From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 08 22:06:39 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 31826 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2005 22:06:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2005 22:06:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 94772 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2005 22:06:34 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 94751 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2005 22:06:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 94738 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2005 22:06:33 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:06:33 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:06:32 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQD2T; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:57:12 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:07:49 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Erenkrantz <jeffreybrooks@example.net> CC: Patrick Leonard <jeffreybrooks@example.net>, Heidi Buelow <jeffreybrooks@example.net>, jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: Rogue Wave INFRA-332 References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On July 8, 2005 1:35:42 PM -0600 Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> > wrote: > >> Hi Justin, >> >> Let me I apologize in advance if by emailing directly I'm in breach >> of the ASF protocol. > > > You really should take this up on the stdcxx mailing lists now that they > are created. Okay, sorry about that. I've CC'd stdcxx-dev on this response. > >> I'm wondering if you could clarify for us whether our infrastructure >> request INFRA-332 has been completely fulfilled yet, specifically, >> whether our user accounts have been created and whether the necessary >> pieces are in place so that we can check in the stdcxx project to SVN. >> We would like do the check-in of the source code and the project Web >> pages sometime next week. > > > I have yet to see the CLAs for the stdcxx folks; I faxed mine in on 6/16 (to the FAX number on the CLA form here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf: 501.908.0645). I believe most others have by now as well. Is the FAX number correct? Should we re-FAX them or mail them instead? > but the stdcxx-ppmc > needs to also request the new accounts. (Names, emails, etc.) The > forms are on: > > <http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html> This might be the missing bit. Sorry if this is a dumb question but can any one of us, including myself, send this request on behalf of all the other stdcxx committers? (I.e., can I assume that all of us are already on the stdcxx PPMC?) > > The Incubator PMC can create the Subversion directories - but that won't > happen without the accounts in place first. > > FWIW, I'm traveling next week and will be completely without email > access. So, I'd really recommend starting to use the ASF mailing lists > where possible. Will Rowe is also on the ppmc list; but Ben Laurie > isn't yet. (Ben is going to be swamped getting ready for ApacheCon in > two weeks.) > > HTH. -- justin Thanks Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 08 22:21:47 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 36478 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2005 22:21:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2005 22:21:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 9286 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2005 22:21:47 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 9267 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2005 22:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 9250 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2005 22:21:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:21:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO scotch.ics.uci.edu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:21:45 -0700 Received: from st-augustin.ics.uci.edu (st-augustin.ics.uci.edu [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by scotch.ics.uci.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j68MLX1T008242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <jeffreybrooks@example.net>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:21:42 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz <jeffreybrooks@example.net> To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: Rogue Wave INFRA-332 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/83.161.120.155 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-r156655 (2005-03-09) on scotch.ics.uci.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on scotch.ics.uci.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=no version=3.1.0-r156655 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --On July 8, 2005 4:07:49 PM -0600 Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> wrote: > I faxed mine in on 6/16 (to the FAX number on the CLA form here: > http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf: 501.908.0645). I believe > most others have by now as well. Is the FAX number correct? Should > we re-FAX them or mail them instead? No, the PPMC needs to submit the account requests now. The CLAs probably have been filed correctly; but we don't automatically create accounts until the PMC requests them. At that point, the root folks will check to make sure the CLA is on file. > This might be the missing bit. Sorry if this is a dumb question > but can any one of us, including myself, send this request on > behalf of all the other stdcxx committers? (I.e., can I assume > that all of us are already on the stdcxx PPMC?) You need to discuss this with the rest of the PPMC. You can use the stdcxx-dev or stdcxx-ppmc list, I guess. We just need to draft who the initial set of committers are. You, by yourself, should not be submitting account requests at this point. Considering I'm out of touch next week, if Will Rowe or Ben Laurie is available, they are the logical people to bootstrap the account list since they are the mentors and Incubator PMC members and the root guys know who they are. I believe we should just grandfather in anyone who is here now and paying attention. But, that could be a question for jeffreybrooks@example.net. -- justin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 08 22:41:57 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 43510 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2005 22:41:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2005 22:41:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 31814 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2005 22:41:57 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 31801 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2005 22:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 31788 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2005 22:41:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:41:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:41:55 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQDJG; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 16:32:35 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:43:13 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: Rogue Wave INFRA-332 References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On July 8, 2005 4:07:49 PM -0600 Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> > wrote: > >> I faxed mine in on 6/16 (to the FAX number on the CLA form here: >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf: 501.908.0645). I believe >> most others have by now as well. Is the FAX number correct? Should >> we re-FAX them or mail them instead? > > > No, the PPMC needs to submit the account requests now. The CLAs > probably have been filed correctly; but we don't automatically create > accounts until the PMC requests them. At that point, the root folks > will check to make sure the CLA is on file. > >> This might be the missing bit. Sorry if this is a dumb question >> but can any one of us, including myself, send this request on >> behalf of all the other stdcxx committers? (I.e., can I assume >> that all of us are already on the stdcxx PPMC?) > > > You need to discuss this with the rest of the PPMC. You can use the > stdcxx-dev or stdcxx-ppmc list, I guess. We just need to draft who the > initial set of committers are. The initial set of committers is a superset of those listed in INFRA-332. We've added just one more since then: Liviu Nicoara [mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net]. > > You, by yourself, should not be submitting account requests at this point. > > Considering I'm out of touch next week, if Will Rowe or Ben Laurie is > available, they are the logical people to bootstrap the account list > since they are the mentors and Incubator PMC members and the root guys > know who they are. That'd be great! Thanks again! Martin > > I believe we should just grandfather in anyone who is here now and > paying attention. But, that could be a question for jeffreybrooks@example.net. > -- justin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Sat Jul 16 13:40:28 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 64996 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2005 13:40:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2005 13:40:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 55611 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 13:40:25 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 55175 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 13:40:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 55137 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2005 13:40:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:40:23 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=URIBL_SBL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO picanmix.dev.day.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:40:16 -0700 Received: from eu-mail.day.com (eu-mail.dev.day.com [83.161.120.155]) by picanmix.dev.day.com (DAY) with ESMTP id j6GDeHT09863; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:40:17 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by eu-mail.day.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 2005071615401534:15383 ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 15:40:15 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Message-Id: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Cc: jeffreybrooks@example.net From: "Roy T. Fielding" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Subject: stdcxx open for business Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 06:40:24 -0700 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on eu-mail/Day(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/16/2005 03:40:15 PM, Serialize by Router on eu-mail/Day(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/16/2005 03:40:16 PM, Serialize complete at 07/16/2005 03:40:16 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello stdcxx committers, Welcome to the stdcxx project, currently under incubation within the Apache Incubator. You are responsible for maintaining a status file at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/stdcxx.html If you don't have one yet, your first task MUST be to create one using some other project as a guide (I suggest using jackrabbit). See the instructions below for editing the incubator site. Hopefully, you have already received information about your new account on svn.apache.org and instructions on how to login. You should use one of the many ssh clients to login and change both your account password, using the passwd command, and your subversion password using the svnpasswd command (we recommend using different passwords). Many developers also place their public ssh keys in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys pgp/gpg key in ~/.pgpkey pgp/gpg key fingerprint summary in ~/.pubkey Version Control =============== After setting up your account, I suggest that you either switch your existing copy of the stdcxx source code to writable via svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stdcxx/trunk or check out a new copy of the source so that the write access is enabled (note the https scheme below): svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stdcxx/trunk \ stdcxx More committer and subversion info can be found at http://www.apache.org/dev/ http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html http://subversion.tigris.org/ http://svnbook.red-bean.com/ http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook/apa.html (quick guide for cvs users) BEFORE COMMITTING anything using subversion, please set up your local configuration so that it adds native eol properties to the common text files. Instructions can be found at http://www.sipfoundry.org/tools/svn-tips.html#line-ends http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt Mailing Lists ============= The following mailing list is where all technical decisions about what goes in (or out) of the stdcxx code get made: jeffreybrooks@example.net Archives of the dev list can be found at http://incubator.apache.org/mail/stdcxx-dev/ http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stdcxx-dev/ As a committer, you should also subscribe to the automated change notices that will be sent to jeffreybrooks@example.net If you are interested in general incubator discussion, like how our status is reported to the rest of Apache, you can subscribe to the "jeffreybrooks@example.net" mailing list. The role of the incubator is to make sure that new projects complete all of the right paperwork needed to transfer intellectual property (we have done that) and ensure that the project is progressing as a true collaboration in accordance with the Apache development guidelines, sometimes referred to as "the Apache way." For various reasons, we are unlikely to exit incubation until after the initial JCR specification is complete and made available for independent implementation. Editing the site: <http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/> ================ This has not been set up yet because you have no files. However, eventually you should do something like svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stdcxx/site \ stdcxx-site The actual website should be a checked-out copy on www.apache.org. It can be updated manually only by those people with an account on www.apache.org. Editing incubator: <http://incubator.apache.org/> ================= Information on how to make incubator site changes can be found at http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html The incubator site uses Forrest, not Maven; most people just edit the content under site-author and let someone else generate the real site. Cheers, Roy T. Fielding <http://roy.gbiv.com/> Chief Scientist, Day Software <http://www.day.com/> From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Sat Jul 16 16:19:35 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 99478 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2005 16:19:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2005 16:19:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 40982 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 16:19:31 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 40661 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 16:19:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 40603 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2005 16:19:26 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:19:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO scotch.ics.uci.edu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:19:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (scotch.ics.uci.edu [83.161.120.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by scotch.ics.uci.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6GGJ3QQ029336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:19:12 +0200 From: Justin Erenkrantz <jeffreybrooks@example.net> To: jeffreybrooks@example.net cc: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: **** QUARTERLY REPORTS DUE **** Message-ID: <F1DDB42C53DF014664FE392E@2B9FC815C12CF19931FDCE0B> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0-r156655 (2005-03-09) on scotch.ics.uci.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on scotch.ics.uci.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Old-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=no version=3.1.0-r156655 X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --On July 12, 2005 8:35:41 AM -0400 "Noel J. Bergman" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> wrote: > Just a reminder: quarterly reports are due from all incubating projects by > Friday. (Been on the road on my way to AC.) stdcxx: Mailing lists have been created, initial accounts have been created for the stdcxx committers (where CLAs have been received), and Subversion directories have been created. Roy has just sent the 'welcome' email to stdcxx-dev@. In other words, real progress can be made now. As always, others can feel free to chime in and add their comments about stdcxx's progress. Thanks! -- justin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Sat Jul 16 18:42:05 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 48224 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2005 18:42:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2005 18:42:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 38045 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 18:42:05 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 38013 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2005 18:42:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 37999 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2005 18:42:05 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:42:05 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:42:00 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQHZQ; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:32:24 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:43:25 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: **** QUARTERLY REPORTS DUE **** References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <F1DDB42C53DF014664FE392E@2B9FC815C12CF19931FDCE0B> In-Reply-To: <F1DDB42C53DF014664FE392E@2B9FC815C12CF19931FDCE0B> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On July 12, 2005 8:35:41 AM -0400 "Noel J. Bergman" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> > wrote: > >> Just a reminder: quarterly reports are due from all incubating >> projects by >> Friday. > > > (Been on the road on my way to AC.) > > stdcxx: Mailing lists have been created, initial accounts have been > created for the stdcxx committers (where CLAs have been received), and > Subversion directories have been created. Roy has just sent the > 'welcome' email to stdcxx-dev@. In other words, real progress can be > made now. Thanks for getting us all set up! Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Tue Jul 19 22:08:46 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 40266 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2005 22:08:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2005 22:08:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 30607 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2005 22:08:46 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 30585 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2005 22:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 30572 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2005 22:08:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:08:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:08:41 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (skynet.bco.roguewave.com [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQJBN; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:58:59 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:09:13 -0600 From: Liviu Nicoara <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: [PATCH] UNAME.cpp Windows [limited] support Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Index: etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp =================================================================== --- etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (revision 219737) +++ etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (working copy) @@ -103,8 +103,27 @@ #else - return 1; + OSVERSIONINFO osinfo; + osinfo.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof osinfo; + if (!888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4GetVersionEx (&osinfo)) + return 1; + + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS\n"); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME \"WINDOWS\"\n"); + + // no micro on Windows + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE \"%d.%d\"\n", + osinfo.dwMajorVersion, + osinfo.dwMinorVersion); + + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMajorVersion); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMinorVersion); + + // not applicable + printf ("#undef _RWSTD_OS_VERSION\n"); + printf ("#undef _RWSTD_OS_MICRO\n"); + #endif return 0; From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Wed Jul 20 01:30:01 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 25642 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 01:30:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 01:30:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 38305 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 01:30:01 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 38290 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 01:30:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 38271 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2005 01:30:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:30:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:29:54 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQJFJ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:20:10 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:31:21 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] UNAME.cpp Windows [limited] support References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010002010000050809060100" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --------------010002010000050809060100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Liviu Nicoara wrote: Thanks! (In the future, please make sure to explain what the patch does in case it's not obvious to everyone). Here's the output of the test I get on Windows 2000 Professional: #define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS #define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME "WINDOWS" #define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE "5.0" #define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR 5 #define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR 0 #undef _RWSTD_OS_VERSION #undef _RWSTD_OS_MICRO > Index: etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp > =================================================================== > --- etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (revision 219737) > +++ etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (working copy) > @@ -103,8 +103,27 @@ > > #else > > - return 1; > + OSVERSIONINFO osinfo; > + osinfo.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof osinfo; > > + if (!888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4GetVersionEx (&osinfo)) (FYI: there's no reason to qualify the call above.) > + return 1; > + > + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS\n"); > + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME \"WINDOWS\"\n"); I would suggest to #define these two unconditionally (i.e., regardless of whether GetVersion() succeeds or not), and probably also to avoid returning a non-0 status on GetVersion() failure. > + > + // no micro on Windows > + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE \"%d.%d\"\n", > + osinfo.dwMajorVersion, > + osinfo.dwMinorVersion); I think this macro would be more useful if it identified the flavor of Windows, i.e., one of "2000", "NT 4.0", "95", "XP", "Server 2003", "98", or "Me". It should be possible to extract it (or most of it) from dwMajorVersion, dwMinorVersion, and dwPlatformId: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/base/osversioninfo_str.asp > + > + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMajorVersion); > + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMinorVersion); Hmmm. These are supposed to let us easily identify the version in preprocessor conditionals. Let's see, what would the values for the different flavors of Windows look like? Windows _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR _RWSTD_OS_MINOR +-----------+---------------+---------------+ | 95 | 4 | 0 (*) | | 98 | 4 | 10 | | Me | 4 | 90 | | NT 4.0 | 4 | 0 (*) | | 2000 | 5 | 0 | |Server 2003| 5 | 2 | | XP | 5 | 1 | +-----------+---------------+---------------+ Okay, that's not too bad, except that the special case (*) would have to be handled. It might be useful to also #define a helper macro corresponding to each flavor of Windows: _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_95 _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_98 _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_ME _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_NT _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_2000 _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_2003 _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_XP > + > + // not applicable > + printf ("#undef _RWSTD_OS_VERSION\n"); > + printf ("#undef _RWSTD_OS_MICRO\n"); These tests shouldn't #undefine any config macros. If it's not applicable, the _RWSTD_OS_MICRO should be #defined to 0, although it might be meaningful to define to the Windows build number (dwBuildNumber, or its low word on 95/98/Me). _RWSTD_OS_VERSION could be #defined to szCSDVersion. Attached is a modified version of the patch with the changes mentioned above. It produces the following output on the same Windows 2000 box: #define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS #define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME "WINDOWS" #define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR 5 #define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR 0 #define _RWSTD_OS_MICRO 2195 /* build number */ #define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE "Windows 2000" #define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_2000 #define _RWSTD_OS_VERSION "Service Pack 4" Martin --------------010002010000050809060100 Content-Type: text/plain; name="UNAME.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="UNAME.patch" Index: stdcxx/etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp =================================================================== --- stdcxx/etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (revision 219823) +++ stdcxx/etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (working copy) @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ const char *s; unsigned long num; +#if !defined (SYS_NMLN) +# define SYS_NMLN 128 +#endif // SYS_NMLN + char str [SYS_NMLN * 2]; for (num = 0; (str [num] = uts.release [num]); ++num); @@ -101,11 +105,58 @@ printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MICRO %lu\n", num); -#else +#else // if defined (_WIN{32,64}) - return 1; + OSVERSIONINFO osinfo; + osinfo.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof osinfo; -#endif + const BOOL success = GetVersionEx (&osinfo); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS\n"); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME \"WINDOWS\"\n"); + + if (!success) + return 0; + + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMajorVersion); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMinorVersion); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MICRO %lu /* build number */\n", + osinfo.dwBuildNumber); + + const char *flavor = 0; + + if (4 == osinfo.dwMajorVersion) { + switch (osinfo.dwMinorVersion) { + case 0: + if (VER_PLATFORM_WIN32_NT == osinfo.dwPlatformId) + flavor = "NT"; + else + flavor = "95"; + break; + + case 10: flavor = "98"; break; + case 90: flavor = "ME"; break; + } + } + else if (5 == osinfo.dwMajorVersion) { + switch (osinfo.dwMinorVersion) { + case 0: flavor = "2000"; break; + case 1: flavor = "XP"; break; + case 2: flavor = "2003"; break; + } + } + + if (flavor) { + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE \"Windows %s\"\n", flavor); + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_%s\n", flavor); + } + else { + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE \"\"\n"); + } + + printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_VERSION \"%s\"\n", osinfo.szCSDVersion); + +#endif // _WIN{32,64} + return 0; } --------------010002010000050809060100-- From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Wed Jul 20 02:01:54 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 33100 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 02:01:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 02:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 63869 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 02:01:54 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 63857 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 02:01:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 63843 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2005 02:01:54 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:01:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:01:49 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQJF9; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:52:05 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:03:16 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: stdcxx sources in svn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N All, The stdcxx project sources and docs are now in subversion: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stdcxx/trunk/ The project README with instructions how to configure and build the library and the examples (sorry, no test suite yet) is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stdcxx/trunk/etc/config/README The project bug tracking database is set up here: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX We're still working on getting the project Web page published: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/stdcxx.html Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Wed Jul 20 20:00:03 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 82463 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 20:00:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 20:00:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 1768 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 20:00:03 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 1750 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 20:00:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 1737 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2005 20:00:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:00:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:59:57 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (skynet.bco.roguewave.com [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQJRF; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:50:12 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:00:29 -0600 From: Liviu Nicoara <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] UNAME.cpp Windows [limited] support References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This looks better. I was reluctant to use build numbers as a substitute for micro as build numbers are AFAIK sequential throughout the whole windows series. I got the point that undef'ing is a no-no in the comp tests. When it comes to OS version, I believe the build number is the one that comes closest to be the equivalent of UNIX "uname -v". It would be very helpful to hear more opinions on this one though. Liviu Martin Sebor wrote: > Liviu Nicoara wrote: > > Thanks! (In the future, please make sure to explain what the patch > does in case it's not obvious to everyone). > > Here's the output of the test I get on Windows 2000 Professional: > > #define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS > #define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME "WINDOWS" > #define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE "5.0" > #define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR 5 > #define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR 0 > #undef _RWSTD_OS_VERSION > #undef _RWSTD_OS_MICRO > > >>Index: etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp >>=================================================================== >>--- etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (revision 219737) >>+++ etc/config/src/UNAME.cpp (working copy) >>@@ -103,8 +103,27 @@ >> >> #else >> >>- return 1; >>+ OSVERSIONINFO osinfo; >>+ osinfo.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof osinfo; >> >>+ if (!888a:dbb7:2d49:b3f6:8605:bf4e:caed:e5a4GetVersionEx (&osinfo)) > > > (FYI: there's no reason to qualify the call above.) > > >>+ return 1; >>+ >>+ printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS\n"); >>+ printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME \"WINDOWS\"\n"); > > > I would suggest to #define these two unconditionally (i.e., regardless > of whether GetVersion() succeeds or not), and probably also to avoid > returning a non-0 status on GetVersion() failure. > > >>+ >>+ // no micro on Windows >>+ printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE \"%d.%d\"\n", >>+ osinfo.dwMajorVersion, >>+ osinfo.dwMinorVersion); > > > I think this macro would be more useful if it identified the flavor > of Windows, i.e., one of "2000", "NT 4.0", "95", "XP", "Server 2003", > "98", or "Me". It should be possible to extract it (or most of it) > from dwMajorVersion, dwMinorVersion, and dwPlatformId: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/base/osversioninfo_str.asp > > >>+ >>+ printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMajorVersion); >>+ printf ("#define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR %lu\n", osinfo.dwMinorVersion); > > > Hmmm. These are supposed to let us easily identify the version in > preprocessor conditionals. Let's see, what would the values for > the different flavors of Windows look like? > > Windows _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR _RWSTD_OS_MINOR > +-----------+---------------+---------------+ > | 95 | 4 | 0 (*) | > | 98 | 4 | 10 | > | Me | 4 | 90 | > | NT 4.0 | 4 | 0 (*) | > | 2000 | 5 | 0 | > |Server 2003| 5 | 2 | > | XP | 5 | 1 | > +-----------+---------------+---------------+ > > Okay, that's not too bad, except that the special case (*) would > have to be handled. It might be useful to also #define a helper > macro corresponding to each flavor of Windows: > > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_95 > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_98 > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_ME > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_NT > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_2000 > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_2003 > _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_XP > > >>+ >>+ // not applicable >>+ printf ("#undef _RWSTD_OS_VERSION\n"); >>+ printf ("#undef _RWSTD_OS_MICRO\n"); > > > These tests shouldn't #undefine any config macros. If it's not > applicable, the _RWSTD_OS_MICRO should be #defined to 0, although > it might be meaningful to define to the Windows build number > (dwBuildNumber, or its low word on 95/98/Me). _RWSTD_OS_VERSION > could be #defined to szCSDVersion. > > Attached is a modified version of the patch with the changes > mentioned above. It produces the following output on the same > Windows 2000 box: > > #define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS > #define _RWSTD_OS_SYSNAME "WINDOWS" > #define _RWSTD_OS_MAJOR 5 > #define _RWSTD_OS_MINOR 0 > #define _RWSTD_OS_MICRO 2195 /* build number */ > #define _RWSTD_OS_RELEASE "Windows 2000" > #define _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_2000 > #define _RWSTD_OS_VERSION "Service Pack 4" > > Martin > From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Wed Jul 20 22:53:28 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 37577 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 22:53:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 22:53:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 68489 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 22:53:28 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 68474 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 22:53:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 68460 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2005 22:53:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:53:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:53:21 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQJVN; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:43:36 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:54:50 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] UNAME.cpp Windows [limited] support References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Liviu Nicoara wrote: > This looks better. I was reluctant to use build numbers as a substitute > for micro as build numbers are AFAIK sequential throughout the whole > windows series. The build number probably isn't terribly useful, except to detect bugs. Unfortunately, on Windows even the major and micro numbers aren't very useful without some non-trivial interpretation. I expect the _RWSTD_OS_WINDOWS_XXX macro is the one that will be the most useful in detecting which API can and cannot be used (which is the main purpose of this test). > > I got the point that undef'ing is a no-no in the comp tests. > > When it comes to OS version, I believe the build number is the one that > comes closest to be the equivalent of UNIX "uname -v". It would be very > helpful to hear more opinions on this one though. Unfortunately, the output of uname -v is completely unspecified (just like the output of pretty much any other uname option): http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/uname.html For example, on AIX it outputs the major version of the OS, but on HP-UX it prints the letter U and on my Solaris box it spits out the word Generic. On IRIX it gives the timestamp when the OS was built, and on Linux it includes a whole bunch of stuff. So I think we can put whatever we want in there, as long as we think it will be useful. None of the macros that expand to strings is currently used in the library (some of them are used in the test suite). Eventually, I would like to use them in the library to detect at runtime on what machine it was configured. This would be useful in cases where the library was configured for one OS and is being used on another that's not 100% compatible with it (e.g., Windows NT vs 2000). Unless there's more feedback I'll go ahead and check in the latest patch. Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 22 16:49:58 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 4741 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2005 16:49:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2005 16:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 91308 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 16:49:33 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 91243 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 16:49:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 91151 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2005 16:49:31 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:49:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:49:18 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQKRK; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:39:27 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:50:46 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: svn commit: r224362 - /incubator/stdcxx/site/index.html References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N jeffreybrooks@example.net wrote: > Author: fielding > Date: Fri Jul 22 09:40:21 2005 > New Revision: 224362 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=224362&view=rev > Log: > clean up the nasty HTML and put the disclaimer where it belongs Thank you! I was just about to open an issue for the malformed HTML. Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 22 16:54:31 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 7330 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2005 16:54:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2005 16:54:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 151 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 16:54:27 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 99871 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 16:54:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 99836 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2005 16:54:26 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:54:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO picanmix.dev.day.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:54:21 -0700 Received: from eu-mail.day.com (eu-mail.dev.day.com [83.161.120.155]) by picanmix.dev.day.com (DAY) with ESMTP id j6MGsNI21447; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:54:23 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by eu-mail.day.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 2005072218542190:935 ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 18:54:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Message-Id: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Cc: jeffreybrooks@example.net From: "Roy T. Fielding" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Subject: Re: HELP with updating web Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:54:21 -0700 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on eu-mail/Day(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/22/2005 06:54:21 PM, Serialize by Router on eu-mail/Day(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/22/2005 06:54:23 PM, Serialize complete at 07/22/2005 06:54:23 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Generally speaking, we prefer to have substantial content on the website before we place it live. However, I have fixed the index file you had in subversion and made the changes so that it will be auto-published on the site. Note that there are two delays involved: the site on minotaur is updated every four hours from subversion and then some time after that (within the next four hours) the content on minotaur is rsync'd to incubator.apache.org. So, at the time I write this, http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/ is up but does not yet show the changes I made in subversion. ....Roy From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 22 16:57:45 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 9717 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2005 16:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2005 16:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 4575 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 16:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 4170 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 16:57:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 4145 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2005 16:57:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:57:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO dfwmail.quovadx.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:57:37 -0700 Received: by dfwmail.quovadx.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <H4R05XG0>; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:02:40 -0500 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> From: Heidi Buelow <jeffreybrooks@example.net> To: "'jeffreybrooks@example.net'" <jeffreybrooks@example.net>, jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: RE: HELP with updating web Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:02:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thank you very much. In the future, will the whole site directory be published or do we need to do something to turn on auto-publish for each page we add to our project website? Heidi. > -----Original Message----- > From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 9:54 AM > To: jeffreybrooks@example.net > Cc: jeffreybrooks@example.net > Subject: Re: HELP with updating web > > Generally speaking, we prefer to have substantial content on the > website before we place it live. However, I have fixed the index > file you had in subversion and made the changes so that it will > be auto-published on the site. Note that there are two delays > involved: the site on minotaur is updated every four hours from > subversion and then some time after that (within the next four > hours) the content on minotaur is rsync'd to incubator.apache.org. > > So, at the time I write this, > > http://incubator.apache.org/stdcxx/ > > is up but does not yet show the changes I made in subversion. > > ....Roy From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Fri Jul 22 17:01:44 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 11709 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2005 17:01:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2005 17:01:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 10365 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 17:01:39 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 10199 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2005 17:01:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 10173 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2005 17:01:38 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:01:38 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO picanmix.dev.day.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:01:32 -0700 Received: from eu-mail.day.com (eu-mail.dev.day.com [83.161.120.155]) by picanmix.dev.day.com (DAY) with ESMTP id j6MH1YI21641; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:01:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by eu-mail.day.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 2005072219013246:946 ; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:01:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Message-Id: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Cc: "'jeffreybrooks@example.net'" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> From: "Roy T. Fielding" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Subject: Re: HELP with updating web Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:01:32 -0700 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on eu-mail/Day(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/22/2005 07:01:32 PM, Serialize by Router on eu-mail/Day(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 07/22/2005 07:01:33 PM, Serialize complete at 07/22/2005 07:01:33 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jul 22, 2005, at 10:02 AM, Heidi Buelow wrote: > In the future, will the whole site directory be published or do we > need to > do something to turn on auto-publish for each page we add to our > project > website? The entire tree on the website is just a checked-out stdcxx/site, so whatever you put under there is what goes live. ....Roy From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Tue Jul 26 16:07:33 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 88010 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 16:07:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 16:07:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 39834 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2005 16:07:33 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 39817 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2005 16:07:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 39804 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2005 16:07:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:07:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:07:25 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (83.161.120.155 [83.161.120.155]) by bco-exchange.bco.roguewave.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NNYTQMHS; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:57:24 -0600 Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:08:55 -0600 From: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050716 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jeffreybrooks@example.net CC: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Jira email notification Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, I'm trying to set up default email notification in stdcxx/Jira. I would like Jira to send an email to jeffreybrooks@example.net for every newly created issue or any change to an existing issue. According to the manual (below) I should see a link to Notification Scheme on the project administration page, but I don't. Perhaps I don't have the right privileges? http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/email.html#schemes Thanks in advance for your help. Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Tue Jul 26 23:27:44 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 95609 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2005 23:27:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jul 2005 23:27:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 82630 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2005 23:27:44 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 82614 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jul 2005 23:27:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 80313 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2005 23:23:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jeffreybrooks@example.net) X-Authentication-Warning: zeus.atlassian.com: jturner set sender to jeffreybrooks@example.net using -f Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:23:31 -0500 From: Jeff Turner <jeffreybrooks@example.net> To: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Cc: jeffreybrooks@example.net, jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: Re: Jira email notification Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Mail-Followup-To: Martin Sebor <jeffreybrooks@example.net>, jeffreybrooks@example.net, jeffreybrooks@example.net References: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/83.161.120.155i In-Reply-To: <jeffreybrooks@example.net>; from jeffreybrooks@example.net on Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:08:55AM -0600 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:08:55AM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to set up default email notification in stdcxx/Jira. I > would like Jira to send an email to jeffreybrooks@example.net > for every newly created issue or any change to an existing issue. > > According to the manual (below) I should see a link to Notification > Scheme on the project administration page, but I don't. Perhaps I > don't have the right privileges? Yes; I've fixed it now. --Jeff > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/email.html#schemes > > Thanks in advance for your help. > Martin From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Wed Jul 27 14:57:45 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 3452 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 14:57:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jul 2005 14:57:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 76772 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2005 14:57:44 -0000 Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 76753 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jul 2005 14:57:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jeffreybrooks@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:jeffreybrooks@example.net> List-Id: <stdcxx-dev.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list jeffreybrooks@example.net Delivered-To: moderator for jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 26556 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jul 2005 00:10:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <jeffreybrooks@example.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:10:18 +0200 (CEST) From: "Martin Sebor (JIRA)" <jeffreybrooks@example.net> To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Subject: [jira] Created: (STDCXX-5) check in MSVC build infrastructure Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N check in MSVC build infrastructure ---------------------------------- Key: STDCXX-5 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-5 Project: STDCXX Type: Task Components: Build Versions: 4.1.2 Environment: MSVC/Windows Reporter: Martin Sebor An infrastructure to build the project and its examples is missing from the repository. It needs to be created and checked in. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira From stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net Wed Jul 27 17:43:35 2005 Return-Path: <stdcxx-dev-returnjeffreybrooks@example.net> Delivered-To: jeffreybrooks@example.net Received: (qmail 72889 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2005 17:43:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}