From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Mon Apr 04 23:55:27 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 29055 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 88262 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 88228 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 88218 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2011 23:55:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:55:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of waltersashley@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gateout02.mbox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:55:19 +0000 Received: from gateout02.mbox.net (gwo2-lo [83.161.120.155]) by gateout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E4F5D1F0A for <waltersashley@example.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:54:58 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from gateout02.mbox.net [83.161.120.155] by gateout02.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 710PDDX359824Mo2; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:54:56 -0000 Received: from S1HUB4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [83.161.120.155] by gateout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPS id XID668PDDX353004Xo2; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:54:56 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 83.161.120.155 IN waltersashley@example.com S1HUB4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID668PDDX353004Xo2 Received: from MBX7.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) by S1HUB4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:54:53 +0000 From: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> To: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:54:45 +0000 Subject: reference maven properties in multi module npanday projects Thread-Topic: reference maven properties in multi module npanday projects Thread-Index: AcvTqdZE3sAXvl64T0e+tRFKA+QSmwAAhzjAABGNk7AHx5Y/AA== Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_004_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_" --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have a .NET multi module project. I'm using the npanday plugin to= build the project and it seems to be working ok. However I can't seem to= reference maven properties from within my pom.xml file like I can with jav= a projects. Can anybody tell me if it's possible to reference maven proper= ties like ${project.version} or ${project.groupId} from within a pom.xml wh= en using NPanday? It doesn't seem to work for me. I've tried the followin= g variants: ${version}, ${pom.version}, and ${project.version}. None of th= em seem to work correctly. It seems to reference the file in the /target f= older correctly however it doesn't actually copy the library to the /target= folder from the local or host repositories before the compile phase. Ther= efore it fails saying that it can't find the file. Attached is something s= imilar to my pom.xml Dashboard.Client depends on Dashboard.Common, both are set to the same vers= ion '1.0-SNAPSHOT '. I want to reference groupId and version info in Dashb= oard.Client pom.xml with the ${project.groupId} and ${project.version} prop= erties. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr= osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns=3D"http:= //www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"> <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"> <style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} span.EmailStyle18 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:#1F497D;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-size:10.0pt;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> </style> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> </head> <body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple> <div class=3DSection1> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Hello, I have a .NET mul= ti module project.&nbsp; I&#8217;m using the npanday plugin to build the proje= ct and it seems to be working ok.&nbsp;&nbsp; However I can&#8217;t seem to reference maven properties from within my pom.xml file like I can with java projects.&nbsp; Can anybody tell me if it&#8217;s possible to reference mav= en properties like ${project.version} or ${project.groupId} from within a pom.= xml when using NPanday?&nbsp; It doesn&#8217;t seem to work for me.&nbsp; I&#82= 17;ve tried the following variants: ${version}, ${pom.version}, and ${project.ver= sion}.&nbsp; None of them seem to work correctly.&nbsp; It seems to reference the file i= n the /target folder correctly however it doesn&#8217;t actually copy the lib= rary to the /target folder from the local or host repositories before the compil= e phase.&nbsp; Therefore it fails saying that it can&#8217;t find the file.&nbsp; Attached= is something similar to my pom.xml<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>= </p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Dashboard.Client depends= on Dashboard.Common, both are set to the same version &#8216;1.0-SNAPSHOT &#82= 16;.&nbsp; I want to reference groupId and version info in Dashboard.Client pom.xml wi= th the ${project.groupId} and ${project.version} properties.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p>= </span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>= </p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Any help would be appreciated.&nbsp; Thanks.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span>= </p> </div> </body> </html> --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_-- --_004_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_ Content-Type: text/xml; name="pom.xml" Content-Description: pom.xml Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pom.xml"; size=1243; creation-date="Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:38:53 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:40:36 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PD94bWwgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4wIiBlbmNvZGluZz0iVVRGLTgiPz4NCg0KPHByb2plY3QgeG1sbnM6 eHNpPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy8yMDAxL1hNTFNjaGVtYS1pbnN0YW5jZSIgeHNpOnNjaGVt YUxvY2F0aW9uPSJodHRwOi8vbWF2ZW4uYXBhY2hlLm9yZy9QT00vNC4wLjAgaHR0cDovL21hdmVu LmFwYWNoZS5vcmcvbWF2ZW4tdjRfMF8wLnhzZCI+ICANCiAgPG1vZGVsVmVyc2lvbj40LjAuMDwv bW9kZWxWZXJzaW9uPiAgDQogIDxncm91cElkPmNvbS5hY21lPC9ncm91cElkPiAgDQogIDxhcnRp ZmFjdElkPkRhc2hib2FyZC5DbGllbnQ8L2FydGlmYWN0SWQ+ICANCiAgPG5hbWU+RGFzaGJvYXJk LkNsaWVudDwvbmFtZT4gIA0KICA8dmVyc2lvbj4xLjAtU05BUFNIT1Q8L3ZlcnNpb24+DQogIDxw YWNrYWdpbmc+bGlicmFyeTwvcGFja2FnaW5nPg0KCTxkZXBlbmRlbmN5Pg0KCSAgPGdyb3VwSWQ+ JHtncm91cElkfTwvZ3JvdXBJZD4gDQoJICA8YXJ0aWZhY3RJZD5EYXNoYm9hcmQuQ29tbW9uPC9h cnRpZmFjdElkPg0KCSAgPHZlcnNpb24+JHt2ZXJzaW9ufTwvdmVyc2lvbj4NCgkgIDx0eXBlPmxp YnJhcnk8L3R5cGU+DQoJPC9kZXBlbmRlbmN5Pg0KICAgIDxkZXBlbmRlbmNpZXM+DQogICAgICAg IDxkZXBlbmRlbmN5Pg0KICAgICAgICAgIDxncm91cElkPk5Vbml0PC9ncm91cElkPg0KICAgICAg ICAgIDxhcnRpZmFjdElkPk5Vbml0LkZyYW1ld29yazwvYXJ0aWZhY3RJZD4NCiAgICAgICAgICA8 dmVyc2lvbj4yLjUuODwvdmVyc2lvbj4NCiAgICAgICAgICA8dHlwZT5saWJyYXJ5PC90eXBlPg0K ICAgICAgICAgIDxzY29wZT50ZXN0PC9zY29wZT4NCiAgICAgICAgPC9kZXBlbmRlbmN5Pg0KICA8 L2RlcGVuZGVuY2llcz4gIA0KICA8YnVpbGQ+IA0KICAgIDxzb3VyY2VEaXJlY3Rvcnk+c3JjL21h aW4vY3NoYXJwPC9zb3VyY2VEaXJlY3Rvcnk+ICANCiAgICA8dGVzdFNvdXJjZURpcmVjdG9yeT5z cmMvdGVzdC9jc2hhcnA8L3Rlc3RTb3VyY2VEaXJlY3Rvcnk+ICANCiAgICA8cGx1Z2lucz4gDQog ICAgICA8cGx1Z2luPiANCiAgICAgICAgPGdyb3VwSWQ+bnBhbmRheS5wbHVnaW48L2dyb3VwSWQ+ ICANCiAgICAgICAgPGFydGlmYWN0SWQ+bWF2ZW4tY29tcGlsZS1wbHVnaW48L2FydGlmYWN0SWQ+ ICANCiAgICAgICAgPGV4dGVuc2lvbnM+dHJ1ZTwvZXh0ZW5zaW9ucz4gDQogICAgICA8L3BsdWdp bj4NCiAgICA8L3BsdWdpbnM+IA0KICA8L2J1aWxkPiANCjwvcHJvamVjdD4NCg== --_004_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C61CMBX7EXCHPRODU_-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 01:07:24 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 79001 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 01:07:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 01:07:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 16377 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 01:07:24 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 16333 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 01:07:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 16324 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 01:07:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 01:07:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 01:07:16 +0000 Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so7006704iye.6 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:06:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id uw7mr3986012icb.169.1301965615352; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:06:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:06:55 +0800 Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: reference maven properties in multi module npanday projects From: Josimpson Ocaba <waltersashley@example.com> To: waltersashley@example.com Cc: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5299f6f034c0e04a0217e27 --bcaec5299f6f034c0e04a0217e27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Khai, We are happy to hear that npanday is working for you :), unfortunately the compiler doesn't recognize maven properties and turn them into their correct values yet. If you would like you could file an issue and submit a patch and we will gladly check it and apply it. We are in the process of finalizing the fixes that we will have for 1.3.1-incubating release so this may have a chance to get included if it gets finish on time. Cheers! Joe --bcaec5299f6f034c0e04a0217e27-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 05:32:26 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 33846 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 05:32:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 05:32:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 55267 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 05:32:24 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 55203 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 05:32:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 54602 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 05:32:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:32:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtprelay02.ispgateway.de) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 05:32:12 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (helo=[83.161.120.155]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <waltersashley@example.com>) id 1Q6yrn-000629-KV; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 07:31:51 +0200 References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8G4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <waltersashley@example.com> Cc: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com>, Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8G4) From: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: reference maven properties in multi module npanday projects Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:31:47 +0200 To: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> X-Df-Sender: waltersashley@example.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Joe, how does the compiler get in the middle of resolving the dependencies? Khai Do uses properties in the dependencies bit. Maybe we can help him with which class he would have to tweak? _ Lars -- Message sent from mobile device Am 05.04.2011 um 03:06 schrieb Josimpson Ocaba <waltersashley@example.com>: > Hi Khai, >=20 > We are happy to hear that npanday is working for you :), unfortunately the= > compiler doesn't recognize maven properties and turn them into their corre= ct > values yet. >=20 > If you would like you could file an issue and submit a patch and we will > gladly check it and apply it. We are in the process of finalizing the fixe= s > that we will have for 1.3.1-incubating release so this may have a chance t= o > get included if it gets finish on time. >=20 > Cheers! >=20 > Joe From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 13:29:09 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 95692 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 13:29:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 13:29:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 49533 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 13:29:08 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 49519 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 13:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 49511 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 13:29:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:29:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of waltersashley@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gateout01.mbox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:29:00 +0000 Received: from gateout01.mbox.net (gateout01-lo [83.161.120.155]) by gateout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA0B51D7F0 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:28:40 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from gateout01.mbox.net [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 189PDeNCl3264Mo1; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:28:37 -0000 Received: from S1HUB4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPS id XID806PDeNCl9972Xo1; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:28:37 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 83.161.120.155 IN waltersashley@example.com S1HUB4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID806PDeNCl9972Xo1 Received: from MBX7.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) by S1HUB4.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:28:37 +0000 From: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> To: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 13:28:28 +0000 Subject: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Topic: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Index: AcvTqdZE3sAXvl64T0e+tRFKA+QSmwAAhzjAABGNk7AHx5Y/AAANk4IA Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C6E2MBX7EXCHPRODU_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C6E2MBX7EXCHPRODU_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Can anybody tell me if transitive dependencies work when using npand= ay? I have a .NET multi module project and have the following simple scena= rio where transitive dependency isn't working. I'm using java 1.6, maven 2= .2.1, and npanday-1.3-incubating, I have 3 projects: projectA, projectB and projectC. projectB depends on projectA. ProjectB and projectA build just fine. I = create projectC which depends on projectA & projectB. When I create my pro= jectC pom.xml I add projectB as the only dependency keeping in mind that = maven should pull in projectA through its transitive dependency mechanism. = However when I build projectC it fails and says that it can't find classes= from projectA. When I add projectA as a dependency to projectC then it builds just fine. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABE97C6E2MBX7EXCHPRODU_-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 13:35:33 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 35276 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 13:35:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 13:35:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 65632 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 13:35:31 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 65605 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 13:35:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 65570 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 13:35:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:35:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtprelay02.ispgateway.de) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:35:22 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (helo=maccorneliussen.dhcp-un.itemis.de) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <waltersashley@example.com>) id 1Q76PN-0007yh-L3; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:35:01 +0200 Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:35:01 +0200 From: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; de; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: waltersashley@example.com CC: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: cannot get transitive dependencies working References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090508070403050209060704" X-Df-Sender: waltersashley@example.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --------------090508070403050209060704 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am not sure about that, but I think you should use a concrete reference whenever you compile against something - since you are taking *direct* dependency on it. Transitive dependencies will work for runtime or test scope, where projectB needs projectC in order to run correctly. _ yours, Lars Am 05.04.11 15:28, schrieb Khai Do: > Hello, Can anybody tell me if transitive dependencies work when using npanday? I have a .NET multi module project and have the following simple scenario where transitive dependency isn't working. I'm using java 1.6, maven 2.2.1, and npanday-1.3-incubating, > > I have 3 projects: projectA, projectB and projectC. > > projectB depends on projectA. ProjectB and projectA build just fine. I create projectC which depends on projectA& projectB. When I create my projectC pom.xml I add projectB as the only dependency keeping in mind that maven should pull in projectA through its transitive dependency mechanism. However when I build projectC it fails and says that it can't find classes from projectA. > > When I add projectA as a dependency to projectC then it builds just fine. > > Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. > > > > --------------090508070403050209060704-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 15:02:45 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 6622 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 4990 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 4961 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 4953 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 15:02:44 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:02:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of waltersashley@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gateout01.mbox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:02:35 +0000 Received: from gateout01.mbox.net (gateout01-lo [83.161.120.155]) by gateout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D702551DCD8; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:02:13 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from gateout01.mbox.net [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 955PDePck8864Mo1; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:02:11 -0000 Received: from S1HUB1.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPS id XID641PDePcL6884Xo1; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:02:11 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 83.161.120.155 IN waltersashley@example.com S1HUB1.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID641PDePcL6884Xo1 Received: from MBX7.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) by S1HUB1.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:02:00 +0000 From: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> To: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com>, "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:01:51 +0000 Subject: RE: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Topic: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Index: AcvzlkW/EVcls9mwQgK4YlvNCMKvqAAAETEA Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABEA211C0MBX7EXCHPRODU_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABEA211C0MBX7EXCHPRODU_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The whole point of maven's transitive dependency feature is to pull in all = indirect dependencies for build, test, and runtime. At least this is how i= t works with maven java projects. You should not have to supply concrete r= eferences to every library that a project depends on, it would be a nightma= re to manage if your chain of dependencies gets really long. Also your pom= files will be very long containing lots of duplication. Here is what I expect.. ProjectB depends on projectA, projectC depends on projectB. Therefore when= I build projectC using npanday it should recognize projectA as a transitiv= e dependency and automatically download and reference projectA as well. --_000_0055CE69D94919458617273479AB71A9DABEA211C0MBX7EXCHPRODU_-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 15:40:19 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 34829 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 15:40:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 15:40:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 68540 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 15:40:18 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 68521 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 15:40:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 68513 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 15:40:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:40:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:40:13 +0000 Received: by pwj9 with SMTP id 9so214618pwj.6 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q11mr7248695wfo.428.1302017992186; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (CPE-124-183-123-227.lns15.ken.bigpond.net.au [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm9136606wfd.13.283.161.120.155.39.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Brett Porter <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: cannot get transitive dependencies working Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Brett Porter <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:39:44 +1000 Cc: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> To: waltersashley@example.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Maven originally didn't allow transitive, compile time dependencies. = Unfortunately, there are certain circumstances under which Java requires = them at compile time and I reluctantly changed it to avoid confusion. = The dependency:analyze goal now warns you if you don't specify them = directly. .NET isn't burdened in the same way, so it's desired that things you = directly use in the current project are specified (which things required = by your dependencies are brought in transitively) On 06/04/2011, at 1:01 AM, Khai Do wrote: > The whole point of maven's transitive dependency feature is to pull in = all indirect dependencies for build, test, and runtime. At least this = is how it works with maven java projects. You should not have to supply = concrete references to every library that a project depends on, it would = be a nightmare to manage if your chain of dependencies gets really long. = Also your pom files will be very long containing lots of duplication. >=20 > Here is what I expect.. > ProjectB depends on projectA, projectC depends on projectB. Therefore = when I build projectC using npanday it should recognize projectA as a = transitive dependency and automatically download and reference projectA = as well. >=20 -- Brett Porter waltersashley@example.com http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 16:12:55 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 41054 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 23916 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 23895 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 23887 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 16:12:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:12:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of waltersashley@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gateout01.mbox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:12:46 +0000 Received: from gateout01.mbox.net (gateout01-lo [83.161.120.155]) by gateout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385E0CC1A5; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:12:25 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from gateout01.mbox.net [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 372PDeqmX2064Mo1; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:12:23 -0000 Received: from S1HUB3.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPS id XID457PDeqmX8132Xo1; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:12:23 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 83.161.120.155 IN waltersashley@example.com S1HUB3.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID457PDeqmX8132Xo1 Received: from MBX7.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) by S1HUB3.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:12:07 +0000 From: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> To: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> CC: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:11:58 +0000 Subject: RE: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Topic: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Index: Acvzp8aP2wIDu+4gSZ+R7gp1menjBwAAocgA Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Brett. Maybe I don't understand. What do you mean when you say ".NET is= not burdened the same way"? As a best practice (for java projects) I foll= ow the pattern of only referencing top level modules and letting maven reso= lve all the transitive dependencies for me on compile. I believe this is t= he definition of dependency management. It seems like your suggesting that= .NET is not build the same way and I shouldn't follow this pattern for npa= nday builds? Wouldn't this break maven's dependency management feature? -= Khai From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 16:24:36 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 75175 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 65241 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 65207 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 65199 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:24:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of waltersashley@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gateout02.mbox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:24:27 +0000 Received: from gateout02.mbox.net (gwo2-lo [83.161.120.155]) by gateout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BCF5D2B59; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:24:06 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from gateout02.mbox.net [83.161.120.155] by gateout02.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 930PDeqye9024Mo2; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:24:04 -0000 Received: from S1HUB2.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [83.161.120.155] by gateout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPS id XID283PDeqye9804Xo2; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:24:04 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 83.161.120.155 IN waltersashley@example.com S1HUB2.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID283PDeqye9804Xo2 Received: from MBX7.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) by S1HUB2.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:23:14 +0000 From: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> To: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com>, "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> CC: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:23:06 +0000 Subject: RE: reference maven properties in multi module npanday projects Thread-Topic: reference maven properties in multi module npanday projects Thread-Index: AcvzUsZ8OQ4XKHVmTke9+/NcEB5cKQAWdRgQ Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I entered a bug.. NPANDAY-395, then Brett closed it as a duplicate of NPAND= AY-98. The problem seems to be deep rooted in how npanday works with the R= DF store. I would love to know whether there is a workaround though. Than= ks. From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 16:32:40 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 7288 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 16:32:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 16:32:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 83899 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:32:40 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 83879 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:32:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 83870 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 16:32:40 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-px0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:32:34 +0000 Received: by pxi17 with SMTP id 17so380589pxi.6 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x32mr7787326wfi.117.1302021131074; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (CPE-124-183-123-227.lns15.ken.bigpond.net.au [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x11sm9186361wfd.13.283.161.120.155.32.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Brett Porter <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: cannot get transitive dependencies working Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Brett Porter <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 02:32:03 +1000 Cc: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> To: waltersashley@example.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) You're correct, and I think it is behaving as you expect. What I'm trying to be clear on (which is sometimes hard without = pictures): Let's say B depends on C. Let's say your current project's source code = uses classes from all of A, B and C. You should declare all 3 dependencies, because you need to compile = against them. You shouldn't rely on not declaring C because B will bring = it in - because B might later change not to, or use a different version. Now, if you just use A, B - you only compile against A, B, but you run = against A, B, C (because B needs C to run). The problem in Java is if C contains an abstract class implemented in B, = you need to compile against C, even if you only use classes from A and = B. :) On 06/04/2011, at 2:11 AM, Khai Do wrote: > Hi Brett. Maybe I don't understand. What do you mean when you say = ".NET is not burdened the same way"? As a best practice (for java = projects) I follow the pattern of only referencing top level modules and = letting maven resolve all the transitive dependencies for me on compile. = I believe this is the definition of dependency management. It seems = like your suggesting that .NET is not build the same way and I shouldn't = follow this pattern for npanday builds? Wouldn't this break maven's = dependency management feature? -Khai >=20 -- Brett Porter waltersashley@example.com http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 05 16:58:23 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 85015 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 56232 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 56211 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 56202 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2011 16:58:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:58:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:58:16 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (helo=maccorneliussen.dhcp-un.itemis.de) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <waltersashley@example.com>) id 1Q79Zj-0001P6-T9 for waltersashley@example.com; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:57:55 +0200 From: Lars Corneliussen <waltersashley@example.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; de; rv:83.161.120.155) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: waltersashley@example.com Subject: Re: cannot get transitive dependencies working References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: waltersashley@example.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, A transitive dependency is a dependeny of your dependency. If you reference a class of that "transitive" dependency, it is not a dependency of your dependency anymore. It's now also your direct dependency and hence SHOULD be declared in the POM. _ Lars Am 05.04.11 18:32, schrieb Brett Porter: > You're correct, and I think it is behaving as you expect. > > What I'm trying to be clear on (which is sometimes hard without pictures): > > Let's say B depends on C. Let's say your current project's source code uses classes from all of A, B and C. > > You should declare all 3 dependencies, because you need to compile against them. You shouldn't rely on not declaring C because B will bring it in - because B might later change not to, or use a different version. > > Now, if you just use A, B - you only compile against A, B, but you run against A, B, C (because B needs C to run). > > The problem in Java is if C contains an abstract class implemented in B, you need to compile against C, even if you only use classes from A and B. > > :) > > On 06/04/2011, at 2:11 AM, Khai Do wrote: > >> Hi Brett. Maybe I don't understand. What do you mean when you say ".NET is not burdened the same way"? As a best practice (for java projects) I follow the pattern of only referencing top level modules and letting maven resolve all the transitive dependencies for me on compile. I believe this is the definition of dependency management. It seems like your suggesting that .NET is not build the same way and I shouldn't follow this pattern for npanday builds? Wouldn't this break maven's dependency management feature? -Khai >> > -- > Brett Porter > waltersashley@example.com > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > > > From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Wed Apr 06 03:43:49 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 85275 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2011 03:43:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Apr 2011 03:43:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 31321 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 03:43:49 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 31278 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2011 03:43:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 31258 invoked by uid 99); 6 Apr 2011 03:43:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:43:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of waltersashley@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gateout01.mbox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:43:37 +0000 Received: from gateout01.mbox.net (gateout01-lo [83.161.120.155]) by gateout01.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D3C52E93E for <waltersashley@example.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 03:43:16 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from gateout01.mbox.net [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 546PDFDrN9264Mo1; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:43:14 -0000 Received: from S1HUB5.EXCHPROD.USA.NET [83.161.120.155] by gateout01.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPS id XID689PDFDro4452Xo1; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:43:13 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 83.161.120.155 IN waltersashley@example.com S1HUB5.EXCHPROD.USA.NET X-USANET-MsgId: XID689PDFDro4452Xo1 Received: from MBX7.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) by S1HUB5.EXCHPROD.USA.NET ([83.161.120.155]) with mapi; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 03:43:13 +0000 From: Khai Do <waltersashley@example.com> To: "waltersashley@example.com" <waltersashley@example.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 03:42:58 +0000 Subject: RE: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Topic: cannot get transitive dependencies working Thread-Index: Acvzsq7YfPo67irjTjefbh9bZjb0gAAWcgxA Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-cr-puzzleid: {EF2A299D-F3C6-4ABF-8CD5-4414DFA502E9} x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BMiR Cb5l C/s+ DSu0 EZwA EfUw Eh+d FRQP FWIG Fcgb Gd43 IUhT Ib2b JJOY JvRS K0Vh;1;bgBwAGEAbgBkAGEAeQAtAHUAcwBlAHIAcwBAAGkAbgBjAHUAYgBhAHQAbwByAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwA=;Sosha1_v1;7;{EF2A299D-F3C6-4ABF-8CD5-4414DFA502E9};awBoAGEAaQAuAGQAbwBAAGkAbQBwAGkAbgBqAC4AYwBvAG0A;Wed, 06 Apr 2011 03:42:58 GMT;UgBFADoAIABjAGEAbgBuAG8AdAAgAGcAZQB0ACAAdAByAGEAbgBzAGkAdABpAHYAZQAgAGQAZQBwAGUAbgBkAGUAbgBjAGkAZQBzACAAdwBvAHIAawBpAG4AZwA= acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Ahh, I get it. Thank you for the clarification. =20 From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Fri Apr 08 14:54:52 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 32390 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 14:54:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 14:54:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6471 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 14:54:48 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 6287 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 14:54:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 6279 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 14:54:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:54:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp165.iad.emailsrvr.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by smtp46.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E5B63E830B for <waltersashley@example.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:54:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp46.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: jamie.kemp-AT-interlinksoftware.com) with ESMTPSA id 68682E89A3 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:54:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jamie Kemp" <waltersashley@example.com> To: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Resource file issues Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:54:20 +0100 Organization: Interlink Software Services LTD Message-ID: <000301cbf5fc$d8230ad0$88692070$@waltersashley@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CBF605.39E772D0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acv1/IzNy13p76SEQbCTBHZccKnkmA== Content-Language: en-gb ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CBF605.39E772D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I am having a issue with embedded resources and NPanday. Project compiles correctly with Visual Studio but when I try to get NPanday to do the compile the following is reported: [INFO] ...\trunk\resources\resource.resx(123,5): error RG0000: Could not find file '...\trunk\assigned.ico'. Line 123, position 5. If i move the *.ico files up into the trunk directory the project compiles correctly in NPanday but then fails when using Visual Studio. I have tried adding a <resources> section in the POM file but the entry seems to have no affect at all and I have also found this old ticket on Codeplex http://npanday.codeplex.com/workitem/10603?ProjectName=npanday which links to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-227 which reports as being unresolved. Is there any way to get both Visual Studio and NPanday happy with being able to compile the project? Thanks, Jamie ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CBF605.39E772D0-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Fri Apr 08 22:48:17 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 8125 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2011 22:48:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Apr 2011 22:48:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 32655 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 22:48:17 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 32627 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2011 22:48:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 32615 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2011 22:48:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 22:48:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 22:48:08 +0000 Received: by iye7 with SMTP id 7so4226539iye.6 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:47:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id yd7mr3833609icb.370.1302302865804; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:47:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] In-Reply-To: <-6332429008768571065@unknownmsgid> References: <-6332429008768571065@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 06:47:45 +0800 Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: Resource file issues From: Josimpson Ocaba <waltersashley@example.com> To: waltersashley@example.com Cc: Jamie Kemp <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51ddb35b4cb8104a0700302 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec51ddb35b4cb8104a0700302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Jamie, can you send as a copy of your pom.xml file? Also after moving the *.ico file upto the trunk did you also change the hintPath in the visual studio project file? This maybe the reason why it is failing for VS. Hope this helps. Cheers, Joe --bcaec51ddb35b4cb8104a0700302-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Sun Apr 10 07:04:31 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 15027 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2011 07:04:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 07:04:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 56468 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 07:04:31 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 56401 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2011 07:04:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 56392 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2011 07:04:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:04:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp155.iad.emailsrvr.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:04:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by smtp45.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 719EA9019F for <waltersashley@example.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:03:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp45.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: jamie.kemp-AT-interlinksoftware.com) with ESMTPSA id ECB289018F for <waltersashley@example.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:03:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jamie Kemp" <waltersashley@example.com> To: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <-6332429008768571065@unknownmsgid> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: RE: Resource file issues Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:03:51 +0100 Organization: Interlink Software Services LTD Message-ID: <000601cbf74d$73a31080$5ae93180$@waltersashley@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01CBF755.D5677880" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acv2Pw1/he207a8kTHCa9mTB5UGPdQBCxDng Content-Language: en-gb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CBF755.D5677880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Please find attached the pom file which i have slightly edited to hide SVN repository details. The referenced dotnet-parent pom defines location of our distribution repositories and also sets the versions of most of the NPanday plugins so I do not have to do that in every projects pom file. Updating the entries that appear in .csproj appears to make no difference in visual studio. The only way is to change the resource.resx file to look up a directory which still does not resolve the issue as then NPanday will not compile the project! So NPanday and Visual Studio are not compiling resources in the same way. As below: Visual Studio Resources path: trunk\resources\resources.resx Base path used: trunk\resources\ NPanday Resources path: trunk\resources\resources.resx Base path used: trunk\ Is there something I can put in my pom file to correct this? For reference I am using NPanday 1.2.1. Thanks, Jamie -----Original Message----- From: Josimpson Ocaba [mailto:waltersashley@example.com] Sent: 08 April 2011 23:48 To: waltersashley@example.com Cc: Jamie Kemp Subject: Re: Resource file issues Hi Jamie, can you send as a copy of your pom.xml file? Also after moving the *.ico file upto the trunk did you also change the hintPath in the visual studio project file? This maybe the reason why it is failing for VS. Hope this helps. Cheers, Joe ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CBF755.D5677880 Content-Type: text/xml; name="pom.xml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pom.xml" <?xml version=3D"1.0" encoding=3D"utf-8"?> <project xmlns:xsi=3D"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" = xmlns:xsd=3D"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" = xmlns=3D"http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"> <parent> <artifactId>dotnet-parent</artifactId> <groupId>com.int-link.dotnet</groupId> <version>1</version> </parent> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>com.int-link.dotnet</groupId> <artifactId>ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.DrillDownHub</artifactId> <packaging>library</packaging> <name>com.int-link.dotnet : = ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.DrillDownHub</name> <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version> <scm> <connection>xxx</connection> <developerConnection>xxx</developerConnection> <url>xxx</url> </scm> <build> <sourceDirectory>./</sourceDirectory> <resources> <resource> <directory>resources</directory> </resource> </resources> <plugins> <plugin> <groupId>npanday.plugin</groupId> <artifactId>maven-compile-plugin</artifactId> <extensions>true</extensions> <configuration> <includeSources> = <includeSource>ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.DrillDownHub.cs</includeSource>= <includeSource>Properties\AssemblyInfo.cs</includeSource> = <includeSource>resources\resource.Designer.cs</includeSource> </includeSources> </configuration> </plugin> <plugin> <groupId>npanday.plugin</groupId> <artifactId>maven-resgen-plugin</artifactId> <configuration> <embeddedResources> <embeddedResource> = <sourceFile>ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.DrillDownHub.resx</sourceFile> = <name>ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.DrillDownHub<= /name> </embeddedResource> <embeddedResource> <sourceFile>resources\resource.resx</sourceFile> <name>ISS.BES.Dashboard.Controls.resources.resource</name> </embeddedResource> </embeddedResources> </configuration> </plugin> </plugins> </build> </project> ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CBF755.D5677880-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Mon Apr 11 14:52:17 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 32241 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2011 14:52:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2011 14:52:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 71447 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 14:52:17 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 71427 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2011 14:52:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 71418 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2011 14:52:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:52:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp195.iad.emailsrvr.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:52:10 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by smtp49.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CEE541900ED for <waltersashley@example.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:51:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp49.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: jamie.kemp-AT-interlinksoftware.com) with ESMTPSA id 489B9190217 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:51:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jamie Kemp" <waltersashley@example.com> To: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Repositories down? Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:51:46 +0100 Organization: Interlink Software Services LTD Message-ID: <000001cbf857$fc21fc40$f465f4c0$@waltersashley@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01CBF860.5DE66440" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acv4V5ellXMs5Fh8QBKqnfuzI8HqPA== Content-Language: en-gb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CBF860.5DE66440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Should the repository be giving 503 errors? http://repo.npanday.org/archiva/repository/npanday-group/ Thanks, Jamie ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CBF860.5DE66440-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 12 00:01:15 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 29973 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2011 00:01:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2011 00:01:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 16379 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 00:01:15 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 16348 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 00:01:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 16340 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2011 00:01:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:01:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:01:06 +0000 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so6590445iwn.6 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id ul1mr8544998icb.211.1302566444985; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] In-Reply-To: <-9064814396996151302@unknownmsgid> References: <-9064814396996151302@unknownmsgid> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:00:44 +0800 Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: Repositories down? From: Josimpson Ocaba <waltersashley@example.com> To: waltersashley@example.com Cc: Jamie Kemp <waltersashley@example.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5299e613fefeb04a0ad6223 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec5299e613fefeb04a0ad6223 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Jamie, Sorry for the inconvenience. Currently working on resolving the repository problem now. Cheers! --bcaec5299e613fefeb04a0ad6223-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 12 08:19:07 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 57701 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2011 08:19:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2011 08:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 24945 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 08:19:06 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 24902 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 08:19:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 24886 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2011 08:19:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:19:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp195.iad.emailsrvr.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:18:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by smtp49.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0A77C190735 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 04:18:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp49.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: jamie.kemp-AT-interlinksoftware.com) with ESMTPSA id 91295190730 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 04:18:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jamie Kemp" <waltersashley@example.com> To: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <-6332429008768571065@unknownmsgid> <waltersashley@example.com> <000601cbf74d$73a31080$5ae93180$@waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <000601cbf74d$73a31080$5ae93180$@waltersashley@example.com> Subject: RE: Resource file issues Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:18:35 +0100 Organization: Interlink Software Services LTD Message-ID: <000901cbf8ea$38d28eb0$aa77ac10$@waltersashley@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acv2Pw1/he207a8kTHCa9mTB5UGPdQBCxDngAGcYs0A= Content-Language: en-gb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have managed to fix the issue by applying the patch provided at http://npanday.codeplex.com/workitem/10603?ProjectName=npanday. Is there a reason this patch has not been applied to the incubating release? If you are intending to fix in a different way is this something I can assist with and provide a patch for inclusion? Even though I have rolled my own version of the resgen plugin for now I would prefer to stick to the core releases where possible. Cheers, Jamie -----Original Message----- From: Jamie Kemp [mailto:waltersashley@example.com] Sent: 10 April 2011 08:04 To: waltersashley@example.com Subject: RE: Resource file issues Hi, Please find attached the pom file which i have slightly edited to hide SVN repository details. The referenced dotnet-parent pom defines location of our distribution repositories and also sets the versions of most of the NPanday plugins so I do not have to do that in every projects pom file. Updating the entries that appear in .csproj appears to make no difference in visual studio. The only way is to change the resource.resx file to look up a directory which still does not resolve the issue as then NPanday will not compile the project! So NPanday and Visual Studio are not compiling resources in the same way. As below: Visual Studio Resources path: trunk\resources\resources.resx Base path used: trunk\resources\ NPanday Resources path: trunk\resources\resources.resx Base path used: trunk\ Is there something I can put in my pom file to correct this? For reference I am using NPanday 1.2.1. Thanks, Jamie -----Original Message----- From: Josimpson Ocaba [mailto:waltersashley@example.com] Sent: 08 April 2011 23:48 To: waltersashley@example.com Cc: Jamie Kemp Subject: Re: Resource file issues Hi Jamie, can you send as a copy of your pom.xml file? Also after moving the *.ico file upto the trunk did you also change the hintPath in the visual studio project file? This maybe the reason why it is failing for VS. Hope this helps. Cheers, Joe From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Tue Apr 12 22:18:57 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 40541 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2011 22:18:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2011 22:18:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 56957 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 22:18:57 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 56939 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2011 22:18:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 56931 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2011 22:18:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:18:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:18:47 +0000 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so37331iwn.6 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:18:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e7mr55305icx.278.1302646706957; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:18:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] In-Reply-To: <-5672305614681633026@unknownmsgid> References: <-6332429008768571065@unknownmsgid> <waltersashley@example.com> <-5672305614681633026@unknownmsgid> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 06:18:26 +0800 Message-ID: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: Re: Resource file issues From: Josimpson Ocaba <waltersashley@example.com> To: waltersashley@example.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e842a3c6ef404a0c012f0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --90e6ba6e842a3c6ef404a0c012f0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Jamie, Which patch did you apply that helped you fixed your problem? There was a discussion as to whether or not this was the fix that we want to go with. We will revisit again and maybe come up with an agreement. Thanks, --90e6ba6e842a3c6ef404a0c012f0-- From npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com Wed Apr 13 08:02:56 2011 Return-Path: <npanday-users-returnwaltersashley@example.com> Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 47300 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2011 08:02:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2011 08:02:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 82254 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 08:02:55 -0000 Delivered-To: waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 82210 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2011 08:02:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact waltersashley@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:waltersashley@example.com> List-Id: <npanday-users.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: waltersashley@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list waltersashley@example.com Received: (qmail 82199 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2011 08:02:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:02:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp155.iad.emailsrvr.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:02:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [83.161.120.155]) by smtp55.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3D6F82E0387 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:02:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp55.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: jamie.kemp-AT-interlinksoftware.com) with ESMTPSA id C8AC42E02D5 for <waltersashley@example.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 04:02:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jamie Kemp" <waltersashley@example.com> To: <waltersashley@example.com> References: <-6332429008768571065@unknownmsgid> <waltersashley@example.com> <-5672305614681633026@unknownmsgid> <waltersashley@example.com> In-Reply-To: <waltersashley@example.com> Subject: RE: Resource file issues Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:02:23 +0100 Organization: Interlink Software Services LTD Message-ID: <001101cbf9b1$1fe72240$5fb566c0$@waltersashley@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01CBF9B9.81AB8A40" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acv5X54bFbHxLrA5SOyP04N4Ml7I4gAUMdcg Content-Language: en-gb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01CBF9B9.81AB8A40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe, Please find the patch I used attached. Thanks, Jamie -----Original Message----- From: Josimpson Ocaba [mailto:waltersashley@example.com] Sent: 12 April 2011 23:18 To: waltersashley@example.com Subject: Re: Resource file issues Hi Jamie, Which patch did you apply that helped you fixed your problem? There was a discussion as to whether or not this was the fix that we want to go with. We will revisit again and maybe come up with an agreement. Thanks, ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01CBF9B9.81AB8A40--
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}