From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Mon Mar 10 19:00:45 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 41981 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 19:00:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 19:00:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 80291 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 19:00:40 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 80164 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 19:00:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 80153 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2008 19:00:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:00:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:59:52 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <richardgriffin@example.net>) id 1JYnEK-0007pi-9a for richardgriffin@example.net; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:00:12 -0700 Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:00:12 -0700 (PDT) From: doepain <richardgriffin@example.net> To: richardgriffin@example.net Subject: Two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: richardgriffin@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is it possible (and I am sure that it is) to have two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server, and connected through the ISAPI redirector to IIS running on the local system. If so could you please guide me in the right direction? Thanks. ----- Sr. Systems Engineer Boston, Ma -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Two-separate-instances-of-Tomcat-running-on-a-single-Windows-2003-server.-tp15951920p15951920.html Sent from the Jakarta - General mailing list richardgriffin@example.net. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Mon Mar 10 19:27:15 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 53489 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 19:27:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 19:27:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26406 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 19:27:09 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 26311 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2008 19:27:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 26300 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2008 19:27:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:27:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO n066.sc1.he.tucows.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:26:20 +0000 Received: from sc1-out08.emaildefenseservice.com (83.161.120.155) by n066.sc1.he.tucows.com (83.161.120.155) id 4769F91800A5893B for richardgriffin@example.net; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:26:40 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,cede52800299968e,e8033c90fd47a0ca,richardgriffin@example.net,-,RULES_HIT:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4:6117:7652:7679,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian: 0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) (Authenticated sender: med.thomas) by sc1-out08.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:26:31 +0000 From: Mark Thomas <richardgriffin@example.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakarta General List <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server. References: <richardgriffin@example.net> In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org doepain wrote: > Is it possible (and I am sure that it is) to have two separate instances of > Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server, and connected through the > ISAPI redirector to IIS running on the local system. > > If so could you please guide me in the right direction? The right direction is the Tomcat users list. See http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Thu Mar 13 21:00:22 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 90053 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 21:00:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 21:00:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15935 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2008 21:00:16 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 15807 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2008 21:00:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 15796 invoked by uid 99); 13 Mar 2008 21:00:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:00:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web37513.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:59:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 47335 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Mar 2008 20:59:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=430+5ZLqyeGRnB+4QfztxMX5tdvZqKoazDT2nSbOE2zcDCo4KDnWGKn3t82sSCcORTcUmNYNvn9/TLtG947qg6stosQsublNBTaOVEtII+Kg9hAJfYXtkT8juH8cTVRY7y/MUxYzGTjvFMkjbEp9l51auESH04gpLgQ2iNpMCk0=; X-YMail-OSG: yCulJasVM1nYtUbTwQDum2uq.nn5SqCdYJnt_6KNRAWpHZwKkReMM8Y1eMNpQavCggVa3M_arPU9PZLRKJ5fmwTljDixg2rvHjGCwzxLjaxHS1L6yAw- Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web37513.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:59:45 PDT Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:59:45 -0700 (PDT) From: shanmuk babu <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Two separate instances of Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server. To: Jakarta General List <richardgriffin@example.net> In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Your tomcats need to be listening on different ports, but other than that there's nothing special about this setup. --- doepain <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > Is it possible (and I am sure that it is) to have > two separate instances of > Tomcat running on a single Windows 2003 server, and > connected through the > ISAPI redirector to IIS running on the local system. > > If so could you please guide me in the right > direction? > > Thanks. > > ----- > Sr. Systems Engineer > Boston, Ma > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Two-separate-instances-of-Tomcat-running-on-a-single-Windows-2003-server.-tp15951920p15951920.html > Sent from the Jakarta - General mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > richardgriffin@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: > richardgriffin@example.net > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Tue Mar 25 01:02:44 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 60755 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2008 01:02:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2008 01:02:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 60910 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2008 01:02:39 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 60833 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2008 01:02:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 60822 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2008 01:02:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:02:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:01:56 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c24so1501656rvf.13 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=IQ+JdTmPZksj1+o74m3rqzG890QsKzfFHTMrzCWAQ6I=; b=FNpwyL6HYjq8jKX5ZP1dcQrGAFHS/7e8hFu+dqUf07K8ulQO03tVT0L0cPSMpI5FyKgPyBcF60DSolIltVzkBCvuUozcI+8Uu9OWUfndr6LV9IqsvBJgxReEOcvod5iOxwqfHRG1PPEIvKj6uIg1+Ig8/bYpOC61EATV+Ts5egw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=SXuflwNNs5P/iaqXB7rvV0cVVIOSs1cp0Ur8LUoGt5VQFfkVk0J90hjIcth1olOmUhDV0cjwJ/T6j0C3XiPxkeJwIRDmPxbpLd8oiPExefn8fBGNwFxOfdpB6zGxnhBzybKPLFpdFcMQGO/V/zurbPazsWhv+4OpNCzxVx2zSGQ= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id y1mr2770716rvf.200.1206406927425; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:02:06 +0200 From: "Petar Tahchiev" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net>, "Cactus Developers List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Cactus Release Archives MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_12630_13661271.1206406927413" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_12630_13661271.1206406927413 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi everybody, I am following this tutorial: http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I have uploaded here: http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ and report problems if you find some. If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the tutorial and make "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them. Thank you all. P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have uploaded here: http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/ I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as "official" Cactus site. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. EOOXML objections http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 ------=_Part_12630_13661271.1206406927413-- From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Sat Mar 29 01:26:49 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 84973 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2008 01:26:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2008 01:26:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 5577 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2008 01:26:45 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 5366 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2008 01:26:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 5355 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2008 01:26:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:26:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:25:51 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so602252pye.22 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:26:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=cs/KGWXneoJn8n7mABv7aZq3xOxKKC0Wc6GqJKHaVBU=; b=BCRBDzpN9pSzRGfOoSV5zRRM0owvYhO5b9GYoErL0UEu2x6/I+fppd1nXMCLiRMXw9t/P/n5e9h2DEdn4keNpcfAjnFtQP8IbvLH2E8zZNXVuuvzenNCKT3BFBaV3r0wDoSU9fIiJeOdCckjiJesbUzdHxO2l6SVKUMpphbHcqI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cjFfmX9IiJVNuJ/IXnSBzHI9dnSiTuI3G1zYpdbe2pYFqu0b0RF8f91iWehKaSYRjAklRD772jnEhcJ6JuULIRHceSW3j9I4/SE/zTSyCS2AvtnCxTgyK4rQSfDAcWw0lJjBOi6c+5C7yuJ3czMoxuL9kIVL7hp7wyP/dTztfA8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w20mr8240891qbq.0.1206753970265; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:26:10 +0000 From: sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Cactus Release Archives Cc: "Cactus Developers List" <richardgriffin@example.net> In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I am following this tutorial: > > http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess > > and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I > have uploaded > here: > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ > > and report problems if you find some. Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller... The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in the lib directory. Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions; if possible, they should be updated. The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g. in the META-INF directory) It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following attributes: Built-By: xxxxx Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache Implementation-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT Specification-Title: Jakarta Cactus Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Specification-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_12 (e.g.) X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) There seem to be some problems with SVN file properties; I've fixed most of them in trunk. Did you create the archives from trunk? There are some discrepancies between that and the source archive. > If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the tutorial > and make > "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them. > > Thank you all. > > P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have uploaded > here: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/ > > I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as > "official" Cactus site. > > -- > Regards, Petar! > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > EOOXML objections > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > Public PGP Key at: > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Sat Mar 29 01:44:36 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 91723 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2008 01:44:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2008 01:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 13591 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2008 01:44:32 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 13451 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2008 01:44:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 13439 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2008 01:44:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:44:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:43:49 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so608920pye.22 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:44:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=BlBpARGK5O0uZenPJsCo36/TN86kiXZiZCEBvhCUSnM=; b=kUJfVDdg5YXFnNBZkAuoC42/i1dz0Kj0WpgzOC1/TBdSwxKf95rPz+DMAk0nGx08iUZlUbj1NCa/2823LkgQX1tY2NG4CDlmhVPnMDuzvrFKUX2C3L6msrsBOX9piXwvaCsOEFhUodustW+wMCqQempO9MiejuCFyEeSu7W76FQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uh/YXkZK+77LCXaDGSqG7RS4bUxf8IRb2dMdQ8d3vIBU6QNkVcsT71qDAbNRzd8CzaS1EdabXA79zaezhyCZxFktq4iVHhbftfmqRC2XA8Cc5GjLzQm5uGHJ7JT33CZYaPJ2L/Xj7paoFcnXmzJlXz6hzNKZSF80ahKXGkvXbfo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id p15mr8193575qbq.37.1206755039827; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:43:59 +0000 From: sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Cactus Release Archives Cc: "Cactus Developers List" <richardgriffin@example.net> In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 29/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I am following this tutorial: > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess > > > > and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the archives I > > have uploaded > > here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ > > > > and report problems if you find some. > > > Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are > slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller... > > The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in > the lib directory. > > Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions; > if possible, they should be updated. > > The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g. > in the META-INF directory) > > It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following > attributes: > > Built-By: xxxxx > Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > Implementation-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > Specification-Title: Jakarta Cactus > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > Specification-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_12 (e.g.) > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > There seem to be some problems with SVN file properties; I've fixed > most of them in trunk. > > Did you create the archives from trunk? > There are some discrepancies between that and the source archive. > Just noticed that the pom.xml does not specify the source and target java versions. It should also have inceptionYear Might be an idea to use a property for the version so the individual poms don't have to be updated. The eclipse .classpath file looks a bit odd - it seems to have lots of entries that don't seem to be required. > > > If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the tutorial > > and make > > "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them. > > > > Thank you all. > > > > P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have uploaded > > here: > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/ > > > > I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as > > "official" Cactus site. > > > > -- > > Regards, Petar! > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > > > EOOXML objections > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > > > Public PGP Key at: > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Sat Mar 29 23:49:06 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 41509 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2008 23:49:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2008 23:49:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 61364 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2008 23:49:02 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 61278 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2008 23:49:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 61267 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2008 23:49:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:49:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO po-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:48:08 +0000 Received: by po-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id a23so3474747poh.3 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:48:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=oIXwUxC3Zs4crmw2gM3TC1U57GClOypvQuNOevQFJR4=; b=AedDCiGrGc6FjG2GFQKgojrCsSMD2qCLSJZAhUVD8WKwUWA4dpVuUIb+mDyM0kgmkCAGwykGdnolUtQJkCqr1p1aPRtASowfE63ZRhPlHj7StHUr9PYeMHFem4AVzclPe3zETX3h88K/Xx+02egJLWSiCuq7uI7s2b6EsHR0iLM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DsevAiVjmNmV34yelO7I01F8P7kx3KaCR0hi7WWq3LQWreKPANqjOV8vXb0DnKI+rctgdEtGG+BtMd4yPaYOIz8j4cHgYMp98SLcynnDdAEIFlObof71fouMB1D04S4ClNDGhb1SwzyFnrHAzXeZ3gLicLeYWXueUtafSxOY1N0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b25mr2434968rvf.117.1206834507522; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 01:48:27 +0200 From: "Petar Tahchiev" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Cactus Release Archives Cc: "Cactus Developers List" <richardgriffin@example.net> In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6542_16538926.1206834507505" References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_6542_16538926.1206834507505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Sebb, thanks for the feedback. I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses according to the lib folder. Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the data you pointed. Also the META-INF folder to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. I have also included the 'source' and 'target' versions in the parent pom.xml and also the inceptionYear attribute. Now I think that everything is OK. You can see the new files here: http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/ Tomorrow morning I will cast a release-vote for these archives. Cheers, Petar. On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:43 AM, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > On 29/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I am following this tutorial: > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess > > > > > > and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the > archives I > > > have uploaded > > > here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ > > > > > > and report problems if you find some. > > > > > > Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are > > slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller... > > > > The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in > > the lib directory. > > > > Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions; > > if possible, they should be updated. > > > > The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g. > > in the META-INF directory) > > > > It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following > > attributes: > > > > Built-By: xxxxx > > Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > Implementation-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > > Specification-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > Specification-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_12 (e.g.) > > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > > > There seem to be some problems with SVN file properties; I've fixed > > most of them in trunk. > > > > Did you create the archives from trunk? > > There are some discrepancies between that and the source archive. > > > > Just noticed that the pom.xml does not specify the source and target > java versions. > It should also have inceptionYear > > Might be an idea to use a property for the version so the individual > poms don't have to be updated. > > The eclipse .classpath file looks a bit odd - it seems to have lots of > entries that don't seem to be required. > > > > > > If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the > tutorial > > > and make > > > "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them. > > > > > > Thank you all. > > > > > > P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have > uploaded > > > here: > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/ > > > > > > I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as > > > "official" Cactus site. > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, Petar! > > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > > > > > EOOXML objections > > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > > > > > Public PGP Key at: > > > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net > > -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. EOOXML objections http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 ------=_Part_6542_16538926.1206834507505-- From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Sun Mar 30 02:40:09 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 2065 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2008 02:40:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2008 02:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 24819 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2008 02:40:05 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 24700 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2008 02:40:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 24689 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2008 02:40:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:40:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:22 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so995814wfa.31 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:39:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=p/TvPHt7PrMUvZENYp2v1B+FOMgnJf/0U/B0/Owl5ms=; b=h2VwVeM1nQhYse5ISqaOA5wzgtUYNiAFZbXoRIx4/lMwKts+7XLTBj1x+FlHCgy2p0fcK9CJ/e2VWT6wBs73fzMCu2eSieWI2WQ9B0Sx47/R0wolOIiSKhXGVFV7Q0YR39hxAhJlSCeMt33VIc7jtELBKFg4S2uU4yaGy2/7aLE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DPbu1C3BLWddlwoFtBtBuT7AkYM4PHG63gN1sKSg0Wc52b9sCLwq4JRAkBj7F61cxUI5g1OMsaexuX+zPBuSg/jzX3WjwXR5+l2a0mm+4l55Ak/UQbgN72Oz9GwDbJsb+g8pM/JJT6XJs3MPaQK5IkvhfLr0vOYsjBbw/PA4xv4= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w4mr2850175wfw.220.1206844774256; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:39:34 +0000 From: sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Cactus Release Archives Cc: "Cactus Developers List" <richardgriffin@example.net> In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 29/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > thanks for the feedback. > > I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses according > to the lib folder. There are still several jars in the lib directory which are not mentioned in the licenses/README.txt. README.txt says: Apache ServletAPI - Apache 2.0 However, the MANIFEST in servlet-api-2.5.jar suggests that the owner is Sun, not Apache, and the license may not be AL 2.0. > Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the data you pointed. But the compiler versions are not in cactus.core.framework.uberjar.javaEE.14-1.8.0.jar. Also, the version says source and target = 1.4, yet the code was built (and presumably tested) with Java 1.6. The code should be built and tested with Java 1.4. I just tried "mvn install" with Java 1.4, and a lot of tests failed. The ones I checked failed with: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/ranges/DocumentRange > Also the META-INF folder to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. However, these files need to relate to the contents of the jar or archive - for example, the ones in the cactus jars should only mention Apache, as all the code therein is Apache, as far as I can tell. The N & L files for the archives need to mention the external software that is included. > I have also included the 'source' and 'target' versions in the > parent pom.xml and also the inceptionYear attribute. The inceptionYear should agree with the first Copyright year. The pom includes the lines: <url>scp://richardgriffin@example.net:/www/jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/</url> <tagBase>file:////home/peter/tags/</tagBase> which are unlikely to work for other users. > Now I think that everything is OK. > > You can see the new files here: > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/ Where is the RC tag for the source? There should be an RC tag and a build that is made from the tag. If the vote succeeds, the tag can be copied to the release tag. If not, then a new tag can be made once all the fixes have been applied, and the process repeated. It looks like the final release tag has already been created. If the vote fails, this will have to be deleted and recreated once the fixes have been made. That's not ideal for release tags. > Tomorrow morning I will cast a release-vote for these archives. Sorry, but I don't think they are ready. > > Cheers, Petar. > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:43 AM, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > On 29/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > I am following this tutorial: > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess > > > > > > > > and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the > > archives I > > > > have uploaded > > > > here: > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ > > > > > > > > and report problems if you find some. > > > > > > > > > Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are > > > slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller... > > > > > > The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in > > > the lib directory. > > > > > > Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions; > > > if possible, they should be updated. > > > > > > The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g. > > > in the META-INF directory) > > > > > > It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following > > > attributes: > > > > > > Built-By: xxxxx > > > Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > > Implementation-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > > > Specification-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > > Specification-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > > > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_12 (e.g.) > > > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > > > > > There seem to be some problems with SVN file properties; I've fixed > > > most of them in trunk. > > > > > > Did you create the archives from trunk? > > > There are some discrepancies between that and the source archive. > > > > > > > Just noticed that the pom.xml does not specify the source and target > > java versions. > > It should also have inceptionYear > > > > Might be an idea to use a property for the version so the individual > > poms don't have to be updated. > > > > The eclipse .classpath file looks a bit odd - it seems to have lots of > > entries that don't seem to be required. > > > > > > > > > If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the > > tutorial > > > > and make > > > > "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them. > > > > > > > > Thank you all. > > > > > > > > P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have > > uploaded > > > > here: > > > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/ > > > > > > > > I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as > > > > "official" Cactus site. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, Petar! > > > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > > > > > > > EOOXML objections > > > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > > > > > > > Public PGP Key at: > > > > > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > > > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, Petar! > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > EOOXML objections > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > Public PGP Key at: > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Mon Mar 31 20:55:06 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 23901 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2008 20:55:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2008 20:55:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 59783 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2008 20:55:00 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 59601 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2008 20:54:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 59573 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2008 20:54:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:54:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rn-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:54:05 +0000 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id s28so753001rnb.13 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:54:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=gyBuzYV5Itw/63uSX1R5qfFaJ4f2+6AkayBgK7l3xh8=; b=L+MFSyYt00ylVMPB47doKgVijCsu2SrOfmmLS1EfptjsENhHwnq3G5vxCtovaJxmOxP7Ju2hxJHEjN13Lx1N8uRY9fUNIYMlC/Y6Co7xKCyshAAOozOv+LEgMDSSxfV9z56TgxRc5Tf4YDwxbEb8fok/jVX74A/kc5RBh/t/8qY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=anKHAAAFwlNfR5C2L1Wx6W2uTtoMkKnZkF/Za1LPXNBeUB+YxXtXOMZIbMpd+dWDsLJ+xmIAvvGjumZgFSlZ3NG60+nziYroVxKjf/PCc4HJXsU53ZZ4x6JNLPUu/xID91+7j1Qb2uEhlVWF5vPbq4IKzFhX61IHCDb7TBFV/zI= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id y9mr4324934wfh.43.1206996561013; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:49:20 +0100 From: sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Cactus Release Archives In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 30/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > On 29/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > > > thanks for the feedback. > > > > I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses according > > to the lib folder. > > > There are still several jars in the lib directory which are not > mentioned in the licenses/README.txt. > > README.txt says: Apache ServletAPI - Apache 2.0 > > However, the MANIFEST in servlet-api-2.5.jar suggests that the owner > is Sun, not Apache, and the license may not be AL 2.0. > > > > Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the data you pointed. > > > But the compiler versions are not in > cactus.core.framework.uberjar.javaEE.14-1.8.0.jar. > > Also, the version says source and target = 1.4, yet the code was built > (and presumably tested) with Java 1.6. The code should be built and > tested with Java 1.4. > > I just tried "mvn install" with Java 1.4, and a lot of tests failed. > The ones I checked failed with: > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/ranges/DocumentRange > > > > Also the META-INF folder to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. > > > However, these files need to relate to the contents of the jar or > archive - for example, the ones in the cactus jars should only mention > Apache, as all the code therein is Apache, as far as I can tell. > > The N & L files for the archives need to mention the external software > that is included. > > > > I have also included the 'source' and 'target' versions in the > > parent pom.xml and also the inceptionYear attribute. > > > The inceptionYear should agree with the first Copyright year. > > The pom includes the lines: > > <url>scp://richardgriffin@example.net:/www/jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/</url> > <tagBase>file:////home/peter/tags/</tagBase> > > which are unlikely to work for other users. > > > > Now I think that everything is OK. > > > > You can see the new files here: > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/ > > > Where is the RC tag for the source? > There should be an RC tag and a build that is made from the tag. > If the vote succeeds, the tag can be copied to the release tag. > If not, then a new tag can be made once all the fixes have been > applied, and the process repeated. > > It looks like the final release tag has already been created. > If the vote fails, this will have to be deleted and recreated once the > fixes have been made. > That's not ideal for release tags. > > > > Tomorrow morning I will cast a release-vote for these archives. > > > Sorry, but I don't think they are ready. > Just ran RAT on cactus-trunk - there are a lot of files that don't have the proper AL header. > > > > > Cheers, Petar. > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:43 AM, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > > > On 29/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > > On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > I am following this tutorial: > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess > > > > > > > > > > and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to test the > > > archives I > > > > > have uploaded > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ > > > > > > > > > > and report problems if you find some. > > > > > > > > > > > > Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they are > > > > slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller... > > > > > > > > The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the jars in > > > > the lib directory. > > > > > > > > Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old versions; > > > > if possible, they should be updated. > > > > > > > > The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files (e.g. > > > > in the META-INF directory) > > > > > > > > It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the following > > > > attributes: > > > > > > > > Built-By: xxxxx > > > > Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > > > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > > > Implementation-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > > > > Specification-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > > > Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > > > Specification-Version: 1.8-SNAPSHOT > > > > Build-Jdk: 1.5.0_12 (e.g.) > > > > X-Compile-Source-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > > > X-Compile-Target-JDK: 1.3 (e.g.) > > > > > > > > There seem to be some problems with SVN file properties; I've fixed > > > > most of them in trunk. > > > > > > > > Did you create the archives from trunk? > > > > There are some discrepancies between that and the source archive. > > > > > > > > > > Just noticed that the pom.xml does not specify the source and target > > > java versions. > > > It should also have inceptionYear > > > > > > Might be an idea to use a property for the version so the individual > > > poms don't have to be updated. > > > > > > The eclipse .classpath file looks a bit odd - it seems to have lots of > > > entries that don't seem to be required. > > > > > > > > > > > > If no problems occur, I will continue with the next steps of the > > > tutorial > > > > > and make > > > > > "official" release archives and cast a vote upon them. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you all. > > > > > > > > > > P.S. You can also have a look at the new Cactus web-site I have > > > uploaded > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/ > > > > > > > > > > I am currently doing final test upon it and then I will upload it as > > > > > "official" Cactus site. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Regards, Petar! > > > > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > > > > > > > > > EOOXML objections > > > > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > > > > > > > > > Public PGP Key at: > > > > > > > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > > > > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net > > > For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, Petar! > > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > > > > EOOXML objections > > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections > > > > Public PGP Key at: > > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9 > > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: richardgriffin@example.net From generalrichardgriffin@example.net Mon Mar 31 22:37:49 2008 Return-Path: <generalrichardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 71421 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2008 22:37:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2008 22:37:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 39688 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2008 22:37:47 -0000 Delivered-To: richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 39356 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2008 22:37:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact richardgriffin@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Help: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:richardgriffin@example.net> List-Id: "Jakarta General List" <general.jakarta.apache.org> Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Delivered-To: mailing list richardgriffin@example.net Received: (qmail 39345 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2008 22:37:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:37:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richardgriffin@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:37:02 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so943561wra.13 for <richardgriffin@example.net>; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:37:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=+MiObRfbkiQ0YComG5t3OLbArOiniV+V42i1J3MT1qU=; b=kR2j5C+PPZYEtRUqbVWVq2DYy9YQ5+ogNWXBo9EUZRC2i9h0MV2AyMPj/3Dyc9gV7LvbTUqyvfSM168VWm2Gl1hOSP6i5fbhTgvdGrVtfbmA6aVhO7s1Kg2dMtN2bTHJFs6iEUt4GtKcxxI976d8hVmaafwiC73G+vnq8rtB/R8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hG1+SlTB9MwH2MGDqtCRMcnxSqMxqK7lwvBH3+oj8JmCTRH1C7/iEsfqla1LfN/ZlNf2I8kLJnxpT2066sWLO8FvD9Oby8trgUqWWXCfD0c86fzXep2HPuOfMZTSsEsZPjRnrnLM2Rl94XgjfaA67jlFcbpmdThzrNXAHAABy1M= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id h11mr3181948rvp.158.1207003032210; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <richardgriffin@example.net> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 01:37:12 +0300 From: "Petar Tahchiev" <richardgriffin@example.net> To: "Jakarta General List" <richardgriffin@example.net>, "Cactus Developers List" <richardgriffin@example.net> Subject: Re: Cactus Release Archives In-Reply-To: <richardgriffin@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_22871_1058831.1207003032174" References: <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> <richardgriffin@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_22871_1058831.1207003032174 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline OK, sorry for bringing this so long but this is my first time I am making a release and as you see I am not so confident. I have uploaded the new archives here: http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/ with the following changes: 0) Now everything is built with JDK 1.4 1) The L&N files are included. 2) The MANIFEST.MF is proper (according to me). 3) I have removed the duplicate maven-release-plugin declaration, which used to bring the line: <tagBase>file:////home/peter/tags/</tagBase> I have made the archives from the trunk. I have no RC tag. If the archives are OK, I will cast a vote upon them and if the vote succeeds I will copy the trunk in a tag. The only issue I see now is that we have the DEPENDENCIES file in the META-INF, but since it is not a blocking issue I will leave as it is. (Actually I couldn't find anywhere in the web how to remove this file). Please can you have a look over the artifacts and in case there are any problems, I will be glad to work on fixing them. Thanks a lot. P.S I have the following in my ~/.subversion/config file: *.java = svn:eol-style=native but I don't seem to set the eol-style correctly. Can you tell me where am I wrong? Also I have added the RAT plugin in the master pom so that we can execute the rat plugin. I exclude the scratchpad/, descriptors/ and ANNOUNCEMENT.txt and I don't see any other file with a missing header.... On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:49 PM, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > On 30/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > On 29/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > Hi Sebb, > > > > > > thanks for the feedback. > > > > > > I prefer to keep the bz2 archives. I have improved the licenses > according > > > to the lib folder. > > > > > > There are still several jars in the lib directory which are not > > mentioned in the licenses/README.txt. > > > > README.txt says: Apache ServletAPI - Apache 2.0 > > > > However, the MANIFEST in servlet-api-2.5.jar suggests that the owner > > is Sun, not Apache, and the license may not be AL 2.0. > > > > > > > Also I have made the MANIFEST.MF to include the data you pointed. > > > > > > But the compiler versions are not in > > cactus.core.framework.uberjar.javaEE.14-1.8.0.jar. > > > > Also, the version says source and target = 1.4, yet the code was built > > (and presumably tested) with Java 1.6. The code should be built and > > tested with Java 1.4. > > > > I just tried "mvn install" with Java 1.4, and a lot of tests failed. > > The ones I checked failed with: > > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/ranges/DocumentRange > > > > > > > Also the META-INF folder to include the LICENSE and NOTICE files. > > > > > > However, these files need to relate to the contents of the jar or > > archive - for example, the ones in the cactus jars should only mention > > Apache, as all the code therein is Apache, as far as I can tell. > > > > The N & L files for the archives need to mention the external software > > that is included. > > > > > > > I have also included the 'source' and 'target' versions in the > > > parent pom.xml and also the inceptionYear attribute. > > > > > > The inceptionYear should agree with the first Copyright year. > > > > The pom includes the lines: > > > > <url>scp://richardgriffin@example.net > :/www/jakarta.apache.org/cactus/1.8.0/</url> > > <tagBase>file:////home/peter/tags/</tagBase> > > > > which are unlikely to work for other users. > > > > > > > Now I think that everything is OK. > > > > > > You can see the new files here: > > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/1.8.0/ > > > > > > Where is the RC tag for the source? > > There should be an RC tag and a build that is made from the tag. > > If the vote succeeds, the tag can be copied to the release tag. > > If not, then a new tag can be made once all the fixes have been > > applied, and the process repeated. > > > > It looks like the final release tag has already been created. > > If the vote fails, this will have to be deleted and recreated once the > > fixes have been made. > > That's not ideal for release tags. > > > > > > > Tomorrow morning I will cast a release-vote for these archives. > > > > > > Sorry, but I don't think they are ready. > > > > Just ran RAT on cactus-trunk - there are a lot of files that don't > have the proper AL header. > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Petar. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:43 AM, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On 29/03/2008, sebb <richardgriffin@example.net> wrote: > > > > > On 25/03/2008, Petar Tahchiev <richardgriffin@example.net> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am following this tutorial: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpComponentsCoreReleaseProcess > > > > > > > > > > > > and making it for Cactus. So I want to invite you all to > test the > > > > archives I > > > > > > have uploaded > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/dist/jakarta/cactus/ > > > > > > > > > > > > and report problems if you find some. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not sure it's useful to include the bz2 archives; although they > are > > > > > slightly smaller, the user-base is much smaller... > > > > > > > > > > The licenses/README.txt file does not seem to agree with the > jars in > > > > > the lib directory. > > > > > > > > > > Also, several of the jars in the lib directory are quite old > versions; > > > > > if possible, they should be updated. > > > > > > > > > > The generated cactus jars must contain NOTICE and LICENSE files > (e.g. > > > > > in the META-INF directory) > > > > > > > > > > It would be useful if the cactus jar manifests included the > following > > > > > attributes: > > > > > > > > > > Built-By: xxxxx > > > > > Implementation-Title: Jakarta Cactus > > > > > Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation > > > > > Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache > > >
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}