From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Wed Sep 01 14:02:36 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 93919 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 14:02:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 14:02:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 75746 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 14:02:36 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 75673 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 14:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 70605 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2010 14:00:35 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Date: 1 Sep 2010 14:00:09 -0000 Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> From: matthewunderwood@example.org To: matthewunderwood@example.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) Dear Lucy Developers, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for . The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting. Thanks, The Apache Incubator PMC Submitting your Report ---------------------- Your report should contain the following: * Your project name * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project or necessarily of its field * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation. * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of * How has the community developed since the last report * How has the project developed since the last report. This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is created from a template. Mentors ------- Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC. Incubator PMC From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Wed Sep 01 14:03:08 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 94071 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2010 14:03:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Sep 2010 14:03:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 76102 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 14:03:08 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 76061 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2010 14:03:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: moderator for matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 71979 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2010 14:00:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Date: 1 Sep 2010 14:00:09 -0000 Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> From: matthewunderwood@example.org To: matthewunderwood@example.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) Dear Lucy Developers, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for . The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review. Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you should submit your report is one week prior to the board meeting. Thanks, The Apache Incubator PMC Submitting your Report ---------------------- Your report should contain the following: * Your project name * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project or necessarily of its field * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation. * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of * How has the community developed since the last report * How has the project developed since the last report. This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is created from a template. Mentors ------- Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC. Incubator PMC From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Fri Sep 03 16:00:39 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 76498 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 21295 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2010 16:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 21226 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2010 16:00:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 21214 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2010 16:00:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:00:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO barracuda01.mpr.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:00:32 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1283529609-7a1d963a0001-2JKy5F Received: from HQMAIL07.mpr.org (hqesnode01.mpr.org [83.161.120.155]) by barracuda01.mpr.org with ESMTP id APH39aDkUR8ecjRj for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:00:09 -0500 (CDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: matthewunderwood@example.org X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from mail.mpr.org ([83.161.120.155]) by HQMAIL07.mpr.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC801.666.9070); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:00:09 -0500 Received: from pkarmanpc ([83.161.120.155]) by mail.mpr.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC801.666.9070); Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:00:09 -0500 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by pkarmanpc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B5E21A336 for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:00:09 -0500 From: Peter Karman <matthewunderwood@example.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matthewunderwood@example.org X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Apache Lucy already being referred to in the community X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Sep 2010 16:00:09.0211 (UTC) FILETIME=[1566BCB0:01CB4B81] X-Barracuda-Connect: hqesnode01.mpr.org[83.161.120.155] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1283529609 X-Barracuda-URL: http://barracuda.mpr.org:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by matthewunderwood@example.org X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: [lucy-dev] Apache Lucy already being referred to in the community http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2010/09/03/open-source-search-engines-and-programming-languages/ The writer overestimates what's available, but still, press. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . matthewunderwood@example.org From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Fri Sep 03 16:19:15 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 83115 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2010 16:19:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2010 16:19:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 43556 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2010 16:19:15 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 43513 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2010 16:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 43505 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2010 16:19:14 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:19:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:18:53 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o83GIT4S031372 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:18:31 -0700 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:18:30 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: "matthewunderwood@example.org" <matthewunderwood@example.org> Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:18:28 -0700 Thread-Topic: [lucy-dev] Apache Lucy already being referred to in the community Thread-Index: ActLgSh3QfD4DjMwTk6ir1wvA4WEdQAAnvdq Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C8A66DE41D6E1ChrisAMattmannjplnasagov_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155] X-Source-Sender: matthewunderwood@example.org X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Apache Lucy already being referred to in the community --_000_C8A66DE41D6E1ChrisAMattmannjplnasagov_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's awesome news, Peter, nice find! Cheers, Chris On 9/3/10 9:00 AM, "Peter Karman" <matthewunderwood@example.org> wrote: http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2010/09/03/open-source-search-engines-and-progra= mming-languages/ The writer overestimates what's available, but still, press. -- Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . matthewunderwood@example.org ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: matthewunderwood@example.org WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --_000_C8A66DE41D6E1ChrisAMattmannjplnasagov_-- From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Tue Sep 07 17:17:19 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 46379 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2010 17:17:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2010 17:17:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 96313 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2010 17:17:19 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 96245 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2010 17:17:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 96237 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2010 17:17:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:17:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:17:13 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <matthewunderwood@example.org>) id 1Ot1mt-0004Xn-Ps for matthewunderwood@example.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:16:51 -0700 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:16:51 -0700 To: matthewunderwood@example.org Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Marvin Humphrey <matthewunderwood@example.org> Subject: [lucy-dev] Grant plan Greets, We need to work out a formal plan for the code import. Primary guidance is located here: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance I asked about examples we might reference on matthewunderwood@example.org a few days ago, but nobody replied (<http://markmail.org/message/xbs24zrhrio76lgl>), so we'll just have to follow the instructions as best we can. I have assembled a list of individuals who have made significant contributions to KinoSearch and thus must participate in the software grant. All of them have been contacted privately and expressed their preliminary approval. I have also been accumulating a list of people who have made small contributions, which while welcome, may not be significant for the purposes of the grant. For these individuals, I think we should have them write to lucy-dev indicating whether they agree with that assessment and whether they think they need to participate formally. This is what I see that mod_fcgid did: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-mod_fcgid.html There are also people in the KinoSearch svn logs who are credited for having identified bugs or provided ideas, but who did not supply patches or whose patches were not incorporated into the code base. I don't think we need to contact these individuals, but we should clarify the status of these commit messages. To track all of these issues, I think we should open a JIRA issue entitled "Software Grant Participants". Another task that needs to be completed before the code drop is the excising of materials which cannot be relicensed. For example, the standalone utility script trunk/devel/bin/dump_index was adapted by Brian Phillips from an original which was published in the Plucene distribution; it will simply not be included in the grant. Lastly, all references to the current GPL/Artistic licensing need to be excised. My current thought is to remove the licensing information but leave the copyright notices with my name in place as sort of a "todo" tag. The result of this process will be a clean tarball that can be unpacked and committed to an "import" directory in one fell swoop. Then we can proceed by through the codebase file by file, removing my copyright, moving other copyright and license notifications to LICENCE and NOTICE, and adding the ASF headers. http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html I am currently reviewing the KinoSearch commit history commit by commit looking for IP issues and assembling an authoritative list of contributors. This is laborious, but it is important work; the audit has yielded one additional name for the software grant participant list (see LUCENE-675, <http://s.apache.org/HTJ>). I think it will take me another week or two to complete my review. Once that's done, I'll branch and tag the KinoSearch repository and prepare the grant tarball and checksum. It would be nice to begin contacting our small contributors now; if one of them decides that they need to participate in the formal grant, we need to know that before we prepare the paperwork. For what it's worth, the possibility exists that I will identify other contributions during the audit that were missed during the initial scan, but I don't think we should wait, as that would hold up the assembly of the grant paperwork (which is supposed to include all names). http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html#notes The alternative is that each party sign its own software grant while everyone references the same contribution (designated by a URL and an MD5 hash over the ZIP file representing the contribution). It is recommended that the software grant form is modified in order to have a line for each party so the completeness of the paperwork can be verified upon receipt. I'm thinking that I should send a private mail to each of the small contributors like the following. Greetings [name of valued contributor], The KinoSearch project is being assimilated by Apache Lucy (<http://incubator.apache.org/lucy>), and we are in the midst of preparing the formal software grant to relicense the code base to the Apache Software Foundation. We need all significant past contributors to KinoSearch to particpate in this grant. So far, we have identified only the contributions below from you: [link to JIRA comment] While valuable to the project, the sum total of them may not be significant for the purposes of copyright. If you agree with that assessment, it is not necessary for you to participate in the formal grant; however, we would like to have a public record of your agreement so that we may use your code freely. Therefore, we would appreciate it if you would send a message to the public mailing list lucy-dev@ with the following text: I agree that I do not consider the sum total of the contributions at [link to JIRA comment] significant for the purposes of the KinoSearch software grant. If you have any questions or concerns, please drop a line to lucy-dev@. Thanks for your past contributions, Marvin Humphrey (I'll expand lucy-dev@ in the actual mails, of course.) Sound good? Alternatively, we could just list everyone in the grant paperwork, no matter how small the patch. But then if it takes a while to contact someone, I'm not sure where that leaves us. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Wed Sep 08 23:09:18 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 61096 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2010 23:09:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2010 23:09:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 32670 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 23:09:18 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 32550 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 23:09:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 32542 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2010 23:09:17 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:09:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of matthewunderwood@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:08:55 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id EDC7C71C1DD; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB70671C13A for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:08:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: matthewunderwood@example.org In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) : The board meeting is scheduled for . The report : for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC : requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow : sufficient time for review. I really wish these Emails had dates in them ... the board meeting is September 15th which means in order to have the Lucy reprt "one week before" it is due "today" I've added a quick stub for Lucy based on understanding of where things are right now, and how we've progressed since the last report, but i havne't "signed off" on it as a member because i'm hoping someone other folks can jump in and fill in the gaps (or correct me if i'm wrong) http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 -Hoss From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Wed Sep 08 23:20:54 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 77349 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2010 23:20:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2010 23:20:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 36438 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 23:20:53 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 36413 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 23:20:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 36405 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2010 23:20:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:20:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:20:47 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <matthewunderwood@example.org>) id 1OtTwH-0006Ew-Vi for matthewunderwood@example.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:20:25 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:20:25 -0700 To: matthewunderwood@example.org Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> <matthewunderwood@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Marvin Humphrey <matthewunderwood@example.org> Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:08:33PM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote: > I've added a quick stub for Lucy based on understanding of where things > are right now, and how we've progressed since the last report, but i > havne't "signed off" on it as a member because i'm hoping someone other > folks can jump in and fill in the gaps (or correct me if i'm wrong) > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 I went to fill in that report just now and found that you had updated it moments before. I deleted a duplicate line and added the following bullet point: * Legal issues regarding usage of Perl C API header files provisionally resolved (LEGAL-79). I'm also about to commit some changes to the Lucy project status page and update it. Thanks for staying on top of things, Hoss. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Wed Sep 08 23:48:21 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 49028 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2010 23:48:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2010 23:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 65035 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 23:48:21 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 64996 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2010 23:48:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 64988 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2010 23:48:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:48:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:48:14 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <matthewunderwood@example.org>) id 1OtUMr-0006GW-HB for matthewunderwood@example.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:47:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:47:53 -0700 To: matthewunderwood@example.org Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> <matthewunderwood@example.org> <matthewunderwood@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Marvin Humphrey <matthewunderwood@example.org> Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:20:25PM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > I'm also about to commit some changes to the Lucy project status page and > update it. Done as r995284. Marvin Humphrey From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Thu Sep 09 00:38:20 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 10774 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 96079 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 96010 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 95898 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2010 00:38:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:38:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:37:56 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o890bWfi023601 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:37:33 -0700 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP02.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:37:32 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: "matthewunderwood@example.org" <matthewunderwood@example.org> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:37:27 -0700 Thread-Topic: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) Thread-Index: ActPqt5RgmO/3CZ3QAygIb5mDDCBCQADE8dA Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C8AD7A571DD96ChrisAMattmannjplnasagov_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap02.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155] X-Source-Sender: matthewunderwood@example.org X-AUTH: Authorized X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) --_000_C8AD7A571DD96ChrisAMattmannjplnasagov_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I added the following to the part about legal-internal: "The results will have an impact on the starting code base for Lucy and ult= imately a significant impact on the podling's momentum. These issues should= be closely watched." And signed off on the report. Thanks Hoss and Marvin for putting this toget= her! Cheers, Chris On 9/8/10 4:08 PM, "Chris Hostetter" <matthewunderwood@example.org> wrote: : The board meeting is scheduled for . The report : for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incuba= tor PMC : requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, t= o allow : sufficient time for review. I really wish these Emails had dates in them ... the board meeting is September 15th which means in order to have the Lucy reprt "one week before" it is due "today" I've added a quick stub for Lucy based on understanding of where things are right now, and how we've progressed since the last report, but i havne't "signed off" on it as a member because i'm hoping someone other folks can jump in and fill in the gaps (or correct me if i'm wrong) http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 -Hoss ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: matthewunderwood@example.org WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ --_000_C8AD7A571DD96ChrisAMattmannjplnasagov_-- From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Thu Sep 09 05:13:37 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 76411 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2010 05:13:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2010 05:13:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 37378 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 05:13:36 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 37315 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 05:13:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 37306 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2010 05:13:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:13:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthewunderwood@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:13:30 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 84A1571C227; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5855871C195 for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:13:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: "matthewunderwood@example.org" <matthewunderwood@example.org> In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) FYI: i also added back the incubation start date from last months report (i noticed that was actually requested for every report) and signed off. : Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:37:27 -0700 : From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <matthewunderwood@example.org> : Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org : To: "matthewunderwood@example.org" <matthewunderwood@example.org> : Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 : (matthewunderwood@example.org) : : I added the following to the part about legal-internal: : : "The results will have an impact on the starting code base for Lucy and ultimately a significant impact on the podling's momentum. These issues should be closely watched." : : And signed off on the report. Thanks Hoss and Marvin for putting this together! : : Cheers, : Chris : : : On 9/8/10 4:08 PM, "Chris Hostetter" <matthewunderwood@example.org> wrote: : : : : : The board meeting is scheduled for . The report : : for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC : : requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow : : sufficient time for review. : : I really wish these Emails had dates in them ... the board meeting is : September 15th which means in order to have the Lucy reprt "one week : before" it is due "today" : : I've added a quick stub for Lucy based on understanding of where things : are right now, and how we've progressed since the last report, but i : havne't "signed off" on it as a member because i'm hoping someone other : folks can jump in and fill in the gaps (or correct me if i'm wrong) : : http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 : : : : : -Hoss : : : : : ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ : Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. : Senior Computer Scientist : NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA : Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 : Email: matthewunderwood@example.org : WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ : ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ : Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department : University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA : ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ : : -Hoss From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Thu Sep 09 09:09:46 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 55481 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2010 09:09:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2010 09:09:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 2226 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 09:09:46 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 2158 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 09:09:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 2124 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2010 09:09:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:09:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:09:36 +0000 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [83.161.120.155]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EAF124 for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 05:09:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([83.161.120.155]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:09:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=80jaC7CdeGxsWqvnArVu30boNNQ=; b=RJ1OMOYgo0cBBnkzant8H56a6AITg6zT7aHli3X+wHb51+8nLCA1DZmkoCNxctMDVqdiC4gId5nKeRxcIlm7M/tfeC7GfI7tSpM358KeB2bf9ijIzlN4cy2JFPZ/9/+CaL0xPwqNHIG71ZLraWoUBWkSaNkmR4PvKllJT2CCbyg= X-Sasl-enc: SDNapkhtgVIJK1xEx8fMrjspW2J3Qq3T6lZ0jZ6W5tCr 1284023356 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (host86-169-31-147.range86-169.btcentralplus.com [83.161.120.155]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E63B65E1E0F for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 05:09:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Upayavira <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: matthewunderwood@example.org In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> <matthewunderwood@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:09:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1284023354.26340.43.camel@urgyen> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Incubator PMC/Board report for September 2010 (matthewunderwood@example.org) On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 16:08 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote: > : The board meeting is scheduled for . The report > : for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC > : requires your report to be submitted one week before the board meeting, to allow > : sufficient time for review. > > I really wish these Emails had dates in them ... the board meeting is > September 15th which means in order to have the Lucy reprt "one week > before" it is due "today" I really wish I would go ahead and fix that. I wrote the script, and haven't adapted it around more recent infrastructure changes. I'll see if I can get it sorted. > I've added a quick stub for Lucy based on understanding of where things > are right now, and how we've progressed since the last report, but i > havne't "signed off" on it as a member because i'm hoping someone other > folks can jump in and fill in the gaps (or correct me if i'm wrong) > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2010 Thanks, I'll go read it. Upayavira From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Sat Sep 11 09:30:26 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 19636 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2010 09:30:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 11 Sep 2010 09:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 55169 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2010 09:30:25 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 55103 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2010 09:30:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 55095 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2010 09:30:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:30:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of matthewunderwood@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:30:19 +0000 Received: by qyk31 with SMTP id 31so227451qyk.6 for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YjxfF5ZuaDQXfHY0DPr/mevHhHEba2t6YFgKJQHPKgc=; b=K/hLUZlnHMD+rmGTRHBPy0H+YRWpwxIYk0H+M2Fj6YC/bNnbvGuVTzVMsRIjtcteXh BYuMFXteF09Tjwsn41dpFpL6Jk743j5CqpoUA6Wxl870qf3UtVCH+MjKivPClSHLef7U skgzzimNy913eiKINIlgP/PLkfV/1cMxAlD38= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=r8+cp0ArLDnOgUzauqTawR9ljrmxK3/z3QeyOFiQtYCydpPOilDg51C+Oe3V7QUA6t lNCtINRL/T09HDFCvHq/ToXltA2OcIVzWNDvw5yVEyYN29C/ewhxE+G0i1UknRrNPb5R 21WEqr9NOyxQXCPi8hcNzYtnGZ0xOvCf12dOc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e28mr1192683qcg.247.1284197398468; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 02:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> From: Simon Willnauer <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: matthewunderwood@example.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Grant plan Hey Marvin, On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Marvin Humphrey <matthewunderwood@example.org> wr= ote: > Greets, > > We need to work out a formal plan for the code import. =C2=A0Primary guid= ance is > located here: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-cl= earance > > I asked about examples we might reference on matthewunderwood@example.org a few = days > ago, but nobody replied (<http://markmail.org/message/xbs24zrhrio76lgl>),= so > we'll just have to follow the instructions as best we can. I guess that our situation is very complicated from a legal point of view and folks might rather be afraid of giving you guidance. It is also above my head to be honest but we are on a good way to sort it out with legal... > > I have assembled a list of individuals who have made significant contribu= tions > to KinoSearch and thus must participate in the software grant. =C2=A0All = of them > have been contacted privately and expressed their preliminary approval. Awesome! > > I have also been accumulating a list of people who have made small > contributions, which while welcome, may not be significant for the purpos= es of > the grant. =C2=A0For these individuals, I think we should have them write= to > lucy-dev indicating whether they agree with that assessment and whether t= hey > think they need to participate formally. =C2=A0This is what I see that mo= d_fcgid > did: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-mod_fcgid.htm= l I really can tell but it seems a good way. I don't really know if thats practical at all but would it make sense to let those people sign their mails with a GPG key or something like that. I mean faking an email address is super easy - I don't think that this has any legal weight, does it? > > There are also people in the KinoSearch svn logs who are credited for hav= ing > identified bugs or provided ideas, but who did not supply patches or whos= e > patches were not incorporated into the code base. =C2=A0I don't think we = need to > contact these individuals, but we should clarify the status of these comm= it > messages. > > To track all of these issues, I think we should open a JIRA issue entitle= d > "Software Grant Participants". +1 - easier to track > > Another task that needs to be completed before the code drop is the excis= ing > of materials which cannot be relicensed. =C2=A0For example, the standalon= e utility > script trunk/devel/bin/dump_index was adapted by Brian Phillips from an > original which was published in the Plucene distribution; it will simply = not > be included in the grant. I guess that is fine though - for stuff like that we have enough knowledge to rewrite. Being on the safe side gets a +1 from me :) Is there more stuff like that which needs to be identified? > > Lastly, all references to the current GPL/Artistic licensing need to be > excised. =C2=A0My current thought is to remove the licensing information = but leave > the copyright notices with my name in place as sort of a "todo" tag. Can you elaborate this a bit more, what is the reason for removing the licensing info and leave a TODO tag? I guess I don't understand this completely. > > The result of this process will be a clean tarball that can be unpacked a= nd > committed to an "import" directory in one fell swoop. =C2=A0Then we can p= roceed by > through the codebase file by file, removing my copyright, moving other > copyright and license notifications to LICENCE and NOTICE, and adding the= ASF > headers. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Makes sense to me. There should be a JIRA issue to and we should really take the time and do that with patches so folks can review and comment... > > I am currently reviewing the KinoSearch commit history commit by commit > looking for IP issues and assembling an authoritative list of contributor= s. > This is laborious, but it is important work; the audit has yielded one > additional name for the software grant participant list (see LUCENE-675, > <http://s.apache.org/HTJ>). =C2=A0I think it will take me another week or= two to > complete my review. =C2=A0Once that's done, I'll branch and tag the KinoS= earch > repository and prepare the grant tarball and checksum. Awesome - seems like we are moving forward! > > It would be nice to begin contacting our small contributors now; if one o= f > them decides that they need to participate in the formal grant, we need t= o > know that before we prepare the paperwork. =C2=A0For what it's worth, the > possibility exists that I will identify other contributions during the au= dit > that were missed during the initial scan, but I don't think we should wai= t, as > that would hold up the assembly of the grant paperwork (which is supposed= to > include all names). > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html#notes > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0The alternative is that each party sign its own software gra= nt while > =C2=A0 =C2=A0everyone references the same contribution (designated by a U= RL and an MD5 > =C2=A0 =C2=A0hash over the ZIP file representing the contribution). It is= recommended > =C2=A0 =C2=A0that the software grant form is modified in order to have a = line for each > =C2=A0 =C2=A0party so the completeness of the paperwork can be verified u= pon receipt. > > I'm thinking that I should send a private mail to each of the small > contributors like the following. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Greetings [name of valued contributor], > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0The KinoSearch project is being assimilated by Apache Lucy > =C2=A0 =C2=A0(<http://incubator.apache.org/lucy>), and we are in the mids= t of preparing > =C2=A0 =C2=A0the formal software grant to relicense the code base to the = Apache > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Software Foundation. =C2=A0We need all significant past cont= ributors to > =C2=A0 =C2=A0KinoSearch to particpate in this grant. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0So far, we have identified only the contributions below from= you: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0[link to JIRA comment] > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0While valuable to the project, the sum total of them may not= be > =C2=A0 =C2=A0significant for the purposes of copyright. =C2=A0If you agre= e with that > =C2=A0 =C2=A0assessment, it is not necessary for you to participate in th= e formal > =C2=A0 =C2=A0grant; however, we would like to have a public record of you= r agreement so > =C2=A0 =C2=A0that we may use your code freely. =C2=A0Therefore, we would = appreciate it if > =C2=A0 =C2=A0you would send a message to the public mailing list lucy-dev= @ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0with the following text: > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0I agree that I do not consider the sum total o= f the contributions at > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0[link to JIRA comment] significant for the pur= poses of the KinoSearch > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0software grant. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0If you have any questions or concerns, please drop a line to= lucy-dev@. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks for your past contributions, > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Marvin Humphrey sounds good to me! go for it! > > (I'll expand lucy-dev@ in the actual mails, of course.) > > Sound good? +1 from my side and thanks for all the hard work! simon > > Alternatively, we could just list everyone in the grant paperwork, no mat= ter > how small the patch. =C2=A0But then if it takes a while to contact someon= e, I'm not > sure where that leaves us. > > Marvin Humphrey > > > From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Sat Sep 11 17:03:05 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 19536 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2010 17:03:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 11 Sep 2010 17:03:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 86010 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2010 17:03:04 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 85946 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2010 17:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 85938 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2010 17:03:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:03:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.jpl.nasa.gov) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:02:59 +0000 Received: from mail.jpl.nasa.gov (altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155]) by smtp.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o8BH2bYA024397 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified FAIL) for <matthewunderwood@example.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:02:37 -0700 Received: from ALTPHYEMBEVSP20.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) by ALTVIREHTSTAP01.RES.AD.JPL ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:02:37 -0700 From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <matthewunderwood@example.org> To: "matthewunderwood@example.org" <matthewunderwood@example.org> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:02:35 -0700 Thread-Topic: [lucy-dev] Grant plan Thread-Index: ActOsIf9tg5B2cbZTLaf9V9EAx3eQADIplg0 Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Source-IP: altvirehtstap01.jpl.nasa.gov [83.161.120.155] X-Source-Sender: matthewunderwood@example.org X-AUTH: Authorized Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Grant plan Hi Marvin, > I asked about examples we might reference on matthewunderwood@example.org a few = days > ago, but nobody replied (<http://markmail.org/message/xbs24zrhrio76lgl>),= so > we'll just have to follow the instructions as best we can. +1 >=20 > I have assembled a list of individuals who have made significant contribu= tions > to KinoSearch and thus must participate in the software grant. All of th= em > have been contacted privately and expressed their preliminary approval. Great. >=20 > I have also been accumulating a list of people who have made small > contributions, which while welcome, may not be significant for the purpos= es of > the grant. For these individuals, I think we should have them write to > lucy-dev indicating whether they agree with that assessment and whether t= hey > think they need to participate formally. This is what I see that mod_fcg= id > did: >=20 > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/httpd-mod_fcgid.html +1 >=20 > There are also people in the KinoSearch svn logs who are credited for hav= ing > identified bugs or provided ideas, but who did not supply patches or whos= e > patches were not incorporated into the code base. I don't think we need = to > contact these individuals, but we should clarify the status of these comm= it > messages. To be honest -- I think that's pushing it and not necessary. We don't need to contact every person that's ever posted a JIRA comment or provided an idea. >=20 > To track all of these issues, I think we should open a JIRA issue entitle= d > "Software Grant Participants". +1, done, here [1]. I also cleaned up JIRA a bit, changing the Lucy URL to [2], and adding components for documentation, the website and a few other things so that we could classify issues better. One thing I did was remove "Core -" in front of all of the comps -- I think it's pretty clear that the= y are core. >=20 > Another task that needs to be completed before the code drop is the excis= ing > of materials which cannot be relicensed. For example, the standalone uti= lity > script trunk/devel/bin/dump_index was adapted by Brian Phillips from an > original which was published in the Plucene distribution; it will simply = not > be included in the grant. Great, so let's just not include it. >=20 > Lastly, all references to the current GPL/Artistic licensing need to be > excised. My current thought is to remove the licensing information but l= eave > the copyright notices with my name in place as sort of a "todo" tag. You can do an SVN import with the GPL license header in the source code and in the license files, it's fine. This should *not* prevent us from doing that. We just can't release software with these tags in matthewunderwood@example.org. So, before making an Incubation release, the tags need to be removed. My recommendation: 1. svn drop as is 2. create JIRA issue (similar to OODT-3 [3]) to fix license headers/etc. 3. work on JIRA issue and resolve it before releasing. >=20 > The result of this process will be a clean tarball that can be unpacked a= nd > committed to an "import" directory in one fell swoop. Then we can procee= d by > through the codebase file by file, removing my copyright, moving other > copyright and license notifications to LICENCE and NOTICE, and adding the= ASF > headers. >=20 > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html -1. Just import as-is, or we'll never get anywhere. Like I said the license stuff can be done post import, with a JIRA issue. >=20 > I am currently reviewing the KinoSearch commit history commit by commit > looking for IP issues and assembling an authoritative list of contributor= s. > This is laborious, but it is important work; the audit has yielded one > additional name for the software grant participant list (see LUCENE-675, > <http://s.apache.org/HTJ>). I think it will take me another week or two = to > complete my review. Once that's done, I'll branch and tag the KinoSearch > repository and prepare the grant tarball and checksum. OK, when you are ready let me know. I think having someone besides you do the import is critical (remember: single point of failure?) :) I'll throw m= y name into the hat to svn import it, since I worked with Joe S. to get it done on OODT. Any other mentors want to do it, just let me know and I'll stand down. >=20 > I'm thinking that I should send a private mail to each of the small > contributors like the following. >=20 > Greetings [name of valued contributor], >=20 > [...] My honest assessment of this step: *overkill*. You know who the significant contributors to Lucy are, I would imagine by now. Just get them to sign the SGA and we're fine. I think going through the tedious process of sending these emails over the fence, then waiting for them to throw one back over will only continue to delay, and the risk of a contributor getting angry over not being part of a= n SGA when her major contribution was a comment on a JIRA issue, or an email RE: design sent to an ML, is little to none. OTOH, if you feel the person has contributed more than a comment or two, or a design email or two, then by all means, include them in the SGA. Cheers, Chris [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCY-122 [2] http://incubator.apache.org/lucy/ [3] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-3 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: matthewunderwood@example.org WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org Sun Sep 12 18:56:29 2010 Return-Path: <lucy-dev-returnmatthewunderwood@example.org> Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 69224 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2010 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 12 Sep 2010 18:56:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 11969 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2010 18:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 11939 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2010 18:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact matthewunderwood@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:matthewunderwood@example.org> List-Id: <lucy-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: matthewunderwood@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list matthewunderwood@example.org Received: (qmail 11931 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2010 18:56:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:56:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:56:23 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <matthewunderwood@example.org>) id 1Ouric-000225-Bx for matthewunderwood@example.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:56:02 -0700 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:56:02 -0700 To: matthewunderwood@example.org Message-ID: <matthewunderwood@example.org> References: <matthewunderwood@example.org> <matthewunderwood@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <matthewunderwood@example.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Marvin Humphrey <matthewunderwood@example.org> Subject: Re: [lucy-dev] Grant plan On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 10:02:35AM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > > There are also people in the KinoSearch svn logs who are credited for having > > identified bugs or provided ideas, but who did not supply patches or whose > > patches were not incorporated into the code base. I don't think we need to > > contact these individuals, but we should clarify the status of these commit > > messages. > > To be honest -- I think that's pushing it and not necessary. We don't need > to contact every person that's ever posted a JIRA comment or provided an > idea. I meant that I would document the commits in question, not that we would contact the individuals. For instance, there's a fellow named Edward Betts who's credited 4 times in the SVN logs. Edward submitted several test cases which exposed low level bugs. However, as hard as he worked on those test cases, they were never integrated into the code base, because the test cases themselves were all high level; the final commits typically include either a test I wrote for the failing lower level component or no matthewunderwood@example.org. I don't think we need to contact Edward; if he doesn't participate in the grant, there are no commits that need to be backed out. However, since I didn't clearly differentiate in the commit messages between when a patch was integrated into the code base (requiring participation in the grant) versus when someone simply reported a bug, I thought it would be worthwhile to enter that information into the public record. I think that in addition to Edward, there are two other
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}