 sectors. Breakdown/failing/corruption of any of these sectors may result in formation of bad sectors which in turn would make the SD card unusable. The steps to remove these bad sectors by using some simple tools and commands are given below:
- Connect your pen drive to your computer. Windows can itself display a message saying “Do you want to scan and fix the Removable Disk (F:)”.
- You can also perform the repair process by opening My Computer or This PC.
- Right Click on your pen drive and go to Properties.
- Next, you need to go to the Tools tab on the top of properties window.
- Here, you’ll see the Error-Checking utility. Click Check Now after that disk checking process will begin.
Note: Don’t forget to close all the applications accessing the pen drive.
- The error checking process also takes some minutes to complete and then itself tells you whether any errors exist on your pen drive or not. It might be possible that your pen drive doesn’t have any errors. You can still continue with the repair process if your pen drive isn’t working correctly.
- If the disk checking service gets any errors on your pen drive, it’ll provide you with two options. Schedule on next restart or Restart. Choose Restart if you want to start the repair process immediately, else, choose the other one. Don’t operate or turn off the computer while the repair is the progress.
Use EaseUS Data Recovery Wizard to recover data from damaged SD card
EaseUS file recovery software is a professional data recovery program that can be used to recover deleted, formatted or inaccessible data in various data loss cases. It supports data recovery from computer hard drives viz. recovering formatted flash drives and all storage media like SD cards, CF cards, etc. With its powerful data recovery capacity and wizard-like interface, it is the best choice to recover your data from a damaged SD card. After retrieving all the data, you can then format the SD card to fix the Damaged SD card.
To Recover Data from Corrupted SD Card:
- Connect the corrupted SD card to your PC, launch ‘EaseUS’s’ data recovery software, select the card and click “Scan“.
- The quick scan will initially start searching all the existing and lost data on your SD card. And after that, a deep scan will automatically launch in order to find more files.
- After the scan, choose those files you want to recover and click the “Recover” button to retrieve them back.
Note: – You must always use a preferred trial version of the respective data recovery software to be used before finally purchasing the full version of the software. Satisfactory results would help you decide whether to buy the software. If not, you can refer to any other recovery softwares’ and the benefactor part about using this process is that you won’t face any loss.
If you have got stuck with your PC, then do read:
Simple Way To Unlock Your PC and Mac Using USB Drive[This is a really good article](https://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/carly-fiorina-planned-parenthood-graphic-abortion-images) that, although biased, links to sources that you can verify yourself.

[An article](https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/how-a-photo-of-one-womans-stillborn-son-was-used-in-a-viral-anti-abortion-video-a6681106.html) about passing off a stillborn baby as an aborted fetus.

[Here is a Wikipedia article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silent_Scream#Medical_community) about a famous video of a fetus being aborted.

[Here is an article](https://www.allure.com/story/how-crisis-pregnancy-centers-deceive-women-on-abortion) about deceptive crisis pregnancy centers.

[This is probably the best article](https://www.lifeandlibertyforwomen.org/issues-in-depth/truth-about-anti-abortion-pictures), which again is biased, but lists it's sources and breaks down exactly how they determined each photo was deceptive. Be warned though, the images are graphic.I’m going to be downvoted to hell, but unpopular opinion, college funds should be for college. In my opinion, these funds shouldn’t be ‘owned’ by the kids. That’s the parent’s money. If a kid doesn’t use his college fund then, in my opinion, they aren’t entitled to that money. While, technically, no, daughter isn’t entitled to that money, neither is son. And quite honestly, it isn’t any of your children’s business what you do with your money. Because, it is your money, OP. You’re not ‘penalizing your son’ by not giving him that money, because it isn’t his money. It was for college. He got his degree, is debt free, and is ready to move on in life. Your daughter has her degree. They are adults.

Now, with that said. I think your daughter has a very valid point. While it seems fair to give son the money, it would not be equal and is the sort of thing that breeds resentment. I get the feeling there is more to your family dynamics than is in your post.  I strongly suggest coming up with a different plan. Such as keeping it or putting it in trust for a future grandchild.Annotation: THIS STATISTICAL REPORT BY THE DELAWARE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS PROVIDES FIGURES ON CASES PENDING, FILED, AND TERMINATED, CASELOAD TRENDS, PERSONNEL INFORMATION AND WORKLOAD DATA FOR EACH DELAWARE COURT.
Abstract: AN OVERVIEW OF THE COURT, THE JUDICIAL PERSONNEL, AND THE SUPPORT PERSONNEL IS PROVIDED FOR EACH COURT. BUDGET INFORMATION AND DATA ON CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES IS ALSO PRESENTED. IN ADDITION, THIS REPORT SUPPLIES INFORMATION ON THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCES AND COMMITTEES OF DELAWARE, THE COURT OF THE JUDICIARY, THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, AND THE THREE STATE LAW LIBRARIES. THIS 1975 REPORT ALSO INCLUDES NEW SECTIONS ON THE AMENDMENTS TO COURT RULES MADE DURING THE FISCAL YEAR, ON PROJECTS SUPPORTED BY FEDERAL FUNDS, AND ON MAJOR LEGISLATIVE CHANGES THAT HAVE EFFECTED THE ENTIRE COURT SYSTEM.There are two chestnuts that are perennially trotted out to “show” that the US is on its way to metric. One is the 2 liter bottle of soda, the other is the fact that liquor is sold in metric quantities. The 1978 GAO Report chapter on beverages indicates a quick change took place in the 1970s, and then the metrication of beverages was frozen in place at near zero kelvin. What happened has become mythologized in the last few decades. The GAO Report is interesting as it comprehensively looks at all the beverage sectors. It is also an example of how tone-deaf Americans are when dealing with metric—something that could be remedied in five minutes.
Wines and distilled spirits are converting their products to metric sizes for marketing reasons. Both are regulated by the Department of Treasury’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms; however, the producers requested the change. A considerable portion of their products are now being sold in metric sizes.
The Report notes that soft drink manufacturers have introduced products with metric volumes in many areas of the US. However, the soft drink industry “did not plan an overall metric conversion in the near future.” Milk has labels with metric equivalents, but had no plan to change-over to metric sizes.
The beer industry sells all its products in customary sizes and did not plan to convert to metric sizes. Some brewers showed metric equivalents on their labels.
This statement was made decades before the recent craft brewing movement began. Their current marketing seems to be based upon unit proliferation.
…it was the Wine Institute, a trade association representing California wine producers, that petitioned the Bureau to convert to metric sizes and reduce the number of permissible sizes.
The organization wanted to reduce the number of permissible sizes from 16 customary to 7 metric sizes. A table is then included that shows only 9 of the 16 customary sizes were in general use.
The Wine Institute made the request because many imported wines were being sold in bottles containing up to several ounces less than the 4/5 quart (the fifth 25.6 ounces), the most common size used by domestic products. The bottles used for imported wines appeared to contain the same amount of contents as those used for domestic wines. The industry believed the practice was deceptive to consumers and gave foreign producers an unfair competitive advantage.
At a hearing held on the Wine Institute request, it was brought out that imported wines should not be required to use customary-size bottles because the National Bureau of Standards study had recommended that the United States switch to the metric system over a 10-year period. Subsequently, the Bureau denied the request because it considered it inappropriate to require foreign wine producers to use customary-size bottles for sales in the United States.
It appears that the wine producers first wanted to force foreign manufacturers to produce wines