From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Thu Nov 03 04:58:22 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 54608 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2005 04:58:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2005 04:58:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 567 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2005 04:58:12 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 397 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2005 04:58:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 360 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2005 04:58:10 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:58:10 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO Boron.MeepZor.Com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:58:06 -0800 Received: from Boron.MeepZor.Com (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA34u3VK013642; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:56:23 -0500 Received: (from cvs@localhost) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id jA34thrP013613; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:55:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:55:43 -0500 Message-Id: <rmartinez@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Application: $Id: report-status.pl,v 1.3 2005/03/30 10:13:06 coar Exp $ MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [STATUS] (incubator) Wed Nov 2 23:55:42 2005 From: Rodent of Unusual Size <rmartinez@example.com> To: Apache Incubator general discussion <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki pages are for collaborative development, including stuff destined for the Web site.] Pending Issues ============== o Clearly and authoritatively document how to edit, generate, and update the Web site (three separate functions). o Move the stable wiki pages into the official site. o We need to be very very clear about what it takes to be accepted into the incubator. It should be a very low bar to leap, possibly not much more than 'no problematic code' and the existence of a healthy community (we don't want to become a dumping ground). o We need to be very very clear about what it takes for a podling to graduate from the incubator. The basic requirements obviously include: has a home, either as part of another ASF project or as a new top-level project of its own; needs to be a credit to the ASF and function well in the ASF framework; ... o Moving the bylaw documentation from the Wiki to the main site o fix formatting of the project status pages Resolved Issues =============== o The policy documentation does not need ratification of changes if there seems consensus. Accordingly, the draft status of these documents can be removed and we will use the lazy "commit first, discuss later" mode common across the ASF for documentation (http://rmartinez@example.com&by=thread&from=517190) o Coming up with a set of bylaws for the project (http://rmartinez@example.com&by=thread&from=517190) o All projects under incubation must use a STATUS file (or a status.xml file if the project prefers XML) that contains information the PMC needs about the project. This file must live at the root of the project cvs module (http://rmartinez@example.com&by=thread&from=504543) o Projects under incubation should display appropriate "disclaimers" so that it is clear that they are, indeed, under incubation (http://rmartinez@example.com&by=thread&from=504543) The Incubation Process ====================== This tries to list all the actions items that must be complete for a project before it can graduate from the incubator. It is probably incomplete. Identify the project to be incubated: -- Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already trademarked for an existing software product. -- If request from an existing Apache project to adopt an external package, then ask the Apache project for the cvs module and mail address names. -- If request from outside Apache to enter an existing Apache project, then post a message to that project for them to decide on acceptance. -- If request from anywhere to become a stand-alone PMC, then assess the fit with the ASF, and create the lists and modules under the incubator address/module names if accepted. Interim responsibility: -- Who has been identified as the mentor for the incubation? -- Are they tracking progress in the file incubator/projects/{project_name}/STATUS Copyright: -- Have the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received? It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project. -- Have the files been updated to reflect the new ASF copyright? Verify distribution rights: -- For all code included with the distribution that is not under the Apache license, do we have the right to combine with Apache-licensed code and redistribute? -- Is all source code distributed by the project covered by one or more of the following approved licenses: Apache, BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with essentially the same terms? Establish a list of active committers: -- Are all active committers in the STATUS file? -- Do they have accounts on cvs.apache.org? -- Have they submitted a contributors agreement? Infrastructure: -- CVS modules created and committers added to avail file? -- Mailing lists set up and archived? -- Problem tracking system (Bugzilla)? -- Has the project migrated to our infrastructure? Collaborative Development: -- Have all of the active long-term volunteers been identified and acknowledged as committers on the project? -- Are there three or more independent committers? [The legal definition of independent is long and boring, but basically it means that there is no binding relationship between the individuals, such as a shared employer, that is capable of overriding their free will as individuals, directly or indirectly.] -- Are project decisions being made in public by the committers? -- Are the decision-making guidelines published and agreed to by all of the committers? Organizational acceptance of responsibility for the project: -- If graduating to an existing PMC, has the PMC voted to accept it? -- If graduating to a new PMC, has the board voted to accept it? Incubator sign-off: -- Has the Incubator decided that the project has accomplished all of the above tasks? Incubator Project ================= Background: o IRC channel #apache-incubator on irc.freenode.net (traffic is SUPPOSED to be logged to <URL:http://Source-Zone.Org/apache-irc/> so that the content of interactive discussions is available to everyone, but the logger isn't working) o Mailing lists: - rmartinez@example.com (send to rmartinez@example.com) - rmartinez@example.com (only for private communication) No project decisions will be made on the PMC list. o This status file is mailed to rmartinez@example.com every Wednesday Project committers (as of 2003-10-27): Note that the most current information is always in the CVS avail file, and can be found using: ssh cvs.apache.org cat /home/cvs/CVSROOT/avail | grep incubator Release: The Incubator Project doesn't do "releases" itself. Track of releases made by projects in the incubator is kept in the per-project status files. Possible topics for educational documents: o A document which describes the 'ideal' way a project has to go to be successfully integrated into the ASF: the flow of the normal incubation process should be pictured o Glossary of important ASF terms and phrases (this was considered as very helpful on the reorg@ list) o Compact, but also encyclopedic link-directory which points to important info on the other ASF sites (e.g. to the Jakarta Charter or to the HTTPd dev pages) o General License-/Licensing documentation (ASL1.1, ASL2.2, TCK, JSPA) # # Local Variables: # mode: indented-text # tab-width: 4 # indent-tabs-mode: nil # tab-stop-list: (4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80) # End: # --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Thu Nov 03 18:54:25 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 77238 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2005 18:54:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2005 18:54:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 43810 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2005 18:54:20 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 43708 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2005 18:54:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 43697 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2005 18:54:19 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:54:19 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:54:14 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 14so230276nzn for <rmartinez@example.com>; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:53:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sJLp3DecAuL8CqF6DqHMXid5/53qLx3wd1WJLehSJ50IikCs4wGC574+4yruLDPx6iyBkzrN17ZF9en+8HCEvw98vgorr/yjx3HKLQFxJ/+pqSKEVgxLqH2IeHao4VPdhOLMSClWfmt7x0iy8+/r1BRahsbanbIeFcxTYCMV0Ow= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q13mr1044455qbr; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:53:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:53:58 -0800 From: Kenneth Tam <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: [STATUS] (incubator) Wed Nov 2 23:55:42 2005 In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Ken, one of the msg links in the incubator status look irrelevant (leading me to suspect it's meant to be pointing somewhere else). See inline. On 11/2/05, Rodent of Unusual Size <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > Resolved Issues > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > ... > > o All projects under incubation must use a STATUS file (or a > status.xml file if the project prefers XML) that contains > information the PMC needs about the project. This file must > live at the root of the project cvs module > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=3Dge= rmartinez@example.com&by=3Dthread&from=3D504543) This link only seems to be about incubator disclaimers instead of STATUS. > > o Projects under incubation should display appropriate "disclaimers" > so that it is clear that they are, indeed, under incubation > (http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=3Dge= rmartinez@example.com&by=3Dthread&from=3D504543) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Fri Nov 04 05:18:36 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 38766 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2005 05:18:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2005 05:18:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 97934 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2005 05:17:44 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 96181 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2005 05:17:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 95623 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2005 05:17:26 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 21:17:26 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:08:16 -0800 Received: from fo2.kc.aoindustries.com (www2.kc.aoindustries.com [83.161.120.155]) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA437xi2000782 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <rmartinez@example.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:07:59 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by fo2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jA437xQA000712 for rmartinez@example.com; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 21:07:59 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: fo2.kc.aoindustries.com: indexgeo set sender to rmartinez@example.com using -f Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:07:47 +1100 From: David Crossley <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: old Geronimo info at Incubator is misleading Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo Status report in its "Project website" section refers to an old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/ I presume that this is a very old version of the Geronimo incubation. These days incubating projects have their rmartinez@example.com/$PROJECT/ instead. For Geronimo, this now correctly redirects to the g.a.o site. So should that old information be removed from site-publish? It can still remain in site-author for history. By the way, there are two other projects in a similar situation. ... altrmi and agila. Their incubating websites should not be in site-author/projects/ -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Fri Nov 04 06:33:00 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 64043 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2005 06:32:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2005 06:32:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 48864 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2005 06:32:56 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 48216 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2005 06:32:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 48198 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2005 06:32:52 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:32:52 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 22:32:47 -0800 Received: from fo2.kc.aoindustries.com (www2.kc.aoindustries.com [83.161.120.155]) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA46WTYt031897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <rmartinez@example.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:32:30 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by fo2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jA46WTtL031822 for rmartinez@example.com; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:32:29 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: fo2.kc.aoindustries.com: indexgeo set sender to rmartinez@example.com using -f Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:31:58 +1100 From: David Crossley <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: simplifying the generation of Incubator website Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I would like to try again to make it easier to build the Incubator website. Next week i will ugrade the configuration to use the current release of Forrest (Incubator is one behind). Along with creating a better procedure document, might make it easier. I also want to have a discussion about why we are using Forrest and whether something else might be more relevant, or if continuing with Forrest then how to improve. First a digression about the content ... The website could use a lot more instructions. Some procedural documentation is incorrect, out-of-date, misleading, non-existent. The current pages could also be enhanced and corrected. The source content is in html format at "site-author" directory. Please edit it and view the html document directly in your web browser. Looks okay? Then do your normal svn procedure 'svn diff, svn commit' etc. Done. Later someone will build the documents with Forrest. That is probably me, but can be any other committer with Forrest installed. Yes we would all love to have the better infrastructure for generating, staging, and publishing all project sites using whatever software they like. However that is not happening yet. See the site-dev list. ---oOo--- Now on to the issues with using Forrest. Yes we know that it is a little cumbersome and needs to be installed. I am concerned that this might be contributing to the hold-up with editing the docs. Not trying to make excuses, but Forrest is pre-1.0 so it should be expected to be a little difficult. Anyway, lets try to either find out what can be improved or look at using something else. Incubator started before i joined, so can someone tell what was the reason for choosing Forrest. It is a publishing framework, and perhaps the simple needs of Incubator do not warrant its use. One beauty is that the content can be edited as simple html docs, rather than an xml format. My guess about the stumbling block for some people is the need to check the final result into svn. Also the need to copy files from build/site into site-publish and then do svn add or svn remove files. I think that we can get Cocoon to generate the files directly into site-publish directory if that helps. Another trouble is that for just changing one little document, then Cocoon needs to generate everything. Sorry not much we can do about that at this stage. There is a trick which i will document. There is also "local forrestbot" which i will explain after the upgrade. Can people define any other issues? Probably best to keep specific stuff until i have upgraded to 0.7 next week. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Fri Nov 04 15:42:20 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 41105 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2005 15:42:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Nov 2005 15:42:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 78266 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2005 15:42:16 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 78060 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2005 15:42:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 78049 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2005 15:42:15 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:42:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:42:10 -0800 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (ool-43560634.dyn.optonline.net [83.161.120.155]) by mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <rmartinez@example.com> for rmartinez@example.com; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:41:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:41:39 -0500 From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." <rmartinez@example.com> Subject: Re: old Geronimo info at Incubator is misleading In-reply-to: <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Message-id: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Nov 3, 2005, at 10:07 PM, David Crossley wrote: > While investigating something else, i noticed that the Geronimo > Status report in its "Project website" section refers to an > old site at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/geronimo/ > > I presume that this is a very old version of the Geronimo > incubation. These days incubating projects have their websites > at incubator.apache.org/$PROJECT/ instead. For Geronimo, > this now correctly redirects to the g.a.o site. Thank you. This brings up another question I have. I've been putting IP registration information into site-author/ projects/$PROJECT Where is the proper place to put this stuff? > > So should that old information be removed from site-publish? > It can still remain in site-author for history. > > By the way, there are two other projects in a similar situation. > ... altrmi and agila. Their incubating websites should not > be in site-author/projects/ I'm responsible for agila. I assume you just want me to move to i.a.o/agila/? > > -David > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > -- Geir Magnusson Jr (464)239-5199 rmartinez@example.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Sun Nov 06 22:59:54 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 28664 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 22:59:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 22:59:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 43001 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 22:59:50 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 42493 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 22:59:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 42482 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2005 22:59:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:48 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:42 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s12so290943wxc for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=L+klOYin85lGnnIc9djkMyWRRwtUMkYbIodCpL1YDfcRPBeDUEsZj4fDRVqLiw678l/JAk81KuxQSAjl6Jve4mJ7bjxMWH6wluHBQ5ZylkOCVuryeHPhhezJpibSXve7/LiGObrWhym1DZ7rEn7kjaO+37zBatA0ggcLNBOswfQ= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 2mr4309622wxf; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:59:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:59:26 +1100 From: Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project Cc: rmartinez@example.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related codebases into the main Maven project. Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know if this is not the case. Project: Surefire Description: Library for running test suites. Project Info: - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be done immediately after import - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has gone quiet there, we will either get a CLA from him or prune his branch from the import. This will be taken care of before the code rmartinez@example.com. - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code Project: Doxia Description: Simple library for document transformation and site generation. Project Info: - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase - It will be stored under /maven/doxia in SVN - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be done immediately after import - All active committers have a CLA on file - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code Thanks, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Sun Nov 06 23:03:31 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 30001 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 23:03:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 23:03:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 46404 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 23:03:28 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 46181 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 23:03:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 46170 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2005 23:03:27 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:03:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:03:19 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h28so344080wxd for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:03:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OO/uenjny2AB7k+XrlaYKND3KhdF2HpzkVoakwP9l5WKE1yNFY14xiaTXwkJGF4BPPxK+FaSZXtKDniwARfy2UxzTFLGs1LWfuAyo2yyqs6DJZwCB0Qfv3VVdIBrqs6kxOdI6tPM2RAFgeRYoPclZs5qkqw+E9mSlxG+n0Pr9Vs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s9mr56871cwc; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 15:03:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 18:03:03 -0500 From: Davanum Srinivas <rmartinez@example.com> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project Cc: rmartinez@example.com In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 from me. On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related > codebases into the main Maven project. > > Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is > that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know if > this is not the case. > > Project: Surefire > Description: > Library for running test suites. > Project Info: > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > done immediately after import > - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one > * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has > gone quiet there, we will either get a CLA from him or prune his > branch from the import. This will be taken care of before the code > rmartinez@example.com. > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > Project: Doxia > Description: > Simple library for document transformation and site generation. > Project Info: > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > - It will be stored under /maven/doxia in SVN > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > done immediately after import > - All active committers have a CLA on file > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > Thanks, > Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Sun Nov 06 23:55:20 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 46465 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 23:55:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 23:55:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 88433 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 23:55:13 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 88216 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2005 23:55:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 88201 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2005 23:55:11 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:55:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO relay03.pair.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 15:55:02 -0800 Received: (qmail 48724 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2005 23:54:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?83.161.120.155?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 6 Nov 2005 23:54:45 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 83.161.120.155 Subject: Re: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Cc: rmartinez@example.com, rmartinez@example.com In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> References: <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Lanka Software Foundation Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:54:16 +0600 Message-Id: <rmartinez@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 83.161.120.155 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So I'm confused .. I was under the impression that *all* new code coming into the ASF had to come thru the incubator and go thru incubation? Maybe there's an exception if the code was written by ASF committers under AL v2 but simply done elsewhere? Would appreciate clarification. Sanjiva. On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 18:03 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > +1 from me. > > On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related > > codebases into the main Maven project. > > > > Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is > > that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know if > > this is not the case. > > > > Project: Surefire > > Description: > > Library for running test suites. > > Project Info: > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > done immediately after import > > - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one > > * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has > > gone quiet there, we will either get a CLA from him or prune his > > branch from the import. This will be taken care of before the code > > rmartinez@example.com. > > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > > > Project: Doxia > > Description: > > Simple library for document transformation and site generation. > > Project Info: > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > - It will be stored under /maven/doxia in SVN > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > done immediately after import > > - All active committers have a CLA on file > > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > > > Thanks, > > Brett > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Mon Nov 07 00:06:11 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 50152 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 00:06:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 00:06:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 97251 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:06:06 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 97171 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:06:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 97159 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2005 00:06:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:06:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:06:00 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s12so298463wxc for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:05:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J9M3vUAhkrrpT1bS2oAw1aJzvmiT5wRiZBuKXc+T9EWlFL/a6XvEinGrvXm7KKLI+w074c9Av7fEGQXALvuagxjpbtyayq5UZSDYPwFq3wh1p4hQyzcK+YejDYz6aMaHCLFPzcUQI5AX8+QMkaeCtXk7bs9mA+Tplhey905A268= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 17mr4348298wxx; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:05:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:05:45 +1100 From: Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N As I understand it, everything has to go past the incubator, however as this code meets all the criteria for clearing incubation (IP is clean, no community concerns) it doesn't need to stay there as long as everyone is satisfied with the below. - Brett On 11/7/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > So I'm confused .. I was under the impression that *all* new code coming > into the ASF had to come thru the incubator and go thru incubation? > Maybe there's an exception if the code was written by ASF committers > under AL v2 but simply done elsewhere? Would appreciate clarification. > > Sanjiva. > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 18:03 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > +1 from me. > > > > On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related > > > codebases into the main Maven project. > > > > > > Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding i= s > > > that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know i= f > > > this is not the case. > > > > > > Project: Surefire > > > Description: > > > Library for running test suites. > > > Project Info: > > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > > - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN > > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > > done immediately after import > > > - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one > > > * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has > > > gone quiet there, we will either get a CLA from him or prune his > > > branch from the import. This will be taken care of before the code > > > rmartinez@example.com. > > > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > > > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > > > > > Project: Doxia > > > Description: > > > Simple library for document transformation and site generation. > > > Project Info: > > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > > - It will be stored under /maven/doxia in SVN > > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > > done immediately after import > > > - All active committers have a CLA on file > > > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > > > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brett > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Mon Nov 07 00:23:05 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 56300 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 00:23:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 00:23:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 8362 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:23:01 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 8298 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 8285 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2005 00:23:01 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:23:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:22:55 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so314262nzn for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:22:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hzRBKN4uguBUa9sAWgKHxgBy+Swk6P8u/+jQZriHWiqZxI+tpmxDy6TXySgELN36VBy6rlyC0LjCnAE8Pr/v2sFZ/xuMF9Tjyw8yfcHdeXyvv1pXrg7bsCVkk4YgM4/n9HqNuK3+19OQFy03S7CtrPPEshachG+hS9SjpmXOiSo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id s59mr137098nzi; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:22:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:22:39 -0500 From: Henri Yandell <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N As I understand it to. Change "All new code donations has to come through the Incubator" to "The Incubator needs to be aware of all new code donations entering Apache". Hen On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > As I understand it, everything has to go past the incubator, however > as this code meets all the criteria for clearing incubation (IP is > clean, no community concerns) it doesn't need to stay there as long as > everyone is satisfied with the below. > > - Brett > > On 11/7/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > > So I'm confused .. I was under the impression that *all* new code comin= g > > into the ASF had to come thru the incubator and go thru incubation? > > Maybe there's an exception if the code was written by ASF committers > > under AL v2 but simply done elsewhere? Would appreciate clarification. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 18:03 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > +1 from me. > > > > > > On 11/6/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two relate= d > > > > codebases into the main Maven project. > > > > > > > > Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding= is > > > > that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know= if > > > > this is not the case. > > > > > > > > Project: Surefire > > > > Description: > > > > Library for running test suites. > > > > Project Info: > > > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > > > - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN > > > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > > > done immediately after import > > > > - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one > > > > * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has > > > > gone quiet there, we will either get a CLA from him or prune his > > > > branch from the import. This will be taken care of before the code > > > > rmartinez@example.com. > > > > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > > > > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > > > > > > > Project: Doxia > > > > Description: > > > > Simple library for document transformation and site generation. > > > > Project Info: > > > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > > > - It will be stored under /maven/doxia in SVN > > > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > > > done immediately after import > > > > - All active committers have a CLA on file > > > > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > > > > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brett > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Mon Nov 07 00:26:38 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 58064 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 00:26:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 9751 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:35 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 9610 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 9597 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:34 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:34 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:28 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z31so215018nzd for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h9GPSLIf1ze9H+81GGr/EzmRPmmdj2+yfJs7qFg/kMsSLJWQOP5keBtrARTHekj40RWN1DakPUnCGOkiCOSJBhU/jhO9YKzyb4QkVH1hDBFEUUuBAx1D6RC3H8eEe2joWyVr6jeWeKH1V7T4wt67zieJBA82KBhGuwHJ1y8i81I= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id t13mr314140nza; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:26:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:26:13 -0500 From: Henri Yandell <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: simplifying the generation of Incubator website In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I did a bit of Incubator generation a week or so ago. Forrest was a problem, but only in that it was a bump I had to get over and so I put it off for a week. When I actually attacked the problem with momentum, the Forrest part was quite enjoyable. Only problem is that you have to know to go look in the archives to download the older version. The weirdest bit for me was that we don't generate straight onto the svn version of the target documents. Instead we generate, use diff and then copy. It seems much simpler to generate onto the target and use svn diff to confirm each difference. Hen On 11/4/05, David Crossley <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > I would like to try again to make it easier to build the > Incubator website. --- snip --- > Can people define any other issues? Probably best to keep > specific stuff until i have upgraded to 0.7 next week. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Mon Nov 07 00:26:50 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 58633 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 00:26:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10175 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:47 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 10089 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 10078 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2005 00:26:46 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:46 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:40 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h27so292021wxd for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GtHZkF6IiJlv3yuznNov2v2LE9oN1hFqrnnli//zfpTeJ1TCt5Rua78FggCgnum5NH03g81ZlSFFsfTGc30MWqoxMiCB9a8Cvd308NB5ZMERGX99QyZevGvmlmVw5elTvS/pCsNSADJHvR0IhZn5aOo39q/SFw8DxDJqyeMfv/g= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id l16mr57575cwb; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:26:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:26:25 +1100 From: Dion Gillard <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Both these statements mention that all *active* committers have a CLA on file. What about IP from non-active committers? On 11/7/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related > codebases into the main Maven project. > > Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is > that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know if > this is not the case. > > Project: Surefire > Description: > Library for running test suites. > Project Info: > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > done immediately after import > - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one > * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has > gone quiet there, we will either get a CLA from him or prune his > branch from the import. This will be taken care of before the code > rmartinez@example.com. > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > Project: Doxia > Description: > Simple library for document transformation and site generation. > Project Info: > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > - It will be stored under /maven/doxia in SVN > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > done immediately after import > - All active committers have a CLA on file > - All code is either MIT/X, BSD or ASL > - There are no external dependencies on unsuitably licensed code > > Thanks, > Brett > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ "You are going to let the fear of poverty govern your life and your reward will be that you will eat, but you will not live." - George Bernard Shaw --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com For additional commands, e-mail: rmartinez@example.com From general-returnrmartinez@example.com Mon Nov 07 00:37:16 2005 Return-Path: <general-returnrmartinez@example.com> Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 60884 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 00:37:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2005 00:37:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 12766 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:37:12 -0000 Delivered-To: rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 12670 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2005 00:37:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rmartinez@example.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Post: <mailto:rmartinez@example.com> List-Id: <general.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: rmartinez@example.com Delivered-To: mailing list rmartinez@example.com Received: (qmail 12659 invoked by uid 99); 7 Nov 2005 00:37:11 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:37:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of rmartinez@example.com designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:37:04 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s12so302075wxc for <rmartinez@example.com>; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:36:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TMqSRg7dEfk5gjA9vo5YCqBrQ0hjRTBeznN0i1hGjzRCEmQhrlf6iBLTtOAOibvsHwRg3J0UHwhUMuenOJrrB9n/WtLD7n8cvYnfTUR01MCXgV8AsOEUg0+B/i1r7tHu6wlpe3K3nWl4FgwQ8loUOjbRgjpbchfYndqFu8Z1hCY= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id 10mr4393978wxo; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:36:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:36:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <rmartinez@example.com> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:36:49 +1100 From: Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> To: rmartinez@example.com Subject: Re: Accepting two code bases into the Maven project In-Reply-To: <rmartinez@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <rmartinez@example.com> <rmartinez@example.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Apologies, I was mirroring the language from the checklist. This covers everyone that has ever committed to it. Cheers, Brett On 11/7/05, Dion Gillard <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > Both these statements mention that all *active* committers have a CLA > on file. What about IP from non-active committers? > > On 11/7/05, Brett Porter <rmartinez@example.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The Maven community has voted to consolidate by bringing two related > > codebases into the main Maven project. > > > > Below are the IP clearance forms for each project. My understanding is > > that neither need to be incubated on this basis. Please let me know if > > this is not the case. > > > > Project: Surefire > > Description: > > Library for running test suites. > > Project Info: > > - Maven PMC will be responsible for the codebase > > - It will be stored under /maven/surefire in SVN > > - Files have not yet been updated with ASF copyright, that will be > > done immediately after import > > - All active committers have a CLA on file, bar one > > * Andy Glick was very recently added to work on a branch. He has > > gone quiet there,
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}