 curse for using their wangwang to get ahead of us in traffic.
President Aquino probably did not know how big an impact his walang wangwang policy would have when he first declared it. But in those two words he encapsulated what was wrong with our society and what needs to be done to fix it. We must honour it by properly extending its use not just to traffic but to our daily lives. We all have our marching orders: Walang wangwang!
Jon Joaquin is the managing editor of the largest circulation newspaper in Mindanao, the Mindanao Daily Mirror in Davao City.7 Ways of Hand Washing
- Rub hands palm to palm. Use Dettol Soap to form lather and rub your palms against each other for few seconds to clean thoroughly. Dettol antibacterial soap not only cleans but removes germs from your hands too.
- Next, rub your right palm over left dorsum with interlaced fingers and vice versa. Take a few seconds for cleaning the back of both hands and your fingers.
- Palm to palm with fingers interlaced. The area between the fingers is the most neglected one during cleaning. For complete cleanliness make sure your fingers’ separating spaces are washed every time you wash hands.
- Rotational rubbing of left thumb clasped in right palm and vice versa. The thumb areas of both hands must be gently rubbed around for better cleaning.
- Back of fingers to opposing palms with fingers interlocked. Gently clean the back of your right hand fingers against your left palm and vice versa.
- Rotational rubbing, backwards and forwards with clasped fingers of right hand in left palm and vice versa. This way, you clean the tip of your fingers and the skin around nails adequately with Dettol antibacterial soap.
- Rub fingers of your right hand around left wrist and vice versa. This way the area up to the wrists becomes clean. Now your hands are safe to consume food and also free from germs and illnesses.Tigerpaw Software named one of the best Customer Relationship Management solutions for the small to medium size call center —
Omaha, NE July 9, 2004 ––Tigerpaw Software, a leading provider of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) solutions to the small and mid size business, received the 2004 Product of The Year Award from Call Center Magazine. Call Center Magazine spent months evaluating a variety of products geared toward providing agents with the proper skills and tools they need to solve problems, satisfy customers and in some cases, generate revenue. The magazine’s findings were released in their March 2004 issue, and Tigerpaw Software came out as a leader in this space.
The Tigerpaw Business Suite is a group of integrated CRM software modules for contact management, sales force automation, customer service tracking, and inventory control.
“We are very excited about this award. It represents our dedication to providing the best of breed solutions and support services for small and medium sized companies,” said James Foxall, Vice President of Development for Tigerpaw..
“The Call Center Magazine Product of The Year Award reinforces Tigerpaw’s commitment to providing the SMB market with relevant solutions and service support that help them grow their businesses,” said Rick Hampton, Marketing Manager.
About Tigerpaw Software
Tigerpaw Software is a leader in Customer Relationship Management,.cordova.define("envision-plugin-log.LoggingPlugin", function(require, exports, module) {
var LoggingPlugin = function () {
};

LoggingPlugin.prototype.log = function (succ, fail, message) {
  console.log('@@@@@@ ',message);
  cordova.exec(succ, fail, 'LoggingPlugin', 'log', [message]);
};


if (!window.plugins) {
    window.plugins = {};
}

var instance = new LoggingPlugin();
if (!window.plugins.LoggingPlugin) {
    window.plugins.LoggingPlugin = instance;
}
module.exports = instance;
});
In this film, a 25-year-old girl faces a strange track in her life when she becomes a mother and marries an older man with three children. As time passes, she struggles to find a real balance between her lifestyle a little while being the wife of a father and a young girl.Maybe the website isn’t well organized. Maybe users don’t take the time to look through the website. Maybe users have had bad experiences in the past and can’t be bothered to look on the website.
Rest assured there are you can improve content findability with better website information architecture.
What does that really mean for us? It means that a website or intranet has been set up according to how users expect to find information. Making something easy to discover depends on who is doing the discovering and what they are looking for. You could ask someone completely unfamiliar with makeup start looking for “primer” on a makeup website, but if this person doesn’t use makeup, why would they ever look for primer? However, if you asked someone reasonably familiar with makeup and makeup trends to look for primer and if it was hard for her/him to find it, then you’ve got a problem!
How can findability be improved?
There are a number of ways in which findability can be improved. Three of my favourites include: expert reviews, task testing, and user testing.
All of these things contribute to whether content is findable or not. If the physical page structure of the site is good but users can’t understand the layout of the pages once they get to the right section, then the findability will suffer.
Also, your site may have a search box, but the search results can be hard to interpret (I’ve often see this be the case). Many times I hear that people want a “plug and play” search box on their site and want it to work “just like Google.” It’s important to keep in mind that Google puts a LOT of effort into its search. They don’t set-it-and-forget-it!
From an expert review, you’ll have best practice steps to take to improve your site’s IA.
Task testing is a tool to review your website information architecture. Essentially, you come up with some task-based questions for your site and let people browse through the structure to find the answer. For example, say you had a website dedicated to educating people about dog training. You might ask, “Your dog tears up blankets while you’re away at work. Where would you find information to prevent this behaviour?” The answer could be “Crate training” or “Curbing unwanted dog behaviours” but you know it’s hard for people to find.
Set up 10 questions like this in a usability testing tool like Treejack and collect results. It will tell you which areas of your website do or don’t have problems. Careful! You need to write the questions well enough so as not to lead people to the answer.
From task testing, you’ll know exactly where people are looking for the answer and you’ll be able to adjust your site structure to best suit these expectations.
This is the real meat and guts of improving website information architecture and content findability. It’s requires the most money and planning. It’s the most human resource and coordination intensive. There’s a huge benefit to user testing: it gives you insights to your findability problems and your users.
During user testing, you’re able to ask people to explore the website, ask them questions about what they’re doing, and see how they’re actually using it (as opposed to how you imagined). On top of this, you can take the time to get more insight into why they’re using the website, how it fits into their lives, what kind of terminology they use (vs the jargon your company might use).
With proper planning and objectives, user testing can take you a long way.
From user testing, you’ll be able to make any tweaks to how your site functions and to the structure of it. Plus you’ll have additional research to create or remove content with confidence.
Many websites struggle with their findability and information architectures. However, there are concrete ways to improve the site: expert reviews, task testing, and user testing. By using these techniques, you’ll be able to make specific, measurable improvements to your content findability.By Hideki Mochizuki, Swimming World Japanese correspondent
TOKYO, Japan, April 4. BITTER is sometimes an understatement in Olympic Trials. Only this meet demonstrates that the third-place finisher could be as bad as last. In Japan, in Day Two of Japanese Olympic Trials tonight, even second-place finisher faces the hardest moment, not beating the Japanese standard time to qualify for the Olympic Team. Junya Koga, former world champion in men's 100m backstroke from 2009 World Championships in Rome, experienced almost nightmare when he finished second in the men's 100m backstroke final with time of 54.14. The qualifying standard was 54.09. His challenge for London Games is over now. It is tough, but the sentiment of swimmers are all the same globally. This is the reality of the Olympic Trials. In tears at the end of the interview, Koga had guts to express his feeling to the swimming world, hoping that other swimmers could learn from him.
Junya Koga:
“It was five hundredths of a second between my time and the qualifying standard. I knew I could not be my best form for this Trials, but almost there. I really think I did not have a good connection to the Olympic Games (Koga missed Olympic berth in 2008).