From generalmooretimothy@example.com Thu May 12 14:00:44 2005
Return-Path: <generalmooretimothy@example.com>
Delivered-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 57182 invoked from network); 12 May 2005 14:00:44 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2005 14:00:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 61288 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2005 14:04:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mooretimothy@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Id: <general.xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Reply-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 61224 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2005 14:03:59 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from exsmtp02.agrinet.ch (HELO mail.messaging.ch) (83.161.120.155)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2005 07:03:59 -0700
Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by mail.messaging.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Thu, 12 May 2005 15:59:29 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:59:21 +0200
From: Jeremias Maerki <mooretimothy@example.com>
To: mooretimothy@example.com
Subject: Re: [Xmlgraphics Wiki] Update of "StatusReports/StatusReportForMay2005" by JeremiasMaerki
In-Reply-To: <mooretimothy@example.com>
References: <mooretimothy@example.com>
Message-Id: <mooretimothy@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en]
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0519-2, 05/12/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 May 2005 13:59:29.0452 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0C82EC0:01C556FA]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

PMCers,

if there's anything else you think should be on the report, please add
it until Monday 2005-05-16. The board meeting is on Wednesday 2005-05-18.

On 10.05.2005 19:21:28 Apache Wiki wrote:
> The following page has been changed by JeremiasMaerki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/StatusReports/StatusReportForMay2005
> 
> The comment on the change is:
> May report


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com


From generalmooretimothy@example.com Mon May 16 19:57:15 2005
Return-Path: <generalmooretimothy@example.com>
Delivered-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 3514 invoked from network); 16 May 2005 19:57:15 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 May 2005 19:57:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 96792 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2005 15:54:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mooretimothy@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Id: <general.xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Reply-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 96710 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2005 15:54:51 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of mooretimothy@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2005 08:54:50 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so1387620nzn
        for <mooretimothy@example.com>; Mon, 16 May 2005 08:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer;
        b=HeEOrHnFKrwyNKdFCQgiPwuNsPOlJ2recEdaupzRAxH1W0Nz1y546x8CIznFZOfkfw+cvj6Yh7Ue39OLCGVNyLpo/vr9SBD/zXUEkwUjaEeIA7B0F7izyt79nbrdEl99YwZr4xV5JcVYkkfeBF439OKNQWS5MwEXO+GlvmmQK38=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id g1mr1665214nze;
        Mon, 16 May 2005 08:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?83.161.120.155? ([83.161.120.155])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 15sm1745406nzp.283.161.120.155.27.59;
        Mon, 16 May 2005 08:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <mooretimothy@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
To: mooretimothy@example.com
From: The Web Maestro <mooretimothy@example.com>
Subject: Haven't seen your POST? Please re-post...
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 08:27:56 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Greetings fellow *.apache.org cats,

As you may've noticed, many of the *.apache.org lists were receiving a 
barrage of messages. The SPAM system has been updated to alleviate the 
problem, but some posts may have been lost in the shuffle.

Does it make sense to send out some sort of message indicating:

   "If you haven't seen your POST show up in a timely manner,
   please RE-POST your message."

If so, to whom should it go? fop-users? batik-users? 
*@xmlgraphics.apache.org?

Regards,

Web Maestro Clay
-- 
<mooretimothy@example.com> - <http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/>
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com


From generalmooretimothy@example.com Tue May 17 06:32:05 2005
Return-Path: <generalmooretimothy@example.com>
Delivered-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 50833 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 06:32:05 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 06:32:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 83647 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2005 20:10:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mooretimothy@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Id: <general.xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Reply-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 83571 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2005 20:10:00 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from exsmtp03.agrinet.ch (HELO mail.messaging.ch) (83.161.120.155)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2005 13:09:58 -0700
Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by mail.messaging.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Mon, 16 May 2005 22:09:36 +0200
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 22:09:24 +0200
From: Jeremias Maerki <mooretimothy@example.com>
To: mooretimothy@example.com
Subject: Re: Haven't seen your POST? Please re-post...
In-Reply-To: <mooretimothy@example.com>
References: <mooretimothy@example.com>
Message-Id: <mooretimothy@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en]
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0520-0, 05/16/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 May 2005 20:09:37.0015 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F2C6070:01C55A53]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Huh? So far, I don't miss any posts though it may currently take several
hours until the posts show up. Actually, your message indicates having
been sent 17:27 (my local time). It has just shown up (22:08).

On 16.05.2005 17:27:56 The Web Maestro wrote:
> Greetings fellow *.apache.org cats,
> 
> As you may've noticed, many of the *.apache.org lists were receiving a 
> barrage of messages. The SPAM system has been updated to alleviate the 
> problem, but some posts may have been lost in the shuffle.
> 
> Does it make sense to send out some sort of message indicating:
> 
>    "If you haven't seen your POST show up in a timely manner,
>    please RE-POST your message."
> 
> If so, to whom should it go? fop-users? batik-users? 
> *@xmlgraphics.apache.org?


Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com


From generalmooretimothy@example.com Tue May 17 21:58:22 2005
Return-Path: <generalmooretimothy@example.com>
Delivered-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 63581 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 21:58:22 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 21:58:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 40846 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 14:58:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mooretimothy@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Id: <general.xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Reply-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 40589 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2005 14:58:09 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of mooretimothy@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2005 07:57:26 -0700
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 16so2368950nzp
        for <mooretimothy@example.com>; Tue, 17 May 2005 07:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer;
        b=pm0XyAmvHV5cTC40+LNZa8IKI+lELBvy2gboexOjHphhZcZZ/MB2AeQac4my4sBrNDMI94Sv3+OtYt3D5SdBRzInO3jtjmAZ001nG2UKtPmgzNXxuN+YlC6lbfhVpRubrLjLhUsOPYJ4MdUPE4hwCQUYfXF7nOzGMX5H5gP03Dk=
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s10mr148492nzc;
        Tue, 17 May 2005 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?83.161.120.155? ([83.161.120.155])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 18sm332734nzo.283.161.120.155.50.20;
        Tue, 17 May 2005 07:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
In-Reply-To: <mooretimothy@example.com>
References: <mooretimothy@example.com> <mooretimothy@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <mooretimothy@example.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The Web Maestro <mooretimothy@example.com>
Subject: Re: Haven't seen your POST? Please re-post...
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 07:50:16 -0700
To: mooretimothy@example.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On May 16, 2005, at 1:09 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Huh? So far, I don't miss any posts though it may currently take 
> several
> hours until the posts show up. Actually, your message indicates having
> been sent 17:27 (my local time). It has just shown up (22:08).
>
> Jeremias Maerki

Louis had sent me a msg indicating he didn't see postings fop-users@ 
over an extended period of time (between 5/12 & 5/16). He posted also, 
and didn't see it (nor did I). It's certainly possible that it was 
merely a delay, but I don't see any fop-users@ posts.

Anyway, I sent my msg to general@ because I thought I'd ask for 
consensus (and see if batik-* had problems as well) *before* I send out 
that type of msg. If you don't think it's warranted, then that's fine 
with me.

Regards,

Web Maestro Clay
-- 
<mooretimothy@example.com> - <http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/>
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com


From generalmooretimothy@example.com Wed May 18 06:26:27 2005
Return-Path: <generalmooretimothy@example.com>
Delivered-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 56461 invoked from network); 18 May 2005 06:26:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2005 06:26:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 11431 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2005 06:21:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mooretimothy@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Id: <general.xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Reply-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 11386 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2005 06:21:42 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0
	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from exsmtp01.agrinet.ch (HELO mail.messaging.ch) (83.161.120.155)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2005 23:21:39 -0700
Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by mail.messaging.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Wed, 18 May 2005 08:21:26 +0200
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 08:21:08 +0200
From: Jeremias Maerki <mooretimothy@example.com>
To: mooretimothy@example.com
Subject: Re: Haven't seen your POST? Please re-post...
In-Reply-To: <mooretimothy@example.com>
References: <mooretimothy@example.com> <mooretimothy@example.com>
Message-Id: <mooretimothy@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en]
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0520-1, 05/17/2005), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2005 06:21:27.0024 (UTC) FILETIME=[D274F700:01C55B71]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Turns out it was due to the new Sober variant flooding the net with
propaganda, thus creating a kind of denial of service attack because the
filters got very very busy.

On 17.05.2005 16:50:16 The Web Maestro wrote:
> On May 16, 2005, at 1:09 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Huh? So far, I don't miss any posts though it may currently take 
> > several
> > hours until the posts show up. Actually, your message indicates having
> > been sent 17:27 (my local time). It has just shown up (22:08).
> >
> > Jeremias Maerki
> 
> Louis had sent me a msg indicating he didn't see postings fop-users@ 
> over an extended period of time (between 5/12 & 5/16). He posted also, 
> and didn't see it (nor did I). It's certainly possible that it was 
> merely a delay, but I don't see any fop-users@ posts.
> 
> Anyway, I sent my msg to general@ because I thought I'd ask for 
> consensus (and see if batik-* had problems as well) *before* I send out 
> that type of msg. If you don't think it's warranted, then that's fine 
> with me.



Jeremias Maerki


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com


From generalmooretimothy@example.com Wed May 18 14:45:27 2005
Return-Path: <generalmooretimothy@example.com>
Delivered-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 52643 invoked from network); 18 May 2005 14:45:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2005 14:45:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 21242 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2005 14:33:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact mooretimothy@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:mooretimothy@example.com>
List-Id: <general.xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Reply-To: mooretimothy@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list mooretimothy@example.com
Received: (qmail 21130 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2005 14:33:08 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0
	tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mooretimothy@example.com)
Received: from fed1rmmtao08.cox.net (HELO fed1rmmtao08.cox.net) (83.161.120.155)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2005 07:33:08 -0700
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (really [83.161.120.155])
          by fed1rmmtao08.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.83.161.120.155 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP
          id <20050518143255.YWMM16890.fed1rmmtao08.cox.net@[83.161.120.155]>
          for <mooretimothy@example.com>;
          Wed, 18 May 2005 10:32:55 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
In-Reply-To: <mooretimothy@example.com>
References: <mooretimothy@example.com> <mooretimothy@example.com> <mooretimothy@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <mooretimothy@example.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The Web Maestro <mooretimothy@example.com>
Subject: Re: Haven't seen your POST? Please re-post...
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 07:32:53 -0700
To: mooretimothy@example.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Heh... and I thought Mac users were immune from viruses... ;-)

On May 17, 2005, at 11:21 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Turns out it was due to the new Sober variant flooding the net with
> propaganda, thus creating a kind of denial of service attack because 
> the
> filters got very very busy.
>
> On 17.05.2005 16:50:16 The Web Maestro wrote:
>> On May 16, 2005, at 1:09 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> Huh? So far, I don't miss any posts though it may currently take
>>> several
>>> hours until the posts show up. Actually, your message indicates 
>>> having
>>> been sent 17:27 (my local time). It has just shown up (22:08).
>>>
>>> Jeremias Maerki
>>
>> Louis had sent me a msg indicating he didn't see postings fop-users@
>> over an extended period of time (between 5/12 & 5/16). He posted also,
>> and didn't see it (nor did I). It's certainly possible that it was
>> merely a delay, but I don't see any fop-users@ posts.
>>
>> Anyway, I sent my msg to general@ because I thought I'd ask for
>> consensus (and see if batik-* had problems as well) *before* I send 
>> out
>> that type of msg. If you don't think it's warranted, then that's fine
>> with me.
>
> Jeremias Maerki

Regards,

Web Maestro Clay
-- 
<mooretimothy@example.com> - <http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/>
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: mooretimothy@example.com



{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}