From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Mon Jan 01 10:07:10 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 20136 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2007 10:07:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2007 10:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 24488 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2007 10:07:16 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 24459 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2007 10:07:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 24450 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2007 10:07:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:07:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO pyramid-01.kattare.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:07:05 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-ull-(819)597-3486.net24.it [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by pyramid-01.kattare.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l01A6fdt025154; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 02:06:42 -0800 In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> References: <meganmartinez@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <meganmartinez@example.org> Cc: meganmartinez@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Marino <meganmartinez@example.org> Subject: Re: Creating Spec related JIRAs WAS IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 02:06:36 -0800 To: meganmartinez@example.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In the spec group we have a JIRA installation set up. This requires access to the spec lists, which I believe can be obtained by joining the collaboration (Mike, correct me if I'm wrong about how to obtain access). I would prefer we keep the spec-related JIRAs in one place if possible. Jim On Dec 31, 2006, at 1:50 PM, haleh mahbod wrote: > Hi Mike, > > How do we create JIRAs against spec on osoa site? > Should we just create JIRAs in Tuscany using specification category > instead? > > Thank you, > Haleh > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe <meganmartinez@example.org> > Date: Dec 22, 2006 7:00 AM > Subject: Re: IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID > To: meganmartinez@example.org > > Sure, I'm just not sure about the details. At the JIRA site there does > not seem to be an OSOA-related project that I can find. And at the > OSOA site (www.osoa.org), there does not seem to be a away to > submit a JIRA. Needless to say, I have not done this before :-) > > > On 12/22/06, Jim Marino <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: >> >> >> On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: >> >> > I noticed that IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect uses >> > getAllPublicAndProtectedFields to obtain the fields on >> > which to invoke each processor's visitField. However, >> > the C&I spec seems to imply that it should be possible >> > to inject a conversation id (the spec still refers to it as >> > @SessionID but that's another matter) into a private >> > field. >> I've already changed @SessionID in the latest version of the spec. >> The other issue regarding private fields is a bug in the spec - it >> should be protected or public. Could you file a JIRA at the OSOA site >> so we don't loose track of that? >> >> Thanks, >> Jim >> >> > Should IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect be changed >> > or is the spec wrong in its assumption? >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Mon Jan 01 22:57:31 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 38452 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2007 22:57:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2007 22:57:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 32203 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2007 22:57:36 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 32153 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2007 22:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 32143 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2007 22:57:36 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:57:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rwcrmhc14.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:57:25 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20070101225704m1400gsfape>; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:57:04 +0000 Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:57:04 -0800 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: [SDO] Literal value support, especially for anyType/anySimpleType References: <meganmartinez@example.org> In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yang ZHONG wrote: > I'm working on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-451, > which may need us to support literal value. > What's your opinion? > > Although the issue was opened against C++, > it also applies to other programming languages including Java since > it's a > issue of XML and its memory representation. > > Given XSD: > <element name="anySimpleType" type="anyType"/> > and XML: > <anySimpleType>anyType literal value</anySimpleType> > > Since no concrete type info such as int/string and so on to parse out a > memory representation, literal value may need to be stored. > Do you have alternative(s) to keep fidelity? > > Literal value support can benefit performance too. Parsing literal > value for > the memory representation can be deferred until a user accesses the > value. > On the other hand, (weakly) referencing literal value after parsing > can make > saving as XML instant. > Do you agree with the 2-way performance gain? > > > Happy New Year. > Yang, What do you mean by storing the literal value? In the absence of any type info shouldn't the element content just be stored as a string? Thanks, -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Mon Jan 01 23:23:30 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 45949 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2007 23:23:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jan 2007 23:23:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 43301 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2007 23:23:35 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 43273 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jan 2007 23:23:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 43264 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jan 2007 23:23:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:23:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO alnrmhc14.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:23:25 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20070101232304b1400o99qqe>; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 23:23:04 +0000 Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:23:03 -0800 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meganmartinez@example.org CC: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: Creating Spec related JIRAs WAS IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID References: <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jim Marino wrote: > In the spec group we have a JIRA installation set up. This requires > access to the spec lists, which I believe can be obtained by joining > the collaboration (Mike, correct me if I'm wrong about how to obtain > access). I would prefer we keep the spec-related JIRAs in one place if > possible. > > Jim > > On Dec 31, 2006, at 1:50 PM, haleh mahbod wrote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >> How do we create JIRAs against spec on osoa site? >> Should we just create JIRAs in Tuscany using specification category >> instead? >> >> Thank you, >> Haleh >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Ignacio Silva-Lepe <meganmartinez@example.org> >> Date: Dec 22, 2006 7:00 AM >> Subject: Re: IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID >> To: meganmartinez@example.org >> >> Sure, I'm just not sure about the details. At the JIRA site there does >> not seem to be an OSOA-related project that I can find. And at the >> OSOA site (www.osoa.org), there does not seem to be a away to >> submit a JIRA. Needless to say, I have not done this before :-) >> >> >> On 12/22/06, Jim Marino <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Dec 20, 2006, at 2:04 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote: >>> >>> > I noticed that IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect uses >>> > getAllPublicAndProtectedFields to obtain the fields on >>> > which to invoke each processor's visitField. However, >>> > the C&I spec seems to imply that it should be possible >>> > to inject a conversation id (the spec still refers to it as >>> > @SessionID but that's another matter) into a private >>> > field. >>> I've already changed @SessionID in the latest version of the spec. >>> The other issue regarding private fields is a bug in the spec - it >>> should be protected or public. Could you file a JIRA at the OSOA site >>> so we don't loose track of that? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jim >>> >>> > Should IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect be changed >>> > or is the spec wrong in its assumption? >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org >>> >>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > What we've done so far is: - Create a JIRA issue in the Tuscany JIRA / Specification category - Assign it to a member of the OSOA collaboration to drive its resolution with the OSOA spec group - Record the resolution in the Tuscany JIRA issue This allows us to track the spec issues that Tuscany cares about in our public JIRA system, even before OSOA accepts them as actual spec issues, associate the issues with the other impacted Tuscany components and issue categories, and to raise them to the OSOA folks just point them to the public JIRA issue link. What's important here is that all members of the Tuscany community have access to all the issues created by the Tuscany project. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 00:14:06 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 55290 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 00:14:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 00:14:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 94826 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 00:14:10 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 94795 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 00:14:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 94785 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 00:14:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:14:07 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i23so1862171wra for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:12:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=YiXFc8reQOcEkxWKhW699YOdVginWw3mzNn79fOK3EGZfwUI+P5ASHQeUvt8YwPDihWQWrMLK3w0/w7ShMSeSOHI4DCRpvXMafzKgfMuq8Mf/o/AryzbWIat5haOC3IsYrWCPCINvZU4UzecAODMFOFgrSEOplEpwJFv22MRia8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q6mr14036723agb.1167696760010; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 16:12:39 -0800 From: "Yang ZHONG" <meganmartinez@example.org> To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: [SDO] Literal value support, especially for anyType/anySimpleType In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_114472_11882334.1167696759877" References: <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_114472_11882334.1167696759877 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 451 has illustrated the element content isn't stored. On 1/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: > > Yang ZHONG wrote: > > I'm working on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-451, > > which may need us to support literal value. > > What's your opinion? > > > > Although the issue was opened against C++, > > it also applies to other programming languages including Java since > > it's a > > issue of XML and its memory representation. > > > > Given XSD: > > <element name="anySimpleType" type="anyType"/> > > and XML: > > <anySimpleType>anyType literal value</anySimpleType> > > > > Since no concrete type info such as int/string and so on to parse out a > > memory representation, literal value may need to be stored. > > Do you have alternative(s) to keep fidelity? > > > > Literal value support can benefit performance too. Parsing literal > > value for > > the memory representation can be deferred until a user accesses the > > value. > > On the other hand, (weakly) referencing literal value after parsing > > can make > > saving as XML instant. > > Do you agree with the 2-way performance gain? > > > > > > Happy New Year. > > > Yang, > > What do you mean by storing the literal value? > > In the absence of any type info shouldn't the element content just be > stored as a string? > > Thanks, > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > -- Yang ZHONG ------=_Part_114472_11882334.1167696759877-- From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 00:20:53 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 56152 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 00:20:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 00:20:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3683 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 00:20:58 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 3651 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 00:20:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 3642 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 00:20:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO alnrmhc11.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:20:55 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20070102001950b1100l9soee>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 00:19:50 +0000 Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 16:19:49 -0800 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: [C++] ODBC and accessing Generated Keys References: <meganmartinez@example.org> In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Luciano Resende wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to work with Adriano Crestani in a C++ version of DAS and we > are trying to figure out how to get access to the generated keys after > the > execution of a prepared statement. Would you guys, the C++ experts, be > able > to give us some pointers/references or examples ? > Luciano, I'll be happy to help but I'll need a little more context :) generated keys? a prepared statement? hmm what about starting with an overview of what you're trying to do? which database? version? operating system? what kind of examples are you looking for? Thanks -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 02:40:14 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 81210 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 02:40:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 02:40:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19181 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 02:40:19 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 19146 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 02:40:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 19137 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 02:40:19 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:40:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:40:09 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o63so6400000nfa for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:39:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=i5ns5BLR4AB1zr0B7xhzgHy9sXYhUrGxS7bvjXjNO9JRSy1Verf+2AxjtMMWdduNbqvPS8i7OsV1q/ZL6XtPfYRNrbAekRlFhqhMGiDJKc3T/OqsGJ4+XyoGnXnvKhg8Et75rR+y9s0PxBWPnZSoR8ojkd6wbRrpmoff7Tqe/Rk= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u20mr4528212hue.1167705588686; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 18:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:39:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:39:48 -0400 From: "Adriano Crestani" <meganmartinez@example.org> To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: [C++] ODBC and accessing Generated Keys In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_160684_720868.1167705588395" References: <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_160684_720868.1167705588395 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We are trying to get the auto-gererated keys after the invocation of the SQLPrepare function of ODBC API. For example, the SQLPrepare is called with an insertion statement "INSERT INTO table1 values(?, ?, ?)". The odbc must send this statement to the DBMS, the DBMS compile it and waits for the parameters and its execution. However there are some DBMSs that auto-generates the primary keys and is capable to retrieve the auto-generated PKs right after the statement compilation and before its execution. It's exactly what we're trying to do, to retrieve the auto-generated PKs before the statement execution. I wonder if it has something to do with the IPD(Implementation Parameter Descriptor) that I found in ODBC API: SQL_ATTR_AUTO_IPD. Adriano Crestani On 1/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: > > Luciano Resende wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm trying to work with Adriano Crestani in a C++ version of DAS and > we > > are trying to figure out how to get access to the generated keys after > > the > > execution of a prepared statement. Would you guys, the C++ experts, be > > able > > to give us some pointers/references or examples ? > > > > Luciano, > > I'll be happy to help but I'll need a little more context :) generated > keys? a prepared statement? hmm what about starting with an overview of > what you're trying to do? which database? version? operating system? > what kind of examples are you looking for? > > Thanks > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > ------=_Part_160684_720868.1167705588395-- From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 05:06:44 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 94388 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 05:06:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 05:06:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 77696 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 05:06:49 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 77669 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 05:06:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 77660 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 05:06:49 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:06:49 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sccrmhc14.comcast.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:06:39 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[83.161.120.155]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <20070102050617014005d3v6e>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:06:18 +0000 Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:06:17 -0800 From: Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Tuscany/Java Doxygen documentation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org To help understand the structure of the Tuscany/Java runtime code I have used the Doxygen tool to generate documentation from the code. This is the same tool we're using for the Tuscany/C++ documentation. It works for Java as well. I have put the generated HTML documentation there: http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/doxygen-java/. It is richer than Javadoc with useful class hierarchy diagrams, collaboration diagrams and links to the source code. My Doxygen config file is there: http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/doxygen-java/Doxyfile in case other people want to try it out or generate the documentation with different settings. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 09:33:18 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 50903 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 09:33:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 09:33:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 64509 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 09:33:23 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 64484 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 09:33:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 64475 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 09:33:23 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 01:33:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO pyramid-01.kattare.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 01:33:12 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-ull-(819)597-3486.net24.it [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by pyramid-01.kattare.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l029Wlj7013258; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:32:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> References: <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <meganmartinez@example.org> Cc: meganmartinez@example.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Marino <meganmartinez@example.org> Subject: Re: Creating Spec related JIRAs WAS IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect and @ConversationID Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:32:44 -0800 To: meganmartinez@example.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > What we've done so far is: > - Create a JIRA issue in the Tuscany JIRA / Specification category > - Assign it to a member of the OSOA collaboration to drive its > resolution with the OSOA spec group > - Record the resolution in the Tuscany JIRA issue > > This allows us to track the spec issues that Tuscany cares about in > our public JIRA system, even before OSOA accepts them as actual > spec issues, associate the issues with the other impacted Tuscany > components and issue categories, and to raise them to the OSOA > folks just point them to the public JIRA issue link. > > What's important here is that all members of the Tuscany community > have access to all the issues created by the Tuscany project. > That's fine. I just want to make sure these are captured in the spec JIRA system and it is treated as the system of record (otherwise the issues will get lost). Ignacio, can you do this in the collaboration? I realize it would be easier for me to just do it but I think we need other people driving these issues into the spec group as well. Jim > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 11:49:02 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 78341 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 11:48:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 11:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 83702 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 11:49:04 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 83658 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 11:49:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 83649 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 11:49:04 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:49:04 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:48:54 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o63so6533740nfa for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:48:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nhOZYd4TYSokclD1ub+lCbGd1m7SKyrfmGH974tKLPr+PoBv5yw9nIEQRGlcV8aAW5SPLeTNWdfjsHTiuOao3aWi4h3cZ8IqkEf3JZ3I1PvQYFukLxyoJqlKX4u2xJ73qV3xB2yz+tAkAdlRX17/ay3ihDxhDzavBHB6poQa5p8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id i16mr11711554nfg.1167738513428; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 03:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 03:48:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:48:33 +0000 From: "ant elder" <meganmartinez@example.org> To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: How to Build a User Community MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_153565_12151499.1167738513012" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_153565_12151499.1167738513012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline An excellent blog post on how to build user communities, including 6 tips we could try doing in Tuscany: http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/12/how_to_build_a_.html ...ant (thanks Paul for the link) ------=_Part_153565_12151499.1167738513012-- From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 13:01:47 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 92470 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 13:01:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 13:01:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 49873 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 13:01:43 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 49845 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 13:01:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 49836 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 13:01:43 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO pyramid-01.kattare.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:01:40 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-ull-9-208.41-151.net24.it [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by pyramid-01.kattare.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l02D0u3U025196 for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:00:57 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <meganmartinez@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: meganmartinez@example.org From: Jim Marino <meganmartinez@example.org> Subject: removal of eager init and cdi samples Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:00:53 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org All, As part of the eager initialization and spec-related refactoring, I want to remove the eager init and cdi samples as they really don't demonstrate very much and other samples cover those capabilities. Unless there are any objections, I will do this over the next couple of days. Jim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 13:43:36 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 3252 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 13:43:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 13:43:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 94560 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 13:43:41 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 94534 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 13:43:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 94525 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 13:43:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:43:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:43:32 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o63so6557683nfa for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:36:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=I5JDLt153d/qpJjSC9RysbZ52JrKfgN3Vhf/SACK2hqMM8VIwuddY7fXeQQ1ksP5as52MUbH+oyBmfF9OsRd+Xqe9gqYFeO6pRrUFxcIcSt9/D/b9fMYvN53Z2SiyHBqfcPGZU3GN+ZVO6xRR3KVsW2T+oIrU3kpaeZEU9d9zfU= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z16mr1136667bud.1167744963990; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:36:03 +0000 From: "Simon Laws" <meganmartinez@example.org> To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: [C++] ODBC and accessing Generated Keys In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_133344_20192276.1167744963937" References: <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_133344_20192276.1167744963937 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 1/2/07, Adriano Crestani <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: > > We are trying to get the auto-gererated keys after the invocation of the > SQLPrepare function of ODBC API. For example, the SQLPrepare is called > with > an insertion statement "INSERT INTO table1 values(?, ?, ?)". The odbc must > > send this statement to the DBMS, the DBMS compile it and waits for the > parameters and its execution. > > However there are some DBMSs that auto-generates the primary keys and is > capable to retrieve the auto-generated PKs right after the statement > compilation and before its execution. It's exactly what we're trying to > do, > to retrieve the auto-generated PKs before the statement execution. > > I wonder if it has something to do with the IPD(Implementation Parameter > Descriptor) that I found in ODBC API: SQL_ATTR_AUTO_IPD. > > Adriano Crestani > > On 1/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: > > > > Luciano Resende wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I'm trying to work with Adriano Crestani in a C++ version of DAS and > > we > > > are trying to figure out how to get access to the generated keys after > > > the > > > execution of a prepared statement. Would you guys, the C++ experts, be > > > able > > > to give us some pointers/references or examples ? > > > > > > > Luciano, > > > > I'll be happy to help but I'll need a little more context :) generated > > keys? a prepared statement? hmm what about starting with an overview of > > what you're trying to do? which database? version? operating system? > > what kind of examples are you looking for? > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > > > > > Hi Adriano I have to admit that I'm not an ODBC expert but there are a couple of things that I don't understand in your question. > We are trying to get the auto-generated keys after the invocation of the SQLPrepare function of ODBC API. 1/ By "auto-gererated keys" do you mean a) Manually defined columns which auto increment or otherwise generate an automatic key b) Magic DBMS columns that uniquely identify a row (and are likely to be specific to the DBMS) I'm assuming you are doing 1a) 2/ By "trying to get the auto-gererated keys after the invocation of the SQLPrepare" do you mean a) You are trying to get at the column meta data b) You are trying to get at the key values I assuming 2a) here as I don't understand why you would be trying to get the key value before the execute. Maybe you can provide some more detail. Given 1a) then retrieving the meta data for the column (2a) should not be any different than with any other column. I took a quick look at ODBC API: SQL_ATTR_AUTO_IPD and, despite the usual paucity of ODBC documentation, this does seem to be to do with populating the IPD with column meta data automatically. It is optional though so your driver might not support it. If you can't get the meta data through the prepared statement then you would have to use another approach, for example, you might have to resort to the catalog. Anyhow, the best I can suggest at the moment it that you try it and see what happens. As Jean-Sebastien suggested if you provide us with a little more info, for example, a sample table description and some details about what you are trying to achieve we may be able to help a little more. Regards Simon ------=_Part_133344_20192276.1167744963937-- From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 14:48:22 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 22871 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 14:48:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 14:48:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 80540 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 14:48:25 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 80496 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 14:48:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 80460 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 14:48:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 06:48:24 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70977142DF for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 06:47:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <13214900.1167749247681.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 06:47:27 -0800 (PST) From: "Fuhwei Lwo (JIRA)" <meganmartinez@example.org> To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: [jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1018) Unused data files for testing should be removed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Unused data files for testing should be removed ----------------------------------------------- Key: TUSCANY-1018 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1018 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SDO Implementation Affects Versions: Java-M3 Reporter: Fuhwei Lwo Priority: Minor Fix For: Java-M3 Statically generated Java files for testing under java/sdo/impl/src/test/java/com/example/simple were codegened by using the old code generator and no longer used by any test cases. They should be removed to avoid confusion. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 15:11:59 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 29455 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 15:11:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 15:11:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8652 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 15:12:03 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 8623 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 15:12:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 8614 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 15:12:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO k2smtpout02-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:12:00 -0800 Received: (qmail 27209 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 15:10:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clyde.boynes.com) (83.161.120.155) by k2smtpout02-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (83.161.120.155) with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2007 15:10:32 -0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-209-233-18-245.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [83.161.120.155]) by clyde.boynes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9644777815E for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:10:35 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> References: <meganmartinez@example.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <meganmartinez@example.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jeremy Boynes <meganmartinez@example.org> Subject: Re: removal of eager init and cdi samples Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:10:34 -0800 To: meganmartinez@example.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Jan 2, 2007, at 5:00 AM, Jim Marino wrote: > All, > > As part of the eager initialization and spec-related refactoring, I > want to remove the eager init and cdi samples as they really don't > demonstrate very much and other samples cover those capabilities. > Unless there are any objections, I will do this over the next > couple of days. > > Jim > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 15:15:15 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 30259 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 15:15:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 15:15:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 10252 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 15:15:20 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 10087 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 15:15:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 10078 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 15:15:19 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:15:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of meganmartinez@example.org designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:15:10 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o63so6579266nfa for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:13:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RA+3WdKXxZB0js5r76G6WOgGmWnTVm8c/ghxxLGc/7FbEkLQub40dtw8W3K5wpM/hVRPiGRY/eK9JUoGlgibxqETXE2Ahb7jXa0WV4V3KYj+cLNMgtkii7CiCmn1bOLmauzhO/Z/fbxWTaJB3/n45cNC8hh8BJPhbMZcU7E7ZCs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u15mr2018193bue.1167750782301; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:13:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 07:13:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:13:01 +0000 From: "Simon Laws" <meganmartinez@example.org> To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Re: [SDO] Literal value support, especially for anyType/anySimpleType In-Reply-To: <meganmartinez@example.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_134945_17188228.1167750781719" References: <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> <meganmartinez@example.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_134945_17188228.1167750781719 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 1/2/07, Yang ZHONG <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: > > 451 has illustrated the element content isn't stored. > > On 1/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <meganmartinez@example.org> wrote: > > > > Yang ZHONG wrote: > > > I'm working on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-451, > > > which may need us to support literal value. > > > What's your opinion? > > > > > > Although the issue was opened against C++, > > > it also applies to other programming languages including Java since > > > it's a > > > issue of XML and its memory representation. > > > > > > Given XSD: > > > <element name="anySimpleType" type="anyType"/> > > > and XML: > > > <anySimpleType>anyType literal value</anySimpleType> > > > > > > Since no concrete type info such as int/string and so on to parse out > a > > > memory representation, literal value may need to be stored. > > > Do you have alternative(s) to keep fidelity? > > > > > > Literal value support can benefit performance too. Parsing literal > > > value for > > > the memory representation can be deferred until a user accesses the > > > value. > > > On the other hand, (weakly) referencing literal value after parsing > > > can make > > > saving as XML instant. > > > Do you agree with the 2-way performance gain? > > > > > > > > > Happy New Year. > > > > > Yang, > > > > What do you mean by storing the literal value? > > > > In the absence of any type info shouldn't the element content just be > > stored as a string? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: meganmartinez@example.org > > > > > > > -- > > Yang ZHONG > > Hi Yang 451 was logged as a result of running the interop schema ( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/interop/src/main/resources/interop50-in.xml). AFAIK this is still an issue but I can't check because my laptop is messed up (I'm trying to fix it now:-). When I ran the test as described the result was that whatever data appeared on the input was not reflected on the output. I don't know if this is because it's not actually stored internally in SDO or because it's not written out when the time comes to recreate the XML from the SDO. I don't know off the top of my head how SDO deals with anyType. Looking at the schema parser code (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sdo/runtime/core/src/commonj/sdo/SDOSchemaSAX2Parser.cpp ) it doesn't seem to take any special notice of "anyType". I may of course be looking in the wrong place. I would assume it would have to do something similar to the way that it handles "any" elements, i.e.open content. The difference is that you already have a property name in the element that is defined as being of "anyType". So you would have to generate a type for this property with open content and assume that it is also mixed to handle the case that either simple type, complex type or both types of data have to be represented within this property. To move this along a bit can you could take a look and see if there is any of this kind of function in the implementation as it stands. Regards Simon ------=_Part_134945_17188228.1167750781719-- From tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org Tue Jan 02 15:31:11 2007 Return-Path: <tuscanymeganmartinez@example.org> Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 34496 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2007 15:31:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jan 2007 15:31:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 24311 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 15:31:15 -0000 Delivered-To: meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 24268 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2007 15:31:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact meganmartinez@example.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Post: <mailto:meganmartinez@example.org> List-Id: <tuscany-dev.ws.apache.org> Reply-To: meganmartinez@example.org Delivered-To: mailing list meganmartinez@example.org Received: (qmail 24259 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2007 15:31:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 07:31:09 -0800 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [83.161.120.155]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l02FTfL5061644 for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:29:41 GMT Received: from d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com [83.161.120.155]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id l02FTeC83219632 for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:29:40 +0100 Received: from d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [83.161.120.155]) by d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l02FTeOd023583 for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:29:40 +0100 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (dhcp-9-20-176-65.hursley.ibm.com [83.161.120.155]) by d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com (83.161.120.15560308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l02FTdCx023565 for <meganmartinez@example.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:29:40 +0100 Message-ID: <meganmartinez@example.org> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:29:38 +0000 From: Simon Nash <meganmartinez@example.org> Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meganmartinez@example.org Subject: Tuscany weekly IRC chat log December 18, 2006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Apologies for the delay in posting this because of the holdays. Also, there may be a bit of missing discussion before and after I joined. The discussion was focused on getting the new Web site into shape for the SCA Java M2 launch. Simon <murphdg> (i=murphdg@@nat/ibm/x-6c500df22064f9c1) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 16:34:58 GMT 2006. [16:36] <jboynes> simonnash: hi [16:36] <jboynes> thanks for closing the incubator vote :) [16:37] <jboynes> I've copied the distro files to the dist site but I've not updated the website yet [16:37] > hi. np. i was pleased that we got the 3 +1s and didn't start threads leading all over the place. [16:37] <jboynes> yes indeedy [16:37] <simonnash> yes I'd like to spend time today talking about what we do with the web sote [16:38] <jboynes> one of the least dicussive votes I've seen [16:38] <simonnash> not sure whether that's good or bad :-) [16:38] <jboynes> I think its the holidays and people have better things to do [16:38] <jboynes> ;) [16:39] <simonnash> on the web site, venkat did a lot of work and I put some matgerial on the wiki yesterday. we ned to decide which of these changes we will make live when we create the download links. [16:40] <simonnash> i know about the holiday effect. we just squeezed in for the vote before everyone left. [16:45] <simonnash> i would like to add my Getting Started material to the web site but I am not sure whether to produce a patch that is a delta to what is there currently or do it as an update to Venkat's changes. (or both maybe) <ant_> has quit the server at Mon Dec 18 16:45:29 GMT 2006 (Read error: 131 (Connection reset by peer)). <jsdelfino> (n=delfinoj@@c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 16:46:15 GMT 2006. <jsdelfino> (n=delfinoj@@c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has left the room at Mon Dec 18 16:46:35 GMT 2006. <jsdelfino> (n=delfinoj@@c-24-5-173-81.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 16:46:39 GMT 2006. <ant_> (i=ant_@@nat/ibm/x-ad6421e8d054ad16) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 16:46:43 GMT 2006. [16:46] <jsdelfino> hi [16:47] <simonnash> it is more work to merge it into venkat's material as there is a bit of overlap in places. But I am OK with doing this if we are agreed that we should accept Venkat's changes. The discussion on this did not seem to close on the mailing list. [16:48] <simonnash> anyone have views on this? <lresende> (n=luckbr19@@83.161.120.155) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 16:48:57 GMT 2006. [16:49] <ant_> i'm for going with venkats new site now and then changing it as reqd over time [16:52] <jboynes> works for me [16:52] <simonnash> anyone not agree with this? [16:52] <kgoodson> sounds god to me [16:52] <kgoodson> good <Venkat> (i=Krish@@83.161.120.155) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 16:54:18 GMT 2006. [16:54] <simonnash> hi venkat [16:54] <simonnash> we are just discussing the Web site [16:55] <Venkat> Hi ... my sincere apologies... for turning up late... [16:55] <simonnash> seems like folks are OK with moving to the new web site that you have been doing. [16:55] <Venkat> just posted a mail in reply to Jeremy's.. on the artifacts [16:56] <Venkat> what abt the links 'Releases' and FAQ for each of SCA, SDO and DAS.. shall I go ahead with that [16:56] <simonnash> just reading it now [16:56] <lresende> one quick question on the website, Venkat's site was based on a old snapshot of the website, and we are going to make necessary changes/updates basically going for the new structure of the left outline, is this riht ? [16:57] <Venkat> lresende: here it is http://people.apache.org/~rfeng/tuscany/site-publish/ [16:57] <Venkat> this is what is proposed [16:57] <simonnash> Venkat, your proposal sounds good to me. let's work together on merging in my Getting Started material into what you have already done. [16:58] <Venkat> ok... [16:59] <Venkat> so let me understand the release artifact stuff.... what needs to be done is update the Downloads page of SCA ... right... [16:59] <Venkat> with a table that lists all of these artifacts... right [16:59] <simonnash> yes [16:59] <simonnash> i listed them all in my Getting Started [17:00] <simonnash> i also listed the nmaven ones.. but these would not be mentioned on the download page [17:00] <Venkat> ok.. [17:00] <lresende> Venkat:so,this url you sent me has some old stuff, like the structure for the download pages, [17:01] <lresende> i think the biggest proposed changes is the outline on the left replacing the tabs on the top <ant_> (i=ant_@@nat/ibm/x-ad6421e8d054ad16) has quit the server at Mon Dec 18 17:01:38 GMT 2006 (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)). [17:01] <Venkat> right... [17:01] <lresende> so, probably would make sense to take a new snapshot of the current website and re-apply your chages [17:01] <lresende> is that the idea ? [17:01] <lresende> as I also joined the chat late [17:02] <Venkat> yes.. that might need to be done as there has been updates after I picked up the last time... for eg. the SDO and DAS downloads and releases [17:02] <Venkat> also what about the content for a separate page on Releases... [17:02] <Venkat> for each of SCA, SDO and DAS... [17:03] <simonnash> i looked at checkins for the site after Venkat's snapshot. there don't seem to be many. it might be easier to apply these to what Venkat has. whichever is less work. [17:03] <murphdg> I think seperating download components makes some sense - when I last looked there were loads of links and a little hard to find what I was after [17:05] <lresende> simonnash: sure, as long as there is some kind of merges [17:05] <simonnash> is htere a Releases page already? i think I saw one somewhere. [17:05] <lresende> the downloads [17:05] <lresende> http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/downloads.html [17:05] <lresende> is that what you are looking for ? [17:06] <Venkat> AFAICT.. there has never been a Release page... just Downloads [17:06] <simonnash> ok, i am looking at Venkat's new site. he has split the downloads in that into separate SCA/SDO/DAS pages [17:07] <murphdg> good - it was the existing page I was referrring to [17:07] <simonnash> i was wondering if it useful to have page listing all releases that we have done as a project (not with every downloadable file). maybe this is the News page. [17:08] <simonnash> Venkat, you site has broken links from the News page <YangZHONG> (n=yzhong@@adsl-69-232-192-86.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) has joined the room at Mon Dec 18 17:08:39 GMT 2006. [17:08] <simonnash> there are links to each of the releases but they refer to an obsolete nonexistent page [17:10] <Venkat> if you are looking at what I had posted... yes those things will need updates from the current site... [17:11] <simonnash> i also found a Java Project page linked from the News page. it has some very useful material. But I don't know where its normal place in the hierarchy is. [17:11] <Venkat> I think that has always been grouped under development <isilval_> has quit the server at Mon Dec 18 17:11:58 GMT 2006 ("Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com"). [17:12] <Venkat> see box titled Development on the left navigation [17:12] <simonnash> found it now, almost at the bottom of the left sidebar [17:12] <simonnash> thanks [17:13] <murphdg> I guess the only minor point with Venkats changes is that the left hand side navigation is quite long... seems to fit fine on my 1600x1400 screen, anyone tried it on a (much) lower resolution ? [17:14] <simonnash> is this
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}