From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 14:00:45 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 43506 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 14:00:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 14:00:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 9582 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 14:00:51 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 9566 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 14:00:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 9557 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 14:00:51 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:00:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of roger49@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:00:41 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Feb 2007 14:00:20 -0000 Received: from blueice3n1.de.ibm.com (EHLO [83.161.120.155]) [83.161.120.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 01 Feb 2007 15:00:20 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25330878 Message-ID: <roger49@example.com> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:00:30 +0100 From: Thilo Goetz <roger49@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roger49@example.com Subject: Re: Ready for new test level? References: <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> In-Reply-To: <roger49@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The new level is currently uploading to /home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.1.0/002 on people. Should be all there in about 30 min. Sorry for the late build, I had some SVN issues earlier today. Adam Lally wrote: > On 1/31/07, Thilo Goetz <roger49@example.com> wrote: >> I hope you're all testing with the distribution I prepared ;-) Are you >> all ready for me to build a new level with the recent fixes tomorrow >> morning my time? >> > > I'm ready. > > -Adam From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 14:39:28 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 60721 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 14:39:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 14:39:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 88819 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 14:39:33 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 88795 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 14:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 88761 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 14:39:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:39:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:39:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C860D7142B6 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:39:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <15918089.1170340745818.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 06:39:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Created: (UIMA-257) Document Analyzer sometimes names style map file incorrectly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Document Analyzer sometimes names style map file incorrectly ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: UIMA-257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-257 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: Tools Reporter: Adam Lally Assigned To: Adam Lally Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.1 Open Document Analyzer. Type in the location of an AE descriptor file (don't use the file selector). Click Run. On results dialog click Edit Style Map. Change a color. Click Save. This writes a file into the working directory called "StyleMap.xml", which is not right. The style map file name is supposed to be formed from the AE descriptor name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 15:24:35 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 73302 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 73995 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:35 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 73921 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 73551 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:24:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:24:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11487142D4 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:24:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <22325999.1170343445985.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:24:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Closed: (UIMA-257) Document Analyzer sometimes names style map file incorrectly In-Reply-To: <15918089.1170340745818.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally closed UIMA-257. --------------------------- Resolution: Fixed > Document Analyzer sometimes names style map file incorrectly > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: UIMA-257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-257 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.1 > > > Open Document Analyzer. Type in the location of an AE descriptor file (don't use the file selector). Click Run. On results dialog click Edit Style Map. Change a color. Click Save. This writes a file into the working directory called "StyleMap.xml", which is not right. The style map file name is supposed to be formed from the AE descriptor name. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 15:24:35 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 73303 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 74002 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:35 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 73969 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 73877 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 15:24:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:24:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:24:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FFF7142E2 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:24:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4127510.1170343446145.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:24:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Baessler (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Reopened: (UIMA-253) default path for CAS annotation viewer does not exist In-Reply-To: <28829844.1170249245780.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Baessler reopened UIMA-253: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Michael Baessler (was: Adam Lally) find another place where the default path is set to a wrong directory > default path for CAS annotation viewer does not exist > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-253 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-253 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Affects Versions: 2.1 > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Michael Baessler > Assigned To: Michael Baessler > Fix For: 2.1 > > > The default path that is used when the CAS annotation viewer is started does not exist: > Input directory: <UIMA_HOME>/docs/examples/data/processed > Typesystem file: <UIMA_HOME>/docs/examples/descriptors/analysis_engine/PersonTitleAnnotator.xml > The used directory layout has changed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 15:35:27 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 77791 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 15:35:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 15:35:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 87876 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 87839 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:35:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 87775 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 15:35:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:35:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:35:25 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB227142E1 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:35:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <15445103.1170344105897.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:35:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael Baessler (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Closed: (UIMA-253) default path for CAS annotation viewer does not exist In-Reply-To: <28829844.1170249245780.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Baessler closed UIMA-253. --------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed fixed > default path for CAS annotation viewer does not exist > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-253 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-253 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Affects Versions: 2.1 > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Michael Baessler > Assigned To: Michael Baessler > Fix For: 2.1 > > > The default path that is used when the CAS annotation viewer is started does not exist: > Input directory: <UIMA_HOME>/docs/examples/data/processed > Typesystem file: <UIMA_HOME>/docs/examples/descriptors/analysis_engine/PersonTitleAnnotator.xml > The used directory layout has changed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 15:49:35 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 85004 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 15:49:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 15:49:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 18307 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:49:41 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 18291 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:49:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 18282 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 15:49:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:49:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gator74.hostgator.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:49:31 -0800 Received: from yktgi01e0-s5.watson.ibm.com ([83.161.120.155]:26452 helo=[83.161.120.155]) by gator74.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <roger49@example.com>) id 1HCeBQ-00077t-VR for roger49@example.com; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:49:09 -0600 Message-ID: <roger49@example.com> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:48:58 -0500 From: Marshall Schor <roger49@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roger49@example.com Subject: Re: UIMA documentation improvements References: <roger49@example.com> In-Reply-To: <roger49@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator74.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - schor.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Michael Baessler wrote: > Hi, > > I have some suggestions, that I think will improve our documentation. > Please let me know what you think. > > 1) I miss a readme file in our distribution that contains some first > steps like: > - Environment variables/setup for command line tools: how do it set > them, so that I can use the provided script files > - Verification steps to verify if the installation was correct > - Getting Started section that links me to the HTML or PDF > documents. Explain which book contains the content I'm interested in. +1 There is a Jira issue open for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-240 > > 2) Maybe we can improve the names of our pdf files. They should at > least contain UIMA in the file name. If someone copies the files from the > UIMA install directory to another place, the names are not related > to UIMA. Probably late to do for 2.1 release. Would impact the docbook build script. Could do in next release. > > > 3) Thilo already changed the doc directory layout slightly. The docs > directory now contains a api, html and pdf directory. Within the html > directory there > are the subdirectories for the different docbooks. I think it will > be good to have something like an index.html directly in the html > directory that links to the > different books we have. Also it gives the user a short overview > and tells them where to find the information he needs. +1 to having an index.html. It could link, besides the docbook html books, other useful things, like the readmes, etc. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 15:56:26 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 90251 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 15:56:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 15:56:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 36902 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:56:32 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 36856 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:56:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 36846 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 15:56:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:56:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:56:25 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEF671408A for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:56:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <21085312.1170345365553.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 07:56:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Reopened: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally reopened UIMA-22: ---------------------------- reopening so we can make the window icon have a transparent background > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner-black.png, UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-all-tilted.png, UIMA-logo-big-not-so-strong-colors.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo-big.png, UIMA-logo-small-100x100-plain.png, UIMA-logo-small-50x50-plain.png, UIMA-logo-small-50x50.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 15:59:17 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 92038 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 15:59:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 15:59:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 40737 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:59:23 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 40727 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 15:59:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 40718 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 15:59:23 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:59:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO gator74.hostgator.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:59:13 -0800 Received: from yktgi01e0-s5.watson.ibm.com ([83.161.120.155]:39901 helo=[83.161.120.155]) by gator74.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <roger49@example.com>) id 1HCeKo-0004FF-Sg for roger49@example.com; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:58:50 -0600 Message-ID: <roger49@example.com> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:58:40 -0500 From: Marshall Schor <roger49@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roger49@example.com Subject: Re: Writing something about the Sandbox References: <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> In-Reply-To: <roger49@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator74.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - schor.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Other projects seem to treat the sandbox differently than as described below; I would prefer to keep the sandbox aligned with usual Apache concepts for it, which seem to be - it's a subproject for potential new additions to the project or to subprojects of it, and things here are works in progress, with no guarantee that they will ever be promoted to an official release of the project its subprojects. We should (in my opinion) establish other subprojects which can do releases, etc., beyond the sandbox, for things like annotators, parsers, consumers, and tooling. Things would graduate from the sandbox into one of these subprojects (or into the main Apache UIMA project) when we want to convey some higher level of support / testing / acceptance, and to have official "distributions/releases" for. I think that the sandbox should not be a subproject which does "distributions/releases". This allows more freedom to tinker, which I think is a valuable thing to have as some part of the project. -Marshall Michael Baessler wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Michael - could you write something about the Sandbox on Apache? >> Purpose, what's in it. Something short - to be included in the >> docbook docs. >> >> -Marshall >> >> > So you want to include a short paragraph about the sandbox to the > docbook of the UIMA 2.1 release. I would only add something similar as > we have on the web: > > The UIMA sandbox is a workspace that is open to all UIMA committers > and developers who would like to contribute code and join the UIMA > developer community. The sandbox is designed to host analysis > components like annotators, parser or consumers, as well as UIMA > tooling. All the components developed in the sandbox are free to use > and licensed under the Apache Software License > <http://incubator.apache.org/uima/license.html>. > A list of proposed analysis components and tooling for UIMA is > available at the UIMA wiki > <http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/uima-sandbox-components.html> and can > be discussed there. > > > I would not tell the people what's currently in since we have no > release for the sandbox. My plan is to have also a release for the > sandbox as soon as we have released the core > framework. For the next UIMA release we can add the components that > have already been released in the sandbox. Does this make sense? > > -- Michael > > > > From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:02:32 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 93029 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:02:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:02:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 49350 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 49311 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 49156 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:02:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:02:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:02:25 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB58D71429F for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:02:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <15523673.1170345725830.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:02:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Mirko Jahn (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mirko Jahn updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png This is the150x150px UIMA logo Adam provided for voting. I just tried to remove the white background and set it to transparent. > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner-black.png, UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-all-tilted.png, UIMA-logo-big-not-so-strong-colors.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo-big.png, UIMA-logo-small-100x100-plain.png, UIMA-logo-small-50x50-plain.png, UIMA-logo-small-50x50.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:17:21 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 1955 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:17:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:17:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 76839 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:17:27 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 76827 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:17:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 76818 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:17:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:17:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of roger49@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:17:17 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Feb 2007 16:16:55 -0000 Received: from blueice1n1.de.ibm.com (EHLO [83.161.120.155]) [83.161.120.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 01 Feb 2007 17:16:55 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25330878 Message-ID: <roger49@example.com> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:17:06 +0100 From: Thilo Goetz <roger49@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roger49@example.com Subject: Re: Writing something about the Sandbox References: <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> In-Reply-To: <roger49@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Marshall Schor wrote: > Other projects seem to treat the sandbox differently than as described > below; I would prefer to keep the sandbox > aligned with usual Apache concepts for it, which seem to be - it's a > subproject for potential new additions to the project or to subprojects > of it, and things here are works in progress, with no guarantee that > they will ever be promoted to > an official release of the project its subprojects. > > We should (in my opinion) establish other subprojects which can do > releases, etc., beyond the sandbox, for things like > annotators, parsers, consumers, and tooling. Things would graduate >> from the sandbox into one of these subprojects (or into the main Apache > UIMA project) when we want to convey some higher level of support / > testing / acceptance, and to have official "distributions/releases" for. > I think that the sandbox should not be a subproject which does > "distributions/releases". This allows more freedom > to tinker, which I think is a valuable thing to have as some part of the > project. > > -Marshall > > Michael Baessler wrote: >> Marshall Schor wrote: >>> Michael - could you write something about the Sandbox on Apache? >>> Purpose, what's in it. Something short - to be included in the >>> docbook docs. >>> >>> -Marshall >>> >>> >> So you want to include a short paragraph about the sandbox to the >> docbook of the UIMA 2.1 release. I would only add something similar as >> we have on the web: >> >> The UIMA sandbox is a workspace that is open to all UIMA committers >> and developers who would like to contribute code and join the UIMA >> developer community. The sandbox is designed to host analysis >> components like annotators, parser or consumers, as well as UIMA >> tooling. All the components developed in the sandbox are free to use >> and licensed under the Apache Software License >> <http://incubator.apache.org/uima/license.html>. >> A list of proposed analysis components and tooling for UIMA is >> available at the UIMA wiki >> <http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/uima-sandbox-components.html> and can >> be discussed there. >> >> >> I would not tell the people what's currently in since we have no >> release for the sandbox. My plan is to have also a release for the >> sandbox as soon as we have released the core >> framework. For the next UIMA release we can add the components that >> have already been released in the sandbox. Does this make sense? >> >> -- Michael >> I'm confused. I don't see the difference between what you and what Michael are saying. --Thilo From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:28:09 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 5691 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:28:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:28:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 96512 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:28:16 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 96497 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 96488 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:28:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:28:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of roger49@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:28:09 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so575860wxd for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:27:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=dVpRmEr63XdMcAhJ9zYJYlUZqZMhGthLzfY11w2ifF5ZAKkHaFCIUjCAZMtD9TeDBtiBXzFGGUqLJ6QKrGpMG4nmp9U7nlLaUKdRVPGJnesc7AbW/11ancxBhpOaTHjC5yzNosczVJzf1vGAhcffWHvIuPTFanaP0cOy0YOCa90= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q6mr3485411agb.1170347268339; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:27:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:27:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <roger49@example.com> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:27:48 -0500 From: "Adam Lally" <roger49@example.com> Sender: roger49@example.com To: roger49@example.com Subject: Re: Writing something about the Sandbox In-Reply-To: <roger49@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2005f116b4e0314f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2/1/07, Thilo Goetz <roger49@example.com> wrote: > I'm confused. I don't see the difference between what you and what > Michael are saying. > I think the confusion is that Michael original said that we would "have a release for the sandbox", which also took me by surprise. But in response to my question on the topic (not sure if Marshall sawa that), Michael revised this to say that we might build downloadable binaries for some of the sandbox components and make them available. I don't have any particular objection to that, but wonder if how the ASF views it. Each of these would probably be a separate "release" as far as they are concerned, and must require Incubator PMC approval? If so that could be a lot of hassle for both us and the PMC. -Adam From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:29:12 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 6171 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:29:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 99157 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:29:15 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 99145 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:29:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 99132 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:29:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:29:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of roger49@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:29:05 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Feb 2007 16:28:43 -0000 Received: from blueice1n1.de.ibm.com (EHLO [83.161.120.155]) [83.161.120.155] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 01 Feb 2007 17:28:43 +0100 X-Authenticated: #25330878 Message-ID: <roger49@example.com> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:28:54 +0100 From: Thilo Goetz <roger49@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roger49@example.com Subject: Re: Writing something about the Sandbox References: <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> <roger49@example.com> In-Reply-To: <roger49@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Here's what the Lucene folks say about their sandbox: "Lucene project also contains a workspace, Lucene Sandbox, that is open to all Lucene committers, as well as a few other developers. The purpose of the Sandbox is to host various third party contributions, and to serve as a place to try out new ideas and prepare them for inclusion into the core Lucene distribution. Users are free to experiment with the components developed in the Sandbox, but Sandbox components will not necessarily be maintained, particularly in their current state." The Lucene sandbox is part of every Lucene release, it just comes with this disclaimer. Since we've been modeling our sandbox on theirs, this is what we're aiming for. I don't think we should add the sandbox to the first release, but after that, why not. Thilo Goetz wrote: > > > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Other projects seem to treat the sandbox differently than as described >> below; I would prefer to keep the sandbox >> aligned with usual Apache concepts for it, which seem to be - it's a >> subproject for potential new additions to the project or to >> subprojects of it, and things here are works in progress, with no >> guarantee that they will ever be promoted to >> an official release of the project its subprojects. >> >> We should (in my opinion) establish other subprojects which can do >> releases, etc., beyond the sandbox, for things like >> annotators, parsers, consumers, and tooling. Things would graduate >>> from the sandbox into one of these subprojects (or into the main Apache >> UIMA project) when we want to convey some higher level of support / >> testing / acceptance, and to have official "distributions/releases" for. >> I think that the sandbox should not be a subproject which does >> "distributions/releases". This allows more freedom >> to tinker, which I think is a valuable thing to have as some part of >> the project. >> >> -Marshall >> >> Michael Baessler wrote: >>> Marshall Schor wrote: >>>> Michael - could you write something about the Sandbox on Apache? >>>> Purpose, what's in it. Something short - to be included in the >>>> docbook docs. >>>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> >>>> >>> So you want to include a short paragraph about the sandbox to the >>> docbook of the UIMA 2.1 release. I would only add something similar >>> as we have on the web: >>> >>> The UIMA sandbox is a workspace that is open to all UIMA committers >>> and developers who would like to contribute code and join the UIMA >>> developer community. The sandbox is designed to host analysis >>> components like annotators, parser or consumers, as well as UIMA >>> tooling. All the components developed in the sandbox are free to use >>> and licensed under the Apache Software License >>> <http://incubator.apache.org/uima/license.html>. >>> A list of proposed analysis components and tooling for UIMA is >>> available at the UIMA wiki >>> <http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/uima-sandbox-components.html> and can >>> be discussed there. >>> >>> >>> I would not tell the people what's currently in since we have no >>> release for the sandbox. My plan is to have also a release for the >>> sandbox as soon as we have released the core >>> framework. For the next UIMA release we can add the components that >>> have already been released in the sandbox. Does this make sense? >>> >>> -- Michael >>> > > I'm confused. I don't see the difference between what you and what > Michael are saying. > > --Thilo From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:30:27 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 6483 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:30:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:30:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 724 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:30:33 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 705 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 690 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:30:33 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:30:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:30:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485267142E1 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:30:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3298236.1170347406294.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:30:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Mirko Jahn (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mirko Jahn updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png the same image as v1, but rescaled to 50x50px. The edges are not perfect, but without a vector based master it is really hard to work around that. > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner-black.png, UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-all-tilted.png, UIMA-logo-big-not-so-strong-colors.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo-big.png, UIMA-logo-small-100x100-plain.png, UIMA-logo-small-50x50-plain.png, UIMA-logo-small-50x50.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:27 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11615 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 22950 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 22909 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 22888 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B987142E1 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <31696994.1170348006135.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Closed: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally closed UIMA-22. -------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Committed the window icon with transparent background. I think this is a slight improvement over the previous one. However it's still not that great, and we should revisit this. > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:28 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11625 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23011 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 22912 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 22896 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4E07142E2 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19505697.1170348006187.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: UIMA-banner-black.png) > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:28 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11637 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23091 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:34 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 23016 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 22898 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E027142E4 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <11105400.1170348006263.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: UIMA-logo-big-not-so-strong-colors.png) > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:29 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11643 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23106 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:34 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 23021 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 22908 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA327142F7 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19343125.1170348006311.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: UIMA-logo-big-all-tilted.png) > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:31 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11725 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 23394 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:35 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 23370 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 23216 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:26 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585157142F8 for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4325654.1170348006359.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: UIMA-logo-small-50x50-plain.png) > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:49 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11897 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 24502 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:53 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 24484 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 24475 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:46 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBC87142FB for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5364887.1170348006455.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: UIMA-logo-small-100x100-plain.png) > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:49 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11926 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24578 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:54 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 24549 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 24529 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:46 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7177142FC for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14871874.1170348006519.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22) Tools still use IBM splashscreen In-Reply-To: <3612285.1163529523456.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adam Lally updated UIMA-22: --------------------------- Attachment: (was: UIMA-logo-big.png) > Tools still use IBM splashscreen > -------------------------------- > > Key: UIMA-22 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-22 > Project: UIMA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Tools > Reporter: Adam Lally > Assigned To: Adam Lally > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 2.1 > > Attachments: UIMA-banner.png, UIMA-logo-big-without-people.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v1.png, UIMA-logo_with_trans_v2.png > > > Our tools still use the splashscreen with the IBM logo. > Also they have "Unstructured Information Management Architecture" banners, although these don't have the IBM logo so I'm not sure if this is a problem. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. From uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com Thu Feb 01 16:40:49 2007 Return-Path: <uima-dev-returnroger49@example.com> Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 11931 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2007 16:40:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 24618 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:54 -0000 Delivered-To: roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 24552 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact roger49@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:roger49@example.com> List-Id: <uima-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: roger49@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list roger49@example.com Received: (qmail 24494 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2007 16:40:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:53 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 08:40:46 -0800 Received: from brutus (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6407B7142FA for <roger49@example.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <32051502.1170348006407.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:40:06 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam Lally (JIRA)" <roger49@example.com> To: roger49@example.com Subject: [jira] Updated: (UIMA-22)
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}