From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 00:17:57 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 34647 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 00:17:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 00:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 85906 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 00:17:46 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 85880 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 00:17:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 85871 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 00:17:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:17:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:17:12 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a25so5558311pyi.11 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id i1mr14178234pym.62.1204330639046; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:17:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:17:18 -0500 From: "James Carman" <jatkinson@example.com> Sender: jatkinson@example.com To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: How to get a context root in wicket? In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1df4e99930952bdb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org You can get to the ServletContext through your application object. On 2/29/08, Vitaly Tsaplin <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Simple... simple question... How to get a context root in wicket? > > Best regards, > Vitaly > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 00:47:21 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 52152 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 00:47:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 00:47:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 6495 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 00:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 6472 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 00:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 6463 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 00:47:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:47:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:46:22 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e6so5950677qbe.2 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:46:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=driOEYQiUhdGDeJMIxDyNbYXHdcq1FMvQUOJrCypJuo=; b=cic7+vTyecbJ3zxUsY0wopkY1Z8wLYqeafnQh/KU0ws7inatj2Xcfuu5Idm4uz4k7tH5Qu5ZnUhqvMOZtbvv7pW3IA98jk9K77V13zsd7xtKHfV1gmz+kOPjRPGNgxivM0xh1QVHHhhoPQbFfP6MurJWpEyYx4eu8LC3L2l03Us= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UVLQZn9HtDdgPU+i/cGwA+v56WsELifDr8EsWxsb8VQq4IS5aU6ltWOeS9S4+/SBZwPAaF0bC/o4oozuo7bsmKj4J+BdqLtPJRLKl5vLlLqEB5Et6qZcmZBkYUfYeWSJaOUiP61d2mIRlEJLvDJQfhCiQa7M/9FN3JdWOZUEx98= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l14mr7412625wfe.230.1204332402521; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:46:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:46:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:46:42 -0800 From: "Toto Laricot" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Integrating with a forum application...? In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_710_31077915.1204332402491" References: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_710_31077915.1204332402491 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We've done it. Nothing Wicket-specific. JForum runs as a separate webapp, we display it in a frame. SSO is a bit tricky but it's doable. v. On 2/29/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > Has any one done this? > > Im thinking of jforum.. http://www.jforum.net/ ? > > It should'nt be that hard to create a contrib for btw, if somebody are > interested..? > > -- > -Wicket for love > -Jme for fun > > Nino Martinez Wael > Java Specialist @ Jayway DK > http://www.jayway.dk > 659-745-7611 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > ------=_Part_710_31077915.1204332402491-- From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 00:59:12 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 54402 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 00:59:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 00:59:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 16099 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 00:59:01 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 16077 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 00:59:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 16068 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 00:59:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:59:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:58:26 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so4137649wag.8 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:58:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=Adly4Rl0v5Is2umxlMx4xygEWjbCXg6idWaFeKRzqlY=; b=jjGZYctElGVbmkcx7KiQtd3g9o/L5ujwox0ebgJoAtWV4042LaUUJITkE8sFLAiCE054V9bJOcpzwD1jecA0QbkrrsaSoUETFgIt7NtfRcdMKM0kXaAilotNrW3RrbGrshmnwQ8CqSVAAoKcUx3N+/lipzUcIORfqRKGSPzPPng= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pGPAqjL15TO+LRm1SuACJFUX5oTLOdIof9EpNIXda0rWYQ8Si9n5Z3pLCd+yJ2+hqu6mcUvsXljHdbWW5f908DfQguH4CYGMWlNHZ+st8PQYjmErHeTzU76S3r3xDytNADLuM+ltEyXtnk+KNmA8Oa6DACZx/Fxx+vnCSa9D2Ko= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 1mr12544315wao.27.1204333115988; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:58:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:58:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:35 -0500 From: "Jay Hogan" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Anyone thinking about an OLAP4J component? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15936_9447171.1204333115972" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_15936_9447171.1204333115972 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Has anyone thought about writing a Wicket OLAP viewer using the new (still beta) olap4j API? (http://www.olap4j.org/) I would kill (ok, maim) for something like that and Wicket is a great platform for it IMHO. I have not been very impressed with the Java OLAP pivot tools I have seen, of which JPivot is the best. Some of the Pentaho developers have put together a proof of concept called Halogen using GWT. http://code.google.com/p/halogen/ ------=_Part_15936_9447171.1204333115972-- From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 01:20:21 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 62349 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 01:20:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 01:20:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 28976 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 01:20:15 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 28386 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 01:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 28377 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 01:20:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:20:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:19:38 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e6so5960584qbe.2 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:19:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=d9+olIHiH1A4bJ4eQngwhTChY8BdVxNpKNwsJe4ZJTI=; b=UxZF/viObRoSkkUzLuU5/4MwjIF9NXdOwHcer/ViylpJqRIkSGzAlp93Upen/fqt7U1fCJrlMbeqMOOcpq4bFxqIrA+Ffx/Y9eV/fih2DczFaZxJkEkw1w23FBgdfK/k7+jTg7d3IrKeTdaZwaiIt+YIyjbwu3LSJIS0bRcdgzI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YPhThE/pOKj/g3Au90Z6VIx/GT5xivoksX8H+ziEEIo3xDnVfglLERbHa9ompkvpqEX98TQt3Mjy57W2lmIBFtsQKmlP27pFEV107kML/Satmt484QYM6Dr7lrXjXQE4f3Wdaa0dUWVFI2gEvPmQ9L7qhCiXA0EcVH0IxdIczh4= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id f1mr7115587wal.100.1204334386698; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:19:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:19:46 -0800 From: "Scott Swank" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Integrating with a forum application...? In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I suspect that Nino wants to use Wicket instead of Freemarker for the UI layer. http://www.jforum.net/doc/TemplatesAndStyles On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Toto Laricot <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > We've done it. Nothing Wicket-specific. JForum runs as a separate webapp, we > display it in a frame. > SSO is a bit tricky but it's doable. > > v. > > On 2/29/08, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael <jatkinson@example.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Has any one done this? > > > > Im thinking of jforum.. http://www.jforum.net/ ? > > > > It should'nt be that hard to create a contrib for btw, if somebody are > > interested..? > > > > -- > > -Wicket for love > > -Jme for fun > > > > Nino Martinez Wael > > Java Specialist @ Jayway DK > > http://www.jayway.dk > > 659-745-7611 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > -- Scott Swank reformed mathematician --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 03:36:31 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 15752 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 03:36:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 03:36:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 28867 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:36:24 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 28841 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:36:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 28832 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 03:36:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:36:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:35:37 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <jatkinson@example.com>) id 1JVIVx-0001z7-IJ for jatkinson@example.com; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:35:57 -0800 Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:35:57 -0800 (PST) From: Kent Tong <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Testing (Ajax)TabbedPanel In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jatkinson@example.com References: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sven Schliesing wrote: > > This works quite good. But I'm having problems with using too much > "internal knowledge" (e.g. the tabs-container id) of the AjaxTabbedPanel. > You can always create your own TabPanelTester that may have a getTab(id) method. This class will encapsulate the internal knowledge. ----- -- Kent Tong Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Testing-%28Ajax%29TabbedPanel-tp15739429p15772312.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list jatkinson@example.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 03:47:39 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 17050 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 03:47:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 03:47:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 32651 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:47:29 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 32628 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:47:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 32617 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 03:47:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:47:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:46:40 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <jatkinson@example.com>) id 1JVIgf-0002IA-9e for jatkinson@example.com; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:47:01 -0800 Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:47:01 -0800 (PST) From: Kent Tong <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Wicket Wizard form need to add custom validation to each panel In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jatkinson@example.com References: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org AshleyAbraham wrote: > > I am working on a wicket wizard component, I am trying to add an > AbstractFormValidation to each wizardStep, so when the wizardStep is > added/replaced the wizard form will know how to custom validate that > particular wizardStep. > Why not add the form validator to the wizard step? It has an add() method exactly for this purpose. ----- -- Kent Tong Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Wizard-form-need-to-add-custom-validation-to-each-panel-tp15746917p15772387.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list jatkinson@example.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 03:57:38 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 19972 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 03:57:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 03:57:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 38273 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:57:31 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 38252 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 38243 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 03:57:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:57:31 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:56:44 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <jatkinson@example.com>) id 1JVIqO-0002Vr-Js for jatkinson@example.com; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:57:04 -0800 Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:57:04 -0800 (PST) From: Kent Tong <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Page markup caching In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: jatkinson@example.com References: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org hbf wrote: > > Has anybody implemented page caching for Wicket? If possible, I'd > like to store the markup of a page in ehcache so that subsequent requests > can be > served without invoking the rendering mechanism of the jatkinson@example.com. > You may try overriding the onRender() method in the Page class in your own page class to retrieve the cached output. However, I really don't think this is necessary as Wicket pages involves no compilation of any kind like OGNL, the render time should be quite consistent. ----- -- Kent Tong Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Page-markup-caching-tp15734416p15772444.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list jatkinson@example.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 03:58:41 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 20072 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 03:58:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 03:58:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 39817 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:58:34 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 39792 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 03:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 39783 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 03:58:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO hu-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:57:58 +0000 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 34so4494296hui.22 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=uSGyhhye+IvvO1+DkxyEqN+yD7s6mKRh1sXcObwfT78=; b=LBBTx+53SC5FKKTvbHrAwF628KI9ULhIqsQDYMcsyKDrgGZOadj/jh1cuNYWPATs2bkw1rj5RIQn7KkszCeGnbkPH3yz8KOaJtd/3yj6Pya3IyTFbrv47TZw4k6Aoc00wPhZfE3anpyXcvZzmwto+gBPh4BTSU1f2xq6nz/qiA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZtrIv4VHQfqOQfwzAGAxJjHKmhljIpUBcGliUWf2bszc+bz0B/orpz3TYlZ8p6CoPWmRGOiUOtosjUNJFUgSZ60hoZ3dLffa+T0E3LsZ8+MZ+h7vbCIkxkXsD+dggLRtFkIpZzosplr/v6TVv5WtOOLJQKYns7Ms9rV4zck26VM= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v20mr6086952hue.44.1204343887071; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:58:07 -0800 From: "Igor Vaynberg" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Wicket Wizard form need to add custom validation to each panel In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org or embed a form in the wizard panel and add the validator to that -igor On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Kent Tong <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > AshleyAbraham wrote: > > > > I am working on a wicket wizard component, I am trying to add an > > AbstractFormValidation to each wizardStep, so when the wizardStep is > > added/replaced the wizard form will know how to custom validate that > > particular wizardStep. > > > > Why not add the form validator to the wizard step? It has an add() method > exactly > for this purpose. > > > ----- > -- > Kent Tong > Wicket tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/EWDW > Axis2 tutorials freely available at http://www.agileskills2.org/DWSAA > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-Wizard-form-need-to-add-custom-validation-to-each-panel-tp15746917p15772387.html > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list jatkinson@example.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 04:06:28 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 23793 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 04:06:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 04:06:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 42867 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 04:06:17 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 42848 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 04:06:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 42839 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 04:06:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:06:16 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:05:40 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id e6so6005310qbe.2 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:05:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jlg1imasA1bKxRGtdoh0/1XqRfuQy5h69coBlVg9l6M=; b=xW5CsLdJpvgqOV53aPBhi9u2uFMAfOFmatCXvTSg0XIEL+WT3l636mPPlhEjRfJ8kb36J+aaOUs2HeA1lPAE6TcHD8O/mR5L4xBmrQeo9rhMJVzFUurqTmhq51SFLqaexbuSf9uearMJq9VWiSgyFy/ikyQkNs9B3ITVN2v+P2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UQqRsTBnajbWTghHXKa/Dgv6ibVbidCaJmHg2hp6Q/Np8C3zZk/y7keR1spQkPssf5PML0tWqmZ5+N+kQ8Vei2LnpgkaHSGxqTyLBMGKZlkWAQ3e0uRqfdBT+JHKZ2jY446ydXJBCYonuEZm+b2LVSMqpJiui35f0mhi1LoGU6I= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id m12mr6904662rvj.26.1204344349480; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:05:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:05:49 +0700 From: "Martijn Dashorst" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Submitting an ajaxform with multipart/form-data In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org iirc wicket-extensions has a multi file upload that does this, and the ajax file upload progress bar in extensions should work as advertised. Martijn On 2/28/08, Michael Sparer <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > it's a known limitation that one cannot submit an ajaxform with multipart > enabled. but as i'd like to upload files without reloading the page i've > been looking for an elegant solution for this problem. > a possible solution (it's even called an AJAX-pattern) is to post the form > data to a hidden inlineframe (iframe) and let the iframe submit the form. > but passing the values to the iframe, let the iframe submit the values, get > the state of the upload from the iframe and displaying results in the > regular form would result in a fair hack. > > my question: has anybody a better solution to go about this problem or has > anyone any experience with the above scenario using an iframe? maybe wicket > already offers an easy way to do this that i haven't found yet? > > regards, > Michael > > ----- > Michael Sparer > http://talk-on-tech.blogspot.com > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Submitting-an-ajaxform-with-multipart-form-data-tp15734375p15734375.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list jatkinson@example.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 04:27:31 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 31149 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 04:27:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 04:27:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 55652 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 04:27:24 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 55627 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 04:27:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 55618 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 04:27:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:27:24 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:26:49 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so4374343wfd.2 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:26:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=A+xmDrbg//ntYZSQc9b98hw+vRKHNoju3p+vQAS+y2c=; b=MRHVj7GneEjYoFciUnGRu1/P69ya7No+Pl1fKEjrbn+EhJrPHOx00M7z4N4jsvPpoV6g3oSu5S0ORjfq0Tdj1UKxxg3ImqJ5FdRBeOnZuk8JVLYUqvCf/VYpX4Af7HcRJIomaC83FHO+h5gbrxIYukb4cA9RiPumEYYtZsF4YBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SHyNK6dg6fTKsSGY2Vp/0c03vqqTsKNOrmTyZbgOm9CiqUJG01W/TNUTmcA1oW2EYA43+QfsTVnflDGBwepv+wa8Nde159yHESiISqoSmcXLm27BH3ZCtgWgxZiwQcdvuEMOEousUrLLXWLy/5q/7I8Wqz+eLR/ZnniDTADVbQQ= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id v7mr7499896wfd.218.1204345619315; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:26:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 05:26:59 +0100 From: "Johan Compagner" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com, jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Sporadic exponential explosion of session size In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7476_26721743.1204345619306" References: <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_7476_26721743.1204345619306 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline please do and also try to attach a quickstart. On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Meetesh Karia <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > Will do and I will respond with any other information we find as we're > looking into this as well. > > Meetesh > > Igor Vaynberg wrote: > > please file a bug report so this doesnt fall through the cracks. > > reference this email thread in this issue report through nabble or > > whatever... > > > > -igor > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Meetesh Karia <jatkinson@example.com> > wrote: > > > >> There's nothing obvious and we don't hold references between pages > >> intentionally. Additionally, when we use the site normally (ie, > without > >> opening new tabs), we don't run into this problem (and I would expect > us > >> to if we were holding references to Pages). > >> > >> Is it possible that the automatic multi-window javascript is executing > >> before the response is completely written (don't know if wicket > flushes > >> the response buffer in parts for large pages) which causes the > redirect > >> to happen before the response completes? Perhaps that keeps a > >> threadlocal variable from being cleaned up somewhere? > >> > >> I'm just speculating here ... > >> > >> Meetesh > >> > >> > >> > >> Matej Knopp wrote: > >> > Wicket shouldn't implicitely hold any page references. Are you sure > >> > you don't have references between your pages? > >> > > >> > -Matej > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Meetesh Karia < > jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi all, > >> >> > >> >> We're running into a problem that we've seen happen many times > though > >> >> unfortunately we can't consistently reproduce it. We're using > Wicket > >> >> 1.3.1 with automatic multi-window support enabled and the default > >> >> SecondLevelCacheSessionStore. > >> >> > >> >> During normal use of our site, no Pages reference other Pages and > the > >> >> session size changes as it should. However, occasionally when we > open > >> >> pages in a new tab (often when multiple pages are opened in a new > tab in > >> >> rapid succession), we get the following situation: > >> >> > >> >> 1 tab > >> >> > >> >> pagemap-null size = x > >> >> > >> >> 2 tabs > >> >> > >> >> pagemap-null size = 2x > >> >> pagemap-0 size = x > >> >> > >> >> 3 tabs > >> >> > >> >> pagemap-null size = 4x > >> >> pagemap-0 size = 2x > >> >> pagemap-1 size = x > >> >> > >> >> 4 tabs > >> >> > >> >> pagemap-null size = 8x > >> >> pagemap-0 size = 4x > >> >> pagemap-1 size = 2x > >> >> pagemap-2 size = x > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> The only explanation that I could come up with for this explosion > is > >> >> that somehow, behind the scenes, a Page is holding onto a > reference to > >> >> another Page in this situation. Because 8x is beyond our max > pagemap > >> >> size, it means that there can only be 1-2 Pages in it taking up > this space. > >> >> > >> >> Has anyone come across a problem like this? Any thoughts on what > this > >> >> could be? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Meetesh > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > ------=_Part_7476_26721743.1204345619306-- From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 04:40:47 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 32998 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 04:40:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 04:40:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 64160 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 04:40:40 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 64136 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 04:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 64127 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 04:40:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:40:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jatkinson@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO qb-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:39:53 +0000 Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id a33so809583qbd.0 for <jatkinson@example.com>; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:40:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8XLCsGEzOrkFCDRqqPgJ7s+047mpi6ayiHUwKpXSUnI=; b=BtDJsAvJfv7vNrxDXemD8Ku30NlPdDMzI/r5MfhKnIGnhf6ak0bl+D2hGsJA8TikSV5ZwzPLXN51qIwGh329hng6NbHEgWZTFz/DBGczo8odtJHX1/SnFdwZ15fYyT5D5UnIDibf43XzdP8/jgXgvCui1u0tENOKpVYEi1mSxcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=ZdKIJtxJNrapPHeDLLh5OvjczRCRUnSFlBeVYb8qwcs9izB5JMjeTVrYuSzAcnvu+/4RC9i1je7T0muWqAqxabXl6tO27yEdhvH6kVji+/74ZpR516sRsuFLB20FOWfkkOq63nORm//d15RosUr8RAd0Lw/BfMyLDeZMPZzWP8I= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id o9mr7512478wfg.226.1204346413775; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:40:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 05:40:13 +0100 From: "Johan Compagner" <jatkinson@example.com> To: jatkinson@example.com Subject: Re: Location of wicket-ajax.js In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7494_8026035.1204346413766" References: <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_7494_8026035.1204346413766 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline if ajax is used in a page then the page is not stateless anyway. johan On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Igor Vaynberg <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > there are no conditions, these things are pushed to wicket by > invocations on iheadercontributor's iheaderresponse interface by all > interested components/behaviors. i guess wicket ignores these if the > page is stateless, which woud be a bug... > > -igor > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Chris Colman > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > I've tried 1.3.1 and still no luck in getting wicket to inject the > > appropriate <script> lines into the header of the HTML. > > > > I was wondering what is the *trigger* or set of conditions that wicket > > uses to determine that it should inject the <script> lines that import > > the .js files into a generated HTML file? > > > > Maybe if I understand these I can 'force' it to add these lines. > > > > I should mention that we're using markup inheritance in case that has > > some bearing on the issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > that is a given. try 1.3.1 and if that doesnt work try building trunk > > > yourself and test with that. > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Chris Colman > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > Using 1.3.0 - maybe I should try 1.3.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:jatkinson@example.com] > > > > > Sent: Friday, 29 February 2008 6:29 PM > > > > > To: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > Subject: Re: Location of wicket-ajax.js > > > > > > > > > > this should happen automatically, please file a bug report > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Chris Colman > > > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > > > Problem found: Was a problem with <script> import lines not > > being > > > > added, > > > > > > not that the .js files were not reachable. > > > > > > > > > > > > Apparently we need to have a stateful component somewhere in > > the > > > > page > > > > > in > > > > > > order for wicket to auto inject the <script> lines into the > > HTML > > > > for > > > > > us. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way of telling wicket to inject the <script> lines > > > > without > > > > > > having a stateful component on the page - currently > everything > > on > > > > the > > > > > > page is stateless - we just have buttons on each item that, > > when > > > > > > pressed, need to bring up an AJAX modal dialog box to display > > some > > > > info > > > > > > on the items. > > > > > > > > > > > > Or do we need to add an invisible edit control or something > to > > get > > > > the > > > > > > <script> injection happening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > ------=_Part_7494_8026035.1204346413766-- From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 06:12:39 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 22072 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 06:12:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 06:12:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 4091 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 06:12:28 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 4069 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 06:12:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 4060 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 06:12:28 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:12:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO stepaheadsoftware.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:11:54 +0000 Subject: RE: Location of wicket-ajax.js Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:12:01 +1100 Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: Location of wicket-ajax.js X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 thread-index: Ach7FxKFc9DMf/trSJqFcqPZPHD39AATAi1A References: <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> From: "Chris Colman" <jatkinson@example.com> To: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I tried that by adding a TextField - still no joy. > no. webpage is the correct choice. as a workaround you can make the > page stateful.... >=20 > -igor >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Chris Colman > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > The class derives, ultimately, from the WebPage class. Should I try > > deriving it from some other wicket base class as a workaround? > > > > > > > > > there are no conditions, these things are pushed to wicket by > > > invocations on iheadercontributor's iheaderresponse interface by all > > > interested components/behaviors. i guess wicket ignores these if the > > > page is stateless, which woud be a bug... > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Chris Colman > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > I've tried 1.3.1 and still no luck in getting wicket to inject the > > > > appropriate <script> lines into the header of the HTML. > > > > > > > > I was wondering what is the *trigger* or set of conditions that > > wicket > > > > uses to determine that it should inject the <script> lines that > > import > > > > the .js files into a generated HTML file? > > > > > > > > Maybe if I understand these I can 'force' it to add these lines. > > > > > > > > I should mention that we're using markup inheritance in case that > > has > > > > some bearing on the issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is a given. try 1.3.1 and if that doesnt work try building > > trunk > > > > > yourself and test with that. > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Chris Colman > > > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > > > Using 1.3.0 - maybe I should try 1.3.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:jatkinson@example.com] > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, 29 February 2008 6:29 PM > > > > > > > To: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Location of wicket-ajax.js > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this should happen automatically, please file a bug report > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Chris Colman > > > > > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Problem found: Was a problem with <script> import lines > > not > > > > being > > > > > > added, > > > > > > > > not that the .js files were not reachable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apparently we need to have a stateful component > somewhere > > in > > > > the > > > > > > page > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > order for wicket to auto inject the <script> lines into > > the > > > > HTML > > > > > > for > > > > > > > us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way of telling wicket to inject the <script> > > lines > > > > > > without > > > > > > > > having a stateful component on the page - currently > > > everything > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > page is stateless - we just have buttons on each item > > that, > > > > when > > > > > > > > pressed, need to bring up an AJAX modal dialog box to > > display > > > > some > > > > > > info > > > > > > > > on the items. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or do we need to add an invisible edit control or > > something > > > to > > > > get > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > <script> injection happening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > > > > >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: jatkinson@example.com From jatkinson@example.com Sat Mar 01 06:20:35 2008 Return-Path: <jatkinson@example.com> Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 31931 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2008 06:20:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2008 06:20:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 5644 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 06:20:23 -0000 Delivered-To: jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 5623 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2008 06:20:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jatkinson@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:jatkinson@example.com> List-Id: <users.wicket.apache.org> Reply-To: jatkinson@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list jatkinson@example.com Received: (qmail 5614 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2008 06:20:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:20:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO stepaheadsoftware.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:19:37 +0000 Subject: RE: Location of wicket-ajax.js Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:19:55 +1100 Message-ID: <jatkinson@example.com> In-Reply-To: <jatkinson@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: Location of wicket-ajax.js X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 thread-index: Ach7FxKFc9DMf/trSJqFcqPZPHD39AATAi1AAABHICA= References: <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> <jatkinson@example.com> From: "Chris Colman" <jatkinson@example.com> To: <jatkinson@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How do I force a page to be stateful? > I tried that by adding a TextField - still no joy. >=20 > > no. webpage is the correct choice. as a workaround you can make the > > page stateful.... > > > > -igor > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Chris Colman > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > The class derives, ultimately, from the WebPage class. Should I try > > > deriving it from some other wicket base class as a workaround? > > > > > > > > > > > > > there are no conditions, these things are pushed to wicket by > > > > invocations on iheadercontributor's iheaderresponse interface by > all > > > > interested components/behaviors. i guess wicket ignores these if > the > > > > page is stateless, which woud be a bug... > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Chris Colman > > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > > I've tried 1.3.1 and still no luck in getting wicket to inject > the > > > > > appropriate <script> lines into the header of the HTML. > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering what is the *trigger* or set of conditions > that > > > wicket > > > > > uses to determine that it should inject the <script> lines > that > > > import > > > > > the .js files into a generated HTML file? > > > > > > > > > > Maybe if I understand these I can 'force' it to add these > lines. > > > > > > > > > > I should mention that we're using markup inheritance in case > that > > > has > > > > > some bearing on the issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is a given. try 1.3.1 and if that doesnt work try > building > > > trunk > > > > > > yourself and test with that. > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Chris Colman > > > > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Using 1.3.0 - maybe I should try 1.3.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:jatkinson@example.com] > > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, 29 February 2008 6:29 PM > > > > > > > > To: jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Location of wicket-ajax.js > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this should happen automatically, please file a bug > report > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Chris Colman > > > > > > > > <jatkinson@example.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Problem found: Was a problem with <script> import > lines > > > not > > > > > being > > > > > > > added, > > > > > > > > > not that the .js files were not reachable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apparently we need to have a stateful component > > somewhere > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > > page > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > order for wicket to auto inject the <script> lines > into > > > the > > > > > HTML > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > us. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way of telling wicket to inject the > <script> > > > lines > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > > > having a stateful component on the page - currently > > > > everything > > > > > on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > page is stateless - we just have buttons on each > item > > > that, > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > pressed, need to bring up an AJAX modal dialog box > to > > > display > > > > > some > > > > > > > info > > > > > > > > > on the items. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or do we need to add an invisible edit control or > > > something > > > > to > > > > > get > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > <script> injection happening? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > jatkinson@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > jatkinson@example.com >
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}