Title: Metadata for Bing Maps Aerial in ArcGIS Desktop?
Tags: arcgis-desktop;metadata;bing-maps
Question: Is there a way to dynamically pull up metadata on the Bing Maps Aerial web mapping service in ArcGIS?  I am working at a 1:245 scale across various locations in OR and CA and need to know if Bing's coordinate system is accurate to within 0.5 meters.  Additionally, I need to know the resolution.  ESRI's description is pretty vague:
This web map contains the Bing Maps aerial imagery web mapping
service, which offers worldwide orthographic aerial and satellite
imagery. Coverage varies by region, with the most detailed coverage in
the USA and United Kingdom. Coverage in different areas within a
country also varies in detail based on the availability of imagery for
that region. Bing Maps is continuously adding imagery in new areas and
updating coverage in areas of existing coverage.

Here is the accepted answer: Yes, if you have a Bing API key, you can get the full metadata for the imagery at each zoom level. Everything you need is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff701716.aspx

Here is another answer: It's highly unlikely you will find the metadata you need through Bing (or Google, for Google Maps). Their basemap is a composite of many, many different data sources, and they have no business incentive to take the time to organize and publish metadata about its geolocational accuracy.
Moreover, just assessing horizontal accuracy of orthorectified imagery is time consuming and expensive. Since this isn't a priority for Microsoft, they probably don't require that their imagery vendors perform such a rigorous QA with multiple ground control points in an effort to save money. In georeferencing work I've done using the Bing Aerial data in ArcGIS, I've usually gotten RMSE of +/- 10 meters.
I should also say that 0.5 meter horizontal accuracy is asking a lot. Think about it--the orthorectification process relies on knowing the exact GPS position of the airplane, the precise angle of the sensor, and the topography of the surface. You need some serious hardware and a really good DEM in order to get sub-meter accuracy. The best I've ever seen is 0.6 meter accuracy in this 15cm imagery for Massachusetts. On the other hand, USDA NAIP imagery that many states publish as DOQ(Q)s are only accurate to within six meters.

{'source': 'StackExchangeDataset', 'subset': 'gis.stackexchange.com', 'metadata': {'AnswerCount': 2, 'CommentCount': 0, 'ContentLicense': 'CC BY-SA 3.0', 'CreationDate': '2012:00:08/15/12', 'FavoriteCount': 4.0, 'PostTypeId': 1, 'Tags': '<arcgis-desktop><metadata><bing-maps>', 'Title': 'Metadata for Bing Maps Aerial in ArcGIS Desktop?', 'ViewCount': 2868, 'id': 31558, 'user_AboutMe': '<p>Geospatial Software Engineer and Principal Consultant at <a href="http://www.redfoxgis.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">RedFox GIS &amp; Remote Sensing</a>.  Please feel free to contact me at the <a href="https://www.redfoxgis.com/contact" rel="nofollow noreferrer">RedFox website</a> for business inquiries.</p>\n<p>Twitter: <a href="https://twitter.com/RedFoxGIS" rel="nofollow noreferrer">@RedFoxGIS</a></p>\n<hr />\n<p>My work focuses largely on integrating machine learning and remote sensing to assess landscape level vegetation structure and composition.</p>\n<p>I am first and foremost a spatial ecologist working to promote the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community.  I enjoy finding solutions to problems on this site that I otherwise would not have exposure to in my day-to-day work.</p>\n<p>Interests: Remote sensing, GIS, machine learning, computer vision, spatial statistics, big data, wildlife conservation, and forest ecology.</p>\n<p>&quot;The feed-forward back-propagation multi-layer perceptron (MLP) is the type of neural network most commonly encountered in remote sensing...&quot; Atkinson and Tatnall, 2010 <em>International Journal of Remote Sensing</em></p>\n', 'user_AccountId': 1554834.0, 'user_DisplayName': 'Aaron', 'user_Reputation': 50528.0, 'user_Views': 4987.0, 'user_id': 8104.0}}