From generalxhall@example.net Tue Sep 02 16:44:21 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 73513 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2008 16:44:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2008 16:44:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 75779 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2008 16:44:19 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 75337 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2008 16:44:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 75326 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2008 16:44:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:44:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO spunkymail-a17.g.dreamhost.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:43:18 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [83.161.120.155]) by spunkymail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D6674376 for <xhall@example.net>; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> From: Grant Ingersoll <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:43:44 -0400 References: <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org So, the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for Lucene Java and Lucene Solr. I just need to finish up the paperwork over in incubation and then I think we can seek out volunteers on the two lists to do the splitting in conjunction with the people donating the code. -Grant On Aug 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : As to where, from the Solr point of view, a geosearch feature seems > : core, thus it should go in Solr core. > > if i remember correctly,the LocalSolr has been designed/built as a > "plugin" so it doesn't actually need to live in the "core" Solr code > base > ... it can be a Solr contrib ... but i agree it would probably makethe > most sense for "Local Lucene" to be a Lucene-Java contrib and "Local > Solr" > to be a Solr contrib ... haveing a seperate "Geo" subproject might > make > sense from a code management standpoint, but not really from a > dependency/release management or user base standpoint ... either > people want to use > LocalLucene directly (in which case they don't care about the Solr > pieces) > or they care about using Local Solr (and don't know they care about > the > Lucene piece) > > > -Hoss > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ From generalxhall@example.net Wed Sep 03 08:50:09 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 49669 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2008 08:50:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2008 08:50:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 78319 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2008 08:50:06 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 78291 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2008 08:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 78280 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2008 08:50:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:50:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:49:07 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1Kao3V-0004lQ-Pv for xhall@example.net; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 01:49:37 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 01:49:37 -0700 (PDT) From: heidiweber <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: GermanAnalyzer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, i use the GermanAnalyzer. But i believe that this analyzer isn=C2=B4t worki= ng correct or i make an error in my code. For indexing and searching i take of course the same (German-) analyzer. But if i search for e.g.: m=C3=BCller sch=C3=B6nheit ... then i have no results. When i take the standardanalyzer for indexing and searching, then the documents are found. Do i need another (german-) steemer?=20 Or what could be wrong? Is this a bug in the germananalyzer? Many thanks Best regards Heidi --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GermanAnalyzer-tp192852= 83p19285283.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Wed Sep 03 18:35:22 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 78304 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2008 18:35:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2008 18:35:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 60654 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2008 18:35:20 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 60219 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2008 18:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 60208 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2008 18:35:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:35:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO smtprelay03.ispgateway.de) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:34:18 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (helo=p5b25cfd9.dip.t-dialin.net) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KaxBn-00063r-0I for xhall@example.net; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:34:47 +0200 From: Daniel Naber <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: GermanAnalyzer Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:36:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) References: <xhall@example.net> In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> X-Df-Sender: 695637 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mittwoch, 3. September 2008, heidiweber wrote: > Do i need another (german-) steemer? > Or what could be wrong? Is this a bug in the germananalyzer? I suggest you use the hints from http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-3558e5121806fb4fce80fc022d889484a9248b71 to debug this. If that doesn't help, you could post a short code example to java-user list (which has more traffic than this list). Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 04 10:13:21 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 96859 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2008 10:13:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2008 10:13:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 59384 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2008 10:13:18 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 59350 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2008 10:13:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 59339 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2008 10:13:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:13:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:12:18 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KbBpY-0001FA-Bx for xhall@example.net; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:12:48 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 03:12:48 -0700 (PDT) From: heidiweber <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: GermanAnalyzer In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net References: <xhall@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thank you very much for the Infos. But i think really, that the GermanAnalyzer isn=C2=B4t working correctly. --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GermanAnalyzer-tp192852= 83p19307349.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 04 10:35:34 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 5752 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2008 10:35:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2008 10:35:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 84858 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2008 10:35:30 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 84796 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2008 10:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 84785 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2008 10:35:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:35:29 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:34:29 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KbCB1-00021A-LM for xhall@example.net; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:34:59 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 03:34:59 -0700 (PDT) From: neils <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: GermanAnalyzer In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6319_20892160.1220524499657" X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net References: <xhall@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_6319_20892160.1220524499657 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Heidi, I'm using the german-analyzer without problems. Letters like =C3=A4,=C3=BC,= =C3=B6 are can be Searched. Maybe something in your code. Can you post some lines? Thanks, Neil s http://www.shoobridge.de http://www.shoobridge.de =20 heidiweber wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > i use the GermanAnalyzer. But i believe that this analyzer isn=C2=B4t wor= king > correct or i make an error in my code. >=20 > For indexing and searching i take of course the same (German-) analyzer. >=20 > But if i search for e.g.: >=20 > m=C3=BCller > sch=C3=B6nheit > ... >=20 > then i have no results. When i take the standardanalyzer for indexing and > searching, then the documents are found. >=20 > Do i need another (german-) steemer?=20 > Or what could be wrong? Is this a bug in the germananalyzer? >=20 > Many thanks > Best regards > Heidi >=20 --=20 View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GermanAnalyzer-tp192852= 83p19307699.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. ------=_Part_6319_20892160.1220524499657-- From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 04 16:38:53 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 69803 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2008 16:38:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2008 16:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 31420 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2008 16:38:49 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 31395 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2008 16:38:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 31384 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2008 16:38:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:38:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:37:50 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KbHqe-0006xI-Qe for xhall@example.net; Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:38:20 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:38:20 -0700 (PDT) From: riotpolice <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Escaped boolean queries with wildcards MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In order to support autocomplete in a location search, I'm taking the query string and adding a wildcard to the end. This works fine in general, but I'm having trouble with searches like "Portland, OR". In this case, the OR is treated as a boolean operator, and the search fails. Downcasing the query fixed this problem, but it still fails to return any results if I add my wildcard to the end of the search. The resulting search is: 'portland, or*' 'portland, or' and 'new york, ny*' work correctly, so I assume the problem is still with the presence of the OR. Any ideas what I can do to make this search return the expected result? AH -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Escaped-boolean-queries-with-wildcards-tp19314671p19314671.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Mon Sep 08 08:17:09 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 6925 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2008 08:17:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2008 08:17:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 11118 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2008 08:17:06 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 11096 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2008 08:17:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 11085 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2008 08:17:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:17:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:16:07 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KcbvJ-0006ws-N1 for xhall@example.net; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:16:37 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 01:16:37 -0700 (PDT) From: pagod <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Preliminary, fundamental question about the demo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I just started with Lucene today, and the first thing I did was try out the small demo. I followed the instructions in "Getting started - Building and Installing the Basic Demo" by the letter -- I downloaded the JAR files (2.3.2), unpacked and launched the indexer on the src directory -- worked fine, indexed all java files in the directory and its subdirectories. I didn't try to search for a swearword, but I did try to search for "vector". The fact that I got only one result whereas the demo says I should get a bunch of them isn't really the problem. The problem is that I got only one result although the word "vector" appears in TWO documents: src/demo/org/apache/lucene/demo/html/HTMLParser.java src/demo/org/apache/lucene/demo/SearchFiles.java (I checked that with grep) When I enter my query, I get a very clear answer: Enter query: vector Searching for: vector 1 total matching documents 1. src/demo/org/apache/lucene/demo/SearchFiles.java grep's version: [silenos:apache/lucene/demo] veda> pwd /home/veda/lucene/lucene-2.3.2/src/demo/org/apache/lucene/demo [silenos:apache/lucene/demo] veda> grep -i vector * */* SearchFiles.java: * are all identical, then single norm vector may be shared. */ html/HTMLParser.java: private java.util.Vector jj_expentries = new java.util.Vector(); [silenos:apache/lucene/demo] veda> So my question is a very easy one: what happened? Is there a special processing for java files, like for HTML documents, which leaves comments out? Is that a bug only in the "demo" part of this small program (this would be surprising, as other queries seem to be working fine)? Is there actually a way I can check the content of my index -- what files were actually indexed, or search for a file in particular? A bit like a field search, but with the URI of the file itself (though I think I read this is implementation-dependent, that means one could do it programmatically, but it's not in the demo, right?)? Anyway, thx for your answers. I hope there is a good one to this question, cos I'd feel rather deceived if a search engine so obviously ignores some results... David -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Preliminary%2C-fundamental-question-about-the-demo-tp19367781p19367781.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Mon Sep 08 08:22:29 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 9320 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2008 08:22:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2008 08:22:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 16277 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2008 08:22:25 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 16245 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2008 08:22:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 16234 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2008 08:22:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:22:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:21:27 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1Kcc0T-00077O-KP for xhall@example.net; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:21:57 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 01:21:57 -0700 (PDT) From: pagod <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: Preliminary, fundamental question about the demo In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net References: <xhall@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ok, my mistake. apparently the dot '.' is not considered a separator, so documents containing "java.util.Vector" will *not* be matched by a search for "vector". quite surprising if you ask me, but well, this can most probably be changed... D -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Preliminary%2C-fundamental-question-about-the-demo-tp19367781p19367849.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Wed Sep 10 21:12:16 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 44439 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2008 21:12:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2008 21:12:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 1696 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2008 21:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 1554 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2008 21:12:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 1543 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2008 21:12:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:12:12 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:11:14 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 8D4EE71C57B; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14ED71C576 for <xhall@example.net>; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: Preliminary, fundamental question about the demo In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> References: <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hello, Two things you should know: 1) this is the general@lucene list -- it's hte starting point for people with questions baout the entire Lucene project wheren they really have no idea where to get started. You seem to be asking about the Lucene-Java demo code, so i'm assuming you are interested in writing java code that uses the Lucene search library to build your own applications. In that case, your best bet for future assistence is the java-user@lucene mailing list. (if i'm wrong, and you are more interested in using applications already built with the Lucene library such as Solr or Nutch; or iwth using the .Net port of hte library, these subprojects all have their own subproject mailing list as well)... http://lucene.apache.org/mail.html 2) regarding this comment... : ok, my mistake. apparently the dot '.' is not considered a separator, so : documents containing "java.util.Vector" will *not* be matched by a search : for "vector". quite surprising if you ask me, but well, this can most : probably be changed... That is a specific behavior of the "Analyzer" used when analyzing the text, it most certianly can be changed and there is a wide variety of Analyzers available that come with Lucene (particularly in the analysis contrib package) The other oddity to arrise from what you are seeing is that recent versions of Lucene have reduced the usage of the Vector class quite a bit, but the tutorial still uses it as an example, i'll commit a quick fix for that. -Hoss From generalxhall@example.net Mon Sep 15 19:12:21 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 42043 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2008 19:12:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2008 19:12:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 24834 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 19:12:17 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 24815 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2008 19:12:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 24804 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2008 19:12:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:12:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO spunkymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:11:18 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [83.161.120.155]) by spunkymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A49DFE223 for <xhall@example.net>; Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> From: Grant Ingersoll <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: Local Lucene and Local Solr Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:11:49 -0400 References: <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org OK, I have completed the software grant for Local Lucene. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387 At this point, there needs to be one or more volunteers to pick up doing the work via patches on the issue. -Grant On Sep 2, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > So, the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for > Lucene Java and Lucene Solr. I just need to finish up the paperwork > over in incubation and then I think we can seek out volunteers on > the two lists to do the splitting in conjunction with the people > donating the code. > > -Grant > > On Aug 25, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > >> >> : As to where, from the Solr point of view, a geosearch feature seems >> : core, thus it should go in Solr core. >> >> if i remember correctly,the LocalSolr has been designed/built as a >> "plugin" so it doesn't actually need to live in the "core" Solr >> code base >> ... it can be a Solr contrib ... but i agree it would probably >> makethe >> most sense for "Local Lucene" to be a Lucene-Java contrib and >> "Local Solr" >> to be a Solr contrib ... haveing a seperate "Geo" subproject might >> make >> sense from a code management standpoint, but not really from a >> dependency/release management or user base standpoint ... either >> people want to use >> LocalLucene directly (in which case they don't care about the Solr >> pieces) >> or they care about using Local Solr (and don't know they care about >> the >> Lucene piece) >> >> >> -Hoss >> From generalxhall@example.net Tue Sep 16 16:00:21 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 99772 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2008 16:00:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2008 16:00:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 34169 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2008 16:00:15 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 34154 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2008 16:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 34143 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2008 16:00:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:00:15 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO bay0-omc2-s38.bay0.hotmail.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:59:15 +0000 Received: from BAY107-W7 ([83.161.120.155]) by bay0-omc2-s38.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(577)889-0000); Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:59:47 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_bb801895-2ec7-453b-9a9d-aa65dd51d6fe_" X-Originating-IP: [83.161.120.155] From: marcus clemens <xhall@example.net> To: <xhall@example.net> Subject: RE: Local Lucene and Local Solr Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> References: <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2008 15:59:47.0510 (UTC) FILETIME=[3E48AD60:01C91815] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_bb801895-2ec7-453b-9a9d-aa65dd51d6fe_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi=20 =20 i am looking for a Lucene Solr consultant to work onsite in west london for= at least 6 months . rates are around 400- 500 a day =20 olease call me on 01892 752730 if this is of any interset=20 =20 kind regards=20 =20 marcus clemens > From: xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net> Subject: Re: Lo= cal Lucene and Local Solr> Date: Mon=2C 15 Sep 2008 15:11:49 -0400> > OK=2C= I have completed the software grant for Local Lucene. See https://issues.a= pache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387> > At this point=2C there needs to be one= or more volunteers to pick up > doing the work via patches on the issue.> = > -Grant> > > On Sep 2=2C 2008=2C at 12:43 PM=2C Grant Ingersoll wrote:> > = > So=2C the consensus seems to be to split into contrib modules for > > Luc= ene Java and Lucene Solr. I just need to finish up the paperwork > > over i= n incubation and then I think we can seek out volunteers on > > the two lis= ts to do the splitting in conjunction with the people > > donating the code= .> >> > -Grant> >> > On Aug 25=2C 2008=2C at 2:24 PM=2C Chris Hostetter wro= te:> >> >>> >> : As to where=2C from the Solr point of view=2C a geosearch = feature seems> >> : core=2C thus it should go in Solr core.> >>> >> if i re= member correctly=2Cthe LocalSolr has been designed/built as a> >> "plugin" = so it doesn't actually need to live in the "core" Solr > >> code base> >> .= .. it can be a Solr contrib ... but i agree it would probably > >> makethe>= >> most sense for "Local Lucene" to be a Lucene-Java contrib and > >> "Loc= al Solr"> >> to be a Solr contrib ... haveing a seperate "Geo" subproject m= ight > >> make> >> sense from a code management standpoint=2C but not reall= y from a> >> dependency/release management or user base standpoint ... eith= er > >> people want to use> >> LocalLucene directly (in which case they don= 't care about the Solr > >> pieces)> >> or they care about using Local Solr= (and don't know they care about > >> the> >> Lucene piece)> >>> >>> >> -Ho= ss> >>>=20 _________________________________________________________________ Get all your favourite content with the slick new MSN Toolbar - FREE http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354027/direct/01/= --_bb801895-2ec7-453b-9a9d-aa65dd51d6fe_-- From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 18 00:07:40 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 51179 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 00:07:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 00:07:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 2671 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 00:07:36 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 2536 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 00:07:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 2525 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 00:07:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:07:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO mslinux.101tec.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:06:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by mslinux.101tec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B71144971; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:06:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) at 101tec.com Received: from jemez.carrieriq.com (CarrierIQ-FWA002-untru.sjz.navisite.com [83.161.120.155]) by mslinux.101tec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F6B144972; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:06:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> From: Stefan Groschupf <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1) Subject: [ANN] katta-0.1.0 release - distribute lucene indexes in a grid Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:06:19 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org After 5 month work we are happy to announce the first developer preview release of katta. This release contains all functionality to serve a large, sharded lucene index on many servers. Katta is standing on the shoulders of the giants lucene, hadoop and zookeeper. Main features: + Plays well with Hadoop + Apache Version 2 License. + Node failure tolerance + Master failover + Shard replication + Plug-able network topologies (Shard - Distribution and Selection Polices) + Node load balancing at client Please give katta a test drive and give us some feedback! Download: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=225750 website: http://katta.sourceforge.net/ Getting started in less than 3 min: http://katta.wiki.sourceforge.net/Getting+started Installation on a grid: http://katta.wiki.sourceforge.net/Installation Katta presentation today (09/17/08) at hadoop user, yahoo mission college: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/1075456/ * slides will be available online later Many thanks for the hard work: Johannes Zillmann, Marko Bauhardt, Martin Schaaf (101tec) I apologize the cross posting. Yours, the Katta Team. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 101tec Inc., Menlo Park, California http://www.101tec.com From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 18 02:08:15 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 75410 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 02:08:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 02:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 95191 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 02:08:11 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 95174 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 02:08:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 95163 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 02:08:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:08:10 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:07:09 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1Kg8vl-0004m8-KO for xhall@example.net; Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:07:41 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:07:41 -0700 (PDT) From: chaiguy1337 <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Updating an index?? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all. I'm new to Lucene, reading Lucene in Action, and using Lucene.NET, but my question is not platform specific. I'm baffled about the "create" parameter of the IndexWriter/IndexModifier constructor. It seems the only two options are overwrite and fail. I would like to append a not-yet-existing database each time I open the IndexWriter. In other words, the first time the user runs my program, the index is clearly not going to exist, but every successive time the method is called, I want it to append the index, not overwrite it! It seems to me the only possible way this design could work is if it were also coupled with some way to determine if the index already exists. Am I totally missing something? Is the append option even supported? Perhaps I'm expected to create a new index each time, for every single document (my documents are indexed one at a time because they are indexed as soon as they are created) and then merge them into the main index? That seems silly when a single operation could take care of everything. Some light shed on this would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Updating-an-index---tp19544691p19544691.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 18 10:07:30 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 68364 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 10:07:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 10:07:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 68809 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 10:07:26 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 68496 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 10:07:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 68485 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 10:07:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:07:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:06:23 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so1039983ywj.5 for <xhall@example.net>; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id f2mr4970769and.36.1221732413949; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?83.161.120.155? ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b12sm17490660ana.14.283.161.120.155.06.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> From: Michael McCandless <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Subject: Re: Updating an index?? Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:06:51 -0400 References: <xhall@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The latest versions of Lucene (java) have a constructor for IndexWriter that does not take a boolean create argument, and simply opens for append if the index is already present else creates the index. I don't remember exactly which version this was added in, but it was a good while ago. Mike chaiguy1337 wrote: > > Hi all. I'm new to Lucene, reading Lucene in Action, and using > Lucene.NET, > but my question is not platform specific. > > I'm baffled about the "create" parameter of the IndexWriter/ > IndexModifier > constructor. It seems the only two options are overwrite and fail. I > would > like to append a not-yet-existing database each time I open the > IndexWriter. > In other words, the first time the user runs my program, the index is > clearly not going to exist, but every successive time the method is > called, > I want it to append the index, not overwrite it! > > It seems to me the only possible way this design could work is if it > were > also coupled with some way to determine if the index already exists. > > Am I totally missing something? Is the append option even supported? > Perhaps > I'm expected to create a new index each time, for every single > document (my > documents are indexed one at a time because they are indexed as soon > as they > are created) and then merge them into the main index? That seems > silly when > a single operation could take care of everything. > > Some light shed on this would be appreciated. > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Updating-an-index---tp19544691p19544691.html > Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. > From generalxhall@example.net Thu Sep 18 14:47:31 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 45302 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2008 14:47:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 2008 14:47:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 82735 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 14:47:25 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 82710 invoked by uid 500); 18 Sep 2008 14:47:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 82699 invoked by uid 99); 18 Sep 2008 14:47:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:47:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhall@example.net designates 83.161.120.155 as permitted sender) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:46:24 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([83.161.120.155]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KgKmW-0008Nb-Rx for xhall@example.net; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:46:56 -0700 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:46:56 -0700 (PDT) From: chaiguy1337 <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: Updating an index?? In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: xhall@example.net References: <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ah I see. Hopefully that will make it into Lucene.NET eventually (it's using the 2.0 codebase right now), thought it hasn't been updated in a while. As a followup, I did manage to get it working alright by checking for the presence of a "segments" file in the directory. Is this reliable? Is there a recommended way to tell if there is already an index present in the directory? I also create an empty index at startup if the segments file is not found, so that my method that creates an IndexWriter normally for updating can pass 'false' for create, and "segments" seems to be the only file created when there are no documents in the index. Logan Michael McCandless-2 wrote: > > The latest versions of Lucene (java) have a constructor for > IndexWriter that does not take a boolean create argument, and simply > opens for append if the index is already present else creates the index. > > I don't remember exactly which version this was added in, but it was a > good while ago. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Updating-an-index---tp19544691p19554571.html Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. From generalxhall@example.net Fri Sep 19 12:32:41 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 39433 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2008 12:32:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Sep 2008 12:32:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 11501 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2008 12:32:36 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 11487 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2008 12:32:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 11476 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2008 12:32:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:32:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:31:34 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g16so154659nfd.15 for <xhall@example.net>; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 83.161.120.155 with SMTP id u2mr6190mup.45.1221827525752; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?83.161.120.155? ( [83.161.120.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm1758478muh.16.283.161.120.155.32.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> From: Michael McCandless <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: Updating an index?? Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 08:32:01 -0400 References: <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> <xhall@example.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's better to use the static IndexReader.indexExists(Directory) method, since the file "segments" has actually changed to "segments_N" in recent Lucene releases. In general the specific naming of files in Lucene's index directory can change from release to release. Mike chaiguy1337 wrote: > > Ah I see. Hopefully that will make it into Lucene.NET eventually > (it's using > the 2.0 codebase right now), thought it hasn't been updated in a > while. > > As a followup, I did manage to get it working alright by checking > for the > presence of a "segments" file in the directory. Is this reliable? Is > there a > recommended way to tell if there is already an index present in the > directory? I also create an empty index at startup if the segments > file is > not found, so that my method that creates an IndexWriter normally for > updating can pass 'false' for create, and "segments" seems to be the > only > file created when there are no documents in the index. > > Logan > > > Michael McCandless-2 wrote: >> >> The latest versions of Lucene (java) have a constructor for >> IndexWriter that does not take a boolean create argument, and simply >> opens for append if the index is already present else creates the >> index. >> >> I don't remember exactly which version this was added in, but it >> was a >> good while ago. >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Updating-an-index---tp19544691p19554571.html > Sent from the Lucene - General mailing list xhall@example.net. > From generalxhall@example.net Fri Sep 26 17:26:16 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 49826 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2008 17:26:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2008 17:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 4185 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2008 17:26:01 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 4059 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2008 17:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 3694 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2008 17:25:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:25:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:25:00 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id B0E8571C674; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE0771C673; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:25:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: ANNOUNCE: Application Period Opens for Travel Assistance to ApacheCon US 2008 Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org NOTE: This is a cross posted announcement to all Lucene sub-projects, please confine any replies to xhall@example.net. ------------- The Travel Assistance Committee is taking in applications for those wanting to attend ApacheCon US 2008 between the 3rd and 7th November 2008 in New Orleans. The Travel Assistance Committee is looking for people who would like to be able to attend ApacheCon US 2008 who need some financial support in order to get there. There are VERY few places available and the criteria is high, that aside applications are open to all open source developers who feel that their attendance would benefit themselves, their project(s), the ASF and open source in general. Financial assistance is available for flights, accomodation and entrance fees either in full or in part, depending on circumstances. It is intended that all our ApacheCon events are covered, so it may be prudent for those in Europe and or Asia to wait until an event closer to them comes up - you are all welcome to apply for ApacheCon US of course, but there must be compelling reasons for you to attend an event further away that your home location for your application to be considered above those closer to the event location. More information can be found on the main Apache website at http://www.apache.org/travel/index.html - where you will also find a link to the application form and details for submitting. Time is very tight for this event, so applications are open now and will end on the 2nd October 2008 - to give enough time for travel arrangements to be made. Good luck to all those that will apply. Regards, The Travel Assistance Committee From generalxhall@example.net Fri Sep 26 18:55:20 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 17979 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2008 18:55:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2008 18:55:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 51465 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2008 18:55:03 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 50794 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2008 18:55:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 50734 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2008 18:55:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:55:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO spunkymail-a10.g.dreamhost.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:53:58 +0000 Received: from [83.161.120.155] (adsl-074-229-189-244.sip.rmo.bellsouth.net [83.161.120.155]) by spunkymail-a10.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8BD1615BB; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <xhall@example.net> From: Grant Ingersoll <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net, xhall@example.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: ApacheCon US promo Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:53:59 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Cross-posting... Just wanted to let everyone know that there will be a number of Lucene/ Solr/Mahout/Tika related talks, training sessions, and Birds of a Feather (BOF) gatherings at ApacheCon New Orleans this fall. Details: When: November 3-7 Where: Sheraton, New Orleans, USA URL: http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/ Lucene: Advanced Indexing Techniques by Michael Busch: http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/7 Lucene Boot Camp (2 day hands-on training by me): http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/69 Solr: Solr out of the Box by Chris Hostetter: http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/9 Beyond the Box by Hoss: http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/10 Solr Boot Camp (1 day hands-on training by Erik Hatcher): http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/91 Mahout: Intro to Mahout and Machine Learning (by me): http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/11 Tika: Content Analysis for ECM with Apache Tika by Paolo Mottadelli : http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/sessions/12 There's also one more Lucene session that is TBD, but it will be on that same Wednesday as everything else. Chances are it will be an intro to Lucene type talk. BOFs: http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/BirdsOfaFeatherUs08 Cheers, Grant From generalxhall@example.net Mon Sep 29 04:54:37 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 90645 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 04:54:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 04:54:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 83244 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 04:54:34 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 83221 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 04:54:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 83210 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 04:54:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:54:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO rectangular.com) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 04:53:30 +0000 Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <xhall@example.net>) id 1KkAln-0000Fv-9X for xhall@example.net; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:54:03 -0700 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:54:03 -0700 To: xhall@example.net Subject: JIRA Forwarding Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Marvin Humphrey <xhall@example.net> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Greets, How do I get Lucy's JIRA set up so that it forwards discussion to the lucy-dev list, as happens with Java Lucene's JIRA and java-dev? If I read <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/smtpconfig.html>, correctly, I can't do that myself, because although I'm "project lead" I don't have the right permissions. Marvin Humphrey Rectangular Research http://www.rectangular.com/ From generalxhall@example.net Mon Sep 29 05:07:14 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 97434 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 05:07:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 05:07:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 86218 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 05:07:11 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 86192 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 05:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 86181 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 05:07:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:07:11 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.161.120.155] (HELO radix.cryptio.net) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:06:09 +0000 Received: by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id E23CE71C41E; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [83.161.120.155]) by radix.cryptio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D605B71C17B for <xhall@example.net>; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:06:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Hostetter <xhall@example.net> To: xhall@example.net Subject: Re: JIRA Forwarding In-Reply-To: <xhall@example.net> Message-ID: <xhall@example.net> References: <xhall@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org : If I read : <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/smtpconfig.html>, : correctly, I can't do that myself, because although I'm "project lead" I don't : have the right permissions. : I think you're looking at the wrong help doc, that's about global SMTP settings, what you're interested in is configuring a Notification Schema... http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/notification_schemes.html ...however that also requires 'JIRA Administrators' permissions, which is (i think) only given to Infra and PMC Chairs (ie: Grant ... but Doug may still have access) -Hoss From generalxhall@example.net Mon Sep 29 11:36:31 2008 Return-Path: <generalxhall@example.net> Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 34744 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2008 11:36:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Sep 2008 11:36:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 67109 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 11:36:28 -0000 Delivered-To: xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 66782 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2008 11:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact xhall@example.net; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Post: <mailto:xhall@example.net> List-Id: <general.lucene.apache.org> Reply-To: xhall@example.net Delivered-To: mailing list xhall@example.net Received: (qmail 66771 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2008 11:36:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (83.161.120.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP;
{'source': 'Apache Software Foundation Public Mail Archives'}