From kthomas@example.org Sun May 02 10:28:07 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 98580 invoked from network); 2 May 2010 10:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 2 May 2010 10:28:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 81543 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 10:28:07 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 81500 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 10:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 81489 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2010 10:28:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 10:28:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 10:27:58 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O8WOZ-00057G-RT for kthomas@example.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 12:27:31 +0200 Received: from ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Sun, 02 May 2010 12:27:31 +0200 Received: from mick by ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Sun, 02 May 2010 12:27:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 14:35:34 +0200 Lines: 46 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2gCC6npLbeL+FvuRT54c" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no In-Reply-To: <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=-2gCC6npLbeL+FvuRT54c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =46rom https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TILES-506 > Mck SembWever commented on TILES-506: > ------------------------------------- >=20 > patches applied. fixes committed into tiles/site as well. > tiles-master now uses apache pom version 7. > remaining is to release tiles-master to version 2 and then update the > other top-level tiles pom files.=20 How do i go about making such a release for the tiles-master project located at https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/maven/trunk/pom ? It is just to `mvn release:prepare` and `mvn release:perform` ? Or does this too need to go through the full release process? ~mck --=20 "Buddhism has the characteristics of what would be expected in a cosmic religion for the future: It transcends a personal God, avoids dogmas and theology; it covers both the natural and the spiritual, and it is based on a religious sense aspiring from the experience of all things, natural and spiritual, as a meaningful unity." Albert Einstein=20 | semb.wever.org | sesat.no | finn.no | --=-2gCC6npLbeL+FvuRT54c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvdcZUACgkQkdPrePiuutN5EACg0l96HcFHjM5gsVZ9WWWI2TJG tOQAoMxFxLj/xAROMUUMvRhKeKyFRDmm =lRGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2gCC6npLbeL+FvuRT54c-- From kthomas@example.org Sun May 02 12:06:30 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 6776 invoked from network); 2 May 2010 12:06:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 2 May 2010 12:06:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 24466 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 12:06:30 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 24420 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 12:06:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 24412 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2010 12:06:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 12:06:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 12:06:24 +0000 Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so2049460iwn.9 for <kthomas@example.org>; Sun, 02 May 2010 05:06:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SLEAMxpbIAdJ6MERC6tyMZ0epux6vITdYpTSmdCuouE=; b=J5/6qy7czZdsntLKTrjk1TptbDXdpGip6nQxXDz/9nqEo4vdo7/CuDEbaLaM6hJXsn kj4uJQghXtVS+8a8ZPCK1ha1X+eCIdHWIaAW/+CIuGJUdxhodI6O7v6Qjv83vTlhkdtZ IcC7EJE/wNGIoflZ/IHiN5aHSeeRzzDbHyu5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=nc2kfXefTSGCPaoFMqS8EjTsHJoNVQ06m/6RdQqJ2eZ8BOSelpoMPtQt6sEGGfYv3P HEGj89IALAymbc+PdSHnIk3roIzo5uviYQckVOavF6v1kzm0r/GqDghre4MP3kmpA+ZT MiM1RlqFGGTBDEkAIG2Kgv3V0YOGK6ZEtAS/I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id f1mr4067225ibx.28.1272801964190; Sun, 02 May 2010 05:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 2 May 2010 05:06:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 14:06:04 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2010/5/2 Mck <kthomas@example.org>: > From https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TILES-506 > >> Mck SembWever commented on TILES-506: >> ------------------------------------- >> >> patches applied. fixes committed into tiles/site as well. >> tiles-master now uses apache pom version 7. >> remaining is to release tiles-master to version 2 and then update the >> other top-level tiles pom files. > > How do i go about making such a release for the tiles-master project > located at https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/maven/trunk/pom ? > > It is just to `mvn release:prepare` and `mvn release:perform` ? > Or does this too need to go through the full release process? First of all please close the TILES-506 issue. For the rest (other members please correct me if I am wrong), since it is not a package and it's only a matter of a POM file, I think you can call for a vote *before* releasing it for real. After a successful vote, you can release it (prepare and perform). Remember to add your own keys before releasing! Antonio From kthomas@example.org Sun May 02 21:07:13 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 89991 invoked from network); 2 May 2010 21:07:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 2 May 2010 21:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 6533 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 21:07:12 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 6486 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2010 21:07:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 6466 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2010 21:07:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 21:07:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 21:07:06 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O8gN1-0003ze-Ux for kthomas@example.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 23:06:35 +0200 Received: from ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Sun, 02 May 2010 23:06:35 +0200 Received: from mick by ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Sun, 02 May 2010 23:06:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 21:14:40 +0200 Lines: 37 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nL+HpH0qH6873RUxWMRj" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 --=-nL+HpH0qH6873RUxWMRj Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > First of all please close the TILES-506 issue. Done.=20 But may i ask why? since i know that more commits will be necessary before the fix is complete. That is after tiles-master is (voted and) released to version 2 then the other pom files must be updated and commited. Only then the website will have correct links to the issue-tracker? ~mck --=20 "The possibility that we may fail in the struggle should not deter us from supporting a cause we believe to be just." Abraham Lincoln=20 | semb.wever.org | sesat.no | finn.no | --=-nL+HpH0qH6873RUxWMRj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvdzx4ACgkQkdPrePiuutPL7gCg3JSVxxLFM+k2fvbvxBNythFJ wJUAni4ew9lbr3A3qAbaeaGkZRFR+0PG =/i00 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nL+HpH0qH6873RUxWMRj-- From kthomas@example.org Mon May 03 07:26:53 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 88797 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 07:26:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 May 2010 07:26:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 38560 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 07:26:52 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 38513 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 07:26:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 38503 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2010 07:26:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 07:26:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 07:26:46 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so302520iwn.8 for <kthomas@example.org>; Mon, 03 May 2010 00:26:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=be7YtGUMAU0o8NQQ0DfpodB0cfTr/s2B4aKCjkT2Izw=; b=ecM6IYs3EUKCZheSn7Bf1RFoAIRLnbSlaFpmXUrkkqKJP4vrL31tMr3zqHGUAkYUS6 CqRYSud7KoBF+KAoY955pXpPyF8gLdyLAr0cjMy02mJzkjnSkxQkth5FLeuy7aYiGA2y UCJFGs0lLu89SaBDLhyJ0VFigtbKM00nu0ods= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gk2RuinEFMqg2PIlj3IZDe/Hn5VOlPxBAEjThZMeb1j0n3ezZudZCLlC5l4nUEGsVO 6gjClbDukP8bzqPbkWrJy2BQKDkyA9dU3YJaog7MJa280mcQvkAXxuRMH57ZcdZwnHQi BjvUaTgrWy3aYO2tzKg6IGUDEl/LJB2Qo7WY4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id cg5mr4626135ibb.12.1272871585384; Mon, 03 May 2010 00:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 3 May 2010 00:26:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 09:26:25 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2010/5/2 Mck <kthomas@example.org>: > >> First of all please close the TILES-506 issue. > > Done. Ok, but you can close directly the issue, not passing the "resolved" state. When we were on the other JIRA instance, we created a custom workflow without the "resolved" and other states, since, in our case, they are meaningless. Usually, resolved means that the developer thinks he had finished his work. Closed means that the reporter tested it and says that it works. Usually we don't have such a feedback from the reporter, so the "resolved" state is useless. > But may i ask why? since i know that more commits will be necessary > before the fix is complete. That is after tiles-master is (voted and) > released to version 2 then the other pom files must be updated and > commited. Only then the website will have correct links to the > issue-tracker? Not necessarily. If you like, you can deploy a snapshot (mvn deploy), let the other project depend on the snapshot and deploy the website (mvn site:deploy). Antonio From kthomas@example.org Mon May 03 18:08:43 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 49910 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 18:08:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 May 2010 18:08:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 9276 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 18:08:42 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 9229 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 18:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 9221 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2010 18:08:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 18:08:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 18:08:37 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O903v-0000D7-8t for kthomas@example.org; Mon, 03 May 2010 20:08:11 +0200 Received: from ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Mon, 03 May 2010 20:08:11 +0200 Received: from mick by ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Mon, 03 May 2010 20:08:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 21:16:16 +0200 Lines: 64 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BYF5cWUpwrjsYb52MW5O" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 --=-BYF5cWUpwrjsYb52MW5O Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >> First of all please close the TILES-506 issue. > > Done. > Ok, but you can close directly the issue, not passing the "resolved" > state. When we were on the other JIRA instance, we created a custom > workflow without the "resolved" and other states, since, in our case, > they are meaningless. Ok. thanks for the explanation. my question was more around why the issue was no longer "in progress"... but that's not so important. > Usually, resolved means that the developer thinks he had finished his wor= k. > Closed means that the reporter tested it and says that it works. > Usually we don't have such a feedback from the reporter, so the > "resolved" state is useless. A different approach... for situations like this where quality assurance by the reporter really can't be relied upon, is to use the "resolved" state for those issue fixed but not yet available in any release. That makes it simpler for developers because they don't need to resolve and close (or remember to directly close) the issue every time. Instead when a release is made part of the release process is to bulk transit all resolved issues over to closed. In this manner the release process itself substitutes as the quality assurance.=20 > > ... That is after tiles-master is (voted and) > > released to version 2 then the other pom files must be updated and > > committed. Only then the website will have correct links to the > > issue-tracker? >=20 > Not necessarily. If you like, you can deploy a snapshot (mvn deploy), > let the other project depend on the snapshot=20 I'm not very fond of inheriting from SNAPSHOT parents. Apart from the project instability it introduces it also slows down every build. ~mck --=20 "When there is no enemy within, the enemies outside can't hurt you." African proverb=20 | http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no | http://finn.no | --=-BYF5cWUpwrjsYb52MW5O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvfIP4ACgkQkdPrePiuutOm7gCfYY8fnYOC/5nXNv4TTvH30tyj q1gAnR8pR7nSeFz2RBk1oqq4ZGJBDzbb =56ot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BYF5cWUpwrjsYb52MW5O-- From kthomas@example.org Mon May 03 18:47:41 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 81717 invoked from network); 3 May 2010 18:47:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 May 2010 18:47:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 80962 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 18:47:41 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 80924 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2010 18:47:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 80916 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2010 18:47:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 18:47:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gy0-f173.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 May 2010 18:47:36 +0000 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5so1051341gyd.32 for <kthomas@example.org>; Mon, 03 May 2010 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ysTuBTgF9paMvvjTwlm41W7yO//2dAfpjple9oVsbnY=; b=Bk89e3C+I4t7jq656So7bpDzUUZRyYdE7CBV+/G1CU58WzUjtwM4zC1RO4g5TSpJvZ vl+lsJ4BIztYrAMAMtbpmnqCIWDlso6GEZ98FpSBptlLj8yf2swURKygLaiMI9uYNgxc 99Uqb/Qh0jAIQ2riVTqtp39gZShfIIV+kov+Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ltajuSCS5Vglz2nL+Pqmj6LGgH2/1btfQG5k3bdXs+3N234rmU3OuXMrOq1Ypyq8TI a3667da5s96gbvKJ3XJcP9U08HYIKiP7/+oOWp5c5B8fx0QqHYdujDpJJFfI21o5m7jQ yZ5WM+iZDDUmHSaeGmJoChQO9w9e4jJUs0c1s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id cb15mr393011ibb.71.1272912434073; Mon, 03 May 2010 11:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 3 May 2010 11:47:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:47:13 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/5/3 Mck <kthomas@example.org>: > =A0Instead when a release is made part of the release process is to bulk > transit all resolved issues over to closed. > =A0In this manner the release process itself substitutes as the quality > assurance. In fact, in the early days of Tiles we did like this, but, in fact, the "resolved" state is still without meaning. Suppose that a build fails, you have to declare the version "invalid" and move all the issues to another version. This step is needed even if you use "resolved" state. >> > ... That is after tiles-master is (voted and) >> > released to version 2 then the other pom files must be updated and >> > committed. Only then the website will have correct links to the >> > issue-tracker? >> >> Not necessarily. If you like, you can deploy a snapshot (mvn deploy), >> let the other project depend on the snapshot > > I'm not very fond of inheriting from SNAPSHOT parents. Apart from the > project instability it introduces it also slows down every build. Ok for the instability, but it is resolved when it is released thanks to the Maven release plugin that checks the presence of snapshots. About the slowdown, what do you mean? I don't think it is so tragic, and you can still build offline. Antonio From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 06:13:15 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 8765 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 06:13:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 06:13:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 74049 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 06:13:14 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 73996 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 06:13:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 73988 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 06:13:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 06:13:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 06:13:08 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O9BN4-0002BU-Sw for kthomas@example.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:12:42 +0200 Received: from 201-134-8.connect.netcom.no ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:12:42 +0200 Received: from mick by 201-134-8.connect.netcom.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:12:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 08:20:51 +0200 Lines: 53 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-apJn7UrFuZ3mkk7bSFnJ" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 201-134-8.connect.netcom.no In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 --=-apJn7UrFuZ3mkk7bSFnJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > In this manner the release process itself substitutes as the quality > > assurance. >=20 > In fact, in the early days of Tiles we did like this, but, in fact, > the "resolved" state is still without meaning. > Suppose that a build fails, you have to declare the version "invalid" > and move all the issues to another version. This step is needed even > if you use "resolved" state. I don't quite understand you. In this context what do you mean the "build failed" ? And why would the issue be invalid? > >> Not necessarily. If you like, you can deploy a snapshot (mvn deploy), > >> let the other project depend on the snapshot > > > > I'm not very fond of inheriting from SNAPSHOT parents. Apart from the > > project instability it introduces it also slows down every build. >=20 > Ok for the instability, but it is resolved when it is released thanks > to the Maven release plugin that checks the presence of snapshots.=20 Yes of course. thanks for your patience.=20 Then I've made the commit so to use 2-SNAPSHOT, and i'll update the site latter today. ~mck --=20 To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it.=20 | http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no | http://finn.no | --=-apJn7UrFuZ3mkk7bSFnJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvfvMIACgkQkdPrePiuutONaQCguxT8gjF+tGwnstxg/b9OTE2U dJEAoN1+Qx/KHHjti/IXeHerVcOYID9f =sHxx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-apJn7UrFuZ3mkk7bSFnJ-- From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 07:36:27 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 29739 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 07:36:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 07:36:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 63683 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 07:36:27 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 63644 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 07:36:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 63635 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 07:36:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 07:36:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 07:36:19 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so1758575iwn.8 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 00:35:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tMRqryjGHN4FCEJ1yjQpPDGBadBaKx5TLyyV2IUtTcA=; b=JODW2azjQBAJWr+e0ZwHDMd0PPQqChDUMSXUWS/wk5mZLYaHo7OPsG9N0K6ogIuEld w9jd9gT5HWCzRs3LyBHQzk1yanTXoUN9jKn90jIPqaSdZd6H7Zt+QZj8V4ScjeM6DYlH eqddVcZaXhi4E7s9cnhvidYEvEuawX3XYtYuA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ogRURMht0dtMRg9W72/8mtwh9rMdko86ERUsDX/SnUb4HZ+JjuN7v/zx5aQv1YwnKr WGQgFa9D0/mYR2BQsjG2WS+u78EAQATUEg6t+Jh7OlZKUXoZYK8TRk7JY7vizMtMgeDr Y0KdiNy+/s9PJg9PIL7AzqctAE80Fma3uAIck= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u21mr317152ibx.95.1272958558827; Tue, 04 May 2010 00:35:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 00:35:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:35:58 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2010/5/4 Mck <kthomas@example.org>: > >> > =A0In this manner the release process itself substitutes as the qualit= y >> > assurance. >> >> In fact, in the early days of Tiles we did like this, but, in fact, >> the "resolved" state is still without meaning. >> Suppose that a build fails, you have to declare the version "invalid" >> and move all the issues to another version. This step is needed even >> if you use "resolved" state. > > I don't quite understand you. > In this context what do you mean the "build failed" ? I used the wrong term, sorry. I meant "leave as a test build". A long time ago we voted against a test build because it did not contain javadocs. > And why would the > issue be invalid? Not the issue, the version in the "Fix for" field of Jira issues. The issues should be moved to a higher version. A thing that you might not have noticed is that we adopted an "always increase" build numbers. We do not use RC, Beta etc. in version numbers. We use X.Y.Z scheme plus a judgment about its maturity/stability (Alpha, Beta, GA, only a test build). Sorry if I've not been clearer before, but after several years here I've taken for granted some things that might not be clear for new people. Anyway, your questions are always welcome! Antonio From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 07:55:33 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 34420 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 07:55:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 07:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 82732 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 07:55:32 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 82692 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 07:55:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 82682 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 07:55:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 07:55:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 07:55:27 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O9Cy4-0000DH-Du for kthomas@example.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:55:00 +0200 Received: from home.schibsted.no ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:55:00 +0200 Received: from mick by home.schibsted.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:55:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: [OT] jira workflow WAS: Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 10:02:55 +0200 Lines: 46 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <1515259.61272729236161.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BAIyk9g1UzL7DZbWGM29" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: home.schibsted.no In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 --=-BAIyk9g1UzL7DZbWGM29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:35 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote: > Not the issue, the version in the "Fix for" field of Jira issues. The > issues should be moved to a higher version. Couldn't this just be done in the same bulk step as when you change all the issues to closed? That is all those resolved issues remain resolved until one of the "test builds" is successfully made into a release X.Y.Z. At that point then all those resolved issues are bulk changed to "closed" and "Fix for X.Y.X". It's not so important, as i've marked the subject OT, but i'm presuming that apache doesn't give anyone here the rights to remove the "resolved" state from the TILES jira project, and so am wondering if there's a way to better use it. Nobody likes dead wood! > Anyway, your questions are always welcome!=20 Thanks. There are many ways of organising an issue tracker so it's nice to know how tiles does it, and to just learn another way.=20 ~mck --=20 "The rainbow would not be without first the rain." D Donche Jr=20 | http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no | http://finn.no | --=-BAIyk9g1UzL7DZbWGM29 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvf1J8ACgkQkdPrePiuutOL/ACfaNWrbSJDwfeTzlGCax0uxEIR q0UAnjz3OTYTHehsmffNs8mXsz/wjsKp =kvPm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BAIyk9g1UzL7DZbWGM29-- From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 08:23:53 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 41504 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 08:23:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 08:23:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 12653 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 08:23:53 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 12611 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 08:23:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 12603 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 08:23:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:23:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:23:47 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so1794130iwn.8 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 01:23:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B2rOT210m1uvSkoWoE/Kwhzfv3kW/+7esojb956HQVk=; b=W4I56BLJqSRscTrPYU+zRBXkW5GIcNID/M14sUkzcbadf0rW8iMX9wVkS4dyalF3Dj 50cdR9XoZiw9aKM1lMz9eO5DBRGTn/IPOArzBm8HLkzZEHAIiFEUOlWep9FOm20Bunm7 340BfhEOiThAbmkyJPRav2LDiULB3heR3FzLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uOH79GDFN58wdEKBgCUDtAI9nl5TQfi07gH3iMI/3scxstoBdOIwhcoK6SKm+ueXKh pQTvGh8g/YZ45dr0m5LZvxYr+hOwTFQMQ5vD14egnmEc3/DGPz+9xO2btZIv+yTwbJoG Xsgb4gdT2YCr2wOXipavdEQHRwv7b8D7YcqVg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n14mr295279ibx.52.1272961406467; Tue, 04 May 2010 01:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 01:23:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <30330667.165141272045170121.JavaMail.jira@thor> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 10:23:26 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [OT] jira workflow WAS: Commented: (TILES-506) Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking" From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2010/5/4 Mck <kthomas@example.org>: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 09:35 +0200, Antonio Petrelli wrote: >> Not the issue, the version in the "Fix for" field of Jira issues. The >> issues should be moved to a higher version. > > Couldn't this just be done in the same bulk step as when you change all > the issues to closed? > That is all those resolved issues remain resolved until one of the "test > builds" is successfully made into a release X.Y.Z. At that point then > all those resolved issues are bulk changed to "closed" and "Fix for > X.Y.X". We want to avoid the bulk change from resolved to closed, not the "fix fore" bulk change. The latter is mandatory anyway. > It's not so important, as i've marked the subject OT Why? It's perfectly On Topic! > but i'm presuming > that apache doesn't give anyone here the rights to remove the "resolved" > state from the TILES jira project, and so am wondering if there's a way > to better use it. Nobody likes dead wood! I did not try, but probably I can create a separate custom workflow as I did in Struts' Jira. I can try it this evening (CET) at home if you like. Antonio From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 12:34:53 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 99009 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 12:34:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 12:34:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 77513 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 12:34:53 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 77466 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 12:34:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 77456 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 12:34:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 12:34:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 12:34:47 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O9HKT-0007W1-GK for kthomas@example.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:34:25 +0200 Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:34:25 +0200 Received: from mick by 83.161.120.155 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 14:34:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 14:42:30 +0200 Lines: 89 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tzPdANiplDC9A9c8m/r+" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.161.120.155 X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 --=-tzPdANiplDC9A9c8m/r+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (There is no test build for this vote as it only consists of a pom.xml file= ). The Tiles Master 2 pom.xml has been available since 2010-05-04 09:44. Release notes (changelog): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r940759 | mck | 2010-05-04 09:44:12 +0200 (Tue, 04 May 2010) | 2 lines > add myself. role=3D=3DCommitter > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r940041 | mck | 2010-05-01 16:38:07 +0200 (Sat, 01 May 2010) | 2 lines > TILES-506 Fix link to jira under "Project Information --> Issue tracking= " > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r749985 | apetrelli | 2009-03-04 13:44:12 +0100 (Wed, 04 Mar 2009) | 2 li= nes > TILES-374 > Updated contributor list. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r676660 | apetrelli | 2008-07-14 19:50:27 +0200 (Mon, 14 Jul 2008) | 1 li= ne > Added new contributors to the list. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r647256 | apetrelli | 2008-04-11 20:28:50 +0200 (Fri, 11 Apr 2008) | 2 li= nes > TILESSHARED-19 > Added list of contributors. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r502711 | ddewolf | 2007-02-02 21:02:49 +0100 (Fri, 02 Feb 2007) | 1 line > Removing License as it's in the apache master > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r501947 | craigmcc | 2007-01-31 20:06:48 +0100 (Wed, 31 Jan 2007) | 2 lin= es > Add myself. Distribution: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml Maven 2 snapshot repository: * http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tiles/ti= les-master/2-SNAPSHOT/ If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. --=20 "Work like you don't need the money. Love like you've never been hurt. Dance like nobody's watching." Satchmo Paige=20 | http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no | http://finn.no | --=-tzPdANiplDC9A9c8m/r+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvgFjYACgkQkdPrePiuutNRdgCfYaDHuUxK7RqXdkyiGtPKmaS1 2qAAoOHaY8UnORIBpeGUaypeBX+891Jn =Nh8R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tzPdANiplDC9A9c8m/r+-- From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 12:43:34 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 1563 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 12:43:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 12:43:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 83555 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 12:43:34 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 83514 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 12:43:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 83506 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 12:43:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 12:43:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 12:43:29 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so2029317iwn.8 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:43:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kYiQ8BpJgmONJUGcmpKGSdpbf32TVOx0K2swD2NcH+8=; b=WMRdQKvWHzS6t70f5hR5Gs6mM35C8teR7jHyNFx5h0RNFNQGnttVyQ0dCX658ilpQp iNgEglGWChec7ipWxP4QgXTpTm535VeMDmN1TLNQ34f5dnbsvV9Z6vSiT9KI+/9mUdJw XroEp5/QHAdR21O4hc+yk97oBmyQlNPKeVs5A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EQh+ejNEFiS8fn+0zRtMhYXjYLH3KrJIO3du12WjBCMnM/IIlKbo3PozxOizRZ/xdj AFq57IH8wzz5h2UneusViUs14Q+sHzL9kovP9P7X5pfL/h/5lChFt3qWKijkBtWg23l5 qJgJ8pZL3HYYKL2+GZgFPksHAGahfamvVuSg0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j6mr278853ibx.29.1272976987602; Tue, 04 May 2010 05:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 05:43:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 14:43:07 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/5/4 Mck <kthomas@example.org>: > =A0[X] General Availability (GA) +1 to release it, seems nice. I forgot a pair of (well, three :-D ) things here: * a quality vote is not necessary for tiles-master, just "release" or "don't release"; * remember to prepare for digitally signing artifacts. At the end in the repository there will be ".asc" files too; * please wait 72 hours before closing the vote. Antonio From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 13:18:30 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 12476 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 13:18:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 13:18:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 41551 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 13:18:30 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 41506 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 13:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 41498 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 13:18:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:18:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gx0-f219.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:18:24 +0000 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1317296gxk.0 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 06:18:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kK0KjPRc5o/vONGhBevq7u8qyJ2x/hwwmviQJ48AmDY=; b=dTNIfHXqzyQKIry3RSYKM1ZslmzPeZXO6ku01KFjXIpvUbXIFsY2HMd3qfn9f1i61T Qyfy2p7RixnrzzRuONzqkLQzDKu49uMIbOdyuvYIHdyFlGyZYrrdOKg7nH6tylljTpyr VCjkKK7R6m9qf2MHNkcY5MogJD2/lacihPgDs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cQfSX2t/PkpLLJFNEWoEIMuBPlzE1L2cAgWR5AG4yHlS8ICALc+1i86xk2RMbclUFi x9D4D6ymGA4YLKBgylCswJH+6RCm2x58Yfn3IY5QKAHZyDD1hd4YzJaq4dQNgzOJhNIE rK/rrK4SLnUyMTEohHlXPjmKs1U79TuYTwsyA= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id ib14mr3078049qcb.28.1272979082655; Tue, 04 May 2010 06:18:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 06:17:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> From: Wendy Smoak <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 09:17:42 -0400 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Mck <kthomas@example.org> wrote: > The Tiles Master 2 pom.xml has been available since 2010-05-04 09:44. ... > Distribution: > =A0* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/maven/trunk/pom/pom.xml > > Maven 2 snapshot repository: > =A0* http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tile= s/tiles-master/2-SNAPSHOT/ Have you gone through the release process yet? We can't vote on the svn repo or on a snapshot, it has to be the actual tagged/signed/deployed artifact. Let us know if you need help sorting out the process, it's not always obvious, and the people who have lots of practice at it tend to leave things out of the instructions. :) Thanks, --=20 Wendy From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 13:35:41 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 16281 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 13:35:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 13:35:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 74459 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 13:35:41 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 74417 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 13:35:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 74409 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 13:35:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:35:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f182.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:35:35 +0000 Received: by iwn12 with SMTP id 12so2091517iwn.8 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 06:35:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rkXPyu+LTSQuaIjXUYU84o4AM98S/KsAx3TtFVkMH+M=; b=GTuCBuaD7UsCtyzAXTjmZEWRyoIokbsnJdXnlOtPGtQo5fOl4V40sbvzH3gwdyiAWL 29SFtZtu4WyNdNmLFuIIkPGIfyw3o5Ml9FFtBbNUACroyvCvPEjOhJikVQTFJ3ZgVP5F 2RdusSq1voQj4iSBVnl2/ycTipiPThyyVazws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YtW2vHsDc4U6jiDVR/p2aFJ6Ht9C7mUmwzXKaxZAT+w7xsCalr4vRhhtItG6juIshs sdtxjpcKrL+3adKvVqq5e2KrOqAZCP8Con3HtRnkQjv4znCnrQJQZKkcW6vJvgCvPt3K 2Uf2z4VJ1B4+nwczvTEjtZ6rCunr9LScMSLrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j21mr866956ibw.42.1272980113973; Tue, 04 May 2010 06:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 06:35:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 15:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality From: Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2010/5/4 Wendy Smoak <kthomas@example.org>: > Let us know if you need help sorting out the process, it's not always > obvious, and the people who have lots of practice at it tend to leave > things out of the instructions. :) Who me? :-D Well yes... However I never released a pom, so Wendy can you help Mick? Antonio From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 16:37:15 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 60803 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 16:37:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 16:37:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 62680 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 16:37:14 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 62659 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 16:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 62651 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 16:37:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 16:37:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 16:37:08 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so5932594qyk.25 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:36:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+s9Ny2e0QYWhq5HWIZ8mfO+6VE3OH5XlddH2SBeIzSo=; b=MIMiVOSPqYYvahXYr9SMUxsWIL5dkCrTUAEuxGE5a6RkikPm8GHRUyzrix7agGeVgP nG8WMyfzCK7iaiot2/ZwiD5vkAGRNSq8E8VXAbT31Cj/nrmiUhTzX49ZifnSXr98Do5S zL47uDdkE8zr1PayeWPKUdiniYsNDdBmhiqWc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Rk3vCD2hhihuZrFnsZvjdipRggRwEFNGbjwr543OE/1VydyJHlbDlV+qKgsST0l8y+ lFhPdF1OTUQXSxdmOVOe5Q/bYvU5zGu8CE5W2ysBKuGGTFL4ll/ZxEsp/8huBa+OO4rW vg8hIrPLjjciL3NqCn8iwE3rDDkSorCQyfvR0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l16mr4646116qan.97.1272991002275; Tue, 04 May 2010 09:36:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 09:36:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> From: Wendy Smoak <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 12:36:21 -0400 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Antonio Petrelli <kthomas@example.org> wrote: > 2010/5/4 Wendy Smoak <kthomas@example.org>: >> Let us know if you need help sorting out the process, it's not always >> obvious, and the people who have lots of practice at it tend to leave >> things out of the instructions. :) > > Who me? :-D Well yes... However I never released a pom, so Wendy can > you help Mick? It should be the same general steps, mvn release:prepare then mvn release:perform . We must have released the master pom at some point? Let me know where the existing release instructions are so I can be somewhat consistent with those, and I'll try to help. I also joined #tiles on freenode irc, in case it's easier to work out real time. -- Wendy From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 17:26:00 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 75025 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 17:26:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 17:26:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 68918 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 17:26:00 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 68877 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 17:25:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 68869 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 17:25:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 17:25:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 17:25:53 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kthomas@example.org>) id 1O9Ls9-0005Go-PQ for kthomas@example.org; Tue, 04 May 2010 19:25:29 +0200 Received: from ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no ([83.161.120.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 19:25:29 +0200 Received: from mick by ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 19:25:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: kthomas@example.org connect(): No such file or directory From: Mck <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 19:33:34 +0200 Lines: 56 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hkK5VfBi6YuJCW9WLR8E" X-Complaints-To: kthomas@example.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ti0022a380-dhcp0203.bb.online.no In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=-hkK5VfBi6YuJCW9WLR8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Who me? :-D Well yes... However I never released a pom, so Wendy can > > you help Mick? >=20 > It should be the same general steps, mvn release:prepare then mvn > release:perform . We must have released the master pom at some point? The only release documentation i know of is http://tiles.apache.org/framework/dev/release.html But Antonio mentioned previously: > For the rest (other members please correct me if I am wrong), since it > is not a package and it's only a matter of a POM file, I think you can > call for a vote *before* releasing it for real. Since there's no bundled product here this all made good sense to me. But being my first call-to-vote/release i'm now confused :-) > Let me know where the existing release instructions are so I can be > somewhat consistent with those, and I'll try to help. =20 Great. Let me know if i am to follow those instructions verbatim. > I also joined > #tiles on freenode irc, in case it's easier to work out real time.=20 i'm there. ~mck --=20 "There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened." Douglas Adams=20 | http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no | http://finn.no | --=-hkK5VfBi6YuJCW9WLR8E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvgWm4ACgkQkdPrePiuutMNogCg8NY4pxNwkcM8efqHqP1SxcYV YGcAoJy9zRtD77+L4PyJOMcoW+tGhZNb =t/gh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hkK5VfBi6YuJCW9WLR8E-- From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 17:31:52 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 76339 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 17:31:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 17:31:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 79316 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 17:31:52 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 79288 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 17:31:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 79280 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 17:31:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 17:31:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gy0-f173.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 17:31:45 +0000 Received: by gyd5 with SMTP id 5so1397918gyd.32 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5zNEqDc1M38NQWFJ6Vc1ClRJdx2Lolel90SMIDdmKcU=; b=DAWCQ7213Yfdsn8hbJNotmgLF7rHec7xazzvK5JZaYFhCy6P9dg6ith+xxeAqak2Aj dArkPo+8NT/jGSmF/lXat3aQbzi3h3x1pOfmorgBGzyBKvZ2icyDqZkx25VFgd9Aydc5 YvOrkI6CPk6Swuwn+ncvCiSBU7ROXLbQfYraY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gsTxsGSpR1ojuDx9z4KDlPPCyY7W0vbK6zvpgnYzSpiu/5/gSSZ1VxVh6GxGp6WckW fXOtw8CxwIbxHuC/U61iMrTFO6RW6/kckLbVJZ5g4hxsTqRkk2zKZb23zgZrZCYU/EFN 7NtGehBVEVwNKmLCIUtVurfvjVeLArr4MOaso= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q4mr532889ibk.69.1272994284281; Tue, 04 May 2010 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 12:31:24 -0500 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality From: Greg Reddin <kthomas@example.org> To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Mck <kthomas@example.org> wrote: > But Antonio mentioned previously: >> For the rest (other members please correct me if I am wrong), since it >> is not a package and it's only a matter of a POM file, I think you can >> call for a vote *before* releasing it for real. > > Since there's no bundled product here this all made good sense to me. > But being my first call-to-vote/release i'm now confused :-) But, I think the POM is, itself, a bundled product, right? Greg From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 18:34:30 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 95313 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 18:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 18:34:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 58730 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 18:34:30 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 58690 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 18:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 58681 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 18:34:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 18:34:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-qy0-f193.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 18:34:22 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so6098494qyk.25 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 11:34:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=oY2uttdTK0JtmSEb6f+cE7GVQEZQetAUXUkRYllnNcQ=; b=BZL66lLN9Kd3b611vtJIx6P12Wec47BkoAD6/4rrG7A57GNELOyD09BkndWy3qomuy 87F9ZlddmyFYoQMGFDgpf+MtXy8EIQKFDAOBwhrrlXRRAccfgekL8eh/AF+rBjpwTBSD KfZWXr5RObZC3Pbn6T+d9eywXiA4O5S6VyuFU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Y5kgeRbirjur+QK5l4A+zqcdzpiC90yiWys70vcrRSCpf77vw+Y4jGy+zcyG2JopAw Prh74Jiqfhvbx4uTRqUgZpomTd/BIoegCfGSXmB38m2KJ7qPnOtLAj3D8XwQ7e3x8wKe IPKYqYDI341i2ohrxe/iZv/qO8Bwcv99evONA= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n1mr5523339qam.186.1272998040719; Tue, 04 May 2010 11:34:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 4 May 2010 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <kthomas@example.org> References: <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> <kthomas@example.org> From: Wendy Smoak <kthomas@example.org> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 14:33:40 -0400 Message-ID: <kthomas@example.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tiles-master 2 Release Quality To: kthomas@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Greg Reddin <kthomas@example.org> wrote: > But, I think the POM is, itself, a bundled product, right? Yep, the pom is an artifact that's going into the Maven repo. We need to see it staged and to vote on the tagged, signed, released artifact. I know it seems like overkill for an xml file, I just consider it the Maven Tax. ;) -- Wendy From kthomas@example.org Tue May 04 18:41:55 2010 Return-Path: <kthomas@example.org> Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 96560 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 18:41:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 4 May 2010 18:41:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 66739 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 18:41:55 -0000 Delivered-To: kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 66708 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2010 18:41:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kthomas@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:kthomas@example.org> List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org> Reply-To: kthomas@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list kthomas@example.org Received: (qmail 66700 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2010 18:41:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 18:41:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kthomas@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f201.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 May 2010 18:41:48 +0000 Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so5196022iwn.7 for <kthomas@example.org>; Tue, 04 May 2010 11:41:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iQt6WCzGkoGhtQrOHWbllWR5gCXYMzHHi6QDptlxU2A=; b=hJEQWm8LgqIH9nn3TeT1WwuQYanmG+WToZJXPDKf10lO0iNXlCQZGjIsFDL9Lc2+yW
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}