 see Brad get his heart broken again,” concludes the report.
It's worth noting that both Poturalski and Pitt have remained pretty mum about the whole ordeal, which makes it a little odd to claim that she's using him for fame. Besides, Instagram verifies accounts for anyone who becomes "notable" and a "highly searched for person." Being paired up with Brad Pitt in nearly every tabloid and celebrity outlet would spike those searches, so that's not a sign of being fame-hungry — Pitt isn't even on Instagram himself. Despite the tabloid's rumor, Poturalski just landed the cover of the German edition of Elle, and she's made a name for herself in the modeling world. New Idea falsely reported that Pitt was having kids with ex Jennifer Aniston just after claiming that he was interested in dating Adele, and this latest gossip is just as false.A kiss, a singular kiss, is a forgivable action in my opinion. Because people can get swept up in something in that moment in time then come to their senses and stop things. This doesn't happen in a healthy relationship, and means there's been a communication gap somewhere, but things are still salvageable if both parties really want to try.

But that didn't happen. She made out with him *twice* and then admittedly only stopped when he said something "assholeish." Whatever that may have been. I also think she's lying through her teeth. Something more went on.I’m not convinced. For a start, Swift’s album sales increased dramatically following her statement. Second, many of her traditional fans will have strayed a while ago, given that her albums once resembled Trisha Yearwood’s; but her latest album, Reputation, is predominantly electropop with no country songs.
Reputation is also tinged with extreme bitterness which makes Swift unrecognisable to old fans like me. Of course, it’s normal for artists to develop their repertoire, but somehow her new style just doesn’t ring true. Swift has gone from singing about God, boys and pumpkin patches to rapping about deadly revenge and carving lovers’ names into bedposts.
When I discovered her music about 10 years ago, Swift’s style was notably different. She had a sense of right and wrong which came through in her music. She championed the cause of the little guy, possessing the narrative flair of Springsteen, the romance of Faith Hill and a sort of Dylanesque schadenfreude that few can pull off.
OK, it seems cheesy, but Swift could also be profound. 
Swift managed to write about men treating women badly without hashtags and virtue-signalling but rather through the simple power of storytelling.
Some of the old Taylor Swift still remains. Although Reputation is not my cup of tea, there are some well-crafted tracks on the album; it’s just that they’re closer to Sophie B Hawkins’s style than Shania Twain’s. Delicate, for example, is a sweet and original piece of work, resembling Hawkins’s distinctive sound (but without the bunny boiler lyrics).
But I’ll be cleaning up bottles with you on New Year’s Day.
So I haven’t given up on Swift yet, despite her new sound and right-on Instagram posts. A more generous person might even reason that Swift’s dive into politics is just a natural extension of her tendency to stand up to the big guys. But then again, she is putting her weight behind some very fashionable grievances, which seem to be unanimously supported by the rich and famous.
I prefer the Swift who told the story of heartbroken women like Abigail and allowed the listener to draw their own conclusions, not this mouthy zillionaire directing Americans at the ballot box. I just hope that, in future, Swift will spend more time alone with her guitar writing songs and less time on Instagram.MONTEREY, Calif., August 4, 2017 — Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion attendees will have the chance to gaze upon 60 years of Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca racing history in the paddock on August 17-20. A special Racing Through the Decades feature display will showcase 12 prominent racing vehicles with history at the iconic circuit.
<?php

/**
 * PHP version 7.1
 *
 * @category Integration
 * @package  Intaro\RetailCrm\Repository
 * @author   RetailCRM <<EMAIL>>
 * @license  MIT
 * @link     http://retailcrm.ru
 * @see      http://retailcrm.ru/docs
 */

namespace Intaro\RetailCrm\Repository;

use Intaro\RetailCrm\Model\Bitrix\ORM\ToModuleTable;
use Intaro\RetailCrm\Model\Bitrix\ToModule;

/**
 * Class ToModuleRepository
 *
 * @package Intaro\RetailCrm\Repository
 */
class ToModuleRepository extends AbstractRepository
{
    /**
     * @param array $select
     * @param array $where
     * @return \Intaro\RetailCrm\Model\Bitrix\ToModule|null
     * @throws \Bitrix\Main\ArgumentException
     * @throws \Bitrix\Main\ObjectPropertyException
     * @throws \Bitrix\Main\SystemException
     */
    public static function getFirstByWhere(array $select, array $where):?ToModule
    {
        return ToModuleTable::query()
            ->setSelect($select)
            ->where($where)
            ->fetchObject();
    }

    /**
     * @param array $select
     * @param array $where
     *
     * @return \Bitrix\Main\Type\Collection|Intaro\RetailCrm\Model\Bitrix\ORM\EO_ToModule_Collection|null
     * @throws \Bitrix\Main\ArgumentException
     * @throws \Bitrix\Main\ObjectPropertyException
     * @throws \Bitrix\Main\SystemException
     */
    public static function getCollectionByWhere(array $select, array $where)
    {
        return ToModuleTable::query()
            ->setSelect($select)
            ->where($where)
            ->fetchCollection();
    }
}
Sean Parnell, the Republican endorsed by former President Donald Trump for Pennsylvania's open US Senate seat, announced on Monday he is suspending his campaign.
The decision comes after a judge awarded Laurie Snell, Parnell's estranged wife, primary physical custody and sole legal custody of the couple's three children, according to an order that was made public Monday. The judge also determined that Parnell committed some abusive acts toward his wife in the past.
It's looking more and more like Trumpism will significantly hamper the GOP's ability to pickup Senate seats just as the Tea Party did in 2010 and 2012.
Only 39% of the public disapproves of the verdict. 43 percent approve the rest Don't know what to think or are apathetic.
@Rippounet so I read the case your citing. It seems as though the woman the prosecution had an opportunity to retreat and leave, but chose to get a gun and return.
Rotten House tried to get away from the man who said he'd kill him and tried to grab onto his firearm.
Also; I don't think you answered how far can his attackers go before he's allowed to use a degree of force to people who for all he knows are trying to kill or seriously injure him?
If Rosenbaum in a tug of war with the gun, managed to Rittenhouse in the leg, does writtenhouse have to crawl away?
That poll demonstrates exactly why anyone saying race didn't play a major role in the case is out of their mind. 37% of whites said the Rittenhouse verdict gave them more confidence in the justice system while 35% of whites said it made them less confident. Meanwhile, only 14% of blacks are more confident due to the verdict compared to 52% that are less confident. Clearly, there is a significant and even fundamental difference in tendencies based on race.
In terms of the justifiableness of his actions? No.
Honestly divorced from the political context I imagine most people right and left wouldn’t cry the first shooting of the guy screaming about wanting to murder someone armed and who grabbed armed person’s gun is murder.
Except you can't divorce the case from the political context, and the poll you cited clearly indicates you're wrong when 58% of liberals think the verdict was unfair.
Sure you can. As the jury had to instead of just giving some lefties and libs a “win” in their ideological war with cons.
Not really, it just shows people having a bias towards something.
Wait to be clear do you think Rittenhouse didn’t have a reasonable fear for his life from the guy screaming about wanting to murder and attempting to take Rittenhouse’s firearm?
What it shows is your statement was demonstrably wrong, at least based on the poll you cited.
Possibly. Imagine a lot of respondents are going off the “white conservative boy shot people at protest” and decide guilt or innocence based around that.

Interesting to note though most respondents take the view Rittenhouse wasn’t there to cause violence.
Well, looking at the crosstabs, the poll did include two items on how much attention the respondent paid to the case (Table MCWA3, page 19; MC