 who are like this with their sons are so creepy. She should be happy her son is in a loving relationship and that she raised him to treat his partner well. Unfortunately you're not the first person to be in this position and you won't be the last. For some reason there are mothers with borderline emotionally incestuous relationships with their sons because they raise them to be good partners and another woman reeps the benefits. This will probably be something you'll just have to deal with for the rest of your life unfortunately, it's such a difficult position because men are very rarely going to turn on their mothers and the more you push the issue the more the mother will dislike you. I've seen situations like this get better once there are kids in the picture but that could also make things worse if she starts criticizing how you parent your own children. 

The best thing you can do is stand your ground in the moment, and if you want to be petty about it rub your relationship with her son in her face lol

Also this may be terrible advice idk I'm not married and have never been in this position myself.  But she is not a part of your relationship and you only have to see her on special occasions.House managers and Trump's defence team delivered closing arguments after Senate rejected hearing from new witnesses.
The impeachment trial of US President Donald Trump entered its 12th day on Monday, following a Senate vote that rejected calling new witnesses, and all but assures an acquittal for the president.
The House managers and Trump's defence team presented their closing arguments, which were followed by a Senate hearing in which legislators were given the chance to say why they are voting for convicting or acquitting the president. The final vote is scheduled for Wednesday.
After closing arguments by both House managers and the president's defence team, the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump has adjourned.
The Senate will now hold a regular session to hear speeches from senators, who will explain why they are voting to acquit or convict Trump.
In scathing final statements, lead House manager Adam Schiff condemned what he described as partisan protection of the president and legislators who are willing to turn a blind eye to misdeeds “as long as it is a president of one’s own party”.
“That is a trend most dangerous for our country,” said Schiff.
Schiff, addressing senators who plan to acquit the president, said: “Your name will be tied to his with a cord of steel for all history”.
"You are decent. [Trump] is not who you are," he said.
Lead House manager Adam Schiff, during his closing statements, referenced a department of Justice filing that came shortly after the Senate voted on Friday not to allow more evidence in the proceedings. The filing revealed that the department had withheld from Congress two dozen emails that detail the president's decision and justifications for withholding military aid from Ukraine.
"The Trump administration has them. It is not turning them over. It does not want the Senate to know until it’s too late," said Schiff.
Despite what is expected to be an all-but-certain acquittal of the president, House manager Hakeem Jeffries urged senators that it was not too late to vote to convict the president.
"All is not lost, even at this later hour...The senate can still do the right thing," said Jeffries.
House manager Sylvia Garcia, in her closing arguments on Monday, said the president will meddle in elections again if not removed from office.
"We all know that he will do it again," said Garcia. "We must stop him from further harming our democracy, we must stop him from further betraying his oath."
"We simply cannot give our children a democracy if their president is above the law," she said. "This president must be removed".
House manager Zoe Lofgren has resumed closing arguments in support of convicting the president.
President Donald Trump's defence team has concluded their closing arguments, again recasting the trial as an attempt to undermine US democracy while calling for the end to "endless" investigations.
"We’re sitting here on the day the election season begins in Iowa. It is wrong," said lead lawyer Pat Cipollone, "and there is only one answer to that, the answer is reject these articles of impeachment".
He called on senators to "end the era of impeachment once and for all."
Trump defence lawyer Jay Sekulow, in his closing arguments on Monday, called the trial the "first totally partisan presidential impeachment in our nation’s history".
"This is exactly and precisely what the founders feared," said Sekulow, after playing a montage of Democratic legislators calling for Trump's impeachment throughout his presidency.
The lead lawyer of the president's defence team, Pat Cipollone, said Democrats were trying to overturn the the results of the 2016 election and urged senators to acquit Donald Trump.
"At the end of the day, this is an effort to overturn the results of one election and to try to interfere in the coming election that begins today in Iowa," Cipollone said during the defence's closing arguments.
The lead lawyer on the president's defence team, Pat Cipollone, said the Defence's closing arguments would be brief.
In his closing arguments on Monday, lead House manager Adam Schiff made a final appeal for senators to convict the president on both articles of impeachment - abuse of power and obstruction of Congress - passed by the House of Representatives in December.
"Today, we urge you in the face of overwhelming evidence of the president's guilt and knowing that if left in office, he will continue to seek foreign interference in the next election to vote to convict on both articles of impeachment and to remove from office Donald J. Trump, the 45th president of the United States," Schiff said.
House manager Hakeem Jeffries spoke directly to Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman and "to the other public servants who came forward and told the truth in the face of vicious smears, intimidation and White House efforts to silence you".
"Your courage mattered," Jeffries said during the House managers closing arguments. "You did the right thing. You did your duty."
Jeffries added that "we will remain vigilant in the House".
President Donald Trump resumed his derision of the impeachment trial taking place in the Senate on Monday.
"I hope Republicans & the American people realize that the totally partisan Impeachment Hoax is exacty [sic] that, a Hoax," Trump tweeted, while Democratic House managers gave closing arguments in the impeachment trial.
Senators will vote on whether to convict or acquit the president on Wednesday. With the Senate voting 51-49 to block any new evidence in the trial, it is considered extremely unlikely that a needed supermajority of 67 senators will vote to convict the president.
House manager Jason Crow began the closing arguments on Monday.
On Wednesday, the trial will resume with a final vote expected on the acquittal or conviction of President Trump by 4pm (21:00 GMT). A super majority, 67 senators, would need to vote in favour of convicting the president - which is considered extremely unlikely.
Will Trump be acquitted?
Recently, I was asked to present at a conference called Student Edge on student engagement and the web. The audience included executives of Student Unions from across Canada and the facilitation process worked more like an unconference than your standard “get up and do a powerpoint” style of conference.
Anyway, as I prepared for my presentation I realized there was so much territory I could cover, and most of it would be a 50-50 on whether it would be well-received, useful, or engaging. The web these days is becoming more and more abstract, starting with the whole Web 2.0 theory that seems to have gone past us, and on to more complicated theories like the Semantic Web. I did not want to have to explain the Semantic Web to an audience that may or may not know what a blog is.
That said, focussing on a particular tool was also quite pointless in my view. Whether a tool will work for any institution depends largely on the culture of the institution itself. Like many organizations, Student Unions have to face IT departments that may or may not allow certain things on their servers (a database, or PHP support for instance).
Clearly, what I need to do was facilitate a discussion with a group of 20-30 people, rather than present something to them. At first, I thought of a seminar approach — where I introduce a concept and get feedback on it. Then, following through with the unconference style of the event, I decided that a fishbowl would work best.
You place 5-8 chairs in a space separate from the audience (usually inside a circle, but there are other ways to do this as well).
You invite some members of the audience to fill the seats, except one of those 4-8 chairs is always vacant.
People inside the fishbowl can speak at will.
If you are outside the fishbowl and want to speak, you sit down in the vacant seat.
If this happens, someone in the occupied seats ought to leave the fishbowl (at the most convenient or appropriate time possible).
I gave a 5 minute presentation on my experience of Twitter as a way to get at local action, and its potential for student unions.
I then relayed a bit about what I could offer as a supposed “expert” in the field.
I stayed in the fishbowl the whole time, since I supposed to be doing a presentation.
The feedback I heard was positive and there wasn’t any real time where people did not seem to be questioning, putting out ideas, admitting challenges and so on. I really liked that I could respond to specific issues or