1150.3) per 100,000 person-years in the highest group to 1963.7 (95%CI: 1876.8-2054.7) per 100,000 person-years in the lowest group. Researchers noted that the rates of death decreased as the total cumulative dose increased.WordPress is very popular because of being a free platform that doesn’t require much coding knowledge. Its functionality is constantly expanding through a wealth of both free and paid plugins that you can add to your site. Because of the nature of how it is set up, there are some inherent security issues that you will want to keep in mind and that leave your website susceptible to being hacked. The first thing you should always do, is try to keep your site updated to the latest version of WordPress if possible, as well as the latest versions of your plugins. Also, make sure to keep full back-ups of your website so that if you have to completely remove your site, you can restore it to a working version.Gmer caused computer to overheat. Why did this happen and how do I make sure I didn't break anything

A few minutes ago I tried to use Gmer to run a malware scan on my computer. I did not expect my computer to have an infection, I was just curious about the program. I ran the executable, clicked on the button to scan the c drive, and hit scan. Within a few seconds coretemp reported that my cpu was at 105c and I started getting warning messages asking me to shut down my computer. I quickly pressed and held the power button to cut the power to the computer. I have a custom built computer with a 3570k processor with a stock fan and it is NOT overclocked.

First of all, how did this happen in the first place? When I built my computer I ran stress tests with Prime95 and I didn't have a problem; my computer's heat levels didn't rise above 70 degrees if memory serves. I also do folding and so according to the task manager my cpu is constantly at 100%  and my computer still doesn't go above 60-70 degrees. How did Gmer push it to 105?

Secondly, how do I make sure that my computer isn't damaged? Thanks

TLDR: Ran a malware scan with Gmer on C drive and cpu overheated. Why did this happen and how do I make sure I didn't break anythingIn this essay, I position myself as a queer writer in the confines of language, nationality and sexuality with the intention of opening a venue for a non essentialist I to dialogue with anybody situated within the highly politicized arena of queer politics.  Political representation is a continuously sliding terrain connecting the personal and the political, a terrain with no security, opened up for dialogue and gestures that attempt to capture something of the infinite difference at the heart of humanity that, paradoxically, can never be completely codified. I wish to experiment here with a writing that encompasses the political, the personal, and the symbolic. In locating myself within my study, I am most concerned with the question of agency through experimental writing. I agree with Norman Denzin that this perspective “is not for everyone. It is based on a research philosophy that is counter to much of the traditional scientific research tradition in the social sciences” (p. 1). My aim is to perform involving minimal theory, show rather than tell, and engage rather than explain. As Denzin argues, researchers should use the interpretive approach “only when they want to examine the relationships between personal troubles and the public policies and public institutions that have been created to address those troubles. Interpretive interactionism speaks to this interrelationship between private lives and public responses to personal troubles. It works outward from the biography of the person” (Denzin, 2001, p. 2).
Malagreca, Miguel. 2006. “Writing Queer Across the Borders of Geography, Desire, and Power.” Pp. 187-204 in Re-Membering Anzaldúa: Human Rights, Borderlands, and the Poetics of Applied Social Theory: Engaging with Gloria Anzaldua in Self and Global Transformations (Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge: Volume IV, Special Issue, 2006.) Belmont, MA: Okcir Press (an imprint of Ahead Publishing House).
H UMAN A RCHITECTURE : J OURNAL OF THE S OCIOLOGY OF S ELF -K NOWLEDGE, IV, S PECIAL I SSUE, S UMMER 2006, 187-204 187 H UMAN A RCHITECTURE : J OURNAL OF THE S OCIOLOGY OF S ELF -K NOWLEDGE ISSN: 1540-5699. © Copyright by Ahead Publishing House (imprint: Okcir Press). All Rights Reserved. HUMAN ARCHITECTURE Journal of the Sociology of Self- A Publication of OKCIR: The Omar Khayyam Center for Integrative Research in Utopia, Mysticism, and Science (Utopystics) In October 16, 2005, Italians had the op- portunity to vote for a candidate from the center-left coalition that might represent them as President of the Council after the next national elections. For weeks, the press and news shows were concentrated on nothing but the coverage of this original political happening. Central to the media coverage of the elections was a project for Civil Unions (PACS) presented in Parlia- ment, and the enforcement of the 1989 and 1994 resolutions of the European Parlia- ment on the equal treatment of sexual mi- norities. In November 26, 2005, dozens of hundreds of queer Italians came out into Pi- azza Farnese, in Rome, to support the PACS project. The square was the site to contest material and symbolic forms of hostility to- wards the Italian gay community. Hun- dreds of queers, including female to male/ Dr. Malagreca, Psy.D., Ph.D., is a licensed clinical psychologist, trained psychoanalyst and holds an MA and Ph.D. in Com- munications. He has been a part time researcher for the Queens University (Canada), University of Buenos Aires (Argen- tina) and the Tel Aviv University (Israel) on ethics and human rights. He also holds a diploma on Social Sciences from the École Des Hautes Études En Sciences Sociales, Paris (France). A Fulbright grantee at the ICR, UIUC, he is working on tran- snational and migrant queer subjectivities in Italy, where he currently lives. Malagreca is the editor of Aesthethika and has published dozens of articles in journals, books and specialized magazines. Writing Queer Across the Borders of Geography, Desire, and Power Miguel Malagreca University of Buenos Aires, Facultad de Psicologia, Catedra de Etica y Derechos Humanos –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– [email protected] Abstract: In this essay, I position myself as a queer writer in the confines of language, nationality and sexuality with the intention of opening a venue for a non essentialist I to dialogue with any- body situated within the highly politicized arena of queer politics.  Political representation is a continuously sliding terrain connecting the personal and the political, a terrain with no security, opened up for dialogue and gestures that attempt to capture something of the infinite difference at the heart of humanity that, paradoxically, can never be completely codified. I wish to experiment here with a writing that encompasses the political, the personal, and the symbolic. In locating myself within my study, I am most concerned with the question of agency through experimental writing. I agree with Norman Denzin that this perspective “is not for everyone. It is based on a research philosophy that is counter to much of the traditional scientific research tradition in the social sci- ences” (p. 1). My aim is to perform involving minimal theory, show rather than tell, and engage rather than explain. As Denzin argues, researchers should use the interpretive approach “only when they want to examine the relationships between personal troubles and the public policies and public institutions that have been created to address those troubles. Interpretive interaction- ism speaks to this interrelationship between private lives and public responses to personal trou- bles. It works outward from the biography of the person” (Denzin, 2001, p. 2). 188 M IGUEL M ALAGRECA H UMAN A RCHITECTURE : J OURNAL OF THE S OCIOLOGY OF S ELF -K NOWLEDGE, IV, S PECIAL I SSUE, S UMMER 2006 male to female transsexuals, leathers, bears and bisexuals, butch and fem lesbians, fag hags, non-heterosexist straights, drag queens and kings, made visible one of the most vibrant acts of political and commu- nal action in years, shaking old stereotypes and myths about the Mediterranean uomo (man) and the Donna Romana (Roman woman). The assortment of groups, politi- cal affiliations, voices and colors presented a vision of a diversified yet united queer community that marched from an obscu- rantist past toward an assertive present. Among the groups, a number of gay and lesbian parents marched together with their children, representing associations of gay parents who struggled for the right of queer couples to adopt. Right beside them, it was usual to see posters exhorting Parlia- ment to pass a law of domestic partnership and legal parity at work. Interestingly, 75% of all the candidates from the left responded to these demon- strations in open agreement to the rights of GLBTQs. Some of them, including Romano