From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 01:40:11 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 19481 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 01:40:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 01:40:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 20361 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 01:40:16 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 20331 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 01:40:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 20322 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 01:40:16 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:40:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:40:08 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c2so1519977anc for <ohart@example.net>; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:39:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=DJ/BP2vbWg1F58u0BYMhv5O2TD/MBFz6RXrSIwMXGdl7GHocq28hsl6Dh0dCVkxiLeOXV1bKxnyFq8Cm/r4AbQNjPxYGL1Tf7Zn/aKx807qQD3IUo9Qh1MYeBWvQEEwPHK9KVjVr4R81H3cnUvaxoV3a2zBxs8wwjZYk+TgUL9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=j8P0hffw3dkTegbuExTAr4d4DZH7eDHFHuksxRBKvCWOwhlh6pbnTTavRUdBK/FEY/sEOzRjJfRcGB5JXXHp0BfoJiTpVo9s712mtTnuHMUXlUGegJvB6Q8ntQGVVdbUe3gvHBTPXg6HQqMOzAu6AWhZ1+ucHulYUhH1H8w1qo4= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 7mr3139393ank.1175477986240; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 18:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 21:39:46 -0400 From: "Bert Lamb" <ohart@example.net> Sender: ohart@example.net To: ohart@example.net, ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Moving on In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e3b5b241f7e4a230 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org http://fabric3.googlecode.com/svn/README.txt Looks like it is a fork. Which is disappointing. My only hope is that this will help us get back on track to organizing Tuscany and building a community here. -Bert On 3/31/07, Davanum Srinivas <ohart@example.net> wrote: > That's why i said "Let's wait and see. No clue yet." :) > > -- dims > > On 3/31/07, Paul Fremantle <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > So far this is just a lot of speculation - all we have is a project > > name and three people. If Asankha and I happened to set up a > > code.google project I don't think it would be fair to assume we were > > deserting Synapse! > > > > Paul > > > > > > On 3/31/07, Davanum Srinivas <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > > Let's wait and see. No clue yet. Clearly some people value their > > > technical prowess more than their desire to build community. > > > > > > thanks, > > > dims > > > > > > On 3/31/07, Valerio Schiavoni <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > > > Is this a fork of Tuscany ? > > > > > > > > If so, I would be a bit disappointed... > > > > > > > > On 3/31/07, Davanum Srinivas <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > > > > Team, > > > > > > > > > > FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something new. > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/ > > > > > > > > > > Please wish them best of luck. > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > dims > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Davanum Srinivas 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 http://wso2.org/ 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 Oxygen for Web Services Developers > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com > > > > http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 http://wso2.org/ 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 Oxygen for Web Services Developers > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Paul Fremantle > > VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair > > > > http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle > > ohart@example.net > > > > "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 http://wso2.org/ 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 Oxygen for Web Services Developers > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 04:11:19 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 43713 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 04:11:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 04:11:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 39087 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 04:11:26 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 38797 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 04:11:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 38788 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 04:11:24 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:11:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO alnrmhc13.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:11:16 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-71-202-137-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070402041055b1300laprqe>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:10:55 +0000 Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:10:47 -0700 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <ohart@example.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it References: <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [snip] Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: > ant elder wrote: >> I guess everything in contrib is not going to be in the next release >> unless >> something changes. How about also moving bpel, celtix and servicemix to >> contrib? >> > > Makes sense to me. I've not seen any activity in these modules > recently, and they don't seem to build. If people are willing to work > on them again and have them included in the next release, then it > won't be a problem to move them back again. > >> There's a few script containers now - groovy, javascript, ruby, bsf and >> jsr223 - I was planning on focusing just on the jsr223 container and >> hope to >> make it support everything the others do. So we could move all the >> others to >> contrib if no one is going to be working on them, but i don't see any >> problem with having a script language specific container as well as the >> jsr223 one if someone wants to work on one of those. > Under revision r524722 the bpel, celtix, servicemix, ruby, groovy, javascript and bsf modules are now in sca/contrib. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 07:49:02 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 5406 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 07:49:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 07:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 92340 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 07:49:01 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 92233 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 07:49:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 92162 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 07:49:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:49:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 00:48:52 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453CD71403B for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 00:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <21117550.1175500112239.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 00:48:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Simon Laws (JIRA)" <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1184) Extend depth and breath of generated databinding tests In-Reply-To: <2980565.1174321052453.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485956 ] Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1184: ------------------------------------- The tests, as they stand, are now copied into the trunk. They still need work to broaded the databindings that are tested and the types that are used during the tests. > Extend depth and breath of generated databinding tests > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TUSCANY-1184 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1184 > Project: Tuscany > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Java SCA Integration Tests > Affects Versions: Java-SCA-integration > Environment: All supported > Reporter: Simon Laws > Assigned To: Simon Laws > Priority: Minor > > The tests as originally commited provided hard coded suport for a limited number of types in SDO and JAXB bindings. These hard coded tests have been augmented with a common project to store shared schema and a set of template files that can be used to generate the tests themselves. The work now is to fill out the set of types and combinations of bindings tested. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 08:20:33 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 13190 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 08:20:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 08:20:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 27124 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 08:20:40 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 26837 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 08:20:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 26827 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 08:20:39 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:20:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:20:30 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so1566717ugd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:20:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=i3YjUBrBKNEkx+/swt763uloNkVpTXnwVGtzbDC3ba3mdcOloTq/YB6Gr7q9lCmR9jfnwzzyF9b9IzbprGE6VJdUMaHp7js/00MN81iy79pDulLeUYOKkTGz3dPI0ix8aB+kjbiVO4qREvfVJDGmfRHeZf3LdZ2ZL4WRv8rqdhs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=H1BuA6Go3eLzEtoBNbA24+7KMSX38O6yWnXl/WGagCYW/kGAnysW9H+wYnbbWtAnUGyf1Ri1xzvfT9xgMO6WZ2iFaaZdlhET/oTBYM4S8oVIxoJvjFzMCWA+Qlk913s56FurkzxL8SczZW39+vWNVhwR+Ek62LRZ0O2Flw8RI7E= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a11mr7279041buf.1175502006611; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 01:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:20:06 +0100 From: "Simon Laws" <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Merge improved databinding code into trunk In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_75962_32116281.1175502006536" References: <00bf01c7715a$e9c5d400$0400a8c0@rfengt60p> <ohart@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_75962_32116281.1175502006536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 3/29/07, Venkata Krishnan <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > Hi Raymond, > > Once you have done this, I'd like to get started with syncing up the trunk > for complex and many valued properties since this depends on the > databinding > framework to trasform property definitions in SCDLs to JavaObejects. > > - Venkat > > On 3/28/07, Raymond Feng <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'll go ahead to commit the last piece which integrates the databinding > > framework with the latest core if there are no other concerns. > > > > The new picture will be: > > > > kernel/core: will depend on databinding-framework (the dependency would > be > > removed as the core is further decomposed) > > services/databinding/databinding-framework: Databinding SPIs and > built-in > > transformers for XML > > kernel/databinding: Databinding related WirePostProcessors and > Inteceptors > > > > Thanks, > > Raymond > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Raymond Feng" <ohart@example.net> > > To: <ohart@example.net> > > Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 10:38 PM > > Subject: Merge improved databinding code into trunk > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As you might have noticed on the ML, I have improved the databinding > > code > > > in the sca-java-integration branch over time. I would like to merge > the > > > changes back to the trunk and bring up the databinding support again > in > > > the trunk. > > > > > > Here is the summary of the improvements: > > > > > > 1. Minimize the usage of @DataType by agressively introspecting the > java > > > classes > > > > > > 2. Data transformation for business exceptions > > > > > > 3. Add copy() support for JAXB and AXIOM > > > > > > 4. More databindings and transformers such as: > > > * JSON databinding > > > * SDO --> AXIOM using OMDataSource > > > * JavaBean --> XMLStreamReader > > > > > > 5. More unit and integration test cases for better coverage > > > > > > To avoid the disruption, I'll stage them as follows: > > > 1) Add a "databinding-framework" module under > > > "java/sca/services/databinding" to hold the updated code in spi and > > core. > > > 2) Update individual databindings > > > 3) Integrate the databinding pieces with the latest core > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Raymond > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > > > > Hi I'm now in the process of copying the Databindings itest from the integration branch to the trunk. I've copied tests for only a few simple types but it doesn't work yet as there are problems with the axis extension (WorkContexT param missing from some method signatures). Once extension problems are ironed out we can back fill with more complex type testing, transformer tests etc. I don't have much time this week so will move it along as and when I can grab 5 mins. It's not plumbed into the higher level itest pom yet so it shouldn't break anything. Regards Simon ------=_Part_75962_32116281.1175502006536-- From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 10:20:34 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 43935 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 10:20:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 10:20:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 80991 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 10:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 80963 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 10:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 80954 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 10:20:37 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:20:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:20:28 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1210913wxd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:20:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bZCU9yFZ5bMFQJroQsuXpQ4bFNO/H72OkzBX9BbML5epp84GO37NCIXo9iyO1AZYpy9RyB/zYju2nRdx4o1pQ7yUIaaEoB971GGh8DQymoZ16qDpJA2tsgb2B3qVIkJmPMEyEczkVHbRpZDh4N8kg1ovyqFIzxZ8L73OYt7easU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KluHgh1Yuv9QYfNBiPRaKBEBijehpt7/zzAShQqBkZTKbgBNK6zMl9EB9vL87Bz8rnbyTi2P5n2Dqg060vLv4ozOvGfJbN/hoFJx9rQW/BY6YNhYbTEssN9MKLUdYUjI/PlEyApfMH6SUXaFlqow4gUvL7Cosk2lZuXr74uTNLc= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z18mr2918272agz.1175509207446; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:20:07 +0100 From: "Paul Fremantle" <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Moving on In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Looks like it is a fork. Which is disappointing. I'm also disappointed --- I think that resolving arguments and finding technical ways to meet multiple competing needs is one of the strengths of open source. And forking is one of the weaknesses. But its just my 2c worth. Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 11:42:28 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 72928 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 11:42:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 11:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 8053 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 11:42:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 8033 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 11:42:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 8016 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 11:42:33 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:42:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:42:25 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j40so1609386ugd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:42:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ddrRo8+/rKY2EFRpvUQwJWIQkApzTfJUE+K4/QeSnW0fSSK2UnJJ55qz4q4el3sjJKV35FzQMsAIBu7bfCft0vSBBSoMxe05Rowpez+95/QJsnZBe42hUqNetnEaZ4xR2evpP4iK9m3WS6WIpcyyohD85F682dKDRtFWOylW2TQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JFW4nGtFR56TcQjtWA9DD5q7O5gnK00NipufvqmwESg90sEwpRczI5a2gEYiRZOMWU/qD/pWh+Q0biz58rDJ3XO7Way9YtHgP4ytOpQHAdOjIeycdPgEPfPVQi1pesOAgdBCwYDj+QU/peeirVWdXlRSWKbXn+RzYtd/biYgx7k= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l15mr1244572buf.1175514123012; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 04:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:42:02 +0200 From: "Valerio Schiavoni" <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Moving on Cc: ohart@example.net In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/2/07, Bert Lamb <ohart@example.net> wrote: > http://fabric3.googlecode.com/svn/README.txt > > Looks like it is a fork. Which is disappointing. My only hope is > that this will help us get back on track to organizing Tuscany and > building a community here. yep..i asked because i've read that. from that readme however, it seems like they'll work on the federated runtime, and not the whole thing... well..let's see. I'm sure they'll make a great job, and the projects will learn from each other and (hopefully) cooperate. -- http://valerioschiavoni.blogspot.com http://jroller.com/page/vschiavoni --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 12:54:13 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 97267 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 12:54:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 12:54:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 26047 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 12:54:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 26008 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 12:54:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 25999 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 12:54:18 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:54:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 05:54:10 -0700 Received: (qmail 25175 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 12:53:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (83.161.120.155) by smtpauth11.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (83.161.120.155) with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2007 12:53:48 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> References: <ohart@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <ohart@example.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Hogstrom <ohart@example.net> Subject: Re: Moving on Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 08:53:47 -0400 To: ohart@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Best of luck guys. I could see the frustration on the list for a while. I trust your project will be wildly successful and perhaps given distance and time a better relationship will end up being the result for Tuscany and your project. On Mar 30, 2007, at 8:52 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something > new. > http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/ > > Please wish them best of luck. > > thanks, > dims > > -- > Davanum Srinivas 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 http://wso2.org/ 888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4 Oxygen for Web Services > Developers > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 14:24:57 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 35346 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 14:24:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 14:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 3931 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 14:25:02 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 3897 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 14:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 3887 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 14:25:01 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:25:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:24:52 -0700 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04AB714070 for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <25648965.1175523872842.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 07:24:32 -0700 (PDT) From: "Frank Budinsky (JIRA)" <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net Subject: [jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1196) java.lang.ClassCastException org.eclipse.emf.ecore.impl.DynamicEObjectImpl incompatible with commonj.sdo.DataObject In-Reply-To: <28627167.1175100685160.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1196. ------------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Java-SDO-M3 Fixed in revision 524792. > java.lang.ClassCastException org.eclipse.emf.ecore.impl.DynamicEObjectImpl incompatible with commonj.sdo.DataObject > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TUSCANY-1196 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1196 > Project: Tuscany > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Java SDO Implementation > Affects Versions: Java-SDO-M3 > Environment: M3 release candidate 1. Modified version as described by Frank Budinsky: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00754.html > Reporter: Christian Landbo Frederiksen > Fix For: Java-SDO-M3 > > Attachments: TestSDOErronousSchemaReferences.java > > > First reported here: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00758.html > When a schema with an invalid reference to another schema is defined it causes an IllegalArgumentException. If the same helperContext is later used to define another schema and then attempting to create using DataFactory causes a ClassCastException - though nothing is wrong with the second schema (passes define - create fails). > The attached JUnit testcase illustrates the problem -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 16:12:04 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 81726 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 16:12:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 16:12:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 63415 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:12:10 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 63360 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:12:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 63351 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 16:12:09 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:12:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:12:01 -0700 Received: (qmail 82603 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Apr 2007 16:11:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=oaLGTmhvteW6kiV5FB7ys21OOJ/89TwkByN/yELG9oZ6LSn/3/dcrX00w8xTVoVdud/t2PVbONKrz/prZjFdxvYQ0OIUgfakYWa+LOGDaL6QJ1QmkJqSkVHX3XRNAwDUGJG7puVDfQ2oAsbXy2kjZgqWQ1CxEUhqcDLTHwYwqko=; X-YMail-OSG: GYJaZXIVM1k2nOHYPhVoVtHLC6bID7VbSPDrDRwQiLicMvGUk_DbZltumjcwMCc1YS1HlWPBjw-- Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web88302.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:11:40 EDT Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:11:40 -0400 (EDT) From: muhwas <ohart@example.net> Subject: calling tuscany service using spring To: ohart@example.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys, How i can call a tuscany java web service using a simple java client. I mean no CompositeContext compositeContext = CurrentCompositeContext.getContext(); and compositeContext.locateService(service.class, "ServiceClientComponent"); inside client code. thanks, muhwas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 16:34:03 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 92072 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 16:34:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 16:34:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 26094 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:34:08 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 26068 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 26057 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 16:34:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:34:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sccrmhc14.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:33:59 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-71-202-137-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20070402163338014003oc6ae>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:33:38 +0000 Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:33:27 -0700 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <ohart@example.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Moving on References: <ohart@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something new. > http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/ > > Please wish them best of luck. > > thanks, > dims > Best of luck guys. I hope that the two projects can cooperate in the future. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 16:38:40 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 94339 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 16:38:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 16:38:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 45264 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:38:45 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 45222 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:38:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 45213 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 16:38:45 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:38:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:38:37 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1317293wxd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:38:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=k2UIEqlHH8lb5a/AJMV+oFZC3WW/cRqnzg9RyvoWwzXdgw6vx7Es3Pj/9wEfZSFyg7jKrjKRainbe6FMn+lA3RFKZANYqGNBzyETi96Jaw50OmuTKd8oLe1q9iikkmPUqzAIAtabqcgrNT1s5gJxql2KvCwcST7FKWXAOSPeSd8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=E35HYaMed08vMEBu3nnNgZIfojc6eBcWPBJTl5rQCEKYiV3bG5d2b3lbsmRUAbEUt7JTCpfWmG5/IQRY6h73T9PsR+BS6LcR4rgu+y7KsAYV/fXFj1ZN1b1MGMbYrFUGT1aY7HafMpJMaZMNj4MPO5GmSK+sHOweygFu9F6rzws= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n4mr3498348agc.1175531896760; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfengt60p ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 6sm921796nzn.283.161.120.155.38.14; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003601c77545$538f1e30$0400a8c0@rfengt60p> From: "Raymond Feng" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> Subject: Testcase failures in scdl4j Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:38:18 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I'm seeing a few failures in the scdl4j modules: Tests in error: testBuildComposite(org.apache.tuscany.scdl.xml.BuildCompositeXMLTestCase) testWriteComponentType(org.apache.tuscany.scdl.WriteTestCase) testWriteComposite(org.apache.tuscany.scdl.WriteTestCase) testWriteConstrainingType(org.apache.tuscany.scdl.WriteTestCase) One of the stack trace is: javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: Can't transform a Source of type ohart@example.net(TransformerIdentityImpl.java:439) at org.apache.tuscany.scdl.xml.BuildCompositeXMLTestCase.testBuildComposite(BuildCompositeXMLTestCase.java:68) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:64) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:615) at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168) at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134) at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110) at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128) at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113) at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124) at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232) at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227) at org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196) I'm using IBM JDK 5.0 and it seems that the TrAX doesn't support such a transformation. Thanks, Raymond --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 16:42:47 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 96897 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 16:42:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 16:42:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 52679 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:42:52 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 52647 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 16:42:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 52638 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 16:42:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:42:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO alnrmhc13.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:42:44 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-71-202-137-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20070402164223b1300latr6e>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 16:42:23 +0000 Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:42:15 -0700 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <ohart@example.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Deep introspection in JavaInterfaceProcessorRegistryImpl References: <ohart@example.net> In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Venkata Krishnan wrote: > Hi, > > When promoting a component reference to the composite level, the specs > says > that if an interface is specified in the composite reference it must be a > superset of what is specified for the component reference that is being > promoted. To do this I reused the CheckCompatibility method in the > 'WireServiceExtension'. > > But then this checking is done during the phase when a composite is being > loaded and in this phase it seems like the > JavaInterfaceProcessorRegistryImpl does not do a deep introspection of > the > JavaInterface of the component's reference (that is being promoted). > As a > result of this there seems to be no comparison possible. Any ideas on > how I > can get over this ? > > Thanks > > - Venkat > One way to fix this (and a number of other related problems caused by premature) would be to split the loading of SCA metadata in multiple phases: 1. load the assembly model from .composite, .componentType and .constrainingType files 2. resolve referenced application artifacts (implementation classes and service interfaces for example), and introspect them 3. normalize the assembly model, connect includes to their parents, resolve wires, nested composites, check interface compatibility etc. What do you think? would that help? -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 17:11:51 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 9542 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 17:11:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 17:11:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 13193 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:11:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 13155 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:11:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 13146 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 17:11:56 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:11:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bay0-omc2-s33.bay0.hotmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:11:48 -0700 Received: from hotmail.com ([83.161.120.155]) by bay0-omc2-s33.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC833-276-4528); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:11:27 -0700 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:11:27 -0700 Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Received: from 83.161.120.155 by by105fd.bay105.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:11:24 GMT X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] X-Originating-Email: [ohart@example.net] X-Sender: ohart@example.net In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> From: "Meeraj Kunnumpurath" <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net Subject: Re: Moving on Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 17:11:24 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2007 17:11:27.0434 (UTC) FILETIME=[F31042A0:01C77549] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys, Just want to send a quick note to say I have decided to move on. I would like to wish you guys all the best. Thanks Meeraj >From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <ohart@example.net> >Reply-To: ohart@example.net >To: ohart@example.net >Subject: Re: Moving on >Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:33:27 -0700 > >Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>Team, >> >>FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something new. >>http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/ >> >>Please wish them best of luck. >> >>thanks, >>dims >> > >Best of luck guys. I hope that the two projects can cooperate in the >future. > >-- >Jean-Sebastien > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net >For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail is evolving - check out the new Windows Live Mail http://ideas.live.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 17:16:14 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 10922 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 17:16:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 17:16:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 17351 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:16:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 17278 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:16:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 17258 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 17:16:17 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:16:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:16:08 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1331682wxd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:15:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=g8ibPsHsF1SVCLzg2AyTWh649VgEo/ICP2Ehd11lITKvy5Sm5em8z9uY3ga0P96aI7BbMnC6cQF+N5cQQI6agHYjYPWxoDf96+FpDWNyafUld7Og5a/AiGWeoXpo9a60aXz6YjpvjmfuD25cCmxaQ4hO076PIXvWtFTEeaisYBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=K+PVlH00swh4y+yaDJuLTs7Ty7jpYDcEB/fiWdUMZaFZAbw1obnlexcHV80T2hyTEZ62fgkbssD/inZOhyssuJ4HTgKUKB1+fZbWByZpj/VYwr66l+T6RtY6DWJjh3gSVFZSp17FJj4jWfs8S14TaGJKosdihLnfDdBsx4zlFpo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id t20mr3571810agb.1175534147677; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfengt60p ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18sm599736nzo.283.161.120.155.15.45; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <006d01c7754a$9149a1a0$0400a8c0@rfengt60p> From: "Raymond Feng" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> References: <ohart@example.net> Subject: Re: Moving on Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:15:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, It's a pity. Best wishes to you all and good luck in the new project. Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meeraj Kunnumpurath" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: Moving on > Hi guys, > > Just want to send a quick note to say I have decided to move on. I would > like to wish you guys all the best. > > Thanks > Meeraj > > >>From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <ohart@example.net> >>Reply-To: ohart@example.net >>To: ohart@example.net >>Subject: Re: Moving on >>Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 09:33:27 -0700 >> >>Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>Team, >>> >>>FYI, Looks like Jeremy, Jim and Meeraj will be working on something new. >>>http://code.google.com/p/fabric3/ >>> >>>Please wish them best of luck. >>> >>>thanks, >>>dims >>> >> >>Best of luck guys. I hope that the two projects can cooperate in the >>future. >> >>-- >>Jean-Sebastien >> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net >>For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Hotmail is evolving - check out the new Windows Live Mail > http://ideas.live.co.uk > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 17:23:49 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 13408 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 17:23:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 17:23:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 36350 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:23:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 36318 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:23:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 36309 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 17:23:54 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:23:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO e34.co.us.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:23:45 -0700 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l32HNOtS028399 for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:23:24 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l32HNOTG151228 for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:23:24 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l32HNNZ2012029 for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:23:23 -0600 Received: from d03nm690.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm690.boulder.ibm.com [83.161.120.155]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l32HNNcx012004 for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:23:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: <ohart@example.net> To: ohart@example.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 (IBMers involved with EMF code) X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006 From: Paul Golick <ohart@example.net> Message-ID: <ohart@example.net> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 13:23:21 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM690/03/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2HF32 | October 17, 2006) at 04/02/2007 11:23:23, Serialize complete at 04/02/2007 11:23:23 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 005FBFC0852572B1_=" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --=_alternative 005FBFC0852572B1_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Frank, Were you the only IBM employee involved in the contribution of this code that is common to Apache Tuscany and to Eclipse EMF? If not, who were the other IBM employees? If it accurate to categorize the code as "common to Apache Tuscany and to Eclipse EMF"? or would you prefer a different description? This will answer a question for the "enhanced pedigree review" of the Tuscany code so that we can ship SOA Feature Pack Iteration 1. Regards, Paul Golick P. O. Box 12195, Dept. 6HSA (503 D224) 3039 Cornwallis Rd. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2195 office phone: 833-276-4528 cell phone: 833-276-4528 home phone: 833-276-4528 e-mail: ohart@example.net Frank Budinsky <ohart@example.net> 2007-03-22 09:01 AM Please respond to ohart@example.net To ohart@example.net cc Subject Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 Thank goodness, common sense applies :-) Now we can proceed with the release candidate. Thanks, Frank. ohart@example.net wrote on 03/21/2007 05:27:35 PM: > On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes <ohart@example.net> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote: > > > > > I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to > > > Apache > > > to reuse the two EMF files in question. > > > > Thanks for confirming this. > > > > > > > > I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes, > > > provided in > > > an attachment. > > > > > > Jeremy, let me know if this is good enough for you, or if you still > > > want > > > me to remove the Tuscany subclasses and resubmit them. > > > > I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as > > described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want > > something official from IBM (Software Grant). > > I am a director of the ASF. > > Apparently the original copyright holder desires to contribute the > same code to two different places under two different licenses. They > are certainly within their rights to do so. The contribution under > the other license isn't particularly relevant to me. Now, concerning > the contribution which is presumably being made in good faith under > the ASF license to the Tuscany project, I see no ASF wide legal or > policy issue here, which means that the only remaining issue a > technical one, namely whether or not tuscany wishes to accept this > code. > > Now, if anybody has any reason to believe that the assertion of > authorship is false (i.e., if there are Eclipse CVS or SVN logs which > show contributions by others), then the issue is an entirely different > one... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net --=_alternative 005FBFC0852572B1_=-- From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 17:40:50 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 20685 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 17:40:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 17:40:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 62059 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:40:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 62032 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 62022 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 17:40:56 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:40:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:40:48 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1340676wxd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=SFHhuatDd4rlirvIqY7CWPg0TQsXdGf1oEom3eWJ0v3c+rxgT2edDm6WeDGbmjGBtP3JDoYR101d0BJZljPrTaA1+1/1Zhw5YNSsIp9Xb+iI5bi3LWIGZjaQceUZxmzkHCyEeAMOVCjr5Tr29HZ8ugu4R2ktQzNZOIhrGwjEc84= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=SpprHF6nQQNxutP+29bBh4aGur5sKgQk7uCDRRti+SWJSOmb3+yl0Q6jt3LXfhtP8p/Mppc3I4dM2ewigKFi6EBhDz3uTdSZs5hqA/T4OyT2N9ilkCtHModTPR+mHF4Vs/ViUqL5eJuDpn2zljTcojFRLTPSkPBGTUeJeV4IeK0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a9mr3631323agb.1175535627107; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfengt60p ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c12sm27212796nzc.283.161.120.155.40.25; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <008101c7754e$03105790$0400a8c0@rfengt60p> From: "Raymond Feng" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> References: <01cd01c77361$09a32fe0$0400a8c0@rfengt60p> <ohart@example.net> Subject: Re: Using StAX-based loaders for SCDL? was: SCDL4J Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:40:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1. Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:58 PM Subject: Using StAX-based loaders for SCDL? was: SCDL4J > [snip] > Raymond Feng wrote: >> Hi, >> >> FYI: I checked in the first cut of the StAX-based loaders under >> scdl4j/stax. The logic is very similar to the SAX handlers. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> > > Thanks Raymond, your new StAX loaders look good to me! actually better > than the SAX handlers that I had checked in yesterday :) > > I made a few minor changes to bring them to the same level of > functionality as the SAX handlers, and then did a quick comparison > between the two approaches. > > Performance: > Here are some numbers from the SAXPerfTest and StAXPerfTest programs > that I committed today, which load the same composite file using both > techniques. > - SAX handler using the JDK parser (Xerces): 0.395 msec > - SAX handler using the Woodstox parser: 0.260 msec > - StAX reader using the Woodstox parser: 0.258 msec > Memory usage is slightly lower with StAX/Woodstox. > So StAX/Woodstox wins by a very small margin, the bigger performance > gain really comes from using Woodstox instead of the version of Xerces > that comes with the JDK. > > Programming model: > Both approaches are very similar. I think I slightly prefer Raymond's > StAX-based approach as it allows state to be kept in local variables > instead of instance variables shared by multiple event handling methods. > Also, I thought that our core StAX loaders were a little fragmented > before and that probably caused some of their complexity, but Raymond's > new loaders now combines the simplicity of having the parsing logic in a > single class (similar to the SAX handlers that I had contributed) and > the convenience of the StAX pull parsing model. > > The other advantage of the StAX based approach is that it covers reading > and writing XML documents (although it's easy to write code that > produces SAX events to generate a document, as I did in CompositeWriter > for example). > > Dependencies: > The SAX based approach works with just a JRE and nothing else. StAX > requires Woodstox (or another StAX implementation) or Java 6. > > To summarize, the StAX loaders are slightly faster, slightly simpler to > write, but require Woodstox (about 500Kb). I'd like to remove the SAX > handlers that I had contributed in favor of Raymond's new StAX loaders, > but since one of the goals of this SCDL4J package is to make SCA really > pervasive and allow projects to consume SCA metadata with minimum > dependencies, I'd like to make sure that the Woodstox dependency is not > going to be a problem for people. Other similar packages like WSDL4J or > Woden for example only require the JRE... > > So, what do people think about this dependency on a StAX parser like > Woodstox? > > If there's no objections I'll switch to use Raymond's StAX loaders > around the end of the day on Monday... > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net > For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ohart@example.net For additional commands, e-mail: ohart@example.net From tuscanyohart@example.net Mon Apr 02 17:53:54 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanyohart@example.net> Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 25710 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2007 17:53:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Apr 2007 17:53:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 80860 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:54:00 -0000 Delivered-To: ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 80832 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2007 17:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ohart@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:ohart@example.net> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: ohart@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list ohart@example.net Received: (qmail 80823 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2007 17:54:00 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:54:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ohart@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:53:52 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1345250wxd for <ohart@example.net>; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=ItDz6dqQaJvP6QgUMt/5E7xwMCo4SsyhD4Jok1U2QbWDd8hx4mj36fvc6fvxA+KAJarUgQpMuomxmGmB0Aat8r9Ta4vncU80M+CGwj55TgbYu8nU1W7ukpLZgP3Tn7oZSPjTnG1btRH3lNyPqV67Fv8dPvuXxDxcIQ7/sMH6ilM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=A5GP97wgcmZsOXHmpYTzOCIMkAeNdFiF8oFUJk6w9YbYjoisIgmmUYfoCVF1Qi+VFtpFJFTiJWiVy6f5H6wZLkoFlKRRNzzECUgWt19rVwSQLqD1FRaR7VRyYOL/0sAvxNyd/nvbwjQmjkvz0J84ZggJWd0K0NUUeEykhACoch0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id d19mr3630326aga.1175536411239; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfengt60p ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 10sm26494826nzo.283.161.120.155.53.30; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <009901c7754f$d672c360$0400a8c0@rfengt60p> From: "Raymond Feng" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> References: <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> <ohart@example.net> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 10:53:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Here are a few things for consideration: 1) Databinding framework and a set of databinding extensions incuding SDO, JAXB, AXIOM and more 2) A refactored Java Container that handles Java component type 3) A refactored Tuscany Core without the dependency on Java Container 4) Refine the extensibility story for implementation/binding extensions Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <ohart@example.net> To: <ohart@example.net> Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:07 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: >> ant elder wrote: >>> On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <ohart@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master >>>> list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help >>>> decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki >>>> page to document the master list. Once we are done documenting the >>>> list. We can figure out which ones are MUST, which ones are nice to >>>> have, which ones are out of scope. Then we can work backwards to >>>> figure out How tightly or loosely coupled each piece is/should be and >>>> how we could decouple them if necessary using >>>> interfaces/spi/whatever... >>>> >>>> Quote from Bert Lamb: >>>> "I think there should be a voted upon core set of extensions, >>>> bindings, services, samples, whatever that should be part of a >>>> monolithic build." >>>> http://ohart@example.net/msg16062.html >>>> >>>> Quote from Ant Elder: >>>> The specifics of what extensions are included in this release is left >>>> out >>>> of >>>> this vote and can be decided in the release plan discussion. All this >>>> vote >>>> is saying is that all the modules that
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}