 County. If you want to play a game of top quality golf with the kids, reserve a tee time at one of our famous greens today.
To make sure your kids get proper golf education, we also offer our renowned Golf Academy. With amazing coaches and educators, we work with our kids to teach the fundamentals of the sport as well as useful techniques and methods guaranteed to improve their game. We also work hard to make sure every kid has fun while they play golf and has a great day at the Academy.
Right now, we all want to make the right decisions for our families, and this includes choosing the best activity spaces. At the Mile Square courses, we cater for everyone and all skill levels and that is why our golf club courses are perfect for families.
Whether you like a casual game of golf or are sprucing up your skills for the next round with colleagues, Mile Square offers not only the best clubhouse facilities for special occasions and days out, but also manicured and maintained greens that will boost your golf game.
To find out more about how to reserve a tee time or to hear about our facilities and clubhouse, contact a member of the Mile Square Golf Course team today.Игри на CRNOBELO.com > Логички > Smarty Bubbles X-MAS Edition
Smarty Bubbles X-MAS Edition
0.00
Ho ho ho! It's wintertime! Our fantastic bubble shooter Smarty Bubbles is now shining in a beautiful winterly look. Combine at least 3 bubbles of the same color and try to remove all bubbles from the field. Can you set a new high score?
Played: 536
Added: 7 December 2015
Please log in to favorite.
Please login or register to leave a comment.
Related files:
2, 3 or 4 player ludo board game.
(Played: 386)
Memory game where you have to flip the same pair of cards to remove them from...
(Played: 1 087)
This is a unique puzzle game that is easy to play but difficult to master. Th...
(Played: 936)
It is an outstanding RPG type shoot around game.
(Played: 536)
To beat the challenging puzzle game “Miner Block” you have to move the wagon...
(Played: 480)
The latest edition of the brain-bending anagram puzzle game!
(Played: 723)
Statistics
Total files: 4 341
Played today: 1 653
Overall played: 4 657 593)I recently received an email from someone who had attended one of our Wychwood Circle meetings and wished to come off the mailing list again. ‘The problem with non-belief, is, it doesn’t take much exploring,’ he told me. ‘Non-belief and rationalism are not very nuanced, spiritually at least. I can only contribute to others’ exploration of their faith by saying (in effect), ‘where is the evidence?’ That is at best tedious and at worst hostile.’ I was provoked by that first sentence – I couldn’t disagree more – and we have since started a fascinating correspondence!
My own position on the science and religion question is the modest but realistic one of saying that I'm not a scientist and I'm not a theologian or philosopher. It seems difficult therefore to settle down on either side of the agnostic-theist boundary, which in any case I suspect is very blurred. I am perhaps more interested in watching the others slugging it out, while agreeing with Mark Vernon that, where academics recognise the limitations of their own insights, some 'epistemological modesty neutralises the fight over which discipline is the best arbiter of truth - and all in the interests of thorough and open-minded debate'.
Where Gould says that religion is needed to discuss Purpose, Jonathan Sacks is interested in the search for Meaning. Strangely I for one have never been too concerned about Purpose or Meaning, but I am much more taken with Sacks's claim that'science and religion are to human life what the right and left hemisphere are to the brain'.
Describing the whole science vs religion debate as unwinnable, Baggini suggested that it has done 'as much to make the participants feel validated as it has to change their opinions'. So should we give it all up and form our own self-regarding clusters? Sacks argues not for compartmentalisation but for conversation - which is very much what Wychwood Circle has been all about. It can certainly be trying, particularly when you feel you are out of your depth, but the dialogue is worth having. Maybe more especially at the academic level.and free from error (IASB, 2010).
valuation in the equity markets.
a change in either net income or other comprehensive income for the period.
standards and the conceptual framework.
in order to meet the objectives (Laux, J. (2011).
(Gore & Zimmerman 2007).
ability to generate net cash inflows (Kuhner and Pelger 2015).
shareholders benefit, managers can also benefit.
and faithful representative financial statements.
provide decision useful information to current and future providers of finance.
helpful in assessing stewardship would be impractical to the objective (Whittington, 2008).
of financial reporting.
<gh_stars>0
package main

// https://space.bilibili.com/206214/dynamic
type seg []struct{ l, r, min, sum int }

func (t seg) build(o, l, r int) {
	t[o].l, t[o].r = l, r
	if l == r {
		return
	}
	m := (l + r) >> 1
	t.build(o<<1, l, m)
	t.build(o<<1|1, m+1, r)
}

// 将 idx 上的元素值增加 val
func (t seg) add(o, idx, val int) {
	if t[o].l == t[o].r {
		t[o].min += val
		t[o].sum += val
		return
	}
	m := (t[o].l + t[o].r) >> 1
	if idx <= m {
		t.add(o<<1, idx, val)
	} else {
		t.add(o<<1|1, idx, val)
	}
	lo, ro := t[o<<1], t[o<<1|1]
	t[o].min = min(lo.min, ro.min)
	t[o].sum = lo.sum + ro.sum
}

// 返回区间 [l,r] 内的元素和
func (t seg) querySum(o, l, r int) (sum int) {
	if l <= t[o].l && t[o].r <= r {
		return t[o].sum
	}
	m := (t[o].l + t[o].r) >> 1
	if l <= m {
		sum += t.querySum(o<<1, l, r)
	}
	if r > m {
		sum += t.querySum(o<<1|1, l, r)
	}
	return
}

// 查询 [1,r] 上 <= val 的最靠左的位置
// 不存在时返回 0
func (t seg) queryFirstIdx(o, r, val int) int {
	if t[o].min > val { // 说明整个区间的元素值都大于 val
		return 0
	}
	if t[o].l == t[o].r {
		return t[o].l
	}
	m := (t[o].l + t[o].r) >> 1
	if t[o<<1].min <= val { // 看看左半部分
		return t.queryFirstIdx(o<<1, r, val)
	}
	if m < r { // 看看右半部分
		return t.queryFirstIdx(o<<1|1, r, val)
	}
	return 0
}

type BookMyShow struct {
	seg
	m, i int
}

func Constructor(n, m int) BookMyShow {
	t := make(seg, n*4)
	t.build(1, 1, n)
	return BookMyShow{t, m, 1}
}

func (t BookMyShow) Gather(k, maxRow int) []int {
	i := t.queryFirstIdx(1, maxRow+1, t.m-k)
	if i == 0 { // 不存在
		return nil
	}
	seats := t.querySum(1, i, i)
	t.add(1, i, k) // 占据 k 个座位
	return []int{i - 1, seats}
}

func (t *BookMyShow) Scatter(k, maxRow int) bool {
	if (maxRow+1)*t.m-t