From yruiz@example.com Fri Jun 01 18:23:27 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 70443 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 18:23:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 18:23:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 14161 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:23:29 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 13992 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 13983 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 18:23:28 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:23:28 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:23:23 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1103149pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:23:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MXRQSQ4NnxPa88v2j077h64F5RCbrGILTguUDx/2ID6ngLd6RKqrJ3jhLrkwKqooQmfIWfekwsLvait/tXTs15RnSWRMKsy7HloyQVlkn6aFPIk97TNfahOqoKqr8QHodaqvMPeTFYPPHa5zotFUn3Nr9jpLnZPSnp81lTt6cyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hc730itvnzFjZOYg8wKUUZu2s2CJepC87OXqt5m2oQXavdpHNXiktWTFD04y/AXvo+9pRh9sW9/axdHeZMmDzI6Co1e2ra1Y3plBDiWFGRs3TXCwgk/VgThaekwA3EFFAg5momPsu6h8/moGGWVYyh3HrmpoY5bxGaQA8I4+0B4= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id p5mr3630397qbn.1180722181962; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:23:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:23:01 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: new registered users disabled by default In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/31/07, Andrew Smalera <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Is there a way to say that users who just registered have disabled accounts > by default? That way as an admin I can check and verify registrations > before a new user can start blogging. In Roller 4.0 we will have account activation via email, but I'm guessing you want to do a "manual" review. > I was thinking of this in terms of configuration but if anyone has an > idea in terms of the source code that would help too. So far I tried changing >the default value of the column in the DB but that didn't do it. I can't find > anything in the hibernate config or code that sets a default value either.. >So pointing me to the right place in the code would be very helpful. > > Also is there a way to say that enabled users can't create new blogs (only > post to existing ones that I've created and assigned to them). We don't have a way to configure that now, but IMO it's definitely something that should be configurable. You're going to have to make code changes if you want to implement it. If you want to place restrictions on who can create new blogs, you should probably start with the MainMenu and CreateWeblog actions and corresponding JSP pages. - Dave From yruiz@example.com Fri Jun 01 18:25:49 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 72049 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 18:25:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 18:25:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 17652 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:25:52 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 17633 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:25:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 17624 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 18:25:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:25:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:25:48 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1104548pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:25:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YTaQoRfnj651nhCqgOzJiaeh9JnOxunVkMIPzyxlfcXkKjr25r83ruzRmGG+hzOW2PuVvIrURnJHR4IGG6cZRqRSRG9IhGBFNDhFzOdtpOdc0fwTDrhMJZqD5vDOtRobO0hQuJs6bVI/ubxS9Jy2dw6eFqAt1KkV3GyCCMPp4nk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Vlxu64qRKxszBBoS55xKdUctU4oAGd+MZzm2hpfaIJCAX/y4Nhc/LQZP4vul37pEW5YtoGGxVR4uw5x8gkzRxNkyENMI+v8Pv7SaO54Ue8BvuQtHAz/4RxLP2e9ieKaIZE/s0i3U3iPE84t1mxLOkcdUHlbk63cfmy1zv9ykJzE= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id o15mr3665588qbr.1180722326215; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:25:26 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't understand what's happening. Perhaps the data in your rag_entry table is corrupted or full of duplicates. Take a look at that table via "select * from rag_entry" or some other way, do you see duplicate entries there? Does the data look corrupted like the posts on your front page with posts attributed to the wrong blogs? - Dave On 5/31/07, yruiz@example.com <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Here is the problem: > In planet I have several feeders from blogspot.com. > I tried to use atom like this: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default but for some reason it didn't work > After I switched to RSS: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss it start working BUT it looks like it cashed all XML. In the agregator's page I see the same post from one of the feeders multiplied as if it comes from ALL feeders from blogspot. And in blog name I see different blogs. > Anybody has any idea how to fix it? > > Thank you > Gene > > > > > > From yruiz@example.com Fri Jun 01 18:35:40 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 77307 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 18:35:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 18:35:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 31242 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:35:43 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 31216 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:35:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 31207 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 18:35:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:35:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:35:38 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1110139pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DNj84jkorEHKWdp7ZqxYtytu2rOFumHYpXQxBZgPoYe74Qhn6ZVM2ToEO0Uk+R2wfxvu+SZQEIsy9Ml3DFEQfKRcExT4IB7LPN4taSM208usZgsfxFgn5tjNLtMuV4znyXz7OOJ4YmZnN9/LC/gbHMbzC3/hdqP1JmVtKKv0bWI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V4bj/nkZhOkt/qffSUmNlGTWpvi9JfkwYbk3TxOnDu4VAMSGz4IhvO/B3bjzqJWjX9HbnVY0f+21kfve4j2ZCMYB/id0H/HiFUdSbXvMcfCCgVQFhcav+QayAOcPQUgZWAQXJ9vtvtiN1si4acnBfqtO+Me9lfTBHtA0XdIiQ8s= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id x12mr3633559qbl.1180722916114; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:35:16 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Error when emailing comments In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/31/07, Gary Kephart <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > When entering a comment to an entry, I expect back an email. I get none. > The log has this error in it. Any hints? > > ERROR 2007-05-30 20:31:49,448 Log4JLogger:error - EXCEPTION: in > RollerServlet > org.apache.velocity.exception.MethodInvocationException: Invocation of > method 'encodeEmail' in class org.roller.util.Utilities threw exception > class java.lang.NullPointerException : null That's an odd one. Looks like the encodeEmail method is blowing up because it's been handed a null email. How would an email become null? And how is that related to your email failing. Are there any cases where sending an email works for you in Roller? Try inviting a user for example. Is the site administrator email field set on the Server Admin page? If you fill in all comment fields does the email go out? (Perhaps the commenter didn't specify his email?) What version of Java and which web server and database are you using? (Oracle stores empty strings as null, could that be it?) - Dave From yruiz@example.com Fri Jun 01 18:37:55 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 78394 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 18:37:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 18:37:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 35919 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:37:58 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 35903 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:37:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 35894 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 18:37:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:37:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:37:53 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1111296pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e1DzHB2EKwoXunLQknRaVjIwZoWBJw1/oC4vqIG7BfepMHYbiFh4gVN127X2f/GnmdibbNLmh2XnxIguUoPYIpmqwEpHJvgSti7tFGikPQt0mqe7XQY8CtER4iBfOUNrS8bLtxVAsh0TVv0wf6ZTmG7V/F84UFV/a720GlaYu6c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oUHlL0zE69HdQU2X8VcWn+s4Z8gBRRejs6kGWy5Gb8NagT+LEdZhfb4xY/q3e0LMYx1M2PUxiRnjarLftGbPrW5Y3k8LCtoVrg+yT6a5ZFAoVarMfjqSiPS9kv3pVGX/F9+RMxxqwfv8QWpDjCY+RG+FmBDtv9/PU16/s2/5zj8= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l3mr3657177qbg.1180723052029; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:37:31 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: default bookmark folders In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org No there is not. We only allow you to configure a basic blog-roll and we put those bookmarks in the root bookmark folder of the weblog. - Dave On 5/29/07, Andrew Smalera <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Is there a way to specify a list of default folders under the bookmarks (in > the same way you can actually specify your default list of bookmarks in your > roller-custom.properties)? Have been looking through the docs but so far I > can't find any info there.. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > From yruiz@example.com Fri Jun 01 18:44:23 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 81190 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 18:44:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 18:44:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 49507 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:44:25 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 49485 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:44:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 49476 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 18:44:25 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:44:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:44:20 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1114812pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:44:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JsuC3wFxcjuefhggD9PThTU+jP8Hw96ZAn1zjvvryZra1LtJVF+4JUQ7B3mAO03uu4aV2m068a7lB2bBvIGiIHQm8S99PKdEAU6ActripPQtXIIXBJ04MCCbxSNTBTEKjMG9ZbeJPRQCj1Sjep/lHh36WoEJfPrbDbvXxC3e1w0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nVTPelXhZPKNMmXRNBWOgLhABk78TkNTmkridA2KW20fPc+XkAP2AegMO3CVTnwVrbWygvIyPeG/U4tZV6x+JgbBe1mwRdCSXBSIr4MDyW/9khHxqv8tQ3g/pEbh+HS6uybfXxmYmsMGn4xZ5qxA3asPK3h6VOFSdBtOddLo0PE= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n16mr3713649qbq.1180723439843; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:43:59 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Server Admin->Configuration, IllegalStateException In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/29/07, Gary Kephart <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Upgrading from Roller 1.0 to 3.1 > Using MySQL 4.1.21 > Using JBoss 4.0.4 on Windows 2000 I didn't notice that Roller 1.0 to 3.1 upgrade note. Wow! > Got past classloader hell, I think. Enough so that the front page comes up: > http://photeus.com:8080/roller-3.1/ Have you gotten past this yet? I don't see anything interesting in the log snippet you sent. Any other glues what the root cause might be? One hint: sometimes exceptions show up in catalina.out and not roller.log. - Dave > However, when I try to go to the Server Admin->Configuration page I get > half the web page displayed, up to the menu bar, and the following in > JBoss's server.log: > > 2007-05-29 00:07:10,745 ERROR > [org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.[jboss.web].[localhost]] > Exception Processing ErrorPage[exceptionType=java.lang.Exception, > location=/WEB-INF/jsps/error.jsp] > java.lang.IllegalStateException From yruiz@example.com Fri Jun 01 18:48:07 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 83678 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2007 18:48:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jun 2007 18:48:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 57260 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:48:09 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 57239 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2007 18:48:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 57230 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2007 18:48:09 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:48:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=10.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:48:03 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1116774pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:47:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sKH+b267CrmLcZDE81FfkY+LzRM4DLm8jXhZMP6A3kzIA9WyKqxVDlTN9bb6fwDFujYpB6GQ0zaZeOnuqJBaoptn+dOdzDRey7PXdZF4KfFsXJSbVplQ+TchRwCRC92E5STellYAAwuAY/dlywH4pB5M9YL2CZOyJ4qP2ch9Kiw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eLgd0vEZLB6tHtKLl6pAbz0nRSq3ZbnlzTIfMQ6nY/iFxT+qHRwHSHS59wqnw8Ke8v6nrylDln++2WVmBBlJKK7UAYqLPKNOO68qW73sdfDYNFT0qHANyOPcsbZIN2vLe1N9s1w27iRUYDE8+iiKh/2pquoo4IHoj//AbKk0fWM= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id g9mr3638943qbk.1180723662372; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 11:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:47:42 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Viral component In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 5/28/07, mohamed felfel <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Has there been any thought on implementing a "invite my gmail/msn/etc > friends" to a roller account? functionalities like this make a website > sPrEaD!, I'd definitely like to find ways to federate Roller blogs and sites, e.g. a sort of auto-FOAF, that could have a viral effect. But I don't like the idea of any program invading my email and auto-spamming my friends. - Dave From yruiz@example.com Sat Jun 02 10:53:01 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 62265 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2007 10:53:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2007 10:53:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 90357 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 10:53:04 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 90325 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 10:53:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 90316 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2007 10:53:04 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:53:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:52:58 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1436693pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:52:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=M2K/Frxg4Dpo0jDlu1BmsvqMxT6GptBp911KIWlCuiB24k6+f8wn/fT2otfqRSEepkjMyVDQWu+XFLSIqCIX8ItSuEKSURk62scIsk5r6pAlkHKGqOZtNAP/wz/5R3ptcgDXi87SUzSpvriWDylq/YODneBj1MIc013weE8qwck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=mukxa2srafn8lP6vEKHlzZ1/Hq58Giap04JZLbg86IlhhrQ5jU6A2CvuVfUiAiZ7nIXpwAj6QDQwtuNedwWoteiMicLF4HXXn1MZZd6ZhL8rp4M4Zx3KGZhzfiybt8gmCdrcBUT/CTjSyFlEkeDR1xXFAQd0sJwJjC+Gz6lmzMQ= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u4mr127940wfo.1180781556774; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 03:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 03:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:52:36 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Enrique_Rodr=EDguez_Lasterra?=" <yruiz@example.com> Sender: yruiz@example.com To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Alexa thumbnails of roller weblogs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10939_16045460.1180781556755" X-Google-Sender-Auth: 765223a7d412bb15 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_10939_16045460.1180781556755 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I was playinf this days with technoraty, and i see that the thumbail of may blog is the same of the weblog frontpage. I take care that its happen the same with blogs.sun.com so it's not a problem of my roller instalation. Technorati catch this images from www.alexa.com Do you know this behaviour? --=20 _______________________________ Enrique Rodriguez Lasterra yruiz@example.com http://www.javahispano.org Asociaci=F3n sin =E1nimo de lucro sobre java Spanish non profit association about java ------=_Part_10939_16045460.1180781556755-- From yruiz@example.com Sat Jun 02 13:15:29 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 86401 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2007 13:15:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2007 13:15:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 95926 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 13:15:32 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 95698 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 13:15:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 95689 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2007 13:15:31 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 06:15:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mail.technorati.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 06:15:26 -0700 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (dsl092-018-219.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [83.161.120.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.technorati.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CCF212E80; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 06:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 06:15:13 -0700 From: Ian Kallen <yruiz@example.com> Organization: Technorati, Inc User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (Macintosh/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Alexa thumbnails of roller weblogs References: <yruiz@example.com> In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, this is a problem with alexa's thumbnails. Compare these two: http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=weblogs.javahispano.org%2Flasterra http://technorati.com/blogs/weblogs.javahispano.org/lasterra Alexa's thumbnails are usually pretty good but when they're not (it's wrong for my blog too), I don't know what the remedy is. I was thinking of suggesting another source for thumbnails to our front-end team :) -Ian Enrique Rodríguez Lasterra wrote: > I was playinf this days with technoraty, and i see that the thumbail > of may > blog is the same of the weblog frontpage. I take care that its happen the > same with blogs.sun.com so it's not a problem of my roller instalation. > > Technorati catch this images from www.alexa.com > > Do you know this behaviour? > -- Ian Kallen || Architect, Technorati Inc. || m: 8458989389 blog@ http://www.arachna.com/roller/page/spidaman From yruiz@example.com Sat Jun 02 14:44:45 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 7746 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2007 14:44:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2007 14:44:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 86822 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 14:44:48 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 86805 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 14:44:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 86795 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2007 14:44:48 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:44:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web37208.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:44:42 -0700 Received: (qmail 88462 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2007 14:44:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=qYpJQalCR4gt6zRB4Lw0pPAHmn2wXt8A8Kn/rJRp50e2VMlE1v0FuYKmBg0VfwcB3d0fQjXUYRiX/jvkFuWkMPCNyuHLkVbjK59r0CGHWYPxxPVomELmgpAWN7OWvpKyEGzhUm0xVTSc5Z0umt0Dv5OzpOwh72tPT6zDnFnzaek=; X-YMail-OSG: RdKGdkwVM1kMeFdmTHWHL69NmreVuzpLATOFAKC4lO5uU5MBDjw3u.CE6GJ_pk.yo.4fJFCux2dHiBKAOjUiFbrQVX5hlO1YUStgpKEsFcpFHRntht4- Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web37208.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 07:44:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/651.23.1 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.155 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) From: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com To: yruiz@example.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1432188562-1180795460=:85212" Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-1432188562-1180795460=:85212 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Yes this is very strange. I did what you suggested,. I even delete all records from rag_entry and cleaned up planet cache, after that I sow the same thing. I have about 30 feeders. 5 of them from blogspot.com. In the screen I see everything from everybody, BUT one post from one of blogspot.com feeder multiplied five times. Exactly the same text and links, the only difference is name of the blog. It looks like it comes from all those 5 bloges. Only Published By shows the same name. As if the same guy posted the same post in all those 5 blogs. This is only happening with blogs hosted on blogspot.com Does somebody have similar issue? Does somebody have any idea? Thank you Gene ----- Original Message ---- From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Sent: Friday, June 1, 2007 2:25:26 PM Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com I don't understand what's happening. Perhaps the data in your rag_entry table is corrupted or full of duplicates. Take a look at that table via "select * from rag_entry" or some other way, do you see duplicate entries there? Does the data look corrupted like the posts on your front page with posts attributed to the wrong blogs? - Dave On 5/31/07, yruiz@example.com <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Here is the problem: > In planet I have several feeders from blogspot.com. > I tried to use atom like this: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default but for some reason it didn't work > After I switched to RSS: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss it start working BUT it looks like it cashed all XML. In the agregator's page I see the same post from one of the feeders multiplied as if it comes from ALL feeders from blogspot. And in blog name I see different blogs. > Anybody has any idea how to fix it? > > Thank you > Gene > > > > > > --0-1432188562-1180795460=:85212-- From yruiz@example.com Sat Jun 02 15:56:38 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 22654 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2007 15:56:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2007 15:56:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 55938 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 15:56:40 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 55907 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 15:56:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 55898 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2007 15:56:40 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:56:40 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web37206.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:56:35 -0700 Received: (qmail 23038 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2007 15:56:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=uHoDMehGJ6UArb4sC13a5O8S/sGCc3iGGqGDUMaLeiGtbz/T/PIm2s69uhEGw+iZSXSc9d1kFNlpKUibCx3ujNFQc2WuPHzQHSJzUUw8yhTpDwvcOdY8X4Qx7OcUl4LtoW43G8t6OD5xEBpKX0PxMSDOoh4TsP/Y1g6+ct2d8AI=; X-YMail-OSG: tkV5wbgVM1mI4bGgFdeJV9Jm28PfOcdlnnaWTh5F72pK3ORtoeyiasOyTbcz3EH7DSxFzyhoYMEh..J5Cm5NyCJw.4acJDUl9bG366XuTj7YmIAqmSI- Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web37206.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 08:56:13 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/651.23.1 YahooMailWebService/83.161.120.155 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 08:56:13 -0700 (PDT) From: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com To: yruiz@example.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2070219564-1180799773=:20395" Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-2070219564-1180799773=:20395 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Another strange thing: when I set feeder of one of the blogspot.com blogs to some wrong URL I cannot see any posts from ALL blogspot.com feeders. It looks like Planet treats all my *.blogspot.com feeders as one,.. but multiplies posts by number of the feeders... ----- Original Message ---- From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Sent: Friday, June 1, 2007 2:25:26 PM Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com I don't understand what's happening. Perhaps the data in your rag_entry table is corrupted or full of duplicates. Take a look at that table via "select * from rag_entry" or some other way, do you see duplicate entries there? Does the data look corrupted like the posts on your front page with posts attributed to the wrong blogs? - Dave On 5/31/07, yruiz@example.com <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Here is the problem: > In planet I have several feeders from blogspot.com. > I tried to use atom like this: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default but for some reason it didn't work > After I switched to RSS: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss it start working BUT it looks like it cashed all XML. In the agregator's page I see the same post from one of the feeders multiplied as if it comes from ALL feeders from blogspot. And in blog name I see different blogs. > Anybody has any idea how to fix it? > > Thank you > Gene > > > > > > --0-2070219564-1180799773=:20395-- From yruiz@example.com Sat Jun 02 19:09:36 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 54018 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2007 19:09:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2007 19:09:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 96090 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 19:09:39 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 96066 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2007 19:09:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 96057 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2007 19:09:39 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:09:39 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:09:33 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1588502pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eGIRWFSnRhb0HW5xZfhekOPn2oFT+G6W9l/qgB3wcdItE3x7zfVRoyfVrYMeu1pVvoj/G2oF9zAGLcegq5qCyNj38QOF+FsVQBEsc+Yo39Sr3X1w1frbtZkc40kBPTU7HVTtBc+DykvRcnOul+J4KjT0btIl4CFsu4d7Dn5Gla8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lhXoI07LJcpI0QtIRpynmVIlkLc1RIawSpwghn4sGpgcXudDhK2FF865FLsJTA27MnZ97ZJywWc1Lt/kWHjGGvt0AsmyWVxRoeicuFklI9ALpMMAM2VdvzOu75M9xmMR7xNwCUq8HYqzheSHdLolGvUGPOovhWfA0H0VkpftKE0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id a7mr4797160qbj.1180811349541; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:09:09 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Any chance you could share the list of feed URLs so I can try to duplicate this myself? - Dave On 6/2/07, yruiz@example.com <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Another strange thing: when I set feeder of one of the blogspot.com blogs to some wrong URL I cannot see any posts from ALL blogspot.com feeders. > It looks like Planet treats all my *.blogspot.com feeders as one,.. but multiplies posts by number of the feeders... > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> > To: yruiz@example.com > Sent: Friday, June 1, 2007 2:25:26 PM > Subject: Re: Problem with feeds from blogger.com > > > I don't understand what's happening. Perhaps the data in your > rag_entry table is corrupted or full of duplicates. Take a look at > that table via "select * from rag_entry" or some other way, do you see > duplicate entries there? Does the data look corrupted like the posts > on your front page with posts attributed to the wrong blogs? > > - Dave > > > On 5/31/07, yruiz@example.com <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > > Here is the problem: > > In planet I have several feeders from blogspot.com. > > I tried to use atom like this: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default but for some reason it didn't work > > After I switched to RSS: http://someblog.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss it start working BUT it looks like it cashed all XML. In the agregator's page I see the same post from one of the feeders multiplied as if it comes from ALL feeders from blogspot. And in blog name I see different blogs. > > Anybody has any idea how to fix it? > > > > Thank you > > Gene > > > > > > > > > > > > From yruiz@example.com Sun Jun 03 17:28:20 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 32169 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 17:28:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 17:28:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 34170 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2007 17:28:23 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 34152 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2007 17:28:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 34141 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2007 17:28:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:28:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ns2.ijws.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:28:17 -0700 Received: from cpe000f66462148-cm000f9f7b7c5c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([83.161.120.155] helo=[83.161.120.155]) by ns2.ijws.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <yruiz@example.com>) id 1Hutrh-0001Zi-0h for yruiz@example.com; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:27:41 -0400 Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:28:10 -0400 From: Ryan de Laplante <yruiz@example.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 83.161.120.155 (X11/20070403) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yruiz@example.com Subject: New roller site went live today Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Today I launched the new version of my blog based on Roller. I've created a new Roller theme based on a free template I found online. Once I'm satisfied that it works in every scenario, I plan on donating it to the Roller project. http://www.ryandelaplante.com Thanks for the great program! Ryan From yruiz@example.com Sun Jun 03 17:37:40 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 33030 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2007 17:37:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2007 17:37:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 42608 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2007 17:37:43 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 42577 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2007 17:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 42564 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2007 17:37:43 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:37:43 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:37:37 -0700 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([83.161.120.155]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.83.161.120.155 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <yruiz@example.com> for <yruiz@example.com>; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:36:52 -0400 Received: from [83.161.120.155] ([83.161.120.155]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 75cp1X00A24tZkc0000000; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:36:50 -0400 Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:36:47 -0700 From: Gary Kephart <yruiz@example.com> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: roller 4.0 release date References: <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Gary Kephart wrote: > Dave wrote: > >> On 5/25/07, Gary Kephart <yruiz@example.com> wrote: >> >>> > I've been meaning to start a "Status of Roller 4.0" thread on the >>> > development mailing-list, so thanks for the kick. >>> > >>> > It would be helpful if everybody who proposed work or fixes for >>> Roller >>> > 4.0 would update the Roller 4.0 release proposal to reflect the >>> status >>> > of their proposals. I'll try to make a pass over the proposal by some >>> > time this weekend. >>> > >>> > The current proposal is here: >>> > >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ROLLER/Proposal+Roller+4.0+Release >>> >>> >>> Sorry, but I haven't been looking at your list of TODOs so I don't know >>> what all you have planned in upcoming releases. However, I'm interested >>> in being able to crosspost to LiveJournal, MySpace, etc. I'm a Java >>> developer, and if you don't have that coming up, I was going to take a >>> look into it on my own. >> >> >> >> I think what you are proposing is the use the Roller weblog editor as >> a blog client to other systems. That's probably a lot of work and I'm >> not sure you'll have a lot of luck contributing that back to Roller. >> Plus, as far as I know LiveJournal and MySpace don't support standard >> web services API for posting. You might want to take another approach. >> >> I created a cross-poster for RSS and Atom in Action (chapter 13). It's >> a command-line program that designed to be run every night (via cron >> or as a Windows Scheduled Task). It's designed for folks who have >> multiple "secondary" blogs and a "primary" one. You configure it to >> check each of your secondary blogs, collect all posts made in the past >> day and then re-post them to your primary blog. You can get the >> source, build script, etc. in the Blogapps 2.x examples >> (http://blogapps.dev.java.net). >> >> Cross-poster can read from any blog that provides an RSS or Atom feed. >> And it uses ROME Propono blog client library so it can post to any >> blog server that support the MetaWeblog API or Atom protocol (I don't >> think LiveJournal or MySpace support either of those protocols). Would >> something like that work for you? > > > > Not really. That assumes that all of my potential readers come to my > site to read my blog. They don't. I have MySpace and LiveJournal > friends who won't bother to come to my site to read my blog. Out of > sight, out of mind. Ergo, what I really need is a way to publish my > blog as broadly as possibly. If the mountain won't come to Mohammad, > etc. I want to post to my blog on my server, and have the posts > replicated on other blog servers. > All I really need is a hook into the system so that when a blog entry > is published, some event is sent out to all of the subscribers > (plugins). I then need a way to register those plugins. > Here is an example of a crossposter from WordPress to LiveJournal. > http://code.google.com/p/ljxp/ More info: Just for fun, I think I'm going to create a crosspost server. You go there, make a list of the sites to which you want to crosspost, and then have your blog software (e.g. Roller) post to this server just once and it will then crosspost wherever you listed. Also found this: http://www.livejournal.com/doc/server/ljp.csp.xml-rpc.protocol.html Gary -- http://blog.photeus.com/ The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves - Plato, philosopher (427-347 BCE) From yruiz@example.com Mon Jun 04 05:01:16 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 83880 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 05:01:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 05:01:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86031 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 05:01:19 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 85845 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 05:01:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 85836 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2007 05:01:18 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:01:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:01:11 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2147541pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:00:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FyfAORKlZlClzQUFp3B/pGlZVnH5V7hdOpyR7GZBMntn2Vi1MmhaWwbby/8TvUf+Nj5NiyZBbns290m9wEhjCj+JXlQjR8/luJ90qkROZISiJ8HReo9vaLcD/vFtXf7tBFyy4/cWPDcRGebpkPWgF/4N7bHgnoxBQwXNOrjI7lE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=po58jsOm+hBsir7CZpBGG8liCOH1KPP9Gp2RqBQUBKtFCshSkc5657Wt300IzmK5eRS3LEa167nSjPx0traWnc94WYL501fd9TGX1JM0GHAR4MuyeALK+Mq7bNa0NeFXptnkkyYR+MIvg6rOdhl7MUKWFyDSmK7aw3p5JjsIlbg= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q2mr7579822pyk.1180933249797; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:00:49 -0700 From: "Max Clark" <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Removing /roller from URL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_20839_18144553.1180933249731" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_20839_18144553.1180933249731 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, Just finishing some basic touches to our Roller installation. I have Apache proxing to Tomcat via Proxypass - i.e. Proxypass / ajp://localhost/roller/ Which works great - only question, how do I configure roller not to display/link to the webapp URL? I want the URL to read. blogs.foo.com not blogs.foo.com/roller Thanks in advance, Max ------=_Part_20839_18144553.1180933249731-- From yruiz@example.com Mon Jun 04 05:08:58 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 85187 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 05:08:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 05:08:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 90260 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 05:09:01 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 90227 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 05:09:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 90218 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2007 05:09:01 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:09:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:08:56 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s11so1016749wxc for <yruiz@example.com>; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:08:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IKcwVBpGh06UGVdX7dC4y/PZaxB/g6hM6O2oPHJxIONKQD3PKIMq119xqRWS9EAD+SoNPOj1gGm6e7MZIOdBxX6GwVDUjfN88URWcOfy3TgwYABK1zZJjruQsJfGsnJwoaE6KxG5EGC1dLpgjS0Vz+siCqyXSnIc+/A4EQ2j/bg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=kWqOPMX2ERJHiwHSpcmnekuvaG8wllNnfd0nI6rCR33s7tzHA7brj0uaNLml+xFcu6J0HyzyBvp2Y6JEC97SvVnBFgGUWHvEQVCgKyHSN1Ci4t2vJSnNklqhSvRsuGZD6EvYjDECDVJPbXFXBnuhmaZlcehjfu6hDURre1q3uIs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s14mr200331wfi.1180933712936; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:08:32 +0800 From: "Sutra Zhou" <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Removing /roller from URL In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_19010_2771269.1180933712913" References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_19010_2771269.1180933712913 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Deploy it to tomcat as ROOT webapp. <Host name="blog.redv.com" appBase="/home/sutra/webapps/blog"> <Context path="" docBase="/home/sutra/webapps/blog/ROOT" debug="0"> <Resource name="jdbc/rollerdb" auth="Container" type="javax.sql.DataSource" driverClassName="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver" url="jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/blog_roller?autoReconnect=true&amp;useUnicode=true&amp;characterEncoding=utf-8&amp;mysqlEncoding=utf8" username="root" password="********" maxActive="20" maxIdle="3" removeAbandoned="true" maxWait="3000" /> <Resource name="mail/Session" auth="Container" type="javax.mail.Session" mail.smtp.host="mail.redv.com" /> </Context> </Host> 2007/6/4, Max Clark <yruiz@example.com>: > > Hi all, > > Just finishing some basic touches to our Roller installation. I have > Apache > proxing to Tomcat via Proxypass - i.e. > > Proxypass / ajp://localhost/roller/ > > Which works great - only question, how do I configure roller not to > display/link to the webapp URL? I want the URL to read. blogs.foo.com not > blogs.foo.com/roller > > Thanks in advance, > Max > ------=_Part_19010_2771269.1180933712913-- From yruiz@example.com Mon Jun 04 08:13:22 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 32045 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 08:13:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 08:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 7348 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 08:13:23 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 7290 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 08:13:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 7270 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2007 08:13:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:13:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:13:17 -0700 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <yruiz@example.com>) id 1Hv7gP-0008Ln-7q for yruiz@example.com; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:12:57 -0700 Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:12:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Eduard Ketler <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: User only edit or remove self-written comments or entries MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: yruiz@example.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Is there a possibility that a user with the permission author only can edit or remove self-written comments or entries? Not the entries and comments written by other users? - Eduard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/User-only-edit-or-remove-self-written-comments-or-entries-tf3863668s12275.html#a10945487 Sent from the Roller - User mailing list yruiz@example.com. From yruiz@example.com Mon Jun 04 14:10:51 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 44175 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 14:10:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 14:10:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12962 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 14:10:53 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 12938 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 14:10:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 12899 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2007 14:10:53 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:10:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:10:48 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2330456pyb for <yruiz@example.com>; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:10:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f4XmyGuoAbqBtRQHh43vXqkiZ4OIxN2SWcNs4w7Xibmcg3QWEUEYt7TGyLN9D+LvN1An50+7ggX50V/UMocakxc/clxvSq2Zrs9ZUGbu+yiSg5R93zwYpiJlfeMLCL1sZwC2ZwbaQiVj7AK3SUvv2VXbz4ZV68Zcqe7roek+VKU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HyQcYjPFuNw44o3XnNvOuvVFOsKJAxAfJPIbLVJ8WERM6H8WpEZYI6H8OjWln0aqUdLtZZq4ao0i5cWbvSEuwQEESuesZfukwfg337Z5tSPpLopJmtB5sLZjJmSGmxWlwrbY11OQ9ZlpfJKNNjngARP/DxEWgl2/ipvJQTqIUQw= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id w13mr6982857qbp.1180966223818; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:10:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:10:23 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: User only edit or remove self-written comments or entries In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6/4/07, Eduard Ketler <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Is there a possibility that a user with the permission author only can edit > or remove self-written comments or entries? Not the entries and comments > written by other users? Roller does not support editing of yruiz@example.com. Originally there was a philosophical reason for this, but I don't think that holds today. I'd like to be able to edit comments from myself and others on my blog; to add a link, fix a spelling error, etc. I don't there's anything wrong with that -- as long as comments are marked as "edit by blog owner" or some other such notification in the standard templates/macros. If you want the feature, please file a JIRA issue (if one does not already exist) -- or better yet write a dev proposal and submit a patch ;-) - Dave > > - Eduard > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/User-only-edit-or-remove-self-written-comments-or-entries-tf3863668s12275.html#a10945487 > Sent from the Roller - User mailing list yruiz@example.com. > > From yruiz@example.com Mon Jun 04 14:11:49 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 44409 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2007 14:11:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 14:11:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 17245 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 14:11:47 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 17200 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2007 14:11:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 17075 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2007 14:11:46 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:11:46 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:11:40 -0700 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s18so908819nze for <yruiz@example.com>; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KHmVI1vA0tTN+HIHBn0PoYOT1MYL23CDY9Tap0fF0R/J0p+sXo9o9E0nzCpvowK0utAb/23rrHSN8uSKGmfq99RdqNOZmqVbcNIUCDOV/D4m+jjyFDd1OmFcLvCVRtXvPY/dOhFpUBa2vy1ZFZC03rLWpkGzxOD99OT+U2eYLPU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jpw+Soehh3jEz/+5xSkhmeIdcKT1LklJOUrQhu3OxywlGtKXKF/bfWFhWatA8mgn4tLv6KyiQNiCPtFCBHmJOjkfmIqZp7SNbEEx78SMwvSEMgiyoo1Acim41bjw8m0V9TsJqHsm5Lj6c3FciZw02hsgmjhOOPi4qMTsNKp2aHY= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id m11mr6973570qbk.1180966278547; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:11:18 -0400 From: Dave <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: New roller site went live today In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks for the pointer. That's a very nice looking theme, BTW. - Dave On 6/3/07, Ryan de Laplante <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Today I launched the new version of my blog based on Roller. I've > created a new Roller theme based on a free template I found online. > Once I'm satisfied that it works in every scenario, I plan on donating > it to the Roller project. > > http://www.ryandelaplante.com > > > Thanks for the great program! > > > Ryan > > From yruiz@example.com Tue Jun 05 03:26:56 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 93437 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 03:26:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 03:26:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 64238 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 03:26:59 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 64215 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 03:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: moderator for yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 18081 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2007 02:36:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kLKGXzqbGioLIH8MMeMDdON4TDWf5JPsnrCl8AWF/UGDw59qMJJAsVfo29hA0aPLjYhWghq7qJcRFYVJyuZezOoGSM2101yBcXNHer/TjJRfa0l838he7+YiuNRULC3DoUyso81nObgP3eRaQWHil9eZ0upT31nTS//JApiqxUk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=mHxe99qmUEYixx79HL/Cyv0sqL6zZey/gbRQhJVvuwMQraymIvFlkL3IfKlqFlPB/VcI7v1+y10czuTS1oal3IW9FtGJ9WarVXmcfJwgLI+wLL0UuezTCwKn9cMqVn0Af9IwUVetXJBQArFL9TbH9FrReQHdHHtYiqTi8pqfPek= Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:36:27 -0400 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ra=FAl_Fuenzalida?=" <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Pop up Alert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I've just installed roller and I get a pop-up alert when trying read an entry in the weblog: It says: There was a problem retrieving XML data: Not Found try yourself: http://www.transitorio.cl/weblog/entry/cold_war_kids thanks in advance ra=FAl. From yruiz@example.com Tue Jun 05 03:44:31 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 97549 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 03:44:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 03:44:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 87512 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 03:44:34 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 87483 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 03:44:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 87472 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2007 03:44:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:44:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of yruiz@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:44:29 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 57so972690wri for <yruiz@example.com>; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:44:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VWdVAUyHm+WlVnpqcYg18KfPILcHIqOADATEDeaSsl097RLDZSbHNDxJRjFpgRkM3sb/1SrdI4jr1p67G7/7M+4/KLu6SlOE2vGPyxtF3wqVdB7jVg7lShB1ye7rygGSv/1b8/pseNGz1xHm2kdtdly4zLvldihXNjBtbLTXDGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Q1SGv4w7nA0gKR+pUMIe25q3KayjI11c+vQ9VwczmfwtLVqe0kD/fOiDptCq+zVjQuERHalD2shwSnDWvMcGj7lGZw0vYUeNx3gWgSL0HOj7wca7oBMh5m9RWVzdzTU+leFr6bMxydSPMm56MIx50wTQm78NTgTdY8rwiQzOAYs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id p8mr253470wfo.1181015047729; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:44:07 +0800 From: "Sutra Zhou" <yruiz@example.com> To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: Pop up Alert In-Reply-To: <yruiz@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9059_6757327.1181015047698" References: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_9059_6757327.1181015047698 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline VGhlIHBhdGg6CgovQ29tbWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0b3JTZXJ2bGV0CgpzaG91bGQgYmUgaGFuZGxl ZCBieSB0b21jYXQuCgpJZiB5b3UncmUgdXNpbmcgYXBhY2hlICsgdG9tY2F0LCBhZGQgdGhlIHBh dGggdG8gdGhlIHByb3h5IG9mIGFwYWNoZSB0byBsZXQKdGhlIHBhdGggaGFuZGxlZCBieSB0b21j YXQuCgoyMDA3LzYvNSwgUmHDumwgRnVlbnphbGlkYSA8YWVvbi5sYW5jZXJAZ21haWwuY29tPjoK Pgo+IEhpLCBJJ3ZlIGp1c3QgaW5zdGFsbGVkIHJvbGxlciBhbmQgSSBnZXQgYSBwb3AtdXAgYWxl cnQgd2hlbiB0cnlpbmcKPiByZWFkIGFuIGVudHJ5IGluIHRoZSB3ZWJsb2c6Cj4KPiBJdCBzYXlz Ogo+Cj4gVGhlcmUgd2FzIGEgcHJvYmxlbSByZXRyaWV2aW5nIFhNTCBkYXRhOgo+IE5vdCBGb3Vu ZAo+Cj4gdHJ5IHlvdXJzZWxmOgo+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cudHJhbnNpdG9yaW8uY2wvd2VibG9nL2Vu dHJ5L2NvbGRfd2FyX2tpZHMKPgo+IHRoYW5rcyBpbiBhZHZhbmNlCj4KPiByYcO6bC4KPgo= ------=_Part_9059_6757327.1181015047698-- From yruiz@example.com Tue Jun 05 13:25:08 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 86777 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 13:25:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 13:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 83485 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 13:25:11 -0000 Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 83281 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2007 13:25:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact yruiz@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:yruiz@example.com> List-Id: <user.roller.apache.org> Reply-To: yruiz@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 83272 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2007 13:25:10 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:25:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO usd-ex01.usd.edu) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:25:04 -0700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: New roller site went live today Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:24:40 -0500 Message-ID: <yruiz@example.com> In-reply-to: <yruiz@example.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-topic: New roller site went live today Thread-index: AcemsktvfiJl5wJAQQmMap0CDryn7gAwmrQA References: <yruiz@example.com> <yruiz@example.com> From: "Johnson, Jason R" <yruiz@example.com> To: <yruiz@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I might as well put ours out there too.... we just implemented a university-wide install of Roller at the University of South Dakota. http://blogs.usd.edu -----Original Message----- From: Dave [mailto:yruiz@example.com]=20 Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 9:11 AM To: yruiz@example.com Subject: Re: New roller site went live today Thanks for the pointer. That's a very nice looking theme, BTW. - Dave On 6/3/07, Ryan de Laplante <yruiz@example.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Today I launched the new version of my blog based on Roller. I've > created a new Roller theme based on a free template I found online. > Once I'm satisfied that it works in every scenario, I plan on donating > it to the Roller project. > > http://www.ryandelaplante.com > > > Thanks for the great program! > > > Ryan > > From yruiz@example.com Tue Jun 05 13:38:59 2007 Return-Path: <yruiz@example.com> Delivered-To: yruiz@example.com Received: (qmail 90594 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2007 13:38:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2007 13:38:58
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}