From dev-returnlpage@example.net Sun Oct 01 13:04:05 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 48795 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 13:04:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 13:04:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 91551 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 13:04:04 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 91531 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 13:04:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 90591 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2006 12:57:35 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 08:57:28 -0400 From: Duncan Findlay <lpage@example.net> To: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <lpage@example.net> Cc: lpage@example.net Subject: Re: mass-check: Too many open files! Message-ID: <20061001125728.GA26330@gold> Mail-Followup-To: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <lpage@example.net>, lpage@example.net References: <20060925235248.GA22749@gold> <20060930184215.GA24049@gold> <lpage@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Debian) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:06:44PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > Duncan Findlay wrote: > >Fixed now! Thanks, Daryl! > I'm confused. What did I unknowingly fix now? :) I think your fixes to ArchiveIterator must have fixed my problem with mass-check complaining about too many open files. --=20 Duncan Findlay --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFH7s4qjUzNGvmnNARAspWAKC8je4CJt2gDDOIKU6vbHtczIPz6wCgmhw8 cOtT+SXKeqE4d1kNr+s9Tak= =DtwK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X-- From dev-returnlpage@example.net Sun Oct 01 16:30:10 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 83683 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 16:30:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 16:30:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 19613 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 16:30:09 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 19592 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 16:30:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 19581 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2006 16:30:09 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:30:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:3938] helo=monitoring.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id C0/00-04942-01DEF154 for <lpage@example.net>; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:30:08 -0700 Received: by monitoring.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 104) id 55F472402C; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:57:42 +0100 (BST) To: lpage@example.net Subject: Service alert: spamassassin.zones.apache.org/BUILDBOT is OK Message-Id: <lpage@example.net> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:57:42 +0100 (BST) From: lpage@example.net X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N *** ASF Nagios *** Notification Type: RECOVERY Host: spamassassin.zones.apache.org Address: 83.161.120.155 Service: BUILDBOT State: OK Info: $ Date/Time: Sun Oct 1 17:57:41 BST 2006 From dev-returnlpage@example.net Sun Oct 01 16:33:08 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 84860 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 16:33:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 16:33:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 22235 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 16:33:08 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 21909 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 16:33:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 21898 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2006 16:33:07 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:33:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:3950] helo=monitoring.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 6D/00-04942-2CDEF154 for <lpage@example.net>; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 09:33:06 -0700 Received: by monitoring.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 104) id 963912402C; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:00:41 +0100 (BST) To: lpage@example.net Subject: Service alert: spamassassin.zones.apache.org/BBMASS is OK Message-Id: <lpage@example.net> Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:00:41 +0100 (BST) From: lpage@example.net X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N *** ASF Nagios *** Notification Type: RECOVERY Host: spamassassin.zones.apache.org Address: 83.161.120.155 Service: BBMASS State: OK Info: $ Date/Time: Sun Oct 1 18:00:41 BST 2006 From dev-returnlpage@example.net Sun Oct 01 21:43:01 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 41574 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 21:43:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 21:43:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 12463 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 21:43:00 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 12429 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 21:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 12418 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2006 21:43:00 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:43:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:30117] helo=smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 45/18-05102-E5630254 for <lpage@example.net>; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 14:42:55 -0700 Received: (qmail 30778 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 21:42:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gold.duncf.mine.nu) (lpage@example.net@83.161.120.155 with login) by smtp109.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 21:42:52 -0000 Received: from duncf by gold.duncf.mine.nu with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <lpage@example.net>) id 1GU95H-000331-CQ for lpage@example.net; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:42:51 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:42:51 -0400 From: Duncan Findlay <lpage@example.net> To: lpage@example.net Subject: L1 Logistic Regression in SpamAssassin Message-ID: <20061001214251.GA10146@gold> Mail-Followup-To: lpage@example.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Debian) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey everybody, Just wanted to let you know that, as part of my 4th Year Math & Engineering Design Project, I'm working on using L1 regularized Logistic Regression to replace the Perceptron scoring mechanism, as described by Lee, Lee, Abbeel and Ng in this paper: http://ai.stanford.edu/~ang/papers/aaai06-efficientL1logisticregression.pdf It's way too early for any kind of predictions, but we're hoping to see better perfomance with this algortihm than the perceptron. I'll let you know when we start to see results. --=20 Duncan Findlay --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFIDZbqjUzNGvmnNARAoa5AJ9ez5evtwFCVHf9tgYcqOIW6zaM3QCgoffO ZdSlufMxnu7juqIc5uX8ZYI= =Tmo+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT-- From dev-returnlpage@example.net Sun Oct 01 21:52:48 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 42497 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2006 21:52:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2006 21:52:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 20786 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 21:52:47 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 20765 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2006 21:52:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 20555 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2006 21:52:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 17:51:54 -0400 From: Duncan Findlay <lpage@example.net> To: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <lpage@example.net>, lpage@example.net Subject: Re: mass-check: Too many open files! Message-ID: <20061001215154.GA12290@gold> Mail-Followup-To: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <lpage@example.net>, lpage@example.net References: <20060925235248.GA22749@gold> <20060930184215.GA24049@gold> <lpage@example.net> <20061001125728.GA26330@gold> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061001125728.GA26330@gold> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (Debian) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 08:57:28AM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:06:44PM -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > Duncan Findlay wrote: > > >Fixed now! Thanks, Daryl! > > I'm confused. What did I unknowingly fix now? :) > I think your fixes to ArchiveIterator must have fixed my problem with > mass-check complaining about too many open files. I lied. I've still got problems. :-( --=20 Duncan Findlay --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFIDh6qjUzNGvmnNARAmdUAKDLslpIOBJE4KuOgtlXGFQ99EJRYACeM+DQ LSGrDTClvymeHpiYyHhDlk4= =ZH7a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 09:05:17 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 52540 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 09:05:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 09:05:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 21754 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 09:05:17 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 21424 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 09:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 21413 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 09:05:16 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:05:16 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:55113] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 2D/C2-16499-B46D0254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:05:15 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 906DA714317; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 02:05:08 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5114] increamental learning Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 02:05:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 02:05 ------- this is not a bug report -- please take this to the users list. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 09:48:59 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 60985 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 09:48:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 09:48:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 59669 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 09:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 59304 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 09:48:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 59293 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 09:48:57 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:48:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:44145] helo=dogma.boxhost.net) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id EA/E3-16499-580E0254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:48:55 -0700 Received: from radish.jmason.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by dogma.boxhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74640310055 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:48:50 +0100 (IST) Received: from jmason.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radish.jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD11859000F for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:48:44 +0100 (IST) To: lpage@example.net Subject: Re: L1 Logistic Regression in SpamAssassin In-Reply-To: <20061001214251.GA10146@gold> From: lpage@example.net (Justin Mason) X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 1368 71CE 3627 9CD3 FA1B 0B63 3091 7972 298B C7D0 Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:48:44 +0100 Sender: lpage@example.net Message-Id: <lpage@example.net> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Duncan Findlay writes: >Hey everybody, > >Just wanted to let you know that, as part of my 4th Year Math & >Engineering Design Project, I'm working on using L1 regularized >Logistic Regression to replace the Perceptron scoring mechanism, as >described by Lee, Lee, Abbeel and Ng in this paper: > >http://ai.stanford.edu/~ang/papers/aaai06-efficientL1logisticregression.pdf > >It's way too early for any kind of predictions, but we're hoping to >see better perfomance with this algortihm than the perceptron. I'll >let you know when we start to see results. Excellent news! I've always been wondering how that would turn out. looking forward to it... --j. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 14:35:32 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 85416 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 14:35:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 76092 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:29 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 76022 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 75642 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:28 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:35:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:52462] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 2C/7B-16499-DA321254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:35:25 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 04754714312; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:34:55 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4940] [review] spamassassin fails to parse dates using obs-zone syntax Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:34:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4940 ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 07:34 ------- +1 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 14:35:54 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 85600 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 14:35:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 77119 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:52 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 77098 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 77087 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 14:35:52 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:35:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:52468] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id ED/7B-16499-8B321254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:35:36 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5F116714312; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:35:23 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4940] [review] spamassassin fails to parse dates using obs-zone syntax Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:35:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4940 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes |needs 1 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 14:37:04 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 85906 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 14:37:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 14:37:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 78207 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 14:37:04 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 77874 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 14:37:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 77863 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 14:37:03 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:37:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:52474] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 96/8B-16499-50421254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:36:54 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id BCE8F714312; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:36:35 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5080] [review] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP doesn't hit as much as it should Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:36:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5080 ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 07:36 ------- +1 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 15:45:22 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 24826 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 15:45:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 15:45:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 93326 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 15:45:21 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 93310 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 15:45:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 93298 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 15:45:21 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:45:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:45589] helo=eclectic.kluge.net) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 4C/BC-16499-9F331254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:44:58 -0700 Received: by eclectic.kluge.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id EDB30AF122; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:44:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:44:32 -0400 From: Theo Van Dinter <lpage@example.net> To: Spamassassin Devel List <lpage@example.net> Subject: Still have a memory leak somewhere ... Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xesSdrSSBC0PokLI" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/83.161.120.155i X-GPG-Keyserver: http://pgp.mit.edu/ X-GPG-Keynumber: 0xE93C82BB X-GPG-Fingerprint: 347F 2F79 9CB4 444C BD54 F270 BD32 EBA3 E93C 82BB X-GPG-URL: http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/pgp.html X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable JM fixed the main one already, but there is still apparently a net-rule related memory leak somewhere: status: starting run stage now: 2006-09-30 05= :13:20 [...] status: 90% ham: 15734 spam: 146797 date: 2006-09-18 now: 2006-09-30 21= :05:19 Out of memory! mass-check: readline failed, attempting to recover status: completed run stage now: 2006-09-30 22= :58:02 --=20 Randomly Selected Tagline: I'm writing an unauthorized autobiography. --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFITPgvTLro+k8grsRAovuAJ91VN6Fzd1OrqwnCn/8+x0LGk74LACeI/ej 0dwy48pAe7oyeKuleiv0aCc= =1G/A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI-- From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 15:58:26 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 30886 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 15:58:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 16810 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:24 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 16765 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 16731 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:24 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:58:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:58452] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 77/FC-16499-11731254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:58:10 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 055A97142E1; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:57:27 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5115] New: make Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS a required module in 3.2.x Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> References: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:57:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5115 Summary: make Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS a required module in 3.2.x Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: Building & Packaging AssignedTo: lpage@example.net ReportedBy: lpage@example.net IMO, spam has evolved to the stage where a local-only SA installation is unlikely to do much good. We should, if at all possible, attempt to ensure that SA is installed with a reasonably optimum accuracy level, and I don't think that's possible without either (a) Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS installed and network tests active, or (b) a load of additional rulesets, kept up to date. I quite frequently hear of users installing SA, finding a low hit-rate, and eventually realising that it's a lot better with Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS installed; obviously they're not reading the INSTALL file, but c'est la vie. ;) I think it would be better to simply require Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS more visibly. To that end, I propose that we change Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS from an optional requirement (vague warnings during installation) to a required module (installation fails if the module's unavailable, RPM dependency, etc.) I'm not suggesting that we change the default value or behaviour of "-L" -- just the behaviour of Makefile.PL, rpm spec file, debian rules etc. in other words, the install-time behaviour. I think most distros now have Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS available in easily-downloadable form, so this won't cause much installer pain, I think... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 15:58:28 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 30924 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 15:58:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 16876 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:24 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 16849 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 16797 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 15:58:24 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:58:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:58454] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id B8/FC-16499-71731254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:58:16 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id E8EA271430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:57:42 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5115] make Net888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4NS a required module in 3.2.x Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 08:57:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5115 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 16:17:11 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 38395 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 16:17:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 16:17:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 55185 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 16:17:10 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 55170 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 16:17:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 55159 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 16:17:09 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:17:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:44696] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 07/30-24395-58B31254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:17:09 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 2C0717142E1; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:17:02 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5098] [review] Add ecelerity received header format to the Received module Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:17:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5098 ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 09:17 ------- Joe says: > It doesn't look to me like ecelerity puts that info in the headers. > I also don't see any documented configuration options to modify > the behavior. I said: if it comes up later, feel free to let us know of the formats. It would be good to capture that info -- helps a lot for SPF and some other rules. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 16:54:21 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 57193 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 16:54:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 35429 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:19 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 35404 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 35393 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:19 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:54:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:51209] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id BC/51-24395-93441254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:54:18 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id A29987142E1; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5080] [review] RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP doesn't hit as much as it should Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:54:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5080 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes |needs 1 vote ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 16:54:44 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 57805 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 16:54:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 40041 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:42 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 40018 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 40007 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 16:54:42 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:54:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:51230] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id F1/61-24395-15441254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:54:42 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8647671423B; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5089] [review] Unable to add header with single digit zero Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:54:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5089 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes |needs 1 vote ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 17:01:28 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 63270 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 17:01:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 17:01:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 58444 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 17:01:27 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 58419 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 17:01:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 58408 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 17:01:26 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:01:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:48756] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 81/A1-24395-5E541254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:01:25 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 1B1417142E1; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:01:17 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5098] [review] Add ecelerity received header format to the Received module Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:01:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5098 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 10:01 ------- thanks :) [dos@FC5-VPC 3.1]$ svn ci -m "bug 5098: add support for ecelerity Received headers, thanks to Joe Schaefer <lpage@example.net>" Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message/Metadata/Received.pm Sending t/rcvd_parser.t Transmitting file data .. Committed revision 452120. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 19:22:45 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 45911 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 19:22:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 19:22:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 86938 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 19:22:44 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 86920 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 19:22:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 86909 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 19:22:43 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:22:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:36282] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 70/F5-24395-10761254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 12:22:41 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 3814771430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:22:29 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5114] increamental learning Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:22:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 12:22 ------- I'm not agree with you. This must be hanlded by Spamassassin and not by hand. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 20:49:09 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 74259 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 20:49:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 20:49:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 18296 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 20:49:07 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 18263 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 20:49:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 18247 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 20:49:07 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:49:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:52917] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 7C/D7-24395-63B71254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:48:56 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id E35BD71430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5114] increamental learning Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5114 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 13:48 ------- Jérôme Bouat wrote: > I don't know really how it actually works and then > This must be hanlded by Spamassassin and not by hand No, your not knowing how it works is not something to be handled by SpamAssassin, it is something to be handled by asking on the spamassassin users mailing list. When you know what SpamAssassin does and can specify 1) a reproducible situation; 2) what SpamAssassin does with it; 3) what SpamAssassin should do with it; then you can submit a bug report or a feature request that we can do something with. Please take your questions to the spamassassin users mailing list. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Mon Oct 02 22:28:16 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 3321 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 22:28:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 22:28:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 47832 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 22:28:15 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 47503 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 22:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 47487 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 22:28:14 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:28:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:41274] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 7C/A9-24395-47291254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 15:28:07 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 506AA71430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:27:29 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4304] Spamd child still running after shutdown Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 15:27:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4304 ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-02 15:27 ------- I think I've identified my problem: - external process starts up spamd - spamd blocks SIGINT - spamd forks off children - external process kills spamd parent, it dies nearly immediately - spamd children continue loading things up (this takes a while in our environment) - external process starts new spamd parent (after short pause) - external process chokes saying socket already in use - spamd children finish loading up, unblock SIGINT, receive SIGINT and then die Is there a reason to continue blocking SIGINT until the child is essentially fully ready to run? In my simple test case moving the unblocking of SIGINT to immediately after the fork() within the child process helps to make sure the child dies immediately and can't linger around for a while. I see that certain things get done with Bayes there and Michael Parker has expressed concern over corrupting databases. Are there actual concerns or reasons for keeping those signals blocked for so long? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 04:55:00 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 92126 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 04:55:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 34347 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:54:59 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 34327 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:54:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 34316 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 04:54:59 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:54:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:33397] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 5B/E6-29668-22DE1254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:54:58 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id C70C8714315; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4678] Two $'s in the MSG id causes 9.4 point in scoreset 2 Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4678 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.1.6 |3.1.7 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 04:55:02 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 92162 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 04:55:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 34812 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:01 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 34695 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 34684 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:00 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:55:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:33396] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id DA/E6-29668-02DE1254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:54:58 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 994D6714313; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4663] SpamAssassin can't find rules on Win32 Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4663 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.1.6 |3.1.7 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 04:55:07 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 92216 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 04:55:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 35061 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:06 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 35046 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 35035 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:06 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:55:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:33395] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id CA/E6-29668-02DE1254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:54:58 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 6704671430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4931] UnixNFSSafe.pm intermittently causes a race condition. Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4931 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.1.6 |3.1.7 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 04:55:10 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 92262 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 04:55:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 35431 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:09 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 35401 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 35390 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 04:55:08 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:55:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:33400] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id BA/E6-29668-02DE1254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:54:58 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 608.566.6591; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:40 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4717] EnvelopeFrom option should be documented Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:54:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4717 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|3.1.6 |3.1.7 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 05:22:19 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 300 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 05:22:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 45700 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:18 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 45682 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 45671 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:18 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:22:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:44799] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 1E/97-29668-683F1254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:22:15 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 2539871430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:22:03 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5116] New: header RULENAME header:raw shouldn't strip leading spaces Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> References: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:22:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5116 Summary: header RULENAME header:raw shouldn't strip leading spaces Product: Spamassassin Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Libraries AssignedTo: lpage@example.net ReportedBy: lpage@example.net It should be possible to write header rules to detect leading spaces in a header value field. :raw should include any leading and trailing spaces. Without :raw, they should probably continue to be striped. This probably shouldn't be changed in 3.1 since it's a change in behaviour. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 05:22:47 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 506 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 05:22:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 46123 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:46 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 46090 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 46077 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 05:22:46 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:22:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:44800] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 41/A7-29668-1A3F1254 for <lpage@example.net>; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:22:42 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id B5C7C71430D; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:22:16 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 5116] header RULENAME header:raw shouldn't strip leading spaces Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:22:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5116 lpage@example.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 09:13:26 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 67856 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 09:13:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 09:13:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 82976 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 09:13:25 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 82958 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 09:13:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 82947 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 09:13:24 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:13:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:53509] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 8D/4A-29668-E9922254 for <lpage@example.net>; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:13:07 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 7FBCD714313; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 02:11:46 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4304] Spamd child still running after shutdown Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 02:11:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4304 ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-03 02:11 ------- thanks Bob! that looks like it, alright. There's no good reason for it to keep the signals blocked. if plugins need to perform lengthy initialisation that can't be interrupted, they need to take care of signals themselves -- and that spamd_child_init hook is the wrong place, too, I think. I'll attach a patch that makes that change... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 09:14:09 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 68023 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 09:14:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 09:14:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 83814 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 09:14:08 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 83789 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 09:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 83773 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 09:14:08 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:14:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155:53517] helo=brutus.apache.org) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 83.161.120.155 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 5F/4A-29668-0D922254 for <lpage@example.net>; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:13:58 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 08CE3714312; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 02:12:17 -0700 (PDT) From: lpage@example.net To: lpage@example.net Subject: [Bug 4304] Spamd child still running after shutdown Message-ID: <lpage@example.net> In-Reply-To: <lpage@example.net> References: <lpage@example.net> X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 02:12:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4304 ------- Additional Comments From lpage@example.net 2006-10-03 02:12 ------- Created an attachment (id=3711) --> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3711&action=view) fix Bob, does this work for your test case? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 13:30:49 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 84034 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 13:30:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 13:30:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 63522 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 13:30:47 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 63505 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 13:30:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 63488 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 13:30:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of lpage@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO dogma.boxhost.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 06:30:45 -0700 Received: from radish.jmason.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by dogma.boxhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82550310055 for <lpage@example.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:29:22 +0100 (IST) Received: from jmason.org (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radish.jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4859000F for <lpage@example.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:29:12 +0100 (IST) To: lpage@example.net Subject: on reusing HTTP as a spamd protocol From: lpage@example.net (Justin Mason) X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 1368 71CE 3627 9CD3 FA1B 0B63 3091 7972 298B C7D0 Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:29:12 +0100 Sender: lpage@example.net Message-Id: <lpage@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N this RFC is worth reading -- http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3117.html , especially the discussion of IPP, which was built on top of HTTP: Mapping IPP onto HTTP 1.1 illustrates the former issue. For example, the IPP server is supposed to signal its client when a job completes. Since the HTTP client must originate all requests and since the decision to close a persistent connection in HTTP is unilateral, the best that the IPP specification can do is specify this functionality in a non-deterministic fashion. Further, the IPP mapping onto HTTP shows that even subtle shifts in behavior have unintended consequences. For example, requests in IPP are typically much larger than those seen by many HTTP server implementations -- resulting in oddities in many HTTP servers (e.g., requests are sometimes silently truncated). The lesson is that HTTP's framing mechanism is very rigid with respect to its view of the request/response model. --j. From dev-returnlpage@example.net Tue Oct 03 15:13:19 2006 Return-Path: <dev-returnlpage@example.net> Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 23794 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2006 15:13:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Oct 2006 15:13:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 92980 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 15:13:17 -0000 Delivered-To: lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 92940 invoked by uid 500); 3 Oct 2006 15:13:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lpage@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: <mailto:lpage@example.net> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:lpage@example.net> List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list lpage@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for lpage@example.net Received: (qmail 65569 invoked by uid 99); 3 Oct 2006 10:09:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS,TO_CC_NONE X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C6E6C8.75953E6D" Subject: Indexing In Lucene Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 14:16:46 +0530 Message-ID: <E07627674982E445BBD8236E84A6A39805D780EC@ctsinpunsxua> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Indexing In Lucene Thread-Index: AcbmyHT3wdCny6+2RYKvLXIy3ZwZyw== From: "Ajani, Akil \(Cognizant\)" <lpage@example.net> Bcc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Oct 2006 08:46:48.0975 (UTC) FILETIME=[76ED51F0:01C6E6C8] X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6E6C8.75953E6D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0D Hi, Can you tell me how indexing takes place in lucene(Depth).if document has 1....n indices then which algorithm it uses,which information retrival model it uses... =0D Thanks & Regards, Akil Ajani Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.=0D Plot # 26, Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, MIDC Hinjewadi, Pune 411057 Tel: (91) (20) 40201100 ext 2825 Vnet: 22809 "Technical Skill is the mastery of complexity, while creativity is the mastery of simplicity." =0D This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the= intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged= information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply= e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.=0D Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding,= printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this= e-mail is strictly=0D prohibited and may be unlawful. Visit us at http://www.cognizant.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6E6C8.75953E6D Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w= =3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1= =3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns= =3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; charset= =3Dus-ascii"> <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"place"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"PlaceType"/> <o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"PlaceName"/> <!--[if !mso]> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Batang; panose-1:2 3 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:"Trebuchet MS"; panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:"\@Batang"; panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:Arial; color:windowtext;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> </head> <body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple> <div class=3DSection1> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span style= =3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3DArial><span style= =3D'font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Arial'>Hi,<br> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Can&nbsp;you tell me how indexing takes= place in lucene(Depth).if document has 1....n indices then which algorithm it= uses,which information retrival model it uses&#8230;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span style= =3D'font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Arial'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><b><font size=3D3 color=3Dgray face=3D"Times New= Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:gray;font-weight:bold'>Thanks &amp;= Regards,</span></font></b><em><b><i><font color=3Dgray face=3D"Trebuchet MS"><span style=3D'font-family:"Trebuchet= MS"; color:gray;font-weight:bold'><o:p></o:p></span></font></i></b></em></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><em><b><i><font size=3D2 face=3D"Trebuchet MS"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet MS";font-weight:bold'>Akil= Ajani</span></font></i></b></em><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy><span style= =3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><em><b><i><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face= =3D"Trebuchet MS"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Trebuchet= MS";color:navy;font-weight:bold'>Cognizant Technology Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. </span></font></i></b></em><font size= =3D2 color=3Dnavy><span style= =3D'font-size:10.0pt;color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><em><b><i><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face= =3D"Trebuchet
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}