 amorphous silicon (ASi) drums, these models feature an industry leading preventive maintenance (PM) cycle of 300,000 impressions. This incredible PM cycle helps to minimize costs for the user and therefore creates longer intervals of time between required service visits.
The devices’ print and scan drivers are conveniently Microsoft Vista Premium certified. The devices also feature a standard 40GB system hard disk drive, a variety of advanced finishing and paper handling options and optional Super G3 fax/network fax capabilities for high-speed delivery of your documents. Kyocera offers several layers of network and data security to deploy printing, scanning, and copying safely in any business or government environment. Security for these networked MFPs can be enhanced through the optional Data Security Kit (D). This Data Security Kit overwrites the data of the document on the hard drive when the device is powered up, and/or after each copy, print and scan job.
• KYOcapture powered by AutoStore, a large workgroup/enterprise document capture workflow solution which enables select Kyocera MFPs to seamlessly capture, process and route paper or electronic-based documents to multiple locations and document management systems.
The KM-C3232E, KM-C3225E and KM-C2525E are available through authorized Kyocera dealers at a Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price of $10,711, $9,722 and $9,062 respectively. To find the nearest dealer, visit Kyocera Mita America’s dealer locator at www.kyoceramita.com/us.Burrowing Owl Winery & Estate is the first in my BC winery series.
This was my first winery on the trip up to Okanagan the famous Burrowing Owl. I checked out some of the reviews online and it was fairly positive. Have to admit I hadn’t had any of their wines for a while and was excited to get rekindle my affair with their Meritage.
The estate is sprawling reminiscent of a castle. It was long and windy drive up to the winery and the estate was perched up top. The views were gorgeous.
Entering the tasting room, it was packed, everyone was pushing their way to the bar. It felt more like a bar and I felt like I had to elbow my way through to the front.
We were famished and decided to have lunch at the Sonoma Room before we the wine tastings. I wished we done the reverse, I would have loved to have tried Burrowing Owl’s wines before our meal. The pairing recommendations on their menu, I felt could have been paired better.
I really wanted to this winery to be one of my greats, unfortunately it fell short, the wine and food. I bumped into other patrons after all was done and regrettably it was a consensus.
None the less the view is spectacular and that alone is worth the trip.Coming up on Hollyoaks... Brody and Warren return from the search for Sienna, while Ollie gets carried away over the baby.
i live in New Zealand, our breastfeeding rate is about 97%, nobody here is preventing them from doing this in public, yet they still feel the need to post "normalize breastfeeding" selfies on facebook and have sit-ins at the mall with other breastfeeding mothers. If you want to "normalize" something, then do it normally. If every bfeeding picture was replaced with pictures of people with toast it would look absolutely ridiculous! That's a normal everyday thing, yet im not posting #toasties or *daring* non-existent anti toast militants to tell me to eat my toast in the bathroom. Simply put, it just doesn't happen here, they just want a bandwagon to jump on and be part of some revolution. My own mother had 4kids and not once was she ever given a side eye, glare, parting comment or told to cover up. In fact of heard of more women being bullied by lactation consultants for for wanting to formula feed or "giving up too easy". Midwives are told not to mention or talk about formula in pre-natal classes here and if asked tend to respond "what would you want to use that for?". Formula feeding mothers are also sent home sooner after giving birth.1. Within the Ministry of Defence (MOD), Director General Intelligence Collection (DGIC) is charged to supply Geospatial Information (GI) to the armed forces in support of operations, exercises and training both in the UK and overseas. DGIC delegates this responsibility to the Intelligence Collection Group (ICG), where the Defence Geographic Centre (DGC) has arrangements for the supply of UK data both directly with the Ordnance Survey (OS), and through the Pan Government Agreement managed by Communities and Local Government. Defence Intelligence, Intelligence Collection Strategy and Plans (DI ICSP) provides the overall policy guidance for provision of GI to defence on behalf of DGIC, and the former Director DI ICSP (Brigadier Rigby) represented MOD on the GI Panel.
2. The MOD is therefore a major customer of the OS, and has a contingent interest in OS data. The MOD requires access to a reliable national database, which can be used for a range of "non-commercial' defence and wider governmental purposes unconstrained by license restrictions, including civil contingencies and crisis response tasks. There has been a very close working relationship between the MOD and OS for the last 250 years, with the MOD being the `owner' of the OS before it became a civilian government body. The MOD believes it is critical that the UK has a national geographic database which is both current and accurate, and available in a consistent and standard format for use by both public and private sectors.
3. Q1. To date the OS has provided an excellent service, and it is recognised as a world class organisation in the field. However, in recent times the boundaries applied to the use of Ordnance Survey's data for public service and national interest work have become increasingly blurred. MOD has experienced more stringency and complexity being applied to the release of data by OS, which has resulted in uncertainty and lack of flexibility in the use of that data by the MOD.
4. Nevertheless, one significant improvement for government users has been the setting up of the separate Pan Government Agreement giving members access to a suite of OS digital products. This arrangement allows sharing of products and derivatives between member government departments which has encouraged more "joined-up government". Whilst this is an excellent arrangement for those departments which can afford membership, it has not encouraged membership from those smaller departments where funding has been an issue.
5. Q2. The OS has introduced a more stringent dispute resolution procedure which escalates issues up to ministerial level if required; however this process could hardly be described as independent. Since the MOD and OS are not in competition the need for such a process has not arisen in our relationship.
6. Q3. The GI Panel has been in place for two years, and policy guidance has been provided via the UK GI Strategy, however the level of visibility and guidance provided to the user community has been disappointing. Indeed, the UK GI Strategy does not appear to have progressed much beyond the Chorley Committee several years ago. MOD awaits clarification on the way ahead following the next GI Panel meeting.
7. Q4. The GI Panel's membership is heavily biased towards the public sector and representational organisations (eg AGI, RICS). There is relatively little private sector involvement in the GI Panel, and disappointingly none at all from those areas where MOD believes that business interests in geographic information could be at its highest, eg transport companies, supermarkets, utilities, construction companies, etc. The Panel's terms of reference do state that an example should be set by government bodies, perhaps providing a slim rationale for the high level of government representation, however MOD considers there is a lack of balance.
8. Q5. It would not be appropriate for the single head of an organisation with a strong commercial interest to deliver advice to the government on all aspects of survey, mapping and geographic information. Such advice should come from government specialists or a committee of suitably qualified government representatives.
9. Q6. The ending of the NIMSA will have a significant impact on OS, however this has not happened suddenly, and OS have used the time to undertake consultation with their major customers and seek views on alternative measures to reduce their costs whilst continuing a service. However it is clear that the OS will not be able to finance all of their previous activities and hence will need to change their business practices. This will inevitably result in reduced maintenance of the national geographic database unless a new source of funds is identified (or the government could reduce the annual dividend that OS are mandated to deliver).
10. Q7. The ending of NIMSA will impact the currency of the rural database used to generate mapping. It has been stated by the OS that they will attempt to find a more automated and hence cheaper way of reviewing and revising the rural and mountains and moor land areas and that the current date ranges of five and 10 years respectively for retaining currency of that data will be affected as little as possible. This intent has not as yet been proven.
12. Q8. Not applicable as MOD is not a local authority. However MOD was particularly pleased to hear that the Mapping for Emergencies service was to be continued and funded by OS for the future. It is however expected that prices will rise on all products.
13. Q9. The license costs imposed by the OS are particularly high and where data is not covered by the advantageous Pan Government Agreement, public bodies are paying very high prices or even finding the data to be unaffordable. Thus some government users are being denied access to this particularly valuable data.
14. MOD believes the problem here comes back to the boundaries issue. Perhaps