From usershinesstephen@example.com Tue May 13 08:09:12 2008
Return-Path: <usershinesstephen@example.com>
Delivered-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 82068 invoked from network); 13 May 2008 08:09:12 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2008 08:09:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 71724 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 08:09:13 -0000
Delivered-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 71704 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 08:09:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact hinesstephen@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
Reply-To: hinesstephen@example.com
List-Id: <users-de.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 71693 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2008 08:09:12 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 01:09:12 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO plasma.jpberlin.de) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 08:08:18 +0000
Received: from localhost (hefe.heinlein-support.de [83.161.120.155])
	by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32A3F816C
	for <hinesstephen@example.com>; Tue, 13 May 2008 10:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([83.161.120.155])
	by localhost (heli.jpberlin.de [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10030)
	with ESMTP id bZrXiuCJPjjy for <hinesstephen@example.com>;
	Tue, 13 May 2008 10:08:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ws24.comparat.intra (pd95b3918.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [83.161.120.155])
	by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82836F8144
	for <hinesstephen@example.com>; Tue, 13 May 2008 10:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: Manfred Rebentisch <hinesstephen@example.com>
Organization: COMPARAT Software-Entwicklungs.-GmbH
To: hinesstephen@example.com
Subject: [OT] Browser und Proxies: Caching-Kontrolle
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:08:25 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <hinesstephen@example.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hallo,
sicherlich ist diese Maililngliste nicht ganz der richtige Ort für diese 
Frage, aber ich weiß auch noch nicht, wohin mit meiner Frage.

Ich betreibe einen Debian-Etch-Server mit Apache 2 und einem eigenen 
Apache-Modul für Internet-Applications. Alles funzt wunderbar.

Aber nun gibt es Leute (in Amerika, in Deutschland), die haben sich gemeldet, 
weil sie bestimmte Aktualisierungen auf der Website (neue Inhalte), nicht 
gesehen haben, aber wußten, dass sie da sein sollten.

Den deutschen Surfer konnte ich befragen und erfuhr, dass er den MS-IE 6 
benutzte. Ein Refresh mit Strg und dem Aktualisieren-Knopf half nicht. Ich 
ließ mir von ihm den Seitenquelltext geben - und siehe da, die nicht 
sichtbaren Inhalte waren durchaus im Source - aber nachwie vor nicht in 
seinem Browser zu sehen.

Gibt es nun bestimmte Einstellungen beim Client, die das Problem verursachen? 
Der Webserver versendet folgende Meta-Tags:

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache" />
    <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
    <meta http-equiv="expires" content="0" />
    <meta http-equiv="created" content="2008-01-11" />

Kann ich noch durch weitere Einstellungen (HTTP-Header) an diesem Problem 
drehen?

Danke für eine Antwort
Manfred

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Apache HTTP Server Mailing List "users-de" 
      unsubscribe-Anfragen an hinesstephen@example.com
           sonstige Anfragen an hinesstephen@example.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


From usershinesstephen@example.com Tue May 13 11:37:56 2008
Return-Path: <usershinesstephen@example.com>
Delivered-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 33590 invoked from network); 13 May 2008 11:37:56 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2008 11:37:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 7710 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 11:37:57 -0000
Delivered-To: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 7693 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2008 11:37:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact hinesstephen@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:hinesstephen@example.com>
Reply-To: hinesstephen@example.com
List-Id: <users-de.httpd.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list hinesstephen@example.com
Received: (qmail 7682 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2008 11:37:57 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 04:37:57 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO plasma.jpberlin.de) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 May 2008 11:37:02 +0000
Received: from localhost (weizen.heinlein-support.de [83.161.120.155])
	by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588C5FE028
	for <hinesstephen@example.com>; Tue, 13 May 2008 13:37:24 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: hinesstephen@example.com
Received: from plasma.jpberlin.de ([83.161.120.155])
	by localhost (weizen.heinlein-support.de [83.161.120.155]) (amavisd-new, port 10030)
	with ESMTP id kFogWVK8PoMr for <hinesstephen@example.com>;
	Tue, 13 May 2008 13:37:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ws24.comparat.intra (pd95b3918.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [83.161.120.155])
	by plasma.jpberlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D62FE089
	for <hinesstephen@example.com>; Tue, 13 May 2008 13:37:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Manfred Rebentisch <hinesstephen@example.com>
Organization: COMPARAT Software-Entwicklungs.-GmbH
To: hinesstephen@example.com
Subject: Re: [OT] Browser und Proxies: Caching-Kontrolle
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 13:37:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
References: <hinesstephen@example.com>
In-Reply-To: <hinesstephen@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <hinesstephen@example.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


Ich antworte mir mal selbst, weil ich glaube, das Problem gefunden zu haben: 
bei diesem einen Projekt fehlten die HTTP-Header:

  Cache-Control: no-cache, must revalidate
  Pragma: no-cache

die ja zusätlich zu den MetaTags gesetzt sein müssen.

Tschau

Manfred

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Apache HTTP Server Mailing List "users-de" 
      unsubscribe-Anfragen an hinesstephen@example.com
           sonstige Anfragen an hinesstephen@example.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}