From lucene-net-user-return-486wphillips@example.net Tue May 01 19:01:27 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-486wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 12374 invoked from network); 1 May 2007 19:01:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 May 2007 19:01:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31003 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2007 19:01:33 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 30729 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2007 19:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 30703 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2007 19:01:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2007 12:01:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sidekick.frogspace.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2007 12:01:24 -0700 Received: from bi01pt1.ct.us.ibm.com ([83.161.120.155] helo=aroushlt) by sidekick.frogspace.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Hixax-0004Wi-Hx; Tue, 01 May 2007 12:01:04 -0700 From: "George Aroush" <wphillips@example.net> To: <wphillips@example.net>, <wphillips@example.net> Subject: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 15:01:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1a5601c78c23$11a70150$6901a8c0@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AceMIs7D3Go3bu2GRYukkOucnkojhAAABumw X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wphillips@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, I just finished checking in what is a first cut at Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 release. This is as a result of porting Java Lucene 2.1 to Lucene.Net. This release is a work in progress and here is a brief high level summary of it: - Dev Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" - Issues: Optimizing an index will cause an exception. - Issues: The "Test" code has not yet be ported for this release. - Issues: Code in "contrib" have not been validated to work with this release. While I work on porting the "Test" code from Java Lucene to Lucene.Net, please take a look at this release, test it, report issues and most of all submit fixes in form of patches. For starters, index optimization is causing an exception. Anyone who can look at this issue is greatly appreciated. Regards, -- George Aroush From lucene-net-user-return-487wphillips@example.net Wed May 02 00:43:21 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-487wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 32667 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 00:43:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 00:43:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 2525 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 00:43:26 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 2483 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 00:43:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 2466 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 00:43:26 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2007 17:43:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sidekick.frogspace.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 May 2007 17:43:18 -0700 Received: from pool-+1-715-209-1309.bos.east.verizon.net ([83.161.120.155] helo=aroushlt) by sidekick.frogspace.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1Hj2vp-00007D-Un; Tue, 01 May 2007 17:42:58 -0700 From: "George Aroush" <wphillips@example.net> To: <wphillips@example.net>, <wphillips@example.net> Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:42:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1b2a01c78c52$d4fa0330$6901a8c0@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: <1a5601c78c23$11a70150$6901a8c0@aroushlt> Thread-Index: AceMIs7D3Go3bu2GRYukkOucnkojhAAABumwAAvX1FA= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wphillips@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Everyone, Two other things: 1) Beside the exception during optimization, there are a number of porting questions that I have. Just search for the text "Aroush-2.1" and you will find them. Beside those, there are left over porting questions, so it's best if you search for "Aroush". 2) Any fix that you provide, should be targeted at fixing the port and no more. That is, lets hold off any .NET 2.0 related changes till when we get this release working. Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: George Aroush [mailto:wphillips@example.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:01 PM > To: wphillips@example.net; > wphillips@example.net > Subject: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released > > Hi Everyone, > > I just finished checking in what is a first cut at Apache > Lucene.Net 2.1 release. This is as a result of porting Java > Lucene 2.1 to Lucene.Net. > > This release is a work in progress and here is a brief high > level summary of > it: > > - Dev Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" > - Issues: Optimizing an index will cause an exception. > - Issues: The "Test" code has not yet be ported for > this release. > - Issues: Code in "contrib" have not been validated to > work with this release. > > While I work on porting the "Test" code from Java Lucene to > Lucene.Net, please take a look at this release, test it, > report issues and most of all submit fixes in form of > patches. For starters, index optimization is causing an > exception. Anyone who can look at this issue is greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > -- George Aroush > From lucene-net-user-return-488wphillips@example.net Wed May 02 09:30:26 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-488wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 78158 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 09:30:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 09:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 73028 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 09:30:32 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 73002 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 09:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 72993 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 09:30:31 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 02:30:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 02:30:24 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so63489wxd for <wphillips@example.net>; Wed, 02 May 2007 02:30:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=hShnhmLvdylkktPacjoJCyY0t1gjjFPYrf1qTJwaMHsZ5uw8RqIypva0Q1OP0k8YSxjiVwyvV2qBi8FBwKRepOA6xzHz1JLM96Pfg327PzGxbmJQQzm0BEbTIsr695p8f3nz44sTFWPXh+md4/sULnIFYCTa89P+3bqzdtgp2Os= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=LKzKTj45lHAJpg8SX6kWQzVqbgxWM9iagGNMZZSe4dGAJp3kcrpdXHx8iwDe/mcBJ/e8lWBDMRR7ig2oj/zIrvIWjcUurFvbLKisouW3f+078/wejdnOkcHEu0V+cm5cvy6nOprS5IYC5T5vp3kKt4o6qaaeAN5liQQswihLm/0= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id q6mr153177agb.1178098203958; Wed, 02 May 2007 02:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 02:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 11:30:03 +0200 From: "Christopher Kolstad" <wphillips@example.net> Sender: wphillips@example.net To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Unexpected result from Lucene.Net index when searching for specific term MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_36990_27793613.1178098203916" X-Google-Sender-Auth: c9fd982bbc54ea3f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_36990_27793613.1178098203916 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi. I've been using Lucene.Net since the 1.4 version, recently moved to the 2.0004 build and seems to work rather well. After a rebuild of the code a search for para* yields 453 hits, 9 of which are excluded by some later logic matching URIs from the index to guarantee uniqueness of results. If I then immediately after fire another search for para* it yields exactly 1 hit. This also happens if I've done another search against the index and then try para* . At first I was sure it was my own exclusion code that was removing too much, but after lots of logging and debugging it turns out the Lucene Hits object only contains 1 hit after the crucial IndexSearcher.search(query, ....) call. I'm at a loss as to why this happens. Can't seem to recreate the issue with any other search. But I can recreate the issue when moving the code from one server to another. Here's the relevant code (queryField gets set from a different method depending on which index we're searching against): StandardAnalyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(); QueryParser qp = new QueryParser(queryField, analyzer); Query query; int totalHits = 0;//Total hits StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); int docHits = 0; Boolean scoreFound = false try { //If there's a space in our search we want to enclose it with "" if (search.Contains(" ")) { sb.Append("\""); sb.Append(search); sb.Append("\""); } else { sb.Append(search); } if (log.IsDebugEnabled) { log.Debug("Search: " + sb.ToString()); //Returns para* } query = qp.Parse(sb.ToString()); if (log.IsDebugEnabled) { log.Debug("Search made against index: " + query.ToString()); //Returns contents:para* } string weightToSetBoost = tRow.weight; double weightOfToken = double.Parse(weightToSetBoost, allowDecimal); query.SetBoost((float) weightOfToken); Hits hits = isearch.Search(query); //isearch is the IndexSearcher if (log.IsDebugEnabled) { log.Debug("COUNTING HITS: " + hits.Length()); //Returns 454 the first time, then 1 any other time for the query para* } TreatHits(searchResult, maxHits, hits, originalToken, indexShort); //The TreatHits() method is where I thought the error was occurring, //but since the hit count is 1 as early as the Lucene Hits object, I'm stumped I've also tried this with the 003 build and the same happens then. Let me know if any more information/code is needed. Anyone run into something similar and willing to share their experience/solution? Christopher -- Regards, Christopher Kolstad E-mail: wphillips@example.net (University) wphillips@example.net (Home) wphillips@example.net (Job) ------=_Part_36990_27793613.1178098203916-- From lucene-net-user-return-489wphillips@example.net Wed May 02 13:48:52 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-489wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 88749 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 13:48:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 13:48:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 35691 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 13:48:58 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 35672 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 13:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 35658 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 13:48:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 06:48:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 06:48:50 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so152358wra for <wphillips@example.net>; Wed, 02 May 2007 06:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=M4RlSsR9n7+fhByOvXPnHsHfybnwkjgT34ZOJbBKnE2b11Wh4MKt6w6w88dN6e6co126JK9nB4V+rJq1RHHSCaQkOi3yHD9h6WXObhManqPI+9shcAoSCXB75khoLpeA0VlWVE74IoH9SmkUeWp+z1ttZrH4qj0jZMk1HkhgKtk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=s+SicVFLjbijh4vbw9S94j8BsaOG6P32Up+W4DWZsbvOcTW7dCom0YBOUVqxg8M/+2ACz1SWc+Qg/HSMuIWmErnCr7GeOTF6Ck5MPxTC/d7MFHE5+VJQcfGXfpU9Pt41NtyKEKxA0D0Go60b+a4eyde0mQidDw+RKFgnhzYzq9Q= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id d13mr249821huf.1178113707862; Wed, 02 May 2007 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 09:48:27 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <wphillips@example.net> To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Download Links Broken MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5234_24832176.1178113707820" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_5234_24832176.1178113707820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I am new to this list. I started asking questions on the forums on the dotlucene page, but they seem to be... well... under-utilized (and buggy...). I just noticed Christopher Kolstad posted about using the version 2.0.xxxsource. On the download page [1] all of the links are broken to any download > 1.4.3. I saw the comment about all other source being in the Apache incubator. Is there another way to start looking at those versions for which my open-source naivate is unaware? [1] http://www.dotlucene.net/download/ -- - P ------=_Part_5234_24832176.1178113707820-- From lucene-net-user-return-490wphillips@example.net Wed May 02 14:41:52 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-490wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 9202 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 14:41:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 14:41:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 49428 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 14:41:57 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 49407 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 14:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 49398 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 14:41:57 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:41:57 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:41:49 -0700 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w1so159714mue for <wphillips@example.net>; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DlSGVIO47Az+EdsmxxHgWUEhbCMEZPCuwLJyL1HBqmvcmkRH2J9z0/fa0eVfJgh9te+3j985exrOiLo0XVqbqcIgMLHx/0CKGXnXYStcKaU2MEu/TxNE8iPVsF4KKYfCSe2ubYnxi+w9QLFW9Z1CbSHp97cNZVXmiBmUj/FFO7w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lnbnVr6EpcMm14xBIVCoSLN76uOum2Sp0L33guVtWxsbs8ynn16QTa0g8H6XnOIYLG+g2yK/SQxPewKpWS5Gqa6C//OwL6tTwh010vbtD3iehbwaYNkQX9aQ6HYZxRywQjM2QSCUVLgl8iYofKUHZzqw6NYcTRnRPJtRqv5dL54= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id y14mr1541369bud.1178116887689; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 07:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:41:27 +0200 From: "Jokin Cuadrado" <wphillips@example.net> To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Re: Download Links Broken In-Reply-To: <wphillips@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <wphillips@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The home for lucene right now is http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ there you can find the latest releases download links, and also the links to the documentation. regards Jokin On 5/2/07, Patrick Burrows <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > I am new to this list. I started asking questions on the forums on the > dotlucene page, but they seem to be... well... under-utilized (and > buggy...). > > I just noticed Christopher Kolstad posted about using the version > 2.0.xxxsource. On the download page [1] all of the links are broken to > any download > > 1.4.3. I saw the comment about all other source being in the Apache > incubator. Is there another way to start looking at those versions for which > my open-source naivate is unaware? > > > > > [1] http://www.dotlucene.net/download/ > > -- > - > P > From lucene-net-user-return-491wphillips@example.net Wed May 02 14:49:50 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-491wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 13358 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 14:49:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 14:49:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 67733 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 14:49:51 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 67717 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 14:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 67697 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 14:49:51 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:49:50 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:49:43 -0700 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so139264ika for <wphillips@example.net>; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:49:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MyWTK954164dgZTFIPUStLkxq6ouKCq9YLnM9VVLwjHAt9fmLEfjwyStN72imXq3dMt7BYEgQzv9NDDvG95FKK2JHm8Ri2r+/MRwcBizVYFJVT9EKhN+oW0rhCZr0WSE279cSyNNQy2eUQuB7OJHUl/PlwQhrizDjMmeKW23daU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RzFgBHNHRtMsk4Bb06ZT1pSiiK+BVG9QltJrKCEZvQwAnzoyhygkKjXYwUwBOG9GPnOD3srnrPDxW/Jq2MUjFCCshQGt/+CQeVYUEUpwnxup1dIWPew/Q2iXugCDHPtKv11SnZazdF08Q7QE65z0zeots+VABCZLFKyjsTxZaOM= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id i15mr267329huf.1178117361134; Wed, 02 May 2007 07:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2007 07:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:49:20 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <wphillips@example.net> To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Re: Download Links Broken In-Reply-To: <wphillips@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5839_25047426.1178117360710" References: <wphillips@example.net> <wphillips@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_5839_25047426.1178117360710 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Ah. <guiness>Brilliant!</guiness> Thanks. On 5/2/07, Jokin Cuadrado <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > The home for lucene right now is http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ > there you can find the latest releases download links, and also the > links to the documentation. > > regards > Jokin > > > On 5/2/07, Patrick Burrows <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > I am new to this list. I started asking questions on the forums on the > > dotlucene page, but they seem to be... well... under-utilized (and > > buggy...). > > > > I just noticed Christopher Kolstad posted about using the version > > 2.0.xxxsource. On the download page [1] all of the links are broken to > > any download > > > 1.4.3. I saw the comment about all other source being in the Apache > > incubator. Is there another way to start looking at those versions for > which > > my open-source naivate is unaware? > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.dotlucene.net/download/ > > > > -- > > - > > P > > > -- - P ------=_Part_5839_25047426.1178117360710-- From lucene-net-user-return-492wphillips@example.net Wed May 02 18:22:59 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-492wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 2818 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 18:22:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 18:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 13773 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 18:23:05 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 13755 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 18:23:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 13746 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 18:23:04 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:23:04 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:22:57 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so218862wxd for <wphillips@example.net>; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:22:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=WgM97AEkkVY674GIDL/4k32Z/aSvU81iaqg+C8143oTfGNYBAeO32NKKQLfpmBPh4LH1QgZ07QZgwRDeOsvRWgYpQ9ANRis0KbppWI7vzk2PunzavJmsiYPG7YmDrMGXY2f+HCYQteFR0seAG1shS0k9Hl6y+rXF50YsNZropfY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=ON/TVJHiq7oqLcgc1ecn26uQ1Z6w2xTZYeHFMpZNvyHX3pXvswbJxXRcxxllahHVSB78BKC+s6McVtPtZjBzsuQf7KEUyoa+dsFF8biO4lpNYV+MFOp1wAn7Oz7Z9EpsANYtpt9splLWykbpvJtGnwJQ2w70BVe3PkhNQ7fv6co= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n3mr924852agb.1178130156644; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from escortxp ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2sm1078089agd.283.161.120.155.22.32; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "Digy" <wphillips@example.net> To: <wphillips@example.net> References: <1a5601c78c23$11a70150$6901a8c0@aroushlt> <1b2a01c78c52$d4fa0330$6901a8c0@aroushlt> In-Reply-To: <1b2a01c78c52$d4fa0330$6901a8c0@aroushlt> Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 21:22:30 +0300 Message-ID: <000001c78ce6$da1e1600$8e5a4200$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AceMIs7D3Go3bu2GRYukkOucnkojhAAABumwAAvX1FAAJOwPQA== Content-Language: tr X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi George, If you don't mind, i want to send my first patch as a text file. DIGY +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- To be able to run the my simple sample code, I changed the "Clone" method of "SegmentInfos" class as below //-ORG. CODE public override System.Object Clone() { SegmentInfos sis = (SegmentInfos) base.Clone(); for (int i = 0; i < sis.Count; i++) { sis[i] = ((SegmentInfo) sis[i]).Clone(); } return sis; } //+NEW CODE public override System.Object Clone() { SegmentInfos sis = new SegmentInfos(); for (int i = 0; i < this.Count; i++) { sis.Add(((SegmentInfo)this[i]).Clone()); } return sis; } //SAMPLE CODE private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { string IndexPath = "IndexAAA"; IndexWriter wr = new IndexWriter(IndexPath, new Lucene.Net.Analysis.Standard.StandardAnalyzer(), true); DummyIndex(wr); wr.Close(); rtf1.Text = "Indexing Completed\n"; Application.DoEvents(); IndexSearcher s = new IndexSearcher(IndexPath); QueryParser parser = new QueryParser("Field1", new Lucene.Net.Analysis.Standard.StandardAnalyzer()); Query q = parser.Parse("2*"); Hits hits = s.Search(q); rtf1.Text = hits.Length().ToString() + " hits found"; } void DummyIndex(IndexWriter wr) { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { Document doc = new Document(); Field f = new Field("Field1", i.ToString() , Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED); doc.Add(f); wr.AddDocument(doc); } wr.Optimize(); } -----Original Message----- From: George Aroush [mailto:wphillips@example.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 3:43 AM To: wphillips@example.net; wphillips@example.net Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released Hi Everyone, Two other things: 1) Beside the exception during optimization, there are a number of porting questions that I have. Just search for the text "Aroush-2.1" and you will find them. Beside those, there are left over porting questions, so it's best if you search for "Aroush". 2) Any fix that you provide, should be targeted at fixing the port and no more. That is, lets hold off any .NET 2.0 related changes till when we get this release working. Regards, -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: George Aroush [mailto:wphillips@example.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:01 PM > To: wphillips@example.net; > wphillips@example.net > Subject: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released > > Hi Everyone, > > I just finished checking in what is a first cut at Apache > Lucene.Net 2.1 release. This is as a result of porting Java > Lucene 2.1 to Lucene.Net. > > This release is a work in progress and here is a brief high > level summary of > it: > > - Dev Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" > - Issues: Optimizing an index will cause an exception. > - Issues: The "Test" code has not yet be ported for > this release. > - Issues: Code in "contrib" have not been validated to > work with this release. > > While I work on porting the "Test" code from Java Lucene to > Lucene.Net, please take a look at this release, test it, > report issues and most of all submit fixes in form of > patches. For starters, index optimization is causing an > exception. Anyone who can look at this issue is greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > -- George Aroush > From lucene-net-user-return-493wphillips@example.net Thu May 03 07:45:29 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-493wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 18493 invoked from network); 3 May 2007 07:45:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2007 07:45:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 39261 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 07:45:34 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 39109 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 07:45:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 39100 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2007 07:45:34 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 00:45:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 00:45:27 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so376742wxd for <wphillips@example.net>; Thu, 03 May 2007 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=BKc7OaLooRLrlgjo5pb92ZLf07rUc4ladhNVdXW1m6Tzkdf31jqAj495K24qT5e7b3tluIpCeMfZGRneg6lBWAgshhp3OcwHiJOfAZIO99RRsrh/uwpIQB2A883INoZ8YdTpgkAxM4tiqknntx+2yLmVwmKNMgTykERWaj4ctwU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=D3AUS9OSjfc18C4t9Q2W56EnSDWy0YI2+84fYbzb9BkbqH6IzNfmCONSBCurQqC4BEpjabINsddCC7JuPwcdyyqOXeH9xZdt+bvPvaD094LJNuUM/A62IG67+t8dJk1Mk/4kh/ew6wuimFTL8QqVT7TI0yD0yw8dBmAi2ypBplo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id d20mr1411074agc.1178178306354; Thu, 03 May 2007 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:45:06 +0200 From: "Christopher Kolstad" <wphillips@example.net> Sender: wphillips@example.net To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Re: Download Links Broken In-Reply-To: <wphillips@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_48649_32464538.1178178306312" References: <wphillips@example.net> <wphillips@example.net> <wphillips@example.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 603a3b163ce45f17 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_48649_32464538.1178178306312 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Patrick, I saw you mentioned me. From your latest reply it seems you managed to find your way around :) However, just in case, the "stable" source I got my 2.0.xxx build from are located here http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download/ Christopher On 5/2/07, Patrick Burrows <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > Ah. <guiness>Brilliant!</guiness> > > Thanks. > > > On 5/2/07, Jokin Cuadrado <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > > > The home for lucene right now is http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ > > there you can find the latest releases download links, and also the > > links to the documentation. > > > > regards > > Jokin > > > > > > On 5/2/07, Patrick Burrows <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > > I am new to this list. I started asking questions on the forums on the > > > dotlucene page, but they seem to be... well... under-utilized (and > > > buggy...). > > > > > > I just noticed Christopher Kolstad posted about using the version > > > 2.0.xxxsource. On the download page [1] all of the links are broken to > > > any download > > > > 1.4.3. I saw the comment about all other source being in the Apache > > > incubator. Is there another way to start looking at those versions for > > which > > > my open-source naivate is unaware? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.dotlucene.net/download/ > > > > > > -- > > > - > > > P > > > > > > > > > -- > - > P > -- Regards, Christopher Kolstad E-mail: wphillips@example.net (University) wphillips@example.net (Home) wphillips@example.net (Job) ------=_Part_48649_32464538.1178178306312-- From lucene-net-user-return-494wphillips@example.net Thu May 03 09:32:13 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-494wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 58280 invoked from network); 3 May 2007 09:32:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2007 09:32:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 94216 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 09:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 94200 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 09:32:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 94191 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2007 09:32:19 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 02:32:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 02:32:10 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so397072wxd for <wphillips@example.net>; Thu, 03 May 2007 02:31:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=B04cA7HVBYbHWZ8kJIKJuVzUQf3D7w0UnXqQAa/5QEcz4WVXCz/gEkmfy4Kc7qlF92WDXIkBS5v0opaa38HEW+QCE5WG6nAkABWE7oqpL4jLmWhDRc+NCxSoyGuss7WejZWAA3DtrrTdLdkSHHThf1lFs5RAjIIxpPeifZOhu3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=sGAxhpBNf1XUDBkpjLtk6NPxZzcZbAyCPNh6GgHOcNHnhFh5dvkG//mNPNY1g6HyJaH9+oP5VaVKY23e9ts3j/9OtcOIR7sbEFB4o5yxHjmX3OKUEC8HRj4xC6LEzL4wlqtl/mJPuKTB5j21oThX4fzcnezLvOF/93PtotvUENs= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e14mr1446497agb.1178184709497; Thu, 03 May 2007 02:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 02:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 11:31:49 +0200 From: "Christopher Kolstad" <wphillips@example.net> Sender: wphillips@example.net To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Re: Unexpected result from Lucene.Net index when searching for specific term In-Reply-To: <wphillips@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_49425_9857780.1178184709455" References: <wphillips@example.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e6f8ec6d87b118c1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_49425_9857780.1178184709455 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Been testing a bit more. The Lucene index I'm working against is created using java Lucene 2.0 and not Lucene.Net, I've also written a small test class to see if the error was reproduced outside my application, and it was, it only returns a single hit from the index (That is, the hit.Length() method says 1). I've tested the same index with Luke 0.7 and Luke returns 453 hits. Here's my test code: protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { IndexSearcher isearch = new IndexSearcher("c:\\work\\indices\\fk"); if (Request["search"] != null && !Request["search"].Equals("")) { string query = Request["search"]; QueryParser qp = new QueryParser("contents", new StandardAnalyzer()); Query qObject = qp.Parse(query); Hits hits = isearch.Search(qObject); for(int i = 0; i<hits.Length(); i++) { Document doc = hits.Doc(i); Response.Write("Hit id: " +doc.Get("ID")); Response.Write("<br/>Title: " + doc.Get("title")); Response.Write("<br/>Score: " +hits.Score(i)); } } } Any idea why Luke returns the correct number of hits while my code only returns 1 hit? Appreciate any help. > > After a rebuild of the code a search for para* yields 453 hits, 9 of which > are excluded by some later logic matching URIs from the index to guarantee > uniqueness of results. If I then immediately after fire another search for > para* it yields exactly 1 hit. This also happens if I've done another search > against the index and then try para* . At first I was sure it was my own > exclusion code that was removing too much, but after lots of logging and > debugging it turns out the Lucene Hits object only contains 1 hit after the > crucial IndexSearcher.search(query, ....) call. I'm at a loss as to why > this happens. Can't seem to recreate the issue with any other search. But I > can recreate the issue when moving the code from one server to another. > > Here's the relevant code (queryField gets set from a different method > depending on which index we're searching against): > > StandardAnalyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(); > > QueryParser qp = new QueryParser(queryField, analyzer); > Query query; > int totalHits = 0;//Total hits > StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); > int docHits = 0; > Boolean scoreFound = false > try > { > //If there's a space in our search we want to enclose it > with "" > if (search.Contains(" ")) > { > sb.Append("\""); > sb.Append(search); > sb.Append ("\""); > } > else > { > sb.Append(search); > } > if (log.IsDebugEnabled) > { > log.Debug("Search: " + sb.ToString()); //Returns > para* > } > query = qp.Parse(sb.ToString()); > if ( log.IsDebugEnabled) > { > log.Debug("Search made against index: " + > query.ToString()); //Returns contents:para* > } > string weightToSetBoost = tRow.weight; > double weightOfToken = double.Parse(weightToSetBoost, > allowDecimal); > > query.SetBoost((float) weightOfToken); > > Hits hits = isearch.Search(query); //isearch is the > IndexSearcher > if (log.IsDebugEnabled) > { > log.Debug("COUNTING HITS: " + hits.Length()); > //Returns 454 the first time, then 1 any other time for the query para* > } > TreatHits(searchResult, maxHits, hits, originalToken, > indexShort); > //The TreatHits() method is where I thought the error was occurring, > //but since the hit count is 1 as early as the Lucene Hits object, I'm > stumped > > > I've also tried this with the 003 build and the same happens then. > > Let me know if any more information/code is needed. > Anyone run into something similar and willing to share their > experience/solution? > > > -- Regards, Christopher Kolstad E-mail: wphillips@example.net (University) wphillips@example.net (Home) wphillips@example.net (Job) ------=_Part_49425_9857780.1178184709455-- From lucene-net-user-return-495wphillips@example.net Thu May 03 13:14:03 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-495wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 56428 invoked from network); 3 May 2007 13:14:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2007 13:14:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 93441 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 13:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 93283 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2007 13:14:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 93274 invoked by uid 99); 3 May 2007 13:14:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:14:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:14:00 -0700 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b32so432829ika for <wphillips@example.net>; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:13:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=K/xy3P53TmRbN2dumH5pH0Xvg2zRsv8Z5mot0Daamfy1sZkj6R9NRI4v/VMihfGjQpbmA/xQ8xeas/RntphzyDzTo2lKkDe3EAoujMZUB8lOrA8jSR/wJg/8E+Huhq+uQWL4JnRotizEhGehqKoLcifQcnllyluo2HwlRvTBCuc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=YY/azggmhekj3LlRyINdVNZ14NH80mROnXcP2AcnYR0gmdwFcUOz+HpVxP6cJ6IAkrW7UkQZxEOEvlM4PB0/gbW9SfZIPqkpsd2j2HbmZE/GB33/f1ihshesPLToIC4wLczgnS6ljUxJfbOFCAHlApqtHF4vz/8811Nb4MEhn2k= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id e8mr874200hud.1178198018868; Thu, 03 May 2007 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2007 06:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:13:38 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <wphillips@example.net> To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Re: Download Links Broken In-Reply-To: <wphillips@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16707_27507604.1178198018789" References: <wphillips@example.net> <wphillips@example.net> <wphillips@example.net> <wphillips@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_16707_27507604.1178198018789 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks, Christopher. On 5/3/07, Christopher Kolstad <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > I saw you mentioned me. From your latest reply it seems you managed to > find > your way around :) > > However, just in case, the "stable" source I got my 2.0.xxx build from are > located here http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download/ > > Christopher > > On 5/2/07, Patrick Burrows <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > > > Ah. <guiness>Brilliant!</guiness> > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > On 5/2/07, Jokin Cuadrado <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > > > > > The home for lucene right now is > http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ > > > there you can find the latest releases download links, and also the > > > links to the documentation. > > > > > > regards > > > Jokin > > > > > > > > > On 5/2/07, Patrick Burrows <wphillips@example.net> wrote: > > > > I am new to this list. I started asking questions on the forums on > the > > > > dotlucene page, but they seem to be... well... under-utilized (and > > > > buggy...). > > > > > > > > I just noticed Christopher Kolstad posted about using the version > > > > 2.0.xxxsource. On the download page [1] all of the links are broken > to > > > > any download > > > > > 1.4.3. I saw the comment about all other source being in the > Apache > > > > incubator. Is there another way to start looking at those versions > for > > > which > > > > my open-source naivate is unaware? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.dotlucene.net/download/ > > > > > > > > -- > > > > - > > > > P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > - > > P > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Christopher Kolstad > E-mail: wphillips@example.net (University) > wphillips@example.net (Home) > wphillips@example.net (Job) > -- - P ------=_Part_16707_27507604.1178198018789-- From lucene-net-user-return-496wphillips@example.net Fri May 04 00:34:22 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-496wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 42201 invoked from network); 4 May 2007 00:34:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2007 00:34:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 50078 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2007 00:34:28 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 49928 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2007 00:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 49915 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2007 00:34:27 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:34:27 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO sidekick.frogspace.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:34:19 -0700 Received: from pool-68-160-48-89.bos.east.verizon.net ([83.161.120.155] helo=aroushlt) by sidekick.frogspace.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HjlkF-0002Lo-6M for wphillips@example.net; Thu, 03 May 2007 17:33:59 -0700 From: "George Aroush" <wphillips@example.net> To: <wphillips@example.net> Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 20:33:59 -0400 Message-ID: <23a701c78de3$e883e8c0$6901a8c0@aroushlt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: <000001c78ce6$da1e1600$8e5a4200$@com> Thread-Index: AceMIs7D3Go3bu2GRYukkOucnkojhAAABumwAAvX1FAAJOwPQAA/cmpg X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.161.120.155 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wphillips@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Digy. This fixed the Optimize() call. I checked in the change. -- George > -----Original Message----- > From: Digy [mailto:wphillips@example.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 2:22 PM > To: wphillips@example.net > Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released > > Hi George, > > If you don't mind, i want to send my first patch as a text file. > > DIGY > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- > +-+-+-+-+- > > To be able to run the my simple sample code, I changed > the "Clone" > method of "SegmentInfos" class > as below > > //-ORG. CODE > public override System.Object Clone() > { > SegmentInfos sis = (SegmentInfos) base.Clone(); > for (int i = 0; i < sis.Count; i++) > { > sis[i] = ((SegmentInfo) sis[i]).Clone(); > } > return sis; > } > > //+NEW CODE > public override System.Object Clone() > { > SegmentInfos sis = new SegmentInfos(); > for (int i = 0; i < this.Count; i++) > { > sis.Add(((SegmentInfo)this[i]).Clone()); > } > return sis; > } > > > //SAMPLE CODE > private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) > { > string IndexPath = "IndexAAA"; > IndexWriter wr = new IndexWriter(IndexPath, new > Lucene.Net.Analysis.Standard.StandardAnalyzer(), true); > DummyIndex(wr); > wr.Close(); > > rtf1.Text = "Indexing Completed\n"; > Application.DoEvents(); > > > IndexSearcher s = new IndexSearcher(IndexPath); > QueryParser parser = new QueryParser("Field1", > new Lucene.Net.Analysis.Standard.StandardAnalyzer()); > Query q = parser.Parse("2*"); > Hits hits = s.Search(q); > rtf1.Text = hits.Length().ToString() + " hits found"; > } > > void DummyIndex(IndexWriter wr) > { > > for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) > { > Document doc = new Document(); > > Field f = new Field("Field1", i.ToString() , > Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.TOKENIZED); > doc.Add(f); > wr.AddDocument(doc); > } > > wr.Optimize(); > } > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Aroush [mailto:wphillips@example.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 3:43 AM > To: wphillips@example.net; > wphillips@example.net > Subject: RE: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released > > Hi Everyone, > > Two other things: > > 1) Beside the exception during optimization, there are a > number of porting questions that I have. Just search for the > text "Aroush-2.1" and you will find them. Beside those, > there are left over porting questions, so it's best if you > search for "Aroush". > > 2) Any fix that you provide, should be targeted at fixing the > port and no more. That is, lets hold off any .NET 2.0 > related changes till when we get this release working. > > Regards, > > -- George > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: George Aroush [mailto:wphillips@example.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:01 PM > > To: wphillips@example.net; > > wphillips@example.net > > Subject: Apache Lucene.Net 2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" is released > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I just finished checking in what is a first cut at Apache > Lucene.Net > > 2.1 release. This is as a result of porting Java Lucene 2.1 to > > Lucene.Net. > > > > This release is a work in progress and here is a brief high level > > summary of > > it: > > > > - Dev Release: Apache Lucene.Net.2.1 build 001 "early-Alpha" > > - Issues: Optimizing an index will cause an exception. > > - Issues: The "Test" code has not yet be ported for > this release. > > - Issues: Code in "contrib" have not been validated to > work with this > > release. > > > > While I work on porting the "Test" code from Java Lucene to > > Lucene.Net, please take a look at this release, test it, > report issues > > and most of all submit fixes in form of patches. For > starters, index > > optimization is causing an exception. Anyone who can look at this > > issue is greatly appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- George Aroush > > > From lucene-net-user-return-497wphillips@example.net Sun May 13 23:30:00 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-497wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 97999 invoked from network); 13 May 2007 23:30:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 May 2007 23:30:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 13569 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2007 23:30:06 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 13536 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2007 23:30:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 13527 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2007 23:30:06 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 May 2007 16:30:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO web30006.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sun, 13 May 2007 16:29:59 -0700 Received: (qmail 29594 invoked by uid 60001); 13 May 2007 23:29:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Vf6M9Z4pJCQeAONoZipWt42SLEIGe/4mGVuqmH0YDWrKFdKLKSiokuqO57lg6e1tx2L5RrNoBUKEwX5kmk6CgZc1xFbfahDWr56EPPdsyIfAAxaA/vbs+kn50RFjLoV8gs727lb4JXeZhxQ3o1HrkFy+UfuiFNe/ZxrsopHTgm0=; X-YMail-OSG: hjP6qj4VM1k1bnqxW38jTQ0GYrreF78ga2Dkg1EQ7pkoyLhLXRS2O.ddo1o_efu0CXByWLr1WL7P8LR1ftPa_vAJ9ZMCblMHL8vK6sXZEZNMUW6IEt5LwVhXWAUY5A-- Received: from [83.161.120.155] by web30006.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 13 May 2007 16:29:37 PDT Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 16:29:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Dave <wphillips@example.net> Subject: IndexModifier and AddIndexes To: wphillips@example.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I'm new to this list and have been working with Lucene v1.9 for the past month. I have a single question to ask, which can be found at the end of this email. What follows is a bit of background on why I'm asking. I've been learning how to increase the speed of indexing by utilizing RAMDirectories and multithreading. I originally was using an IndexReader and IndexWriter and was going from one to the other as the need required. As I read up on the documentation I found it was much easier to use a IndexModifier as it takes care of a lot of the background work. The only problem is combining the indexes from the multiple threads into a single FSDirectory index. Using an indexWriter it is simple to call the AddIndexes method, but since indexModifier does not have this method I've needed to do some extra work to accomplish the same thing. The Question: Why is the method AddIndexes not a part of indexModifier? Thanks ahead of time, Dave Gosinski ____________________________________________________________________________________ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 From lucene-net-user-return-498wphillips@example.net Mon May 14 18:22:30 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-498wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 38946 invoked from network); 14 May 2007 18:22:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 May 2007 18:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 62849 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 18:22:35 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 62836 invoked by uid 500); 14 May 2007 18:22:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 62827 invoked by uid 99); 14 May 2007 18:22:35 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:28 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so1711184wxd for <wphillips@example.net>; Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=NvI+rlbmFHEGS5U+0n43mos2tHDPv07mXOvAoYNhnJbyEiZGMIHIuih6jR5Hw/tZWbZuXcXDiqjJoPFZ3VzMvZVyQMgUIgVb51qRpGfK4ZTOnMQPkBEkAEx6v5nVKMgt+QFcutiboX7/bsLM9TbYpAIbtCbzevNiLzzB8Ut30hE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=lfhUp4gAtH1mikXDu12HTE15Ra14TKJG0LpZHq+oHZrl7wZyWmMr+pXU5EKlulEzMmhGwr5v7xVCls5VwlBqy0/1ow4vcxGAvCS0PzvUGUt4k9854G0QnepKySsxIVTx9IQx82dvTWn5KQ3HKk2U0b7K0ycSCvU9H2J+RIEO44k= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id p4mr10278446wxa.1179166925611; Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from escortxp ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i35sm17026769wxd.283.161.120.155.22.01; Mon, 14 May 2007 11:22:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Digy" <wphillips@example.net> To: <wphillips@example.net> References: <wphillips@example.net> In-Reply-To: <wphillips@example.net> Subject: RE: IndexModifier and AddIndexes Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 21:21:59 +0300 Message-ID: <004b01c79654$c519a540$4f4cefc0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AceVtqDv2PMVso7gSem0QxV6CRHV7AAm1rWg Content-Language: tr X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Dave & George, According to helppage(http://lucene.apache.org/java/1_9_0/api/org/apache/lucene/index/Ind exModifier.html) ".... This class hides IndexReader and IndexWriter so that you do not need to care about implementation details such as that adding documents is done via IndexWriter and deletion is done via IndexReader. .... Not all methods of IndexReader and IndexWriter are offered by this class. If you need access to additional methods, either use those classes directly or implement your own class that extends IndexModifier." So I think it is not a deliberate desicion of the Author not to implement "AddIndexes". Coding a class like below can be a solution. public class MyIndexModifier : IndexModifier { public MyIndexModifier(Lucene.Net.Store.Directory directory, Analyzer analyzer, bool create) : base(directory, analyzer, create) { } public MyIndexModifier(System.IO.FileInfo file, Analyzer analyzer, bool create) : base(file, analyzer, create) { } public MyIndexModifier(String dirName, Analyzer analyzer, bool create) : base(dirName, analyzer, create) { } public void AddIndexes(IndexReader[] readers) { base.AssureOpen(); base.CreateIndexWriter(); base.indexWriter.AddIndexes(readers); } public void AddIndexes(Lucene.Net.Store.Directory[] dirs) { base.AssureOpen(); base.CreateIndexWriter(); base.indexWriter.AddIndexes(dirs); } } But I think, it would be better to add that method to the IndexModifier *********************************** Index: IndexModifier.cs =================================================================== --- IndexModifier.cs (revision 536611) +++ IndexModifier.cs (working copy) @@ -575,5 +575,19 @@ System.out.println(indexModifier.docCount() + " docs in index"); indexModifier.close(); }*/ + + public void AddIndexes(IndexReader[] readers) + { + AssureOpen(); + CreateIndexWriter(); + indexWriter.AddIndexes(readers); + } + + public void AddIndexes(Lucene.Net.Store.Directory[] dirs) + { + AssureOpen(); + CreateIndexWriter(); + indexWriter.AddIndexes(dirs); + } } } \ No newline at end of file *********************************** DIGY -----Original Message----- From: Dave [mailto:wphillips@example.net] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 2:30 AM To: wphillips@example.net Subject: IndexModifier and AddIndexes Hi, I'm new to this list and have been working with Lucene v1.9 for the past month. I have a single question to ask, which can be found at the end of this email. What follows is a bit of background on why I'm asking. I've been learning how to increase the speed of indexing by utilizing RAMDirectories and multithreading. I originally was using an IndexReader and IndexWriter and was going from one to the other as the need required. As I read up on the documentation I found it was much easier to use a IndexModifier as it takes care of a lot of the background work. The only problem is combining the indexes from the multiple threads into a single FSDirectory index. Using an indexWriter it is simple to call the AddIndexes method, but since indexModifier does not have this method I've needed to do some extra work to accomplish the same thing. The Question: Why is the method AddIndexes not a part of indexModifier? Thanks ahead of time, Dave Gosinski ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097 From lucene-net-user-return-499wphillips@example.net Tue May 15 08:54:06 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-499wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 7269 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 08:54:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 May 2007 08:54:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 26269 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2007 08:54:12 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 26228 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2007 08:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 26215 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2007 08:54:12 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 01:54:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO cluster-j.mailcontrol.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 01:54:01 -0700 Received: from SGBD012100.wsatkins.com ([83.161.120.155]) by rly39j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with SMTP id l4F8raHV006379 for <wphillips@example.net>; Tue, 15 May 2007 09:53:37 +0100 Received: From SGBD012103.wsatkins.com ([83.161.120.155]) by SGBD012100.wsatkins.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR2); id 1179219227681; Tue, 15 May 2007 09:53:47 +0100 Received: from SGBLOW2101.wsatkins.com ([83.161.120.155]) by SGBD012103.wsatkins.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC+1-715-209-1309); Tue, 15 May 2007 09:53:46 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: unsubscribe Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:53:38 +0100 Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: unsubscribe Thread-Index: AceVtqDv2PMVso7gSem0QxV6CRHV7AAm1rWgAB8d/1A= References: <wphillips@example.net> <004b01c79654$c519a540$4f4cefc0$@com> From: "Kainth, Sachin" <wphillips@example.net> To: <wphillips@example.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2007 08:53:46.0891 (UTC) FILETIME=[8C8E3DB0:01C796CE] X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-06-00-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 83.161.120.155 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org unsubscribe This email and any attached files are confidential and copyright protected.= If you are not the addressee, any dissemination of this communication is s= trictly prohibited. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, nothing s= tated in this communication shall be legally binding. The ultimate parent company of the Atkins Group is WS Atkins plc. Register= ed in England No. 1885586. Registered Office Woodcote Grove, Ashley Road, = Epsom, Surrey KT18 5BW. Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really = need to.=20 From lucene-net-user-return-500wphillips@example.net Thu May 17 23:30:58 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-500wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 93498 invoked from network); 17 May 2007 23:30:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2007 23:30:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 60232 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2007 23:31:04 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 60139 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2007 23:31:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact wphillips@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:wphillips@example.net> List-Id: <lucene-net-user.incubator.apache.org> Reply-To: wphillips@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 60130 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2007 23:31:03 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:31:03 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of wphillips@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:56 -0700 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i26so732571wxd for <wphillips@example.net>; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZrVH78Rdu62sYjDKIembVAjFVPkm47F51MXMfX9KlEbGHBJ7kT8om2OWuOOgNxcI+nfu8HjUieNmFDbmiMe/gpYrFa0w7xG5pXyoFsDVUOhQBE4JHJmD53qPoPastxzgKuXeOoS+Cm8fHKat8+Fm4pCkWf6S9PHSaIgSz20lOnw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=JARj7uB9MVQjQZ0xq9LyFG6+Y3e9U9eO+zHnn+/kV3cHia11QszdjW9bpNdLsvMoX2A3HMorz7RfsCIVBVG7QRB1TL14pku+vxErYbK4d3gjagc1gqz2nzWkf9dSgp4naInS1ndkoi5U6y0MIJfMw9BlSv8iKipGmSCFual7/Xo= Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id n14mr1435064wxb.1179444635750; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <wphillips@example.net> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:30:35 -0400 From: "Patrick Burrows" <wphillips@example.net> To: wphillips@example.net Subject: Handling Duplicates MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_24628_30362164.1179444635649" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_24628_30362164.1179444635649 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Is there anything built into DotLucene that will handle duplicate entries? While I am going to do my best to make sure there are no duplicates, there may be a case where I am unsure if a transaction completed (such as a disk full situation, maybe) and I might want to re-add a certain number of items just to make sure they are in there. If there isn't something built in, is there a strategy others have used to handle this? Thanks. ------=_Part_24628_30362164.1179444635649-- From lucene-net-user-return-501wphillips@example.net Thu May 17 23:38:00 2007 Return-Path: <lucene-net-user-return-501wphillips@example.net> Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received: (qmail 96247 invoked from network); 17 May 2007 23:38:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2007 23:38:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 72776 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2007 23:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: wphillips@example.net Received:
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}