 'AtlasProduction/12.0.6.2'
    job.transformation    = 'csc_evgen_trf.py'
    job.destinationDBlock = datasetName
    #job.destinationSE     = destName
    job.currentPriority   = 1000
    job.prodSourceLabel   ='managed'
    #job.prodSourceLabel   = 'test'
    #job.computingSite     = site
    job.cmtConfig         = 'i686-slc4-gcc34-opt'
    job.metadata          = 'evgen;%s;%s;%s' % (str({'FR': 46, 'NL': 45, 'NDGF': 300, 'CERN': 19, 'TW': 44110, 'CA': 2922, 'DE': 9903, 'IT': 1168, 'US': 6226, 'UK': 1026, 'ES': 26619}),str({999907:100,999906:200,999905:300}),str({999905:100,999906:910,999907:500}))
    #job.metadata          = 'evgen;%s' % str({'FR': 46, 'NL': 45, 'NDGF': 300, 'CERN': 19, 'TW': 44110, 'CA': 2922, 'DE': 9903, 'IT': 1168, 'US': 6226, 'UK': 1026, 'ES': 26619})

    #job.cloud = "UK"
    job.taskID = i
    
    file = FileSpec()
    file.lfn = "%s.evgen.pool.root" % job.jobName
    file.destinationDBlock = job.destinationDBlock
    file.destinationSE     = job.destinationSE
    file.dataset           = job.destinationDBlock
    #file.destinationDBlockToken = '<PASSWORD>'
    file.type = 'output'
    job.addFile(file)
    
    fileOL = FileSpec()
    fileOL.lfn = "%s.job.log.tgz" % job.jobName
    fileOL.destinationDBlock = job.destinationDBlock
    fileOL.destinationSE     = job.destinationSE
    fileOL.dataset           = job.destinationDBlock
    fileOL.type = 'log'
    job.addFile(fileOL)
    
    job.jobParameters="7087 0 500000 1 DC3.007087.singlepart_fwdgamma_etaplus_E500.py %s NONE NONE NONE" % file.lfn
    jobList.append(job)

for i in range(1):
    #s,o = Client.submitJobs(jobList)
    s,outS = Client.runTaskAssignment(jobList)    
    print "---------------------"
    print s
    for tmpOut in outS:
        print tmpOut
is he an author? or working on Matt's CAR outside of CC?
This old forum doesn't work for a long time.
So obervet03 and I wrote about 50 emails (translation of the German rules, my clarifications with HiG - but the last month without a beautiful forum) - now we have the best CAR since ever.
I will write him an email.
What are we doing with "obervet03"?
He is working at the CAR.
The last two - what should I do with them?
"original login - who is that?
Then I have to write to the Founding Members.
There are 10 more authors from the old member list.
Should I wrote them the message, too?
For the old minis like "The River I" or "Corn Cirles I" - you have numbers.
have any number.
I personally would love it because the umlaut is in the name of Hans im Glueck (Glück).
Edit: Oh yay! It worked!
that is the reason that we need the ä ö ü - especially the ü from Hans im Glück.
The easiest way is to look at the German Carcassonne-Forum.
from the old forum.In a recent report, the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) detailed “significant shortcomings” in the management by the Department of Immigration and Border Protection of contracts for security and welfare services on Manus Island and Nauru.
One shortcoming identified by the ANAO was that video records and reports of incidents provided by the department and their service providers between 2013 and 2016 were not always able to be reconciled.
Although personal camouflage uniforms are a standard item for military service members and many SWAT teams in America, not everyone has a tactical need for camouflage. In fact, many well-known camouflage patterns were selected primarily for service-branch identification purposes and standardization of a group uniform, not for actual camoufl aging capabilities.
The MultiCam family: Arid version on left, Standard in center, and Tropic on right.
Few folks who wear a camouflage uniform for work get to pick the pattern they wear. Modern camouflage designs are driven by factors such as economics, marketing, fashion and cultivating a certain image. The purpose of this article is to review some of the newer options available on the open market, specifi cally patterns designed for visual concealment for tactical purposes.
The various industries supporting the tactical community have grown explosively in the last decade, and personal camouflage is no exception. While there were once a meager few camo patterns available to the public, today there are literally hundreds of patterns available for purchase. Consumer demand, a growing market, and new manufacturing technology are all coming together to make this happen.
Many readers have the discretion within their jobs to select their own camo attire, so I will highlight a few of the newer patterns on the market and put them into some context. To keep things brief, I will use broad brush strokes and remind readers that camouflage is a very subjective topic. Many patterns with interesting (and often debated) histories exist, and everyone has varying degrees of opinion, some of which might be based on personal experience. Your mileage may vary.
PenCott Badlands pattern on left and GreenZone on right.
Detail of PenCott GreenZone fabric. Hyde De nition logo is worked into the pattern.
Pixilated camo (often referred to as “digital” or “digicam”) has become a standard among modern armies of the world. Whereas curved edges within patterns were the norm for many years, now tiny square pixels, with their ability to create a fuzzy visual interpretation to the viewer, are common.
This started in 2002 when the Canadian military fielded its pixilated CADPAT pattern (and desert version). The Canadian CADPAT could be thought of as the turning point after which pixilated patterns became mainstream. Many modern patterns have copied key features of CADPAT, to the point where you can see identical clusters of pixels between the CADPAT and newer patterns, even though the colors might be diff erent.
Within a few years, the U.S. Marine Corps followed with MARPAT, which uses much of the same patterning and design, also with its own desert environment variant. These were measurable improvements over the patterns they were replacing.
In 2004 the U.S. Army tried to go with a general-purpose pattern, UCP (Universal Camouflage Pattern), which many (including the Army) regard as a failure.
Spec4ce Central camo is one of many patterns produced by the Canadian firm HyperStealth.
Along the way, other patterns were adopted by the various service branches (e.g., Navy NWU, Air Force ABU), but these were designed primarily as recognizable uniforms and not as concealment garments.
Camouflage in the visible spectrum is only part of the camouflage equation on the modern battlefield. To be effective when being viewed with Night Vision Devices (NVDs), the fabric itself must utilize special dyes. The Near Infrared (NIR) spectrum is visible through modern infrared NVDs. Too much brightness in the NIR spectrum or not enough contrast within the colors of the pattern can seriously degrade the eff ectiveness of the camo when viewed with modern night-vision electronics.
Newer NVDs can also work in the Short Wave Infrared (SWIR) spectrum, adding another wrinkle to the mix. Chances are that if you have an operational need for this kind of camo, you probably receive it as an issued item. NATO has compliance standards for NIR fabric treatments, and manufacturers who have it usually display the fact prominently. These dye treatments also drive up the cost of the fabric, so those without the NIR treatment are typically cheaper.
Officers in rural force-on-force training wearing A-TACS AU (on left) and MultiCam (on right).
First appearing in 2002, MultiCam has enjoyed considerable success on the commercial market as an eff ective multienvironment pattern. It was developed by Crye Precision in conjunction with U.S. Army Natick labs. Although not new, it makes a useful point of comparison. It is not a pixilated pattern. Many elite military units quickly adopted MultiCam and continue to use it today.
Such a generalized pattern is useful because on today’s battlefields, soldiers may go through wooded, arid and urban environments in a single mission. A pattern that works in all these areas may be a prudent fi t. One of MultiCam’s features is the