From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 01 10:22:30 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 66747 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 10:22:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2006 10:22:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 95873 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 10:23:17 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 95852 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 10:23:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 95841 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2006 10:23:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:23:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:23:15 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id u2so41989uge for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:22:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fp4e/9grGa8/8CGN9ZFF1RiWUC+KXa4m0DNBUkZuEqxL4FH9kiQDlsnupkolVe+FyyvwnXZrA0bHMbbZWIKeFfzPu5ssajpUFiHVZkZyddJQk893JwEReo0WYaawtKp7WixXfLYZ/2BI/tmrEFhvR0ouiOxkdxsNdZ89btC3UPs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v11mr5748ugl; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:22:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 02:22:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:22:52 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: How can I write data within a list of tables into a XML file? In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/1/06, Jun Li <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > Here comes another question, how can I use DataReader to read the XML fil= e > in and then insert them back to a database? This is similar, you'll just need the DataToDatabaseSink. E.g. have a look at the WriteDataToDatabaseCommand : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/db/ddlutils/trunk/src/java/org/apache/ddl= utils/task/WriteDataToDatabaseCommand.java?view=3Dmarkup Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 01 13:13:56 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 49111 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 13:13:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2006 13:13:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 35974 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 13:14:42 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 35916 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 13:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 35899 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2006 13:14:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:14:42 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO srv-nl-msweep2.vanenburg.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 05:14:41 -0800 Received: from ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com (ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com) by srv-nl-msweep2.vanenburg.com (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.0.9) with ESMTP id <choijoshua@example.net> for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:17:47 +0100 Received: from ex-ind-u1.vanenburg.com ([83.161.120.155]) by ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC (5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:14:16 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C63D32.0934741E" Subject: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 18:44:13 +0530 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? Thread-Index: AcY9Mgk7wo6mY/iLSmClA4cbjgcEDQ== From: "Vignesh Swaminathan" <choijoshua@example.net> To: <choijoshua@example.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2006 13:14:16.0490 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AC3C8A0:01C63D32] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C63D32.0934741E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Does DDLUtils help in overcoming the CLOB , BLOB issues with JDBC? Should I still use a platform specific class for CLOB and BLOB datatype? (any other approach other than doing a double update to insert, query and update with blob/clob again)? <vignesh/> "Winning solutions find the right balance between market needs and technical needs" ***************************************************************************= ************************ The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privile= ged.=20 It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone e= lse is=20 unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copyin= g, or=20 distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reli= ance=20 on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sen= der if=20 you have received this message in error. This email does not constitute any= =20 commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its subsidiaries except when= =20 expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended recipient and= =20 Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. **************************************************************************= ************************* ------_=_NextPart_001_01C63D32.0934741E-- From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 01 14:59:29 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 20322 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 14:59:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2006 14:59:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 37602 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 14:59:34 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 37564 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 14:59:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 37552 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2006 14:59:33 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:59:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:59:31 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j3so67735ugf for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:59:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ONKIZAVFjiYo1Uqy6aSgwZhrpHZJYvTjOUd/fpdFEPySAc8XKtQw0CsrJOMwbKnVkNvwHEdH2Xf+CeKPe9KNq0ttAnRrrrUuLQtfNkYgfa+0CAYE3SRl/rHQWLfTU/QoT6WLQKyotopg9dYAKtix3JdCBhZzcM+8v6oRlBOSAek= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v8mr144389ugl; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:59:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 06:59:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 15:59:09 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/1/06, Vignesh Swaminathan <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > Does DDLUtils help in overcoming the CLOB , BLOB issues with JDBC? > Should I still use a platform specific class for CLOB and BLOB datatype? > (any other approach other than doing a double update to insert, query > and update with blob/clob again)? I'm not entirely sure what you mean? DdlUtils is intended to be used to setup databases and initialize them with data (both esp. from XML files). You can define binary data in your data xml file (e.g. in base64 encoding or using your own custom data converter), and DdlUtils should write this into a Blob column without problems (same in the other direction). Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 01 22:25:39 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 52874 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2006 22:25:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2006 22:25:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 10719 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 22:26:25 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 10643 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2006 22:26:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 10604 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2006 22:26:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:26:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:26:23 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q2so122082uge for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:26:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a+wm7m0tDSNm+14P8ulGhvIdJgKC6u4GcjGrAYwrrENwJeqkIqq8PW6gDV9FWy6EVk/IKyu4MXm7aQ8mTwxVYdJqrqushOn4mqU9Pam04uQXMktxFg3xHVmt3atH8tiOjyII0HIvyb3u08Z5KoAh/0l0Jmm5yhCCufwNYfRwtfo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l3mr405383ugh; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:25:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:25:59 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Some bugs with Oracle In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 2/23/06, Hans Mu=F1oz <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > >> ----Getting DDL and generation xml from the database---- > >> - Fails to remove internal primary keys (JDBCModelReader.java in > >> removeInternalPrimaryKeyIndex:629 - always false) So it fails while > triyng > >> to Create tables from xml generated, because is duplicated. > > >? Could you post the table definition SQL, and the generated XML ? > I think the problem is in the method removeInternalPrimaryKeyIndex as lon= g > as it only have one line... return false; so it can never remove the > duplicate index. > The original Database hasn't been created with ddlUtils, the SQL definiti= on > of one table is: > > ALTER TABLE ACCESOS DROP PRIMARY KEY CASCADE; > DROP TABLE ACCESOS CASCADE CONSTRAINTS; > > CREATE TABLE ACCESOS > ( > IDACCESO NUMBER(10) NOT NULL, > USUARIO VARCHAR2(255 BYTE) NOT NULL, > OPERACION VARCHAR2(255 BYTE) NOT NULL, > FECHA DATE NOT NULL, > ADICIONAL1 NUMBER(10), > ADICIONAL2 VARCHAR2(255 BYTE), > NUMERO NUMBER(10) DEFAULT 1 > NOT NULL > ) > TABLESPACE BIBDESA_DAT > LOGGING > NOCACHE > NOPARALLEL; > > > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX PK_ACCESOS ON ACCESOS > (IDACCESO) > LOGGING > TABLESPACE BIBDESA_IND > NOPARALLEL; > > > CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_ACCESOS > BEFORE INSERT > ON ACCESOS > REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD > FOR EACH ROW > BEGIN > IF :new.IDACCESO IS NULL THEN > SELECT SEQ_ACCESOS.NEXTVAL INTO :new.IDACCESO FROM dual; > END IF; > END ; > / > SHOW ERRORS; > > > > ALTER TABLE ACCESOS ADD ( > CONSTRAINT PK_ACCESOS PRIMARY KEY (IDACCESO) > USING INDEX > TABLESPACE BIBDESA_IND); This is not an internal index - "internal index" refers to indices that the database creates automatically (i.e. you don't specify them) for primary keys or foreign keys, and which are returned in the JDBC metadata. Oracle does not define such indices (or at least they are not present in JDBC) and hence the methods simply contain a "return false". Your index however is created manually via SQL and thus is not internal but rather a normal unique index (which plays the role of the primary key as the table in question does not seem to contain one which would be unique automatically). > >Mhmm, this works on Oracle 10. What driver do you use ? > Oracle 9i. In general you should use the newest JDBC driver available because they are usually downward compatible (Oracle drivers are) and contain important bugfixes. In your case, you should use the driver that can be downloaded from the Oracle 10 site. As for the other things, I'll try to get an Oracle 9 installation running in the next days and then check against it. Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Thu Mar 02 04:37:30 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 7069 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 04:37:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 04:37:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 88117 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2006 04:38:17 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 88096 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2006 04:38:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 88085 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2006 04:38:16 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:38:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO srv-nl-msweep2.vanenburg.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:38:16 -0800 Received: from ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com (ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com) by srv-nl-msweep2.vanenburg.com (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.0.9) with ESMTP id <choijoshua@example.net> for <choijoshua@example.net>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 05:41:25 +0100 Received: from ex-ind-u1.vanenburg.com ([83.161.120.155]) by ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC (5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 05:37:53 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:07:50 +0530 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? Thread-Index: AcY9QMUisBCODX7zT9u13Q3XOG+keQAbsXoQ From: "Vignesh Swaminathan" <choijoshua@example.net> To: <choijoshua@example.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2006 04:37:53.0112 (UTC) FILETIME=[11A53D80:01C63DB3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >You can define binary data in your data xml file (e.g. in base64 encoding or using your own custom >data converter), and DdlUtils should write this into a Blob column without problems (same in the other direction). The problem here is that JDBC expects a CLOB/BLOB interface, however each driver has its own implementation of this interface. So you have a code piece which looks like CLOB clobField; If(MSSQLdriverX) clobField =3D new MSSQLCLOBFromDriverX(); Else if(MSSQLdriverY) clobField =3D new MSSQLCLOBFromDriverY(); Else if (MySQLdriverX) clobField =3D new MySQLCLOB(); You can see that the clob implementation that you can use to get at a CLOB interface is specific to each driver. This can be abstracted (if possible) by adding a method to the PlatformImplBase and subclasses of it called getCLOB()/getBLOB() where specific to the platform we can add code to retrieve the CLOB/BLOB interface specific to that platform(?). This will take users of DDLUtils API one more step to being DB independent. More of this at MSSQL http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms378813.aspx Oracle http://www.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/tech/java/codesnippet/jdbc/ clob10g/handlingclobsinoraclejdbc10g.html PostgreSQL (could not get official doc) http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2000-07/msg00120.php MySQL (could not get official doc) http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=3D576315&messageID=3D2886886 <vignesh/> ***************************************************************************= ************************ The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privile= ged.=20 It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone e= lse is=20 unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copyin= g, or=20 distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reli= ance=20 on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sen= der if=20 you have received this message in error. This email does not constitute any= =20 commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its subsidiaries except when= =20 expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended recipient and= =20 Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. **************************************************************************= ************************* From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Thu Mar 02 10:27:46 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 61123 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2006 10:27:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2006 10:27:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 93864 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2006 10:28:32 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 93829 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2006 10:28:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 93818 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2006 10:28:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 02:28:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO srv-nl-msweep2.vanenburg.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 02:28:31 -0800 Received: from ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com (ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com) by srv-nl-msweep2.vanenburg.com (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.0.9) with ESMTP id <choijoshua@example.net> for <choijoshua@example.net>; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:31:40 +0100 Received: from ex-ind-u1.vanenburg.com ([83.161.120.155]) by ex-nl-u1.vanenburg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC (5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:28:00 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 15:57:58 +0530 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: What is the support for CLOB and BLOB? Thread-Index: AcY9QMUisBCODX7zT9u13Q3XOG+keQAbsXoQAA0GOfA= From: "Vignesh Swaminathan" <choijoshua@example.net> To: <choijoshua@example.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2006 10:28:00.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB34F460:01C63DE3] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just got a feel of the flow of the DataToDatabase and DataToFile commands by stepping through the code, I should just say it is super cool! Thanks Tom <vignesh/> "Winning solutions find the right balance between market needs and technical needs" ***************************************************************************= ************************ The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privile= ged.=20 It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone e= lse is=20 unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copyin= g, or=20 distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reli= ance=20 on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sen= der if=20 you have received this message in error. This email does not constitute any= =20 commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its subsidiaries except when= =20 expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended recipient and= =20 Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. **************************************************************************= ************************* From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Mon Mar 06 13:36:50 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 95907 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2006 13:36:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2006 13:36:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 39401 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 13:37:36 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 39340 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 13:37:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 39329 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2006 13:37:35 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:37:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO dragon.axen.be) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:37:35 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C64123.13731260" Subject: hashCode and database equality Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:37:08 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: hashCode and database equality Thread-Index: AcZBIxBPs7k9JZpEQ82SzVDNrEXFlQ== From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Arbogast_S=E9bastien?= <choijoshua@example.net> To: <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C64123.13731260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am I right to assume that if two databases have the same structure (and = only if so), then they will have the same hashCode ? Can I rely on that = ? =20 S=E9bastien ARBOGAST ------_=_NextPart_001_01C64123.13731260-- From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Mon Mar 06 19:21:54 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 8988 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2006 19:21:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2006 19:21:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 21618 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 19:22:09 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 21560 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2006 19:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 21549 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2006 19:22:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:22:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=10.0 tests=INFO_TLD,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:22:08 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k40so613368ugc for <choijoshua@example.net>; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:21:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fkEaFgV1OYwkmjkYD/t9ya2zAi0xsyVWfUM+OX+vqIMAHpkcxv/UyRxlZJhNXaUieDvhZY0hhrfOMXhE0b9u/hiJ3yd6TAgQAmU7iPwhGx/mHIoSgf/8v0ccrhx1yhgBJ/KF2WCoaeJtHS7d/CxvrPFosjnzClidya74ncF0w6U= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s7mr3118818ugh; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:21:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:21:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:21:46 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: hashCode and database equality In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/6/06, Arbogast S=E9bastien <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > Am I right to assume that if two databases have the same structure (and o= nly if so), then they will have the same hashCode ? Can I rely on that ? Mhmm, this depends on what is meant by 'same structure'. E.g. possible problems are: * DdlUtils automatically generates a foreign key name if none is specified. So, are a foreign key without a name and one with a name equal ? * The platform can operate in delimited identifier mode (where the case of identifiers matters) or in normal mode (where the case does not matter). Since the model is operation-independent, it is impossible for equals/hashCode to work correctly in both modes. That being said, the model implements equals/hashCode for delimited identifier mode and assumes that there is always a name. But in the long run, you're probably better off implementing your own hashCode. Just have a look at how the model does it and implement a Visitor for your mode. If it is not too urgent, then you could also add a feature request to JIRA and we can include it in the 1.1. Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 11:52:21 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 53977 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 11:52:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 11:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 40280 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 11:52:21 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 40218 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 11:52:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 40207 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 11:52:20 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:52:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp4-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:52:20 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF2454862 for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:51:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 3149A5EBF; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:52:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:52:50 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:52:50 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Subversion checkout fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm trying to checkout DdlUtils sources from Subversion repository (as it seems to be the only way for now to get DdlUtils), but I keep getting an error in TortoiseSVN : PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk' PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk': Could not read status line: an existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (http://svn.apache.org) Is there another way to retrieve ddlUtils ? Because I really need it. Thx in advance. -- Sebastien From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 12:04:59 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 58901 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 12:04:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 12:04:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 50739 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:04:39 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 50676 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:04:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 50665 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 12:04:39 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:04:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:04:38 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j3so81770ugf for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:04:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rnVHNfkJl1RFdrkHWXIrvrGYd4K/YZuG/MspdeVLet9IxfxNL+j+7NGzZRgd4lAHx6YVHlkGvjf0Q1mmrB3N31JTQVGNodViYiXUvrrdc9JW+KrHjXKdMPH08yAouUEUHqmARNLB0DPnLnl88bXZHmMQkELXrTYFvBJCmbagSMA= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b17mr396551ugi; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:04:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 04:04:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:04:17 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > I'm trying to checkout DdlUtils sources from Subversion repository (as it= seems > to be the only way for now to get DdlUtils), but I keep getting an error = in > TortoiseSVN : > > PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk' > PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk': Could not read status line: a= n > existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. > (http://svn.apache.org) > > Is there another way to retrieve ddlUtils ? Because I really need it. Mhmm, I had no problems updating 5 minutes ago, so its likely not a problem here. Do you perhaps use a proxy ? Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 12:13:46 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 63520 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 12:13:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 12:13:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 58835 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:13:45 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 58823 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:13:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 58812 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 12:13:45 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:13:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp1-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:13:44 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C9790DAC for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:13:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id E1F615EC0; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:14:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:14:14 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:14:14 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Quoting Thomas Dudziak <choijoshua@example.net>: > On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > > > I'm trying to checkout DdlUtils sources from Subversion repository (as it > seems > > to be the only way for now to get DdlUtils), but I keep getting an error in > > TortoiseSVN : > > > > PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk' > > PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk': Could not read status line: an > > existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. > > (http://svn.apache.org) > > > > Is there another way to retrieve ddlUtils ? Because I really need it. > > Mhmm, I had no problems updating 5 minutes ago, so its likely not a > problem here. Do you perhaps use a proxy ? > Oh yes, I'm behind my company's proxy ! Maybe I should configure it with TortoiseSVN. From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 12:24:48 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 68681 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 12:24:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 12:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 86113 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:24:47 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 86093 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:24:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 86082 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 12:24:47 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:24:47 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp2-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:24:46 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC6672B8D for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:24:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id C01135EDB; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:25:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:25:16 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:25:16 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Quoting choijoshua@example.net: > Quoting Thomas Dudziak <choijoshua@example.net>: > > > On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to checkout DdlUtils sources from Subversion repository (as it > > seems > > > to be the only way for now to get DdlUtils), but I keep getting an error > in > > > TortoiseSVN : > > > > > > PROPFIND request failed on '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk' > > > PROPFIND of '/repos/asf/db/ddlutils/trunk': Could not read status line: > an > > > existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. > > > (http://svn.apache.org) > > > > > > Is there another way to retrieve ddlUtils ? Because I really need it. > > > > Mhmm, I had no problems updating 5 minutes ago, so its likely not a > > problem here. Do you perhaps use a proxy ? > > > > Oh yes, I'm behind my company's proxy ! Maybe I should configure it with > TortoiseSVN. > > I've configured my proxy in TortoiseSVN option, but now when I try to checkout, I obtain the following error : Working copy 'C:\data\ddlutils' locked Please execute the "Cleanup command" And when I do a Cleanup, and Update, I get the following error : REPORT request failed on '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default' REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request (http://svn.apache.org) Please... help ! From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 12:32:19 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 72567 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 12:32:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 12:32:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 97361 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:32:18 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 97339 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:32:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 97328 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 12:32:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:32:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:32:17 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so81894uge for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:31:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rkPiPMmBDjqmJi1ArP+7omlQisMT/eENzGQr4seDzJNb6ytlBZVZ0dpv5EvtL8Ugte8kjqIQDy634kr0LA6x1s53MMS7+FKjj/d1k7FWAwrLv74053r3tSo3DYyMgU/I6Xw6qddYOw5Be6WXubtBgzX6qYqrWkJPsHoZZnLPnvw= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u20mr413978ugg; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 04:31:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:31:56 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > I've configured my proxy in TortoiseSVN option, but now when I try to che= ckout, > I obtain the following error : > > Working copy 'C:\data\ddlutils' locked > Please execute the "Cleanup command" > > And when I do a Cleanup, and Update, I get the following error : > > REPORT request failed on '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default' > REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request (http://svn.apac= he.org) Please try the SVN URL (complete including "trunk") in a browser (that uses the same proxy settings) to see whether that works. Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 12:33:53 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 77171 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 12:33:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 12:33:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 98210 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:33:52 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 98149 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:33:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 98138 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 12:33:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:33:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp3-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:33:51 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D7A495C0 for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:33:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id E3C095EC4; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:34:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:34:21 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:34:21 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Quoting Thomas Dudziak <choijoshua@example.net>: > On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > > > I've configured my proxy in TortoiseSVN option, but now when I try to > checkout, > > I obtain the following error : > > > > Working copy 'C:\data\ddlutils' locked > > Please execute the "Cleanup command" > > > > And when I do a Cleanup, and Update, I get the following error : > > > > REPORT request failed on '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default' > > REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request > (http://svn.apache.org) > > Please try the SVN URL (complete including "trunk") in a browser (that > uses the same proxy settings) to see whether that works. > > Tom > Yes, it works just fine. It's weird. From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 12:45:36 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 87972 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 12:45:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 12:45:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 27174 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:45:27 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 27154 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 12:45:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 27143 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 12:45:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:45:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:45:26 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so82972uge for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:45:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pLhP7jqcMluQDdNIRa2g+O1f11OP3NPzfF5oHC/QUrbZxdtz+hgB1bdYGQw+rR7ZKL5rsHYuYYPy3eeVchnOlsbRe/8fF8I6yT/RwF8awB7vxpZDMBiFlL9mdCNFh/iFr9oG7tB13ninBfoqShys9DUa0QcD5g9c3LfxWUifmxw= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w2mr423991ugi; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:45:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 04:45:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 13:45:05 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > Yes, it works just fine. It's weird. I'd say its a TortoiseSVN problem then. Please try a different SVN client (e.g. an IDE like Eclipse/NetBeans). Or you could check for a newer TortoiseSVN version and check their docs/forums. Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 13:08:44 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 2927 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 13:08:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 13:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 74806 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:08:44 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 74743 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 74732 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 13:08:43 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:08:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp5-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:08:42 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1731E402 for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:08:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 827D461D0; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:09:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:09:12 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:09:12 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Selon Thomas Dudziak <choijoshua@example.net>: > On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > > > Yes, it works just fine. It's weird. > > I'd say its a TortoiseSVN problem then. Please try a different SVN > client (e.g. an IDE like Eclipse/NetBeans). Or you could check for a > newer TortoiseSVN version and check their docs/forums. > > Tom > I got exactly the same error with 1.3.0 comand-line subversion client. From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 13:24:35 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 11456 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 13:24:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 13:24:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 636 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:24:29 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 616 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:24:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 605 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 13:24:29 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:24:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:24:28 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s2so85154uge for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:24:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L/LgOJSa5SClH0DYCwNjxvHHnwe/Q3figyYA4lwf9sxLhW7kkycJGXecfLcB127v0fl/kkBCAqW9A7Eqadi9LSYqHlnJXKMskEdKpnwloS9/k8rO80VlYdhXmTzWhgvukjg8rW/QuOgXHI0OcIOYCxaKtJj6w5RNfGX1NJ7WWrU= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x16mr440356ugi; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:24:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:24:07 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > I got exactly the same error with 1.3.0 comand-line subversion client. This seems to be a known problem with SVN. E.g. see this thread: http://svn.haxx.se/tsvn/archive-2004-11/0286.shtml In short, the proxy server needs to be configured to allow some additional WebDAV stuff: http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#proxy Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 13:39:33 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 20410 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 13:39:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 13:39:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 30105 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:39:33 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 30044 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:39:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 30032 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 13:39:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:39:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp5-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:39:32 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1C41EC0A for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:39:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id C4DC861BA; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:40:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:40:02 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Selon Thomas Dudziak <choijoshua@example.net>: > On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > > > I got exactly the same error with 1.3.0 comand-line subversion client. > > This seems to be a known problem with SVN. E.g. see this thread: > > http://svn.haxx.se/tsvn/archive-2004-11/0286.shtml > > In short, the proxy server needs to be configured to allow some > additional WebDAV stuff: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#proxy > > Tom > Ok. End of the problem. I can't modify my company's proxy configuration. Damn paranoids ! I'll have to check it choijoshua@example.net. Thanks for your help. From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 13:42:18 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 22387 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 13:42:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 13:42:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 37825 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 37803 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:42:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 37792 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 13:42:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:42:17 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k40so87727ugc for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:41:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NEnsb2nTQGP325Ian346PCVTMbmrObXm5xk3jUuUZI5dmw3ga9CVQeRnMtNmDa4zPJZxOyx4i70MWoCY9HSNE/DDJfcFEhpH5HJcQlyFeymh5nC/H2VQfbYnuxFvY2WEKkRtpW6B6AqXQ3afHkiOOM/8n+7N9qjR+LCnAsfzQtM= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u20mr453732ugg; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:41:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:41:55 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > Ok. End of the problem. I can't modify my company's proxy configuration. = Damn > paranoids ! I'll have to check it choijoshua@example.net. Thanks for your help. But you can request it. And if it is urgent, I can send you off-the-list a fresh JAR, if that helps= . Tom From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 13:48:09 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 25231 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 13:48:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 13:48:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 48239 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:48:09 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 48209 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 13:48:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 48198 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 13:48:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:48:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtp2-g19.free.fr) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:48:07 -0800 Received: from imp8-g19.free.fr (imp8-g19.free.fr [83.161.120.155]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BCB72AC4 for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:47:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id EB1F661C1; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:48:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from 83.161.120.155 ([83.161.120.155]) by imp8-g19.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:48:37 +0100 Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 14:48:37 +0100 From: choijoshua@example.net To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Subversion checkout fails References: <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> <choijoshua@example.net> In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Selon Thomas Dudziak <choijoshua@example.net>: > On 3/8/06, choijoshua@example.net <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > > > Ok. End of the problem. I can't modify my company's proxy configuration. > Damn > > paranoids ! I'll have to check it choijoshua@example.net. Thanks for your help. > > But you can request it. > And if it is urgent, I can send you off-the-list a fresh JAR, if that helps. > > Tom > Security in here is a tricky thing. I'm not even supposed to do what I'm doing, that is using an external webmail. Anyway, yes if you could send me a jar that would be great. Will I be able to use it directly as a Maven dependency (I guess yes, but just to be sure there is nothing special about it) ? From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 18:06:36 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 9295 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 18:06:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 18:06:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 49439 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 18:06:36 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 49415 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 18:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 49403 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 18:06:35 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:06:35 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:06:35 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s17so180730wxc for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:06:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=RGlF3GwAziE3xEzcisOxo1JLcc86ZCY3dQgiEuB8u77fK0aQOOugz8M31daaUlnCgcY3n7TfLpnPuR1rhEfmve7prsUNEeFo+AljlqB9mG5Rt/Q7fX6IDQUw2vktOOuYca/KewTvbcfxcOsrIOmu1XIjkn9jmSrT/3MYuS8LC2g= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w1mr1161644wxc; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:06:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:06:07 +0100 From: "Sebastien Arbogast" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Building DdlUtils MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I've managed to checkout DdlUtils sources but when I tried to build it (as there is no readme at root, I guessed the goal to run was "mvn install"), I got plenty of Java compilation errors. Did I miss someting ? -- S=E9bastien Arbogast From ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net Wed Mar 08 18:11:24 2006 Return-Path: <ddlutilschoijoshua@example.net> Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 13189 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2006 18:11:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2006 18:11:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 57089 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 18:11:23 -0000 Delivered-To: choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 57028 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2006 18:11:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact choijoshua@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:choijoshua@example.net> List-Id: <ddlutils-user.db.apache.org> Reply-To: choijoshua@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list choijoshua@example.net Received: (qmail 57010 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2006 18:11:23 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:11:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of choijoshua@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:11:22 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so123677uge for <choijoshua@example.net>; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:11:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HRF5c32UqaArCjFKPKcGU7+s7Zze2xMtqKrqfoJg4XPkfcp7bS4h1rnUTrtlzaKkHtcZuxItO4CzkzsHH/LbrGei7nNUfqtyBkPTlvRl5lARG2HY1KD7eZ4AplGHNGyUYaZ24rQcAP0MPZF+pTriA50uyNRxDGa9roZJekpkv3s= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id b17mr624905ugi; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 10:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:10:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <choijoshua@example.net> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:10:59 +0100 From: "Thomas Dudziak" <choijoshua@example.net> To: choijoshua@example.net Subject: Re: Building DdlUtils In-Reply-To: <choijoshua@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <choijoshua@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/8/06, Sebastien Arbogast <choijoshua@example.net> wrote: > I've managed to checkout DdlUtils sources but when I tried to build it > (as there is no readme at root, I guessed the goal to run was "mvn > install"), I got
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}