From kato-spec-returndaniellemcfarland@example.net Wed Jul 28 16:55:59 2010
Return-Path: <kato-spec-returndaniellemcfarland@example.net>
Delivered-To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Received: (qmail 76741 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2010 16:55:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 28 Jul 2010 16:55:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 62772 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 16:55:59 -0000
Delivered-To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Received: (qmail 62733 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2010 16:55:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact daniellemcfarland@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:daniellemcfarland@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:daniellemcfarland@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:daniellemcfarland@example.net>
List-Id: <kato-spec.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list daniellemcfarland@example.net
Received: (qmail 62725 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2010 16:55:59 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:55:59 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rcsinet10.oracle.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:55:49 +0000
Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id o6SGtQMh021507
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:55:27 GMT
Received: from acsmt353.oracle.com (acsmt353.oracle.com [83.161.120.155])
	by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o6SGQTO3024781;
	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:55:25 GMT
Received: from abhmt009.oracle.com by acsmt354.oracle.com
	with ESMTP id 465103111280336053; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:54:13 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e37fda27-fd68-4bd1-9bad-4cdc278b9bee@default>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrik Torstensson <daniellemcfarland@example.net>
To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Cc: Steve Poole <daniellemcfarland@example.net>
Subject: JSR Status from Oracle
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 83.161.120.155.1.2  (406224) [OL
 +1-231-215-0262]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Source-IP: acsmt353.oracle.com [83.161.120.155]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.4C5060FD.0239:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

All,
=20
As a expert member and part of the Oracle Java Platform Group I want to giv=
e you an short update of Oracle's view of JSR 326.=20
We still believe that JSR 326 is important and useful for the Java platform=
, and we are still committed to the JSR and will continue to be a part of i=
t.
=20
It's still open if JSR 326 will be a part of JDK 7 or not.


Cheers,
 Patrik Torstensson
 Oracle Java Platform Group

From kato-spec-returndaniellemcfarland@example.net Thu Jul 29 08:04:13 2010
Return-Path: <kato-spec-returndaniellemcfarland@example.net>
Delivered-To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Received: (qmail 24047 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2010 08:04:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
  by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP; 29 Jul 2010 08:04:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 77190 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2010 08:04:13 -0000
Delivered-To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Received: (qmail 77151 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2010 08:04:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact daniellemcfarland@example.net; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:daniellemcfarland@example.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:daniellemcfarland@example.net>
List-Post: <mailto:daniellemcfarland@example.net>
List-Id: <kato-spec.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Delivered-To: mailing list daniellemcfarland@example.net
Received: (qmail 77020 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2010 08:04:11 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:04:10 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of daniellemcfarland@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender)
Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-iw0-f175.google.com) (83.161.120.155)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:04:04 +0000
Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so75643iwn.6
        for <daniellemcfarland@example.net>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=60Ubht/dgNyyuRROljcAaVd4VPs9hWK8jOn0axFHPS4=;
        b=qWaP/N3gdazgZbDHJe8cSdL5CmpukjfrIHOtXDLy3SdumTY6M1fhFea/xfeNiyjRGs
         qVxhMo0TFe+L2oTwT3LnqlBO2lTW7KlGGnwGngxAUnx7RZAi6ofo4ehVfntNi9NT6GoO
         /K1MBXDwOG/8JUUkeVmz8tGBNdyEOJluMw3jI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=GWbdcJy81ekQ3FSuEBmBtzBkn2sVHDnJtvv7NwhYDnivT0MidtrFcC+C5I1ENkC7UN
         eqRRId7YdXcJpYEn5h6gh1BRKP/oWWK5lPXM+jekx5Tvmb9SAb1AZHms1+oGiBBBJg4c
         WJZyPrVpBod6V6C1l4UEiQzxQEbtqr4h3rnso=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id h12mr13363011ibd.59.1280390623519; 
	Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e37fda27-fd68-4bd1-9bad-4cdc278b9bee@default>
References: <e37fda27-fd68-4bd1-9bad-4cdc278b9bee@default>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:03:43 +0100
Message-ID: <daniellemcfarland@example.net>
Subject: Re: JSR Status from Oracle
From: Steve Poole <daniellemcfarland@example.net>
To: daniellemcfarland@example.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022152d5f0549e6d1048c822cf7
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0022152d5f0549e6d1048c822cf7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Patrik - a quick ack to say  thank you for posting this update.    I'm
sure others will have questions for you.   I'm going to think about mine a
little first.


On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Patrik Torstensson <
daniellemcfarland@example.net> wrote:

> All,
>
> As a expert member and part of the Oracle Java Platform Group I want to
> give you an short update of Oracle's view of JSR 326.
> We still believe that JSR 326 is important and useful for the Java
> platform, and we are still committed to the JSR and will continue to be a
> part of it.
>
> It's still open if JSR 326 will be a part of JDK 7 or not.
>
>
> Cheers,
>  Patrik Torstensson
>  Oracle Java Platform Group
>



-- 
Steve

--0022152d5f0549e6d1048c822cf7--


{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}