From scm-hinesstephen@example.com Fri Mar 26 17:07:31 2010
Return-Path: <scm-hinesstephen@example.com>
Delivered-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 7907 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2010 17:07:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 26 Mar 2010 17:07:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 66689 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 17:07:31 -0000
Delivered-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 66648 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2010 17:07:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact hinesstephen@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
List-Id: <scm-users.maven.apache.org>
Reply-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 66641 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2010 17:07:30 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:07:30 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hinesstephen@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:07:22 +0000
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so2246457fgg.6
        for <hinesstephen@example.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=WbizPAz6L+HBuWfx0VF3ayjro3rK9DvI7C7z0Kl2oWY=;
        b=tVucub3U8vDs8rGcpHnuXZd6dBcFGQWe88Hnlg4j4N234eZRgFPkIfgyHl4hPoGJxq
         n1w0T6B5L6pid1lYlaE4J1QSE3IKjkR5506JBExbUD5hBFEzrt8EwAxZGu4Ppt15bJlF
         Ky86W9Sll9WICQo8qknfToJ3GwOrJV09XetZE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=Urbu7EGLCHfuIOeFAaS9m6xlKa0bSIK6gWjJWS/2nGyKIrJ5oyjtDRCkrN7Tao2C5D
         l6cSDWvr0D9UjTbXZ/xm5Oyk21934F4OVPaqYIX1Cv3tkkCc7rlErcnBTBOPN3y0vskx
         QNBOW4gn1JzeJUdnuFrTsL7BrZqr43+URtKIw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:07:02 -0400
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b16mr97128hbb.204.1269623222169; Fri, 
	26 Mar 2010 10:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <hinesstephen@example.com>
Subject: Question about Clearcase UCM support
From: Jonathan Ducharme <hinesstephen@example.com>
To: hinesstephen@example.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636457f8e27ef630482b731dd
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001636457f8e27ef630482b731dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

I'm not very sure if this should be asked here, or in the normal maven user
group, but since it's a SCM question about the Release Plugin, I'll take my
chances.

We're using CC UCM, and we are just starting experimenting with the
maven-release-plugin. When I run a mvn release:prepare, the plugin does what
it have to do, but when it come to the tagging part it doesn't seem to do a
ucm mkbl, but a mklabel. Is that normal behavior and do you plan on having
it do a mkbl?

Thanks

Jonathan Ducharme

--001636457f8e27ef630482b731dd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,<br><br>I&#39;m not very sure if this should be asked here, or in the=
 normal maven user group, but since it&#39;s a SCM question about the Relea=
se Plugin, I&#39;ll take my chances.<br><br>We&#39;re using CC UCM, and we =
are just starting experimenting with the maven-release-plugin. When I run a=
 mvn release:prepare, the plugin does what it have to do, but when it come =
to the tagging part it doesn&#39;t seem to do a ucm mkbl, but a mklabel. Is=
 that normal behavior and do you plan on having it do a mkbl?<br>
<br>Thanks<br><br>Jonathan Ducharme<br>

--001636457f8e27ef630482b731dd--


{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}