From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Tue Mar 01 15:50:47 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 35850 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 15:50:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 15:50:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1669 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 15:50:46 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 1473 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 15:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 1465 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 15:50:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:50:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO loveml1.coldjet.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:50:33 +0000 Received: from loveml1.coldjet.com ([83.161.120.155]) by loveml1.coldjet.com ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:50:06 -0500 From: Ben Snowden <ginapetersen@example.net> To: "ginapetersen@example.net" <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:50:04 -0500 Subject: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected Thread-Topic: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected Thread-Index: AcvYKFSZuOyLFHn/RDSTLNe4UG6JLg== Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F12249loveml1coldje_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F12249loveml1coldje_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I appear to be having the same problem getting our crystal reports server t= o work through the reverse proxy. When a client posts the report, the cryst= al server sends a http 302 response with the address of the generated repor= t. I have done packet capture on the client and it is receiving the http 302 w= ith a location that is not being translated. The report server runs on port= 3334. The client receives a url like http://external.domain.com:3334/... E= ven though I have reverse_map rule: Reverse_map http://external.domain.com:3334/ http://external.dom= ain.com/ Forward rule is: Map http://external.domain.com/ http://internal.domain.com:3334/ Pristine headers is set to 1 ATS 2.1.5 ubuntu 10.04 I tried changing ATS to also listen on the custom port but didn't seem to h= ave much luck. I will try changing the port on the crystal server but I don= 't know what kind of dependencies that will break. I upgraded to 2.1.5 because I thought it would fix a ssl issue I was having= . Since that didn't work, does anyone know if this problem exists on 2.0.1?= I can roll back pretty easily. Thanks! --_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F12249loveml1coldje_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:x=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p=3D"urn:schemas-m= icrosoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office= :access" xmlns:dt=3D"uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s=3D"= uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs=3D"urn:schemas-microsof= t-com:rowset" xmlns:z=3D"#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-co= m:office:publisher" xmlns:ss=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadshee= t" xmlns:c=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns= :odc=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" xmlns:oa=3D"urn:schemas-micro= soft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" = xmlns:q=3D"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:rtc=3D"http://m= icrosoft.com/officenet/conferencing" xmlns:D=3D"DAV:" xmlns:Repl=3D"http://= schemas.microsoft.com/repl/" xmlns:mt=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/share= point/soap/meetings/" xmlns:x2=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel= /2003/xml" xmlns:ppda=3D"http://www.passport.com/NameSpace.xsd" xmlns:ois= =3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir=3D"http://= schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds=3D"http://www.w3= .org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint= /dsp" xmlns:udc=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd=3D"http= ://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/sha= repoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec=3D"http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#"= xmlns:sp=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps=3D"http://= schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi=3D"http://www.w3.org/2001= /XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcs=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/so= ap" xmlns:udcxf=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:udc= p2p=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" xmlns:wf=3D"http:/= /schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:dsss=3D"http://sche= mas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" xmlns:dssi=3D"http://schemas.mi= crosoft.com/office/2006/digsig" xmlns:mdssi=3D"http://schemas.openxmlformat= s.org/package/2006/digital-signature" xmlns:mver=3D"http://schemas.openxmlf= ormats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.c= om/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels=3D"http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/pa= ckage/2006/relationships" xmlns:spwp=3D"http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/web= partpages" xmlns:ex12t=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/20= 06/types" xmlns:ex12m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/200= 6/messages" xmlns:pptsl=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/Sli= deLibrary/" xmlns:spsl=3D"http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortal= Server/PublishedLinksService" xmlns:Z=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:= st=3D"&#1;" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equi= v=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGen= erator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} span.BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text"; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vli= nk=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>I appear to be h= aving the same problem getting our crystal reports server to work through t= he reverse proxy. When a client posts the report, the crystal server sends = a http 302 response with the address of the generated report.<o:p></o:p></p= ><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>I have done= packet capture on the client and it is receiving the http 302 with a locat= ion that is not being translated. The report server runs on port 3334. The = client receives a url like <a href=3D"http://external.domain.com:3334/">htt= p://external.domain.com:3334/</a>... Even though I have reverse_map rule:<o= :p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal= >Reverse_map <a href=3D"http://external.domain.com:3334/">http://external.d= omain.com:3334/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n= bsp;&nbsp; <a href=3D"http://external.domain.com/">http://external.domain.c= om/</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3D= MsoNormal>Forward rule is:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</= o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Map <a href=3D"http://external.domain.com/">ht= tp://external.domain.com/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs= p;&nbsp; <a href=3D"http://internal.domain.com:3334/">http://internal.domai= n.com:3334/</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Pristine headers is set to 1<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMso= Normal>ATS 2.1.5 ubuntu 10.04<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp= ;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>I tried changing ATS to also listen on the = custom port but didn&#8217;t seem to have much luck. I will try changing th= e port on the crystal server but I don&#8217;t know what kind of dependenci= es that will break.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p= ><p class=3DMsoNormal>I upgraded to 2.1.5 because I thought it would fix a = ssl issue I was having. Since that didn&#8217;t work, does anyone know if t= his problem exists on 2.0.1? I can roll back pretty easily.<o:p></o:p></p><= p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Thanks!<o:p><= /o:p></p></div></body></html>= --_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F12249loveml1coldje_-- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Tue Mar 01 22:42:52 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 4203 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 22:42:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 22:42:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 75201 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:42:51 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 75151 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 75143 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 22:42:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:42:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kramer.ogre.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:42:43 +0000 Received: from loki.ogre.com (homey.ogre.com [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by kramer.ogre.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p21MgKQN002495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:42:20 -0800 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 kramer.ogre.com p21MgKQN002495 Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:42:20 -0700 From: Leif Hedstrom <ginapetersen@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ginapetersen@example.net CC: Ben Snowden <ginapetersen@example.net> Subject: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected References: <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010203070003010902080106" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010203070003010902080106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/01/2011 08:50 AM, Ben Snowden wrote: > > I appear to be having the same problem getting our crystal reports > server to work through the reverse proxy. When a client posts the > report, the crystal server sends a http 302 response with the address > of the generated report. > > I have done packet capture on the client and it is receiving the http > 302 with a location that is not being translated. The report server > runs on port 3334. The client receives a url like > http://external.domain.com:3334/... Even though I have reverse_map rule: > > Reverse_map http://external.domain.com:3334/ http://external.domain.com/ > > Forward rule is: > > Map http://external.domain.com/ http://internal.domain.com:3334/ > I suspect this will work with v2.0.1, and perhaps v2.1.3. The problem is that I'm an idiot. I'm looking at the issue now, hopefully a patch soon for trunk. -- leif --------------010203070003010902080106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> On 03/01/2011 08:50 AM, Ben Snowden wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:ginapetersen@example.net" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"> <style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} span.BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text"; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> <div class="WordSection1"> <p class="MsoNormal">I appear to be having the same problem getting our crystal reports server to work through the reverse proxy. When a client posts the report, the crystal server sends a http 302 response with the address of the generated report.<o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal">I have done packet capture on the client and it is receiving the http 302 with a location that is not being translated. The report server runs on port 3334. The client receives a url like <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://external.domain.com:3334/">http://external.domain.com:3334/</a>... Even though I have reverse_map rule:<o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Reverse_map <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://external.domain.com:3334/">http://external.domain.com:3334/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://external.domain.com/">http://external.domain.com/</a><o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Forward rule is:<o:p></o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p> <p class="MsoNormal">Map <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://external.domain.com/">http://external.domain.com/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://internal.domain.com:3334/">http://internal.domain.com:3334/</a><br> </p> </div> </blockquote> <br> I suspect this will work with v2.0.1, and perhaps v2.1.3. The problem is that I'm an idiot.<br> <br> I'm looking at the issue now, hopefully a patch soon for trunk.<br> <br> -- leif<br> <br> </body> </html> --------------010203070003010902080106-- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Tue Mar 01 22:57:33 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 52977 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 22:57:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 22:57:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 9000 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:57:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 8946 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 22:57:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 8938 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 22:57:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:57:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO loveml1.coldjet.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:57:25 +0000 Received: from loveml1.coldjet.com ([83.161.120.155]) by loveml1.coldjet.com ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:56:16 -0500 From: Ben Snowden <ginapetersen@example.net> To: "ginapetersen@example.net" <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:56:13 -0500 Subject: RE: reverse_map not happening as expected Thread-Topic: reverse_map not happening as expected Thread-Index: AcvYYe9yI//f5dQETCOWxccMQEWL9QAAcqwQ Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> References: <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F124E6loveml1coldje_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F124E6loveml1coldje_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Haha. That's why I went into networking and not programming. I was successf= ul in getting my workaround going. Seems I had to completely restart ATS to= get it to listen on an additional port instead of just running traffic_lin= e -x. Thanks for confirming the bug, Ben From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:ginapetersen@example.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 5:42 PM To: ginapetersen@example.net Cc: Ben Snowden Subject: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected On 03/01/2011 08:50 AM, Ben Snowden wrote: I appear to be having the same problem getting our crystal reports server t= o work through the reverse proxy. When a client posts the report, the cryst= al server sends a http 302 response with the address of the generated repor= t. I have done packet capture on the client and it is receiving the http 302 w= ith a location that is not being translated. The report server runs on port= 3334. The client receives a url like http://external.domain.com:3334/... E= ven though I have reverse_map rule: Reverse_map http://external.domain.com:3334/ http://external.dom= ain.com/ Forward rule is: Map http://external.domain.com/ http://internal.domain.com:3334/ I suspect this will work with v2.0.1, and perhaps v2.1.3. The problem is th= at I'm an idiot. I'm looking at the issue now, hopefully a patch soon for trunk. -- leif --_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F124E6loveml1coldje_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content= =3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Micros= oft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:black;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"; color:black;} span.BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text"; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=3Dwhite lang=3DEN-US= link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p class=3DMsoNormal>= <span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Haha. That&#8217;s why I went into networking= and not programming. I was successful in getting my workaround going. Seem= s I had to completely restart ATS to get it to listen on an additional port= instead of just running traffic_line &#8211;x.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p cla= ss=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p= class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Thanks for confirming the = bug,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D= '><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F= 497D'>Ben</span><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p clas= s=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><di= v><div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0i= n 0in 0in'><p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-fam= ily:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style=3D'= font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> Leif = Hedstrom [mailto:ginapetersen@example.net] <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, March 01, 2011= 5:42 PM<br><b>To:</b> ginapetersen@example.net<br><b>Cc:</b> Ben Sno= wden<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: reverse_map not happening as expected<o:p></o:p= ></span></p></div></div><p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class= =3DMsoNormal>On 03/01/2011 08:50 AM, Ben Snowden wrote: <o:p></o:p></p><p c= lass=3DMsoNormal>I appear to be having the same problem getting our crystal= reports server to work through the reverse proxy. When a client posts the = report, the crystal server sends a http 302 response with the address of th= e generated report.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p= ><p class=3DMsoNormal>I have done packet capture on the client and it is re= ceiving the http 302 with a location that is not being translated. The repo= rt server runs on port 3334. The client receives a url like <a href=3D"http= ://external.domain.com:3334/">http://external.domain.com:3334/</a>... Even = though I have reverse_map rule:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>&nbsp;<o= :p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Reverse_map <a href=3D"http://external.do= main.com:3334/">http://external.domain.com:3334/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp= ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href=3D"http://external.doma= in.com/">http://external.domain.com/</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal= >&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Forward rule is:<o:p></o:p></p><= p class=3DMsoNormal>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></p><p class=3DMsoNormal>Map <a href= =3D"http://external.domain.com/">http://external.domain.com/</a>&nbsp;&nbsp= ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href=3D"http://internal.doma= in.com:3334/">http://internal.domain.com:3334/</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class= =3DMsoNormal style=3D'margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt= ;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"'><br>I suspect this will work with v= 2.0.1, and perhaps v2.1.3. The problem is that I'm an idiot.<br><br>I'm loo= king at the issue now, hopefully a patch soon for trunk.<br><br>-- leif<o:p= ></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>= --_000_C9165C22F2F1E944BF543F361B1B94DB1C62F124E6loveml1coldje_-- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Tue Mar 01 23:12:47 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 8067 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2011 23:12:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2011 23:12:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 24818 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 23:12:47 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 24690 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2011 23:12:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 24677 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2011 23:12:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:12:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kramer.ogre.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:12:39 +0000 Received: from loki.ogre.com (homey.ogre.com [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by kramer.ogre.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p21N97ad004407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:09:07 -0800 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 kramer.ogre.com p21N97ad004407 Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:09:07 -0700 From: Leif Hedstrom <ginapetersen@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ginapetersen@example.net CC: Ben Snowden <ginapetersen@example.net> Subject: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected References: <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070101020103060803060806" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070101020103060803060806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/01/2011 03:56 PM, Ben Snowden wrote: > > Haha. That's why I went into networking and not programming. I was > successful in getting my workaround going. Seems I had to completely > restart ATS to get it to listen on an additional port instead of just > running traffic_line --x. > Any chance you'd be able to test "trunk" in a few? Fwiw, these fixes should fix reverse_map, redirect and permanent_redirect. -- leif --------------070101020103060803060806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> On 03/01/2011 03:56 PM, Ben Snowden wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:ginapetersen@example.net" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"> <style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:black;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"; color:black;} span.BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text"; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> <div class="WordSection1"> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Haha. That&#8217;s why I went into networking and not programming. I was successful in getting my workaround going. Seems I had to completely restart ATS to get it to listen on an additional port instead of just running traffic_line &#8211;x.</span></p> </div> </blockquote> <br> Any chance you'd be able to test "trunk" in a few? Fwiw, these fixes should fix reverse_map, redirect and permanent_redirect.<br> <br> -- leif<br> <br> </body> </html> --------------070101020103060803060806-- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Wed Mar 02 00:37:33 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 100 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 00:37:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 00:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 24975 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 00:37:32 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 24895 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 00:37:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 24887 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 00:37:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:37:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kramer.ogre.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 00:37:24 +0000 Received: from loki.ogre.com (homey.ogre.com [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by kramer.ogre.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p220b1Bt009394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 1 Mar 2011 16:37:01 -0800 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 kramer.ogre.com p220b1Bt009394 Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:37:01 -0700 From: Leif Hedstrom <ginapetersen@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ginapetersen@example.net CC: Ben Snowden <ginapetersen@example.net> Subject: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected References: <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000809000400040102040006" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000809000400040102040006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/01/2011 04:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 03/01/2011 03:56 PM, Ben Snowden wrote: >> >> Haha. That's why I went into networking and not programming. I was >> successful in getting my workaround going. Seems I had to completely >> restart ATS to get it to listen on an additional port instead of just >> running traffic_line --x. >> > > Any chance you'd be able to test "trunk" in a few? Fwiw, these fixes > should fix reverse_map, redirect and permanent_redirect. It's gonna take me a little longer to clean this up, but I'll have it committed on trunk tomorrow for sure. I'll attach the fixes to TS-675, which is a bug for "redirect" maps not working, but it's the same problem. Basically all of redirect redirect_permanent reverse_map got broken (by yours truly). Hang in there though, and keep filing bugs! -- leif --------------000809000400040102040006 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> On 03/01/2011 04:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:ginapetersen@example.net" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> On 03/01/2011 03:56 PM, Ben Snowden wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:ginapetersen@example.net" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"> <style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:black;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"; color:black;} span.BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char"; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text"; font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";} span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> <div class="WordSection1"> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">Haha. That&#8217;s why I went into networking and not programming. I was successful in getting my workaround going. Seems I had to completely restart ATS to get it to listen on an additional port instead of just running traffic_line &#8211;x.</span></p> </div> </blockquote> <br> Any chance you'd be able to test "trunk" in a few? Fwiw, these fixes should fix reverse_map, redirect and permanent_redirect.<br> </blockquote> <br> <br> It's gonna take me a little longer to clean this up, but I'll have it committed on trunk tomorrow for sure. I'll attach the fixes to TS-675, which is a bug for "redirect" maps not working, but it's the same problem. Basically all of<br> <br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; redirect<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; redirect_permanent<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; reverse_map<br> <br> got broken (by yours truly). Hang in there though, and keep filing bugs!<br> <br> -- leif<br> <br> </body> </html> --------------000809000400040102040006-- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Wed Mar 02 03:41:42 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 71155 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2011 03:41:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2011 03:41:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 67071 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 03:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 67013 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2011 03:41:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 67005 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2011 03:41:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:41:31 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=3uSaImBeuprzHBlOOPjkqgu+7PcxSRW0m2Aphm9Zmck= c=1 sm=0 a=PW2Lcx-aMV8A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=o97Z5GjoA5FqMepkzAFpSA==:17 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=Zz17CuUF_6VQhNqqpqgA:9 a=G7OABoHG2tPDI9ORYKoA:7 a=He-rPzdmO9To92XGxkFmhljOmJ4A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=o97Z5GjoA5FqMepkzAFpSA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:49441] helo=gray-2.local) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <ginapetersen@example.net>) (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r()) with ESMTP id 7B/B5-04612-05CBD6D4; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:41:04 +0000 Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:41:04 -0500 From: "Michael A. Smith" <ginapetersen@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20110221 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ginapetersen@example.net Subject: Re: reverse_map not happening as expected References: <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'll help test. We're talking about the fix for TS-675, right? On 3/1/11 7:37 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > On 03/01/2011 04:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> On 03/01/2011 03:56 PM, Ben Snowden wrote: >>> >>> Haha. That's why I went into networking and not programming. I was >>> successful in getting my workaround going. Seems I had to completely >>> restart ATS to get it to listen on an additional port instead of just >>> running traffic_line --x. >>> >> >> Any chance you'd be able to test "trunk" in a few? Fwiw, these fixes >> should fix reverse_map, redirect and permanent_redirect. > > > It's gonna take me a little longer to clean this up, but I'll have it > committed on trunk tomorrow for sure. I'll attach the fixes to TS-675, > which is a bug for "redirect" maps not working, but it's the same > problem. Basically all of > > redirect > redirect_permanent > reverse_map > > got broken (by yours truly). Hang in there though, and keep filing bugs! > > -- leif > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNbbxMAAoJEKpdEwhL7QyvrpUP/2jSXiQIvBeFanTWGAITaNta DFVRuC3iOrOtB1lw9OW7WSALoB1XtwGVu2A3zyc/5+3VsQkd96jNFMGBzTP8DL+c T8dNiQOYE/w0cVibHqsP1eLfHxGdz8nRh6n9l6PoS70tdJUtRxEi1yKzO6C4BX8T mavDanQXGuw3m0oTKmYhCu1xhfL5s0FKqoG5lL1OIIgholjKLWtGvf7HziuuCjl9 wvEGwK+m0ETlBqc7rFdwfOF71vUDr8GLBPQorl77rW5mXSazLZYpkqTFT6Yb3zgG 5UYDaPWMJP96c0xQ+BwOjI21N70rdVdT6AyTHv9rGGdlmhRaxfUO9dKCLy7cG6S5 gccXnwHoGWeGSiltJl+6MZ/WqfbQ2j++meph8QHh1nnldzDCbyR2woUnF7YMNqO3 UQxqxAJh7dK6gisi5KYwmBUh6n0NV5+yC3KjxkytuDoSUaLCUERTaR+UhUirLLnc bvFWYCWcOtPN/5rwgZQSnEaSikitwy3V5h9uDBv856GAckP+ksHz4Gh9X4uEffdl po5W2OQBCS/U8uJNz+Sx3iysIpdDG0m+Va/dds9DUO79cLQ79hEZ0IdZs/AY6A16 MNxRI1Dn2GtX5fHOvdrNIYsZntMBdTVB1jxU/Ft11zKa+9R+nbmXZS6XPfGSkG/8 +6zjwCqEEjQekCyGtOV9 =HW1f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Fri Mar 04 20:55:06 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 79907 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 20:55:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 20:55:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 20483 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 20:55:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 20431 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 20:55:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 20318 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 20:55:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:55:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kramer.ogre.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 20:54:57 +0000 Received: from loki.ogre.com (homey.ogre.com [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by kramer.ogre.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24KsZQw002203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:54:36 -0800 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 kramer.ogre.com p24KsZQw002203 Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:54:35 -0700 From: Leif Hedstrom <ginapetersen@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ginapetersen@example.net, "'ginapetersen@example.net'" <ginapetersen@example.net>, ginapetersen@example.net Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server 2.1.6-unstable released Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Apache Traffic Server v2.1.6-unstable Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Traffic Server project are pleased to announce the release of Apache Traffic Server v2.1.6. This is a developer release, and might not be 100% stable. However, we encourage Traffic Server users to download and try our developer releases, and file bugs (and/or send patches), to help prepare our next stable release (which will be v3.0). In particular, users of the v2.1.0 to v2.1.5 releases are encouraged to upgrade to this version as soon as possible. This release has a few new features, and many bug fixes, and is immediately available for download at http://trafficserver.apache.org/downloads.html More details about this release is available on this download page. Cheers, -- The Apache Traffic Server community From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Fri Mar 04 22:16:40 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 40833 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 22:16:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 22:16:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 44306 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:16:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 44251 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:16:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 44243 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 22:16:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:16:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:16:33 +0000 Received: (qmail 8261 invoked by uid 507); 4 Mar 2011 22:16:07 -0000 Received: from 83.161.120.155 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from <ginapetersen@example.net>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 83.161.120.155. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(83.161.120.155):. Processed in 0.620632 secs); 04 Mar 2011 22:16:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail3.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 22:16:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1AF1E8C004 for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:16:06 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: ginapetersen@example.net Received: from ucimail3.uci.cu ([83.161.120.155]) by localhost (ucimail3.uci.cu [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zUbXVJBxaCIl; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:16:05 -0500 (CST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (marcosluis-aspire-5251.uci.cu [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708B51E8C002 for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:16:05 -0500 (CST) Subject: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server From: Marcos Ortiz <ginapetersen@example.net> To: "ginapetersen@example.net" <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: UCI Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:17:08 -0430 Message-ID: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regards to all the list. Can you give some links, papers, etc, where is showed the success of the use of Apache Traffic Server? Thanks a lot for your time. -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Centro de Tecnologías de Gestión de Datos (DATEC) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Fri Mar 04 22:39:30 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 28326 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 22:39:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 22:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 1420 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:39:29 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 1384 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:39:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 1375 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 22:39:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:39:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-qy0-f170.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:39:21 +0000 Received: by qyk32 with SMTP id 32so577169qyk.8 for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:39:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=Lef74BtfbCS5VPvVGR1axd5M0VDwsA8Ajs7foqdBnB4=; b=c7f2Qilk3T1Na50adbykwXe3vrdQg7YTlsXFCtlf9COnR9++PQdrFzss4fxMuzOKTd Vd0wHqbo//GNiLVYx5EY6g6V22T39x0Zh9Gy2fWXKXbTepmH7eaZ9UoZ5YBfIkjOJ9G3 t1YGR/hP1ovEW20idXwVemqo/6KSEpyvvKS04= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=iSRLGaQyeIbdJqUO/B4uUuu2/hxcWWHqjPy2yK74oOa8vv7vk1i/38sVeyBIuGbZ0P yrpyshBkDPkzQlomsg0Rqi0IzNDo5KLveLgsuuoGHOirIK9uTLAl27UFievRXDhJzAHU sqddvWoKTlkx2GuDMQv40JfeDRTsTHn35l8cE= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id gw1mr1069941qab.348.1299278340916; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:39:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (pool-74-109-106-202.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q12sm2017588qcu.30.283.161.120.155.38.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:38:59 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server From: Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:38:58 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <ginapetersen@example.net> References: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> To: ginapetersen@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Have you tried installing Apache Traffic Server locally and comparing = how it performs with your current system? Has tratado intstalar Apache Traffic Server para ver como funciona a lo = que se refiere a la velocidad? - Jason On Mar 4, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=E1ticas From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Fri Mar 04 22:42:28 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 28921 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2011 22:42:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2011 22:42:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 7802 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:42:28 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 7760 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2011 22:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 7725 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2011 22:42:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-vx0-f170.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:42:21 +0000 Received: by vxb39 with SMTP id 39so2475295vxb.29 for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:42:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id dd19mr1905491vdb.133.1299278519410; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 14:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:41:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> References: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> <ginapetersen@example.net> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:41:59 -0800 Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server From: Billy Vierra <ginapetersen@example.net> To: ginapetersen@example.net Cc: Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org NetDNA has had it rolled out for some time now without issue. We use it in a non clustered mode and it works great. While I cannot give out direct numbers, we have it on a number of servers, most pushing over 1Gbps. The average load on the boxes are much lower than when we were doing the same thing with Nginx. ---- Billy Vierra Senior System Engineer NetDNA=99 The Science of Acceleration=99 Email: ginapetersen@example.net P: 1.877.5-NETDNA (563-8362) ext 260 F: 980-565-9884 Follow Us Web: http://www.NetDNA.com Blog: http://blog.netdna.com Twitter @NetDNACDN On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net> w= rote: > > Have you tried installing Apache Traffic Server locally and comparing how= it performs with your current system? > > Has tratado intstalar Apache Traffic Server para ver como funciona a lo q= ue se refiere a la velocidad? > > - Jason > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > >> Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=E1ticas > > From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Sat Mar 05 03:17:24 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 17017 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 03:17:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 03:17:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 35590 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:17:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 35015 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:17:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 34878 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 03:16:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:16:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:16:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 10845 invoked by uid 507); 5 Mar 2011 03:16:25 -0000 Received: from 83.161.120.155 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from <ginapetersen@example.net>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 83.161.120.155. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(83.161.120.155):. Processed in 0.629038 secs); 05 Mar 2011 03:16:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail2.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by 0 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 03:16:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBDF3DC009; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:17:52 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: ginapetersen@example.net Received: from ucimail2.uci.cu ([83.161.120.155]) by localhost (ucimail2.uci.cu [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kb+zxkH8iNa6; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:17:48 -0500 (CST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail2.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591293DC007; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:17:48 -0500 (CST) Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server From: Marcos Ortiz <ginapetersen@example.net> To: ginapetersen@example.net Cc: Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net>, Billy Vierra <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> References: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> <ginapetersen@example.net> <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: UCI Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:17:26 -0430 Message-ID: <1299293246.21686.14.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 14:41 -0800, Billy Vierra wrote: > NetDNA has had it rolled out for some time now without issue. We use > it in a non clustered mode and it works great. While I cannot give out > direct numbers, we have it on a number of servers, most pushing over > 1Gbps. The average load on the boxes are much lower than when we were > doing the same thing with Nginx. > ---- > Billy Vierra > Senior System Engineer > NetDNA™ > The Science of Acceleration™ > > Email: ginapetersen@example.net > P: 1.877.5-NETDNA (563-8362) ext 260 > F: 980-565-9884 > > Follow Us > Web: http://www.NetDNA.com > Blog: http://blog.netdna.com > Twitter @NetDNACDN > > > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net> wrote: > > > > Have you tried installing Apache Traffic Server locally and comparing how it performs with your current system? > > > > Has tratado intstalar Apache Traffic Server para ver como funciona a lo que se refiere a la velocidad? > > > > - Jason > > > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > > > >> Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas > > > > A good number of our servers are using Nginx and Varnish, and we have from one of my colleagues that he was using Apache Traffic Server in front of its Apache servers. So, that's the main reason for my question: - Benefits of Apache Traffic Server for heavy load sites - Companies that are powered by Apache Traffic Server - Advanced Apache Traffic Configuration for this kind of sites - and any case of Apache Traffic customization -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Centro de Tecnologías de Gestión de Datos (DATEC) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Sat Mar 05 03:19:50 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 27985 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 03:19:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 03:19:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 39169 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:19:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 39030 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:19:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 38997 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 03:19:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:19:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:19:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 11330 invoked by uid 507); 5 Mar 2011 03:19:16 -0000 Received: from 83.161.120.155 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from <ginapetersen@example.net>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 83.161.120.155. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(83.161.120.155):. Processed in 0.641057 secs); 05 Mar 2011 03:19:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail3.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by 0 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 03:19:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BF21E8C009; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:19:15 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: ginapetersen@example.net Received: from ucimail3.uci.cu ([83.161.120.155]) by localhost (ucimail3.uci.cu [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJOT4vGR9Rkb; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:19:13 -0500 (CST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail3.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE841E8C007; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:19:13 -0500 (CST) Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server From: Marcos Ortiz <ginapetersen@example.net> To: ginapetersen@example.net Cc: Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ginapetersen@example.net> References: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> <ginapetersen@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: UCI Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:20:19 -0430 Message-ID: <1299293419.21686.16.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 17:38 -0500, Jason Giedymin wrote: > Have you tried installing Apache Traffic Server locally and comparing how it performs with your current system? > > Has tratado intstalar Apache Traffic Server para ver como funciona a lo que se refiere a la velocidad? > > - Jason > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > > > Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas > Jason, I'm planning a series of tests with Apache Traffic Server. The Apache Benchmarking(ab) works with it too? Regards -- Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda Software Engineer Centro de Tecnologías de Gestión de Datos (DATEC) Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Sat Mar 05 03:47:00 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 16713 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 03:47:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 03:47:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 89020 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:47:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 88778 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 03:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 88680 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 03:46:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:46:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-qw0-f42.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 03:46:48 +0000 Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so2150026qwd.29 for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:46:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=rOe/cAa2w36VNvms0CvR0Ca72tegpE/GJrIheL1nX9c=; b=pIwR9PR6YC6C2uDrxxKuDqgpQk9mxA+lnCp2flq9sOpk183SzcsELbSPre+ZSvBaX7 foHawl+par2W1Cem2jxU+dmQXo/zcGEYaoAH++gJFFEGSDojI6KPJg7yDjyTiGCUMilV n8oVWq1mfRAZAv4rR378q/hi9FBGSx7XQ+S7g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=bNzzTkyzXsSVeYmJtmjfGchawK272WkiOGX3CjFKvOcFuoS2fH6Aa6/iSifIpuo+C7 3J9BV6SlKCvGqe0m/hVkJ9GEiEU8x6UoMwf7dF8JeI7wNrn0lUkZgymyM+uBAIc9Ork4 mfjWekgGuwlRMmZ+CVWFwv9weHzXV/HrvyM8Q= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id k13mr1191236qcu.36.1299296786058; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (pool-74-109-106-202.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g32sm91367qck.46.283.161.120.155.46.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Mar 2011 19:46:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7-1014518815 From: Jason Giedymin <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <1299293419.21686.16.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:46:22 -0500 Cc: ginapetersen@example.net Message-Id: <ginapetersen@example.net> References: <1299275228.10130.20.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> <ginapetersen@example.net> <1299293419.21686.16.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> To: Marcos Ortiz <ginapetersen@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-7-1014518815 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Should work. I would also keep in mind that a good test be done via real = paths from two machines (try not using loop back). I think Leif had run some tests, and posted the results on his site. Check it out: http://www.ogre.com/node/364 - J On Mar 4, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 17:38 -0500, Jason Giedymin wrote:=20 >> Have you tried installing Apache Traffic Server locally and comparing = how it performs with your current system? >>=20 >> Has tratado intstalar Apache Traffic Server para ver como funciona a = lo que se refiere a la velocidad? >>=20 >> - Jason >>=20 >> On Mar 4, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote: >>=20 >>> Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=E1ticas >>=20 > Jason, I'm planning a series of tests with Apache Traffic Server. The > Apache Benchmarking(ab) works with it too? >=20 > Regards >=20 > --=20 > Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda > Software Engineer > Centro de Tecnolog=EDas de Gesti=F3n de Datos (DATEC) > Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=E1ticas > http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-7-1014518815 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 <html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; = -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; = ">Should work. I would also keep in mind that a good test be done via = real paths from two machines (try not using loop = back).<div><br></div><div>I think Leif had run some tests, and posted = the results on his site.</div><div><br></div><div>Check it out:&nbsp;<a = href=3D"http://www.ogre.com/node/364">http://www.ogre.com/node/364</a></di= v><div><br></div><div><a href=3D"http://www.ogre.com/node/364"></a>- = J<br><div><br><div><div>On Mar 4, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Marcos Ortiz = wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><div>On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 17:38 -0500, Jason Giedymin = wrote: <br><blockquote type=3D"cite">Have you tried installing Apache = Traffic Server locally and comparing how it performs with your current = system?<br></blockquote><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">Has tratado = intstalar Apache Traffic Server para ver como funciona a lo que se = refiere a la velocidad?<br></blockquote><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">- = Jason<br></blockquote><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">On Mar 4, 2011, = at 4:47 PM, Marcos Ortiz wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><blockquote = type=3D"cite">Universidad de las Ciencias = Inform=E1ticas<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote>Jason, I'm planning a series of tests = with Apache Traffic Server. The<br>Apache Benchmarking(ab) works with it = too?<br><br>Regards<br><br>-- <br> Marcos Lu=EDs Ort=EDz Valmaseda<br> = Software Engineer<br> Centro de Tecnolog=EDas de Gesti=F3n de Datos = (DATEC)<br> Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=E1ticas<br> <a = href=3D"http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com">http://uncubanitolinuxero.= blogspot.com</a><br> <a = href=3D"http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186">http://www.linkedin.com= /in/marcosluis2186</a><br><br><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div= ></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-7-1014518815-- From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Sat Mar 05 10:45:33 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 37138 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 10:45:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 10:45:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 18504 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 10:45:32 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 18418 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 10:45:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 18405 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 10:45:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:45:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.brainsware.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:45:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by mail.brainsware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7DF1DE44A for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:45:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: ginapetersen@example.net Received: from mail.brainsware.org ([83.161.120.155]) by localhost (mail.brainsware.org [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVac1jk0390H for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.brainsware.org (mail.brainsware.org [83.161.120.155]) by mail.brainsware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1DF1DE425 for <ginapetersen@example.net>; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:44:59 -0000 (UTC) From: Igor =?utf-8?Q?Gali=C4=87?= <ginapetersen@example.net> To: ginapetersen@example.net Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server Message-ID: <b7a34e5e-07b8-4e82-97a4-d264fcd67682@iris> In-Reply-To: <1299293246.21686.14.camel@marcosluis-Aspire-5251> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.0.0_GA_3077 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/7.0.0_GA_3077) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > So, that's the main reason for my question: > - Benefits of Apache Traffic Server for heavy load sites > - Companies that are powered by Apache Traffic Server > - Advanced Apache Traffic Configuration for this kind of sites > - and any case of Apache Traffic customization One of the companies running ATS, of course, is Yahoo!, for kinds of purposes: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2010/10/yahoo= -mail-beta/ Now to the other questions: I think major benefit of ATS is that it delivers the promised performance out of the box -- there's no need for "advanced" configuration tweaks to get the same benchmark results as everyone else is getting, all you need is the hardware. Once you need to deliver more than 90K QPS, we'll talk :) Finally, to customization: There's Plugins, you can write. Despite the fact that Traffic Server is written in C++, it has a clean C API, which can be used from pretty much anything, i.e.: Python+ctypes (I wish I could find the examples right now..). We're also working on integrating Lua - whether as configuration language or as programming language or both remains to be seen. i > -- > Marcos Lu=C3=ADs Ort=C3=ADz Valmaseda > Software Engineer > Centro de Tecnolog=C3=ADas de Gesti=C3=B3n de Datos (DATEC) > Universidad de las Ciencias Inform=C3=A1ticas > http://uncubanitolinuxero.blogspot.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcosluis2186 i -- Igor Gali=C4=87 Tel: 980-565-9884 Mail: ginapetersen@example.net URL: http://brainsware.org/ From users-returnginapetersen@example.net Sat Mar 05 14:01:16 2011 Return-Path: <users-returnginapetersen@example.net> Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 52233 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2011 14:01:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 14:01:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 51402 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 14:01:16 -0000 Delivered-To: ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 51352 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2011 14:01:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ginapetersen@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ginapetersen@example.net> List-Id: <users.trafficserver.apache.org> Reply-To: ginapetersen@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ginapetersen@example.net Received: (qmail 51343 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2011 14:01:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:01:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ginapetersen@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mx3.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 14:01:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 4373 invoked by uid 507); 5 Mar 2011 14:00:44 -0000 Received: from 83.161.120.155 by ns3.uci.cu (envelope-from <ginapetersen@example.net>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (avp: 83.161.120.155. spamassassin: 3.0.6. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(83.161.120.155):. Processed in 0.626563 secs); 05 Mar 2011 14:00:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucimail4.uci.cu) (83.161.120.155) by 0 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2011 14:00:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6F11324532; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:00:43 -0500 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: ginapetersen@example.net Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu ([83.161.120.155]) by localhost (ucimail4.uci.cu [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hof5rIr2Ax4o; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:00:40 -0500 (CST) Received: from ucimail4.uci.cu (ucimail4.uci.cu [83.161.120.155]) by ucimail4.uci.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6A51324550; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:00:40 -0500 (CST) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 09:00:39 -0500 (CST) From: Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda <ginapetersen@example.net> To: ginapetersen@example.net Cc: ginapetersen@example.net Message-ID: <ginapetersen@example.net> In-Reply-To: <{{EMAIL+PHONE}}> Subject: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.16_GA_2921.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/5.0.16_GA_2921.RHEL5_64) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org OK, thanks a lot Igor. Well, to the tests now. ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Igor Gali=C4=87" <ginapetersen@example.net> Para: ginapetersen@example.net Enviados: S=C3=A1bado, 5 de Marzo 2011 5:44:59 (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected Asunto: Re: Successful stories with Apache Traffic Server > So, that's the main reason for my question: > - Benefits of Apache Traffic Server for heavy load sites > - Companies that are powered by Apache Traffic Server > - Advanced Apache Traffic Configuration for this kind of sites > - and any case of Apache Traffic customization One of the companies running ATS, of course, is Yahoo!, for kinds of purposes: http://developer.yahoo.com/blogs/ydn/posts/2010/10/yahoo= -mail-beta/ Now to the other questions: I think major benefit of ATS is that it delivers the promised performance out of the box -- there's no need for "advanced" configuration tweaks to get the same benchmark results as everyone else is getting, all you need is the hardware. Once you need
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}