From lucene-net-user-return-657brittany35@example.net Wed Aug 01 09:21:04 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-657brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 86707 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 57373 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 09:21:02 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 57295 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 09:21:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 57258 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2007 09:21:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO correo.inerza.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:20:58 -0700 Received: from jsantos ([83.161.120.155]) by correo.inerza.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC309-703-8849); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:17:38 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jaime_Santos_Alc=F3n?= <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net> Subject: unsubscribe Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:20:08 +0200 Message-ID: <001501c7d41d$3264dec0$972e9c40$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcfTqAhEGemhfdpxQua1JDfbCwTSdgAALvfQAB0VmPA= Content-Language: es X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Aug 2007 09:17:39.0661 (UTC) FILETIME=[CEC617D0:01C7D41C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Unsuscribe unsuscribe From lucene-net-user-return-658brittany35@example.net Wed Aug 01 09:38:52 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-658brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 92874 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 09:38:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 09:38:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 90888 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 09:37:51 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 87210 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 09:37:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 81953 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2007 09:35:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO 202-124-246-50.dedsvrs.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:35:28 -0700 Received: (qmail 15494 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 19:33:01 +1000 Received: from spectr11.lnk.telstra.net (HELO v) (83.161.120.155) by 202-124-246-50.dedsvrs.net with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 19:33:01 +1000 From: "Vijay Santhanam" <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net> References: <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <018b01c7d3e6$5d8cb5f0$18a621d0$@com> <007801c7d3ed$365330c0$a2f99240$@brittany35@example.net> In-Reply-To: <007801c7d3ed$365330c0$a2f99240$@brittany35@example.net> Subject: RE: Lucene in Action (relevance and usefulness) Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:33:44 +1000 Message-ID: <01a501c7d41f$0e424fd0$2ac6ef70$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcfTu3DoEPVQyAP2Q5C1z7CBYcvAYQAKj4EAAAHRfnAADHuJsA== Content-Language: en-au X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >The API may be a little different, but the javadocs are good as an API > reference. Lucene in Action is great as an architectural introduction. That's a better way of putting it. -Vijay =A0 -----Original Message----- From: Dean Harding [mailto:brittany35@example.net]=20 Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2007 1:37 PM To: brittany35@example.net Subject: RE: Lucene in Action (relevance and usefulness) > The book is still immensely useful, but API differences may cause new > readers some confusion. Dean. __________ NOD32 2220 (20070426) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com From lucene-net-user-return-659brittany35@example.net Wed Aug 01 09:57:54 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-659brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 98844 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2007 09:57:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2007 09:57:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 16842 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 09:57:54 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 16821 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2007 09:57:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 16812 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2007 09:57:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:57:53 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b33so22700ana for <brittany35@example.net>; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=AOS4+3xdlUf2QRWNOHPX1j0BlaEmZ1vyU4GKoQXZkSSGJhKPlUa2EpPpEkC5JfFcsqbpBbtB5r7tc9TYSv7gMWlsRL7AYgPUNZ209BItX9gpZSUTLfzIjvyL0RyXZnIdof/6tXLxHBEkRVBfVR56ERjSbSknuTZFujGDaQ0jYFY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BN9sz5Xb4jvMpnk2K9CAMNfdOtC+Z5FP0OIOIbgGJjT0vDq3vEClCgOWpaerprWnXOofCjQyBYYcMSpN1hNaZFmP0Yw7FDaaoRshqTzw5bBcp81BmMLfJlIgy/YEJrNXmLxzVXy4ehwBjTjRCPh00xLPoRkW+4voAlP8PWTr74U= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id m17mr292353anf.1185962235296; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 02:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 02:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:57:15 +0100 From: "Ciaran Roarty" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Lucene in Action (relevance and usefulness) In-Reply-To: <01a501c7d41f$0e424fd0$2ac6ef70$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_89051_28795002.1185962235255" References: <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <brittany35@example.net> <018b01c7d3e6$5d8cb5f0$18a621d0$@com> <01a501c7d41f$0e424fd0$2ac6ef70$@com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_89051_28795002.1185962235255 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Agreed, to understand what Lucene does and how it works, Lucene in Action is invaluable. The API may have moved on but the core is still similar. On 01/08/07, Vijay Santhanam <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > >The API may be a little different, but the javadocs are good as an API > > reference. Lucene in Action is great as an architectural introduction. > > That's a better way of putting it. > > -Vijay > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Harding [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 1 August 2007 1:37 PM > To: brittany35@example.net > Subject: RE: Lucene in Action (relevance and usefulness) > > > The book is still immensely useful, but API differences may cause new > > readers some confusion. > > > Dean. > > > > __________ NOD32 2220 (20070426) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.eset.com > > > ------=_Part_89051_28795002.1185962235255-- From lucene-net-user-return-660brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 17:13:08 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-660brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 59088 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 17:13:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 17:13:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 99372 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 17:13:05 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 99223 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 17:13:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 99213 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 17:13:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:13:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ps02.vds2000.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:13:04 +0000 Received: (qmail 32024 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 13:12:36 -0400 Received: from bi01pt1.ct.us.ibm.com (HELO aroushlt) (83.161.120.155) by aroush.net with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 13:12:35 -0400 From: "George Aroush" <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net>, <brittany35@example.net> Subject: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:13:06 -0400 Message-ID: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Thread-Index: AcfcOuIo7nsWBTEiQxe1ThfosvBN5w== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Folks, I just released Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 as beta. The changes in this release is: - Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 002 "Beta" - Port: Ported the "Test" code from Java to C# - Fix: LUCENENET-47: "Make up for Constansts.cs" - Fix: LUCENENET-48 "Clone method of SegmentInfos.cs does'nt copy local fields/variables." - Fix: LUCENENET-50 "Improvement for FSDirectory." - Fix: LUCENENET-52 "IndexFileDeleter in svn trunk" - Fix: LUCENENET-53 "SegmentsInfos.GetCurrentSegmentGeneration works incorrectly" - Issues: A number of NUnit tests are failing. The major change is the port of the "Test" code from Java to C#. As expected, there are a lot of failed tests, 261 out of 629. Some of those are due to port issues in the test code itself while others are issues in the core code and I'm sure many are around a common defect. Wherever the issue is, we have to fix them. If you can help, get the latest code from SVN, build and run NUnit test. Look at the failed tests and start debugging. Once you have a fix, submit a patch. If you don't know how to submit a patch, an email with a fix will do to. However you submit a fix, do explain what test it is fixing and the effected file, class and method. Best regards, -- George From lucene-net-user-return-661brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 17:36:48 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-661brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 66791 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 17:36:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 17:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11259 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 17:36:46 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 11239 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 17:36:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 11230 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 17:36:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:36:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:36:38 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so2209831pye for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:36:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=dY7bsVipXnq1X9I+oYCPuS/8NLXQ+Id3SzvU4IVImlu8uEd/FfAQaKXxHCRsElvCK748yPcS070mPth+++TGiijQhB5AzRr5ix+zU0v+5OMrJyw8a9m6XPJH+zQ4gaAp/bUaAr9v278IwbnunkTzcTqrk+BUSGTl9r1HXXCpnDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=FeaGHpZ3gkY8mGX0dw39n3rAM0uVbDTk9hAk37kr+kKhN3iFa1l4FXWBP1Jw3pIl01c5i/bnfjt210jNImAaZ/QtEHjaBdI5ZlxeyJYS9ItWltI9kz/1CDQ5npzfQ5xq///4U9e8ilh6xU90SP5cMOADGPAnrw3HRwK134PPDc8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id k7mr6985451qbp.1186853777666; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:36:17 -0300 From: "Jan Limpens" <brittany35@example.net> Sender: brittany35@example.net To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Lucene and a dynamic website MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_29056_20840607.1186853777578" X-Google-Sender-Auth: b27f7ad3bc818e41 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_29056_20840607.1186853777578 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello, where can I find examples/howtos/tutorials/faqs... on how to use Lucene.netto index database generated aspx pages on a webserver. Or should I stick to sql server/fulltext search in that case? Thanks! Jan ------=_Part_29056_20840607.1186853777578-- From lucene-net-user-return-662brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 18:00:08 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-662brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 76031 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 18:00:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 18:00:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 18876 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 18:00:05 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 18852 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 18:00:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 18843 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 18:00:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:00:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO hu-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:00:02 +0000 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 27so1235500hub for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:59:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LZmq5JMPR4z5srfPj7lqqlNhr5X1FhOYmWrIG7jyDNAMbWDEMSbOe5ovrcKpEKJXOAXdVQdSp5mJo5aaAWwSB2JaM5oyl+ag5kKpuu9nYEXUfwLyNjE0JZnLgjFDW2xEmunoYpwwRnHaC1ZkzsIbKNSSp8ISFNCH67O+cmShufk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OuEL0FCKEViCGFzusl0ExwMDp3l0EVeX93Tc1UZXSJxJJt9JBFpp+FIiKBK9FaDCFhRW4SLmnV+exGiG5wEeUSZXSe0eu36sSj0QCyLgK19Gmkv66bXDTXozMTGJvdytrAXG49AwZzNou2olLrUUrK/bYkwGxkUdolaAOCmuRxs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s17mr2809425ugg.1186855179775; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?83.161.120.155? ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm5788387nfv.283.161.120.155.59.32 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:59:06 +0200 From: Simone Busoli <brittany35@example.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Lucene and a dynamic website References: <brittany35@example.net> In-Reply-To: <brittany35@example.net> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1"><font face="Segoe UI">Do you need to index the markup generated by aspx pages? The markup is available only to the client, if you need to index the contents of the database just use sql server.<br> <br> Simone<br> </font></font><br> Jan Limpens wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:brittany35@example.net" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hello, where can I find examples/howtos/tutorials/faqs... on how to use Lucene.netto index database generated aspx pages on a webserver. Or should I stick to sql server/fulltext search in that case? Thanks! Jan </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html> From lucene-net-user-return-663brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 18:01:56 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-663brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 76615 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 18:01:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 18:01:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19501 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 18:01:54 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 19481 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 18:01:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 19472 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 18:01:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:01:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO hu-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:01:49 +0000 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 27so1235631hub for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bT1Osa3RDCAzVUbSxLFcH6XLgDr+JgGeNphAbRrBqaSiV5f0BUcwQbmSu2GyOlY5+01ewC8wtMQyktb8OlXaABoKt32sgtVfzlvpWO6DXJO6Wc+1dwWOzBY6hKvckP4iAkA7c9li3kr2HnDNPPjaPkiICV0FY91kbzbQXE1gz4s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cC0PgyFlmvAQFnFa87JfSTo+rYe7p6H06WJtbZwAQ5UG3+ilqhTLAwUnUy9AQIQpPSQw7FndJEnrr1+7Et02oisrjcydjaqoPNPGsos0XP17sLAkbqVA+vU6IujSNVqYHiVarXGtNB0Ks33PWXUcQzgyGZvU1u9d4FwcDAfqLbE= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e1mr6475537buf.1186855287495; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?83.161.120.155? ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d24sm1478519nfh.283.161.120.155.01.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:57 +0200 From: Simone Busoli <brittany35@example.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released References: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> In-Reply-To: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1"><font face="Segoe UI">Thanks George, good to know. About the tests, then this is a good chance for people who wanted to help!<br> <br> Simone<br> </font></font><br> George Aroush wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">Hi Folks, I just released Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 as beta. The changes in this release is: - Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 002 "Beta" - Port: Ported the "Test" code from Java to C# - Fix: LUCENENET-47: "Make up for Constansts.cs" - Fix: LUCENENET-48 "Clone method of SegmentInfos.cs does'nt copy local fields/variables." - Fix: LUCENENET-50 "Improvement for FSDirectory." - Fix: LUCENENET-52 "IndexFileDeleter in svn trunk" - Fix: LUCENENET-53 "SegmentsInfos.GetCurrentSegmentGeneration works incorrectly" - Issues: A number of NUnit tests are failing. The major change is the port of the "Test" code from Java to C#. As expected, there are a lot of failed tests, 261 out of 629. Some of those are due to port issues in the test code itself while others are issues in the core code and I'm sure many are around a common defect. Wherever the issue is, we have to fix them. If you can help, get the latest code from SVN, build and run NUnit test. Look at the failed tests and start debugging. Once you have a fix, submit a patch. If you don't know how to submit a patch, an email with a fix will do to. However you submit a fix, do explain what test it is fixing and the effected file, class and method. Best regards, -- George </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html> From lucene-net-user-return-664brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 21:03:50 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-664brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 12714 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 21:03:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 21:03:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 15319 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:03:38 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 15293 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:03:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 15284 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 21:03:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:03:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:03:35 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1018028rvb for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id r16mr614526wfi.1186866184486; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:03:04 -0400 From: "Joe Shaw" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released Cc: brittany35@example.net In-Reply-To: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi George, On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > I just released Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 as beta. Given that Java Lucene 2.2 was released in June, and 2.3 is expected out fairly soon, does it make sense to skip porting 2.1 and go straight to 2.2? Would that substantially set things back, or speed things up? Thanks, Joe From lucene-net-user-return-665brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 21:23:12 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-665brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 14493 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 21:23:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 21:23:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 23392 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:23:10 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 23371 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:23:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 23354 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 21:23:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:23:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:23:04 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so2264729pye for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:22:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ucg1jl9Hvq/C4dqH5RTTfM6j772n1AXjyF1XIO859+Pr2R9z0NrOKrCutqJttmcPuKDvUXfs6OYMvGVwHE+BUFD4gaCGxJz/5yv3B3dSGNjtRef+MuaHbHE0RLEWrXflim7leG9wMYHm7tef7Jb5XVN8i9p6hlToDWCta5X/cn8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=YnCIgFl0bXUxefSDbm4SY4Ed58g4qUrZnVtURmIN7ehJjhhNAqAupAZAAS0DLdbSDXV9L5MQ7wTRSb3ZutdYBr0F50be91AX/sPdyfUQMhCbGfwzCz3cbM9cM9ZkLQzbVRdZON1/8VkXSMX4TQeTuuC7KQOpvpGKfQn45B5llp0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w2mr6200855qbf.1186867362979; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:22:42 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released In-Reply-To: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13592_16025200.1186867362936" References: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13592_16025200.1186867362936 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline does it matter if the work is done in vs2k5? I just noticed all the project files are vs2k3. On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I just released Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 as beta. The changes in > this release is: > - Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 002 "Beta" > - Port: Ported the "Test" code from Java to C# > - Fix: LUCENENET-47: "Make up for Constansts.cs" > - Fix: LUCENENET-48 "Clone method of SegmentInfos.cs does'nt copy > local fields/variables." > - Fix: LUCENENET-50 "Improvement for FSDirectory." > - Fix: LUCENENET-52 "IndexFileDeleter in svn trunk" > - Fix: LUCENENET-53 "SegmentsInfos.GetCurrentSegmentGenerationworks > incorrectly" > - Issues: A number of NUnit tests are failing. > > The major change is the port of the "Test" code from Java to C#. As > expected, there are a lot of failed tests, 261 out of 629. Some of those > are due to port issues in the test code itself while others are issues in > the core code and I'm sure many are around a common defect. Wherever the > issue is, we have to fix them. > > If you can help, get the latest code from SVN, build and run NUnit test. > Look at the failed tests and start debugging. Once you have a fix, submit > a > patch. If you don't know how to submit a patch, an email with a fix will > do > to. However you submit a fix, do explain what test it is fixing and the > effected file, class and method. > > Best regards, > > -- George > > -- - P ------=_Part_13592_16025200.1186867362936-- From lucene-net-user-return-666brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 21:24:41 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-666brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 14577 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 21:24:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 21:24:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 24071 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:24:39 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 24047 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:24:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 24038 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 21:24:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:24:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:24:39 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so2265124pye for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GMHzV5tvGlKStoxK3R6ARojCinqiYrdyzLO2CzvM935PESvm2VeP+UzH2OxqE8pPkgKyE3lXaqerPOP5Jy/MOG2DBUXCviHTqa/T70mlzqrTpTdkgSZqD2pmpvbc33189HTswmzESf7CrfBDdx8FpG4o+EARdBRiISqk3PyBp3w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RbfD0g3J+qfHDuZNzGY4DjcwSW0QswZXQiVVc1INGAxNWR928LGJrO5oQn3XvN3OKiUUo/nE//x+/Zu5ej+XnLMXxB21gyELMucnbyk6GppJeW2hDXx0R9ftce+WPPFXdlTwyd+8euTpcyceakQpeaB4yGkYFwqNDknIN/ci+RI= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a4mr7230133qbe.1186867451389; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:24:11 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released In-Reply-To: <brittany35@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13596_12584630.1186867451335" References: <0de201c7dc3a$e2bcdaf0$90832209@aroushlt> <brittany35@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13596_12584630.1186867451335 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline nevermind. just noticed there are two sets of files. On 8/11/07, Patrick Burrows <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > does it matter if the work is done in vs2k5? I just noticed all the > project files are vs2k3. > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I just released Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 as beta. The changes in > > this release is: > > - Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 002 "Beta" > > - Port: Ported the "Test" code from Java to C# > > - Fix: LUCENENET-47: "Make up for Constansts.cs" > > - Fix: LUCENENET-48 "Clone method of SegmentInfos.cs does'nt copy > > local fields/variables." > > - Fix: LUCENENET-50 "Improvement for FSDirectory." > > - Fix: LUCENENET-52 "IndexFileDeleter in svn trunk" > > - Fix: LUCENENET-53 " SegmentsInfos.GetCurrentSegmentGenerationworks > > incorrectly" > > - Issues: A number of NUnit tests are failing. > > > > The major change is the port of the "Test" code from Java to C#. As > > expected, there are a lot of failed tests, 261 out of 629. Some of > > those > > are due to port issues in the test code itself while others are issues > > in > > the core code and I'm sure many are around a common defect. Wherever > > the > > issue is, we have to fix them. > > > > If you can help, get the latest code from SVN, build and run NUnit test. > > > > Look at the failed tests and start debugging. Once you have a fix, > > submit a > > patch. If you don't know how to submit a patch, an email with a fix > > will do > > to. However you submit a fix, do explain what test it is fixing and the > > > > effected file, class and method. > > > > Best regards, > > > > -- George > > > > > > > -- > - > P -- - P ------=_Part_13596_12584630.1186867451335-- From lucene-net-user-return-667brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 21:40:25 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-667brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 16356 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 21:40:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 21:40:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 34822 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:40:22 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 34790 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 21:40:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 34753 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 21:40:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:40:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ps02.vds2000.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 21:40:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 6826 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 17:39:53 -0400 Received: from bi01pt1.ct.us.ibm.com (HELO aroushlt) (83.161.120.155) by aroush.net with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 17:39:53 -0400 From: "George Aroush" <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net> Cc: <brittany35@example.net> Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:40:23 -0400 Message-ID: <0e7a01c7dc60$39a0a930$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <brittany35@example.net> Thread-Index: AcfcWx/6qu3kC9W7RKCLndJy+EBivAAA/lZQ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Joe, I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing known issues with 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the transition to 2.2 must easier. If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does everyone agree? Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Shaw [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 5:03 PM > To: brittany35@example.net > Cc: brittany35@example.net > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > Hi George, > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > I just released Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 as beta. > > Given that Java Lucene 2.2 was released in June, and 2.3 is > expected out fairly soon, does it make sense to skip porting > 2.1 and go straight to 2.2? Would that substantially set > things back, or speed things up? > > Thanks, > Joe > From lucene-net-user-return-668brittany35@example.net Sat Aug 11 23:35:26 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-668brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 49956 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 23:35:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 23:35:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 96644 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 23:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 96603 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2007 23:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 96584 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2007 23:35:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:35:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 23:35:15 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so1031116rvb for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s10mr606722wfh.1186875293630; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:34:53 -0400 From: "Joe Shaw" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released Cc: brittany35@example.net In-Reply-To: <0e7a01c7dc60$39a0a930$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <brittany35@example.net> <0e7a01c7dc60$39a0a930$90832209@aroushlt> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. However, > before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing known issues with > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the transition to 2.2 > must easier. If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a > "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does everyone agree? When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the changes from the previous Java version (converted somehow), or are they totally new conversions with some of the .Net-isms merged in? If the former, this definitely makes sense. If the latter, I would think it makes more sense to skip 2.1 entirely. In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. Keep up the good work. :) Joe From lucene-net-user-return-669brittany35@example.net Sun Aug 12 00:03:11 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-669brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 60551 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2007 00:03:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2007 00:03:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4883 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2007 00:03:09 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 4857 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2007 00:03:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 4846 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2007 00:03:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 17:03:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ps02.vds2000.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 00:03:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 27814 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2007 20:02:38 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO aroushlt) (83.161.120.155) by aroush.net with SMTP; 11 Aug 2007 20:02:38 -0400 From: "George Aroush" <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net> Cc: <brittany35@example.net> Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:03:09 -0400 Message-ID: <0ebe01c7dc74$2b06c710$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <brittany35@example.net> Thread-Index: AcfccEvUv7qRJx9KR/CqoC+RnGX98AAA6PdQ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Joe, It is a merge, so it make sense (and life easier) to fix the existing NUnit issues before we move on. Sorry, for not making this clear. Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Shaw [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:35 PM > To: brittany35@example.net > Cc: brittany35@example.net > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > Hi, > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. > > However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing > > known issues with > > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the > transition to > > 2.2 must easier. If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a > > "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does everyone agree? > > When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the > changes from the previous Java version (converted somehow), > or are they totally new conversions with some of the > .Net-isms merged in? If the former, this definitely makes > sense. If the latter, I would think it makes more sense to > skip 2.1 entirely. > > In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. > Keep up the good work. :) > > Joe > From lucene-net-user-return-670brittany35@example.net Sun Aug 12 02:12:13 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-670brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 87055 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2007 02:12:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2007 02:12:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 46981 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2007 02:12:10 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 46961 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2007 02:12:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 46952 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2007 02:12:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:12:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:12:03 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so2322879pye for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:11:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GU6m1hK9XKp2Ih8iyDainVti4oqds+OSPtSfj1D1+FlKGluCWF5Jqv5i88WVGUDFTc0q0MxPpQJhJcpDhdYynugLxfHWDRscjKsTPWCAPSHFTvpXbHSCm4WMl1IXU3VvhxZH2pScHYqE+jqP2RGFUe2AaWy1ObdIkB07rpD7N78= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Yu1RDSxh+QuHbYieF6wD2hrD37pCwfwEdyuQcVrXCUBckbn6pkEQH6f1F7feJIV95zx2YXGkLZy3sPr3oSUGhgPOBxG5O67Ax+5kouJKh1G55YlvhbOm/WU2rnGMZy+QtDoctZqfx5kZku4JFDUrxJtsJNdGWmb8u+nNQKaY+rw= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id m11mr7210406qbk.1186884701061; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:11:41 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released In-Reply-To: <0ebe01c7dc74$2b06c710$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13956_17256652.1186884701000" References: <brittany35@example.net> <0ebe01c7dc74$2b06c710$90832209@aroushlt> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13956_17256652.1186884701000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hey George: Since this is my first attempt at a bug fix, I figure I would just write up everything about it and see what the correct course is to correct it: The first error that NUnit reports is that the TestStandard test is failing. It is failing on this line: AssertAnalyzesTo(a, "t-com", new System.String[]{"t", "com"}); And the reason this line is failing, ultimately, is because "t" is a stop word and the Next() method in StopFilter.cs has this line: if (!stopWords.Contains(termText)) return token; The comments in TestStandard() regarding this line say this: // t and s had been stopwords in Lucene <= 2.0, which made it impossible // to correctly search for these terms: It seems simple enough to remove "t" from the list of stop words. But is this the correct way to fix the issue? Was there a deeper reason that made "t" have to be in the list of stop words that should also be checked? Am I thinking too much about it? :-) On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > It is a merge, so it make sense (and life easier) to fix the existing > NUnit > issues before we move on. Sorry, for not making this clear. > > Regards, > > -- George > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joe Shaw [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:35 PM > > To: brittany35@example.net > > Cc: brittany35@example.net > > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > > > Hi, > > > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. > > > However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing > > > known issues with > > > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the > > transition to > > > 2.2 must easier. If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a > > > "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does everyone agree? > > > > When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the > > changes from the previous Java version (converted somehow), > > or are they totally new conversions with some of the > > .Net-isms merged in? If the former, this definitely makes > > sense. If the latter, I would think it makes more sense to > > skip 2.1 entirely. > > > > In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. > > Keep up the good work. :) > > > > Joe > > > > -- - P ------=_Part_13956_17256652.1186884701000-- From lucene-net-user-return-671brittany35@example.net Sun Aug 12 02:21:01 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-671brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 87664 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2007 02:21:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2007 02:21:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 51931 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2007 02:20:59 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 51915 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2007 02:20:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 51906 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2007 02:20:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:20:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of brittany35@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:20:59 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d32so2324584pye for <brittany35@example.net>; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:20:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rJc5eZVVyBl1wrmHIP/jW2DGo7M0/tdeQdEjYbkv9wwnR6SBdQtnEnvBbxEbX1JCmMnrvU2cKKb7Smskog/9+kX6nX0wE1nketWKs6q9cSgGkp4C4HkvU2ivh2j5pE84YUf+J3X11kRR1wP4fKqQBmNzx10xa+4BUMJ7KZscy3w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=rVwmWUfjKVSGef1URXot3DDOKHUvR0FBksw9f0S70TwH1/1m5QJeicR6YzmN1/g1i9vN7Psm8puVwgFotXm+xADcde3MozSQeRRK03VaWv6J7+VtD/qLBK9t37aFEg8uNuDCyYW5z5qNrylIp0BsNMBn6tVHW8P92Zsbh7jVNEM= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a4mr3446965qbg.1186885230862; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:20:30 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <brittany35@example.net> To: brittany35@example.net Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released In-Reply-To: <brittany35@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_13968_17830409.1186885230811" References: <brittany35@example.net> <0ebe01c7dc74$2b06c710$90832209@aroushlt> <brittany35@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_13968_17830409.1186885230811 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline By the way, if that is the correct fix, then changing this line in Analysis.StopAnalyzer.cs public static readonly System.String[] ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS = new System. String[]{"a", "an", "and", "are", "as", "at", "be", "but", "by", "for", "if", "in", "into", "is", "it", "no", "not", "of", "on", "or", "such", "t", "that", "the", "their", "then", "there", "these", "they", "this", "to", "was", "will", "with"}; to public static readonly System.String[] ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS = new System. String[]{"a", "an", "and", "are", "as", "at", "be", "but", "by", "for", "if", "in", "into", "is", "it", "no", "not", "of", "on", "or", "such", "that", "the", "their", "then", "there", "these", "they", "this", "to", "was", "will", "with"}; causes that test to pass. On 8/11/07, Patrick Burrows <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > Hey George: > > Since this is my first attempt at a bug fix, I figure I would just write > up everything about it and see what the correct course is to correct it: > > The first error that NUnit reports is that the TestStandard test is > failing. It is failing on this line: > > > AssertAnalyzesTo(a, > "t-com", new System.String []{"t", "com"}); > And the reason this line is failing, ultimately, is because "t" is a stop > word and the Next() method in StopFilter.cs has this line: > > if > (!stopWords.Contains(termText)) > > return token; The comments in TestStandard() regarding this line say > this: > > > // t and s had been stopwords in Lucene <= 2.0, which made it impossible > > // to correctly search for these terms: > It seems simple enough to remove "t" from the list of stop words. But is > this the correct way to fix the issue? Was there a deeper reason that made > "t" have to be in the list of stop words that should also be checked? Am I > thinking too much about it? :-) > > > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > It is a merge, so it make sense (and life easier) to fix the existing > > NUnit > > issues before we move on. Sorry, for not making this clear. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Joe Shaw [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > > > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:35 PM > > > To: brittany35@example.net > > > Cc: brittany35@example.net > > > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. > > > > However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the existing > > > > known issues with > > > > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the > > > transition to > > > > 2.2 must easier. If we take this path, then we can leave 2.1 in a > > > > "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does everyone agree? > > > > > > When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the > > > changes from the previous Java version (converted somehow), > > > or are they totally new conversions with some of the > > > .Net-isms merged in? If the former, this definitely makes > > > sense. If the latter, I would think it makes more sense to > > > skip 2.1 entirely. > > > > > > In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. > > > Keep up the good work. :) > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > -- > - > P -- - P ------=_Part_13968_17830409.1186885230811-- From lucene-net-user-return-672brittany35@example.net Mon Aug 13 11:47:20 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-672brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 36128 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2007 11:47:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2007 11:47:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 92611 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2007 11:47:17 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 92578 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2007 11:47:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 92569 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2007 11:47:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:47:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO adicia.telenet-ops.be) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:47:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 19982230097 for <brittany35@example.net>; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:46:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pdc.softelligent.local (d5152F234.access.telenet.be [83.161.120.155]) by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73B3230091 for <brittany35@example.net>; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:46:49 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Quote in query MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7DD9F.9164C56C" Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:46:48 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Message-ID: <brittany35@example.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Quote in query Thread-Index: Acfdn6HxjHYIy94RSQKZv4NzMIFc0A== From: "Benny Michielsen" <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7DD9F.9164C56C Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 How would one search for the text: "it's" using Lucene. All other search options work fine, just whenever there's a single quote it fails. I don't think it's a special character (checked the documentation), even tried escaping it. I use this code: =20 QueryParser parser =3D new QueryParser("Text", new StandardAnalyzer()); Query queryText =3D parser.Parse(keyword); =20 When I check querytext I notice it is empty instead of containing the parsed statement. =20 Benny =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7DD9F.9164C56C-- From lucene-net-user-return-673brittany35@example.net Mon Aug 13 13:37:49 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-673brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 95138 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2007 13:37:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2007 13:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 43868 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2007 13:37:46 -0000 Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 43846 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2007 13:37:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact brittany35@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:brittany35@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: brittany35@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 43837 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2007 13:37:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 06:37:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ps02.vds2000.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:37:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 1243 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2007 09:37:17 -0400 Received: from bi01pt1.ct.us.ibm.com (HELO aroushlt) (83.161.120.155) by aroush.net with SMTP; 13 Aug 2007 09:37:17 -0400 From: "George Aroush" <brittany35@example.net> To: <brittany35@example.net> Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:37:49 -0400 Message-ID: <12a801c7ddaf$2418aa40$90832209@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: <brittany35@example.net> Thread-Index: Acfch24l6k+hTahjRLCHw6jpLvasMABJ3r4A X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Patrick. "t" was left over and should have been removed as it is removed from the Java version too. I committed a new version of StopAnalyzer.cs to take care of this defect. -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Burrows [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 10:21 PM > To: brittany35@example.net > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > By the way, if that is the correct fix, then changing this > line in Analysis.StopAnalyzer.cs > > > public static readonly System.String[] ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS = > new System. > String[]{"a", "an", "and", "are", "as", "at", "be", "but", > "by", "for", "if", "in", "into", "is", "it", "no", "not", > "of", "on", "or", "such", "t", "that", "the", "their", > "then", "there", "these", "they", "this", "to", "was", > "will", "with"}; to > > > public static readonly System.String[] ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS = > new System. > String[]{"a", "an", "and", "are", "as", "at", "be", "but", > "by", "for", "if", "in", "into", "is", "it", "no", "not", > "of", "on", "or", "such", "that", "the", "their", "then", > "there", "these", "they", "this", "to", "was", "will", "with"}; > > causes that test to pass. > > > On 8/11/07, Patrick Burrows <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > > Hey George: > > > > Since this is my first attempt at a bug fix, I figure I would just > > write up everything about it and see what the correct > course is to correct it: > > > > The first error that NUnit reports is that the TestStandard test is > > failing. It is failing on this line: > > > > > > AssertAnalyzesTo(a, > > "t-com", new System.String []{"t", "com"}); And the reason > this line > > is failing, ultimately, is because "t" is a stop word and > the Next() > > method in StopFilter.cs has this line: > > > > if > > (!stopWords.Contains(termText)) > > > > return token; The comments in TestStandard() regarding this line > > say > > this: > > > > > > // t and s had been stopwords in Lucene <= 2.0, which made it > > impossible > > > > // to correctly search for these terms: > > It seems simple enough to remove "t" from the list of stop > words. But > > is this the correct way to fix the issue? Was there a deeper reason > > that made "t" have to be in the list of stop words that > should also be > > checked? Am I thinking too much about it? :-) > > > > > > > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > It is a merge, so it make sense (and life easier) to fix the > > > existing NUnit issues before we move on. Sorry, for not > making this > > > clear. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > -- George > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Joe Shaw [mailto:brittany35@example.net] > > > > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:35 PM > > > > To: brittany35@example.net > > > > Cc: brittany35@example.net > > > > Subject: Re: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 002 "Beta" released > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 8/11/07, George Aroush <brittany35@example.net> wrote: > > > > > I agree, and I see little value to have a full release of 2.1. > > > > > However, before we start working on 2.2, we should fix the > > > > > existing known issues with > > > > > 2.1 that NUnit tests has exposed; doing so will make the > > > > transition to > > > > > 2.2 must easier. If we take this path, then we can > leave 2.1 in > > > > > a "non-supported" mode and move on to 2.2. Does > everyone agree? > > > > > > > > When new versions of Lucene.Net made, are they merges of the > > > > changes from the previous Java version (converted > somehow), or are > > > > they totally new conversions with some of the .Net-isms > merged in? > > > > If the former, this definitely makes sense. If the latter, I > > > > would think it makes more sense to skip 2.1 entirely. > > > > > > > > In any case, moving forward on either front is positive news. > > > > Keep up the good work. :) > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > - > > P > > > > > -- > - > P > From lucene-net-user-return-674brittany35@example.net Mon Aug 13 14:01:21 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-674brittany35@example.net> Delivered-To: brittany35@example.net Received: (qmail 2597 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2007 14:01:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}