From crystalalvarado@example.com Tue May 12 21:51:56 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 56220 invoked from network); 12 May 2009 21:51:55 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2009 21:51:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 95058 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 21:51:55 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 95026 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 21:51:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 95016 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2009 21:51:55 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 21:51:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-fx0-f165.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 21:51:47 +0000
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so272543fxm.8
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Tue, 12 May 2009 14:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=AqvReSsYpHiHe0jliY4rZ3Cd9d+idTu1/s23f5zpr5E=;
        b=VCHSA+dT0V6bfQ2J3aZa3yXCi5JGsNJ5vcJGsJF7Mfw1h5Z+dhCBU/ycUj6Oid7MNq
         +XQqiLsYgwUaQ6B4suWguxkOnkUNIhFSL+X8T4U8D//ENJl6NdR0ljHb1JpfwOQP0AAt
         jyqeUk9LicQqZIuv4cOJBJkwKHhVjhuZDJ/3A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=x9p4ppy+KUye3bvWvavT2b5bHGXLxImZs8OaeARkk06KH9gNP0BT+FnvPl/j5/Mh39
         Q4olI+ND12PKaV0TLmP5Ol8UyD6f9Dv6G9KHZWC7+n/yi5KOLIhr3E6R1Fs3EkA1u2a1
         /uLif1UucsnKLl21YaY5iaEkFBSf7AoXUiXTw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id y9mr191452fap.19.1242165085801; Tue, 12 
	May 2009 14:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 23:51:25 +0200
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Holiday time for a serious business...
From: Antonio Petrelli <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

... that kind of business that means wearing a gold ring :-)
Sorry but I won't be online until the 3rd of June because I'm
marrying. Ubi maior minor cessat :-D

See you
Antonio

From crystalalvarado@example.com Tue May 12 21:55:17 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 57571 invoked from network); 12 May 2009 21:55:16 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2009 21:55:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 99293 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 21:55:16 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 99251 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2009 21:55:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 99241 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2009 21:55:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 21:55:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rv-out-0708.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2009 21:55:07 +0000
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so183401rvf.8
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Tue, 12 May 2009 14:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=SFKTJNZEoIavWOJuxVjovzT50Ddfiz7w9MCuu4GiJNU=;
        b=po20amsHysWgdmdcwjWIQZQfxbrKJOhorQ9c8KQIzLROCzZGbTEev3UxQIf1ifjXoT
         dZO7ikfFO5DyCSpLi4u5cpqTwFsfXmuzB+LRPdd8GBzkl9Rj28CG9u3htIhusp8YszM5
         KArskXzRtNsU4MKe/jbUmNjFSeYGnm2Vhh0Cs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=MEU0alvBTNwQHUFPA+588DSrZrckVx5xRmZSY04m7rk4t7OBX0V2LmzTRn9t6ArauJ
         4Ifw57ozsQoszzQbv4Cp3DCmSbx5dg2uq0VtArMLJXRBbTTH1mPMyb2SWF8WfjjloBG8
         uY54pb5iqjvF8Aem3a4W541KrcqJqeHsqqYhM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j7mr70075wfg.28.1242165285933; Tue, 12 
	May 2009 14:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
References: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:54:45 -0700
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Holiday time for a serious business...
From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Congrats!  Have a great time!

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Antonio Petrelli
<crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
> ... that kind of business that means wearing a gold ring :-)
> Sorry but I won't be online until the 3rd of June because I'm
> marrying. Ubi maior minor cessat :-D
>
> See you
> Antonio
>

From crystalalvarado@example.com Wed May 13 14:25:15 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 7265 invoked from network); 13 May 2009 14:25:15 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2009 14:25:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 27269 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 14:25:15 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 27226 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 14:25:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 27216 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2009 14:25:14 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 14:25:14 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 14:25:06 +0000
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so344877ywm.8
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Wed, 13 May 2009 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=ici5ErKhvMK6992EtKIZxaXOuhWWHpb91zn/s5Khuws=;
        b=QtLi7rwsUpYZCkzLwhkCnSZz2JsPqgcQ3m41gZ6BWPjNHB3tLSK/0DJmop2l0mNHEj
         7UXZNYpDt8IGI6eywg4N1ibpHphmqadOq69EOozO8PvybE1ur+JK32sFffz1DVSq/uQA
         WsP2DM/Gz/WkXGF/z80Kk7zbYtInBbxlV9smE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=b96sAuQdWVVOf7dNf1qJyHiUkzkjZPUZ5y8HuwxlN5yM/cgAItoTFjy/ps7NYziUJq
         fOBcHI4P4LoOXVFpYT+1Ap35diat0r7Sq8EuKQxP25nF8JGRPC0gyM9hZqHdAUO65Yrz
         pKxPylaPv6zsPyU15tz5awROkpw39qDPErpkc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s12mr1296060anf.125.1242224685613; 
	Wed, 13 May 2009 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
References: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:24:45 -0500
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Holiday time for a serious business...
From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Antonio Petrelli
<crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
> ... that kind of business that means wearing a gold ring :-)
> Sorry but I won't be online until the 3rd of June because I'm
> marrying. Ubi maior minor cessat :-D

That's so awesome! Congratulations!

Greg

From crystalalvarado@example.com Wed May 13 23:54:53 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 9358 invoked from network); 13 May 2009 23:54:53 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2009 23:54:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 73349 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 23:54:53 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 73304 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2009 23:54:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 73294 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2009 23:54:52 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 23:54:52 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-fx0-f213.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 23:54:43 +0000
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so1019362fxm.8
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Wed, 13 May 2009 16:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=XZ4vdjcpVbMjIMVAqVa0ivs7H/tkaNg50yEGCfyJJqE=;
        b=iWwPoCnu0gzM8+tU6W9OFJaF25SWN+4+PJADcwS6hK562CZZr9jTbYQUaFQJhHNnmk
         gwAmVsl/sISnyw0ql/B2J2/v1GITg3R2/ejRqUD0AvVAQxSr5B+UJFtVn4TLCHTwhdtP
         4XpzyKOKVoJvTAPb04lICCITms/wCwu84uFbI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=IrPb7DyhQgG7x/4ot4aBxxQ6JApieeaAb+J2rPIG/9oGCpJuNculA8Izuz8snfxwQy
         rnZPcvicvlb5B1SLlIq5vOvcVzhfBw+I6tr/M5uyhkZLmQ8Asd7qR5gBKSvzHX36D3rC
         ZWCv3DvOKdzv+BSsEVUxEVULe7Vq7KOwjoXxw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l4mr1342215fap.47.1242258863041; Wed, 
	13 May 2009 16:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:54:23 -0500
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Getting hitched eh?
From: crystalalvarado@example.com
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c599a6402d080469d3ee34
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--001636c599a6402d080469d3ee34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Congratulations my brother!  Marriage will allow you so much more quality
time to make your code drops.  You will no longer have the hassle of
laundry, mowing, preparing meals or the rest.  It's an institution I
wholeheartedly support so long as she is Web 2.0 compatible.

P.S. Of course if you believe any of this, you are doomed!

Peace,
Scott

--001636c599a6402d080469d3ee34--

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 15:49:53 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 16441 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 15:49:53 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 15:49:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 29328 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 15:49:53 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 29285 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 15:49:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 29275 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 15:49:53 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:49:53 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:49:42 +0000
Received: (qmail 96430 invoked by uid 60001); 14 May 2009 15:49:21 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1242316161; bh=JP+WoAyUIADIEHdZ6c0mhVueAUUYNrDkFMHQfKgqV7A=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=A3n3CnCzLw9Uklria2bD3g/9Ha6+/pH9Vl7JvVXstMqtVb1Fgd73qweRrPbqXtFEoOEErPylr1tExup0ma6/7qrS4lVIhY280fRZS0vAFA8mzJSTngq0qf2uHvUVTpxC/nJUx4FovT5vjCV2hLcqpAprF89o6qKHXpFTU0ovJsQ=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=iNcyPBT3BG2D7oPdjPDAQxITfACd65kR7RpEooyyxCzDpFC+ogJRdzVCY+UlBRr2Ypqv0mPud/Znxq88D3tbBp9a1ZwBSdoBO8ih78tasIVlhIQRdorQq+xCyfqeAKwv5g9pgv7kWtRsX2p7z2v06BRgZUidXlOA7UgZIuIxE9o=;
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
X-YMail-OSG: Xbo2_90VM1ngbDcohdGNYPSm82yi1JZqOdz4ZFBEhi9IUuJ6jC7ozIXWVFgSeXywKBN9oW_8JVyFZBcDLgmTOQijqUkxlrB25N4PnTtSAKvwghcq7NtQuxEGPQYQxnxgmxdQD4Cv6zvvduzQx3CWU7RM3nV.oymHUuOOvBgSbtKbz_q4xUpu2RUOj_ywq_vOuZn.b7j6dEW_nw7I0123H9nRwVIMepRGJzzz1_RSVPYCLQI1_vMqeA65mBLcLSvKJZS2OxX_SZncWktsbMyQdkRfR8CPvQtRWg4dM05ZqA4DTjk3xwKgUGtBqo7UqPUHtsZe
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:49:21 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Tiles 2.2.0
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


I see from the archives I just managed to get on-list right after Antonio left.  :)  Just my luck.  I am interested in the native freemarker support coming.  Is there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could be published?  If not I will build them locally.  Finally, has a timeframe been established for 2.2.0 final?

Thanks,
Matt


      

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 16:08:09 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 22820 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 16:08:09 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 16:08:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 57833 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 16:08:09 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 57807 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 16:08:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 57771 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 16:08:09 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:08:09 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 16:08:01 +0000
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so552310and.8
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 09:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=TPqqL6ZWdmowFwMZItff6X+pAz/zoulm0nXD3dbczmk=;
        b=O6uEPvY3UAy5kn0WMEiDtGsnWJU2tTu3TmnyvN3TjZ8xce1/YrHQjcLvOlDJHQ+JEv
         2baTw9tOh+CZ73ndjUgolzjmQfp7xpvVDJ7nnRF2wCsBLMjE1JcZrfsQXnkMUCp8EmFR
         5/gXDpyLMM5V4pDPHsb8QhT7QasSZYp6bRerQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ED+zVRxveeE7la3L/g5lQFUooG2gWOScNbY6SZz6UTBQnVYcWDk4Da12iNU5Y75DJB
         7Sf0d7c79OEWkLnMVrWyDxatMZwmq/i9bstQoilYmy0F/bChrE8MZC+rBvhi//dm9BG8
         48i8bGQzAmaDNU8QeingSwFb4z0ybR8oOZfRw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id t4mr3311418ant.80.1242317259852; Thu, 14 
	May 2009 09:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
References: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:07:39 -0500
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>
> I see from the archives I just managed to get on-list right after Antonio=
 left. =A0:) =A0Just my luck. =A0I am interested in the native freemarker s=
upport coming. =A0Is there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could be published? =
=A0If not I will build them locally. =A0Finally, has a timeframe been estab=
lished for 2.2.0 final?

Currently, there's no timeframe set for 2.2.0. Your best bet right now
would be to build locally. I'd be willing to publish a release if it
*really* needs to happen and I can find all the needed steps to make
it happen.

Greg

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 17:12:45 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 44077 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 17:12:45 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 17:12:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 71029 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:12:45 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 70994 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:12:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 70984 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 17:12:45 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:12:45 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web55103.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:12:35 +0000
Received: (qmail 39956 invoked by uid 60001); 14 May 2009 17:12:13 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1242321133; bh=hskXzCW0PjJAMeOdej16k2t2vJKc/rjm9se1nfi5KEw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eTWJ4Iut/gUPzsjQNPqna9MnDTNWCIG9bIPoG49nH5Vl6H0yRY1/f38dyL6yRA2oqtKfO4OL1X9YtFbphUWfWsh4PHXvNjelzHtiCOzx39TiycqVEQc9wTj8ET1mI+YC6c6nw0/9b4hd4gsimMOZL9WW0w+3mg28+emoIa5Umn0=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=Qot3hHGNz44skFq2daRQCu79PBR51y9BygqS8yvJq3IFsxl+4WH1zfrTZ86fEKT+IMJZyrwG0C9J5tw3YOSzlZYBz7i7P1j2HqLZPEmbf0ZpeuycDtxWWT41bUYylFCQ+t9MoIHcXyShpfi+2Z414yjqcGKXM4WWpuSZoZCwcIo=;
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
X-YMail-OSG: I96kV6kVM1ljCeEeOK6JW.5Rb3.3ZU036JSQSG22Sk_te.Ijl453Ujy8Q3cZRotuG4HqHHZtBqhs5WUGb4Q6SZ1yEE5uNDWSCzXhWosozONkiY3htKVc.M4oKAryD9HGWi6.NWOMYGiGe_4ynfU53zNNqZMQF2_HnEJl_RspP.wJOkrGp6B1ns3wSBfdPUc9zCTzjX6SVBddhwRn5EgkxRZMBvJQuRW.uF7vbcx3IfM2SYdx7AtOfgNru_.uSkpe4ZIk.5Fohm9UuG1LbjVrz4DFBud609c9qYP7ArxvVUSz8Fck8T6Jmpmw2ol5NgQKSsHKgnMgUxo-
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web55103.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 10:12:13 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org




--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:

> From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
> Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I see from the archives I just managed to get on-list
> right after Antonio left.  :)  Just my luck.  I am
> interested in the native freemarker support coming.  Is
> there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could be published?  If
> not I will build them locally.  Finally, has a timeframe
> been established for 2.2.0 final?
> 
> Currently, there's no timeframe set for 2.2.0. Your best
> bet right now
> would be to build locally. I'd be willing to publish a
> release if it
> *really* needs to happen and I can find all the needed
> steps to make
> it happen.
> 

Well, assuming I can get the whole framework built and published to my local Nexus repo I can get by that way for quite some time before I personally need a release.  Thanks.

-Matt

> Greg
> 


      

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 17:30:14 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 54664 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 17:30:14 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 17:30:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 92211 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:30:14 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 92170 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 17:30:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 92160 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 17:30:14 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:30:14 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web55105.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 17:30:05 +0000
Received: (qmail 90326 invoked by uid 60001); 14 May 2009 17:29:44 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1242322184; bh=IL0Jv0trH7gR1StqO6VqNwIbwF0EW80ADW2e1V1zL5A=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1cGgZ0L+kBXJah/NBqE0QFvqym7Iy/+GlrS4b5GypmOw1hqG37No5URjXUQUT4GawnXwtLGwaenUA3cOl4TiYVJQAf9lu8yK2mBwK+x8vJ9QXiH9K+6luFk5s/MPU9mnS2aun78BAG/jTY6k/9i+JpMSgpnDseFbia8fGQQuGbU=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=PKIdEo38gDViizM7hiiYeRBYvNoEm9mEcT4r6L7XpZTocslhrWMe3ophmlpaz1dgHOSDapByjZur14UbuUWzkPGcxqyiSIHScGBkEKZ5eyZ3PZTJaqsaGLyIyImQ/l/4DQSjASd322QfGXdcu2dQIpaCGJRrLlZGjAVUYoGoQtY=;
Message-ID: <{{EMAIL+PHONE}}>
X-YMail-OSG: EmfgvuQVM1nCoghNRxszcCfTMA8OQtqLwymOL4kq174qnhGgNP5FHy26YqbVY16Jv8dxTUEB6bhB37D61Div6zqx0mECY27yyNX46ToyXhq.Npbf25AgOIPwSnCi0TMZQrIMIKmhuEcU92JU_IvoyD9yFnlsgIGt3voEZ8Eb8ZlAQB470aMN2PT91bxiJ_QqvUSczD2mZdO4lHt0TQy42Y7zzNmB3dBE6wQAyJq.KOlYZUx2.2LNvmF7IJbLkQuNXPTqEU35ItKxC67.plonbe9uqqbgUoRgOEVTOZizBISd7HHDECsg1iBZlIQ0L5Sh1fsjWGb8PNkvUp0rR0LkuXz1rxEIy6U3eYEv67w-
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web55105.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 10:29:43 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but it looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd be willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the PMC.

-Matt

--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:

> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
> > Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I see from the archives I just managed to get
> on-list
> > right after Antonio left.  :)  Just my
> luck.  I am
> > interested in the native freemarker support
> coming.  Is
> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could be
> published?  If
> > not I will build them locally.  Finally, has a
> timeframe
> > been established for 2.2.0 final?
> > 
> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for 2.2.0. Your
> best
> > bet right now
> > would be to build locally. I'd be willing to publish
> a
> > release if it
> > *really* needs to happen and I can find all the
> needed
> > steps to make
> > it happen.
> > 
> 
> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework built and
> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by that way for
> quite some time before I personally need a release. 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Matt
> 
> > Greg
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 


      

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 18:11:19 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 75707 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:11:19 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:11:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 64368 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:11:19 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 64327 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:11:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 64317 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 18:11:19 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:11:19 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-pz0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:11:09 +0000
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so814447pzk.12
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Yc4GtEK7VfPiQbjMlXfAC5OngYEzn4PsnPsQ3IbJ+D0=;
        b=G6fOMlW1fLo9vzFMrWwLfaDYQQfg6FCijOfzNjZFbbqOONg0AMAwMUS+t36sOPCX0h
         sBHiAh8gTvDqXxkHeoD3wOwxpNG44b0+I8owsyo4xYcvMtrVOu5X1CJX6uIHjzAjryD1
         CATK4fn+TPG60IqvzzNvdsNPbiHY7W+tr9BfE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=QC6SToXe3bjZadWcvFF/u9ClQSB9hT6MQY7BGCrx7Z1bwvHO2ubhKXVWmr2yME1CrO
         ctHi7h6vK9nND1sC3/LFTw3ZgjSaW0rW1HybtrJnMetDn/dC0i/LxY+79qNYQxoQp9iS
         4I76hCXUHNtvx5ya7TrY3A3JISrYEKVgtIqXE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id j7mr960314wfg.28.1242324648581; Thu, 14 
	May 2009 11:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <{{EMAIL+PHONE}}>
References: <{{EMAIL+PHONE}}>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:10:48 -0700
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I see no problem with anyone publishing snapshots.  If you have access
to p.a.o and want to publish a snapshot there, go for it.  If you can
only publish snapshots elsewhere, go for it.  Just don't call it
"official" or a "release" or anything else of that sort, as those must
be voted on by the PMC.  But you already know that. :)

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>
> You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but it looks like any member =
of the apcvs group on p.a.o can publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapsh=
ots; I'd be willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the PMC.
>
> -Matt
>
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
>> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
>> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
>> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
>> > Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I see from the archives I just managed to get
>> on-list
>> > right after Antonio left. =A0:) =A0Just my
>> luck. =A0I am
>> > interested in the native freemarker support
>> coming. =A0Is
>> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could be
>> published? =A0If
>> > not I will build them locally. =A0Finally, has a
>> timeframe
>> > been established for 2.2.0 final?
>> >
>> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for 2.2.0. Your
>> best
>> > bet right now
>> > would be to build locally. I'd be willing to publish
>> a
>> > release if it
>> > *really* needs to happen and I can find all the
>> needed
>> > steps to make
>> > it happen.
>> >
>>
>> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework built and
>> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by that way for
>> quite some time before I personally need a release.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> > Greg
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 18:18:36 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 80329 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:18:36 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:18:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 85717 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:18:36 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 85678 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:18:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 85667 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 18:18:36 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:18:36 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web55102.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:18:23 +0000
Received: (qmail 34813 invoked by uid 60001); 14 May 2009 18:18:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1242325082; bh=Pod7hfKhC5sZ8XeEXqHKD6HgsAsydmAkG26IwKqAkCU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1YiVVlhOyeVbSYWam1ZFK11s9vegtpdusFJV6BKfk6THbLHyNJ+8FcATnY5bVpOPj4zG9soKBQkHErjt9xn5vqxZ/WUQUSLxg13AeBwv4mDP3uPeBv3rMgHgxxH2cUYadUeViWDqdIaCdNCruWGj1dDD7P5lGXU7IJjXeTCIKfg=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=qX8Js0z2DD7LUv578vH2xSsoPTEDTdpQFEj7otmFyXnpSvdTy0FihX8QKHn+1RmAj52aTt2d8WwoSmM6wLXbki1qLbVggJgZN75Y95ELkMNgWeF/NnveKdBGCtN7wF17zvZzzv0kehxkOxmAYtyq40/31vvP/iEtEt6lY+N6Xyk=;
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 4BiE_lcVM1kb9qXk24aTAH_CVa.CpY7RVNeqdj3ZmsPubD85SlnxSNi7CIOUkOkZYtPs2SyKzfST0kecFqnpWTUtciEl3GKTLIMEvVR.skgd3XD17ky7a9.ls4Aeon5m7HlOlAwxqDBA2HiFTKNW9OyJcYgB9M6iwpvNEyxXBDTq5OTaqIBQgwKXbT7eCTatRvB8FMpQtOI_TCaXJCWOwCHcR4StCkZ1zYLcHITQlAeg5GBRNJPGB6l03AEFzj7I3wJ_opTyE96Vg92fq9QwpPKQ_Bs7ixR9_9DQUaqWLARi1e6jH_wuV.b0PAmM6_uCL3aKzY1oeM3W.EtXO3ZfgQeFcb1HjPadfoZbUA--
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web55102.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:18:01 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org




--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:

> From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:10 PM
> I see no problem with anyone
> publishing snapshots.  If you have access
> to p.a.o and want to publish a snapshot there, go for
> it.  If you can
> only publish snapshots elsewhere, go for it.  Just
> don't call it
> "official" or a "release" or anything else of that sort, as
> those must
> be voted on by the PMC.  But you already know that.
> :)

Hi Nathan.  Thanks for your input; I've been working on building everything under the framework and have run into a few snags.  First, I switched to the new Nexus install for snapshots, because maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT crystalalvarado@example.com snapshots... then, I still couldn't get  2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT to work, so I upgraded to 2.1-SNAPSHOT (this forced me to upgrade to mvn 2.1.0).  Then the build kicked off.  Now I am wrestling with the Velocity dependency; I may have to hit those guys up for a blessing to publish a 1.7-SNAPSHOT as well.

Thanks again,
Matt

> 
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but it
> looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can
> publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd be
> willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the PMC.
> >
> > -Matt
> >
> > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> >> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> >> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> >> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> >> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> >> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
> >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
> >> > Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > I see from the archives I just managed
> to get
> >> on-list
> >> > right after Antonio left.  :)  Just my
> >> luck.  I am
> >> > interested in the native freemarker support
> >> coming.  Is
> >> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could be
> >> published?  If
> >> > not I will build them locally.  Finally, has
> a
> >> timeframe
> >> > been established for 2.2.0 final?
> >> >
> >> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for
> 2.2.0. Your
> >> best
> >> > bet right now
> >> > would be to build locally. I'd be willing to
> publish
> >> a
> >> > release if it
> >> > *really* needs to happen and I can find all
> the
> >> needed
> >> > steps to make
> >> > it happen.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework built
> and
> >> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by that
> way for
> >> quite some time before I personally need a
> release.
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> > Greg
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 


      

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 18:20:11 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 87708 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:20:11 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:20:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 91547 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:20:11 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 91506 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:20:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 91496 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 18:20:11 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:20:11 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web55106.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:20:02 +0000
Received: (qmail 84014 invoked by uid 60001); 14 May 2009 18:19:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1242325180; bh=YwOpXaCLegtaiaLAU48Sm34RHo6qkpDkV7+fKKzT0TE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ivnJIREaYnf4u4I0oWxUgiHQaC3sL00sVhj5H5ojm2pQJ6z78048hrv5VUhMe+nqvcpbAtKfbLb+SHSBPcHf/+UGUc8JCleJ54CUZgYs0SMtFKlRC0gzK2uxIvd6YFJkkyGo+slKFTDDKhkiHKG2Ij2swBa3Q0NzzyhM5uVxN44=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=1CMytiiUq9Kdw2HneCnoTuGAgUnXvQqofFraLLVpNSpIys37dRTR6w8tq4FFVxtbARcbflu97B0GqJBhlyzmAjnL8yp6vdWTg9nQxvEeR0hpKLNOJeUuik0CTtrGRSCgmYgS9QIi6YeCVDnXemoJDjoqB7VCFMUgcmDddMS/ONg=;
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
X-YMail-OSG: 4KOkdxIVM1kbayrYygfOy175_ZYGC7zV4ThCPFacaUbvcIGVJK8EVEhxpClG_5XkbUreGyMZV0aQIHERmQFYN8GaST_BAGYQlsq7rEDx3MC9QCz21yVpDmAhKTzavOiXkVnOFBbSHDT4Qn58UaRNJcVbb9mR.RjQSXps268LhVRjClLIks_c1UG1L1.0Re8sZV4pQZaUpcKSAfitsv4QaG.f_zufZ0cyIlIXr5Mj2vSqspVenHsjA8TtOtJLH3hTtY0IQne2lg4b6ko9AR2ywzvPo1xx56ujnpMt_2qbj1weHdrxjlA4B4rVL7GKq50NEVctH.DtNQ--
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web55106.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:19:40 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org




--- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:

> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:18 PM
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:10 PM
> > I see no problem with anyone
> > publishing snapshots.  If you have access
> > to p.a.o and want to publish a snapshot there, go for
> > it.  If you can
> > only publish snapshots elsewhere, go for it. 
> Just
> > don't call it
> > "official" or a "release" or anything else of that
> sort, as
> > those must
> > be voted on by the PMC.  But you already know
> that.
> > :)
> 
> Hi Nathan.  Thanks for your input; I've been working
> on building everything under the framework and have run into
> a few snags.  First, I switched to the new Nexus
> install for snapshots, because maven-site-plugin
> 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT crystalalvarado@example.com snapshots... then, I
> still couldn't get  2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT to work, so I
> upgraded to 2.1-SNAPSHOT (this forced me to upgrade to mvn
> 2.1.0).  Then the build kicked off.  Now I am
> wrestling with the Velocity dependency; I may have to hit
> those guys up for a blessing to publish a 1.7-SNAPSHOT as
> well.
> 

...and (having perused committers.html) you are one of those guys.  ;)

> Thanks again,
> Matt
> 
> > 
> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but
> it
> > looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can
> > publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd
> be
> > willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the
> PMC.
> > >
> > > -Matt
> > >
> > > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> > >> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> > >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > >> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
> > >> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
> > >> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
> > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
> > >> > Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I see from the archives I just
> managed
> > to get
> > >> on-list
> > >> > right after Antonio left.  :) 
> Just my
> > >> luck.  I am
> > >> > interested in the native freemarker
> support
> > >> coming.  Is
> > >> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could
> be
> > >> published?  If
> > >> > not I will build them locally. 
> Finally, has
> > a
> > >> timeframe
> > >> > been established for 2.2.0 final?
> > >> >
> > >> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for
> > 2.2.0. Your
> > >> best
> > >> > bet right now
> > >> > would be to build locally. I'd be
> willing to
> > publish
> > >> a
> > >> > release if it
> > >> > *really* needs to happen and I can find
> all
> > the
> > >> needed
> > >> > steps to make
> > >> > it happen.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework
> built
> > and
> > >> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by
> that
> > way for
> > >> quite some time before I personally need a
> > release.
> > >> Thanks.
> > >>
> > >> -Matt
> > >>
> > >> > Greg
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> 


      

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 18:31:05 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 93061 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:31:05 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:31:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 14970 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:31:05 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 14928 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:31:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 14918 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 18:31:05 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:31:05 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:30:56 +0000
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so831823wfg.23
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=VrSwXLYyHy91hfmHyqUVqecVU2leWdo1LcFcbQsKi4g=;
        b=oBNJ5KTaV/f+P3FleoZEgM1fg2M7ZN+gpU7UAVZEFszbgyiPKpY9KXvNMrx7nwQb0K
         pLMopUiQ6RN4L5xLW0RiIpvn1uHe+RUqqrXIVYvRWsp0yKWCyBKLSn8neTWsrTbfSHP6
         iv8wzXCJ/ti7ZsJpmaJYC7kgTxSCnomCLLGrQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=uU49LaJjvix+hXDDx8ltlgrd2oUvY7mS6dT7S5xUyvpQa/ZZZvyg5EV9YH4BNTpln/
         W12d6a/yBdFBSxrqwEQp59bKjAesLKwsSUDgXwHARKw8HWAZIz7bIa7TKtOXZgm6YtcC
         slI/NZhbakVIz/zh3YVC+aAhemECKCucsJ13E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z7mr820755wfz.267.1242325834731; Thu, 14 
	May 2009 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
References: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:30:34 -0700
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
>> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:18 PM
>> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
>> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 1:10 PM
>> > I see no problem with anyone
>> > publishing snapshots. =A0If you have access
>> > to p.a.o and want to publish a snapshot there, go for
>> > it. =A0If you can
>> > only publish snapshots elsewhere, go for it.
>> Just
>> > don't call it
>> > "official" or a "release" or anything else of that
>> sort, as
>> > those must
>> > be voted on by the PMC. =A0But you already know
>> that.
>> > :)
>>
>> Hi Nathan. =A0Thanks for your input; I've been working
>> on building everything under the framework and have run into
>> a few snags. =A0First, I switched to the new Nexus
>> install for snapshots, because maven-site-plugin
>> 2.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT crystalalvarado@example.com snapshots... then, I
>> still couldn't get =A02.0-beta-8-SNAPSHOT to work, so I
>> upgraded to 2.1-SNAPSHOT (this forced me to upgrade to mvn
>> 2.1.0). =A0Then the build kicked off. =A0Now I am
>> wrestling with the Velocity dependency; I may have to hit
>> those guys up for a blessing to publish a 1.7-SNAPSHOT as
>> well.
>>
>
> ...and (having perused committers.html) you are one of those guys. =A0;)

Yep.  Same opinion applies there.  Publishing snapshots is limited
only by your ability to do so and what you can call it. :)  So, go for
it!

>> Thanks again,
>> Matt
>>
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but
>> it
>> > looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can
>> > publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd
>> be
>> > willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the
>> PMC.
>> > >
>> > > -Matt
>> > >
>> > > --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > >> Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > >> To: crystalalvarado@example.com
>> > >> Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 12:12 PM
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --- On Thu, 5/14/09, Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > >> > Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
>> > >> > To: crystalalvarado@example.com
>> > >> > Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 11:07 AM
>> > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM,
>> > >> > Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I see from the archives I just
>> managed
>> > to get
>> > >> on-list
>> > >> > right after Antonio left. =A0:)
>> Just my
>> > >> luck. =A0I am
>> > >> > interested in the native freemarker
>> support
>> > >> coming. =A0Is
>> > >> > there any chance 2.2.0 snapshots could
>> be
>> > >> published? =A0If
>> > >> > not I will build them locally.
>> Finally, has
>> > a
>> > >> timeframe
>> > >> > been established for 2.2.0 final?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Currently, there's no timeframe set for
>> > 2.2.0. Your
>> > >> best
>> > >> > bet right now
>> > >> > would be to build locally. I'd be
>> willing to
>> > publish
>> > >> a
>> > >> > release if it
>> > >> > *really* needs to happen and I can find
>> all
>> > the
>> > >> needed
>> > >> > steps to make
>> > >> > it happen.
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> Well, assuming I can get the whole framework
>> built
>> > and
>> > >> published to my local Nexus repo I can get by
>> that
>> > way for
>> > >> quite some time before I personally need a
>> > release.
>> > >> Thanks.
>> > >>
>> > >> -Matt
>> > >>
>> > >> > Greg
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 18:34:56 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 95014 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:34:55 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:34:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 25640 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:34:55 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 25602 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:34:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 25592 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 18:34:55 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO yw-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:34:47 +0000
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so779015ywm.8
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=xcLHCw8ysw9BfbMXA7JL/y/69zQe//OD55L125hZ4OE=;
        b=ajcYSBZC/yYMdFGdxGVTnPE+c3ccd1qR5UE3l8r4q15PFKPFnd9qAOPK0R5JidfjHW
         jWuT1FAqpfRHd7ZUPe1nMieO/rtBT3DBc0tiJsGfnLcKKGgTUTQubeE6/TOBEqt8H979
         APaUVl1dCJIYTuOyuqp3GcvgBhoiesKDeP3BI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=jwctkrdJyxa6Juu1r0RaA/uPd4Q10pxF0M4tMI99TAdplQ2SBt2+Ga00oUdnZypK9e
         nC5CboqcdAy9gWFbW4yISkiTFZr0lR90bH1rk+NK7NefsLz58ofJboEzcjBDfsO4zlec
         rHI1jiUhYGpOgwyW4bbnKST7JngyT8RNoRZWI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x14mr3504261anc.136.1242326066952; 
	Thu, 14 May 2009 11:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
References: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
	 <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:34:26 -0500
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
From: Greg Reddin <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>
> Yep. =A0Same opinion applies there. =A0Publishing snapshots is limited
> only by your ability to do so and what you can call it. :) =A0So, go for
> it!

Agreed.

Greg

From crystalalvarado@example.com Thu May 14 18:55:56 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 99405 invoked from network); 14 May 2009 18:55:56 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2009 18:55:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 47289 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:45:13 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 47275 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2009 18:45:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 47265 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2009 18:45:13 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:45:13 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 18:45:05 +0000
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1020544qwk.56
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=mtqbDgBeAGdcoS0nCPpxWBmI2ltoOu92FtEx6aNgBe8=;
        b=CaBs8p5m4K5Q1yIk2zFhRIosskSbME3mbi9dyfy/e4Hda3xS5c259CdLqDmNQsYAWh
         esuEYbhgpJ6BUXa7XdP8/KFgqobGgvaN2uQAZCEMbwtJQ6EdKayPomUTTl4xsEUBkzyK
         ZuAGbnrPx13sonyBdQBpzXdk2I4+z5IToUMqQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=VzRamOx83Zdg1wuxGP2JZO2ZFKsqTGpEkfH0yFsTFRQseMh0Aje36EWKh5n01M4STX
         VQg6KPZGhL8gSWwU/eTjcLkghX3nWgTYlYdph4jthNS/LsLwCj8MA1hcQ1QT357dxmdm
         AR+QHMqfhJNEYRkxELlmhArcdgUs9D53RHdmk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s13mr3030812qas.244.1242326684348; Thu, 
	14 May 2009 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <{{EMAIL+PHONE}}>
References: <{{EMAIL+PHONE}}>
From: Wendy Smoak <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:44:24 -0700
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: Tiles 2.2.0
To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>
> You know, this might be somewhat irregular, but it looks like any member of the apcvs group on p.a.o can publish (legacy as opposed to Nexus) snapshots; I'd be willing to make the attempt with the blessing of the PMC.

Hmmm.... it's generally Not Done as you point out. :)  As long as you
keep the dev list up to date on what you're doing though, I don't see
a huge problem with it.

-- 
Wendy

From crystalalvarado@example.com Fri May 15 02:34:40 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 52442 invoked from network); 15 May 2009 02:34:40 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2009 02:34:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 44297 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2009 02:34:40 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 44254 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2009 02:34:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 44213 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2009 02:34:40 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 02:34:40 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 02:34:30 +0000
Received: (qmail 785 invoked by uid 60001); 15 May 2009 02:34:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1242354848; bh=vx0A3vfkyaQ1w4cDTBCsDrKcdxJvHPwymXPi+lVynsA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=y9V84hhsmAqUuQC2HTeFP7eQQneaquy4Wu0q7Z5vyOTv4L8cVviTUikni5aC4+LemmyAtDfrCzirjyOpJX/NUJj4BpYnS24gm21qXGLAM62HU+FH9e0Y+b03V3MWgib+bMN2eCV8VkigHoVGQxX1Jf8JsWe+mzOSnlZlZFAA3Y4=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=usSpjTFzLyTS4MKwxKXaxCc9D4OmlO/LKnIjK2SXiwCtx7PhgL6ceZjYsYUAcqu658eune0LTBDW8+J52UNgoAeQsGX/CGlklcPquozjW/75y7SohrmOp3AzgHw5qA2X6FueTSj0tKg8oOVx4V0xyT73S9YImXVKQQiYFvsT1v0=;
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
X-YMail-OSG: wCZMS9sVM1kXVFV3BBU15ushMX2lfATL.z8xstgSSO7UJtgHbGo6EqJQRmNqqxQy8bj1D69AHWnFLendg830KWWAUmAmigNfb4fEHLTk1Y_xOkjZT4RvRsG63Z6FaEYep60es7VFwNaqE8sMvEGeGUzbs3CJIYECxj.Cx1mJzAQ7z9z5Y72Zfo7ofx7of9dAueBGKXkKRZEN.jyUJtcsfZqmDOCbGqmE7xjCB9fLj7BiPSpQDUehd9D.IuGDa334S0hxpS9uXiLxWu2qklkafx_bKumXGHjvezvAxOE-
Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 19:34:08 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.3.9 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: tiles-velocity problem
To: crystalalvarado@example.com, crystalalvarado@example.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


Apologies for the cross-post, but will someone step forward as the Velocity dev with whom Antonio was working on changes?  There is code in tiles-velocity that wants a velocity-tools o.a.v.t.view.AbstractJeeConfigImpl class that appears to be missing.  Does anybody know anything about such a beast, and where it may be hiding?  Would(n't) this be a simple do-nothing implementation of the JeeConfig interface from the same class?

TIA,
Matt


      

From crystalalvarado@example.com Fri May 15 03:14:15 2009
Return-Path: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 61247 invoked from network); 15 May 2009 03:14:14 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2009 03:14:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 73425 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2009 03:14:14 -0000
Delivered-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 73309 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2009 03:14:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact crystalalvarado@example.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Post: <mailto:crystalalvarado@example.com>
List-Id: <dev.tiles.apache.org>
Reply-To: crystalalvarado@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list crystalalvarado@example.com
Received: (qmail 73226 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2009 03:14:14 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 03:14:14 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of crystalalvarado@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-pz0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 May 2009 03:14:05 +0000
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so992909pzk.12
        for <crystalalvarado@example.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 20:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=hcbfNfs2lFzI4M9uUQDAu/vOfwqFb2EYCJQrV2xhtBk=;
        b=RfBqVfCGLsKjltXrvmKw9D8nxI9HTVVyADf3ouMa2I6DjDoQVa1lnzhSQHVtnUYxMh
         a+8XnsUDPvot+3kfyLyH/kVWhIA83rU3VxdHA7vRbJTjyagFR+sTeOkDl3qz7UWv/xTb
         IFRMIiVfck1EwAaqQU48bpkJZFcHPqzsWVQ/s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=d8l3Tte2zyt4TExHW39ISAs3U8RzmXHN8C4f1zLdqPG9W9nD/NfcElIhn1rJn9gwJw
         azPzqRcmplPV1NASdxX7W/49jvbmgEmfmKm1moixkgA/nokDlwemD/l+hA3GcNMWYQw0
         8MJk/I35eg6Oyj3oJuJeZS3EQCnPwWcrP1lbQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id p20mr954276wfj.207.1242357223728; Thu, 
	14 May 2009 20:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
References: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 20:13:43 -0700
Message-ID: <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Subject: Re: tiles-velocity problem
From: Nathan Bubna <crystalalvarado@example.com>
To: Velocity Developers List <crystalalvarado@example.com>
Cc: crystalalvarado@example.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hmm.  That would be a part of Antonio's patch for VELTOOLS-116 that i
didn't take (it was unnecessary).  Apparently he kept building
tiles-velocity against his own local version after i resolved that
issue. :(

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Matt Benson <crystalalvarado@example.com> wrote:
>
> Apologies for the cross-post, but will someone step forward as the Veloci=
ty dev with whom Antonio was working on changes? =A0There is code in tiles-=
velocity that wants a velocity-tools o.a.v.t.view.AbstractJeeConfigImpl cla=
ss that appears to be missing. =A0Does anybody know anything about such a b=
east, and where it may be hiding? =A0Would(n't) this be a simple do-nothing=
 implementation of the JeeConfig interface from the same class?
>
> TIA,
> Matt
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: crystalalvarado@example.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: crystalalvarado@example.com
>
>


{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}