From sabrinagardner@example.net Thu Jul 01 13:47:21 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 17866 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 13:47:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 13:47:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 47492 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 13:47:21 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 47346 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 13:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 47337 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 13:47:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:47:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:47:10 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so1192337bwz.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=X6dm7q3i1oJ2yE7FX4DNDGNuLlFOnO+4sK7jDuZ7nRQ=; b=QfXzEpRnvhsBP1zr8iQEfd5MmV5rrCRPpPCrgbuYFfKiVuO69J2rEYZOqIO9gr2Ttn 5uitVc29XHyzi5di8FdeQ+V4dz/d0zE20/xD4TKP0/kyeFQgIir/o4E1E4M1l46wmpYX wyvPXFvD1S+xqPP0ZQeebRjQrKBYKBY0ZPUpY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=NFJGN4o85PS1aCh0CyRMSEzb7Ay/VjbbfPCnWeO/9ncGk5nbZEINGQHkiINn+UoBoN /YRNFhe6JkfqEs3MFWKcB5n7uZiO5eMT6YMgLcRTQfETnSlYhOolbHis0NKndwQHrJP5 ioJcv9MNNmYSFQEwEPYfrQTomfJNImJ+XhrcA= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q23mr7572645bkt.161.1277992010346; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 06:46:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:46:30 +0000 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: buildr 1.4 packaging problem? To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys, I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility issue.. but sure you know better than me. The issue is shown here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out. thanks a lot, K From sabrinagardner@example.net Thu Jul 01 15:26:59 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 54780 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 15:26:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 15:26:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 10056 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 15:26:59 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 9948 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 15:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 9940 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 15:26:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:26:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 15:26:50 +0000 Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so1446209gyh.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:26:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6i+fYz14xdWmenD1eJb3j6sngo0WspkMSkxRDUHnd8w=; b=GH/tCUuKHTNrveE/+HW4DgXJlaK6Uy1N4GdCcAcARDBKRyC18CVMD+hPZJuHnWbdCo o5RximDo6Pkg+jO0+PVFP2QjW4gp6+lhny6JrZyMqjZ8z/VRfS3Glb7DcBLHCnUGVB+W nxBf1RxsNMS9dyC8zK3p8GRmbOkhA4pP8M3bQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JufSbRuu8P0ZlmE/K2dZ0yktCxw+HNJjXRp3QMPDQALDQpGzObwkGpKKSkJ+GSSL7n 5h21xofC31k8lp6nTA0xH9f1scirTnC16eYL4Hg3qjzxObZuqhqs1kPcdY2M8B9BCdGb r4Pq0bQl6/W6e8nAXfg2rydJYncGyQOoa/T18= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z8mr7712099qai.233.1277997989558; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:26:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:26:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:26:29 -0700 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem? From: Alex Boisvert <sabrinagardner@example.net> To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64cc95230f8a4048a5518b7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64cc95230f8a4048a5518b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Kristof, Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for reporting. If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a trivial fix) it would be appreciated. alex On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net>wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling > and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into > a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility > issue.. but sure you know better than me. > > The issue is shown here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on > arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have > a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out. > > thanks a lot, > K > --0016e64cc95230f8a4048a5518b7-- From sabrinagardner@example.net Thu Jul 01 15:53:29 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 72292 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 15:53:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 15:53:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 60685 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 15:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 60640 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 15:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 34356 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 15:38:43 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=uEWS7bsLz80a8FhYYJhmCCB6f1s7vpqhBBPNFlyi3VQ=; b=UvHId2sfbMHT5Z1t0fv5U+gSyvPUTUXP5kdp9T2zujD1yK4EjHg1aQ8nRfNX3aDNfG K62GrrB+xQJYyYkS5kwDYJbJPm69afDvESuT+GMXPMysTMcPPywiA2tZjC7IfTaKV16A saL5V0rLJk/nwMXK0nugJ+rEEMdLxg6qd5tGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=dn4PrnEVAysfSqcHq16Bo6YUUyy4qiY6CgTNWniN8NblKphA0f0kwJLQndMTI7VDLc /vTbs1NjWSmObjySYoTVEnT9zRuUmF5KJy9yXijJSkP0NZjK53DHqh8Dt+pIkpThWJi9 TbGULWg+lExdjeqoyAc8MCn+ao+2xqsAibaO0= Sender: Rhett Sutphin <sabrinagardner@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem? From: Rhett Sutphin <sabrinagardner@example.net> In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 10:38:10 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> To: sabrinagardner@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Hi Kristof, >=20 > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for = reporting. > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a = trivial > fix) it would be appreciated. I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious = problem: it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is = activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in = Kristof's case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests. =20 Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related. I don't = think this can be fixed in buildr. Rhett [1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140 >=20 > alex >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa = <sabrinagardner@example.net>wrote: >=20 >> Hi guys, >>=20 >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility >> issue.. but sure you know better than me. >>=20 >> The issue is shown here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you = have >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out. >>=20 >> thanks a lot, >> K >>=20 From sabrinagardner@example.net Thu Jul 01 16:18:40 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 90044 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 16:18:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 16:18:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 99607 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 16:18:38 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 99532 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 16:18:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 99524 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 16:18:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:18:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 16:18:32 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so240596wwd.5 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:18:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=8BAvOyhegzjecl5rU6Q28pejQ7+rWzmQbDoFZTsQxtw=; b=UZFHLk9vOKHMMCPt+ykcRyoaWftULYjJgIlT9FYYs1SLvGrSEUdmE0xypFACt+gVjm GmQrwbGKXedNUnb89G/N/xsW/8e2G3pM+/+77YGC/UgVzUUzDUANRHDrV7wj6B/3LsWZ KQn8S2Y9Ftr5TGpbL5EQlyGWi4dl3/tLeApik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=j4/FEGMTbze+lmoFCK0352sMP58rZicpJ97wFsTEgYc6CnTno7LptqWHA6VgIAmqIm D1t5ZaqXH5SDm9sXv4/op8Xot2GizWALVZoYZbsi3mDbsl5x0AWRulEvZyXmuDJYcrxn 98AnLXpUvRG0jWazQuz3+wWKjo46MxV8rdMmI= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v6mr809608hbh.45.1278001091537; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:18:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sabrinagardner@example.net Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:17:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:17:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: h9NPXi2jfCmP9uLDItV5zni3G3s Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem? To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b9f96156cdc048a55d138 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b9f96156cdc048a55d138 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 JRuby 1.6 targets supporting 1.9. When they do we can think of moving on. On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:38, Rhett Sutphin <sabrinagardner@example.net>wrote: > Hi, > > On Jul 1, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > > > Hi Kristof, > > > > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. Thanks for > reporting. > > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a > trivial > > fix) it would be appreciated. > > I posted on the ticket, but I'll repeat it here since it's a curious > problem: it seems like the issue is that under 1.9.1, rubygems is > activating the most recent installed version of rubyzip (0.9.4 in Kristof's > case), not the version (0.9.1) that buildr requests. > > Bug #3140[1] in MRI's issue tracker seems like it is related. I don't > think this can be fixed in buildr. > > Rhett > > [1]: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/3140 > > > > > alex > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net > >wrote: > > > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling > >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into > >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility > >> issue.. but sure you know better than me. > >> > >> The issue is shown here: > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on > >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have > >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out. > >> > >> thanks a lot, > >> K > >> > > --0016363b9f96156cdc048a55d138-- From sabrinagardner@example.net Mon Jul 05 08:55:58 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 65385 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 08:55:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 08:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 59443 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 08:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 59074 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 08:55:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 59065 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 08:55:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:55:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:55:45 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so3292263bwz.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BfoTHs7IDyj/8fE57yu1ODUvVSKGzbgf84/rmB1Q+Ac=; b=CvoyjWVrQFsNQgtqDTlA6DAndHO3wI5edT/+ng+X8fuB0SyPZ6c2qNdcjpoEFwUfH5 /CMkSkMn8M7i6NAOv7QGkZ8hQFmKdLBMRkSu30GgITACyd3w/G2/vsv/tHG+HccRHtUY UnL7L4ecqJMfV2culSzhQDBSLF/9BSeSqj+r8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vSV7YewbGXOdzMLQ6Vlt60ebLYdNvqwVmrt8YdMpxEDyxtuy9uQimtaLx3VbXVIuGY LeTSd6oBjRP+vsHL1BcksJUcRVU/v2ny/Dv88IN8kwu7g7YbUt3RaI60z5T6gCjj0vh+ kbehYaxDCGEFJK0CLzXiJHfhyBEPiAxo64l0k= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w12mr2141528bkx.135.1278320125191; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 01:55:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 01:55:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 08:55:05 +0000 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4 packaging problem? To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi alex, I've installed ruby 1.9.2-preview3 the other day and buildr is working perfectly with it. Based on this fact I don't think the Buildr team should do any serious efforts getting rid of this problem, I think it'll just resolve itself once ruby 1.9.2 is released as final.. K On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Alex Boisvert <sabrinagardner@example.net> wro= te: > Hi Kristof, > > Yes, Ruby 1.9.x compatibility is a work in progress. =C2=A0Thanks for rep= orting. > If you feel like spending some time to fix it (it's likely to be a trivia= l > fix) it would be appreciated. > > alex > > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net>wr= ote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I just discovered buildr already has transitive dependency handling >> and that sounded way too cool to miss it.. Unfortunately I'd run into >> a packaging problem in a few minutes. I _guess_ it's a compatibility >> issue.. but sure you know better than me. >> >> The issue is shown here: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-462 and it happens on >> arch linux x64 using ruby 1.9.1 and the latest buildr gem. If you have >> a quick fix or any workarounds for now, I'd be happy to try it out. >> >> thanks a lot, >> K >> > From sabrinagardner@example.net Mon Jul 05 10:07:57 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 84603 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 10:07:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 10:07:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 6241 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 10:07:57 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 6100 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 10:07:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 6084 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 10:07:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:07:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:07:46 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so3335737bwz.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 03:06:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=mpy4qey/TM8W91krlbmsGoZf3CL7z6nJud4gdApN4YQ=; b=Rm7kgdzMF9uOQYyv4Dr4QDwuG2K+4804wVvP1fwsjXBXgq/ykcKauGCYJzCYAIG0Tc dj0GuhRgy0ByTozL+Md0+ivkgW4l+wQadjb3RLl7rSZFVzeqSPiL49jE3V7Xn3uezQNI JN93rqyL7zqB6kc1JTEZUxHae143n2Pby6A8o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=QkdKWqX8WpjtO/c1QkITMMAKPa4ZyGlM/ju9Il3GyfsTq9faFFMfrdEUUQ/G6oPceR oEPdwC7wwSy1cxYlSuvqWH9YYmvIRkZ2+usU4yT5p1Jqho5yyDXPN35awZ0muov1NKci LJMXG30G4hzD6D95+IuK+LbtvHPFoX+CuOZIg= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b39mr2179355bkl.164.1278324385428; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 03:06:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 03:06:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 10:06:05 +0000 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: subprojects and eclipse classpath generation To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, assume I have a buildfile with the following projects structure: Parent |- Sub1 |- Sub2 where Sub2 also depends on Sub1. As this is an older project where I'm trying to introduce Buildr, the directories are named like 'parent', 'sub1' and 'sub2' (all lowercase). Once I execute the eclipse task of buildr, it generates an eclipse classpath which makes Sub2 module depend on the Sub1 module (correctly) but using the name "Parent-Sub1". Is there any way to override this naming with our own somehow easily? thanks, K From sabrinagardner@example.net Mon Jul 05 16:46:41 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 92850 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 16:46:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 16:46:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 40956 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 16:46:41 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 40847 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 16:46:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 97773 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 09:54:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=zfOAZQGzPbBocy9L9/CXrq1hgqorAlC5+FxOqp/1/Q0=; b=sVekWdgb41rBR2OG0xSlC4+4L640NRh/FAMrBADxnC50nLRN2dVvFsDNnNx+YitOYd s6m9ohIeH9XiohLvFPkN3Ae95Jjxqj3UIHdpehUiaM/20ARelHWZW3G5mQbCSbWGaHk2 T9hOTISDPdFf1mI4Wu2cp5w+eUeMKDewuEvaU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=CgWh8gI1QPUgWdNRFJgHtRaOPH7GtnvIH1CpJ974NVSSg4y73mbd3ghRvtPHmEZnqJ WUEkQymCbtwyzfW5OEgi53lOkGiYAHZoASBftQdGAmzot8OYqpSRCjcf1luITs2eHWXF py9xjz1BHjvurjyYgNuXLuyFO94zSa4uSB4Ww= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sabrinagardner@example.net From: Karl Trygve Kalleberg <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 11:52:54 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Jc48YpSVAyKFs664vVEH4w_Jy1Y Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Removing toplevel prefix from the generated IntelliJ IDEA .iml files To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi gang, I've been browsing the online docs, the API docs and also looked at the IDEA buildr source code a bit, but if the answer was right there in my face, I didn't see it... I have a toplevel Buildfile in project foo, and a few subjects, say bar and baz. Inside baz/, I do buildr idea, and the file foo-bar.iml is generated. However, I want this file to be named bar.iml, i.e. without the toplevel prefix "foo-". In /var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/buildr-1.4.0/lib/buildr/ide/idea.rb, I found the line task_name = project.path_to("#{project.name.gsub(':', '-')}.iml") which leads me to think that my desires are (i) unreasonable or (ii) reasonable, but not supported. Is there a way to (temporarily) change the project.name for just the idea target? -- Karl T From sabrinagardner@example.net Mon Jul 05 23:45:59 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 89247 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 23:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 23:45:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 94402 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 23:45:58 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 94301 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 23:45:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 94293 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 23:45:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:45:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-vw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:45:52 +0000 Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so6204444vws.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:44:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KD88c09nX2oRIn7Xle4hj71k0JpOMFxGp4cUchsaHzY=; b=cGGyVUSFL02QyZ2KufTtI6DDncrbAdZpyQe00uj6PepLcSX+D1Hxj4otPOxd5IM3ZD RNkN14hv2Ft18bc9cPjJvAPP28w3fJo7f6OnP3YcI1i5vPgOrFETp3Y4ClMbGsxYtrPk U3xhKKFEjtL41ho15rjS9kQXmfkL2NCpfcF1Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Hp6eG/5kl1eVL9oDmysaTqmL0bvnf+LRnKaZ2Oq0m4kFC+dFLtXr++p7F7OI0aKjVB uFEFO0CAA3wlfLDD4kUDfaW320XAHTP10uBWCz5j9SQrnxTRqb2HMaFOtRQjn35QbSgQ nYJg//UYK2AYBDGDCEOou24NznIk85LUplv1Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w12mr1931528vcf.243.1278373471102; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 16:44:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:44:31 +1000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c5hJ-P5bbqSKgoVwh-qwXPxbRQo Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: Removing toplevel prefix from the generated IntelliJ IDEA .iml files From: Peter Donald <sabrinagardner@example.net> To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, You may want to check out buildr-iidea [1] which is an enhanced suite of task to generate IDEA project files. It can be configured to do what you want and much more besides that. If you try it out and find anything missing then drop me a line. [1] http://github.com/realityforge/buildr-iidea On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Karl Trygve Kalleberg <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: > Hi gang, > > I've been browsing the online docs, the API docs and also looked at > the IDEA buildr source code a bit, but if the answer was right there > in my face, I didn't see it... > > I have a toplevel Buildfile in project foo, and a few subjects, say > bar and baz. Inside baz/, I do buildr idea, and the file foo-bar.iml > is generated. However, I want this file to be named bar.iml, i.e. > without the toplevel prefix "foo-". > > In /var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/buildr-1.4.0/lib/buildr/ide/idea.rb, I found th= e line > > =A0task_name =3D project.path_to("#{project.name.gsub(':', '-')}.iml") > > which leads me to think that my desires are (i) unreasonable or (ii) > reasonable, but not supported. > > Is there a way to (temporarily) change the project.name for just the > idea target? --=20 Cheers, Peter Donald From sabrinagardner@example.net Mon Jul 05 23:57:43 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 90171 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2010 23:57:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 5 Jul 2010 23:57:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 96058 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 23:57:43 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 96009 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2010 23:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 77283 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2010 23:09:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=iW8JH8sXwG8G1q+EGHbUfVHSjTL86kOGvQi+S4X8uN0=; b=ZjIxMYHhpc3FQcH69SOewUaBC4Qu0ZrFWrzYPjPmkdVAcyRG7DWbXkUeMXD0UUoyXY PeNtsq824nBCs8bZTLEb0KcYPIAV+GaWxJy0fPQ4ViZe5V8eaufG/Hi/6JpPB1OqOEvF RMIB9AjdP+7pXAxxfrR9xNhsYcaOsL2ddQwG4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=fq5FNTa9w6B7KSWOu0MBFjJ3NdJMnQG2rG6cE8xds+a0pjb7idn8hNcBD4wC0YX4Oc z8xbs2tWg421B1NTNZ0EOQN6sYNDphYzXcHdU8qukjN3ZUymF1gxiH6jt+pX1rKwsL6i CoUtDoo2CYaifF35cPTBuFPFEB7qC3E6RHANM= Sender: Rhett Sutphin <sabrinagardner@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Removing toplevel prefix from the generated IntelliJ IDEA .iml files From: Rhett Sutphin <sabrinagardner@example.net> In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:08:37 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> To: sabrinagardner@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Karl, On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote: > Hi gang, >=20 > I've been browsing the online docs, the API docs and also looked at > the IDEA buildr source code a bit, but if the answer was right there > in my face, I didn't see it... >=20 > I have a toplevel Buildfile in project foo, and a few subjects, say > bar and baz. Inside baz/, I do buildr idea, and the file foo-bar.iml > is generated. However, I want this file to be named bar.iml, i.e. > without the toplevel prefix "foo-". This is the default behavior for the buildr-iidea plugin, which is a = third-party replacement for the built-in idea and idea7x tasks: http://github.com/realityforge/buildr-iidea If you are using buildr-iidea, you can also control the name for a = particular project like so: define "foo" do define "bar" do iml.id =3D "not-bar" end end In this situation, the IML for bar would be named not-bar.iml. Rhett >=20 > In /var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/buildr-1.4.0/lib/buildr/ide/idea.rb, I found = the line >=20 > task_name =3D project.path_to("#{project.name.gsub(':', '-')}.iml") >=20 > which leads me to think that my desires are (i) unreasonable or (ii) > reasonable, but not supported. >=20 > Is there a way to (temporarily) change the project.name for just the > idea target? >=20 >=20 > -- Karl T From sabrinagardner@example.net Tue Jul 06 09:13:17 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 23549 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 09:13:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 31496 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:17 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 31342 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 31332 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 09:13:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:13:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:13:04 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so4180037bwz.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:12:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=254PE/U6jqkheACORYCjdWx+npo2b4vjMzwNZdlsUVs=; b=kGnJihI5kc3UXWu4o/ItkmcCXP5UfeS1euAC7jpVv2BhmZCBb4FYg3lONjYbuEPdvj oL0RytpHZzaVAvDeVpAqunWPHmQIxThngFbWmrznrB4Sw13C/xcw2V+l9Rx079ALqiPj /YL0L1ybtDeS+kYvcy+mKN6l2ppRaRJRk03BQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=Bvl7b9eummEcGNo2sq+hfFBAFT7J9L2ezB7M7xnkHtxwJbQ9IhXA+xKKraXf7vRcst 6BfUI2ju5wngMC/Vt8amHwA1sfSdc4mywqJhy8osbu7RuQ58nzYsEhdlIntTN6N7THAl vOY+ufjVr+X09eKmr8CtC73SdXkQ+jJF3wPys= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id g21mr3394903bkf.11.1278407563883; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 02:12:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:12:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 09:12:22 +0000 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: subprojects and eclipse classpath generation To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org examining the buildr gem source, it seems that eclipse.rb:334 adds the classpath entries using the project ids which use the fully qualified name of subprojects in the Parent:Subproject form. I made it fix for my needs changing this short method to: def src_projects project_libs project_libs.map(&:id).sort.uniq.each do |project_id| stripped = project_id.gsub(/.*-/, '') @xml.classpathentry :kind=>'src', :combineaccessrules=>'false', :path=>"/#{stripped}" end end so if anyone else bumps into this problem, something like this might help. I just wonder if anyone names it's Eclipse projects using the naming schema suggested by this Buildr sabrinagardner@example.net.. :) cheers, K On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: > Hi, > > assume I have a buildfile with the following projects structure: > > Parent > |- Sub1 > |- Sub2 > > where Sub2 also depends on Sub1. As this is an older project where I'm > trying to introduce Buildr, the directories are named like 'parent', > 'sub1' and 'sub2' (all lowercase). > > Once I execute the eclipse task of buildr, it generates an eclipse > classpath which makes Sub2 module depend on the Sub1 module > (correctly) but using the name "Parent-Sub1". Is there any way to > override this naming with our own somehow easily? > > thanks, > K > From sabrinagardner@example.net Tue Jul 06 14:14:53 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 9323 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 14:14:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 14:14:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 18057 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 14:14:53 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 17923 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 14:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 17915 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 14:14:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:14:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gy0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:14:45 +0000 Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so3819396gyh.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:14:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8t/RYeLa7w4wvapbE5eWp9q4n4qqUat1ObUlJcQRgoU=; b=wL9Wjnb1HaESd3voxu9vuoEQ39gbJJ68FOyHKcL8TrWdlvWr/rQoWT5W6yhxIbUrJf CYOHbc2jAwYoVjGYI3I2TNFp6C+VKn4F87X8i2emuFxbuGHaMO/dt9aPqTVZQ6lXA6aE bmp7lXpg4HickHIxdSOZKs/var07qiJ/tZHkw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hqrI6FYYzaS70lm7bmH84nZ0UFybqAwbL1fmKzUDa0ywkinToJtnBayHzTjk5gRkfX 61cL2tTwThXnbQU5HUzVqt2j5fyH4DwDvO9qkgj5GqsAIM2VWZQtwTYtA7PKMTNSyQN2 XO7CCmS9n3BCrWbcuNEiYlm/ALKXWX6MQaxNU= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z3mr317673eba.64.1278425663466; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:14:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:14:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:14:02 +0000 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 (without jruby) on cygwin To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Magnus, did you manage to install buildr on windows at last? I'm trying to set up an old windows-box as the hudson server for the company but failed miserably on this rjb gem installation with the same problems :( K On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Rundberget <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: > > I'm stuck with cygwin at my organization.... > > I have tried to install buildr 1.4.0 (without jruby) on cygwin but so far= no luck. > Any pointers would be appreciated ! > > > > 1. Installed ruby package through cygwin setup > $ ruby -v > ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i386-cygwin] > > $ gem -v > 1.3.7 > > $ echo $JAVA_HOME > > c:/dev/JDK160 > > > > 2. trying to install buildr > $ gem install buildr --version 1.4.0 > Building native extensions. =C2=A0This could take a while... > ERROR: =C2=A0Error installing buildr: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. > > /usr/bin/ruby.exe extconf.rb > checking for jni.h... no > *** extconf.rb failed *** > Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of > necessary libraries and/or headers. =C2=A0Check the mkmf.log file for mor= e > details. =C2=A0You may need configuration options. > > Provided configuration options: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-opt-dir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-opt-dir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-opt-include > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-opt-include=3D${opt-dir}/include > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-opt-lib > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-opt-lib=3D${opt-dir}/lib > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-make-prog > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-make-prog > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--srcdir=3D. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--curdir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--ruby=3D/usr/bin/ruby > > > Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5 = for inspection. > Results logged to /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5/ext/gem_make.out > > > 3. try install downloaded gem for buildr > gem install buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem > Building native extensions. =C2=A0This could take a while... > ERROR: =C2=A0Error installing buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. > > /usr/bin/ruby.exe extconf.rb > checking for jni.h... no > *** extconf.rb failed *** > Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of > necessary libraries and/or headers. =C2=A0Check the mkmf.log file for mor= e > details. =C2=A0You may need configuration options. > > Provided configuration options: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-opt-dir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-opt-dir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-opt-include > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-opt-include=3D${opt-dir}/include > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-opt-lib > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-opt-lib=3D${opt-dir}/lib > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--with-make-prog > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--without-make-prog > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--srcdir=3D. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--curdir > =C2=A0 =C2=A0--ruby=3D/usr/bin/ruby > > > Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5 = for inspection. > Results logged to /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5/ext/gem_make.out > > > > cheers > Magnus > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft=E2=80=99s powerful SPAM protection. > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969 From sabrinagardner@example.net Tue Jul 06 17:27:20 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 65310 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 17:27:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 81034 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:20 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 80991 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 80983 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:11 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so4597484bwz.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=zURfNbHZ2Q6BH+JoxKv/Y0QpTZJrdml3NKSIfvnax+M=; b=rhtDx6k99dH+qdxo4Go8oSKOIKhQ/EhwMao1Js39z/JxJrHU6JHtm0zfGPlkzhRSwX 4H0b8EnO7L9jRhVhqXz3HOaPaBsRiiYUedohOiY4diYnADH3cQcw080BOUChgqouu2ug yFCCPx7R9e0bwcnENsVhGrHPSqv3+5z3PpC/0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=c0HQzZtXONKhw5hIuw+wqmgermKLmpMhh3kijpTAvWa+BthzFX8dJPOoo4Ts1C+k0W G1Rsyih7XpYptFStULFiQ3quFfSb3ZXT4g+wtr5IStKj2sq1SF4B7BafW6Tme+0rd81w GAdpmaj/1uY4QS2ymDXVOZ6RZzorJ0cUL8svg= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id g10mr4030859bko.42.1278437150655; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sabrinagardner@example.net Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:25:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:25:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: olbrkfUmuvsbjZFW9qg4XiQCGfY Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: subprojects and eclipse classpath generation To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7eeb43b8c38048abb5890 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7eeb43b8c38048abb5890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Kristof, can you open an enhancement request so that people can override Eclipse project names ? In general, I am also in favor of avoiding long names with dashes, but they are the only way to avoid collisions of namespaces. Something like eclipse.project_name should be made available if you want to override the name of the project name. On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 02:12, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: > examining the buildr gem source, it seems that eclipse.rb:334 adds the > classpath entries using the project ids which use the fully qualified > name of subprojects in the Parent:Subproject form. I made it fix for > my needs changing this short method to: > > def src_projects project_libs > project_libs.map(&:id).sort.uniq.each do |project_id| > stripped = project_id.gsub(/.*-/, '') > @xml.classpathentry :kind=>'src', :combineaccessrules=>'false', > :path=>"/#{stripped}" > end > end > > so if anyone else bumps into this problem, something like this might > help. I just wonder if anyone names it's Eclipse projects using the > naming schema suggested by this Buildr sabrinagardner@example.net.. :) > > cheers, > K > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > assume I have a buildfile with the following projects structure: > > > > Parent > > |- Sub1 > > |- Sub2 > > > > where Sub2 also depends on Sub1. As this is an older project where I'm > > trying to introduce Buildr, the directories are named like 'parent', > > 'sub1' and 'sub2' (all lowercase). > > > > Once I execute the eclipse task of buildr, it generates an eclipse > > classpath which makes Sub2 module depend on the Sub1 module > > (correctly) but using the name "Parent-Sub1". Is there any way to > > override this naming with our own somehow easily? > > > > thanks, > > K > > > --0016e6d7eeb43b8c38048abb5890-- From sabrinagardner@example.net Tue Jul 06 17:27:58 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 65386 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 17:27:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 81270 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:58 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 81216 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 81208 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 17:27:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:27:51 +0000 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so3500041wwb.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=jUJLUUTjf7J57nVZlDmjOH0hg995cmk+FInhkO+UJRQ=; b=UalyuwS7UzOYRDSHDeg+rXA8IiNeNQ6sPCatVyYGEjAtivw5Pj2XljsrQJsPkdG3pN AXHbNvrM25rRFOugZttlMbbAROyG69B+nvQkW9nqZyn+UI4EEj5+kwm3zA/KK2JBvq4u CtHRgrFljkvxuqcxDSUJ6ssnLFJFq1hvR3Gmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=x6nKylB/fHs965bDU3p39CFbWINGr2CWTDjbB/KdctAHnhLBmIkLfzOq4N2pUjQgVX GmaiLHdi7eE7SpFaI8mQArO6Piy7hD5RbikzUccd3KQrKpsbIRYk2m19ohAB4tM147xF YtRWe2FFgk+I2jHWvYTZnb0ir8vYpyFjy8WPo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id z10mr419454hbg.208.1278437190814; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:26:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sabrinagardner@example.net Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:26:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:26:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nx-z6nu_pwxsPcCXRBmG4CYkWMk Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 (without jruby) on cygwin To: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f90e20a05678048abb5ab8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f90e20a05678048abb5ab8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kristof, if you can, use jruby on windows. We have a all-in-one bundle on rubyforge. On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 07:14, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote= : > Hi Magnus, > > did you manage to install buildr on windows at last? I'm trying to set > up an old windows-box as the hudson server for the company but failed > miserably on this rjb gem installation with the same problems :( > > K > > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Rundberget > <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: > > > > I'm stuck with cygwin at my organization.... > > > > I have tried to install buildr 1.4.0 (without jruby) on cygwin but so f= ar > no luck. > > Any pointers would be appreciated ! > > > > > > > > 1. Installed ruby package through cygwin setup > > $ ruby -v > > ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i386-cygwin] > > > > $ gem -v > > 1.3.7 > > > > $ echo $JAVA_HOME > > > > c:/dev/JDK160 > > > > > > > > 2. trying to install buildr > > $ gem install buildr --version 1.4.0 > > Building native extensions. This could take a while... > > ERROR: Error installing buildr: > > ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. > > > > /usr/bin/ruby.exe extconf.rb > > checking for jni.h... no > > *** extconf.rb failed *** > > Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of > > necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more > > details. You may need configuration options. > > > > Provided configuration options: > > --with-opt-dir > > --without-opt-dir > > --with-opt-include > > --without-opt-include=3D${opt-dir}/include > > --with-opt-lib > > --without-opt-lib=3D${opt-dir}/lib > > --with-make-prog > > --without-make-prog > > --srcdir=3D. > > --curdir > > --ruby=3D/usr/bin/ruby > > > > > > Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.= 5 > for inspection. > > Results logged to /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5/ext/gem_make.ou= t > > > > > > 3. try install downloaded gem for buildr > > gem install buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem > > Building native extensions. This could take a while... > > ERROR: Error installing buildr-1.4.0-x86-mswin32.gem: > > ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. > > > > /usr/bin/ruby.exe extconf.rb > > checking for jni.h... no > > *** extconf.rb failed *** > > Could not create Makefile due to some reason, probably lack of > > necessary libraries and/or headers. Check the mkmf.log file for more > > details. You may need configuration options. > > > > Provided configuration options: > > --with-opt-dir > > --without-opt-dir > > --with-opt-include > > --without-opt-include=3D${opt-dir}/include > > --with-opt-lib > > --without-opt-lib=3D${opt-dir}/lib > > --with-make-prog > > --without-make-prog > > --srcdir=3D. > > --curdir > > --ruby=3D/usr/bin/ruby > > > > > > Gem files will remain installed in /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.= 5 > for inspection. > > Results logged to /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rjb-1.2.5/ext/gem_make.ou= t > > > > > > > > cheers > > Magnus > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft=92s powerful SPAM protection. > > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=3D60969 > --001485f90e20a05678048abb5ab8-- From sabrinagardner@example.net Tue Jul 06 17:40:57 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 67577 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 17:40:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 17:40:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 91293 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:40:57 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 91243 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 17:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 91235 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 17:40:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:40:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-gw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:40:49 +0000 Received: by gwb10 with SMTP id 10so4030015gwb.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dVzLXK+T9M3VUohqwDS+f2dhpB2F4lYvwMBKmyy9t+s=; b=evOVWFx0PcaQjE5famvYF2Pfk8EYpm3t0MUyhwPpE5MYG9YRvhFTpXjz29mSic2Re8 helgZixOfqSXc0/dTd3fF3SbupEM7eRaYzSawfhGgkcPdV2bdAlwxmVATf5v4IGZpIuo wltSchK2kL0mIzeYtEdhrEobOkHqEJXipJz58= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IzrwMiRhL8fDQgUtD2VHk4udbUlBfqZ7wwLa5gF5Yp/rTh09T3yK/mJ7aLrbwcz36t xVnvY+4isv33dE30Edl98HAJ3cbCj3QpAESs681HhwgGL/vE+TIKL9TkSYwk98IZzXeo PiATPWI55iZUPpNyN8mlHqBb+20OcBrjBjnXc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id bw6mr2945283qcb.172.1278437968495; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:39:28 -0700 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: subprojects and eclipse classpath generation From: Alex Boisvert <sabrinagardner@example.net> To: sabrinagardner@example.net, sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b8b54fac8f4048abb88e9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b8b54fac8f4048abb88e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 How about a configuration option so the Eclipse task generates only non-prefixed names? (not mutually exclusive with your suggestion) alex On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net>wrote: > Kristof, can you open an enhancement request so that people can override > Eclipse project names ? > > In general, I am also in favor of avoiding long names with dashes, but they > are the only way to avoid collisions of namespaces. > > Something like eclipse.project_name should be made available if you want to > override the name of the project name. > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 02:12, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> > wrote: > > > examining the buildr gem source, it seems that eclipse.rb:334 adds the > > classpath entries using the project ids which use the fully qualified > > name of subprojects in the Parent:Subproject form. I made it fix for > > my needs changing this short method to: > > > > def src_projects project_libs > > project_libs.map(&:id).sort.uniq.each do |project_id| > > stripped = project_id.gsub(/.*-/, '') > > @xml.classpathentry :kind=>'src', :combineaccessrules=>'false', > > :path=>"/#{stripped}" > > end > > end > > > > so if anyone else bumps into this problem, something like this might > > help. I just wonder if anyone names it's Eclipse projects using the > > naming schema suggested by this Buildr sabrinagardner@example.net.. :) > > > > cheers, > > K > > > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > assume I have a buildfile with the following projects structure: > > > > > > Parent > > > |- Sub1 > > > |- Sub2 > > > > > > where Sub2 also depends on Sub1. As this is an older project where I'm > > > trying to introduce Buildr, the directories are named like 'parent', > > > 'sub1' and 'sub2' (all lowercase). > > > > > > Once I execute the eclipse task of buildr, it generates an eclipse > > > classpath which makes Sub2 module depend on the Sub1 module > > > (correctly) but using the name "Parent-Sub1". Is there any way to > > > override this naming with our own somehow easily? > > > > > > thanks, > > > K > > > > > > --0016363b8b54fac8f4048abb88e9-- From sabrinagardner@example.net Tue Jul 06 18:55:32 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 96052 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 18:55:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 18:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 72432 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 18:55:32 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 72316 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 72308 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2010 18:55:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:55:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f172.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:55:24 +0000 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so1538647iwn.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=wLNn+/3+03tLEdU/MWlb/ozPOa9T+rIu3Twrypdsow0=; b=Jsp/Xl/L3OtkT5gB2/7EL4s8OYru2O0fB3bat812ZELIA1WL7z1UGg7I2fiRHVfl/s KE63WQjDx9wm9a8NO6779AOJg+JGofCJVMvVDjs6C6Ak5BRlkAkOTFbDuXjbGBLKomPg xuMzuQwmMyXXH2gVNg1Lk/bPGJnNkRCLHxiPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=MBiV5hYoM3vtsYXyj5kgir+nTdg2bMVFHD0KTxAKlhbo9BsrFP500D3tlmEnlwjTIu F82ayhJyd4r4hKDOf3PfsSljbm33FrvBqDNbF+xzqBCPaAiU2+ko7YkOu9AM+Sa2r86t 8u4b4kafXMc9tzdv+CmIOYr9dyT+2Lxn3HHUs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v8mr5527837iby.33.1278442442683; Tue, 06 Jul 2010 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sabrinagardner@example.net Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:53:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 11:53:22 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: v6pS-izX1cPgwr2mXu7gWnXksQI Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: subprojects and eclipse classpath generation To: Alex Boisvert <sabrinagardner@example.net> Cc: sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450142dba97557048abc9361 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0050450142dba97557048abc9361 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OK with me! On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:39, Alex Boisvert <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: > How about a configuration option so the Eclipse task generates only > non-prefixed names? > (not mutually exclusive with your suggestion) > > alex > > > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net>wrote: > >> Kristof, can you open an enhancement request so that people can override >> Eclipse project names ? >> >> In general, I am also in favor of avoiding long names with dashes, but >> they >> are the only way to avoid collisions of namespaces. >> >> Something like eclipse.project_name should be made available if you want >> to >> override the name of the project name. >> >> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 02:12, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> >> wrote: >> >> > examining the buildr gem source, it seems that eclipse.rb:334 adds the >> > classpath entries using the project ids which use the fully qualified >> > name of subprojects in the Parent:Subproject form. I made it fix for >> > my needs changing this short method to: >> > >> > def src_projects project_libs >> > project_libs.map(&:id).sort.uniq.each do |project_id| >> > stripped = project_id.gsub(/.*-/, '') >> > @xml.classpathentry :kind=>'src', :combineaccessrules=>'false', >> > :path=>"/#{stripped}" >> > end >> > end >> > >> > so if anyone else bumps into this problem, something like this might >> > help. I just wonder if anyone names it's Eclipse projects using the >> > naming schema suggested by this Buildr sabrinagardner@example.net.. :) >> > >> > cheers, >> > K >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net >> > >> > wrote: >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > assume I have a buildfile with the following projects structure: >> > > >> > > Parent >> > > |- Sub1 >> > > |- Sub2 >> > > >> > > where Sub2 also depends on Sub1. As this is an older project where I'm >> > > trying to introduce Buildr, the directories are named like 'parent', >> > > 'sub1' and 'sub2' (all lowercase). >> > > >> > > Once I execute the eclipse task of buildr, it generates an eclipse >> > > classpath which makes Sub2 module depend on the Sub1 module >> > > (correctly) but using the name "Parent-Sub1". Is there any way to >> > > override this naming with our own somehow easily? >> > > >> > > thanks, >> > > K >> > > >> > >> > > --0050450142dba97557048abc9361-- From sabrinagardner@example.net Wed Jul 07 08:07:26 2010 Return-Path: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 2158 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 08:07:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 08:07:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 13183 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 08:07:26 -0000 Delivered-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 13039 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 08:07:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact sabrinagardner@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:sabrinagardner@example.net> List-Id: <users.buildr.apache.org> Reply-To: sabrinagardner@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list sabrinagardner@example.net Received: (qmail 13030 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 08:07:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:07:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabrinagardner@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:07:15 +0000 Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so5034243bwz.17 for <sabrinagardner@example.net>; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=T9I1jP6shtisayD41AINs0P9uPLsxKGM50i+KNaWfVM=; b=j9hVCmSV3q2ARN0OqRd7B11GSPHWmqUCaNJN+Kv37BfIHVx8K62AdpfHZaEnLlUmHr Oxtng3NpHRr2iYY9tcSeMacXsJFsP7vCvYCWkUYuHyXHoBgV9JwQICzhcDyAqywyrV08 lfONmU0nO6/cEh4CaplQUBeC/lmtHB/39BKa4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SNEbhqKdAqiQhMYKBG0Fq14y2VIUnS55JNeFJrqJJAqhj5XHTGPvnkB/M7TCX2XxET JdUA2EeGpRCkXlsRYW6MRmGKv4330Gku337AAA0YJBCXtKT2bSgMHXRehGTcX9p70517 k3+gKKotrTG6VLXN+bQQ4Cvn5Y6rb9RO0h20Y= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b2mr4737877bkl.12.1278489955344; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:05:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 01:05:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <sabrinagardner@example.net> References: <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> <sabrinagardner@example.net> From: Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:05:35 +0000 Message-ID: <sabrinagardner@example.net> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 (without jruby) on cygwin To: sabrinagardner@example.net, sabrinagardner@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I managed to install it successfully at last without cygwin but using the 1.8.6 mri ruby + the devkit package from rubyinstaller.org. I also tried getting it up with JRuby but the box used was very slow (a Celeron 1.7 with Windows2000(!)) and JRuby was unable to create some directories upon installing the xml builder gem.. I've never seen such a problem before. The same stuff installed clean on my WinXP virtualbox image on my Arch linux without any problems.. eh, nevermind. K On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Antoine Toulme <sabrinagardner@example.net> wr= ote: > Kristof, if you can, use jruby on windows. We have a all-in-one bundle on > rubyforge. > > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 07:14, Kristof Jozsa <sabrinagardner@example.net> wro= te: > >> Hi Magnus, >> >> did you manage to install buildr on windows at last? I'm trying to set >> up an old windows-box as the hudson server for the company but failed >> miserably on this rjb gem installation with the same problems :( >> >> K >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Magnus Rundberget >> <sabrinagardner@example.net> wrote: >> > >> > I'm stuck with cygwin at my organization.... >> > >> > I have tried to install buildr 1.4.0 (without jruby) on cygwin but so = far >> no luck. >> > Any pointers would be appreciated ! >> > >> > >> > >> > 1. Installed ruby package through cygwin setup >> > $ ruby -v >> > ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i386-cygwin] >> > >>
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}