From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 09:28:12 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 60073 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 09:28:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 09:28:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 67024 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 09:28:11 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 66887 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 09:28:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 66878 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 09:28:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:28:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qroberts@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail-bw0-f11.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:28:00 +0000 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so329758bwz.17 for <qroberts@example.com>; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:27:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sprDPxkzxzseGGFX28B3UIpVWFRyrLbq0HSCUgIlGoU=; b=vPK0DaFrGQKrgXs4OFg21mPwf9KkcObmAK5NFFxGh6FAKHfxGfwZERg49YvylZBkNM ucxPzP0eTpJHEHRVPQHTsaaNNjto7QGZeBOYabuzd1ANuNtN1zahQ8V00rsLmlx5mgGG bxCEHWsoBwT5XBrp7wBuzE4xOPieGIn+ykxVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=e9cAMZiZ9kYEfPXllS8u2hHlNlpr+CeGtZTojjFuWBvV9GBSGL4uEfRCXPzwGwafQb nXxJ2eSjcRvJXg8OTDlNxeViNq481LjVuLGyYyTT+mLJeg424/hZiNg0EiyuqEW7kcDA ZR/a1uvpy75/3wXdHo2N5CIZeeBD7BkaTl9VM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id t14mr1615551bkq.8.1233566859147; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:27:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:27:39 +0000 Message-ID: <qroberts@example.com> Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196) From: Sian January <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the update Geir. Would be great to keep pushing for 200 if you can. Sian 2009/1/29 Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com>: > I have! > > Current status on outstanding : > > 311: waiting for "executive signature" on the license (I dropped off a > signed copy a little over a week or so ago when I was in bay area) > > 200: there is no standalone TCK for this JSR. I've suggested that they make > one, or just give us the Java SE5 TCK. THe spec lead was required to > deliver a TCK for this. > > 196: waiting on internal Sun legal for a license for us to sign. > > geir > > > > On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ? >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >> On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> >>> Nope, nor 200. There's a stall somewhere. I'm digging. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks <qroberts@example.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Any progress on this one? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thx for the reminder. I've sent the application for the license (full >>>>> disclosure - this reminded me). >>>>> >>>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending approval >>>>> by the board. >>>>> >>>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward. >>>>> >>>>> geir >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this? >>>>>> >>>>>> many thanks >>>>>> david jencks >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> of course! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Geir, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to test >>>>>>>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196). The final release of this spec was >>>>>>>> on 10 Oct 2007. Could you please see if we can get the tck for it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> > > -- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 14:23:43 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 87940 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 14:23:43 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 14:23:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 25852 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 14:23:43 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 25666 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 14:23:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Delivered-To: moderator for qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 92970 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 07:54:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Sender: Brett Porter <qroberts@example.com> Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: Brett Porter <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-577.673.8494 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: JSR 294 (Language and VM features for modularity) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:52:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-577.673.8494 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is anyone (eg, someone from Harmony) interested in representing the ASF on 294? All 277 reps were invited to join recently when it was put on hold. I didn't intend to do so myself, and will just follow with interest the Jigsaw list where the discussions are intended to be held instead. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter qroberts@example.com http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ --Apple-Mail-577.673.8494 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; = -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Is anyone (eg, someone = from Harmony) interested in representing the ASF on 294? All 277 reps = were invited to join recently when it was put on = hold.</div><div><br></div><div>I didn't intend to do so myself, and will = just follow with interest the Jigsaw list where the discussions are = intended to be held = instead.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Brett</div><br><div = apple-content-edited=3D"true"> <span class=3D"Apple-style-span" = style=3D"border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: = Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; = font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; = orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; = white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: = 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: = auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div style=3D"word-wrap: = break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: = after-white-space; "><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" = style=3D"border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: = Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; = font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; = orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; = widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: = auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><div style=3D"word-wrap: = break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: = after-white-space; "><div>--</div><div>Brett Porter</div><div><a = href=3D"mailto:qroberts@example.com">qroberts@example.com</a></div><div><a = href=3D"http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/">http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/</= a></div></div></span></div></span> </div><br></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-577.673.8494-- From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 14:24:12 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 88430 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 14:24:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 14:24:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26242 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 14:24:11 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 26028 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 14:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 26018 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 14:24:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:24:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of qroberts@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:24:01 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 309C623E49D for <qroberts@example.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:23:36 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:23:35 -0500 References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I will - this is important. It can't be the case that a spec lead doesn't have to provide a TCK if the spec is licensed for independent implementation. geir On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Sian January wrote: > Thanks for the update Geir. Would be great to keep pushing for 200 > if you can. > > Sian > > > 2009/1/29 Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com>: >> I have! >> >> Current status on outstanding : >> >> 311: waiting for "executive signature" on the license (I dropped >> off a >> signed copy a little over a week or so ago when I was in bay area) >> >> 200: there is no standalone TCK for this JSR. I've suggested that >> they make >> one, or just give us the Java SE5 TCK. THe spec lead was required to >> deliver a TCK for this. >> >> 196: waiting on internal Sun legal for a license for us to sign. >> >> geir >> >> >> >> On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> >>> Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> >>>> Nope, nor 200. There's a stall somewhere. I'm digging. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks >>>> <qroberts@example.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Any progress on this one? >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> david jencks >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thx for the reminder. I've sent the application for the >>>>>> license (full >>>>>> disclosure - this reminded me). >>>>>> >>>>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending >>>>>> approval >>>>>> by the board. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward. >>>>>> >>>>>> geir >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> of course! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Geir, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to >>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196). The final release of >>>>>>>>> this spec was >>>>>>>>> on 10 Oct 2007. Could you please see if we can get the tck >>>>>>>>> for it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > number 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 3AU From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 16:39:38 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 55257 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 16:39:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 16:39:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 37461 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 16:39:37 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 37358 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 16:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 37349 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 16:39:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:39:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qroberts@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO outbound-mail-02.bluehost.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:39:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 4828 invoked by uid 0); 2 Feb 2009 16:38:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host118.hostmonster.com) (83.161.120.155) by outboundproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 16:38:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ungoverned.org; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=xfpiPEHlTxM1TClqYqjhnqVMwkDN8w4KATQs0Zzh0Q2gtWE9p2wvBZM875vOlpp0S2YapiHowHCWZeNPod0ty14a503/zQUkRT7LDvDvPWTzYmkoR+NKU9I2ri6DMT75; Received: from [83.161.120.155] (helo=heavyweight.glastender.com) by host118.hostmonster.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <qroberts@example.com>) id 1LU1pC-0003JM-O5 for qroberts@example.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:39:06 -0700 Message-ID: <qroberts@example.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:39:01 -0800 From: "Richard S. Hall" <qroberts@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qroberts@example.com Subject: Re: JSR 294 (Language and VM features for modularity) References: <qroberts@example.com> In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1027:host118.hostmonster.com:ungovern:ungoverned.org} {sentby:smtp auth 83.161.120.155 authed with qroberts@example.com} X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Brett Porter wrote: > Is anyone (eg, someone from Harmony) interested in representing the > ASF on 294? All 277 reps were invited to join recently when it was put > on hold. FYI, I am on 294, but do not necessarily consider myself as representing ASF. > I didn't intend to do so myself, and will just follow with interest > the Jigsaw list where the discussions are intended to be held instead. Not sure what comment means. Jigsaw != 294. -> richard From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 17:25:48 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 79134 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 17:25:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 17:25:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 26908 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 17:25:47 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 26802 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 17:25:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 26793 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 17:25:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:25:47 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO as.toolazydogs.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:25:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 26581 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 09:25:17 -0800 Received: from c-71-202-180-198.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO ?83.161.120.155?) (83.161.120.155) by toolazydogs.com with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 09:25:17 -0800 Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-577.673.8494 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: JSR 294 (Language and VM features for modularity) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:25:17 -0800 References: <qroberts@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-577.673.8494 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would like to be the ASF representative. Regards, Alan On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > Is anyone (eg, someone from Harmony) interested in representing the > ASF on 294? All 277 reps were invited to join recently when it was > put on hold. > > I didn't intend to do so myself, and will just follow with interest > the Jigsaw list where the discussions are intended to be held instead. > > Cheers, > Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > qroberts@example.com > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > --Apple-Mail-577.673.8494 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; = -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I would like to be the ASF = representative.<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Alan<= /div><div><br><div><div>On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Brett Porter = wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote = type=3D"cite"><div style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: = space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Is anyone (eg, = someone from Harmony) interested in representing the ASF on 294? All 277 = reps were invited to join recently when it was put on = hold.</div><div><br></div><div>I didn't intend to do so myself, and will = just follow with interest the Jigsaw list where the discussions are = intended to be held = instead.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Brett</div><br><div = apple-content-edited=3D"true"> <span class=3D"Apple-style-span" = style=3D"border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: = Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; = font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; = orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; = white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: = 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: = auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div style=3D"word-wrap: = break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: = after-white-space; "><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" = style=3D"border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: = Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; = font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; = orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; = widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; = -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: = auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; "><div style=3D"word-wrap: = break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: = after-white-space; "><div>--</div><div>Brett Porter</div><div><a = href=3D"mailto:qroberts@example.com">qroberts@example.com</a></div><div><a = href=3D"http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/">http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/</= a></div></div></span></div></span> = </div><br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>= --Apple-Mail-577.673.8494-- From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 18:27:38 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 19138 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 18:27:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 18:27:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 30786 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 18:27:37 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 30681 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 18:27:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 30672 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 18:27:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:27:36 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:27:25 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([83.161.120.155]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n12IQlLj008224 for <qroberts@example.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <qroberts@example.com> (original mail from qroberts@example.com) for qroberts@example.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-usca14-133-127.SFBay.Sun.COM ([83.161.120.155]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <qroberts@example.com> for qroberts@example.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:26:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:26:43 -0800 From: Craig L Russell <qroberts@example.com> Subject: Request for JSR 200 TCK (changed subject) In-reply-to: <qroberts@example.com> Sender: qroberts@example.com To: qroberts@example.com Message-id: <qroberts@example.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Looking at the JSR 200 page on the tck web site http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=200 it looks to me like there was no intent to make 200 available as an independent JSR. << 2.13 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both. Include version information for the profile or platform in your answer. This JSR will be delivered as part of J2SE 1.5 "Tiger". 2.14 Please state the rationale if previous versions are available stand-alone and you are now proposing in 2.13 to only deliver RI and TCK as part of a profile or platform edition (See sections 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 of the JCP 2 document). N/A 2.15 Please provide a description of the business terms for the Specification, RI and TCK that will apply when this JSR is final. This JSR will be delivered as part of J2SE 1.5 "Tiger". The proposed J2SE 1.5 licensing terms are available here http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/jsr/tiger/BizTerms.html >> I don't see anything here to indicate that the spec was intended to be licensed for independent implementation... And "On 2004-09-13 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with no comment." http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2774 Craig On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > I will - this is important. It can't be the case that a spec lead > doesn't have to provide a TCK if the spec is licensed for > independent implementation. > > geir > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Sian January wrote: > >> Thanks for the update Geir. Would be great to keep pushing for 200 >> if you can. >> >> Sian >> >> >> 2009/1/29 Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com>: >>> I have! >>> >>> Current status on outstanding : >>> >>> 311: waiting for "executive signature" on the license (I dropped >>> off a >>> signed copy a little over a week or so ago when I was in bay area) >>> >>> 200: there is no standalone TCK for this JSR. I've suggested that >>> they make >>> one, or just give us the Java SE5 TCK. THe spec lead was required >>> to >>> deliver a TCK for this. >>> >>> 196: waiting on internal Sun legal for a license for us to sign. >>> >>> geir >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>> >>>> Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ? >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nope, nor 200. There's a stall somewhere. I'm digging. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks >>>>> <qroberts@example.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Any progress on this one? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> david jencks >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thx for the reminder. I've sent the application for the >>>>>>> license (full >>>>>>> disclosure - this reminded me). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending >>>>>>> approval >>>>>>> by the board. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> geir >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> of course! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Geir, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to >>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196). The final release >>>>>>>>>> of this spec was >>>>>>>>>> on 10 Oct 2007. Could you please see if we can get the tck >>>>>>>>>> for it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >> number 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire >> PO6 3AU > Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 577.673.8494 mailto:qroberts@example.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 18:37:30 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 22030 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 18:37:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 18:37:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 39674 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 18:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 39585 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 18:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 39570 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 18:37:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:37:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of qroberts@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:37:18 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9BF023E3E1 for <qroberts@example.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:36:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Request for JSR 200 TCK (changed subject) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:36:52 -0500 References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Go get the spec. Read the spec license. geir On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Looking at the JSR 200 page on the tck web site http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=200 > it looks to me like there was no intent to make 200 available as an > independent JSR. > > << > 2.13 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as > part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both. > Include version information for the profile or platform in your > answer. > This JSR will be delivered as part of J2SE 1.5 "Tiger". > > 2.14 Please state the rationale if previous versions are available > stand-alone and you are now proposing in 2.13 to only deliver RI and > TCK as part of a profile or platform edition (See sections 1.1.5 and > 1.1.6 of the JCP 2 document). > N/A > > 2.15 Please provide a description of the business terms for the > Specification, RI and TCK that will apply when this JSR is final. > This JSR will be delivered as part of J2SE 1.5 "Tiger". The proposed > J2SE 1.5 licensing terms are available here http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/jsr/tiger/BizTerms.html > > >> > > I don't see anything here to indicate that the spec was intended to > be licensed for independent implementation... And "On 2004-09-13 > Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with no comment." http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2774 > > Craig > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> I will - this is important. It can't be the case that a spec lead >> doesn't have to provide a TCK if the spec is licensed for >> independent implementation. >> >> geir >> >> On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Sian January wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the update Geir. Would be great to keep pushing for >>> 200 if you can. >>> >>> Sian >>> >>> >>> 2009/1/29 Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com>: >>>> I have! >>>> >>>> Current status on outstanding : >>>> >>>> 311: waiting for "executive signature" on the license (I dropped >>>> off a >>>> signed copy a little over a week or so ago when I was in bay area) >>>> >>>> 200: there is no standalone TCK for this JSR. I've suggested >>>> that they make >>>> one, or just give us the Java SE5 TCK. THe spec lead was >>>> required to >>>> deliver a TCK for this. >>>> >>>> 196: waiting on internal Sun legal for a license for us to sign. >>>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>> >>>>> Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ? >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> david jencks >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Nope, nor 200. There's a stall somewhere. I'm digging. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks >>>>>> <qroberts@example.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Any progress on this one? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thx for the reminder. I've sent the application for the >>>>>>>> license (full >>>>>>>> disclosure - this reminded me). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still >>>>>>>> pending approval >>>>>>>> by the board. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> geir >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> of course! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Geir, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to >>>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196). The final release >>>>>>>>>>> of this spec was >>>>>>>>>>> on 10 Oct 2007. Could you please see if we can get the >>>>>>>>>>> tck for it? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Unless stated otherwise above: >>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >>> number 741598. >>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire >>> PO6 3AU >> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo > 577.673.8494 mailto:qroberts@example.com > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 19:13:24 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 29059 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 19:13:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 19:13:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 86091 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 19:13:23 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 85987 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 19:13:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 85978 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 19:13:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:13:23 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sca-es-mail-2.sun.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:13:13 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-10.sun.com ([83.161.120.155]) by sca-es-mail-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n12JCfvI008302 for <qroberts@example.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:12:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-10.sun.com by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <qroberts@example.com> (original mail from qroberts@example.com) for qroberts@example.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:12:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-usca14-133-127.SFBay.Sun.COM ([83.161.120.155]) by fe-sfbay-10.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <qroberts@example.com> for qroberts@example.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:12:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:12:34 -0800 From: Craig L Russell <qroberts@example.com> Subject: Re: Request for JSR 200 TCK (changed subject) In-reply-to: <qroberts@example.com> Sender: qroberts@example.com To: qroberts@example.com Message-id: <qroberts@example.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Content-type: text/plain; delsp=yes; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The spec license that JSR 200 download page directs me to is the Java SE 5 license, which is consistent with the intent to release this JSR only as part of Java SE 5. What am I missing? Specification: JAVA 2 PLATFORM STANDARD EDITION DEVELOPMENT KIT 5.0 Specification ("Specification") Status: Final Release Release: August 25, 2004 Regards, Craig On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Go get the spec. Read the spec license. > > geir > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > >> Looking at the JSR 200 page on the tck web site http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=200 >> it looks to me like there was no intent to make 200 available as >> an independent JSR. >> >> << >> 2.13 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as >> part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both. >> Include version information for the profile or platform in your >> answer. >> This JSR will be delivered as part of J2SE 1.5 "Tiger". >> >> 2.14 Please state the rationale if previous versions are available >> stand-alone and you are now proposing in 2.13 to only deliver RI >> and TCK as part of a profile or platform edition (See sections >> 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 of the JCP 2 document). >> N/A >> >> 2.15 Please provide a description of the business terms for the >> Specification, RI and TCK that will apply when this JSR is final. >> This JSR will be delivered as part of J2SE 1.5 "Tiger". The >> proposed J2SE 1.5 licensing terms are available here http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/jsr/tiger/BizTerms.html >> >> >> >> >> I don't see anything here to indicate that the spec was intended to >> be licensed for independent implementation... And "On 2004-09-13 >> Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with no comment." http://jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=2774 >> >> Craig >> >> On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> >>> I will - this is important. It can't be the case that a spec lead >>> doesn't have to provide a TCK if the spec is licensed for >>> independent implementation. >>> >>> geir >>> >>> On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Sian January wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the update Geir. Would be great to keep pushing for >>>> 200 if you can. >>>> >>>> Sian >>>> >>>> >>>> 2009/1/29 Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com>: >>>>> I have! >>>>> >>>>> Current status on outstanding : >>>>> >>>>> 311: waiting for "executive signature" on the license (I >>>>> dropped off a >>>>> signed copy a little over a week or so ago when I was in bay area) >>>>> >>>>> 200: there is no standalone TCK for this JSR. I've suggested >>>>> that they make >>>>> one, or just give us the Java SE5 TCK. THe spec lead was >>>>> required to >>>>> deliver a TCK for this. >>>>> >>>>> 196: waiting on internal Sun legal for a license for us to sign. >>>>> >>>>> geir >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> david jencks >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, nor 200. There's a stall somewhere. I'm digging. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks <qroberts@example.com >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any progress on this one? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thx for the reminder. I've sent the application for the >>>>>>>>> license (full >>>>>>>>> disclosure - this reminded me). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still >>>>>>>>> pending approval >>>>>>>>> by the board. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> geir >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> of course! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Geir, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like >>>>>>>>>>>> to test >>>>>>>>>>>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196). The final release >>>>>>>>>>>> of this spec was >>>>>>>>>>>> on 10 Oct 2007. Could you please see if we can get the >>>>>>>>>>>> tck for it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> many thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Unless stated otherwise above: >>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >>>> number 741598. >>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, >>>> Hampshire PO6 3AU >>> >> >> Craig L Russell >> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo >> 577.673.8494 mailto:qroberts@example.com >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> > Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 577.673.8494 mailto:qroberts@example.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! From qroberts@example.com Mon Feb 02 19:14:15 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 29388 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 19:14:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 19:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 87092 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 19:14:14 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 87018 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2009 19:14:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 87009 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2009 19:14:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:14:14 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qroberts@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:14:05 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so624466fgb.29 for <qroberts@example.com>; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:13:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TzH7yfUpWgRZxfWMo6AVxw18eOVX8LxhcYdM9wbnEmY=; b=ZyC9trR1ATQnPHNHiDDOOWJFSPI1GmkpnohyW/N7GIvvbILe3bY4fl+2dgQkvbvedg Q4rgD7eSJx06ucnfv1jwnc/q5pzpkMfe6uEtbHadkZLcgjgBpPIAGz1rvIlgOnvUPQIF Kxiaf1lLPZyAHNR+igU4j1+ghdjxrN2taOKls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pvcVXao+o6MG/HpKizQIR/4FhRLE4RY0d5nxkdLOC4OPIv++cJYzPXyfMrsd/LDoPD IDGMuP9v5j/ln0q0/utmuzygr5sBRJ5e72HkMtx8O/vYOHVyj1tO0Ejd0VmghS1waYHe VujdjBB6zCFrwYmtWzy3end7Se5w+Hth12vf0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 4mr1084487fgc.66.1233602025175; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:13:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:13:44 +0100 Message-ID: <qroberts@example.com> Subject: Re: JSR 294 (Language and VM features for modularity) From: Karl Pauls <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd be interested in joining 294 as well. I think Alan is a perfect choice so if we can have only one representative it should be him but just in case we can have more I'd like to throw in my hat as well. regards, Karl On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <qroberts@example.com> wrote: > I would like to be the ASF representative. > > Regards, > Alan > On Feb 1, 2009, at 9:52 PM, Brett Porter wrote: > > Is anyone (eg, someone from Harmony) interested in representing the ASF on > 294? All 277 reps were invited to join recently when it was put on hold. > I didn't intend to do so myself, and will just follow with interest the > Jigsaw list where the discussions are intended to be held instead. > Cheers, > Brett > -- > Brett Porter > qroberts@example.com > http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/ > > -- Karl Pauls qroberts@example.com From qroberts@example.com Thu Feb 05 20:17:24 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 93585 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2009 20:17:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2009 20:17:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 6452 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 20:17:21 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 6227 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 20:17:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Delivered-To: moderator for qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 73232 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2009 18:57:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qroberts@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ko9fhwJmPPa5FIyJ28xmpk+cibA4PNFYXTORP+VG+Pw=; b=DA8ydt3qSqiz7jgMTkpaQyAehwWDC2LsKeiCVlTJqhHzko4Y25g35OVyuiWZ+JaUNR 8+G6xhs8pzZEUIOQ36KYSj9poq9EEs9p0IiE/jdSBlQ6GMcsaMNKErhmp9MqsgiCIR6k iFkr3lw6Ui3pssOdmHMFBVjKb3f3IKT2Rh2go= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HWq2yesf5AJh33tNtYYRPV/6mKahmVUM0gZ3gY462InSMbOZmp8TfjqzekHhI86qOu VaXFDYtErltGV348WAjXiHwIXurvbLEiOvaSaKMg2zwh6Uy/Yc6VOfdl1KVjnDeLOF4u oWsGMaYm/jHcDVoK64Qgeslfryzju8YhLSvdA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:56:57 +0100 Message-ID: <qroberts@example.com> Subject: JBI TCK update From: Guillaume Nodet <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Do we have the latest TCK for JBI ? We haven't really been working on it since a long time, but we are on it again now. The problem is that the version we have has some problems and is inconsitent with the jbi spec. I've raised this issue a very long time ago, so hopefully a new tck is available ... -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com From qroberts@example.com Thu Feb 05 20:22:41 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 94817 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2009 20:22:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2009 20:22:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 10866 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 20:22:40 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 10653 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 20:22:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 10644 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2009 20:22:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:22:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of qroberts@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:22:30 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0F8D23E3E9 for <qroberts@example.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:22:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: JBI TCK update Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:22:07 -0500 References: <qroberts@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org latest JBI is 1.0c, dated 08-feb-2007 geir On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Do we have the latest TCK for JBI ? > We haven't really been working on it since a long time, but we are on > it again now. > The problem is that the version we have has some problems and is > inconsitent with the jbi spec. > I've raised this issue a very long time ago, so hopefully a new tck is > available ... > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com From qroberts@example.com Thu Feb 05 21:05:37 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 16991 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2009 21:05:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2009 21:05:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 73303 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 21:05:35 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 73212 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 21:05:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 73161 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2009 21:05:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:05:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of qroberts@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fk-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:05:25 +0000 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 22so510625fkq.1 for <qroberts@example.com>; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:05:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fJpc/47q74cVlOviIYlTmgsi4hp60LEhBPAMhBuYhdQ=; b=ppUWJMJHbVYNkM+KWQ8UBhdcouWJTUl0q6MQHLVr0Gna3V4R03weuvayasFNYdVeuL 3o37BBEqZqG3k+2AqEI94axv+Oozc05kBBwQnrIq4KCl5LbEWVQ3Vr3t1dDZAPkvKIBe XMGnUK25diQWNaNn8y9EAwMv6TP4ppRkgcpA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CPxs5fbf0x0xJ5s9r8gz5+UxeWyxwhO6uj8kwb83CcT/QscfXZ3qNzbTpefYbkMvGR 41/jVxQKM7V0s4SzY6zd6fuORvcuUwdni7DP5kHOzqtRKXlzR160WXrUOoM4ssO+mqUj tAPsla3lcIrTK0vKH49HiL+u5x9sVlA9WJd28= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e10mr866811fap.35.1233867903634; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:05:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:05:03 +0100 Message-ID: <qroberts@example.com> Subject: Re: JBI TCK update From: Guillaume Nodet <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We only have 1.0b in https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/servicemix-tck/tcks Would you mind giving me the latest version of putting it in subversion please ? On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 21:22, Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com> wrote: > latest JBI is 1.0c, dated 08-feb-2007 > > geir > > On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> Do we have the latest TCK for JBI ? >> We haven't really been working on it since a long time, but we are on >> it again now. >> The problem is that the version we have has some problems and is >> inconsitent with the jbi spec. >> I've raised this issue a very long time ago, so hopefully a new tck is >> available ... >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com From qroberts@example.com Thu Feb 05 21:18:12 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 23003 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2009 21:18:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2009 21:18:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 88651 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 21:18:11 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 88541 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 21:18:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 88529 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2009 21:18:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:18:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of qroberts@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:18:02 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC51F23E3E9 for <qroberts@example.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:17:35 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: JBI TCK update Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:17:35 -0500 References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'll drop in your home dir. On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > We only have 1.0b in https://svn.apache.org/repos/tck/servicemix-tck/tcks > Would you mind giving me the latest version of putting it in > subversion please ? > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 21:22, Geir Magnusson Jr. <qroberts@example.com> > wrote: >> latest JBI is 1.0c, dated 08-feb-2007 >> >> geir >> >> On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >>> Do we have the latest TCK for JBI ? >>> We haven't really been working on it since a long time, but we are >>> on >>> it again now. >>> The problem is that the version we have has some problems and is >>> inconsitent with the jbi spec. >>> I've raised this issue a very long time ago, so hopefully a new >>> tck is >>> available ... >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >> >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com From qroberts@example.com Thu Feb 05 21:24:07 2009 Return-Path: <qroberts@example.com> Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 24360 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2009 21:24:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2009 21:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 94057 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 21:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 93933 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2009 21:24:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact qroberts@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: qroberts@example.com list-help: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:qroberts@example.com> List-Id: <jcp-open.apache.org> Delivered-To: mailing list qroberts@example.com Received: (qmail 93924 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2009 21:24:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:24:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 83.161.120.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of qroberts@example.com) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:23:57 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (unknown [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 087C723E3E1 for <qroberts@example.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:23:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <qroberts@example.com> From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <qroberts@example.com> To: qroberts@example.com In-Reply-To: <qroberts@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Request for jaspi tck (jsr 196) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 16:23:29 -0500 References: <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> <qroberts@example.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have received, signed and faxed back the license for JSR 196. I'l let you know once it's countersigned and the TCK released to us. On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:02 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Have you managed to uncover anything :-) ? > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jan 18, 2009, at 12:08 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> Nope, nor 200. There's a stall somewhere. I'm digging. >> >> >> >> On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:49 PM, David Jencks <qroberts@example.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Any progress on this one? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Thx for the reminder. I've sent the application for the license >>>> (full disclosure - this reminded me). >>>> >>>> They don't come back this fast btw - 200 is also still pending >>>> approval by the board. >>>> >>>> I'll see what I can do to usher this forward. >>>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's been a week.... any progress on this? >>>>> >>>>> many thanks >>>>> david jencks >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> of course! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 2, 2008, at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Geir, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have an implementation of jaspi for geronimo I'd like to >>>>>>> test (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=196). The final release >>>>>>>
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}