#ubuntu-qt 2018-04-01 <lubot2> DoralynneOeONG was added by: DoralynneOeONG <lubot2> was removed by: tsimonq2 <lubot2> was removed by: tsimonq2 <lubot2> was removed by: tsimonq2 <lubot2> was removed by: tsimonq2 <lubot2> was removed by: tsimonq2 <lubot2> <tsimonq2> There, all the deleted accounts are gone... <lubot2> <tsimonq2> Lazy You were right <lubot2> <Lazy B> :D <lubot2> LatvinaKniazeva was added by: LatvinaKniazeva <lubot2> AlenchikzavTropareva was added by: AlenchikzavTropareva #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-02 -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New sync: dde-qt5integration (bionic-proposed/primary) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] <lubot2> ÐÐ¾Ð½Ð½Ð° petro was added by: ÐÐ¾Ð½Ð½Ð° petro -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [sync] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: dde-qt5integration [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: dde-qt5integration [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: dde-qt5integration [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: dde-qt5integration [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: dde-qt5integration [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: dde-qt5integration [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [amd64] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [armhf] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [arm64] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [s390x] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted dde-qt5integration [i386] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1] <lubot2> ArdeliazavBigoness was added by: ArdeliazavBigoness <lubot2> <mitya57> All those people with âzavâ in their usernames look like bots too <lubot2> <mitya57> Not welcome :) <lubot2> AlenchikzavTropareva was removed by: mitya57 <lubot2> IrazavStasova was removed by: mitya57 <lubot2> ArdeliazavBigoness was removed by: mitya57 <lubot2> <tsimonq2> Alright. #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-03 <lubot2> was removed by: acheronuk <lubot2> was removed by: acheronuk <lubot2> was removed by: acheronuk #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-05 <lubot3> Biddie Caba was added by: Biddie Caba <lubot3> Daune Devita was added by: Daune Devita <lubot3> Biddie Caba was removed by: acheronuk <lubot3> Bridie Ackerman was added by: Bridie Ackerman <lubot3> Aubrey Brewer was added by: Aubrey Brewer <lubot3> <mitya57> Maybe we should restrict joining this chat? And change IRC topic to say âPing us here to be added to the Telegram chatâ? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I can't tell if these people are legit or not. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Yeah. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Sounds good to me. <lubot3> <mitya57> Two previous sets of joining people were bots, so these are most probably too :) <lubot3> * mitya57 finds it suspicious that their names all start with {A,B,C,D} <lubot3> <ilyaishere> @mitya57, You're surprisingly popular among bots :) <lubot3> <ilyaishere> The chat link must have got to some spam list <lubot3> <acheronuk> does anyone else keep reading "Achim Bohnet" as "Achim Botnet"? <lubot3> * acheronuk hides <lubot3> <mitya57> I don't have rights to change or delete the group name (t.me/ubuntuqt), @tsimonq2 can you do that? <lubot3> <mitya57> Or there is no way back? :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, . <lubot3> <mitya57> Thanks! Can you update the IRC topic as well? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Doing :) * tsimonq2 changed the topic of #ubuntu-qt to: Ubuntu Qt Discussion Channel | https://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-qt-transitions | Help remove Qt 4! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=qt4-removal | 5.9.4 in Bionic, 5.5.1 in Xenial, 5.2.1 in Trusty | This channel is bridged to Telegram, ask us to be added | This channel is lauren32@example.com. Use of this channel implies acceptance of Ubuntu IRC channel terms. <lubot3> <mitya57> Looks great, thank you! <lubot3> <tsimonq2> \o/ <lubot3> Aubrey Brewer was removed by: mitya57 <lubot3> Bridie Ackerman was removed by: mitya57 <lubot3> Daune Devita was removed by: mitya57 <tsimonq2> Dup time. <tsimonq2> Whoops, wrong chan. <acheronuk> o_O <tsimonq2> I had to make one bug a duplicate of another. Thus, dup time. :P <valorie> Achim Bohnet is a real person <acheronuk> I know. just joking <valorie> I read it the same way sometimes <valorie> :-) #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-06 <lubot3> Essy Canessa was added by: Essy Canessa <lubot3> <Essy Canessa> http://tinyurl.com/ybm3nmhy <lubot3> <tsimonq2> What. <lubot3> Essy Canessa was removed by: tsimonq2 <lubot3> * alleehol is not bot net ð <lubot3> <alleehol> nevertheless an interesting association <lubot3> * TronFortyTwo <lubot3> <TronFortyTwo> ops sorry #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-09 <lubot3> <acheronuk> Fwd from nggraham: It would be really really great to get this in for Bionic: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rtm/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/+bug/1761016 <lubot3> <acheronuk> Fwd from IrcsomeBot: <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1761016 in qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu RTM) "cherry-pick https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/224684/ to fix image slideshows in KDE Plasma" [High,Confirmed] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1761016 in qtdeclarative-opensource-src (Ubuntu RTM) "cherry-pick https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/224684/ to fix image slideshows in KDE Plasma" [High,Confirmed] <lubot3> <acheronuk> Fwd from nggraham: The Qt patch just landed in 5.11 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I can take care of it. <lisandro> tsimonq2: if you can also commit it in Debian. This is definitely bugging us all <lisandro> acheronuk: thanks for the update! <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @lisandro, Sure, should I prepare an upload for Sid? <lisandro> Yes please <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Will do in a few hours. <lisandro> Sure! <valorie> weeeeeeeee <valorie> it was biting me you-know-where #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-10 <lubot3> <mitya57> The tarballs for Qt 5.9.5 are out: http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.9/5.9.5/submodules/ <lubot3> <mitya57> Though not officially announced yet, and no tags in Git yet. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Oooooooooh <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, When could it be announced? <lubot3> <mitya57> Maybe later today, but I am not sure. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ok. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> As soon as it's announced, I'm going to work as hard as I can to land it so it can go in this weekend or before. <mitya57> There is a release team meeting on #qt-releases starting right now <lubot3> <mitya57> <jaheikki3_> So 5.9.5: Content was ready but new release blocker reported from testing <lubot3> <frkleint> huih..which one? <lubot3> <jaheikki3_> QTBUG-67577 <lubot3> <qt_gerrit> jaheikki3_: [REG 5.9.4 -> 5.9.5] qt.io shows warning about Certificate Transparency - https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-67577 (In Progress) <lubot3> <jaheikki3_> We discussed about it with Kai & it is quite visible regression <lubot3> <mitya57> <jaheikki3_> Target is still to get release out during this week <lubot3> <mitya57> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/releasing/2018-April/004631.html <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ok <lubot3> * tsimonq2 joins #qt-releases <lubot3> <tsimonq2> It's a Windows issue :| <lisandro> @tsimonq2 get the packaging ready, if it's only one change you will have it ready to go once the fix is there <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Good idea. <lubot3> <mitya57> @lisandro, They removed the previously published tarballs, so unless @tsimonq2 had downloaded them, it would be hard. <lisandro> if I read correctly they released a beta <lubot3> <mitya57> I wonder if checksums of the (non-WebEngine) tarballs will be the same in the final release. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Ah no <tsimonq2> So from the look of things, Ubuntu 18.10 will ship with Qt 5.11. #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-11 -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New binary: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [amd64] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [armhf] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [arm64] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [s390x] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- New: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [i386] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1] #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-12 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> YAY <lubot3> <tsimonq2> 5.9.5 is out. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I'll start work on it after school. <lubot3> <mitya57> So we have a week before final freeze. Nice. <lubot3> <mitya57> I would like to see also http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/commit/?id=a35c6a49c938fefb in Bionic, it fixes bug 1761708 <ubottu> bug 1761708 in qtbase-opensource-src (Ubuntu) "QWebEngineView crashes" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761708 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, "As long as it's in proposed, we're fine." <lubot3> :P <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Awesome! <lubot3> <mitya57> @mitya57, Do you want me to commit that patch, or will you better do it yourself? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, I can take care of it. <lubot3> <mitya57> Thanks! <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I have a few more patches I need to do and even a few new packages. :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Thanks for pointing it out! :) <lubot3> * tsimonq2 starts the Qt transition in Bileto <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Let's see how far I can get tonight. <tsimonq2> I'll be keeping track of things in https://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-qt-transitions which is in the topic. * tsimonq2 changed the topic of #ubuntu-qt to: Ubuntu Qt Discussion Channel | Staging 5.9.5 to go into Bionic: https://is.gd/0Rfz4k | https://pad.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-qt-transitions | Help remove Qt 4! https://is.gd/QXLEFW | 5.9.4 in Bionic, 5.5.1 in Xenial, 5.2.1 in Trusty | This channel is bridged to Telegram, ask us to be added | This channel is lauren32@example.com. Use of this channel implies acceptance of Ubuntu IRC channe <tsimonq2> Argh, just barely short. :P * tsimonq2 changed the topic of #ubuntu-qt to: Ubuntu Qt Discussion Channel | Staging 5.9.5 to go into Bionic: https://is.gd/0Rfz4k | https://is.gd/GIZG9E | Help remove Qt 4! https://is.gd/QXLEFW | 5.9.4 in Bionic, 5.5.1 in Xenial, 5.2.1 in Trusty | This channel is bridged to Telegram, ask us to be added | This channel is lauren32@example.com. Use of this channel implies acceptance of Ubuntu IRC channel terms. <tsimonq2> Better. <tsimonq2> There, now the Bileto ticket link is in the topic. <tsimonq2> So with qtbase, the changes are a bit too complex to do a full "git merge" but I'll go through and cherry-pick anything I think is relevant. <tsimonq2> Initial qtbase upload done to the PPA. Assuming I did everything correctly, I can get in a groove, and the rest will be a walk in the park. #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-13 * tsimonq2 goes to bed <tsimonq2> The pad has been updated. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Would you be able to use the pad with me to tag team this Qt transition? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I'm starting to feel a little bit under the weather and could not finish before Final Freeze. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> But, spends. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> s/spends/depends/ autocorrect :/ * valorie sends along hot tea and vitamin C <lubot3> <tsimonq2> <3 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Oh, I totally meant to ping @mitya57 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @lubuntu_bot, Fortunately my mom has both. But it's going around; a third of most of my classes was gone today, and apparently they're all sick. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> s/was/were/ <valorie> did you get a flu shot this year? <valorie> or is this just a cold <valorie> I would love to get a shot to avoid *both* <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Didn't get my flu shot, no. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Might be strep. <valorie> ewwww <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ikr :( <valorie> if you insist, at the doctor's they can just do a quick test <valorie> then you can see the doc IF it is positive <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Right. <valorie> because a sore throat because of something else doesn't need meds <valorie> it needs a bit of sleep, more water, some vit. c <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Right. <valorie> strep needs meds <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Anyway, this is the Qt channel. :) <valorie> oops <valorie> sorry <lubot3> <tsimonq2> ;) #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-14 <mitya57> tsimonq2: get better, I will try to make some Qt uploads right now. <valorie> good to hear, mitya57 <valorie> hopefully he is sleeping now <mitya57> haha, I hope so too :) <valorie> it's 11:30pm here, so 2 or 3:30 am there * mitya57 wonders why tsimonq2 merged Debian's qtdeclarative 5.10.1 into ubuntu/bionic <mitya57> the patches, the symbols files and the copyright now are all wrong :( <lubot3> <acheronuk> @tsimonq2 ^^^ <mitya57> tsimonq2: For now I made an upload based on the last ubuntu tag, maybe we will overwrite the branch or merge my tag after the final upload. <mitya57> tsimonq2: I did not bump qtdeclarative ABI, I think bumping the qtbase one is enough. <mitya57> Also we have dh_qmlcdeps which should make the dependencies stricter when it is used :) <mitya57> Also uploaded qttools built without webkit support, this should shortcut the bootstrapping a bit. <mitya57> It looks like qtdeclarative *does* have removed symbols, so after all I bumped the ABI version there too. <mitya57> tsimonq2: If you have any qtbase commits please push them. (Otherwise no problem, I will re-create the commits based on your changes in the PPA.) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Thank you mitya57! :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I did have commits but only got as far as updating patches for qtdeclarative which I didn't finish locally. <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2, I meant qtbase, not qtdeclarative <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I have commits for qtbase, qtdeclarative, and qtxmlpatterns, assuming Seafile is working :> <lubot3> <acheronuk> @tsimonq2 I'm reverting the keyboard navigation support in QtVirualKeyboard, as it currently breaks using the enter key to log in via sddm <lubot3> <tsimonq2> ack <lubot3> <acheronuk> I'll do a MP in salsa with my changes after I upload. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Kool. <lubot3> <acheronuk> @tsimonq2 https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtvirtualkeyboard/merge_requests/2 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @acheronuk, Usually we like that split apart into multiple commits but I'll accept it. <lubot3> <acheronuk> It's one commit why would it be 2? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> One for the new changelog entry, one adding the change, and one for uploading into Bionic. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I mean, that's Debian Qt/KDE Team policy. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I think it's fine. :P <lubot3> <acheronuk> (Document) http://vps.tsimonq2.net//file_3937.mp4 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> heh. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Wait, so you're saying the bootstrap dance is done? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> We just have to upload normal versions of things now? <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2, No, it's not done yet, I need to do qtbase and qttools uploads <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Meaning, uploads without docs packages? <lubot3> <mitya57> Uploads *with* docs packages <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Er, right. <lubot3> <mitya57> Please let me handle it, I will do it in ~an hour <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OK, thank you. <lubot3> <mitya57> qtbase uploaded, qttools will follow later if qtbase builds. <lubot3> <mitya57> But in principle you can now upload all packages except (qtbase, qttools) with docs as usual. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ok <lubot3> <mitya57> I suggest to check if upstream branch has any changes between 5.9.4 and 5.9.5, and if it doesn't, upload straight without ~1 prefix. <lubot3> <mitya57> If you are feeling bad, then just let me do it, I can take care of it before Monday. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I'm feeling better today. :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Thanks again @mitya57, really appreciated! <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2 Please let me know when you push your qtbase commits so I can push mine. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, OK. <lubot3> <mitya57> And I hope there is no 5.10 merge there :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> There isn't. :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Ping, could you please upload qttools? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> And what about qtdeclarative? :) <lubot3> <mitya57> I am going to do both today, but later. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OIK <lubot3> <tsimonq2> *OK <lubot3> * mitya57 wonders how popular this will become <lubot3> http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/04/13/qt-for-python-is-coming-to-a-computer-near-you/ <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Oh, hm. <lubot3> <mitya57> Uploaded qtdeclarative (final) and qttools (not final, needs re-enabling webkit support later) <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2 Will you mind if I force-push qtdeclarative, removing the 5.10 merge? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Go ahead <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Qool \o/ <lubot3> <tsimonq2> So after this @mitya57 qtbase can be uploaded? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ah, maybe qtdeclarative? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Er, xmlpatterns <lubot3> <tsimonq2> idk <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Where are we at? :) <lubot3> <mitya57> You can upload everything except qttools :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> \o/ <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OK :) #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-15 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 So, here's where we're at: <lubot3> 1. qtwebengine builds are timing out? :/ We might need to poke someone on the LP team to remedy that. <lubot3> 2. qtwebview is waiting on qtwebengine, so no use in doing that quite yet. <lubot3> 3. qtdoc can be done after those first two are done. <lubot3> 4. qtwebkit needs a poke; I'll likely do that tonight, otherwise I'd like to get it in alongside this. <lubot3> 5. I'm triggering no-change rebuilds now. <lubot3> Besides that, it's ready. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ah, and I also synced pyqt5 to the PPA as briefly discussed privately. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @tsimonq2, 5> I'll need to kick some stuff after webkit's handled. Should be no problem. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> ofc the usual dep fun; working out what I can. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I might be stopped by the usual Launchpad publisher maintenance, but I've graphed what I think is a sensible yet rough depwait graph at the bottom of the pad. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I'll keep going until I know it's the publisher stopping me. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> With qtwebkit, I might just hold off on that for now and no-change rebuild it real quick so I can get these rebuilds successful. :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> So I learned that the publisher starts at 5:59 UTC. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 I'll tag you in here; qtwebkit has a weird FTBFS on ppc64el that you might be able to look at, or maybe fix. There's a depwait tree in the doc depending on it. <lubot3> Otherwise, there's just those qtwebengine timeouts and qtdoc, then it should be good. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Ah, then you have to do the qttools upload yet. :) <lubot3> * tsimonq2 goes to bed o/ <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2 Thanks for your work, as usual. I will look at qtwebkit today. <lubot3> <mitya57> For pyqt5 I just got an RC bug (Debian #895718), maybe it will need another upload. <ubottu> Debian bug 895718 in python-pyqt5 "python-pyqt5: import PyQt5.QtCore fails" [Grave,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/895718 <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2, qtwebkit FTBFS may be just out of memory, I will retry it in hope it gets assigned to another buildd. <lubot3> <mitya57> Uploading a potential fix for qtwebengine. Not with a final version number, because it will likely need symbols updates. <lubot3> <mitya57> Also uploaded a potential fix for qtwebkit/ppc64el, and a potential fix for pyqt5 (all archs). <lubot3> <mitya57> The qtwebkit/ppc64el fix did not work, it's still ICE and I have no idea how to fix it :( <lubot3> <mitya57> It does not happen in Debian so testing on a porter box is not going to help. <lubot3> <mitya57> The file where it is failing is https://github.com/annulen/webkit/blob/qtwebkit-5.212/Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderingAllInOne.cpp <lubot3> Maybe building individual .cpp files instead of this monster will help. I will try that in the evening. <lubot3> <mitya57> Now we have a more meaningful error with qtwebkit: <lubot3> <mitya57> ../Source/WebCore/dom/SlotAssignment.h:49:36: error: field âSlotNameFunctionâ has incomplete type âWebCor33ec:265c:71fe:e26d:2682:4ec2:aaa1:99abSlotAssignmentâ <lubot3> SlotAssignment(SlotNameFunction); <lubot3> <mitya57> Which may be fixed by https://github.com/annulen/webkit/commit/4ce8ebc4094512b9916bfa5984065e95ac97c9d8 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Slept a little bit late today. :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Thanks @mitya57! <lubot3> <mitya57> No problem, I think you deserved sleeping :) <lubot3> <mitya57> Latest news: I am uploading a webkit version which should *really* fix ppc64el. <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2 Still waiting for your qtbase commitsâ¦ <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Over the weekend we got a total of like four feet of snow. My other computer with those commits isn't syncing. So I need to find a way to get to it. :P <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Awesome! <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2, Oh. If it's such a problem then I'll just use a local branch and rebase it on your changes later. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Ok <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Your qtwebengine upload worked <lubot3> <tsimonq2> However, your qtwebkit upload didn't. <lubot3> <mitya57> @tsimonq2, Now it's really out-of-memory, easily fixable <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Oh? <lubot3> <mitya57> Replacing -g with -g1, will do it now <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OK <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Thanks <lubot3> <mitya57> Uploaded. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> \o/ <lubot3> <tsimonq2> What about qttools? <lubot3> <mitya57> I will do it tomorrow if webkit builds fine. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OK <lubot3> <mitya57> Feel free to upload the latest Git commit yourself, if it builds before I wake up. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Alright. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Otherwise are you an ACK on landing? <lubot3> <mitya57> Yes <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OK cool <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Have a good night :) <lubot3> <mitya57> Thanks <lubot3> <mitya57> Please also upload qtwebengine with final version number, if it builds on all archs. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Sure <lubot3> <tsimonq2> That's all pushed to Git? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> s/Git/Salsa/ I guess :) <lubot3> <mitya57> Yes, maybe just needs UNRELEASED â bionic <lubot3> <tsimonq2> OK #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-16 <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Things are looking really great for this transition. :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> All the builds now succeed, just doing rebuilds without ~. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> I'll give enabling it on my local machine a try... <valorie> did you get through to your other machine, tsimonq2? <tsimonq2> Not quite yet, but I can make it work without it. * valorie sends snowshoes <tsimonq2> I need BOOTS! :) <tsimonq2> Snow is knee high <tsimonq2> School already cancelled for tomorrow <tsimonq2> valorie: I am *so* looking forward to get away from this snow. ;) * valorie sends 7 league boots <valorie> and a horse and sleigh <tsimonq2> hah <tsimonq2> I need it, lol <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Upgraded and rebooted (for good measure), everything works \o/ <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Feel free to take another look, but otherwise I can land it in ~ 8 hours after I sleep. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> That is, if QtWebEngine is done... :P <lubot3> <mitya57> The city falls asleep, the mafia wakes up. <lubot3> <mitya57> Qtwebengine is still building, when it is done I can publush it myself. <lubot3> mattia was removed by: mattia <mapreri> o.O I removed myself! <mitya57> Do you want to be added back? <mapreri> nope <mapreri> just commenting on the relayed message :) <mitya57> Ok :) <mapreri> I am not really contributing here, and it's bothering me having a telegram group that I don't even read :) <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, >:D <lubot3> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Ok. Just needs regenerated diffs and a publish button pressed. <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Already discussing with sil2100 et. al in #ubuntu-release <lubot3> <acheronuk> (Document) http://vps.tsimonq2.net//file_3940.mp4 <lubot3> <mitya57> If you need someone to push the button, ping me :) <lubot3> <acheronuk> all pressed I think? <lubot3> <tsimonq2> Yep, published. \o/ <lubot3> * tsimonq2 high fives @mitya57 <lubot3> <mitya57> Ok, I did not even notice that :) <lubot3> * mitya57 high fives back <lubot3> <tsimonq2> That was really fast transition preparation, thanks! :) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: fcitx-qt5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1build2 => 1.1.1-1build3] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt3d-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu2] (qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.2+dfsg-1build2 => 5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu4 => 5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtconnectivity-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtcreator (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.5.2-3ubuntu1 => 4.5.2-3ubuntu2] (qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtdoc-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtimageformats-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtlocation-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtpim-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0~git20140515~29475884-0ubuntu24~6 => 5.0~git20140515~29475884-0ubuntu24~7] (qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtmultimedia-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtgraphicaleffects-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtquickcontrols-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtstyleplugins-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0+git23.g335dbec-2build4 => 5.0.0+git23.g335dbec-2build5] (qt5, ubuntu-budgie, ubuntu-mate) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtsvg-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qttools-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qttranslations-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/main) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtsensors-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtscript-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtwayland-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu2 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtwebkit-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.212.0~alpha2-7build2 => 5.212.0~alpha2-7ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtserialport-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtwebsockets-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtx11extras-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu1 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtxmlpatterns-opensource-src (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.9.4-0ubuntu2+2 => 5.9.5-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted fcitx-qt5 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-1build3] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh <tsimonq2> :)) <tsimonq2> Added to the transition tracker: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/594 <tsimonq2> Everything should be accepted now. <tsimonq2> Ah, right. I did leave out one no-change rebuild... <tsimonq2> Can a Core Developer (maybe @mitya57 or LocutusOfBorg etc.) please no-change rebuild qtubuntu against qtbase-abi-5-9-5? <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, when <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: Hm? <LocutusOfBorg> is it published? <tsimonq2> Yes. <LocutusOfBorg> done. <tsimonq2> Thank you! <LocutusOfBorg> uw! it might be go un unapproed -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+ds-1 => 502.619.2016+ds-1build1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [source] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+ds-1build1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: dde-qt5integration (bionic-proposed/universe) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1 => 502.619.2016+git20180208-1build1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted dde-qt5integration [source] (bionic-proposed) 502.619.2016+git20180208-1build1] <mitya57> qtubuntu -0ubuntu6 is built against Qt 5.9.4 (see the build logs) * mitya57 will upload -0ubuntu7 now <mitya57> Argh, there was already -0ubuntu7 in unapproved, my upload replaced it(?) #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-17 <lubot> <acheronuk> @mitya57 any idea about this? https://www.kubuntuforums.net/showthread.php/73395-Still-stuck-and-cannot-upgrade?p=413331#post413331 <lubot> <acheronuk> Unpacking qmlscene (5.9.4-0ubuntu1) over (5.9.1-4ubuntu1) ... <lubot> dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/qmlscene_5.9.4-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--install): <lubot> unable to install new version of '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/bin/qmlscene': No such file or directory <lubot> Errors were encountered while processing: <lubot> /var/cache/apt/archives/qmlscene_5.9.4-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb <lubot> <acheronuk> https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtdeclarative/commit/46a25d2178e3898f6fd57a1b93a2d47247b4ec16 <lubot> <acheronuk> may have nothing to do with it, but hmmmm? <lubot> <mitya57> Something really weird seems to happen there <lubot> <mitya57> Like, something deletes /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/bin/ while qmlscene is unpacking? <lubot> <mitya57> I will try an Artful â Bionic upgrade myself a bit later. <lubot> <acheronuk> Thanks. I did one yetedays, but don't think I had qtcreator installed, which seems to be a major reason for qmlscene to be installed? <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe, I don't know what uses qmlscene nowadays. <lubot> <acheronuk> reverse-depends qmlscene <lubot> Reverse-Recommends <lubot> ================== <lubot> * qtcreator <lubot> Reverse-Depends <lubot> =============== <lubot> * python-autopilot-tests <lubot> * python3-autopilot-tests <lubot> * twinvoicerecalc <lubot> <mitya57> @acheronuk, This may be related, but I don't see how. <lubot> The binaries now live in an arch-independent directory (`/usr/lib/qt5/bin/`), the multiarched directory contains the symlinks. <lubot> <acheronuk> It was just one I noticed trying to look at changes since 5.9.1. It may well have zero to do with it. <lubot> <acheronuk> just tested and it seemed to unpack and overwrite ok. weird <lubot> <acheronuk> (Photo, 666x144) https://i.imgur.com/4LVe1B5.jpg <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe it will be different on a cleaner system which does not have other binaries in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/bin? <lubot> * mitya57 tries <lubot> <mitya57> Successfully upgraded in a chroot. <lubot> <acheronuk> I guess he has manged to do something bizarre with his system, or is hitting an apt/dpkg bug we can't reproduce <lubot> <mitya57> Yeah, that seems to be the case. * tsimonq2 changed the topic of #ubuntu-qt to: Ubuntu Qt Discussion Channel | https://is.gd/GIZG9E | Help remove Qt 4! https://is.gd/QXLEFW | 5.9.5 in Bionic, 5.5.1 in Xenial, 5.2.1 in Trusty | This channel is bridged to Telegram, ask us to be added | This channel is lauren32@example.com. Use of this channel implies acceptance of Ubuntu IRC channel terms. <tsimonq2> It migrated! <tsimonq2> That was a *fast* transition! <lubot> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 ^^^^^ <valorie> weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! <tsimonq2> :D <lubot> <mitya57> ð <lubot> * tsimonq2 high fives @mitya57 <lubot> * mitya57 high fives back :) <tsimonq2> 04:18:54 PM -queuebot:#ubuntu-ci-eng- tsimonq2 mitya57, https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3237 Release pocket <lubot> <acheronuk> ð <lubot> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 qtxmlpatterns and qtbase pushed to Salsa. * mitya57 rebases his qtbase branch <lubot> <acheronuk> so qt5datavisualization soon? <lubot> <tsimonq2> Soon. <lubot> <mitya57> @tsimonq2, Your âUpload to bionicâ was a bit wrongâ¦ <lubot> <tsimonq2> @mitya57, Aw. :( <lubot> <tsimonq2> Could you fix it, or would you like me to? <lubot> <mitya57> I will fix it, it needs just one additional commit <lubot> <tsimonq2> OK <lubot> <tsimonq2> Thank you! <lubot> <mitya57> And I will overwrite your tag. <lubot> <tsimonq2> Sure. <lubot> <mitya57> In fact it needed two additional commits, https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtbase/compare/6fe63acf...bced5359 <lubot> <tsimonq2> ack #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-20 <lubot> AlFXLogic was removed by: AlFXLogic #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-23 -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5 (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1 => 5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted pyqt5 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.10.1+dfsg-1ubuntu2] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 Was that you? :) <lubot> <mitya57> Yes :) <lubot> <tsimonq2> \o/ #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-26 <djamal> when i compiled program with make command <djamal> <djamal> i get Some of the required modules (linux:!android|win32-msvc2013:!winrt|win32-msvc2015:!winrt|osx|win32-g++*) are not available. #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-27 <djamal> how can i install appman from git repository <lubot2> <acheronuk> going to want this backpprted if we do 5.10 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-66443 <lubot2> <acheronuk> fixes crash in krunner apparently <lubot2> <mitya57> I think we'll better do 5.11 without the intermediate step. <lubot2> <acheronuk> @mitya57, when is 5.11 out? <lubot2> <mitya57> End of May / beginning of June <lubot2> https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.11_Release <lubot2> <acheronuk> I ask as plasma 5.13 out 12th June needs 5.10 or greater <lubot2> <mitya57> Ok, I don't mind shipping 5.10 before June then. Noted your patch :) <lubot2> <acheronuk> Ok. I was hoping to build the 5.13 beta for testers (out 17th May). not in archive nessessarily, but it would be better if I didn't have to PPA build new Qt and plasma <lubot2> <acheronuk> but we shall see what timing permits :) <lubot2> <acheronuk> lets just hope we don't have another spectre/meltdown when 18.10 opens for development! <djamal> i need help to install appman <mitya57> djamal: this channel is for development, not for user support. Please try #ubuntu. <djamal> appman is qt application manager <mitya57> Oh, from the automotive suite. I think it is just not packaged. <djamal> what do you mean <djamal> mitya57: plz sen me link with appman prepared <mitya57> I mean you cannot install it in Ubuntu unless you build it from source yourself. <djamal> mitya57: i spend a whole day trying to compile it can you help me <mitya57> This is still the wrong channel for such questions, but please ask it. <djamal> i clone appman repository and i run qmake and make i get this output <djamal> https://pastebin.com/D27rbQwK <mitya57> > Project ERROR: Unknown module(s) in QT: qml-private <mitya57> If you had our build of Qt, I would recommend you installing qtdeclarative5-private-dev package. But you seem to have a custom installation, so you need to get these private headers via some other means. <djamal> custom installation? <mitya57> Yes, according to your log you have Qt in /opt/Qt5.10.1/, which is not the Ubuntu package. <djamal> i download it <djamal> and install it manually <djamal> <mitya57: yes it is working thanks a lot <djamal> but i got this g++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) <lubot2> <mitya57> This is a very tricky error, and there is no universal advice. Try changing compiler options, compiler version, or get a minimal example and report a bug. <djamal> lubot2: how can i get minimal example <lisandro> @mitya57 djamal has been trying to solve this all day. I ended up compiling it myself, but he was gone <lisandro> whatever taht is it uses qtbase and declarative's private headers <lisandro> I think it's a kind of qml app loader #ubuntu-qt 2018-04-29 <lubot2> <acheronuk> seems qtdatavis3d never made it for bionic @tsimonq2 ? I grabbed the WIP debian packaging, and built it for KCI repo anyway <lubot2> <tsimonq2> OK <lubot2> <tsimonq2> Qool #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-01 <lubot> <X> Without Qt 5.14 PySide2 will be missing it's tools (uic and rcc). 5.12 ones are not suitable. Although I can not predict how it will affect userbase and how many bug reports will follow. Maybe it's not critical at all <lubot> <X> https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.14.2-released -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @RikMills [So sad as that may be, perhaps that nudges me in the 5.12.8 direction], I'm +1 on going with 5.12.8 <lubot> <tsimonq2> I think that's the better option for an LTS <lubot> <RikMills> It would certainly be less controversial with the RT <lubot> <mitya57> Ok. And it should take less time to update, too. <lubot> <mitya57> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qt5/+/295702 is currently integrating, when that is done we should have tarballs. <lubot> <mitya57> I will do the core part (bootstrapping docs and so on), if someone wants to help with the remaining Qt modules and rebuilds it would be welcomed. <lubot> <tsimonq2> @mitya57 [I will do the core part (bootstrapping docs and so on), if someone wants to help â¦], Do you want an Etherpad/CodiMD doc on one of the million instances? <lubot> <tsimonq2> We can coordinate there <lubot> <mitya57> For me this chat is fine, but Etherpad will work too <lubot> <tsimonq2> Can you edit this? https://notes.lubuntu.me/tg_BplIoS0eAAFoGZILdWQ# <lubot> <mitya57> Yes <lubot> <tsimonq2> Sounds good <lubot> <RikMills> Great :) #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-02 <estan> aw, very sad that 5.14 for focal won't happen, but understand your decision of course. <valorie> it probably will be in focal backports soon, estan <valorie> knowing rik, asap <lubot> <RikMills> Not sure about usual backports. Would have to rebuild and maintain other non KDE things in the PPA to do that. Very likely I will have it somewhere though. <valorie> ah, for sure <valorie> esp. since I think Plasma isn't bumping? <valorie> I might be remembering that wroing <valorie> wrong <RikMills> valorie: plasma is bumping Qt minimum, sadly <valorie> ah <valorie> :( <RikMills> it is possible we could have 'normal backports' (limited to what builds natively) and backports with bumped qt (super use at your own risk on a LTS, don't install these unless you really need the new things) <RikMills> maintenance overhead is also an issue <mitya57> qutebrowser developer about our plan to ship 5.12.8: <mitya57> <The-Compiler> mitya57: as a downstream, that's probably a good thing - at least QtWebEngine suffers from lot of crashes in 5.14.0 and .1 (most of them I haven't reported yet because I don't see any pattern yet, and/or they were too late for .2 anyways) <lubot> <X> "A lot" is an over-exaggeration for sure. I had like 3 or something with .1 <lubot> <X> And I use no other browsers except Falkon <mitya57> Maybe depends on applicationâ¦ <estan> yea i know there will probably be some ways to get 5.14 packages eventually, but had gotten my hopes up that it would be part of the main repos (not just kubuntu backports). we build debs of our commercial application for *buntu LTS, and many of us at the company run the LTS with no special backports enabled (typically). <estan> but i completely understand the decision, and the time pressure. you're doing a great job and 5.12 will be fine. <lubot> <RikMills> focal archive now builds riscv64 <lubot> <mitya57> Oh <lubot> <RikMills> That came a bit out of the blue <lubot> <mitya57> qtbase currently dep-waits, but in Debian it built fine on riscv64 #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-05 -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtlocation-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5build2 => 5.12.5+dfsg-5ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-06 -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtwebkit-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.212.0~alpha4-1 => 5.212.0~alpha4-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) <lubot> * mitya57 hits F5 on https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.12/ but no .8 so far <lubot> <mitya57> I hope it will be there very soon though #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-07 <lubot> <mitya57> And now it's finally available! <lubot> <RikMills> \o/ <lubot> <mitya57> I will start working on it in 15 minutes :) <lubot> <mitya57> But https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.12/5.12.8/submodules/ is empty :( <lubot> <X> Release script bug or releases are not public anymore? <lubot> <mitya57> Not finished yet, I think. <RikMills> /o\ -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Not finished yet, I think.], :( <lubot> <mitya57> Also I wonder why there is no release meeting. There should have been one an hour ago. <lubot> <mitya57> Hmm, salsa search_project python-team/modules is working > 1 minute and prints nothing :( <lubot> <mitya57> Do you remember how long it was taking for qt-kde-team/qt? <lubot> <RikMills> Not sure I am searching in the same place, but result seem immediate here <lubot> <mitya57> --verbose please, what do you mean? <lubot> <mitya57> Oh, I am really sorry, I sent the above to wrong Telegram chat :( <lubot> * RikMills asked <lubot> <mitya57> I have just noticed that channel's topicâ¦ <lubot> <RikMills> gah! <lubot> <mitya57> At least someone created 5.12.8 directory today, so I assumed there is some release script in progress. <lubot> <RikMills> This things don't always complete smoothly, and if people are AWOL for the meeting they might not also be babysitting such a script <lubot> <mitya57> Let's wait for jaheikki3's reply <lubot> <mitya57> In the worst case we can fall back to 5.12.7 <lubot> <RikMills> @RikMills [These things don't always complete smoothly, and if people are AWOL for the meet â¦], Or it is now on QtWebEngine ð¤£ <lubot> <mitya57> That is quite likely :) <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [In the worst case we can fall back to 5.12.7], Yeah, I almost asked if there might be benefit starting on that <lubot> <mitya57> Not much benefit. The ABI package name will be different so we would have to re-bootstrap docs for 5.12.8 anyway. <lubot> <RikMills> Worth waiting to see then. <lubot> <mitya57> On codereview there are no changes for 5.12.8 since April 2nd. So the needed automated testing has already happened, and I hope manual testing too. #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-08 <lubot> <RikMills> tars! <lubot> <mitya57> Finally! <lubot> <RikMills> https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.12.8-released <lubot> <mitya57> I will start working on it in an hour. <lubot> <RikMills> Great. <lubot> <mitya57> qtbase building in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4005/+packages <lubot> <RikMills> nice. I doubt I can help today, but since that will mostly be rebuilds for me, tomorrow onwards should be ok I guess <lubot> <mitya57> Thanks! I will add you to IRC nicks in Bileto then :) <lubot> * mitya57 has the same t-shirt :) <lubot> <mitya57> @tsimonq2 [Can you edit this? https://notes.lubuntu.me/tg_BplIoS0eAAFoGZILdWQ#], This is 404 now. Also it doesn't accept my password :( <lubot> <RikMills> @tsimonq2 ? <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [This is 404 now. Also it doesn't accept my password :(], Me neither <RikMills> can always use a google doc if all else fails <lubot> <mitya57> qtbase built on s390x and amd64. Uploading qtdeclarative. <lubot> <mitya57> "they are thinking about restricting ALL Qt releases to paid license holders for the first 12 months" <lubot> <mitya57> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2020q2/006098.html <lubot> <RikMills> Surely a negotiating tactic <lubot> <mitya57> Let's hope this policy won't apply to 5.15. <lubot> <mitya57> Or otherwise I anticipate an unofficial release based on beta <lubot> <mitya57> riscv64 is the slowest architecture now. Building qtbase for 6 hours ð¢ <lubot> <RikMills> riscv64 can be ignored AFAIK. release team cannot block us on it, as it was nuts to try to bootstrap a new arch this late <lubot> <RikMills> *** nuts *** part is my opinion <lubot> <mitya57> :-) <lubot> <RikMills> In other words, if it blocks migration, they should force it through <lubot> <mitya57> I won't break it deliberately, but maybe I won't update symbols from it. <lubot> <mitya57> Now I am going to bed. The docs are not yet bootstrapped, so no help is needed yet. I will finish bootstrapping them tomorrow, after which parallelizing work will speed things up. <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Now I am going to bed. The docs are not yet bootstrapped, so no help is needed y â¦], Sounds good! #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-09 <lubot> <X> https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-and-open-source <lubot> <X> ð¤·ââï¸ <lubot> <mitya57> So they decided to pretend that they did not have any plans to make Qt releases commercial :) <lubot> <mitya57> Is there any command to pull build logs from a PPA? <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills @tsimonq2 5.12.8 status update: I made a good progress today. In case someone wants to continue the work during european night, then: â¦ - Some rebuilds may already be started. â¦ - Some Qt packages are not yet uploaded: qtgamepad, qtvirtualkeyboard, qttranslations, qtimageformats, qtserialbus, qtdatavis3d, qtspeech â these do <lubot> not have any major upstream changes, so one can just bump build-deps and upload without ~ppa1 suffix. <lubot> <mitya57> Please do not upload anything that depends on qtwebengine yet. I forgot to bump the ABI version and will do in the next upload. Also please don't upload qttools yet, I want to wait for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/1:10.0.0-2ubuntu2/+build/19128076 to succeed. <lubot> <mitya57> (Packages are in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4005/+packages) <lubot> <RikMills> Thanks. I annoyingly managed to get waylaid doing other things . Hopefully can really get on with things in the morning #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-10 <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [Thanks. I annoyingly managed to get waylaid doing other things . Hopefully can r â¦], Rebuilds can be done now. From Qt side just a few packages are remaining, which I will upload later today. <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [Rebuilds can be done now. From Qt side just a few packages are remaining, which â¦], Ok. I have KDE PIM update to finish in another PPA, so will try to look a little later in the afternoon <lubot> <mitya57> Thanks! <lubot> <mitya57> To be honest, I am quite tired with doing tens of packages per day, so I would prefer delegating rebuilds to you to doing them myself. <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [To be honest, I am quite tired with doing tens of packages per day, so I would p â¦], Ok. I appreciate the work you have done! :) <lubot> <mitya57> And I really hope we won't have problems with the release teamâ¦ <lubot> <RikMills> Yeah. I swear the rebuild list has got bigger! <lubot> <mitya57> â¹ <lubot> <mitya57> At least changes between 5.12.5 and .8 are minimal, so packages should build fine (unless they are broken by something else) <lubot> <mitya57> All of Qt is now uploaded, except qtwebview which is waiting on webengine to build. <lubot> <RikMills> I am currently fighting akonadi and apparmor :/ <lubot> <mitya57> What do you mean by fighting? They FTBFS? <lubot> <mitya57> Or that is KDE PIM stuff? <lubot> <RikMills> KDE PIM. Every time akonadi changes, it breaks with new apparmor denials <lubot> <RikMills> And the upstream supplied profiles are garbage <lubot> <mitya57> ð¢ <lubot> * mitya57 remembers about qtdeclarative-gles and uploads it too <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills Do you think we should warn the release team that we will be publishing new Qt? <lubot> <RikMills> I think so? <lubot> <mitya57> Just pinging vorlon is enough? <lubot> <mitya57> Or a mail to lauren32@example.com? <lubot> <RikMills> I would say both. Can't then be said there was no notice <lubot> <mitya57> Ok, will do <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/7zb3yN53g8/ does that look good to you? <lubot> <RikMills> Looks sensible <lubot> <mitya57> Thanks! <lubot> <mitya57> Sigh, "Your message to Ubuntu-release awaits moderator approval" <lubot> * mitya57 subscribes and re-posts <lubot> <RikMills> I usually end up sending from the wrong email and get that :/ <lubot> <mitya57> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2020-April/004956.html <lubot> <RikMills> I'll try to get most of the rebuilds done this evening now. I am determined KDE PIM is not going to beat me. ð¡ <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2020-April/004956.html], great <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [I'll try to get most of the rebuilds done this evening now. I am determined KDE â¦], Thanks a lot <lubot> <RikMills> Victory. apparmor was defeated <lubot> <RikMills> I will take a break, then start on Qt things <lubot> <mitya57> Congratulations! Let's hope the enemy won't come again :) <lubot> <RikMills> fingers crossed they haven't made more breaking changes upstream! <lubot> <RikMills> most of the rebuilds uploaded. waiting for the few that need webengine <lubot> <RikMills> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955416 <ubottu> Debian bug 955416 in src:hedgewars "hedgewars: FTBFS with newer SDL" [Serious,Open] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [most of the rebuilds uploaded. waiting for the few that need webengine], That was fast! Thank you very much <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955416], There is some patch in that bug. I will look tomorrow. <ubottu> Debian bug 955416 in src:hedgewars "hedgewars: FTBFS with newer SDL" [Serious,Open] #ubuntu-qt 2020-04-11 <lubot> <RikMills> gammaray FTBFS (tests), but so did the last debian sync in proposed <valorie> RikMills: don't you sleep???? <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [gammaray FTBFS (tests), but so did the last debian sync in proposed], These tests can be disabled, I think <lubot> <RikMills> deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin is the other pain (as usual) <lubot> <mitya57> I will take care of it. <lubot> <mitya57> (Working on hedgewars currently.) <lubot> <RikMills> ok. Thanks! <lubot> <mitya57> @mitya57 [(Working on hedgewars currently.)], And of course I screwed it up. <lubot> <RikMills> Cmake + pascal, who wouldn't! :P <lubot> <mitya57> Will fix after a bit more local testing :) <lubot> <mitya57> Ah, on ppc64el it uses pascal to C converter, so project_files/hwc/CMakeLists.txt is used, which is not the case on other platforms. <lubot> <mitya57> Now it built fine. <lubot> <RikMills> :) <lubot> <mitya57> Can Bileto automatically update packages list? <lubot> <RikMills> It usually does. Not sure why it is not on that ppa. <lubot> <RikMills> If you mean the list on the ticket.... <lubot> <mitya57> Yes, I mean that. But I can do it manually. <lubot> <RikMills> maybe it will update when you diff? <lubot> <mitya57> Already tried, didn't help <lubot> <RikMills> Did you manually add qtbase-opensource-src to the description/list when you created the ticket? log suggests so <lubot> <mitya57> Yes <lubot> <mitya57> Removing it helped, thanks <lubot> <RikMills> I think that might have messed it up then. I never manually add anything to start with. just let it see what gets uploaded. <lubot> <RikMills> oh akonadi is missing from the PPA, as not sure if I'll land a new version from another PPA before Qt <lubot> <RikMills> If you want to land before my PIM, shout! <lubot> <mitya57> For me any option works. Qt PPA is mostly ready, we just need to wait for gammaray/riscv64 <lubot> <RikMills> Right. I will put akonadi in there now in case <mamarley> I have installed that PPA and I can confirm that everything seems to work fine. :) <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [Right. I will put akonadi in there now in case], If you want, you can add your PPA as a dependency, then Akonadi will build against new KDE PIM and you won't need to rebuild it again. <mitya57> mamarley: that = 4005? <lubot> <RikMills> I don't have FFe approval yet, so better not <lubot> <mitya57> Ah, ok. Please upload akonadi here then. <mamarley> mitya57: That's the one. <mitya57> mamarley: great, thanks for testing! <mamarley> RikMills: If it doesn't get approved, I can just ppa-purge it. <mitya57> I think Rik was replying to me, not to you. Qt doesn't need FFe as it has only important fixes. <mamarley> Ah, OK. <lubot> <RikMills> PIM ppa is 3993 <lubot> <RikMills> akonadi building. it will dep wait on riscv64, as archive mariadb failed to build on that <lubot> <mitya57> Thanks. <lubot> * mitya57 retries kwin/riscv64 because it's a regression (it segfaulted) <lubot> <RikMills> A few things in the archive bootstrap did that, then worked later. hope this does <lubot> <RikMills> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwin/4:156.14.161.142-0ubuntu1/+build/19126130 <lubot> <RikMills> ð± <lubot> <RikMills> 5+ hrs <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe let's publish it anyway and let it build in archive? <lubot> <RikMills> Maybe if it looks to be taking ages. Not sure how the resources are shared for these qemu riscv64 builds. Sometimes they are very slow. Sometimes not so much. <lubot> <mitya57> Then maybe I will do that if it doesn't build by the time I go to bed :) <lubot> <mitya57> Which will be in ~8 hours <lubot> <RikMills> ok. The jist of what I read in ubuntu-release is that they are trying not to block migration on riscv64 installability issues, so I guess will be ok to just land <lubot> <mitya57> Ah, good news then <lubot> <mitya57> Let's wait 5.5 hours anyway <lubot> <RikMills> not sure if they have got britney doing that completely yet. Laney was moaning about it not doing something right <lubot> <RikMills> but would not be fair to block on a new flaky arch <lubot> <mitya57> Especially one that is so slow :) <lubot> <RikMills> lol. yep <lubot> <RikMills> looks like kwin did not segfault <lubot> <mitya57> Yeah, awaiting publication <lubot> <mitya57> I wonder why Bileto says âDependency wait (focal/hedgewars)â but other packages with dep-wait are OK. <lubot> <mitya57> hedgewars is not a regression, even better, it is a fix :) <lubot> <RikMills> odd <lubot> * mitya57 hits the Publish button <lubot> <RikMills> oooh <lubot> <mitya57> ERROR focal/hedgewars: riscv64: Dependency wait <lubot> <RikMills> If it keeps doing that, you could remove from the ppa and ticket and upload manually when published <lubot> <mitya57> But the job is still running <lubot> <RikMills> ah <lubot> <mitya57> Failed in the end <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [If it keeps doing that, you could remove from the ppa and ticket and upload manu â¦], Maybe I can remove it from Bileto but not from PPA? So that I can still copy it manually? <lubot> * mitya57 tries <lubot> <mitya57> No, it was re-added. So removing from PPA too. <RikMills> wait <mitya57> Too late, deletion requested <mitya57> In any case I screwed it a bit and when uploading manually I can use ubuntu1 version, not ubuntu2 :) <lubot> <RikMills> ok. just wonder is removal and being re-added might have reset the hedgewars status <lubot> <mitya57> WUT? â Bileto now tries to publish hedgewars ubuntu1 and says that it FTBFS <lubot> <RikMills> probably sees it missing from ppa as that <lubot> <mitya57> ubuntu1 was my first upload, and it FTBFS, yes <lubot> <mitya57> Maybe I should re-diff to make it disappear from the list completely <lubot> <RikMills> yes, delete from list and rediff would be good now <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [ubuntu1 was my first upload, and it FTBFS, yes], right, as it was back on the ticket list, that makes sense <lubot> <mitya57> Ok, looks like it's going to work now <lubot> <RikMills> \o/ <lubot> * RikMills waits..... <lubot> * mitya57 expects lots of messages from bot <lubot> <RikMills> doing copies.. :) <lubot> <mitya57> Succeeded! <lubot> <mitya57> :) <lubot> <mitya57> Don't know where is the bot, but at least the packages now show in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1 -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: fcitx-qt5 (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.4-1build1 => 1.2.4-1build2] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-qt-packages) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: dde-qt5integration (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1build2 => 5.0.0-1build3] (no packageset) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-3build1 => 5.0.1-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: pyqt5 (focal-proposed/universe) [5.14.1+dfsg-3 => 5.14.1+dfsg-3build1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted dde-qt5integration [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0.0-1build3] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted deepin-qt5dxcb-plugin [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0.1-3ubuntu1] -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu2] (no packageset) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtconnectivity-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-1build1 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtcreator (focal-proposed/universe) [4.11.0-2build1 => 4.11.0-2build2] (qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt3d-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-1build2 => 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-9build1 => 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtgraphicaleffects-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-2 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtimageformats-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-1build1 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtlocation-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5ubuntu1 => 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtdeclarative-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-5build1 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5ct (focal-proposed/universe) [0.39-1build2 => 0.39-1build3] (no packageset) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtdoc-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-1 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtquickcontrols-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-1build1 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtscript-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-2build1 => 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtserialport-opensource-src (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5-1build1 => 5.12.8-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) (sync) -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qtmultimedia-opensource-src
{'channel': 'ubuntu-qt', 'month': 4}