.net> wrote: > > I checked the codes of ConfirmMessageTag, its main purpose is to import > Dojo > > js file and some styles for showing Dojo box. > > 1. When dojo is not installed, I do not think the confirm box could work. > > For the showConfirmMessage function uses some Dojo components. > > 2. The name seems not conformable with its function. I agree that we > should > > change it to be more valid. > > Ivan > > > > 2009/6/30 Jarek Gawor <hmurphy@example.net> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> While debugging the console testsuites I realized that the admin > >> console was no longer prompting when uninstalling a given module (or > >> stopping or restarting). I tracked down the problem to > >> ConfirmMessageTag.java where it was pointing to wrong locations for > >> Dojo resources. Now, I have a few of questions about this > >> ConfirmMessageTag that I'm hoping somebody will be able to answer: > >> > >> 1) Is it necessary for ConfirmMessageTag to use Dojo? Or at least can > >> we make it so that it still works (displays prompts) when Dojo is not > >> installed? > >> > >> 2) The ConfirmMessageTag injects a <style/> element into the page body > >> (within <body/>). But from what I can tell (and I checked this with > >> jslint) the <style/> elements only should appear within the <head/> > >> element. Things seems to work the way they are now but I'm wondering > >> if we should change this to be more valid. > >> > >> Jarek > > > > > > > > -- > > Ivan > > > -- Ivan --00163646c7b6b6dc98046d9e3889 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes, the regular dialog boxes are also OK. I remembered that I had discusse= d it with the patch contributor Jeff, our final result is that since more a= nd more portlets are using Dojo, why not use it :-)<br>I also wish the cons= ole would use Dojo to do some validation stuff in the future.<br> Ivan<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/1 Jarek Gawor <span dir=3D"lt= r">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:hmurphy@example.net">hmurphy@example.net</a>&gt;</span><= br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(20= 4, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> If Dojo is only used to display a nice box in this case, I think we<br> should just get rid off it and use the regular dialog boxes.<br> <font color=3D"#888888"><br> Jarek<br> </font><div><div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ivan&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:hmurphy@example.net= ">hmurphy@example.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br> &gt; I checked the codes of ConfirmMessageTag, its main purpose is to impor= t Dojo<br> &gt; js file and some styles for showing Dojo box.<br> &gt; 1. When dojo is not installed, I do not think the confirm box could wo= rk.<br> &gt; For the showConfirmMessage function uses some Dojo components.<br> &gt; 2. The name seems not conformable with its function. I agree that we s= hould<br> &gt; change it to be more valid.<br> &gt; Ivan<br> &gt;<br> &gt; 2009/6/30 Jarek Gawor &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:hmurphy@example.net">jgawor@g= mail.com</a>&gt;<br> &gt;&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; Hi,<br> &gt;&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; While debugging the console testsuites I realized that the admin<b= r> &gt;&gt; console was no longer prompting when uninstalling a given module (= or<br> &gt;&gt; stopping or restarting). I tracked down the problem to<br> &gt;&gt; ConfirmMessageTag.java where it was pointing to wrong locations fo= r<br> &gt;&gt; Dojo resources. Now, I have a few of questions about this<br> &gt;&gt; ConfirmMessageTag that I&#39;m hoping somebody will be able to ans= wer:<br> &gt;&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; 1) Is it necessary for ConfirmMessageTag to use Dojo? Or at least = can<br> &gt;&gt; we make it so that it still works (displays prompts) when Dojo is = not<br> &gt;&gt; installed?<br> &gt;&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; 2) The ConfirmMessageTag injects a &lt;style/&gt; element into the= page body<br> &gt;&gt; (within &lt;body/&gt;). But from what I can tell (and I checked th= is with<br> &gt;&gt; jslint) the &lt;style/&gt; elements only should appear within the = &lt;head/&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; element. Things seems to work the way they are now but I&#39;m won= dering<br> &gt;&gt; if we should change this to be more valid.<br> &gt;&gt;<br> &gt;&gt; Jarek<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt;<br> &gt; --<br> &gt; Ivan<br> &gt;<br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Ivan<br> --00163646c7b6b6dc98046d9e3889-- From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:20:59 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 17046 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:20:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:20:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 91324 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:21:09 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 91220 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:21:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 91212 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:21:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:21:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:21:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1D1234C044 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1347414250.1246432847179.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:20:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4645) jetty7 ejb web service authentication is turned off In-Reply-To: <983683491.1243116705591.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725957#action_12725957 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4645: ---------------------------------------- rev 790050 fixed a lot of the testsuite problems. For the remaing 2 failures I think the tests should be changed. The question is whether, if authentication is specified, whether the authentication should apply to requests for the wsdl or just attempts to use the web service. I think the attempts to access the wsdl should also require authentication. > jetty7 ejb web service authentication is turned off > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4645 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4645 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: Jetty > Affects Versions: 2.2 > Reporter: David Jencks > Assignee: David Jencks > Fix For: 2.2 > > > See JettyContainerImpl.addWebService. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:24:19 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 17896 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:24:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:24:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 97667 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 97565 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:24:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 97546 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:24:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:24:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp101.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:24:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 10826 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:23:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=20z4lC8YKE+oBDwuAD5mUwsVPPmDm/jV6FYeqKfnur/ERK3sYS0DdXAjFz/8BcbJy3kJ4fn+F1jJCAfedpBMVeX+py0VilLSTDN48RhLkyK/WXdnYiBPtLjiRfLdbkLfRwwRZDXK+He9Mmi+JMDKwPZEZyg+XHvNTi6kKNtJvyc= ; Received: from 076-076-148-215.pdx.net (hmurphy@example.net with plain) by smtp101.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jul 2009 00:23:54 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- X-YMail-OSG: ia.IzUIVM1nICV9kMNBA4ujI_l37f43h4STBye9aMAnp6uNguWHHNDZ6NHjdLhRl8xEM2PirDyXpcgv2_Rsgd_uXXUMHiLIsCdXmdfh2gSFRduJxRwZcbKz7FYIB2R.nwtlUrNzHz37I2w2o.JIU7jFEZHDABiTAmkF0iijJJICj4.SN4mEhahTFZmVLeNkyjHmC6rDON.k28qvwIoU4G7uCsFthLikvo6C1qqIwtD8vhgQhnnayHPixM06UdP7E7TvwczK7jQ5XVgXWSYbVUdmVzmtr3M_2tq_EzcHfMCAQYll5ixGEE_fmM9B8Z2qJE6sAXOH_liDsujyudby00aBN X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-Id: <hmurphy@example.net> From: David Jencks <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net In-Reply-To: <hmurphy@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Trunk Builds Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:23:53 -0700 References: <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> <hmurphy@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:28 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > On Jun 30, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > >> David, >> >> Some errors on the console (or in the logs) are to be expected. The >> tests check if for example the service that requires security can be >> accessed without security. That should generate some errors and >> that's >> what the test expects. >> > > As usual I wasn't too clear... > > For instance, if I look at concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic/ > build.log, I see that the build was successful and > .... > OUT: Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time > elapsed: 316.367 sec > OUT: Results : > OUT: Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > OUT: [INFO] [geronimo:undeploy-module {execution: undeploy-war-as- > moduleId}] > OUT: [INFO] Using non-artifact based module id: > org.apache.geronimo.testsuite/concurrent-web-ear/2.2-SNAPSHOT/ear > .... > OUT: Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time > elapsed: 0.933 sec > OUT: Results : > OUT: Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > OUT: [INFO] [geronimo:undeploy-module {execution: undeploy-war-as- > moduleId}] > OUT: [INFO] Using non-artifact based module id: > org.apache.geronimo.testsuite/concurrent-ejb-ear/2.2-SNAPSHOT/ear > .... > > however on the console I'm running the tests from I see > > [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic RUNNING > [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic FAILURE > (0:20:47.746) Java returned: 1 > > I don't understand why the test runner thinks the tests failed but I > don't see any failures in the build.log > > >> As to securing ?wsdl access, a while ago I added a feature where the >> user can specify which http methods should be secured or not. This >> was >> supposed to work just like for servlet-based web services. We got a >> few queries about this feature and I think we should continue to >> support it. In fact, I'm not sure how jaxws-ejb-sec tests would pass >> without it. > > I was only really looking at jetty here. Previously ?wsdl requests > were serviced before checking transport type and for jetty the > protected methods were ignored. I've changed it so that all > requests have their security checked and that only the http methods > specified are allowed. (I think this is what the tomcat code is > doing also, but I'm not 100% sure). I think this is what you > intended but I find the parameter name "protected methods" a little > confusing. I fixed IMO all the security problems here and think we should change the tests for the 2 remaining failures. The question is whether if the web service requires authentication, the wsdl requests should too. Previously wsdl requests never required authentication, just the correct transport guarantee. While this seemed reasonable when we first wrote this, I no longer think it makes sense. Currently in the jetty ejb ws if authentication is required (i.e.an auth method specified) then all requests, both to the ws and for the wsdl require authentication. Shall I go ahead and change the testsuite and tomcat ejb ws? thanks david jencks > > Do you think there's any value in allowing specification of excluded > http methods rather than included methods, as the servlet spec allows? > > thanks > david jencks > >> >> Jarek >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:04 AM, David >> Jencks<hmurphy@example.net> wrote: >>> I've worked on GERONIMO-4645, however I'm getting strange results >>> from >>> running the testsuite. When I hmurphy@example.net for a test bit I >>> don't see >>> errors but the console output claims a lot of bits failed. >>> >>> So hopefully your automated tests won't have this problem and we >>> can see how >>> successful I was.... >>> >>> >>> BTW my new code secures access to the ?wsdl for the web service. >>> This seems >>> like a good idea to me, WDYT? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Jun 25, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: >>> >>>> Based on running the testsuite yesterday and with fixes committed >>>> last >>>> night I *think* we should be passing all tests on Tomcat and fail >>>> enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests and webservices-testsuite/jaxws- >>>> tests >>>> on Jetty. The webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests fails because of >>>> GERONIMO-4645. Not sure what's going on with >>>> enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests. >>>> >>>> Jarek >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Kevan Miller<hmurphy@example.net >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> A search of emails shows that our last successful automated >>>>> build of >>>>> trunk >>>>> was on May 26th. I know that there have been increasing >>>>> frustration with >>>>> these recent build issues. We seem to be closing in on getting >>>>> these >>>>> issues >>>>> resolved. I built last night. I built successfully, last night, >>>>> but had 7 >>>>> testsuite failures -- 3 jetty, 4 tomcat. >>>>> >>>>> I think it would do us a lot of good to have a concerted effort >>>>> to get >>>>> these >>>>> final issues resolved. Here are the test failures that I'm seeing: >>>>> >>>>> 3 common errors: >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] The following tests failed: >>>>> [INFO] * console-testsuite/advanced - >>>>> >>>>> /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/ >>>>> advanced/build.log >>>>> [INFO] * enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests - >>>>> >>>>> /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/enterprise- >>>>> testsuite/sec-tests/build.log >>>>> [INFO] * webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests - >>>>> >>>>> /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices- >>>>> testsuite/jaxws-tests/build.log >>>>> >>>>> 1 Tomcat unique failure: >>>>> >>>>> [INFO] * web-testsuite/test-tomcat - >>>>> >>>>> /Users/kevan/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/web-testsuite/test- >>>>> tomcat/build.log >>>>> >>>>> Is this consistent with what others are seeing? >>>>> >>>>> --kevan >>>>> >>> From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:34:59 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 19460 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:34:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:34:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 4091 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:35:09 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 3991 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:35:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 3983 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:35:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:35:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:35:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E46234C044 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1345813859.1246433687219.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:34:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4723) Replace our dojo repackaging with the released dojo-war MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Replace our dojo repackaging with the released dojo-war ------------------------------------------------------- Key: GERONIMO-4723 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: web Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: David Jencks dojo has a dojo-war that looks pretty similar to our repacked dojo war. I can't quite tell if it works. Maybe someone who understands what dojo does could try it? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:39:00 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 20151 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:38:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:38:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 10235 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 10126 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 10113 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:39:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:39:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40080234C045 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1874028805.1246433927261.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ivan (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4724) Empty string for contextPath should not be allowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Empty string for contextPath should not be allowed -------------------------------------------------- Key: GERONIMO-4724 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4724 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: specs Affects Versions: 2.2 Reporter: Ivan Assignee: Ivan Fix For: 2.2 While passing the empty string as the contextPath to the newInstance method, no exception is thrown, which expects a JAXBException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:39:01 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 20267 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:39:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 10727 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:11 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 10642 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 10634 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:39:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:39:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:39:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE1B234C044 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <682814780.1246433927248.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4723) Replace our dojo repackaging with the released dojo-war In-Reply-To: <1345813859.1246433687219.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4723: ----------------------------------- Attachment: GERONIMO-2723.patch Patch that swaps the released dojo war for our repacked dojo war. It also has an attempt to remove the jasper dependency which might not work and is not essential. > Replace our dojo repackaging with the released dojo-war > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4723 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: web > Affects Versions: 2.2 > Reporter: David Jencks > Attachments: GERONIMO-2723.patch > > > dojo has a dojo-war that looks pretty similar to our repacked dojo war. I can't quite tell if it works. Maybe someone who understands what dojo does could try it? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:41:05 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 20494 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:41:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:41:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 11354 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:41:15 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 11255 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:41:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 11247 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:41:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:41:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp107.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:41:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 80382 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:40:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:X-Mailer; b=wPFX/6QR3yEOTrE9D3hNTzCy5cuosRR+arDQacpvezlnlbf3/ty+xVS2IQO5zyksKnKnbCGpZ6Hc1Njmp8BSMSK9AJu39GxM10LYd7QQQu0gk3yntVwCtHXEHIsWXHc8pQiIEBO/NP3ilQImv/O34Kw7qF5XPLOcwy+oyPCimRI= ; Received: from 076-076-148-215.pdx.net (hmurphy@example.net with plain) by smtp107.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Jul 2009 00:40:44 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- X-YMail-OSG: Z6vx72oVM1m8evJcvWq_68v3.JD1V.vWf26RqC.HZA7CNFcbkA2iv32gHbZgUR0Yvd10yF4LH9KFormHMX1PWGGPiNIrsBtZBxtKjAjuqi_UIx6rVCWSLMJvUpeSMZXEqHyHOCp7hcLyDOzfbBVwQdLEDQMC4Ds6XweG4gFnJNjllIOGfh4yNbzFp5d66nL8qfSVaHalJ0VrUmjN_ARCe9ynp.60eiJnR6PLKJkA9HrnQvRFBdkKY1dy6Jqbr6fmJPAqmQARuJkMu2IIHBUojxQ9YfrzNurrHCp3Giq6Z1XfZt3dyg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-Id: <hmurphy@example.net> From: David Jencks <hmurphy@example.net> To: "Geronimo Dev List \(JIRA\)" <hmurphy@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Which dojo? Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:40:43 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In my attempt to remove our svn repo I found that dojo releases a dojo- war that looks pretty similar to our repacked dojo war. I can make the build work with the substitution but I don't know enough about dojo to know if/what it breaks. Is there anyone who understands our use of dojo well enough to take a look and see if this replacement is plausible? I recall some discussion in the distant past about not including all of dojo... I'm not sure if this is still a concern, but if the released dojo-war works and is too big we can use maven to come up with a smaller war. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723 for my patch. thanks david jencks From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 07:59:02 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 23624 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 07:59:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 07:59:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 26523 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:59:12 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 26417 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 07:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 26403 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 07:59:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:59:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:59:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9B1234C004 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1016245327.1246435127639.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 00:58:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ivan (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4724) Empty string for contextPath should not be allowed In-Reply-To: <1874028805.1246433927261.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan updated GERONIMO-4724: --------------------------- Attachment: Geronimo-4724.patch Attach a patch, please help to review it. BTW, do we have any special rule for committing the patch to the spec svn? Thanks ! > Empty string for contextPath should not be allowed > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4724 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4724 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: specs > Affects Versions: 2.2 > Reporter: Ivan > Assignee: Ivan > Fix For: 2.2 > > Attachments: Geronimo-4724.patch > > > While passing the empty string as the contextPath to the newInstance method, no exception is thrown, which expects a JAXBException. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 08:15:15 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 27515 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 08:15:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 08:15:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 40276 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 08:15:25 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 40190 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 08:15:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 40174 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 08:15:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:15:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hmurphy@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-px0-f187.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:15:15 +0000 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so768972pxi.27 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:14:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RZco5EjO9UKXZYliW6b/edcKpfS+KGz3sRsZi+6MPFo=; b=Dg4LuRw4d4RboghFaF11yl/HK+pjA8uVMMB5O++XdsD3iCCWTDHHkXqqRWAIuv1HOJ vDUGOnlH2D/a7XfdHz4REA05LvE3wbpx4JqS1huKzmzdIVOJkVIPlGQbfIS1QAXuhSgJ SmqsnDkFnYLBbPUA4z15xG7XDFmSIgZdNf0FE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Yp4Qhq9uJlXbQbGBrRrSZs9ghIkXVBFiyRaqtCKS5Q0lfPVZTRKdcxJyAZyndBPjrN ykUNMiZceU6mjtj/IGgLrbxyYawvXJ+MnEqyJ52ESPPVa9LnO9wXRzSSSNxIWHfDqNuy JWthIBFlUye2OQg/sdQtZ+ws3hDg8yggbdyL8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j5mr14857660wam.105.1246436094627; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:14:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <hmurphy@example.net> References: <hmurphy@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:14:54 +0800 Message-ID: <hmurphy@example.net> Subject: Re: Which dojo? From: Ivan <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64f683aa7d1a1046da084e8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64f683aa7d1a1046da084e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think the one is what need, no samples and testcases are included. But I found 1.3.1 is released, why not use the newest one ? And for the legacy dojo 0.4.3, how shall we handle it ? Like tomcat, maitaine a our own repo ? 2009/7/1 David Jencks <hmurphy@example.net> > In my attempt to remove our svn repo I found that dojo releases a dojo-war > that looks pretty similar to our repacked dojo war. I can make the build > work with the substitution but I don't know enough about dojo to know > if/what it breaks. Is there anyone who understands our use of dojo well > enough to take a look and see if this replacement is plausible? > > I recall some discussion in the distant past about not including all of > dojo... I'm not sure if this is still a concern, but if the released > dojo-war works and is too big we can use maven to come up with a smaller > war. > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723 for my patch. > > thanks > david jencks > -- Ivan --0016e64f683aa7d1a1046da084e8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think the one is what need, no samples and testcases are included. But I = found 1.3.1 is released, why not use the newest one ?<br>And for the legacy= dojo 0.4.3, how shall we handle it ? Like tomcat, maitaine a our own repo = ?<br> <br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2009/7/1 David Jencks <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;= <a href=3D"mailto:hmurphy@example.net">hmurphy@example.net</a>&gt;</s= pan><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid r= gb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> In my attempt to remove our svn repo I found that dojo releases a dojo-war = that looks pretty similar to our repacked dojo war. =A0I can make the build= work with the substitution but I don&#39;t know enough about dojo to know = if/what it breaks. =A0Is there anyone who understands our use of dojo well = enough to take a look and see if this replacement is plausible?<br> <br> I recall some discussion in the distant past about not including all of doj= o... I&#39;m not sure if this is still a concern, but if the released dojo-= war works and is too big we can use maven to come up with a smaller war.<br= > <br> See <a href=3D"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723" target= =3D"_blank">https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723</a> for my = patch.<br> <br> thanks<br><font color=3D"#888888"> david jencks<br> </font></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Ivan<br> --0016e64f683aa7d1a1046da084e8-- From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 08:42:59 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 36185 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 08:42:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 08:42:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 70597 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:09 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 70508 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 70500 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:43:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:43:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6D3234C004 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2080805197.1246437767386.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:42:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ivan (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4625) JMS statistics does not work correctly while the server url is of vm protocol In-Reply-To: <(510)560-3543.1242268605538.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725971#action_12725971 ] Ivan commented on GERONIMO-4625: -------------------------------- The question is that in the connector plan, we usually use tcp://****:61613 or vm://localhost:61613. Currently, I need to compare those urls to the listening addresses of existed brokers to detect the right broker name. Due to various style of those urls, for example, the listening address maybe tcp://83.161.120.155:61613, the url in the plan maybe something like tcp://localhost:61613. I just feel it is hard to do the match, Not sure there is a better way to do this, :-( > JMS statistics does not work correctly while the server url is of vm protocol > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4625 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4625 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: ActiveMQ > Affects Versions: 2.2 > Environment: WIndows XP > JDK 1.5.0 > Reporter: Ivan > Priority: Minor > > While doing the statistics for queue, we need the name of the broker, so that we could query the status in the MBeanServer by the borker name, current codes could not handle the server url like vm://. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 08:43:41 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 36340 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 08:43:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 71262 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 71183 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 71175 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:43:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 36306 invoked by uid 1845); 1 Jul 2009 08:43:14 -0000 Date: 1 Jul 2009 08:43:14 -0000 Message-ID: <hmurphy@example.net> From: hmurphy@example.net To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 790047 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Geronimo Revision: 790047 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090701/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090701 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 44 minutes 15 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Wed Jul 01 03:48:18 EDT 2009 [INFO] Final Memory: 433M/1013M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only) ================================= Assembly: tomcat ================================= See full test results and logs at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090701/logs-0300-tomcat/ [INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for updates from apache.snapshots [INFO] Using assembly artifact: org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided [INFO] Using geronimoHome: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT [INFO] Installing assembly... [INFO] Expanding: /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target [INFO] Starting Geronimo server... [INFO] Selected option set: default [INFO] Redirecting output to: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log [INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server... [INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:46.140 [INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}] [INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/testing/testsuite-testing.pom [INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}] [INFO] Starting 36 test builds [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy SUCCESS (0:01:20.144) [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell SUCCESS (0:00:34.802) [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws SUCCESS (0:00:40.201) [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown SUCCESS (0:00:21.812) [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic RUNNING [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic SUCCESS (0:06:31.061) [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:02:17.426) Java returned: 1 [INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:02:06.024) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:01:01.118) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal SUCCESS (0:00:59.198) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:47.061) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.145) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.815) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests SUCCESS (0:00:36.531) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:23.753) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:01:00.785) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:51.727) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client SUCCESS (0:00:31.324) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests SUCCESS (0:00:53.964) [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security RUNNING [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security SUCCESS (0:00:50.269) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps SUCCESS (0:00:34.648) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets SUCCESS (0:00:30.749) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces SUCCESS (0:00:35.124) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-tomcat RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-tomcat SUCCESS (0:00:24.550) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward SUCCESS (0:00:38.710) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references SUCCESS (0:00:45.900) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:05.634) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests SUCCESS (0:00:59.224) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests SUCCESS (0:00:39.850) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests SUCCESS (0:00:49.020) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests SUCCESS (0:00:56.666) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests SUCCESS (0:00:58.785) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests SUCCESS (0:01:01.543) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests SUCCESS (0:02:15.683) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests SUCCESS (0:01:03.155) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests SUCCESS (0:00:39.680) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests SUCCESS (0:00:59.866) [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] Test Summary (0:38:55.292) [INFO] Passed: 35 [INFO] Failed: 1 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] The following tests failed: [INFO] * console-testsuite/advanced - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/advanced/build.log [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR Assembly: jetty ================================= See full test results and logs at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090701/logs-0300-jetty/ [INFO] Using geronimoHome: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT [INFO] Installing assembly... [INFO] Expanding: /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-jetty7-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target [INFO] Starting Geronimo server... [INFO] Selected option set: default [INFO] Redirecting output to: /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log [INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server... [INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:48.744 [INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}] [INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to /home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/testing/testsuite-testing.pom [INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}] [INFO] Starting 36 test builds [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy SUCCESS (0:01:15.963) [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell SUCCESS (0:00:35.812) [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws SUCCESS (0:00:40.839) [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown RUNNING [INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown SUCCESS (0:00:21.453) [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic RUNNING [INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic SUCCESS (0:06:28.329) [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/advanced FAILURE (0:00:22.300) Java returned: 1 [INFO] console-testsuite/basic RUNNING [INFO] console-testsuite/basic SUCCESS (0:02:11.423) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:53.818) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal SUCCESS (0:01:02.074) [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING [INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:47.078) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.029) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.567) [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests RUNNING [INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests SUCCESS (0:00:36.025) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:00:45.595) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:01:01.449) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:45.202) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client SUCCESS (0:00:31.444) [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests RUNNING [INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests FAILURE (0:00:49.169) Java returned: 1 [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security RUNNING [INFO] security-testsuite/test-security SUCCESS (0:00:50.826) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jsps SUCCESS (0:00:33.590) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servlets SUCCESS (0:00:32.236) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-jetty RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-jetty SUCCESS (0:00:24.314) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces SUCCESS (0:00:34.690) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-forward SUCCESS (0:00:38.132) [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references RUNNING [INFO] web-testsuite/test-web-references SUCCESS (0:00:43.850) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:07.600) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxr-tests SUCCESS (0:01:00.912) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-jaxws-tests SUCCESS (0:00:34.671) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxrpc-tests SUCCESS (0:00:49.987) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-catalog-tests SUCCESS (0:00:56.970) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-mtom-tests SUCCESS (0:00:54.727) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-provider-tests SUCCESS (0:01:07.060) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests FAILURE (0:01:29.914) Java returned: 1 [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/jaxws-wsa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:58.115) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/saaj-tests SUCCESS (0:00:41.096) [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests RUNNING [INFO] webservices-testsuite/stax-tests SUCCESS (0:01:01.137) [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] Test Summary (0:35:16.623) [INFO] Passed: 33 [INFO] Failed: 3 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [INFO] [INFO] The following tests failed: [INFO] * console-testsuite/advanced - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/console-testsuite/advanced/build.log [INFO] * enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/build.log [INFO] * webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests - /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxws-tests/build.log [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR Samples: trunk ================================= Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090701/samples-0300.log Build status: OK From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 10:33:00 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 78136 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 10:32:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 10:32:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 83236 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 10:33:09 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 83159 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 10:33:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 83151 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 10:33:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:33:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:33:07 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51826234C053 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <129723579.1246444367332.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:32:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rex Wang (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject: [jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4217) Check for all data primitive types when shortcutting to the primordial classloader In-Reply-To: <536376930.1216994851644.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rex Wang reassigned GERONIMO-4217: ---------------------------------- Assignee: Rex Wang > Check for all data primitive types when shortcutting to the primordial classloader > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-4217 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4217 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: public(Regular issues) > Components: kernel > Affects Versions: 2.1.2, 2.2 > Reporter: Kevan Miller > Assignee: Rex Wang > > Make sure that MultiParentClassLoader checks for all data primitive types when deciding if the primordial ClassLoader should be invoked -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From hmurphy@example.net Wed Jul 01 10:39:03 2009 Return-Path: <hmurphy@example.net> Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 79465 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2009 10:39:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2009 10:39:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 89404 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 10:39:11 -0000 Delivered-To: hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 89336 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2009 10:39:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact hmurphy@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:hmurphy@example.net> Reply-To: hmurphy@example.net List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list hmurphy@example.net Received: (qmail 89315 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2009 10:39:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:39:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:39:08 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDE4234C045 for <hmurphy@example.net>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <640300648.1246444727260.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 03:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rex Wang (JIRA)" <hmurphy@example.net> To: hmurphy@example.net Subject:
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}